269:'encyclopedia' is a word that has multiple meanings, and it can be used for lists, including lists that include everything indiscriminately. There are works called encyclopedias, for example, listing every major available at each US college, but we would not consider this suitable for individual articles on each ... Any rule in Knowledge can be used to give irrational results if used without common sense. Given the diversity of people here, the best guide to common sense is compromise solutions: National network schedules, for example, not those of individual stations.
90:
1329:
117:
107:
33:
127:
87:
137:
97:
653:, 'Consensus is not determined by counting heads, but by looking at strength of argument, and underlying policy (if any). Arguments that contradict policy, are based on opinion rather than fact, or are logically fallacious, are frequently discounted.' This MFD discussion was incorrectly closed as "no consensus", despite the fact that it was clearly established that
412:
Your writer has trawled the deletion debates opened and closed in the last week and presents these debates for your edification. Either they generated larger than average response, centred on policy in an illuminating way, or otherwise just jumped out as of interest. Feel free to suggest interesting
248:
Numerous reliable abd independent sources cover the network block schedules, such as books listed above as well as 'The complete directory to prime-timenetwork tv shows 1946-present,' by Tim Brooks and Earle Marsh, Ballantine Books, 1979. Additionally I have seen TV columnists in major newspapers
614:
The spirit of the policy is that
Knowledge is on some mission to produce free content, and that we should infringe other people's copyrights only when it's really necessary, i.e., in articles. Considering that during the development of Knowledge's fair use policies, images were the primary concern
398:
would like the opinions of
Wikipedians on different images they have designed to quickly communicate the pattern of someone's various activities on Knowledge. If you are willing to help the research group out by taking the survey, you will need to visit their site. Full details can be found at
1389:
589:
ur fair use/copyright policies were generally created to prevent serious textual copyright violations and to create a more-strict-than-legally-required interpretation for media. Additionally, we are generally more permissive within userspace than we are elsewhere, remembering the above
287:
Too often, editors come to MOSNUM to change things in order to lend legitimacy to their particular way of doing things in articles theyāre working. However, this is often done with an insufficient understanding of the ramifications. This results in edit wars and instability on
332:
of having a 'quarantine room' -i.e. a non-googlable talk subpage accessible only to trusted editors -and involved parties, such as people bringing the controversial statements first- to discuss the thing at will, reporting then the outcome of the discussion in the public talk
734:
514:
This leads me to believe that in such cases, nomination for deletion should never have occured , and is indeed a waste of resources. If content is suitable for merging, I think keeping valuable content superseeds the deletion process, and would make things run
110:
570:
I initiated this MFD discussion, based on my judgment, as an editor uninvolved in any preceding conflicts with Jack
Merridew, that this massive use of non-free text in non-encyclopedic userspace is inconsistent with both the letter and and the intent of our
615:
for copyright infringement, most of the focus was on images and fair use. This was carried over when developed as a
Foundation policy. In other words, I consider the lack of mention of text-fair-use to be an oversight rather than a deliberate exclusion.
680:
To the extent that the said material contributes to building an encyclopaedia, it could be phrased differently. In other words, the use of copyrighted text in that instance is not necessary and I do not think it is justified either. So I would like to
1164:
738:
130:
100:
1254:
140:
763:
1346:
767:
1278:
181:
462:
used the fact that the content was merged as an excuse to get rid of the article, however, the content was only merged because he did it himself, without reaching consensus from others involved in the debate.
259:
I'm now convinced these standalone schedules are too much out of context to be useful, and that scheduling issues are better off discussed articles about the individual series and notable programming blocks.
308:
912:
231:
I'm in support of removing per-station program guides, while keeping network-level guides. I _think_ that's the same position as, for example, DGG... but you listed us with two different positions.
908:
380:
788:
945:
525:
In practice almost every fiction afd has a likely merge target (the parent work) and options other than deletion are often entertained. Whether that is right or wrong isn't really the issue.
