Knowledge:Requests for adminship/Acalamari 2

1972:

person. It has been 3 months since his last RfA and my own personal observations of him in that time have been very positive and have shown what I believe is genuine and profound growth in maturity, outlook and a reevaluation of the way he responds to vandals, trolls and otherwise difficult users, as well as the way he handles personal attacks and abuse. Three months is a very fair and decent time between nominations, especially when the first nomination didn't reveal any serious problems or deficiencies, but were mostly issues which emanated from a genuine concern for Acalamari, his sensitivity and his ability to cope with abuse and trolling. I feel some trepidation and apprehension that perhaps three months isn't enough time to be sure that there has been sufficient personal growth needed to let go of the insecurity, drama and hypersensitivity. And so my support comes as very solid support but with the proviso that he not be too proud to lean on others, on his friends, on people he trusts and respects and on the entire admin team if needed. In Acalamari's previous RfA, I was also concerned about his judgment, particularly pertaining to policy development and implementation of existing policy, most notably, as he has already mentioned above, at RFC/Usernames. Again, my hope here is that he will lean on Allie, Ryan and other more experienced admins he has come to trust and respect before jumping in at the deep end. All that said, Acalamari has

706:. I would post a message on both users talk pages, asking them to discuss instead of revert war. If they would be willing to discuss and stop reverting each other, I would ignore 3RR for them both. The reason I would ignore that policy for them is because common sense tells me that if they were both blocked, they would be unable to discuss their edits, and it's possible they could begin warring again after coming off the blocks; but if they were given a chance to talk, there's a strong chance the revert war would end. If they discussed and came to an agreement, ignoring 3RR in that circumstance would have been justifed and productive overall to Knowledge. Yes, I could have reported/blocked the users and had the page protected, but if that event can be avoided, that's a good thing. 472:, and I initiated a discussion on the talk page to get them to discuss. They did initially, but unfortunately, JJH1992 began edit warring again. I gave the user links to the pages he should read, but sadly, he didn’t pay any attention to them. He is currently blocked for a month by Adam Cuerden. I hope to try to talk to JJH1992 again when he comes off his block to prevent him from getting into more revert wars over infoboxes. He’s been blocked 6 times (7, but that block was undone to extend the block) for that, and I want to stop him from getting an indefinite block, as he has actually done a lot of good work. 96:. (Wiki-gnomes may locate an aborted one a few days ago, which was terminated because I had already promised to nominate). The first one did not fail, but did not achieve consensus. I did not !vote at that time, partly because my own RfA was running simultaneously, but I became aware of this editor at that time. I have been seriously impressed by the way that he has developed and matured as an editor over the three months since his last RfA, and I believe that this improvement is manifested in the edits which he has produced over this period. 534:. I used to have a habit or patrolling the list of new users each day, and I didn't understand the username policy completely, and reported borderline and inoffensive usernames to that page. I didn't bother to discuss a user's name, and instead, just brought them to RFCN without even notifying them. There was concern at the last RfA that I would block users with borderline usersnames or users who had inoffensive usernames, and/or concerns I would forget the username policy. 1750: 89:. Acalamari has been a Knowledge editor since October 2006, and in the eight months that he has been with the project he has amassed, for those to whom edit count is important, 13,343 edits. These include 7,257 edits to mainspace, 1.843 to wikipedia and 109 to wiki talk. He has also registered significant contributions within the areas of templates and of images, and indeed in essentially every nook and cranny of the project. 633:, as of 12:26, 22 June 2007, says that open proxies should be blocked indefinitely, and currently, there appears to be no consensus established on whether to change that or not. I will follow the current policy because that's what is on that page. Unless the policy changes, I should follow the current version instead of my own, or anybody else's, view on open proxies. 923:- I supported last time, but I have to agree in hindsight that maybe he wasn't quite ready. If you look through his edits since then, what a difference there has been, he's taken on board the opposition like a true gent and is a much stronger character and can deal with anything that is hit at him in a way that any admin should. I give Acalamari my full endorsement. 2598:

She's a good editor and works in an area where more administrator supervision could be an asset to Knowledge. Has been a great help on researching and editing some minor biographies of living people (outside of pop culture, including an African cardiovascular surgeon) in a responsible manner. Takes

1835:

I have noticed this user when I vote in Rfa's and have noticed Acalamari in my recent changes patrolling. I am shocked that Acalamari is not already a admin. The reason why I am supporting Acalamari is A)because Acalamari is a active wikipedian B) because Acalamari is a experienced wikipedian and C)

1128:

Yes, of course. I was neutral the last time, due to some concerns about maturity, but Acalamari has truly changed phenomenally since his last RfA - I can think of few editors more mature than him! Hard worker, always civil, always gets along with people, and evidently cares deeply about us, which can

481:

The other conflict (it wasn't a conflict; it's actually a case of silly sockpuppetry) has been going on since an hour or so after my previous RfA closed. While I was responding to users who were talking about the RfA, I edit conflicted on my own talk page with a user called Owner of Boats, who asked

692:

IAR is an interesting policy, and when it's used correctly, it helps the project greatly. In all fairness, I hadn't heard about it until it was commonly getting asked on RfA's during April. I was unsure of it at first, but I've come to understand it more. Before ignoring a rule, I believe that it's

553:

As for why I think I'm ready now, I believe I have addressed the concerns listed. I understand policy now more than I did back then (especially the policies the opposition mentioned). However, I accept that however ready I may feel to become an administrator, in the end, it is not me who determines

525:

I believe it failed for pretty much most of the reasons the opposition listed. The two biggest concerns, in my opinion, were me being incapable at the time of taking criticism and personal attacks (with the blog incidents and user page vandalism); and I had a tendency to overreact to small problems

184:

I will explain my reasons for wanting to work in these places: AIV can get backlogged quickly, and there have been times where I have reported a vandal to there, the page is filled with reported vandals, and no administrators have been around for as long as half an hour. It will be a good thing to

1971:

comment, albeit one with some slight trepidation, but a solid support nonetheless. I feel that Acalamari is clearly dedicated to the project and I feel certain that he can be trusted to use the tools to the best of his ability in the best interests of the project. My only concern is for him as a

215:

is a category which is filled with either the user pages or talk pages of indefinitely blocked users; and those pages need deleting. I am interested in working in this category because it too, gets backlogged, and from what I’ve seen of the category, it needs more administrative attention. I will

543:

I believe I am no longer thin-skinnned. I have been called a variety of names since three months ago, and those insults never bothered me. I don't overreact to silly situations anymore, as I didn't go crazy when I was trolled and vandalized. I learned to accept that I'll get verbally whacked by

642:

The policy is important because open proxies, more often than not, are used abusively, and not just on Knowledge either. A sockpuppeteer could use an open proxy to create multiple accounts, and begin to vandalize pages, attack Wikipedians with personal information, etc, and remain undetected.

3038:

sorry this may seem petty... but after reading all 28 opposes in the last RFA, there is no way I can support this one. I don't think that the issues brought up in March (only 3 months ago I might add) have been resolved at this point. Sorry Acalamari... maybe next year.

