Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Criticism of Wall Street - Knowledge

Source 📝

265:
sourced to an opinion piece on a newspaper website is not in any way encyclopedic. Under this principle, any crazy-assed statement making the web under the banner of Fox News would be "in." It's just the idle speculation of one dude, and an obscure one, writing commentary to make his deadline.
204:
to "Predictions of post-capitalist economics" since that seems to be the main topic of the article. After that keep or delete depending on the sources provided. It should be possible to find some sources for notable predictions.
240: 154: 185:
Not sure what to say about this contribution, maybe you best see for yourself: The article seems unencyclopedic to me, an amalgamation of statements that have little to do with each other, and with the article's title.
243:, for example, with a more narrow focus. This is a much too broadly drawn topic for anything meaningful to come of it. It's essentially a trojan horse for POV as well. Focus and source. 148: 79: 346: 363: 115: 214: 299: 252: 71: 63: 319: 275: 231: 195: 284: 88: 83: 92: 57: 169: 136: 75: 130: 263:
The form of capitalism that has been prevalent since the beginning of the modern era may cease to exist as we know it.
97: 126: 62: 109: 17: 176: 377:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
315: 105: 142: 378: 36: 342: 101: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
53: 359: 8: 338: 210: 191: 334: 295: 271: 248: 227: 49: 162: 355: 330: 206: 187: 291: 267: 244: 354:. Fails NPOV and would require a fundamental rewrite to be encyclopedic.-- 311: 223: 239:
as original essay. One might write an encyclopedic sourced article like
371:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
241:
Anarchist critique of contemporary American capitalism
161: 310:
as an essay. Far too broad and POV to be an article.
39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 381:). No further edits should be made to this page. 285:list of Business-related deletion discussions 175: 283:Note: This debate has been included in the 14: 23: 222:for the same reason as BigJim707. 24: 393: 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 13: 1: 7: 10: 398: 374:Please do not modify it. 364:20:13, 8 July 2011 (UTC) 347:21:20, 2 July 2011 (UTC) 320:18:13, 2 July 2011 (UTC) 300:17:42, 2 July 2011 (UTC) 276:14:37, 2 July 2011 (UTC) 253:14:32, 2 July 2011 (UTC) 232:03:41, 2 July 2011 (UTC) 215:22:33, 1 July 2011 (UTC) 196:22:13, 1 July 2011 (UTC) 72:Criticism of Wall Street 64:Criticism of Wall Street 58:23:28, 8 July 2011 (UTC) 32:Please do not modify it. 329:Inherently contrary to 44:The result was 302: 288: 389: 376: 289: 282: 180: 179: 165: 113: 95: 34: 397: 396: 392: 391: 390: 388: 387: 386: 385: 379:deletion review 372: 318: 122: 86: 70: 67: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 395: 384: 383: 367: 366: 349: 333:; an improper 323: 322: 314: 304: 303: 280: 279: 278: 256: 255: 234: 217: 183: 182: 119: 66: 61: 42: 41: 25: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 394: 382: 380: 375: 369: 368: 365: 361: 357: 353: 350: 348: 344: 340: 336: 332: 328: 325: 324: 321: 317: 313: 309: 306: 305: 301: 297: 293: 286: 281: 277: 273: 269: 264: 260: 259: 258: 257: 254: 250: 246: 242: 238: 235: 233: 229: 225: 221: 218: 216: 212: 208: 203: 200: 199: 198: 197: 193: 189: 178: 174: 171: 168: 164: 160: 156: 153: 150: 147: 144: 141: 138: 135: 132: 128: 125: 124:Find sources: 120: 117: 111: 107: 103: 99: 94: 90: 85: 81: 77: 73: 69: 68: 65: 60: 59: 55: 51: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 373: 370: 351: 326: 307: 262: 236: 219: 201: 184: 172: 166: 158: 151: 145: 139: 133: 123: 45: 43: 31: 28: 331:core policy 261:BTW, THIS: 149:free images 50:Mkativerata 356:EdwardZhao 335:WP:POVFORK 316:contribs. 292:• Gene93k 207:BigJim707 188:Pgallert 116:View log 268:Carrite 245:Carrite 155:WP refs 143:scholar 89:protect 84:history 352:Delete 339:Warden 327:Delete 312:OSborn 308:Delete 237:Delete 224:GVnayR 220:Rename 202:Rename 127:Google 93:delete 46:delete 170:JSTOR 131:books 110:views 102:watch 98:links 16:< 360:talk 343:talk 296:talk 272:talk 249:talk 228:talk 211:talk 192:talk 163:FENS 137:news 106:logs 80:talk 76:edit 54:talk 177:TWL 114:– ( 362:) 345:) 337:. 298:) 290:— 287:. 274:) 251:) 230:) 213:) 194:) 157:) 108:| 104:| 100:| 96:| 91:| 87:| 82:| 78:| 56:) 48:. 358:( 341:( 294:( 270:( 247:( 226:( 209:( 190:( 181:) 173:· 167:· 159:· 152:· 146:· 140:· 134:· 129:( 121:( 118:) 112:) 74:( 52:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
deletion review
Mkativerata
talk
23:28, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
Criticism of Wall Street
Criticism of Wall Street
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
Pgallert
talk
22:13, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
BigJim707

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.