Knowledge:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 177

10520:

Cross and the Lebanese authorities, rapidly circulated around the world. "It is clear to anyone who has traveled in southern Lebanon" that these numbers were "extreme exaggerations," wrote David Shipler. Nevertheless, the PLO news agency soon became the "primary source of information both for Western reporters and for the Lebanese state radio and television." As a result, official Lebanese casualty estimates came to mirror the PLO inventions, recording 19,085 dead, 57% combatants and 43% civilians...In 1984 these inflated estimates were publicly repudiated by the Lebanese authorities, who announced that “about 1,000 Lebanese were killed as a result of the Israeli invasion." No-one wants to remove Kingsindian's preferred sources, but Haj's statement should be included.

4580:, Dr. Fleischman didn't say it was "difficult to use this source", they said it was "a reliable source for details of the Game of Thrones series." You've turned their advice on its head. Fleischman also quite rightly pointed out that you're contributing to this being a never-ending tug-of-war. I think if the main two editors represented here weren't involved, this whole thing would have gone as smoothly as the "badassdigest" thread below. This isn't properly a "reliable source" issue anymore, with multiple editors agreeing that there's a case for "expert status" on this ersatz pop culture issue. Experts don't have to be "neutral" on an issue. Now there may be other issues, but the "reliable source" one seems to have been assessed here. 7095:", and who bases this on something he/she might have found out about the publisher. (Although the real troble is that the Stalinist doesn't likes what Montefiore has written). I say it again, I do not believe You to be a Stalinist, but the allegory is how I perceive you in this matter. And since You seem to reject all authors that SSF has assembled in "333 Årsboken", I presume You will put a ban to all history wrighting based at a Scanian, rather than Stockholm-Swedish perspective. I do not believe there is a Knowledge policy of f.i. prohibit Scotish, Catalan, Kurdistan or Scanian perspectives in history wrighting. And again SSF only has assembled different kind of works related to the 333 year period between 5367:"Outrageous mistakes and falsifications in The Armenian People: From Ancient to Modern Times are countless. Any student, who would make such horrible mistakes during an exam, would receive an F and fail. So, how come this anti-scholastic book and its authors have continued to use this book since 1997, and even have republished it in 2004 without making ANY CORRECTIONS whatsoever? For many years, Armenian scholars from Armenia have repeatedly exposed and criticized this falsified book in their scientific publications. Yet, the chief editor continues to insist that the critics of this unscientific textbook are violating the freedom of academic expression." 9919:, included above, but without the translation that I duly provided on the Article's talk page, and, since Google Translate is unreliable, I will help with the translation of "صادقت وزارة الدفاع الإسرائيلية على اعتبار (داعش) حركة إرهابية" which translates to "The Israeli Ministry of Defense approves the designation of Daa3esh as a terrorist movement". Hope this helps. This is a complicated matter for those who do not have long term insight into Middle Eastern affairs, but I am confident that there is enough reliable evidence that Israel has already declared ISIS as a terrorist organization. However, I am fine with whatever the response is given here. 5170:, included above, but without the translation that I duly provided on the Article's talk page, and, since Google Translate is unreliable, I will help with the translation of "صادقت وزارة الدفاع الإسرائيلية على اعتبار (داعش) حركة إرهابية" which translates to "The Israeli Ministry of Defense approves the designation of Daa3esh as a terrorist movement". Hope this helps. This is a complicated matter for those who do not have long term insight into Middle Eastern affairs, but I am confident that there is enough reliable evidence that Israel has already declared ISIS as a terrorist organization. However, I am fine with whatever the response is given here. 4537:" I think there's a general consensus to avoid drawing conclusions from sources like the above infographic for specific claims in the article, but I don't see a good reason to restrict claims to "explicit" comparisons made on a per episode or per chapter basis. If, for example, someone published a book with the same content as that infographic but formatted in a different way (i.e. pointing to page numbers and episode times instead of drawing points on a plot) we're better off relying on a review of that source and the claims we want to make in light of OR/SYN/RS than pointing to an old discussion with ~5 participants to disallow its use entirely." 5835:. It is self published, it has no peer-review, and is coming from an advocacy group. Essentially, we don't have an acceptable source for scientific content here. Nor is it something that should be called a review in that context. We normally don't consider a source reliable for scientific content for much lesser or fewer problems, so it's looking like it would be an extremely uphill battle to try to say it's an acceptable source in this context. I should also note that no discussion even occurred at the article talk page on the most recent round of edits before this post was made, so there won't be any background discussion to find yet. 2069:"Veryha, Pid krylami, 27. There was a network of camps at Dachau, known as the Kauferingconcentration camps. Hannah Arendt writes that Eichmann in 1933 attended an SS camp in Dachau‘which had nothing to do with the concentration camp there.’ Hannah Arendt, Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil. Revised and Enlarged Edition, New York: Penguin Books, 1994, p. 34. While Veryha’s 2007 reminiscences do not specify the details of which of the subsidiary camps the training took place, they demonstrate that, at the very least, he was aware of the concentration camp system and the nature of the National Socialist system." 2155:

that fought along with the Wehrmacht. The Soviets produced “evidence” that it was Nachtigall that perpetrated the atrocities in Lviv in early July 1941. That something was fishy here should have been apparent from the start. Competent people who made it their business to know about the Lviv pogrom in the immediate aftermath of the war and who were aware of Nachtigall’s presence in the city at the time did not link the pogrom with Nachtigall. Particularly I have in mind the Jewish historian Philip Friedman and the Polish chronicler Tadeusz Zaderecki. A preponderance of evidence pointed to a Soviet fabrication."

423:, which concludes "Hydrinos as proposed by Mills and Lu are inconsistent with laboratory scale high pressure LTE hydrogen plasmas, inconsistent with the stability and structure of stars including the Sun, and inconsistent with the known Universe." The user raising the issue wishes to use the editorial as a RS for a statement to the effect that "the hydrino hypothesis is not nonsense, but has attracted serious scientific discussion" and an assertion that the editors "came down in support of" such serious discussion of that hypothesis. Anyone care to offer an analysis of its reliability for such statements? 8078:: "As a self-published site, it cannot be used as a reliable source. ... "However, the site sometimes provides links to some reliable sources." I've used "LukeIsBack.com" as a jumping off point to do web searches to research certain alleged facts, and I've found that many, but not all, of the facts contained on this site to be pretty easily verifiable through other, more reliable sources. I'm much less concerned about the often-repeated past quotation from Jimmy Wales since, as far as I can tell, this is Knowledge not Jimbopedia. Should lukeisback.com be used as a reliable source in Knowledge articles? No. 5479:, wrote a review of the film, describing it as "a sardonic look at how US foreign policy brought about the demise of Yugoslavia in the late 80s." According to the review, the film is "elegantly edited", and "makes the whole documentary feel like a history lesson as relayed by an endearing teacher with an average sense of humour." The review notes that, in the film, "experts tell grim stories about how fractured groups of people were exploited by power-hungry domestic leaders" and that "soon Yugoslavia is in the grip of one of history's most heartbreaking periods of civil war and ethnic cleansing." 7318:. But you keep touting your own fairly ordinary regional dialect of Swedish with well over a million speakers as "oppressed" by referring to Dano-Swedish strife that ceased sometime in the 18th century. I find this stance to be both ignorant and self-aggrandizing. Scanian is not unique or suppressed any more than other regional cultural expressions in Sweden and you have zero reliable sources to back up your claims to the contrary. The only real difference is that a small minority of Scanians, like yourself, have an unusually inflated sense of self-importance. 6812:. Danish-Scanian relationships, Swedish-Scanian relationships, Swedish-Danish relationships, both as of 1991 as of times before. The Danish era, the wars, and the Swedish era. Some authors believes in a stronger regionalisation of Sweden, which is a rather centralised nation, and where Stockholm is "the natural core". Many of the authors describe historical events, like Uno Röndahl who contributes with "The bloodbath at Klågerup" in 1811, the last recorded military assult on the Scanian civil population. While f.i. Helmer Lång discusses the Scanian dialect. 2268:

the other side: anti-OUN? I haven't encountered any such expressions before. Are you, therefore, asserting that Faustian and I are somehow promoting a 'pro-OUN' agenda, or are you confusing the use of politically motivated nationalism as per Right Sector with the historical entity known as the UIA? As for revisionism: you appear to have a very, very limited understanding of its multitude of meanings and the question of whose nation-building objectives it serves (the Soviet narrative of 'Benderivtsi' still being touted now, or Polish national narratives)? --

9274:. And there is obviously none in this case. Not only did he use his page to vendetta-stalk a random-nobody-pseudonym Knowledge editor, he actually used his page to rant that some random-nobody-pseudonym Fark commenter called him a homosexual. That wasn't journalism, that wasn't even an opinion/editorial piece, that was an unhinged flamewarring personal blog. thefederalist has significant readership, but so do many blogs, and so do many youtube channels. They are not Reliable Sources for much of anything beyond what they say about themselves. 1393:" has been caught with inaccuracies" by whom? I think he should be criticized by historians, not only Knowledge editors with special POV And article mentions "response to the Canadian-Ukrainian complaint about Rudling, an open letter was published in his support, signed by 38 scholars of the Holocaust and professors of leading universities supporting him, including Omer Bartov, Kristian Gerner, John-Paul Himka, Dovid Katz, Alexey Miller, Ruth Wodak, and Efraim Zuroff." So, you have to deal with all these researchers to prove Rudling POV. 2201:

reconnaissance company "Nachtigal" we find the following entry: "During our trek, we saw firsthand the victims of Jewish-Bolshevik terror, so this kind of sealed our hatred of the Jews, that in two villages, we have done some shooting all counterclaims Jews. I remember one episode. During our transition to one of the villages we see a lot of people wandering around. To answer the questions that the Jews threaten them and they are afraid to sleep in the huts. Because of this, we all met there they shot the Jews. " cited here

8670:'s "filmographies are considered reliable, but opinion is split on whether their biographical information is reliable." What IAFD is being used for in this specific case is merely to confirm how many & which adult films the subject here was in, which is not controversial at all. I personally happen to be on the side of inclusion of this site as a reliable source for simple biographical data due to their past rigorous use of industry declarations that are used during the production of film content in the adult industry. 6473:

exception, but we have guidance from the community who specializes in scientific content saying sources like this are not reliable for scientific content, and that it is fine to summarize only the opinion of the source. My proposal above seems like a fair compromise (I originally wanted the content just deleted), removes the question of reliability for scientific content, and allows a notable opinion to remain. I don't see a better way to satisfy the reliability issues and keep everyone relatively happy.

7145:, and very soon the entire (some 15.000) population in Sjöbo was accused of being racists, it could not have happened anywhere else but in Sjöbo , and for a while "Sjöbo" as such became an invective in the nation wide media. And also in the Stockholm-owned and controlled regional media. I'm not saying I would have voted as most did in Sjöbo in 1988. But the aftermath became a verbal terror on that small municipality. Also in 2006 when SD , in the local election in Landskrona got 22% of the votes, 8941:

like that the editorial opinions published by that person or company are therefore to be excised (noting that many major publishers would fall into that criminal category)? On what basis in any Knowledge policy can you find "publishers who are immoral can not publish 'reliable sources'"? We are better off ascribing opinions as opinions, and letting the readers assign their own weight to those opinions, lest Knowledge ever have "officially approved opinions" listed as a criterion for articles.

8659:, Excaliburfilms' "biographies are not considered reliable, and they are often taken from other sites, such as Knowledge." As seen in this specific case though, at least some of the information contained on this site can routinely be confirmed by doing a web search for other, more reliable sources. While I personally have no problem with including links to this website under an article's External Links section, others have objected to doing this in the past as this site sells adult movies. 5988:, etc. in contentious topics. In this case, it seems very apparent this source is not appropriate for a scientific statement, especially factoring in what SCIRS says about it above, so we shouldn't be commenting on the science with this source in the article. This is primarily what I've taken issue with, and haven't seen any strong reason to say a "review" was done (review tends to connote a peer-reviewed review article we consider very reliable) with the reliability issues above in mind. 35: 5678:). and LyricFind (legal lyrics provider). They are official, legal and most important LICENSED just as Metrolyrics.com Additionally, they add more cool content that metrolyrics sometimes doesn't have (an updated blog - but I'm only focusing on the lyrics in this discussion). So my point is. Is Directlyrics.com reliable to be used as external link for "complete lyrics" in song wiki pages? I think so. Because just as metrolyrics, they are 'official, legal and most important LICENSED'. 3074:

Anyone can add 15 sources they have not read and force anyone challenging them to read through, research and comment on each and every one of them. Whether or not a source is biased is irrelevant to whether it is reliable. I have little doubt that Melnikova made the comments attributed to her, although I would have more confidence were it from a better known source. However, the best place to verify it is her organization's website. The real issue is whether it is significant.

5915:

cause, aren't afforded that same respect because they have a stronger potential bias that could be influencing their review or statements. If they went and submitted their review to a peer-reviewed journal and got it published, then we'd have a generally reliable source, but without peer-review or independent third party publishing like you get in a journal, we're left with a statement by an organization that's the equivalent of a blog post from a science content perspective.

10027: 7039:

neutral descriptions of the region's history. It's an anthology that openly propagates a the POV of a small minority, not a generally acknowledged aspect of Scanian history. No Swedish historian denies the harsh assimilation of Scania, the brutal nature of the guerilla war in the 1670s and 1710s, etc. But they don't recognize the unsubstantiated and exaggerated claims about the uniqueness of Scanian culture. As far as I know, most Scanians today don't even share this view.

9564:), but the site is apparently self-published though, which means that it would have limited usefulness as a citation for potentially contentious or notable information in an article. Basically, it depends on how a site like this is used in the context of a specific article. In the article apparently mentioned in passing above (which I should note here that I recently edited in a small way), it's currently being used to cite that the subject of the article "moved to 4248:

of it, there is little I can do about it. In my defense, I am one of the few remaining editors (there used to be at least 8 of us) who endured for four months this editor ignoring consensus, offering fan forum blogs or fake sources. I watch her schmoozing it up with key editors and am frustrated that you can't see the game she is running on you. That is as much a part of the problem as the source being provided, but I should have presented it in a calmer manner. -

3785:. My frustration with this is that a fairly solid consensus of users do not think this material is important enough to include. The reasoning behind this is that most of the references in support of this information are from forum sites, or fanclubs, or blog posts from reviewers who wouldn't pass the sniff test for fandom or fakery. I am frustrated with Darkfrog's continued shouting that the consensus is wrong, and she is right - pretty much counter to 3948:"GA reviewers must have made a mistake" is an assumption. There are three possibilities: 1) GA reviewers saw this content, thought it was appropriate and deliberately kept it. 2) GA reviewers would have deleted it if they'd noticed it but missed it (which indicates that it's at least not taking up inordinate space). 3) GA reviewers did not care about this content one way or the other. This isn't a huge unsolvable mystery: If this is really an issue, 226:, the oldest Jewish cemetery in the Netherlands, which uses the exact same words. So you have a choice: either the terminology is not an endorsement of racism or the establishment of some mythical prototype (meaning, you're wrong), or whoever compiled that document and put it on the cemetery's website suffers from Nazi POV. On page 61 you'll see the colofon--it reads like a who's who of the Dutch Jewish community, so be careful with your answer. 5350:. His book consistently has the goal of attributing Armenian history to other nationalities and referring to the Armenians as outsiders in their own homeland, which is why he has been accused of having political motives such as in the video I linked. Other statements by him are just plain wrong, such as the book stating (Volume II, page 432) that the first Armenian book was printed in 1660, in Holland, when in fact it was published by 5901:"Advocacy organizations formed for a specific purpose or to advance a cause may be composed of scientists and mimic the structure and naming conventions of the general purpose societies. Statements and reports from such organizations are not reliable except to cite the organization's opinion or position. If such statements are necessary to the coverage of a topic, they should be attributed and the role of the organization made clear." 4242:: The strongest advocate for inclusion of fansite info claims that the reader might want to know this information. If this is truly the case, then we provide a link to Westeros.org where the ep is crufted about in detail and be done with it. If the reader is indeed looking for that fine level of detail, it is our responsibility to point them in the right direction. We are an encyclopedia, not a fan-source warehouse. 4208:: allowing content from largely user-created sources sets us up for wide-spread problems in both the short- and long-term. While one of the owners of the website has in fact written a book on GRRM's world, we have no proof (apart from the one person favoring it) that it is he who is writing the articles in Westeros.org that some are seeking to draw references from. How about when further comparisons come up between 169:, with an additional, painful, detail. Arguing that stereotypes do not exist is plain silly. Like Dutch stereotypes (windmills, tulips and clogs), British stereotypes (having tea with bowlerhat, umbrella and "The Times") they do exist, regardless of their veracity (very close to zero). Nazi's in particular were quite big on those and that occasionally worked in favor of some. Sad, cruel, but nevertheless a fact. 3908:. Jack, it's one thing if you're changing your mind about why you don't like this content, but do not claim that this has been your position all along. Or you can admit that you lied to me when I asked you about your objections and apologize for wasting our time by keeping this dispute going in the wrong direction. Don't complain that I keep finding new sources when you repeatedly demanded that I do so. 1689:

not the correct number of deaths at the hands of Ukrainian nationalists, rather that it is the upper limit that scholars consider (300,000 is not considered to be a legitimate figure by scholars, it's false, like 10 million victims of Holodomor). By listing only the absolute upper limit as a fact, rather than providing a range that scholars claim is between 60,000 and 100,000, Rudling demonstrates bias.

9595:

there does not appear to be a clear consensus as to the answer, but it still may be enlightening. On the specific Barrowman discussion, my interpretation of the consensus is that the source became reliable by Barrowman's participation, but the particular content was trivia and not worthy of inclusion. How that applies to the porn bios you are thinking of will probably depend a lot on the context.

6210:. The core that informs that guideline that applies outside of fringe topics as well is that we don't present low quality sources alongside high quality sources and make the unreliable source appear as if it's contributing to the scientific consensus. That usually means we don't list any assertion of fact from that "study", or mention that a "study" was done at all unless we have proper 10106:, asserting that the place doesn't exist (there is a side-issue as to whether the database asserting it is a 'populated place' is sufficient to establish that it has legal recognition, and therefore is automatically notable, but I don't think we need to discuss that here). I've looked through the archives, and the only previous discussion mentioning I can find on this noticeboard 3847:, most notably, the refernce information (several of the references in these articles do not reflect the content they are citing). But then, they are GA, not FA. I am somewhat convinced that a fansite reference wouldn't survive the FA nomination process -and that's why we edit, right? To make the best, most neutral articles we can. Usiong a fansite isn't neutral; its pandering. - 2429:). Sources like that can however be good as gateways to other sources; your link references a post, apparently by Popaditch himself, on his Facebook page. But when I log on I can't find it. I'd guess that his Facebook page qualifies an RS as long as it's clearly his, but am not sure; if it is RS you might find something useful there. Sorry I couldn't be of more help. -- 11020:

fronts over two months, and Bogdanor is citing one article saying over all that period 1,000 died? Worsse still, if 600 IDF soldiers died, that is an unheralded proportion of 6 to 10 in the history of Israeli warfare, where the differential is a always multiple of at last 10. Bogdanor's figure is less than a few arbitrary instances of specific episodes over a few days.

8422:, it's up to the publishers to engage in fact checking and editorial oversight, not us (all we can do is exclude sources from publishers who refuse to adequately fact check, which applies to none of the sources here). Since Smith was published by a UP for a good school, he would have been at least vetted for undeniable errors. The Encyclopedia of Daoism was edited by 8918:, whose biography notes that he admitted to serial plagiarism and that he took money from a foreign-government lobbyist to write favorable opinion pieces without disclosing the payments. I would submit that, at best, there are substantial questions about the reliability of any material from a source whose publisher has such a significant history of ethical violations. 8853:. Should we purge BLPs of all opinions? An interesting thought - but for now opinions are frequently found in such articles, and if the person opining is in a reasonable position to hold opinions (for example scientists opinion n scientific matters, political journalists opinion on political matters, film reviewers opinion on films etc., we allow them. 7066:. As I have stated "333 Årsbokon" challanges parts of Swedish history, but its autors do it by mention things "forgotten" by other autors. I think SSF has made some good choices in exampifying such lacking parts. But in "333 Årsboken" or its at the world wide webb in English published there is no political agenda. Sweden has indeed during several centuries 10125:

by going down a geoname list of villages and writing a brief stub for each stating that "X is a village in such and such country". Any fictitious village added in to the GeoName server could potentially end up with a Knowledge article. A skilled vandal could even deliberately insert a fictional village, and then write a "sourced" article about it.

7450:. The different articles (and their authors) should be delt with as any other possible source. (But for that matter also direct SSF statements can be used as source, if they provide further reliable sources). Some "333 Årsboken" articles do challanges parts of common Swedish history wrighting, Yes. Is that a problem in itself ? Independant of 3777:

fulfillment, we are overlooking the main point that fansites contain crufty information that wouldn't be considered noteworthy to anyone who isn't a fan. Our readers cannot be assumed to be huge fans, and those of them that actually are know where to go to get that sort of information. We do not write for them; we write for the average reader.

10355:. It can be considered as opinion from recognized experts as per legal issues. I would say that the Volokh Conspiracy can be used to suggest that something is notable (clearly not on its own however but as part of a large context), especially posts by people on the site that are well known public figures that are regularly cited in other 8108:, but anything else that can be verified seems to be fair game. I have no opinion or comment about sexherald.com, but on the other hand I have found links to some fantastic content in the forum for adultdvdtalk.com. That is truly the "crowd sourced" collaboration that we wish WP would be at times with regard to the adult industry. -- 4222:: one of the problems with starting out with a statement that you desperately want to have in the article is finding a source for it (which is actually backwards). When that source largely does not exist in any other source but fancruft, that should be a large-type warning sign that your information isn't considered noteworthy. 1965:. While wikipedia articles alone are not a good reliable source, the figures in this section have references to reliable sources. Note that 100,000 is the ceiling figure among the reliable sources. By only including the ceiling figure within the range, and claiming it to be a fact, Rudling is demonstrating bias. 10051:

able to tell whether labeling a group "unlawful" is in this context tantamount to calling it terrorist and whether statements by the defense ministry are the same as government announcements or whether different parts of the government (such as justice and finance) keep separate lists of terrorist organizations.

1494:"response to the Canadian-Ukrainian complaint about Rudling, an open letter was published in his support, signed by 38 scholars of the Holocaust and professors of leading universities supporting him, including Omer Bartov, Kristian Gerner, John-Paul Himka, Dovid Katz, Alexey Miller, Ruth Wodak, and Efraim Zuroff." 10835:

mentioned in the article. It is very hard to estimate the numbers and there are many estimates. As to your suggestion that other views be included, they already are: I mentioned one other view of 5,000-8,000 civilians killed, which is included. Another source gives about 20,000 total killed, with 5,000 fighters.

10326:. When legal scholars write about the price of tea in China, or some other issue unrelated to their professional expertise, then I'm not sure it makes sense to use their blog musings as sources in a serious reference work. Moreover, a key point (which appears to need constant reiteration) is that the blog is 10923:

between the two claims here. One is a totally uncontroversial fact widely reported everywhere (that Lebanese and Red Cross sources put the figure at 20,000), and the other is an obscure and totally unsubstantiated claim about one isolated unclear incident where one Lebanese official quoted the figure 1,000.

7813:'s a perfectly traditional reliable source for that claim. (If it was only on Twitter, I'd be hesitant to use it. Sometimes people tweet things casually, sometimes celebrities' Twitter accounts are run by third-party companies, sometime celebrities have had long-term impostors that fool diehard fans etc.) 3990:. Have Antonsson and Garcia produced third-party content that is acceptable for use on Knowledge? Yes, their book and their outside articles. So their self-published content is acceptable too. But you don't have to take my word for it. You can always ask ...well I guess that's what we're doing now. 10575:. "Entirely absent from his mathematical manipulations is a rather pertinent fact: in 1984 these inflated estimates were publicly repudiated by the Lebanese authorities, who announced that “about 1,000 Lebanese were killed as a result of the Israeli invasion" ". If TTAAC can confirm, it would be good. 10922:

I am afraid I did not write the article. This is not the place to argue about the whole article, the correct venue is the talk page. The last few comments were only referring to the question which Shrike raised as to why include Fisk and not this other claim. To this I replied: there is no comparison

10823:

The Israeli claim is already present in the article, this is why I did not quote it. If you want to use the text without the "retracted" phrase, then this is simply a primary source reporting one isolated incident. If this is a notable incident, the correct way to do it would to use secondary sources

10763:

I ask any fair-minded person whether such an unclear primary source bears the weight of the claim that is being put upon it in the secondary source, that Lebanese officials have "publicly retracted the earlier figure". If Lebanese sources did withdraw their claim and give a figure 15 times lower than

10390:

David Cochrane is a professional astrologer. He (along with his wife) founded an astrology software company, and established an astrology school in Florida. Especially in those two contexts, he is cited with some regularity in astrology publications by other authors, although as far as I can tell, no

9376:

The source may or may not be reliable enough, and the content may or may not be due, but neither of those questions has anything to do with the article mentioning wikipedia. Knowledge's internal politics and policies are quite often mentioned in reliable sources when major BLP controversies are afoot

8781:

been raised elsewhere, I'd have to suggest that we quite possibly shouldn't be citing such a source at all. We don't cite every opinion of every partisan commentator on every subject, and the fact that the commentator in question doesn't like Knowledge excluding his commentary isn't in itself grounds

8616:

The first one is probably not reliable in general due to its user generated content nature. The second is probably reliable for film related facts, but not for personal BLP facts. As for the adultoutlook.com I provided you with the original link, but no URL whatsoever is required - just saying the LA

8001:

LB, it would be better if you made your post more neutrally, not strongly suggesting the answer you think is correct. The answer is going to be it depends. people whose presence in the porn industry is uncontested and uncontroversial, things like "won award X" or "was in movie X" is not really a BLP

7514:

If you want to write about Swedish history, you use the works of established historians as they will actually represent recognized perspectives in the field of history. You never rely on anthologies assembled by tiny fringe organizations with an openly separatist agenda. That you concede that SSF has

7070:

has attempted to re-nationalize the three former Danish provinces, Scania, Halland and Blekinge. This wasn't "a nice thing to do" and their success isn't full, which any reader of "333-Årsboken" will discover. This is especially true for Scania, where people often travels to Helsingør for shopping or

7020:

Translation: "The foundation wishes to point out that in a state like the Swedish one, there is no place for cultural regional diversity. The Scanian problem lives on through media silence, ridicule and constant efforts to push the problem down to a gutter level. It might be that the Skåneland region

7006:

You can simply search talkpages if you want to find stuff. I have no reason to call an organization like SSF "extremist", though. They merely have a political agenda (claiming to be unpolitical doesn't make you that) that is clearly separatist. That's problem number one, and here's a clear example of

6636:

it does seem to be. The material is neither unduly self-serving nor an exceptional claim; it does not involve claims about third parties; it does not involve claims about events not directly related to the source; there is no reasonable doubt as to its authenticity; the article is not based primarily

5991:

2. Using the source as an opinion is a slightly different issue that hasn't really been in contention yet, but I do agree the source is reliable for documenting that the group called for a ban. Whether this should be included in the article is a different question (e.g., why this organization and not

5941:

As you just noted per our policies, the report is reliable "to cite the organization's opinion and position," precisely so. And the secondary-source coverage demonstrates that the organization's opinion is of public interest and a significant point of view in a public controversy about the chemical's

4335:

And its working. Of the five original active editors in the article, only three remain (Donlago, Darkfrog24 and myself); the rest chased away by your constant bickering and text walls and forum-shopping. I think the only reason I remain is that by allowing a fansite to be given equal footing with the

4247:

I wanted to take a moment to apologize for the strongly negative reaction I presented last week here. While I personally feel that the advocate for this information has been gaming the system for four months to get what she wants, it isn't my place to point it out. If you can't or won't see the truth

4150:

And you don't need to "keep" things fair, Darkfrog24. They are fair. Now, lets see if some of this newfound collaborative spirit carries into someplace else. Are yoiu prepared to stop arguing against consensus and recognize the fact that the material doesn't appear to be notable enough to list in the

3985:

gets cited a lot on Knowledge. Because its authors have PhDs in linguistics and have been published in the journals of their field, their blog posts are also usable on Knowledge. The other publications (linguistics journals; Garcia and Antonsson's books and articles) prove that they are experts, so

3760:

If necessary, I'll point out the problems that others (this isn't about me) found with each of the listed links, not the least of which is that one or two of the sources do in fact note a chapter connection to an episode. That was in fact added to the article in prose form. That said, I'll avoid the

3058:

I agree that while this source may not be unreliable in itself, it shouldn't be used as an only source. Rather, it can serve as one source among others, and what we write in the article is based on what the sources collectively say, not what individual sources choose to point out. The New York Times,

2909:

I don't see an established track record of independent reporting or wide citation among other sources . I'll defer to Wikiproject Video Gaming on whether it's useful for games stuff, but I wouldn't consider it reliable for issues relating to living people. We have far better sources for living people

2777:

There is a lengthy list of biographical articles, many written by Dik de Heer. In my experience of using that site to help start (literally) hundreds of articles here, it is highly reliable and written by experts with decades of experience in its specialist field. Of course, as with all such sites,

2510:

source from badassdigest.com, written by Devin Faraci, be a reliable source? The site and author are cited all over Knowledge, but I don't see there's been any real discussion of its reliability before. Faraci seems to be a fairly ubiquitous critic and is cited with some frequency in books about film

2233:

in order to get POV content included in an article? Becoming an autodidact by sourcing blogs and zines dedicated to revisionism certainly reflects on where you've gleaned your knowledge and formed your opinions. It most certainly refutes your ability to approach the subject matter without treating it

936:

Actually, due to the fact all the gaming press websites have launched about the same story, completely one-sided, for Gamergate EVERY source should be met with scrutiny. It's an one-sided story being told, one where also a lot is missing that has turned up in blogs etc but for some reason isn't being

582:

Guy, considering LeadSongDog hasn't taken part in the RSN discussion your observation is irrelevant. It's not even clear to me why you accepted a discussion at DRN which is centred around reliability rather than directing it here in the first place. Fundmentally the question is about reliability. You

362:

look like Jews to me, so there's no reliable source for what a flatly-stated "Jewish-looking" means without clear attribution of who is making that subjective assessment in clear context. 2. Drmies's original text wasn't flatly stating that in the first place, and didn't indicate any endorsement. 3.

136:

survived the war because of his "non-Jewish appearance". However, that wording is especially problematic. In reality (and in another more reliable source) Caransa said his marriage to his Catholic wife and his blonde hair and blue eyes helped him survive. This is an altogether different statement,

10124:

I was one of the main commenters in the debate over Gasaneri, and I do not believe that articles should be written that use Geonames as the only source. The website states that it allows users to "add new names using a user friendly wiki interface." Many village articles appear to have been written

9871:

In that list are two Arabic sources and one Hebrew source (nos. 5-7), and a document (no. 4) which editors claim proves that “unlawful” means “terrorist” in Israeli law, but I think they have misinterpreted this document. It seems to be merely a list of organisations that the Israeli government has

8940:

opinions? In what manner does an editorial column used as a source for an opinion properly cited as such become "unreliable"? Do you mean the author of the opinion does not actually mean to promote that opinion? That if a publisher, for example, was fined by the government for tax evasion or the

7481:

This in not the place to put OR vs POV ultimatums, in order to miscredit a potential souce, which You possibly find "inappropriate". However if an article gives no further source, that perticulary article may though become doubtful or even unusable. In that I can agree. But where sources are clearly

6205:

The problem is that the group did not publish a study we can consider reliable as I described above for scientific content. We don't use unreliable sources in scientific content even with attribution as an opinion, but rather just strike them all together typically. The opinion is that they want the

5122:

4552:

There is a point, imo (and my experience in participating in other discussions of this nature), where one has to accept the consensus is what it is for now. Over the course of four months, one editor has pushed exclusively for a way to include information in the article wherein a consensus currently

4390:

They do if you are gaming the system. Now, you have a choice: you can throw yet another wall of text of slightly reworded, identical text of how you are bringing in all these sources which we unfairly consider to be useless, or you can be silent, and trust the others here to make a solid evaluation,

4375:

about the reliability or unreliability Westeros.org, please post it somewhere else, like the Oathkeeper talk page, my talk page, or the talk page of this noticeboard. If you are serious in your belief that I have engaged in tendentious editing, then go through proper channels. Accusations about me

4104:

There. I hope we can both agree that "break" is both neutral and implies nothing false. I chose this site by topic but also because it gave you both the last word one one thread and the first in the next. Like I said, I'm trying to keep things fair. If you'd prefer it somewhere else, then where?

