1177:, so it was never accepted as a reliable source on those grounds. The most it was attempted to be used for was for the airdates, and if there were any delays in broadcast times, but it was more of an off-wiki source that would never be cited directly, just used as a guide to get the dates right, and also used as a place to get the episode titles from (which is what I mainly used it for back when I used to populate episode lists). The best source available today for verifiable airdates is the
35:
107:, read the rest of the sentence. It has links to the sources that are usually paywalled. Not everyone uses free sources. Some online information, such as Oricon sales, require further registration / paywall after it ages, such as with Billboard magazine's song and album charts. And if you want to read the liner notes for your favorite manga or bonus material from the anime, you probably have to buy it if it isn't at your local library.
1733:) As for the Dr. STONE sequel, the website states, "An anime sequel was confirmed to be in production by the final episode of the second season. The exact format hasn't been specified yet." It says something similar for The Quintessential Quintuplets: "On March 25, 2021, an anime sequel project was officially confirmed to be in production by a teaser trailer. The format hasn’t been specified yet." (
1741:
how they kept claiming for months that
Kingdom Season 3 was covering the wrong story arc. (I tried pointing that out on their forums.) For The Seven Deadly Sins: Wrath of the Gods they even claimed it would have 40 episodes since they confused the Hawk’s Trouble Consultation Room mini-series with the main anime. They were called out repeatedly but kept repeating the mistake in updates.
1189:
1823:", which if you ask me, that last one includes making predictions about a premiere date with little to no other evidence, and using said predictions as the title of the article. Also this is off-topic, but Larry Sanger has made multiple other wiki sites, all that have failed, so I'm not sure his opinions on other wiki sites are valid.
1684:
3600:, among others but I chose those two because they have their own wikipedia page in the hopes that I wouldn't have to also argue about whether those sponsorships are meaningful. Panos was also a member of the jury for multiple film festivals. Rotten Tomatoes approved him not as a mere "user" but an actual critic.
2360:. They also work directly with several brands and anime studios, judging by their collaboration posts and events. That makes me think they do have an editorial line and people in editorial roles who know what they are doing, not just random fans posting whatever they feel like. 20:57, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
484:. It's a great resource for manga, anime, authors, artists, magazines, live-action adaptations, etc. Personally, I've used it to find the serialization start/end dates for lesser known manga series from the '70s – many of which you can't track down outside of blogs or listings on Japanese auction sites.
1740:
No site is completely reliable. ANN has a long history of goofs, repeating their mistakes and ignoring correction. Recently, they called the
Yashahime sequel "Part 2" even though VIZ Media clearly labeled it as The Second Act. ANN still hasn't updated their story with a correction. Another example is
1383:
Is
Mangapedia a reliable website? About its information, it is stated that it is compiled by General Incorporated Association Encyclopedia Research Center, Eight Links Co., Ltd., and VOYAGE MARKETING Co., Ltd. It doesn't seem to be another Wiki page or that it has user-generated content, but I can't
1793:
In short, you call a website unreliable since you don't like their story format, which is clearly labeled. The speculation is labeled as predictions. Leaks are labeled as leaks. BTW, I'm not the only one linking to
Monsters and Critics since I've seen other users do it for a bunch of Wiki pages. You
1744:
The only reason I noticed Link20XX, and thus this talk page, was due to the fact that I would update a Wiki page with an announcement and then Link20xx's sole contribution would be to change the link to ANN. This behavior came off as stalking. Therefore, I have to question Link20xx's reliability and
277:
I'm sorry but you shouldn't make those decisions without creating a topic first. If you are convinced its unreliable you have to provide evidence. You can't just call it unreliable based on your personal interpretation and expect others to comply without objections. Why do you think it is unreliable
3328:
I think that
Comicbook.com is not a reliable source as well, as many of their articles are iffy at best. I'd say the same about CBR, however, the articles written by Hannah Collins, who appeared as a judge of the Crunchyroll Anime Awards 2021, along with other reputable critics/reviewers from Anime
1274:
having a Right Stuf review on a work that Right Stuf licensed, for example. Anyway, none of the reviewers use full names, so it's difficult to research their background and tell whether or not they have any journalist or manga critic background. I can't come to a conclusion, but I'm inclined to say
3202:
being referenced a lot, usually listed as simply "Anime", and I have a feeling it's not a reliable source. They seem to just take news content from another source, such as
Crunchyroll News or ANN, or even Twitter, and then use this information to make an attention-grabbing title and content; or is
2963:
or Anime
Trending, which runs both social media trending polls for anime each season, as well as hosting news on their website. Admittedly, I have no stance either way as to their reliability, but since I have seen them being used on more and more articles, I feel their reliability warrants a full
1771:
ANN has made small mistakes, but part 2 vs act 2 really isn't that big of a deal. Monsters and
Critics on the other hand makes speculation as to when something will premiere and uses leaks for sources, something ANN does not do. I agree ANN is not perfect, but it does have reliable information and
88:
The text on top of this page mention "To help editors avoid FUTON bias". I read the page and conclude that free source shouldn't be the only consideration because there are other sources behind paywall. I think this isn't relevant in
Knowledge page about "Online reliable sources". All of wikipedia
3346:
I wouldn't necessarily consider being on
Crunchyroll Anime Awards 2021 judge list to be reputable or reliable. Comicbook.com's Megan Peters is on the list (despite some of the articles I listed above being written by her), and there are some people on that list who are not anime critics/reviewers
385:
I would check whether the articles cited are written by someone who knows what they are talking about vs. who are just trying to translate tabloid-like news sources. Like if someone on ANN writes about box office rankings and results but cites IMDb or random forums, I wouldn't necessarily believe
262:
ANN is the best, most reliable source in the community. Parts of it are not RS, such as the encyclopedia. Most of the news and reviews in general are the best the industry has to offer, and often, the ONLY source. There could be a case by case argument on some things, which for many sources are a
3646:
however, about Myjitsu I couldn't find any evidence of its notability, only perhaps, as I said on the Yashahime talk page, that it belongs to Nihon Journal Publishing Inc., but, anyway, I'd like to know what others think about these two websites, maybe there is more information about them that I
206:
Anime News Network is not the original publishers of its news articles, thus should not be used or considered a reliable source. I have an editor claiming ANN is valid while claiming its source is not valid. I will move it to the unreliable source section to comply with WP V standards with out
1999:
I'd disagree, as they seem to translate books (well, production material; i.e. their extensive coverage of Kizumonogatari's production process through staff interviews from the films themselves) not readily available in English. Also, they do have actual connections to the anime industry; for
447:
Re: the "original publisher" thing, ANN will occasionally publish translations of Japanese articles (and have articles based off of press releases, like many news outlets). But they also have original journalism and other original content, for example, Justin Sevakis' old Answerman columns.
3447:, which I am active in regards to updating the current Phase 4 films and TV shows, are using the website as a source. We should consider a certain article a reliable source if they basing it on an existing confirmed information. Overall, ComicBook.com is a reliable source.
1185:. The only problem with that source is that it takes a little while between when an anime airs and when it's updated, so it's really only useful for older series that aired at least a year or two before. You can see this by searching for a recent anime like
507:
Also, I noticed there's only one Japanese publisher and two North American publishers listed under the "Publishers" section. Is it all right if I go ahead and add other well-known companies, such as Shueisha, Shogakukan, Viz Media, Dark Horse Manga, etc.?
491:
is, as the name implies, a website dedicated to analyzing anime and other Japanese pop culture through a feminist lens. They publish reviews, discussions, and some interesting special features. They've also published exclusive interviews with the likes of
2708:. There was a lot more there than I had though, as print American newspapers aren't what people typically think of when they think as a source discussing anime/manga. By clipping them they become viewable for free by anyone without an account forever.
2711:
I also suggest checking out 90's gamer magazines, since they often did reviews of anime dvds and vhs releases. Anime magazines are also great, but few are scanned. I want people to use more of these high quality print journalism sources for articles.
295:
I agree that we need more evidence as to why the site should be considered unreliable. I’m also confused what was meant by Anime News Network not be the original publisher of their news article since I haven’t seen anything to support that
873:
be added as a reliable source? The website was run by Benjamin Ettinger, "considered one of the North American experts on the subject of independent animators and keyframe animators in Japan" and he was interviewed by Anime News Network
3068:
Hello and welcome to Knowledge! Admittedly, I don't know much about what happens on their social, but the evidence others have stated above does make me lean more towards the "reliable" side, though perhaps limited to just the website.
2355:
Just want to point out that Honey's Anime has an Editor in Chief, Alfonso "Fonzy" Ortíz, but after googling the rest of the editors (I'm ignoring freelance writers for obvious reasons) I think "Rod Locksley" is another reliable source,
315:
3736:
I was planning on using ComiXology as a source for genres, since they usually include them on their website, but I'm unsure about its reliability since they are not an original publisher. So I better ask before making any addition. -
2482:
As of now, we have no reliable sources for eroge content - probably because the genre is shun by mainstream anime and manga sites. This is not an healthy state of affairs, as it undermines any attempt to source eroge publications.
1117:, which is very detailed in its coverage of stations the show aired on, even down to baseball broadcasting delays. If reliable, it would be an extremely useful and comprehensive source on broadcasting info for virtually any anime.
