Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 January 2

4192:. Satisfies GNG easily and by an exceptionally wide margin. There is an exceptionally large number of books and periodical articles on Indian criminal law, and they treat it as a single unified topic, and many are entirely and specifically about Indian criminal law as a whole. The summary style is not a content fork. We need to have an article that is an overview of Indian criminal law generally. The six statutes linked to do not contain the whole of Indian criminal law. There was criminal law in India before any of the statutes listed were enacted. For example, the Criminal Law (India) Act 1828 (9 Geo 4 c 74) was a (very lengthy) compilation of criminal law provisions from earlier statutes. There are many other Indian statutes that contain provisions that form part of the criminal law. India is a common law country, which means that roughly on the order of half the criminal law consists of judicial precedents (see eg 4680:

citing any applicable policy or guideline. Editors will be reluctant to expand a (redirect or article) page on a notable topic if they think the community might respond with a WP:BLAR; and they will be especially reluctant to expand such a page if they think the community might respond with a WP:BLAR for content reasons that do not seem to be based on any particular policy or guideline (which makes it unclear what the community wants), and which seem to impose a deadline on expansion and improvement. Further, redirection will also impair the development of the missing articles and article content in this area of the project, since it will eliminate the list of criminal laws.

16416:, which is nice and counts, but I always regret that these grand multinational, multigovernmental community research projects avoid all media attention. There are lots of sources about the organization's individual clinical trials and their outcomes. It is common practice on Knowledge that when an individual artist gets attention for their art but not as a person that we keep the biography. When we have stubby articles like this about organizations which could only be built out by describing their programs but not the org itself, we typically delete. Medical papers do not make for good Knowledge narratives. This org merged into the 11856:- I've previously removed clearly-identified paid placement advertorials from the usual sources, and an obvious "contributor content" piece from a digital marketing agency. I've also removed a blatant SEO blog. Of the remaining sources, I'm not sure an advertorial "Featured Post" on Africa Business Insider, and churnalism from Bologna, Italy are the best sources for a entity "based" in Miami. Looking around elsewhere turns up the absolutely worst SEO and PR garbage. Nothing organic at all. It's a CSC anonymous business with virtual offices in Miami. Not clear how this is notable, and it just seems like ED spam, frankly. 4347:

history as distinct from, and irrelevant to, the history of the IPC (which does not begin before the First Law Commission started drafting the IPC). Mittal treats the penal code as part of his chapter 27 on "Law Commissions and Codification" (notice the IPC does not even get its own chapter in either book). Similarly Sinha has chapter 12 on "Codification in British India" and chapter 13 on "The Indian Law Commissions . . .". I think, however, that retaining this article would be more practical than creating "History of Indian criminal law before 1860" from scratch.

4198:

and classify criminal laws in a way that does not consist of discussing the whole of one statute at a time. Indeed, it is necessary to adopt this approach for a country that still has many uncodified offences. If there is no overview article, it will be impossible for readers to find most of the criminal law of India. We need this article for navigation. A redirect to the penal code is especially inappropriate, because the criminal procedure code, and all the other statutes creating criminal offences, are as much a part of the criminal law as the penal code is.

4735:

topic is not a WP:REDUNDANTFORK of the Penal Code, because that guideline applies to "2 articles about the exact same thing", and the Penal Code is significantly less than half the criminal law. Conversely, criteria 2 and 3 of the information page WP:NOTMERGE do apply. I do not wish to risk becoming involved in a cycle of merging, splitting, re-merging, re-splitting, and arguing about whether there is "enough" wikipedia content to split. The purpose of GNG is to prevent the merger of stubs on notable topics.

8260:. Hmm. I was the one who got that draft back into mainspace. Except I left the tag "This article contains content that is written like an advertisement", which has since been removed. Personally, I've been to the city and I know the place is notable. So I would not delete the page, but try to get a neutral view (Moving to drafts, I think, is not the best way to fix an article's tone, as the AfC reviewer's rules instruct not to reject an article when its flaws can be resolved by tagging it). 1220:

building is notable, and the hotel aspect incidental. Maybe the casual 10-12 is too low, but I seriously doubt the number reaches even middle double digits, however broad the criteria, and there are over 1,500 hotels licenced in Ireland, and almost 150 in Northern Ireland, so it's a low percentage, and that's fine. Others, if large, active or slightly notable, can be mentioned in their locality's article. And I do believe that this particular hotel simply does not make the cut.

13906:(government press), and there is no secondary analysis, depth or other indication of notability. I can find no scholarly treatment of this relationship nor mentions in reputable journals. Merging to one or both countries' articles might be possible, but I can find no info particularly worth merging and no sourcing on which to base such a merge. Redir begs the question of which country to redirect towards (and do we really expect this as a search string?). Cheers, 13287:: Sometimes, it's just not viable to have an article about a subject if they don't meet the necessary criteria for notability. It isn't a negative reflection on the author, if created in good faith. Draft is one option, but if they aren't notable, that is potentially a waste of people's time. Redirect is another option, but I noted the other band by the same name, so the consideration is why we would redirect to the label of one of them but not the other. 4753:, seeing as consensus here is tending towards not keeping the article as a standalone page. I thought you would find my compromise appealing, seeing as it offers us the opportunity to continue improving the contents, albeit as a section in a bigger article. Regardless of what is the correct outcome, inflexibility and resistance to compromise makes it difficult to work on crowdsourced, consensus-driven projects like Knowledge. Please reconsider. 11545:; the post office was on the Woodlief farm. The Woodlief station was later renamed Tauy Station. The Tauy Baptist Church was near Tauy Creek; the church had a "Tauy Ladies' Missionary Circle" group. Tauy is in several sources named a "vicinity", but I found no mention of a hamlet, village, or town under any of the three names. Cram (1902) lists Woodlief on page 230, but with the population listed as "X", indicating a rail or postal site only. 7956:- Unless his name has a different spelling in his native tongue (perhaps with diacritical marks and such), I can find no reliable sources about his works or career. The language shouldn't matter anyway, because his own sites use the spelling we see here. Despite a lengthy career it appears that he has not been noticed by the media and all that can be found are his own self-uploads and promotional sites. This article looks like an attempted 7229:, and the poor rationale. It doesn't even begin to hold up today, nor should it have then. We can see that sources were added inappropriately through a process of original research and synthesis. The sources that actually mention this concept specifically are so limited that they basically boil down to two promoters of the Blanchard typology (Blanchard and Bailey). And as we all know, the Blanchard typology is not mainstream. 4599:, subdivided into Constitutional, Criminal, Civil, Administrative, etc. would provide the reader with an easy way to navigate through all the relevant topics under the broad umbrella of the legal system in India, and would be far more useful than the current attempt to aggregate all criminal-law-related articles in one introductory page. Would you be interested in building such a template? Let me know if you need my help. 121: 35: 13541:

whatever it was to the southeast; otherwise what we have there is the airport and an area of the Purdue campus which seems to have been quite recently cleared of what appear to have been "temporary" residence halls or the like (the road names suggest they were thrown up right after WW II). There's absolutely no reason to think there was anything town-ish here without some supporting text reference.

7711:

about that subject but want to show their virtue by shunning him are going to come up with a different name. It's still the same story: trans women are trans women because they are in the wrong body, not because they're whatever names Blanchard et al. called them. When the real world uses multiple names for something, we're supposed to have a single article about them – not one for

8831:). I'm not sure I saw the previous delete discussion. In any case, it happened 3 years ago, a loooong time in the history of Bitcoin. It didn't have many RS back then, it now lists in "Further reading" several centered reliable sources: Kaushal 2017, Van Der Horst 2017, Brakmić 2019, and Groce 2022. We can probably find more RS. Enough for me to keep it. Also, contrary to what 16335:), we need at least two independent, reliable secondary sources with significant coverage. To my understanding, the only difference between NORG and GNG is the condition that the sources are also secondary sources. Studies run by the org are not independent or secondary sources, so they cannot meet ORGCRIT. In any case, NORG generally overrides GNG as NORG is a 19604:– those are some of the largest newspapers in 11 different states across the U.S. writing about Hultman's being named captain. And it's not surprising: Michigan State is one of the most prestigious college football teams and has several hundred NFL alumni (with Hultman being one of the first five), something only a few other schools can claim. 7020:, and having a "female brain" is arguably essentialist, but having a neurologically determined gender identity isn't essentialist either. This is why I feel it's so important to distinguish these concepts from each other and why this article ought to be deleted as, again, a strawman Blanchard made up by mashing a bunch of concepts together. 443:

certainly not national. It's hard to prove though because of the common name, and the abundance of places called "corners". I can't find any online sources that name it as a current city or town in Humboldt county. It seems an informally named area and comprises the the cluster of buildings in the NE section of the intersection.

19364:. Although there has been much debate about the presumption of notability for players who only played in 1 or 2 games, playing in 30 games over three seasons should have a strong presumption of notability that is only overthrown by a complete lack of sources/references. Kudos to BeanieFan11 for their work on this article. 13654:

over the river, so it's not a suitable place to settle because there is no water access for trade. That river I gather, flooded a lot before flood control was implemented. So I think, Summit is where everyone went with their things until the water went down. It's a large flat area above the city that is easily accessible.

12092:. Anything I could find appeared to just be reposts of this article. Article itself is unreliably made, using a meme generator website as a source and containing a made up virus classification. Also claims the virus was ported to Windows 97, which doesn't even exist. Poor article at the best, troll article at the worst. 15341:

century. While his identity is uncertain I don’t think we can assume he was “mythical”, and the uncertainty about who exactly he was, though he was wanted for the murder of three policemen and Winston Churchill took personal charge of hunting him down, was one of the reasons why he has been so widely discussed.