909:, beat the nom. Acalamari is a really friendly and sensible guy, and has obviously learned a lot since his last RfA and knows what he's going in for now. I have complete trust in him with the tools and believe he'd be a great admin. Best of luck, - 2574:. I'm not familiar with the details of the issues surrounding his previous nomination, but he seems very calm and level-headed now; he also does fantastic work on pop music articles, and adminship seems to be the next logical step for him. 2043:

The growth this editor has shown in the last 3 months leads me to support. Acalamari is a good and dedicated editor. Keep up the good work and (echoing Sarah) continue to improve on your sensitivity and slight proclivity towards drama. —

1848:

I didn't read everything, but I'll just say this: I can't remember what the problem was last time. Acalamari has contributed in a lot of useful ways, and will continue his valuable efforts. Adminship will only enable him to do more.

1146:

per - 1) Nicely expanded and referenced answers to the questions. 2) Civility demonstrated in contribution history. 2) Activity demonstrated by count tool. 4) Anthony nominated and I have deep respect for his values. 5) Per Majorly.

494:

came back, and the trolling spread to her. As I said, this isn’t really a conflict, and it wasn't stressful, as I'm no longer offended by insults or personal attacks; but this is a sockpuppet event notable enough for mentioning

2085:. I've run into Acalamari on numerous occasions here and there and have always come away with a good impression. I find the answers to the questions quite satisfactory. Get the mop ready - this user will do good with it. 99:

His edits are open to your inspection. I feel that they now show a level of knowledge of policy, a level of self-discipline and a level of maturity which more than justify the award to him of the mop and bucket.

824: 818: 619:

My view: they are used to keep the people who use them untrackable when they use the Internet. I understand that some people use them to remain private on the Internet while others use them to be disruptive

652:

As I said, there appears to be no current consensus to change the policy. My concern is that this RfA may turn into an open proxy debate, even though I do not use, and do not want to use, an open proxy.

1685:. Acalamari is one of the most dedicated, hard workind and kindest editors I've ever encountered. He's an awesome candidate, just the kind that makes you think "I wish I was the one to nominate him!" 1221: 2912:

It's because my signature is upside down! I saw your RfA, ran a search for "Deskana" to see if I'd already voted, and when nothing came up (because my sig is upside down), I voted again! Whoops! --

212: 172: 202:

because, as I mentioned last time, I have been auto-blocked before (not for a long time, fortunately), and it’s because of auto-blocks that I am interested in keeping an eye on those categories.

194:

I mentioned in my last RfA that I’d like to do work at RFPP because I am interested in page protection. That still holds true now. With two of the categories I mentioned, I will keep an eye on

2671:! :) Polite, helpful and experienced enough in my humble opinion. Acalamari, please bear Sarah's note above in mind—if you need any help in the future and I can be of assistance, I'm here :) 723:

be used to justify an edit war or start one in the first place, nor should it be used to intentionally disrupt Knowledge; and in my opinion, there is absolutely no reason at all to ignore

2865:

cliche-tastic. Unnaturally strong support here, nothing but good things to report, I see you everywhere and I hope to continue to do so once you get three extra buttons. Good luck!

347: 2944:

for reasons described before on Acalamari's talk page. By the way, Acalamari, why did you not accept my nomination and accepted this one? Just wondering. Anyway, good luck, and I

1990:- I'd been hoping to do a co-nom, but missed my chance, as I was offline. :-( Anyway, Acalamari will make a fantastic admin, and I'm glad to see this request should sail through. 290: 2077: 1198: 526:(such as trolls), and turn minor situations, as one member of the opposition said, "into scandals". Those issues had to be addressed; for thin-skinnedness and overreaction are 185:

help clear that backlog instead of have to wait for someone else to do it. CSD, on the other hand, is backlogged most of the time, and administrators are always needed there.

1580: 139:

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Knowledge as an administrator. You may wish to answer the following optional questions to provide guidance for participants:

1836:

because Acalamari is a very friendly person. I feel as if being friendly is a very important quality to have if you are going to be a admin. Good luck with your Rfa!:)--

490:

had blocked. A few days later, Natalie Erin and I started getting trolled by blatant sockpuppets. This carried on for a while, stopped, and then returned about the time

2578: 1991: 1266:- Acalamari has changed quite a bit since his previous RfA. His skin has thickened rather nicely. Answers to the questions show just how far this candidate has come - 429:

Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

2643: 1994: 2907: 1016: 1005: 947: 125: 2462: 2898: 2869: 2830: 2821: 2659: 1052: 2980: 2719: 2195: 1840: 1564: 1529: 1336: 1242: 2686: 2405:

I see this user frequently and do not recall having any issues with his work. Seeing all of the support above from competent editors and I am happy to support.

2381: 2217: 2026: 1550: 2967: 2164: 2153: 1332:

I see a notable difference in the quality of editing in the period between RfAs from this editor, so no reason to believe that the admin tools will be abused.

1324: 1212: 1120: 2926:

I wonder how long it might be before someone suggests on your RfB that you think your opinion ought to count doubly and are thus unfit for bureaucratship. :)

2728: 2329: 2053: 1827: 1815: 1587: 1185: 731: 702:

As for invoking it, I believe a good example of invoking it would be in situation where, say, two editors were engaged in a revert war, and both had violated

657: 2777: 2123:

Acalamari appears to be a terrific editor who can be trusted to click a few buttons. And count me in for the people who can't pronounce his username, hehe!

1962: 1677: 260:. I have done a mixture of rewording the some of content of those articles, formatting them, and reverting vandalism. I’ve done more than 300 edits alone to 3127: 3023: 2921: 2804: 2632: 2603: 2542: 2517: 2487: 2367: 2308: 2118: 1909: 1710: 1656: 1352: 1258: 1034: 2987: 2930: 2590: 2397: 2179: 2135: 1940: 1876: 1724: 1538: 1510: 1491: 1434: 1416: 1400: 976: 967: 956: 2851: 2697: 2620: 2474: 2437: 2296: 2281: 2259: 2240: 2065: 1771: 1743: 1076: 2759: 2271: 2099: 2035: 1853: 1637: 1613: 1522: 1463: 1376: 1285: 1205: 794: 727:, even when dealing with a troll, a vandal, or other problems. Using IAR in a disruptive manner is not the way the policy is supposed to be interpreted. 2740: 2566: 2429: 2341: 1982: 1921: 1168: 1138: 1098: 3005: 2712: 2097: 1892: 1308: 567: 1546:

I was undecided about the previous RfA but Acalamari seems to have matured as a member of the community and I fully trust the nominator's evaluation.

3146: 840: 350:

to see if I can help improve the pages listed there, and when I’m done with that category, I plan to go through more categories about female singers.

1803: 1255: 1081:

I've run across Acalamari a couple of times now, and each time I felt like he would make a fine addition to our administrative ranks. No concerns.

515:

Why do you think your last RFA failed? What if, if anything, did you learn from it? And why do you now think you're ready to be an administrator?

1719: 1645:. I supported last time but even if I hadn't, I think Acalamri has addressed the concerns of those who opposed. I think he'll make a good admin. 1534: 1385: 578: 309:, however, most of my edits to that page have been reverts. The others, on the other hand, I have helped reword and improve the existing content. 2276: 1384:

Would make a great admin and good answer to my optional question (let's just hope that question won't turn into a heated debate in this RfA).--

1012: 963: 911: 445: 2525:

Acalamari is a truly fine editor, Very kind and knowledgeable. I've come across his work many times and he would make a great administrator.

1850: 1424:

Significant experience, trustworthy, good person - plus we started on Knowledge 13 days apart. It's time that Acalamari received the mop. --

108: 753: 232:

I don’t believe I have an individual or group of “best” contributions, but that’s just me. I am most pleased with my work to pages such as

894: 346:, and also articles relating to the music of some of the songstresses I mentioned above. I am currently going through all the articles in 2073:

and passa the aioli. ;-) Acalamari has consistently shown to be a thoughtful and dedicated contributor, and we are lucky to have him.