1850:
with the proposal to consider the website unreliable on the project. But none of this has anything to do with bias, even I find myself frustrated with ANN and other sources that tend to fall under weaker journalistic tendencies.
3358:
Regardless, if Hannah Collins were to be added, she should be considered as a reliable individual, rather than having the entire site listed as situational. I know that CBR has allegedly been accused with plagiarism (allegedly
523:
Regarding 1) Kotobank is actually just an interface to several dictionaries/encyclopedias. You'd need to look at the individual entry to see what the source is. I would say that these sources are usually quite reliable such as
3816:, probably no one bothered to include her because she's so well-established as a critic that no one would question it. However, I think it's good that we establish consensus here and add so newcomers to the project know that.
233:
as we have had past discussions already regarding its reliability. Anime News Network is only reliable on its own when it comes to reviews done by contributors who have also appeared in major anime/manga magazine reviews. -
2494:
147:
and often publish release dates and interviews with artists. They're often sourced by ANN and Crunchyroll as well. Should they be added? Would it be situational where their articles are okay but product listings aren't?
1729:). For its release date stories the website literally states that it combines news and analysis: "As such, this article will be updated over time with news, rumors, and analysis." The news updates are listed by date. (
2408:
1706:
703:
Okay, I wouldn't be against listing Kotobank, as long as the description includes that it's a collection of sources from different publishers. I'd also support AnimeFeminist based on your research on their writers.
575:
says that the editor-in-chief, Amelia Cook, is "a published writer on Japanese film, television, and comics in books, magazines and online publications." I did a quick search and found that she used to write for
2541:
and I agree with the feedback for most. Lewdgamer has no evidence of a formal editorial board and it was associated with Gamergate at one point in time, so there's much to be doubted about its lack of bias.
3053:
I'm not sure about Anime Trending..They delete comments & immediately ban people that even ask about possible flaws in their voting result..or are like suspicious of them..there's some other things too
1564:
I think they should be considered a reliable source because despite the name, Sakuga Blog doesn't allow anyone to contribute information to the site, only their writers can. The site also has coverage from
1666:
should be listed as an unreliable source for anime and manga-related articles. The main reason is their articles rely almost entirely on speculation of when something will release, making them fall under
75:
63:
2524:
2486:
305:
1710:
517:
438:
193:
175:
424:
2341:
2033:
1908:
348:
290:
1718:
1021:
330:
3039:
2532:
2075:
852:
831:
809:
788:
559:
3301:
3287:
3265:
3152:
added as a reliable source. They have been extremely useful in my edits as they are a great source for finding UK release dates for anime (DVDs/Blu-rays etc), news and anime and manga reviews.
3117:
I am very much aware that BD Gest is generally considered reliable for its news and reviews, however I am a bit skeptical as to their biographical information. For instance, the image on their
2944:
2551:
2300:
2168:
3456:
3393:
as unreliable, because, just like Collins, there must be other reputable writers on the website, but since I'm not aware about it, I suppose that it should not be considered as situational. -
1334:
657:
627:
3807:
3765:
3725:
3138:
3104:
3078:
3063:
2538:
2461:
1987:
1714:
1551:
1284:
386:
that, as opposed to citing Oricon or some official news source. Or if they cite (not just link) their own encyclopedia database for the voice actors. It's kind of like the K-pop news groups.
243:
128:
3319:
2883:
2656:
2596:
2237:
2089:
1922:
1832:
1803:
1649:
1628:
1521:
800:
Dengeki Hobby Web usually has articles on the latest merchandise and toy releases, which may be helpful for articles about series connected to massive toy deals, such as kids' anime series.
735:
713:
698:
541:
378:
3825:
3565:
3540:
3508:
3482:
3426:
3402:
3380:
3341:
2610:
2455:
1940:
1372:
946:
2694:
2674:
2253:
1781:
1121:
1096:
248:
That is not how it is being represented on this page ("For news, reviews, and release information, ANN is a reliable source and close to being a newspaper of record for anime and manga.")
3780:
not on the list of reliable individuals. She has been a long time anime and manga critic, authored several anime reference books and written for/edited for two manga magazines in the UK (
3023:
3007:
2930:
2839:
2774:
2441:
2223:
1453:
1356:
457:
407:
3499:
then I shall inform the Marvel Cinematic Universe task force about this since they also use CBR as a source aside from that. That will be a major overhaul of MCU-related articles then.
3187:
1205:
272:
681:
that contribute to the site all seem to check out, too; they have good reputations. Plus, some of these dictionaries/encyclopedias are only available online via Kotobank (for example,
2665:
has a section titled "To cite and quote a clipped and archived news article on an information aggregation service requiring a subscription", which uses newspapers.com as the example.
2136:
21:
2973:
2411:
257:
1860:
1512:
The staff doesn't consist of any notable writers and I haven't seen them cited as a source in order major publications. I would hold off on them being considered a reliable source.
3877:
2432:
is another example of them citing a random Twitter account as a source. As for Manga Mogura, that is a different topic and I would be inclined to agree with you on that topic too.
2700:
It's an online paid newspaper archive of mostly American newspapers, and used on other projects. During the last free weekend, I went and clipped hundreds of articles relating to
2043:
1570:
769:
532:. Don't have an opinion on 2, but regarding expanding the publishers, you'd pretty much be making a list of publishers, so not sure how helpful the section is in the first place.
3444:
1756:
2759:
1700:
98:
3656:
3385:
Yes, right. I didn't mean that because she was a judge she's automatically reliable, but the link depicts her profile, and she has also written for other websites, including
3232:
3211:, the author references a Tweet from an "anime content creator" (not any reliable sources), and then presents it as fact (at the time, no other sources had confirmed this).
1819:
does exist, specifically "Such sources include websites and publications expressing views that are widely acknowledged as extremist, that are promotional in nature, or that
3611:
2915:
1260:
2721:
2641:
1794:
know what, Knowledge founder Larry Sanger is right. People like you make this whole platform frustrating with their protectionism and blatant bias. I'm done contributing.
318:
3746:
1893:
1722:
216:
157:
3644:
1530:
The refs I use from there were their direct interviews with voice actors and others in the industry, but that was back in the 2000s. Not sure if that's the same site.
587:
3035:
2940:
2277:
2164:
2029:
1904:
1856:
1499:
2581:
2283:
The only person who seems reliable is "Alfonso "Fonzy" Ortiz", but you need to look into him online some more to make sure. I would not call any of the other writers
2192:
1972:
1606:
1234:
1164:
1071:
3713:
3171:
2422:
2208:
3703:
2385:
1846:
corrects their mess-ups. In comparison to Monsters and Critics, I'd call them far more reliable due to the points that Link20XX brought up, and so I'd have to do a
1393:
2824:
1312:
985:
2868:
2153:
2059:
1586:
889:
2516:
2501:
689:
asked, "Where would you draw the line?" w/r/t to listing all of the publishers, and I'm not sure, either. ^^; It feels weird to leave the section as-is, though.
1059:
3552:
There are already some cases where WP:ANIME and other projects consider the same source of different reliability, such as we consider Animetric unreliable but
3528:
1734:
1726:
1663:
1490:
as a reliable source? I'm running into my first article that has used them as a reference, and I've noticed them used in several articles throughout the site.
3031:
2936:
2160:
2025:
1900:
1852:
3364:
2196:
1955:
be added as a reliable source. Its contributors have expert knowledge of the Japanese animation industry and have industry contacts (see for example, their
2188:
1012:
to flesh out that article, but as it is published to her personal website, it would not automatically qualify as RS unless she herself is deemed reliable.
899:
1296:
1248:
reviews count as valid source? I've checked out some of them and they seem to be written by the web's staff and they're not simply user-generated reviews.
1173:
Now you're just making me feel old. All jokes aside, this was a source I remember cropping up back in the day, but there was never a consensus about it's
2959:
already brought this up above, but I am going to bring it up again because I feel this warrants a full discussion. Obviously, the website in question is
1688:
463:
2901:
2479:
The site, according to Alexa, is popular. While that does not imply reliability, it does attest to being influential - a must for an acceptable source.
1978:
I don't think it should be added as one -- this just seems like a blog made by fans and reviewers with no formal connections to the animation industry.
2429:
1730:
1300:
3794:
blog, and while Wordpress usually isn't source-worthy, one of her posts about magazines was only one of two sources I could find about the history of
3638:
3632:
3556:
considers it reliable. Though for CBR, they do have some writers with good background, so I would support putting that more on the situational side.
2376:
and I'm checking to see if it is considered reliable. I don't see any formal editorial board and they seem to accept articles on a submission basis.
1810:
1795:
1766:
1748:
104:
90:
3694:
The website stopped posting for over 6 years. I think it would be a good addition to the list but I'm curious about why it hasn't been added yet. -
1142:
changes are not done directly by the users, but rather submitted (with sources) by the users and then checked and implemented by the administrators.
3219:
section. Surely this isn't RS, especially since they usually just reference other, more credible sources, and just add their own commentary to it.
2013:
1056:
1687:
just called it a sequel, not necessarily a third season. The website has also used leaked magazine pictures from random Twitter users as sources (
3771:
3274:
CBR and Comicbook are different websites. Regardless, I also agree on you with CBR being on the same level of quality and iffyness as Comicbook.
