Knowledge:Requests for adminship/Thingg 2

3433:. I'd pushed for article probation on the Obama pages, and although it wasn't ideal for the candidate to be partially sanctioned under it, and partially under 3RR, I'm very happy to trust this user with tools for demonstrating what he learnt from that experience. The candidate also provided a nice answer to question 9. Just as a further point on that answer, users too easily start having doubts whether someone is speaking about them behind their back, or vice versa, just because they use it. Sometimes the doubts are well-founded, while other times it's pure paranoia, and the effects of such doubts which can be damaging to collaborativeness. It can never replace on-wiki consensus building, and certainly, doubts shouldn't replace basic AGF. I hope that this is also something that the candidate will reinforce when his RFA is granted. ;) Best wishes, 713:#2 was a valid objection to an error I had made when replacing a speedy tag on a page without checking the article first. I was pretty new at NP patrol at the time, and I made a much larger number of mistakes. The first part of #4 was a similar objection to the above and resulted from an incomplete knowledge of the CSD rules and not being careful when placing speedy tags. The second part was an objection to an incorrect fair-use rational I had placed on an image I had uploaded very soon after I joined Knowledge. I didn't understand fair-use then and I had neglected to fix the rational after I gained a better knowledge of the rules. #11 part one is the same objection as #4 part two and the second part was an astronomically boneheaded placing of a speedy tag on 3176: 357:

where I live), so I didn't find out about the block until the next day. I think I handled the situation pretty well and the admin said later that he probably would have given me a warning instead of a block if he saw the situation again. I do have to say though, that I have been and will continue to be much more careful in the future when reverting edits that aren't necessarily vandalism. Other than that incident, I haven't been involved in any really large conflicts except for some rather heated discussions relating to the

1788:, albeit a little weakly. Thingg's instability is a small cause for concern for me: I fear his judgement may at times be lacking, or that he may—rarely, I suspect, admittedly—make rash decisions in the course of his work as an administrator. By and large, however, I believe he will bring some improvement to the project through his having the +sysop bit; I do caution him to take a step back if he feels unsettled on the project, but at the root of the matter I trust him and think he will make a decent administrator. 636:(discretion blocks, not 3RR ones), incivility, tendentious editing or other disruption that is clearly made by an opinionated rather than vandalizing editor? Also, do you plan to enforce WP:3RR by patrolling WP:AN3 and the arbcom decisions by patrolling WP:AE? Particularly, would you enforce the so called "general sanctions", "civility paroles" or other wide scope measures that the arbcom frequently passes lately with a significant administrator's discretion being allowed? 860:"newness" where we still have rules that can be changed and policies that can be adjusted if necessary. One of my greatest fears for this site is that as a community we will fossilize into an unmovable bureaucracy of tradition and hard-fast, set-in-stone policies. Now, I'm not saying I think no rules should stand as any organization must have some sense of stability to be successful, and some policies (such as the 2269: 718:

several key areas of Knowledge, particularly CSD, at that time, it probably was for the best that my first RfA did not succeed as I'm fairly certain I would have made some rather embarrassing mistakes. This is not to say I think I am perfect now as I most certainly am not, but I am definitely more familiar and experienced with the admin areas I'm interested in working in.

750:

editor made some constructive edits followed by page blankings and "F*** YOU!!!1111"s, then I would almost definitely block them if the edits were recent. Basically, what action I would take would depend totally on what edits were made and when they were made, so I can't really give an entirely accurate answer when speaking in generalities.

81:. He has now nearly a year of service on the project and all of the things I said in my past nomination statement hold true: a prolific recent changes patroller who maintains composure under fire, a contributor to several WikiProjects, a sizeable edit count, and a solid knowledge of wikitext, formatting, and parserFunctions. 1119:. Thingg has an impressive WikiResume, displays great understanding of Knowledge policy, and has the temperament to be an administrator. Although I have had only minimal direct interaction with Thingg, I am constantly bumping into him at AIV and other places - and all I see is indications of a reasonable, thoughtful editor. 418:

generally place a speedy tag on the page. If the search reveals some information other than the Myspace variety but I still feel the band is non-notable (ie, if the info is not from a reliable source), I generally PROD the page. So, to answer your question, if no citations are provided and/or I can't find any

191:, you can see that this consistent level of contribution to the project has been going on for quite a while. Note the removal of unsourced material and spam links, the spelling fixes, image uploads, table formatting fixes...in other words, Thingg finds time to be an editor as well as a vandal-fighter. 1340:(edit conflict x2). Only 913 reports to AIV? I've seen Thingg's work and it's always seemed good to me. Seems to have a good handle on policy, and has demonstrated the ever-subjective clue. That's some serious Huggling you got there, but you have other work as well. I think he'll do fine as an admin. 319:

created appear in DYK. This is probably because most topics in my main of areas of interest (science and technology) already have articles and I am better at organizing and formatting existing content than creating large amounts of new content. (It's also easier to do this, which probably contributes

103:

article. The FAQ on the talk page of the article states in no uncertain terms that the instruction of the article is to refer to Obama as "African American" taking lead from the bulk of the reliable sources. This did not stop a POV-pushing SPA sockpuppet account to attempt to modify the lead-in, and

901:

of articles. I would also like to see large-scale vandalism become a a much less serious issue than it is now. While automated and semi-automated tools have helped a lot in this area, vandalism is still a large problem, and one I hope we can find a way to at least greatly reduce its impact compared

803:

hmmm... that's a good question and one I haven't really given much thought as I've never encountered a situation like that. I would probably leave a post on WP:AN mentioning the message and requesting someone with some experience in that area to contact the user because I do not have any experience

717:

after it had been vandalized a few times. As for #28, I don't think I have a mechanistic view of the policies, but looking over my cautious answers to the questions, I definitely see that I gave that impression even though I did not intend to. To be honest, looking back at my level of experience in

677:

I don't really have a particular opinion about IRC because I have never used it. I also don't plan on using in the future at this time, but I may end up using it at some point. A proper use of the IRC channel would be to talk about things that don't need to be documented and to get help from people

422:

information about the band, I will probably delete the page regardless of what edits are made to it because there would be no way to verify anything about the band. However, if I feel there is a possibility the band is notable, I will most likely take no action regarding deleting the article. Also,

289:

My interests on Knowledge vary widely and I seem to go through "spurts" where I edit heavily in one area and then move on to another one. That being said, I have done a fairly large amout of vandal fighting on a more-or-less steady pace since late February, and this activity probably makes up about

749:

It would depend on how "bad" the vandalism was and when it was made. If the vandalism was of the "eighiehieihgihgie" or similar variety and occurred at the start of the edits followed by a string of constructive edits, I would most likely take no action regarding a black. On the other hand, if the

1983:

When I saw your reply, I went back and re-read the "non-criteria" section; and lo and behold, it DOES mention that "blatant and obvious" hoaxes can be treated as vandalism and speedy deleted on that basis. Striking out my misinterpretation of policy and noting that I'm clearly not as smart as I'd

1964:

I would have said the same thing but it appears that, in the breech, blatant hoaxes that are basically speedied on a regular basis. Within the letter of the law or not, that appears to be the operating precedent. Personally, I don't mind it. The biggest fears for speedying "hoax" articles are

876:

to edit the majority of pages on this site. I mean, that ability is, in a large part, responsible for the spectacular success of this encyclopedia, and while that ability does contribute to much of the vandalism here, it enables us to keep up with current events rapidly (a huge asset in a lot of

859:

Wow I'm sorry I missed this one. What would I like Knowledge to be like in then years? hmmm.... Well, in many ways, I'd like it to be like it is now: lively, active; a fun place, but one where work gets done and we accomplish something useful. I especially hope Knowledge never loses its sense of

356:

incident mentioned by Xeno and Frank. In retrospect, it probably would have been wiser to stop after the third revert and let someone else take care of it, but unfortunately I did not think of that at the time. I had actually signed off Knowledge soon after the vandal stopped (it was like 2:00am

314:

started and helped design the project's portal and some of its templates.. Also, I have reviewed quite a few DYK noms, (I'm not sure exactly how many; probably around 300 based on the number of edits I have on that page), though, as stated above, I haven't been as active on there as I once was.