3164: 748: 3107: 2346:

Yes, yes, yes and yes... Trustworthy, maintains his civility, good article contributor, no negative interactions... To sum it all up,

468:), the user continued to change infoboxes and leave uncivil edit summaries. At one point, JJH1992 was reverting Mel Etitis’ edits to 3053: 2655: 915: 134: 2878:. Seriously. I was shocked when I found out I hadn't. And given the current consensus, I say "Good luck with your adminship!" -- 836: 781: 530:

good traits for an administrator to have. Another issue was usernames. As you can see from "Wannabe Kate", I have 267 edits to

1344:

I see Acalamari too often while editing wikipedia; meaning he is a excellent contributor who will never abandon their post.

630: 2074: 1224:?! Looks like you've earned some notoriety. But seriously, I like the question answers and your vast range of experience. 2681: 2550:. Per above. He is a great editor and should have been chosen to be an administrator much earlier. I have really admired 199: 168: 788: 3083: 1584: 2826:

Sorry, but I had to indent this out. I know I'm the candidate, but you already said support above at 30. I'm sorry.

383:

templates, and those templates are used in their articles. I've also done a lot of work on other templates, such as

216:

delete pages listed in that category after the accepted amount of time has passed since a user was listed in there.

33: 17: 2510: 1904: 1764: 850: 774: 82: 1811:

per a great many of the above comments, as well as the strong overall record and good answers to the questions.

1030:- worked alot with this editor and they would make an excellent addition to the administrative team hear on WP. 849:

Please keep criticism constructive and polite. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review

1872: 1500: 1485: 1395: 1371: 588: 812: 2007: 875: 360: 339: 195: 164: 2649: 2203:. I have seen this user's contributions all over the board and he always strikes me as a force of good. -- 1293:. Of course. I've been waiting for this one for a while. He'll make an excellent admin. Simple as that. :-) 2956: 1627: 2454: 404: 400: 392: 302: 282: 544:

people who object to me reverting their vandalism or tagging a page of they created for speedy deletion.

396: 3145:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either

2575: 1050: 318:

Pages that aren’t on the “Wannabe Kate” list that I’ve worked quite a bit on from time to time include

106: 2002:

Acalamari can make a fine administrator, even if some people can't pronounce his or her username. ;-)

2640:

Good editor, will be a good admin. Would have been here to chime in sooner but I've been offline. -

1782: 609: 1333: 1232: 806: 2677: 2212: 2020: 1793: 982: 924: 888: 857: 416: 380: 364: 2975:

inasmuch as I think it rather clear, especially in view of the candidate's fine construction of

2448: 2161: 2147: 376: 1900:

My impressions of Acalamari's edits and actions are positive. He could use the extra buttons.

3079: 2866: 2323: 2049: 1602: 1482: 1181: 1045: 412: 368: 118: 101: 3068:

You are a good and mature editor but still you don´t reach the level required by wikipedia.

3071: 2774: 2558: 1756:. CSD and temp user pages needs more admins - often entries stay in there for a long time. 1673: 408: 85:) - Ladies and Gentlemen of Knowledge, I present to you for consideration for admin status 8: 2816: 2796: 2502: 2192: 2113: 1837: 1797: 1761: 1652: 1559: 1350: 1227: 768: 76: 1061:

Kind, helpful, cares about the project, just what I like to see in an admin. Good luck!

800: 2672: 2529: 2394: 2373: 2204: 2176: 2133: 2124: 2012: 1866: 1547: 1479: 1413: 1390: 880: 582: 241: 2107:

Acalamari is a great Wikipedian, and I have no doubts that he won't misuse the tools.

3122: 3047: 2949: 2917: 2894: 2883: 2692: 2616: 2279: 2257: 2158: 2142: 1738: 1318: 1107: 1071: 486:’s user page. I responded to the user, and found out they were actually a vandal who 483: 465: 249: 50: 739: 3075: 2757: 2318: 2045: 1824: 1812: 1632: 1607: 1574: 1367: 1282: 1178: 1091: 693:

best to properly know the situation where you believe ignoring a rule is necessary.

504: 456:, to a non-standard style without discussion. Despite being asked by users such as 388: 343: 323: 2267:

You have quite an edit count, and good recommendations. I trust you with the mop.

1176:- I missed it last time..I wont miss it again.. One of the Best Editors around..-- 2768: 2422: 1978: 1950: 1665: 1161: 1133: 1106:, again. He's a very promising candidate. I am sure he would make a good admin. — 1087: 724: 605: 461: 457: 384: 319: 294: 261: 233: 2981:

the net effect on the project of Acalamari's being sysop(p)ed should be positive

1595:

I've seen this user around a lot, seems to be doing a great job. Good answers.--

1250:

I like the answer to Question #4. And I'm glad that you're going to work on the

155:

is one of the places that I plan to do work at. I also would like to do work at

3091: 3014: 2904: 2827: 2791: 2629: 2600: 2539: 2496: 2484: 2351: 2305: 2109: 1901: 1757: 1686: 1647: 1345: 1294: 1031: 832: 764: 728: 668: 654: 564: 531: 491: 487: 469: 449: 372: 257: 237: 156: 122: 86: 72: 3158: 3139:

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion.

2984: 2976: 2927: 2857: 2842: 2813: 2786: 2750: 2706: 2668: 2587: 2526: 2387: 2173: 1936: 1862: 1505: 1476: 1427: 1409: 1316:

WOW! A nom from anthony.bradbury? Will make a brilliant addition as a sysop.

973: 953: 864: 703: 678: 331: 327: 160: 152: 93: 2337:

I'm fully convinced Acalamari will do an excellent job as an administrator.

2187:. I encountered this user only last week while following up on vandalism to 3114: 3040: 2913: 2890: 2879: 2846: 2612: 2471: 2434: 2249: 2236: 2062: 1931: 1767: 1733: 1063: 601: 274: 245: 2495:. What else to say? Strong contributions, and support from the community. 972:

Yes, I know that, I was trying to be funny. Evidently the attempt failed.

2754: 2268: 2086: 1887: 1622: 1597: 1519: 1443: 1363: 1267: 563:

If I've left anything out, please tell me and I will gladly address you.

453: 306: 298: 278: 253: 448:. This user has changed music and band infoboxes, mainly to do with the 2737: 2563: 2555: 2406: 2338: 2188: 1918: 1194: 1155: 1130: 1082: 2191:, and came away impressed. Glad to support a fellow vandal patroller. 1749: 1664:

until I find a reason to oppose--not that that will be anytime soon! -

3149:

or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.

2997: 2224: 1300: 359:

I've edited templates, mainly musician templates. I have created the

1251: 961:

He never was sysopped, his last RfA failed to reach consensus. -

335: 286: 435:

In the last three months, I have been involved in two conflicts:

1787: 61: 2316:

I have no doubt that this user will do well with admin tools.

2034:

add me without a doubt to the list of people he can lean on.

1732:- good editor, will use the tools well, good luck with them! — 115:

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

1948:, good editor, will make good use of the mop :). Good luck- 1044:

as nominator. Would have been quicker except for conflict!--

64: 952:

Until someone says why not. When did you get desysopped?

