Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 January 1

21063:- The above discussion is making me dizzy. I finally found the prod that said, "Does not meet the bar for WP:NCHARITY. Expect unopposed good-faith delete votes at AFD. (proposed by बिनोद थारू)" What I get from reading the foundation's home page is a lot more clear. "Mr. H. Fyssen created the Foundation state approved by March 21st, 1979" Financially supported 1320 scientists, published 45 books, awarded 43 prizes, etc. etc. etc. This foundation exists to support scientists. And more power to them. I get it. English language sources look OK to me. Knowledge would do well to keep this article. 6917:- a) changelogs are hard or impossible to find specially for older versions b) The list contains info which is nowhere to find on the Autocad's website: the DWG tag which specifies save format broad compatibility c) I spent a considerable amount of time/did a lot of research to establish OS compatibility for older versions (which exists only in printed-then-scanned old computer magazines found of books google com). This information is completely missing on the website. In fact the website contains information only for the past limited number of releases, but not for any older releases. 20980:. Foundation that administers a prestigious international award (the list of recipients is a virtually who's who in cognitive sciences), supports research by postdoctoral stipends and research grants, and organizes regular symposia that most of the time result in books published by major publishers and receiving positive reviews (perhaps a list should be added to the article). All this can be found using Google, but I have currently no time to add all that to the article. I have expanded it a bit and added some sources (some to the prestigious national french newspaper 7203: 15056: 20556:(government press), and there is no secondary analysis, depth or other indication of notability. I can find no scholarly treatment of this relationship nor mentions in reputable journals. Merging to one or both countries' articles might be possible, but I can find no info particularly worth merging and no sourcing on which to base such a merge. Redir begs the question of which country to redirect towards (and do we really expect this as a search string?). Cheers, 20241:(government press), and there is no secondary analysis, depth or other indication of notability. I can find no scholarly treatment of this relationship nor mentions in reputable journals. Merging to one or both countries' articles might be possible, but I can find no info particularly worth merging and no sourcing on which to base such a merge. Redir begs the question of which country to redirect towards (and do we really expect this as a search string?). Cheers, 18936: 12291: 7557: 15027: 13455: 13719: 6015: 6326: 21391:, where a brief note can be made about it, in the Ghost Towns section. Pansy, Franklin County, Kansas, was very briefly regarded as a community in a few sources, but it was for less than five years. You couldn't string together more than five sentences about it, which isn't enough for a standalone article. Cram, 1900, gives it a population of X, indicating a rail site, post office, or temporary community only. The 4562: 18405: 17079: 9240:, especially on an article I only encountered from skimming the AfD log and thus have little outside interest in. I was just trying to do what seemed to me like obvious remedial drive-by cleanups, but I guess someone else disagreed. Looks like that IP is genuinely interested in improving the article. If this article is kept, maybe you two can continue having dialogue on the talk page as to how to improve it. 160: 4850: 35: 9466:, exceedingly distinct concept commonly invoked in literary studies. No immediate evidence of major OR or POV-pushing issues, subject is primarily used in reference to a specific Western paradigm of race so established racial discourses already within that paradigm do not constitute POV and attribution is often obvious from context. I do not see anything that could not be fixed with time. 9177:. A simple search for the word "racialization" on Google Books yields dozens of results with the word "racialization" in the book title, implying that the topic is extremely well-covered by reliable sources. The issues described above can all be resolved through normal editing; unsourced statements can be removed, and POV or undue sources can be swapped with better ones. 11611:: he appears to be a functionary in whatever role he's in. Calling up the minister and complaining doesn't make you notable. Perhaps more as an activist, but what's given is stories about things he's been involved with that are "colourful" more than anything else. Secretary for 3 years doesn't get you notability and I'm not sure the rest of it does either. 6922:

active WP editors willing to delete anything under any pretense is a lot higher than the number of people interested in a particular narrow/historical issue. The fact this article has caught someone's attention is already alarming in itself. This means someone is scavenging Knowledge trying to exercise their ability and right to delete someone's hard work.

8752:. Policy guidance given in both WP:GNG and WP:GEOLAND are that such articles should be merged into a related article or deleted. This place is a recent construct that was never legally recognized, cited news article describes the Arroyo Vista as a group of people not a place. I see no reason to merge it with the county article. 6981:. This leaves the table, I think the major points that might be merged again are already in the target (imo), I personally don't think a merge would improve the target (imo), but it also wouldn't hurt, so if there is a consensus that some of the info should be merged into the appropriate section, I have no objection. 22126:

that was externally linked to. I don't trust the factual accuracy of this "history" that outright said that it was a good selling point, and even gave the purchase price; and Knowledge should not be hosting barely edited advertisements at all, let alone long-expired advertisements. Needless to say,

13865:

There is no independent reliable sourcing about the subject. They do not meet general notability requirements nor notability requirements for academics or government officials. One of many articles spammed by a ring of editors who are singularly focused on promoting the Azerbaijani government/elites.

16338:

Unfortunately, I haven't had time to read through all of his articles to determine exactly his particular field and since he was in Bulgaria, I don't have access to their publications that would cover this field outside of publishing the research directly. Nor do I actually speak or read Bulgarian -

16334:

He's published 100 papers per the bibliography linked in the article. I was told not to list them all, so I put that it was a select bibliography and stopped. I'm afraid I'm confused as to what warrants notability for academics because his body of work seems to warrant an article as I understand the

10644:

Bringing to AfD after deprod-ed on the grounds that there are books about him which establish notability. However, I could not find the books mentioned (in an English language search) about him, anything else per WP:BEFORE to establish notability, or to confirm any of the biographical details. Might

9825:

One thing that is not often said but should be a disclaimer about every AfD nomination of an American broadcast journalist is that the Emmy Awards are regional (in this case, Los Angeles). I have argued they don't confer notability multiple times at AfD. I'm not personally convinced that the 1984 LA

9194:

I also don't think racialization is significant enough to have its own article, considering the Racial formation theory and Race articles which already include the bulk of the encyclopedically appropriate content in this article. Information about racism in education and the workforce is represented

9136:

Racialization in an educational setting is apparent based on the teacher and the background they come from. The teacher’s race along with their views that came along through socialization growing up can affect the way the students portray themselves in a classroom setting. It also has to do with the

22023:

Contested PROD. The original article cited only GNIS and Durham's place names gazetteer as sources, which are not reliable or indicators of notability. The user who removed the PROD added some content, which is appreciated, but it is sourced to a real estate listing, which I can't imagine is RS.

16215:

Question: Can or should the long list of publications be created as a "List of Georgi Rikov publictions" article? I know almost nothing of topic of the author's works so unable to evaluate how significant contributions they are. Just curious if a list might be helpful here to reduce article length.