642:

Well, at the present, I don't plan on actively monitoring WP:AN3 or WP:AE, but if I come across or am made aware of a situation where an editor is being disruptive and is refusing to talk about the disagreement, I would be willing to administer a block if I thought it was necessary to end the

417:

Well, to answer your question, I'll have to explain a little about how I handle articles like this one. If I come across a new article about a band that is not clearly non-notable, I do a google search to see if anything other than a few Myspace-like pages show up. If nothing does show up, I

461:

Content editing: Could you elaborate on your answer to question 2 in a little more detail? For example, could you provide diffs (or series of diffs) that would show your improvements to the articles you listed in your answer? Particularly, diffs to sufficient content additions would be most

264:

as I could simply delete the page rather than add to other admins' workloads by nominating it to be speedily deleted. Another area I have worked in (though I have not done so as frequently in the past few weeks because of real-life time constraints) where admin tools would be helpful is the

259:

As I do a quite a bit of vandal-fighting and new page patrolling, admin tools would be very useful by allowing me to block persistent vandals myself instead of waiting for another admin to block them. The extra buttons would also come in handy when I come across pages that clearly meet the

659:

I'm not sure I grasp exactly what you are asking, but if you meant "will I single-handedly impose permanent restrictions on editors who have not made clearly disruptive edits," the answer is no because that authority rests with the arbcom, not with individual admins. Is that what you

670:

What's your opinion of IRC. Do you use it? Do you plan to use it? If yes, do you plan to join #admins and what do you think about this channel's past, present and, perhaps, future? What in your opinion would constitute the proper and improper use of the IRC channel?

2049:

Nobody reads these comments, so I'll come forth and say that abortion is the best thing since sliced bread, McCain is a revolutionary step forward in U.S. presidency, and we should work on colonizing Mars because Wal-mart is running out of places to urbanize.

678:

if you need it. It would also be useful in a rapidly-changing situation where you need to communicate with other users quickly. An improper use would be to surreptitiously organize activities for the wiki and to talk about people behind their backs.

1094:– Yes, I've been waiting for this for a while now, and have always thought Thingg would be a fine administrator. I've been watching his talk page and his edits for a while now, and see most everything constructive. Happy to support. Good luck! -- 2571:— seriously, this one kind of surprised me. No problems with what I've seen of this user, and I think he'd definitely make a fine admin with the areas he intends to work in. The first time I really saw him around was about the time when he once 1948:. I kinda thought you were an admin already too. Talk page looks good (You get a lot of pints, don't you!) and contribs...well, as you said, a little Huggly--but I'm not one who considers that a bad thing. Yeah, I'd trust you with the mop. 444:

Only hoaxes that are blatantly obvious (eg. The South won the American Civil War) can be speedied. Obviously, there is some room for interpretation as to what qualifies as "blatant," so if I have a question about it, I usually PROD

410:

tag on the page, but that is all. How long would you wait before deleting it? What would you do if the editor makes an implausible but not impossible (and unsourced) edit to the article that makes a claim to the article?

774:

I can't really think of any Knowledge policies I disagree with. I am not saying that I think Knowledge is perfect, but for the most part, I think the guidelines in place have been fairly well thought-out and work pretty

365:

format war in January and February. Although I do not avoid conflict if I feel the issue being debated is important, the vast majority of heated discussions are trivial at best and I generally do not get involved with

3156:. I would like to see you branch out beyond RCP and new pages patrolling though. Most of that type of patrolling doesn't need the admin toolkit (other than of course administering blocks and making pages disappear). 172:. Instead of just reverting and moving on, these two edits (among others on the page) show particular attention to the content rather than simply reverting what appears to be vandalism without investigation. 2353:. More Huggly than I personally prefer admins to be, but that's a question of personal style, and to each his own. Editor appears a superb vandal fighter and would be an obvious net gain for the project. 427:

case where I see an article about a potentially non-notable band as every case is different and there are exceptions to every rule. However, this what I generally do with band-articles that aren't clearly

1010: 2953:(even if my opinion is redundant at this point). He has accumulated a lot of experience in different areas, and he used the feedback from his previous RfA constructively. I see no reasons for concern. 1004: 96:). Thingg's main area of focus is in recent changes patrol, and his reports to AIV are always spot-on: it would save the rest of us admins a lot of time if he could perform the blocks himself. 1695:

as nom. Thingg taught me so much when I was first starting here and as I said to him at my talk page, it's pretty much a travesty that I was made an admin before he was - let's fix that =) –

3488:

Nominated by an editor that I have the utmost respect for, co-nominated by another of the same stature, outstanding contributions to the project... what more could I possibly ask for? --

112:, agreeing that the sockpuppet's edits could reasonably be construed as vandalism and thus 3RR exempt. As usual, Thingg maintained incredible composure throughout the entire situation. 885:

like to see change on Knowledge over the next decade. The main thing I'd like to see is a much higher average quality level for articles, especially in the area of citations. While we

1248:

I fail to see why your support for this candidate has to spill out into disrepect for other candidates, some of whom are currently standing. I think you have over-stepped the mark. --

643:

conflict. I would also be willing to enforce other arbcom restrictions if necessary. However, I would not impose a block unless I felt there was no other way to end the argument.

164:

is a page of edits, and right there in the middle of all those standard reverts are edits which were carefully picked out and dealt with individually. Two examples are edits to

246:

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Knowledge as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:

2465:

I've seen Thingg around, Huggling and whatnot, and he's done very well. With a bit of my own investigating, I am pretty ready to believe that Thingg will do well as an admin.

1848:

with the candidate in the past, and apparently I'm not the only one with some concerns, as shown by Anthony above. However, I do feel that this will be an overall net gain.

400:, a band. The article only notes that they have a myspace page, so it seems like a good A7 candidate. You tag it as A7 and inform the author and the page creator places a 397: 2336:

All problems (even the minor ones) raised in the last RfA seem to be addressed. While I would like to see his answers to the remaining questions, it appears irrelevant.

3420: 2957: 346:

Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

1720:

Has objectively worked and overcame the concerns raised during the Previous RFA.Further trust the Judgement of Acalamari.See no chance of the user abusing the tools.

1449: 1427: 1398: 2090: 793:

If you came across a user talk page from a newly registered user that said something to the effect of "I am thinking of killing myself." what would you do? (Note:

1480:. I've seen Thingg's contributions for quite a while and I know he's an amazing editor and vandal fighter. Definitely will make an amazing administrator as well. 881:

defining feature that sets Knowledge apart from the myriad of copycat projects out there. I also hope that never changes. However, there are a couple of things I

472:, I didn't really have to add a large amount of content, though I did have to add quite a few citations and reformat a good portion of the article. some diffs: ( 183:

OK, so Thingg's vandal-fighting pedigree is excellent. It is worth noting that Thingg also knows about the other things that make Knowledge tick. Take a look at

1988: 1978: 1257: 306:

status and helping to keep it at FA status by formatting additions if necessary and removing vandalism and inaccuracies. I also made extensive improvements to

315:

However, despite the number of noms I have reviewed (I've also nominated a few pages created by other people), until recently I had never had an article that

2954: 1683: 1663: 729: 868:

be changed in my opinion, but I think that one of Knowledge's strengths is its adaptability and freedom of action when working for the good of the project (

1201: 1187: 156:

in his history. That gives some editors pause (honestly it makes me dig a little deeper too), so I want to address that issue a bit. This is no Huggle-bot

1922: 1139: 980: 1215:– i've seen this guy around a lot, and he seems to get it. The issues brought up by the opposes last time around seem to have since been dealt with. 1174: 850: 115:

An entirely trustworthy fellow who never fails to learn from his mistakes, I have full confidence in Thingg's ability to wield the mop effectively. –

2639:- Good answers to questions, nothing alarming in the past 500 edits. Answer to question 11 was a little iffy, but it was a pretty general question. 232: 741: 1319:

Hello, I'm Catherine the Great and I'm in a frisky mood -- I'll take a dozen oysters and a horse, please...oh, wrong queue. But while I am here:

2835: 2165:

A review of the stats shows no likelihood of mop abuse, and my interactions with the candidate (reviewing/actioning AIV reports) have been good.

1289: 571:(warning: long pages). Please note that in both cases, all of the edits between the diffs were not made by me, though the majority of edits were. 474:

Just so you know, I was a pretty new user at this time (less than 1.5 months), so there are some odd, overcautious html comments in some of these

84:

Most of the opposition in the first RFA hinged upon Thingg's grasp of our speedy deletion policy. In my review of the last 60 days, I only found

705: 197:

I have no reservations: this is a trustworthy, productive, prolific editor who will be an even more positive asset to the project with the mop.

