Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Fiddlesticks! (interjection) - Knowledge

Source 📝

692:"Cupid, I adore thee ! There is a charm Turn up your lip, old Sourcrout ! we care not. We — the young — the gay — the healthy — the happy! Wisdom! — physic — no more ! — fling them both to the dogs, say I. Wisdom ! — fiddlesticks ; I am tired ..." from "Monsieur Bossu's treatise of the epick poem: Preface of ... - Page 53" by ≤René Le Bossu, ‎André Dacier, ‎Fontenelle (Bernard Le Bovier, M. de) - 1719 - ‎Snippet view. (Other sources date le Bossu's original work, likely in French where a different word might have been used to 1675). The references provided so far to beating on a violin with straws or sticks are not sufficient to show notability of that technique as a subject of an article about the musical technique. 606:" His use of "fiddlestick" (singular) there is neither employed as an interjection, nor does it carry the same meaning as the American Cajun usage of "fiddlesticks" (plural) when the latter is used as either just a noun to refer to the straws or sticks used to tap on a violin, or as the interjection "fiddlesticks!", both of which did in fact originate in 18th Century Cajun culture in the United States; and you'd be surprised, 580:, already. After due consideration to the amount of whatever talent anyone commenting here may have being wasted on this discussion, and my willingness to concede on the "too much original research" argument and on the point of "too few sources" (American Cajun traditions, mostly oral traditions, are still not extensively documented in written literature) --- I have changed my mind, and agree that the 640:, and "would love to come up with a rationale for keeping this one" --- but at some point it behooves us to desist from paddling against the rip-current of the millennial tide, and, not with any feelings of discontent nor regret, to content ourselves with the recognition that, as the novelist said: " 548:
Knowledge is not a dictionary. The sources cited above in this discussion show that "fiddlestick" and the exclamation "Fiddlesticks" date back to Shakespeare's time and the claim that it is an important part of Cajun culture is not supported by reliable sources. Anyway, how many slaves had fiddles?
309:
When white plantation owners, as they often did, suppressed the use of African musical instruments by slaves, they deprived those people of their traditional means of cultural rhythmic expression. Their continuing need to enjoy musical traditions and express rhythm found new outlets in a number of
719:
That's most interesting, and thank you so much for tracking it down. I appreciate knowing that the use of "fiddlesticks" as an exclamation or interjection may trace back that far. Even though the French original (which I have not perused) may not have included a term or word equivalent to
584:. Why should any of us worry about better informing the, in many instances benighted young users of Knowledge on topics such as one regarding the origins of an American cultural phenomena from Louisiana Cajun slave peoples' culture, or striving to better document same. 310:
different forms, one of which was straw beating on violins, or using "fiddlesticks", and the resultant concomitant expletive expression often muttered under ones breath back at their "Masters" and owners, that is the intended subject of this Knowledge article.
610:, "how many slaves had fiddles" --- as they were more ingenious than you apparently give them credit for, and in many instances even learned to read, and dared to worship, though those activities were also forbidden in the majority of cases by their "owners". 276:
in the early history of the United States, which I do think is interesting; and it is my intention that myself and other editors will expand that aspect of this subject further as the article is further developed and improved upon from stub
724:
in the sense we're talking about here, which does indeed seem to validate its use as an exclamation as early as the early 18th-Century in England. Thank you again. (Incidentally, are you aware that there already exists a Knowledge article
212:
not a dictionary. The second source even cites the first one. There is an etymology if you look for it but it's neither interesting, nor clear enough to build an article around. Even fleshed out it would be a permastub with bad sources.
178: 487:
that are not supported by the references given. It essentially is now chock full of original research and shows a huge US bias even though what little information I have dug up points to the fact it's been in use since the 15th
688:
Professor JR, your ad hominem attack on "millenials" certainly misses in my case. "Fiddlesticks" appears to have been a term of derision by 1719. Google book search has a 1719 version (English translation of that date?)
