477:, which advertising by definition is not. Even if well segregated from article content, advertising could create an impression that our content is commercially influenced and that our content could be affected by advertisers threatening to withdraw their ads, whether or not this is actually the case. Advertising could discourage contributors, the lifeblood of Knowledge, many of whom object strongly to advertising. Placing ads would also likely decrease the amount of money raised by community fundraising. Also, since we don't allow spam or advertising by users, doing it ourselves would be, at the very least, hypocritical. Finally, the financial situation of the Wikimedia Foundation, which hosts the website, is stable—there is no pressing need to make such a change.
2290:" new users and discourage them from becoming members of the community, as even good-faith contributions are immediately deleted or proposed for deletion. Keep in mind that not all users fully understand our policies and guidelines the minute they start editing. When a brand-new article is started without references, the creator, or another user, is often gathering sources to add later. Many users—both new and experienced—create stubs as a starting point, with the intention of developing them into full-fledged, well-sourced articles. Of course you are free to tag such pages, and to help clear the backlog of
950:"meta-template" used by the templates means that they are not nearly as cluttered-looking as they were before 2007. The implementation costs would be large: About a million articles have maintenance tags, and moving them all to talk pages would be a massive undertaking, even using a bot or spreading the work out over many months. The documentation on all the templates, several editing help pages, and any bot or script that edits or reads maintenance tags would have to be updated manually.
3320:. Having to decide which sites to include and which not would potentially cause issues in the community where Knowledge would rather remain neutral. The copy-and-paste facility in most computer operating systems already allows people to copy links and paste them into a much wider range of websites than any share or like implementation ever could. In addition, there are potential privacy issues with many "like"/"share" implementations. Most network-sites provide
65:
736:
is not identical to the first source, and therefore is never truly equal in all particulars. Many academic journals eventually release papers, and more books are being digitized, so "unavailable" sources may become freely available later. What appears to be free in your country or computer network may not be free everywhere. Knowledge already has a systemic bias in favor of freely available online sources (called the
2650:, there are always exceptions. The encyclopedia should not lose out on a good candidate just because they have not achieved an arbitrary number of edits or does not frequent a particular area of the encyclopedia. Having a set minimum edit count may not lower the number of failed RfAs substantially, because an otherwise poor candidate could edit just for the sake of meeting the requirements. In addition,
643:
strong source will be deemed unreliable if the claim is unrelated to the source's contents (e.g., a source about electricity being cited for information about a celebrity). Although it may be possible to define a minimum threshold below which sources are never acceptable as reference for
Knowledge content, it appears presumptuous to define all sources
3092:
sections, being fluid, are assigned numbers on the page they are situated on, but adding or removing sections above it will change the number. The name of the section can also be changed easily and new sections can be created with the same name. This does not apply to pages which are transcluded within other pages, but this setup is not commonly used.
1993:
edits to the article and aren't concerned whether or not it's deleted. Regardless, editors are encouraged to notify the original author or the main contributors of an article when their article is nominated for deletion, as it is considered courteous; this is strictly optional. This puts fewer requirements for a deletion proposal than for a
1063:; the reason for the existing order follows a logical progression from on-wiki to off-wiki information. About the names of the section headings, different academic fields use different terms, and Knowledge editors do not want to impose the convention preferred by one academic discipline on articles in another discipline.
3281:
There is little if any reason for such a move and we would still need to keep a cross-namespace redirect at the current title to avoid breaking probably millions of incoming links. The Main Page in its modern form dates to 2002, before the modern namespace system fully crystallized, and was placed by
2565:
The
Wikimedia Foundation may require an RFA-style process to access some specific permissions anyway, such as viewing deleted revisions. Therefore, it does not make sense to have people go through one RFA to just get a subset of these tools and then later go through a second RFA if they want the full
1860:
Most custom signatures cause little or no trouble. In addition, they are popular throughout
Knowledge, and forcing users to give them up would create more trouble than it would be worth. It is better to deal with unacceptable signatures on a case-by-case basis than to issue a blanket prohibition that
642:
Assessing the reliability of sources requires sound editorial judgment, not strict adherence to a list of rules. Whether a source is reliable depends on how the source relates to the material: a very weak source may be reliable for a very small claim, such as "this source was published", while a very
297:, and some proposals that remained on this page for a long time have finally been proposed in a way that reached consensus, but you should address rebuttals raised in the past if you make a proposal along these lines. If you feel you would still like to do one of these proposals, then raise it at the
3443:
In desktop view, a link to the disclaimers appears on the bottom of all pages. In mobile web view, the disclaimers can be accessed from any page via the three-bar settings menu in the upper left-hand corner. The official
English Knowledge app has no interface link to the disclaimers, but they can be
1992:
Excessive bureaucracy; people are expected to keep pages important to them on their watchlist. The "first creator" is meaningless for many articles, as this person may have long since left or made few contributions; "everybody" can number several hundred people, including those who have made trivial
1894:
This conflicts with our mission at a fundamental level: our purpose is to create an encyclopedia, not to provide a place for people to hold random discussions on various topics. Similarly, we are not here to endorse any particular external sites for such discussion; people interested in finding such
1716:
Talk pages are not intended as a permanent record of a user's misbehavior. Warnings are frequently placed incorrectly or spuriously. Removal of warnings other than to archive them is strongly discouraged, but does constitute definitive proof that the warning was seen, and can still lead to escalated
1232:
The actual location and formatting of the attribution is merely required to be "reasonable to the medium" and "at least as prominent as the credits for the other contributing authors". The assertion that linking to a file description page is not "reasonable to the medium" of a hypertext encyclopedia
735:
Editors should use the best sources available to them, regardless of cost or format. The content policies require that it be possible for someone to verify a given statement—not that it be quick, easy, and free for you to verify it. A "replacement" source that is available online and/or without cost
466:
To cover server costs, or for some other public good such as charity, Knowledge should add advertisements to its pages. The ads could be highly targeted, unobtrusive textual ads similar to those used by Google. Revenues would be very high based on
Knowledge's very high search engine ranking for many
2325:
Pages should be immune to deletion for a certain amount of time after their creation and/or XFD/PROD/speedy nomination. This would give editors time to improve the page or convince editors of its subject's importance, and would help make
Knowledge more friendly and inviting for new users. There may
1228:
While the CC license deed (a summary, not legally binding) says attribution is to be provided "in the manner specified by the author or licensor", this does not mean that the author/licensor can require specific fonts, colors, wording, or placement of the credit. Looking at the actual license (the
2336:
are carefully written so that articles can be speedily deleted only if no
Knowledge-compliant article is possible at this time or the content is so dangerous to the encyclopedia it must be removed immediately. A mandatory grace period would also be excessively bureaucratic, and would make it more
1221:
Prominently crediting some images without crediting all, including the various icons used in maintenance templates, could itself prove problematic by seemingly valuing some people's contributions over others'. The same applies to prominently crediting image contributions without doing so for text
1140:
If academics can't find a single system suitable for all fields, why would one system work for
Knowledge? An extreme amount of time and effort would be necessary to (1) develop, or even agree on, a comprehensive house style that covers most or all situations, and (2) implement it on all 6,884,348
1664:
rules. Very few active users choose names that are difficult to type, so the problem is quite small. Being able to type a name is not necessary, as names can be copied or ignored. Furthermore, banning non-Latin usernames would cause difficulty on
Wikipedias in languages that do not use the Latin
1618:
It's already an option in the user preferences, and forcing (or reminding) users to enter edit summaries may annoy them enough they will not save their (possibly constructive) edits. Forcing users to type something in the edit summary box does not mean that they will provide accurate, honest, or
1899:
violations, block or ban disruptive users, and so on, which would reduce the time these people (likely Admins) have to spend on activities that do improve the encyclopedia. Occasionally it is claimed that these forums could provide a place for original research to be "peer reviewed"; this would
3091:
While many users support the use of such a feature, the technical implementation of this feature is difficult, if not impossible with the current version of MediaWiki. At the moment, watchlisting is done on a page-by-page basis, as each page is assigned a unique ID number in the database. Page
578:
reliable sources, not on the opinions or beliefs of editors. The community refuses to let editors delete well-sourced material if they believe the sources are wrong or to include material merely because they personally believe the unpublished, unsourceable material to be true. Adding unsourced
3224:
Few pages in most of these namespaces are linked or navigated to directly (using browser search boxes or direct URL manipulation) often enough that the savings of a few characters for a few users is worth the hassle for the rest of the community. Those few pages that are can be handled with
2545:
There should be some kind of "partial admin" that gets certain admin powers, but not all of them, such as only being allowed to block IP users or only being able to delete pages. Or, new admins should undergo a probationary period, which may include limited abilities or desysopping on
2730:
Many editors object that a system like this would be too open to abuse by editors who have been disciplined by admins for violating policy. While there has generally been consensus that such a system should exist in principle, there is disagreement on the requirements for filing a
1521:
A large portion of our good edits come from IP addresses; positive experiences with initial IP edits lead users to create accounts who otherwise would not do so; software features disabling IPs from creating new articles or editing semiprotected ones are sufficient. According to
2794:
Lack of need; admin workload is not high enough to justify this. There are also possible security concerns; if users could delete pages in their userspace, they would be able to move pages to their user space and delete them. This ability also gives the impression of user space
3484:
As of May 2023, there are 6,275 featured articles and 1,541 former featured articles (1,611 that have lost featured status minus 70 that have regained it). If you divide the 1541 former featured articles by the 6275 articles that have ever been featured, 24% of FAs have been
1563:
2694:
in 2017 determined that editors must be at least extended confirmed to nominate/self-nominate someone for adminship without the request being reviewed by someone else first. Both proposals were enacted to prevent futile RfAs of very new editors who didn't know
815:
appropriate, encyclopedic information, which often means adding citations to reliable sources for editors who did not name sources at the time the material was added. Increasing the requirements discourages new editors, and would destroy most of
Knowledge's
1538:(Prohibiting IP edits would not eliminate 97% of all vandalism, where all vandalism is about 8% of all users, because those inclined to vandalize could easily take the 10 seconds to register.) The ability of anyone to edit articles without registering is a
556:
merely being true in the opinion of an editor. The most common proposal is to require not only that all material be verifiable, but that all material also be true in the opinion of editors. The second most common proposal is to require that material be
3372:
435:
employs legal counsel to advise on whether and when such measures are necessary, and editors may rest assured that appropriate Knowledge policies will inform them of any such needed measures, such as removal of copyrighted material. Please do not make
1125:
Knowledge should establish a house citation style applicable to all articles. This would improve consistency between articles and/or make citing sources easier for new users. Past suggestions include an outside style guide/prescribed format (such as
356:. Our mission is to document human knowledge, no matter how unpleasant or offensive it may be to some people. It is impossible to draw a line between "offensive" and "non-offensive" content that satisfies all cultural, religious and political norms.