964:
474:
426:
598:
1156:
343:
Discussions about how to improve articles or which sources to use or which sources to trust or what can and can't be included in an article are expressly allowed to go on in talk pages,
312:
1148:
834:
284:
proposed the locking down of the manual of style, with only an authorised gate-keeper allowed to amend the pages according to consensus formed through discussion on the talk pages:
1100:
1449:
1005:
782:
73:
951:
841:
reasons that while it "was deleted as a recreation of deleted material ... I restored because I did not think it was substantially identical to the originally deleted article"
643:
1404:
718:
629:
1132:
844:
278:
1368:
1373:
886:
848:
756:
120:
1378:
1316:
1307:
1238:
1189:
855:
421:
414:
368:
157:
931:
927:
finding that as the "delete site argue on apolicy basis that GNG requires secondary sourcing ... I find the delete argumenst are moe in accordance with policy"
894:
752:
1439:
1246:
792:
607:
1353:
1270:
1197:
803:
1084:
1042:
815:
177:
478:
1460:
1214:
582:
The arguments to keep revolved around the contradictions between
Knowledge policies and United States law, as well as the intentions of Knowledge policy.
1358:
830:
639:
there is no consensus over whether this violates the fair use rules or if it doesn't, whether 'user space leeway' applies to infringing copyright or not.
498:
383:
on a proposal that would see any large-scale semi-automated or fully automated article creation task require affirmation from the community through the
1173:
326:
We are not an open discussion forum and we set our rules as to what is acceptable at some distance from the maximum we might be able to get away with.
1053:
364:
1340:
650:
488:
156:
The following is a brief overview of new discussions taking place on the
English Knowledge. For older, yet possibly active, discussions please see
52:
41:
1011:
556:
as a copyright infringement, given the text was a lengthy quotation from a copyrighted work in userspace with no fair use justification. Although
774:
1472:
807:
452:
67:
995:
1181:
1534:
876:
796:
723:
297:
counter to the
Knowledge spirit. I'd rather people exercise self-control and abide by consensus by choice than be systematically forced to.
1409:
1035:
759:
has been open since 8 August, having been relisted twice. No consensus has yet emerged as to the notability or otherwise of the subject
1028:
811:
979:
363:. You can suggest a poll for inclusion, preferably including details as to how the poll will be closed and implemented, either on the
238:
221:
170:
1416:
534:
Early merges should be encouraged, but only where consensus is sufficiently clear that an early closure would normally be warranted.
560:
546:
188:
on 22 August, with participants directed back to the main request for comment. During the course of this week, the discussion led
193:
1230:
21:
1096:
538:
1509:
1435:
1393:
1046:
714:
1504:
1499:
1080:
384:
211:
1206:
483:
1494:
654:
602:
549:
316:
241:, hoping to better capture people's opinion. The debate continued, with fresh participants voicing disparate opinions.
564:
301:
1294:
470:
466:
456:
1092:
991:
863:
501:
advises against merging content from an article at AfD, suggesting that editor wait until the AfD is closed. Since
660:
Although a number of participants felt the deletion review was rehashing arguments made at the deletion debate,
619:
1124:
1111:
727:
710:
448:
nominator changing their vote to something other than delete was automatic grounds for a speedy keep or close.
1286:
1140:
898:
819:
1445:
Yeah, really. This is one of the best summaries of internal
Knowledge affairs I've ever seen. Keep writing!
1489:
1328:
46:
32:
17:
163:
359:
A round up of polls spotted by your writer in the last seven days or so, bearing in mind of course that
1431:
1088:
543:
442:
505:
has low activity, I'm starting a discussion here to see if current consensus affirms this guidance."
349:
didn't read carefully that paragraph happy to know that the talk page policy is sensible after all.
1060:
406:
395:
360:
273:
823:
1114:
regarding the content of the guideline, with the page itself protected for one week on 21 August
986:
313:
Knowledge:Biographies of living persons#Remove unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material
625:
because I feel like it I re-opened that discussion. In fact, I am listing it for another week.