990:
1842:
While I agree ANN has a history of goofs (which even I have corrected for them through emails), they are a reputable source of information that
3864:
2528:
2490:
3636:
3306:
I haven't done much research into CBR, so I can't speak for them, but Comicbook.com definitely doesn't appear reliable most of the time, like
1440:
strives to provide accurate information as the world's first official "manga encyclopedia." It's not user-generated, and its writers/editors (
429:
I'd be wary on using some of their interest articles, as the sources come from random blogs hosted on Livedoor and tend to be more tabloid-y.
907:
3330:
2994:
2979:
It seems that the website has established some reputation. Twin Engine, the production company of Vinland Saga, mentioned their 2020 award.
2899:
2134:
2055:
1582:
3112:
2428:
I agree. As far as I can tell, they also don't say who the author is, so we have no reason to assume the author(s) isn't/aren't just fans.
1317:
3862:
3860:
2142:
2990:
2399:. I don't think that it does count as a reliable website, since there is no info about their background and many of their articles cite
3332:
should be considered reliables in my opinion. There must be more reputable critics on that website, but I don't really know about it.-
1956:
1881:
51:
17:
2313:
2138:
263:
thing. Do you have more information about what is wrong with the specific article/review? Has this been reported to ANN as an error?
2475:
LewdGamer aims to raise and improve the standards of the adult gaming market by giving it proper criticism and deserved recognition.
2140:
1594:
685:
tells you to go to Kotobank or JapanKnowledge to view its Digital Daijisen Plus entries). Re: the "Publishers" section: I saw that
3642:
3634:
1680:
3292:
Oh, wow, I'm silly. Please disregard that example. My comment on both CBR and Comicbook not being reliable still stands, though.
3204:
2986:
2798:
2403:, a self-proclaimed source "dedicated to be the quickest, most accurate manga news ressource in english". Despite websites like
2800:
677:
said that it was created with the goal of "posting only reliable information written and edited by professionals." The list of
3307:
2992:
2988:
593:
3844:
2830:
Looks fine for any article, especially since they have been widely used by ANN and they don't have that many reviews anyway.
2705:
2701:
2446:
I agree that Anime Sweet is not a reliable source. I also think Manga Mogura is a bit too soon to list as a reliable source.
919:
915:
779:
for Kadokawa material. As probably they won't be useful for other articles, I don't think it's necessary to include it here.
3866:
3640:
3592:
with directors and actors within the realm of Asian movies, they have sponsorships with several film distributors including
2998:
I honestly don't know if that is enough reason to call them reliable, but at the moment, I personally would call them so. -
586:. A few of the other editors/contributors have professional experience, too: Lauren Orsini writes about manga and anime for
3212:
3756:. If it's a review by some professional writer, it'd be a good source. If it's the retailer part, I'd be more skeptical.
3622:
3178:
I already brought this up above in the section "three new suggestions", where there appears to be a consensus to add it.
2950:
2629:
935:
370:
297:
89:
anime contributor, full time or or not, use free sources anyway. What kind of anime information, locked behind paywall?
2815:
But besides Bertschy, I can't find enough information about the other reviewers. So I better ask before any decision. -
1129:
686:
3831:
3583:
2802:
2373:
1155:
Does anyone have any information on this particular source? Is there a pre-existing project consensus that I missed? —
2790:
2131:
1676:
1006:
3283:
3228:
1062:. However, only interviews and the annual BL Awards should be used; the encyclopedia and ratings are user-submitted.
2921:
Looking over it, I would say its probably okay, though I am a bit skeptical that they only operate on social media.
3376:
2268:
a reliable source? I've seen a few articles using it as a source, but I'm not sure enough about its reliability.--
2009:
673:
Sorry for the late reply! I still think that Kotobank can be considered a reliable source on its own. The head of
366:
2047:
1574:
1545:
401:
122:
2810:
1433:
747:
3843:(I'm not sure if we can directly cite blogspot.com, but some of his reviews were also translated in French by
1225:
310:
I think they might be referring to the fact that sometimes new releases and such articles are translated from
2804:
2726:
2358:
with experience in the gaming/tech industry, anime, comics/manga, and other Spanish-based entertainment media
973:(which for some reason no one updated it when it finished in 2017) , and this website has the exact end date
648:) so they are also a good author. So it's very good evidence and it can be used as source in my opinion now.
3857:
1705:
Unreliable? Monsters and Critics has been cited by the New York Times. They have exclusive interviews with (
3616:
3466:
3360:
2813:
2808:
1672:
1657:
1407:
525:
3631:
could be considered reliable sources. Blog.esuteru has been cited by Anime News Networks a couple of times
3208:
2000:
example, Ken Yamamoto (山本健) has written for the blog, and is an experienced animator formerly working for
3167:
2996:
1960:
969:
3252:
as a "magical girl idol" series when there are no other sources that stated the show is involved in the
2806:
613:
2889:
2519:, it is close to impossible to sift a list of valid sources as been done in other genres. Ideas how to
1239:
501:
201:
83:
42:
3203:
just a review/summary of an episode or chapter of a series, and then passed off as news. For example,
3577:
2906:
Still, honestly, I'm not sure if that is enough to call them automatically reliable. Any thoughts? -
3853:
3837:
3602:
Admittedly I have no strong feelings either way, just curious what others think about this website.
3415:
2797:'s late reviewer Zac Bertschy could be considered reliables. Also, they were frequently cited by ANN
3731:
3689:
2898:
be considered reliable? I found two Anime News Network articles citing them (as a secondary source)
2859:. The website does some coverage over idol, 2.5D, and other parts of otaku culture aimed at women.
2682:
2296:
1876:) reports on anime and manga, and they're owned by Kadokawa. They also publish yearly rankings and
1873:
1047:
344:
239:
3850:
2259:
3193:
3118:
1087:. Based on your description and the linked references, I agree that this is a reliable source. —
374:
301:
3207:
uses an ANN interest article for its source, and adds the author's own interpretation to it. In
2738:. It features news, interviews and other articles in English, which could be very helpful, like
3821:
3761:
3721:
2616:
1816:
1668:
1280:
1111:, which is a Japanese database for anime airdates/times. As an example of a typical entry, see
827:
784:
674:
653:
606:(where he is also a producer); and Chiaki Hirai has written about Japanese pop culture for the
555:
3586:
over the website Asian Movie Pulse and its reliability. The IP wrote this for its reliability
3465:
An article being based on confirmed information doesn't guarantee it to be a reliable source.
2539:
Knowledge talk:WikiProject Video games/Sources#Reliable sources to cover extreme sexual gaming
2512:
article regarding extreme eroge is automatically deemed un-notable, which is of course absurd.
875:
3531:
so I am not sure how the WikiProject Anime and Manga will agree on that another WikiProject.
3279:
3224:
3143:
3059:
2628:
as a reliable source and has also submitted newspaper clippings to the website, as stated in
1865:
1539:
1102:
911:
413:
395:
279:
164:
134:
116:
3683:
3589:
2935:
I personally don't think I'd consider Yonkou to be reliable, mostly in agreement with Link.
2508:
simply does not cover explicit hard-core eroge and can not be used as guideline - otherwise
2144:. I think that it should be added as a reliable source, unless someone can say otherwise. -
3524:
3372:
3297:
3261:
3155:
3122:
2980:
2864:
2717:
2637:
2577:
2547:
2451:
2381:
2337:
2233:
2121:
2085:
2080:
I will tentatively change my opinion then and agree it should be added to the source list.
1983:
1928:
1889:
1799:
1624:
1517:
1481:
1229:
1067:
942:
848:
805:
765:
709:
537:
434:
326:
189:
153:
94:
3681:
3014:
Yeah, even the creators of Akudama Drive talked to that website when they won their award.
2559:
1323:
A new open access peer-reviewed journal dedicated exclusively to Anime & Manga Studies
597:
493:
8:
3536:
3504:
3452:
2739:
2390:
2350:
2307:
2292:
1968:
1559:
1330:
1124:, and from what I can piece together there were a few discussions 10 years ago about its
1017:
976:. I think this site could be helpful, but I'm not entirely sure about its reliability. -
497:
453:
340:
235:
3679:
3677:
2904:
1322:
1249:
3661:
3607:
3593:
3561:
3547:
3478:
3315:
3243:
3183:
3134:
3100:
3074:
2969:
2926:
2879:
2835:
2794:
2770:
2670:
2662:
2652:
2592:
2437:
2248:
2204:
2174:
2071:
2039:
1946:
1918:
1877:
1828:
1777:
1752:
1696:
1645:
1602:
1566:
1495:
1449:
1378:
1367:
1052:
927:
923:
731:
694:
623:
513:
268:
144:
2632:. The paid archive has dozens more clippings. Would this be fine to list as a source?
2410:(although this article also cited Comicbook.com, which reliability is disputed above)
2021:
1041:. It's one of the biggest BL websites in Japan only and has appeared in reporting for
878:
603:
3873:
3817:
3757:
3742:
3717:
3699:
3674:
3652:
3422:
3398:
3337:
3163:
3019:
3003:
2911:
2820:
2780:
2755:
2606:
2418:
2413:, I don't think that is a reason to consider Manga Mogura a reliable source either.-
2273:
2219:
2149:
1936:
1424:
1389:
1308:
1290:
1276:
1256:
1211:
1199:
1026:
999:
under the Individuals header. She is a science fiction writer, and columnist for the
981:
952:
931:
885:
838:
823:
795:
780:
776:
723:
649:
566:
551:
473:
311:
3275:
3220:
3055:
2690:
2184:
2101:
2005:
1352:
1160:
1092:
903:
864:
2786:
843:
I believe it's anime/hobby merchandise (like figurines, Gunpla, etc.) in general.