2449:
2895:
1887:
People should be allowed to discuss the topic of the article on talk pages, instead of limiting discussion to improvement of the article. Or forums of some sort should be created to allow this, either on Knowledge or elsewhere and linked from all
2193:
forums. Users should be made aware of the very real possibility that the article will in fact be deleted at the end of the discussion (the result for perhaps three-quarters of nominated articles). AFD is already very large and would become even
1717:
warnings. All warnings continue to be available in the page history regardless of whether or not they have been removed from the page's current revision. Revert warring to keep a warning on a user's talk page is disruptive and constitutes "
1201:
There is no need to clutter articles with this information. Credit is already provided for the majority of images by linking them to the file description page, which includes authorship, licensing, and more. (The exceptions to this are
551:
stated, "The threshold for inclusion is verifiability, not truth". This meant that the absolute minimum standard for including material in Knowledge is that it be possible to verify it; the minimum standard for including material is
877:
While some featured articles deteriorate in quality, this is not a widespread problem. Since the featured article program began in 2004, 24% of promoted articles have been de-featured as of 2023, and this is mainly due to increased
881:
In regards to vandalism, our featured articles are not specifically targeted by vandals, and are among the most-watched pages on Knowledge. Short-term semi-protection and blocks are more than adequate to deal with featured article
2441:
RfA is a discussion and people may need to be able to ask questions they find pertinent towards making a decision. People should be able to ask the questions they want/need to ask to make an assessment based upon their individual
2576:
It would also increase wasteful overhead, because even admins with the "wrong" powers would have to find, explain the situation to, and request help from someone with the correct power, instead of stopping the problem instantly
2232:
939:
Every reader is a potential editor and the maintenance tags give potential editors ideas of how to improve an article. Some tags also serve as warnings to readers about potentially problematic and low-quality content. The
846:. Alternatively, featured articles could be split into two pages: a protected page showing the article as it appeared when originally promoted, and a separate "Draft" version for any future editing the articles may need.
1854:. Personalized signatures (colored text, CSS, HTML, special characters, etc.) are inherently disruptive, draw too much attention to the user, are often poorly designed, and/or take up too much space in the edit window.
292:
several times in the past. It should be noted that merely listing something on this page does not mean it will never happen or is to be rejected on sight, but that it has been discussed before and never met consensus.
2874:
2078:
3364:
1246:
2763:
3360:
2920:
are generally disregarded anyway. Bureaucrats are empowered and able to discern such activity on an RfA and factor it in appropriately. Vandalism and troll behavior at RfA is low and handled already by current
2679:
2787:
to administer their user space, with the tools technically limited to that space only. This has been proposed in a number of different ways, ranging from individual abilities (such as deletion), to full admin
1215:
Mistaken credit of images taken from Knowledge (e.g. crediting them to "Knowledge" rather than the actual authors) is an issue, but it is not evident that this would be significantly affected by this proposal.
858:
over time, rather than deteriorate. Although a featured article "exemplifies our very best work and features professional standards of writing and presentation", there is, and always will be, room for further
2573:. This means that a protection-only semi-admin, for example, would sometimes deploy page protection when a user block would be far more appropriate, because page protection is the only tool available to them.
1463:
Having GNG be a policy would be overly-restrictive on articles that could be included on Knowledge and preclude the use of common sense. More discretion in deletion discussions is preferred to a clear policy.
2940:
1861:
would anger many users, with few or no benefits. Furthermore, a user whose username uses non-Latin characters could use a custom signature to display an alternate name that English speakers could understand.
1099:
It could cause confusion. Many editors may not realize that they cannot use images under this license for any purpose, and hence inadvertently violate the licensing policy for these kinds of images by doing
2627:
To reduce the number of failed RFAs, all candidates should meet certain requirements, such as a minimum edit count, contributions to featured content, or participation in internal Knowledge processes like
1764:
Some people get missed for weeks at a time, or never welcomed at all. Would it not be better to have a bot drop one of the welcome templates on newcomers' pages instead of depending upon volunteers of the
3516:
style guide (all physical sciences) in naming the primary list of citations "References"; this proposal usually comes from someone who is familiar with the conventions used in history or the humanities.
395:. In an encyclopedia, it is expected that articles on sexual subjects should be illustrated as such. In addition, standards about what is and is not acceptable for pictures vary widely between cultures.
3013:
2767:
2379:
Text and files copyright violations are dealt with in different ways. It is possible to revert to a previous version to remove text copyright violations, but it is not possible to do so for files. A
2928:
2402:
1209:
Maintaining these in-article credits would be a significant maintenance burden on our editors, so there should be a similarly significant advantage to doing it. Such advantage has not been evident.
2569:
Many common problems require access to multiple tools (e.g., RevDel, blocking, and page protection for BLP vandalism). Having only a small subset also results in non-optimal responses due to the
893:
2394:
1212:
The existing model of attribution has so far proven to be widely successful, despite resistance by a small number of copyright holders to allowing use of their images without in-article credit.
978:
974:
957:
1385:
3310:
Knowledge pages should have a "Like" button or "Share" widget to enable users to tag their favourite articles and to share article content on Facebook, Twitter/X and other social media sites.
2889:
This would create major problems for the Wikimedia Foundation's legal department. The legal department requires that admin rights only be granted to users who have undergone community review.
2950:
1013:) should be changed to the system preferred by the editor/a particular professional field/the editor's school. These proposals may involve changing the names of the sections (e.g., changing
2490:
Reconfirmation "on demand" has faced objections about potential abuse. Although no proposal for mandatory reconfirmation has achieved consensus, some administrators have voluntarily joined
3193:
Along the lines of the existing WP: → Knowledge: and WT: → Knowledge talk: namespace aliases, TT: → Template talk:, U: → User:, UT: → User talk:, P: → Portal:, CAT: → Category:, and so on.
2406:
970:
3247:
2410:
1236:
Providing in-article credit for some but not all images might possibly fall afoul of the CC BY license's "at least as prominent as the credits for the other contributing authors" clause.
425:
Because of such-and-such law, Knowledge must do so-and-so (e.g. implement censorship as above, or require identification of editors, or defer certain rulings to the U.S. Supreme Court).
3368:
2332:
PROD and XFD already have "grace periods" built in, so editors should have ample time to find sources or otherwise improve problematic articles, if possible. As for speedy deletion,
1254:
1141:
articles with sources, even with the help of one or more bots. Any benefits of a single encyclopedia-wide house style pale in comparison to the massive scope of such an undertaking.
3260:
3256:
3344:
2479:
There are 850 administrators. Periodically reconfirming them would be an onerous and time-consuming process. For example, with annual reconfirmation, there would be 15+ reviews
1262:
1039:
Policies and guidelines document "actual good practices". Most proposals fail to demonstrate that their proposed practice is an emerging, sustainable alternative to the current
318:
Certain Knowledge pages should display content warnings or disclaimers, such as "This article contains sexually explicit images" or "This article is not suitable for children".
2185:
The purpose of AfD is in fact to decide whether or not to delete an article. Lesser issues such as mergers or renaming should be discussed on the talk page or at the separate
3036:
Watchlists are currently private for each logged-in user. Watchlist functionality should be public so that a given watchlist could be managed by all members of a wikiproject.
929:
from the head of article pages to the article talk pages. Some proposals recommend all tags be moved, and others only propose moving some tags. Moving templates would reduce
986:
1554:
For privacy reasons, the Foundation has stated that the public display of IP addresses will be terminated at an unspecified date, probably in 2024. They intend to deploy a
1526:, "what is commonly called 'anonymous' editing is not particularly anonymous ... and there are good reasons to want vandals on IP numbers instead of accounts". While about
1329:
3376:
2398:
1229:"legal code"), this seems to be referring to the author/licensor's ability to choose the name to be attributed, the title of the work, and the canonical URL for the work.
982:
2936:
3009:
3392:
3199:
Adding shortcuts comes with an increase in complexity that the community in general does not feel is justified by the added convenience. Contributing factors include:
2086:
1956:
On occasion the community has imposed specific limitations on specific editors, demonstrating that issue can be handled on a case-by-case basis without a general rule.
268:
2932:
2517:
1193:
Knowledge should include bylines or some other sort of in-article credit for images used in articles. It is sometimes also claimed this is required by CC BY licenses.
3424:
3396:
3184:
2774:
612:
Knowledge should define the reliability of particular types of sources so that no exceptions are possible, and only sources defined as reliable may be used for the
3356:
1878:
1566:
has been published on the results. The Persian Knowledge similarly experimented with ending IP editing, but decided that an anti-vandal bot fit their needs better.
1531:
1250:
990:
3017:
1895:
places should use a search engine. Additionally, hosting such discussions would require volunteers or staff to monitor and/or moderate these discussions, delete
1739:
tags and requests for uninvolved administrator help, and templates and notes on anonymous IP user talk pages that indicate other users share the same IP address.
966:
2856:
3384:
1665:
alphabet, as speakers of those languages may not be able to enter Latin characters with their keyboards and would have a difficult time in choosing a username.