9442:

While the issue of racialization can be included in articles such as Racial Formation Theory, it is ultimately a different concept to Racial Formation Theory, and it would be beneficial to have an article that could fully expand on it and explain issues of racialization in detail. Even if currently

11332:

This article was previously deleted through AFD. He doesn't have any significant coverage before AAP affiliation. The Social Activism section was deliberately made look like notable; he wasn't known in the Patidar reservation agitation and there is only a passing mention about him before political

9319:

sourced and randomly picking a couple I was able to verify the claims. I would recommend to start with cleanup, trying to find sources for unattributed quotes, or if not removing them. I would like to see this article improve to the point it can meaningfully be put in summary style in the cultural

6921:

In the end I don't care about this "Deletion" process. I've noticed that in wikipedia it is disproportionally skewed depending on whether the subject is currently relevant/hot or not. If it's not relevant/new/fresh enough, articles are deleted without any second thoughts just because the number of

21422:

I skimmed through the Ottawa daily herald and found passing mentions of this place, but this appears limited to a very brief period. There is a pansy grower in the area, this is probably related to the community. I will not be able to erase the image of the ad for a "formaldehyde inhaler" from my

19755:

essay that advances the thesis that Azerbaijan has undertaken legal reform . That's not something which is reflected in reliable sources. RS characterize Azerbaijan as an authoritarian state where power is in the hands of the executive, there is no principled rule of law, and the legislature and

16089:

Maybe wait until consensus becomes clearer? It is genuinely not obvious to me whether he should be considered to pass #C8, or whether we have enough sourcing for some other kind of notability. That's why my unprod message also suggested the need for a full discussion, which you have now started.

10758:

Can you clarify what these references are? They seem to be somewhere between an homage and an obituary based on the Google translation. This seems more like a personal page and therefore I don't know if it meets a level of reliable/independent source to establish notability. The publications are

3710:

Hi, I made this article as a translation of the corresponding article in Portuguese Knowledge. I have updated it now to better reflect the quantity of sources in the original, some of which I had accidentally omitted. Please reconsider this nomination, and if we do get consensus that it merits

7008:

Exhaustive logs of software updates. Use reliable third-party (not self-published or official) sources in articles dealing with software updates to describe the versions listed or discussed in the article. Common sense must be applied regarding the level of detail to include. A list of every

2416:

I had some doubts when creating this AfD exactly because I thought the book he wrote could be notable, but I couldn't find any source that would show the notability of the author. I would also be in favor of creating an article for the book and redirecting the page of the author to it.

20106:

Another article almost entirely based on the primary source of the Spanish Ministry of Foreign Affairs. These relations lack third party coverage to meet GNG. Most of their interactions are in multilateral forums. No embassies, agreements or state visits which would add to notability.

16048:(which needs to be evaluated with respect to the possible significance of the journal he edited). I didn't find citations for his works that might be used to pass #C1, but there may be a language barrier. I also found what appears to be a review of a posthumous collection of his works 15557: 15504: 16044:. The "passing mention reference" is false: it is a reference to a published obituary of the subject (whose actual text I unfortunately have not found). The nominator also appears to have ignored the edit summary in my unprod that his journal editorship gives him a claim to 15339:

There is nothing that indicates that the subject meets general notability requirements nor requirements of notability for academics or government officials. There is no independent reliable sourcing on the subject. They have only been covered Azerbajaini government outlets.

9137:

number of people who come from the same background because the majority of a population will dictate which group is being racialized. An example of students being racialized by their teachers and institutions can be seen through the way high schools teach in America today.

11628:: There were virtually no articles on Italia before he joined the AAP and became its chief ministerial face - he was unable to win in his own constituency. After the election, he has disappeared. There have been no articles in the mainstream media about him since April, 10801:

and are therefore memorializing Gilani rather than reporting factual information about him. I don't think these particular articles are useful for establishing notability and I think they should be removed from the article. I have already removed the Scribd citation.

9351:. This is not the simplest case. On the one hand, the article's topic is certainly justified here. On the other, it has some pretty serious problems, and, judging by the tag dates, uncorrected over the years. On the third hand, there is some good in this article, so 15600: 15521: 12787:: While I see bunch of reviews and citations, nothing looks too reliable and they are all from mom-and-pop type bloggers and websites. In addition the only Award he has been nominated for (Galaxy Music Awards) is not a known award and does not have a Wiki page. 9081:

Most of the article’s body is not actually about racialization—it’s information about racial realities (discrimination, Orientalist aesthetic production, racial disparity) that come from sources that analyze said information through the lens of racialization.

2525:. I don't think that the co-edited volumes contribute much to an NAUTHOR case, and I'm not seeing so much towards an NPROF case. The surprisingly-common name makes it a bit harder to search, and will watch in case better evidence of notability arises. 491: 9117:

One of the most prominent examples of Orientalist work in art is a piece by Eugène Delacroix titled Women of Algiers in their Apartment... Fine textiles, hookahs, and other paraphernalia adorn the room, which represents a European fantasy of an exotic

5391: 15513: 15490: 487: 3636:. In the sources themselves, notability is literally based on vanity social metrics. Article tone is balanced, but mostly focuses on things unrelated to the institute itself. but rather its founders namesakes and or US relation (or lack off). ~ 🦝 22182:: Much of the information in the article is directed to a particular housing property there, not about the "community" itself. Per the above information, there is no evidence to suggest this is an actual "community" of any sort other than being a 15499: 20890:

Reading correctly apparently is hard, I didn't say that the foundation had won a prize either... And in AfD debates, you don't chanage comments that have already been addressed by others, because that makes the discussion rather weird. Instead,

14450:

About 47 Google results. Possibly promotional entry. While there are a few local news sources in ABC affiliates in Sacramento and Vegas, and a couple of magazine profiles of the creators of the app, neither the creators nor the app seem to have

20414: 11441: 11457:

Um, the first person might be notable, the second and third look non-notable. A spokesperson for the tourism department and a surgeon aren't necessarily notable. Might have to review those for deletion as well, thank you for bringing them up.

16970:

would likely be the best outcome for this article, and in reality merge effectively mean delete, I have already transferred the main test of this article to the Live Lounge page, meaning that there is now no need for this article to remain.

21600: 7319: 1561: 20854:: please cite more carefully, I didn't say "many prizes" (plural) but "an important international prize" (singular). The prize is quite prestigious but there's only one and usually only 1 recipient per year (2021 being an exception). -- 9042:

Adherents of Judaism, Islam, and Sikhism can be racialized when they are portrayed as possessing certain physical characteristics, despite the fact that many individual adherents of those religions do not possess any of those physical

5312: 4245: 3950: 20075: 18811: 19052: 14542:. Were they just from one local source, I might agree, but these come from various different localities and different periodicals. I would also disagree that it's promotional, it's too short and to-the-point to read that way. -- 20445:

12406: 2952: 10883:

This section was totally unsourced. I tried to get some reliable references to add them but unfortunately mostly references belongs to Internet archive and WordPress. So I think it is better to remove that section to vote for

7673: 2244: 19716: 14073: 8641: 5304: 5296: 16179:. A selected list of significantly influential publications (around five of them) can be appropriate, but except in very rare circumstances (which this is not) we should not try to include a complete list of publications. — 15530: 15525: 4403:

during the year. I created an article about the center because I consider it notable for the number of graduates and other reasons. It has nothing to do with the state and state interest. If it doesn't meet the conditions,

817: 14594:

Sourcing within the article and a Google search show that there is significant coverage in multiple reliable sources beyond passing mentions, even if these sources are local. Similar rationale behind keeping this article:

9355:

is probably too early to do. My suggestion is to send it to AfC. Thus, if no one wants to do its cleanup, it will be deleted after 6 months. And the tags will still be there, so AfC people will know what the problems are.

6756: 1180: 15594: 15534: 14419: 5348: 3601: 21992: 10613: 3751:

articles are either about the worldwide Ludwig von Mises influence, or social media stats. The remainder of the article is cited almost totally to primary sources. I can't see anywhere suitable to redirect the article.

16822: 7704:

This is a recent initiative by the Azerbaijani state that a COI account immediately created a Knowledge article for. There is no independent reliable sourcing on the subject. It's solely sourced to government outlets.

17558: 15517: 7988: 21399:

how obscure Pansy was, even then: "This is probably the first time the name of the town has been heard outside a radius of five miles." This Pansy is notable only for its obscurity, even when it existed. (BTW, there

20729: 13570: 11983: 9039:

This article is rife with issues—undue weight to various topics, including race in art making up the bulk of the history section, unattributed contentious POVs, delivering in wikivoice unclear and POV'd phrases like

4433:

Your self-described name on Az Knowledge matches that of a "Marketing And Public Relations Specialist" employed by Innovative Technologies in Education. If this is accurate, you need to disclose this affiliation per

15308: 14808: 10222: 7240: 6162:

There is nothing whatsoever that indicates that this scientist is notable. This is one of many extremely poor articles that a ring of editors are importing into the English Knowledge from the Azerbaijani Knowledge.

5782:

5751: 4709:

428: 21261: 19400: 15635:

Do we even need to have this list? Many of the pages of the people listed in this list did NOT hold active military ranks while in office, either before or after. No sources either for 16 years, might be better to

13834: 10018: 9656: 6473:

6131: 3282: 16531: 12962: 6442: 13281: 9008: 4678: 20335: 18521: 17876: 17195: 15991: 11164: 1915: 18171: 8354: 4973: 5385: 3711:

deletion, then I will simply nominate the Portuguese-language version for deletion as well. I do not particularly care either way whether either version of Knowledge covers the Instituto Mises Brasil or not.

17973:....a quick look at the first Google Books results (for example adding ”De Niro’’ to the search terms) shows that this is a perfectly notable film and that the page can be improved. Willing to do it later.- 12676: 7232: 7224: 7083:

Relisting. It looks like a partial Merge was done by an editor arguing for Deletion before this AFD was closed and I just would like to see if others agree with this act and if it changes anyone's opinion.

14112:, lacks any significant coverage, just a series of mentions on lists or inclusions in directories. The article was deprodded without addressing the issue or providing any independent secondary sources. 4398:

Licensed by the Ministry of Science and Education and the Ministry of Economy. Officially, it carries out professional development of pedagogical workers in different regions of Azerbaijan and graduates

215: 210: 15817:

Per nomination. The scope of this article is much too broad, especially as in countries with mass conscription virtually all politicians (or at least male politicians) will have served in the military.

20327: 20319: 14994:

Drajay.lobo.143 seems to be same as Ajay Lobo (where they edited), created by Surajsinghl (COI disclosed). Drajay.lobo.143 created a Draft:Yohan poonawala and left it and again created this article. —

7276: 5549: 4166: 20552:

example of a standalone article being created for every combination of two nations, no matter how insignificant their connexion may be. The subject is not encyclopaedic, the sources presented are all

20408: 20237:

example of a standalone article being created for every combination of two nations, no matter how insignificant their connexion may be. The subject is not encyclopaedic, the sources presented are all

11430: 5216:

confusion came from since it appears that one person from the company was sent to jail for fraud but the way it's phrased in the headlines kind of blurs the two. It at least mixed me up for a second.

4370:: borderline G11. Part of a coordinated attempt by a group of COI SPAs, likely paid by the Azerbaijani government for promotional purposes. Most of these dozens of articles are now going through AfD. 21557: 22024:

There is very little information about this place, but even if the listing is accurate, it only states this was a vacation property that later became a lodge, not an "unincorporated community". So

9443:

it seems like this article isn't doing a good job of that, I still think it's a complex enough topic to warrant it's own article instead of just putting the information about it in other articles.

20371: 5321: 5316: 3871: 1482: 21594: 7313: 5325: 4461:

It is training company operating in the educational market. No indication of significance. Actually contains a shop front reference for product sales,can you believe it. Brochure advertisement.

1555: 6787:

Exhaustive list of software updates without any meaningful context/content about updates. List fails NLIST, WP:NOTCHANGELOG. Any appropriate version history could be easily accomodated in the

18732: 17993: 17675: 5308: 4239: 4158: 4150: 2287:. No other mention could be found. His research output seems rather limited and he doesn't hold a major position in his institution. The subject does not fulfill the notability requirements. 6977:: Re: merging. I have no objection to a merge in principle, but I couldn't see any material in the article worth merging. The opening two paragraphs contain info already in the main article 18973: 15489: 7035:

as above. Article relies a lot on primary sources from Autodesk and is just a list of all versions. If you think this is really important information I'd merge it with the AutoCAD article.

3944: 10797:

The third reference is just a Scribd upload from a WordPress site, so that is not a good source. The first two sources are from well-known news media but they seem to be written about the

20069: 15649: 4202: 3863: 3855: 1962: 1474: 1466: 18805: 9127:

A positive application of racialization is nationalism, whereby the created race seeks to assert cultural and national aspirations which are compatible and accommodating to other groups.

19996: 19046: 18858: 12327: 19452: 6646:. There is a rough consensus below not to retain (between delete and merge/redirect). Paianis executed a merge of relevant information, so closing as redirect to preserve the history. 12400: 10179: 10126: 7594: 3907: 2946: 1518: 9303:

I can see why this has been a bit of a mess for a few years; it's a difficult topic to write about, and it would take a lot of research to do the cleanup. The term, as distinct from

7667: 4775:. Being a member of the European Society of Cardiology and presenting his work at international meetings is not a proof of notability. The page reads like personal CV and promotion. 2238: 21292:

Another short-lived Kansas post office, this one on a MoPac line so maybe we can call it a rail point. At any rate, nothing there, GNIS entry dropped... This should be dropped too.

19710: 19637: 18724: 18716: 14067: 13994: 8635: 15890: 2461:

The only other books listed are two co-edited volumes of conference proceedings. Those tend not to get reviewed in any substantial way, and even if they do, they count for less in

18965: 18957: 10725:

a search in Arabic script for his given name and spiritual name yield me nothing indicating notability so I’d be inclined to delete unless anyone can show decent sources in Urdu.