194:

Finally, I'm not one to be concerned with counts, but I do note there's at least one DYK notice currently hanging out on his talk page as well.

3530: 2572: 923: 3244:- Seems to be an almost perfect candidate. Lots of frequent edits, many reverting vandalism. Very good question answering too :-). Good luck. 2311: 105: 1729: 109: 2945: 1940: 1463:. I've never interacted with this user, but from his responses to the questions, the nomination, and from the approval of other editors. 188: 184: 177: 161: 149:. I was very pleased that Thingg maintained composure, and that the blocking admin came around. It is a credit to them both; 'nuff said. 3425: 2457: 2072: 1565: 3548: 2932: 2864:

Thingg is one of the sites most fervent and intelligent administrators, there's no reason not to gie him the flag to go along with it.

1492: 732:, has made 23 contributions to WP. 10 of those are vandalism, the rest are things like typo or spelling corrections. What do you do? 93: 2769: 1959: 1405: 3253: 3236: 2960: 2521: 2483: 2425: 2362: 2345: 2174: 2157: 1904: 1375: 939: 2416: 1817: 1648: 3459: 3377: 2917: 1877: 553: 3442: 3199: 3068: 3022: 2562: 2241: 2208: 2191: 1472: 1280: 1133: 3287: 3270: 2014: 1861: 1780: 1556: 1332: 1226: 1086: 934: 78: 3347: 3148: 3129: 3051: 2987: 2786: 2752: 2737: 2297: 2224: 1746: 1712: 1146: 241: 3497: 3401: 2873: 2840: 2717: 2590: 2261: 2121: 1602: 1521: 1314: 132: 58: 3359: 3216: 3111: 3006: 2896: 2607: 2399: 2378: 1842: 1763: 1581: 1535: 1349: 1062: 3321: 3165: 3094: 3042:

I like people who i find worthy, know how to use the tools, dont like vandals, and will make constructive edits to wikipedia.

2826: 2694: 2631: 2328: 1833: 1625: 1243: 1163: 320:

to my being better at it...) Recently though, I have been writing and improving quite a few small articles on islands in the

3304: 3034: 2809: 2648: 2504: 2145: 2041: 512: 2859: 2470: 2282: 1898: 1444: 1421: 1393: 1370: 1111: 213: 3480: 2671: 1801: 2545: 2438: 967: 919: 3373: 1875: 1185: 612: 568: 561: 549: 545: 541: 537: 533: 492: 3089: 2009: 1725: 1078: 146: 33: 17: 1969:

unfounded and that an admin who sees a blatantly misinformative article would not be in the wrong in deleting it.

628:

Do you plan to involve yourself in decisions that would significantly affect content editors, particularly in the

2975: 2733: 169: 974: 2940: 2713: 2112: 1845: 1308: 1138:

Seen nothing but good things from Thingg: he's always been sensible whenever I've seen him. I was the one who

508: 504: 500: 496: 489: 486: 483: 480: 477: 1058: 165: 605: 2689: 2306: 1082: 1027: 998: 960: 230: 173: 74: 3334: 2452: 2067: 1721: 1551: 3529:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either

2491:

Not much more to say, I really thought he was an admin and answers and contribs look fine as well. :-)

1488: 1253: 85: 3476: 2927: 2765: 3410: 3249: 3231: 2905: 2517: 2358: 2341: 2170: 1932: 1893: 1440: 1416: 1389: 1366: 768:

Do you agree with every Knowledge policy, or guidline? If not please give an example and tell why.

529: 2412: 2324: 1965:

misidentification and deletion of a factual account of a notable RL hoax. I find that those are

1676: 1641: 1354:

Strong Oppose :) per he is the perfect candidate with excellent nominations and therefore there

992: 3455: 3415: 2913: 2679:

I supported last time per candidate's good work which has only improved since then. Good luck!

2447: 2232:

Never had a problem with this user. Hard worker who deserves the tools and will use them well.

2051: 1873: 1546: 1183: 152:

As you look through Thingg's contributions, you may take note that there is no small amount of

1034: 889:

made a lot of progress in this direction (as evidenced by the constantly increasing number of

187:, which show a bunch of varied contributions - some vandal-fighting, some not. And, picking a 3438: 3191: 3064: 2558: 2237: 2204: 1481: 1468: 1274: 1249: 1128: 1043: 653:

Do you plan to invent and enforce extra-policy restrictions on content editors on your own?

3283: 3266: 2761: 2084: 2006: 1985: 1956: 1855: 1776: 1328: 1219: 1074: 872:). I hope that never changes. Another thing I hope stays the same is the ability for truly 565: 525: 310:, though it did not pass it's FAC due to a lack of sufficient referencing and I helped get 307: 8: 3345: 3245: 3225: 3142: 3047: 2981: 2782: 2749: 2514: 2477: 2467: 2354: 2337: 2294: 2219: 2166: 2154: 1886: 1742: 1705: 1433: 1409: 1382: 1359: 125: 89: 3493: 3393: 3175: 2869: 2707: 2583: 2408: 2259: 2109: 1810: 1669: 1634: 1596: 1515: 1298: 1023: 890: 3333:! A great candidate, good record, no bad points brung up and I can't find any; per my 3451: 3368: 3356: 3212: 3107: 3001: 2909: 2889: 2603: 2394: 1974: 1870: 1759: 1657: 1529: 1345: 1180: 1054: 986: 843: 820: 794: 714: 378: 92:

version of the article with only a very weak assertion of notability as discussed in

2745:: I've seen Thingg around and found his work to be solid. Should make a good admin. 3434: 3409:. I supported this user on his previous RfA, but now he has even more experience. ~ 3317: 3184: 3161: 3137:, good answers to the questions, respectable editing history; seems trustworthy. 3082: 3060: 3015: 2822: 2685: 2554: 2233: 2200: 2185: 1951: 1617: 1464: 1270: 1238: 1169: 1120: 954: 597: 228: 153: 68: 1825:- Hard working editor with a stable record of contributions and Vandal fighting -- 3300: 3279: 3262: 2802: 2644: 2498: 2138: 2078: 2029: 2001: 1849: 1772: 1324: 1216: 1069: 908: 737: 701: 581: 556:. The complete diff of changes from beginning to end of my major improvements to 404: 325: 206: 3337: 3138: 3120: 3043: 2969: 2855: 2778: 2746: 2727: 2291: 2278: 2214: 1954:--particularly item #2 under "non-criteria". (Did I just give the answer away?) 1738: 1697: 1668:

Well, by the amount of unanimous supports above, I believe he will do alright.

1143: 1103: 511:. If you need more diffs, most of my improvements to that article can be found 117: 54: 45: 3542: 3523:

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion.

3489: 3472: 3388: 3330: 2881:

Why not? If there's not not, then there should not be anyone not supporting.

2865: 2703: 2668: 2576: 2250: 2103: 1917: 1796: 1590: 1503: 869: 758: 632:

rather than direct action? For example, do you plan to institute blocks for

593: 585: 557: 469: 333: 295: 261: 104:

per the prevailing consensus, Thingg reverted the changes. An administrator

3208: 3103: 2996: 2884: 2599: 2538: 2388: 2371: 1970: 1755: 1575: 1341: 1050: 894: 838: 815: 783: 601: 589: 419: 374: 353: 329: 311: 303: 299: 100: 1869:

I literally, honestly, truly believed you were already an administrator. –

3313: 3157: 3077: 2818: 2680: 2616: 2320: 1827: 1611: 1193: 1155: 950: 915: 861: 423:

I'd like to say that what I've written above is not what I do/will do in

223: 64: 3296: 3031: 2796: 2640: 2575:

of mine at DYK. ;-) Good luck with everything, keep up your good work!

2493: 2132: 2024: 733: 697: 686: 453: 321: 200: 139: 2834:- I opposed last time, but my concerns are no more. Have fun mopping! 3533:

or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.

2850: 1095: 157: 1754:(ec) Per the above and a clear, reasonable answer to the questions. 3512: 3468: 2817:

Great edits and experience over the past 6 months, good answers. --

2657: 1910: 1789: 1026:. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review 3059:

Answers look good, and you seem to have the trust of many users.--

3503: 2531: 528:, I had to pretty much re-write the article from scratch because 386: 358: 2578: 3385:

The reasons I opposed the latest RFA are no longer applicable.