1258:
804:
408:
proposes user-configurable options. In August 2011, a referendum on how to permit users to suppress types of images they personally deem unwanted was begun at
3352:
3348:
1218:
Including in-article credits would increase the incentive for people to "spam" their images into articles in an attempt to use Knowledge for free advertising.
2458:
While there has been no consensus to ban "canned" questions, they have routinely been criticized as being ineffective and adding little value to the process.
1548:
IP addresses have been unable to create pages in the main namespace since 2005, and are subject to other restrictions such as not being able to vote in RfAs.
579:
material or deleting well-sourced material on the basis of editors' personal beliefs can result in biased, unbalanced articles and frequently does result in
208:
3072:
2247:}} to the top of the page. Users wishing to permanently leave can have a global renamer rename their account with a generic username not tied to them under
777:
that supports it. Any material added without a reliable source should be promptly removed. All articles without references should be deleted, regardless of
2525:
2236:
2016:
This defeats the purpose of deletion, which is to improve Knowledge quality by getting rid of the worst parts; also, it would increase the workload of the
1169:
161:
3340:
2521:
1527:
2708:
There should be a community-based process for removing adminship. Currently, the only way to involuntarily remove adminship outside of emergencies is by
1966:
1413:
Use any color except red to identify links to non-existent articles. The usual reasons are that red is an aggressive color or that it is too easy to see.
386:
Images of a sexual, obscene, emotionally disturbing, religiously offensive or disgusting nature should be hidden from all users or even deleted entirely.
2896:
Knowledge:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 116 § RFA reform Proposal: Automatic admintools to users with 1 year of registration and 3000 mainspace edits
2231:. Even if it was not technically impossible, there would still be legal limitations on the implementations of this idea, particularly violations of our
3295:
1745:
930:
483:
176:
171:
1558:
system. The general public will see "User:~2024 1234" in logs and history pages, but experienced editors will be able to reveal the IP addresses. The
2201:
1394:
508:
3282:
default in the main namespace. It has remained there since largely due to inertia and lack of a solid reason to move it to another namespace. Being
2993:
Users should be able to have multiple watchlists so that they can group the pages they watch and not have to see all watched pages in one huge list.
405:
88:; rather, its purpose is to explain certain aspects of Knowledge's norms, customs, technicalities, or practices. It may reflect differing levels of
3388:
2491:
2811:
2120:
requires consensus for deletion as well as for edits. (One exception: Biographies that are entirely negative in tone and unsourced are considered
3496:
3275:
Since the Main Page isn't an article, it should go in another namespace such as "Knowledge:" or "Portal:" rather than stay in the main namespace.
2295:
166:
2699:
1584:
1354:
1641:
1608:, they should automatically be reminded that no summary has been provided and given another opportunity to include one. (Registered users can
3408:
3380:
1835:
3266:
2766:, a rough consensus was in favor of establishing a procedure for community-based recall of administrators. Implementation details are still
2749:
2509:
1595:
2611:
698:, which dealt with an attempted merger of the verifiability, no original research and reliable sources pages into a single official policy.
666:
392:
349:
186:
47:
31:
2167:
from "Articles for deletion" to "Articles for discussion" in order to seem less confrontational and/or to match some other forums such as
1986:
The first creator, or everybody who has contributed to an article, must be warned on their talk page of a deletion debate of that article.
2910:
New editors lack the knowledge and experience to appropriately evaluate an RfA candidate. This also would eliminate vandalism and trolls.
2349:
2299:
1572:
517:
It is wildly impractical and there is no agreement on which style should be chosen, which has in the past resulted in repeated, needless
39:
2831:
in the country in which they reside. This would provide legal protection for the editor and possibly also for the Wikimedia Foundation.
2287:
1718:
226:
2341:
in your userspace in certain limited cases. If you believe a page was deleted mistakenly or out of process, you are free to request a
73:
2753:
2691:
1947:
1841:
1453:
should become project-wide policy, requiring all articles to meet it or be deleted. Some versions of this proposal continue to allow
862:
Featured articles are not "finished" articles. Not only do they need further editing in response to changes in the topic itself, our
2883:
An editor who has edited for a certain period of time and made a certain number of edits would be automatically granted admin rights
1970:
1429:
2257:
2129:
527:
3301:
1504:
651:-level) definition of reliable sources is impractical. Furthermore, strict rules about what type of source is permitted amount to
2103:
1755:
1173:
531:
1384:
was added to the Main Page every Monday and Friday in 2011, and minor tweaks have been done since 2006. Another major change is
1134:), a system preferred by the user's school or teacher(s), and/or a unique style that would meet the specific needs of Knowledge.
764:
2513:
2333:
2125:
2028:
by the Wikimedia Foundation legal counsel. If you have a plausible reason for seeing a particular page, then you can request a
1736:
1535:
1367:
Although some consensus exists that certain changes are in order, no particular change or specific redesign has had consensus.
662:
231:
1936:
Something like "people can only nominate three articles per day", "articles cannot be nominated more than once per year", etc.
1321:
Including the state makes it clear that the article is about a US municipality, which can be helpful with lesser known places.
3331:
2043:
1697:
871:
1795:
Many vandals are exposed when one of their edits receives extra scrutiny because their user or talk page shows as a redlink.
1080:
3563:
3288:, the Main Page doesn't particularly belong in any of the other namespaces either (with the possible exception of Portals).
744:; this bias may distort its contents, and institutionalizing such a recommendation would only further exacerbate this bias.
370:
275:
3099:
498:
3573:
3467:
3202:
Some namespaces, such as User:, Help:, and Talk:, are already so short that further abbreviation is not really necessary.
3174:
2745:
2471:
Administrators should have their status reconfirmed through RFA or an RFA-like process, either periodically or on demand.
863:
2483:. Endorsements of uncontroversial admins would consume much of the schedule, while the "wait time" to review admins who
2337:
difficult to delete copyright violations and attack pages, even if there are exceptions for such cases. You can already
2261:
900:
3413:
3115:
2735:
should be. Many want very strict requirements for a desysop, while some want it no more difficult, or easier, than the
2601:
2070:
1910:
1776:
1620:
1580:
589:
1867:
3106:
2384:
2338:
2291:
1994:
1732:
648:
240:
85:
1654:
characters, non-English alphabets, and/or any characters that are not easy to type on "standard" computer keyboards.
1247:
Knowledge talk:Manual of Style/Captions/Archive 2 § RfC: Requiring photo credits in footnotes for copyrighted images
2977:
2383:
may be added to non-free files that would otherwise qualify for F9, which is not possible for text. When they were
1562:
does not allow unregistered editors to edit articles (but allows them to edit talk pages and other namespaces) and
1523:
1381:
866:
for featured articles change over time. For example: In Knowledge's early days, most featured articles did not use
750:
196:
3081:
Allow specific sections of pages to be watchlisted, so editors can monitor small portions of large pages, such as
2837:
No consensus to implement this; editors are free to use age as a personal rationale for opposing adminship on RfA.
1206:
and public domain images used as icons, where the file description page still exists but is sometimes not linked.)
1184:
1116:
538:
3472:
3021:
2824:
2654:
are not a reliable indicator of an editor's experience or competence. It is better to evaluate candidates on the
2629:
2088:
2001:
1927:
1707:
1358:
754:
691:
597:
568:. It is usually motivated by a desire to reduce errors in Knowledge or increase Knowledge's scholarly reputation.
17:
2494:, agreeing to stand for reconfirmation if requested to do so by a sufficient number of editors in good standing.
1609:
1268:
2200:
This proposal was favorably received in 2009, but technical difficulties and inertia prevented the change; see
1977:
1901:
1681:
800:
633:
593:
294:
217:
81:
2901:
996:
409:
3153:
1871:
1766:
1419:
Red has been used for so many years that its meaning is established among editors. There is no evidence that
401:
93:
2435:, limit the types of questions asked, not allow additional questions to be asked, or ban "canned" questions.
1404:
795:
for someone to name a reliable source that supports it. Sourcing policies require inline citations only for
3568:
2687:
2529:
2280:. This may apply to all articles, newly created articles, or certain types of articles (BLPs, for example).
2267:
2248:
1792:
If a bot is used, it is cold and impersonal, and the bot is incapable of mentoring and assisting newcomers.
1152:
782:
621:
337:
329:
325:
289:
181:
2618:
1440:
702:
2868:
2639:
2277:
1728:
1576:
843:
839:
345:
870:. Today, a proposal to promote such an article to "featured" status would have no chance of surviving a
3578:
3525:
3513:
3419:
3243:
3226:
2558:
A "partial admin" process would at least double the already considerable frictional effort expended at
2365:(deletion of text that is obviously copyright infringement). Both authorize speedy deletion of obvious
2172:
2143:
1433:
1398:
1293:
1110:
1033:
last), or changing the formatting (e.g., long lists of references should be hidden in a scrolling box).
867:
774:
695:
625:
617:
333:
2422:
3454:
3210:
3164:
by forcing MediaWiki to contact the server for CAPTCHA verification). Using third-party servers is a
2597:
2342:
2316:
2208:
2176:
1922:
1635:
1492:
1155:
to be a de-facto 'house style', however, the use of these is neither encouraged nor discouraged (see
1131:
565:
341:
148:
2462:
1467:
829:
3206:
3066:
2976:
Note that extensive styling of nearly every aspect of one's watchlist is possible through CSS; see
2784:
2276:
Knowledge should automatically delete articles that do not cite at least one source, via speedy or
2224:
2150:
subjects when there is no consensus for keeping the article and the subject has requested deletion.
1962:
808:
678:
446:
2984:
2536:
2038:
Some articles that are unsuitable in their present state but have potential are often turned into
3149:
3105:
allows editors to subscribe to specific talk page sections. This can be enabled by navigating to
1661:
1160:
896:
there was consensus to semi-protect today's featured article for the day before to the day after.
