39:
451:
Mandatory part of the process, taking place seven days after nomination. In exceptional circumstances a bureaucrat may hold the declaration early, or extend the duration in order to make consensus clearer. Experienced editors may declare early if there is no chance of the candidate succeeding, as per
412:
Optional part of the process that runs concurrently with
Advertising and Election, although it is encouraged. The candidate is presented with three standard questions in order to describe what administrative areas the candidate has worked in, what work they are particularly proud of and what (if any)
252:
Gather opinions, thoughts and suggestions from the community on the process. Request feedback on each section of the process, focusing on areas and experiences that have been summarised in the
Reflect phase and suggestions or recommendations on what could be changed to improve the experiences of each
146:
process has been criticised in a number of different ways. The criticism has become a perennial topic of discussion for many years but has not resulted in any significant changes to the process. As such, a process review has been arranged so that the current process can either be validated or so that
350:
This optional part of the process is where a candidate is provided with one-on-one coaching with a more experienced user. The coach assesses the candidate's strengths and weaknesses and recommends further ways in which the candidate can develop themselves. Coaches use individual methods and coaching
177:
This review is intended to be a complete examination of the full end to end process, including supporting and ancillary parts. Using this method, a full appreciation of the process can be gained and each milestone or gate's impact on other sections can be understood. Through this, it is hoped that a
239:
Gather together all information presented by contributors and use it to build a common perception of the current stage of the process. Pull out common opinions, thoughts and themes from the responses and present them using examples and references provided by contributors. Responses will be analyzed
265:
Gather together all information presented by contributors and use it to build a series of recommendations, using common themes and strong suggestions. Perform a risk analysis on each recommendation, ensuring that before it is put forward that it represents a net benefit to the process. Ensure that
425:
Mandatory part of the process that runs concurrently with
Advertising and the Debate. Interested editors can pass either a Support, Oppose or Neutral vote on a candidate. An editor can, if desired, include a rationale, argument or reason for their vote. This reason can then be challenged by other
253:
section. Ask contributors to bear in mind the entire process when making their comments. Strive for as much independent thought as possible, with contributors being able to provide feedback in a number of ways. Seek references and examples from contributors in order to illustrate their thoughts.
226:
Gather opinions, thoughts and suggestions from the community on the current process. Request feedback on each section of the process, commenting on what is seen as working well and what is thought to be problematic. Ask contributors to bear in mind the entire process when making their comments.
181:
In a rare departure for
Knowledge, certain phases of this review will not contain an element of debate. These are the Question and Collate phases. The reasons for this are twofold. Firstly, to allow each contributor to present their opinions without fear of criticism or for the weight of their
484:
Optional part of the process. Administrators can choose to make themselves available for recall or re-confirmation of adminship if requested to do so by a large enough group of editors. Administrators can set their own criteria for recall although default recommendations are provided as per
194:
The review will analyse the entire RfA process end to end, including all milestones, points of concurrency and points of termination. The review will involve multiple phases conducted over a number of weeks. At the conclusion of the review, a report will be presented on this page detailing
213:
Agree the starting point for the review, ensuring that the current understanding is detailed correctly and all information contained inside is accurate. Also ensure that the information contained in this document is not likely to prejudice any possible outcome from the review
185:
As a protection against providing undue weight to a concept, contributors will be encouraged to provide references and examples when providing their feedback. In addition, all feedback will be collated, meaning that similar thoughts and suggestions will be grouped together.
337:
This optional part of the process is where a candidate is invited to take part in a request for adminship. This invitation is likely to come from a potential nominator or co-nominator. Alternatively, it can come from an administrator offering to coach or mentor the
169:
is the process by which the
Knowledge community decides who will become administrators, who are users with access to additional technical features that aid in maintenance. The process has been in use for several years and has come under frequent criticism.
