363:
to pass. Even though you only need to meet one of the WP:MUSIC criteria, the general consensus here is that #6 is considered the weakest one of the lot. I can see this one coming back to AfD in 6 months or so if no more ref's to prove notability in any of the other areas arise.
156:
As we all should know, wikipedia is for articles about things that are verifiable and indeed notable as of the time the article is written, claiming that it will become notable some day is a violation of
184:
is what's being claimed; "Contains at least one member who was once a part of or later joined a band that is otherwise notable". The creator's a new account so doesn't know how to word it in
116:
132:
defence of the article on the talkpage (basically summarised as: the band's new, but all the members are already notable). Bringing it over for consensus one way or the other.
236:
I must apologize for not being aware of that particular sentence in that particular guideline; however, I stick to my original opinion, due to the problem with verifiability.
332:
121:
245:
206:
376:
346:
320:
413:
397:
263:
434:
421:
Agreeing with the reasoning, notable people forming a band implies a certain notability for the band. Needs some cleanup though if kept...
146:
169:
57:
181:
405:, notable per above, and since there are five notable people forming this band there's no good redirect target. --
17:
448:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
88:
83:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
92:
75:
97:
449:
36:
109:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
105:
200:
140:
8:
254:
The author has responded to the request and added references, no reason to delete it now.
185:
305:
62:
393:
101:
53:
356:
281:
259:
241:
165:
428:
385:
289:
195:
158:
135:
79:
366:
339:
313:
407:
389:
49:
360:
297:
255:
237:
161:
128:
Procedural nom. I've declined a speedy on this as the creator's posted a
423:
293:
71:
63:
301:
388:
under guideline C6, the members alone give the band notability.
285:
442:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
276:
333:
list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions
288:—but neither are they hopeless. This band passes
188:yet. Not judging either way whether the claim is
48:(non-admin closure). Seems to be a notable band.
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
452:). No further edits should be made to this page.
331:: This debate has been included in the
14:
274:Well, the references are not ideal—
23:
24:
464:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
292:criterion #6, with members of
13:
1:
359:. References provide enough
7:
435:08:42, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
414:20:20, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
398:10:42, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
384:- per Esradekan, does pass
377:03:31, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
347:01:55, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
321:01:52, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
264:20:25, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
246:00:41, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
207:00:14, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
170:00:09, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
147:23:54, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
58:09:14, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
10:
469:
445:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
159:Knowledge: cristal ball
304:forming a supposed "
182:WP:BAND criteria 6
44:The result was
375:
349:
345:
336:
319:
460:
447:
431:
426:
412:
410:
390:Thor Malmjursson
373:
372:
365:
344:
342:
337:
327:
318:
316:
282:AbsolutePunk.net
205:
203:
198:
145:
143:
138:
119:
113:
95:
34:
468:
467:
463:
462:
461:
459:
458:
457:
456:
450:deletion review
443:
429:
424:
408:
406:
370:Esradekan Gibb
368:
367:
340:
314:
201:
196:
193:
141:
136:
133:
115:
86:
70:
67:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
466:
455:
454:
438:
437:
416:
400:
379:
350:
324:
323:
272:
271:
270:
269:
268:
267:
266:
212:
211:
210:
209:
126:
125:
66:
61:
42:
41:
25:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
465:
453:
451:
446:
440:
439:
436:
433:
432:
427:
420:
417:
415:
411:
404:
401:
399:
395:
391:
387:
383:
380:
378:
374:
371:
362:
361:verifiability
358:
354:
351:
348:
343:
334:
330:
326:
325:
322:
317:
311:
307:
303:
299:
295:
291:
287:
283:
279:
278:
273:
265:
261:
257:
253:
250:
249:
248:
247:
243:
239:
234:
233:
231:
230:
228:
227:
225:
224:
222:
221:
219:
218:
216:
215:
208:
204:
199:
191:
187:
183:
180:
177:
176:
175:
174:
173:
172:
171:
167:
163:
160:
155:
149:
148:
144:
139:
131:
123:
118:
111:
107:
103:
99:
94:
90:
85:
81:
77:
73:
69:
68:
65:
60:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
444:
441:
422:
418:
402:
381:
369:
352:
328:
309:
275:
251:
235:
232:
229:
226:
223:
220:
217:
214:
213:
189:
186:WP:WIKISPEAK
178:
153:
151:
150:
129:
127:
45:
43:
31:
28:
357:WP:MUSIC#C6
298:Steel Train
306:supergroup
294:The Format
72:Fun (band)
64:Fun (band)
341:Paul Erik
315:Paul Erik
302:Anathallo
130:potential
409:Amalthea
386:WP:MUSIC
290:WP:MUSIC
122:View log
286:Buzznet
179:Comment
89:protect
84:history
300:, and
256:DubZog
238:DubZog
162:DubZog
154:Delete
117:delete
93:delete
50:Ruslik
277:Relix
202:scent
197:iride
190:valid
142:scent
137:iride
120:) – (
110:views
102:watch
98:links
16:<
419:Keep
403:Keep
394:talk
382:Keep
355:per
353:Keep
329:Note
310:Keep
260:talk
252:Keep
242:talk
166:talk
106:logs
80:talk
76:edit
54:talk
46:Keep
430:Why
335:.
308:".
425:So
396:)
312:.
296:,
284:,
280:,
262:)
244:)
194:–
168:)
134:–
108:|
104:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
82:|
78:|
56:)
392:(
338:—
258:(
240:(
192:.
164:(
152:*
124:)
114:(
112:)
74:(
52:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.