2398:(total of five), so the book is probably notable. We can redirect to an article about it if we can't find anything else to suggest that Houston is notable independently from it. — 811: 20986:) that are not surprisingly mostly in French. Unfortunately most are paywalled, but the tidbits provided for free suffice to se that these are in-depth and establish notability. 6750: 1174: 18768: 15615: 14482: 14413: 9124:

Further significant research in this area is aiding politicians and policy makers in creating a more equal society that embraces and supports different racial and ethnic groups.

8562: 7249: 7244: 3595: 21986: 16193:

Sadly, I don't know enough about him or the field of linguistics to say which ones are the most influential. Limit to the ones that have the most citations via Google Scholar?

21530: 21525: 19988: 19980: 19009: 16112: 15582: 15361: 13887: 13639: 13333: 13014: 12319: 12311: 11629: 10607: 9055:

articles which already include the bulk of the encyclopedically appropriate content in this article. Information about racism in education and the workforce is represented at

7253: 2308: 16816: 8019:

No sources could be found outside of trivial coverage in football databases. (If there are any Persian-language secondary sources, please add them and I'll retract the AfD.)

70: 21534: 20344: 20339: 17552: 11121: 11068: 7982: 7586: 7578: 3522: 2377:

might include further substantial commentary. If the book is notable but nothing else turns up, we can refactor the article about the person into an article about the book.

2201: 20723: 18870: 13564: 11977: 9121:

Racialization is a long process, and members of each group are categorized based on their perceived differences relative to those who are considered elite within a society.

20348: 20032: 19629: 19621: 18573: 15302: 14802: 13986: 13978: 12363: 10216: 7236: 5745: 2909: 422: 106: 82: 22032:

because there is no significant coverage about this place in RS. I suspect this got into GNIS because it had its own railroad stop, but that does not confer notability.

21255: 19394: 16026:

with one passing mention reference. The Polish language article is unreferenced. After searching, could not locate sufficient reliable sources. Created on 27 April 2012.

13828: 11776: 9650: 6925:

Imagine I was away from keyboard, dead, sick or anything else which would prevent me from chiming in. No voice, no opinion, "OK, let's delete it". </Offtopic-rant: -->

6125: 5435: 3276: 21517: 17703:"The film features significant involvement (i.e., one of the most important roles in the making of the film) by a notable person and is a major part of their career." -- 16525: 12956: 10534: 7630: 6436: 503: 13275: 9002: 4672: 21913: 20829: 20467: 20331: 20145: 19673: 18515: 17870: 17189: 16592: 15985: 14030: 12738: 11158: 8554: 8546: 5650: 1909: 19456: 18165: 7359: 7052:- I've moved across most information I felt was relevant for the AutoCAD article. I'm content with this page being deleted if there are no objections as to my edits. 22053: 19856:

article that relies heavily on primary sources and SYNTH. The topic is also vaguely defined, consisting mostly of dry recounts of reforms to the constitution and to

18851: 12498: 8348: 7909: 6519: 6208: 5847: 4967: 21396: 19757: 15576: 9883:: Local Emmys do not confirm notability here. Coverage is simply routine confirmation of where the person works and what they've done in their job over the years. 5406: 1643: 1258: 891: 21051: 20918: 20877: 20805: 20785: 20764:

on the basis that this foundation has won "an international prize" and is "well known". I am nominating for deletion because I believe it does not pass the bar of

20130: 15127:: Could meet three CSD criteria (G4, G5, and/or G11). Already deleted once, creator is a sock, and blatantly promotional article with no other purpose whatsoever. 14862: 14187: 13491: 10143: 8838: 8598: 7015: 5295: 4175: 4170: 3514: 3506: 1593: 774: 18322: 17310:

Ecosystem. The article has already been reduced to a stub after discussion and issues have been resolved. This article also has requested mentions and has links.

12670: 5373: 21640: 15229: 14729: 6713: 5672: 4179: 1137: 848:

Doesn't meet NSPORT. I haven't been able to find any reliable sources with information about this league, though sources may exist in Arabic or other languages.

21891: 19842: 15539: 7044: 1612: 19321: 15713: 15572: 14691: 13755: 10526: 10518: 9577: 8894:‎. Consensus that this is a notable topic, and TNT doesn't fully apply here. Cleanup can (and perhaps should) still be done, but that is not a matter for AfD. 6052: 4285: 3880: 3875: 3558: 3203: 1491: 1486: 18585: 18255: 17964: 17642: 11782: 9152:

Almost all of these are close to common knowledge in Western social studies in my experience, this is an issue of referencing style not of original research.

6969: 21905: 21897: 21367: 19128: 18305: 17251: 16888: 16452: 15400: 14890: 14376: 13368: 13094: 12883: 11752: 11743:

if all of the coverage of him were in the context of one election, the coverage of this candidate spans far beyond that; I think that this individual passes

9268: 7572: 7137: 6590: 6363: 5928: 4784: 4162: 3884: 3691: 2312: 1705: 1689: 1495: 1329: 1310: 962: 943: 65: 60: 55: 51: 47: 21404:

a notable Pansy, Kansas, which appears in dozens of Kansas history books; it was in the now-abolished Garfield County. That community's name was changed to

20513: 20429: 20200: 12490: 7887: 1397: 1292: 925: 22199: 20941: 20455: 19152: 17515: 15551: 14967: 14502: 13202: 10570: 9096: 7901: 7893: 7462: 6994: 4599: 3653: 3008: 1672: 1380: 1349: 1266: 1013: 982: 899: 128: 20396: 15622: 12456: 11770: 11571: 7019: 4002: 1747: 860: 21949: 21047: 20914: 20873: 20801: 20781: 20126: 19480: 19207:

magazine relies heavily on an interview with one of the founders of the Trust (now resigned) but still the headteacher of one of the Trust's schools see

18741: 18736: 18619: 18442: 18339: 17116: 16779: 16075:- Sorry, this is first time with AfD that I saw the WP:Prof#C8 and misunderstood importance of that. Wondering if I should withdraw nomination? Regards, 14694:) with a side of title disruption. I don't want to SALT and play whackamole with alternate spelllings, but any admin is welcome to do so if they choose. 14183: 13483: 13475: 12509: 12472: 11758: 10690: 10135: 10112: 9343: 8834: 8418: 8086: 7011: 6816: 3989:

of different summits, but none of the sources are scholarly, nor comprehensive. The topic may be worthwhile, but needs a complete rewrite to comply with

3867: 2617: 1998: 1726: 1478: 1227: 586: 527: 463: 313: 22073: 21615: 19884: 18279: 17984: 17666: 16329: 13389: 13118: 8721: 7809: 7771: 7752: 7473: 7416: 7397: 7334: 6934: 6568: 6549: 6238: 5877: 5858: 4361: 4342: 4323: 4059: 2784: 22157: 20628: 19512: 18982: 18977: 18745: 18009: 17691: 17013: 15694: 15221: 15213: 14935: 14921: 14721: 14713: 14596: 11436: 11237: 10391: 10045: 9475: 8761: 8158: 7945: 7061: 6824: 5664: 5656: 5367: 3012: 2332: 2047: 1950: 1800: 1679: 1300: 933: 607: 133: 21582: 16348: 15724: 15705: 15686: 15144: 14953: 14621: 9130:

Racialization is then normalized by the promotion of "colorblindness" through the use of "soft" language which avoids highlighting ethnic differences.