822:
On merchandise and toys of their own brands or for kids' anime series in general?
577:
550:
doesn't indicate any professional journalist nor people with industry background.
3803:
3368:
3293:
3257:
2860:
2713:
2633:
2621:
2573:
2543:
2447:
2377:
2364:
2333:
2319:
2229:
2124:
2081:
1994:
1979:
1885:
1635:
1620:
1593:). They have also interviewed various people in the industry like Shinya Takano (
1513:
1245:
1079:
1063:
938:
844:
817:
801:
761:
719:
705:
668:
646:
608:
583:
533:
430:
322:
253:
212:
185:
149:
2288:
1961:
their look at the animation of 2019 that included the opinions of anime creators
1347:
I agree with your assessment, hopefully we can make good use of the articles. —
50:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
3777:
3553:
3532:
3500:
3448:
2327:
2001:
1964:
1531:
1342:
1326:
1013:
1001:
996:
449:
387:
108:
2515:
I admit that I have no clear idea how to address this issue. As stated in the
3603:
3557:
3496:
3474:
3470:
3440:
3408:
3311:
3310:
they wrote an article that is just fans of the show asking for a new season.
3248:
3179:
3130:
3096:
3092:
3070:
3048:
2965:
2922:
2875:
2845:
2831:
2766:
2747:
2666:
2648:
2588:
2505:
2433:
2357:
2243:
2200:
2067:
1914:
1824:
1788:
1773:
1692:
1641:
1614:
1598:
1507:
1491:
1445:
1362:
1271:
1182:
1145:
1133:
1043:
727:
690:
634:
619:
509:
336:
264:
230:
572:
3869:
3847:
3753:
3738:
3709:
3695:
3648:
3418:
3394:
3348:
3333:
3253:
3015:
2999:
2956:
2907:
2816:
2751:
2602:
2414:
2284:
2269:
2215:
2145:
2113:
2004:. Also, the lead editor, Kvin (Kevin Cirugeda) is an occasional writer for
1932:
1401:
1385:
1304:
1267:
1252:
1194:
1149:
1125:
977:
974:
881:
641:
1303:. Helpful to expand popularity in regards to characters, actors or animes.
870:
3597:
3126:
2743:
2686:
2473:
The site holds editorial and journalists cadre. Its mission statement is
2316:
about the validity of Honey's Anime being used as a source. Also pinging
2063:
2051:
1590:
1578:
1348:
1174:
1156:
1088:
369:. I’m Not sure why the OP didn’t link to it it would have been helpful.--
3841:
3215:
just seems to be a summary of an anime episode, yet is on the website's
3813:
3799:
3791:
3159:
2038:
To add on to what Sarcataclysmal said, the site also has coverage from
1411:
547:
481:
249:
224:
208:
3712:, I agree with you. I've made a similar point back in October 2016 at
1441:
3671:
3389:, which is considered a reliable source. I was dubious about listing
3030:
Based on the above information I would consider them to be reliable.
2017:
1112:
546:
1) seems fine; but for 2) apparently there are no credentials? Their
3216:
2985:
and they had also conducted direct interviews with various creators
2400:
1299:
and even the staff members from Akudama Drive and Konosuba in polls
1178:
967:-related manga. I had troubles when I tried to find the end date of
365:
Taking a closer look this appears to have come from this discussion
3782:
2853:
is owned by Cybird, a company known for publishing otome games and
2647:
Since it is just pictures of newspapers, I don't see any problems.
1186:
529:
477:
184:
If you don't mind, I'll add it to the list unless someone objects.
3686:
3495:
Well, if the WikiProject Anime and Manga doubt the credibility of
1619:
Sakugablog was already mentioned earlier on this page. See above.
1221:
678:
3088:
2903:
and there are various articles posted by them on The Fandom Post.
2895:
2731:
2569:
488:
3084:
1471:
1251:
Do you think it can be added to the list of reliable sources? -
3083:
Upon doing more looking on their website, it appears they have
2735:
1952:
1487:
1419:
682:
2983:
2789:'s Anime Colony reviews be considered reliables? Here I found
2462:
Suggesting lewdgamer.com as a reliable source concerning eroge
2159:
Can't think of a particular reason as to why it shouldn't be.
1671:. For the new Dr. Stone announcement that happened, they even
140:
3714:
Knowledge talk:WikiProject Anime and manga/Archive 67#Knights
3352:
1136:, where he argues for its reliability on the grounds that it
1032:
3859:
MangaCast has been cited several times by Anime News Network
2625:
1415:
1325:. I think this is a pretty obvious candidate for inclusion.
757:
3692:
3688:
and according to her website, she is production manager at
3667:
3629:
3149:
2565:
753:
314:. Luckily, Natalie is considered an RS on this project and
3626:
775:
They are reliable, of crouse, but probably just useful as
760:
as valid online sources since they are owned by Kadokawa?
3752:
Comixology is already listed under "Situational" header,
2960:
2855:
2564:
I saw this source and think it might be a nice addition.
2500:
I urge any editor with connection to the subject to read
2396:
2369:
2265:
2187:, a Japanese newspaper, and are frequently cited by ANN (
2180:
143:
on the list of online reliable sources; they're owned by
3798:, and given her experience I feel it could be reliable.
1870:
1108:
639:
Wow, very good information. Vrai Kaiser has written for
2568:
is owned by Sony Music Entertainment Japan, as seen on
2502:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Euphoria (visual novel)
2183:
should be listed as a reliable source. They are run by
2106:
961:
937:). We could probably add him as a reliable individual.
469:
3868:
so I think that it should be added to the list too. -
2850:
2523:
this (unlike just ignoring the issue) are called for.
1384:
really confirm it. Does anybody know more about it? -
1036:
3625:, I'd like to know if these two websites Blog.esuteru
3407:
I also found that CBR has articles by Danielle Leigh,
3238:
I would be wary on listing CBR as a reliable source,
2324:, who disagreed on it being an unreliable source and
1444:) read each series they cover from beginning to end.
1217:
412:
I've never seen ANN use IMDB or their own forum/wiki.
3469:
does that and yet they are considered unreliable by
2793:
done by them. I suppose that the reviews written by
2537:
I see that the discussion as already been raised at
2133:. The website has also been frequently cited by ANN
2062:, the latter of which is used as a source in the GA
1589:, the latter of which is used as a source in the GA
2812:, and there is an article dedicated to the website.
3443:then I consider it as a reliable source since the
3091:, so obviously reviews of those series would be a
1815:Fine by me. Do what you want, but the standard at
2314:Talk:List of yaoi anime and manga#Primary sources
3840:had a blog where he wrote various manga reviews
1414:established the "Encyclopedia Research Center";
3670:, owned by Lissa Pattillo, who has written for
1913:I don't see a reason why they're not reliable.
1884:. Should they be considered a reliable source?
898:Ettinger is deferred to as a subject expert in
877:. The last post was published in October 2015.
3367:), so that should also be taken into account.
2750:. I think that it would be a good addition. -
2291:(fans with no prior work or establishment). -
367:Talk:Marvel Anime#Future Avengers spliting off
3836:I found out that the professional translator
3527:, the site is listed as a reliable source on
2601:I agree as well. It seems pretty reliable. -
1361:Looking good, this should be a good source.--
1035:(also spelled Chill Chill) as a resource for
957:I've found this Japanese news website called
926:. There are also positive mentions of him by
278:and can you quote WP:V to back up your claim?
3529:WikiProject Film/Comic book films task force
1821:rely heavily on rumors and personal opinions
1128:status, that ended up inconclusive. I found
3582:I was recently involved in a discussion at
2332:, who was also involved in the discussion.
2312:Hey, Knowledgekid, there's a discussion at
718:Just added both sites to the list. Thanks,
464:Two suggestions for online reliable sources
679:companies, dictionaries, and encyclopedias
18:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Anime and manga
1190:which doesn't have anything up yet for it
3623:discussion on the talk page of Yashahime
3329:News Network and other notable websites,
229:I wouldn't do this without taking it to
3772:Helen McCarthy as a reliable individual
2120:s "The world’s 50 most powerful blogs"
1005:. I'm specifically interested in using
991:Madeline Ashby as a reliable individual
163:I would support it. they seem reliable.
14:
3849:His blog was also linked on MangaCast
1927:Yes, it's a reliable website owned by
1138:compiles anime airdates from tv guides
675:Asahi Shimbun's digital media division
596:; Peter Fobian writes about anime for
48:Do not edit the contents of this page.
1486:Has there ever been consideration of
335:Past discussions both project and at
3445:Marvel Cinematic Universe task force
3113:BD Gest for biographical information
1318:Journal of Anime & Manga Studies
29:
27:
3584:Talk:The Rising of the Shield Hero
2395:I've seen various articles citing
2374:Digimon Adventure (2020 TV series)
1436:. :) The site's "About" page says
1220:a reliable source? It is owned by
1122:search of the WikiProject archives
28:
3888:
2681:There is more info about this at
339:have proven ANN's reliability. -
3790:) I ask this, because she has a
3129:, a different person. Thoughts?
1418:is a Shogakukan subsidiary; and
1216:Hello, everyone! Is the website
930:("top-notch anime blogger") and
752:Would this WikiProject consider
472:is an encyclopedia published by
33:
3588:the site continues to get many
3414:, considered a reliable source.
2214:I agree. It should be added. -
1957:survey of production assistants
1685:the original announcement tweet
683:the Daijisen's official website
3808:08:09, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
3716:, but no one commented on it.
3685:here is the rest of the staff
3566:16:17, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
3541:16:12, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
3509:15:58, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
3483:15:26, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
3457:15:11, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
3439:If we are going to generalize
3188:17:27, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
3172:17:27, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
3139:01:25, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
1465:
1230:
13:
1:
3704:07:59, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
3657:10:26, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
2982:They have an editorial staff
2301:16:20, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
1472:https://mangapedia.com/about/
1261:05:27, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
129:03:37, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
99:03:08, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
3826:18:22, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
3766:18:04, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
3726:17:56, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
3612:00:41, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
3467:International Business Times
2278:09:10, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
1500:19:53, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
1394:02:22, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
1285:17:58, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
1235:19:21, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
526:Heibonsha World Encyclopedia
7:
2951:Bringing up Anitrendz again
1434:WikiProject reliable source
1222:Kabushiki-gaisha MediaVague
1037:
1007:her review and analysis of
995:I'd like to propose adding
970:Inugami-san to Nekoyama-san
10:
3893:
3878:02:39, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
3832:Stephen Paul and MangaCast
3302:06:24, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
3085:some kind of a partnership
2661:Actually now that I look,
2533:13:48, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
2495:03:31, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
2442:03:30, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
2423:02:45, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
2407:citing Manga Mogura twice
2372:is listed as a source for
2342:16:21, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
2287:based on what I am seeing
2254:05:45, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
2169:23:52, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
2154:03:13, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
2076:15:40, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
2034:11:38, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
2016:), and formerly wrote for
1988:04:19, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
1973:21:48, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
1923:22:25, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
1909:17:23, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
1894:06:23, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
1861:21:29, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
1833:16:04, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
1804:15:55, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
1782:15:46, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
1757:15:29, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
1701:15:29, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
1650:22:11, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
1640:oh sorry I didn't notice.
1629:22:00, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
1607:22:31, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
1552:20:13, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
1454:17:45, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
1373:14:04, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
789:07:23, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
770:20:56, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
560:07:21, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
542:15:41, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
518:14:20, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
476:, with contributions from
458:21:33, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
439:22:17, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
425:21:13, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
408:20:55, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
379:23:21, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
349:00:06, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
331:21:46, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
306:19:56, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
291:18:24, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
273:15:04, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
258:14:52, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
244:14:07, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
217:13:53, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
194:20:36, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
176:16:26, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
158:16:23, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
3747:02:00, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
3427:04:34, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
3403:16:04, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
3381:10:05, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
3342:01:06, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
3320:21:44, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
3288:03:15, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
3266:20:36, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
3233:15:23, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
3105:14:19, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
3079:14:14, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
3064:07:06, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
3040:20:31, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
3024:21:20, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
3008:21:03, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
2974:20:22, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
2945:20:28, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
2931:20:35, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
2916:03:59, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
2884:20:33, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
2840:20:32, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
2466:I am not affiliated with
2238:03:50, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
2224:18:23, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
2209:16:58, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
2090:03:49, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
1941:21:52, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
1522:22:21, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
1357:21:17, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
1335:07:40, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
1313:20:27, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
1206:11:10, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
1179:Japan Media Arts Datebase
1165:07:25, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
1097:07:34, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
1072:22:38, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
474:The Asahi Shimbun Company
3690:Seven Seas Entertainment
3621:Now that I've started a
2869:00:32, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
2825:03:35, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
2775:16:33, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
2760:15:53, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
2722:01:51, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
2695:19:47, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
2683:Knowledge:Newspapers.com
2675:19:25, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
2657:19:13, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
2642:19:11, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
2611:01:30, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
2597:18:59, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
2582:18:52, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
1673:called it a third season
1148:as support, rather than
1022:04:45, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
986:03:00, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
947:04:00, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
890:14:05, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
853:21:49, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
832:21:15, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
810:20:30, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
3776:I was surprised to see
3198:I've seen this website
2552:19:38, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
2456:19:35, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
2386:19:34, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
1406:I think it's reliable.
736:17:20, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
714:19:53, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
699:15:58, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
658:04:41, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
628:16:05, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
22:Online reliable sources
3666:I found this website,
3351:is a cosplayer/model,
1228:have cited magmix.jp.—
748:Dengeki / Weekly ASCII
3647:simply don't know. -
3246:, for example, lists
2727:Silent Manga Audition
1951:I would propose that
1031:I would like request
912:Giannalberto Bendazzi
321:have supported that.
46:of past discussions.
3617:Blog.esuteru/Myjitsu
3525:Comic Book Resources
3148:I would like to see
3123:File:Naoshi Komi.jpg
1929:Kadokawa Corporation
1664:Monsters and Critics
1658:Monsters and Critics
1272:conflict of interest
3856:as editor in chief
3410:who also wrote for
3119:Naoshi Arakawa page
2624:recently suggested
1880:has used them as a
1772:doesn't use leaks.
1275:it's not reliable.
1144:He cites the essay
3676:Anime News Network
3594:Third Window Films
3355:is a voice actor).
3242:their editorials.
2896:Yonkou Productions
2890:Yonkou Productions
2874:Looks fine to me.
2795:Anime News Network
2765:Looks good to me.
2663:Template:Cite news
2587:Looks fine to me.
2405:Anime News Network
2040:Anime News Network
1878:Anime News Network
1874:Japanese Wiki link
1731:example for MHA S5
1677:Anime News Network
1567:Anime News Network
1536:
1240:Right Stuf Reviews
1053:Anime News Network
924:Animation Magazine
594:Anime News Network
392:
202:Anime News Network
113:
84:FUTON bias? Really
3578:Asian Movie Pulse
3551:
3158:comment added by
2791:a list of reviews
2228:I agree as well.
2130:s "25 best blogs"
1532:
1425:The Asahi Shimbun
1107:Recently I found
1009:Kids on the Slope
963:, specialized in
932:Jonathan Clements
928:The Comics Jornal
758:Dengeki Hobby Web
388:
109:
81:
80:
58:
57:
52:current talk page
3884:
3732:About ComiXology
3601:
3545:
3412:Manga Book Shelf
3201:
3174:
3095:and unreliable.
3052:
2566:What's In? Tokyo
2354:
2331:
2323:
2311:
2251:
2246:
2185:Mainichi Shimbun
2129:
2119:
1998:
1814:
1792:
1770:
1639:
1618:
1548:
1542:
1535:
1511:
1474:
1469:
1420:Voyage Marketing
1405:
1370:
1365:
1346:
1232:
1226:several articles
1204:
1083:
1040:
842:
821:
799:
672:
638:
615:Nichi Bei Weekly
612:and now for the
570:
404:
398:
391:
228:
125:
119:
112:
72:
60:
59:
37:
36:
30:
3892:
3891:
3887:
3886:
3885:
3883:
3882:
3881:
3834:
3774:
3734:
3664:
3619:
3587:
3580:
3199:
3196:
3194:Comicbook/anime
3153:
3146:
3115:
3046:
2953:
2892:
2848:
2783:
2729:
2630:this discussion
2619:
2562:
2464:
2393:
2367:
2348:
2325:
2317:
2305:
2264:Is the website
2262:
2249:
2244:
2177:
2127:
2117:
2104:
1992:
1949:
1868:
1817:WP:QUESTIONABLE
1808:
1786:
1764:
1669:WP:QUESTIONABLE
1660:
1633:
1612:
1562:
1546:
1540:
1533:
1505:
1484:
1479:
1478:
1477:
1470:
1466:
1399:
1381:
1368:
1363:
1340:
1320:
1293:
1246:Right Stuf Inc.
1242:
1214:
1193:
1114:Hidamari Sketch
1105:
1077:
1029:
993:
955:
904:The Japan Times
867:
836:
815:
793:
777:primary sources
750:
666:
632:
609:Nichi Bei Times
564:
466:
402:
396:
389:
222:
204:
137:
123:
117:
110:
86:
68:
34:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
3890:
3833:
3830:
3829:
3828:
3778:Helen McCarthy
3773:
3770:
3769:
3768:
3733:
3730:
3729:
3728:
3663:
3660:
3618:
3615:
3579:
3576:
3575:
3574:
3573:
3572:
3571:
3570:
3569:
3568:
3516:
3515:
3514:
3513:
3512:
3511:
3488:
3487:
3486:
3485:
3460:
3459:
3436:
3435:
3434:
3433:
3432:
3431:
3430:
3429:
3405:
3387:Anime Feminist
3356:
3326:
3325:
3324:
3323:
3322:
3269:
3268:
3195:
3192:
3191:
3190:
3145:
3142:
3125:, which is of
3114:
3111:
3110:
3109:
3108:
3107:
3081:
3043:
3042:
3032:Sarcataclysmal
3027:
3026:
3011:
3010:
2952:
2949:
2948:
2947:
2937:Sarcataclysmal
2933:
2891:
2888:
2887:
2886:
2847:
2844:
2843:
2842:
2782:
2779:
2778:
2777:
2740:this interview
2732:Manga Audition
2728:
2725:
2698:
2697:
2679:
2678:
2677:
2626:Newspapers.com
2618:
2617:Newspapers.com
2615:
2614:
2613:
2599:
2561:
2558:
2557:
2556:
2555:
2554:
2513:
2463:
2460:
2459:
2458:
2444:
2392:
2389:
2366:
2363:
2362:
2361:
2351:Knowledgekid87
2346:
2345:
2344:
2308:Knowledgekid87
2293:Knowledgekid87
2261:
2258:
2257:
2256:
2240:
2226:
2176:
2173:
2172:
2171:
2161:Sarcataclysmal
2103:
2100:
2099:
2098:
2097:
2096:
2095:
2094:
2093:
2092:
2026:Sarcataclysmal
2002:Production I.G
1948:
1945:
1944:
1943:
1925:
1911:
1901:Sarcataclysmal
1867:
1864:
1853:Sarcataclysmal
1840:
1839:
1838:
1837:
1836:
1835:
1784:
1659:
1656:
1655:
1654:
1653:
1652:
1561:
1558:
1557:
1556:
1555:
1554:
1525:
1524:
1483:
1480:
1476:
1475:
1463:
1462:
1458:
1457:
1456:
1380:
1377:
1376:
1375:
1359:
1319:
1316:
1295:Recognized by
1292:
1289:
1288:
1287:
1270:. It may be a
1241:
1238:
1213:
1210:
1209:
1208:
1181:, such as for
1104:
1101:
1100:
1099:
1028:
1025:
1002:Ottawa Citizen
997:Madeline Ashby
992:
989:
954:
951:
950:
949:
866:
863:
862:
861:
860:
859:
858:
857:
856:
855:
749:
746:
745:
744:
743:
742:
741:
740:
739:
738:
687:someone up top
664:
663:
662:
661:
660:
494:Arina Tanemura
489:Anime Feminist
465:
462:
461:
460:
445:
444:
443:
442:
441:
382:
381:
362:
361:
360:
359:
358:
357:
356:
355:
354:
353:
352:
351:
341:Knowledgekid87
246:
236:Knowledgekid87
203:
200:
199:
198:
197:
196:
179:
178:
136:
133:
132:
131:
85:
82:
79:
78:
73:
66:
56:
55:
38:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3889:
3880:
3879:
3875:
3871:
3867:
3865:
3863:
3861:
3858:
3855:
3851:
3848:
3846:
3842:
3839:
3827:
3823:
3819:
3815:
3812:
3811:
3810:
3809:
3805:
3801:
3797:
3793:
3789:
3785:
3784:
3779:
3767:
3763:
3759:
3755:
3751:
3750:
3749:
3748:
3744:
3740:
3727:
3723:
3719:
3715:
3711:
3708:
3707:
3706:
3705:
3701:
3697:
3693:
3691:
3687:
3684:
3682:
3680:
3678:
3675:
3673:
3669:
3659:
3658:
3654:
3650:
3645:
3643:
3641:
3639:
3637:
3635:
3633:
3630:
3627:
3624:
3614:
3613:
3609:
3605:
3599:
3595:
3591:
3585:
3567:
3563:
3559:
3555:
3549:
3548:edit conflict
3544:
3543:
3542:
3538:
3534:
3530:
3526:
3522:
3521:
3520:
3519:
3518:
3517:
3510:
3506:
3502:
3498:
3497:ComicBook.com
3494:
3493:
3492:
3491:
3490:
3489:
3484:
3480:
3476:
3472:
3468:
3464:
3463:
3462:
3461:
3458:
3454:
3450:
3446:
3442:
3441:ComicBook.com
3438:
3437:
3428:
3424:
3420:
3416:
3413:
3409:
3406:
3404:
3400:
3396:
3392:
3388:
3384:
3383:
3382:
3378:
3374:
3370:
3366:
3362:
3357:
3354:
3350:
3345:
3344:
3343:
3339:
3335:
3331:
3327:
3321:
3317:
3313:
3309:
3305:
3304:
3303:
3299:
3295:
3291:
3290:
3289:
3285:
3281:
3277:
3273:
3272:
3271:
3270:
3267:
3263:
3259:
3255:
3251:
3250:
3249:Macross Delta
3245:
3241:
3237:
3236:
3235:
3234:
3230:
3226:
3222:
3218:
3214:
3210:
3206:
3200:comicbook.com
3189:
3185:
3181:
3177:
3176:
3175:
3173:
3169:
3165:
3161:
3157:
3151:
3150:Anime UK News
3144:Anime UK News
3141:
3140:
3136:
3132:
3128:
3124:
3120:
3106:
3102:
3098:
3094:
3090:
3086:
3082:
3080:
3076:
3072:
3067:
3066:
3065:
3061:
3057:
3050:
3045:
3044:
3041:
3037:
3033:
3029:
3028:
3025:
3021:
3017:
3013:
3012:
3009:
3005:
3001:
2997:
2995:
2993:
2991:
2989:
2987:
2984:
2981:
2978:
2977:
2976:
2975:
2971:
2967:
2962:
2958:
2946:
2942:
2938:
2934:
2932:
2928:
2924:
2920:
2919:
2918:
2917:
2913:
2909:
2905:
2902:
2900:
2897:
2885:
2881:
2877:
2873:
2872:
2871:
2870:
2866:
2862:
2858:
2857:
2852:
2841:
2837:
2833:
2829:
2828:
2827:
2826:
2822:
2818:
2814:
2811:
2809:
2807:
2805:
2803:
2801:
2799:
2796:
2792:
2788:
2776:
2772:
2768:
2764:
2763:
2762:
2761:
2757:
2753:
2749:
2748:Kentaro Miura
2745:
2741:
2737:
2733:
2724:
2723:
2719:
2715:
2709:
2707:
2703:
2696:
2692:
2688:
2684:
2680:
2676:
2672:
2668:
2664:
2660:
2659:
2658:
2654:
2650:
2646:
2645:
2644:
2643:
2639:
2635:
2631:
2627:
2623:
2612:
2608:
2604:
2600:
2598:
2594:
2590:
2586:
2585:
2584:
2583:
2579:
2575:
2571:
2567:
2553:
2549:
2545:
2540:
2536:
2535:
2534:
2530:
2526:
2522:
2518:
2514:
2511:
2507:
2503:
2499:
2498:
2497:
2496:
2492:
2488:
2484:
2480:
2477:
2476:
2471:
2469:
2457:
2453:
2449:
2445:
2443:
2439:
2435:
2431:
2427:
2426:
2425:
2424:
2420:
2416:
2412:
2409:
2406:
2402:
2398:
2388:
2387:
2383:
2379:
2375:
2371:
2359:
2352:
2347:
2343:
2339:
2335:
2329:
2321:
2315:
2309:
2304:
2303:
2302:
2298:
2294:
2290:
2286:
2282:
2281:
2280:
2279:
2275:
2271:
2267:
2266:Honey's Anime
2260:Honey's Anime
2255:
2252:
2247:
2241:
2239:
2235:
2231:
2227:
2225:
2221:
2217:
2213:
2212:
2211:
2210:
2206:
2202:
2198:
2194:
2190:
2186:
2182:
2170:
2166:
2162:
2158:
2157:
2156:
2155:
2151:
2147:
2143:
2141:
2139:
2137:
2135:
2132:
2126:
2122:
2116:
2115:
2110:
2109:
2091:
2087:
2083:
2079:
2078:
2077:
2073:
2069:
2065:
2061:
2057:
2053:
2049:
2045:
2041:
2037:
2036:
2035:
2031:
2027:
2023:
2019:
2015:
2011:
2007:
2003:
1996:
1991:
1990:
1989:
1985:
1981:
1977:
1976:
1975:
1974:
1970:
1966:
1962:
1958:
1954:
1942:
1938:
1934:
1930:
1926:
1924:
1920:
1916:
1912:
1910:
1906:
1902:
1898:
1897:
1896:
1895:
1891:
1887:
1883:
1879:
1875:
1872:
1871:Da Vinci News
1866:Da Vinci News
1863:
1862:
1858:
1854:
1849:
1845:
1834:
1830:
1826:
1822:
1818:
1812:
1807:
1806:
1805:
1801:
1797:
1790:
1785:
1783:
1779:
1775:
1768:
1763:
1762:
1761:
1760:
1759:
1758:
1754:
1750:
1746:
1742:
1738:
1736:
1732:
1728:
1724:
1720:
1716:
1715:manga artists
1712:
1708:
1703:
1702:
1698:
1694:
1690:
1686:
1682:
1678:
1674:
1670:
1665:
1651:
1647:
1643:
1637:
1632:
1631:
1630:
1626:
1622:
1616:
1611:
1610:
1609:
1608:
1604:
1600:
1596:
1592:
1588:
1584:
1580:
1576:
1572:
1568:
1553:
1549:
1543:
1537:
1529:
1528:
1527:
1526:
1523:
1519:
1515:
1509:
1504:
1503:
1502:
1501:
1497:
1493:
1489:
1473:
1468:
1464:
1461:
1455:
1451:
1447:
1443:
1439:
1435:
1431:
1427:
1426:
1422:, along with
1421:
1417:
1413:
1409:
1403:
1398:
1397:
1396:
1395:
1391:
1387:
1374:
1371:
1366:
1360:
1358:
1354:
1350:
1344:
1339:
1338:
1337:
1336:
1332:
1328:
1324:
1315:
1314:
1310:
1306:
1302:
1301:like this one
1298:
1286:
1282:
1278:
1273:
1269:
1265:
1264:
1263:
1262:
1258:
1254:
1250:
1247:
1237:
1236:
1233:
1227:
1223:
1219:
1207:
1203:
1202:
1198:
1197:
1191:
1188:
1184:
1180:
1176:
1175:verifiability
1172:
1169:
1168:
1167:
1166:
1162:
1158:
1153:
1151:
1147:
1143:
1139:
1135:
1134:User:Erachima
1131:
1127:
1123:
1118:
1116:
1115:
1110:
1109:cal.syoboi.jp
1103:cal.syoboi.jp
1098:
1094:
1090:
1086:
1081:
1076:
1075:
1074:
1073:
1069:
1065:
1061:
1058:
1055:
1054:
1049:
1046:
1045:
1044:Sankei Sports
1039:
1034:
1024:
1023:
1019:
1015:
1011:
1010:
1004:
1003:
998:
988:
987:
983:
979:
975:
972:
971:
966:
962:
960:
948:
944:
940:
936:
933:
929:
925:
921:
917:
913:
909:
905:
901:
897:
894:
893:
892:
891:
887:
883:
879:
876:
872:
854:
850:
846:
840:
835:
834:
833:
829:
825:
819:
813:
812:
811:
807:
803:
797:
792:
791:
790:
786:
782:
778:
774:
773:
772:
771:
767:
763:
759:
755:
737:
733:
729:
725:
721:
717:
716:
715:
711:
707:
702:
701:
700:
696:
692:
688:
684:
680:
676:
670:
665:
659:
655:
651:
647:
644:
643:
636:
631:
630:
629:
625:
621:
617:
616:
611:
610:
605:
601:
600:
599:The Daily Dot
595:
591:
590:
585:
581:
580:
574:
568:
563:
562:
561:
557:
553:
549:
545:
544:
543:
539:
535:
531:
527:
522:
521:
520:
519:
515:
511:
505:
503:
502:Mamoru Hosoda
499:
498:Sayo Yamamoto
495:
490:
485:
483:
479:
475:
471:
459:
455:
451:
446:
440:
436:
432:
428:
427:
426:
423:
422:
419:
416:
411:
410:
409:
405:
399:
393:
384:
383:
380:
376:
372:
371:69.157.252.96
368:
364:
363:
350:
346:
342:
338:
334:
333:
332:
328:
324:
320:
317:
313:
309:
308:
307:
303:
299:
298:69.157.252.96
294:
293:
292:
289:
288:
285:
282:
276:
275:
274:
270:
266:
261:
260:
259:
255:
251:
247:
245:
241:
237:
232:
226:
221:
220:
219:
218:
214:
210:
195:
191:
187:
183:
182:
181:
180:
177:
174:
173:
170:
167:
162:
161:
160:
159:
155:
151:
146:
142:
141:Animate Times
135:Animate Times
130:
126:
120:
114:
106:
103:
102:
101:
100:
96:
92:
77:
74:
71:
67:
65:
62:
61:
53:
49:
45:
44:
39:
32:
31:
23:
19:
3852:, which had
3838:Stephen Paul
3835:
3818:Gabriel Yuji
3795:
3787:
3781:
3775:
3758:Gabriel Yuji
3735:
3718:Gabriel Yuji
3665:
3620:
3581:
3411:
3390:
3386:
3363:plagiarised
3349:Kaho Shibuya
3254:magical girl
3247:
3244:This article
3239:
3217:"Anime News"
3213:This article
3209:this article
3205:this article
3197:
3154:— Preceding
3147:
3121:is actually
3116:
2964:discussion.
2955:I know that
2954:
2893:
2854:
2849:
2784:
2734:is owned by
2730:
2710:
2699:
2620:
2563:
2520:
2509:
2504:. As of now
2485:
2481:
2478:
2474:
2472:
2470:in any way.
2467:
2465:
2404:
2401:Manga Mogura
2394:
2368:
2263:
2178:
2114:The Guardian
2112:
2111:appeared on
2107:
2105:
1950:
1869:
1847:
1843:
1841:
1820:
1747:
1743:
1739:
1723:voice actors
1704:
1661:
1563:
1488:Anime Herald
1485:
1482:Anime Herald
1467:
1459:
1437:
1429:
1423:
1382:
1321:
1294:
1277:Gabriel Yuji
1243:
1215:
1200:
1195:
1183:Angle Beats!
1171:10 years ago
1170:
1154:
1141:
1137:
1119:
1113:
1106:
1084:
1051:
1042:
1030:
1008:
1000:
994:
968:
964:
958:
956:
908:Cartoon Brew
895:
868:
839:Gabriel Yuji
824:Gabriel Yuji
796:Gabriel Yuji
781:Gabriel Yuji
754:Weekly ASCII
751:
724:Gabriel Yuji
650:Gabriel Yuji
642:The Mary Sue
640:
614:
607:
598:
588:
584:The Mary Sue
578:
567:Gabriel Yuji
552:Gabriel Yuji
506:
486:
467:
420:
417:
414:
296:assertion.--
286:
283:
280:
207:objections.
205:
171:
168:
165:
139:I don't see
138:
87:
69:
47:
41:
3796:Manga Mania
3788:Manga Mania
3628:and Myjitsu
3598:Arrow Films
3276:Alex Tenshi
3221:Alex Tenshi
3127:Naoshi Komi
3056:Kimochihime
2785:Should the
2744:Tetsuo Hara
2525:אילן שמעוני
2487:אילן שמעוני
2397:Anime Sweet
2391:Anime Sweet
2064:Yuri on Ice
2052:Crunchyroll
2022:his profile
1899:I'd say so
1591:Yuri on Ice
1579:Crunchyroll
1560:Sakuga Blog
1534:AngusW🐶🐶F
1442:listed here
916:as a source
604:Crunchyroll
573:"team" page
319:discussions
40:This is an
3668:Kuriousity
3662:Kuriousity
3590:interviews
3523:About the
3369:tenshibeat
3294:lullabying
3258:lullabying
3240:especially
2861:lullabying
2714:Harizotoh9
2634:lullabying
2622:Harizotoh9
2574:lullabying
2544:lullabying
2517:discussion
2448:lullabying
2378:lullabying
2334:lullabying
2320:Isaidnoway
2242:I agree.--
2230:lullabying
2181:Mantan Web
2175:Mantan Web
2082:lullabying
1995:Lullabying
1980:lullabying
1953:Sakugablog
1947:Sakugablog
1886:lullabying
1848:weak agree
1811:Gumpngreen
1796:Gumpngreen
1767:Gumpngreen
1749:Gumpngreen
1681:Funimation
1636:Lullabying
1621:lullabying
1514:lullabying
1460:References
1438:Mangapedia
1428:, created
1412:Shogakukan
1379:Mangapedia
1266:Not sure,
1231:Lopullinen
1224:. I found
1080:Lullabying
1064:lullabying
939:Opencooper
845:lullabying
818:Lullabying
802:lullabying
762:lullabying
720:Opencooper
706:Opencooper
669:Opencooper
548:"about us"
534:Opencooper
482:Shogakukan
431:lullabying
323:Opencooper
186:lullabying
150:lullabying
105:Hyoroemon2
91:Hyoroemon2
3854:Ed Chavez
3792:Wordpress
3672:Otaku USA
3533:Centcom08
3501:Centcom08
3449:Centcom08
2961:Anitrendz
2787:SciFi.com
2781:SciFi.com
2570:this page
2560:What's In
2468:LewdGamer
2328:Morgan695
2018:Thrillist
1965:Sandtalon
1727:composers
1719:directors
1711:producers
1408:Heibonsha
1343:Sandtalon
1327:Sandtalon
1291:AniTrendZ
1218:magmix.jp
1212:magmix.jp
1140:and that
1130:this post
1033:Chil Chil
1027:Chil Chil
1014:Morgan695
959:Yuri Navi
953:Yuri Navi
920:Linked to
914:uses him
579:Otaku USA
450:Sandtalon
390:AngusWOOF
111:AngusWOOF
76:Archive 3
70:Archive 2
64:Archive 1
3783:Anime UK
3604:Link20XX
3558:Link20XX
3475:Link20XX
3377:contribs
3312:Link20XX
3284:contribs
3229:contribs
3180:Link20XX
3168:contribs
3156:unsigned
3131:Link20XX
3097:Link20XX
3071:Link20XX
3049:Link20XX
2966:Link20XX
2923:Link20XX
2876:Link20XX
2832:Link20XX
2767:Link20XX
2742:between
2667:Link20XX
2649:Link20XX
2589:Link20XX
2434:Link20XX
2201:Link20XX
2199:, etc).
