216:
204:
192:
240:
103:
228:
110:
130:
185:). I don’t particularly like scratches and blurs, but where’s the limit? Clearing a background, removal of persons or buildings, image restoration: it all happens at Commons. There’s one line I won’t cross: changing the characteristics of a photograph. Yes, I have seen cigarettes removed from the lips of one of my cultural heroes (“just a small retouch”), and the retouched photograph was used in 10 language versions of Wiki, over a period of six years. I pushed the original photograph back in.
320:
90:
120:
36:
140:
100:
150:
280:
are quite clear. I'm inclined to adhere to the most likely interpretation (in short: removal of (copyright) watermarks is in line with CC-BY-SA and not a legal violation), because CC-BY permits changing of files and removal of watermarks. Some
Wikipedians say this issue is not an issue of copyright,
502:
The whole "removal of visible copyright indicators" has caused loads of problems for historic media in the past. Postcards that had text on the image identifying the publisher, the cabinet card mounts of old photographs, and many other things are an intrinsic part of the design of the media. I know
172:
I like to add photographs to
Knowledge articles. The addition of a visual aspect improves the quality of an article, and gives a better view on a subject. If the photo isn't reflecting reality, it can also influence the opinion of readers. That’s why many Wikipedians try to improve the quality of
420:
143:
113:
70:
153:
271:
I love removing watermarks and copyright signs from photos in
Commons– if permitted by the license. Most photographs in Wikimedia Commons have either a PD or a CC-BY-license, and both permit removing watermarks. At the same time, I like
133:
281:
but is about ethics. They say it would be disrecpectful or insulting to remove the copyright claims. My simple answer: if you don’t want your photo to be touched by others, don’t bring them under a CC-BY-license.
259:
wanted his image to change in 2020, and thus wanted to abolish the then current photo in
Knowledge. They hired a company to take legal action via a request for removal of this 2017 photograph in Wiki (
215:
173:
photos. I have seen astonishing improvements of photographs, but also weird effects. Some photographs are beautified so much, that the new photograph is an improved version of reality.
479:
76:
409:
364:
435:
394:
384:
123:
389:
359:
344:
203:
404:
354:
337:
307:
298:
273:
475:
30:
Removing watermarks, copyright signs and cigarettes from photos: Suggestion: promote removal of visible copyright signs of images under a CC-BY license.
369:
491:
349:
331:
191:
55:
44:
263:). The result was devastating for Commons: not only was the photograph removed, but two great administrators resigned during the resulting row.
399:
374:
468:
181:
I have to admit: I crop photographs. I also remove watermarks, or ask skilled colleagues to make that happen (thank you, Wikipedians at the
587:
523:
440:
21:
563:
447:
558:
553:
239:
93:
266:
548:
503:
what you're advocating for (and, for those situations, it's perfectly fine), but be careful exactly how it's phrased.
536:
424:
176:
505:
Also, the attempts to remove a cigarette from a photo are nothing new. Look closely at the hand on the table in
227:
250:
543:
319:
49:
35:
17:
497:
277:
285:
464:
182:
569:
8:
288:
should also promote removal of visible copyright signs of images under a CC-BY license.
487:
512:
460:
431:
474:
I was hesitant to dig up old dirt, but you are right in asking. Here are two refs:
506:
581:
483:
163:
518:
260:
256:
71:
Removing watermarks, copyright signs and cigarettes from photos
457:
but two great administrators resigned during the resulting row
255:
When money is involved, attitudes change. The management of
480:
unfortunate discussion leading to two admins resigning
278:
The rules in
Knowledge regarding removal of watermarks
445:If your comment has not appeared here, you can try
579:
507:http://loc.gov/pictures/resource/ppmsca.12045/
161:
476:Discussion at Commons about the DMCA notice
221:Clear copyright claim (right in the middle)
197:Carly Rae Jepsen (2012) – with watermark
448:
267:Removing watermarks and copyright signs
14:
580:
54:
29:
209:Carly Rae Jepsen – watermark removed
177:Watermarks, scratches and cigarettes
588:Knowledge Signpost archives 2022-09
27:
318:
56:
34:
28:
599:
430:These comments are automatically
251:Vanity of vanities! All is vanity
459:- Link to relevant discussions?