8184: 8168: 8078: 7790: 7733: 7714: 7454: 7435: 7378: 7301: 6530: 6219: 5839: 4766: 4577: 4304: 22061: 21796: 21700: 21676: 21672: 20833: 20686: 19820: 19794: 19774: 19313: 19305: 18986: 18593: 15421: 15373: 15102: 13899: 13891: 13747: 13739: 13643: 13527: 13341: 13057: 13026: 11940: 11500: 10121: 9871: 9734: 9730: 9726: 9569: 9561: 9365: 9294: 8842: 8709: 8684:, and since there are at least two other developments named Arroyo Vista in the Sacramento area, this article is confusing as well as uninformative. 8672:

Non-notable housing development. Was PRODded in 2020; article was kept with addition of two news articles as sources. These articles are extremely

8460: 8112: 7760: 7741: 7405: 7367: 6952: 6499: 6188: 6044: 6036: 5903: 5808: 5075: 4894: 4735: 4471: 4331: 4312: 4040: 3720: 3702: 3683: 3427: 3392: 3195: 3187: 2174: 2169: 1576: 19108: 17712: 17267: 15667: 14989: 11399: 9186: 8693: 8130: 6858: 5156: 5130: 5116: 4144: 2996: 650: 22057: 21692: 21313: 20971: 20797: 20475: 20005: 20000: 19448: 19120: 18728: 17622: 17394: 16623: 16601: 16576: 16444: 16436: 16243: 16144: 16124: 16099: 16084: 16064: 15382: 15265: 15013: 14765: 14707: 14318: 14157: 14137: 13908: 13652: 13350: 13075: 13035: 12875: 12867: 12775: 12575: 12336: 12331: 12137: 11815: 10849: 10286: 9913: 9161: 8705: 8477: 7798: 7779: 7443: 7424: 7097: 6355: 6347: 5708: 5475: 5330: 5056: 5025: 4447: 4350: 4260: 4021: 3664: 3373: 3338: 3043: 2882: 2877: 2178: 1628: 1543: 1243: 876: 385: 103: 22140: 21093: 21055: 20999: 20922: 20908: 20881: 20863: 20845: 20809: 14906: 14604: 14525: 14121: 11486: 9752: 9195:

at Employment discrimination and Discrimination in education. The information about Orientalist art is much better represented at Orientalism#Art.

9191:

It's not a deletion-as-cleanup argument (though the article, if it were to continue existing, would need basically a complete ground-up rewrite):

9147: 8825: 8151: 5363: 3101: 3052:

I checked google, google news, the newspaper archive and the internet archive. Nothing came up that wasn't a passing mention or a primary source.

2474: 633: 617: 21521: 21405: 21361: 20149: 20009: 19790: 19538: 19522: 19488: 19357: 18969: 18951: 17334: 17299: 16958: 16202: 16188: 16170: 16132: 15675: 15547: 15369: 15048: 14252: 14191: 13895: 13791: 13628: 13337: 13194: 13186: 13022: 12468: 12340: 12039: 12035: 11599: 11467: 11241: 10716: 10670: 10325: 10290: 9892: 9613: 9264: 8795: 8051: 7603: 7598: 6828: 6804: 6495: 6260: 6184: 6088: 5949: 5804: 5447: 5200: 5064: 4731: 4591: 4583: 4496: 4227: 4029: 3965: 3362: 3239: 3032: 2886: 2073: 2057: 2006: 1624: 1239: 1079: 872: 539: 535: 22098: 21726: 21432: 21030: 20179: 19911: 19299: 19219:

source doesn't provide SIGCOV of the Trust, it's about the interviewee, Ian Young's teaching background, views and vision. Possible redirect to

19182: 16940: 16649: 16639: 16605: 15588: 14166: 14149: 12796: 11324: 9995: 9494: 9432: 9403: 9249: 9224: 9206: 6880: 5523: 5486: 5227: 3354: 3063: 3024: 2761: 2534: 2426: 2407: 2296: 1814: 22174: 22041: 21771: 21696: 21688: 21504: 21343: 21072: 20825: 20390: 20134: 20090: 19646: 19641: 19492: 19156: 19124: 18434: 18426: 17108: 17100: 16980: 16488: 16358:

Meets notability as an academic. There’s a clear language and digital barrier to finding more sources, but there appears to be enough to pass.

15783: 15742: 15063: 14231: 14133: 14003: 13998: 12919: 12779: 12742: 12597: 12089: 12065: 11649:

The article has dozens of references that points to significant coverage which the subject has gained for various activities. Nobody can doubt

11384: 11249: 10294: 9841: 9816: 9452: 8907: 7827: 7722: 7607: 7491: 7386: 7223: 6901: 6820: 6557: 6511: 6399: 6227: 6200: 5828: 5820: 5574: 5567: 5540: 5174: 5045: 4755: 4747: 4379: 4293: 3932: 3739: 3418: 3381: 2851: 2581: 2369: 2161: 2010: 21819: 20540: 20225: 20116: 19552: 19087:

for this article about a multi-academy trust, and added an interview. I do not see enough reliable secondary sourcing for the article to meet

18826: 16614:– as per nom, no relevant hits other than social media profiles. Also excessive usage of Apple Music, and definitely fails NMUSICBIO and GNG. 16308: 15827: 14582: 14551: 12752: 11662: 11452: 10682: 10306: 9976: 9942: 9776: 9215:, you should know that some IP just reverted all the changes that both you and I have made to the article, including removing the AfD notice. 8430: 5586: 5342: 5099: 3786: 3645: 3439: 3181: 3118: 2374: 2355: 1215:. I haven't been able to find any reliable sources with information about this league, though sources may exist in Arabic or other languages. 598: 21750: 21680: 21655: 21317: 21218: 20945: 20821: 20057: 19992: 19650: 19067: 16596: 15543: 15119: 14886: 14638: 14007: 13238: 12734: 12323: 12225: 12091: 12015: 11633: 11620: 11519: 11358: 10951: 10734: 8965: 8039: 5506: 5413: 4635: 4010: 3672: 2869: 2607: 2509: 2040: 97: 21414: 20565: 20487: 20250: 19974: 19504: 19236: 19140: 18793: 17365: 16906: 16656: 16367: 15805: 14181:

Where coverage is only local in scope, consider adding a section on the organization to an article on the organization's local area instead.

13610: 13376:. I don't think head of what appears to be a small theological institute counts as the sort of "major academic institution" that would pass 13180: 11270: 10985: 10811: 10790: 10768: 10751: 10449: 10420: 10354: 9795: 7350:

There is nothing that indicates that this is a notable research institution. There is no independent reliable sourcing of the organization.

