258:
66:
73:
93:
295:
268:
53:
83:
278:
103:
63:
113:
451:
It's a decent start, even if you're not satisfied with it yet. At any rate, the effort to give the article some kind of theme is a good idea, whether or not this theme is the right one. Putting a theme together when dealing with disparate subjects can be a challenging art. There's still time left in
211:
Well, it turns out that the article about the
Kardashev scale is not advanced enough to qualify as a featured article either. Problems reported included confusing diagrams and failure to cite sources correctly, making it appear to be original research. Its nomination, which turned out to be a
370:
106:
76:
169:
to a desk in the Rare Books Room because it was deemed pornographic. This triggered an extensive discussion of whether the book could in fact be read elsewhere in the library, and whether the Rare Books Room was restricted to pornographic literature.
33:
223:, who might be described as one of the scientists who helped humanity make significant progress along the Kardashev scale, received overwhelming support and was designated as a new featured article last week. Other articles so honored included
200:, which is apparently used to measure the technological advancement of a civilization based on how much energy it can harness, also went through the featured article nomination process last week. The scale has been applied hypothetically in
454:
Additional thoughts about covering FACs generally, not directed to any topic in particular. Articles that undergo significant change after nomination, or overcome major objections, will probably be of more interest than those that are
116:
96:
312:
39:
339:
208:, but according to the article our present human civilization is not advanced enough to even qualify as a Type I civilization (it registers a "score" of 0.8 instead).
334:
177:
made an attempt to turn things around by revisiting the original comprehensiveness objection. The objection was not resolved and the nomination ultimately failed.
329:
319:
385:
86:
359:
324:
349:
134:
Several articles dealing with controversial topics tried to achieve featured article status last week, but were not successful in their efforts so far.
137:
306:
526:
344:
191:
21:
390:
502:
497:
492:
397:
460:
257:
150:
on 7 January, following a failed nomination last
September. Initially the improved article received an endorsement from
487:
56:
181:
242:
Meanwhile, it appears that being a famous painting can be helpful in becoming a featured picture as well, since
236:
482:
294:
17:
463:
before, that's an extra source to look for something interesting to say about it and its development. --
374:
433:
Or
Everyking will go in there and edit it himself, despite the fact that it's in your user space. —
243:
188:. However, both still had unresolved objections, so it appears the nominations will not succeed.
508:
8:
452:
the coming week to see what happens; events may make you reconsider what to write about.
224:
437:
419:
147:
415:. I twould also be good to have a link to FAC in the article. Otherwise, looks good. —
464:
381:
232:
412:
408:
220:
213:
205:
197:
166:
151:
228:
126:
520:
434:
416:
143:
267:
247:
185:
174:
201:
250:
received this status. A gallery of last week's new featured pictures:
456:
442:
424:
161:
Dbiv also challenged an assertion in the article that Irving's book,
155:
277:
146:
was nominated for featured article status for the second time by
180:
Two articles related to abortion were also nominated last week,
34:
Featured article candidates on controversial subjects struggle
459:
one way or the other. Also, if an article has been a
395:If your comment has not appeared here, you can try
154:, but its comprehensiveness was soon questioned by
518:
124:
216:, received no new support and was rejected.
138:Reading David Irving at the British Library
212:resubmission of a previous nomination by
276:
266:
256:
398:
14:
519:
142:Controversial World War II historian
527:Knowledge Signpost archives 2005-01
27:
293:
28:
538:
380:These comments are automatically
192:Understanding the Kardashev scale
182:Morality and legality of abortion
111:
101:
91:
81:
71:
61:
51:
477:: doing it for free since 2005.