1427:
930:
Sunday 23 August saw twenty-four debates re-listed for further discussion with the debate on
487:
Taking a cue from the "A Place With No Name" deletion debates, we move on to a discussion at
387:
process. Polling appears to have formed naturally during a community discussion initiated by
1038:
concerns the extent to which topics need to be defined in order to include them in templates
1515:
902:
746:
430:
201:
1118:
8:
1222:
1021:
320:
1455:
838:
699:
he next step here is to run an RfC to ask the community to clarify policy in this area.
388:
189:
1400:
916:
491:
over whether a merge should be performed while an article is nominated for deletion.
262:
As the discussion turned to arguments over the encyclopedic quality of the articles,
212:
demonstrated on talk page before making change (also, cannot promote WP:N to policy )
1426:
If that's brief, I can't imagine the FA comprehensive version. Great work again. -
799:. Debate continues, and has expanded to consider etiquette during a deletion debate
441:. User:PokerDance made the request on the basis that the content had been merged to
1468:
1262:
880:
583:
508:
291:
182:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/List of United States network television schedules
1446:
920:
778:
674:
438:
400:
938:
851:
at the subject's request. The debate concentrates on the sourcing of the article
477:. "A Place With No Name" has now been the subject of three deletion debates in
1165:
Knowledge talk:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2009-04-14/Daybreak (Battlestar
Galactica)
1073:
661:
572:
434:
353:
217:
197:
1079:
Discussions regarding the acceptability of boldly editing policy in line with
1528:
1104:
890:
553:
492:
376:
305:
235:
180:
mentioned last week has continued, expanding to encompass a deletion debate.
703:
924:
519:
337:
1464:
281:
253:
242:
150:
1279:
Talk:Reports of organ harvesting from Falun Gong practitioners in China
952:
Knowledge:Categories for discussion/Log/2009 August 22#Category:Craters
869:
594:
557:
528:
225:
207:
196:
to read that articles on such schedules "may be acceptable if there is
1461:
Knowledge talk:Knowledge
Signpost#The Signpost and the Manual of Style
469:
the request to overturn the debate, after some minutes thought they
249:
discuss the networks scheduling choices for many seasons in the past
859:
693:
499:
WP:Guide to deletion#You may edit the article during the discussion
263:
391:
on 17 August, although it is unclear how or when it is to close.
657:
violates Wikimedia Foundation policy regarding non-free content.
256:
wasn't swayed by arguments in favour of retaining such content:
1083:
are springing up at a number of policy and project talk pages:
967:: A group nomination which is seeking to standardise naming as
1215:
Knowledge:Requests_for_comment/User names#Cromwellian Conquest
677:
pointed out that the debate had missed a fundamental point:
730:. A number of participants suggest case-by-case approaches
1157:
Talk:United States presidential election in Vermont, 2008
739:
List of media personalities who have vandalised Knowledge
883:
out of respect for "the recent work done on the article"
854:
Two years and four months after the first nomination, a
563:, Erik9 also regarded the matter as worthy of debate at
522:
thought this avenue unsuitable for the current debate:
433:" was closed as "Content has been Merged" by non-admin
948:
categorising a trivial or informative characteristic?
764:
List of diseases and conditions with unusual features
437:
on 20 August after a request made there by nominator
1459:
I'd like input on how I should handle quotations at
1414:If your comment has not appeared here, you can try
692:The debate regarding this material continues, with
628:At the end of that week, on 23 August, Harej again
954:proposes renaming over seventy categories to read
279:Knowledge talk:Manual of Style (dates and numbers)
68:Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
975:, since the "companies don't really sell Belgium"
1526:
934:now re-listed twice without attracting a comment
915:turned on whether summarising primary source is
783:articles about people notable only for one event
651:Knowledge:Deletion guidelines for administrators
429:regarding the unreleased Michael Jackson song "
294:was quick to point out that this approach was
1027:linked to date auto-formatting and therefore
148:
1085:Knowledge talk:Biographies of living persons
826:are contested in respective deletion debates
724:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Nandor Vadas
579:when not used for any encyclopedic purposes.