4542:

prevention, trial and punishment of offences against the State" (Act 11 of 1857). Presumably both could be put under the heading of "offences against the State", on that basis, if they remain in this article. That would more informative than putting them in a list of miscellaneous statutes in random order.

4423:. The target is an existing page that we believe will best serve a reader searching for that term. Of course the criminal system in India is more than just the 1860 Act. However, the article about the Act contains not only relevant information, but also links to the criminal procedure and evidentary laws. 11290:

I'd argue that list (and the edits to the article you made) very much show there isn't anything close to reaching "significant" work or coverage of the level of warranting a separate article at this point. The most heavily sourced are reviews for two musicals that already have their own articles (and

6920:

Depending on the sources, there may be sufficient coverage to write a broader historical article about how trans women had to use that concept to get healthcare in the 70s-90s, divorced from the strict confines of Blanchard, if such a thing is not already covered in another preexisting article. But I

4197:

amongst other works, and the books of reports of cases might run to a much larger number of pages than the books of statutes). That case law is not part of any statute. There are principles of criminal law that go beyond the wording of a single specific statute, and it is entirely possible to analyse

442:

There are numerous mentions in the local paper (The Times Standard, Eureka) from around 1900 - 1977. The county website has pages that mention it, flooding usually. The place is inherently flood prone, and is occasionally described as a town. There isn't news coverage from regional papers that I saw,

16289:

Yes, that is what I meant, significant coverage for a topic unrelated to the org (the study objectives and the topic) and not enough coverage for the org and their specific research practices. On its own, I didn't think the three stubs have enough salvageable content to warrant a merge request since

15377:

Just to say that I've now read sections of three different books - including one about the history of the British Secret Service - which seem to think completely different things about this character - one that it was a soviet spy called Serge, another says he was a peasant called Jaklis arrested by

4541:

Putting Acts in a "see also" section fails to explain what their relevance is. The present article at least tells us they create offences. A law book would normally try to group related offences together. For example, the Defence of India Act, 1915 was held to be in pari materia with "An Act for the

4445:

More importantly, the penal code and criminal procedure code articles do not include, and probably could not include, a large number of criminal laws that are not part of those codes (and are not amendments to those codes). Where, for example, are we supposed to put the Admiralty Offences (Colonial)

16342:

Some restaurant reviews might meet NORG and GNG criteria based on their contents and sources; I am not sure how far to entertain the hypothetical other to say that "it depends". I had a brief glance at the sources you linked, as far as I could tell none of them were both independent and significant

15340:

I was surprised to see this nomination. Do a Google book search on “peter the painter houndsditch” and you will see plenty of coverage in reliable independent sources. The same search in Google news brings up five stories in the UK press since 2010, demonstrating sustained coverage over more than a

7102:

The only significant sources for the article seem to be from advocates of the Blanchard typology who use the idea as a straw man. The original author of the article is also part of the small group that advocates for the Blanchard typology. The sources even after cleanup are from these few advocates

6938:

is where the idea for the article started. There were two competing stories at that time. The first was that trans women had some essential quality that made them be true women. Depending on the times/culture, the named quality might be ineffable (e.g., "a woman's soul" during the Victorian era)

6880:

Well, there's an NPOV tag at the top of the article, and I suspect it, or other tags like it, is deserved. Ever since Blanchard published something that re-cast the familiar old narrative in theoretical terms (which is what you'd need to do if someone wanted to do serious research on the subject),

4734:

There is no question about the standalone notability of this topic. Do you want me to go through the books and periodical articles on Indian criminal law, one at a time, and explain the extent to which they are not about the Penal Code of 1860 (or the criminal procedure codes, for that matter)? The

13653:

which is where the divide that causes water to flow either into the gulf of mexico or the great lakes lies. It is not near this summit. The other usage is to describe a place where flooding would not occur. Looking at the TOPO; I believe the location of this Summit is that. It's perched on a cliff

11542: 7394:

I don't think that there is a single subject that has gone by a variety of names. I think and have thought for quite a while that term is Blanchard collecting a bunch of separate but facially similar concepts into what looks like a single non-scientific folk tale to strawman his opponents. Each of

4346:

In all fairness, what the chapters in Mittal and Sinha actually establish is that the topic of "History of Indian criminal law before 1860" satisfies GNG in its own right. The logical inference is that the "before the Penal Code" language indicates that Mittal and Sinha are treating that period of

4327:

That's right, hence my use of the word "expand". A brief historical review of the status of criminal law in India prior to 1860 is relevant to the IPC article, but does not, I believe, justify a standalone article. the fact that both Sinha and Mittal bundle their coverage of the 1828 Act and other

1219:

It's a little off-topic but relevant to the principle in nominating this - to my mind, it takes a lot to make a hotel notable. I'm not even convinced about at least 2 of the current Dublin ones, and I'd say they're are a few in Cork, Kerry, Limerick, Galway, etc. - but this includes ones where the

872:

Though I believe this link is really just a list of post offices, and the author doesn't really understand the situation. I searched the three local papers that cover the area and found no mentions of the place. Though in 1906 there was blurb about postmaster McCandless painting his post office in

13540:

I have no idea where the Indiana DoT got the name "Summit" from, but in any case its appearance on the topos is brief and appears to have been copied in from GNIS and then deleted again. The actual spot is one end of what used to be a small rail yard that seems to have supported the gravel pit or

7710:

I don't think that it's "a different topic with a different name". I think it's the same topic, which has had multiple names. The choice of names can be very political, even within medical/scientific subjects. If a pariah calls it "feminine essence theory", then all the people who need to talk

4679:

Redirecting the page would make it harder to create such an overview article. The reason I have not attempted to expand the article with the many missing laws etc is because people keep !voting for redirection; and especially because they keep !voting for redirection without, as far as I can see,

4426:

Everything in this page is already covered in other articles here, better written articles with better sourcing. I'm not convinced we need a top-level page about criminal law in India, especially if it's a content fork, but if you want to turn it into a DAB page rather than a redir, I'll support.

4227:

For the avoidance of doubt only: The following books about Indian criminal law were published before 1860, and their content has nothing to do with the Penal Code of 1860, or any of the criminal procedure codes: John D Mayne, A Treatise on the Principles and Practice of Criminal Law, 1st Ed, 1859

4613:

Encyclopedias like "Halsbury" also follow the pattern I described. I do not think they are intended to teach or instruct. What WP:NOT actually says is that WP articles should not contain "leading questions and systematic problem solutions as examples". I do not think that navigation links, or a

531:(Page 188) there is a feature for an elementary school designed by William M Van Fleet for the Freshwater Elementary School District in Freshwater Corners, California. Unless there is another Freshwater Corners in California I'm willing to say that the place was populated at least in the 1950's. 11584:

in which I improperly nominated the article for deletion, Uncle G claimed this is a "largely undocumented claimed rural post office. Zero sources found indicating any sort of population centre. The Woodlief post office synthesis is not supported by the source in the article, and I've found no

1395:

suggests that we are some way from SIGCOV. The only coverage not (purely) from local newspapers published in the same town, are the coverage of the (awful) news about the deaths which occurred during the hotel's construction. This coverage doesn't materially contribute to the notability of the

4555:

I do not think that criminal statutes repealed in 1828 should be included in the IPC article, since the code was passed more than thirty years after they disappeared. I think their inclusion would be an anachronism and irrelevant to a code passed in 1860. I do not think the history of the IPC

4493:

section at the target, let's merge it into the target. The "Issues with IPC" section, in its current form, isn't encyclopedic. Perhaps a rewritten "Criticisms" section, with more than just one TV show as source, would do a better job, but those should go into the individual articles about the

7685:

that cover from a NPOV the various topics Bailey and Blanchard conflated to rail against. This article has never existed as anything other than a poorly-sourced and OR-filled POV rant about how all scientific arguments for a biological basis for transsexuality must be a "narrative" because

7210:

Ten editors !voted to keep the article, and you've singled out its initial author as "the main proponent of keeping the article", even though he made only one (1) edit to the AFD page, and three others posted more words on the subject than him? Your conclusion doesn't seem logical to me.

4441:

The penal code and criminal procedure code articles do not include everything in this article. They do not, for example, mention the offences under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, the Food Adulteration Act, the Dowry Prohibition Act 1961 or the Defence of India

7379:

Your comment is about "the term". What can you tell us about "the subject", which has gone by a variety of names in different centuries? Where would you describe the narrative that trans women were required to parrot when they wanted to access medical transition before you were born?

10508:

I wouldn't even suggest the redirect target now that I've figured out this is not even a broadcast station. One source lists it at 102.7, but I cannot find mention of the frequency in their social media. The 102.7 frequency in Accra has been licensed to someone, but it's not on air.

7139:

I'm not sure why that is relevant to this discussion. There is a lack of objective evidence that the subject of this article is generally notable. Just because a metaphor or analogy may have been occasionally used, does not mean that Knowledge needs an encyclopedia article about it

10559:

per nom and Sammi Brie. Broadcast stations are not inherently notable, but this being a brand new webcast-only station makes it even less likely that it's going to meet GNG in the foreseeable future. It can be recreated if it generates sufficient coverage to be considered notable.

6939:

or physical (e.g., "brain sex"/gender identity is neurologically determined) or something else, but whatever it was, it wasn't genital anatomy and it wasn't necessarily the cause/etiology (in the sense that we'd use that term in a medical article), but it was the thing that makes

4212:

For the avoidance of doubt, I am not aware of any actual original research in this article in its present revision (which I last edited several minutes ago). The article contains verifiable content not included in the other articles, and a great deal more can and should be added.