629:
548:
1904:, even if the "peer review" turned out to be much more rigorous than can be reasonably expected.
603:
377:
2025:
1784:
1780:
580:
518:
298:
3027:
2580:
It's confusing. People won't know who can deal with a problem, especially inexperienced users.
1692:
1340:
3317:
3062:
2713:
2570:
2498:
2228:
2121:
2010:
Make deleted pages visible to everybody (or to all logged-in users), not just administrators.
1588:
1311:
1073:
758:
353:
118:
3425:
Knowledge:FAQ/Main Page § Why doesn't the cursor appear in the search box, like with Google?
2562:, as users debate who gets full administrator powers versus who gets only partial abilities.
2179:
would be merged into AFD, as the equivalent processes are at the XFD "for discussion" pages.
2042:
for later improvement. Also, several long-standing deleted hoax articles are preserved (see
1943:
1539:
652:
125:
3053:
2651:
2593:
2113:
1851:
1798:
The bot would make thousands of pointless edits welcoming vandals and non-editing accounts.
1559:
1300:
1277:
Remove the state from the titles of articles about unambiguously-named US places. Example:
1127:
1089:
Allow uploading and use of media which is licensed under a non-commercial license (such as
778:
674:
432:
1818:
they created their account within the past 36 hours and have since made at least 10 edits.
8:
2844:
2240:
2117:
2017:
1555:
716:
575:
261:
111:
89:
1255:
Knowledge:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 25 § Photograph attribution in image captions
288:
This is a list of things that have been frequently proposed on Knowledge, and have been
2589:
2555:
If we can't trust people to use their tools sensibly, they don't become admins. Period.
1810:
1749:
1457:, while others attempt to do away with those and have GNG be the only governing policy.
1420:
1106:
812:
708:
670:
491:
103:
3257:
Knowledge:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 68 § Proposal for an alias to templatespace
2970:
1263:
Knowledge:Village pump (policy)/Archive AZ § Image attribution under CC-Attrib license
3261:
Knowledge:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 127 § Prefix suggestion: TP: for Template:
3119:
3043:
3000:
2954:
2875:
Automatically grant adminship to users with a certain number of edits or time editing
2683:
2669:
2501:
process can address problems that arise from accusations of administrator misconduct.
2309:
2133:
2106:(BLPs) where there is no consensus for keeping the article should result in deletion.
1672:
1605:
1315:
1278:
1177:
1156:
487:
3214:
3160:
will not let us run it on our own servers (so it would introduce a dependency on an
2361:(deletion of files that are obviously copyright infringement) should be merged into
3540:
2864:
2709:
2647:
2244:
2079:
Knowledge:Village pump (proposals)/Persistent proposals/Straw poll for view-deleted
2039:
2029:
2024:
visible to everybody. The proposal to allow access to all deleted content has been
1515:
Everybody should register an account before editing; IP addresses are insufficient.
1304:
913:
796:
741:
3536:
3102:
2588:
Several permissions are available to trustworthy non-admins upon request, such as
885:
A link to the "originally featured version" is already available on the talk page.
309:
2828:
2813:
2380:
2370:
2057:
1318:. Always appending the state produces a consistent and predictable set of titles.
1148:
1090:
1069:
437:
3178:
2800:
3296:
Knowledge:FAQ/Main Page § Why is the Main Page in the main (article) namespace?
2804:
2732:
2721:
2643:
944:
474:
51:
3205:
Some proposed shortcuts, such as TT: → Template talk:, conflict with existing
3126:
2116:, most BLP-related problems do not require deletion of the article. Policy on
933:, reduce clutter, and reserve article space for information about the subject.
3557:
3082:
2917:
2852:
2796:
2736:
2559:
2432:
2362:
2168:
2164:
2099:
2061:
2053:
1896:
1685:
1673:
no usernames are permitted to contain Unicode characters unrelated to writing
1454:
1450:
682:
647:
that threshold as "reliable". For this reason, a universally applicable (or:
43:
35:
2855:
non-disclosure agreement, which requires those to be 18 and older. See also
2958:
2848:
2662:
of their edits. Finally, no one agrees on what the prerequisites should be.
2366:
2358:
2190:
2186:
1806:
1333:
1310:
Repeated or otherwise ambiguous placenames are very common in the US (e.g.
923:
3148:
The primary reasons for rejection were given by Brooke Vibber, our former
729:
Editors should use sources that anyone can read immediately, without cost.
416:
3321:
3284:
1483:
791:
The policy is that material must be verifiable, that is, that it must be
613:
2518:
Knowledge:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 70 § Time limits on adminship
457:
364:. Furthermore, once a page has loaded, the disclaimer is often too late.
2916:
There is already a prohibition on IPs from 'voting' on RfA. New and/or
2843:
Certain user rights typically occupied by administrators, specifically
2154:
1675:, although usernames registered before that time were grandfathered in.
1619:
useful edit summaries. Manually added edit summaries also suppress the
737:
1495:
pulls in the latest stable and preview release versions from Wikidata.
669:. Strong community consensus results in a source being classified as "
3509:
3152:, who stated that reCAPTCHA is proprietary (Wikimedia prefers to use
3136:
2020:
body to ensure that copyright violations and libelous statements are
1971:
List of articles that have been nominated for deletion more than once
1824:
the user has not been blocked from editing at any point since joining
1821:
the user has not already received an invitation to visit the Teahouse
1350:
1251:
Knowledge:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 76 § Attribution of images
803:
for supplying these citations. Inline citations are not required for
450:
1259:
Knowledge:Village pump (policy)/Archive 17 § Requiring photo credits
1282:
3161:
2217:
Allow users to have their own accounts deleted upon their request.
1423:
are abused to make certain names or words stand out in an article.
3218:
3165:
3139:
1660:
The notion of acceptable characters was broadened to accommodate
1651:
1623:. Blank edit summaries are a good way to spot possible vandalism.
2528:. Reconfirmation is done at some very small Wikipedias, such as
2308:
A deletion process for unreferenced BLPs has been approved, see
1650:
Proposals have included banning usernames that include symbols,
3416:, listing some perennial disputes regarding the Manual of Style
3232:
Shortcuts for Help pages are often created in the WP namespace.
3157:
2223:
This is currently a technical impossibility for both Knowledge
2239:. Alternatively, users can delete their user page by adding {{
507:
For consistency's sake, we should pick one style of spelling (
2752:. Before proposing a new system to revoke admin rights, read
2387:, it contained numerous caveats that applied solely to files.
1353:. The current design was implemented in March 2006 following
3042:
Technologically unfeasible without further development. See
2999:
Technologically unfeasible without further development. See
2965:
2522:
Knowledge:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 97 § Admin tenure
2417:
1303:
and sufficiently natural that it may be considered part of
393:
Knowledge:What Knowledge is not § Knowledge is not censored
3402:
3334:
have a "share" button accessible through the options menu.
2326:
be exceptions for copyright violations, attack pages, etc.
1916:
3444:
found through the search function or via the links above.
2668:
This is one of the issues that was discussed in depth at
2258:
Knowledge:Username policy § Deleting and merging accounts
1688:
for the list of active accounts using Unicode characters.
1629:
As said above, this is an option for account Preferences.
1587:(new accounts shouldn't be allowed to create pages), and
1536:
82% of IP edits are intended to improve the encyclopedia.
1373:
No consensus on particular changes to the general layout.
1370:
No consensus on what Main Page sections to add or remove.
1314:); a majority would require disambiguation regardless of
1203:
528:
Knowledge:Manual of Style § National varieties of English
3229:
shortcuts, or shortcuts with the full namespace prefix.
3185:
Create shortcut namespace aliases for various namespaces
2823:
Administrators should either indicate or prove at their
2775:
Grant non-admins admin functions within their user space
2750:
Knowledge:Requests for de-adminship § Proposed processes
2510:
Knowledge:Requests for de-adminship § Proposed processes
1499:
1174:
Knowledge:Citing sources § Variation in citation methods
1005:
The standard appendices at the end of an article (e.g.,
779:
whether Knowledge should have an article on that subject
304:
3457:
is free to (most) readers in the UK, but not elsewhere.
1775:
In general, this proposal comes up every few months at
773:
Every sentence (or paragraph) should be followed by an
30:"WP:PERENNIAL" redirects here. Not to be confused with
3497:
Policies and guidelines: "Sources of Knowledge policy"
2243:}} and can mark the talk page as inactive by adding {{
3175:
Wikicaptcha: a ReCAPTCHA-like solution for Wikisource
3056:
feature displays changes on pages linked from a page.
2690:(30 days/500 edits) to run for adminship. Earlier, a
1025:), changing the order of the sections (e.g., putting
3430:
2526:
Knowledge:Requests for comment/Adminship term length
1604:
When any editor is about to post an edit without an
1170:
Knowledge:Centralized discussion/Citation discussion
3316:Consensus and policy both establish that Knowledge
3221:
that may be used for future interlanguage prefixes.
2857:
wmf:Policy:Access to nonpublic personal data policy
2146:to permit (not require) deletion of biographies of
1997:, for which all main contributors must be notified.
1967:
Knowledge:Repeated AfD nomination limitation policy
1043:method. These guidelines only seek to document the
1746:Knowledge:Centralized discussion/Removing warnings
1612:to do this, but many users are not aware of this.)
1233:has not received any significant level of support.
665:, and frequently discussed sources are indexed at
616:of Knowledge's content. Examples include changing
484:Knowledge:Funding Knowledge through advertisements
27:List of frequently rejected proposals on Knowledge
3107:Special:Preferences § mw-prefsection-betafeatures
2638:While candidates with few edits and/or a lack of
2369:. Merging into a single criterion would decrease
2202:Knowledge talk:Articles for discussion/Proposal 1
1946:. This is a solution in search of a problem (see
1868:Knowledge:Signatures § Customizing your signature
1476:Implement infoboxes that pull data from Wikidata.
1395:Knowledge:Requests for comment/Main Page features
822:
661:Editors can assess the reliability of sources at
511:, generally), and enforce it throughout the site.