575:, which seeks to minimize non-free content,
210:reverted this addition as no consensus was "
770:due to a lack of "clear inclusion criteria"
315:(WP:GRAPEVINE) "to non-article namespaces (
224:. However this action proved contentious,
1127:have been made in the week 18ā23 August:
795:has been userfied and a redirect left to
913:Fictional history of the Marvel Universe
422:Michael Jackson's "A Place With No Name"
1417:
733:After almost three years to the day, a
618:However, after discussion, archived at
511:chipped in his thoughts on the matter:
14:
1527:
1247:Talk:Provisional Irish Republican Army
1101:Policy and Guideline improvement drive
1255:Talk:2008 Summer Olympics torch relay
1190:Talk:Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed Al Megrahi
1081:Knowledge:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle
980:Files, templates, redirects and stubs
642:Erik9 contested the close, opening a
413:deletion debates for future editions
184:, opened on 13 August, was closed as
51:
1097:Knowledge talk:Neutral point of view
620:User talk:Harej/Archive09#Your close
489:Knowledge talk:Articles for deletion
451:This prompted the article's creator
385:Knowledge:Bots/Requests for approval
1535:Knowledge Signpost archives 2009-08
1239:Knowledge talk:Requests for comment
1066:, open since 28 May, was closed as
443:Michael Jackson#Posthumous releases
27:
1327:
655:User:Jack Merridew/Blood and Roses
622:, Harej overturned that decision:
603:User:Jack Merridew/Blood and Roses
550:User:Jack Merridew/Blood and Roses
539:User:Jack Merridew/Blood and Roses
53:
31:
28:
1546:
1399:These comments are automatically
1297:(Missed from last week's report)
862:focused on how the subject meets
726:has become a group nomination of
565:Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion
531:offered a case-by-case solution:
495:opened the debate by noting that
169:Full disclosure: Your writer has
864:Knowledge:Notability (academics)
135:
125:
115:
105:
95:
85:
1484:: doing it for free since 2005.
1198:Talk:List of extrasolar planets
728:United States magistrate judges
329:Cyclopia proposed a compromise
311:regarding the applicability of
1410:add the page to your watchlist
1207:Talk:List of Ultima characters
1112:Knowledge talk:Naming conflict
946:Category:Mayflower Descendants
820:Mimic (Dungeons & Dragons)
802:The notability of articles on
632:, this time as having reached
484:Merging during afd discussions
13:
1:
1231:Talk:Athanasius of Alexandria
965:Category:Retailers of Belgium
923:research, with closing admin
899:Knowledge:Notability (people)
897:regarding the application of
781:breaches guidance concerning
743:deleted, then redirect set up
711:False Moshe Ya'alon quotation
1385:
992:IsraeliāPalestinian conflict
346:Cyclopia conceded that they
18:Knowledge:Knowledge Signpost
7:
1473:08:54, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
1450:15:06, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
1440:03:59, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
1133:Talk:Toronto Port Authority
1093:Knowledge talk:Five pillars
879:was withdrawn by nominator
367:or by directly editing the
171:participated in this debate
10:
1551:
1103:has been suggested at the
866:. The article content was
845:Robert Bateman (historian)
735:second deletion nomination
696:expressing the view that:
544:User:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz
302:Heard it on the grapevine?
216:Within the debate itself,
891:speedy deletion candidate
685:the consensus itself and
646:with the rationale that:
593:After robust discussion,
459:that User:Pokerdance had
1271:Knowledge talk:Consensus
1110:Discussion continues at
1089:Knowledge talk:Consensus
932:Me Plus One (Annie song)
887:Stephen Roche (football)
757:Abdul Majeed Khan Marwat
396:University of Washington
381:polling has been spotted
996:this redirect offensive
875:The deletion debate of
824:Lane End Primary School
689:the offending material.