7730:

I'd love to see a source that explains how the common and popular (among lay people) wrong body discourse/narrative is significantly different from what Dreger and Blanchard described. Have you found such a source yet? I haven't. I'd rather have the article at a title like

8312:

The article has some statements that suggest notability of the place, for example "Fabrika is considered one of Tbilisi's biggest success stories". I don't really want to try and figure this one out when there is a literal mountain of other articles that are more in need of

8285:. I was unable to find significant coverage in English sources. That does not preclude the possibility that there is significant coverage in Georgian, however there is no corresponding page in the Georgian Knowledge - so I can only conclude that this factory is not notable. 2535:, thank you for responding. I found another non-database source which I added to the page, which covers Dagiero and confirms at least one fact in the article. I don't know Czech, so maybe there is more to be found on that website? What do you think about the new source? -- 4396:

A redirect would make the least sense, because the penal code is not the same thing as the criminal law. In fact, the penal code is not even close to being the same thing as the criminal law. Redirecting this page to the penal code of 1860 would be worse than redirecting

6832:. It is the story that trans women had to tell their psychologists (plural, because they had to convince two of them that they believed this) in the 1980s and 1990s, or they'd be denied access to gender-affirming medical treatment. Do you think that's the same as just 5571:

and expand. Based on the articles shown, it appears to be her that is notable, not the studio label she operates under. I assume she didn't make an article on herself because she wanted to promote her game label, but it's clear from the sources it's a one-person label.

7066:

calls it a "discourse" and says it wasn't a common discourse in Fiji (where one can be "a woman inside" without feeling "trapped in a man's body"). I didn't see any that said it's "just an idiom". Do you have sources saying that it's just words and not a narrative?

19386:- per BeanieFan11. Most of the references are short but in the context of a century old subject (where many sources are likely unavailable anymore) I am fine with that, and the Detroit Free Press article at least is of reasonable length. I would also point out that 7428:

actually about the topic aren't sufficient for an independent article. There's essentially only a single paper directly discussing this concept directly, plus a handful of followups, virtually all of them by the same two authors; if it must be covered it could go on

7163: 6858:

on it before the removals. It is mostly about Blanchard and his supporters arguing against the concept in general. And I think gender identity/gender essentialism is the right article to talk about someone feeling they are different gender than their body (i.e. a

19497:" has any relevance here; Hultman is notable for his coverage and accomplishments per WP:NBASIC/WP:GNG. Now, even if the national coverage is short, it still shows that his accomplishments were not considered "of little value or importance" (trivial definition). 7608:: As other's and myself have noted, the concept is itself a non-notable strawman that conflates 1) a narrative and 2) all scientific arguments that there is a biological basis for gender identity (though I'm more partial to the earlier term "psychological sex"). 3577:

The Ottawa Herald states that Garlington is one of the little post offices in franklin county, and implies the community name may have been Pomona. It is just a post office not a place. The Ottawa Herald, 14 Aug 1961, Mon ·Page 8. in the obit of Charles Steele.

7615:

is showing the notability of a different topic with a different name, not Blanchard's strawman (though I appreciate it and would be happy to work with them to include the "Wrong Body discourse" in a standalone article or broader one), and 3) google searching

16290:

their sources are all either primary or not significant coverage, which is why I chose to nominate. But considering the sources you found, maybe the content is worth keeping through a merge when backed up by secondary sources, even if it's minor on its own.

12380:

per all the above, this isn't Knowledge's job. A non-article by a permanently-blocked sock, by the way. We can't possibly have a list of all conditions for every imaginable symptom: Knowledge is not a medical dictionary, nor for that matter a diagnosis aid.

4477:

doesn't mention the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, the Dowry Prohibition Act 1961 or the Defence of India Act. Each of those have their own page. We can certainly add these specific acts to the "See also" section in the target. The

15789:

has got us sources for a list of ingredients, and I couldn't find sources for anything more than that, either; with most saying a lot less. This puts us in borderline not-a-directory territory, as this is, literally given the sources that I found which

2402:, this article would deserve to be kept if there are reliable sources discussing the subject. I don't think it was the correct decision to remove a source discussing the subject from the article, while a deletion discussion is ongoing about sources. -- 16412:; my guess is that it could have spent and consumed about US$ 100 million from its existence in 2005-2021, doing about 40 medical research trials in many countries, including 12,000 participants. The best reliable source I found about the org is from 1483:

They say they "have a great passion for helping others, and creating articles for others to learn" (user page) – so they make a page. A different page. Someone questions on their talk page. Then another page (this one) is nominated instead. One hour

11259: 5627: 19316:, which is considered one of the top-level collegiate teams. Many newspapers of the time are not available online and thus it is more difficult to find coverage for athletes of this era, but regardless, we clearly have a pass of WP:NBASIC here. 11291:

frankly need more detailed review sections) so are most appropriately placed there, which leaves a BLP stub that consists of new material that amounts to a single award they won and a one word mention of another musical they did an adaption of.

7735:

than under its current title. I think that a good article (which we don't have), outlining the variations, popularity among the Western public, and criticism of it (e.g., that it's fundamentally cissexist and Western), would IMO be valuable.

13831: 1487:

It must be like they are under attack from everywhere - here, talk pages, edit summarys. Awful. I think this is lots for one person. Too much. It is their fault too they make a list that a person from Sri Lanka WikiProject asked to make? See

6676: 19312:. But we also must take into consideration the player's age and his accomplishments: he played three full seasons in the National Football League, the highest major league in the sport all-time, and was also considered a top player for the 4997:

I was unable to find any significant coverage but I was able to find two mentions of the river. One is a note about building a bridge with money from the Asian Development Bank and the other is a notice for contractors to build the bridge.

19695:. I am still not seeing the SIGCOV required by SPORTSCRIT. A brief announcement in a Detroit newspaper about him being elected captain of the Michigan Aggies is routine news, and a local obituary submission is clearly not INDY or SIGCOV. 13441: 1465:

Nominator SeoR writes "this is a fairly nicely-made article" and "an item in a list" is possible. Two days pass. It is written "I do not think that a redirect would be appropriate" - but that is all? Appropriate? What? I cannot find the

21838:. But treating this subject standalone is probably a mistake, as Barbiche and everyone else that I can find almost always treats this as part of a larger subject of classes of Ancien Régime officers in la marine and l'armée de terre. 19448:

If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability. Trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not usually sufficient to establish

19720:. It clearly is significant coverage, especially considering the subject here (captain at a major school, extensive top-level NFL career, 100 years old, pre-internet, not great access to sources). We need to use common sense here. 16689:. As always, concert tours are not "inherently" notable enough for their own separate articles just because they happen — the notability of a concert tour travels through the ability to demonstrate cultural and social and artistic 16100: 16095: 354: 16865: 12626: 16104: 7063: 6943:

women (cis and trans) actually be women. The second story was Blanchard's taxonomy. This article is supposed to be about the first story. A merge/redirect to the story it competes with would be a way of erasing its existence.

18921:

for a concept that wouldn't deserve its own article anyway (how including rotation changes the Tolman–Oppenheimer–Volkoff calculation). The cited paper by Bhatia and Hazarika is about something else and doesn't even include it.

7162:? We decided back then that there was objective evidence that the subject of this article was generally notable, and there won't be fewer sources available now than there were back then. Even the editor nominating the article 21437:. I can find no sources that speak to the subject specifically. The term is used frequently, but not treated as an independent subject as required by GNG. I see not path to creating a valid, encyclopaedic article here. Cheers, 21116:. I can find no sources that speak to the subject specifically. The term is used frequently, but not treated as an independent subject as required by GNG. I see not path to creating a valid, encyclopaedic article here. Cheers, 16054: 16049: 21668: 20511: 16960:: Tech buzzwords, tech buzzwords, OR, tech buzzwords. Even if this is a distinct concept, I have no idea what it is, based on this article. I can find the term used by a couple of professional organizations and publications: 16585: 14971: 16087: 16058: 15958: 13579:" is bonkers behaviour. The even madder thing is that the GNIS has claimed since the 1980s that there is a "ppl" here, somehow mysteriously in what was empty fields in 1930 and an airport from 1934 onwards, according to the 8535:, there aren't many secondary sources available in the English language, Gaye's quoted opinion does crop up a few times though. This might be expected as Gaye writes in the Italian language. His page on the Italian Knowledge 4719:

section under the parent page at your leisure, without having the sword of AfD hanging over you. The question of standalone notability can be readdressed once content and sourcing are at a more mature state. Sounds workable?

17935: 7686:"according to us , any trans woman who's not straight must in fact be transitioning for a different reason than the straight ones". TLDR: there is no way to salvage such an egregious POV-fork of multiple topics written by a 6935: 5881: 16219:

I searched on google scholar, DDG and DDG news. I did not do a paywalled journal search. My concern is NORG, as I understand it, these organisations publish plenty of research, and the sources you provide could be used for

18684: 5153: 3454: 17380: 16041: 15491:. There has been a lot of study into Peter the Painter, particularly from Philip Ruff whose years (decades even) of research into the man has taken him to Latvia and as far as Australia, culminating in the publication of 7055: 17691: 7059: 3823: 20254: 11312:

in view of the reliable sources coverage identified by Jfire in this discussion such as the significant coverage about him in the Cincinatti Enquiror and lengthy reviews of his works which together amounts to a pass of

9894: 1112: 793: 13107: 8466: 7051: 7035: 3949: 17123: 12829: 11470: 3886: 15277: 12012: 11029: 10713: 20784: 14080: 12284: 9337: 7043: 2737: 2343:, thank you for scrutinizing our sources because it's important to use reliable citations. I couldn't find any contradictory or false information in any of the stories from my overview. I honestly do not think that 8146: 7047: 6182: 3090: 2007: 19075: 18410: 16197:

I didn't thoroughly research the others, but I would say some sort of merge to an article about HIV/AIDS research would be superior to deletion, since there is encyclopedic content that can be written about them.