3555:
3073:Allow watchlisting individual sections of a page
2686:, the community decided that candidates must be
2552:The proposal doesn't solve any of the problems.
2492:Category:Knowledge administrators open to recall
1827:the user has not received a level 4 user warning
1436:on how to change the color for your own account.
1879:Allow discussion about the topic of the article
1787:page. There are multiple reasons for rejection:
583:between editors with opposing personal beliefs.
406:m:2010 Wikimedia Study of Controversial Content
2700:Community-based process for removing adminship
2487:controversial could be on the order of months.
1642:Usernames should contain only Latin characters
1585:Knowledge:Autoconfirmed article creation trial
1528:97% of vandalism comes from unregistered users
324:All Knowledge web pages contain a link to the
3409:Knowledge:Bot requests/Frequently denied bots
2957:, the community decided that editors must be
2851:, can only be occupied by those who sign the
2134:a "sticky" proposed deletion for BLP articles
1836:Knowledge:Bot requests/Frequently denied bots
1596:Automatically prompt for missing edit summary
1007:See also, Notes, References, Further reading,
269:
3267:Move the Main Page out of the main namespace
3122:("Ability to watch section levels of pages")
667:Knowledge:Reliable sources/Perennial sources
404:for instructions on how to suppress images.
48:Knowledge:Deletion review/Perennial requests
32:Knowledge:Reliable sources/Perennial sources
2612:Knowledge:Unbundling administrators' powers
2350:Merge speedy deletion criterion F9 into G12
1706:Editors should be prohibited from removing
1573:Knowledge:Editors should be logged-in users
751:Knowledge:Verifiability § Access to sources
40:Knowledge:External links/Perennial websites
1735:tags while the discussion is in progress,
1682:Knowledge:Signatures § Non-Latin usernames
1147:Inline parenthetical referencing has been
1091:Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial
276:
262:
2754:Knowledge:De-adminship proposal checklist
1386:the removal of portal links in April 2022
2052:Deleted articles may be archived in the
1948:Knowledge:Don't stuff beans up your nose
1505:Prohibit unregistered users from editing
1296:commonly append the state to placenames.
3537:Knowledge Statistics - Tables - English
3302:Share pages on Facebook, Twitter/X etc.
3248:TM: → Template: was created in May 2024
2604:for a list and the application process.
2431:Limit the number of questions asked at
2397:that resulted in the relevant split, a
1911:Knowledge:What Knowledge is not § FORUM
1107:Jimbo's original edict against NC media
960:, orphan tags were moved to talk pages.
765:Require inline citations for everything
547:For a long time, the first sentence of
532:Knowledge:Standardize spellings/Archive
360:page could conceivably be offensive to
14:
3556:
2514:User:SamuelTheGhost/Re-electing admins
2032:. Knowledge is written by its readers.
1072:. Many discussions in the archives of
663:Knowledge:Reliable sources/Noticeboard
2044:Knowledge:List of hoaxes on Knowledge
1900:nonetheless conflict with our policy
1332:are exempted from the convention per
1225:And, specific to the CC BY licenses:
1081:Allow non-commercial licensed content
694:(and/or many archives of that page);
574:Knowledge is supposed to be based on
1731:regarding a currently active block,
499:Enforce American or British spelling
371:Knowledge:No disclaimers in articles
59:
3468:Knowledge:Featured article criteria
2746:Knowledge:Requests for de-adminship
2532:, which had just 63 admins in 2013.
1942:Strict numerical limits fall under
901:Move maintenance tags to talk pages
805:material everyone agrees is obvious
24:
3508:A majority of articles follow the
3414:Knowledge talk:Manual of Style/FAQ
3318:is not a social networking service
3116:User:Enterprisey/section-watchlist
2961:to vote in requests for adminship.
2929:2015 administrator election reform
2716:action. This would make adminship
2602:Knowledge:Requests for permissions
2300:articles with unsourced statements
2262:mw:Extension:User Merge and Delete
2112:In articles that meet Knowledge's
2071:Knowledge:Viewing deleted articles
1777:Knowledge talk:Welcoming committee
1581:Knowledge:Not every IP is a vandal
1530:(less than 8% are vandals), about
1357:by the community organized by the
590:Knowledge:Verifiability, not truth
86:Knowledge's policies or guidelines
25:
3590:
2091:for biographies of living persons
1552:This issue is currently evolving:
1486:of Wikidata and subtle vandalism.
1330:Twenty-nine significant US cities
3246:" such as "CAT:". Additionally,
2978:Knowledge:Customizing watchlists
2812:Administrators should be of the
2658:of their contributions, not the
2124:, which makes them eligible for
1842:Disallow personalized signatures
1185:Add in-article credit for images
1117:Establish a house citation style
838:To maintain their high quality,
539:Only allow the truth in articles
63:
3314:Reasons for previous rejection:
3197:Reasons for previous rejection:
3146:Reasons for previous rejection:
3089:Reasons for previous rejection:
3040:Reasons for previous rejection:
2997:Reasons for previous rejection:
2927:various proposals such as from
2887:Reasons for previous rejection:
2853:access to nonpublic information
2835:Reasons for previous rejection:
2792:Reasons for previous rejection:
2728:Reasons for previous rejection:
2636:Reasons for previous rejection:
2550:Reasons for previous rejection:
2475:Reasons for previous rejection:
2377:Reasons for previous rejection:
2330:Reasons for previous rejection:
2284:Reasons for previous rejection:
2221:Reasons for previous rejection:
2183:Reasons for previous rejection:
2110:Reasons for previous rejection:
2014:Reasons for previous rejection:
2002:Deleted pages should be visible
1990:Reasons for previous rejection:
1940:Reasons for previous rejection:
1928:Cap on nominations for deletion
1892:Reasons for previous rejection:
1858:Reasons for previous rejection:
1773:Reasons for previous rejection:
1714:Reasons for previous rejection:
1684:on providing transliterations.
1658:Reasons for previous rejection:
1616:Reasons for previous rejection:
1610:set their accounts' Preferences
1519:Reasons for previous rejection:
1480:Reasons for previous rejection:
1461:Reasons for previous rejection:
1417:Reasons for previous rejection:
1365:Reasons for previous rejection:
1289:Reasons for previous rejection:
1269:Remove state from US placenames
1197:Reasons for previous rejection:
1138:Reasons for previous rejection:
1097:Reasons for previous rejection:
1037:Reasons for previous rejection:
937:Reasons for previous rejection:
850:Reasons for previous rejection:
789:Reasons for previous rejection:
755:Knowledge:Reliable sources/Cost
733:Reasons for previous rejection:
692:Knowledge talk:Reliable sources
677:", but exceptions are possible
640:Reasons for previous rejection:
598:Knowledge:Neutral point of view
572:Reasons for previous rejection:
515:Reasons for previous rejection:
471:Reasons for previous rejection:
429:Reasons for previous rejection:
390:Reasons for previous rejection:
328:page, where you can access the
322:Reasons for previous rejection:
3530:
3519:
3502:
3488:
3478:
3460:
3447:
3437:
3279:Reasons for previous rejection
2914:Reason for previous rejection:
2439:Reason for previous rejection:
1978:Notify all authors of deletion
1850:Editors should use only plain
1756:Use a bot to welcome new users
1727:Users may not remove declined
997:Changes to standard appendices
909:Move maintenance tags such as
823:§ Delete unreferenced articles
634:Knowledge:No original research
594:Knowledge:Editorial discretion
13:
1:
3154:free and open-source software
2902:Suffrage requirements for RfA
2642:contributions often fail per
2104:biographies of living persons
1872:User:Kephir/gadgets/unclutter
1455:subject notability guidelines
1405:Change the color of red links
402:Help:Options to hide an image
3085:, instead of the whole page.
2452:of two questions per editor.
2268:Delete unreferenced articles
2171:. This usually assumes that
1698:Prohibit removal of warnings
1451:general notability guideline
1441:Upgrade GNG to policy status
1355:several months of discussion
931:self-references to Knowledge
703:Require free, online sources
566:true according to any editor
473:Knowledge is supposed to be
410:m:Image filter referendum/en
326:Knowledge:General disclaimer
7:
3564:Knowledge information pages
3324:that work on every webpage.
3142:system in place of our own.
2869:Knowledge:Age and adminship
2827:that they have reached the
2799:, and has been rejected by
2619:Prerequisites for adminship
1577:Knowledge:IPs are human too
844:protected or semi-protected
10:
3595:
3574:Knowledge failed proposals
3545:Aaron Swartz's Raw Thought
3539:, accessed April 2, 2008;
3514:Council of Science Editors
3420:Knowledge:Historic debates
3294:The discussions listed in
2598:protected template editing
2173:Knowledge:Proposed mergers
1920:
1693:Talk pages and discussions
1636:Help:Preferences § Editing
1434:User:Anomie/linkclassifier
1399:Knowledge:Main Page design
1111:Knowledge:Non-free content
1047:and not to change it. The
872:featured article candidacy
706:
696:Knowledge:Attribution/Poll
618:Knowledge:Reliable sources
348:disclaimers. In addition,
101:
57:Knowledge information page
29:
3547:; accessed July 13, 2010.
3455:Oxford English Dictionary
2566:set of admin permissions.
2423:Too many questions at RfA
2317:Grace period for deletion
2209:Deletion of user accounts
2177:Knowledge:Requested moves
1923:Knowledge:Deletion reform
1493:Template:Infobox software
1468:Use Wikidata in infoboxes
830:Protect featured articles
350:Knowledge is not censored
290:rejected by the community
187:Perennial deletion review
3217:prefixes, or codes from
3067:Knowledge:Article alerts
2733:request for de-adminship
2463:Reconfirm administrators
2381:valid fair use rationale
2169:Redirects for discussion
1963:Knowledge:Revotes on Vfd
1813:invites to new users if:
1621:automatic edit summaries
854:Featured articles often
447:Knowledge:Office actions
3470:, as of April 2, 2008.