2585: 2182:

per Master of Puppets and that I don't see anything troubling.

362: 266: 696:

Comment on opposes 2, 4, 11, and 28 at your past RfA, please.

270: 220:

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

2792:

Pile-On/As-Co-Nom/Of-Course/Thought-You-Were-Already-Support

324:. Although most of them are relatively short, (for example: 273:

on the Main Page when it is time for a fresh batch of hooks.

1589:

a demonstrated need for the tools and a good demeanor. -

877:

cases) and is also (in my humble opinion) one of, if not

546:

corrections to previous edits based on new info I located

352:

The only recent conflict I have been involved in was the

147:

immediately stepped up to ask the blocking admin about it

29:

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a

3467:- Very impressive contributions. I hope this passes! --( 2489:"What do you mean you are not already an admin?"-Support 1192:

Oh. Feels like a lot less than that. Peh, ignore me.

283:

What are your best contributions to Knowledge, and why?

253:

What administrative work do you intend to take part in?

1154:- a little soon after his last RfA but what the hell. 835:

What would you like Knowledge to be in ten years time?

1381:

If you didn't understand the humor, that's a support.

3078: 2848:- Per noms and answers to the first three questions. 2512:

Seems to merit trust, despite some past controversy.

2199:

Yep, this fellow has the temperament to be an admin.

3083: 2426: 145:

When I noticed the block mentioned by xeno above, I

1950:But re: Q5...you might want to go back and peek at 1104: 1096: 336:, is a bit longer and became my first self nom DYK. 99:Thingg was recently involved in a situation on the 1323:for one of Knowledge's very best editors (truly)! 269:where being an admin would allow me to update the 3540: 2656:. Excellent contributions and sensible answers. 396:: Let's say you come across a new article about 2760:Seen him around and he does a excellent job. -- 1267:. By my past nom. Glad to see you back at RfA! 1234:- all-round good candidate from my experience. 1129: 1121: 438:: What kind of hoax articles can be speedied? 389:, I'll ask a few questions relating to that. 1067:Nothing immediately alarming :) Good luck! — 294:best contribution would probably be getting 2777:A capable candidate doing very good work... 1179:It's been around five months, Garden. :-) – 2213:Really hope this one finally passes. ;) — 897:), we still have a lot of work to do on a 509:adding and fixing refs per concerns at FAC 189:random group of edits from four months ago 77:) - It has been nearly six months since I 728:(copied from previous RfA) A new editor, 53:Final (111/0/0); Closed as successful by 3224:- per nom, and has over 40,000 edits. -- 2153:Looks like would be a good mop-wielder. 1885:Let's get this Thingg started! Erik the 1022:Please keep discussion constructive and 1236:Best we've had in weeks, in my opinion. 1142:as well, which he has been great with. 14: 3541: 2530:. I have no concerns about this user. 110:later rescinded his block as erroneous 106:originally saw this as a 3RR violation 3181:Ref: Userbox on the candidate's page 3102:A top prospect for the Cleanup Team. 2573:helped cleanup after a little mistake 608:variety to the islands listed in the 604:as well as making around 95 edits of 532:was in pretty bad shape. some diffs: 385:Since you said you wanted to work in 812:Additional (optional) question from 782:Additional (optional) question from 79:first nominated Thingg for adminship 2466: 23: 2968:I have no concerns trusting them. 24: 3560: 3549:Successful requests for adminship 3030:. Looks like a strong candidate. 1432:Ha! That's absolutely amazing. . 3174: 2567:Already-thought-you-owned-a-mop 2478: 2407:. Edits and answers look good. - 2267: 804:with counseling suicidal people. 18:Knowledge:Requests for adminship 3394: 3389: 2934: 2928: 2471: 2036: 2030: 2025: 1918: 1911: 1797: 1790: 1358:be something wrong with him ;) 1301: 1291: 1194: 1156: 940:Requests for adminship/Thingg 2 497:adding refs to existing content 2890: 2885: 2372: 1677: 1670: 1642: 1635: 1489: 1482: 922:. For the edit count, see the 844: 839: 821: 816: 13: 1: 2077:o_O Some people read them... 2033: 935:Requests for adminship/Thingg 176:is another one, from among a 3498:19:53, 11 October 2008 (UTC) 3481:19:16, 11 October 2008 (UTC) 3460:15:40, 11 October 2008 (UTC) 3443:09:45, 11 October 2008 (UTC) 3426:22:18, 10 October 2008 (UTC) 3402:22:17, 10 October 2008 (UTC) 3378:22:06, 10 October 2008 (UTC) 3360:10:51, 10 October 2008 (UTC) 3348:09:55, 10 October 2008 (UTC) 3322:00:18, 10 October 2008 (UTC) 2925:No problems, huge positives 2305:Thought he was an admin! -- 1028:Special:Contributions/Thingg 262:criteria for speedy deletion 88:that was declined (based on 59:21:27, 11 October 2008 (UTC) 7: 3367:Definitely trust-worthy. -- 3329:Wooo! You made it into the 3305:22:43, 9 October 2008 (UTC) 3288:21:31, 9 October 2008 (UTC) 3271:21:07, 9 October 2008 (UTC) 3254:20:24, 9 October 2008 (UTC) 3237:17:36, 9 October 2008 (UTC) 3217:14:27, 9 October 2008 (UTC) 3200:12:44, 9 October 2008 (UTC) 3166:02:59, 9 October 2008 (UTC) 3149:23:15, 8 October 2008 (UTC) 3130:12:25, 8 October 2008 (UTC) 3112:04:20, 8 October 2008 (UTC) 3095:03:51, 8 October 2008 (UTC) 3069:01:50, 8 October 2008 (UTC) 3052:01:46, 8 October 2008 (UTC) 3035:01:22, 8 October 2008 (UTC) 3023:22:06, 7 October 2008 (UTC) 3007:21:18, 7 October 2008 (UTC) 2988:20:04, 7 October 2008 (UTC) 2961:19:22, 7 October 2008 (UTC) 2946:14:36, 7 October 2008 (UTC) 2918:14:30, 7 October 2008 (UTC) 2897:03:21, 7 October 2008 (UTC) 2874:00:08, 7 October 2008 (UTC) 2860:21:59, 6 October 2008 (UTC) 2841:20:36, 6 October 2008 (UTC) 2827:18:12, 6 October 2008 (UTC) 2810:17:15, 6 October 2008 (UTC) 2787:17:09, 6 October 2008 (UTC) 2770:14:47, 6 October 2008 (UTC) 2753:14:28, 6 October 2008 (UTC) 2738:14:25, 6 October 2008 (UTC) 2718:13:40, 6 October 2008 (UTC) 2695:12:40, 6 October 2008 (UTC) 2672:10:06, 6 October 2008 (UTC) 2649:04:26, 6 October 2008 (UTC) 2632:04:00, 6 October 2008 (UTC) 2608:01:35, 6 October 2008 (UTC) 2591:01:11, 6 October 2008 (UTC) 2563:00:47, 6 October 2008 (UTC) 2546:00:24, 6 October 2008 (UTC) 2522:22:48, 5 October 2008 (UTC) 2505:21:39, 5 October 2008 (UTC) 2484:21:32, 5 October 2008 (UTC) 2458:19:41, 5 October 2008 (UTC) 2439:19:31, 5 October 2008 (UTC) 2417:19:15, 5 October 2008 (UTC) 2400:19:14, 5 October 2008 (UTC) 2379:18:28, 5 October 2008 (UTC) 2363:17:32, 5 October 2008 (UTC) 2346:16:42, 5 October 2008 (UTC) 2329:16:19, 5 October 2008 (UTC) 2312:15:39, 5 October 2008 (UTC) 2298:15:10, 5 October 2008 (UTC) 2283:15:06, 5 October 2008 (UTC) 2262:14:01, 5 October 2008 (UTC) 2242:13:56, 5 October 2008 (UTC) 2225:13:42, 5 October 2008 (UTC) 2209:13:39, 5 October 2008 (UTC) 2192:11:11, 5 October 2008 (UTC) 2175:10:15, 5 October 2008 (UTC) 2158:10:03, 5 October 2008 (UTC) 2146:08:35, 5 October 2008 (UTC) 2122:08:22, 5 October 2008 (UTC) 2091:13:03, 5 October 2008 (UTC) 2073:07:04, 5 October 2008 (UTC) 2042:03:23, 5 October 2008 (UTC) 2015:03:16, 5 October 2008 (UTC) 1989:03:54, 5 October 2008 (UTC) 1979:03:41, 5 October 2008 (UTC) 1960:02:37, 5 October 2008 (UTC) 1941:01:44, 5 October 2008 (UTC) 1923:15:36, 5 October 2008 (UTC) 1905:01:41, 5 October 2008 (UTC) 1878:01:17, 5 October 2008 (UTC) 1862:01:09, 5 October 2008 (UTC) 1834:01:05, 5 October 2008 (UTC) 1818:01:00, 5 October 2008 (UTC) 1802:00:58, 5 October 2008 (UTC) 1781:23:55, 4 October 2008 (UTC) 1764:23:43, 4 October 2008 (UTC) 1747:23:42, 4 October 2008 (UTC) 1730:23:41, 4 October 2008 (UTC) 1713:23:31, 4 October 2008 (UTC) 1684:23:20, 4 October 2008 (UTC) 1664:23:14, 4 October 2008 (UTC) 1653:But will he abuse the mob? 1649:23:12, 4 October 2008 (UTC) 1626:22:49, 4 October 2008 (UTC) 1603:22:40, 4 October 2008 (UTC) 1582:22:33, 4 October 2008 (UTC) 1566:22:20, 4 October 2008 (UTC) 1536:22:16, 4 October 2008 (UTC) 1522:22:13, 4 October 2008 (UTC) 1493:22:07, 4 October 2008 (UTC) 1473:22:06, 4 October 2008 (UTC) 1450:01:58, 5 October 2008 (UTC) 1428:01:43, 5 October 2008 (UTC) 1408:for some context. Erik the 1399:21:49, 4 October 2008 (UTC) 1376:21:47, 4 October 2008 (UTC) 1350:21:36, 4 October 2008 (UTC) 1333:21:36, 4 October 2008 (UTC) 1315:21:34, 4 October 2008 (UTC) 1281:21:33, 4 October 2008 (UTC) 1258:22:34, 4 October 2008 (UTC) 1244:21:33, 4 October 2008 (UTC) 1227:21:28, 4 October 2008 (UTC) 1202:21:14, 5 October 2008 (UTC) 1188:01:19, 5 October 2008 (UTC) 1175:21:33, 4 October 2008 (UTC) 1164:21:10, 4 October 2008 (UTC) 1147:21:07, 4 October 2008 (UTC) 1134:21:05, 4 October 2008 (UTC) 1112:21:04, 4 October 2008 (UTC) 1087:21:03, 4 October 2008 (UTC) 1063:21:01, 4 October 2008 (UTC) 918:'s edit summary usage with 902:to what we deal with today. 