690: 506:
that my username was the inspiration for this article - but I can't find any coverage/scholarship on it besides the usual dictionary-style definitions. Regrettably, I think that makes it a
172: 442:
I know that AfDs are closed by humans, there's a script that counts the votes for convenience. Not picking up an argument here, I think I know my way around, having been here so long. --
95: 856: 742: 653: 395: 131: 419: 340: 518: 873: 783: 751: 674: 497: 471: 840: 763: 536: 451: 436: 265: 87: 79: 811: 701: 562: 249: 238: 321: 222: 240:
This book seems to lend some credence to that narrative. But a lack of contemporaneous accounts or research that goes beyond one authors opinion is missing.--
53: 138: 634:; and the context where "fiddlestick" appears in that line of the play certainly does not support that it is intended as an exclamation or interjection. 104: 99: 771: 193: 108: 428:, but yes, you're mistaken. There is no bot. AfD's are closed by humans, and they can read humanspeak just fine, so "Retain" is not a problem. 160: 91: 73: 154: 586:
It is NOT accurate, however, that the interjection "fiddlesticks!" dates "back to Shakespeare's time", as has bee suggested by
150: 78: 200: 113: 626:); and the playwright uses the term here to suggest metaphorically that the Devil is riding (or resting his case) on a 374:. (By the way, the word "etymology", perhaps ironically, has an entire long article on its own etymology in Knowledge ( 125: 458:
Etymology is an academic discipline. Regardless this discussion isn't about other articles. It's about this article.
503: 121: 17: 166: 64:, I, an admin, have vacated this closure as it seems out of line with the consensus. I am re-closing as delete. 268:" warrants inclusion as a Knowledge entry is the fact of that interjection's roots in, and connection with 117: 550: 894: 264:
I appreciate and share your concerns for the integrity of Knowledge, but the reason I believed that "
232: 40: 359: 57: 852: 738: 649: 391: 317: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
890: 889:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
447: 415: 336: 36: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
733:
as a musical technique, whether qualifying for notability or not I'll leave to others.) ---
861: 514: 459: 8: 869: 670: 532: 493: 467: 245: 218: 623: 433: 848: 795: 779: 759: 734: 645: 387: 351: 313: 302: 807: 697: 641: 594:(the fact that a couple of you may have found the word "fiddlestick" (singular) in 558: 443: 425: 411: 332: 273: 209: 69: 406:
as a valid !vote, however I might be mistaken. I suggest you change the retain to
186: 637: 510: 61: 865: 666: 662: 591: 528: 489: 463: 379: 258: 241: 235: 214: 429: 355: 642:
we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past.
382:
or anyone else, as far as I know, for deletion, nor to be relegated only to
775: 755: 730: 726: 363: 298: 331:
Knowledge is not a dictionary. This is more appropriate for Wiktionary. --
820: 803: 714: 693: 607: 587: 554: 65: 799: 286: 375: 367: 604:
Heigh, heigh! the Devil rides upon a fiddlestick: what's the matter?
612:
Shakespeare's character, however, was referring merely to a violin
502:
Would love to come up with a rationale for keeping this one since
883:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
362:, this topic warrants more extensive treatment than just a mere 289:, and is significant in its acknowledgement of African-American 752:
list of United States of America-related deletion discussions
598:, notwithstanding.) Shakespeare's line (in Act 2, Scene 4 of 269: 837:
warrant inclusion in our august, "etymology-free" Knowledge,