9642: 7293: 6597: 2083:. Ran as fast as a reasonably fast 14 year-old boy, had a quota entry to the World Championships, but a lack of athletic achievements means a lack of significant in-depth coverage. Should ideally be redirected to 1491:

Maybe it is an accident. Maybe mistakes made by everyone. But if they feel miserable and cannot work right now? I think they can have 1 chance to work and make Knowledge better - they cannot fix 1-2-3 problems at

18131: 5433: 14647: 14396: 11745: 9055: 8740: 7891: 4934: 1664: 6456: 2889:. Assistant professors usually have not had time to accumulate enough impact to become notable, and I see nothing here that might indicate an exception to that. The citation record is not yet strong enough for 16710:- to respective album article. It was a big album/tour, and there's even some RS coverage, but as is, it still fails NTOURS. There's no need for an article split when there's nothing of substance to document. 10424: 2084: 21347: 21026: 16354:

that if we can find another source of similar quality. I would much rather keep these articles and expand them, and I concur with Bluerasberry that it is unfortunate these kind of orgs avoid media coverage.

13752: 19993: 19715:

article, from the largest newspaper in one of the U.S.'s largest cities (Detroit), contains approximately 160 words and is directly about Hultman. A sometimes quoted standard, although not set in stone, is

2897:. The "Outstanding Public Archaeology Initiative Award" might be somewhat more significant, but was given to the "Archaeology in the Time of Black Lives Matter” Virtual Panel, not to Dunnavant personally. — 15700: 21916:

If only a few sentences could be written and supported by sources about the subject, that subject does not qualify for a separate article, but should instead be merged into an article about a larger topic

19807:

Wait, so you are now saying that this article doesn't meet the GNG and BASIC and instead IAR is the reason this should be kept? Just trying to understand under what policy you think this should be kept.

12583: 12530: 6916:

is targeted at the wrong article. What the correct target for that redirect should be I don't know right now. I'd need to have a look at sources, and ultimately that may be something better discussed at

6589: 6581: 896:

in which I improperly nominated the article for deletion, Uncle G claimed this is a "largely undocumented claimed rural post office". They found "zero sources indicating any sort of population centre."

176: 171: 18127: 13677:

for doing a thorough search and finding a plausible origin for this place name. There are no sources supporting that this was ever a village or community of any kind, and it certainly is not one now.

9743:

by the the creator (high chance of being the subject themselves), there is no obvious indication this person was, or is, notable. I'd suggest moving the cricketer to this article title also if deleted.

7703: 6761: 4452:? Where are we supposed to put the pre-1860 criminal statutes and pre-1882/1973 criminal procedure statutes (some of which were repealed long before 1860 or 1882/1973)? Where, for example, shall we put 16091: 7659:

Gender identity and sexual orientation are different facets of identity. Everyone has a gender identity and a sexual orientation, but a person’s gender does not determine a person’s sexual orientation.

5630: 13902:

example of a standalone article being created for every combination of two nations, no matter how insignificant their connexion may be. The subject is not encyclopaedic, the sources presented are all

15436:

of this guy are all over the internet. Was he real? Was Jack the Ripper real? This is one of those historical figures (or legends, take your pick) of England that are so fascinating to read about.

7322:." Of course if someone wants to contest those removals they can, but I'm confident that overall they were proper - most of the sources simply didn't discuss the idea of "feminine essence" at all. -- 6633: 4580:

I got my law education from textbooks arranged by course topic: Common Law, Criminal Law, etc.; I'm assuming you did as well. The arrangement you describe follows that pattern. However, Knowledge is

3579: 13825: 10823:- I think there has been coverage in the news in the past due to it being the most remote post office in the UK, but I cannot find anything substantially about it other then mentions in coverage of 10026:, for simpler programming flow. Nagare does not appear to be widely used, and the fact that it is written in Python 2, rather than Python 3, means it has fallen behind the times, but WP:NSOFT says, 6866:

But yeah I guess a redirect might not be right, even if the article as it stands right now is about Blanchard arguing against this, and the specific term of "feminine essence" seems a Blanchardism.

16045: 13744: 13736: 13362: 7159: 6670: 1799:

whose outcome on 18 December 2023 was to draftify it, and was then moved back to mainspace just a couple days later with no real significant change and no significant event to justify such a move.

6893: 20601:: The article has since received more sources, but all of them are still database (and government) and still do not count towards notability. Some are also duplicates of already-cited webpages. 13788: 13435: 11563:

these post offices are not necessarily sited in official places. THey were put where they were needed. It even seems a person who runs a big business of some kind may get their own post office.

5545:

Obvious COI article. Not much about the studio can be found, even in gaming magazines. I cannot rule out that news articles may exist, but the article creator must demonstrate that and didn't.

16786: 16083: 1383:

we'd have for any of the 350,000 registered companies in Ireland. In terms of the hotel business (its history, development and operations) that we are reliant on hyper-local "small ad" style

16037: 14892: 13354: 13346: 348: 16859: 12620: 16257: 17729: 13398: 21662: 20505: 19204:. A more thorough search would likely turn up much more, especially given that many of the sources which mention Hultman—a star before the dawn of the internet—are likely offline. -- 16579: 14965: 17998:

2. ^ "Faizan Islam Institute London organized a conference on the arrival of Allama Dr. Pir Sultan Al-Arifin Siddiqui in Britain". Daily Pakistan. 2022-03-28. Retrieved 2023-12-16.

16966:; but it's not clear they're talking about the same thing (and both of those sources appear rather dated). Unless and until someone can put this in plain English this is a case of 16778: 16770: 15952: 17929: 5875: 17856: 12434:(emphasis added). I know this is a rare case where an SPI was confirmed but only limited to a one account restriction, but I do not think it is relevant to the nomination itself. 6996: 6913: 6889: 6860: 6825: 6786: 4483: 4313:

For the avoidance of doubt only: The "History" section of the IPC article is presently entirely concerned with the drafting of that Code. It says nothing about the pre-1860 laws.

1152:, or any other article threshold. In general, individual small to medium businesses at most rate a mention in a local article, or in a list not subject to article-required rules. 18678: 5147: 3448: 17374: 16822: 16639: 16143: 14884: 14876: 11787: 11075: 9101: 7612: 7582: 7530: 5701:; the sources meet GNG for Karen Crowther rather than Redwood Games. The abstract for the 1000+ word article starts with "Features Karen Crowther of Redwood Games Inc", and the 5199: 17685: 13610:

Vsmith's latest crusade is updating all the "old" GNIS ids with a newer one, I don't understand the details. But, looking at the history of the article, he reverted it for the

7745: 7034:

I don't think that these are meaningfully different, and I think that "woman trapped in a man's body" is better described as an explanatory narrative than as "just a phrase".

4405:, because this article has much less overlap with the articles on its subtopics, and the articles on its subtopics don't cover anything close to the whole of the parent topic. 3817: 20248: 18605: 14153: 10850:

No notability established and this is essentially just an article for a local business which while no doubt important historically to the residents of Foula does not meet GNG

9888: 7488: 7374: 6980:

They're all basically gender essentialism, no? "All real women have women's souls/women's brains/women's ____, and I have one of those, so that makes me a real woman", right?

6606: 6601: 2775: 1106: 787: 311: 16260:). The reason it may not count isn't because the content is irrelevant but it may not be in depth enough for NORG. While it's not necessarily trivial to find a merge target, 13101: 10484:

I do not see independent coverage of this radio station, even though it is in the Accra area. I suspect its recent creation is part of the reason. A possible redirect ATD is

8460: 4459:

The penal code and criminal procedure code articles are not particularly well written either. All of these articles need to be greatly expanded and to some extent rewritten.

3943: 70: 17173: 17117: 14928: 12823: 11464: 9815: 8697: 8644: 7446: 6811: 6610: 3880: 1621: 1568: 21937:

I'm not sure a Merge to this section of the article is feasible given that it is just a list. I don't know how additional content could be incorporated into one list item.

15271: 12006: 11023: 10707: 7258:: Note that the article, an hour before deletion, had almost ten thousand characters removed from it (it was 14k and was taken down to 5k, so about 60% of it removed); see 7116: 2125:, thank you for nominating this article because it allows us to improve it together. This article was mistakenly AfD'ed based on a misunderstanding of the sources used. In 1379:, it is relatively modern and doesn't have "protected status on a national level". In terms of the holding(?) company, it is like any other and we seem reliant on the same 20778: 14074: 12278: 9379: 9331: 9093: 7513: 3375: 2731: 18216:

notable: sources are reliable like Jung news, Daily Pakistan, word news and aslo from Niwa e Waqt, which i have added recently in the article which was above provided by

8140: 6176: 3084: 2001: 21953:

I still have creeks in Kentucky. I'll try to work something out for that section. There's more to be said than just a list, I think, from the aforementioned sources.

20468: 19584: 19069: 18404: 17848: 17840: 16542: 13761: 13756: 12525: 9636: 7463: 7192:

Yes, I've read that discussion, and my main takeaway is that some sources were used improperly and should not have been part of the article. The other takeaway was that

6749: 6593: 1033: 9967:

I noticed that it was PROD'ed before (in 2021), then the creator contested the decision. The proposer removed the PROD tag and decided to AfD it instead but never did.

7279: 5427: 15915: 14641: 14390: 13869: 13765: 13145: 12664: 11739: 11067: 9049: 8734: 7929: 7885: 5838: 4928: 1658: 6450: 1480:

But he/she/they stopped work - because of all this? I do not know for sure. They have no edits after 2 January. When this page opened. Do they know what is happening?