2918:single purpose accounts
2537:Hierarchical structures
2530:the Norwegian Knowledge
2448:In 2015, the community
2286:Such a practice would "
1995:Featured Article review
1902:WP:No original research
1809:automatically delivers
1733:miscellany for deletion
1349:Revamp the look of the
1299:Appending the state is
630:Knowledge:Verifiability
604:Define reliable sources
549:Knowledge:Verifiability
378:Censor offensive images
2737:requests for adminship
2610:Discussions listed at
2114:criteria for inclusion
1671:Since 6 November 2017
1341:Redesign the Main Page
842:should be permanently
797:four types of material
740:) that are written in
3541:Who Writes Knowledge?
3063:Help:Public watchlist
2825:request for adminship
2710:Arbitration Committee
2630:articles for deletion
2571:Law of the instrument
1921:Further information:
1710:from their talk page.
1382:Today's Featured List
1359:Usability WikiProject
1151:. One could consider
1074:Knowledge talk:Layout
964:Previous discussions:
628:, or merging it with
177:Common outcomes (TfD)
172:Common outcomes (RfD)
167:Common outcomes (AfD)
3526:Statement from Legal
3332:official mobile apps
2367:copyright violations
2233:CC BY-SA 4.0 License
2100:Deletion discussions
2087:Delete no-consensus
1589:Prosecutor's fallacy
1560:Portuguese Knowledge
811:requires editors to
801:there is no deadline
683:consensus can change
679:depending on context
675:generally unreliable
433:Wikimedia Foundation
354:protection of minors
295:Consensus can change
241:Proposals and policy
227:Guide to arbitration
218:Arbitration (Arbcom)
199:Bureaucratship (RfB)
82:encyclopedic article
3569:Knowledge proposals
2985:Multiple watchlists
2955:the 2024 RfA review
2805:Knowledge community
2163:Change the name of
1767:welcoming committee
1132:Harvard referencing
509:American or British
250:Perennial proposals
197:Adminship (RfA) and
2959:extended confirmed
2933:proposal from 2015
2688:extended confirmed
2385:a single criterion
2339:request undeletion
2249:courtesy vanishing
2148:relatively unknown
1482:Concerns over the
1153:citation templates
783:general references
671:generally reliable
492:Enciclopedia Libre
209:Arguments to avoid
182:Overcategorisation
162:Arguments to avoid
3579:Knowledge culture
3512:(psychology) and
3453:For example, the
3244:pseudo-namespaces
3054:"related changes"
3028:Public watchlists
2971:Watchlist changes
2760:Gained consensus:
2278:proposed deletion
2132:.) There is also
2076:Failed proposals:
2026:explicitly vetoed
1944:instruction creep
1708:warning templates
1662:single user login
1556:temporary account
1279:Missoula, Montana
840:featured articles
785:should be banned.
653:instruction creep
488:Spanish Knowledge
467:diverse keywords.
286:
285:
136:
135:
16:(Redirected from
3586:
3548:
3534:
3528:
3523:
3517:
3506:
3500:
3492:
3486:
3482:
3476:
3475:
3464:
3458:
3451:
3445:
3441:
3242:in the form of "
3227:pseudo-namespace
3225:WP-namespace or
3100:discussion tools
2865:Knowledge:Ageism
2225:system operators
2128:under criterion
1729:unblock requests
1540:Foundation issue
1305:American English
1294:Reliable sources
1161:WP:CITECONSENSUS
949:
943:
928:
922:
918:
912:
868:inline citations
719:
310:Content warnings
278:
271:
264:
141:Common decisions
138:
137:
128:
121:
114:
74:information page
67:
66:
60:
21:
3594:
3593:
3589:
3588:
3587:
3585:
3584:
3583:
3554:
3553:
3552:
3551:
3535:
3531:
3524:
3520:
3507:
3503:
3493:
3489:
3483:
3479:
3471:
3465:
3461:
3452:
3448:
3442:
3438:
3433:
3405:
3304:
3269:
3187:
3162:external server
3129:
3103:mw:Beta Feature
3075:
3030:
2987:
2973:
2968:
2904:
2877:
2829:age of majority
2817:
2814:age of majority
2777:
2768:being discussed
2764:2024 discussion
2702:
2684:2024 RfA review
2621:
2539:
2465:
2425:
2420:
2403:2019 discussion
2395:2007 discussion
2352:
2343:deletion review
2319:
2270:
2211:
2157:
2126:speedy deletion
2093:
2058:Wayback Machine
2004:
1980:
1930:
1925:
1919:
1881:
1844:
1758:
1737:speedy deletion
1700:
1695:
1644:
1598:
1507:
1502:
1470:
1443:
1430:Help:Link color
1407:
1343:
1271:
1187:
1119:
1083:
1057:Further reading
999:
947:
941:
926:
920:
916:
910:
903:
832:
775:inline citation
767:
723:
722:
715:
711:
705:
626:official policy
606:
541:
501:
460:
419:
380:
312:
307:
282:
201:
132:
131:
124:
117:
110:
106:
98:
97:
64:
58:
55:
28:
23:
22:
18:Knowledge:PEREN
15:
12:
11:
5:
3592:
3582:
3581:
3576:
3571:
3566:
3550:
3549:
3529:
3518:
3501:
3487:
3477:
3459:
3446:
3435:
3434:
3432:
3429:
3428:
3427:
3422:
3417:
3411:
3404:
3401:
3400:
3399:
3393:Village pump 5
3353:Village pump 4
3349:Village pump 3
3345:Village pump 2
3341:Village pump 1
3335:
3325:
3311:
3303:
3300:
3299:
3298:
3289:
3276:
3268:
3265:
3264:
3263:
3251:
3237:
3236:
3235:
3234:
3233:
3222:
3211:interWikimedia
3203:
3194:
3186:
3183:
3182:
3181:
3169:
3143:
3128:
3125:
3124:
3123:
3110:
3093:
3086:
3074:
3071:
3070:
3069:
3057:
3047:
3037:
3029:
3026:
3025:
3024:
3004:
2994:
2986:
2983:
2972:
2969:
2967:
2964:
2963:
2962:
2944:
2922:
2911:
2903:
2900:
2899:
2898:
2890:
2884:
2876:
2873:
2872:
2871:
2859:
2838:
2832:
2816:
2810:
2809:
2808:
2801:the developers
2789:
2785:administrators
2776:
2773:
2772:
2771:
2757:
2740:
2725:
2719:
2701:
2698:
2697:
2696:
2673:
2663:
2661:
2657:
2633:
2620:
2617:
2616:
2615:
2605:
2583:
2582:
2581:
2578:
2574:
2567:
2563:
2556:
2547:
2538:
2535:
2534:
2533:
2516:(a proposal),
2504:
2503:
2502:
2495:
2488:
2482:
2472:
2464:
2461:
2460:
2459:
2453:
2443:
2436:
2424:
2421:
2419:
2416:
2415:
2414:
2388:
2374:
2351:
2348:
2347:
2346:
2327:
2318:
2315:
2314:
2313:
2303:
2298:articles, and
2296:poorly sourced
2281:
2269:
2266:
2265:
2264:
2252:
2218:
2210:
2207:
2206:
2205:
2195:
2180:
2156:
2153:
2152:
2151:
2149:
2144:already exists
2137:
2107:
2092:
2085:
2084:
2083:
2082:
2081:
2065:
2047:
2033:
2023:
2011:
2003:
2000:
1999:
1998:
1987:
1979:
1976:
1975:
1974:
1957:
1951:
1937:
1929:
1926:
1918:
1915:
1914:
1913:
1905:
1889:
1880:
1877:
1876:
1875:
1862:
1855:
1843:
1840:
1839:
1838:
1829:
1828:
1825:
1822:
1819:
1815:
1814:
1800:
1799:
1796:
1793:
1789:
1788:
1770:
1757:
1754:
1753:
1752:
1740:
1722:
1711:
1699:
1696:
1694:
1691:
1690:
1689:
1676:
1666:
1655:
1643:
1640:
1639:
1638:
1630:
1624:
1613:
1597:
1594:
1593:
1592:
1567:
1549:
1543:
1516:
1506:
1503:
1501:
1498:
1497:
1496:
1487:
1477:
1469:
1466:
1465:
1464:
1458:
1442:
1439:
1438:
1437:
1424:
1414:
1406:
1403:
1402:
1401:
1389:
1376:
1375:
1374:
1371:
1362:
1342:
1339:
1338:
1337:
1324:
1323:
1322:
1319:
1308:
1297:
1286:
1270:
1267:
1266:
1265:
1241:
1240:
1239:
1238:
1237:
1234:
1230:
1223:
1222:contributions.