834: 830: 826: 720:"fiddlesticks", the translator certainly did use the term, 624:
Merriam Webster - definition of "fiddlestick" (singular)
350:
Given the significance of the use of "Fiddlesticks!" in
185: 56:on 7 September as soft redirect to Wiktionary by 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 897:). No further edits should be made to this page. 772:list of Language-related deletion discussions 281:That story goes considerably beyond the mere 199: 770:Note: This debate has been included in the 750:Note: This debate has been included in the 798:. Word definitions and etymology belong in 14: 630:, in other words that he is spouting 402:Note: I don't think the bot picks up 285:of a word as it would be set out in 553:, like "frick," for the "f-word." 23: 378:), which has not been proposed by 24: 909: 618:, with which one plays a violin ( 305:and culture of the United States. 825:Then explain to me, please, why 297:(often overlooked or given only 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 483:This article now has numerous 234:This source which copies this 74:09:26, 10 September 2015 (UTC) 13: 1: 874:04:38, 7 September 2015 (UTC) 857:07:47, 6 September 2015 (UTC) 812:07:10, 6 September 2015 (UTC) 794:. Clearly doesn't belong per 784:03:15, 4 September 2015 (UTC) 764:03:15, 4 September 2015 (UTC) 743:10:46, 2 September 2015 (UTC) 702:16:01, 1 September 2015 (UTC) 549:In the 20th century it was a 527:Well that's interesting o.O-- 472:08:04, 1 September 2015 (UTC) 88:Fiddlesticks! (interjection) 80:Fiddlesticks! (interjection) 60:, a non-admin. In line with 7: 675:09:28, 31 August 2015 (UTC) 654:08:45, 31 August 2015 (UTC) 563:22:26, 30 August 2015 (UTC) 537:20:30, 30 August 2015 (UTC) 519:20:14, 30 August 2015 (UTC) 498:20:08, 30 August 2015 (UTC) 452:20:15, 30 August 2015 (UTC) 437:19:45, 30 August 2015 (UTC) 424:Thanks for trying to help, 420:12:01, 30 August 2015 (UTC) 396:11:40, 30 August 2015 (UTC) 341:10:55, 30 August 2015 (UTC) 322:10:19, 30 August 2015 (UTC) 250:08:34, 30 August 2015 (UTC) 223:08:21, 30 August 2015 (UTC) 10: 914: 729:) on the subject of using 886:Please do not modify it. 360:African-American History 270:American Louisiana Cajun 32:Please do not modify it. 58:User:Sovereign Sentinel 582:page should be deleted 52:. This discussion was 291:cultural traditions 827:this interjection 786: 766: 590:and elsewhere by 352:American folklore 303:American folklore 301:) to the broader 905: 888: 824: 769: 749: 718: 632:trivial nonsense 596:Henry IV, Part 1 274:enslaved peoples 262: 204: 203: 189: 141: 129: 111: 34: 913: 912: 908: 907: 906: 904: 903: 902: 901: 895:deletion review 884: 847:nevermind. --- 818: 712: 638:User:Fyddlestix 600:Henry IV Part 1 504:I'm pretty sure 256: 146: 137: 102: 86: 83: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 911: 900: 899: 879: 878: 877: 876: 838: 815: 814: 788: 787: 767: 747: 746: 745: 707: 706: 705: 704: 680: 679: 678: 677: 657: 656: 635: 611: 592:User:Savonneux 585: 566: 565: 542: 541: 540: 539: 522: 521: 500: 477: 476: 475: 474: 456: 455: 454: 399: 398: 380:User:Savonneux 364:short-shrifted 344: 343: 306: 278: 272:culture among 253: 252: 231:on etymology: 207: 206: 143: 82: 77: 46: 45: 25: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 910: 898: 896: 892: 887: 881: 880: 875: 871: 867: 863: 862:WP:OTHERSTUFF 860: 859: 858: 854: 850: 846: 842: 841:fiddlesticks! 