18597: 18572: 17892: 16264:

should be considered before an AfD if there is encyclopedic content worth preserving. I would support merging any of these to a parent/sponsoring organization or to

16236:, the web of organisations is big, and these articles I nominated were just the ones in the cluster I couldn't find sources reporting about the organisation itself. 15996: 10418: 3495: 1319: 714: 16109: 14827: 3580:

https://www-newspapers-com.wikipedialibrary.idm.oclc.org/image/402890/?terms=garlington%20post%20office&match=1&article=ea3f687f-6dba-47b7-8615-54b6e2de4ef8

2214: 21341: 21020: 19117: 14754: 14503: 13748: 10133: 9807: 9799: 9466:. With the content and sources this article has, I don't really see the reason to delete it. Could be interested in the nominator's reply to the expander, though. 9152:– As nom stated, there are multiple hits on Google; however, it appears to be a different person, especially seeing the name mentioned as one of the voice cast of 8223: 6103: 19987: 16179:

I notice you didn't search on Google Scholar or in paywalled academic journals. There is a decent amount of coverage of the organization and its activities, i.e.

16063: 7652:

According to the feminine essence theory, the differences between homosexual and heterosexual transsexuals have no bearing on the origins of transsexualism per se

7296:. The majority of the edit summaries are about removing sources that don't actually relate to the topic, and from what I've seen these descriptions are accurate. 3282:

It seems like a minor event, moving the operation in Mandatory Palestine there makes sense because it's also definitely the one more readers will be looking for.

18641: 18587: 16413: 15694: 13591:

I came up even drier than everyone else, google, google books all, Newspapers.com this was hard too, because the word is common. Sweep this crap out of here now.

12205: 11933: 11391: 11292: 5110: 3367: 3359: 3272: 2854: 2658: 1467: 18135: 17044: 17648: 17337: 16121: 13371: 13366: 9851: 8067: 7732: 7039: 6532: 6025: 2447:

coverage. Often times mentions in other articles can be a jumping off point to find that coverage, which is why I don't think it was appropriate to remove the

2221:

was never mentioned at all as it is a separate newspaper, so claims about that paper need to be made on their own merits instead of by association with the UK

1928: 1025: 1017: 14702: 14451: 10885: 7531:

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Knowledge%3AArticles_for_deletion%2FFeminine_essence_concept_of_transsexuality&diff=1193876107&oldid=1193870548

4446:

Act, 1849 and the Admiralty Jurisdiction (India) Act, 1860 (which are apparently still used in cases of piracy)? Where are we supposed to put the Act of 1828

21625: 18794: 18581: 18331: 16075: 15319: 13375: 13278: 13233: 13219: 13064: 11586: 11581: 10859: 10827:. As there is a photograph of a post office (of a previous building I believe) and very brief mention of the island having a post office, then a redirect to 10773: 8878: 6921:

don't think the existence of the redirect should preclude the deletion of this article, if that is where the consensus of this discussion eventually lies. s

6498: 6216: 4482:

article doesn't tell us anything about these laws other than that they exist. This could be handled just as well in a DAB. Or better yet, a category such as

3780: 3636: 3411: 3162: 2251:

are not to be trusted. In this case, we don't AGF on sources. If a source is contested, as I am now, especially on a BLP article, don't include it. Per BLP,

1737: 893: 65: 60: 55: 51: 47: 20705: 16022: 14781: 12336: 11805: 6962:. Having "a woman's soul", having a "female brain", neurologically determined gender identity, and the idiom of being "a woman trapped in a man's body" are 2074: 20211: 17435: 16000: 11221: 10809: 10210: 10188: 8191: 7682: 7167: 4162: 4057: 3987: 3487: 3212: 3192: 3173: 3154: 3143: 1069: 706: 698: 17415:

A Youth Advisory Council as a concept may be a notable topic, but this current article is extremely poor and cites no references to its claims. I suggest

15116: 14252: 13846: 13518:

from 2010 and 2013 have a label, that was copied in turn from GNIS (lots of circular junk in some recent ones) and the 2016 update removed it – which did

12940: 12390: 9391: 6514: 3291: 1354:: as a non-notable regular hotel, not even 30 yrs old yet, I can't see it being architecturally notable. Rest is routine business activities/descriptions 20822: 20292: 19145: 19125: 18448: 17161: 16943: 16911: 16795: 16790: 16433: 16147: 14736: 14710: 14568: 14485: 14459: 14317: 13358: 12370: 11666: 11326: 11101: 10129: 9399: 8976: 8423: 8219: 7812: 7013:

Err, no? For one, "woman trapped in a man's body" really is just a phrase. It's an idiom that conveys, basically, just the concept of being trans itself.

6691: 6095: 6087: 4855: 3135: 2045: 1698: 1585: 478: 16173: 13813: 12361:

I would just like to let everyone know that if it is not notable enough for continued inclusion then I will not object to the deletion of this article.

12119: 12101: 11847: 10840: 10793: 8298: 5268: 4273:

says "Consensus is ascertained by the quality of the arguments given on the various sides of an issue, as viewed through the lens of Knowledge policy".

4182: 4065: 3995: 3310: 2906: 408: 20856: 20553: 20324: 20039: 18898:

Per nomination, not notable. Only one existing article reference mentions the limit and that is a ad-supported site, one paragraph with no references.

18476: 18456: 17210: 16979: 16939: 16799: 16681: 16310:

Studies run by the org are not "unrelated to the org" any more than reviews of a restaurant's food are unrelated to the notability of the restaurant. (

15474:- There are plenty of sources, and notability seems to be quite well established. If it needs some expansion and/or rewrite that's a separate issue. - 15360: 15017: 14685: 14434: 12786: 12197: 12189: 11925: 11917: 11601: 11383: 11375: 10200: 9684: 9680: 8552: 6881:

we've had problems with POV pushing about it. It's taken significant work by several editors just to keep the article from being any worse than it is.

6658: 6377: 5950: 5471: 4026: 3679: 2779: 2650: 2642: 2178:

is still a tabloid. Because they have very similar logos and editorial styles, the UK Sun, US Sun, and Fiji Sun should be treated as one and the same.

2100: 2088: 1775: 909: 750: 452: 284: 279: 94: 89: 19664: 19309: 18502: 18486: 17524: 17493: 17036: 17028: 16951: 16919: 16190: 15772: 12894: 12354: 12139: 12071:: Little to no coverage of this over 20 yr old virus, I can't see the need to keep the article. Sourcing is poor, even with the archived copies used. 9987: 9959: 9498: 9475: 9452: 9433: 6953: 6930: 5737: 5642: 5289: 4120: 2812: 2793: 2526: 2161:

is made at WP:RSP, I don't think it was appropriate to remove that source while an AfD is being made specifically about lack of sources. Thank you, --

20834: 20031: 19646: 17785: 17733: 16907: 16721: 16233: 16117: 15234: 14901: 14896: 14802: 13496:

It was restored because it has a history as an independent community. I doubt it was always within West Lafayette. Have you checked "all" topo maps?

13456: 13202: 10986: 10670: 10345: 10109: 10052: 9408: 9132: 8059: 8051: 7404: 7389: 7076: 7029: 7008: 6975: 6312: 6139: 5720: 5536: 5195: 2880: 2846: 1920: 1912: 649: 628: 396: 288: 19352: 19235: 19213: 19175: 17547: 12463: 12449: 12417: 10280: 10137: 9707: 5493: 4391: 4260:. There are chapters on criminal law in general works on Indian legal history covering the pre-1860 period, such as Banerjee's English Law in India 3233: 2834: 2117: 583:. Freshwater is the community, this is just a particular place (or, sure, neighborhood around the intersection) within it and not notably distinct. 542: 21781: 20581: 20035: 19378: 18781: 18718: 18323: 18315: 18111: 18064: 16782: 16384: 16326: 16305: 16284: 16251: 16071: 15363:. It appears that I may be wrong on this one - although these books do emphasise the lack of information and likely mythical status of the person. 14905: 14165: 14037: 13936: 13877: 13479: 13423: 12867: 12241: 12046: 11969: 11817: 11508: 11427: 11300: 11285: 10255: 9932: 9294: 8322: 7982: 7699: 6907: 6875: 6855: 6849: 6757: 6274: 5946: 5475: 5239: 4976: 4972: 4207: 3555: 3258: 2694: 2593: 1300: 846: 587: 392: 20882: 20866: 20697: 20689: 19613: 19522: 19156: 18523: 18468: 17759: 17080: 16932: 16192: 15133: 15081: 14235: 13663: 13635: 13600: 13293: 13173: 12062: 10569: 10524: 10004: 9166: 9143: 9124: 8269: 8249: 7331: 7238: 7220: 7205: 7187: 7153: 7134: 7103:(Bailey, Blanchard), not mainstream independent reliable sources. The article subject does not meet criteria for general notability as defined in 6232: 5935: 5677: 5601: 4566:

Even if we resolve all of these particular problems, how are we going to fit a large number of statutes into the IPC article without swamping it?