573:non-free content policy
239:re-formatted the counts
1407:.Ā To follow comments,
1332:
1174:Talk:Aesthetic Realism
1036:generational templates
849:nominated for deletion
835:nominated for deletion
833:has been restored and
777:believe an article on
709:Is the article on the
701:
691:
673:
659:
641:
627:
617:
592:
581:
536:
527:
517:
507:
464:
450:
427:second deletion debate
351:
345:
335:
328:
309:initiated a discussion
299:
290:
271:
261:
251:
233:
36:
1331:
1320:"Discussion report" ā
1006:Infobox Assassination
987:Palestinian Holocaust
793:Ra (channeled entity)
697:
678:
665:
647:
637:
623:
612:
597:initially closed the
587:
568:
532:
523:
512:
496:
475:third deletion debate
460:
457:Unionhawk's talk page
446:
347:
341:
330:
324:
295:
285:
267:
257:
246:
229:
194:amend the policy page
176:The debate regarding
35:
1403:from this article's
1125:Requests for comment
1119:Requests for comment
903:Knowledge:Notability
893:was deleted after a
804:The Drunken Dead Guy
747:Knowledge in culture
431:A Place With No Name
394:A research group at
178:television schedules
164:Television schedules
1369:Features and admins
1312:"Discussion report"
1223:Talk:Joseph Barbera
1141:Talk:Caster Semenya
1043:File:Verlinsky1.jpg
1034:A debate regarding
969:Retail companies of
816:Canadian Ivy League
787:While subject to a
561:declined the speedy
465:Although Unionhawk
321:User:ArnoldReinhold
198:verifiable evidence
158:last week's edition
1394:Discuss this story
1374:Arbitration report
1333:
1287:Talk:Modi'in Illit
839:User:SarekOfVulcan
467:initially declined
389:User:Gavin.collins
340:pointed out that:
190:User:Gavin.collins
42:ā Back to Contents
37:
1471:
1418:purging the cache
1379:Technology report
1364:Discussion report
1300:
1295:Talk:Basset Hound
1291:
1283:
1275:
1267:
1259:
1251:
1243:
1235:
1227:
1219:
1211:
1203:
1194:
1186:
1178:
1170:
1161:
1153:
1149:Talk:Maria Cunitz
1145:
1137:
1047:fair use criteria
831:Alan Roger Currie
791:, the article at
630:closed the debate
503:Guide to deletion
473:the article in a
407:Deletion round-up
317:Talk pages mostly
274:Dates and numbers
65:Discussion report
47:View Latest Issue
1542:
1518:
1467:
1428:Peregrine Fisher
1421:
1419:
1413:
1392:
1351:
1343:
1336:
1319:
1311:
1298:
1289:
1281:
1273:
1265:
1263:Talk:Jonny Quest
1257:
1249:
1241:
1233:
1225:
1217:
1209:
1201:
1192:
1184:
1176:
1168:
1159:
1151:
1143:
1135:
1099:. Separately, a
1065:
1059:
1026:
1020:
1010:
1004:
989:
881:User:Niteshift36
762:The deletion of
584:User:Philosopher
509:User:NickPenguin
471:agreed to relist
292:User:Laser brain
153:
139:
138:
129:
128:
119:
118:
109:
108:
99:
98:
89:
88:
59:
57:
55:
1550:
1549:
1545:
1544:
1543:
1541:
1540:
1539:
1525:
1524:
1523:
1522:
1521:
1520:
1519:
1514:
1512:
1507:
1502:
1497:
1492:
1485:
1477:
1476:
1458:
1423:
1415:
1408:
1397:
1396:
1390:+ Add a comment
1388:
1384:
1383:
1382:
1344:
1339:
1337:
1334:
1323:
1322:
1317:
1314:
1309:
1303:
1121:
1076:
1063:
1061:bartending-stub
1057:
1054:deletion debate
1024:
1018:
1008:
1002:
985:
982:
941:
909:deletion debate
789:deletion debate
779:William Kostric
753:deletion debate