29:

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a

2767:. An excellent editor, kind, mature, and knowledgeable. 1518:- very civil user with more than sufficient experience. 226:

What are your best contributions to Knowledge, and why?

2995:

Aw... I wanted to be #100... anyway, no reason not to.

1779:

per contributions and my many interactions with him. --

1408:- No evidence that this user would abuse the tools. - 1206: 2628:—Contributions look good; no reason not to support. -- 1360:

Absolutely, for the same reasons as the previous time.

681:

policy, and in what circumstances would you invoke it/

1199: 643:

Blocking the open proxy prevents that from happening.

3093: 2736:

Excellent editor; fine addition to the admin-corps.

2353: 1442:A great contributer. I see no reason to oppose. -- 3090:Would you mind clarifying that further please? -- 2599:criticism well, by actually weighing its value. 2552:(and will continue admiring for as long as I can) 2420: 2407: 3156: 1572:Answer to my question was satisfactory enough. 1558:for pretty much all the reasons outlined above. 121:, and thank him for taking the time to do this. 146:What admin work do you intend to take part in? 2948:that you will make Knowledge a better place. 2586:See nothing to suggest will abuse the tools. 1669: 1150:Unless this gets edit conflicted again.... 1010:Meh, sorry, didn't follow! *walks away* - 460:and myself to talk (and after blocks from 1718:, I don't see any outstanding issues. -- 1666: 863:I'm going to prepare to insert this into 3112:Probable SPA, if you look at xyr edits. 2958: 2876:I swear I already supported this Support 2447: 1621:No issues, nor reservations whatsoever. 1222:User:Acalamari has a WikiCrush on Alison 213:Category: Temporary Wikipedian userpages 173:Category: Temporary Wikipedian userpages 117:I accept this generous nomination from 14: 3157: 2951: 2903:Um, you did support; you're at 89. :) 2304:, hardworking, dedicated, sincere, ok 1471:Very good contributions to Knowledge. 444:The first has been with a user called 1823:. Appears to be a solid contributor. 2996: 2641: 1011: 962: 910: 200:Category: Requests for unblock-auto 169:Category: Requests for unblock-auto 23: 1929:It is time to give him the mop. -- 1886:Much matured since the last RfA. 1425: 867:. Why not extrapolate the result? 754:Requests for adminship/Acalamari 2 24: 3176: 3165:Successful requests for adminship 2386:After Mailer Diablo as usual! -- 1499:Per Mschel; no reason to oppose. 348:Category: American female singers 2172:. We need admins like this. :) ~ 1954: 1861:- good 'pedia builder. cheers, 1748: 749:Requests for adminship/Acalamari 554:if I a should be a sysop or not. 273:I’ve also done a lot of work on 18:Knowledge:Requests for adminship 3099: 3096: 2713: 2611:. "Let the good times roll". -- 2359: 2356: 2324: 2319: 2125: 2091: 2088: 869:That was a rhetorical question. 851:Special:Contributions/Acalamari 608:? Why do you think the policy " 2075:Can't sleep, clown will eat me 1888: 1459: 1317: 839:. For the edit count, see the 291:List of Starfleet ship classes 196:Category: Requests for unblock 165:Category: Requests for unblock 13: 1: 2798: 2749:but trying to help him reach 2455: 2061:— Acalamari-4-7-Alpha-Tango. 2021: 2013: 2008: 1957: 1456: 1450: 1447: 889: 881: 876: 482:me why I revert vandalism on 340:Star Trek: The Motion Picture 2720: 2711: 2652: 2483:- will make a fine admin! - 2449: 1951: 1453: 1428: 1319: 1032:-- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 677:What is your opinion on the 7: 2792: 1674: 1472: 1444: 1301: 1298: 835:'s edit summary usage with 303:Raptor: Call of the Shadows 283:USS Enterprise (NCC-1701-E) 135:Questions for the candidate 10: 3181: 3066:Neutral Leaning to support 2140:Just adding my name... :) 981:That was meant as a joke. 3108:23:29, 29 June 2007 (UTC) 2633:20:41, 30 June 2007 (UTC) 2621:19:08, 30 June 2007 (UTC) 2604:17:02, 30 June 2007 (UTC) 2591:15:31, 30 June 2007 (UTC) 2579:14:46, 30 June 2007 (UTC) 2567:08:54, 30 June 2007 (UTC) 2543:07:40, 30 June 2007 (UTC) 2518:20:56, 29 June 2007 (UTC) 2488:20:47, 29 June 2007 (UTC) 2475:18:24, 29 June 2007 (UTC) 2463:14:39, 29 June 2007 (UTC) 2438:13:29, 29 June 2007 (UTC) 2430:13:18, 29 June 2007 (UTC) 2398:13:03, 29 June 2007 (UTC) 2382:12:03, 29 June 2007 (UTC) 2368:08:34, 29 June 2007 (UTC) 2342:05:06, 29 June 2007 (UTC) 2330:02:58, 29 June 2007 (UTC) 2309:01:41, 29 June 2007 (UTC) 2297:01:18, 29 June 2007 (UTC) 2282:00:40, 29 June 2007 (UTC) 2272:00:33, 29 June 2007 (UTC) 2260:00:30, 29 June 2007 (UTC) 2241:23:55, 28 June 2007 (UTC) 2218:22:56, 28 June 2007 (UTC) 2196:21:07, 28 June 2007 (UTC) 2180:20:11, 28 June 2007 (UTC) 2165:19:37, 28 June 2007 (UTC) 2154:18:54, 28 June 2007 (UTC) 2136:18:28, 28 June 2007 (UTC) 2119:18:26, 28 June 2007 (UTC) 2100:18:07, 28 June 2007 (UTC) 2078:17:50, 28 June 2007 (UTC) 2066:17:12, 28 June 2007 (UTC) 2054:17:03, 28 June 2007 (UTC) 2036:14:46, 28 June 2007 (UTC) 2027:14:45, 28 June 2007 (UTC) 1995:11:51, 28 June 2007 (UTC) 1983:11:13, 28 June 2007 (UTC) 1963:06:34, 28 June 2007 (UTC) 1941:06:17, 28 June 2007 (UTC) 1922:05:38, 28 June 2007 (UTC) 1910:05:29, 28 June 2007 (UTC) 1893:04:48, 28 June 2007 (UTC) 1877:04:46, 28 June 2007 (UTC) 1854:03:32, 28 June 2007 (UTC) 1841:02:31, 28 June 2007 (UTC) 1828:02:28, 28 June 2007 (UTC) 1816:02:07, 28 June 2007 (UTC) 1804:01:55, 28 June 2007 (UTC) 1772:01:45, 28 June 2007 (UTC) 1744:01:19, 28 June 2007 (UTC) 1725:01:19, 28 June 2007 (UTC) 1711:01:16, 28 June 2007 (UTC) 1678:00:56, 28 June 2007 (UTC) 1657:00:18, 28 June 2007 (UTC) 1638:00:07, 28 June 2007 (UTC) 1614:00:06, 28 June 2007 (UTC) 1588:23:54, 27 June 2007 (UTC) 1565:23:46, 27 June 2007 (UTC) 1551:23:45, 27 June 2007 (UTC) 1539:23:33, 27 June 2007 (UTC) 1523:23:26, 27 June 2007 (UTC) 1511:23:09, 27 June 2007 (UTC) 1492:23:05, 27 June 2007 (UTC) 1464:22:37, 27 June 2007 (UTC) 1435:22:33, 27 June 2007 (UTC) 1417:22:29, 27 June 2007 (UTC) 1401:22:08, 27 June 2007 (UTC) 1377:21:42, 27 June 2007 (UTC) 1353:21:35, 27 June 2007 (UTC) 1337:21:28, 27 June 2007 (UTC) 1325:21:22, 27 June 2007 (UTC) 1309:21:15, 27 June 2007 (UTC) 1286:21:09, 27 June 2007 (UTC) 1259:20:58, 27 June 2007 (UTC) 1243:20:22, 27 June 2007 (UTC) 1213:20:09, 27 June 2007 (UTC) 1186:19:24, 27 June 2007 (UTC) 1169:19:01, 27 June 2007 (UTC) 1139:18:55, 27 June 2007 (UTC) 1121:18:54, 27 June 2007 (UTC) 1099:18:18, 27 June 2007 (UTC) 1077:18:13, 27 June 2007 (UTC) 1053:18:12, 27 June 2007 (UTC) 1035:18:10, 27 June 2007 (UTC) 1017:18:14, 27 June 2007 (UTC) 1006:18:11, 27 June 2007 (UTC) 977:18:12, 27 June 2007 (UTC) 968:18:09, 27 June 2007 (UTC) 957:18:08, 27 June 2007 (UTC) 948:18:08, 27 June 2007 (UTC) 916:18:07, 27 June 2007 (UTC) 732:16:51, 29 June 2007 (UTC) 658:21:15, 27 June 2007 (UTC) 568:19:22, 27 June 2007 (UTC) 126:18:06, 27 June 2007 (UTC) 109:22:14, 26 June 2007 (UTC) 3142:Please do not modify it. 3128:14:58, 2 July 2007 (UTC) 3054:15:15, 2 July 2007 (UTC) 3024:14:53, 4 July 2007 (UTC) 3006:04:22, 4 July 2007 (UTC) 2988:03:43, 4 July 2007 (UTC) 2968:02:26, 4 July 2007 (UTC) 2931:03:43, 4 July 2007 (UTC) 2922:01:53, 4 July 2007 (UTC) 2908:01:49, 4 July 2007 (UTC) 2899:01:53, 4 July 2007 (UTC) 2887:01:47, 4 July 2007 (UTC) 2870:21:30, 3 July 2007 (UTC) 2852:21:15, 3 July 2007 (UTC) 2831:20:46, 3 July 2007 (UTC) 2822:20:41, 3 July 2007 (UTC) 2805:10:18, 3 July 2007 (UTC) 2778:07:11, 2 July 2007 (UTC) 2760:01:42, 2 July 2007 (UTC) 2741:16:10, 1 July 2007 (UTC) 2729:12:04, 1 July 2007 (UTC) 2698:05:59, 1 July 2007 (UTC) 2687:01:46, 1 July 2007 (UTC) 2660:01:24, 1 July 2007 (UTC) 2532:2:57, 30 June 2007 (UTC) 895:13:28, 2 July 2007 (UTC) 719:invoking it, IAR should 667:Optional question from 629:The current version of 577:Optional question from 503:Optional Question from 39:Please do not modify it 2289:per all of the above. 2248:a matured candidate -- 2234:, per everyone above. 1129:only be a good thing. 3074:comment was added by 2576:Extraordinary Machine 2470:Very solid candidacy 762:Links for Acalamari: 600:What is your view on 34:request for adminship 2554:his editing skills. 2548:Support, undoubtedly 606:blocked indefinitely 361:Vanessa Anne Hudgens 2858:One hundred percent 1988:Very strong support 1801:(Let's Go Yankees!) 744:RfAs for this user: 92:This is his second 2863:you're not already 2445:- Per everyone. -- 1722: 1612: 853:before commenting. 405:The Pussycat Dolls 401:Nicole Scherzinger 393:Christina Aguilera 242:Christina Aguilera 3087: 3013:, hello pile-on. 2965: 2920: 2897: 2886: 2776: 2724: 2685: 2619: 2515: 2507: 2450:Tλε Rαnδom Eδιτor 2396: 2295: 2017: 2005: 1802: 1786: 1770: 1742: 1720: 1596: 1307: 1167: 1151: 885: 873: 870: 604:? Should they be 250:Anna Nicole Smith 3172: 3144: 3117: 3104: 3103: 3097: 3069: 3052: 3045: 3021: 3004: 3002: 2964: 2957: 2954: 2953: 2916: 2893: 2889:Double voter! -- 2882: 2867:The Rambling Man 2849: 2800: 2794: 2773: 2771: 2726: 2722: 2718: 2715: 2691:Wonderful user. 2675: 2658: 2654: 2646: 2645:Kathryn NicDhàna 2615: 2561: 2514: 2511: 2506: 2503: 2499: 2460: 2457: 2451: 2428: 2418: 2417: 2412: 2393: 2390: 2380:this message! - 2364: 2363: 2357: 2326: 2321: 2293: 2215: 2152: 2150: 2145: 2131: 2130: 2117: 2093: 2090: 2083:Happy to support 2023: 2018: 2015: 2010: 2003: 1959: 1956: 1953: 1939: 1934: 1890: 1838:†Sir James Paul† 1792: 1780: 1760: 1752: 1736: 1706: 1704: 1702: 1700: 1698: 1675: 1671: 1668: 1655: 1635: 1630: 1625: 1610: 1605: 1600: 1577: 1508: 1503: 1490: 1461: 1458: 1455: 1452: 1449: 1446: 1433: 1430: 1375: 1348: 1323: 1321: 1306: 1303: 1297: 1280: 1277: 1275: 1238: 1235: 1230: 1210: 1203: 1184: 1166: 1164: 1153: 1149: 1136: 1117: 1114: 1097: 1094: 1066: 1047:Anthony.bradbury 1040:(edit conflict) 1015: 1002: 1000: 998: 996: 994: 966: 944: 942: 940: 938: 936: 914: 891: 886: 883: 878: 871: 868: 828: 787: 740:General comments 679:ignore all rules 344:Katharine McPhee 324:Carrie Underwood 119:Anthony.bradbury 103:Anthony.bradbury 41: 3180: 3179: 3175: 3174: 3173: 3171: 3170: 3169: 3155: 3154: 3153: 3147:this nomination 3140: 3115: 3105: 3070:—The preceding 3050: 3041: 3015: 2998: 2950: 2847: 2769: 2725: 2644: 2559: 2538:, good editor. 2512: 2504: 2497: 2427: 2413: 2408: 2388: 2365: 2255: 2213: 2148: 2143: 2141: 2126: 2108: 2000:Strong support: 1974:my full support 1932: 1930: 1907: 1885: 1800: 1696: 1694: 1692: 1690: 1688: 1646: 1633: 1628: 1623: 1608: 1603: 1598: 1575: 1506: 1501: 1361: 1346: 1273: 1271: 1268: 1236: 1233: 1228: 1177: 1162: 1154: 1134: 1115: 1109: 1092: 1085: 1064: 992: 990: 988: 986: 984: 934: 932: 930: 928: 926: 860: 780: 763: 759: 742: 631:No open proxies 612:" is important? 610:no open proxies 397:Beyoncé Knowles 320:Amanda Michalka 295:Alyson Michalka 262:Fergie (singer) 234:Fergie (singer) 137: 60:; Ended 21:09, 58:Final (104/1/1) 55: 37: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3178: 3168: 3167: 3152: 3151: 3135: 3134: 3133: 3132: 3131: 3130: 3092: 3057: 3056: 3027: 3026: 3008: 2990: 2970: 2939: 2938: 2937: 2936: 2935: 2934: 2933: 2901: 2854: 2837: 2836: 2835: 2834: 2833: 2780: 2762: 2743: 2731: 2717: 2700: 2689: 2662: 2635: 2623: 2606: 2593: 2581: 2569: 2545: 2533: 2523:Strong Support 2520: 2513:what I've done 2490: 2481:Strong Support 2477: 2465: 2440: 2432: 2421: 2400: 2384: 2370: 2352: 2348:good candidate 2344: 2335:Strong Support 2332: 2314:Strong Support 2311: 2299: 2284: 2274: 2262: 2253: 2243: 2220: 2198: 2193:Hiberniantears 2182: 2170:Strong Support 2167: 2156: 2138: 2121: 2102: 2080: 2068: 2056: 2038: 2029: 1997: 1985: 1976:at this time. 1965: 1943: 1924: 1912: 1905: 1895: 1881: 1879: 1856: 1843: 1833:Strong Support 1830: 1818: 1806: 1796: 1774: 1758:Matt/TheFearow 1746: 1727: 1713: 1683:Strong Support 1680: 1659: 1640: 1616: 1590: 1567: 1553: 1541: 1525: 1513: 1494: 1466: 1437: 1419: 1403: 1379: 1355: 1339: 1334:(aeropagitica) 1327: 1311: 1291:Strong support 1288: 1261: 1245: 1215: 1188: 1174:Strong Support 1171: 1141: 1126:Strong support 1123: 1101: 1079: 1059:Strong support 1056: 1037: 1028:Strong Support 1025: 1024: 1023: 1022: 1021: 1020: 1019: 979: 950: 921:Strong support 918: 907:Strong support 898: 897: 859: 856: 846: 845: 844: 837:mathbot's tool 829: 758: 757: 756: 751: 743: 741: 738: 737: 736: 735: 734: 710: 709: 708: 707: 697: 696: 695: 694: 687: 686: 672: 663: 662: 661: 660: 647: 646: 645: 644: 637: 636: 635: 634: 624: 623: 622: 621: 614: 613: 594: 593: 573: 572: 571: 570: 558: 557: 556: 555: 548: 547: 546: 545: 538: 537: 536: 535: 517: 516: 509: 508: 499: 498: 497: 496: 476: 475: 474: 473: 470:Pussycat Dolls 450:Pussycat Dolls 439: 438: 437: 436: 423: 422: 421: 420: 419:to name a few. 417:Kelly Clarkson 381:Laura Branigan 365:Ashley Tisdale 354: 353: 352: 351: 313: 312: 311: 310: 268: 267: 266: 265: 258:Kelly Clarkson 238:Pussycat Dolls 220: 219: 218: 217: 206: 205: 204: 203: 189: 188: 187: 186: 179: 178: 177: 176: 136: 133: 131: 129: 128: 54: 49: 47: 45: 44: 25: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3177: 3166: 3163: 3162: 3160: 3150: 3148: 3143: 3137: 3136: 3129: 3125: 3124: 3119: 3118: 3111: 3110: 3109: 3106: 3102: 3098: 3089: 3088: 3085: 3081: 3077: 3073: 3067: 3064: 3063: 3062: 3061: 3055: 3049: 3046: 3044: 3037: 3034: 3033: 3032: 3031: 3025: 3022: 3020: 3019: 3012: 3009: 3007: 3003: 3001: 2994: 2991: 2989: 2986: 2982: 2978: 2974: 2971: 2969: 2966: 2963: 2962: 2955: 2947: 2943: 2940: 2932: 2929: 2925: 2924: 2923: 2919: 2915: 2911: 2910: 2909: 2906: 2902: 2900: 2896: 2892: 2888: 2885: 2881: 2877: 2873: 2872: 2871: 2868: 2864: 2860: 2859: 2855: 2853: 2850: 2844: 2841: 2838: 2832: 2829: 2825: 2824: 2823: 2820: 2819: 2815: 2811: 2808: 2807: 2806: 2803: 2802: 2801: 2795: 2788: 2784: 2781: 2779: 2775: 2772: 2766: 2763: 2761: 2758: 2756: 2752: 2748: 2744: 2742: 2739: 2735: 2732: 2730: 2727: 2723: 2716: 2708: 2705:Shooting for 2704: 2701: 2699: 2696: 2695: 2690: 2688: 2683: 2679: 2674: 2673:Fvasconcellos 2670: 2666: 2663: 2661: 2657: 2651: 2648: 2647: 2639: 2636: 2634: 2631: 2627: 2624: 2622: 2618: 2614: 2610: 2607: 2605: 2602: 2597: 2594: 2592: 2589: 2585: 2582: 2580: 2577: 2573: 2570: 2568: 2565: 2562: 2557: 2553: 2549: 2546: 2544: 2541: 2537: 2534: 2531: 2528: 2524: 2521: 2519: 2516: 2508: 2500: 2494: 2491: 2489: 2486: 2482: 2478: 2476: 2473: 2469: 2466: 2464: 2461: 2458: 2452: 2444: 2441: 2439: 2436: 2433: 2431: 2426: 2425: 2419: 2416: 2411: 2404: 2401: 2399: 2395: 2391: 2385: 2383: 2379: 2375: 2374:Mailer Diablo 2371: 2369: 2366: 2362: 2358: 2349: 2345: 2343: 2340: 2336: 2333: 2331: 2328: 2327: 2322: 2315: 2312: 2310: 2307: 2303: 2300: 2298: 2292: 2288: 2285: 2283: 2280: 2278: 2275: 2273: 2270: 2266: 2263: 2261: 2258: 2256: 2252: 2247: 2244: 2242: 2239: 2238: 2233: 2229: 2228: 2226: 2221: 2219: 2216: 2211: 2208: 2207: 2206:Spike Wilbury 2202: 2199: 2197: 2194: 2190: 2186: 2183: 2181: 2178: 2175: 2171: 2168: 2166: 2163: 2160: 2157: 2155: 2151: 2146: 2139: 2137: 2134: 2132: 2129: 2122: 2120: 2115: 2111: 2106: 2103: 2101: 2098: 2095: 2094: 2084: 2081: 2079: 2076: 2072: 2069: 2067: 2064: 2060: 2057: 2055: 2052: 2051: 2047: 2042: 2039: 2037: 2033: 2030: 2028: 2025: 2024: 2019: 