3609:

covered at other sites. Please acknowledge that there is a difference between disagreeing with you and "not learning a lesson." It is no more your job to teach me than it is mine to teach you. One of the problems with this content dispute is that you keep expecting me to not only take your word for

3002:

The quote supported is, "Valentina Melnikova, head of the Russian Union of Committees of Soldiers’ Mothers, said that conscripts may have been forced to sign contracts before being sent to Ukraine." Why is this in the lead anyway? It is not even a confirmed fact. And conscripts are not "forced to

1544:

Your point being? Has anyone contested that he is an academic whose area is Eastern European history? You're presenting an article written by Rudling and an Assistant Professor Amar discussing historical questions in relation to current affairs in Ukraine, plus another demonstrating that he has been

1353:

I have no idea as to where that came from, nor can I see any sources for it. I can see that he's was educated predominantly in Sweden and has credentials from Canada and the US (although that doesn't actually even mean that he's had to spend any time there as primary postgrad supervisors aren't even

1034:

word-for-word their own written work from the book on their own blog, that would probably be verifiable enough (I'm assuming the author has no reason to misquote themselves). If it's somehow different writing, different phrasing, or a different work, even if it covers the same topic, then there's no

724:

a self-published source can be used for routine uncontested details about uncontroversial factual matters, or as a statement of an organization's philosophy. In some cases, such as a group's intended goals, it can be best to quote, but for routine material like this, the usual practice is to rewrite

696:

In 1972, the Geophysical Monitoring for Climatic Change (GMCC) program was established as part of the Air Resources Laboratory (ARL), a division of NOAA’s Environmental Research Laboratories (ERL). "In January 1990, as part of an ERL reorganization, GMCC activities were transferred, along with those

344:

I think the original "apparently" helped indicate it was not some empirical assessment of the "truth" of his appearance, (although I think the phrasing of the current version makes it even clearer that it describes a stereotype and is an overall improvement). I think that most of the time any phrase

191:

did. Please cite the passage from Het Parool. I already did in my initial comment, and I demonstrated that marrying a Catholic wife and having blonde hair and blue eyes is not equivalent to having a ""non-Jewish appearance", which is a Nazi Master Race theory. The fact that the person in question

149:

is unreliable (known for its sensationalism and gossip) for use in a biography article and we should stick with the more reliable source that describes his blonde hair and blue eyes. I don't see any good reason to claim that he looks "non-Jewish" when this was the claim the Nazis were making, which

11019:

Paul Bogdanor should never be used on wikipedia for any statement of facts. The item cited is total nonsense, as any familiarity with the IDF accounts of casualties they caused on any day in that initial 2 month conflict. This war was one conducted deep into Lebanon, using massive firepower on four

10834:

As I have said already, Fisk's book is used mostly to report the Red Cross and Lebanese police figures. Nobody doubts that the Red Cross and Lebanese police gave these figures. As everyone (including the Red Cross themselves) recognize, the figures given by them are very unsatisfactory, and this is

10758:

Israeli and UN sources said it was the first time they could remember any Lebanese official using such a figure. Early casualty estimates originating in Lebanon after 1982 invasion put the figure at 15,000. UN sources said it was not clear whether El Haj's figures included the casualties during the

10638:

Fisk is not a historian, of course. But he is a journalist who has covered the middle east for decades and his statements are for now limited to reporting what the Lebanese Police sources and the Red Cross said. Nobody challenges that the Lebanese Police or Red Cross made these statements. The book

10179:

This article appears on the Volokh Conspiracy web blog. The VC was self-published for about a dozen years from 2002 to 2013. As of this January, Eugene Volokh entered into a distribution and advertising revenue sharing arrangement with the Post, and a key point of the agreement was that the VC stay

9821:

article, editors wish to add Israel to the list of countries which designate the Islamic State (ISIS/ISIL) as a terrorist organisation (see para 1 of the Lead). For other countries in the Lead, government documents have been found that support such a designation – official lists of groups formally

8955:

If you read the source carefully, you will find that the author is making (and insinuating) plenty of factual claims, some of which have made it into our article. And no, we don't publish all opinions we can reliably attribute. I have a hard time finding reasons to consider TheFederalist notable or

7605:

Om du vill skriva in påståenden i artiklar som om de vore okontroversiella historiska fakta så måste du kunna hänvisa till publicerad och erkänd forskning (verk av professionella historiker som Rystad eller Skansjö). En antologi sammanställd av en öppet regionalistisk intresseförening med texter av

7140:

far away, and just a little bit longer than what Stockholm is). And in the referendum about the Euro, if Scanians had decided alone, we would have had the Euro today (Sililar reason). And there were the local referendum in Sjöbo in 1988, about wether that municipality would host refugees or not. To

6045:

Well, I disagree. So long as we clearly state that the findings are the organization's opinion, it should remain in. To not mention that the organization states that it has a scientific basis for its position amounts to telling a half-truth. If there are rebuttals to the organization's findings, we

5660:

recommended me to. He says that the only external link that can be used for lyric pages is Metrolyrics because they're "official" I would like to debate this. Metrolyrics is indeed official as it is LICENSED, but other lyric websites are too. And this is the point that I want to make so I don't get

5599:

Tiptoethrutheminefield, not knowing who to credit as source is the heart of the problem. We don't know who to credit because we don't know who wrote it - 'VICE staff' is what it says - no name and no reason to believe that this wasn't something knocked up by the copy dept. No reason to believe that

5498:

The basis of the disagreement is whether the VICE link and the 'blurb' is actually, meaningfully, reliably a VICE review - rather than a VICE/Raindance ad, which may or may not come, in whole or in part - intact or selectively quoted from a 'real' independent review, and indeed, whether VICE online

5072:

4613:

Holy crap, you're right, Elaqueate - he didn't say 'difficult to use this source'. That was probably me, taking the whole of the user's response into account; I've stricken that wording. Dr. Fleischman said we should treat the source as an ABOUTSELF, and opt for an independent source if both it and

4055:

Eh, I still prefer the collapse and reference to digression. The break isn't arbitrary, after all. I feel this ranty back-and-forth we've got going here may be discouraging new participants from taking this matter seriously. I don't consider these matters we're discussing trivial (in case that's

3780:

Sidestepping the forum-shopping, my other problem with this effort by the only other user truly interested in adding this information is that he is working the process backwards. She saw the chapter-to-episode connection early on, and was reverted when she sought to add it. She has been looking for

3527:

The complaint that Darkfrog24 alludes to regards the use by Slate, AV Club and another source of a Reddit table that some (unidentifed) fan put together that shows all the chapters per episode. The sources were not making the statements; they were simply discussing the phenomenae of how involved in

3010:

or any of dozens of other leading media, find out what they say and put it into the article, using them as sources. Why are we using an aricle by a human rights activist in an Eastern European online publication? This rings alarm bells for cherry-picking, where an editor decides what they want to

2267:

I really don't understand what you're trying to convey. Dyukov is cited by Патриляк, or he cites Патриляк? Either way, all it's established is that he's been cited by some scholars who have a particular and extremist opinion of the OUN. Your use of language appears biased in itself: pro-OUN? What's

2135:

Himka thinks he can believe SBU, maybe Rudling do not believe in their "evidence". And I think that paper about Nachtigall can be fake, as it was published when Shuhevich was claimed as hero, And there was not only Lvov massacre, " It is true that Nachtigall executed Jews on its subsequent march to

867:

If you're referring to the event in which one journalist allegedly slept with his subordinate and then she falsified a review or whatever it was, then no I don't think that two people's conduct, regardless of the truth or falsehood of the events, justifies the automatic rejection of an entire class

462:

Sorry Ronnotel, but you perhaps don't grasp the roles of DRN and RSN. This is the board where the question should have been brought in the first place, which is the reason I showed zero interest in it being pursued at DRN. In any event the DRN findings have no weight on the question here. Taking it

403:

Despite the reservations about the “hydrino” hypothesis expressed by some members of the scientific community, we decided that, after ensuring that the paper passed all necessary refereeing procedures (review by two independent senior members of the academic community), we should publish this paper

11046:

Specifically, in just one small graveyard at Sabra, the gravdigger they interviewed had a diary tabulating the names of those he had buried since 6 June, i.e.250 by the end of that month. Fisk himself had the names of 270 men, women and children who died in the Israeli bombing of Beirut on June 7.

10519:

and this RS book by an academic publisher, is RS for Lebanese casualties. Kingsindian wants to use original research to bridge the gap between what Osama bin Laden-approved far leftists like Fisk wrote at the time and reality. As the full passage explains, "The PLO fabrications, adopted by the Red

10478:

This is an astonishing claim. Lebanese sources have reported 20,000 figure total for Lebanese and Palestinian. There are tens of sources for this claim, three of them cited in the article. The lowest estimate is Gabriel, Richard , A, Operation Peace for Galilee, The Israeli-PLO War in Lebanon, New

9734:

states "DivaDevotee is my little space on the World Wide Web to share with the world my thoughts and feelings on one of my favourite topics: music's Divas. I'm very much aware of my place in the universal pecking order (at the bottom, with all the other critics) so please take everything I write

9594:

The following discussion may give some insights, it is on a very similar topic: Does the fact that the person in question participated in an interview, elevate an otherwise questionable source into being a valid source for the subjects own statements. The conversation is long and complicated, and

8103:

regarding Lukeisback.com. Granted there are blogs and bloggers that have some journalistic integrity, but Luke Ford is not someone I'd generally put in that category. Also, sometimes Press Releases are some of the best sources of background information on the industry. Often if the first couple of

7920:

Lukeisback is definitely not a reliable source per consensus below and previous consensus as well as Jimbo's own comments. There isn't a lot of strong opinion on sexherald.com but discussion seems to fluxuate between "I don't know" and "Probably not" and so there is a slight consensus against the

7289:

is the extent to which Scanian is considered a separate language: pig-headed requests from random Saanians who lack any substantial support for their claims. It's all about persistence and skewed ideas about what actually constitutes threatened languages or cultures. I personally find most of this

7191:

his Further You resemble the historical Swedish oppression of Scania, and its language/dialect, culture and indeed history. To modern day Scanian life, this is no big matter, however it isn't forgetten either. In my oppinion You want to put a ban on all historical authors whose work You disapprove

6552:

that there are two issues here, whether the source is reliable (properly attributed) in this context, and that whether it has enough weight. My answer to the first is yes, and the second is leaning to no, but requires more study (and not a matter for this board anyway, probably NPOV noticeboard or

6301:

Both of the authors are prestigious scientists with academic and government backgrounds involved heavily with scientific review of environmental toxicity articles, so they meet the requirement of a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy necessary to state that they performed a review instead of

4962:

TheNextWeb appears to be staffed by several professional journalists and various web searches indicate that they do serious fact-checking and retractions when they get things wrong, so I'm okay with including. The article is of such trivial social significance that I think the risk of error on the

4327:

As has been said before, Darkfrog24 did indeed keep bringing sources: fanblogs, forum reviews and even one faked source. There was one or two good sources, and they were incorporated into the article. When I suggest that you are gaming the system, I am stating that running to RSN, DRN or ANI every

3893:

Jack, if you don't want "walls of text about how horrible people are" then stop writing them. You don't want long responses to accusations? Stop making accusations. Don't attack me and then complain when I defend myself. I'm also not sure that this is the right place for you to be making these

3375:

Either way, now that you're here, could you guys take a look? WP:SPS is actually the policy in question. Do you think Antonsson and Garcia's other published work qualifies their self-published website as an acceptable expert source? If your concern is a reputation for fact-checking, they did do

3098:

Does Westeros.Org, a self-declared fansite without editorial oversight constitute a reliable source for the Game of Thrones tv series based upon the fact that two of the fansite's owners unofficially and intermittently act as a continuity source for some of the members of the writing staff? If so,

2340:

I'm sorry, but this really feels like talking to a brick wall. You brought Podworniak up. To what end? "Himka, Patrylyak, etc." are not being discussed: the use of Rudling is. Again, I'm sorry but I don't think your English is good enough to engage in a discussion here as you are unable to express

2154:

Um..Himka did not only state that SBU debunked the lie. He stated ""n 1959-60 the Soviets tried to embarrass the Adenauer government in West Germany by linking one of its ministers, Theodor Oberländer, with the Lviv pogrom. Oberländer was the German liaison to the nationalist battalion Nachtigall

2074:

So in an interview Rudling states they trained in the vicinity of the concentration camp, in the article he states that they trained in part in a subsidiary camp, not concentration camp (see footnote, which contradicts his words in the body of the text), and elsewhere he claims that they worked in

1688:

Just to clarify, I posted Rudling's own words, that contradict each other. Readers can draw their own conclusions about the reliability of a source that states two different things, particularly about a serious charge such as participation in the Holocaust. Also, I did not claim that 100,000 was

261:

So you're not interested in the fact that other, non-Telegraaf sources used the exact same phrasing? Because that's the real issue here--not whether this one source should be accepted (and for the record, you can read that article, and the many other sources cited in the current Knowledge article,

11042:

Oxford University Press 1991 pp.437ff. p.649 goes into the details of a lot of cross-checking he himself did at the time with Nick Tatro involving hospital casualty lists, cemetaries, Red Cross statistics, noting:’The Israelis still claimd that the casualty figures were lies, that the information

10050:

It is best to use a source that is specificially about what states consider ISIL a terrorist organization. Because different states use different definitions and terminology, and have different procedures for this, it is preferable to use a secondary source whose author is familiar with this and

7119:

and continues to spell the bus stop wrong. It actually looks bizzare, bus stop "Vilan" and right behind it, is an off-liecence store called "Hvilans Servicebutik" located, even the immigrant who ownes it, has adapted the local (and thereby true) spelling. I could give You endless similar examples

7038:

And problem number two is that none of the writers appear to be recognized in the field of Scandinavian history. At least none of the texts actually represent mainstream historical research. It can be used as a source for separatist or strongly pro-Scanian (and anti-Swedish) opinions, but not for

6030:

Not quite. With what I was suggesting above, saying the ABC called for a ban on the seed treatments would be fine from a reliability standpoint. Their findings on the other hand, would not be presented because the source would not be reliable for scientific content. Basically, it's ok to say they

4617:

As for my participation in this "tug of war", I should point out that I wasn't the one who repeatedly went forum-shopping for a pet version of the article; lets keep things in perspective, please. We don't need to repeat fancruft into an article when we can simply direct the reader to an External

4364:

Please do not misprepresent things. Scooby and TAnthony and most of the others were not weighing in on whether the article should include the disputed text at all, only on whether a specific source to do so (in which case leaving out people like InedibleHulk and others who supported inclusion is

200:

the same as asserting he has a "non-Jewish appearance". The former appeals to known facts, while the latter to fictional stereotypes. Again, what do Jews look like? For every answer you give, I can provide ten that disprove it. Yes, the Nazis relied on stereotypes to promote their theory of the

11003:

I don't understand this "She is not historian either not she is an academic". Historians are academics. Anyway, Saad-Ghoraeb is a widely cited political scientist on South Lebanon and Hezbollah. Her figures are in line with many other estimates, some of which are cited in the article. Bogdanor's

8776:

it? No. There may well be other concerns though - in particular, we need to be sure that undue weight isn't being placed on this single source. Have similar concerns been raised elsewhere? If so, we might be better off finding a source less filled with partisan hyperbole. And if similar concerns

7795:

Hi, I added the addition to that list article. I'd like some clarity on this issue, too. My reasoning is that, though the Twitter account does not use Twitter's "verified" feature, 1) the account is active for 7+ years, since 2007, 2) it has ~ 75,000 followers and 25,000+ tweets, 3) the person's

7015:

Stiftelsen vill peka på att det i en stat som den svenska inte finns plats för kulturell regional mångfald. Det skånska problemet lever vidare genom mediatystnad, förlöjligande och ständiga ansträngningar att pressa saken ner på rännstensnivå.Det är kanske så att skånelandsregionen är vår världs

3776:

Here is my take on this: Westeros.org is a fansite, run by two people who sometimes (and quite unofficially) act as helpers in terms of fact-checking for the writers of the series. This is an SPS. Overlooking for a moment that fansites are very often rife with speculation and outright false wish

2050:

5) Dachau "The units were trained in facilities linked to concentration camps" "Veryha recalls how the inmates of the Dachau concentration camp were forced to remove their hats for the Ukrainian SS recruits.5" "It would not have been unusual for Waffen-SS recruits to have helped with guarding or

11029:

Routledge (2000) 2002 p.174, gives the data for just one point on June 7 alone in a densely populated Beirut. There the IAF and the Israeli navy offshore bombed or struck with missiles some 500 buildings alone in Beirut. On August 9 the IAF bombed massively for 12 successive hours a sector of

8318:

of I Ching, I said "So instead of removing one or the other, I kept them both and incorporated them into the section". I questioned citing Richard Joesph Smith for the dating due to the uncertainty and ambiguity of the words used in Smith's book and that was used for citation ("A good guess is

7123:

You can trace a certain Scanian oppinion, at the very few occations when the people has been given a possibility to vote in something which actually can be related to "Scanian issues" in any respect. Sweden has held a total of six referendums, I think. The matters of left or right side driving,

6175:

The first sentence would need to be struck, but the last sentence in essence would be fine by adding "due to concerns of toxicity to birds, aquatic invertebrates, and other wildlife." The word concern would alleviate the red flag issue. This would also open us up to using sources that establish

6109:

I could say more on how Knowledge addresses scientific content if it helps, but does it seem like we're on the same page about how content about studies and related content are handled? I'm not sure how familiar some folks are here with how we generally have much tighter standards for weighting

6084:

makes that pretty clear that we don't do. There are small nuances in language when dealing with scientific content, so statements of opinion need to be carefully crafted to avoid overreaching what we can use the source for that result in huge changes in meaning. That's why the two parts of your

5914:

Self publishing and lack of peer-review are sometimes acceptable here when reputable organizations such as government scientific agencies, scientific professional organizations, etc. put out informal reviews or statement pieces. Groups furthering a cause though, regardless of the virtue of that

4557:

use it. Consensus can change, but a push for that change isn't supposed to happen moments after the consensus emerges and remerges time and again. This RSN section, and others like it, have been proxy fights to get that info in. It would seem that consensus should be taken into consideration. -

3903:

The consensus on talk:Oathkeeper is not that the content is "not important enough" to include but that more sources are required. So I've been finding more sources. I have also repeatedly asked other participants if they have any objections to this material other than sourcing. Verbatim upon

3574:

TParis has noted a point of view that has come up repeatedly in the Oathkeeper discussion (not by me) that, were the information about chapter-to-episode comparisons truly noteworthy, it would be covered by someone outside of a fansite. While there have been sources that comment on a similarity

3073:

Using multiple sources for the same fact is a form of fact-checking. The reason we use reliable sources is that they already use fact-checking. The problem I find with multiple sources, other than it makes articles hard to read, is that it puts a tremendous burden on anyone challenging them.

1915:

The claim that the officers were trained "in the Dachau concentration camp" is simply a lie which Rudling himself contradicts elsewhere. Rudling himself here in an interview states "Officers and NCO’s of the Waffen-SS Galizien were trained in Dachau, in the vicinity of the concentration camp."

1426:

1264:

article, considering that the "Treatment of Ukrainian nationalism" section is based on information paraphrased from the Defending history page, I don't even see the section name as actually being relevant to the information it carries. Members of Canadian-Ukrainian community groups objecting to

349:

should be clearly inline attributed when it involves contentious material or can be confused in this way. I don't really care what phrase the sources specifically use, unless you were using it within a direct quote. To compare, if a source said person X "looked like a hero", I might include the

306:

says, "Dat hij overleefde, dankte hij, zei hij later, aan zijn gemengde huwelijk en zijn uiterlijk: blond, bijna rood, lichtblauwe ogen." One could translate that. And then one could, if one liked, tweak the article one way or another, to add "he later said" or something like that. Or one could

7104:

The foundation wishes to point out that in a state like the Swedish one, there is no place for cultural regional diversity. The Scanian problem lives on through media silence, ridicule and constant efforts to push the problem down to a gutter level. It might be that the Skåneland region is our

6079:

Except doing so would violate NPOV, because it is not clear the content is not about scientific consensus. If something is not addressing scientific content, we should not make it appear like it is by giving it undue weight. It may seem like I'm being picky, subtle changes in wording have wide

4056:

not clear from all the attention I've paid them here and elsewhere), I don't feel this is the place for them. The instructions up top say not to talk about issues other than reliability here. Besides, most of this stuff is covered in your second post and mine at the beginning of this thread.

2311:

I've found, and it doesn't suggest any credentials other than being a theologian (although it doesn't indicate that he actually completed a degree at the seminary he was enrolled in. I'm sorry, but your English is weak and I find it difficult to comprehend what it even is that you're trying to

886:

What this is is evidence of a systematic problem in gamer press websites where they break journalism ethics (accepting money, close relations with subjects etc.) and also suppress criticism. They also harass and insult people who have differing opinions who in this case seems to be their usual

10884:

Sentence as fact: "By the end of the first week, 14 June 1982, International Red Cross and Lebanese police figures claimed that 9,583 had died and 16,608 injured. By the end of the second week, they claimed up to 14,000 people died and 20,000 were injured, mostly civilians." (Fisk pp 255-257)

4235:

have that info in there. Looking at the information that was sourced to Westeros.org indicates the large amount of cruft and relatively useless information that was crammed in for no other purpose than to pad the article. I suspect that they won't make it through FA candidacy with them there.

4005:

Jack I have a request. I've separated our back-and-forth into a subsection. I think that the two of us should keep it in here (or even delete all this entirely) so that new people will not be discouraged from adding their input above. Considering that both respondents so far have said that

3276:

the regulars here to think that this thread is worth their time, and complaining suggests that it is not. If you want this RSN to count we have to do it right. If you don't like "Fan or expert," then we should just delete the "again" and say "Westeros.org" by itself. Doniago would probably

10498:

The citation in this book is to a single Washington Post article dated 1984, which does not say anything about retraction. The full quote is "In demanding war reparations, Haj said that about 1,000 Lebanese were killed as a result of the Israeli invasion and that more than 1,000 others were

8872:. Knowledge articles should not be used to promote the significance of facts and information that are ignored by the mainstream. The best approach for Sean Davis to take is to get the news media interested enough to run a story about his research. Then when it hits AP, we can include it. 7132:. One explination is that generally Scanians, like Danes are liberal in alcohol related matters. And almost every Scanian finds the free sell of beer, wine and liquor in Denmark uncontroversial. Also in the 1994 referendums of Sweden joining the European Union, Scanians voted also around 75% 1732:

but rather his right to engage in scholarship and his criticism of some Ukrainian nationalist "scholar": "We, the undersigned, declare our solidarity with Dr. Rudling. We find his criticism plausible and extremely valuable. We also endorse his call for rethinking some aspects of the field of

10276:

Agree with both your points. "Keep" looks very likely (check my vote to see where I stand on the matter) and the VC is quite notable. But I don't see how either is relevant to the question I asked. The VC status as RS given their editorial independence and partnership with the Post is an

6472:

is "only" an essay, but it is regularly used by the community. If someone wants to ignore the conventions the community uses for assessing scientific content specifically, it's going to be a very uphill battle to make an exception. So far, we don't have anything particularly supporting this

2200:

Yes, i found it, it is from fighter memoirs ЦДАВОВ. Ф. 3833. Оп. 1. Д. 57. Л. 17; Патриляк I.K. Легiони Украiнських Нацiоналiстiв. С. 26. "But there is compelling evidence of the participation of soldiers "Nachtigal" in the extermination of Jews in Vinnitsa region. In the diary of a soldier

556:

If this had been open when the DRN case was filed, I would have closed the DRN case and asked the filer to re-file after the RSN discussion has ended. Because this was opened (without any discussion on RDN and without notifying me) during an ongoing DRN case, I am going to request that this

7796:

official website repeatedly links to and references that specific Twitter account as her own. Therefore, I believe that it is reasonable to assume this account genuinely belongs to the person in question and is not someone else's, despite the account not using Twitter's "verified" feature.

8441:

and cannot include an additional source to point out that Smith's view is the majority while including Woolf's view to indicate a properly attributed minority position. Doing so would actually elevate Smith's position and devalue Woolf's position moreso than simply removing the latter.

2282:

You demonstrate rather corrupt logic. If Hitler used multiplication table, multiplication table is not known only as "something, that was used by Hitler". And Dyukov has mainstream opinion of the OUN. Еxcept historians, I met exactly the same stories about Bandera units in the memoirs of

10784:

also states, "Israel has long claimed that...about 800 Lebanese civilians were killed during the invasion, excluding deaths during the Beirut siege." The Lebanese figure of 1,000 matches up with the Israeli figures exactly. If the "retracted" phrase is POV-pushing, I will amend the text

3793:

RfCs. She inundates noticeboards like this with walls of text talking about how horrible everyone is for not appreciating her efforts. So yeah, I find Darkfrog24 a net negative to the Project, and I am not alone in that assessment - at least three others have all but given up on working

7110:

And I can give very good examples of this aswell. In my home town, at its northbound entrance/exit street , the street bends some 30 degrees. The area around this place is well-known as "Hvilan", there are (and has been) many shops that has used "Hvilan" in its name. But some years ago

7682:

the exact statement in the article that the source supports. It is not possible to say whether a particular source is "reliable" or not—it depends on the context. If the issue concerns whether historical accounts have been "falsified", much more than one source would be needed because

7232:

of "SSF exaggeration" - to be the actual truth and not at all exaggerations. The Catalan example resembles Scania rather well, with the exception that Scanian isn't a writing language. But it could just as easilly become a writing language - just like Serbian and Croation no longer is

7071:

to Copenhagen for its many attractions. And through Danish television, of which all DR channels are available. Also Danish TV2 is offered through analogue cable. You may not like it, or the parts that SSF published in 1991. I cannot see a problem in the statement You use as an example.

985: 6348:

We don't use author notoriety to determine reliability for scientific content when summarizing consensus (it's a form of original research on our part), especially when we have the underlying reliability issues of the source itself, regardless of authors, that I've outlined above.

937:

picked up by 'regular' reporters while the one-sided story is, either out of incompetence or malice. I wonder what happened with 'checking the story' - because hearing the other side of the story is completely absent so far, and the articles themselves are hating and inflammatory.

10549:

The book in question here does not appear to be focused on this war. Given that the war is the subject of many high quality specialist works, it's hard to see why it's being used as a reference. Recent scholarship on the war should be referenced, not books on more general topics.

7399:) was indeed very easy to find other sources of. We cannot rule out the book as potential source, like in the case of Klågeröds blooldbath based on Peter Isosalo's ideas on "Stiftelsen Skånsk Framtid". Each part and author must be treated separately and its context in relation to 10892:: "Journalist Robert Fisk claims that early Israeli figures for civilian casualties were so low as to be "preposterous", and that afterwards it "issued casualty figures for its own losses but no longer offered figures for the invasion death toll among Lebanese and Palestinians" 9825:

Editors have provided sources which they claim support such a designation by Israel, which I have listed below, but I do not believe any of them can. I do not believe second-hand reports are enough, and the source originally cited (no. 1) mentions “unlawful” not “terrorist”.

5076:

513:

would be to give a false impression that there is any real controversy in the scientific community about this. It's a primary source, and using it would give a misleading impression, wait for the actual sources which if anyone respond to the editorial. In wikijargon, using a

8057:

and related discussions. But we also have users who relentlessly add press releases, advertising, and giveaway/throwaway magazines whose "editorial content" caters to their advertisers' interests to porn-related bios, which is far worse than occasionally-informed blogging.

6253:

seems like a reasonable end to this conversation with reliability of scientific content, and of an organization's opinion being considered. Does this seem like a reasonable approach, especially when substituting for a source that establishes notability of the opinion only?

9398:

I agree with Kelly that the reporting in this case seems to be accurate, though the tone is such that most people wouldn't take it seriously. Looking more generally at the WP article, I consider it basically a press release with far too many quotes from the individual.

1202:. He's a credentialed historian but has a POV and has been caught with inaccuracies and perhaps dishonesty. He should be avoided when he makes controversial statements or claims. There are some pro-Ukrainian nationalist historians who should be treated equally carefully. 981: 921:, and tech journalism is no different. Sift through the worthless, biased, and obvious shill articles to find what's useful. It helps to look for reviewers who do not accept advertising or keep reviewed products, but that's pretty rare in tech journalism, unfortunately. 7124:

ATP-pension and Neuclear power plants, were not of that kind. But the first ever referendum about alcohol prohibitation, in 1921 or 1922 was, if You have a look at regional numbers (in this very tight result ; around 49.5% Yes - 50.5% no nation wide) - Western Scania, or

6531:

Actually, you're the one arguing for an exception so the uphill battle is yours. Not only is policy against your argument, every uninvolved editor so far (NorthBySouthBaranof, Darkfrog24, Stephan Schulz and myself) have found this source to be reliable in this context.

8894:

clearly establishes an absence of editorial oversight. It doesn't even rate as an "opinion piece", it's nothing more than an unhinged personal-vendetta blog flamewarring at random internet nobodies: random editor's Talk pages here and random individual commenters on the

6248:

states, "Statements and reports from such organizations are not reliable except to cite the organization's opinion or position." Since we should only be citing the organization's opinion or we should have a concise statement of the opinion, and nothing more. With that,

307:

escalate this all over the place and accuse other editors of having a Nazi POV, which is of course a personal attack. All these links, by the way, are on the talk page already, but perhaps someone didn't see that--see, I'm applying good faith. Also on that talk page is

7169:, but instead mentioned a demonstration at Sergels Torg, Stockholm, with 400 people (what about, I don't know) Clearly 400 Stockholmers were concidered more importaint than 17.000 Scanians. And don't You believe that I am the only one who has such oppression memories. 6553:

the talk page). Advocacy groups can be extremely valuable, but they should be treated with extreme caution. Newspapers in general do a horrible job in science-related matters, and they should only be used to establish notability, not any weight for the opinion itself.

9062:

Perhaps I should have been more clear - I believe that they should be treated as reliable in this instance due to the fact that the author tracked down and interviewed primary sources who would be knowledgeable on the facts of this particular allegation. In addition,

9957:. That is useful extra information. That source didn't have a Google translation into English, unfortunately, so I don't think it can be used, but that is for those on this board to judge. If we could use your translation, it would simplify matters enormously. -- 8179:(2013) which purports to cover much of the history on tattooing and this particular tattooing style. The documentary features Freddy Negrete, Don Ed Hardy, Jack Rudy, and several others who are frequently discussed in the context of early tattooing in books such as 5208:. That is useful extra information. That source didn't have a Google translation into English, unfortunately, so I don't think it can be used, but that is for those on this board to judge. If we could use your translation, it would simplify matters enormously. -- 1035:

way it can be cited as if it was directly from the book. It has to be verifiable that the exact material appears in the book, if that's what's we're telling the reader of the article. But it's still unclear what the actual situation is here without a diff or article.

506:

EPJ D is a fine journal (not first tier, but top quartile sounds about right), but the editorial in question is a good reason to continue treating the issue of hydrinos as outside of mainstream physics. Using this source as proposed would be to severely misrepresent

6243:

So, again, there are two things going on in the original content. The opinion portion isn't under contention, but it's the scientific content weight issue that's key here that's really affecting content. So far, we've established the group is an advocacy group, and

5578:

Vice is giving its opinion on a particular film showing in a film festival. Vice is also presenting 4 documentaries at that same festival (this, together with what appears to be invited access to screenings, is extent of the "partnership" that is talked about, see

3925:

Back to Westeros.org: That's not how WP:SPS works, Jack. Say Stephen Hawking writes his own website about physics. Because Stephen Hawking is an established expert who's been published elsewhere, the things that he says about physics on that web site are usable.

3179:

via user-created sources. No single reliable source has noted all of the aforementioned links to the book except in passing. This also highlights the concern that the material is but crufty details. I am sure that the good folks at the fan forums for Harry Potter,

336:

non-Jewish appearance". I think that any statement like "Jewish-looking" is a subjective assessment that requires attribution, but I don't think there was ever an issue here that Knowledge was stating that a stereotype was true. This is a lot of ill will over what

916:

Give me a break. One manufactured controversy isn't going to destroy the entirety of gaming journalism. I don't cite Gawker properties, as I consider them to be clickbait nonsense. You can do the same and refuse to cite souces that you find to be substandard.

8685: 4416:

I realize that the bickering is distracting, but it would be nice to get some informed, neutral inoput on this matter. One of the reasons that two users are so vocal in their opinions is that so very few others have offered their input. Please help out a bit. -

10800:

Not reliable in this context. There are likely to be other poor quality sources in the article too. Fisk, for example, is a reputed journalist but this is a historical topic and the work of historians should be preferred. if scholars differ include both views.

7309:

Some very localized forms of Scanian are at most a bit hard to follow (like any other dialects), but never moreso than, say, English from the southern United States. This can be confirmed with just about any basic linguistic work on Swedish, like Garlén (1988)

7165:, not even the result was mentioned in the TV-sport news ! And I recall when 17.000 out of 30.000 (figure came from the Police)local people, in my home town, protested againt closing the Öresundsvarvet shipyard in february 1978, the "Rapport" TV-news mentioned 1869:

in which Rudling largely smears most of the Ukrainian-Canadian community. Rudling quotes: "Ukrainian Waffen-SS Division Galizien, a deeply anti-Semitic organization under the command of Heinrich Himmler, whose officers were trained in the Dachau concentration

7776:

account. As I understood we could only cite Tweets from verified accounts; I searched the archives but it's difficult to find a clear answer on this. The IP restored the name on the grounds that there is no "reasonable doubt" to the account's authenticity per

2252:

Dyukov is citing book by academic historian Патриляк I.K. I know that academic historian Dyukov is hardly criticised by pro-OUN historians) You have strange opinion about revisionism, as far as I know, revisionism - it is when someone rejects crimes of nazi.

10294:

hmmm... Not much response. I'm going to conclude that the marketing and revenue sharing arrangement with the Post does not substantially change the fact that the Volokh Conspiracy is self-published with no editorial oversight from the Post. Thus, it remains

5321:

Would this be blanket advice for all WikiLeaks "cablegate" material - if a mainstream news source has reproduced, or made mention of some specific content, the information that has been reproduced, or mentioned, is probably usable, including in BLP articles?

3218:

Jack, I request that you remove your most recent comment so that newcomers feel more comfortable adding their opinions here. You were the one complaining about walls of text. If you do so, I give permission for you to delete this comment of mine at the same

2172:"Executed Jews" is not the same as "mass shootings." The mass shootings were conducted by OUN militias not Nachtigall in Lviv. When Rudling mentioned mass shootings he was referring to mass shootings, and Nachtigal's ties to those was a Soviet fabrication. 2093:

The Rudling article linked above includes the following falsehood: "ts previous incarnation, the Nachtigall battalion, took part in mass shootings of Jews in the summer of 1941." Although the OUN did slaughter Jews, Nachtigall did not - as noted by scholar

3188:

series are of use to the writers/directors/producers of those series, but it is the latter that creates the material. We don't start out with a preferred phrasing and spend months trying to find barely adequate sources to protect them - that's backwards. -

10534:

The book is an edited collection so the citation is incorrect. Would you please give the title of the piece and its author that you wish to cite, rather than just a page number. This is necessary because reliability depends partly upon authorship. Thanks.

4708:

on this matter when it looked like this thread wasn't going to get any more comments. If either of you want to weigh in, you're welcome to. In any case, am I correct in thinking that you both feel this is more of a weight issue than a reliability issue?

4280:

an external link. While a single sentence listing relevant chapters is sufficiently important for inclusion on Knowledge, Westeros.org also contains a great deal of information on the subject that may also be of interest to readers but does not meet that

7588:

You mean these are litterature You apporve of ? They do not exclude the authors of "333Årsboken" (In the case of former "Croatia within Yugoslavia" , there actually are similarities, though Yougoslavia was some kind of Communistic Federation after WW2.)

6708:"333 Årsboken", 15 different authors from the most part of the 20th Century, assembled and published by "Stiftelsen Skånsk Framtid" or "SSF" (a litterar translation for these three words are "the foundation, Scanian, future"), published in 1991, Swedish 10195:

which says it is not for that purpose. Since then, the relationship with the Post has begun. Does that change anything with regard to RS? One can argue that it is self-published so it should not be RS for much of anything, or one could argue that it

897:

scandal did not make the NYT non-reliable, and this scandal does not make Kotaku non-reliable. Unfortunately for all of us, the arbiters of taste still regard them as a leading source of information about games. Individual gamers may feel differently.

9648:

No I think. There are some obvious mistakes in that text. They refer to her as Asia Carrera in one bit, an obvious mistake referring to another porn star. Also a good amount of the text is duplicated on other websites and appears to be a "stock" bio.