706:
675:User:S Marshall
644:deletion review
554:speedy deletion
541:
486:
439:User:Pokerdance
424:
409:
401:User:Commprac01
356:
304:
276:
266:commented that
166:
154:
147:
146:
145:
136:
126:
116:
106:
96:
86:
80:
77:
66:
62:
60:
50:
49:
44:
38:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
1548:
1538:
1537:
1513:
1508:
1503:
1498:
1493:
1488:
1487:
1486:
1479:
1478:
1475:
1457:
1454:
1453:
1452:
1398:
1395:
1387:
1386:
1381:
1376:
1371:
1366:
1361:
1356:
1354:News and notes
1350:
1341:24 August 2009
1338:
1326:
1325:
1324:
1315:
1306:
1305:
1304:
1302:
1301:
1299:17 August 2009
1292:
1290:18 August 2009
1284:
1282:19 August 2009
1276:
1274:19 August 2009
1268:
1266:19 August 2009
1260:
1258:19 August 2009
1252:
1250:19 August 2009
1244:
1242:20 August 2009
1236:
1234:20 August 2009
1228:
1226:20 August 2009
1220:
1218:21 August 2009
1212:
1210:21 August 2009
1204:
1202:21 August 2009
1195:
1193:21 August 2009
1187:
1185:21 August 2009
1179:
1177:21 August 2009
1171:
1169:22 August 2009
1162:
1160:22 August 2009
1154:
1152:22 August 2009
1146:
1144:23 August 2009
1138:
1136:23 August 2009
1129:
1120:
1117:
1116:
1115:
1108:
1075:
1072:
1071:
1070:
1056:regarding the
1050:
1039:
1032:
1015:
999:
981:
978:
977:
976:
962:
956:impact craters
949:
940:
937:
936:
935:
928:
905:
889:, a contested
884:
873:
852:
842:
829:An article on
827:
800:
785:
771:
760:
749:
731:
721:
705:
702:
662:User:Unitanode
611:on 15 August:
540:
537:
485:
482:
435:User:Unionhawk
423:
420:
408:
405:
361:voting is evil
355:
352:
336:However, when
323:reasoned that
303:
300:
275:
272:
218:User:Abductive
165:
162:
144:
143:
133:
123:
113:
103:
93:
82:
81:
78:
72:
71:
70:
69:
64:
63:
61:
58:
54:24 August 2009
45:
40:
39:
30:
29:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1547:
1536:
1533:
1532:
1530:
1517:
1511:
1506:
1501:
1496:
1491:
1483:
1474:
1470:
1466:
1462:
1451:
1448:
1444:
1443:
1442:
1441:
1437:
1433:
1429:
1420:
1411:
1406:
1402:
1391:
1380:
1377:
1375:
1372:
1370:
1367:
1365:
1362:
1360:
1357:
1355:
1352:
1348:
1342:
1335:In this issue
1330:
1321:
1313:
1296:
1293:
1288:
1285:
1280:
1277:
1272:
1269:
1264:
1261:
1256:
1253:
1248:
1245:
1240:
1237:
1232:
1229:
1224:
1221:
1216:
1213:
1208:
1205:
1199:
1196:
1191:
1188:
1183:
1180:
1175:
1172:
1166:
1163:
1158:
1155:
1150:
1147:
1142:
1139:
1134:
1131:
1130:
1128:
1126:
1113:
1109:
1106:
1102:
1098:
1094:
1090:
1086:
1082:
1078:
1077:
1069:
1062:
1055:
1051:
1048:
1044:
1040:
1037:
1033:
1030:
1023:
1016:
1013:
1007:
1000:
997:
993:
988:
984:
983:
974:
970:
966:
963:
961:
957:
953:
950:
947:
943:
942:
933:
929:
926:
922:
918:
914:
910:
906:
904:
900:
896:
892:
888:
885:
882:
878:
874:
872:
871:
865:
861:
857:
856:second debate
853:
850:
846:
843:
840:
836:
832:
828:
825:
821:
817:
813:
809:
805:
801:
798:
794:
790:
786:
784:
780:
776:
772:
769:
765:
761:
758:
754:
750:
748:
744:
741:saw the list
740:
736:
732:
729:
725:
722:
720:
716:
712:
708:
707:
700:
695:
690:
688:
684:
676:
672:
670:
664:noting that:
663:
658:
656:
652:
645:
640:
635:
631:
626:
621:
616:
610:
609:
604:
600:
596:
591:
590:restrictions.