2011: 2001: 1998: 1996: 1993: 1989: 1986: 1984: 1981: 1980: 1975: 1970: 1966: 1964: 1961: 1960: 1947: 1944: 1942: 1938: 1935: 1928: 1925: 1923: 1920: 1916: 1913: 1911: 1908: 1903: 1899: 1896: 1894: 1891: 1884: 1880: 1878: 1874: 1871: 1868: 1864: 1860: 1857: 1855: 1852: 1847: 1844: 1842: 1839: 1834: 1831: 1829: 1826: 1822: 1819: 1817: 1814: 1810: 1807: 1805: 1799: 1795: 1791: 1790: 1784: 1778: 1775: 1773: 1769: 1766: 1763: 1759: 1755: 1751: 1747: 1745: 1740: 1735: 1731: 1728: 1726: 1723: 1717: 1714: 1712: 1708: 1707: 1684: 1681: 1679: 1676: 1672: 1663: 1660: 1658: 1654: 1651: 1650: 1644: 1641: 1639: 1636: 1631: 1626: 1620: 1617: 1615: 1611: 1606: 1601: 1594: 1591: 1589: 1586: 1582: 1579: 1578: 1571: 1568: 1566: 1563: 1562: 1557: 1554: 1552: 1549: 1548:Pascal.Tesson 1545: 1542: 1540: 1536: 1532: 1531: 1526: 1524: 1521: 1517: 1514: 1512: 1509: 1504: 1498: 1495: 1493: 1489: 1488: 1487: 1484: 1481: 1478: 1470: 1467: 1465: 1462: 1441: 1438: 1436: 1432: 1431: 1423: 1420: 1418: 1415: 1411: 1407: 1404: 1402: 1399: 1398: 1394: 1393: 1389: 1388: 1383: 1380: 1378: 1373: 1369: 1365: 1359: 1356: 1354: 1351: 1349: 1343: 1340: 1338: 1335: 1331: 1328: 1326: 1322: 1315: 1312: 1310: 1304: 1296: 1292: 1289: 1287: 1284: 1281: 1279: 1265: 1262: 1260: 1257: 1253: 1249: 1246: 1244: 1241: 1240: 1239: 1231: 1223: 1219: 1216: 1214: 1211: 1209: 1204: 1202: 1196: 1192: 1189: 1187: 1183: 1180: 1175: 1172: 1170: 1165: 1159: 1158: 1152: 1145: 1142: 1140: 1137: 1132: 1127: 1124: 1122: 1119: 1118: 1112: 1105: 1102: 1100: 1095: 1089: 1084: 1080: 1078: 1074: 1073: 1068: 1067: 1060: 1057: 1055: 1054: 1051: 1049: 1048: 1041: 1038: 1036: 1033: 1029: 1026: 1018: 1014: 1009: 1008: 1007: 1004: 1003: 980: 978: 975: 971: 970: 969: 965: 960: 959: 958: 955: 951: 949: 946: 945: 922: 919: 917: 913: 908: 905: 904: 903: 902: 896: 893: 892: 887: 879: 866: 862: 861: 855: 854: 852: 842: 838: 834: 830: 826: 823: 820: 817: 814: 811: 808: 805: 802: 799: 796: 793: 790: 786: 783: 779: 776: 773: 770: 766: 761: 760: 755: 752: 750: 747: 746: 745: 733: 730: 726: 722: 718: 714: 713: 712: 711: 705: 701: 700: 699: 698: 691: 690: 689: 688: 684: 680: 676: 673: 671: 670: 665: 664: 659: 656: 651: 650: 649: 648: 641: 640: 639: 638: 632: 628: 627: 626: 625: 618: 617: 616: 615: 611: 607: 603: 599: 596: 595: 592: 590: 587: 584: 580: 575: 574: 569: 566: 562: 561: 560: 559: 552: 551: 550: 549: 542: 541: 540: 539: 533: 529: 524: 521: 520: 519: 518: 514: 511: 510: 507: 506: 501: 500: 493: 489: 485: 480: 479: 478: 477: 471: 467: 463: 459: 455: 451: 447: 443: 442: 441: 440: 434: 431: 430: 428: 425: 424: 418: 414: 410: 406: 402: 398: 394: 390: 386: 382: 378: 377:Missy Higgins 374: 370: 366: 362: 358: 357: 356: 355: 349: 345: 341: 337: 333: 332:CeCe Peniston 329: 328:Diana DeGarmo 325: 321: 317: 316: 315: 314: 308: 304: 300: 296: 292: 288: 284: 280: 276: 272: 271: 270: 269: 263: 259: 255: 251: 247: 243: 239: 235: 231: 228: 227: 225: 222: 221: 214: 211:Finally, the 210: 209: 208: 207: 201: 197: 193: 192: 191: 190: 183: 182: 181: 180: 174: 170: 166: 162: 158: 154: 151: 148: 147: 145: 142: 141: 140: 132: 127: 124: 120: 116: 113: 112: 111: 110: 107: 105: 104: 97: 95: 90: 88: 84: 81: 78: 74: 70: 69: 66: 63: 59: 53: 48: 43: 40: 35: 32: 27: 26: 19: 3141: 3138: 3121: 3113: 3101: 3094: 3065: 3059: 3058: 3042: 3035: 3029: 3028: 3017: 3016: 3010: 2999: 2992: 2972: 2960: 2959: 2945: 2941: 2875: 2874: 2862: 2856: 2839: 2817: 2809: 2797: 2790: 2782: 2764: 2746: 2745:Superfluous 2733: 2710: 2702: 2693: 2664: 2642: 2638:Full Support 2637: 2625: 2608: 2595: 2583: 2571: 2551: 2547: 2535: 2522: 2492: 2480: 2467: 2446: 2442: 2423: 2414: 2409: 2402: 2377: 2361: 2354: 2347: 2334: 2317: 2313: 2301: 2290: 2286: 2264: 2250: 2245: 2235: 2231: 2223: 2222: 2209: 2205: 2200: 2184: 2169: 2159:Sean William 2127: 2104: 2087: 2082: 2070: 2058: 2048: 2040: 2031: 2006: 1999: 1987: 1977: 1973: 1968: 1949: 1945: 1926: 1914: 1897: 1882: 1869: 1858: 1845: 1832: 1820: 1808: 1788: 1776: 1753: 1729: 1715: 1687: 1682: 1661: 1648: 1642: 1618: 1592: 1573: 1569: 1560: 1555: 1543: 1528: 1515: 1496: 1474: 1473: 1468: 1439: 1426: 1421: 1405: 1396: 1391: 1386: 1381: 1357: 1341: 1329: 1320:Kevinwong913 1313: 1290: 1269: 1263: 1247: 1229:bibliomaniac 1226: 1225: 1217: 1207: 1200: 1190: 1173: 1156: 1148: 1143: 1125: 1110: 1108: 1103: 1070: 1062: 1058: 1046: 1043: 1039: 1027: 983: 925: 920: 906: 900: 899: 874: 848: 847: 821: 815: 809: 803: 797: 791: 784: 777: 771: 720: 716: 682: 674: 666: 602:open proxies 597: 585: 576: 527: 522: 512: 502: 484:Natalie Erin 466:Adam Cuerden 432: 426: 413:Keyshia Cole 369:Brooke Hogan 275:Nicky Hilton 254:Aly & AJ 246:Paris Hilton 229: 223: 149: 143: 138: 130: 114: 102: 98: 91: 79: 71: 68: 57: 56: 51: 46: 38: 30: 28: 3076:Lucasbunchi 2814:So close... 