2179:I think
2108:Gigazine
2102:Gigazine
2068:Link20XX
1915:Link20XX
1825:Link20XX
1789:Link20XX
1774:Link20XX
1725:), and (
1693:Link20XX
1662:I think
1642:Link20XX
1615:Link20XX
1599:Link20XX
1508:Esw01407
1492:Esw01407
1446:KuroMina
1430:Kotobank
1187:Hamefura
1152:policy.
1120:I did a
1060:(link 2)
1057:(link 1)
900:OtakuUSA
871:AniPages
865:AniPages
728:KuroMina
691:KuroMina
635:KuroMina
620:KuroMina
530:Daijisen
510:KuroMina
478:Kodansha
470:Kotobank
265:Esw01407
20: |
3870:Xexerss
3754:Xexerss
3739:Xexerss
3710:Xexerss
3696:Xexerss
3649:Xexerss
3554:WP:VGRS
3419:Xexerss
3395:Xexerss
3334:Xexerss
3256:genre.
3089:Netflix
3016:Tintor2
3000:Xexerss
2957:Tintor2
2908:Xexerss
2894:Should
2817:Xexerss
2752:Xexerss
2603:Xexerss
2415:Xexerss
2370:OtakuPT
2365:OtakuPT
2270:Xexerss
2216:Xexerss
2146:Xexerss
1933:Xexerss
1844:usually
1402:Xexerss
1386:Xexerss
1305:Tintor2
1268:Xexerss
1253:Xexerss
1244:Do the
1085:Support
978:Xexerss
896:Support
882:Xexerss
869:Should
418:Pumpkin
312:Natalie
284:Pumpkin
169:Pumpkin
145:Animate
43:archive
3471:WP:RSP
3093:WP:COI
2736:Coamix
2687:Goszei
2506:WP:GNG
2197:link 3
2193:link 2
2060:link 2
2050:) and
2048:link 2
1882:source
1745:bias.
1683:, and
1587:link 2
1577:) and
1575:link 2
1416:8-Lynx
1349:Goszei
1157:Goszei
1146:WP:RSE
1089:Goszei
1048:(link)
906:, and
589:Forbes
571:Their
500:, and
337:WP:RSN
231:WP:RSN
3814:Amffy
3800:Amffy
3353:Jenya
3160:Amffy
3087:with
2851:Numan
2846:Numan
2706:manga
2702:anime
2521:solve
2285:WP:RS
2008:(see
1959:, or
1707:anime
1675:when
1547:sniff
1150:WP:RS
1132:from
1126:WP:RS
726:! :)
403:sniff
250:Spshu
225:Spshu
209:Spshu
124:sniff
16:<
3874:talk
3822:talk
3804:talk
3786:and
3762:talk
3743:talk
3722:talk
3700:talk
3653:talk
3608:talk
3596:and
3562:talk
3537:talk
3505:talk
3479:talk
3453:talk
3423:talk
3399:talk
3373:talk
3365:this
3361:this
3338:talk
3316:talk
3308:here
3298:talk
3280:talk
3262:talk
3225:talk
3184:talk
3164:talk
3135:talk
3101:talk
3075:talk
3060:talk
3036:talk
3020:talk
3004:talk
2970:talk
2941:talk
2927:talk
2912:talk
2880:talk
2865:talk
2836:talk
2821:talk
2771:talk
2756:talk
2746:and
2718:talk
2704:and
2691:talk
2685:. —
2671:talk
2653:talk
2638:talk
2607:talk
2593:talk
2578:talk
2548:talk
2529:talk
2491:talk
2452:talk
2438:talk
2430:Here
2419:talk
2382:talk
2338:talk
2297:talk
2289:here
2274:talk
2250:here
2245:Vulp
2234:talk
2220:talk
2205:talk
2189:link
2165:talk
2150:talk
2125:Time
2123:and
2086:talk
2072:talk
2056:link
2044:link
2030:talk
2014:here
2012:and
2010:here
1984:talk
1969:talk
1937:talk
1931:. -
1919:talk
1905:talk
1890:talk
1857:talk
1829:talk
1800:talk
1778:talk
1753:talk
1735:link
1721:), (
1717:), (
1713:), (
1697:talk
1689:link
1646:talk
1625:talk
1603:talk
1595:link
1583:link
1571:link
1541:bark
1518:talk
1496:talk
1450:talk
1432:, a
1410:and
1390:talk
1369:here
1364:Vulp
1353:talk
1331:talk
1309:talk
1281:talk
1257:talk
1161:talk
1093:talk
1068:talk
1050:and
1038:yaoi
1018:talk
982:talk
965:yuri
943:talk
886:talk
849:talk
828:talk
806:talk
785:talk
766:talk
756:and
732:talk
722:and
710:talk
695:talk
654:talk
624:talk
602:and
592:and
582:and
556:talk
538:talk
514:talk
480:and
454:talk
435:talk
415:Blue
397:bark
375:talk
345:talk
327:talk
316:past
302:talk
281:Blue
269:talk
254:talk
240:talk
213:talk
190:talk
166:Blue
154:talk
118:bark
95:talk
3845:du9
3391:CBR
2856:A3!
2693:)
2510:any
2066:).
2024:).
2006:ANN
1963:).
1709:) (
1691:).
1597:).
1355:)
1297:ANN
1192:.--
1163:)
1095:)
922:by
528:or
487:2)
468:1)
421:Pie
287:Pie
172:Pie
3876:)
3824:)
3806:)
3764:)
3745:)
3724:)
3702:)
3655:)
3610:)
3564:)
3539:)
3507:)
3481:)
3473:.
3455:)
3425:)
3417:-
3401:)
3379:)
3340:)
3318:)
3300:)
3286:)
3264:)
3231:)
3186:)
3170:)
3166:•
3137:)
3103:)
3077:)
3062:)
3038:)
3022:)
3006:)
2972:)
2943:)
2929:)
2914:)
2882:)
2867:)
2838:)
2823:)
2773:)
2758:)
2720:)
2673:)
2655:)
2640:)
2609:)
2595:)
2580:)
2572:.
2550:)
2531:)
2493:)
2454:)
2440:)
2421:)
2384:)
2340:)
2299:)
2276:)
2236:)
2222:)
2207:)
2195:,
2191:,
2167:)
2152:)
2088:)
2074:)
2058:,
2046:,
2032:)
1986:)
1971:)
1939:)
1921:)
1907:)
1892:)
1859:)
1831:)
1802:)
1780:)
1755:)
1737:)
1699:)
1679:,
1648:)
1627:)
1605:)
1585:,
1573:,
1550:)
1544:•
1520:)
1498:)
1452:)
1392:)
1333:)
1311:)
1283:)
1259:)
1070:)
1020:)
984:)
945:)
918:.
910:.
902:,
888:)
880:-
851:)
830:)
808:)
787:)
768:)
734:)
712:)
697:)
656:)
626:)
618:.
558:)
540:)
516:)
504:.
496:,
456:)
437:)
406:)
400:•
377:)
347:)
329:)
304:)
271:)
256:)
242:)
215:)
192:)
156:)
127:)
121:•
97:)
3872:(
3820:(
3802:(
3760:(
3741:(
3720:(
3698:(
3651:(
3606:(
3560:(
3550:)
3546:(
3535:(
3503:(
3477:(
3451:(
3421:(
3397:(
3375:|
3371:(
3347:(
3336:(
3314:(
3296:(
3282:|
3278:(
3260:(
3227:|
3223:(
3182:(
3162:(
3133:(
3099:(
3073:(
3058:(
3054:-
3051::
3047:@
3034:(
3018:(
3002:(
2968:(
2939:(
2925:(
2910:(
2878:(
2863:(
2834:(
2819:(
2769:(
2754:(
2716:(
2689:(
2669:(
2651:(
2636:(
2605:(
2591:(
2576:(
2546:(
2527:(
2489:(
2450:(
2436:(
2417:(
2380:(
2353::
2349:@
2336:(
2330::
2326:@
2322::
2318:@
2310::
2306:@
2295:(
2272:(
2232:(
2218:(
2203:(
2163:(
2148:(
2128:'
2118:'
2084:(
2070:(
2054:(
2042:(
2028:(
2020:(
1997::
1993:@
1982:(
1967:(
1935:(
1917:(
1903:(
1888:(
1855:(
1827:(
1813::
1809:@
1798:(
1791::
1787:@
1776:(
1769::
1765:@
1751:(
1695:(
1644:(
1638::
1634:@
1623:(
1617::
1613:@
1601:(
1581:(
1569:(
1538:(
1516:(
1510::
1506:@
1494:(
1448:(
1404::
1400:@
1388:(
1351:(
1345::
1341:@
1329:(
1307:(
1279:(
1255:(
1201:八
1196:十
1159:(
1091:(
1082::
1078:@
1066:(
1016:(
980:(
941:(
934:(
884:(
847:(
841::
837:@
826:(
820::
816:@
814:{
804:(
798::
794:@
783:(
764:(
730:(
708:(
693:(
671::
667:@
652:(
645:(
637::
633:@
622:(
569::
565:@
554:(
536:(
512:(
452:(
433:(
394:(
373:(
343:(
325:(
300:(
267:(
252:(
238:(
227::
223:@
211:(
188:(
152:(
115:(
93:(
54:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.