4149: 3628: 3609: 3566: 2487: 2464: 2434: 2411: 2393: 2356: 2334: 2311: 2273: 2234: 2196: 2170: 1767: 857: 21731: 20830: 20441: 20436: 20350: 20334: 20304: 20300: 20110: 19835: 19817: 19802: 19784: 19770: 19750: 19729: 19506: 19488: 19474: 19460: 19437: 19325: 19288: 19121: 18452: 18085: 17236: 17220: 17169: 16651: 16515: 16510: 16139: 16113: 16004: 15734: 15495:. The quality of this page might not be of the best standard, but that alone is not sufficient reason for deletion. The figure clearly meets our 14689: 14438: 12871: 12556: 12551: 12318: 12080: 11868: 11783: 10747: 10543: 10503: 10083: 9936: 9725: 8904: 8782: 8778: 8207: 8103: 6502: 6240: 5211: 4674: 3181: 3124: 3047: 2049: 1964: 1808: 1718: 1261: 604: 271: 20075: 19416: 18867: 17461: 16702: 15061: 13687: 12963: 11572: 10475: 10149:: While Nagare is not one of the main Python frameworks, it's known by the Python community and thus cited in several reviews / comparaisons as: 10038: 8002: 6291: 6252: 5554: 4087: 3590: 3547: 1844: 1786: 1748: 1729: 882: 838: 565: 434: 21727: 21194:

per A. B. This seems pretty much like a dicdef to me but including all of these terms under the relevant encyclopedia topic is a good outcome.

20592: 20549: 20445: 19914: 19704: 19598: 19577: 19570: 19563: 19556: 19549: 19535: 19528: 19164: 19032: 18367: 18264: 17428: 16961: 16903: 16519: 16229: 16214: 16067: 15888: 15883: 15047: 15013: 14888: 14560: 14552: 14309: 14301: 14157: 13483: 12915: 12560: 11821: 11658: 11650: 11560: 11071: 10485: 9599: 9097: 8968: 8960: 8512: 8508: 7933: 7804: 7796: 7395:

those names he's subsuming into his strawman actually refers to something different and attempting to collect them is an intellectual mistake.

6494: 5962: 5811: 5806: 5513: 4988: 4847: 4839: 4414: 4139: 2927: 2850: 2053: 1863: 1756: 1577: 1554: 1502: 1443: 1281: 1243: 1211: 369: 21809: 20741: 20051: 19683: 19591: 19542: 19137: 18206: 16880: 15029: 14141: 13490: 12641: 9750: 9193: 8871: 8794: 8526: 7947: 5001:

Construction Of Bridge Over Radiya River Near Radiya Village And Panchayat In Mohanpur Block, District . (2022, November 2). Mena Report, NA.

4282: 4222: 2946: 1311: 1292: 1166:

I have stayed in Irish hotels. I am not expert on hotel notability. But "10-12 hotels" in all of Ireland! This is very tiny. There is Dublin (

968: 21929: 21735: 20367: 19399: 19304:: the article is now over 700 words and provides an extensive summary of his life. There are additionally some sources with some depth, e.g. 19274: 19113: 18907: 18759: 18240: 18077: 17865: 17860: 17203: 16635: 16631: 16627: 16186: 15892: 15405: 15315: 15009: 13807: 12668: 11512: 10831:

might be worthwhile, though I am not 100% convinced. Whatever the case, I do not see that there is enough coverage for a standalone article.

9375: 8577: 8504: 7305: 6580: 6369: 6361: 5815: 5592: 5390: 3536: 2801: 1345: 947: 827: 336: 21878: 20846: 20316: 19302:

If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability

18931: 17185: 16847: 15810: 15746: 14177: 13915: 13889: 13550: 13530: 13505: 12684: 12608: 11551: 11524: 7621: 6652: 5984: 5707:

article is about her achievements, mentioning that she "recently" founded Redwood Games. I think a redirect would be more appropriate, so I

5581: 4689: 4651:

for now per above, but I think an overview article can be written that summarizes each of the laws and links to the appropriate pages using

2558: 2544: 1829: 1505: 1413: 515: 21398: 21077: 20826: 20640: 20428: 20296: 18081: 17869: 17476:. The article does contain references in the the form of a reading list. The problems with the article can be resolved through editing per 17165: 16623: 16502: 15409: 15070: 14693: 14604: 14442: 14353: 14161: 13873: 13564: 13149: 12672: 12543: 12129:- This was a notable virus back in the early 2000s. This article should be preserved for historical purposes or maybe merged with another. 11702: 10466: 10462: 10337: 10329: 10048: 9012: 8815: 8639: 8516: 7848: 7362: 6009: 4891: 4780: 4762: 4744: 4729: 4623: 4608: 4575: 4536: 4468: 4436: 4356: 4341: 4328:

pre-1860 laws under the single heading, "before the Indian Penal Code" suggests to me that the material can justifiably be included in the

4322: 4308: 4094: 4003: 1796: 1563: 1363: 21898: 21683: 20526: 16600: 15801:

being an A–Z catalogue of drugs that can be bought in stores, for example), product catalogue stuff more than it is encyclopaedia stuff.

15508: 15483: 15421: 15099: 14986: 13158: 1710: 1446: 928: 21948: 21761: 18614: 18609: 15973: 15875: 15449: 15437: 15372: 15350: 13770: 10070: 10056: 10015: 7695: 7631:

Contemporary proponents of this view also generally hold that the female-typical structure of the gender identity center(s) is congenital

7611:

All arguments towards keeping have relied on claims of notability but 1) the original AFD was including the OR in the citation count, 2)

6753: 6413: 5798: 5191: 5083: 5078: 1246: 1229: 1214: 21962: 21716: 21650: 20618: 20573: 20493: 17950: 16567: 15466: 14953: 13803: 13417: 7196:

was the main proponent of keeping the article, and that you appear to have been in very close agreement with him on a number of issues.

7050:

calls it "a transgressive narrative" that "became the definition of trans femininity during the modernist period despite" being wrong.

6615: 5896: 4523:

As to rewriting the IPC and the criminal procedure code articles, I agree, and I'm happy to leave that rewriting in your capable hands,

4161:- Because there are three criminal laws and each law has its own article, redirecting just to any one article would again appear messy. 2294:

from its list of affected domains to search for in the rightmost column. What is your rationale for contesting The Fiji Sun? Looking at

18888: 18805: 18618: 17852: 17621: 17616: 17310: 17305: 15940: 10381: 9824: 9819: 7598:: The article consists almost entirely of primary sources from Bailey/Blanchard (and in once case, Dreger). Their views are considered 7424:

that strung together unrelated sources in order to present essentially an editor's argument for Blanchard's position; the sources that

6648: 5087: 4563:, but how would readers be able to reach that page from the IPC article (which gives no indication that piracy is an offence in India)? 3983: 18727: 18699: 17917: 15556: 15390: 15331: 5863: 5168: 3469: 3268: 1273: 1161: 166: 21598: 21593: 19906: 19898: 17776:. I wasn't able to locate online copies of the sources, though I did find a table of contents for one of them, and it had this book. 17625: 17395: 17314: 13037: 13032: 9828: 4584:. There is no editorial onus on us to make sure the reader finds out about the Admiralty Acts unless they specifically search for it. 3753: 3748: 3384: 3379: 18793:. I agree this article is hard to follow and it's hard to know exactly how to clean it up. Also, per the nominator's search and the 18666: 17706: 13782: 7500:

pointed out, previous discussions already established the notability of this topic. The information in this article should included

7054:

calls it "the 'wrong body' narrative" and says that it was medically constructed and imposed on trans folk by medical gatekeepers.

5135: 4456:(which applied to India in addition to the code)? Where are we supposed to put rules of common law? And all the other criminal laws. 3838: 3436: 21907: 21887: 21602: 21478: 21304: 21157: 20983: 20269: 20184: 20179: 18876: 18814: 18739: 18601: 17362: 13853: 13413: 13041: 9909: 6627: 5070: 3757: 3388: 1127: 1042: 1037: 808: 213: 21424: 21103: 17673: 14223: 13555:

The history books tell us that there was flight training at the university airport during the war. Our article touches upon it.

13122: 8481: 6698: 5002: 3964: 3805: 3600:

Pleasant hill is mentioned many times without a state name in the local papers for Ottawa Kansas. Many turn out to be in Missouri.

2937:

I agree with WP Toosoon. Also the page looks like written from a fan’s point of view - not a good case for Knowledge biography. --

330: 21391: 21070: 20236: 20188: 19950: 17608: 17297: 17138: 16841: 16225: 12844: 12602: 11485: 9876: 9811: 8396: 8391: 3901: 1094: 1046: 775: 15292: 13380: 13089: 12027: 11044: 10728: 10028:"software with significant... technical importance... are notable even if they are no longer in widespread use or distribution." 8448: 3931: 469:

Based on the evidence provided, it cannot be shown to be notable due to lack of sources to completely satisfy WP:GEOLAND or WP:N

21723: 21585: 20818: 20799: 20545: 20288: 20027: 19333:

per BeanieFan11. Also, NGRIDIRON used to presume notability for 1 game in the NFL and this guy had 30 (and most as a starter).

19109: 18444: 18073: 18020:

4. ^ "pir sultan ul arifeen visited zia ul ummah". World News TV "United Kingdom" (in Urdu). 2017-10-11. Retrieved 2023-12-16.

17725: 17157: 17105: 16899: 16619: 16135: 15992: 15657: 15401: 15311: 15005: 14681: 14430: 14149: 14095: 13865: 13735: 13475: 13141: 13024: 12863: 12811: 12759: 12754: 12660: 12299: 11813: 11779: 11504: 11452: 11063: 10458: 9928: 9676: 9441:: Added a few things, removed various IMDb and other dead refs. It still can be improved a lot. Still willing to do it later.-- 9371: 9352: 9089: 8774: 8500: 8400: 8215: 7925: 7125:, if what the article currently describes is a strawman, what do you think the non-strawman description would say differently? 7046:

calls it "the wrong body trans* narrative", and condemns it for being "safe and understandable from a cisgender perspective".

6490: 5942: 5467: 5187: 4968: 4489:

The "History" section of our page is currently talking only about the IPC. If there's anything in it that isn't covered by the

4447: 3868: 3740: 3504: 3499: 3371: 2842: 2771: 2752: 2041: 723: 718: 388: 156: 21524: 21446: 21203: 21125: 19494: 15259: 13463: 11994: 11011: 10695: 8161: 7617: 7560:“Disputes over page content are usually not dealt with by deleting the page”, and the page had already been reduced to a stub. 7536: 6197: 4263:; chapter 16 of Sinha's Legal History of India is "History of Criminal Law . . . in India before . . . the Indian Penal Code" 3105: 2022: 21833: 21822: 21644: 20766: 20487: 20171: 19407:– state of the article now (January 2) vs. prior (January 1 and earlier) shows significant expansion via additional sources. 19090: 18425: 16804: 16561: 15207: 15202: 14947: 14062: 13526:

a neighborhood later incorporated into the city at some point, that doesn't mean it's notable or needs a standalone article.

13345: 12763: 12565: 12266: 10959: 10954: 10643: 10638: 9657: 9319: 6112: 6107: 3658: 3646: 3508: 3242: 2719: 1029: 727: 326: 224: 218: 21505: 21497:

are slightly different variations of municipal subdivisions. All of them can be merged and redirected to the same target. --

21184: 21176:

are slightly different variations of municipal subdivisions. All of them can be merged and redirected to the same target. --

18009:

3. ^ "Arrival of Sajjad Nasheen Niryan Sharif Pir Sultan Al-Arifin Siddiqui in Britain". jang.com.pk. Retrieved 2023-12-16.

16837: 15934: 15440:

is proof that there's room for this article in Knowledge. With these types, it's even better if the riddle is never solved.

12598: 11538: 8128: 6164: 5448: 4453: 4252: 3264: 3072: 1989: 293: 19057: 18861: 18392: 17911: 15211: 14910: 14777: 14662: 14411: 14010: 14005: 13392: 12422:

As I noted in my nomination, the SPI was resolved subject to a one account restriction and so this is not eligible for CSD

12214: 12209: 11942: 11937: 11760: 11400: 11395: 10963: 10647: 9624: 9267: 9262: 9070: 8755: 8383: 7906: 7430: 6829: 6799: 6735: 6116: 5857: 4949: 4261: 4229: 2667: 2662: 2108:

I am unable to find much coverage at all, which is understandable considering his athletic achievements (or lack thereof).

1679: 17053: 17048: 15356: 13778: 11533:. I have found no mention of Dennison in neither the 1890, 1900, 1920, 1940, nor the 1960 census records. There's a one-N 7058:

also calls it "the wrong body narrative" and says that trans folk differ on whether it is imposed involuntarily on them.

6471: 5415: 4255: 21607: 20450: 19305: 19258: 18660: 18157: 16524: 14629: 14378: 14014: 13819: 12746: 12218: 11946: 11727: 11404: 11139: 10439: 10218: 10196: 9271: 9037: 8722: 8076: 8071: 7976: 7873: 7166:

that the subject pre-dated Blanchard's comments on it and that his concern was with who wrote it (it's tricky to balance

6854:

Well the article as it exists, both before the recent removals and now, is not really about the story - there was only a

6623: 5820: 5702: 5621: 5129: 4916: 3491: 3430: 3020: 3015: 2671: 1937: 1932: 1646: 710: 418: 275: 21: 21640: 20483: 17356: 17057: 16816: 16557: 15897: 14943: 12948:- per above comments. The two can be used as synonyms: "a particular program called a helper application or a plug-in ( 12577: 11179: 6664: 6438: 4749:

I am no longer talking about the Penal Code of 1860. My latest proposal to you is to merge the contents as a section in

376: 21362: 21041: 19005: 19000: 18340: 18335: 17874: 17667: 16887: 16769: 16261: 16256:

NORG coverage includes coverage of an organization's activities, such as organizing trials of vaginal microbicide (see

15930: 15194: 12890: 12648: 11239: 10946: 10881: 10630: 10406: 10164: 9983: 9955: 9703: 9572: 9567: 9120: 8080: 7555: 7285: 6099: 5007: 4715:, it will be spun off back into this page, with the original page history intact. This way, you can keep improving the 4711:

section there, leaving the current page as a redirect to that section. If the section grows too large for embedding in

4046: 4038: 4022: 3799: 3024: 2787: 1941: 305: 141: 136: 20714: 20709: 20230: 20008: 17907: 14922: 13774: 13616:

So his assertion that it's a valid community is based on GNIS entirely, he's just a competitionist obsessed with GNIS.

9870: 5853: 4450: 1088: 769: 21850: 21756: 21419: 21382:

This doesn't seem to be notable enough to meet WP:GNG. I cannot find any sources either that demonstrate notability.

21329: 21098: 21008: 20105: 19009: 18623: 18344: 18106: 17754: 17630: 17456: 16168: 15798: 15715: 14731: 14480: 13997: 13388: 13083: 12201: 11929: 11842: 11387: 11096: 10768: 10104: 9576: 9254: 8899: 8442: 8244: 6619: 5363: 5358: 5092: 4596: 4115: 3925: 2875: 2654: 1340: 258: 146: 21619: 21061:

This doesn't seem to be notable enough to meet WP:GNG. I cannot find any sources either that demonstrate otherwise.

20718: 20462: 19975: 19390:

is just an essay, and not of ideal applicability to pre-internet subjects, especially not subjects of this vintage.

18656: 17319: 17099: 17040: 16536: 13429: 12949: 12805: 11446: 9833: 6991:. Articles, including this one, are generally supposed to be about the ideas, not about the words. The article at 5832: 5125: 3862: 3426: 1371:. Per nom it doesn't appear that the subject meets any applicable criteria. In terms of the hotel building, and per 21690: 20533: 20432: 20071: 19313: 19262: 18828: 17352: 16607: 16506: 15909: 15682: 15253: 14993: 14875: 14823: 14577: 14572: 14326: 14321: 14248: 13046: 12547: 12115: 12058: 11988: 11675: 11670: 11005: 10689: 10520: 10499: 10174: 9739:, not convinced the "awards" are notable, and some can't easily even be verified. Putting aside the fairly obvious 8985: 8980: 8670: 8665: 8063: 7821: 7816: 7259: 6912:

As you say, the term and its use significantly predate Blanchard's work. That to me suggests that the redirect for

6228: 5367: 4864: 4859: 3762: 3393: 3007: 2213:

would say "The Sun (all editions)" or just "The Sun" instead of specifically "The Sun (UK)" as it does. Looking at

1924: 1594: 1589: 114: 34: 20760: 20193: 18031:

5. ^ "The three-day Urs will begin today at Dargah Nirian Sharif Tarakhil". dailyausaf.com. Retrieved 2023-12-16.

17886: 17663: 15980: 14056: 12260: 9313: 7642:

Considerable scientific evidence has emerged demonstrating a durable biological element underlying gender identity

7602:

to the extreme, and there is no Knowledge article that would be improved by shoehorning in their primary opinions.

4614:

logical arrangement, or an arrangement that happens to facilitate navigation, constitute teaching or instruction.

3795: 2713: 1051: 20226: 19513:

How is a brief announcement in a Detroit newspaper about a Michigan university topic "national-level coverage"??

18992: 18327: 17957: 15879: 14750: 14581: 14499: 14330: 11679: 11559:

There are only a handful of mentions for these places in the local paper (ottawa herald), and as we learned from

11199: 9866: 9559: 8989: 8674: 8405: 8122: 7825: 6386: 6381: 6303:

sweeteners, but that's the only other option I can think of. There isn't enough to make a standalone Norbu page.

6158: 5903: 5802: 4868: 3066: 2205:, thank you for your response. That may be your opinion, but it is not the opinion of the Knowledge community at 1983: 1598: 1439: 1084: 765: 193: 131: 42: 17: 20701: 19051: 18635: 18386: 17642: 17480:. There are also a number of notable Youth Advisory Councils on Knowledge which could be linked in the article. 17062: 16405: 14918: 13079: 12768: 9618: 8438: 5785: 5104: 4078:: the verifiable portions already exist in the three articles mentioned by the nom, and the rest reads like OR. 3921: 3513: 732: 20415: 18706: 18153: 17331: 17095: 16489: 15216: 15112: 12801: 11951: 11442: 10968: 10652: 10354: 10349: 10222: 9845: 7171: 6390: 6121: 5409: 5350: 5175: 3858: 3476: 301: 267: 259: 20723: 20083:: Another completely non-notable DTV America/HC2/Innovate facility without anything even remotely approaching 17402: 16812: 16180: 15249: 14623: 14372: 14019: 13058: 12573: 12223: 11984: 11721: 11409: 11001: 10685: 9276: 9031: 8716: 7867: 7638: 5828: 4910: 3774: 3405: 2676: 1640: 342: 20756: 20205: 17713: 16853: 16417: 16343:

coverage. If you still believe the articles warrant keeping, I would kindly appreciate if you could list the

15862: 14564: 14313: 14052: 13384: 12614: 12256: 11662: 11597: 11116:

has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work

10358: 10159: 9309: 8972: 8657: 8085: 7808: 7674: 7472: 7350: 6432: 4851: 3845: 3675: 3029: 2709: 1946: 1581: 1063: 905: 21707:, cannot find any sources to indicate notability other than passing mentions of the existence of this term. 20276: 19014: 18349: 15521: 10400: 9916: 9581: 8417: 8118: 6154: 3062: 1979: 1134: 815: 203: 21277: 21272: 20956: 20951: 19047: 18382: 18190: 17839: 17074: 16315: 16273: 16203: 13129: 12780: 9614: 8488: 6373: 5372: 5074: 4670: 4266:; chapter 26 of Mittal's An Introduction to Indian Legal History is "Criminal Law before . . . Penal Code" 3971: 3525: 744: 151: 21615: 21323: 21002: 20458: 17638: 17145: 16808: 16532: 15228: 14586: 14335: 13645:

I was thinking about what I learned going through the 19th century papers. There were two general uses of

12851: 12569: 11963: 11684: 11492: 10980: 10664: 8994: 8679: 7830: 6133: 5405: 4873: 3908: 1603: 208: 21656: 21629: 21308: 21281: 20987: 20960: 20745: 20735: 20499: 20472: 20424: 20416: 20215: 19969: 19954: 19923: 19918: 19036: 18645: 18371: 18051:

BEFORE showed nothing that meets WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth.