3805:

noteworthy when they are cited outside of Westeros.org. But citing them within their personal blogsite for factual information is like deciding our content based on Twitter feeds. It is contrary to our role as an encyclopedia to pander to fansites. -

7921:

use of sexherald.com. I would say based on this discussion that it's inappropriate to use unless there is a consensus to use it and no prejudice against a future discussion on the subject here if it results in a more meaningful evaluation.--v/r -

7111:"Skånetrafiken" the regional collective coordinators labeled the bus stop as "Vilan" (not "Hvilan"). This spelling has caused a lot of harm in the town, and I would say that among 100 people that i born in Landskrona or has lived here a long time, 10160: 6130:

In March 2013, the American Bird Conservancy published a review of 200 studies on neonicotinoids, concluding that they are toxic to birds, aquatic invertebrates, and other wildlife. The group called for a ban on the use of neonicotinoids in seed

6085:

proposal need to be separated as I outlined above. If we are assuming that the source is unreliable for scientific content, but fine for an opinion then we need a much more condensed sentence only commenting on the statement of opinion such as,

5411:

is a reliable source, because it is accepted by the academic community as factually correct. If there are specific errors in the book, you need to raise them on a case by case basis providing other reliable sources that disagree on the facts.

2024: 2020: 4632:

Correct, noteworthiness is a balance issue. It can only be addressed by looking at the article as a whole and is beyond the scope of this noticeboard. It belongs on the article talk page and, if necessary, can go to other DR forums (not here).

2829:

GamesNosh is not a reliable source, given that it has apparently only existed for two months, has an editorial staff of one and "is a wholly owned website and content platform maintained and created by Christopher Heeley." That would make it a

6846:

isn't political. It's not a political party nor a movement, to me it seems most closesly related to a Gentleman's club, unrelated to left or right on the usual political scale. And besides - they have not written its contence. I can only give

7482:

given, "333 Årsboken" is mainly a historical collection, and ought to be used as a such. And each author / article must be delt with seperately, and yet again - SSF has only collected older articles and assebled this book 333 years after the

5955:

discussing the controversy. We should ensure that the statement is properly cited to the organization, but I don't see grounds for removing it entirely. We are not prohibited from including notable points of view in articles about chemicals.

5879:

Except we are talking about scientific content here, so news organizations are not considered third-party reliable sources in this case. Depending on whether someone is taking a natural sciences approach, or the veterinary medicine approach,

5032:

he has reviewed policies, restructured the organisation, enabled an acquisitions budget for contemporary art, opened a new 4th floor gallery, expanded the Library & Archive, developed a new sculpture terrace and increased visitor figures

4723:

Speaking just for myself, yes it's more of a weight issue, but also a promotion issue. An article that relies too heavily on ABOUTSELF sources ends up reading like an advertisement, even if the prose itself is neutral. Hence the 5th prong of

5582:). These two things are unrelated, and Vice has no actual connection to the film. I cannot see a justification for excluding Vice as a source. Exactly what wording in the article will use Vice as its source is a different question of course 1002:. If you can't find pages of the book available on databases like Google Books then I would not cite anything. Could you be more specific though? What blog are you talking about and what do some editors want to use as a reference? Thanks. -- 9133:. In the case of the assertions being made, I have weighed this source in regards to the statements the author is making and believe it to be reliable based on the sourcing (interviews with Presidential aides, speechwriters, etc.) Even the 4296:

I'm pretty sure the bot archives discussions based on the date of the last post, so posting here has artificially prolonged the life of this thread. I will support deletion of this post of mine if you delete that post of yours at the same

7026:

In the same introduction they compare Scanians with everything from Catalans to Inuits, a very, very far-fetched idea since even Swedes and Danes are extremely similar culturally, socially, linguistically. The Inuit comparison (they're an

6206:

ban, and it is that opinion that most everyone here agrees is fine to include. The issue is that saying they did a study or review is undue weight for the source for scientific content. As a parallel, this comes up a lot when we deal with

1600:

Why do you think his views are extreme? Faustian has provided reasons based on his own original research, I asked him to give similar reasons frome reliable sources. At example he says that 100 000 it is not correct number of deaths, but

1354:

necessarily in the same country as the candidate). Being published by the University of Pittsburgh means nothing as it's simply a matter of having an honorary position for the research quantum - a byline. Cheers for pointing that out. --

398:

as a "secondary" source for the paper in the same issue that the editorial introduces. The editorial itself cautions that it "is in no way an endorsement of the authors’ “hydrino” hypothesis by the Editors of this journal". It continues

11059:

Add just these four elements up of hundreds of episodes over more than 2 months and your figures exceed Bodganor's for the whole war. It is typical of him to fish up something extreme (WP:Undue) and make it a showcase for the 'truth'.

4436: 2681: 2476: 811: 6062:

In March 2013, the American Bird Conservancy published a review of 200 studies on neonicotinoids calling for a ban on neonicotinoid use as seed treatments because of their alleged toxicity to birds, aquatic invertebrates, and other

1435:

The Division like the entire Waffen SS was under Himmler's command. Himmler's involvement with the Division was almost nil. He approved it being formed, and reviewed it a couple of times during the war. Bringing him up is simply

404:

rather than silence the discussion by rejecting it. We view this as the most effective way to stimulate scientific discourse, encourage debate, and engage in a meaningful dialogue about what is admittedly a controversial postulate.

6792:

island. (Several wars followed and the Danish armies was then supported by Scanians. Some enlisted for the Danish Army, while others , especially in the areas around the former Danish-Swedish border acted alone. They were labeled

4269:

Noteworthiness is addressed by the treatment of this material in other reliable sources such as Slate, AV Club, and Forbes. Its presence in every other GA-rated article on this subject suggests a wider Knowledge consensus for its

10647:. As for including the throwaway line in the Washington Post, I will repeat the analogy on the talk page: if you find a throwaway line of unclear meaning claiming that 1 million, not 16 million died in WW1, would you include it? 5354:

in 1512, in Venice. The textbook also presents the Armenian people as newcomers and "colonists" in their own homeland who have "overran" the indigenous "Urartian" population (Vol. I, pages 23-26). Knowledge correctly acknowledges

647: 407:

We would therefore like to invite the scientific community, opponents and proponents of the “hydrino” hypothesis alike, to send us their comments and views. All comments received that are suitable for publication will undergo the

4445:

On the reliability of Westeros.org, I agree with TRPoD and NRP that Westeros.org is, per the "expert" exception to WP:SPS, a reliable source for details of the Game of Thrones series. I also agree that, as a fansite, it's not an

3610:

it but to prefer your opinion to what I can see for myself. But you shouldn't have to take my word for it either. Since you brought it up, here is a list of people who thought chapter information was important enough to cover:

10425:

I haven't followed any of the links you provided, but based on what you've written and my understanding of ABOUTSELF, it's fine to refer to him as a self-identified "fringe theorist", though it's possible you could run afoul of

9319:

Given the recent discussion of the VC as RS it is likely to become a topic here in the near future. (If it hasn't alreacy - I haven't searched the discussion history) so let's save further discussion of that issue until then.

2983:

The source might be reliable, but looks at first glance at least rather partisan (see the funding of the TOL magazine and the affiliation of the author). A more reputable and less partisan is certainly to be preferred for the

7341:

uses the 333 årsboken as a source, to save people having to root around for it? I can imagine contexts where it would be a reliable source — as Peter suggests above, for separatist or strongly pro-Scanian (and anti-Swedish)

6013:

In March 2013, the American Bird Conservancy published a review of 200 studies on neonicotinoids calling for a ban on neonicotinoid use as seed treatments because of their toxicity to birds, aquatic invertebrates, and other

3590:

The continued request for reliable, secondary and explicit sources from Darkfrog24 was to help her learn that not everything is noteworthy. Four months later, she has not learned this lesson, nor of following a consensus. -

2894:

They have staff who have various tertiary-education English credentials. One of them even has a journalism degree. From their autobiographies it's clear they are knowledgeable about gaming. The website's been up for a year.

599: 10173:). The issue is one of notability. Editors are trying to determine if there are sufficient citations from reliable sources to justify notability. One source being considered (it's not currently sourced by the article) is 3203:

Actually, no. Off the top of my head, I've seen it in 538, Slate, AV Club, i09, and other sources. There's similar content in Spark Notes. It's also in the books itself, which is where I originally found it. That's not

670: 5995:

So, for anyone out there, does it sound reasonable, given the above, to say the source isn't reliable for the scientific content of the article, but that it is reliable for the American Bird Conservancy's stance on a ban?

5664:

I'm a lyrics fan, and I decided to add on the (new single) page a link to the complete lyrics via Directlyrics.com There are thousands of lyric websites in the Internet but only very few are official, legal and licensed.

1610: 10391:

one outside of astrology's insular community has paid him any attention. He's likely not notable in Knowledge's sense of the term, but he has come currency in his field, and is probably what passes for an expert therein.

10265:, so it may inherit the mantle of reliability that the Post has. OTOH, The Volokh Conspiracy is editorially independent of the Post. So I don't see PostEverything serving as an example to indicate the answer to my query. 675:

Let me begin by saying I'm an editor with a conflict of interest. I work at NOAA's Global Monitoring Division (GMD), and the director of the division has asked me to clean up the Global Monitoring Division portion of the

6818:

The official Swedish interpretation of Scanian history, as "natural borders", "Scania was lucky to became a part of Sweden rather than of Denmark" is challanged, from several perspectives and different times of history.

8956:

competent on the question of deGrasse Tyson's character and lectures (one might argue that the publisher knows something about dishonest publishing from first-hand experience, but that would be begging the question). --

10383:. While I disagree stridently with the editor who nominated it for deletion, I cannot argue with the fact that the current content is pretty damn terrible. My sourcing so far is irrefutably mainstream sources talking 7763: 9269:

is utterly irrelevant. The fact that he (claims or actually did) talk to Presidential aides and speechwriters is irrelevant. In the general case, the question of Reliable Sources is whether there is a reputation for

4318:

In favor of using the statements (and therefore of using references that support them): DonQuixote, Donlago, Balaenoptera musculus, FormerIP, Scoobydunk, NinjaRobotPirate, TAnthony, TParis, Crisco 1492, Tutelary and

1557:

citing Professor Peter J. Potichnyj. History News Network is essentially a mirror site pulling in articles surrounding the discussion of history, and has no POV as to whether the historian is credible, extremist or

680:

article because I have some extra time. I fully respect the mission of Knowledge and as such I will not edit the article directly, but rather make suggestions on the talk page for other editors to accept or reject.

4368:

As for ANI, I reported you exactly once for repeatedly referring to my contributions as feces after you'd been asked to stop twice and for making misleading edits on GA-rated articles about the use of Westeros.org.

3426:

We could certainly deal with those issues if need be, but I'm pretty sure coverage of this particular material in other secondary sources and the treatment of this material in GA-rated articles would address them.

2067: 150:

he ironically refuted by his very appearance. It seems very unusual for a neutral encyclopedia to argue from the Nazis POV, that there is such a thing as a "non-Jewish appearance", or that it can even be defined.

127:

accused them of "fraudulent reporting". Google scholar seems to say quite a bit about this source but I don't have acess to the data at this moment. But to get down to brass tacks...In this particular case, this

10208:

for a standalone article. Clearly, if the Post is writing about it then it has some level of notability. Not sure about a blog they host (and perhaps "publish" depending on what you mean by that term).(unsigned)

9474: 8104:

paragraphs are ignored, which contain the promotional content, some really valuable and non-contentious material can be gleaned from these sources. According to policy Press Release cannot be used to substantiate

11004:

article is not about Lebanon war, he is not an expert talking about the war, this sentence is an isolated sentence in a larger essay discussing Chomsky, and this is an exceptional claim based on unclear sources.

10311: 7828:

Merely being old and well-followed I would say is not sufficient, but if the person's official website links to it I would call that well enough verified for our purposes. Elaqueate's source looks good anyway. -

3921:

called you or anyone in this dispute stupid. I have never implied that you were stupid. I haven't called your edits or reasoning stupid. The harshest term I had for DQ or Doniago is "guys who don't agree with

8363:

period (supporting Smith), with its present form dating to the 2nd century BCE. I could see excluding Woolf, but I could also see citing the Encyclopedia of Daoism and Smith as "Most scholars..." followed with

5803:

My initial thoughts are yes, they are an advocacy group, but I don't think that means they cannot be cited, especially if we use in-text attribution. BTW, this appears to be been reported on by mainstream news

1919:

The city of Dachau, near Munich, contained the camp as well as training facilities. By lying that the officers trained in the camp, Rudling is falsely accusing military people of participating in the Holocaust.

1430:

7805: 7422:

If you want each text to be treated separately, you must be prepared to quote it from its original context and publication. Quoting an openly separatist anthology will automatically attach a separatist POV to

714: 665: 240:

Whatever other sources might say, I wouldn't use an unreliable tabloid like "De Telegraaf" in a biographical article. The bar isn't as high for non-BLP bios, but still, I don't think "De Telegraaf" makes it.

9735:

with a pinch of salt. It's really not that serious." All of these qualities lead me to believe it is not a reliable source. This is only my opinion, maybe I have missed something. Please share your thoughts.

9390: 10499:

wounded". It is not clear exactly what category he is talking about. The claim is so left-field that my only guess is that he is perhaps talking about soldiers in the Lebanese Army, though this is unclear.

10226: 8862: 7790: 4450:

source and is therefore not a reliable source for (1) anything appearing to promote the series, or for (2) determining the notability of the article subject. In other words, Westeros should be treated as an

3341:

Oops, i dont know what i was looking at when i wrote that. When I went back to find what had triggered my response all i found were things that lined up with what's outlined in the requirements for using a

10317:

I think you have it pretty much right. As with any self-published source, its usage needs to be considered in context. For instance, when legal scholars write about legal issues on the blog, those opinions

8401:

My problem is that I don't know what grounds a tertiary source like Smith or other encyclopedias can base its claims on, while I can assume that a specialist source like Smith has expertise in this matter.

5888:

outline how reliable scientific sources are different from the coverage you are describing that we use for sources in general topics. I'd especially point out the White and Grey literature section in SCIRS:

10666:

I don't want to give a promotional blurb, but the volume features many distinguished contributors from Efraim Karsh to Irving Louis Horowitz, and many of the articles are collected from journals including

9315:

by Jonathan Adler. The WaPo exercises no editorial control over the VC; their relationship is one of marketing and advertizing revenue sharing. Please stop referring to it as "The Washington Post" It's

9011: 8908: 8762: 8310:

I did not say anything about "wishes to replace it with the statement", especially the "replace" part. In my edit changes, I specifically kept both of Daniel Woolf's and Richard Joseph Smith's references

7822: 6700: 4339:

That said, I would support an external link to Westeros.org, for those readers who want to delve more into what fans are saying. I do not support using it as a source for claims made within the article. -

6298:

The American Bird Conservancy published a review of 200 studies calling for a ban on the use of neonicotinoids in seed treatments due to concerns about toxicity to birds, aquatic invertebrates, and other

701:

Please note that the second sentence is a quote from the introduction page. I have read that quotes can be useful on Knowledge, however I do not know if quotes from self-published sources are acceptable.

10410:, but I'm not used to writing content that invokes that particular standard, much less while doing so in a controversial topic area, so I'd like to pre-submit this use here for a community sanity check. 9596: 7217: 9830:

Could we have your opinion on whether any of the documents listed below would reliably support the statement that Israel has designated the Islamic State (ISIS/ISIL) as a terrorist organisation, please?

5081:

551:"We cannot accept disputes that are already under discussion at other dispute resolution forums or in decision-making processes such as Requests for comments, Articles for deletion, or Requested moves." 192:

had blonde hair and blue eyes dispels the stereotype. I am not arguing that stereotypes don't exist, I'm saying that we do not represent them as fact, as is being done here. I'm also arguing that the

8868:

It fails rs. As an "opinion" piece it is unacceptable because saying that someone fabricated facts is a statement of fact not opinion and opinions should only be included if they are significant, per

1448:). If an apologist for UPA stated that it killed "about 65,000 Poles" (the lowest estimate) he would rightly be accused of bias. Rudling just gives the ceiling figure, demonstrating that he is biased. 7742: 8054:

God knows why we still have Luke Ford sourcing/links six years after the issue was settled. "I would certainly take out the Luke Ford blog stuff - no way in hell is that site a WP:RS." --Jimbo Wales.

7416: 7256:. Each source must be evaluated seperatly. And atleast "333 Årsboken" cannot be written off as potential source, only because You think so. By the way - if You watched the Champions League qualifier 6928: 448:

and has suggested parties work together in good faith to resolve the dispute. I think it would be useful to seek concurrence from the DRN moderator on the proposed change of venue before proceeding.

8804:

as a RS in general, and the series on Neil deGrasse Tyson in particular. To me, this very much reads like your average blog post hatchet job. It clearly does not meet the high standard we have for

7115:

preferrs the spelling "Hvilan" in this case, though it has absolutely nothing to do with our Danish time (the bend didn't exist in 1720), but still the civil servant boss in Hässleholm won't listen

5408: 4758:, whose reliability isn't generally questioned. Most of the article is undisputed. It's only this one line that's the subject of any fuss, and even it is mostly about out-of-universe perspective. 4614:

Westeros.org say the same thing. The editor also pointed out the noteworthiness of the material being sourced should be considered, though that noteworthiness isn't really something to address here.

4027:

who doesn't like that has my permission to revert. If anyone wants their digression posts to be more visible, put them below the bottom of the collapse, and move the bottom tag after say 24 hours.

9517: 7725: 5691: 3826:

io9 has some pretty useful content in their main area, despite the previous concerns raised in RSN archives about their parent company, Gawker Media. However, the noted reference comes from their

3443:

I'm mostly in agreement with NinjaRobotPirate. It is a reliable SPS for issues of continuity, but care must be taken not to confuse coverage by Westeros.org with making a subject notable.--v/r -

2968:

The source is reliable. And it's not an "opinion piece", it's mostly reporting with a bit of analysis thrown in. The actual text that is being discussed is a factual claim, not somebody's opinion.

2453:

if there were no doubts about its authenticity. But a notable figure like Popaditch would be very unlikely post something like this to a random website using just his nickname. Probably a fake. --

1733:

Ukrainian studies. We reject entirely any attempt to denounce Dr. Rudling, to exert pressure on him, and to obfuscate the issue by presenting Mr. Zabily and the organizers of his tour as victims."

1265:

Rudling's public announcement infers (very, very strongly) that they are automatically "Nationalists" per Defending history's hysterical definition of 'nationalism', reflecting in that section as

9493: 8259:

Sevilledade does not consider this reliable. He wishes to replace it with the statement "According to Daniel Woolf, the I Ching reached a "definitive form" at the end of the 2nd millennium BCE".

7606:

amatörhistoriker och skönlitterära författare är inte en trovärdiga källa i sammanhanget. Du får heller inte infoga åsikter från amatörer som Röndal och sen källbelägga dem med trovärdiga källor.

4147:

Let's just leave it in keeping how other people use breaks. Arbitrary in this instance doesn't refer to being argumentative, but instead, without any real reason. Break by itself is insufficient.

1515: 4848:

Of course these can only be estimates, because it is based on investments whose actual value can only be estimated. Better to use an article that explains where they get their info, such as

2355:

Try to read discussion one more time, if you want to understand why I spek about Podworniak, answerin to your question. It is interesting, you you did not write any argument relating to theme.

4442:

A major reason this thread hasn't received more attention from uninvolved editors is that both of your posts are too long. Please keep them short and confined to the subject of the discussion.

6769:

Most of the authors has no involvement in SSF, some of them were dead long before this foundation even was started. Most of them are/were Swedish citizens, but some contributers are Danish.

5823:

This very topic was already discussed at this board here previously out of my curiosity on how such sources are intentionally (or unintentionally used), but no action was taken at the time:

5531:

The blurb is not a review, and while I don't think the article would be harmed by linking to it, it should not be referred to as a review or quoted from; especially the marketing hyperbole.

9189: 4300:

Please make no further accusations against me here. If you truly believe that any of this holds water, then go through proper channels. I have many complaints about your conduct as well.

5651: 9792: 6074: 775: 314:

In de Tweede wereldoorlog was hij korte tijd geïnterneerd in kamp Westerbork, maar zijn huwelijk met de katholieke Rika Heijsteeg en zijn niet-Joodse uiterlijk redden hem van deportatie.

7619:. But even then, you clearly skewed your brief summary by cherry picking the word "bloodbath" and including blatantly subjective terms like "very sad event". You even managed to render 7473:

For instance, the (possibly) rounded figures from Klågeröds bloodbath, is (if that's the case) rounded by the Swedish military back in 1811. This becommes clear when reading that part.

7306:. Unlike Scanian, they are can be almost incomprehensible to other Swedish speakers. Most of these have no more than 10,000 speakers and will most likely be gone within two generations. 7240:

by this foundation, nothing else. There are several similar foundations or organisations by the way. Like Danish-Scanian association www.danskskaanskforening.dk/, Skåneland Friskytten

7200:

to describe modern-day Scania as an oppressed region. Your only contributions are long-winded outpourings of random personal reflections, anecdotes an extreme bias towards interpreting

4936:

Content: Users on Vimeo who deal explicitly with databending and glitch art in general exist, and a Chicago-based digital art project named GLI.TC/H was funded using Kickstarter in 2011

1492:, have you actually bothered to read the entire discussion so far, or have you just not understood it? You've just re-quoted an article from a site being discussed as being unreliable. 10419: 9478: 8191:. The director does not appear to be established, but the documentary has received national coverage as it was shown on Spike TV on 11 March 2014. The documentary has gotten reviews 6005: 5443: 4041:

I've removed it, replacing it with an 'arbitrary break' subsection. It has the virtue of concealing no one's post, but allowing it to be cordoned off if others don't want to see it.-

2712: 196:

is not a reliable source, and we shouldn't even be using it. Saying that the person in question avoided death because he had blonde hair and blue eyes and married a Catholic wife is

9677:

regarding whether the site WatchersOnTheWall.com meets the criteria for an expert self-published source (and is therefore suitable for use on Knowledge). Participation is welcome.

8782:

for inclusion. If people are reading the Davis piece and coming to Knowledge with the intention of promoting his arguments against Tyson, they need to be pointed in the direction of

3355: 3336: 350:

direct quote, or attribute to whom X looked like a hero, but we shouldn't have a blunt "X was heroic-looking" in Knowledge's voice. (And, of course, that's not what happened here).

9692: 8835: 6156: 989: 8150: 8067: 6801:

1660, the three provinces were included in Sweden in 1719 and the last peace treaty between Sweden and Denmark was signed in Stockholm 3rd July 1720 it's sometimes labeled as the

2843: 1072: 1011: 10402:

purpose I wish to put it to is to cite him as an example of someone willing to self-identify as a "fringe theorist". Needless to say, it is not a remotely reliable source for any

10043: 8337:

Apologies. I wrote this very late at night and took your edit summary "Richard Joseph Smith's part is problematic as well, why didn't you remove that as well" a little literally.

6541: 6482: 6411: 6119: 6087:"The American Bird Conservancy has called for a ban on neonicotinoid use as seed treatments because of their alleged toxicity to birds, aquatic invertebrates, and other wildlife." 5924: 5866: 5774: 5331: 1775:"I posted Rudling's own words, that contradict each other." I do no see it. " rather that it is the upper limit that scholars consider" reliable source, where is such conclusion? 1422:"Ukrainian Waffen-SS Division Galizien, a deeply anti-Semitic organization under the command of Heinrich Himmler, whose officers were trained in the Dachau concentration camp..." 974:

Some Tamil Wikipedians believed that if book of the author is not referrable in internet except in blogspot means then we can refer his blog with that book contents as reference.

10449:

Sentence: "In 1984, the Lebanese authorities publicly retracted their earlier estimate , instead stating "about 1,000 Lebanese were killed as a result of the Israeli invasion.""

8359:

entry gives the traditional dates as sometime around the 11th century BCE to some point during the life of Confucius, noting that modern scholarship places most of it during the

7996: 6562: 4439:

about the Lucy Burns Institute, which also has been languishing. Interestingly, even though they're in completely different article spaces, there's some overlap on the RS issues.

2919: 2767: 1309:

What are you talking about? Poeticbent has already addressed that issue in modifications to the article. The remaining issue is that of Defending history com (represented by the

610:

while giving the impression of being fresh eyes. You explicitly support one side and have made recommendations along specific edits you made in the past but which were rejected.

10794: 10708: 10544: 10529: 10185: 9628: 6055: 6040: 6025: 5965: 4549:

was not discussing the usability of this source in the article (nor voting on the matter), I find the administrator's closing words on the matter germane to the discussion here.

4201:

Apart from the personality hurdles that often arise when two or more editors differ in opinion, the problems I see with considering Westeros.org a usable source are as follows:

746: 6016:

That is in-text sourced to the organization, making it clear that it's the organization's POV. So if you're saying the current wording in the article is satisfactory, I agree.

5613: 3942:

AV Club, Slate, and i09 all cite the content; they all thought chapters were important enough to list ant talk about. Ergo, it is important enough for Knowledge to talk about.

531: 10740: 10726: 9966: 9888: 9653:- I wouldn't be surprised if some of it was reverse copying from wikipedia. however, if the original source of the text could be uncovered, that might ultimately be reliable. 6251:

The American Bird Conservancy called for a ban on the use of neonicotinoids in seed treatments due to concerns of toxicity to birds, aquatic invertebrates, and other wildlife.

3840:

FiveThirtyEight's mention of a single chapter usage in the episode was incorporated into the article, again by myself, even though I missed it when someone else introduced it.

2462: 868:

of sources. If you are suggesting that gaming press websites be reevaluted on their own merits, then please list your specific reasons. If the falsification of reviews is a

5816: 4567: 3856: 3815: 3198: 2904: 2873: 639: 619: 10908:

Let's set the bar much higher. I see very few historians in the references. if only Benny Morris has written at length about the war, then base the article on Benny Morris.

10134: 5362:"The Armenian Progressive Students Union demands that the grossly falsified textbook The Armenian People from Ancient to Modern Times is removed from academic circulation." 5217: 5139: 4647:

The material in question seems to involve basic facts about the book, and not intended to promote the series or support the notability of the television episode. That makes

4458:

Any material appearing in Westeros.org that also appears in an independent reliable source (such as Slate), should be sourced to the independent source, not to Westeros.org.

492: 10060: 9686: 9219: 9202: 9149: 9125: 9091: 9057: 9043: 9030: 8950: 8817: 8598: 8384: 6263: 6142: 5789: 5675: 4642: 4507: 4493: 4479: 3436: 2326:

Podworniak had not qulification, Himka, Patrylyak, etc. have. It is one example about real person who wrote his memoirs from Canada and had nothing with "Soviet propaganda"

7757: 5491:, on the VICE site which this link leads to, if you click on 'more details' on the Weight of Chains section, this leads you to the Raindance Festival 'blurb' on the film, 4869: 4358:. I also brought in Forbes, FiveThirtyEight, Slate, AV Club, i09 (two from i09, actually) and others, and yes, one of them was a blog, which I posted here for evaluation. 3385: 3032: 2978: 2444: 930: 10434: 10213:

I am amazed. Right now the AfD is headed for a "Snow Keep" result. The "blog" was notable, and won awards, before it was given an official home at WaPo, and WaPo would

9484:

Reliable for what? As the note at the top of this page makes clear, you need to tell us what article this concerns, and what specific text the source is being cited for.

8927: 6646: 6170: 5824: 4404: 4385: 4349: 4309: 4174: 4160: 4096: 4079: 4065: 4050: 3935: 3746: 3537: 3286: 3265: 3231: 3165: 3083: 2693: 2488: 823: 594:

You are also (again, if I recall you did this years ago when I last saw you at DRN) using your position at DRN to give your own point of view prominence in a discussion:

9803: 9470: 8132: 5697: 5421: 4627: 3823:

AV Club, Slate and Panda all use the same Reddit user-created table to point out how fans are deeply involved in the series. The references do not represent the content.

2787: 1025: 10933: 10917: 10863: 10845: 10599: 10585: 10074: 8881: 7659: 7598: 7571: 7509: 7429: 7324: 7281: 7183: 7045: 7001: 6965: 6954: 6940: 5513: 5400: 4767: 4737: 4718: 3450: 2669: 1385: 797: 684:

I've been looking for articles on the history of my division, and unfortunately I have found a dearth of 3rd party sources. However, GMD has a number of self-published

10152: 9662: 8965: 8826:? Anyone can publish a web site. In fact, this looks like a blog. Is there any reason to believe that this source has a reputation for accuracy and fact-checking? 8633: 8563: 8045: 8031: 8014: 7383: 7354: 6661: 5316: 4838: 4681: 4664: 4606: 4426: 4257: 3986:

what they produce is expert content. In that case, "the field" is publications that talk about linguistics. In this case "the field" is publications that talk about

3520: 3059:

of course, isn't unbiased either but is usable nonetheless, treated properly. The lead for it's part is then based on the balance of what the article says. Cheers, --

3049: 2993: 2962: 11069: 10344: 10006: 9992: 9928: 9585: 8679: 8548: 8092: 7981: 4824: 4805: 4114: 4036: 4018: 3961: 3617: 3068: 2596: 1044: 11096: 10286: 10103: 6358: 6311: 5844: 5298: 4653:

side example: bird scientists can be super keen on the general subject of birds, specific birds, and can be publicly enthusiastic about their own scientific theories

3171:

Disclosure: Jack Sebastian and Darkfrog24 are two participants in a multi-editor content dispute. Consensus was reached to seek outside input on the RS noticeboard.

1742: 1698: 1505: 1286: 881: 474: 457: 434: 10368: 5257: 5243: 5179: 4893: 2649: 2628: 1363: 964: 788:

and is therefore not a reliable source. There is no evidence that the author is an expert in the field. He appears to be a technical writer, not a lexicographer. --

11014: 10998: 10984: 10970: 10661: 10633: 10619: 10559: 10515:

This claim is only way out in left-field to those who have been thoroughly inundated in radical anti-Israel propaganda. The Lebanese government, as reported in RS

9703: 9350: 9329: 8795: 8663: 7907: 7893: 7696: 6031:

want a ban because they think toxicity for certain organisms poses a suitable risk, but it's not ok to give weight to the idea they did a literature review/study.

5682:

The issue that would prevent linking that comes to mind is copyright violations. In that you are correct that direct lyrics doesn't seem to be violating copyright.

4972: 4087:

Similar note: Since you clearly don't have a problem with changing headers that other people wrote, please remove the biased "Again" from the head of this filing.

2364: 2350: 2335: 2321: 2277: 2262: 2247: 2104:

In February 2008 the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) revealed documentation that demonstrated clearly that the KGB had “cooked” the evidence against Nachtigall."

1654: 1640: 1622: 1575: 1527: 256: 10955: 10902: 10810: 10774: 10590:

Haven't seen anything yet that indicates that this is a scholarly work of history. Could those who want to include the work justify it by that criterion. Thanks.

10509: 9907: 8580: 6692: 6176:

notability of that opinion without having to refer to this contested source, and thereby not appear to be accepting the source as reliable for scientific content.

5641: 5591: 5554: 4589: 3502: 3488: 3476: 2122: 1326: 1304: 1168: 1150: 214: 178: 9822:

designated as terrorist organisations – but no such document can be traced for Israel. (Exampes of these are cited in the infobox in section 13 of the article.)

9809: 8463: 8451: 8409: 8396: 8344: 8332: 7840: 7079:

It seem to me, You wan't to ban not only SSF but also "333 Årsboken", which only is assembled by SSF. Now - please, I do not accuse anyone of being a Stalinist.

5073:

designated as terrorist organisations – but no such document can be traced for Israel. (Exampes of these are cited in the infobox in section 13 of the article.)

4524:

it isn't neutral about its interest in the content and has a CoI regarding the usage of its material. Additionally, Dr. Fleischman points out that if we can use

1496:

is from that very site: Defending history com. In other words, you are presenting Rudling as being 'right' according to the interpretation of a spurious site. --

1188: 946: 858: 326: 235: 9439: 8456:

With the I Ching, there are plenty of minority positions. I suppose we can include any number of non-specialist claims as long as they are properly attributed.

8230: 5158: 4845:

This is a tertiary source and therefore not recommended. While this publication puts his net worth at $ 30 billion, different sources have different estimates.

3256:). I should know; I've submitted both queries. The title accurately reflects the issue, and I apologize for not previously linking the earlier conversations. - 2823: 2213: 2195: 2181: 2149: 2084: 1974: 1784: 1475: 1457: 905: 271: 10244: 9508:

that may or may not be fiction (and may or may not be by the author - I don't know how frequent that name is). Certainly not enough to confer expert status. --

7928: 7236:

But about SSF, I don't know more about the foundation than You do, and what they have stated at their webbsite www.scania.org ,anyhow - "333 Årsboken" is only

6598: 3363: 3322: 2815: 1516:

http://www.academia.edu/2763263/_The_Honor_They_So_Clearly_Deserve_Legitimizing_the_Waffen-SS_Galizien_The_Journal_of_Slavic_Military_Studies_26_1_2013_114-137

1211: 736: 595: 8743:. This is BLP material, so there was lively Talk page discussion of whether the criticism warranted inclusion in the Bio. Then the same source published this 7781:. Can I get some input on this please. What is the threshold for"reasonable doubt" when it comes to Twitter accounts, and do they need to be verified or not? 6861:, regarding the number of killed civilians and later the public amputations (of right hand) followed by beheading, of convicted rebels at a square in Malmö. 5572: 2295: 1444:

This is the maximum estimate in the range. Consensus among sources is 40,000-60,000 in Volhynia and 25,000-40,000 in Galicia (this is covored extensively in

969: 10889: 9452: 9410: 5060: 3123: 9306: 9283: 8217: 3420: 317:

Will someone claim this is also Nazi POV wording? Because the document comes from the website of the 400-year old Jewish cemetery where Caransa is buried.

10714: 10374: 9845: 9668: 9642: 6616: 5096: 5011:

He also organised such shows as the first John Baldessari European Retrospective toured to the Serpentine Gallery, London and onwards onto a European tour;

3314: 10479:

York: Hill & Wang. 1984, which gives 5,000-8,000 civilians, not total. There are two sources cited for the Lebanese official sources claim of 20,000 (

5745:

published a review of 200 studies on neonicotinoids calling for a ban on neonicotinoid use as seed treatments because of their toxicity to birds, aquatic

3481:

The non-Westeros.org sites would be preferred. I'm not sure of the reliability of avclub. Higher quality sources are always preferred above SPS.--v/r -

3108: 2420: 1549:(and Romanovsky doesn't show up on the map of historians of any repute other than through Rudling's citations)? Look up any contemporary historian on the 8256:

I have included in this article the statement "Richard Joseph Smith states that it had developed into something like its current form prior to 800 BC."

8196: 5825:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_174#Reliability_of_reviews_of_scientific_literature_put_out_by_advocacy_groups.3F

5780:

I would think it's a reliable source from a notable POV. It is an advocacy group so I'd use it with a citation, but I can't see grounds for removing it.

5008:... he and other city curators established the Manchester Gallery Consortium when the Hayward Gallery brought the British Art Show 4 to the city in 1995. 653: 303: 9551: 6877:

I realise that the book, when and if, used as source, must be in line with the Knowledge article topic and common criteria. But this request deals with

2075:

the concentration camp. The books you listed with 100,000 weren't by specialists in the massacres, such as Motyka (who gives a range of 80,000-100,000).

308: 10065:

Finding any source at all is the problem. I have looked on the internet and cannot find anything. Perhaps my search terms are not accurate enough. --

9576:", which doesn't sound like especially contentious material to me. That doesn't mean that there aren't better sources out there for this type of info. 8644:

FYI, I have preliminarily recently edited the article in question here. I have also gone ahead & changed the specific link to the above-referenced

8302: 7782: 4461:

Material that only appears in Westeros.org may be included and sourced to Westeros.org as long as (1) it appears to be noteworthy and does not violate

4196: 2729: 1602: 1445: 98: 93: 88: 76: 71: 63: 9785: 7391:

I have not been aware of the previous discussion. What Peter Isosalo ever thinks about "333 Årsboken" it is only assembled by the SSF foundation. And

7149:

the town got full of "explaining and examining" journalists from the central power in Stockholm. When the Swedish football cup final in 1984, between

5674:

I have confirmed they have signed deals with all major publishing companies (pay artists money), and even LyricsSeal (you can verify its legal status

5483: 3837:

into the article. I know, because I am the one who did it. There is no chapter listing there, and no reference to Westeros.org or "Oathkeeper" at all.

3737:

RSN regulars—if you feel this is too off-topic, I'll remove it upon request. But the claim that this material isn't covered elsewhere is not valid.

3493:

AV Club was used elsewhere in the article without incident, but there have complaints have been made about it and about Slate in this specific case.

2137: 583:

also fundamentally misunderstand reliability in your comment at DRN as well. Anderson is completely reliable for saying what Anderson says. There is

9341: 5604:. We DO already use the connected link as a ref for the film being shown at the festival. It is using it as an independent review that is disputed. 5381: 4686:

Jack, this is not the place to accuse me of forum-shopping or anything else. Coming to the RSN was Doniago's idea, and I happened to agree with it.

3222:

This section needs an unbiased header. If you don't like "Fan site or expert site?" then suggest one in the appropriate thread at talk:Oathkeeper.

2778:

caution needs to be exercised. However, it is far, far more reliable on details than other more general sites such as (one example) Allmusic.com.

9607: 7674:

As stated under "Before posting, please be sure to include the following information" in the box at the top, it is necessary to provide the source

7640:

Published by major publishing houses (Norstedts, Bonnier, Historiska Media, Svenskt Milithärhistoriskt Bibliotek, colleges and universities, etc);

5540: 5307:

No. This is a primary source. If a mainstream news source has picked this information up and republished it, then that would probably be reliable.

3039:

I agree that it does not belong in the lead, for the reasons that TFD mentions. Perhaps it may be warranted elsewhere, but certainly not the lead.

2570: 759: 10257:

I guess I'm failing to see how this response is helpful. I haven't been able to determine what criteria is used to decide what gets published in

9983:, and especially in cases as complicated as this case pertaining to Israeli law, and/or especially when English sources cannot be readily found? 9744: 8984: 5234:, and especially in cases as complicated as this case pertaining to Israeli law, and/or especially when English sources cannot be readily found? 2724: 1347: 688:

that reveal some of its history. Could these be acceptable sources in describing GMD's history? For instance, could I use the Introduction of the

463:

there could itself be considered a failure of good faith. Warping a source reliability discussion into an article-BPOV discussion was even worse.

390:

has erroneously been taken to DRN rather than here. The subject of the discussion is the use of the editorial in a fine journal (Eur Phys J D) at

10204:

BTW, I'm having a spot of trouble with requirement #3. The issue is notability, and the statement supported is that thefederalist.com meets the

5518: 5451: 5348:

He has been condemned by the National Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Armenia and Yerevan State University for falsifying Armenian history

4266:

Westeros.org has been used on Knowledge for years, usually very stably. If there were a slippery slope, we would have seen some slipping by now.

2060: 1402: 576: 2051:

being trained in prisoner escort in the camps.5" from his work ‘They Defended Ukraine’: The 14.Waffen-Grenadier-Division der SS(Galizische Nr.

1123: 10174: 10102:

source for an article on a geographical location, where other sources are entirely lacking? This has come up because a new contributor started

9872:

certified as being either unlawful or terrorist. I include these four sources on their behalf, but I don't think any of them can be used here.

5123:

certified as being either unlawful or terrorist. I include these four sources on their behalf, but I don't think any of them can be used here.

4953: 4006:

Westeros.org is reliable, this may be in your interest. Repeat: Jack, if you see fit to delete this whole sub-section, you have my permission.

3843:

The GA articles which contained information from Westeros.org must have slipped through the cracks during the nomination process, as they fail

3789:. Towards that end, she has spread her concerns far and wide. She didn't get approval through DRN. She didn't get approval through not one but 3633: 3132: 10186:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2014/01/21/in-brazil-you-can-always-find-the-amazon-in-america-the-amazon-finds-you-2/

7563: 7241: 600:

Talk:BlackLight_Power/Archive_6#.22Such_states_would_require_non-relativistic_counterparts_to_remain_physical.2C_yet_they_don.27t_have_them.22

372: 159: 10118: 9850: 5853:

As long as we use in-text attribution, I don't see a problem, especially when the report has received coverage from independent, third-party

5101: 5029:

Milton Keynes Gallery (MK G) opened on 8 October 1999 with ‘The Rudimentary Pictures’, an exhibition of 33 new works by Gilbert & George.

4546: 4084:

If you post a long rant accusing me of misconduct, then yes, I have to respond. You don't have to post long rants accusing me of misconduct.

165:

If it were just "De Telegraaf" reporting this, i might even agree with you. However, practically the same is reported by Het Parool and even

10691:

among others, although he is certainly not a historian. The Lebanese estimate isn't throwaway material in my view. BTW, Bogdanor also cites

5055: 4705: 3880: 3770: 3761:

wall of text eventuality that inevitably occurs in any conversation where Darkfrog24 is a participant, unless asked by someone else here. -

3600: 9207:

No, you didn't. The reason why you can't answer the question is because it's not there. You're making up rules that simply don't exist.

8888: 8744: 7603:

This is the last time I attempt to advise you. And I'll go Swedish on you to make this extra clear (please don't try to reply in Swedish):

4856:(I think it is the basis for other estimates.) It is not clear whether this wealth is his personal property, since it is legally owned by 4465:

and (2) the coverage as a whole does not rely primarily on any combination of Westeros.org, other fansites, and/or other ABOUTSELF sources.

3900:

I did start from a source—the book. Just because I started from a source that Jack doesn't like doesn't mean I'm doing anything backwards.

3729:

Just found this other site, PandaWhale, while I was looking up the Slate link. Never seen it before, but it seems to be the older version

2945: 2852:

The APG article is a first person interview, that's almost completely primary-source opinions about what happened and should be considered

502: 332:

Okay, I reviewed this and the original wording was never that Knowledge was asserting he had a "non-Jewish" appearance but that he had an "

11047:

The official Lebanese toll in late August estimated for Beirut alone (leaving out all the rest of central and southern Lebanon) was 6,776.

8656: 4875: 3730: 7368: 4785: 1273:(which I don't believe to be the case), it should only be used with "according to" prefacing the opinion in the body of the article, not 628: 9997:

As you know this has been discussed several times on the Talk page. Let the board decide on this point. My view here is irrelevant. --

9505: 7962: 5248:

As you know this has been discussed several times on the Talk page. Let the board decide on this point. My view here is irrelevant. --

4365:

misleading). You have similarly misrepresented other people's positions. If you want to know what these people think, go and ask them.

3999: 3664: 2927:

After their recent interview with Milo, APGNation should have their own Knowledge Page. As stated before, their staff are well educated.

2601:

Yes, looks fine. For that site it very much depends on the author, but Faraci is fine. The site appears to be a group blog (see their

10731:

An atrocity by a vengeful Christian militia? As the source says, the figure is presumably only counting those killed by Israeli troops.

6621: 5276: 3894:

claims. If you agree to delete this post you've just made, then I give permission for you to delete my response here at the same time.

3403:; these are not appropriate for an encyclopedia entry. That issue can be resolved with other forms of dispute resolution, such as the 2951: 284:

Someone is forumshopping here. That someone knows fully well that the "non-Jewish appearance", the literal quote, is found not only in

9840: 9424: 5980:

1. Our job in scientific articles is to especially use sources reliable for scientific content. Not doing so can quickly run afoul of

5091: 3897:

It's possible that not everything on Westeros.org is suitable for inclusion here, but this content is. Reasons above in my last post.

3726:) (Links in parentheses are the versions at the time of GA listing and reassessment, if any; chapter information was always retained.) 2656:

Agree with Middle 8, with a caveat: As this is a self-published source with a lot of opinion content, it should probably be used with

1566:, the use of material from some scholars should be treated with caution. You've merely confirmed that Rudling and Romanovsky exist. -- 8368:

also suggests in his Global History of History that..." giving a good range with due weight toward the apparent majority of academia.

4216:? How bout who the different characters should have been cast with? Who should end up with who at the end? Where do we draw the line? 2811:

is recounting facts that have come up from the Phil Fish hack, which points toward possible corruption in an indie game competition.

2609:

have editorial oversight (see disclaimer at bottom of page), so it's in effect self-published and falls under the third paragraph of

1863: 1413: 378: 289: 8075: 7021:

is our world's best example of historic oppression, prolonged suppression and modern collective self-censorship in healthy society."

5952: 4815:

online staff," but is this saying that some of the information comes from the search engine Bing? Or is that a staffer's nickname?

3627: 2019:

1)- John P. Himka: 100,000. 2) I think there not all reliable sources listed in wiki-article 3) It was debates, not work 4) 100 000

624: 201:

Master Race, and that's why the subject says he survived, because the Nazis saw him with blonde hair and blue eyes, which dispelled

8708: 8703: 8475: 7912: 7730: 6864:

Info about the assembly and publishing "Stiftelsen Skånsk Framtid" or "SSF" and some history of Scania is available in English at

5949: 5563:

It shouldn't be used in the article. It is somewhat of a promo piece, stating, "To celebrate our partnership with the festival" --

3871:

Err, are you equating Stephen Hawking talking about rock hard science with the whimsical Sherlcoking of a fansite owner? Really. -

3833:

Forbes has a great write-up about another episode, "Breaker of Chains". The partial information about a chapter fromt he book used

1244: 607:

What I find particularly startling is that you appear to claim neutrality despite having made some of the edits you advance at DRN

537: 10192: 8036:

Exceptional claims require exceptional sources. A porn star being in a porn, or winning a porn award is not an exceptional claim.

4328:

time your latest blog source isn't allowed seems designed to wear down the dissent to the content you have been trying to add for

8712: 8430:, the Encyclopedia would actually be the best option for figuring out what would be appropriate for saying "most scholars." Per 4293:, plural. This dispute has five longstanding participants, three against inclusion and two for inclusion, not eight against one. 2878:

I spoke wrong it seems. I was relating it to be more of a primary source than an opinion piece, you said it correctly. Thank you.

836: 697:

of the NOAA Climate Research Group, to a newly formed NOAA Laboratory, the Climate Monitoring and Diagnostics Laboratory (CMDL).”

8768:

No. It is the outside interests of a contributor that may cause COI concerns, not the source being cited. Clearly, were someone

6808:

The different topics of the book cover Scania, Scanian history, the enforced re-nationalisation of the provinces , known as the

3977:

isn't theoretical physics or rocket science. (Similarly, I wouldn't call Feynman an expert on GoT, not unless those zombies are

2102: 10440: 7228:

No I don't think so, in this case. I just attempted enlighten You about the Scanian problem. And to explain how and why I find

6080:

implications in scientific content. Simply saying a review was done has special meaning and is attributing towards fact, which

4361:"Running to RSN" was Doniago's idea. You also insisted on it. You also posted several filings about sources here on your own. 4273:

IAR is not in play, nor has anyone advocated for its use. Please do not argue matters that are not in dispute as if they were.

2802: 2238:. Seriously, you're expecting that a biased blogger lacking in academic credentials should be considered a scholarly source? -- 311:, where Caransa's non-Jewish appearance is also given credit for his survival, withou the "he later said" kind of modification. 21: 4651:

moot as experts aren't required to be neutral if they also have some reputation for topic-accuracy among independent sources (

3122:

Its authors, Antonsson and Garcia, have co-authored a book on the tv show's source material with series creator George Martin

1545:

published. How does that attest to his reliability when he holds extreme views you consider appropriate to the article on the

951:

As the top of the page indicates, this noticeboard is for disputes about specific sources and their use in specific articles.

10961:

She is not historian either not she is an academic if she will be used I don't see why Paul Bagdanor could not be used too.--

9035:

Nobody is soapboxing here, I'm discussing the merits of this source in regards to this particular topic. Yes, it's relevant.

8695: 7846: 5977:

There are two different things going on that are important to separate: 1. Use as a secondary source. 2. Use as an opinion.

3673: 3018: 841:

Due to recent controversies (GamerGate look it up), it is felt that all gaming press websites should no longer be considered

564: 10975:

She is a political analyst writing in a good journal. Reliable. Paul Bogdanor's work may be reliable in many circumstances.

10879: 10480: 6874:

organisations or movements. The foundations primary aim seems to be enlightenment of Scanian history, and Scanian dialect.

2613:. Since Faraci has been published elsewhere (in 3rd-party pubs), and fairly frequently too, no problemo. Happy editing! -- 1016:

I would say that a well-known author's blog is a reliable source for that author's opinions. But not for objective facts.

10299:

albeit one whose authors are established experts in their field. Usable as RS, but with all the usual caveats of a SPS.

9818: 9810: 7940:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

7797: 7733:

I think that each playing being referenced is overkill. I also think the detail is ridiculous but that's a separate issue.

7105:

world's best example of historic oppression, prolonged suppression and modern collective self-censorship in healthy society

5765:

monographs by experts are the highest quality sources even if their entire books are not peer reviewed. Which is this one?

5069: 5061: 3668: 3464: 1518:) Rudling also mentions Tarik Cyril Amar, John-Paul Himka, Dovid Katz, JaredMcBride, Andreas Umland, who co-work with him. 1200: 1173:

There's no need for this. I just made a few touch-ups here and there because that's how Knowledge works. See my comment at

223: 8160:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

7626:

So the issue doesn't come down to whether I personally acknowledge a source but whether they fulfil these basic criteria:

6652:

Of course secondary sources are preferable but primary sources could be used especially in the article about the subject--

5286:

article Wikileaks is used, with an anonymous source, to describe the health condition of Ali Khamenei. This is the soured

4165:

EDIT: I just realized that there is a better place to discuss the wording of this thread: The talk page. Kindly join me.

3671: 2512: 689: 9761: 7244:

etc. (Search and You will find more)I do not state that everything such foundations, associations or organisations write

2507: 1055:

Self-published sources such as an author's own blogspot posts may be cited as long as they meet the five requirements of

10258: 9846:

http://mfa.gov.il/MFA/PressRoom/2014/Pages/FM-Liberman-addresses-International-Anti-Terrorism-Conference-9-Sep-2014.aspx

9075:, stating "I concur with @seanmdav & @FDRLST--from my research Tyson has hallucinated this post-9/11 Bush verbiage". 8192: 5097:

http://mfa.gov.il/MFA/PressRoom/2014/Pages/FM-Liberman-addresses-International-Anti-Terrorism-Conference-9-Sep-2014.aspx

5026:... during the construction of a brand new gallery as part of the £30 million Milton Keynes Theatre and Gallery complex. 10989:

And he is journalist writing in book published in Academic publishing house.Can you explain what the difference here?--

9460: 8236: 6622: 2934: 2544: 1440:

Rudling: "In 1943-44, the UPA murdered around 100,000 Polish nationals and thousands of Jews in Volhynia and Galicia."

1247:

about them from when it was purely sourced from their own site information to being reworked with other sources. Their

296:. (Need we explain that such content is typically written by the channel that airs the program?) And of course there's 7608:

The closest you've gotten to actual mainstream historical sources is your referencing of an article from the magazine

7530:

Here are some examples of mainstream works by Swedish and Danish authors that are specifically about Scanian history:

7016:

bästa exempel på historiskt förtryck, långvarigt förtigande och modern kollektiv självcensur i ett välmående samhälle.

4907: 4336:

sorts of sources we normally allow, we are allowing the trivial to replace the substantive. I think this is important.

3145: 11011: 10952: 10930: 10899: 10842: 10771: 10658: 10582: 10506: 8686:(thefederalist.com) Source directly targets Knowledge editing. Special Conflict of Interest concerns for this source? 8315: 8246: 8164: 7810: 6712: 5630: 4829:

It's not actually an article, just an information card. Too informal for potentially sensitive information in a BLP.

4520:

So, what the takeaway from DrFleischman's post is that while Westeros.org qualifies as an 'expert' exception to SPS,

10945:

in the article, she gives the figures 19,000 killed and 32,000 wounded. Hopefully this will put the matter to rest.

10488: 3623: 3395:

It sounds like it this site may be an authority on matters of continuity. However, there are other issues, such as

11043:

came from the PLO rather than from our own investigations. Not once did they ever produce evidence to th contrary.'

9794:, I don't think it's at all likely that it's a publishing firm with a reputation for producing good quality works. 9138: 8203:. Anyway, the content I want to add expands upon how black-and-gray tattoos originated from what is referred to as 6984:. But why do You then concider "333 Årsboken" and Uno Röndahl to be "unimpropriate as source", for instance about " 6683: 6110:

scientific content than more general content on Knowledge, so I want to make sure that's not a point of confusion.

5587: 5439: 5327: 4435:

I am participating in this thread in the desperate hope that one or both of you will return the favor and dig into

3137:. He said that he and Antonsson have worked as "informal and unofficial" consultants on the show but that they are 2793: 2644: 2591: 2565: 677: 8717: 6468:

is built by those who demonstrate reasoning based in relevant policies, guidelines, and essays. Keep in mind even

5946: 5805: 4790: 2426:

It's not an RS; it's a collective blog with no editorial oversight (other than a restriction on acceptable handles

2138:

https://www.academia.edu/1314919/The_Lviv_Pogrom_of_1941_The_Germans_Ukrainian_Nationalists_and_the_Carnival_Crowd

656:

on whether Breitbart.com is a reliable source for an attributed quote from its own film review. Input is welcome.

10193:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_19#The_Volokh_Conspiracy_.28legal_blog.29

9979:

expressly permit non-English reliable sources, especially when a Wikipedian has taken the time to duly provide a

9769: 9215: 9185: 9121: 9053: 9026: 8831: 8416:

it's not our place to decide whether a source that otherwise meets WP:RS provides an adequate base for its claims

8280:

Richard Joseph Smith is one of the world's leading experts on the I Ching and author of the groundbreaking study

8146: 8063: 7520: 6537: 6407: 6152: 6070: 5862: 5812: 5230:

expressly permit non-English reliable sources, especially when a Wikipedian has taken the time to duly provide a

3914:

of the eight or so sources I've provided are from news outlets. Two, including Westeros.org, were from fansites.

3332: 1730: 608: 603: 8887:

In case anyone searches for information about thefederalist.com as a Reliable Source in the future, I think the

7731:

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=2014%E2%80%9315_FC_Bayern_Munich_season&oldid=626427583&diff=prev

10790: 10736: 10704: 10525: 9444:

Meh. There are some silly comments on that talk page, especially from the perspective of a Knowledge outsider.

7360: 6060:

I disagree as well. Perhaps, this dispute can be resolved by qualifying ABC's claims. For example, how about

5992:

listing all the others that want a ban for whatever reason) that should be discussed back over at the article.

2619: 2581: 2554: 2524: 2435: 626: 247: 10398:, which appears on the website of Cosmic Patterns, his software company; it is inarguably self-published. The 8319:

that...no later than about 800 BCE" on page 22), and I have a problem with Shii's exclusion of Daniel Woolf's

5754: 4286:

You keep saying, "Find more sources." I find more sources. If that's gaming the system, everyone should play.

1963: 1597: 129: 11083:

TTAAC has dropped the Bogdanor source and is now citing the newspaper directly for Haj's claim. He says that

10571:

I do not have the book, but as far as I know, the piece in question is written by Paul Bogdanor. See page 10

10415: 9612: 9500:

I'd say that no, it's not reliable for statements of fact. The author is a self-described PhD candidate, and

8923: 8002:

issue, and porn-centric sources are reliable for porn-news. For example, I think this diff is inappropriate

7992: 7967: 6974:

it was You (perhaps a year ago or so), then I'm not "the detective" to attempt to trace it far back in time.

6051: 6021: 5961: 5785: 3125: 2915: 2839: 1310: 615: 527: 488: 10643:) was published by Oxford University Press. I am happy to include more sources, like the more recent one by 10175:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2014/09/22/does-neil-degrasse-tyson-make-up-stories/

10107: 8729: 6934:

Please note that I have never referred to SSF as "political extremists". Those are Boeing's words, not mine.

3253: 1317:

biography) without questions of neutrality or a highly problematic imbalance in the content being raised. --

288:(apparently that paper is one of many windmills that need fighting), but also in a fairly innocuous Belgian 10351:

Volokh Conspiracy is self-published with no editorial board, as such it cannot be considered like a normal

9916:

In order to help in good faith, I will fill in a critical missing translation of an Arabic reliable source

8200: 8003: 7835: 7379:

does not attempt to make any serious descriptions of Scanian separatism (which would be very interesting).

7242:

https://sites.google.com/site/skanelandsksamling//aeldre-dokument-fraan-fsf/tidningen-skaaneland-friskytten

6592: 5568: 5167:

In order to help in good faith, I will fill in a critical missing translation of an Arabic reliable source

4231:: Just because the fansite has been used in a small number of GA articles doesn't mean that those articles 3718: 3687: 3639: 3507:

AV Club has passed FAC reviews before, though generally for their reviews (see, for instance, the featured

3149: 2856:. The source generally needs to have a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy demonstrated for any part 2226: 1821:""I posted Rudling's own words, that contradict each other." I do no see it." See earlier in this section: 387: 11050:‘By late August 1982, Lebanese sources placed the official death toll in Beirut at 6,776.'(Molly Dunigan, 9851:

http://www.osenlaw.com/sites/default/files/uploaded/Counter-Terrorism/Key_Terrorist_Organizations/GOI1.pdf

8845:

Usual result: Opinions must be properly cited as opinions. "Reliable" does not have anything to do with

8822:

I agree with the concern voiced by Stephan Schulz. On what basis would thefederalist.com be considered a

8750:

directly targeting Knowledge editing, wanting inclusion of it's original criticism into Tyson's biography.

8265:

is a scholar of early modern England who includes this claim in an introduction to history writing called

6460:(which has also been used in the article since we're talking about veterinary medicine topics) supplement 5102:

http://www.osenlaw.com/sites/default/files/uploaded/Counter-Terrorism/Key_Terrorist_Organizations/GOI1.pdf

10854:

If you want to cite a book by Fisk, as opposed to his reportage at the time, please present the details.

10764:

the original, it should be possible to find a better and more serious source for this astonishing claim.

9781: 8083:

I'm not at all familiar with "sexherald.com" - it's looks mostly like some kind of review website to me.

7196:

As before, you don't have a single neutral backup source. There is not a shred of relevant evidence from

5757:

says that the American Bird Conservancy is an "advocacy group" and the book did not undergo peer review.

5583: 5435: 5341: 5323: 3249: 3093: 2416: 1313:

article in Knowledge) as a reliable source from which to base the major portion of an article (being the

1110: 302:, the resistance paper: people died to deliver that paper during WWII, and its reputation is impeccable. 8312: 7738: 6666:

Information is directly confirmed by the website, in such circumstances you can use the primary source.

5600:'VICE staff' had actually SEEN the film, and no reason to believe that it was actually IN the magazine, 3724: 2136:

Vinnytsia,8" Himka. The Lviv Pogrom of 1941: The Germans, UkrainianNationalists, and the Carnival Crowd

725:

and give a reference. Propose your wording on the article talk page, along with a {{Request edit}} tag.

9835: 9523: 9211: 9181: 9117: 9116:

does it say that if a blog author tracks down and interviews primary sources, that makes it reliable?

9049: 9022: 8827: 8622: 8617:

time and the story name and date is sufficient for citation. Anything beyond that is gravy for ease of

8493: 8142: 8059: 7613: 6533: 6403: 6148: 6066: 5858: 5808: 5086: 4876:

http://www.ibtimes.com/irans-supreme-leader-ayatollah-khamenei-multi-billionaire-bmw-car-dealer-1233899

3701: 3416: 3328: 2284: 1078: 926: 685: 51: 42: 17: 9180:

does it say that if a blog author tracks down and interviews primary sources, that makes it reliable?

9081:, Chief Foreign Correspondent for ABC News, has written "I covered Bush then. Never heard him say it." 7290:

campaigning to be in rather poor taste. There are genuinely endangered local languages in Sweden like

3715: 3708: 3003:

sign contracts". They are "conscripted", i.e., forced to serve - it is not a contractual arrangement.

2713:

Talk:Shooting_of_Michael_Brown#RfC:_Should_article_mention_Brown_had_no_.28adult.29_criminal_record.3F

2099: 10818: 10786: 10732: 10700: 10521: 10130: 10056: 9597:

Knowledge:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#John_Barrowman_.28BLPSOURCES_vs_CONTEXTMATTERS.29

8877: 6642: 5742: 5708: 5687: 5417: 4865: 4070:

It's been pointed out that you don't have to respond with a wall of text. Physician, heal thyself. -

3711: 3347: 3306: 3079: 3028: 2819: 2798:

This is pertaining to GamerGate, both have been said to not be established RS, and we are unsure of.

2759: 2706: 10161:

Is Jonathan Adler writing on the Volokh Conspiracy web page a RS for notability of thefederalist.com

9048:

No, your post did not explain anything related to why this should be treated as a reliable source.

8568: 8223:

Yes, you can cite a documentary, and you can quote the people making statements in the documentary.

3680: 119:

into a biographical article. According to sources (including our own Knowledge page on the paper),

10411: 9841:

http://jpupdates.com/2014/08/26/israel-moves-declare-support-isis-illegal-photo-groups-flag-appear/

9756: 9513: 9130: 8961: 8919: 8813: 8699: 7988: 7801: 7298:(recognized but with few speakers). There are also dialects that border on separate langauges like 6609: 6138: 6047: 6017: 5957: 5781: 5396: 5092:

http://jpupdates.com/2014/08/26/israel-moves-declare-support-isis-illegal-photo-groups-flag-appear/

4623: 4563: 4503: 4489: 4422: 4400: 4345: 4253: 4156: 4075: 4046: 3945:

Forbes and FiveThirtyEight also thought that chapters were important enough to name and talk about.

3876: 3852: 3811: 3766: 3596: 3533: 3261: 3194: 3104: 2911: 2835: 2501: 2392: 1546: 611: 523: 484: 441: 9895: 8725: 5943: 5146: 2808: 1227:

Yes, I appreciate that you've modified his bio a little, but I am still concerned with the use of

10095: 9776:

catageory, and the associated webpage as well, or whether they can be seen as reliable sources.--

9709: 9638: 9565: 9547: 8594: 8544: 8508: 8027: 7977: 7903: 7889: 5832: 5564: 5472: 5372:

PanARMENIAN.Net is one of the largest online news agencies from Armenian and is very reliable. --

3555: 2953:

is being used as a RS in lede. It's not a reliable site, and an opinion piece, it seems. Thanks.

2900: 1174: 558: 468: 428: 7364: 6855:'s criticism, the mentioned article about "Klågerup's Bloodbath", here the author (Uno Röndahl) 3011:

appear in an article and then searches for sources. Is Halya Coynash writing as a reporter for

2735: 888: 846: 10307: 10282: 10114: 9777: 9489: 9377:

in RL. For example, the numerous sources discussing The Bradley naming dispute, and discussing

9325: 8791: 8124: 7088: 6687: 6679: 6597:

Here is an RfC about the reliability of some sources in establishing an actors comedy career.

6478: 6354: 6259: 6115: 6036: 6001: 5920: 5840: 5036:

He was Director of Look11, the Liverpool International Festival of Photography and Photography,

4978: 4733: 4677: 4638: 4602: 4475: 3721: 3694: 3661: 2938: 2814:

Would there be any problems with these, since they do not dive to much, if any, into opinions?

2689: 2665: 2484: 2458: 2412: 1068: 1007: 960: 819: 793: 11051: 11024: 10181: 9466: 9427:

posted today. I'd say that article is pretty much all that is needed to discard the site as a

9311:

The post that you erroneously attribute to the Washington Post is actually a blog post on the

9288:

In this particular case, it appears that the facts at issue were verified and repeated by the

8721: 7734: 4531:

Protonk, in closing a Proposal in the article discussion, seems to reflect some of this view:

849:

If you think the source is not reliable enough, the reliable sources usually used are biased.

11037: 11008: 10980: 10949: 10927: 10913: 10896: 10859: 10839: 10806: 10768: 10655: 10648: 10595: 10579: 10540: 10503: 10039: 9988: 9924: 9076: 8447: 8392: 8328: 8288:(2012), part of the "Lives of Great Religious Books" series from Princeton University Press. 7786: 7753: 6558: 5312: 5239: 5175: 4834: 4447: 3516: 3412: 3046: 2805:

has an interview with TFYC, who were a catalyst of the situation, and they tell their story.

2346: 2317: 2273: 2243: 1636: 1571: 1563: 1501: 1381: 1359: 1322: 1282: 1146: 1021: 922: 864:

A Google search yields only a company called GamersGate. You might want to be more specific.

510: 9334:

There has actually been additional sourcing published today on the topic, from John Aziz of

8753:

Question: Does this raise special Conflict Of Interest issues regarding use of this source?

8019:

In case anyone looks at the diff Gaijin42 gave but not the source it refers to, here it is:

5042: 3658: 2739: 10170: 10126: 10052: 9749: 9740: 9723: 9715: 9699: 9082: 8873: 8215: 8128: 8105: 7261: 6838:

also in Knowledge's Global perspective. And his reason for this is "the publishing SSF are

6798: 6638: 6166: 5683: 5580: 5460: 5413: 5294: 4949: 4898: 4861: 4820: 4801: 4763: 4714: 4381: 4305: 4170: 4110: 4092: 4061: 4032: 4014: 4009:

If you would prefer that the subsection have a different header, feel free to suggest one.

3995: 3957: 3931: 3742: 3704: 3498: 3472: 3432: 3381: 3372:

think the source meets the SPS criteria or just that you were talking about something else?

3282: 3227: 3161: 3075: 3024: 3006:

When news events are widely covered internationally, then the best approach is to read the

2970: 2958: 2930: 2752: 2641: 2588: 2562: 2401:. I am asking others to look at this source and see if it appears to be a reliable source: 1466:

I have read this, but you tell your own conclusions, do you find same in academical works?

1419:

in which Rudling largely smears most of the Ukrainian-Canadian community. Rudling quotes:

1373: 1274: 1183: 877: 771: 710: 106: 10942: 8589:

The citation from the article may say Los Angeles Times, but the URL is adultoutlook.com.

8524: 7272:

but outside the stadium there were Swedish and Austrian flags at the official flagpoles ?

4849: 546:

volunteer who is managing this case. On of our rules (see at the top of the DRN page) is:

8: 11065: 10722: 10407: 10323: 9509: 9290: 9018: 8957: 8809: 8740: 8691: 8323:

published by the Cambridge University Press but not questioning Richard Joseph Smith's.--

7594: 7505: 7412: 7277: 7179: 6997: 6950: 6924: 6602: 6207: 6134: 6081: 5762: 5657: 5550: 5392: 4725: 4619: 4577: 4559: 4499: 4485: 4452: 4418: 4396: 4341: 4249: 4152: 4071: 4042: 3872: 3848: 3807: 3786: 3762: 3592: 3529: 3257: 3190: 3100: 3064: 2450: 942: 854: 635: 572: 445: 210: 155: 142: 9772:

in the article. Therefore I am curious as to whether Riverview Publishing falls under a

8020: 7898:

Ping, ping, hello? Any comment on whether or not xmag.com is a reliable source? Thanks.

7852: 6065:? This makes it more clear that this is ABC's opinion and not a scientific consensus. 4988: 3211:

articles have single-line chapter lists and they all use phrasing very similar to this.

1277:

as has been done. Anything less can only be understood as being extremely misleading. --

10644: 9658: 9634: 9603: 9591: 9543: 9386: 8629: 8611: 8590: 8576: 8559: 8540: 8438: 8427: 8041: 8023: 8010: 7973: 7899: 7885: 7692: 7656: 7568: 7483: 7426: 7380: 7351: 7321: 7286: 7214: 7096: 7042: 6962: 6937: 6878: 6852: 6831: 6773: 5798: 5637: 5609: 5509: 5459:

An editor wishes to insert text in the 'Review/Critical response' section for the film

5377: 4889: 3697: 3569: 3135: 3013: 2896: 2783: 2720: 2614: 2577: 2534: 2430: 2177: 2118: 2113:

So now we have clear evidence of Rudling repeating a Soviet fabrication. He is biased.

2080: 1970: 1738: 1694: 1453: 1314: 1261: 1207: 1138: 1130: 1095: 661: 561:, with an understanding that anyone is free to re-open it once the DRN case is closed. 480: 453: 242: 10262: 9731: 7515:"thoughts about regionalism" is an extreme understatement; they compare Scanians with 5391:

violation territory here. And your understanding of "reliable sources" is peculiar. --

10303: 10278: 10222: 10166: 10110: 10070: 10002: 9962: 9903: 9884: 9682: 9581: 9485: 9321: 9312: 8946: 8858: 8801: 8787: 8675: 8646: 8423: 8376: 8291:

Please inform us which of these sources is considered reliable for the dating of the

8088: 7778: 7684: 7545: 7537: 7125: 7028: 6709: 6474: 6350: 6307: 6255: 6125: 6111: 6032: 5997: 5916: 5836: 5770: 5536: 5368: 5253: 5213: 5154: 5135: 4968: 4729: 4699: 4673: 4634: 4598: 4528:

source, we should - but only after determining whether the information is noteworthy.

4471: 4462: 3981:

more awesome than I thought!) If you would like a non-hypothetical example, the blog

3683: 2861: 2853: 2774: 2685: 2661: 2623: 2480: 2454: 2439: 1343: 1064: 1003: 999: 956: 815: 789: 785: 515: 251: 174: 8174: 4846: 3798:

articles because of her insistence that we are all stupid for not agreeing with her.

1729:

And a further note: the open letter did not support Rudling's specific scholarship:

11005: 10994: 10976: 10966: 10946: 10924: 10909: 10893: 10873: 10855: 10836: 10829: 10802: 10765: 10652: 10629: 10615: 10591: 10576: 10572: 10566: 10555: 10536: 10500: 10446: 10364: 10240: 10232: 10148: 10082: 10035: 9984: 9976: 9954: 9920: 9799: 9437: 8869: 8783: 8443: 8388: 8324: 8242: 8207:

culture withink the documentary (and an existing source in the article right now).

7925: 7830: 7749: 7075:

But this has no bearing on the question of the book is reliable as a source or not.

6977:

If You honnestly can say, You have never stated SSF to be "political" or "extreme"

6912: 6657: 6554: 5985: 5363: 5308: 5287: 5235: 5227: 5205: 5171: 4830: 4236:

Ignoring or bending our sourcing policy to the breaking point is counterproductive.

3512: 3485: 3447: 3040: 2989: 2657: 2529: 2360: 2342: 2331: 2313: 2291: 2269: 2258: 2239: 2230: 2209: 2191: 2145: 2056: 1780: 1650: 1632: 1628: 1618: 1567: 1559: 1523: 1497: 1471: 1398: 1377: 1355: 1318: 1278: 1228: 1142: 1087: 1060: 1017: 648:

RFC Notice - Is Breitbart.com a reliable source for its own attributed film review?

519: 464: 424: 416: 391: 380: 359: 322: 267: 231: 205:

stereotype of Jews. NPOV stands for Neutral Point of View, not Nazi Point of View.

166: 10395: 8282:

Fathoming the cosmos and ordering the world: the Yijing and its evolution in China

6402:

is only an essay; it is not policy or even a guideline and has no real standing.

2301: 11088: 10640: 10140: 10091:

database quite widely despite the fact that it apparently permits users to edit,

9917: 9875:

If you need any clarification, please contact me; I am one of the editors on the

9860: 9773: 9736: 9695: 9568:... where she began working in adult films in 1998" and that her "first film was 9279: 9266: 8904: 8849:

of opinions - only that we can verify that the opinion was published by a source

8758: 8372: 8208: 8187: 8181: 8113: 8109: 7715: 7403:

it is supposed to support, just like other historical sources. It's the possible

7303: 7154: 6916: 6667: 6457: 6399: 6245: 6162: 5885: 5881: 5758: 5476: 5351: 5290: 5168: 5126:

If you need any clarification, please contact me; I am one of the editors on the

5111: 5051: 4945: 4816: 4797: 4759: 4710: 4377: 4301: 4166: 4106: 4088: 4057: 4028: 4010: 3991: 3953: 3927: 3738: 3494: 3468: 3428: 3404: 3400: 3377: 3278: 3223: 3157: 2954: 2638: 2585: 2559: 2095: 1606: 1300: 1266: 1222: 1178: 1164: 1119: 918: 873: 767: 706: 420: 395: 355: 9650: 9137:

has been found to be a reliable source in certain limited contexts, such as the

6629: 6161:

I concur. That text establishes the according-to-whom of the matter very well.

5503: 5464: 3127:. They have produced articles about the series for MTV Geek, Tor, and Suvudu. 3017:, subject to normal fact-checking, or is she writing as a representative of the 1059:. Quotation isn't necessary, but anything even slightly controversial should be 50:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

11092: 11061: 11053:

Victory for Hire: Private Security Companies’ Impact on Military Effectiveness,

10718: 10492: 10484: 9501: 8996: 8992: 8460: 8406: 8341: 8299: 8227: 8170: 7814: 7769: 7590: 7501: 7487: 7408: 7338: 7273: 7269: 7211:. Please stop trying to use Knowledge as a platform for your personal opinions. 7208: 7175: 7032: 6993: 6946: 6920: 6820: 6742: 5981: 5546: 5431: 5001: 4691: 4656: 4581: 3844: 3676: 3060: 2865: 2398: 2235: 1866: 1416: 1338:

As an aside, I see how Rudling is Swedish, but how is he "Swedish-American"? --

1232: 1036: 952: 938: 902: 850: 756: 631: 568: 364: 219: 206: 151: 7392: 6728: 5347: 4669: 2680:

Now that I've contributed to this discussion, please consider contributing to

2475:

Now that I've contributed to this discussion, please consider contributing to

2202: 810:

Now that I've contributed to this discussion, please consider contributing to

671:

Global Monitoring Division history in Earth System Research Laboratory article

11084: 10610:

Anyhow the WashPo is reliable source for General words about the casualties--

10380: 10340: 10296: 10109:

doesn't really come to any definitive conclusions regarding its reliability.

9865: 9727: 9719: 9654: 9599: 9539: 9538:

I've encountered several porn bios today that give it as a source, including

9406: 9382: 9064: 8988: 8805: 8772:

with the source to edit the Tyson bio, that would raise concerns, but having

8625: 8572: 8555: 8431: 8415: 8037: 8006: 7954: 7688: 7347: 7299: 7295: 6633: 6469: 6465: 5746: 5733: 5633: 5605: 5526: 5505: 5388: 5373: 5116: 4885: 4811:

MSN Money is usually reliable, and this particular article is attributed to "

4470:

I hope this helps, now please, if you will, consider looking at my thread. --

4226: 3690: 3584: 3580: 3408: 3396: 3343: 3115: 2831: 2779: 2742:

sources reliable to be used on Knowledge? The second one is also included on

2716: 2634: 2610: 2539: 2519: 2173: 2114: 2076: 1966: 1734: 1690: 1449: 1203: 1056: 980:

Is it correct to cite a blog in wiki even the blog has that Book contents.?--

732: 657: 543: 449: 293: 9562: 7714:

the treaty in faximlie is available through the Swedish national archive at

7633:) as experts in their field, usually academics; none of the contributors to 4371:

This thread has gotten off-topic. If you have anything else to say that is

4276:

Those actions are not mutually exclusive. We could provide the information

2307:. Author of what, and what are his qualifications in the field? This is the 766:. Shouldn't we be using secondary sources rather than this tertiary source? 10356: 10352: 10218: 10066: 9998: 9958: 9899: 9880: 9760:, published by Riverview Publishing. I am looking to refurbish the article 9678: 9674: 9621: 9577: 9532: 9428: 9262: 9177: 9113: 8987:

with notable Bush administration aides on this particular topic, including

8942: 8915: 8854: 8823: 8671: 8481: 8419: 8365: 8360: 8262: 8138: 8100: 8084: 7946: 7878: 7855: 7764:

When exactly is Twitter appropriate for self-published biographical claims?

7197: 7136:

joining the EU (being closer to the continent, is my guess. Brussels isn't

6461: 6303: 5854: 5766: 5532: 5283: 5249: 5209: 5150: 5131: 4964: 4793: 3781:

references to cite it ever since. Most of these sources are unsatisfactory

3272:

This header is a complaint. It biases newcomers and poisons the well. We

1598:

http://search.lu.se/search/lunduniversity/?q=Rudling%2C+Per+Anders&i=en

1369: 1339: 1270: 894: 842: 170: 133: 115: 113:

A user is attempting to add controversial content from the Dutch newspaper

10171:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Thefederalist.com

9557:

I'm pretty sure that this site is almost exclusively used as a source for

8055: 7376: 6896: 3654: 1248: 11091:, which is technically correct, I suppose. I have opened a discussion at 11033: 10990: 10962: 10625: 10611: 10551: 10360: 10236: 10144: 9795: 9432: 9378: 9078: 8618: 8485: 8120: 8116: 7922: 7162: 6900: 6653: 4992: 4941: 4931: 3482: 3444: 3131:

writer Bryan Cogman referred to Westeros.org as "a tremendous resource."

2985: 2356: 2341:

your arguments properly. There's no point in prolonging this any more. --

2327: 2287: 2254: 2220: 2205: 2187: 2141: 2052: 1776: 1646: 1614: 1519: 1489: 1467: 1394: 1260:

In other words, while you've toned down the language to an extent on the

318: 263: 227: 138: 10754:

An update: There is another LA Times source on the same day. It states:

8295:, and whether either of them might be excluded as an unreliable source. 8188:

Bodies of Inscription: A Cultural History of the Modern Tattoo Community

7620: 7257: 7150: 2308: 567:

is the best place to start when deciding where to go with a dispute. --

10429: 9765: 9445: 9420: 9343: 9299: 9275: 9254: 9195: 9142: 9084: 9036: 9004: 9000: 8900: 8754: 7438:( like many others, in other parts of Sweden and in other nations, the 7062:

We are mainly discussing "333 Årsboken" as a possible soucre, not SSF.

6599:

Talk:Rebecca_Bardoux#RfC: Should the article mention her comedy career?

5047: 4915: 4743: 3820:

Oh, and the refs provided? We should take a closer look at those, too:

3153: 1296: 1240: 1231:

as a reliable source. It certainly presents as being an interest group

1160: 1115: 444:

the DRN moderator has found the article fails to meet the standards of

298: 9017:

That's not relevant to this discussion. Please remember that this is

8650:

article in the article in question here just to clear things up a bit.

6776:

1658, in which the Swedish Crown took over the three Danish provinces

4963:

side of helping people learn more about something obscure is minimal.

4391:

or post another wall of text-y drama. I personally do not believe you

3156:. Garcia confirmed that he and Antonsson wrote that page themselves. 2449:

Agree with Middle 8, not at all reliable. The source might fall under

1236: 10261:. It has the Washington Post's masthead, and a Post employee is the 10092: 9569: 8457: 8403: 8380: 8338: 8296: 8249:, I have come here to ask the reliability of two sources used on the 8224: 7516: 7466:(published 23 years ago). The quality of the work cannot be doubted, 7291: 6794: 5669: 5499:

is itself a RS. In short is the above text justified by the source ?

5356: 2743: 899: 9836:

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/184728#.VBaZQD9wbIW

8284:(University of Virginia Press, 2008) as well as the recent overview 5087:

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/184728#.VBaZQD9wbIW

4746:

unencyclopedic. Most of the sources in the article are things like

2285:

http://www.antiqbook.com/books/bookinfo.phtml?o=intern&bnr=12889

872:

problem in gamer press websites, then that would be another matter.

596:

Knowledge:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#BlackLight_Power_discussion

10088: 9971:

I am curious to know on what WP rule have you based your statement

9401: 9336: 8434:, we do give appropriate weight to significant minority viewpoints. 7369:

talk:Skåneland#Dubious sources and limits of historical description

7264:(3-0), howcome do You believe there were not a single Swedish flag 6789: 6785: 5709:"The Impact of the Nation's Most Widely Used Insecticides on Birds" 5502:

Comments welcome, either below or on the article talk page, here:-

5222:

I am curious to know on what WP rule have you based your statement

3579:, those sources were not fansites. And they weren't these somewhat 1199:

This conversation provides an overview of Rudling's "objectivity":

1156: 763: 748: 727: 7645: 7553: 6945:

Not during our debates the last week, but around a year ago or so.

6011:

That's precisely how the source is currently used in the article.

4354:

No, I did not bring in a fake source. I brought in a source that

1865:, an exchange in the Globe and Mail between Rudling and professor 1415:, an exchange in the Globe and Mail between Rudling and professor 762:

website Wordspy is being used as a source to identify language as

9558: 8786:, and asked to justify inclusion on valid encyclopaedic grounds. 8569:

http://articles.latimes.com/1994-07-16/local/me-16173_1_rock-star

8371:

Full Encyclopedia of Daoism cite: "Yijing", Isabelle Robinet, in

8275:

Public Duty and Private Conscience in Seventeenth-Century England

8250: 7772:

using Twitter as a source. The tweet pans out, but it is from an

7726:

Is this acceptable sourcing or was the previous state acceptable?

7524: 7375:

is one of several sources that I have pointed to as problematic.

7158: 6908: 6781: 6632:

a reliable source to say that IPT was founded in 1995? Following

5046:

since October 2012 and it's about time this issue was settled. --

4796:'s net worth. Is this reliable, is this allowed for BLP? Thanks. 3616:

Slate (they actually thought it was important enough to write up

3119: 2549: 2427: 1134: 9618: 7337:

Could either of you please provide one or two examples of where

4655:). This doesn't seem to be a reliable source question any more. 3459:

So if the text in question were supported by, say, Westeros.org

2602: 2515: 2186:

Vinnytsia is not Lvov, i shall try to find about this episode.

7490:

can not be given any "automatical POV"-status, as You suggest.

6904: 6892: 6777: 5632:, which I leave only to gather comments together in one place. 4960: 4940:

Is "The Next Web" a reliable source? It's cited in the article

4880:

His personal net worth is about $ 40 billion. Government owned

4289:

Please check your numbers before you post, Jack. It's advocate

2891: 2405: 1605:

page says that other historians also speak about this number (

1511: 132:

is being used to support the statement that Jewish businessman

6870:

The SSF foundation surelly cannot compare at the slightest of

6128:. Why not turn the thing on its head? For example, how about 1917: 1554: 1428: 784:: I'm not sure this is a tertiary source but it appears to be 9529: 8204: 7448:

but their assembled articles by a number of different authors

7120:

that support what You have found out to be an "SSF-oppinion".

5807:

so you can cite the report itself as well as news coverage.

4881: 4857: 4101:

You deleted a post of mine there, Jack, probably by accident.

3399:. Fan sites will spend inordinate amounts of time analyzing 1962:

Actual numbers of victims are of Volhynia massacre are here:

598:(It's not like you weren't aware of Blacklight power before: 10624:

Robert Fisk is too not historian so why he should be used?--

10387:

fringe theories and the idea of a fringe theory. However...

8005:

for true BLP issues however, they are likely not reliable.

7102:

Without any real knowlidge about SSF, in Your translation "

6891:

where some of the book's articles and authors can be used -

5831:

The main issue is that the source fails multiple aspects of

5652:

Realiable source: Directlyrics.com - licensed lyric provider

4240:

Most of this problem could be resolved with an external link

3099:

under what conditions could they be utilized as a source? -

2305:"Michael Podworniak, author, editor of Baptist publications" 1251:

is a thinly veiled attack on his works and him, as a person.

10495:

which gives 19,000 killed and 37,000 casualties in total.

10182:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/about/

9876: 9754:

Greetings, I am seeking others opinions regarding the book

9467:

https://www.academia.edu/3733730/Anatolia_Cradle_of_Mankind

8896: 8667: 8426:, who also has clear expertise on the matter as well. Per 6701:"333 Årsboken", assembled by a Scanian foundation in Sweden 6548: 5706: 5127: 2406:

POPADITCH LEAVING SAN DIEGO TO JOIN TEACH FOR AMERICA CORPS

222:, I await your comment on the document, linked below, from 10406:

content. I believe this use satisfies all the concerns of

3973:

Elio Garcia is no Stephen Hawking or Richard Feynman, but

1609:), and extreme number is up to 300 000. Daniel Romanovsky 411:

standard review process for comments prior to publication.

10717:), so the figure of 1,000 seems to be way off. Cheers, -- 10338:

credibility and reliability does not attach to the blog.

10205: 10104:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Gasaneri (2nd nomination)

9855: 7648: 5106: 5017:'Sublime: Manchester Music and Design'; Edward Allington; 2522:. It would be used to cite something along the lines of " 2140:

So, now we see that you should be careful in your claims

1368:

Just to let you know that he does have dual citizenship,

955:, please follow the directions at the top of the page. -- 9141:. (Not that I'm equating this website to that tabloid.) 9071:

has written that he concurs with the original author at

7475:

Do You suggest I should dig in archives myself instead ?

4323:

In favor of using the statements: Diego and Darkfrog24.

2411:

Thanks in advance for taking a moment to look at this.--

183:

You evidently did not read what I wrote. Het Parool did

7874: 7439: 7367:" in 1811. This addition was reverted and discussed at 7346:. (Though not indeed as a neutral third-party source.) 2747: 1137:

page as to how a relevant historian is being used as a

587:

about that. Are you seriously contending that Anderson

141:

were used against them, rather than the notion that he

10713:

1,700 persons were killed in Sabra and Chatila alone (

10165:

There's currently an AFD for the wikipedia article on

9381:'s actions and opinions, or the Santorum controversy. 7248:

becomes reliable sources, but thats doesn't mean they

4792:

is used in the "personal life" section as a source of

3248:

The subject of Westeros.Org has come up twice before (

2854:

an account written by people who are directly involved

2850:

since they do not dive to much, if any, into opinions?

995:

I don't think it's ever appropriate to cite Blogspot.

9726:. This site has no notability, no qualifications, is 9272:

professional reliable responsible editorial oversight

8554:

Are you asking if the LA times is a reliable soruce?

7464:

previously never before questioned book of importance

7458:, there may be better litterature on Scanian. But in 6797:

by the Swedes) While Bornholm returned to Denmark in

5656:

Hello everyone, I start this discussion because user

4023:

Just realized a collapse might be appropriate here.

1269:. If Defending history org can be considered to be a 1084:

Time for Per Anders Rudling to be taken to the WP:RSN

479:

The DRN volunteer has recused himself because he was

10878:

I have already given it above. But repeating. Book:

10379:

I'm currently working on a bottom-to-top rewrite of

8525:"Porn Star Puts an End to Her Life in the Fast Lane" 6823:

shows how the history of Scania has been falsified.

3642:(partial Oathkeeper specifically, concept generally) 3376:

some fact-checking for the guy who wrote the books.

2715:

could use additional input from uninvolved editors.

10941:I will be including estimates by Amal Saad-Ghoraeb 7434:I believe SSF to possibly have some thoughts about 7031:) is downright ridiculous and even the parallel to 5698:

Is the American Bird Conservancy an advocacy group?

11030:Beirut causing 300 deaths (‘Black Thursday) p.175. 9894:I don't know if this article dated 11th September 7442:seems rather fond of regions). But the main issue 5493:(the bulk of the text is credited to 'VICE Staff') 5145:I don't know if this article dated 11th September 4649:it isn't neutral about its interest in the content 3277:appreciate that; he says he likes things concise. 2775:http://www.rockabilly.nl/references/references.htm 1603:Massacres of Poles in Volhynia and Eastern Galicia 1446:Massacres of Poles in Volhynia and Eastern Galicia 10464: 9764:, and it appears that significant content from a 9298:as a sole source on the contentious information. 8914:The Federalist's masthead lists its publisher as 7565:would be preferable to anything collected by SSF. 6970:I may have confused You with and other user, but 4908:"ExtraFile: Databending and corrupt files as art" 1550: 10277:interesting question without an obvious answer. 9714:I thought I would start a discussion here after 4618:Link, should they wish to explore that route. - 3141:employees of HBO. Further details upon request. 2834:, inappropriate for claims about living people. 7651:, a specialist on books on hunting and fishing. 6986:The Swedish military Bloodbath in Klågeröd 1811 5484:Raindance Film Festival 2011 - Reviews! by VICE 4905: 4522:we find it difficult to use as a source because 3801:At least one of the owners of Westeros.org are 2773:Re Rockabilly.nl, the clearest link to use is 518:source as a justification for content violates 292:, a TV guide announcing a radio program by the 10191:I found this previous discussion of VC as RS: 10188:for more info about the VC-Post relationship. 9861:http://new.elfagr.org/Detail.aspx?nwsId=683441 8979:It does appear that, new or not, blog or not, 7716:http://sok.riksarkivet.se/bildvisning/R0000328 7685:exceptional claims require exceptional sources 6959:Lemme know when you have the diff to prove it. 5112:http://new.elfagr.org/Detail.aspx?nwsId=683441 2576:Oh, and the addition would be for the article 1645:It is amusing Faustian cites the same article 1627:Why are you citing another Knowledge article? 747:Is wordspy.com RS for identifying language as 501:I think 2/0 summarised the issue nicely here: 440:I would like to point out that this appeal is 415:The publication did draw one such comment, at 10483:reporting Lebanese police and Red Cross, and 9791:As the firm doesn't appear to have a website 9730:, is merely a blog/personal website, and its 9651:http://www.pornstarscenter.com/star.asp?id=47 8169:Hi folks, I'm trying to make improvements to 3134:Garcia responded to a request for information 3114:It's been argued that Westeros.org meets the 2890:I'd consider it a reliable source. See their 1510:Why is it "spurious"? Well. this is ok site? 10375:Fringe theories, astrology, and WP:ABOUTSELF 10200:RS for notability due to the Post masthead. 9669:RfC: Is WatchersOnTheWall.com an expert SPS? 8522: 6884:of this book and his mentioned reasons why. 5707:Pierre Mineau; Cynthia Palmer (March 2013). 5346:Richard Hovannisian is cited far too much. 3904:request, but I keep getting "No" from them, 3783:according to our own policies and guidelines 2660:for anything even slightly controversial. -- 2300:Who is Podworniak? All I've found on him is 2066:You should have read the footnote, pg. 342: 1372:. Poeticbent has pointed it out as being on 977:But I beleieve that Book Details is enough. 10699:, which may or may not include more detail. 8271:The Idea of History in Early Stuart England 8137:Neither appear to meet our definition of a 7864:1998 F.O.X.E. Award for Female Fan Favorite 7171:The SSF statement is a Bull's eye of truth. 7141:the Stockholmian horror, some 70-80% voted 7007:it taken directly from the introduction to 2397:I am writing regarding a BLP article about 2229:? Precisely how far do you intend to go in 2203:http://scepsis.net/library/id_2175.html#a34 10465:Alexander, Edward; Bogdanor, Paul (2006). 10098:. Should we be using this database as the 9866:http://mfa.gov.il/MFAAR/Pages/default.aspx 7561:Danmark og Sverige - danskere og svenskere 5117:http://mfa.gov.il/MFAAR/Pages/default.aspx 2730:Rockabilly.nl and .peggyleediscography.com 8936:IOW, opinions from such a source are not 8800:I would start with seriously questioning 8657:longstanding Pornography Project guidance 5668:Please read here about Directlyrics.com: 5430:Steverci, I think the article about your 5000:a reliable source as used in the article 3630:; one of these is a chart and one is not) 1562:. Faustian has provided reasons why, per 5289:. Does this belong in a BLP? Thank you. 4597:Agree with this comment by Elaqueate. -- 3175:I'd point out that this material exists 262:and you will find that they all agree). 137:implying that the nutty theories of the 8060:The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) 7316:Svensk Nationalatlas: Språken i Sverige 6988:" ? You have written "do not use such 4220:It is also a question of noteworthiness 509:" Using a journal editorial to try and 14: 6990:inappropriate sources as "333 Årsboken 6214:attribution that the source is flawed. 4484:Thanks for the input, DrFleischman. - 970:Books' Details vs Books' Author's blog 889:summary of what is going on with links 48:Do not edit the contents of this page. 11056:Stanford University Press 2011 p.103) 10487:). One of the most recent sources is 10231:It appears we feel differently about 9471:2A02:908:E620:FD80:6455:D8D:5629:7425 8437:At the end of the day, it's not like 7945:Are "lukeisback" and "sexherald.com" 7768:An IP is repeatedly adding a name to 7615:a slightly less reputable version of 6772:It was published 333 years after the 3665:Cripples, Bastards, and Broken Things 3019:Kharkiv Human Rights Protection Group 2283:Canadian-Ukrainian writer Podworniak 565:Knowledge:Dispute resolution requests 557:noticeboard close this discussion as 11026:Israel's Wars: A History Since 1947, 10651:claims require exceptional sources. 9819:Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant 9811:Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant 7936:The following discussion is closed. 7035:shows a serious lack of perspective. 5716:Neonicotinoid Insecticides and Birds 5070:Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant 5062:Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant 4906:Weber, Harrison (21 December 2011). 2946:Russian intervention in Ukraine 2014 2886:So, is APGNation a reliable source? 504:with using an editorial like this. " 29: 10330:under the editorial control of the 9762:Philippine resistance against Japan 9419:If you think the article linked by 8355:Routledge's Encyclopedia of Daoism 7494:do however not intend to use it in 7157:wasn't played in Stockholm, but at 6858:refers to official Swedish archives 4944:, a DYK nominated article. Thanks. 4786:MSN Money net worth on Ali Khamenei 4395:stop yourself, but we shall see. - 3327:Can you please expound upon that? 388:Talk:BlackLight_Power#New_source.3F 27: 10217:host a non-notable blog. Cheers. 9716:I removed the divadevotee citation 8851:competent to publish such opinions 8494:"Personal Biography — Megan Leigh" 7987:Definitely not RS for BLP issues. 7117:to the local people and population 7087:to a Stalinist that want's to ban 6623:Investigative Project on Terrorism 6456:SCIRS and the companion guideline 5670:http://www.directlyrics.com/about/ 5627:Another editor left a comment here 5482:The citation he wishes to use is:- 5468:The text he wishes to insert is:- 5277:Ali Khamenei wikileaks as a source 2545:Conquest of the Planet of the Apes 1629:Knowledge is not a reliable source 28: 11108: 9766:website associated with this book 9627:It is used five times in the BLP 8173:, and found a documentary called 7966:WP search results "sexherald.com" 7207:You're clearly trying to violate 7093:Stalin: The Court of the Red Tsar 6302:simply issuing a position paper. 5942:environmental impacts. There are 5602:(rather than just on the website) 5023:Annette Messager: Telling Tales'; 4918:from the original on 28 July 2014 4206:It is a theme park slippery slide 2633:Excellent, thanks for the input, 10025: 9722:article, and it was reverted by 9139:John Edwards extramarital affair 8739:thefederalist.com published of 8476:Reliable sources for Megan Leigh 8156:The discussion above is closed. 7913:lukeisback and sexherald dot com 7498:, if that's some comfort for You 7204:as a Stockholm-based conspiracy. 7128:as of then voted 75% (or more) 7099:1658 and its publishing in 1991. 4197:Arbitrary break 2: In a nutshell 1408:His own words are contradictory: 705:Thanks in advance for any help. 678:Earth System Research Laboratory 145:. It is my contention that the 33: 10824:for it to establish notability. 10679:. Bogdanor has written for the 10139:It would be better not to post 9898:is of any help (see para 5). -- 9265:. Whether you or I think it is 8484:for the sensational article at 8269:. Woolf's other books include 8076:here at the Pornography Project 7064:SSF has only assembled the book 6803:Third peace treaty of Stockholm 6725:Stig Larsén & Ingvar Rydzén 5149:is of any help (see para 5). -- 5014:a Bruce McLean film commission; 3118:criteria for an expert source. 1295:isn't nationalistic, which one? 837:Kotaku, other gaming news sites 692:to support a statement such as 10956:21:26, 30 September 2014 (UTC) 10934:21:01, 30 September 2014 (UTC) 10918:20:52, 30 September 2014 (UTC) 10903:20:32, 30 September 2014 (UTC) 10864:20:21, 30 September 2014 (UTC) 10846:19:56, 30 September 2014 (UTC) 10811:19:42, 30 September 2014 (UTC) 10795:19:40, 30 September 2014 (UTC) 10775:19:25, 30 September 2014 (UTC) 10741:19:32, 30 September 2014 (UTC) 10727:19:00, 30 September 2014 (UTC) 10709:17:48, 30 September 2014 (UTC) 10662:17:20, 30 September 2014 (UTC) 10634:17:08, 30 September 2014 (UTC) 10620:16:32, 30 September 2014 (UTC) 10600:15:44, 30 September 2014 (UTC) 10586:13:01, 30 September 2014 (UTC) 10560:10:00, 30 September 2014 (UTC) 10545:09:11, 30 September 2014 (UTC) 10530:19:40, 29 September 2014 (UTC) 10510:18:28, 29 September 2014 (UTC) 10458: 10441:Casualties of 1982 Lebanon War 10420:19:57, 26 September 2014 (UTC) 10312:11:55, 30 September 2014 (UTC) 10287:00:55, 29 September 2014 (UTC) 10245:00:00, 29 September 2014 (UTC) 10227:23:18, 28 September 2014 (UTC) 10153:08:24, 30 September 2014 (UTC) 10135:01:40, 30 September 2014 (UTC) 10119:17:42, 28 September 2014 (UTC) 10075:09:01, 25 September 2014 (UTC) 10061:04:37, 24 September 2014 (UTC) 10044:13:46, 23 September 2014 (UTC) 10007:12:32, 16 September 2014 (UTC) 9993:08:39, 16 September 2014 (UTC) 9967:08:21, 16 September 2014 (UTC) 9929:05:00, 16 September 2014 (UTC) 9908:14:19, 15 September 2014 (UTC) 9889:09:09, 15 September 2014 (UTC) 9804:06:43, 28 September 2014 (UTC) 9786:18:58, 27 September 2014 (UTC) 9745:12:08, 27 September 2014 (UTC) 9704:02:20, 26 September 2014 (UTC) 9687:01:14, 26 September 2014 (UTC) 9663:02:04, 26 September 2014 (UTC) 9643:19:31, 25 September 2014 (UTC) 9608:21:37, 25 September 2014 (UTC) 9586:20:31, 25 September 2014 (UTC) 9552:19:56, 25 September 2014 (UTC) 9518:21:19, 25 September 2014 (UTC) 9494:20:21, 25 September 2014 (UTC) 9479:20:06, 25 September 2014 (UTC) 9453:06:42, 24 September 2014 (UTC) 9440:00:47, 24 September 2014 (UTC) 9411:19:49, 23 September 2014 (UTC) 9391:18:44, 22 September 2014 (UTC) 9351:13:29, 25 September 2014 (UTC) 9330:13:21, 25 September 2014 (UTC) 9307:10:19, 25 September 2014 (UTC) 9284:10:05, 25 September 2014 (UTC) 9220:03:10, 25 September 2014 (UTC) 9203:06:30, 24 September 2014 (UTC) 9190:14:07, 23 September 2014 (UTC) 9150:13:49, 23 September 2014 (UTC) 9126:13:19, 23 September 2014 (UTC) 9092:07:50, 23 September 2014 (UTC) 9058:07:41, 23 September 2014 (UTC) 9044:07:32, 23 September 2014 (UTC) 9031:18:39, 22 September 2014 (UTC) 9012:15:21, 22 September 2014 (UTC) 8966:18:32, 22 September 2014 (UTC) 8951:15:13, 22 September 2014 (UTC) 8928:01:34, 22 September 2014 (UTC) 8909:00:45, 22 September 2014 (UTC) 8882:00:14, 22 September 2014 (UTC) 8863:21:01, 21 September 2014 (UTC) 8836:18:32, 21 September 2014 (UTC) 8818:17:39, 21 September 2014 (UTC) 8796:16:34, 21 September 2014 (UTC) 8763:15:01, 21 September 2014 (UTC) 8680:04:55, 25 September 2014 (UTC) 8634:03:20, 25 September 2014 (UTC) 8599:03:16, 25 September 2014 (UTC) 8581:02:47, 25 September 2014 (UTC) 8564:02:46, 25 September 2014 (UTC) 8549:02:39, 25 September 2014 (UTC) 8464:21:27, 23 September 2014 (UTC) 8452:20:12, 23 September 2014 (UTC) 8410:19:40, 23 September 2014 (UTC) 8397:18:58, 23 September 2014 (UTC) 8345:17:01, 23 September 2014 (UTC) 8333:10:22, 23 September 2014 (UTC) 8303:07:19, 23 September 2014 (UTC) 8231:21:57, 22 September 2014 (UTC) 8218:03:54, 22 September 2014 (UTC) 8151:08:04, 19 September 2014 (UTC) 8133:20:21, 15 September 2014 (UTC) 8093:20:06, 15 September 2014 (UTC) 8068:17:24, 15 September 2014 (UTC) 8046:15:34, 18 September 2014 (UTC) 8032:15:24, 18 September 2014 (UTC) 8015:17:22, 15 September 2014 (UTC) 7997:17:11, 15 September 2014 (UTC) 7982:16:28, 15 September 2014 (UTC) 7961:WP search results "lukeisback" 7929:17:31, 22 September 2014 (UTC) 7908:16:30, 22 September 2014 (UTC) 7894:21:37, 18 September 2014 (UTC) 7873:More generally, is the source 7841:14:05, 22 September 2014 (UTC) 7823:00:30, 22 September 2014 (UTC) 7806:00:24, 22 September 2014 (UTC) 7791:23:47, 21 September 2014 (UTC) 7758:12:33, 22 September 2014 (UTC) 7743:06:48, 21 September 2014 (UTC) 7708: 7697:10:46, 19 September 2014 (UTC) 7660:12:41, 20 September 2014 (UTC) 7599:23:28, 16 September 2014 (UTC) 7572:22:01, 14 September 2014 (UTC) 7559:Even a commissioned work like 7510:02:56, 14 September 2014 (UTC) 7486:in 1658, so its authors, like 7430:22:19, 13 September 2014 (UTC) 7417:05:44, 12 September 2014 (UTC) 7384:10:16, 11 September 2014 (UTC) 7355:09:47, 11 September 2014 (UTC) 7325:07:10, 11 September 2014 (UTC) 7282:00:03, 11 September 2014 (UTC) 7218:18:05, 10 September 2014 (UTC) 7081:But Your ban of "333 Årsboken" 6693:05:02, 20 September 2014 (UTC) 6662:06:53, 18 September 2014 (UTC) 6647:04:07, 18 September 2014 (UTC) 6617:13:45, 18 September 2014 (UTC) 6563:06:42, 18 September 2014 (UTC) 6542:03:55, 18 September 2014 (UTC) 6483:02:53, 18 September 2014 (UTC) 6412:21:21, 15 September 2014 (UTC) 6359:20:41, 15 September 2014 (UTC) 6312:19:57, 15 September 2014 (UTC) 6264:19:29, 15 September 2014 (UTC) 6171:17:54, 15 September 2014 (UTC) 6157:17:02, 15 September 2014 (UTC) 6143:16:08, 15 September 2014 (UTC) 6120:15:43, 15 September 2014 (UTC) 6075:12:32, 15 September 2014 (UTC) 6056:07:29, 15 September 2014 (UTC) 6041:07:22, 15 September 2014 (UTC) 6026:06:56, 15 September 2014 (UTC) 6006:06:38, 15 September 2014 (UTC) 5966:05:24, 15 September 2014 (UTC) 5925:04:40, 15 September 2014 (UTC) 5867:00:32, 15 September 2014 (UTC) 5845:00:22, 15 September 2014 (UTC) 5817:23:42, 14 September 2014 (UTC) 5790:23:39, 14 September 2014 (UTC) 5775:22:58, 14 September 2014 (UTC) 5692:06:20, 18 September 2014 (UTC) 5642:13:33, 17 September 2014 (UTC) 5614:13:28, 17 September 2014 (UTC) 5592:23:43, 16 September 2014 (UTC) 5573:22:15, 15 September 2014 (UTC) 5555:19:34, 15 September 2014 (UTC) 5541:01:45, 15 September 2014 (UTC) 5514:13:18, 14 September 2014 (UTC) 5444:02:41, 17 September 2014 (UTC) 5422:14:34, 16 September 2014 (UTC) 5401:21:52, 15 September 2014 (UTC) 5382:21:17, 15 September 2014 (UTC) 5332:23:50, 16 September 2014 (UTC) 5317:07:27, 14 September 2014 (UTC) 5299:00:22, 14 September 2014 (UTC) 5258:12:32, 16 September 2014 (UTC) 5244:08:39, 16 September 2014 (UTC) 5218:08:21, 16 September 2014 (UTC) 5180:05:00, 16 September 2014 (UTC) 5159:14:19, 15 September 2014 (UTC) 5140:09:09, 15 September 2014 (UTC) 5056:21:32, 15 September 2014 (UTC) 5040:The reliability of the source 5004:for the following statements: 4973:01:37, 15 September 2014 (UTC) 4954:00:29, 15 September 2014 (UTC) 4894:01:14, 14 September 2014 (UTC) 4884:is worth over $ 100 billion.-- 4870:17:42, 13 September 2014 (UTC) 4839:08:24, 12 September 2014 (UTC) 4825:14:22, 11 September 2014 (UTC) 4806:10:58, 11 September 2014 (UTC) 4768:20:18, 13 September 2014 (UTC) 4738:21:21, 12 September 2014 (UTC) 4719:14:13, 11 September 2014 (UTC) 4682:18:31, 10 September 2014 (UTC) 4665:18:22, 10 September 2014 (UTC) 4643:17:53, 10 September 2014 (UTC) 4628:17:44, 10 September 2014 (UTC) 4607:17:53, 10 September 2014 (UTC) 4590:17:24, 10 September 2014 (UTC) 4568:17:06, 10 September 2014 (UTC) 3401:trivia and other minor details 3084:19:00, 13 September 2014 (UTC) 3069:17:48, 13 September 2014 (UTC) 3050:17:03, 13 September 2014 (UTC) 3033:16:57, 13 September 2014 (UTC) 2994:21:41, 12 September 2014 (UTC) 2979:15:27, 12 September 2014 (UTC) 2963:14:58, 12 September 2014 (UTC) 2920:09:39, 13 September 2014 (UTC) 2905:09:02, 13 September 2014 (UTC) 2874:01:30, 11 September 2014 (UTC) 2844:00:13, 11 September 2014 (UTC) 2824:23:33, 10 September 2014 (UTC) 2788:15:17, 11 September 2014 (UTC) 2768:14:42, 11 September 2014 (UTC) 2748:here at the bottom of the page 2725:02:25, 11 September 2014 (UTC) 2694:18:12, 10 September 2014 (UTC) 2670:18:09, 10 September 2014 (UTC) 2582:Rise of the Planet of the Apes 2525:Rise of the Planet of the Apes 2489:18:04, 10 September 2014 (UTC) 2463:18:03, 10 September 2014 (UTC) 2365:03:01, 10 September 2014 (UTC) 1376:: Citizenship - Sweden/ USA.-- 1133:article and discussion on the 13: 1: 10467:The Jewish Divide Over Israel 10180:editorially independent. See 9973:"I don't think it can be used 9629:Keisha (pornographic actress) 9294:so it's not necessary to use 9194:Already answered, see above. 7847:two questions re xmag dot com 7748:The previous way was better. 7184:01:50, 9 September 2014 (UTC) 7046:08:34, 8 September 2014 (UTC) 7002:05:23, 7 September 2014 (UTC) 6966:22:40, 5 September 2014 (UTC) 6955:22:10, 5 September 2014 (UTC) 6941:21:28, 5 September 2014 (UTC) 6929:21:09, 5 September 2014 (UTC) 6836:automatically "inappropriate" 5224:"I don't think it can be used 4508:14:04, 8 September 2014 (UTC) 4494:20:23, 5 September 2014 (UTC) 4480:18:44, 5 September 2014 (UTC) 4427:14:01, 5 September 2014 (UTC) 4405:21:21, 3 September 2014 (UTC) 4386:10:00, 3 September 2014 (UTC) 4350:04:25, 3 September 2014 (UTC) 4310:19:04, 2 September 2014 (UTC) 4258:15:43, 2 September 2014 (UTC) 3528:the series that fans were. - 3303:No, it is not a valid source. 2650:15:09, 7 September 2014 (UTC) 2629:05:35, 7 September 2014 (UTC) 2597:19:56, 6 September 2014 (UTC) 2571:14:43, 6 September 2014 (UTC) 2445:08:45, 6 September 2014 (UTC) 2421:05:47, 6 September 2014 (UTC) 2351:01:27, 9 September 2014 (UTC) 2336:13:10, 5 September 2014 (UTC) 2322:04:42, 5 September 2014 (UTC) 2296:03:16, 5 September 2014 (UTC) 2278:07:01, 4 September 2014 (UTC) 2263:07:13, 1 September 2014 (UTC) 1611:is cited by different authors 1311:The Seventy Years Declaration 1073:22:42, 9 September 2014 (UTC) 1045:18:21, 9 September 2014 (UTC) 1026:18:09, 9 September 2014 (UTC) 1012:16:48, 9 September 2014 (UTC) 990:23:13, 8 September 2014 (UTC) 965:22:35, 9 September 2014 (UTC) 947:13:19, 8 September 2014 (UTC) 931:21:06, 7 September 2014 (UTC) 906:01:33, 7 September 2014 (UTC) 882:02:57, 3 September 2014 (UTC) 859:23:52, 2 September 2014 (UTC) 824:20:21, 9 September 2014 (UTC) 798:20:13, 9 September 2014 (UTC) 776:08:25, 4 September 2014 (UTC) 737:02:47, 9 September 2014 (UTC) 715:15:59, 8 September 2014 (UTC) 666:23:24, 8 September 2014 (UTC) 640:22:52, 8 September 2014 (UTC) 620:22:27, 8 September 2014 (UTC) 577:21:27, 8 September 2014 (UTC) 532:22:52, 8 September 2014 (UTC) 493:22:57, 8 September 2014 (UTC) 475:20:06, 8 September 2014 (UTC) 458:18:59, 8 September 2014 (UTC) 435:18:26, 8 September 2014 (UTC) 373:16:28, 7 September 2014 (UTC) 327:13:32, 7 September 2014 (UTC) 272:18:42, 7 September 2014 (UTC) 257:12:11, 7 September 2014 (UTC) 236:18:42, 7 September 2014 (UTC) 215:10:01, 7 September 2014 (UTC) 179:09:28, 7 September 2014 (UTC) 160:08:20, 7 September 2014 (UTC) 8664:Pornography Project guidance 7550:Skåne mellem dansk og svensk 7314:or Dahl & Edlund (2010) 6982:I apologize, and believe You 6124:"Alleged" is a red flag per 4455:source. Following from this: 3636:(partial, Breaker of Chains) 3182:Star Wars' Expanded Universe 2528:has been variously called a 2225:You're citing an article by 1512:http://hnn.us/article/155618 1249:indictment of Timothy Snyder 123:is notoriously unreliable. 7: 11070:20:46, 1 October 2014 (UTC) 11015:10:04, 1 October 2014 (UTC) 10999:05:56, 1 October 2014 (UTC) 10985:05:37, 1 October 2014 (UTC) 10971:04:14, 1 October 2014 (UTC) 10435:16:44, 1 October 2014 (UTC) 10369:02:51, 1 October 2014 (UTC) 10345:00:23, 1 October 2014 (UTC) 9981:translation by a Wikipedian 8571:for the original story btw 8523:John Johnson (1994-07-16). 8439:we're constrained for space 8321:A Global History of History 8267:A Global History of History 7302:or Österbotten variants of 5718:. American Bird Conservancy 5661:my edits reverted anymore. 5232:translation by a Wikipedian 4175:23:03, 29 August 2014 (UTC) 4161:20:49, 29 August 2014 (UTC) 4115:18:20, 29 August 2014 (UTC) 4097:15:32, 29 August 2014 (UTC) 4080:14:11, 29 August 2014 (UTC) 4066:02:56, 29 August 2014 (UTC) 4051:20:57, 28 August 2014 (UTC) 4037:00:10, 29 August 2014 (UTC) 4019:16:33, 28 August 2014 (UTC) 4000:16:24, 28 August 2014 (UTC) 3962:16:24, 28 August 2014 (UTC) 3936:16:08, 28 August 2014 (UTC) 3881:16:14, 28 August 2014 (UTC) 3857:15:40, 28 August 2014 (UTC) 3816:15:21, 28 August 2014 (UTC) 3771:03:21, 28 August 2014 (UTC) 3747:02:55, 28 August 2014 (UTC) 3601:01:55, 28 August 2014 (UTC) 3538:01:58, 28 August 2014 (UTC) 3521:01:54, 28 August 2014 (UTC) 3503:01:52, 28 August 2014 (UTC) 3489:01:27, 28 August 2014 (UTC) 3477:01:21, 28 August 2014 (UTC) 3451:23:50, 27 August 2014 (UTC) 3437:21:10, 27 August 2014 (UTC) 3421:20:00, 27 August 2014 (UTC) 3386:01:28, 27 August 2014 (UTC) 3356:01:02, 27 August 2014 (UTC) 3337:00:21, 27 August 2014 (UTC) 3315:19:05, 26 August 2014 (UTC) 3287:01:28, 27 August 2014 (UTC) 3266:00:50, 27 August 2014 (UTC) 3232:18:58, 26 August 2014 (UTC) 3199:18:22, 26 August 2014 (UTC) 3166:14:47, 26 August 2014 (UTC) 3109:14:15, 26 August 2014 (UTC) 2801:For the specific articles, 2248:22:32, 30 August 2014 (UTC) 2214:19:08, 28 August 2014 (UTC) 2196:18:55, 28 August 2014 (UTC) 2182:16:56, 28 August 2014 (UTC) 2150:21:52, 27 August 2014 (UTC) 2123:15:27, 27 August 2014 (UTC) 2085:15:14, 27 August 2014 (UTC) 2061:14:33, 27 August 2014 (UTC) 1975:13:44, 27 August 2014 (UTC) 1785:13:32, 27 August 2014 (UTC) 1743:13:38, 27 August 2014 (UTC) 1699:13:13, 27 August 2014 (UTC) 1655:13:32, 27 August 2014 (UTC) 1641:05:26, 27 August 2014 (UTC) 1623:02:48, 27 August 2014 (UTC) 1576:02:01, 27 August 2014 (UTC) 1553:site. In fact, you'll find 1528:11:07, 26 August 2014 (UTC) 1506:05:57, 26 August 2014 (UTC) 1476:11:11, 26 August 2014 (UTC) 1458:03:50, 26 August 2014 (UTC) 1403:01:48, 26 August 2014 (UTC) 1386:23:54, 26 August 2014 (UTC) 1364:10:02, 22 August 2014 (UTC) 1348:08:48, 22 August 2014 (UTC) 1327:06:26, 22 August 2014 (UTC) 1305:05:51, 22 August 2014 (UTC) 1291:I assume that at least one 1287:06:08, 21 August 2014 (UTC) 1212:17:02, 20 August 2014 (UTC) 1189:14:24, 20 August 2014 (UTC) 1169:07:59, 20 August 2014 (UTC) 1151:06:59, 20 August 2014 (UTC) 1124:06:51, 20 August 2014 (UTC) 10: 11113: 9675:Game of Thrones (season 5) 9461:Anatolia Cradle of Mankind 9176:No, I asked which part of 8623:Knowledge:Convenience_link 8237:Two sources on the I Ching 7363:is a use relating to the " 7294:(not even recognized) and 6637:on such sources. So is it? 6046:should publish those too. 3830:, called Observation Deck. 1243:and even their indictment 1030:If the author is directly 421:10.1140/epjd/e2011-20623-0 396:10.1140/epjd/e2011-20455-x 18:Knowledge:Reliable sources 11087:is not a venue to decide 8662:Also as per longstanding 8165:Tattoo Nation documentary 7470:. Have You even read it ? 5743:American Bird Conservancy 3649:GA-rated article about a 3152:in the Knowledge article 3148:is being used to support 1596:He is academic historian 919:90% of everything is crap 363:The current text is fine. 187:report this at all, only 9465:is this paper reliable? 9423:was bad, take a look at 8480:Are any of these source 8286:The I Ching: A Biography 8158:Please do not modify it. 7938:Please do not modify it. 7637:appear to be historians. 7544:, edited by Göran Rystad 7479:That would be OR indeed. 7397:Klågeråds Bloodbath 1811 6147:Yes, that sounds fine. 4742:I doubt that you'd find 3254:again earlier this month 2864:claims in the interview. 2794:APGNation & Gamenosh 1547:Ukrainian Insurgent Army 10695:on the same day as the 9566:Los Angeles, California 9506:one obscure publication 8509:"Megan Leigh Porn Star" 7552:by Paul Erik Engelhardt 5755:edit summary on removal 5473:Raindance Film Festival 5463:article section here:- 5452:Reviews section of The 5387:You are very much into 3620:; here's the older one) 3463:an article in Slate or 3351:aka The Red Pen of Doom 3310:aka The Red Pen of Doom 1175:Talk:Per Anders Rudling 1135:Per Anders Rudling talk 1109:A revert has been made 442:appearing shortly after 10888:Sentence with in-text 10761: 10322:be useable subject to 9856:http://www.mod.gov.il/ 9261:, you are misapplying 8373:Encyclopedia of Daoism 8099:I'm in agreement with 7678:a link to the article 7089:Simon Sebag Montefiore 6736:Berndt David Assarsson 5749:, and other wildlife." 5584:Tiptoethrutheminefield 5475:, in association with 5436:Tiptoethrutheminefield 5324:Tiptoethrutheminefield 5107:http://www.mod.gov.il/ 3146:page from Westeros.org 1098:has been described as 699: 413: 316: 125:The Skeptical Inquirer 10756: 10681:Middle East Quarterly 10673:Middle East Quarterly 10469:. Transaction. p. 89. 9613:pornstaremart dot com 9212:A Quest For Knowledge 9182:A Quest For Knowledge 9118:A Quest For Knowledge 9050:A Quest For Knowledge 9023:A Quest For Knowledge 8828:A Quest For Knowledge 8143:A Quest For Knowledge 8074:As is already stated 7496:lingvistical articles 7468:not in general anyway 6534:A Quest For Knowledge 6404:A Quest For Knowledge 6149:A Quest For Knowledge 6067:A Quest For Knowledge 5859:A Quest For Knowledge 5809:A Quest For Knowledge 4229:is not a suicide pact 3712:The Wolf and the Lion 3368:, are you saying you 3329:A Quest For Knowledge 2832:self-published source 2746:'s official website ( 1229:Defending history com 694: 511:teach the controversy 401: 312: 46:of past discussions. 10819:TheTimesAreAChanging 10787:TheTimesAreAChanging 10733:TheTimesAreAChanging 10701:TheTimesAreAChanging 10689:The Jewish Chronicle 10522:TheTimesAreAChanging 10324:the usual strictures 10087:We seem to cite the 8736:This is a weird one. 8511:. Excaliburfilms.com 7875:http://www.xmag.com/ 7858:for this statement: 7456:lingvistical matters 7262:FC Red Bull Salzburg 7230:Your examplification 6849:one concrete example 6840:political extremists 6799:Treaty of Copenhagen 6715:. List of authors: 6593:RfC: Rebecca Bardoux 5741:"In March 2013, the 5461:The Weight of Chains 5434:needs my attention. 4756:Entertainment Weekly 4498:Other viewpoints? - 4376:do not belong here. 3950:we can just ask them 3587:comparisons, either. 1275:hidden in a footnote 10412:Squeamish Ossifrage 9941:Tangential exchange 9673:There is an RfC at 9574:Dirty Debutantes 94 9291:The Washington Post 8920:NorthBySouthBaranof 8741:Neil_deGrasse_Tyson 8692:Neil_deGrasse_Tyson 8527:. Los Angeles Times 7989:NorthBySouthBaranof 6048:NorthBySouthBaranof 6018:NorthBySouthBaranof 5958:NorthBySouthBaranof 5782:NorthBySouthBaranof 5519:Comments/Discussion 5342:Richard Hovannisian 5192:Tangential exchange 4437:my own thread below 3906:including from Jack 3094:Westeros.org. Again 2912:NorthBySouthBaranof 2836:NorthBySouthBaranof 2658:in-text attribution 1245:Knowledge's article 982:Tenkasi Subramanian 690:Summary Report 1989 652:There is currently 612:Second Quantization 524:Second Quantization 485:Second Quantization 143:doesn't look Jewish 10645:Amal Saad-Ghorayeb 9524:rogreviews dot com 9431:forever. Regards. 9069:The New York Times 8995:, John McConnell, 8891: 8747: 8201:Hollywood Reporter 7939: 7484:treaty of Roskilde 7460:historical matters 7312:Svenskans fonologi 7107:" - I fully agree. 7097:Treaty of Roskilde 6992:", have You not ? 6774:Treaty of Roskilde 6765:Richard Willerslev 5565:Somedifferentstuff 3722:You Win or You Die 3014:Transitions Online 2711:The following RFC 2578:Planet of the Apes 2555:Planet of the Apes 2535:Planet of the Apes 1315:Per Anders Rudling 1262:Per Anders Rudling 1131:Per Anders Rudling 1096:Per Anders Rudling 1079:Per Anders Rudling 1061:attributed in-text 585:nothing unreliable 167:"Jewish Amsterdam" 10302:Other opinions? 10167:thefederalist.com 10022: 10021: 9778:RightCowLeftCoast 9313:Volokh Conspiracy 9135:National Enquirer 9131:WP:CONTEXTMATTERS 8889: 8802:Thefederalist.com 8745: 8647:Los Angeles Times 8615: 8424:Fabrizio Pregadio 8377:Fabrizio Pregadio 8193:in the L.A. Times 7937: 7839: 7818:E L A Q U E A T E 7029:indigenous people 6759:Johs. Christensen 6691: 5802: 5407:Policy says that 5273: 5272: 5043:has been disputed 4983:Is this webpage: 4813:Canadian Business 4660:E L A Q U E A T E 4585:E L A Q U E A T E 3691:Lord_Snow#Writing 3645:the reviewers of 3573: 3352: 3311: 2942: 2933:comment added by 2869:E L A Q U E A T E 2707:michael brown RFC 2696: 2647: 2627: 2594: 2568: 2514:The site doesn't 2491: 2443: 2413:RightCowLeftCoast 1040:E L A Q U E A T E 826: 473: 433: 379:Editorial use at 368:E L A Q U E A T E 255: 104: 103: 58: 57: 52:current main page 11104: 11039:Pity the Nation, 10877: 10833: 10822: 10759:seige of Beirut. 10570: 10471: 10470: 10462: 10447:1982 Lebanon War 10433: 10096:WP:USERGENERATED 10046: 10029: 10028: 9937: 9936: 9450: 9435: 9348: 9304: 9259: 9200: 9147: 9089: 9041: 9009: 8985:score interviews 8733: 8715: 8609: 8535: 8533: 8532: 8519: 8517: 8516: 8504: 8502: 8501: 8213: 7833: 7820: 7819: 7718: 7712: 7617:Populär Historia 7610:Allt om Historia 7407:I disapprove of 7233:"Serbocroatian". 7198:reliable sources 7167:nothing about it 7083:would I like to 6913:Swedish language 6867:www.scania.org 6762:Victor Andreasen 6677: 6674: 6671: 6614: 6607: 6551: 5855:reliable sources 5833:WP:NOTGOODSOURCE 5796: 5727: 5725: 5723: 5713: 5530: 5454:Weight of Chains 5188: 5187: 5045: 4996: 4989:"Stephen Snoddy" 4927: 4925: 4923: 4704:, we started an 4703: 4695: 4662: 4661: 4587: 4586: 3835:was incorporated 3705:Winter Is Coming 3567: 3413:NinjaRobotPirate 3405:NPOV noticeboard 3367: 3353: 3350: 3326: 3312: 3309: 3043: 2977: 2975: 2973:Volunteer Marek 2928: 2871: 2870: 2766: 2764: 2757: 2676: 2645: 2617: 2592: 2580:and potentially 2566: 2552:to the original 2538:series, a loose 2520:personal webpage 2511:and pop culture. 2502:Badassdigest.com 2471: 2433: 2393:San Diego Rostra 2224: 1226: 1186: 1104:too few opinions 1088:User:Iryna Harpy 1042: 1041: 923:NinjaRobotPirate 806: 559:WP:FORUMSHOPPING 471: 467: 431: 427: 386:A discussion at 381:BlackLight Power 370: 369: 360:Andrew Dice Clay 245: 85: 60: 59: 37: 36: 30: 11112: 11111: 11107: 11106: 11105: 11103: 11102: 11101: 11023:Ahron Bregman, 10880:Pity the Nation 10871: 10827: 10816: 10697:Washington Post 10641:Pity the Nation 10564: 10517:Washington Post 10476: 10475: 10474: 10463: 10459: 10443: 10427: 10377: 10332:Washington Post 10233:Post Everything 10163: 10127:Spirit of Eagle 10085: 10030: 10026: 10023: 9942: 9815: 9774:Self-publishing 9770:previously used 9752: 9724:Subtropical-man 9712: 9710:Divadevotee.com 9671: 9615: 9526: 9463: 9446: 9433: 9344: 9300: 9255: 9196: 9143: 9085: 9037: 9005: 8983:has managed to 8890:crazy blog rant 8824:reliable source 8746:crazy blog rant 8706: 8690: 8688: 8530: 8528: 8514: 8512: 8507: 8499: 8497: 8492: 8478: 8239: 8209: 8167: 8162: 8161: 8139:reliable source 7942: 7933: 7932: 7931: 7915: 7851:Is this source 7849: 7817: 7815: 7766: 7728: 7723: 7722: 7721: 7713: 7709: 7542:Kampen om Skåne 7536:by Sten Skansjö 7534:Skånes historia 7444:still isn't SSF 7395:'s part (about 7304:Finland Swedish 7266:in the audience 7252:are unreliable 7155:Landskrona BoIS 6917:Scanian dialect 6842:. However this 6834:find this book 6722:Carl Liljenberg 6703: 6672: 6669: 6639:Serialjoepsycho 6626: 6610: 6603: 6595: 6547: 5721: 5719: 5711: 5700: 5684:Serialjoepsycho 5654: 5524: 5521: 5457: 5359:are Armenians. 5352:Hakob Meghapart 5344: 5279: 5274: 5193: 5066: 5041: 4987: 4981: 4921: 4919: 4901: 4788: 4697: 4689: 4659: 4657: 4584: 4582: 4356:you didn't like 4199: 3988:Game of Thrones 3975:Game of Thrones 3651:Game of Thrones 3640:FiveThirtyEight 3558: 3364:TheRedPenOfDoom 3361: 3348: 3323:TheRedPenOfDoom 3320: 3307: 3209:Game of Thrones 3129:Game of Thrones 3096: 3041: 2971: 2969: 2948: 2868: 2866: 2816:PseudoSomething 2796: 2760: 2753: 2751: 2732: 2709: 2678:Shameless plug: 2504: 2473:Shameless plug: 2395: 2218: 2096:John-Paul Himka 1607:John-Paul Himka 1293:community group 1220: 1184: 1155:But what about 1100:multiple issues 1081: 1039: 1037: 972: 839: 808:Shameless plug: 753: 686:Summary Reports 673: 650: 540: 538:Meta discussion 469: 429: 384: 367: 365: 356:Sammy Davis Jr. 111: 81: 34: 26: 25: 24: 12: 11: 5: 11110: 11081: 11080: 11079: 11078: 11077: 11076: 11075: 11074: 11073: 11072: 11057: 11048: 11044: 11031: 11021: 10939: 10938: 10937: 10936: 10869: 10868: 10867: 10866: 10849: 10848: 10825: 10798: 10797: 10752: 10751: 10750: 10749: 10748: 10747: 10746: 10745: 10744: 10743: 10622: 10608: 10607: 10606: 10605: 10604: 10603: 10602: 10562: 10473: 10472: 10456: 10455: 10451: 10442: 10439: 10438: 10437: 10376: 10373: 10372: 10371: 10348: 10347: 10292: 10291: 10290: 10289: 10271: 10270: 10269: 10268: 10267: 10266: 10259:PostEverything 10250: 10249: 10248: 10247: 10203: 10162: 10159: 10158: 10157: 10156: 10155: 10084: 10081: 10080: 10079: 10078: 10077: 10032:Bumping thread 10020: 10019: 10018: 10017: 10016: 10015: 10014: 10013: 10012: 10011: 10010: 10009: 9944: 9943: 9940: 9935: 9934: 9933: 9932: 9931: 9911: 9910: 9869: 9868: 9863: 9858: 9853: 9848: 9843: 9838: 9814: 9808: 9807: 9806: 9751: 9748: 9728:self-published 9711: 9708: 9707: 9706: 9670: 9667: 9666: 9665: 9614: 9611: 9589: 9588: 9525: 9522: 9521: 9520: 9510:Stephan Schulz 9502:Google Scholar 9497: 9496: 9462: 9459: 9458: 9457: 9456: 9455: 9416: 9415: 9414: 9413: 9374: 9373: 9372: 9371: 9370: 9369: 9368: 9367: 9366: 9365: 9364: 9363: 9362: 9361: 9360: 9359: 9358: 9357: 9356: 9355: 9354: 9353: 9317: 9296:The Federalist 9237: 9236: 9235: 9234: 9233: 9232: 9231: 9230: 9229: 9228: 9227: 9226: 9225: 9224: 9223: 9222: 9163: 9162: 9161: 9160: 9159: 9158: 9157: 9156: 9155: 9154: 9153: 9152: 9112:Which part of 9101: 9100: 9099: 9098: 9097: 9096: 9095: 9094: 9073:The Federalist 8997:Michael Gerson 8993:Matthew Scully 8981:The Federalist 8977: 8976: 8975: 8974: 8973: 8972: 8971: 8970: 8969: 8968: 8958:Stephan Schulz 8899:messageboard. 8885: 8884: 8843: 8842: 8841: 8840: 8839: 8838: 8810:Stephan Schulz 8687: 8684: 8683: 8682: 8660: 8652: 8651: 8641: 8640: 8639: 8638: 8637: 8636: 8602: 8601: 8586: 8585: 8584: 8583: 8537: 8536: 8520: 8505: 8477: 8474: 8473: 8472: 8471: 8470: 8469: 8468: 8467: 8466: 8435: 8369: 8352: 8351: 8350: 8349: 8348: 8347: 8241:By request of 8238: 8235: 8234: 8233: 8171:black-and-gray 8166: 8163: 8155: 8154: 8153: 8135: 8096: 8095: 8080: 8079: 8071: 8070: 8052: 8051: 8050: 8049: 8048: 7999: 7970: 7969: 7964: 7943: 7934: 7919: 7918: 7917: 7916: 7914: 7911: 7868: 7867: 7866: 7865: 7848: 7845: 7844: 7843: 7798:71.146.134.113 7770:List of vegans 7765: 7762: 7761: 7760: 7735:Walter Görlitz 7727: 7724: 7720: 7719: 7706: 7705: 7701: 7700: 7699: 7671: 7670: 7669: 7668: 7667: 7666: 7665: 7664: 7663: 7662: 7654: 7653: 7652: 7638: 7629:Acknowledged ( 7624: 7623:as "Klågeröd". 7579: 7578: 7577: 7576: 7575: 7574: 7566: 7557: 7556: 7555: 7547: 7539: 7528: 7499: 7488:Wilhelm Moberg 7471: 7424: 7389: 7388: 7387: 7386: 7365:Klågerup riots 7334: 7333: 7332: 7331: 7330: 7329: 7328: 7327: 7319: 7307: 7268:, but lots of 7234: 7221: 7220: 7212: 7205: 7189: 7188: 7187: 7186: 7173: 7121: 7108: 7100: 7077: 7072: 7057: 7056: 7055: 7054: 7053: 7052: 7051: 7050: 7049: 7048: 7040: 7036: 7024: 7023: 7022: 7018: 6960: 6935: 6821:Wilhelm Moberg 6767: 6766: 6763: 6760: 6757: 6754: 6751: 6748: 6747:Werner Persson 6745: 6743:Wilhelm Moberg 6740: 6737: 6734: 6731: 6726: 6723: 6720: 6702: 6699: 6698: 6697: 6696: 6695: 6625: 6620: 6594: 6591: 6590: 6589: 6588: 6587: 6586: 6585: 6584: 6583: 6582: 6581: 6580: 6579: 6578: 6577: 6576: 6575: 6574: 6573: 6572: 6571: 6570: 6569: 6568: 6567: 6566: 6565: 6506: 6505: 6504: 6503: 6502: 6501: 6500: 6499: 6498: 6497: 6496: 6495: 6494: 6493: 6492: 6491: 6490: 6489: 6488: 6487: 6486: 6485: 6433: 6432: 6431: 6430: 6429: 6428: 6427: 6426: 6425: 6424: 6423: 6422: 6421: 6420: 6419: 6418: 6417: 6416: 6415: 6414: 6378: 6377: 6376: 6375: 6374: 6373: 6372: 6371: 6370: 6369: 6368: 6367: 6366: 6365: 6364: 6363: 6362: 6361: 6329: 6328: 6327: 6326: 6325: 6324: 6323: 6322: 6321: 6320: 6319: 6318: 6317: 6316: 6315: 6314: 6279: 6278: 6277: 6276: 6275: 6274: 6273: 6272: 6271: 6270: 6269: 6268: 6267: 6266: 6228: 6227: 6226: 6225: 6224: 6223: 6222: 6221: 6220: 6219: 6218: 6217: 6216: 6215: 6190: 6189: 6188: 6187: 6186: 6185: 6184: 6183: 6182: 6181: 6180: 6179: 6178: 6177: 6173: 6159: 6135:Stephan Schulz 6098: 6097: 6096: 6095: 6094: 6093: 6092: 6091: 6090: 6089: 5975: 5974: 5973: 5972: 5971: 5970: 5969: 5968: 5932: 5931: 5930: 5929: 5928: 5927: 5907: 5906: 5905: 5904: 5903: 5902: 5894: 5893: 5892: 5891: 5890: 5889: 5872: 5871: 5870: 5869: 5848: 5847: 5828: 5827: 5820: 5819: 5793: 5792: 5751: 5750: 5739: 5736: 5731: 5728: 5704: 5699: 5696: 5695: 5694: 5653: 5650: 5649: 5648: 5647: 5646: 5645: 5644: 5619: 5618: 5617: 5616: 5576: 5575: 5560: 5559: 5558: 5557: 5520: 5517: 5456: 5450: 5449: 5448: 5447: 5446: 5425: 5424: 5404: 5403: 5393:Stephan Schulz 5343: 5340: 5339: 5338: 5337: 5336: 5335: 5334: 5302: 5301: 5278: 5275: 5271: 5270: 5269: 5268: 5267: 5266: 5265: 5264: 5263: 5262: 5261: 5260: 5195: 5194: 5191: 5186: 5185: 5184: 5183: 5182: 5162: 5161: 5120: 5119: 5114: 5109: 5104: 5099: 5094: 5089: 5065: 5059: 5038: 5037: 5034: 5030: 5027: 5024: 5021: 5018: 5015: 5012: 5009: 5002:Stephen Snoddy 4998: 4997: 4980: 4979:Stephen Snoddy 4977: 4976: 4975: 4938: 4937: 4934: 4928: 4900: 4897: 4873: 4872: 4843: 4842: 4841: 4787: 4784: 4783: 4782: 4781: 4780: 4779: 4778: 4777: 4776: 4775: 4774: 4773: 4772: 4771: 4770: 4730:Dr. Fleischman 4687: 4674:Dr. Fleischman 4635:Dr. Fleischman 4620:Jack Sebastian 4615: 4611: 4610: 4609: 4599:Dr. Fleischman 4578:Jack Sebastian 4575: 4574: 4573: 4572: 4571: 4570: 4560:Jack Sebastian 4550: 4543: 4542: 4541: 4540: 4539: 4529: 4513: 4512: 4511: 4510: 4500:Jack Sebastian 4496: 4486:Jack Sebastian 4472:Dr. Fleischman 4468: 4467: 4466: 4459: 4456: 4443: 4440: 4419:Jack Sebastian 4414: 4413: 4412: 4411: 4410: 4409: 4408: 4407: 4397:Jack Sebastian 4369: 4366: 4362: 4359: 4342:Jack Sebastian 4337: 4333: 4325: 4324: 4321: 4320: 4313: 4312: 4298: 4294: 4287: 4284: 4283: 4282: 4274: 4271: 4267: 4261: 4260: 4250:Jack Sebastian 4244: 4243: 4237: 4223: 4217: 4198: 4195: 4194: 4193: 4192: 4191: 4190: 4189: 4188: 4187: 4186: 4185: 4184: 4183: 4182: 4181: 4180: 4179: 4178: 4177: 4153:Jack Sebastian 4148: 4130: 4129: 4128: 4127: 4126: 4125: 4124: 4123: 4122: 4121: 4120: 4119: 4118: 4117: 4102: 4085: 4072:Jack Sebastian 4043:Jack Sebastian 4007: 3971: 3970: 3969: 3968: 3967: 3966: 3965: 3964: 3946: 3943: 3923: 3915: 3909: 3901: 3898: 3895: 3888: 3887: 3886: 3885: 3884: 3883: 3873:Jack Sebastian 3862: 3861: 3860: 3859: 3849:Jack Sebastian 3841: 3838: 3831: 3824: 3818: 3808:Jack Sebastian 3799: 3778: 3763:Jack Sebastian 3758: 3757: 3756: 3755: 3754: 3753: 3752: 3751: 3750: 3749: 3735: 3734: 3733: 3727: 3698:The Pointy End 3677:A Golden Crown 3643: 3637: 3631: 3621: 3614: 3593:Jack Sebastian 3588: 3577:here and there 3557: 3554: 3553: 3552: 3551: 3550: 3549: 3548: 3547: 3546: 3545: 3544: 3543: 3542: 3530:Jack Sebastian 3524: 3523: 3454: 3453: 3440: 3439: 3393: 3392: 3391: 3390: 3389: 3388: 3373: 3300: 3299: 3298: 3297: 3296: 3295: 3294: 3293: 3292: 3291: 3290: 3289: 3258:Jack Sebastian 3239: 3238: 3237: 3236: 3235: 3234: 3220: 3216: 3205: 3191:Jack Sebastian 3168: 3142: 3101:Jack Sebastian 3095: 3092: 3091: 3090: 3089: 3088: 3087: 3086: 3053: 3052: 3036: 3035: 3022: 3008:New York Times 3004: 2999: 2998: 2997: 2996: 2947: 2944: 2925: 2924: 2923: 2922: 2892:\About Us page 2884: 2883: 2882: 2881: 2880: 2879: 2795: 2792: 2791: 2790: 2731: 2728: 2708: 2705: 2704: 2703: 2702: 2701: 2700: 2699: 2698: 2697: 2686:Dr. Fleischman 2662:Dr. Fleischman 2654: 2653: 2652: 2503: 2500: 2499: 2498: 2497: 2496: 2495: 2494: 2493: 2492: 2481:Dr. Fleischman 2455:Dr. Fleischman 2447: 2409: 2408: 2399:Nick Popaditch 2394: 2391: 2390: 2389: 2388: 2387: 2386: 2385: 2384: 2383: 2382: 2381: 2380: 2379: 2378: 2377: 2376: 2375: 2374: 2373: 2372: 2371: 2370: 2369: 2368: 2367: 2309:only biography 2280: 2231:cherry picking 2198: 2163: 2162: 2161: 2160: 2159: 2158: 2157: 2156: 2128: 2127: 2126: 2125: 2108: 2107: 2106: 2105: 2088: 2087: 2071: 2070: 2048: 2047: 2046: 2045: 2044: 2043: 2042: 2041: 2040: 2039: 2038: 2037: 2036: 2035: 2034: 2033: 2032: 2031: 2030: 2029: 2028: 2027: 1996: 1995: 1994: 1993: 1992: 1991: 1990: 1989: 1988: 1987: 1986: 1985: 1984: 1983: 1982: 1981: 1980: 1979: 1978: 1977: 1941: 1940: 1939: 1938: 1937: 1936: 1935: 1934: 1933: 1932: 1931: 1930: 1929: 1928: 1927: 1926: 1925: 1924: 1923: 1922: 1921: 1920: 1892: 1891: 1890: 1889: 1888: 1887: 1886: 1885: 1884: 1883: 1882: 1881: 1880: 1879: 1878: 1877: 1876: 1875: 1874: 1873: 1872: 1871: 1867:Lubomyr Luciuk 1839: 1838: 1837: 1836: 1835: 1834: 1833: 1832: 1831: 1830: 1829: 1828: 1827: 1826: 1825: 1824: 1823: 1822: 1802: 1801: 1800: 1799: 1798: 1797: 1796: 1795: 1794: 1793: 1792: 1791: 1790: 1789: 1788: 1787: 1758: 1757: 1756: 1755: 1754: 1753: 1752: 1751: 1750: 1749: 1748: 1747: 1746: 1745: 1714: 1713: 1712: 1711: 1710: 1709: 1708: 1707: 1706: 1705: 1704: 1703: 1702: 1701: 1672: 1670: 1669: 1668: 1667: 1666: 1665: 1664: 1663: 1662: 1661: 1660: 1659: 1658: 1657: 1585: 1584: 1583: 1582: 1581: 1580: 1579: 1578: 1564:WP:COMMONSENSE 1535: 1534: 1533: 1532: 1531: 1530: 1483: 1481: 1480: 1479: 1478: 1461: 1460: 1438: 1437: 1432: 1431: 1417:Lubomyr Luciuk 1410: 1409: 1391: 1390: 1389: 1388: 1336: 1335: 1334: 1333: 1332: 1331: 1330: 1329: 1255: 1254: 1253: 1252: 1215: 1214: 1196: 1195: 1194: 1193: 1192: 1191: 1113: 1112: 1107: 1080: 1077: 1076: 1075: 1065:Dr. Fleischman 1052: 1051: 1050: 1049: 1048: 1047: 971: 968: 957:Dr. Fleischman 934: 933: 913: 912: 911: 910: 909: 908: 865: 847:Proof (non RS) 838: 835: 834: 833: 832: 831: 830: 829: 828: 827: 816:Dr. Fleischman 790:Dr. Fleischman 786:self-published 760:Paul McFedries 752: 745: 744: 743: 742: 741: 740: 739: 672: 669: 649: 646: 645: 644: 643: 642: 605: 592: 554: 553: 539: 536: 535: 534: 498: 497: 496: 495: 477: 383: 377: 376: 375: 347:"looks like a" 330: 329: 281: 280: 279: 278: 277: 276: 275: 274: 238: 110: 105: 102: 101: 96: 91: 86: 79: 74: 69: 66: 56: 55: 38: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 11109: 11100: 11098: 11094: 11090: 11086: 11071: 11067: 11063: 11058: 11055: 11054: 11049: 11045: 11041: 11040: 11035: 11032: 11028: 11027: 11022: 11018: 11017: 11016: 11013: 11010: 11007: 11002: 11001: 11000: 10996: 10992: 10988: 10987: 10986: 10982: 10978: 10974: 10973: 10972: 10968: 10964: 10960: 10959: 10958: 10957: 10954: 10951: 10948: 10944: 10935: 10932: 10929: 10926: 10921: 10920: 10919: 10915: 10911: 10907: 10906: 10905: 10904: 10901: 10898: 10895: 10891: 10886: 10882: 10881: 10875: 10865: 10861: 10857: 10853: 10852: 10851: 10850: 10847: 10844: 10841: 10838: 10831: 10826: 10820: 10815: 10814: 10813: 10812: 10808: 10804: 10796: 10792: 10788: 10783: 10779: 10778: 10777: 10776: 10773: 10770: 10767: 10760: 10755: 10742: 10738: 10734: 10730: 10729: 10728: 10724: 10720: 10716: 10712: 10711: 10710: 10706: 10702: 10698: 10694: 10690: 10686: 10682: 10678: 10674: 10670: 10669:World Affairs 10665: 10664: 10663: 10660: 10657: 10654: 10650: 10646: 10642: 10637: 10636: 10635: 10631: 10627: 10623: 10621: 10617: 10613: 10609: 10601: 10597: 10593: 10589: 10588: 10587: 10584: 10581: 10578: 10574: 10568: 10563: 10561: 10557: 10553: 10548: 10547: 10546: 10542: 10538: 10533: 10532: 10531: 10527: 10523: 10518: 10514: 10513: 10512: 10511: 10508: 10505: 10502: 10496: 10494: 10490: 10486: 10482: 10468: 10461: 10457: 10454: 10450: 10448: 10436: 10431: 10424: 10423: 10422: 10421: 10417: 10413: 10409: 10405: 10401: 10397: 10392: 10388: 10386: 10382: 10381:fringe theory 10370: 10366: 10362: 10358: 10354: 10350: 10349: 10346: 10343: 10342: 10337: 10334:, and so the 10333: 10329: 10325: 10321: 10316: 10315: 10314: 10313: 10309: 10305: 10304:Mr. Swordfish 10300: 10298: 10288: 10284: 10280: 10279:Mr. Swordfish 10275: 10274: 10273: 10272: 10264: 10260: 10256: 10255: 10254: 10253: 10252: 10251: 10246: 10242: 10238: 10234: 10230: 10229: 10228: 10224: 10220: 10216: 10212: 10211: 10210: 10207: 10201: 10199: 10194: 10189: 10187: 10183: 10177: 10176: 10172: 10168: 10154: 10150: 10146: 10142: 10138: 10137: 10136: 10132: 10128: 10123: 10122: 10121: 10120: 10116: 10112: 10108: 10105: 10101: 10097: 10093: 10090: 10076: 10072: 10068: 10064: 10063: 10062: 10058: 10054: 10049: 10048: 10047: 10045: 10041: 10037: 10033: 10008: 10004: 10000: 9996: 9995: 9994: 9990: 9986: 9982: 9978: 9974: 9970: 9969: 9968: 9964: 9960: 9956: 9952: 9951: 9950: 9949: 9948: 9947: 9946: 9945: 9939: 9938: 9930: 9926: 9922: 9918: 9915: 9914: 9913: 9912: 9909: 9905: 9901: 9897: 9893: 9892: 9891: 9890: 9886: 9882: 9878: 9873: 9867: 9864: 9862: 9859: 9857: 9854: 9852: 9849: 9847: 9844: 9842: 9839: 9837: 9834: 9833: 9832: 9831: 9827: 9823: 9820: 9812: 9805: 9801: 9797: 9793: 9790: 9789: 9788: 9787: 9783: 9779: 9775: 9771: 9767: 9763: 9759: 9758: 9747: 9746: 9742: 9738: 9733: 9729: 9725: 9721: 9720:Kylie Minogue 9717: 9705: 9701: 9697: 9694: 9691: 9690: 9689: 9688: 9684: 9680: 9676: 9664: 9660: 9656: 9652: 9647: 9646: 9645: 9644: 9640: 9636: 9635:Lightbreather 9631: 9630: 9625: 9623: 9619: 9610: 9609: 9605: 9601: 9598: 9593: 9592:Lightbreather 9587: 9583: 9579: 9575: 9571: 9567: 9563: 9560: 9556: 9555: 9554: 9553: 9549: 9545: 9544:Lightbreather 9541: 9540:Julie Meadows 9536: 9534: 9530: 9519: 9515: 9511: 9507: 9503: 9499: 9498: 9495: 9491: 9487: 9483: 9482: 9481: 9480: 9476: 9472: 9468: 9454: 9451: 9449: 9443: 9442: 9441: 9438: 9436: 9430: 9426: 9422: 9418: 9417: 9412: 9408: 9404: 9403: 9397: 9396: 9395: 9394: 9393: 9392: 9388: 9384: 9380: 9352: 9349: 9347: 9342: 9339: 9338: 9333: 9332: 9331: 9327: 9323: 9322:Mr. Swordfish 9318: 9314: 9310: 9309: 9308: 9305: 9303: 9297: 9293: 9292: 9287: 9286: 9285: 9281: 9277: 9273: 9268: 9264: 9260: 9258: 9253: 9252: 9251: 9250: 9249: 9248: 9247: 9246: 9245: 9244: 9243: 9242: 9241: 9240: 9239: 9238: 9221: 9217: 9213: 9210: 9209:Not reliable. 9206: 9205: 9204: 9201: 9199: 9193: 9192: 9191: 9187: 9183: 9179: 9175: 9174: 9173: 9172: 9171: 9170: 9169: 9168: 9167: 9166: 9165: 9164: 9151: 9148: 9146: 9140: 9136: 9132: 9129: 9128: 9127: 9123: 9119: 9115: 9111: 9110: 9109: 9108: 9107: 9106: 9105: 9104: 9103: 9102: 9093: 9090: 9088: 9083: 9080: 9077: 9074: 9070: 9066: 9065:Robert Draper 9061: 9060: 9059: 9055: 9051: 9047: 9046: 9045: 9042: 9040: 9034: 9033: 9032: 9028: 9024: 9020: 9016: 9015: 9014: 9013: 9010: 9008: 9002: 8998: 8994: 8990: 8989:Ari Fleischer 8986: 8982: 8967: 8963: 8959: 8954: 8953: 8952: 8948: 8944: 8939: 8935: 8934: 8933: 8932: 8931: 8930: 8929: 8925: 8921: 8917: 8913: 8912: 8911: 8910: 8906: 8902: 8898: 8893: 8883: 8879: 8875: 8871: 8867: 8866: 8865: 8864: 8860: 8856: 8852: 8848: 8837: 8833: 8829: 8825: 8821: 8820: 8819: 8815: 8811: 8807: 8803: 8799: 8798: 8797: 8793: 8789: 8785: 8780: 8775: 8771: 8767: 8766: 8765: 8764: 8760: 8756: 8751: 8749: 8742: 8737: 8734: 8731: 8727: 8723: 8719: 8714: 8710: 8705: 8701: 8697: 8693: 8681: 8677: 8673: 8669: 8665: 8661: 8658: 8654: 8653: 8649: 8648: 8643: 8642: 8635: 8631: 8627: 8624: 8620: 8613: 8612:edit conflict 8608: 8607: 8606: 8605: 8604: 8603: 8600: 8596: 8592: 8591:Lightbreather 8588: 8587: 8582: 8578: 8574: 8570: 8567: 8566: 8565: 8561: 8557: 8553: 8552: 8551: 8550: 8546: 8542: 8541:Lightbreather 8526: 8521: 8510: 8506: 8495: 8491: 8490: 8489: 8487: 8483: 8465: 8462: 8459: 8455: 8454: 8453: 8449: 8445: 8440: 8436: 8433: 8429: 8425: 8421: 8417: 8413: 8412: 8411: 8408: 8405: 8400: 8399: 8398: 8394: 8390: 8386: 8382: 8378: 8374: 8370: 8367: 8362: 8358: 8354: 8353: 8346: 8343: 8340: 8336: 8335: 8334: 8330: 8326: 8322: 8317: 8313: 8309: 8308: 8307: 8306: 8305: 8304: 8301: 8298: 8294: 8289: 8287: 8283: 8278: 8276: 8272: 8268: 8264: 8260: 8257: 8254: 8252: 8248: 8244: 8232: 8229: 8226: 8222: 8221: 8220: 8219: 8216: 8214: 8212: 8206: 8202: 8198: 8197:Village Voice 8194: 8190: 8189: 8184: 8183: 8178: 8177: 8176:Tattoo Nation 8172: 8159: 8152: 8148: 8144: 8140: 8136: 8134: 8130: 8126: 8122: 8118: 8117:banjo playing 8115: 8111: 8107: 8106:WP:Notability 8102: 8098: 8097: 8094: 8090: 8086: 8082: 8081: 8077: 8073: 8072: 8069: 8065: 8061: 8056: 8053: 8047: 8043: 8039: 8035: 8034: 8033: 8029: 8025: 8024:Lightbreather 8021: 8018: 8017: 8016: 8012: 8008: 8004: 8000: 7998: 7994: 7990: 7986: 7985: 7984: 7983: 7979: 7975: 7974:Lightbreather 7968: 7965: 7963: 7960: 7959: 7958: 7956: 7952: 7948: 7941: 7930: 7927: 7924: 7910: 7909: 7905: 7901: 7900:Lightbreather 7896: 7895: 7891: 7887: 7886:Lightbreather 7882: 7880: 7876: 7871: 7863: 7862: 7861: 7860: 7859: 7857: 7853: 7842: 7837: 7832: 7827: 7826: 7825: 7824: 7821: 7812: 7808: 7807: 7803: 7799: 7793: 7792: 7788: 7784: 7780: 7775: 7771: 7759: 7755: 7751: 7747: 7746: 7745: 7744: 7740: 7736: 7732: 7717: 7711: 7707: 7704: 7698: 7694: 7690: 7686: 7681: 7677: 7673: 7672: 7661: 7658: 7655: 7650: 7646: 7643: 7639: 7636: 7632: 7628: 7627: 7625: 7622: 7618: 7614: 7611: 7607: 7602: 7601: 7600: 7596: 7592: 7587: 7586: 7585: 7584: 7583: 7582: 7581: 7580: 7573: 7570: 7567: 7564: 7562: 7558: 7554: 7551: 7548: 7546: 7543: 7540: 7538: 7535: 7532: 7531: 7529: 7526: 7522: 7518: 7513: 7512: 7511: 7507: 7503: 7500: 7497: 7493: 7489: 7485: 7480: 7476: 7472: 7469: 7465: 7461: 7457: 7454:or not ? For 7453: 7452:their sources 7449: 7445: 7441: 7437: 7433: 7432: 7431: 7428: 7425: 7421: 7420: 7419: 7418: 7414: 7410: 7406: 7402: 7398: 7394: 7385: 7382: 7378: 7374: 7370: 7366: 7362: 7359: 7358: 7356: 7353: 7349: 7345: 7340: 7336: 7335: 7326: 7323: 7320: 7317: 7313: 7308: 7305: 7301: 7297: 7293: 7288: 7285: 7284: 7283: 7279: 7275: 7271: 7267: 7263: 7259: 7255: 7251: 7250:automatically 7247: 7246:automatically 7243: 7239: 7235: 7231: 7227: 7226: 7225: 7224: 7223: 7222: 7219: 7216: 7213: 7210: 7206: 7203: 7199: 7195: 7194: 7193: 7185: 7181: 7177: 7174: 7172: 7168: 7164: 7160: 7156: 7152: 7148: 7144: 7139: 7135: 7131: 7127: 7122: 7118: 7114: 7109: 7106: 7101: 7098: 7094: 7090: 7086: 7082: 7078: 7076: 7073: 7069: 7065: 7061: 7060: 7059: 7058: 7047: 7044: 7041: 7037: 7034: 7030: 7025: 7019: 7017: 7013: 7012: 7010: 7005: 7004: 7003: 6999: 6995: 6991: 6987: 6983: 6979: 6978: 6973: 6969: 6968: 6967: 6964: 6961: 6958: 6957: 6956: 6952: 6948: 6944: 6943: 6942: 6939: 6936: 6933: 6932: 6931: 6930: 6926: 6922: 6918: 6914: 6910: 6906: 6902: 6898: 6894: 6890: 6885: 6883: 6880: 6875: 6873: 6868: 6865: 6862: 6860: 6859: 6854: 6850: 6845: 6841: 6837: 6833: 6829: 6825: 6824: 6822: 6815: 6811: 6810:Swedification 6806: 6804: 6800: 6796: 6791: 6787: 6783: 6779: 6775: 6770: 6764: 6761: 6758: 6756:Göran Hansson 6755: 6752: 6750:Peter Broberg 6749: 6746: 6744: 6741: 6738: 6735: 6732: 6730: 6727: 6724: 6721: 6718: 6717: 6716: 6714: 6713:91-7586-384-7 6711: 6707: 6694: 6689: 6685: 6684:Contributions 6681: 6676: 6675: 6665: 6664: 6663: 6659: 6655: 6651: 6650: 6649: 6648: 6644: 6640: 6635: 6631: 6624: 6619: 6618: 6615: 6613: 6608: 6606: 6600: 6564: 6560: 6556: 6550: 6546:I agree with 6545: 6544: 6543: 6539: 6535: 6530: 6529: 6528: 6527: 6526: 6525: 6524: 6523: 6522: 6521: 6520: 6519: 6518: 6517: 6516: 6515: 6514: 6513: 6512: 6511: 6510: 6509: 6508: 6507: 6484: 6480: 6476: 6471: 6467: 6463: 6459: 6455: 6454: 6453: 6452: 6451: 6450: 6449: 6448: 6447: 6446: 6445: 6444: 6443: 6442: 6441: 6440: 6439: 6438: 6437: 6436: 6435: 6434: 6413: 6409: 6405: 6401: 6398: 6397: 6396: 6395: 6394: 6393: 6392: 6391: 6390: 6389: 6388: 6387: 6386: 6385: 6384: 6383: 6382: 6381: 6380: 6379: 6360: 6356: 6352: 6347: 6346: 6345: 6344: 6343: 6342: 6341: 6340: 6339: 6338: 6337: 6336: 6335: 6334: 6333: 6332: 6331: 6330: 6313: 6309: 6305: 6300: 6295: 6294: 6293: 6292: 6291: 6290: 6289: 6288: 6287: 6286: 6285: 6284: 6283: 6282: 6281: 6280: 6265: 6261: 6257: 6252: 6247: 6242: 6241: 6240: 6239: 6238: 6237: 6236: 6235: 6234: 6233: 6232: 6231: 6230: 6229: 6213: 6209: 6204: 6203: 6202: 6201: 6200: 6199: 6198: 6197: 6196: 6195: 6194: 6193: 6192: 6191: 6174: 6172: 6168: 6164: 6160: 6158: 6154: 6150: 6146: 6145: 6144: 6140: 6136: 6132: 6127: 6123: 6122: 6121: 6117: 6113: 6108: 6107: 6106: 6105: 6104: 6103: 6102: 6101: 6100: 6099: 6088: 6083: 6078: 6077: 6076: 6072: 6068: 6064: 6059: 6058: 6057: 6053: 6049: 6044: 6043: 6042: 6038: 6034: 6029: 6028: 6027: 6023: 6019: 6015: 6010: 6009: 6008: 6007: 6003: 5999: 5993: 5989: 5987: 5983: 5978: 5967: 5963: 5959: 5954: 5951: 5948: 5945: 5940: 5939: 5938: 5937: 5936: 5935: 5934: 5933: 5926: 5922: 5918: 5913: 5912: 5911: 5910: 5909: 5908: 5900: 5899: 5898: 5897: 5896: 5895: 5887: 5883: 5878: 5877: 5876: 5875: 5874: 5873: 5868: 5864: 5860: 5856: 5852: 5851: 5850: 5849: 5846: 5842: 5838: 5834: 5830: 5829: 5826: 5822: 5821: 5818: 5814: 5810: 5806: 5800: 5799:edit conflict 5795: 5794: 5791: 5787: 5783: 5779: 5778: 5777: 5776: 5772: 5768: 5764: 5760: 5756: 5748: 5747:invertebrates 5744: 5740: 5737: 5735: 5734:Neonicotinoid 5732: 5729: 5717: 5710: 5705: 5702: 5701: 5693: 5689: 5685: 5681: 5680: 5679: 5677: 5672: 5671: 5666: 5662: 5659: 5643: 5639: 5635: 5631: 5628: 5625: 5624: 5623: 5622: 5621: 5620: 5615: 5611: 5607: 5603: 5598: 5597: 5596: 5595: 5594: 5593: 5589: 5585: 5581: 5574: 5570: 5566: 5562: 5561: 5556: 5552: 5548: 5544: 5543: 5542: 5538: 5534: 5528: 5523: 5522: 5516: 5515: 5511: 5507: 5504: 5500: 5496: 5494: 5490: 5486: 5485: 5480: 5478: 5477:VICE magazine 5474: 5469: 5466: 5465: 5462: 5455: 5445: 5441: 5437: 5433: 5429: 5428: 5427: 5426: 5423: 5419: 5415: 5410: 5406: 5405: 5402: 5398: 5394: 5390: 5386: 5385: 5384: 5383: 5379: 5375: 5370: 5369: 5365: 5364: 5360: 5358: 5353: 5349: 5333: 5329: 5325: 5320: 5319: 5318: 5314: 5310: 5306: 5305: 5304: 5303: 5300: 5296: 5292: 5288: 5285: 5281: 5280: 5259: 5255: 5251: 5247: 5246: 5245: 5241: 5237: 5233: 5229: 5225: 5221: 5220: 5219: 5215: 5211: 5207: 5203: 5202: 5201: 5200: 5199: 5198: 5197: 5196: 5190: 5189: 5181: 5177: 5173: 5169: 5166: 5165: 5164: 5163: 5160: 5156: 5152: 5148: 5144: 5143: 5142: 5141: 5137: 5133: 5129: 5124: 5118: 5115: 5113: 5110: 5108: 5105: 5103: 5100: 5098: 5095: 5093: 5090: 5088: 5085: 5084: 5083: 5082: 5078: 5074: 5071: 5063: 5058: 5057: 5053: 5049: 5044: 5035: 5031: 5028: 5025: 5022: 5019: 5016: 5013: 5010: 5007: 5006: 5005: 5003: 4994: 4990: 4986: 4985: 4984: 4974: 4970: 4966: 4961: 4958: 4957: 4956: 4955: 4951: 4947: 4943: 4935: 4933: 4929: 4917: 4913: 4909: 4903: 4902: 4896: 4895: 4891: 4887: 4883: 4878: 4877: 4871: 4867: 4863: 4859: 4855: 4851: 4847: 4844: 4840: 4836: 4832: 4828: 4827: 4826: 4822: 4818: 4814: 4810: 4809: 4808: 4807: 4803: 4799: 4795: 4791: 4769: 4765: 4761: 4757: 4753: 4752:The A.V. Club 4749: 4745: 4741: 4740: 4739: 4735: 4731: 4727: 4722: 4721: 4720: 4716: 4712: 4707: 4701: 4693: 4688: 4685: 4684: 4683: 4679: 4675: 4671: 4668: 4667: 4666: 4663: 4654: 4650: 4646: 4645: 4644: 4640: 4636: 4631: 4630: 4629: 4625: 4621: 4616: 4612: 4608: 4604: 4600: 4596: 4595: 4594: 4593: 4592: 4591: 4588: 4579: 4569: 4565: 4561: 4556: 4551: 4548: 4544: 4538: 4535: 4534: 4533: 4532: 4530: 4527: 4523: 4519: 4518: 4517: 4516: 4515: 4514: 4509: 4505: 4501: 4497: 4495: 4491: 4487: 4483: 4482: 4481: 4477: 4473: 4469: 4464: 4460: 4457: 4454: 4449: 4444: 4441: 4438: 4434: 4433: 4431: 4430: 4429: 4428: 4424: 4420: 4406: 4402: 4398: 4394: 4389: 4388: 4387: 4383: 4379: 4374: 4370: 4367: 4363: 4360: 4357: 4353: 4352: 4351: 4347: 4343: 4338: 4334: 4331: 4326: 4322: 4317: 4316: 4315: 4314: 4311: 4307: 4303: 4299: 4295: 4292: 4288: 4285: 4279: 4275: 4272: 4268: 4265: 4264: 4263: 4262: 4259: 4255: 4251: 4246: 4245: 4241: 4238: 4234: 4230: 4228: 4224: 4221: 4218: 4215: 4211: 4207: 4204: 4203: 4202: 4176: 4172: 4168: 4164: 4163: 4162: 4158: 4154: 4149: 4146: 4145: 4144: 4143: 4142: 4141: 4140: 4139: 4138: 4137: 4136: 4135: 4134: 4133: 4132: 4131: 4116: 4112: 4108: 4103: 4100: 4099: 4098: 4094: 4090: 4086: 4083: 4082: 4081: 4077: 4073: 4069: 4068: 4067: 4063: 4059: 4054: 4053: 4052: 4048: 4044: 4040: 4039: 4038: 4034: 4030: 4026: 4022: 4021: 4020: 4016: 4012: 4008: 4004: 4003: 4002: 4001: 3997: 3993: 3989: 3984: 3980: 3976: 3963: 3959: 3955: 3951: 3947: 3944: 3941: 3940: 3939: 3938: 3937: 3933: 3929: 3924: 3920: 3916: 3913: 3910: 3907: 3902: 3899: 3896: 3892: 3891: 3890: 3889: 3882: 3878: 3874: 3870: 3869: 3868: 3867: 3866: 3865: 3864: 3858: 3854: 3850: 3846: 3842: 3839: 3836: 3832: 3829: 3825: 3822: 3821: 3819: 3817: 3813: 3809: 3804: 3800: 3797: 3792: 3788: 3784: 3779: 3775: 3774: 3773: 3772: 3768: 3764: 3748: 3744: 3740: 3736: 3731: 3728: 3725: 3723: 3719: 3716: 3713: 3709: 3706: 3702: 3699: 3695: 3692: 3688: 3685: 3684:The Kingsroad 3681: 3678: 3674: 3672: 3669: 3666: 3662: 3659: 3656: 3652: 3648: 3644: 3641: 3638: 3635: 3632: 3629: 3625: 3622: 3619: 3615: 3612: 3611: 3608: 3604: 3603: 3602: 3598: 3594: 3589: 3586: 3582: 3578: 3571: 3570:edit conflict 3566: 3565: 3564: 3563: 3562: 3561: 3560: 3559: 3541: 3540: 3539: 3535: 3531: 3526: 3525: 3522: 3518: 3514: 3511:episodes). — 3510: 3506: 3505: 3504: 3500: 3496: 3492: 3491: 3490: 3487: 3484: 3480: 3479: 3478: 3474: 3470: 3466: 3462: 3458: 3457: 3456: 3455: 3452: 3449: 3446: 3442: 3441: 3438: 3434: 3430: 3425: 3424: 3423: 3422: 3418: 3414: 3410: 3406: 3402: 3398: 3387: 3383: 3379: 3374: 3371: 3365: 3359: 3358: 3357: 3354: 3345: 3340: 3339: 3338: 3334: 3330: 3324: 3319: 3318: 3317: 3316: 3313: 3304: 3288: 3284: 3280: 3275: 3271: 3270: 3269: 3268: 3267: 3263: 3259: 3255: 3251: 3247: 3246: 3245: 3244: 3243: 3242: 3241: 3240: 3233: 3229: 3225: 3221: 3217: 3214: 3210: 3207:All GA-rated 3206: 3202: 3201: 3200: 3196: 3192: 3187: 3183: 3178: 3174: 3173: 3172: 3169: 3167: 3163: 3159: 3155: 3151: 3147: 3143: 3140: 3136: 3133: 3130: 3126: 3124: 3121: 3117: 3113: 3112: 3111: 3110: 3106: 3102: 3085: 3081: 3077: 3072: 3071: 3070: 3066: 3062: 3057: 3056: 3055: 3054: 3051: 3048: 3044: 3038: 3037: 3034: 3030: 3026: 3023: 3020: 3016: 3015: 3009: 3005: 3001: 3000: 2995: 2991: 2987: 2982: 2981: 2980: 2976: 2974: 2967: 2966: 2965: 2964: 2960: 2956: 2952: 2943: 2940: 2936: 2932: 2921: 2917: 2913: 2908: 2907: 2906: 2902: 2898: 2897:Willhesucceed 2893: 2889: 2888: 2887: 2877: 2876: 2875: 2872: 2863: 2859: 2855: 2851: 2847: 2846: 2845: 2841: 2837: 2833: 2828: 2827: 2826: 2825: 2821: 2817: 2812: 2810: 2806: 2804: 2799: 2789: 2785: 2781: 2776: 2772: 2771: 2770: 2769: 2765: 2763: 2758: 2756: 2749: 2745: 2741: 2737: 2727: 2726: 2722: 2718: 2714: 2695: 2691: 2687: 2683: 2679: 2675: 2674: 2673: 2672: 2671: 2667: 2663: 2659: 2655: 2651: 2648: 2642: 2640: 2636: 2632: 2631: 2630: 2625: 2621: 2616: 2612: 2608: 2604: 2600: 2599: 2598: 2595: 2589: 2587: 2583: 2579: 2575: 2574: 2573: 2572: 2569: 2563: 2561: 2557: 2556: 2551: 2547: 2546: 2541: 2537: 2536: 2531: 2527: 2526: 2521: 2517: 2513: 2509: 2490: 2486: 2482: 2478: 2474: 2470: 2469: 2468: 2467: 2466: 2465: 2464: 2460: 2456: 2452: 2448: 2446: 2441: 2437: 2432: 2428: 2425: 2424: 2423: 2422: 2418: 2414: 2407: 2404: 2403: 2402: 2400: 2366: 2362: 2358: 2354: 2353: 2352: 2348: 2344: 2339: 2338: 2337: 2333: 2329: 2325: 2324: 2323: 2319: 2315: 2310: 2306: 2303: 2299: 2298: 2297: 2293: 2289: 2286: 2281: 2279: 2275: 2271: 2266: 2265: 2264: 2260: 2256: 2251: 2250: 2249: 2245: 2241: 2237: 2232: 2228: 2222: 2217: 2216: 2215: 2211: 2207: 2204: 2199: 2197: 2193: 2189: 2185: 2184: 2183: 2179: 2175: 2171: 2170: 2169: 2168: 2167: 2166: 2165: 2164: 2153: 2152: 2151: 2147: 2143: 2139: 2134: 2133: 2132: 2131: 2130: 2129: 2124: 2120: 2116: 2112: 2111: 2110: 2109: 2103: 2100: 2097: 2092: 2091: 2090: 2089: 2086: 2082: 2078: 2073: 2072: 2068: 2065: 2064: 2063: 2062: 2058: 2054: 2026: 2022: 2018: 2017: 2016: 2015: 2014: 2013: 2012: 2011: 2010: 2009: 2008: 2007: 2006: 2005: 2004: 2003: 2002: 2001: 2000: 1999: 1998: 1997: 1976: 1972: 1968: 1964: 1961: 1960: 1959: 1958: 1957: 1956: 1955: 1954: 1953: 1952: 1951: 1950: 1949: 1948: 1947: 1946: 1945: 1944: 1943: 1942: 1918: 1914: 1913: 1912: 1911: 1910: 1909: 1908: 1907: 1906: 1905: 1904: 1903: 1902: 1901: 1900: 1899: 1898: 1897: 1896: 1895: 1894: 1893: 1868: 1864: 1861: 1860: 1859: 1858: 1857: 1856: 1855: 1854: 1853: 1852: 1851: 1850: 1849: 1848: 1847: 1846: 1845: 1844: 1843: 1842: 1841: 1840: 1820: 1819: 1818: 1817: 1816: 1815: 1814: 1813: 1812: 1811: 1810: 1809: 1808: 1807: 1806: 1805: 1804: 1803: 1786: 1782: 1778: 1774: 1773: 1772: 1771: 1770: 1769: 1768: 1767: 1766: 1765: 1764: 1763: 1762: 1761: 1760: 1759: 1744: 1740: 1736: 1731: 1728: 1727: 1726: 1725: 1724: 1723: 1722: 1721: 1720: 1719: 1718: 1717: 1716: 1715: 1700: 1696: 1692: 1687: 1686: 1685: 1684: 1683: 1682: 1681: 1680: 1679: 1678: 1677: 1676: 1675: 1674: 1673: 1656: 1652: 1648: 1644: 1643: 1642: 1638: 1634: 1630: 1626: 1625: 1624: 1620: 1616: 1612: 1608: 1604: 1599: 1595: 1594: 1593: 1592: 1591: 1590: 1589: 1588: 1587: 1586: 1577: 1573: 1569: 1565: 1561: 1556: 1552: 1548: 1543: 1542: 1541: 1540: 1539: 1538: 1537: 1536: 1529: 1525: 1521: 1517: 1513: 1509: 1508: 1507: 1503: 1499: 1495: 1491: 1488: 1487: 1486: 1485: 1484: 1477: 1473: 1469: 1465: 1464: 1463: 1462: 1459: 1455: 1451: 1447: 1443: 1442: 1441: 1436:inflammatory. 1434: 1433: 1429: 1425: 1424: 1423: 1420: 1418: 1414: 1407: 1406: 1405: 1404: 1400: 1396: 1387: 1383: 1379: 1375: 1371: 1367: 1366: 1365: 1361: 1357: 1352: 1351: 1350: 1349: 1345: 1341: 1328: 1324: 1320: 1316: 1312: 1308: 1307: 1306: 1302: 1298: 1294: 1290: 1289: 1288: 1284: 1280: 1276: 1272: 1268: 1263: 1259: 1258: 1257: 1256: 1250: 1246: 1242: 1238: 1234: 1230: 1224: 1219: 1218: 1217: 1216: 1213: 1209: 1205: 1201: 1198: 1197: 1190: 1187: 1182: 1181: 1176: 1172: 1171: 1170: 1166: 1162: 1158: 1154: 1153: 1152: 1148: 1144: 1140: 1136: 1132: 1129:See both the 1128: 1127: 1126: 1125: 1121: 1117: 1111: 1108: 1105: 1101: 1097: 1093: 1092: 1091: 1089: 1085: 1074: 1070: 1066: 1062: 1058: 1054: 1053: 1046: 1043: 1033: 1029: 1028: 1027: 1023: 1019: 1015: 1014: 1013: 1009: 1005: 1001: 998: 994: 993: 992: 991: 987: 983: 978: 975: 967: 966: 962: 958: 954: 949: 948: 944: 940: 932: 928: 924: 920: 915: 914: 907: 904: 901: 896: 892: 891: 890: 885: 884: 883: 879: 875: 871: 866: 863: 862: 861: 860: 856: 852: 848: 844: 825: 821: 817: 813: 809: 805: 804: 803: 802: 801: 800: 799: 795: 791: 787: 783: 780: 779: 778: 777: 773: 769: 765: 761: 757: 750: 738: 734: 730: 729: 723: 722: 721: 720: 719: 718: 717: 716: 712: 708: 703: 698: 693: 691: 687: 682: 679: 668: 667: 663: 659: 655: 641: 637: 633: 629: 627: 625: 623: 622: 621: 617: 613: 609: 606: 604: 601: 597: 593: 590: 586: 581: 580: 579: 578: 574: 570: 566: 562: 560: 552: 549: 548: 547: 545: 533: 529: 525: 521: 517: 512: 508: 503: 500: 499: 494: 490: 486: 482: 478: 476: 472: 466: 461: 460: 459: 455: 451: 447: 443: 439: 438: 437: 436: 432: 426: 422: 418: 412: 409: 405: 400: 397: 393: 389: 382: 374: 371: 361: 357: 353: 352: 351: 348: 342: 340: 335: 328: 324: 320: 315: 310: 305: 301: 300: 295: 294:Joodse Omroep 291: 287: 283: 282: 273: 269: 265: 260: 259: 258: 253: 249: 244: 239: 237: 233: 229: 225: 221: 218: 217: 216: 212: 208: 204: 199: 195: 190: 186: 182: 181: 180: 176: 172: 168: 164: 163: 162: 161: 157: 153: 148: 144: 140: 135: 131: 126: 122: 118: 117: 109: 100: 97: 95: 92: 90: 87: 84: 80: 78: 75: 73: 70: 67: 65: 62: 61: 53: 49: 45: 44: 39: 32: 31: 23: 19: 11095:noticeboard 11082: 11052: 11038: 11025: 10943:this article 10940: 10887: 10883: 10870: 10799: 10785:accordingly. 10781: 10762: 10757: 10753: 10696: 10692: 10688: 10684: 10680: 10676: 10672: 10668: 10516: 10497: 10477: 10466: 10460: 10452: 10444: 10408:WP:ABOUTSELF 10403: 10399: 10396:this article 10393: 10389: 10384: 10378: 10339: 10335: 10331: 10327: 10319: 10301: 10293: 10214: 10202: 10197: 10190: 10178: 10164: 10111:AndyTheGrump 10099: 10094:contrary to 10086: 10034:for 5 days. 10031: 10024: 9980: 9975:"? Doesn't 9972: 9874: 9870: 9829: 9828: 9824: 9816: 9757:Bataan Diary 9755: 9753: 9750:Bataan Diary 9713: 9693:Working link 9672: 9632: 9626: 9616: 9590: 9573: 9537: 9527: 9486:AndyTheGrump 9464: 9447: 9400: 9375: 9345: 9335: 9301: 9295: 9289: 9271: 9256: 9208: 9197: 9144: 9134: 9086: 9072: 9068: 9038: 9019:WP:NOTAFORUM 9006: 8980: 8978: 8937: 8916:Ben Domenech 8892:Fine Article 8886: 8850: 8846: 8844: 8788:AndyTheGrump 8778: 8773: 8769: 8752: 8748:Fine Article 8738: 8735: 8689: 8645: 8621:. Also, see 8538: 8529:. Retrieved 8513:. Retrieved 8498:. Retrieved 8479: 8385:p. 1161-1164 8366:Daniel Woolf 8361:Western Zhou 8356: 8320: 8292: 8290: 8285: 8281: 8279: 8274: 8270: 8266: 8263:Daniel Woolf 8261: 8258: 8255: 8240: 8210: 8186: 8180: 8175: 8168: 8157: 8112:- Just your 7971: 7950: 7944: 7935: 7897: 7883: 7872: 7869: 7850: 7809: 7794: 7773: 7767: 7729: 7710: 7702: 7679: 7675: 7644:is published 7642:333-årsboken 7641: 7635:333-årsboken 7634: 7630: 7616: 7609: 7604: 7560: 7549: 7541: 7533: 7495: 7491: 7478: 7474: 7467: 7463: 7459: 7455: 7451: 7447: 7443: 7435: 7404: 7400: 7396: 7390: 7373:333-årsboken 7372: 7343: 7315: 7311: 7270:Scanian ones 7265: 7253: 7249: 7245: 7237: 7229: 7201: 7190: 7170: 7166: 7146: 7142: 7137: 7133: 7129: 7126:Malmöhus län 7116: 7112: 7103: 7092: 7084: 7080: 7074: 7067: 7063: 7014: 7009:333-årsboken 7008: 6989: 6985: 6981: 6976: 6975: 6971: 6888: 6886: 6881: 6876: 6871: 6869: 6866: 6863: 6857: 6856: 6848: 6843: 6839: 6835: 6827: 6826: 6817: 6813: 6809: 6807: 6802: 6771: 6768: 6753:Arne Källsbo 6733:K. Arne Blom 6705: 6704: 6668: 6627: 6611: 6604: 6596: 6549:Kingofaces43 6475:Kingofaces43 6351:Kingofaces43 6297: 6256:Kingofaces43 6250: 6211: 6208:WP:FRINGE/PS 6129: 6112:Kingofaces43 6086: 6082:WP:RSOPINION 6061: 6033:Kingofaces43 6012: 5998:Kingofaces43 5994: 5990: 5979: 5976: 5917:Kingofaces43 5837:Kingofaces43 5763:WP:SECONDARY 5752: 5720:. Retrieved 5715: 5673: 5667: 5663: 5655: 5626: 5601: 5577: 5501: 5497: 5492: 5488: 5487: 5481: 5470: 5467: 5458: 5453: 5371: 5366: 5361: 5345: 5284:Ali Khamenei 5231: 5226:"? Doesn't 5223: 5125: 5121: 5080: 5079: 5075: 5067: 5039: 5020:Jochen Gerz; 4999: 4982: 4939: 4920:. Retrieved 4912:The Next Web 4911: 4899:The Next Web 4879: 4874: 4853: 4850:this article 4812: 4794:Ali Khamenei 4789: 4755: 4751: 4747: 4726:WP:ABOUTSELF 4700:DrFleischman 4652: 4648: 4576: 4554: 4536: 4525: 4521: 4453:WP:ABOUTSELF 4415: 4392: 4372: 4355: 4329: 4290: 4277: 4239: 4232: 4225: 4219: 4213: 4209: 4205: 4200: 4024: 3987: 3983:Language Log 3982: 3978: 3974: 3972: 3949: 3918: 3911: 3905: 3863: 3834: 3827: 3802: 3795: 3790: 3787:WP:CONSENSUS 3782: 3759: 3650: 3646: 3606: 3605:It actually 3581:crufty lists 3576: 3508: 3460: 3394: 3369: 3302: 3301: 3273: 3212: 3208: 3185: 3181: 3176: 3170: 3138: 3128: 3097: 3042:RGloucester 3012: 3007: 2972: 2949: 2935:12.48.129.10 2929:— Preceding 2926: 2885: 2857: 2849: 2813: 2807: 2800: 2797: 2761: 2754: 2733: 2710: 2684:. Thanks. -- 2677: 2606: 2603:"about" page 2553: 2543: 2533: 2523: 2505: 2479:. Thanks. -- 2472: 2451:WP:ABOUTSELF 2410: 2396: 2304: 2101:. and here: 2049: 1671: 1493: 1482: 1439: 1421: 1411: 1392: 1337: 1292: 1179: 1114: 1103: 1099: 1094:The article 1083: 1082: 1031: 1004:Precision123 996: 979: 976: 973: 950: 935: 895:Jayson Blair 869: 840: 814:. Thanks. -- 807: 782:Not reliable 781: 754: 726: 704: 700: 695: 683: 674: 651: 588: 584: 563: 555: 550: 541: 505: 446:WP:IMPARTIAL 414: 410: 406: 402: 385: 346: 343: 338: 333: 331: 313: 304:This article 297: 286:De Telegraaf 285: 202: 197: 194:De Telegraaf 193: 189:De Telegraaf 188: 184: 147:De Telegraaf 146: 134:Maup Caransa 124: 121:De Telegraaf 120: 116:De Telegraaf 114: 112: 108:De Telegraaf 107: 82: 47: 41: 11034:Robert Fisk 11006:Kingsindian 10977:Itsmejudith 10947:Kingsindian 10925:Kingsindian 10910:Itsmejudith 10894:Kingsindian 10890:attribution 10874:Itsmejudith 10856:Itsmejudith 10837:Kingsindian 10830:Itsmejudith 10803:Itsmejudith 10766:Kingsindian 10653:Kingsindian 10649:Exceptional 10592:Itsmejudith 10577:Kingsindian 10567:Itsmejudith 10537:Itsmejudith 10501:Kingsindian 10481:Robert Fisk 10036:Kingsindian 9985:Worldedixor 9955:Worldedixor 9921:Worldedixor 9504:finds only 9079:Terry Moran 8847:correctness 8808:sources. -- 8486:Megan Leigh 8444:Ian.thomson 8428:WP:TERTIARY 8389:Ian.thomson 8325:Sevilledade 8243:Sevilledade 8211:I, JethroBT 8121:drag racing 7783:Betty Logan 7750:Itsmejudith 7405:general ban 7393:Uno Röndahl 7163:Helsingborg 6901:Scandinavia 6882:general ban 6872:extremistic 6739:Helmer Lång 6729:Uno Röndahl 6719:Lars Larson 6555:Kingsindian 6296:How about, 6131:treatments. 5309:Itsmejudith 5236:Worldedixor 5206:Worldedixor 5172:Worldedixor 4993:Prix Pictet 4942:Databending 4932:Databending 4831:Itsmejudith 4448:independent 4330:four months 4151:article? - 3513:Crisco 1492 3250:back in May 2343:Iryna Harpy 2314:Iryna Harpy 2302:an obituary 2270:Iryna Harpy 2240:Iryna Harpy 1633:Iryna Harpy 1568:Iryna Harpy 1498:Iryna Harpy 1378:Iryna Harpy 1356:Iryna Harpy 1319:Iryna Harpy 1279:Iryna Harpy 1143:Iryna Harpy 1139:WP:COATRACK 1102:: POV and 1018:Formerly 98 481:WP:INVOLVED 465:LeadSongDog 425:LeadSongDog 345:similar to 290:publication 139:Master Race 99:Archive 180 94:Archive 179 89:Archive 178 83:Archive 177 77:Archive 176 72:Archive 175 64:Archive 170 40:This is an 22:Noticeboard 10453:References 9737:Melonkelon 9732:about page 9696:Darkfrog24 9559:interviews 9001:David Frum 8531:2008-01-08 8515:2008-01-08 8500:2009-07-30 8496:. IAFD.com 8414:True, but 8110:Scalhotrod 7951:especially 7779:WP:TWITTER 7774:unverified 7703:References 7462:is this a 7436:reginalism 7202:everything 7147:immidiatly 6911:-history, 6907:-history, 6903:-history, 6844:foundation 6795:Snapphanar 6212:scientific 6163:Darkfrog24 6126:WP:ALLEGED 5761:says that 5291:Ism schism 4946:Hybernator 4817:Darkfrog24 4798:Ism schism 4760:Darkfrog24 4744:Oathkeeper 4711:Darkfrog24 4553:exists to 4463:WP:BALASPS 4432:5 points: 4378:Darkfrog24 4302:Darkfrog24 4281:threshold. 4270:inclusion. 4167:Darkfrog24 4107:Darkfrog24 4089:Darkfrog24 4058:Darkfrog24 4029:Darkfrog24 4011:Darkfrog24 3992:Darkfrog24 3954:Darkfrog24 3928:Darkfrog24 3739:Darkfrog24 3653:episode: 3495:Darkfrog24 3469:Darkfrog24 3429:Darkfrog24 3397:due weight 3378:Darkfrog24 3279:Darkfrog24 3224:Darkfrog24 3204:backwards. 3186:Doctor Who 3158:Darkfrog24 3154:Oathkeeper 2955:Ism schism 2862:WP:PRIMARY 2803:\apgnation 2639:Cúchullain 2605:), but it 2586:Cúchullain 2560:Cúchullain 2312:convey. -- 1514:And here ( 1223:Poeticbent 1180:Poeticbent 1177:. Thanks, 1000:WP:SELFPUB 887:audience. 874:Darkfrog24 768:Dougweller 707:NickAtNOAA 516:WP:PRIMARY 470:come howl! 430:come howl! 334:apparently 299:Het Parool 11062:Nishidani 10719:Dailycare 10693:The Times 10445:Article: 10394:He wrote 10359:media. -- 9977:WP:NONENG 9879:page. -- 9768:had been 9718:from the 9570:Ed Powers 8870:WP:WEIGHT 8784:WP:WEIGHT 8770:connected 8381:Routledge 8316:talk page 8314:. On the 8253:article. 7591:Boeing720 7525:Croatians 7523:and even 7502:Boeing720 7409:Boeing720 7377:Skåneland 7339:Boeing720 7292:Elfdalian 7274:Boeing720 7238:assembled 7176:Boeing720 6994:Boeing720 6947:Boeing720 6921:Boeing720 6897:Skåneland 6887:Possible 6788:aswll as 6466:consensus 6299:wildlife. 6063:wildlife. 6014:wildlife. 5986:WP:FRINGE 5658:IndianBio 5547:bobrayner 5545:I agree. 5357:Urartians 5228:WP:NONENG 5130:page. -- 4930:Article: 4692:Elaqueate 4214:Star Wars 3585:synthetic 3150:this text 3120:About Us. 3061:Dailycare 2848:You say, 2809:\gamenosh 2744:Peggy Lee 1086:believes 953:Retartist 939:MicBenSte 851:Retartist 755:This page 632:Guy Macon 591:say that? 569:Guy Macon 542:I am the 520:WP:FRINGE 354:Shorter: 309:this link 224:Beth Haim 220:Viriditas 207:Viriditas 152:Viriditas 11089:WP:UNDUE 10782:LA Times 10426:UNDUE.-- 10341:MastCell 10141:WP:BEANS 10089:GeoNames 10083:GeoNames 9953:Thanks, 9813:– Israel 9655:Gaijin42 9600:Gaijin42 9425:this gem 9383:Gaijin42 9337:The Week 9267:WP:Truth 8938:actually 8626:Gaijin42 8573:Gaijin42 8556:Gaijin42 8038:Gaijin42 8007:Gaijin42 7689:Johnuniq 7621:Klågerup 7517:Catalans 7348:Bishonen 7344:opinions 7300:kalixmål 7258:Malmö FF 7151:Malmö FF 7068:by force 7033:Catalans 6889:articles 6830:is that 6790:Bornholm 6786:Blekinge 6458:WP:MEDRS 6400:WP:SCIRS 6246:WP:SCIRS 5950:reliable 5886:WP:MEDRS 5882:WP:SCIRS 5759:WP:MEDRS 5722:19 March 5634:Pincrete 5606:Pincrete 5527:Pincrete 5506:Pincrete 5409:the book 5374:Steverci 5204:Thanks, 5064:– Israel 5033:annually 4916:Archived 4904:Source: 4886:Trodbowl 4854:Reuters. 3215:of them. 3184:and the 2931:unsigned 2780:Ghmyrtle 2717:Gaijin42 2682:this one 2635:Middle 8 2620:contribs 2615:Middle 8 2558:film."-- 2548:, and a 2518:to be a 2477:this one 2436:contribs 2431:Middle 8 2174:Faustian 2115:Faustian 2077:Faustian 1967:Faustian 1870:camp..." 1735:Faustian 1691:Faustian 1555:articles 1450:Faustian 1267:WP:LABEL 1241:about us 1204:Faustian 1157:Volhynia 997:See also 870:systemic 845:Reasons: 812:this one 764:Fedspeak 749:Fedspeak 658:VictorD7 450:Ronnotel 248:contribs 243:Middle 8 20:‎ | 11093:WP:NPOV 10780:As the 10685:Judaism 10404:factual 10219:Collect 10143:here.-- 10067:P123ct1 9999:P123ct1 9959:P123ct1 9900:P123ct1 9881:P123ct1 9817:In the 9679:Piandme 9578:Guy1890 8943:Collect 8855:Collect 8779:haven't 8709:protect 8704:history 8672:Guy1890 8655:As per 8418:. Per 8293:I Ching 8251:I Ching 8114:average 8085:Guy1890 7649:Sättern 7631:erkända 7521:Basques 7209:WP:NPOV 7159:Olympia 7085:compare 6980:, then 6909:Denmark 6828:Problem 6814:Primary 6782:Halland 6304:EllenCT 5982:WP:NPOV 5953:sources 5944:several 5804:outlets 5767:EllenCT 5738:Context 5730:Article 5533:EllenCT 5282:In the 5250:P123ct1 5210:P123ct1 5151:P123ct1 5132:P123ct1 5068:In the 4965:EllenCT 4922:28 July 4547:Protonk 4526:another 4319:myself. 3917:I have 3845:WP:GACR 3613:AV Club 3509:X-Files 3465:AV Club 2984:lead.-- 2910:stuff. 2762:***D.D. 2755:I Am... 2607:doesn't 2550:prequel 2532:of the 2236:soapbox 1370:Hegvald 1340:Hegvald 1237:authors 1233:WP:INDY 1032:quoting 171:Kleuske 130:article 43:archive 11085:WP:RSN 10991:Shrike 10963:Shrike 10715:source 10687:, and 10675:, and 10626:Shrike 10612:Shrike 10552:Nick-D 10493:author 10361:Obsidi 10336:Post's 10297:WP:SPS 10263:editor 10237:a13ean 10145:Shrike 9796:Nick-D 9561:(See: 9379:Morwen 8999:, and 8806:WP:BLP 8713:delete 8461:(tock) 8432:WP:DUE 8407:(tock) 8383:2008, 8375:, ed. 8357:Yijing 8342:(tock) 8300:(tock) 8228:(tock) 8199:, and 8195:, the 8129:(Talk) 8125:cowboy 7955:WP:BLP 7254:either 6905:Sweden 6893:Scania 6778:Scania 6706:Source 6670:Occult 6654:Shrike 6634:wp:sps 6470:WP:BRD 5703:Source 5389:WP:BLP 4754:, and 4670:Bingo! 4545:While 4233:should 4227:WP:IAR 4025:Anyone 3655:Baelor 3634:Forbes 3626:(also 3407:or an 3360:Wait, 3349:TRPoD 3344:WP:SPS 3308:TRPoD 3177:solely 3116:WP:SPS 2986:Kmhkmh 2858:beyond 2611:WP:SPS 2540:remake 2530:reboot 2506:Would 2357:Cathry 2328:Cathry 2288:Cathry 2255:Cathry 2227:Dyukov 2221:Cathry 2206:Cathry 2188:Cathry 2142:Cathry 2053:Cathry 1862:Here: 1777:Cathry 1647:Cathry 1615:Cathry 1560:fringe 1551:hnn.us 1520:Cathry 1490:Cathry 1468:Cathry 1412:Here: 1395:Cathry 1374:his CV 1235:. See 1057:WP:SPS 903:(tock) 654:an RFC 589:didn't 544:WP:DRN 341:said. 339:wasn't 319:Drmies 264:Drmies 228:Drmies 10677:Azure 10430:Elvey 10385:about 10357:WP:RS 10353:WP:RS 9622:WP:RS 9533:WP:RS 9448:Kelly 9429:WP:RS 9421:Alsee 9407:talk 9346:Kelly 9302:Kelly 9276:Alsee 9263:WP:RS 9257:Kelly 9198:Kelly 9178:WP:RS 9145:Kelly 9114:WP:RS 9087:Kelly 9039:Kelly 9007:Kelly 8901:Alsee 8755:Alsee 8730:views 8722:watch 8718:links 8482:WP:RS 8420:WP:RS 8205:cholo 8182:Inked 7947:WP:RS 7879:WP:RS 7856:WP:RS 7836:cont. 7657:Peter 7569:Peter 7427:Peter 7381:Peter 7322:Peter 7215:Peter 7192:of. 7161:, in 7043:Peter 6963:Peter 6938:Peter 6919:etc. 6879:Peter 6853:Peter 6832:Peter 6605:Green 6462:WP:RS 5947:other 5712:(PDF) 5471:"The 5048:RexxS 4882:Setad 4858:Setad 4297:time. 3919:never 3828:forum 3803:maybe 3647:every 3628:twice 3618:twice 3556:break 3219:time. 3144:This 2950:This 2234:as a 1297:Xx236 1271:WP:RS 1161:Xx236 1116:Xx236 843:WP:RS 758:from 733:talk 203:their 16:< 11097:here 11066:talk 10995:talk 10981:talk 10967:talk 10914:talk 10860:talk 10807:talk 10791:talk 10737:talk 10723:talk 10705:talk 10630:talk 10616:talk 10596:talk 10573:here 10556:talk 10541:talk 10526:talk 10489:this 10485:this 10428:{{U| 10416:talk 10400:only 10365:talk 10308:talk 10283:talk 10241:talk 10223:talk 10184:and 10149:talk 10131:talk 10115:talk 10100:only 10071:talk 10057:talk 10040:talk 10003:talk 9989:talk 9963:talk 9925:talk 9904:talk 9896:here 9885:talk 9877:ISIS 9800:talk 9782:talk 9741:talk 9700:talk 9683:talk 9659:talk 9639:talk 9604:talk 9582:talk 9548:talk 9514:talk 9490:talk 9475:talk 9434:Gaba 9387:talk 9326:talk 9316:not. 9280:talk 9216:talk 9186:talk 9122:talk 9054:talk 9027:talk 8962:talk 8947:talk 8924:talk 8905:talk 8897:Fark 8878:talk 8859:talk 8832:talk 8814:talk 8792:talk 8774:read 8759:talk 8726:logs 8700:talk 8696:edit 8676:talk 8668:IAFD 8630:talk 8619:WP:V 8595:talk 8577:talk 8560:talk 8545:talk 8458:Shii 8448:talk 8404:Shii 8393:talk 8339:Shii 8329:talk 8297:Shii 8273:and 8247:here 8225:Shii 8185:and 8147:talk 8131:☮ღ☺ 8127:... 8089:talk 8064:talk 8042:talk 8028:talk 8011:talk 7993:talk 7978:talk 7953:for 7904:talk 7890:talk 7811:Here 7802:talk 7787:talk 7754:talk 7739:talk 7693:talk 7595:talk 7506:talk 7413:talk 7401:what 7361:Here 7352:talk 7296:Sami 7287:This 7278:talk 7180:talk 7153:and 7138:that 7091:'s " 6998:talk 6951:talk 6925:talk 6784:and 6710:ISBN 6680:Talk 6673:Zone 6658:talk 6643:talk 6630:this 6559:talk 6538:talk 6479:talk 6408:talk 6355:talk 6308:talk 6260:talk 6167:talk 6153:talk 6139:talk 6133:? -- 6116:talk 6071:talk 6052:talk 6037:talk 6022:talk 6002:talk 5962:talk 5921:talk 5863:talk 5841:talk 5813:talk 5786:talk 5771:talk 5753:The 5724:2013 5688:talk 5676:here 5638:talk 5610:talk 5588:talk 5569:talk 5551:talk 5537:talk 5510:talk 5489:Note 5440:talk 5418:talk 5397:talk 5378:talk 5328:talk 5313:talk 5295:talk 5254:talk 5240:talk 5214:talk 5176:talk 5155:talk 5147:here 5136:talk 5128:ISIS 5052:talk 4969:talk 4959:Per 4950:talk 4924:2014 4890:talk 4866:talk 4835:talk 4821:talk 4802:talk 4764:talk 4734:talk 4728:. -- 4715:talk 4678:talk 4639:talk 4624:talk 4603:talk 4564:talk 4504:talk 4490:talk 4476:talk 4423:talk 4401:talk 4382:talk 4346:talk 4306:talk 4254:talk 4212:and 4171:talk 4157:talk 4111:talk 4093:talk 4076:talk 4062:talk 4047:talk 4033:talk 4015:talk 3996:talk 3958:talk 3932:talk 3922:me." 3912:Most 3877:talk 3853:talk 3812:talk 3767:talk 3743:talk 3597:talk 3534:talk 3517:talk 3499:talk 3473:talk 3467:... 3433:talk 3417:talk 3382:talk 3333:talk 3283:talk 3274:want 3262:talk 3252:and 3228:talk 3195:talk 3162:talk 3105:talk 3080:talk 3065:talk 3029:talk 2990:talk 2959:talk 2939:talk 2916:talk 2901:talk 2860:the 2840:talk 2820:talk 2784:talk 2740:this 2738:and 2736:this 2734:Are 2721:talk 2690:talk 2666:talk 2516:seem 2508:this 2485:talk 2459:talk 2417:talk 2361:talk 2347:talk 2332:talk 2318:talk 2292:talk 2274:talk 2259:talk 2244:talk 2210:talk 2192:talk 2178:talk 2146:talk 2119:talk 2081:talk 2057:talk 2025:here 2023:and 2021:here 1971:talk 1781:talk 1739:talk 1695:talk 1651:talk 1637:talk 1631:. -- 1619:talk 1572:talk 1524:talk 1502:talk 1472:talk 1454:talk 1399:talk 1382:talk 1360:talk 1344:talk 1323:talk 1301:talk 1283:talk 1208:talk 1185:talk 1165:talk 1147:talk 1141:. -- 1120:talk 1069:talk 1063:. -- 1022:talk 1008:talk 986:talk 961:talk 943:talk 927:talk 900:Shii 893:The 878:talk 855:talk 820:talk 794:talk 772:talk 711:talk 662:talk 636:talk 616:talk 573:talk 528:talk 489:talk 454:talk 358:and 323:talk 268:talk 232:talk 211:talk 175:talk 156:talk 10491:by 10328:not 10320:may 10235:. 10215:not 10206:GNG 10053:TFD 9617:Is 9528:Is 9402:DGG 9067:of 9021:. 8874:TFD 8387:. 8141:. 8101:Guy 7831:2/0 7816:__ 7680:and 7676:and 7647:by 7423:it. 7134:for 7113:all 6851:of 6688:Log 6628:Is 6601:-- 5884:or 5857:. 5432:god 5414:TFD 4862:TFD 4860:. 4852:in 4748:IGN 4706:RfC 4658:__ 4583:__ 4555:not 4393:can 4373:not 4278:and 4210:GoT 3979:way 3952:. 3796:GoT 3791:two 3717:) ( 3703:) 3660:) ( 3624:i09 3583:of 3461:and 3409:RFC 3346:-- 3305:-- 3213:All 3139:not 3076:TFD 3025:TFD 2867:__ 2750:). 2637:.-- 2624:COI 2584:.-- 2542:of 2440:COI 1090:. 1038:__ 728:DGG 507:it. 417:doi 392:doi 366:__ 252:COI 198:not 185:not 11099:. 11068:) 11036:, 10997:) 10983:) 10969:) 10916:) 10862:) 10809:) 10793:) 10739:) 10725:) 10707:) 10683:, 10671:, 10632:) 10618:) 10598:) 10558:) 10543:) 10528:) 10432:}} 10418:) 10367:) 10310:) 10285:) 10243:) 10225:) 10198:is 10151:) 10133:) 10117:) 10073:) 10059:) 10042:) 10005:) 9991:) 9965:) 9927:) 9906:) 9887:) 9802:) 9784:) 9743:) 9702:) 9685:) 9661:) 9641:) 9633:-- 9624:? 9620:a 9606:) 9584:) 9572:' 9550:) 9542:? 9535:? 9531:a 9516:) 9492:) 9477:) 9469:-- 9409:) 9389:) 9328:) 9282:) 9218:) 9188:) 9124:) 9056:) 9029:) 9003:. 8991:, 8964:) 8949:) 8926:) 8907:) 8880:) 8861:) 8834:) 8816:) 8794:) 8761:) 8728:| 8724:| 8720:| 8716:| 8711:| 8707:| 8702:| 8698:| 8678:) 8666:, 8632:) 8597:) 8579:) 8562:) 8547:) 8539:-- 8488:? 8450:) 8395:) 8379:, 8331:) 8277:. 8245:, 8149:) 8123:, 8119:, 8091:) 8066:) 8044:) 8030:) 8022:. 8013:) 7995:) 7980:) 7972:-- 7957:? 7949:- 7906:) 7892:) 7884:-- 7881:? 7877:a 7870:? 7854:a 7804:) 7789:) 7756:) 7741:) 7695:) 7687:. 7597:) 7519:, 7508:) 7477:- 7446:, 7440:EU 7415:) 7371:. 7357:. 7350:| 7280:) 7260:- 7182:) 7143:no 7130:No 7011:: 7000:) 6972:if 6953:) 6927:) 6915:, 6899:, 6895:, 6816:- 6805:. 6780:, 6686:• 6682:• 6660:) 6645:) 6561:) 6540:) 6481:) 6464:. 6410:) 6357:) 6310:) 6262:) 6169:) 6155:) 6141:) 6118:) 6073:) 6054:) 6039:) 6024:) 6004:) 5984:, 5964:) 5923:) 5865:) 5843:) 5815:) 5788:) 5773:) 5714:. 5690:) 5640:) 5629::- 5612:) 5590:) 5571:) 5553:) 5539:) 5512:) 5495:. 5442:) 5420:) 5399:) 5380:) 5330:) 5315:) 5297:) 5256:) 5242:) 5216:) 5178:) 5157:) 5138:) 5054:) 4991:. 4971:) 4952:) 4914:. 4910:. 4892:) 4868:) 4837:) 4823:) 4804:) 4766:) 4750:, 4736:) 4717:) 4696:, 4680:) 4672:-- 4641:) 4633:-- 4626:) 4605:) 4566:) 4506:) 4492:) 4478:) 4425:) 4403:) 4384:) 4348:) 4308:) 4256:) 4173:) 4159:) 4113:) 4095:) 4078:) 4064:) 4049:) 4035:) 4017:) 3998:) 3960:) 3934:) 3879:) 3855:) 3814:) 3769:) 3745:) 3720:) 3710:) 3696:) 3689:) 3682:) 3675:) 3663:) 3607:is 3599:) 3536:) 3519:) 3501:) 3475:) 3435:) 3419:) 3411:. 3384:) 3370:do 3335:) 3285:) 3264:) 3230:) 3197:) 3164:) 3107:) 3082:) 3067:) 3045:— 3031:) 2992:) 2961:) 2941:) 2918:) 2903:) 2842:) 2822:) 2786:) 2723:) 2692:) 2668:) 2622:• 2487:) 2461:) 2438:• 2419:) 2363:) 2349:) 2334:) 2320:) 2294:) 2276:) 2261:) 2246:) 2212:) 2194:) 2180:) 2148:) 2121:) 2098:: 2083:) 2059:) 1973:) 1783:) 1741:) 1697:) 1653:) 1639:) 1621:) 1613:. 1574:) 1526:) 1504:) 1474:) 1456:) 1384:) 1362:) 1346:) 1325:) 1303:) 1285:) 1239:, 1210:) 1167:) 1159:? 1149:) 1122:) 1071:) 1024:) 1010:) 988:) 963:) 945:) 929:) 880:) 857:) 822:) 796:) 774:) 735:) 713:) 664:) 638:) 630:-- 618:) 602:, 575:) 530:) 522:. 491:) 483:. 456:) 325:) 270:) 250:• 241:-- 234:) 213:) 177:) 158:) 68:← 11064:( 11012:♚ 11009:♝ 10993:( 10979:( 10965:( 10953:♚ 10950:♝ 10931:♚ 10928:♝ 10912:( 10900:♚ 10897:♝ 10876:: 10872:@ 10858:( 10843:♚ 10840:♝ 10832:: 10828:@ 10821:: 10817:@ 10805:( 10789:( 10772:♚ 10769:♝ 10735:( 10721:( 10703:( 10659:♚ 10656:♝ 10639:( 10628:( 10614:( 10594:( 10583:♚ 10580:♝ 10569:: 10565:@ 10554:( 10539:( 10524:( 10507:♚ 10504:♝ 10414:( 10363:( 10306:( 10281:( 10239:( 10221:( 10169:( 10147:( 10129:( 10113:( 10069:( 10055:( 10038:( 10001:( 9987:( 9961:( 9923:( 9902:( 9883:( 9798:( 9780:( 9739:( 9698:( 9681:( 9657:( 9637:( 9602:( 9580:( 9546:( 9512:( 9488:( 9473:( 9405:( 9385:( 9340:. 9324:( 9278:( 9214:( 9184:( 9120:( 9052:( 9025:( 8960:( 8945:( 8922:( 8903:( 8876:( 8857:( 8830:( 8812:( 8790:( 8757:( 8732:) 8694:( 8674:( 8628:( 8614:) 8610:( 8593:( 8575:( 8558:( 8543:( 8534:. 8518:. 8503:. 8446:( 8391:( 8364:" 8327:( 8145:( 8087:( 8062:( 8040:( 8026:( 8009:( 7991:( 7976:( 7926:P 7923:T 7902:( 7888:( 7838:) 7834:( 7800:( 7785:( 7752:( 7737:( 7691:( 7612:, 7593:( 7527:. 7504:( 7492:I 7411:( 7276:( 7178:( 6996:( 6949:( 6923:( 6690:) 6678:( 6656:( 6641:( 6612:C 6557:( 6536:( 6477:( 6406:( 6353:( 6306:( 6258:( 6165:( 6151:( 6137:( 6114:( 6069:( 6050:( 6035:( 6020:( 6000:( 5960:( 5919:( 5861:( 5839:( 5811:( 5801:) 5797:( 5784:( 5769:( 5726:. 5686:( 5636:( 5608:( 5586:( 5567:( 5549:( 5535:( 5529:: 5525:@ 5508:( 5438:( 5416:( 5395:( 5376:( 5326:( 5311:( 5293:( 5252:( 5238:( 5212:( 5174:( 5153:( 5134:( 5050:( 4995:. 4967:( 4948:( 4926:. 4888:( 4864:( 4833:( 4819:( 4800:( 4762:( 4732:( 4713:( 4702:: 4698:@ 4694:: 4690:@ 4676:( 4637:( 4622:( 4601:( 4562:( 4502:( 4488:( 4474:( 4421:( 4399:( 4380:( 4344:( 4332:. 4304:( 4291:S 4252:( 4169:( 4155:( 4109:( 4091:( 4074:( 4060:( 4045:( 4031:( 4013:( 3994:( 3956:( 3930:( 3875:( 3851:( 3810:( 3765:( 3741:( 3732:. 3714:( 3707:( 3700:( 3693:( 3686:( 3679:( 3670:( 3667:( 3657:( 3595:( 3572:) 3568:( 3532:( 3515:( 3497:( 3486:P 3483:T 3471:( 3448:P 3445:T 3431:( 3415:( 3380:( 3366:: 3362:@ 3331:( 3325:: 3321:@ 3281:( 3260:( 3226:( 3193:( 3160:( 3103:( 3078:( 3063:( 3047:☎ 3027:( 3021:? 2988:( 2957:( 2937:( 2914:( 2899:( 2838:( 2818:( 2782:( 2719:( 2688:( 2664:( 2646:c 2643:/ 2626:) 2618:( 2593:c 2590:/ 2567:c 2564:/ 2483:( 2457:( 2442:) 2434:( 2415:( 2359:( 2345:( 2330:( 2316:( 2290:( 2272:( 2257:( 2242:( 2223:: 2219:@ 2208:( 2190:( 2176:( 2144:( 2117:( 2079:( 2055:( 1969:( 1779:( 1737:( 1693:( 1649:( 1635:( 1617:( 1570:( 1522:( 1500:( 1470:( 1452:( 1401:) 1397:( 1380:( 1358:( 1342:( 1321:( 1299:( 1281:( 1225:: 1221:@ 1206:( 1163:( 1145:( 1118:( 1106:. 1067:( 1020:( 1006:( 984:( 959:( 941:( 925:( 876:( 853:( 818:( 792:( 770:( 751:? 731:( 709:( 660:( 634:( 614:( 571:( 526:( 487:( 452:( 419:: 394:: 321:( 266:( 254:) 246:( 230:( 209:( 173:( 154:( 54:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge

:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 177 - Knowledge

Index