238:
226:
214:
202:
190:
148:
138:
128:
118:
108:
98:
88:
441:add the page to your watchlist
13:
1:
416:
18:Knowledge:Knowledge Signpost
7:
524:05:38, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
492:09:55, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
469:05:25, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
10:
604:
286:proposed Commons guideline
261:DMCA Removal Request, 2020
274:to respect photographers
517:Has about 8.1% of all
438:. To follow comments,
323:
245:Same image, brightened
39:
531:What do you think of
322:
38:
537:Share your feedback.
434:from this article's
233:Frogs web (original)
284:My suggestion: the
425:Discuss this story
324:
45:← Back to Contents
40:
449:purging the cache
410:From the archives
365:Discussion report
332:30 September 2022
57:30 September 2022
50:View Latest Issue
595:
572:
522:
452:
450:
444:
423:
395:Featured content
342:
334:
327:
310:
302:
242:
230:
218:
206:
194:
166:
152:
151:
142:
141:
132:
131:
122:
121:
112:
111:
102:
101:
92:
91:
62:
60:
58:
603:
602:
598:
597:
596:
594:
593:
592:
578:
577:
576:
575:
574:
573:
568:
566:
561:
556:
551:
546:
539:
528:
527:
521:
510:
500:
454:
446:
439:
428:
427:
421:+ Add a comment
419:
415:
414:
413:
385:Recent research
335:
330:
328:
325:
314:
313:
311:"Serendipity" →
308:
305:
300:
294:
293:
269:
253:
246:
243:
234:
231:
222:
219:
210:
207:
198:
195:
179:
168:
167:
160:
159:
158:
149:
139:
129:
119:
109:
99:
89:
83:
80:
69:
65:
63:
53:
52:
47:
41:
31:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
601:
591:
590:
567:
562:
557:
552:
547:
542:
541:
540:
530:
529:
526:
516:
499:
496:
495:
494:
429:
426:
418:
417:
412:
407:
402:
397:
392:
390:Traffic report
387:
382:
377:
372:
367:
362:
360:Special report
357:
352:
347:
345:News and notes
341:
329:
317:
316:
315:
306:
297:
296:
295:
291:
268:
265:
252:
249:
248:
247:
244:
237:
235:
232:
225:
223:
220:
213:
211:
208:
201:
199:
196:
189:
178:
175:
170:
169:
157:
156:
146:
136:
126:
116:
106:
96:
85:
84:
81:
75:
74:
73:
72:
67:
66:
64:
61:
48:
43:
42:
33:
32:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
600:
589:
586:
585:
583:
571:
565:
560:
555:
550:
545:
538:
534:
525:
520:
515:
514:
509:from c. 1907
508:
504:
493:
489:
485:
481:
477:
473:
472:
471:
470:
466:
462:
458:
451:
442:
437:
433:
422:
411:
408:
406:
403:
401:
398:
396:
393:
391:
388:
386:
383:
381:
378:
376:
373:
371:
368:
366:
363:
361:
358:
356:
353:
351:
348:
346:
343:
339:
333:
326:In this issue
321:
312:
304:
303:"Serendipity"
292:
289:
287:
282:
279:
275:
264:
262:
258:
241:
236:
229:
224:
217:
212:
205:
200:
193:
188:
187:
186:
184:
174:
165:
155:
147:
145:
137:
135:
127:
125:
117:
115:
107:
105:
97:
95:
87:
86:
78:
59:
51:
46:
37:
23:
19:
533:The Signpost
532:
513:Adam Cuerden
511:
501:
461:TrangaBellam
456:
455:
405:CommonsComix
379:
355:In the media
338:all comments
290:
283:
270:
254:
183:Graphics Lab
180:
171:
94:PDF download
570:Suggestions
498:Careful now
432:transcluded
380:Serendipity
144:X (Twitter)
68:Serendipity
257:The Weeknd
82:Share this
77:Contribute
22:2022-09-30
564:Subscribe
436:talk page
370:Interview
582:Category
559:Newsroom
554:Archives
484:Vysotsky
478:and the
350:In focus
301:Previous
164:Vysotsky
134:Facebook
124:LinkedIn
114:Mastodon
20: |
400:Gallery
375:Opinion
154:Reddit
104:E-mail
549:About
16:<
544:Home
488:talk
465:talk
309:Next
519:FPs
162:By
79:—
584::
535:?
490:)
482:.
467:)
299:←
276:.
486:(
463:(
453:.
443:.
340:)
336:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
.jpg)
_(no_watermark).jpg)
,_1976,_Rappresentazione_Carnevalesca-_La_Pace._(18557239594).jpg)
.png)