252:
391:add the page to your watchlist
13:
1:
237:Nintendo Entertainment System
196:On a more esoteric note, the
366:
184:and the U.S. court decision
18:Knowledge:Knowledge Signpost
7:
10:
543:
429:22:32, Jan 11, 2005 (UTC)
261:Holbein's portrait of More
461:Collaboration of the week
447:00:11, Jan 12, 2005 (UTC)
467:04:03, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)
244:Hans Holbein the Younger
165:, was restricted by the
281:TRACE image of sunspots
388:. To follow comments,
298:
282:
272:
262:
297:
280:
271:Polydactyly left hand
270:
260:
384:from this article's
225:Matthew Brettingham
219:On the other hand,
375:Discuss this story
340:Arbitration report
299:
283:
273:
263:
446:
445:
428:
427:
399:purging the cache
335:Country infoboxes
287:
286:
534:
511:
441:
440:
423:
422:
402:
400:
394:
373:
317:
309:
302:
253:
233:Cat's Eye Nebula
129:
115:
114:
105:
104:
95:
94:
85:
84:
75:
74:
65:
64:
55:
54:
542:
541:
537:
536:
535:
533:
532:
531:
517:
516:
515:
514:
513:
512:
507:
505:
500:
495:
490:
485:
478:
470:
469:
413:Kardashev Scale
409:Kardashev scale
404:
396:
389:
378:
377:
371:+ Add a comment
369:
365:
364:
363:
330:Writing contest
320:From the editor
310:
307:17 January 2005
305:
303:
300:
288:
246:'s portrait of
221:Albert Einstein
206:science fiction
198:Kardashev scale
194:
167:British Library
140:
131:
130:
123:
122:
121:
112:
102:
92:
82:
72:
62:
52:
46:
43:
32:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
540:
530:
529:
506:
501:
496:
491:
486:
481:
480:
479:
472:
471:
468:
449:
448:
379:
376:
368:
367:
362:
357:
352:
347:
342:
337:
332:
327:
322:
316:
304:
292:
291:
290:
289:
285:
284:
274:
264:
229:Pulaski Skyway
193:
190:
139:
136:
132:
120:
119:
109:
99:
89:
79:
69:
59:
48:
47:
44:
38:
37:
36:
35:
30:
29:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
539:
528:
525:
524:
522:
510:
504:
499:
494:
489:
484:
476:
466:
462:
458:
453:
444:
439:
436:
432:
431:
430:
426:
421:
418:
414:
410:
401:
392:
387:
383:
372:
361:
358:
356:
353:
351:
348:
346:
343:
341:
338:
336:
333:
331:
328:
326:
323:
321:
318:
314:
308:
301:In this issue
296:
279:
275:
269:
265:
259:
255:
254:
251:
249:
245:
240:
238:
234:
230:
226:
222:
217:
215:
209:
207:
203:
199:
189:
187:
183:
178:
176:
171:
168:
164:
159:
157:
153:
149:
148:GeneralPatton
145:
135:
128:
118:
110:
108:
100:
98:
90:
88:
80:
78:
70:
68:
60:
58:
50:
49:
41:
23:
19:
474:
465:Michael Snow
450:
435:Ben Brockert
417:Ben Brockert
406:
360:In the media
354:
325:Server order
313:all comments
241:
218:
210:
195:
179:
172:
163:Hitler's War
162:
160:
144:David Irving
141:
133:
57:PDF download
509:Suggestions
382:transcluded
350:Celebrities
248:Thomas More
186:Roe v. Wade
107:X (Twitter)
457:slam dunks
214:Ctrl build
202:futurology
45:Share this
40:Contribute
22:2005-01-17
503:Subscribe
386:talk page
173:Finally,
127:Johnleemk
521:Category
498:Newsroom
493:Archives
475:Signpost
355:Features
175:Peter O.
97:Facebook
87:LinkedIn
77:Mastodon
31:Features
20: |
443:UE News
425:UE News
405:Hello,
411:, not
235:, and
117:Reddit
67:E-mail
488:About
407:It's
16:<
483:Home
473:The
438:(42)
420:(42)
204:and
156:Dbiv
152:Slim
345:Fvw
125:By
42:—
523::
239:.
231:,
227:,
158:.
403:.
393:.
315:)
311:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.