Knowledge

:Featured picture candidates/File:Miomantis paykullii Luc Viatour.jpg - Knowledge

Source 📝

34: 221:
too large. It took me approximately 1:55 min. to fully display the image at full size. The blown highlights at the end of the abdomen hurt too. I'm not a big fan of this composition either, but I don't want to get into that with mantis pics. Perhaps you can prove me wrong and find sources that show
216:
I changed to a comment (I don't want to oppose an image for something that may not be true). The fact that the nominator claims it is naturally bright leaves me doubts. As an image editor myself, I can tell if the image is over saturated or not. I may be wrong, but the color in this image seems
381:
The image does seem to be a bit over-saturated, but that said, the consensus is definitely in favor of the image. And while the size is a bit large, we are only limited here by the WP and Commons limitations of 100MB.
355: 375: 294: 147: 331: 275: 257: 165: 315: 235: 202: 183: 406: 322:
It is not visible on Knowledge. But many of my images are used elsewhere without the respect of licenses, it is a discreet way to keep track of my images outside of Knowledge. --
115: 83: 135: 430: 420: 425: 17: 143: 64: 346: 243: 222:
the same color factor. I may support if so for its wow factor. By the way, I added it into two more articles.
26: 267:
looks good to me, size is not an issue, only minor blown out highlights at the edges of the animal. --
371: 341: 289: 217:
exaggerated when looking very close at the detail in full size. Speaking of size, this image is
139: 400: 367: 284: 131: 8: 54: 327: 272: 253: 161: 111: 95: 246: 198: 33: 389: 414: 323: 268: 249: 157: 107: 91: 309: 304: 229: 224: 193: 77: 72: 302:
This doesn't affect, but why does the file name have "Luc Viatour" in it?
178: 127:
Is the bug that bright in real life, or is this just really saturated?
68: 337: 384:Promoted File:Miomantis_paykullii_Luc_Viatour.jpg 412: 177:per nom. Good DoF, great resolution, has wow. 156:It is a young subject. It is very colorful -- 340:useful for keeping track of your images -- 32: 431:Featured picture nominations/April 2009 242:Link to more images and other lighting 14: 413: 18:Knowledge:Featured picture candidates 23: 421:Ended featured picture nominations 214:I hate to oppose such "WOW!" image 24: 442: 65:List of mantis genera and species 191:per above. Very nice picture. - 51:Articles this image appears in 13: 1: 426:Featured picture nominations 7: 10: 447: 407:17:24, 17 April 2009 (UTC) 376:20:51, 13 April 2009 (UTC) 356:20:44, 13 April 2009 (UTC) 332:06:46, 13 April 2009 (UTC) 316:02:46, 13 April 2009 (UTC) 295:21:30, 12 April 2009 (UTC) 276:05:56, 11 April 2009 (UTC) 258:21:50, 12 April 2009 (UTC) 236:01:16, 11 April 2009 (UTC) 203:21:16, 10 April 2009 (UTC) 184:18:40, 10 April 2009 (UTC) 166:13:51, 10 April 2009 (UTC) 148:09:45, 10 April 2009 (UTC) 116:13:15, 10 April 2009 (UTC) 84:01:16, 11 April 2009 (UTC) 48:information aesthetics 41: 40:- Miomantis paykullii 36: 104:Support as nominator 55:Miomantis paykullii 28:Miomantis paykullii 42: 353: 151: 134:comment added by 438: 403: 397: 395: 392: 347: 312: 307: 292: 287: 232: 227: 209:Regretful oppose 201: 196: 181: 150: 128: 80: 75: 446: 445: 441: 440: 439: 437: 436: 435: 411: 410: 405: 401: 393: 390: 388: 368:Epiphyllumlover 310: 305: 290: 285: 230: 225: 197: 192: 179: 129: 78: 73: 63: 31: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 444: 434: 433: 428: 423: 399: 379: 378: 361: 360: 359: 358: 319: 318: 297: 278: 261: 260: 239: 238: 205: 186: 171: 170: 169: 168: 153: 152: 119: 118: 100: 99: 89: 86: 59: 57: 52: 49: 46: 30: 25: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 443: 432: 429: 427: 424: 422: 419: 418: 416: 409: 408: 404: 398: 396: 385: 377: 373: 369: 366: 363: 362: 357: 354: 351: 345: 344: 339: 336:You may find 335: 334: 333: 329: 325: 321: 320: 317: 314: 313: 308: 301: 298: 296: 293: 288: 282: 279: 277: 274: 270: 266: 263: 262: 259: 255: 251: 247: 244: 241: 240: 237: 234: 233: 228: 220: 215: 212: 210: 206: 204: 200: 195: 190: 187: 185: 182: 176: 173: 172: 167: 163: 159: 155: 154: 149: 145: 141: 137: 133: 126: 123: 122: 121: 120: 117: 113: 109: 105: 102: 101: 97: 93: 90: 87: 85: 82: 81: 76: 70: 66: 62: 58: 56: 53: 50: 47: 44: 43: 39: 35: 29: 19: 387: 383: 380: 364: 349: 342: 303: 299: 280: 264: 223: 218: 213: 208: 207: 188: 174: 136:74.47.114.74 130:— Preceding 124: 103: 71: 60: 37: 27: 324:Luc Viatour 250:Luc Viatour 158:Luc Viatour 108:Luc Viatour 92:Luc Viatour 415:Categories 291:Wartenberg 391:ωαdεstεr 343:Muhammad 269:Chris 73 144:contribs 132:unsigned 125:Question 38:Original 365:Support 300:Comment 281:Support 265:Support 211:Comment 194:Fastily 189:Support 175:Support 88:Creator 199:(talk) 180:Durova 69:Mantis 67:& 45:Reason 402:«talk 16:< 372:talk 350:talk 338:this 328:talk 311:Fari 286:Jake 273:Talk 254:talk 245:and 231:Fari 162:talk 140:talk 112:talk 96:talk 79:Fari 306:Zoo 226:Zoo 219:way 74:Zoo 417:: 394:16 386:~ 374:) 330:) 283:— 271:| 256:) 248:-- 164:) 146:) 142:• 114:) 106:-- 370:( 352:) 348:( 326:( 252:( 160:( 138:( 110:( 98:) 94:( 61:+

Index

Knowledge:Featured picture candidates
Miomantis paykullii

Miomantis paykullii
List of mantis genera and species
Mantis
Zoo
Fari
01:16, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
Luc Viatour
talk
Luc Viatour
talk
13:15, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
unsigned
74.47.114.74
talk
contribs
09:45, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
Luc Viatour
talk
13:51, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
Durova
18:40, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
Fastily
(talk)
21:16, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
Zoo
Fari
01:16, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.