836: 832: 828: 822: 817: 816: 813: 809: 805: 801: 797: 793: 790: 789: 785: 781: 777: 773: 768: 765: 761: 757: 753: 748: 744: 740: 736: 732: 728: 723: 716: 711: 710: 709: 708: 703: 699: 695: 691: 687: 684: 683: 682: 681: 676: 672: 668: 664: 661: 660: 659: 658: 655: 651: 647: 643: 639: 636:I agree with 633: 629: 625: 621: 617: 616: 609: 605: 601: 597: 593: 589: 583: 579: 575: 571: 568: 567: 564: 560: 556: 552: 547: 544: 543: 538: 534: 530: 526: 525: 524: 523: 520: 516: 512: 509: 505: 501: 499: 495: 491: 486: 482: 479: 478: 473: 469: 465: 461: 460:WP:OTHERSTUFF 457: 453: 449: 445: 441: 440: 438: 435: 431: 427: 423: 422: 421: 417: 413: 409: 405: 401: 400: 397: 393: 389: 385: 381: 377: 373: 369: 365: 361: 357: 356:Cajun culture 353: 349: 346: 345: 342: 338: 334: 330: 327: 326: 325: 324: 323: 319: 315: 307: 304: 300: 296: 295:contributions 292: 288: 284: 279: 275: 271: 267: 266:Fiddlesticks! 263: 260: 251: 247: 243: 239: 237:this source. 236: 233: 230: 227: 226: 225: 224: 220: 216: 211: 202: 198: 195: 192: 188: 184: 180: 177: 174: 171: 168: 165: 162: 159: 156: 152: 149: 148:Find sources: 144: 140: 136: 133: 127: 123: 119: 115: 110: 106: 101: 97: 93: 89: 85: 84: 81: 76: 75: 71: 67: 63: 59: 55: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 885: 882: 849:Professor JR 844: 791: 735:Professor JR 731:fiddlesticks 721: 685: 646:Professor JR 631: 627: 619: 614: 613: 603: 599: 595: 581: 577: 573: 569: 545: 507: 484: 480: 407: 403: 388:Professor JR 383: 371: 347: 328: 314:Professor JR 311: 308: 299:short shrift 294: 290: 282: 280: 255: 254: 228: 208: 196: 190: 182: 175: 169: 163: 157: 147: 134: 49: 47: 31: 28: 608:User:Edison 588:User:Edison 551:minced oath 444:Rsrikanth05 426:Rsrikanth05 412:Rsrikanth05 333:Rsrikanth05 173:free images 800:Wiktionary 796:WP:NOTDICT 511:Fyddlestix 488:century.-- 384:Wiktionary 372:Wiktionary 287:Wiktionary 62:WP:DPR#NAC 891:talk page 866:Savonneux 843:does not 776:• Gene93k 756:• Gene93k 667:Savonneux 529:Savonneux 490:Savonneux 464:Savonneux 368:etymology 283:etymology 259:Savonneux 242:Savonneux 215:Savonneux 210:WP:DICDEF 37:talk page 893:or in a 835:this one 831:this one 430:Bishonen 366:, token 132:View log 39:or in a 686:Comment 663:WP:SOAP 602:) is: " 508:Delete. 386:.) --- 277:status. 229:Comment 179:WP refs 167:scholar 105:protect 100:history 821:Michig 804:Michig 792:Delete 715:Edison 694:Edison 644:" --- 628:trifle 578:Delete 574:Delete 570:Delete 555:Edison 546:Delete 404:Retain 358:, and 348:Retain 329:Delete 151:Google 109:delete 66:Stifle 54:closed 50:delete 845:. . . 833:, or 829:, or 485:facts 194:JSTOR 155:books 139:Stats 126:views 118:watch 114:links 16:< 870:talk 853:talk 839:but 808:talk 802:. -- 780:talk 760:talk 739:talk 727:here 698:talk 671:talk 650:talk 559:talk 533:talk 515:talk 494:talk 481:Note 468:talk 448:talk 434:talk 416:talk 410:. -- 408:Keep 392:talk 376:Here 337:talk 318:talk 312:--- 293:and 246:talk 219:talk 187:FENS 161:news 122:logs 96:talk 92:edit 70:talk 722:and 615:bow 370:in 201:TWL 130:– ( 872:) 864:-- 855:) 810:) 782:) 774:. 762:) 754:. 741:) 700:) 673:) 665:-- 652:) 622:. 620:cf 576:, 572:, 561:) 535:) 517:) 496:) 470:) 462:-- 450:) 439:. 432:| 418:) 394:) 354:, 339:) 320:) 248:) 221:) 181:) 124:| 120:| 116:| 112:| 107:| 103:| 98:| 94:| 72:) 868:( 851:( 823:: 819:@ 806:( 778:( 758:( 737:( 725:( 717:: 713:@ 696:( 689:, 669:( 648:( 557:( 531:( 513:( 492:( 466:( 446:( 414:( 390:( 335:( 316:( 261:: 257:@ 244:( 217:( 205:) 197:· 191:· 183:· 176:· 170:· 164:· 158:· 153:( 145:( 142:) 135:· 128:) 90:( 68:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
closed
User:Sovereign Sentinel
WP:DPR#NAC
Stifle
talk
09:26, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
Fiddlesticks! (interjection)
Fiddlesticks! (interjection)
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.