Knowledge

:Featured article review/Thomas C. Hindman/archive1 - Knowledge

Source ๐Ÿ“

171:, but I've had trouble getting those. It's been over two years now, real life is forcing me to become less and less active with on wiki, and I really just want to have closure on this before either a) I lose the residual familiarity with parts of the sourcing material that remains or b) my career finally gets so hectic that I'm not active enough to push this over the finish line anymore. 188:
As a note - after this was rewritten, there were some concerns about prose quality brought up (which seems to be a hallmark of most of my writing). The main Neal & Kremm source is on the Internet Archive, and I own all of the other book sources except for Woods (which I have been looking for an
162:
This is perhaps a bit drastic step, but one I've been thinking about for several years now. When this was promoted in 2007, this was 22kb long. In early 2022, I rewrote this article after noting sourcing issues. The article is now 47kb long, and uses a number of sources not used in the original.
189:
excuse to buy off of eBay anyway if it becomes needed), so I should have the source access needed to resolve any concerns. It'll just be a matter of squeezing in any work on this around my job and household responsibilities.
243:
update here. I doubt that the new version will have factual or sourcing issues, given the nominator's form, but it would be good to do those checks after any prose issues (haven't properly looked) are largely dealt with.
302:
Its an exhaustive review, enough that I'd be happy to close this if you resolved the issues raised....you have enough audited form that trust can be made on use of sources. Commend your diligence in raising this here.
317:
I have just taken a quick look at this. FWIW, I think Hog Farm and Mike Christie have resolved the issues and the review could be closed without reassessment of the article.
90: 79:
As of 22 September 2024, 08:37 (UTC), this page is active and open for discussion. A FAR coordinator will advance or close this nomination when consensus is reached.
83: 297: 225: 200: 326: 312: 278: 182: 253: 163:
According to xTools, I'm now the author of 81.6% of this article. The relationship between this and the promoted version is essentially a
142: 150: 146: 263:
talk page; that'll hopefully get a better-quality copy editor. The link above also undersells the scope of the changes a bit -
259:
I'll see what I can come up with - I just don't trust the average GOCE to produce FA-quality prose. I'll post a request at the
51: 46: 138: 55: 111: 154: 38: 17: 264: 236: 221: 60: 106: 72: 134: 167:
question. At the time, I was counseled to not take this through FAR and to seek reviews through
68: 42: 64: 26: 8: 168: 130: 322: 292: 283: 273: 260: 215: 195: 177: 34: 27: 308: 249: 239:. Obviously it needs a review. My advice would be to ask for a look at GOCE, and 164: 286:
has kindly taken a pass through the prose and has addressed a number of issues.
235:
To note, it was a 2007 promotion, with 4 minimalist supports. These are Hog's
318: 287: 268: 211: 190: 172: 304: 245: 116: 91:Featured article review/Thomas C. Hindman/archive1 84:Featured article candidates/Thomas C. Hindman 267:is a fuller demonstration of the changes. 14: 210:- I understand but...yeah...time.... 23: 24: 344: 18:Knowledge:Featured article review 13: 1: 327:00:16, 4 September 2024 (UTC) 7: 313:23:12, 18 August 2024 (UTC) 298:22:57, 18 August 2024 (UTC) 279:16:03, 17 August 2024 (UTC) 254:00:20, 17 August 2024 (UTC) 226:01:27, 12 August 2024 (UTC) 201:01:15, 12 August 2024 (UTC) 183:01:02, 12 August 2024 (UTC) 10: 349: 78: 158: 124: 123: 35:Thomas C. Hindman 28:Thomas C. Hindman 340: 127: 96: 95: 76: 58: 348: 347: 343: 342: 341: 339: 338: 337: 296: 277: 199: 181: 165:Ship of Theseus 80: 49: 33: 31: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 346: 336: 335: 334: 333: 332: 331: 330: 329: 290: 271: 233: 232: 231: 230: 229: 228: 193: 175: 160: 159: 151:WP US Congress 122: 121: 120: 119: 117:External links 114: 109: 101: 100: 94: 93: 87: 86: 30: 25: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 345: 328: 324: 320: 316: 315: 314: 310: 306: 301: 300: 299: 295: 294: 289: 285: 284:Mike Christie 282: 281: 280: 276: 275: 270: 266: 262: 258: 257: 256: 255: 251: 247: 242: 238: 227: 223: 220: 217: 213: 209: 206: 205: 204: 203: 202: 198: 197: 192: 187: 186: 185: 184: 180: 179: 174: 170: 166: 157: 156: 152: 148: 144: 140: 136: 135:Lieutcoluseng 132: 126: 125: 118: 115: 113: 110: 108: 105: 104: 103: 102: 98: 97: 92: 89: 88: 85: 82: 81: 77: 74: 70: 66: 62: 57: 53: 48: 44: 40: 36: 29: 19: 291: 272: 240: 234: 218: 207: 194: 176: 169:WP:URFA/2020 161: 128: 112:Citation bot 32: 155:WP Politics 143:WP MILHIST 129:Notified: 212:Cas Liber 131:Nishkid64 319:Donner60 288:Hog Farm 269:Hog Farm 222:contribs 191:Hog Farm 173:Hog Farm 107:Analysis 237:updates 208:(groan) 99:Toolbox 52:protect 47:history 261:WT:FAC 147:WP USA 139:WP Bio 56:delete 305:Ceoil 246:Ceoil 73:views 65:watch 61:links 16:< 323:talk 309:talk 293:Talk 274:Talk 265:this 250:talk 241:then 216:talk 196:Talk 178:Talk 69:logs 43:talk 39:edit 325:) 311:) 252:) 224:) 153:, 149:, 145:, 141:, 137:, 133:, 71:| 67:| 63:| 59:| 54:| 50:| 45:| 41:| 321:( 307:( 248:( 219:ยท 214:( 75:) 37:(

Index

Knowledge:Featured article review
Thomas C. Hindman
Thomas C. Hindman
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
Featured article candidates/Thomas C. Hindman
Featured article review/Thomas C. Hindman/archive1
Analysis
Citation bot
External links
Nishkid64
Lieutcoluseng
WP Bio
WP MILHIST
WP USA
WP US Congress
WP Politics
Ship of Theseus
WP:URFA/2020
Hog Farm
Talk
01:02, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
Hog Farm

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

โ†‘