363:
Mandatory part of the process. The nominator provides a rationale, reasoning why the candidate would make a suitable administrator. Co-nominators may add their own viewpoints separately if desired. A candidate can nominate themselves (also known as
498:
Any editor can participate in contributing to this review, both administrators and non-administrators. Exposure to the RfA process in any form is preferred in order to gain insight and feedback based on first-hand experience.
182:
comments to be increased or decreased based on their skills at debating. Instead, common themes and ideas will be pulled out and brought forward for the report. Secondly, to allow contributors to remain anonymous if desired.
502:
Although the
Question Phase is now closed, editors will be invited to read and comment on the report prepared during the Reflect phase, as well as generating suggestions based on the report's findings in the Recommend phase.
227:
Strive for as much independent thought as possible, with contributors being able to provide feedback in a number of ways. Seek references and examples from contributors in order to illustrate their thoughts.
438:
Optional part of the process. At any time following nomination and before declaration, the candidate may withdraw from the process. In this instance, the process is archived at the point of withdrawal and
278:
Report back all findings to the community, inviting further discussion where appropriate. Ensure that the report is clearly laid out, unambiguous, neutral and referenced where possible using examples.
139:. Knowledge administrators have access to a number of tools that can aid in maintenance. Potential candidates pass through a series of mandatory and optional stages before becoming an administrator.
351:
styles rather than any uniform process, although many share similar themes and structures. As well as providing training, some coaches provide mentoring and advice to candidates.
174:
states that although years of discussion have taken place on the process, no consensus has been reached on exactly what elements are problematic or how they should be remedied.
456:. The closing bureaucrat then analyses the debates and votes in order to determine if there is consensus from the community to grant administrator status to the candidate.
53:
Either the page is no longer relevant or consensus on its purpose has become unclear. To revive discussion, seek broader input via a forum such as the
98:
517:
413:
conflicts they have been involved in. The candidate may be set further optional questions by other editors as the debate progresses.
154:: Recommendations from editors are now being reviewed and analyzed, with the goal of generating specific policy proposals.
385:
54:
512:
381:
69:
380:
Restricted part of the process that runs concurrently with the Debate and
Election. Nominations are advertised on
542:
104:
527:
316:
The following sections are deemed out of scope of this review. These may be reviewed separately if required.
89:
109:
94:
469:
84:
522:
266:
the reconsiderations are valid as an end to end overhaul, but can also be implemented in isolation.
136:
324:
397:
8:
547:
391:
25:
396:
on their user page if they wish. Further canvassing is regulated through the guideline
46:
38:
17:
453:
202:. Should a contributor wish, they will be able to submit their feedback anonymously.
171:
493:
536:
486:
198:
Contributors to the review will have the option to be recognised under the
468:
Optional part of the process. Successful candidates are encouraged to use
506:
132:
472:
in order to learn how to use the new options made available to them.
189:
384:
as well as through regularly updated transcludable content such as
157:
131:
process is the mechanism whereby the
Knowledge Community develops
150:
The review will consist of multiple phases and is currently at
240:
on both a qualitative and quantitative (or statistical) basis.
199:
287:
The following sections are deemed in scope of this review
388:. Candidates are also welcome to use templates such as
282:
45:
This page is currently inactive and is retained for
147:clear recommendations for improvement can be made.
534:
178:unified set of recommendations can be reached.
518:Knowledge:Guide to requests for adminship
535:
195:recommendations for the RfA process.
306:Bureaucrat declaration and promotion
33:
386:User:Tangotango/RfA Analysis/Report
13:
291:Candidate selection and invitation
14:
559:
135:on nominated candidates becoming
513:Knowledge:Requests for adminship
382:Knowledge:Requests for Adminship
37:
1:
528:Knowledge:Perennial proposals
303:Debates, elections and voting
357:Nomination and co-nomination
325:Recap of the current process
297:Nomination and co-nomination
7:
10:
564:
470:Knowledge:New admin school
374:Advertising and canvassing
300:Advertising and Canvassing
15:
523:Knowledge:Adminship poll
426:editors if appropriate.
543:Inactive project pages
344:Administrator coaching
309:Training and probation
163:Requests for adminship
70:Requests for Adminship
122:Request for Adminship
398:Knowledge:Canvassing
331:Candidate selection
494:How to participate
454:Knowledge:Not Now
117:
116:
62:
61:
555:
395:
64:
63:
58:
41:
34:
28:
563:
562:
558:
557:
556:
554:
553:
552:
533:
532:
509:
507:Further reading
496:
389:
368:) if they wish.
366:self-nomination
327:
285:
192:
160:
142:Over time, the
67:A Review of the
52:
32:
31:
24:
20:
12:
11:
5:
561:
551:
550:
545:
531:
530:
525:
520:
515:
508:
505:
495:
492:
491:
490:
474:
473:
458:
457:
441:
440:
428:
427:
415:
414:
402:
401:
370:
369:
353:
352:
340:
339:
326:
323:
322:
321:
320:Admin removal.
314:
313:
310:
307:
304:
301:
298:
295:
294:Admin coaching
292:
284:
281:
280:
279:
268:
267:
255:
254:
242:
241:
229:
228:
216:
215:
191:
188:
159:
156:
137:administrators
115:
114:
113:
112:
107:
102:
92:
87:
82:
74:
73:
68:
60:
59:
51:
42:
30:
29:
21:
16:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
560:
549:
546:
544:
541:
540:
538:
529:
526:
524:
521:
519:
516:
514:
511:
510:
504:
500:
488:
483:
482:
481:
480:
479:
471:
467:
466:
465:
464:
463:
455:
450:
449:
448:
447:
446:
437:
436:
435:
434:
433:
424:
423:
422:
421:
420:
411:
410:
409:
408:
407:
399:
393:
387:
383:
379:
378:
377:
376:
375:
367:
362:
361:
360:
359:
358:
349:
348:
347:
346:
345:
336:
335:
334:
333:
332:
319:
318:
317:
311:
308:
305:
302:
299:
296:
293:
290:
289:
288:
277:
276:
275:
274:
273:
264:
263:
262:
261:
260:
251:
250:
249:
248:
247:
238:
237:
236:
235:
234:
225:
224:
223:
222:
221:
212:
211:
210:
209:
208:
203:
201:
196:
190:Review method
187:
183:
179:
175:
173:
168:
164:
155:
153:
148:
145:
140:
138:
134:
130:
129:
124:
123:
111:
108:
106:
103:
100:
96:
93:
91:
88:
86:
83:
81:
78:
77:
76:
75:
71:
66:
65:
56:
50:
48:
43:
40:
36:
35:
27:
23:
22:
19:
501:
497:
477:
476:
475:
461:
460:
459:
444:
443:
442:
431:
430:
429:
418:
417:
416:
405:
404:
403:
373:
372:
371:
365:
356:
355:
354:
343:
342:
341:
330:
329:
328:
315:
286:
271:
270:
269:
258:
257:
256:
245:
244:
243:
232:
231:
230:
219:
218:
217:
206:
205:
204:
197:
193:
184:
180:
176:
166:
162:
161:
158:Introduction
151:
149:
143:
141:
127:
126:
121:
120:
118:
79:
55:village pump
44:
445:Declaration
439:terminates.
548:RfA Review
537:Categories
432:Withdrawal
392:RfX-notice
338:candidate.
85:Discussion
49:reference.
47:historical
246:Recommend
133:consensus
105:Recommend
462:Training
419:Election
220:Question
214:process.
207:Baseline
172:WP:PEREN
90:Question
80:Overview
18:Shortcut
272:Present
259:Collate
233:Reflect
152:Collate
110:Collate
95:Reflect
72:Process
26:WP:RREV
487:WP:AOR
478:Recall
406:Debate
312:Recall
283:Scope
99:stats
394:|a}}
200:GFDL
165:or
119:The
167:RfA
144:RfA
128:RfA
125:or
539::
390:{{
489:.
400:.
101:)
97:(
57:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