2714:Evilclown93 2667:(going for 2479:Definitely 2096: 1825:Majoreditor 1813:Newyorkbrad 1581:(Highlights 1576:Black Harry 505:Black Harry 454:Danity Kane 409:Danity Kane 307:Mandy Moore 299:Mandy Moore 279:Haylie Duff 2770:SlimVirgin 2505:talk to me 2254:(Stephen) 2189:User:Sarah 2144:*Cremepuff 1967:This is a 1765:(Contribs) 858:Discussion 685:invoke it? 462:Mel Etitis 458:ShadowHalo 31:successful 3018:Wizardman 2905:Acalamari 2861:support, 2828:Acalamari 2630:Paul Erik 2601:KP Botany 2540:Everyking 2306:Modernist 2225:SQUIDWARD 2110:Nishkid64 1902:Flyguy649 1783:Review Me 1585:Contribs) 1347:Hirohisat 1256:Darkspots 1254:backlog. 841:talk page 833:Acalamari 807:block log 765:Acalamari 729:Acalamari 669:DarkFalls 655:Acalamari 565:Acalamari 492:Phaedriel 488:Chrislk02 123:Acalamari 87:Acalamari 73:Acalamari 52:Acalamari 3159:Category 3084:contribs 3072:unsigned 2785:. Go to 2588:Davewild 2389:FayssalF 2230:I mean, 2128:gaillimh 1906:contribs 1873:contribs 1863:Casliber 1794:Contribs 1721:Phoenix2 1530:AldeBaer 1507:TomasBat 1475:Cheers, 1429:Jreferee 1410:Philippe 974:Moreschi 954:Moreschi 775:contribs 725:WP:CIVIL 589:contribs 579:PrestonH 83:contribs 3116:Majorly 3060:Neutral 3043:ALKIVAR 3011:Support 2993:Support 2979:, that 2973:Support 2952:A•N•N•A 2942:Support 2914:ɐuɐʞsəp 2891:ɐuɐʞsəp 2880:ɐuɐʞsəp 2848:Flubeca 2840:Support 2810:Support 2783:Support 2765:Support 2747:support 2734:Support 2703:Support 2694:Peacent 2665:Support 2626:Support 2613:ɐuɐʞsəp 2609:Support 2596:Support 2584:Support 2572:Support 2536:Support 2498:Charlie 2493:Support 2472:Johnbod 2468:Support 2443:Support 2435:Terence 2403:Support 2378:approve 2302:Support 2291:Rahk E✘ 2287:Support 2277:Jaranda 2265:Support 2246:Support 2232:Support 2201:Support 2185:Support 2105:Support 2071:Support 2063:Matthew 2059:Support 2041:Support 2032:Support 1969:support 1946:Support 1937:iva1979 1927:Support 1915:Support 1898:Support 1859:Support 1846:Support 1821:Support 1809:Support 1777:Support 1754:Support 1734:Krellis 1730:Support 1716:Support 1662:Support 1643:Support 1619:Support 1593:Support 1570:Support 1556:Support 1544:Support 1516:Support 1497:Support 1469:Support 1440:Support 1422:Support 1406:Support 1382:Support 1358:Support 1342:Support 1330:Support 1314:Support 1264:Support 1252:CAT:CSD 1248:Support 1218:Support 1191:Support 1144:Support 1104:Support 1065:Majorly 1042:Support 1013:Zeibura 964:Zeibura 912:Zeibura 901:Support 782:deleted 620:online. 532:WP:RFCN 446:JJH1992 389:Rihanna 336:Rihanna 305:. With 287:Shakira 157:WP:RFPP 3036:Oppose 3030:Oppose 2918:(ʞɿɐʇ) 2895:(ʞɿɐʇ) 2884:(ʞɿɐʇ) 2843:WP:100 2787:WP:100 2755:DS1953 2751:WP:100 2721:(talk) 2707:WP:100 2669:WP:100 2617:(ʞɿɐʇ) 2376:and I 2325:Griz98 2269:J-stan 2050:tizzle 1992:Walton 1889:Keegan 1851:Shalom 1762:(Talk) 1670:flash) 1667:(lemon 1653:scribe 1520:Addhoc 1372:Review 1364:Xnuala 1193:- per 1182:styles 1135:(talk) 865:WP:100 704:WP:3RR 415:, and 385:Fergie 379:, and 256:, and 163:, and 161:WP:CSD 94:WP:RfA 62:4 July 3100:Falls 3095:Dark 2753:. -- 2738:Xoloz 2527:Quasy 2360:Falls 2355:Dark 2339:P3net 2320:Darth 2251:Steve 2046:Scien 2016:NIMUM 1979:Sarah 1919:MONGO 1768:(Bot) 1299:(aka 1195:Pedro 1179:Comet 1163:Chat 1157:Pedro 1131:Riana 1083:EVula 884:NIMUM 789:count 721:never 715:With 495:here. 373:Trina 67:(UTC) 16:< 3123:talk 3080:talk 3000:Kwsn 2946:know 2845:Lol- 2456:ταlκ 2424:talk 2410:Jody 2372:I'm 2350:. -- 2237:Will 2214:talk 2149:222* 2114:talk 1955:tleG 1867:talk 1739:Talk 1624:Jmlk 1414:Talk 1392:ston 1368:talk 1302:Wimt 1295:Will 1208:ddie 1088:talk 1072:talk 831:See 819:rfar 801:logs 769:talk 583:talk 464:and 452:and 301:and 198:and 171:and 77:talk 65:2007 2985:Joe 2983:. 2977:IAR 2961:hi! 2928:Joe 2818:Tim 2530:Boy 2177:Boy 2092:yan 2089:Ark 1958:irl 1952:Cat 1649:WjB 1599:Hús 1561:Tim 1387:Pre 1090:// 1086:// 825:spi 795:AfD 717:not 683:not 528:not 153:AIV 3161:: 3126:) 3086:). 3082:• 2812:. 2789:. 2709:! 2564:4b 2556:Ac 2485:eo 2392:- 2174:Ed 1917:-- 1875:) 1709:- 1609:nd 1537:) 1486:er 1483:ov 1480:tL 1477:Je 1412:| 1370:)( 1362:-- 1274:is 1220:. 1197:. 1160:| 1116:as 1096:// 1075:) 1001:te 999:ai 997:hw 995:et 993:tl 991:os 987:an 985:Ry 943:te 941:ai 939:hw 937:et 935:tl 933:os 929:an 927:Ry 813:lu 675:6. 598:5. 433:A: 427:3. 411:, 407:, 403:, 399:, 395:, 391:, 387:, 375:, 371:, 367:, 363:, 342:, 338:, 334:, 330:, 326:, 322:, 297:, 293:, 289:, 285:, 281:, 277:, 252:, 248:, 244:, 240:, 236:, 230:A: 224:2. 167:, 159:, 150:A: 144:1. 36:. 3120:( 3078:( 3051:☢ 3048:™ 2799:W 2793:A 2684:) 2682:c 2680:· 2678:t 2676:( 2656:♫ 2653:♦ 2650:♫ 2560:s 2509:- 2501:- 2459:) 2453:( 2415:B 2294:] 2227:! 2210:♫ 2162:@ 2116:) 2112:( 2022:» 2014:A 2009:« 2004:— 1933:S 1883:+ 1870:· 1865:( 1798:@ 1789:R 1785:) 1781:( 1741:) 1737:( 1705:l 1703:e 1701:i 1699:r 1697:d 1695:e 1693:a 1691:h 1689:P 1634:7 1629:1 1604:ö 1583:| 1535:c 1533:( 1527:— 1502:♠ 1460:l 1457:e 1454:h 1451:c 1448:s 1445:M 1397:H 1374:) 1366:( 1305:) 1283:☺ 1278:n 1276:o 1272:l 1270:A 1237:5 1234:1 1201:E 1113:n 1111:A 1093:☯ 1069:( 989:P 931:P 890:» 882:A 877:« 872:— 843:. 827:) 822:· 816:· 810:· 804:· 798:· 792:· 785:· 778:· 772:· 767:( 591:) 586:· 581:( 523:A 513:4 264:. 175:. 80:· 75:( 42:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge

:Requests for adminship/Acalamari 2 - Knowledge

Index