585:
580:
578:
574:
566:
562:
559:
555:
551:
548:
545:
535:
530:
526:
521:
516:
510:
506:
504:
500:
494:
493:User:Flatscan
490:
480:
479:as many weeks
476:
472:
468:
463:
458:
454:
449:
445:, and that a
444:
440:
436:
432:
428:
419:
418:
416:
404:
402:
397:
392:
390:
386:
382:
378:
373:
372:
370:
366:
362:
350:
344:
339:
334:
327:
322:
318:
314:
310:
307:
306:User:Cyclopia
298:
293:
289:
283:
280:
270:
265:
260:
255:
250:
244:
240:
237:
236:User:Firsfron
232:
227:
223:
222:tally opinion
220:attempted to
219:
215:
213:
209:
205:
203:
199:
195:
191:
187:
183:
179:
174:
173:
172:
161:
159:
152:
142:
134:
132:
124:
122:
114:
112:
104:
102:
94:
92:
84:
83:
75:
56:
48:
43:
34:
23:
19:
1481:
1425:
1363:
1347:allĀ comments
1122:
1105:Village Pump
1067:
973:Retailers of
972:
971:rather than
968:
959:
958:rather than
955:
925:User:Spartaz
877:trans (film)
867:
808:Symphony CMS
775:commentators
742:
715:undue weight
698:
686:
682:
679:
668:
666:
648:
638:
634:No Consensus
633:
624:
613:
606:
588:
586:noted that:
576:
569:
542:On 8 August
533:
524:
520:User:Protonk
513:
502:
497:
461:
455:to argue on
453:User:JDelo93
447:
411:
410:
393:
377:Village Pump
374:
358:
357:
348:
342:
338:User:Protonk
331:
325:
296:
286:
268:
258:
247:
245:felt that:
230:
228:noting that
206:
186:no consensus
185:
175:
168:
167:
155:
1516:Suggestions
1401:transcluded
1359:In the news
1200:(Relisted)
1182:Talk:Gaydar
1167:(Relisted)
282:User:Greg L
254:User:BryanG
243:User:Edison
234:Eventually
1463:. Thanks,
1456:Quotations
1447:HereToHelp
1029:deprecated
1022:Start date
939:Categories
870:Chen model
868:merged to
858:regarding
797:Don Elkins
768:considered
755:regarding
713:guilty of
671:AFD part 2
601:regarding
595:User:Harej
577:especially
558:User:Erik9
529:User:Mazca
369:next issue
226:User:Pytom
208:User:Masem
79:Share this
74:Contribute
22:2009-08-24
1510:Subscribe
1405:talk page
1045:meet our
1012:redundant
766:is being
547:nominated
515:smoother.
200:they are
1529:Category
1505:Newsroom
1500:Archives
1482:Signpost
1436:contribs
1424:==Wow==
1310:Previous
921:tertiary
917:original
860:Lin Chen
812:Ding Day
704:Articles
694:User:Lar
683:overturn
518:However
365:tip line
264:User:DGG
121:LinkedIn
101:Facebook
20: |
1074:Briefly
960:craters
667:DRV is
375:At the
354:Polling
288:MOSNUM.
202:notable
111:Twitter
1465:Hiding
895:debate
719:debate
717:? See
687:delete
608:delete
599:debate
252:while
151:Hiding
131:Reddit
91:E-mail
1495:About
1041:Does
994:: is
773:Most
333:page.
16:<
1490:Home
1480:The
1432:talk
1318:Next
1068:keep
1052:The
901:and
847:was
822:and
751:The
737:for
649:Per
552:for
425:The
415:here
319:)".
141:Digg
1434:) (
1123:21
1017:Is
1001:Is
944:Is
919:or
911:on
837:.
745:to
669:not
605:as
277:At
204:".
192:to
149:By
76:ā
1531::
1438:)
1308:ā
1095:;
1091:;
1087:;
1064:}}
1058:{{
1025:}}
1019:{{
1009:}}
1003:{{
990:ā
907:A
818:,
814:,
810:,
806:,
636::
567::
481:.
403:.
379:,
214:"
160:.
1469:T
1430:(
1422:.
1412:.
1349:)
1345:(
1107:.
1049:?
1031:?
1014:?
998:?
417:.
371:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