1219:
1216:
1213:
1210:
1207:
1194:
1186:
1183:
1182:
1181:
1164:
1142:
1135:
1118:
1115:
1114:
1113:
1101:
1094:
1082:
1079:
1078:
1077:
1064:
1061:External links
1034:
1027:External links
1011:External links
998:
995:
994:
993:
967:September 2010
961:
951:
934:
902:
899:
898:
897:
894:in August 2023
888:
887:
886:
883:
879:
875:
860:
847:
831:
828:
827:
826:
817:
809:editing policy
786:
766:
763:
762:
761:
759:WP:NOTONLYFREE
745:
730:
721:
720:
712:
707:
704:
701:
700:
699:
686:
656:
637:
605:
602:
601:
600:
584:
569:
540:
537:
536:
535:
522:
512:
500:
497:
496:
495:
478:
468:
459:
456:
455:
454:
441:
426:
418:
415:
414:
413:
396:
387:
379:
376:
375:
374:
365:
319:
311:
308:
306:
303:
284:
283:
281:
280:
273:
266:
258:
255:
254:
253:
252:
244:
243:
237:
236:
235:
234:
229:
221:
220:
214:
213:
212:
211:
203:
202:
198:
195:
192:
191:
190:
189:
184:
179:
174:
169:
164:
156:
155:
145:
144:
142:
134:
133:
130:
129:
122:
115:
107:
102:
99:
79:
78:
70:
68:
56:
26:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3591:
3580:
3577:
3575:
3572:
3570:
3567:
3565:
3562:
3561:
3559:
3546:
3542:
3538:
3533:
3527:
3522:
3515:
3511:
3505:
3499:
3498:
3491:
3481:
3474:
3469:
3463:
3456:
3450:
3440:
3436:
3426:
3423:
3421:
3418:
3415:
3412:
3410:
3407:
3406:
3398:
3394:
3390:
3386:
3382:
3378:
3374:
3370:
3366:
3362:
3358:
3354:
3350:
3346:
3342:
3339:
3336:
3333:
3329:
3326:
3323:
3319:
3315:
3312:
3309:
3306:
3305:
3297:
3293:
3290:
3287:
3286:
3280:
3277:
3274:
3271:
3270:
3262:
3258:
3255:
3252:
3249:
3245:
3241:
3238:
3231:
3230:
3228:
3223:
3220:
3216:
3212:
3208:
3207:interlanguage
3204:
3201:
3200:
3198:
3195:
3192:
3189:
3188:
3180:
3176:
3173:
3170:
3167:
3163:
3159:
3155:
3151:
3147:
3144:
3141:
3138:
3134:
3131:
3130:
3127:Use reCAPTCHA
3121:
3117:
3114:
3111:
3108:
3104:
3101:
3097:
3094:
3090:
3087:
3084:
3080:
3077:
3076:
3068:
3064:
3061:
3058:
3055:
3051:
3048:
3045:
3041:
3038:
3035:
3032:
3031:
3023:
3019:
3015:
3011:
3008:
3005:
3002:
2998:
2995:
2992:
2989:
2988:
2982:
2981:
2979:
2960:
2956:
2952:
2948:
2945:
2942:
2938:
2937:2016 proposal
2934:
2930:
2926:
2923:
2919:
2915:
2912:
2909:
2906:
2905:
2897:
2894:
2891:
2888:
2885:
2882:
2879:
2878:
2870:
2866:
2863:
2860:
2858:
2854:
2850:
2846:
2842:
2839:
2836:
2833:
2830:
2826:
2822:
2819:
2818:
2815:
2806:
2802:
2798:
2793:
2790:
2786:
2782:
2779:
2778:
2769:
2765:
2761:
2758:
2755:
2751:
2748:, especially
2747:
2744:
2741:
2738:
2734:
2729:
2726:
2723:
2717:
2715:
2712:action or by
2711:
2707:
2704:
2703:
2693:
2689:
2685:
2681:
2677:
2674:
2671:
2667:
2664:
2659:
2655:
2653:
2649:
2645:
2641:
2640:project-space
2637:
2634:
2631:
2626:
2623:
2622:
2613:
2609:
2606:
2603:
2599:
2595:
2591:
2587:
2584:
2579:
2575:
2572:
2568:
2564:
2561:
2557:
2554:
2553:
2551:
2548:
2544:
2541:
2540:
2531:
2527:
2523:
2519:
2515:
2511:
2508:
2505:
2500:
2496:
2493:
2489:
2486:
2480:
2478:
2477:
2476:
2473:
2470:
2467:
2466:
2457:
2454:
2451:
2447:
2444:
2440:
2437:
2434:
2430:
2427:
2426:
2412:
2408:
2404:
2400:
2396:
2392:
2389:
2386:
2382:
2378:
2375:
2372:
2368:
2364:
2360:
2357:
2354:
2353:
2344:
2340:
2335:
2331:
2328:
2324:
2321:
2320:
2311:
2307:
2304:
2301:
2297:
2293:
2289:
2285:
2282:
2279:
2275:
2272:
2271:
2263:
2259:
2256:
2253:
2250:
2246:
2242:
2238:
2234:
2230:
2226:
2222:
2219:
2216:
2213:
2212:
2203:
2199:
2196:
2192:
2191:article title
2188:
2184:
2181:
2178:
2174:
2170:
2166:
2162:
2159:
2158:
2147:
2145:
2141:
2138:
2135:
2131:
2127:
2123:
2119:
2115:
2111:
2108:
2105:
2101:
2098:
2095:
2094:
2090:
2080:
2077:
2074:
2073:
2072:
2069:
2066:
2063:
2062:archive.today
2059:
2055:
2054:Deletionpedia
2051:
2048:
2045:
2041:
2037:
2034:
2031:
2027:
2021:
2019:
2015:
2012:
2009:
2006:
2005:
1996:
1991:
1988:
1985:
1982:
1981:
1972:
1968:
1964:
1961:
1958:
1955:
1952:
1949:
1945:
1941:
1938:
1935:
1932:
1931:
1924:
1912:
1909:
1906:
1903:
1898:
1893:
1890:
1886:
1883:
1882:
1873:
1869:
1866:
1863:
1859:
1856:
1853:
1849:
1846:
1845:
1837:
1834:
1831:
1830:
1826:
1823:
1820:
1817:
1816:
1812:
1808:
1805:
1802:
1801:
1797:
1794:
1791:
1790:
1786:
1782:
1778:
1774:
1771:
1768:
1763:
1760:
1759:
1751:
1747:
1744:
1741:
1738:
1734:
1730:
1726:
1723:
1720:
1715:
1712:
1709:
1705:
1702:
1701:
1687:
1683:
1680:
1677:
1674:
1670:
1667:
1663:
1659:
1656:
1653:
1649:
1646:
1645:
1637:
1634:
1631:
1628:
1625:
1622:
1617:
1614:
1611:
1607:
1603:
1600:
1599:
1590:
1586:
1582:
1578:
1574:
1571:
1568:
1565:
1561:
1557:
1553:
1550:
1547:
1544:
1541:
1537:
1533:
1529:
1525:
1520:
1517:
1514:
1511:
1510:
1509:
1494:
1491:
1488:
1485:
1484:verifiability
1481:
1478:
1475:
1472:
1471:
1462:
1459:
1456:
1452:
1448:
1445:
1444:
1435:
1431:
1428:
1425:
1422:
1418:
1415:
1412:
1409:
1408:
1400:
1396:
1393:
1390:
1387:
1383:
1380:
1377:
1372:
1369:
1368:
1366:
1363:
1360:
1356:
1352:
1348:
1345:
1344:
1335:
1331:
1328:
1325:
1320:
1317:
1313:
1309:
1306:
1302:
1298:
1295:
1292:
1291:
1290:
1287:
1284:
1280:
1276:
1273:
1272:
1264:
1260:
1256:
1252:
1248:
1245:
1242:
1235:
1231:
1227:
1226:
1224:
1220:
1217:
1214:
1211:
1208:
1205:
1200:
1199:
1198:
1195:
1192:
1189:
1188:
1179:
1175:
1171:
1168:
1165:
1162:
1158:
1154:
1150:
1146:
1143:
1139:
1136:
1133:
1129:
1124:
1121:
1120:
1112:
1108:
1105:
1102:
1098:
1095:
1092:
1088:
1085:
1084:
1075:
1071:
1068:
1065:
1062:
1058:
1054:
1051:precedes the
1050:
1046:
1042:
1038:
1035:
1032:
1028:
1024:
1020:
1016:
1012:
1008:
1004:
1001:
1000:
992:
988:
984:
980:
979:December 2008
976:
972:
971:November 2009
968:
965:
962:
959:
958:November 2013
955:
952:
946:
938:
935:
932:
925:
915:
908:
905:
904:
895:
892:
889:
884:
880:
878:requirements.
876:
873:
869:
865:
861:
857:
853:
852:
851:
848:
845:
841:
837:
834:
833:
824:
821:
818:
814:
810:
806:
802:
798:
794:
790:
787:
784:
781:. All use of
780:
776:
772:
769:
768:
760:
756:
752:
749:
746:
743:
739:
734:
731:
728:
725:
724:
718:
714:
713:
710:
697:
693:
690:
687:
684:
680:
676:
672:
668:
664:
660:
657:
654:
650:
646:
641:
638:
635:
631:
627:
623:
619:
615:
611:
608:
607:
599:
595:
591:
588:
585:
582:
577:
573:
570:
567:
564:
560:
555:
550:
546:
543:
542:
533:
529:
526:
523:
520:
516:
513:
510:
506:
503:
502:
493:
489:
485:
482:
479:
476:
472:
469:
465:
462:
461:
452:
448:
445:
442:
439:
438:legal threats
434:
430:
427:
424:
421:
420:
411:
407:
403:
400:
397:
394:
391:
388:
385:
382:
381:
372:
369:
366:
363:
359:
355:
351:
347:
343:
339:
335:
331:
327:
323:
320:
317:
314:
313:
302:
300:
296:
291:
279:
274:
272:
267:
265:
260:
259:
257:
256:
251:
248:
247:
246:
245:
242:
239:
238:
233:
230:
228:
225:
224:
223:
222:
219:
216:
215:
210:
207:
206:
205:
204:
200:
194:
193:
188:
185:
183:
180:
178:
175:
173:
170:
168:
165:
163:
160:
159:
158:
157:
154:
152:
147:
146:
143:and arguments
140:
139:
127:
123:
120:
116:
113:
109:
108:
105:
100:
95:
91:
87:
84:, nor one of
83:
80:It is not an
77:
75:
69:
62:
61:
53:
49:
45:
41:
37:
33:
19:
3544:
3532:
3521:
3504:
3495:
3490:
3485:de-featured.
3480:
3462:
3449:
3439:
3397:Help desk 10
3337:
3328:Partly done:
3327:
3322:bookmarklets
3313:
3307:
3291:
3283:
3278:
3272:
3253:
3239:
3196:
3190:
3171:
3145:
3132:
3112:
3096:Partly done:
3095:
3088:
3078:
3059:
3050:Partly done:
3049:
3039:
3033:
3006:
2996:
2990:
2975:
2974:
2946:
2924:
2913:
2907:
2892:
2886:
2880:
2861:
2841:Partly done:
2840:
2834:
2820:
2791:
2780:
2759:
2742:
2727:
2705:
2675:
2665:
2635:
2624:
2607:
2586:Partly done:
2585:
2549:
2542:
2506:
2484:
2474:
2468:
2455:
2446:Partly done:
2445:
2438:
2428:
2390:
2376:
2355:
2334:our criteria
2329:
2322:
2306:Partly done:
2305:
2283:
2273:
2254:
2220:
2214:
2197:
2182:
2160:
2140:Partly done:
2139:
2122:attack pages
2109:
2096:
2075:
2067:
2049:
2035:
2013:
2007:
1989:
1983:
1959:
1954:Partly done:
1953:
1939:
1933:
1907:
1891:
1884:
1864:
1857:
1847:
1832:
1804:Partly done:
1803:
1785:bot requests
1781:village pump
1772:
1761:
1742:
1725:Partly done:
1724:
1721:" newcomers.
1713:
1703:
1678:
1669:Partly done:
1668:
1657:
1647:
1632:
1627:Partly done:
1626:
1615:
1606:edit summary
1601:
1569:
1551:
1546:Partly done:
1545:
1518:
1512:
1508:
1490:Partly done:
1489:
1479:
1473:
1460:
1446:
1426:
1416:
1410:
1391:
1379:Partly done:
1378:
1364:
1346:
1327:Partly done:
1326:
1301:common usage
1288:
1274:
1243:
1196:
1190:
1166:
1145:Partly done:
1144:
1137:
1122:
1103:
1096:
1086:
1066:
1060:
1056:
1052:
1048:
1044:
1040:
1036:
1030:
1026:
1023:Bibliography
1022:
1018:
1014:
1010:
1006:
1002:
991:October 2007
983:October 2008
975:January 2009
963:
953:
936:
906:
890:
859:improvement.
855:
849:
835:
819:
792:
788:
770:
747:
732:
726:
688:
659:Partly done:
658:
644:
639:
614:verification
609:
586:
571:
562:
558:
553:
544:
524:
519:edit warring
514:
504:
480:
470:
463:
443:
428:
422:
417:Legal issues
398:
389:
383:
367:
361:
357:
321:
315:
299:village pump
287:
249:
150:
119:WP:PERENNIAL
71:
3473:(permalink)
3389:Help desk 9
3385:Help desk 8
3381:Help desk 7
3377:Help desk 6
3373:Help desk 5
3369:Help desk 4
3365:Help desk 3
3361:Help desk 2
3357:Help desk 1
3285:sui generis
3240:Partly done
3179:phab:T34695
2951:proposal 14
2722:No big deal
2680:proposal 25
2652:edit counts
2577:themselves.
2499:Arbitration
2450:set a limit
2229:bureaucrats
1750:WP:BLANKING
1524:Jimbo Wales
1312:Springfield
1176:(shortcut:
954:Partly done
891:Partly done
561:verifiable
458:Advertising
126:WP:FREQUENT
72:This is an
3558:Categories
3018:archive 92
3010:archive 68
2931:, another
2788:abilities.
2783:Allow non-
2714:bureaucrat
2692:discussion
2670:WP:RFA2011
2594:page mover
2371:rule creep
2310:WP:BLPPROD
2241:db-userreq
2155:Rename AFD
1852:signatures
1178:WP:CITEVAR
1157:WP:CITEVAR
1149:deprecated
1053:References
1045:status quo
1031:References
1029:first, or
1015:References
987:March 2008
882:vandalism.
738:FUTON bias
232:Principles
149:Deletion (
3510:APA style
3338:See also:
3308:Proposal:
3292:See also:
3254:See also:
3215:interwiki
3191:Proposal:
3172:See also:
3137:reCAPTCHA
3133:Proposal:
3113:See also:
3079:Proposal:
3060:See also:
3014:archive 3
3007:See also:
2966:Technical
2925:See also:
2908:Proposal:
2893:See also:
2881:Proposal:
2862:See also:
2849:oversight
2845:checkuser
2821:Proposal:
2797:ownership
2781:Proposal:
2743:See also:
2706:Proposal:
2666:See also:
2648:WP:NOTNOW
2625:Proposal:
2608:See also:
2543:Proposal:
2507:See also:
2469:Proposal:
2442:criteria.
2429:Proposal:
2418:Adminship
2391:See also:
2356:Proposal:
2323:Proposal:
2292:unsourced
2274:Proposal:
2255:See also:
2215:Proposal:
2161:Proposal:
2142:A policy
2118:consensus
2097:Proposal:
2068:See also:
2030:WP:REFUND
2018:Oversight
2008:Proposal:
1984:Proposal:
1960:See also:
1934:Proposal:
1908:See also:
1888:articles.
1885:Proposal:
1865:See also:
1848:Proposal:
1833:See also:
1783:, or the
1762:Proposal:
1743:See also:
1704:Proposal:
1679:See also:
1648:Proposal:
1633:See also:
1602:Proposal:
1570:See also:
1513:Proposal:
1474:Proposal:
1447:Proposal:
1427:See also:
1421:red links
1411:Proposal:
1392:See also:
1351:Main Page
1347:Proposal:
1275:Proposal:
1244:See also:
1191:Proposal:
1167:See also:
1123:Proposal:
1104:See also:
1087:Proposal:
1067:See also:
1003:Proposal:
907:Proposal:
864:standards
836:Proposal:
820:See also:
771:Proposal:
748:See also:
727:Proposal:
689:See also:
622:guideline
610:Proposal:
587:See also:
581:edit wars
576:published
545:Proposal:
525:See also:
505:Proposal:
481:See also:
464:Proposal:
451:CAT:LEGAL
444:See also:
423:Proposal:
399:See also:
384:Proposal:
368:See also:
316:Proposal:
104:Shortcuts
90:consensus
3403:See also
3273:Proposal
3135:Use the
3034:Proposal
2991:Proposal
2941:2017 RfC
2939:, and a
2921:methods.
2803:and the
2739:process.
2660:quantity
2590:rollback
2481:per week
2411:2022 RfC
2409:, and a
2407:2019 RfC
2399:2016 RfC
1917:Deletion
1811:Teahouse
1564:a report
1334:AP style
1283:Missoula
1070:WP:ORDER
1049:See also
1041:de facto
816:content.
813:preserve
793:possible
717:WP:FUTON
709:Shortcut
362:somebody
352:for the
112:WP:PEREN
3219:ISO 639
3166:privacy
3140:CAPTCHA
2695:better.
2682:of the
2656:quality
2644:WP:SNOW
2546:demand.
2245:retired
2194:larger.
1807:HostBot
1652:Unicode
1500:Editing
1316:USPLACE
1019:Sources
914:cleanup
856:improve
825:, below
742:English
632:and/or
620:from a
475:neutral
338:medical
330:content
305:Content
94:vetting
52:WP:DRPR
3158:Google
3156:) and
3083:WP:ANI
2718:really
2600:. See
2560:WP:RFA
2524:, and
2165:WP:AFD
2040:drafts
1969:, and
1897:WP:BLP
1779:, the
1719:biting
1686:WP:UUN
1059:, and
807:. The
799:, and
757:, and
673:" or "
649:policy
624:to an
559:either
346:survey
46:), or
44:WP:ELP
36:WP:RSP
3466:From
3431:Notes
3213:, or
3168:risk.
3120:T2738
3044:T9467
3001:T7875
2947:Done:
2762:In a
2676:Done:
2456:Note:
2198:Note:
2187:merge
2060:, or
2050:Note:
2036:Note:
945:ambox
645:above
334:legal
3494:See
3330:The
3098:The
3052:The
3022:Help
2935:, a
2847:and
2497:The
2405:, a
2401:, a
2393:The
2294:and
2288:bite
2237:GFDL
2235:and
2227:and
2189:and
2175:and
2102:for
2089:AfDs
1449:The
1159:and
1009:and
919:and
681:and
490:and
449:and
431:The
344:and
342:risk
92:and
3150:CTO
2953:of
2949:In
2678:In
2646:or
2596:or
2485:are
2433:RfA
2363:G12
2130:G10
2022:not
1534:or
1532:76%
1432:or
1204:CC0
1130:or
1128:MLA
1100:so.
1021:or
1017:to
956:In
924:POV
554:not
358:Any
153:fD)
38:),
3560::
3543:.
3395:,
3391:,
3387:,
3383:,
3379:,
3375:,
3371:,
3367:,
3363:,
3359:,
3355:,
3351:,
3347:,
3343:,
3259:,
3209:,
3177:,
3118:,
3065:,
3020:,
3016:,
3012:,
2867:,
2724:".
2592:,
2520:,
2512:,
2359:F9
2260:,
2056:,
2046:).
1965:,
1950:).
1870:,
1748:,
1583:,
1579:,
1575:,
1397:,
1281:→
1261:,
1257:,
1253:,
1249:,
1172:,
1163:).
1109:;
1093:).
1055:,
989:,
985:,
981:,
977:,
973:,
969:,
948:}}
942:{{
927:}}
921:{{
917:}}
911:{{
753:,
596:,
592:,
563:or
530:,
486:;
340:,
336:,
332:,
301:.
54:).
3250:.
3109:.
3046:.
3003:.
2980:.
2943:.
2807:.
2770:.
2756:.
2720:"
2672:.
2632:.
2614:.
2413:.
2373:.
2345:.
2312:.
2302:.
2251:.
2204:.
2136:.
2064:.
1973:.
1874:.
1769:?
1591:.
1542:.
1388:.
1361:.
1336:.
1307:.
1285:.
1180:)
1076:.
874:.
685:.
655:.
636:.
534:.
521:.
494:.
453:.
440:.
412:.
373:.
277:e
270:t
263:v
151:X
96:.
76:.
50:(
42:(
34:(
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.