18036:

Annoucement about a visit and speaking engagement. Fails WP:IS WP:RS no WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject

18025:

Annoucement about a visit and speaking engagement. Fails WP:IS WP:RS no WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject

17896: 17652: 17612: 17543: 17518: 17487: 17341: 17301: 17084: 16826: 16573: 16546: 16498: 16490: 16380: 16366: 16301: 16247: 16018: 15919: 15905: 15766: 15661: 15299: 15238: 14959: 14932: 14819: 14619: 14608: 14368: 14357: 14244: 14041: 14031: 13792: 13402: 13272: 13196: 13068: 12790: 12587: 12539: 12516: 12445: 12332: 12245: 12235: 12034: 11973: 11801: 11717: 11706: 11431: 11421: 11051: 10990: 10735: 10674: 10385: 10341: 9855: 9841: 9603: 9298: 9288: 9027: 9016: 8849: 8712: 8701: 8546: 8427: 8292: 8107: 7863: 7852: 7720: 6637: 6417: 6395: 6143: 5842: 5394: 5114: 4906: 4895: 4054: 3784: 3415: 3051: 2698: 2688: 1968: 1636: 1625: 1495: 1430: 1380: 1073: 754: 315: 297: 198: 107: 20806: 19257:. It is of course possible that some Michican newspapers are not available there. Of the above sources, 17882: 17595: 15946: 15676: 14914: 14102: 13054: 12306: 10363: 9359: 8097: 6428: 4240: 3041: 2759: 2549:

The new source also contains a trivial passing mention. He does not appear in any other IDNES articles.

1958: 21589: 19927: 19790: 19026: 18571: 18361: 17923: 15871: 15863: 15630: 15625: 14746: 14700: 14495: 14449: 13028: 12936: 12515: 12097: 11296: 10396: 9593: 8168: 7270: 6898:, and the fact that Blanchard happened to write something about it does not mean that it's his idea. 6204: 5869: 5794: 5786: 5057: 4592: 3744: 3112: 2029: 21611: 21286: 20965: 20454: 19097: 18631: 18432: 16528: 16128:

Because these two similarly turn up no independent scholar or news search results, and are both stubs.

10875:. Perfectly fine as a redirect even if it is not notable for purposes of having its own article. ---- 9664: 7635:

Thus the trans person has a sort of neurological intersex condition, typically understood to be inborn

5824: 5384: 5100: 3401: 21983: 21795: 21564: 21541: 21319: 21264: 21243: 21220: 20998: 20943: 20922: 20899: 20680: 20657: 20407: 20384: 20175: 20150: 20127: 19932: 19889: 19866: 19642: 19371: 18971: 18948: 18817:

written by a user who clearly has poor English skills. The initial versions of two other articles by

18672: 18563: 18540: 18306: 18283: 17831: 17808: 17587: 17564: 17477: 17327: 17284: 17276: 17253: 17019: 16996: 16761: 16738: 16481: 16458: 15901: 15854: 15831: 15634: 15596: 15573: 15173: 15150: 15108: 14867: 14844: 14598: 14543: 14520: 14347: 14292: 14269: 13976: 13953: 13727: 13704: 13337: 13314: 13003: 12980: 12725: 12702: 12507: 12484: 12180: 12157: 11908: 11885: 11696: 11641: 11618: 11366: 11343: 10925: 10902: 10609: 10586: 10320: 10297: 10192: 9798: 9790: 9767: 9538: 9515: 9233: 9210: 9006: 8951: 8928: 8691: 8621: 8598: 8362: 8339: 8042: 8019: 7842: 7787: 7764: 7716: 6781: 6572: 6549: 6352: 6329: 6078: 6055: 5777: 5754: 5455: 5329: 5306: 5264: 5141: 5049: 5026: 4885: 4830: 4807: 4042: 3719: 3696: 3442: 3350: 3327: 2986: 2963: 2942: 2633: 2610: 2483: 2430: 2389: 2330: 2290:

just said "The Sun", but it doesn't say that -- it says "The Sun (UK)" specifically, and it excludes

2269: 2192: 2070: 1903: 1880: 1615: 1545: 1522: 1474: 1457: 1421: 1401: 1179: 1008: 985: 689: 666: 250: 19965: 19822:

It does meet GNG and BASIC. I am saying that we need to use common sense to come to that conclusion

18161: 17878: 17368: 15639: 14669: 14418: 11767: 11159: 9077: 8762: 7913: 7365:, there are almost no mentions of it, and those that there are all attribute the term to Blanchard. 6888:, I see you saying something similar. What exactly about Blanchard's typology makes you think that 6407: 6129: 4956: 3770: 1686: 21777: 20201: 19910: 19344: 19209: 18856: 17781: 17679: 16677: 15672: 15355:

You are right, there is more to read than I thought. I have also found some more sources including

15052:

Gsearch is simply PR items, then the few sources already used in the article, which aren't useful.

14773: 14231: 14187: 13932: 13229: 13215: 13169: 13011: 11590: 10537:

Excellent work on this. I agree that we're safer not having an ATD and deleting for those reasons.

10375: 9387: 8387: 7990:. His name does not have a different spelling in German; in fact, the entry was salted on de-wiki: 7712: 6478: 5711:

went ahead and started an article so that there was something to redirect/merge into, if needed. -

3811: 3727: 3668: 3521: 3358: 3207: 2902: 1059: 898: 740: 20242: 18627: 18255:

based on the source table above, I can't find anything further about this person that would help.

17634: 10446: 10169: 10043:

Those reviews are quite outdated as Nagare has been updated to Python 3 and now works with latest

9882: 8413: 5096: 1100: 781: 21911: 21298: 20977: 20158: 19465:

National-level coverage for being named captain of a prestigious football team is not trivial...

17323: 17070: 16975: 15617: 14226:). Based on all that, he appears to meet Knowledge's author and academic notability standards. -- 13576: 13095: 12776: 12750: 12386: 12106:

Considering all this, it's surprising the article has survived since 2008 without being deleted.

11417: 10214: 9837: 8454: 7972: 7578: 6528: 6308: 5733: 5638: 5285: 5066: 5058: 4166: 4061: 4050: 3991: 3937: 3287: 2298:, it appears to be mainly local news and not sensationalist or inaccurate coverage. Compare with 2134: 2126: 1804: 1016: 404: 21369: 21048: 19944: 18835: 17111: 16184: 15224: 13050: 12817: 11959: 11458: 10976: 10660: 3874: 3766: 3397: 506:

that there's nothing actually named this and this isn't used as anyone's address, back in 2009.

20879: 20863: 20731: 20347: 20331: 20197: 20015: 19738: 18499: 18483: 18122:

it's unclear what makes him notable? I don't see any proper source that confirms his biography,

17604: 17596: 17513: 17482: 17293: 17285: 17233: 17217: 16947: 16915: 16716: 16661: 16428: 16420:, which is much bigger. I could support a deletion or redirect/merge of the wiki content here. 15786: 15761: 15651: 15265: 15198: 15129: 14027: 13659: 13631: 13623: 13596: 13267: 13191: 12886: 12366: 12231: 12000: 11568: 11114:, which says that a creative professional (such as a composer and playwright) is notable if he 11017: 10950: 10701: 10634: 9979: 9951: 9699: 9284: 9116: 8541: 8536: 8370: 8318: 8287: 7741: 7678: 7385: 7216: 7183: 7130: 7072: 7004: 6949: 6926: 6903: 6845: 5716: 5003:

https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A725263368/EAIM?u=anon~bb1d8da8&sid=sitemap&xid=7b6864ab

4018: 3624: 3605: 3586: 2684: 1841: 1055: 878: 637: 613: 580: 551: 499: 492: 484: 474: 466: 448: 21553:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

21232:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

20911:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

20772: 20669:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

20396:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

20139:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

19878:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

19296:. I have just performed an extensive expansion of the article which shows that Hultman passes 19261:

is probably the best but not enough to base a whole article on. I would suggest a redirect to

18960:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

18552:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

18295:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

17820:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

17576:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

17265:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

17008:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

16750:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

16470:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

15843:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

15722: 15585:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

15162:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

14856:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

14532:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

14281:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

14068: 13965:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

13716:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

13515: 13326:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

12992:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

12714:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

12496:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

12272: 12169:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

11897:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

11630:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

11355:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

10914:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

10598:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

10309:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

9779:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

9527:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

9325: 9222:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

8940:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

8610:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

8409: 8351:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

8093: 8031:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

7776:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

7687: 6561:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

6341:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

6067:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

5766:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

5318:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

5038:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

4819:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

4236:

of 1859 reprinted in 2nd Ed of 1865; Baynes, The Criminal Law of the Madras Presidency, 1848:

3708:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

3339:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

3037: 2975:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

2725: 2622:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

1954: 1892:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

1534:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

997:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

678:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

239:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

21979: 21978: