46:) Hello everybody. I sort of came here because most of the articles to which I have contributed to - are mainly those which no one else has an interest in. I've been here (actively) since December. I try to get community involvement, but mostly these aren't in areas where I particularly edit content. I would like to be become an admin, but I am still trying to broaden my versatility in terms of writing a wider range of content, and also trying out different facets of wikipedia first. Thankyou.
660:
forum :) - possibly the only polite cyber-cricket forum around). For people who try and use WP as advertising or for political marketing, this is something I was always mindful of; so this always keeps me philosophical when these things happen. I don't do any religious/nationalist debates, so I haven't gotten involved luckily. I revert once, and explain in the edit summary, but if the other party doesn't agree, then I use talk or user talk.
349:
56:
Jason
Gastrich vote stacking efforts. You have managed to get a list featured so you are apparently a good editor, successfully nominated two admins including me (with excellent nomination statements) which shows that you have a good notion of how the adminship process works and who could be successful, reported a couple of vandals, and generally have been helpful and done good work in the Knowledge space. Why are you not an admin yet?
79:
204:
have nominated you for adminship two months ago, but the short period you've been here was bound to be the cause of some objections. Too many good editors have been turned off
Knowledge by unpleasant RFAs, so I prefer not to nominate you for a few months, when you'll be certain of sailing through. If someone else nominates you before then, you can count on my strong support.
396:
appear to be engaged in every field and every sphere of
Knowledge. In addition to efforts in the main namespace, you participate in community debates, combat vandalism, and handle disputes with great skill. You have all the virtues of a good administrator. One thing I thing I would do is to encourage you to be a little
214:
FPo though) but you succesfully nominated me for adminship. I would give you a strong support unless something controversial popped out of nowhere, like for
Deeptrivia. Btw, if you were/had a troll/sockpuppet/vandal earlier on in your Wiki-life be open and admit it now, otherwise another catrastophe might unfold.
639:. I also keep an extensive list of material on my userpage and the subpages which I have linked as I am a bit of a record-stats-keeping pedant. Probably the general thing that I take pride in is trying to kind out new ways of editing and trying to diversify my conribution range (I've recently tried t help at
213:
Wonderful
Wikipedian. You are committed to the project and nice to have a talk with. I have seen you contribute heaps to both Aussie, Indian and maintenance stuff. The substantial content shouldn't put you off. I haven't contributed to a FA unfortunately, (played a minor part in Portal:India become a
142:
No 'meaty' strong contributions to any particular article. This is heavily countered, however, by your exceptional organising, sorting, checking and tidying up of existing articles - as well as creating many stubs. Always cool and never kicks the POV bucket. I look forward to what you will produce in
395:
Given the relatively short time you have been on
Knowledge, the extent of your contributions is astounding. Since I first encountered and welcomed you, I have seen you take to Knowledge with great enthusiasm. Something that has particularly impressed me about your contributions is their variety; you
55:
Your contributions are quite impressive: massive contributions to sports and
Australia-related topics, including the appropriate templates, portals, and categories. Also, you have participated in many AfD's and have apparently made lots of useful contributions to the discussions, including reporting
659:
Not really. The thing which makes
Knowledge great - it's open sourced nature - "the encyclopedia that anybody can edit" will ineveitably lead to people who are over enthusiastic about certain things - discussing POV edits on the talk pages can solve this (this also allows for using WP as a cricket
187:
That's a good outlook to have! I have been reading your geography contributions in north-west
Adelaide though; I might step in and add something in soon over there, provided I can get some research materials. You seem to have an exceptional drive, or passion, for so much of wikipedia and adding in
203:
From what I've seen, you're always civil and helpful, you get along well with people, keep your cool well, and with 9000 edits in such a short time you're obviously committed to
Knowledge. These things are far more important to adminship than the number, diversity or nature of your edits. I would
159:
might turn out to be a bit too dry. It's important to become a solid editor before admin I feel, rather than simply reverting vandalism or doing AfDs because there are a lot of complicated content issues which are important to an encyclopedia. I feel that a person should not be defence minister,
290:
out whole paragraphs, lines, links and even sections without a pretense of trying to understand the quality of work done. You didn't have the basic decency to go through history of the article and distinguish between vandal and contributor. Citing past cleanup issues, you reverted the article
413:
Thank you for your assistance when I needed it, and I am amazed at how much work you have done for Knowledge. I hope that if you become administrator, you can continue to ensure that users can successfully and accurately edit Knowledge. Thanks again, and best of wishes.
436:
disagreement with him in the past but I can't deny that he's a pretty good editor, and apart from that initial rift I've come to realise that he does contribute and organise across many Australia and cricket-related articles. Keep up the good work Bl!
484:
Time for the cliched "I thought he was already an admin". Looking at your talk page you have offers from several esteemed editors to nominate you. I recommend selecting one or two of those (but no more than 2) to nominate you and get on with it!
372:
From what I've seen so far, Blnguyen is great editor, very polite and civil with plenty of experience. As with the above comments, I reccomend that he should apply to become an admin soon. --
247:
I have never interacted with this editor; however, I have noticed his presence in many articles, talk pages and DYK nomination pages. I think here is a brilliant would be admin. Regards.--
238:
I associate the username BlNguyen with someone who is always making useful edits and takes a community-minded approach to editing (which could be more important than the 'meaty' edits). —
160:
unless they have been in the defence force themselves, for example, so the the same applies here to me I think. It's good to see someone with high standards for articles like you.
653:
Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
308:
Just a bit of information for any readers. Zora, Blnguyen, Jath, Benzee (who got unnecessarily blocked after Anwars complaints), Nichalp, Ganeshk and all others that have edited
341:
You should apply for adminship as I think the admin tools will help you with your goals. You are another good editor who should edit more substantially in the mainspace. --
353:
261:
I concur with all of the above. Blnguyen seems to be a first rate wikipedian who would make an excellent admin. He's committed, polite and civil and never pushes a POV. --
126:
342:
205:
86:
192:
174:
167:
37:
620:
147:
473:
465:
233:
364:
332:
137:
616:
427:
299:
208:
161:
33:
27:
479:
418:
408:
256:
459:
76:& copyediting of the articles, which is a big chore considering the number of cricket fanatics. Is polite & helpful. Has got my vote!
489:
283:
224:
96:
242:
390:
269:
513:
As English Knowledge is no longer replicating data to the toolserver, the user's edit count (as of 21:12, 22 April 2006 (UTC)) using
369:
As far as I know your work, you are an excellent user. You have my support when you decide to run for an admin. Why not now already?
643:) with Vietnamese articles - although all of them have turned out to be unenecyclopedic and were deleted - mostly csd a7s)- Also,
102:
Very experienced, civil and wise user with a huge amount of experience. Also, you're very well rounded and surprised me by (
501:
612:
63:
156:
624:
605:
Of your articles or contributions to Knowledge, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
444:
43:
106:
Cliche minefield ahead) not being an administrator yet. I'd gladly nominate you if that was ok with yourself.
69:
188:
your voice where you can. Sometimes I'm amazed where you've been lurking. Your reply here signifies this.
118:
505:
464:
Its time you should become an admin. I see no problem with your contributions. Keep up the good work! --
189:
144:
230:
17:
108:
476:
405:
385:
312:
know that we are not at fault. He did not blank out paragraphs and lines, he just got rid of
26:
327:
252:
8:
468:
456:
424:
278:
have my vote if you stood up for admin. You joined hands with a repeat offender called
313:
296:
221:
415:
401:
229:
BLNguyen is a valuable contributor and has the necessary judgement to be an Admin.
636:
318:
248:
60:
628:
449:
397:
73:
514:
640:
486:
439:
373:
266:
646:
do I have an abnormally high percentage of category/template/portal edits??
215:
171:
91:
83:
509:(Warning:Both tools have stopped updating and the edit counts are way off)
239:
348:
57:
632:
279:
378:
262:
78:
72:. He is not only a good contributer but also helps maintain the
358:
309:
292:
143:
the future, you would have my vote if you stood for admin.
155:- an FA is one of the things on my wishlist - although
623:
are somewhat notable. Possibly also resuscitating the
68:
Amazing editor. Is one of the integral members of the
502:See this user's edit history with Interiot's tool
282:who is facing a wall of incivility complaints
627:. Mostly my articles are bios of swimmers,
107:
423:You're just waiting to be nominated! ;) -
14:
291:provoking a unnecessary revert war in
274:I am sorry to say this but you will
613:Swimming World Swimmers of the Year
542:First edit 22:40, 14 September 2005
23:
157:Australian Mathematics Competition
24:
672:
615:is a featured list, and also the
625:Knowledge:WikiProject Eurovision
347:
77:
13:
1:
70:Knowledge:WikiProject Cricket
7:
10:
677:
534:Distinct pages edited 6688
234:00:29, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
225:11:11, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
209:04:46, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
193:08:16, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
175:07:11, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
148:04:33, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
138:16:21, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
97:09:23, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
64:03:35, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
316:'s POV from the article.
538:Average edits/page 1.380
490:09:58, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
480:07:35, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
460:04:32, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
428:07:29, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
419:17:37, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
409:08:49, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
391:02:15, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
333:07:53, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
365:08:56, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
300:10:17, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
270:00:27, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
257:18:36, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
243:13:31, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
18:Knowledge:Editor review
593:Knowledge talk 106
506:edit summary usage
231:Capitalistroadster
621:Portal:Eurovision
526:Username Blnguyen
515:Interiot's Tool 2
314:User:Anwar saadat
122:
668:
585:Category talk 14
530:Total edits 9229
471:
452:
447:
442:
388:
383:
376:
363:
361:
356:
351:
345:
330:
324:
321:
168:Have your say!!!
164:
153:Reviewee Comment
136:
134:
124:
123:
121:
116:
89:
81:
676:
675:
671:
670:
669:
667:
666:
665:
637:South Australia
617:Portal:Swimming
577:Template talk 3
469:
450:
445:
440:
400:. Good luck, --
386:
379:
374:
359:
354:
352:
343:
328:
322:
319:
162:
133:
127:
120:
119:
115:
109:
87:
31:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
674:
664:
663:
662:
661:
651:
650:
649:
597:
596:
595:
594:
591:
590:
589:Knowledge 2050
587:
586:
583:
582:
579:
578:
575:
574:
571:
570:
567:
566:
563:
562:
559:
558:
555:
554:
548:
547:
546:
545:
544:
543:
540:
539:
536:
535:
532:
531:
528:
527:
521:
520:
519:
518:
493:
492:
482:
462:
430:
421:
411:
393:
370:
367:
338:
337:
336:
335:
303:
302:
272:
259:
245:
236:
227:
211:
200:
199:
198:
197:
196:
195:
180:
179:
178:
177:
140:
128:
110:
100:
66:
30:
25:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
673:
658:
655:
654:
652:
648:
647:
642:
638:
634:
630:
626:
622:
618:
614:
610:
607:
606:
604:
603:
602:
601:
592:
588:
584:
580:
576:
572:
568:
565:User talk 969
564:
560:
556:
552:
551:
550:
549:
541:
537:
533:
529:
525:
524:
523:
522:
516:
512:
511:
510:
507:
503:
500:
499:
498:
497:
491:
488:
483:
481:
478:
475:
472:
467:
463:
461:
458:
457:
454:
453:
448:
443:
435:
431:
429:
426:
425:Mailer Diablo
422:
420:
417:
412:
410:
407:
403:
399:
394:
392:
389:
384:
382:
377:
371:
368:
366:
362:
357:
350:
346:
340:
339:
334:
331:
326:
325:
315:
311:
307:
306:
305:
304:
301:
298:
294:
289:
285:
281:
277:
273:
271:
268:
264:
260:
258:
254:
250:
246:
244:
241:
237:
235:
232:
228:
226:
223:
222:
219:
218:
212:
210:
207:
202:
201:
194:
191:
186:
185:
184:
183:
182:
181:
176:
173:
169:
165:
158:
154:
151:
150:
149:
146:
141:
139:
135:
131:
125:
117:
114:
105:
101:
99:
98:
94:
93:
90:
85:
80:
75:
71:
67:
65:
62:
59:
54:
53:
52:
51:
47:
45:
42:
39:
35:
29:
28:User:Blnguyen
19:
656:
645:
644:
608:
599:
598:
581:Category 221
573:Template 186
508:
495:
494:
455:
438:
433:
380:
317:
297:Anwar saadat
287:
275:
220:
216:
206:Snottygobble
152:
129:
112:
103:
95:
82:
49:
48:
40:
32:
553:(main) 4650
432:I've had a
416:Nehrams2020
355:(the scope)
629:cricketers
633:geography
600:Questions
496:Comments
249:Dwaipayan
172:review me
569:Image 54
561:User 261
557:Talk 715
487:kingboyk
434:argument
163:ßlηguγΣη
104:Warning:
50:Reviews
44:contribs
34:Blnguyen
451:gerthat
288:blanked
190:michael
145:michael
657:Answer
641:WP:PNT
611:Well,
609:Answer
398:bolder
329:(Talk)
240:Донама
477:e Ong
344:Samir
323:eagle
320:Noble
310:Ajith
293:Ajith
217:Gizza
58:Kusma
16:<
631:and
619:and
504:and
406:talk
360:धर्म
286:and
284:here
280:Zora
267:talk
253:talk
84:Srik
74:NPOV
61:(討論)
38:talk
635:of
517:is:
466:Ter
381:TBC
276:NOT
263:I@n
485:--
474:nc
404:|
402:cj
295:.
265:≡
255:)
170:-
166:|
132:-_
111:_-
92:it
470:e
446:o
441:R
387:☆
375:☆
251:(
130:P
113:M
88:e
41:·
36:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