851:03:22, 7 October 2008 (UTC) 742:12:47, 5 October 2008 (UTC) 706:12:47, 5 October 2008 (UTC) 398:The Funky (my)Space Monkeys 242:Questions for the candidate 233:21:03, 4 October 2008 (UTC) 214:15:59, 3 October 2008 (UTC) 133:15:00, 3 October 2008 (UTC) 10: 3565: 1633:User won't abuse the mop. 685:Additional Questions from 552:. More diffs may be found 542:fork info to a sub-article 452:Additional questions from 3295:, everything looks good. 1500:- nothing wrong, at all. 757:Additional Question from 613:Islands in the Bering Sea 534:complete overhaul of lead 3526:Please do not modify it. 580:I also recently created 373:Optional questions from 2308:how do you turn this on 1984:like to think I am. ;) 1909:Oh, that was poor. :-) 290:70-75% of my edits. My 267:DYK nominations process 94:the AfD for the article 38:Please do not modify it 2995:: without hesitation. 2598:. Very good editor. -- 2100:(AA) per Juliancolton 2010:egg-throwing coleslaw? 1771:- trustworthy editor. 1722:Pharaoh of the Wizards 501:reorganizing a section 2702:As last time Cheers, 170:Online questionnaires 34:request for adminship 1809:– good candidate. — 1049:Of course (per nom) 634:general edit warring 566:PlayStation Portable 526:PlayStation Portable 308:PlayStation Portable 3465:Very Strong Support 3040:very strong support 930:RfAs for this user: 730:user:wiwiwejd992728 185:this group of edits 166:Mega Man & Bass 3486:No-brainer support 3400: 1030:before commenting. 948:Links for Thingg: 538:add a few sections 39: 3386: 3182: 3173:: Have a stormy 3147: 3005: 2808: 2693: 2670: 2542: 2370:Excellent user.-- 2281: 2144: 2117: 2013: 1903: 1543:per Bsimmons666. 1426: 1310: 1305: 1140:gave him rollback 895:featured articles 795:Knowledge:SUICIDE 715:Avenged Sevenfold 475: 212: 37: 3556: 3528: 3423: 3418: 3413: 3399: 3397: 3391: 3343: 3340: 3234: 3228: 3180: 3178: 3145: 3141: 3127: 3085: 3080: 3019: 2999: 2984: 2978: 2972: 2944: 2936: 2930: 2894: 2892: 2887: 2838: 2807: 2805: 2799: 2794: 2747:Heimstern Läufer 2683: 2667: 2666: 2662: 2628: 2626: 2624: 2615:. Solid editor. 2587: 2580: 2543: 2540: 2536: 2520: 2501: 2496: 2482: 2480: 2475: 2455: 2450: 2436: 2397: 2391: 2376: 2309: 2277: 2275: 2271: 2270: 2257: 2222: 2217: 2190: 2188: 2187:User:Ameliorate! 2155:Prince of Canada 2143: 2141: 2130: 2120: 2115: 2106: 2087: 2081: 2065: 2038: 2035: 2032: 2027: 2004: 1938: 1935: 1920: 1915: 1901: 1896: 1892: 1889: 1858: 1852: 1830: 1815: 1799: 1794: 1711: 1708: 1702: 1681: 1674: 1662: 1646: 1639: 1599: 1593: 1578: 1559: 1554: 1549: 1534: 1520: 1512: 1511: 1510: 1490: 1486: 1484:DiverseMentality 1436: 1424: 1419: 1415: 1412: 1385: 1362: 1309: 1303: 1299: 1293: 1279: 1250:Malleus Fatuorum 1241: 1198: 1172: 1160: 1131: 1125: 1106: 1098: 1014: 973: 909:General comments 848: 846: 841: 825: 823: 818: 797:is not policy). 617: 611: 598:Sagchudak Island 550:26 various edits 473: 409: 403: 332:), one article, 312:Wikiproject Xbox 304:featured article 226: 211: 209: 203: 198: 131: 128: 122: 3564: 3563: 3559: 3558: 3557: 3555: 3554: 3553: 3539: 3538: 3537: 3531:this nomination 3524: 3515: 3506: 3421: 3416: 3411: 3387: 3376: 3341: 3338: 3312:- definitely —— 3232: 3226: 3143: 3121: 3092: 3017: 2982: 2976: 2970: 2937: 2926: 2883: 2836: 2803: 2797: 2795: 2736: 2664: 2658: 2622: 2620: 2618: 2613:Pile on support 2541:clamation point 2539: 2532: 2513: 2499: 2494: 2453: 2448: 2395: 2389: 2307: 2268: 2266: 2251: 2220: 2215: 2186: 2183: 2139: 2131: 2118: 2104: 2101: 2085: 2079: 2070: 2069:Call me MoP! :) 2052: 1986:Gladys J Cortez 1957:Gladys J Cortez 1936: 1933: 1899: 1894: 1887: 1856: 1850: 1828: 1811: 1706: 1698: 1696: 1654: 1597: 1591: 1576: 1557: 1552: 1547: 1526: 1508: 1506: 1504: 1501: 1447: 1434: 1422: 1417: 1410: 1401: 1396: 1383: 1373: 1360: 1313: 1304: 1268: 1239: 1170: 1046: 1037: 966: 949: 945: 911: 837: 814: 615: 609: 582:Chagulak Island 530:the old version 505:fixing the lead 495:. Later diffs: 407: 401: 326:Chagulak Island 244: 224: 207: 201: 199: 126: 118: 116: 50: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3562: 3552: 3551: 3536: 3535: 3519: 3518: 3514: 3511: 3510: 3509: 3505: 3502: 3501: 3500: 3483: 3462: 3445: 3428: 3404: 3380: 3372: 3362: 3350: 3324: 3307: 3290: 3278:, no worries. 3273: 3257: 3246:AtheWeatherman 3239: 3219: 3207:- looks good. 3202: 3195: 3188: 3179:admin life :) 3168: 3151: 3132: 3114: 3097: 3088: 3074:Strong Support 3071: 3054: 3037: 3025: 3009: 2990: 2963: 2948: 2933: 2920: 2899: 2876: 2862: 2843: 2829: 2812: 2789: 2772: 2755: 2740: 2732: 2720: 2697: 2674: 2651: 2634: 2610: 2593: 2565: 2548: 2524: 2515:Steven Walling 2507: 2486: 2460: 2441: 2419: 2402: 2381: 2365: 2348: 2338:ErikTheBikeMan 2331: 2319:, seems fine. 2314: 2300: 2285: 2264: 2244: 2227: 2211: 2194: 2177: 2167:LessHeard vanU 2160: 2148: 2129:As last time. 2124: 2113: 2095: 2094: 2093: 2068: 2044: 2017: 1995: 1994: 1993: 1992: 1991: 1943: 1927: 1926: 1925: 1883:Strong support 1880: 1867:Strong support 1864: 1836: 1820: 1804: 1783: 1766: 1749: 1732: 1715: 1690: 1689: 1688: 1687: 1686: 1628: 1605: 1584: 1568: 1561: 1538: 1524: 1495: 1475: 1458: 1457: 1456: 1455: 1454: 1453: 1452: 1445: 1435:NuclearWarfare 1394: 1384:NuclearWarfare 1380: 1371: 1361:NuclearWarfare 1352: 1335: 1321:Strong Support 1317: 1300: 1296: 1288:- Absolutely. 1283: 1265:Strong Support 1262: 1261: 1260: 1229: 1210: 1209: 1208: 1207: 1206: 1205: 1204: 1168:Are you sure? 1149: 1136: 1114: 1089: 1065: 1045: 1042: 1041: 1040: 1036: 1033: 1019: 1018: 1017: 1015: 944: 943: 942: 937: 929: 928: 927: 920:mathbot's tool 910: 907: 906: 905: 904: 903: 891:edits per page 808: 807: 806: 805: 779: 778: 777: 776: 754: 753: 752: 751: 722: 721: 720: 719: 682: 681: 680: 679: 664: 663: 662: 661: 647: 646: 645: 644: 622: 621: 620: 619: 575: 574: 573: 572: 519: 518: 517: 516: 456: 449: 448: 447: 446: 432: 431: 430: 429: 383: 382: 370: 369: 368: 367: 340: 339: 338: 337: 277: 276: 275: 274: 243: 240: 238: 236: 235: 49: 44: 43: 42: 25: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3561: 3550: 3547: 3546: 3544: 3534: 3532: 3527: 3521: 3520: 3517: 3516: 3508: 3507: 3499: 3495: 3491: 3487: 3484: 3482: 3478: 3474: 3470: 3466: 3463: 3461: 3457: 3453: 3450:. Impressive. 3449: 3446: 3444: 3440: 3436: 3432: 3429: 3427: 3424: 3419: 3414: 3408: 3405: 3403: 3398: 3396: 3392: 3384: 3381: 3379: 3375: 3374:contributions 3370: 3366: 3363: 3361: 3358: 3354: 3351: 3349: 3346: 3344: 3336: 3332: 3328: 3325: 3323: 3319: 3315: 3311: 3308: 3306: 3302: 3298: 3294: 3291: 3289: 3285: 3281: 3277: 3274: 3272: 3268: 3264: 3261: 3258: 3255: 3251: 3247: 3243: 3240: 3238: 3235: 3229: 3223: 3220: 3218: 3214: 3210: 3206: 3203: 3201: 3197: 3196: 3193: 3190: 3189: 3186: 3177: 3172: 3169: 3167: 3163: 3159: 3155: 3152: 3150: 3146: 3140: 3136: 3133: 3131: 3128: 3126: 3125: 3118: 3115: 3113: 3109: 3105: 3101: 3098: 3096: 3093: 3091: 3086: 3081: 3075: 3072: 3070: 3066: 3062: 3058: 3055: 3053: 3049: 3045: 3041: 3038: 3036: 3033: 3029: 3026: 3024: 3021: 3020: 3013: 3010: 3008: 3003: 2998: 2994: 2991: 2989: 2985: 2979: 2973: 2967: 2964: 2962: 2959: 2956: 2952: 2949: 2947: 2942: 2938: 2931: 2924: 2921: 2919: 2915: 2911: 2907: 2903: 2900: 2898: 2895: 2893: 2888: 2880: 2877: 2875: 2871: 2867: 2863: 2861: 2857: 2853: 2852: 2847: 2844: 2842: 2839: 2833: 2830: 2828: 2824: 2820: 2816: 2813: 2811: 2806: 2800: 2793: 2790: 2788: 2784: 2780: 2776: 2773: 2771: 2767: 2763: 2759: 2756: 2754: 2751: 2748: 2744: 2741: 2739: 2735: 2730: 2729: 2725:- No issues. 2724: 2721: 2719: 2715: 2712: 2709: 2705: 2701: 2698: 2696: 2691: 2687: 2682: 2678: 2675: 2673: 2669: 2663: 2661: 2655: 2652: 2650: 2646: 2642: 2638: 2635: 2633: 2630: 2629: 2614: 2611: 2609: 2605: 2601: 2597: 2594: 2592: 2589: 2588: 2582: 2581: 2574: 2570: 2566: 2564: 2560: 2556: 2552: 2549: 2547: 2544: 2537: 2535: 2529: 2525: 2523: 2519: 2516: 2511: 2508: 2506: 2503: 2502: 2497: 2490: 2487: 2485: 2481: 2476: 2474: 2469: 2464: 2461: 2459: 2456: 2451: 2445: 2442: 2440: 2437: 2435: 2432: 2429: 2423: 2420: 2418: 2414: 2410: 2409:FlyingToaster 2406: 2403: 2401: 2398: 2393: 2392: 2385: 2382: 2380: 2377: 2375: 2369: 2366: 2364: 2360: 2356: 2352: 2349: 2347: 2343: 2339: 2335: 2332: 2330: 2326: 2322: 2318: 2315: 2313: 2310: 2304: 2301: 2299: 2296: 2293: 2289: 2286: 2284: 2280: 2274: 2265: 2263: 2260: 2258: 2256: 2255: 2248: 2245: 2243: 2239: 2235: 2231: 2228: 2226: 2223: 2218: 2212: 2210: 2206: 2202: 2198: 2195: 2193: 2189: 2181: 2178: 2176: 2172: 2168: 2164: 2161: 2159: 2156: 2152: 2149: 2147: 2142: 2136: 2135: 2128: 2125: 2123: 2119: 2110: 2108: 2107: 2099: 2096: 2092: 2089: 2088: 2082: 2076: 2075: 2074: 2071: 2066: 2063: 2059: 2055: 2048: 2045: 2043: 2040: 2039: 2028: 2022:- why not. 2021: 2018: 2016: 2011: 2008: 2003: 1999: 1996: 1990: 1987: 1982: 1981: 1980: 1976: 1972: 1968: 1963: 1962: 1961: 1958: 1955: 1953: 1947: 1944: 1942: 1939: 1931: 1928: 1924: 1921: 1916: 1914: 1908: 1907: 1906: 1902: 1897: 1890: 1884: 1881: 1879: 1876: 1874: 1872: 1868: 1865: 1863: 1860: 1859: 1853: 1847: 1844: 1840: 1837: 1835: 1832: 1831: 1824: 1821: 1819: 1816: 1814: 1813:sephiroth bcr 1808: 1805: 1803: 1800: 1795: 1793: 1787: 1784: 1782: 1778: 1774: 1770: 1767: 1765: 1761: 1757: 1753: 1750: 1748: 1744: 1740: 1736: 1733: 1731: 1727: 1723: 1719: 1716: 1714: 1709: 1703: 1701: 1694: 1691: 1685: 1682: 1680: 1675: 1673: 1667: 1666: 1665: 1661: 1660: 1659: 1652: 1651: 1650: 1647: 1645: 1640: 1638: 1632: 1629: 1627: 1624: 1621: 1620: 1616: 1613: 1609: 1606: 1604: 1600: 1594: 1588: 1585: 1583: 1580: 1579: 1573:Makes sense. 1572: 1569: 1567: 1564: 1562: 1560: 1555: 1550: 1545: 1542: 1539: 1537: 1533: 1532: 1531: 1525: 1523: 1519: 1517: 1513: 1499: 1496: 1494: 1491: 1487: 1485: 1479: 1476: 1474: 1470: 1466: 1462: 1459: 1451: 1448: 1443: 1442: 1441: 1437: 1431: 1430: 1429: 1425: 1420: 1413: 1407: 1403: 1402: 1400: 1397: 1392: 1391: 1390: 1386: 1379: 1378: 1377: 1374: 1369: 1368: 1367: 1363: 1357: 1353: 1351: 1347: 1343: 1339: 1336: 1334: 1330: 1326: 1322: 1318: 1316: 1311: 1306: 1295: 1294: 1287: 1284: 1282: 1278: 1276: 1272: 1266: 1263: 1259: 1255: 1251: 1247: 1246: 1245: 1242: 1237: 1233: 1230: 1228: 1225: 1223: 1218: 1214: 1211: 1203: 1199: 1197: 1191: 1190: 1189: 1186: 1184: 1182: 1178: 1177: 1176: 1173: 1167: 1166: 1165: 1161: 1159: 1153: 1150: 1148: 1145: 1141: 1137: 1135: 1132: 1126: 1124: 1118: 1115: 1113: 1109: 1108: 1107: 1099: 1093: 1090: 1088: 1084: 1080: 1076: 1072: 1071: 1066: 1064: 1060: 1056: 1052: 1048: 1047: 1039: 1038: 1032: 1031: 1029: 1025: 1016: 1012: 1009: 1006: 1003: 1000: 997: 994: 991: 988: 985: 982: 979: 976: 972: 969: 965: 962: 959: 956: 952: 947: 946: 941: 938: 936: 933: 932: 931: 925: 921: 917: 913: 912: 900: 896: 892: 888: 884: 880: 875: 871: 867: 863: 858: 854: 853: 852: 849: 847: 842: 834: 831: 830: 829: 828: 827: 824: 819: 802: 799: 798: 796: 792: 789: 788: 787: 786: 785: 773: 770: 769: 767: 764: 763: 762: 761: 760: 748: 745: 744: 743: 739: 735: 731: 727: 724: 723: 716: 712: 709: 708: 707: 703: 699: 695: 692: 691: 690: 689: 688: 676: 673: 672: 669: 666: 665: 658: 655: 654: 652: 649: 648: 641: 638: 637: 635: 631: 630:discretionary 627: 624: 623: 614: 607: 603: 599: 595: 594:Uliaga Island 591: 587: 586:Adugak Island 583: 579: 578: 577: 576: 570: 567: 563: 560:can be found 559: 558:PlayStation 3 555: 551: 547: 543: 539: 535: 531: 527: 523: 522: 521: 520: 514: 510: 506: 502: 498: 494: 493:failed GA nom 491: 488: 485: 482: 479: 471: 470:PlayStation 3 467: 464: 463: 462:appreciated. 460: 457: 455: 451: 450: 443: 440: 439: 437: 434: 433: 426: 421: 416: 413: 412: 406: 399: 395: 392: 391: 390: 388: 380: 376: 372: 371: 364: 360: 355: 351: 348: 347: 345: 342: 341: 335: 334:Uliaga Island 331: 327: 323: 318: 313: 309: 305: 301: 297: 296:PlayStation 3 293: 288: 285: 284: 282: 279: 278: 272: 268: 263: 258: 255: 254: 252: 249: 248: 247: 239: 234: 231: 229: 227: 221: 218: 217: 216: 215: 210: 204: 195: 192: 190: 186: 181: 180:of reverts. 179: 175: 171: 167: 163: 159: 155: 150: 148: 143: 142: 141: 135: 134: 129: 123: 121: 113: 111: 107: 102: 97: 95: 91: 87: 82: 80: 76: 73: 70: 66: 62: 61: 60: 56: 48: 41: 35: 32: 27: 26: 19: 3525: 3522: 3485: 3464: 3452:Sumoeagle179 3447: 3430: 3406: 3395: 3382: 3369:Patar knight 3364: 3352: 3335:RfA criteria 3326: 3309: 3292: 3275: 3259: 3241: 3221: 3204: 3192: 3185: 3170: 3153: 3134: 3123: 3122: 3116: 3099: 3087: 3073: 3056: 3039: 3027: 3016: 3011: 2992: 2965: 2950: 2922: 2910:Cosmic Latte 2904:per nom and 2901: 2882: 2878: 2849: 2845: 2831: 2814: 2791: 2774: 2757: 2742: 2726: 2722: 2710: 2699: 2676: 2659: 2653: 2636: 2617: 2612: 2595: 2584: 2577: 2568: 2550: 2533: 2527: 2509: 2492: 2488: 2479:eUnshattered 2472: 2462: 2444:Affirmative. 2443: 2433: 2430: 2427: 2421: 2404: 2387: 2383: 2373: 2367: 2350: 2333: 2316: 2302: 2290:(again!) — 2287: 2272: 2253: 2252: 2246: 2229: 2196: 2179: 2162: 2150: 2133: 2126: 2102: 2097: 2083: 2061: 2057: 2053: 2046: 2023: 2019: 1997: 1966: 1949: 1945: 1929: 1912: 1882: 1871:Juliancolton 1866: 1854: 1846:interactions 1841:Haven't had 1839:Weak Support 1838: 1826: 1822: 1812: 1806: 1791: 1785: 1768: 1751: 1737:Looks good. 1734: 1717: 1699: 1692: 1678: 1671: 1656: 1655: 1643: 1636: 1630: 1622: 1618: 1614: 1610:of course. — 1607: 1586: 1574: 1570: 1563: 1544: 1540: 1528: 1527: 1502: 1497: 1483: 1477: 1460: 1439: 1438: 1388: 1387: 1365: 1364: 1355: 1337: 1320: 1290: 1285: 1269: 1264: 1235: 1231: 1221: 1212: 1195: 1181:Juliancolton 1157: 1151: 1122: 1116: 1102: 1101: 1091: 1068: 1021: 1020: 1007: 1001: 995: 989: 983: 977: 970: 963: 957: 898: 886: 882: 878: 873: 865: 862:five pillars 856: 836: 832: 813: 811: 809: 800: 790: 781: 780: 771: 765: 756: 755: 746: 725: 710: 693: 684: 683: 674: 667: 656: 650: 639: 633: 629: 625: 602:Aziak Island 590:Baby Islands 478:improvements 465: 458: 441: 435: 428:non-notable. 424: 414: 393: 384: 354:Barack Obama 349: 343: 330:Baby Islands 316: 300:good article 291: 286: 280: 271:DYK template 256: 250: 245: 237: 219: 196: 193: 182: 151: 144: 137: 136: 119: 114: 101:Barack Obama 98: 83: 71: 63: 52: 51: 46: 30: 28: 3469:GameShowKid 3435:Ncmvocalist 3280:Tim Vickers 3061:Cube lurker 3018:Spinach Dip 2941:KoЯn flakes 2555:Majoreditor 2234:Daniel Case 2201:AdjustShift 1465:Bsimmons666 1271:Malinaccier 178:long string 86:one CSD tag 3263:Hobartimus 3014:Clearly. 2105:·Add§hore· 2002:Slgrandson 1937:HyBRiD II 1934:II MusLiM 1773:PhilKnight 1619:discussion 1325:Ecoleetage 1217:Yilloslime 1070:Cyclonenim 1035:Discussion 322:Bering Sea 222:I accept. 138:Co-nom by 31:successful 3139:Dreadstar 3124:Wizardman 3044:Hawkey131 2971:rootology 2779:Modernist 2728:Jauerback 2449:Christian 2292:Athaenara 1952:WP:SPEEDY 1739:America69 1144:Acalamari 993:block log 924:talk page 864:) should 618:template. 158:automaton 55:WJBscribe 3543:Category 3490:Winger84 3477:evidence 3390:Cenarium 3194:Cherian 3117:Supportt 2906:the lulz 2866:Valtoras 2837:Tiptoety 2714:contribs 2704:Casliber 2690:contribs 2422:Support. 2197:Support. 2007:How's my 1930:Supportt 1843:the best 1672:Schfifty 1637:Schfifty 1592:Icewedge 1553:Mountain 1292:Wisdom89 1079:contribs 1059:contribs 961:contribs 759:RockManQ 420:reliable 154:Huggling 75:contribs 3513:Neutral 3448:Support 3431:Support 3407:Support 3383:Support 3365:Support 3353:Support 3327:Support 3310:Support 3293:Support 3276:Support 3260:Support 3242:Support 3222:Support 3209:Bearian 3205:Support 3171:Support 3154:Support 3135:Support 3104:Freqsh0 3100:Support 3057:Support 3028:Support 3012:Support 2997:Toddst1 2993:Support 2966:Support 2951:Support 2929:Special 2923:Support 2902:Support 2886:Marlith 2879:Support 2846:Support 2832:Support 2815:Support 2775:Support 2762:Patrick 2758:Support 2743:Support 2723:Support 2700:Support 2677:Support 2654:Support 2637:Support 2600:Carioca 2596:Support 2569:support 2551:Support 2510:Support 2463:Support 2405:Support 2384:Support 2374:Xp54321 2368:Support 2355:Ford MF 2351:Support 2334:Support 2317:Support 2303:Support 2288:Support 2273:user OK 2254:Realist 2247:Support 2230:Support 2180:Support 2163:Support 2151:Support 2127:Support 2098:Support 2047:Support 2020:Support 1998:Support 1971:Protonk 1967:usually 1946:Support 1913:Anthøny 1823:Support 1807:Support 1792:Anthøny 1786:Support 1769:Support 1756:Protonk 1752:Support 1735:Support 1718:Support 1693:Support 1658:Everyme 1631:Support 1608:Support 1587:Support 1577:MBisanz 1571:Support 1541:Support 1530:Everyme 1498:Support 1478:Support 1461:Support 1446:My work 1395:My work 1372:My work 1342:Useight 1338:Support 1286:Support 1232:Support 1213:Support 1152:Support 1117:Support 1092:Support 1051:Tombomp 1044:Support 968:deleted 840:Marlith 817:Marlith 784:Toddst1 484:article 387:CAT:CSD 375:Protonk 359:Blu-ray 3504:Oppose 3331:WP:100 3314:Possum 3233:Wolfie 3227:Yowuza 3158:Apteva 3090:review 3032:Jayjg 2891:(Talk) 2819:Banime 2798:Frank 2750:(talk) 2681:SWik78 2526:Umm... 2518:(talk) 2431:ndonic 2321:Stifle 2064:uppets 2056:aster 1829:Flewis 1612:αἰτίας 1548:Little 1240:Caulde 1196:Garden 1171:Caulde 1158:Garden 951:Thingg 916:Thingg 874:anyone 870:WP:IAR 845:(Talk) 822:(Talk) 660:meant? 600:, and 564:, and 405:Hangon 363:HD DVD 292:single 225:Thingg 202:Frank 65:Thingg 47:Thingg 3297:Nsk92 2804:talk 2734:dude. 2641:Matty 2579:Jamie 2216:Ceran 2140:Chat 2134:Pedro 2086:Cobra 2080:Glass 2026:jj137 1857:Cobra 1851:Glass 1679:Three 1644:Three 1083:email 1024:civil 975:count 883:would 866:never 775:well. 734:Giggy 698:Giggy 687:Giggy 487:prior 468:With 454:Irpen 425:every 366:them. 208:talk 140:Frank 16:< 3494:talk 3479:)-- 3475:)--( 3473:talk 3471:)--( 3456:talk 3439:talk 3342:Loxy 3339:Foxy 3318:talk 3301:talk 3284:talk 3267:talk 3250:talk 3213:talk 3187:Tinu 3162:talk 3108:talk 3065:talk 3048:talk 3002:talk 2914:talk 2870:talk 2856:talk 2851:Cirt 2823:talk 2783:talk 2766:talk 2708:talk 2686:talk 2645:talk 2604:talk 2559:talk 2413:talk 2396:ergy 2359:talk 2342:talk 2325:talk 2279:macy 2238:talk 2221:thor 2205:talk 2171:talk 2034:talk 2000:. -- 1975:talk 1777:talk 1760:talk 1743:talk 1726:talk 1707:talk 1700:xeno 1598:talk 1516:talk 1469:talk 1406:here 1404:See 1356:must 1346:talk 1329:talk 1275:talk 1254:talk 1105:talk 1097:RyRy 1075:talk 1055:talk 1005:rfar 987:logs 955:talk 914:See 893:and 887:have 738:talk 702:talk 606:this 569:here 562:here 554:here 524:For 513:here 379:talk 302:and 174:Here 168:and 162:Here 127:talk 120:xeno 108:but 90:this 69:talk 3371:- / 3183:-- 3084:Fan 3079:LAA 2660:Axl 2586:S93 2528:yes 2500:Why 2390:Syn 2116:ont 1888:Red 1507:tth 1505:iMa 1411:Red 1127:| 1123:Tan 1011:spi 981:AfD 899:lot 879:the 833:14. 791:13. 766:12. 726:11. 694:10. 445:it. 298:to 57:at 3545:: 3496:) 3458:) 3441:) 3357:╦╩ 3355:ˉˉ 3320:) 3303:) 3286:) 3269:) 3252:) 3230:ZX 3215:) 3198:- 3164:) 3119:. 3110:) 3076:-- 3067:) 3050:) 2986:) 2980:)( 2955:VG 2916:) 2908:. 2872:) 2858:) 2825:) 2801:| 2785:) 2768:) 2716:) 2688:• 2647:) 2627:ni 2606:) 2561:) 2553:. 2495:So 2454:.И 2424:· 2415:) 2386:. 2361:) 2344:) 2327:) 2295:✉ 2276:. 2249:— 2240:) 2207:) 2184:~ 2173:) 2137:: 2060:f 1977:) 1900:~~ 1895:~~ 1891:2 1779:) 1762:) 1745:) 1728:) 1601:) 1509:ew 1471:) 1423:~~ 1418:~~ 1414:2 1348:) 1331:) 1307:/ 1256:) 1200:. 1162:. 1130:39 1110:) 1085:) 1081:· 1077:· 1061:) 999:lu 857:A. 801:A. 772:A. 747:A. 740:) 711:A. 704:) 675:A: 668:9. 657:A: 651:8. 640:A: 626:7. 616:}} 610:{{ 596:, 592:, 588:, 584:, 548:, 544:, 540:, 536:, 507:, 503:, 499:, 490:to 481:to 476:) 466:A: 442:A: 408:}} 402:{{ 394:4: 361:- 350:A: 344:3. 328:, 287:A: 281:2. 257:A: 251:1. 205:| 160:. 36:. 3492:( 3454:( 3437:( 3422:1 3417:H 3412:A 3316:( 3299:( 3282:( 3265:( 3256:. 3248:( 3211:( 3160:( 3144:† 3106:( 3063:( 3046:( 3004:) 3000:( 2983:T 2977:C 2974:( 2958:☎ 2943:) 2939:( 2935:K 2912:( 2868:( 2854:( 2821:( 2781:( 2764:( 2731:/ 2711:· 2706:( 2692:) 2684:( 2665:¤ 2643:( 2625:i 2623:k 2621:u 2619:K 2602:( 2557:( 2534:X 2473:c 2468:I 2446:→ 2434:O 2428:A 2411:( 2357:( 2340:( 2323:( 2236:( 2203:( 2169:( 2114:C 2111:/ 2062:P 2058:o 2054:M 2037:) 2031:( 2012:) 2005:( 1973:( 1919:✉ 1798:✉ 1775:( 1758:( 1741:( 1724:( 1710:) 1704:( 1623:• 1615:• 1595:( 1558:5 1518:) 1514:( 1467:( 1344:( 1327:( 1312:) 1302:T 1297:( 1277:) 1273:( 1252:( 1224:) 1222:t 1220:( 1100:( 1073:( 1057:/ 1053:( 1013:) 1008:· 1002:· 996:· 990:· 984:· 978:· 971:· 964:· 958:· 953:( 926:. 855:' 826:' 810:' 736:( 700:( 515:. 459:6 436:5 415:A 381:) 377:( 317:I 130:) 124:( 72:· 67:( 40:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge

:Requests for adminship/Thingg 2 - Knowledge

Index