5037: 4420: 4081: 3761: 3080: 2743: 2726: 2663: 2643: 2455: 2386: 2022: 551: 21576: 21379: 20471: 20353: 20153: 19484: 19034: 18565: 18478: 18070: 17255: 17152: 16914: 16884: 16630: 16276: 15948: 15656: 15365: 15349: 14894: 14494: 14478: 14466: 13018: 12421: 11351: 11245: 11063: 10666: 10654: 9722: 9692: 8571: 8566: 8414: 7590: 7295: 6832: 6538: 5866: 5792: 5455: 5451: 4886: 4878: 2967: 2002: 1872: 747: 742: 531: 20789: 20386: 20313: 18642: 18235: 16225: 14629:: There is significant coverage in a national magazine and other major publications across the United States. Meets notability threshold. 13875: 13733: 12305: 12200: 12166: 11727: 11641: 11542: 10878: 7688: 6172: 2259: 21684: 21668: 19731: 19633: 18243: 18128: 17952: 17944: 17833: 17652: 17630: 16872: 15093:

per nom. I'm guessing this will be G4/G5'd at some point, but if others want to play out the AfD to full term, that's also fine by me. --

15075: 14874: 14088: 13990: 13002: 12388: 11048: 10930: 10316:. Firm has been the subject of news stories (mostly in regional and professional news outlets) as a result of its own legal problems. -- 10270: 8656: 8575: 8253: 8055: 7258: 7218: 6686: 6681: 6483: 5467: 3342: 2934: 1460: 1110: 1105: 751: 716: 100: 22115: 13321: 12108: 10897: 9710: 9107: 7655: 4719: 4276:

This is a non-notable Azerbaijani state initiative that a ring of editors translated into English Knowledge from Azerbaijani Knowledge.

3849: 2702: 2226: 1537: 495: 21539: 21513: 21505: 20526: 19786: 19698: 15793: 14055: 11693: 11204: 10512: 10282: 8623: 8311: 6690: 4930: 3531: 3526: 3326: 1114: 832: 575: 21572: 20365: 17775: 17239: 16580: 14945:: Deleted twice and salted in April 2023 as Yohan Poonawalla (with a capital P) agree with nominator, suggest salt this spelling also 13972: 13469: 12023: 9311:: while I can agree there is undue weight for some sources, possibly some original research, and the article has become somewhat of a 7291: 6771: 4221: 2629: 2324: 1195: 515: 205: 22131:

history source has been proferred, and none turns up when I look for any. There's a self-published autobiography, and nothing else.

20436: 19468: 17094: 14434: 14349: 14344: 12589: 12581: 10942:

the two sources in the article are definitely not independent coverage. If that’s all we can find then notability isn’t established.

8558: 3616: 3535: 2570: 2143: 799: 734: 22007: 18710: 10106: 9904:, one source is a wake-up call, but not enough reason to remove an article. Especially since there are already more references now. 9076: 7270: 6738: 5338: 3926: 3500: 1500: 1162: 21160: 20318: 17488: 17483: 16721: 15796:

is a sockmaster, not the puppet. He was indefinitely blocked for socking, but it was after this article had already been created.

14401: 14353: 10628: 10543: 10538: 8744:

in order to be considered notable and remain a standalone article. No sources have been presented that demonstrate compliance with

6673: 6655: 5379: 3583: 1533: 1097: 252: 21974: 21551: 21301: 20051: 16837: 16035: 15484: 15207: 11225: 9555: 6030: 5017: 4184: 1986: 22085:

that it was the summer home of a Walters (or possibly Walter or Water) family, but don't get much more detailed than that. Fails

21922: 21917: 21622: 19615: 18787: 17573: 17492: 16752: 16747: 12633: 11882: 11297: 10595: 10547: 8402: 8003: 7341: 6341: 5121:

Velissaris is the BLP1E subject here. We can delete that entire section too and solely argue on basis of lack of SIGCOV too ~ 🦝

4217: 4149: 3518: 20744: 19028: 16804: 13585: 11998: 5334: 3889: 22049: 21926: 21664: 21499: 21309: 20937: 20817: 20463: 20141: 19782: 19476: 19148: 19116: 17540: 17247: 16880: 16756: 16588: 15357: 15323: 14882: 14823: 14612:

There's is significant coverage from multiple news sources. The article could use some improvement but it seems to be notable.

14474: 14336: 14129: 13883: 13635: 13329: 13010: 12730: 12464: 12031: 11233: 10662: 10278: 10237: 9718: 9260: 8701: 8410: 8047: 7970: 7918: 7913: 6812: 6491: 6180: 5800: 5766: 5443: 4872: 4727: 3922: 3334: 3004: 2304: 1994: 1620: 1512: 1235: 868: 523: 443: 195: 94: 91: 79: 21276: 20711: 20014: 19415: 17457: 16430: 13849: 13552: 12861: 12722: 12382: 11965: 9671: 7266: 6146: 5185:

Exactly. I'm afraid that BLP1E doesn't apply. Infinity Q was an enterprise. It isn't and hasn't ever been a living person.—

3297: 2928: 1583: 21010: 20659: 20654: 20047: 18861:

lack any significant content whatsoever. Is it possible to archive this so I can put the proper template on the page? Sorry.

18750: 18420: 17475: 17345: 17279: 16546: 16287: 16258: 15290: 14790: 14562: 14202: 13500: 13495: 12977: 12177: 12148: 12119: 11913: 11908: 11704: 11673: 11582: 10962: 10910: 10832: 10530: 10402: 10336: 10204: 10152: 10147: 9953: 9924: 9854: 9414: 9376: 8772: 7922: 7649: 7072: 6457: 5733: 4196: 4055: 3854: 2545: 2220: 410: 277: 263: 257: 109: 88: 21243: 20361: 19759: 19692: 19382: 18991: 18866: 18847: 18783: 14049: 13816: 13296: 9638: 9023: 8733: 8617: 8540: 8440: 8237: 6113: 5290: 4693: 4267: 3264: 21909: 20663: 20402: 19878: 19024: 18536: 17891: 17210: 16739: 16513: 16006: 15238: 15233: 15137: 15009: 14738: 14733: 13504: 12944: 11917: 11179: 10779: 10156: 9483:

The problems are with the article here on Knowledge. The subject is covered by a number of peer-reviewed journal articles.

6424: 5681: 5676: 3901: 2183: 1930: 358: 353: 18186: 13263: 12345: 10003:. There's at least one source that easily provides significant coverage of this individual: a multi-page profile piece in 8990: 4660: 3972: 3769:. Lots of red flags of a bad article: red links, bare links, obscure sources, and lots of jargon. At best, it's a case of 2891: 793: 20026: 19330: 19325: 18503: 17858: 17177: 15973: 15242: 14742: 13764: 13759: 12378: 11146: 10008: 9586: 9581: 8369: 7905: 7612: 7132: 6732: 6061: 6056: 5685: 4988: 3212: 3207: 2924: 1897: 1156: 362: 85: 21: 21547: 20357: 20097: 19655: 18762: 18153: 14395: 14012: 7645: 3577: 2216: 21968: 21631:

Subject does not appear to be independently notable (notability is not inherited from its notable parent organization)

21588: 20646: 19688: 19334: 19003: 18833: 18715: 16461: 16456: 14521: 14045: 13768: 13487: 12892: 12887: 11900: 10139: 9590: 8613: 8336: 8073: 8034: 7307: 6943:

without prejudice to merging. The article is not long and there is no reason to scrub this information from Knowledge.

6372: 6367: 6065: 4955: 3216: 2351: 2165: 1597: 1356: 1336: 1318: 1066: 989: 969: 951: 703: 180: 175: 19074: 12691: 12093: 10589: 9307:, unquestionably meets notability requirements in substantial independent academic usage. I also object to a complete 8580: 7262: 2195: 756: 21721: 21338: 21191: 21186: 20966: 20509: 20196: 20174: 19838: 19815: 19177: 18956: 18614: 16935: 16798: 16465: 15225: 14725: 13211: 13206: 12896: 12357: 12060: 11379: 10711: 9289: 8938: 8933: 8107: 6853: 6695: 6376: 5668: 5563: 4608: 4603: 3993:

otherwise it becomes random collection of arbitrary events. There are minor issues with formatting etc as well ~ 🦝

2903: 2873: 2771: 2712: 2650: 2602: 2126: 1508: 1465: 1287: 1119: 920: 789: 345: 185: 21543: 18556:; he’s only had one significant role in Little Voice. Needs two or more significant roles in order to be eligible. 17534: 14358: 12658: 12428: 11764: 7964: 7624: 6728: 3540: 2974: 1549: 1152: 475: 21195: 20705: 19667: 19317: 18451: 18446: 17125: 17120: 16158: 15921: 15916: 14391: 14024: 13751: 13731: 13546: 13467: 13215: 12303: 11959: 11567: 11491:

What has he done as a "notable political figure" exactly? He appears to be more of an activist than anything else.

11094: 11089: 9837: 9748: 9706: 9573: 8942: 7695: 7110:

applies here as it's a list of versions over 20-30 years, which is encyclopaedic information. I'm just not sure if

6048: 5196: 4612: 4192: 4051: 3573: 3199: 2780: 2266: 2148: 1845: 1840: 1077: 714: 153: 34: 21964: 19738: 18862: 18843: 17497: 15284: 14784: 14095: 10552: 10198: 8663: 5727: 5107:- I used to be fairly involved in deletion discussions but it has been several years. Why is BLP1E relevant here? 4233: 2752:, as nothing more has turned up to provide evidence of independent notability from the book for Houston himself. — 404: 21931: 21237: 19546:- the four or five sentences in that article aren't enough and I couldn't see anything better in my own searches 19376: 18455: 18101: 18096: 17806: 17801: 17129: 16761: 16448: 15925: 14848: 13810: 12879: 12310: 11098: 10585: 9632: 9237: 8592: 6359: 6107: 5514:

per NLIST. Not arbitrary—the criterion is pretty clear—but nobody's out there listing schools by motto language.

3897: 3258: 2856: 1849: 1504: 768: 483: 466:. It seems like she was the top scorer in the Bulgarian league in 2019, but I can't find enough coverage to meet 327: 232: 170: 42: 17: 21737:

into the university's article. Even then, info merged into the University's article should have some cites to a

16794: 16507: 12938: 10862: 7927: 6707: 6418: 3938: 2191: 1131: 839: 22104: 21805: 21759: 21485: 21178: 20668: 20022: 19894:. There might be an article that can be written about changes in Azerbaijan's legal system, but this should be 19440: 18318: 18105: 17810: 17530: 14370: 13509: 13257: 13198: 12855: 12569: 11922: 11200: 10501:‎. Consensus seems to be that there are insufficient independent and reliable sources to establish notability. 9321: 8984: 8925: 8901: 8284: 8279: 8247: 7960: 7577: 6778: 4903: 4898: 4654: 4595: 4395:

Also, the UNESCO chair operates in the center. This and other reasons make it quite influential in the country.

4188: 3552: 1202: 20701: 20063: 18758: 18497: 17852: 17171: 15967: 15247: 14747: 14441: 13542: 11955: 11140: 10161: 5690: 3623: 3089: 2837: 1891: 367: 22014: 20529:, I think this is a better move for all these little articles that aren't well developed or not significant. 20214:, I think this is a better move for all these little articles that aren't well developed or not significant. 20211: 19620: 19339: 18999: 18857:

Oops, might have messed this up - first AfD nomination. However, this page and its presumable sister page at

18799: 18438: 18147: 17509: 17112: 16902: 16868: 16325: 15908: 15396: 15280: 14780: 13977: 13773: 13364: 13090: 11081: 10564: 10194: 9595: 9047:

This is bad. I also don't think racialization is significant enough to have its own article, considering the

8288: 6586: 6070: 5924: 5723: 5552:

is a related article that describes itself as "a list of Sanskrit mottoes of non-educational institutions". —

4907: 4780: 3893: 3221: 2157: 2149: 1832: 1639: 1608: 1254: 1223: 887: 856: 738: 479: 400: 21943: 21233: 19372: 19040: 16773: 16470: 13806: 12901: 10635: 9628: 8330: 6381: 6103: 4949: 3254: 2488:

to an article to be created on the book discussed above which does seem to be notable. Doesn't seem to meet

242: 21200: 20505: 20192: 20018: 19907: 19834: 18088: 18066: 17793: 17003: 16844: 16503: 16230:

No, Knowledge is not the right place for hosting long lists of publications of minor academics. Again, see

15071: 13220: 12934: 12353: 10445: 8947: 7939: 7884: 6930: 6677: 6414: 4617: 2899: 2865: 2857: 2693: 1101: 190: 20680: 18754: 18460: 17815: 17580: 17134: 16853:

I'm having trouble finding anything meaningful about this. I've only been able to find news sources about

15930: 13521: 13253: 12394: 12084:. There's some extremely weak sourcing that I think might qualify a section there, but not enough to pass 11934: 11282:

The content on the page seems to prioritize promotion rather than providing neutral, factual information.

11103: 8980: 8010: 7620: 4857:

I'm closing this as a Soft Delete due to the confusion in the deletion rationale and the mispplication of

4650: 3071:, I'm struggling to find any WP:IRS about the Alliance. They need to work on raising their profile a bit! 2940: 1854: 247: 21953: 21561: 21222: 20751: 20690: 20375: 20036: 19979: 19677: 19663: 19361: 19013: 18995: 18772: 18493: 18482: 18132: 18110: 17848: 17837: 17519: 17167: 17156: 16783: 16492: 15963: 15952: 15561: 15505:

Articles for deletion/List of political leaders who held active military ranks in office (2nd nomination)

15269: 15259: 14769: 14759: 14380: 14034: 14020: 13795: 13592: 13531: 13359:

Keeping a high administrative position in Azerbaijan Institute of Theology is not a proof of notability.

13242: 12923: 12652: 12637: 12606: 12601: 12486: 12452: 12367: 12005: 11944: 11563: 11136: 11125: 10574: 10385: 10183: 10173: 9617: 9339: 9060: 8969: 8805: 8602: 8588: 8545: 8315: 8271: 7949: 7661: 7634: 7280: 6717: 6403: 6092: 5712: 5702: 5352: 4934: 4890: 4639: 4206: 3911: 3562: 3243: 2913: 2776: 2232: 2205: 1887: 1876: 1522: 1141: 778: 721: 389: 379: 237: 146: 19704: 19444: 19351: 18143: 15391:. Just keeping a high administrative position in a scientific institution is not a proof of notability. 15330: 14830: 14061: 13785: 10244: 9607: 8629: 8293: 6082: 5773: 5495:

Seems kind of arbitrary, there isn't a theme of mottos for educational institutions or Sanskrit mottos.

4912: 3233: 2187: 646: 450: 22195: 22083: 21790: 21283: 20302:‎. Ordinarily, I would Redirect this article but it's true, what country should this be Redirected to? 19422: 19095:. If it continues to grow and attracts more coverage it may become notable, but at the moment it looks 18581: 18561: 18251: 18231: 17960: 17940: 17638: 17618: 17505: 17311: 16482: 14701: 14617: 14340: 13856: 12913: 12610: 12349: 12104: 11397: 9678: 8326: 7040: 6660: 6393: 6153: 4945: 3304: 2895: 2556:

Relisting. Any editors volunteering to create a new article for this one to be Merged or Redirected to?

1084: 764: 21212: 16949:– fails notability. Heavy reliance on BBC which can be considered a primary source in this situation. 16553: 14323: 13232: 12984: 11632:, meaning he has not been reported for eight months, and it will probably be some time until he will. 10014: 10011: 8959: 7616: 6703: 6464: 4629: 1127: 805: 499: 22218: 21859: 21836: 21472: 21449: 21133: 21110: 20605: 20582: 20290: 20267: 19951: 19928: 19659: 19592: 19569: 19276: 19253: 18910: 18887: 18682: 18659: 18638: 18472: 18379: 18356: 18314: 18301: 18049: 18026: 17827: 17752: 17729: 17479: 17434: 17411: 17146: 17053: 17030: 16696: 16673: 16407: 16384: 15942: 15867: 15844: 15461: 15438: 15184: 15161: 14963: 14931: 14917: 14840: 14678: 14655: 14366: 14292: 14269: 14016: 13949: 13926: 13693: 13670: 13429: 13406: 13303: 13172: 13158: 13135: 12836: 12813: 12615: 12550: 12527: 12265: 12242: 12133: 11855: 11832: 11809: 11115: 11027: 11004: 10489: 10466: 10085: 10062: 10039: 9534: 9511: 9056: 9030: 8882: 8859: 8745: 8517: 8494: 8468:

it doesn't seem like an article can be built around this so that's probably the most useful outcome.

8454: 8224: 8201: 7867: 7844: 7531: 7508: 7177: 7154: 6744: 6630: 6607: 6300: 6277: 5989: 5966: 5627: 5604: 5267: 5244: 4824: 4801: 4700: 4536: 4513: 4121: 4098: 3826: 3803: 3548: 3505: 3479: 3456: 3158: 3135: 2824: 2801: 2113: 2090: 1866: 1787: 1764: 1437: 1414: 1168: 1053: 1030: 690: 667: 300: 21939: 19761: 18543: 18293: 18122: 17898: 17217: 16013: 14407: 12648: 11186: 8443:, where this is mentioned. I am not able to find significant coverage for this radio station, but a 5936:- as an associate professor, she fails the PROF test. I don't see anything special that she's done. 3589: 1937: 21980: 19873: 18193: 16743: 16321: 16239: 16184: 16140: 16120: 16095: 16060: 15392: 15133: 15005: 13385: 13360: 13114: 13086: 12593: 11482: 10560: 9807:: she has received Emmy Awards and the Mark Twain Award, making her a notable broadcast journalist. 8584: 8305: 6965: 6582: 5920: 4924: 4776: 3716: 2757: 2530: 2403: 2275:

Senior lecturer at the University of Leeds. His only mention I found in the news is a passage in a

1632: 1601: 1247: 1216: 880: 849: 760: 730: 722: 16769: 15733:- No purpose to the list - no sourcing, and no validation that any part of this list is accurate. 10601: 8376: 6699: 4995: 1123: 22069: 22037: 21388: 21357: 21146: 18330:

as per reviews in horror reliable sources such as Dread Central, Starburst, and Horror News, imv

18062: 17462: 16810: 15098: 14926:

the article was declined because i publish blank page of draft that's why article was declined.

14362: 10517: 9471: 9463: 9325: 9157: 9048: 8717: 8689: 8473: 7935: 7880: 7124: 6926: 6913:

1) The changelog is long and extensive enough the main article could absolutely do without it 2)

6669: 6661: 6643: 5152: 5112: 3544: 1093: 1085: 22165:- Thanks everyone for taking the time to look. Looks like the potential sources are dead ends. ~ 20676: 17546: 13517: 12627: 11930: 11425:. There are many sources that have provided significant coverage to this subject. This includes 7976: 22153: 21896: 21428: 20717: 20650: 19770: 19535: 19519: 19224: 18289: 17501: 16726: 15345: 15255: 14755: 14517: 13871: 13606: 13558: 13317: 12998: 12698: 11971: 11904: 11320: 10556: 10433: 10380: 10169: 9901: 8757: 8181: 8165: 8069: 8030: 7710: 7355: 7107: 7032: 7003: 6889: 6479: 6168: 5788: 5698: 5519: 4715: 4443: 4281: 2347: 2070: 2054: 1702: 1686: 1326: 1307: 959: 940: 630: 614: 375: 21935: 21848:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

21461:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

21208: 21122:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

20594:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

20279:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

19940:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

19581:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

19347: 19265:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

18899:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

18671:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

18368:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

18038:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

17741:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

17423:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

17325:

This discussion can be closed with no consensus, or keep if nothing happens in the next week.

17042:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

16765: 16685:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

16396:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

16320:. Publishing a few scientific papers and working as a researcher is not a prof of notability. 15856:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

15450:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

15296: 15173:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

14796: 14667:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

14281:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

13938:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

13781: 13682:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

13418:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

13147:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

12825:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

12539:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

12254:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

11844:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

11016:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

10781:, there are also other sources about the subject but belongs to blogging and WordPress sites. 10478:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

10210: 10074:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

9603: 9523:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

8871:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

8506:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

8213:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

7856:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

7520:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

7166:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

6619:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

6289:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

6078: 5978:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

5739: 5616:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

5256:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

4813:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

4525:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

4110:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

3815:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

3468:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

3229: 3147:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

2813:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

2102:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

1776:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

1426:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

1042:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

679:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

642: 416: 289:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

22214: 22213: