Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 4

1017:

map, I'd like to consider a removal of blanket 500/30 in favor of implementing 500/30 where disruption occurs as a discretionary sanction, with a remedy explicitly noting that the Committee would like it to be used liberally but not unreasonably. Blanket 500/30 is a relic of a bygone era when 500/30 could not be applied by technical means in case-by-case scenarios. Existing protections could be automatically converted to discretionary sanctions appealable at AE like any other sanction, so no "mass-unprotecting" during a switch. I also think we need to rethink the awareness requirements of 1RR and its applicability. In particular, we could change the DS notice to include mention of 1RR and then allow a consensus of administrators at AE to enforce 1RR in cases where a reasonable editor who had received the notice would be aware the article was covered in addition to being able to enforce it where edit notices exist. In other words, edit notices would only be truly needed to enforce the requirement on articles that are difficult to tell are reasonably construed to be within the topic area, but not on those articles that are obviously related. Plus I think a look at the long-term contributors in this area would be useful to determine where there are issues that have not been solvable by the community. ~

1972:: All IP editors, users with fewer than 500 edits, and users with less than 30 days' tenure are prohibited from editing content within the area of conflict. On primary articles, this prohibition is preferably to be enforced by use of extended confirmed protection (ECP) but this is not mandatory. On pages with related content, or on primary articles where ECP is not feasible, the 500/30 Rule may be enforced by other methods, including page protection, reverts, blocks, the use of pending changes, and appropriate edit filters. Reverts made solely to enforce the 500/30 Rule are not considered edit warring.The sole exceptions to this prohibition are: 920:. I think the intention was to ensure that users get warned by having editnotices placed on appropriate articles. But it has created a limbo loop hasn't it? The rule to place editnotices should be separate from the general rule on warning. That is, an editor who meets the general criteria for being warned, should not be able to escape sanction by wiki-lawyering that there was no editnotice in place. It looks like Rob intended or hoped that a bot would be created that allowed editnotices to be created if there was an appropriate talkpage notice in place. I think AGK is right - it would be helpful to conduct a review of the remedies. 892:. My understanding is that a DS notice goes on the talkpage to let people know that the article comes under DS, and if someone edits that article, and it appears they are not aware that DS applies to the article, they need to be informed on their talkpage before sanctions can be applied against them. I understand that an editnotice can also be added, but does that mean a talkpage notice cannot be placed, and a user cannot be informed? Has there been a rule change which says that we are no longer using talkpage notices, and no longer informing users? I wouldn't have thought an 1867:

devote some of their knowledge, interest, and effort to creating or editing other articles that may relate to the same broad subject-matter as the dispute, but are less immediately contentious. For example, an editor whose ethnicity, cultural heritage, or personal interests relate to Side X and who finds that they become caught up in edit-warring on an article about a recent war between Side X and Side Y, may wish to disengage from that article for a time and instead focus on a different aspect of the history, civilization, and cultural heritage of Side X.

250: 989:

area's sanction regime, I consider that unhelpful. There are some editors, admins even, who seem like they just simply won't understand anything we throw their way in this topic area. Further tweaking is highly unlikely to change that, because we've tweaked these sanctions about a dozen times already to try to solve such issues, and the repeated changes have never helped. If anything, they've made things more confused because we aren't just settling on one set of sanctions and sticking with it.

305: 732:. Concerning the issue itself, I indeed interpret the decision such that if an article contains a significant part (in the case of Airbnb, this is a dedicated section) the discretionary sanctions apply. However, I do not hold strong opinions here, if the result of this clarification request is that only dedicated articles can be extended-confirmed protected (or anything else) this is perfectly fine with me.-- 2425: 2151:. The presence of the templates is required before the General Sanctions can be enforced on related content. Once added by any editor, any marking, template, or editnotice may be removed only by an uninvolved administrator. Users who lack the appropriate permissions to create an editnotice should place the talk page template as normal, then make an 2019:: Each editor is limited to one revert per page per 24 hours on any edits made to content within the area of conflict. Reverts made to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are exempt from the provisions of this motion. Also, the normal exemptions apply. Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator. 2491:

While asking the enforcing administrator and seeking reviews at AN or AE are not mandatory prior to seeking a decision from the committee, once the committee has reviewed a request, further substantive review at any forum is barred. The sole exception is editors under an active sanction who may still

2458:

Administrators are free to modify sanctions placed by former administrators – that is, editors who do not have the administrator permission enabled (due to a temporary or permanent relinquishment or desysop) – without regard to the requirements of this section. If an administrator modifies a sanction

991:

What we have now is discretionary sanctions on articles "broadly construed" - meaning any article that's even tangentially related to the topic area. Additionally, we have 500/30 and 1RR on articles "reasonably construed" - meaning any article where one could not talk about the article subject at the

937:- Hah, yes, I was a member of Mensa in the Seventies, yet my mind glazes over when faced with some ARBPIA stuff. But, truth be told, IQ tests only test how good someone is at solving IQ tests, they don't measure the ability to handle arcane Knowledge bureaucracy created by an ever changing committee. 2158:

Editors should apply the ARBPIA General Sanctions templates to related content only when disruption creates a need for additional administrative tools. Administrators should only utilize the ARBPIA General Sanctions to reduce disruption caused by edits related to the conflict area. Problematic edits

667:

So the question...are this decision's stipulations on page protection meant to apply to all articles that have bits related to Israel-Palestine, or is it only intended for pages to which Israel-Palestine is an integral component? This article is definitely the first — one can understand the company

1866:

3) Editors who find it difficult to edit a particular article or topic from a neutral point of view and adhere to other Knowledge policies are counselled that they may sometimes need or wish to step away temporarily from that article or subject area. Sometimes, editors in this position may wish to

1296:

I don't want to, because these discussions are sprawling and polarising. I don't know how we are going to fit it in, with our other workload. However, I do agree that this is probably the right time to do this, it needs tidying up. What's more, if the committee itself can let this stall so long, it

1275:

Proposed. We don't have a lot of bandwidth right now, but we seem to agree that it is time to formally review these decisions and look into why participating editors and uninvolved administrators alike seem to be discontented. This motion proposes a low-fuss path towards conducting such a review,

1120:

I'm not sure what's more to be said here - but I've been lax at ARCA, so I thought I'd pitch in. In my opinion - the discretionary sanctions can be applied where the disruption occurs - hence the broadly construed nature of that. I would hope that the sanction would be as light as possible in areas

953:

Arbitration remedies applying to the Arab–Israeli conflict seem to have grown confusing and patchworked. Is it time to conduct a review of all remedies? I'd like to hear from editors and enforcing administrators who are active in this topic area. Among other questions for a review, we should look

707:

If an admin levies an ARBPIA sanction and then changes his mind, is there something preventing the admin from self-reverting? If this is indeed the case, and it's specific to ARBPIA (I don't know; I don't do WP:AE), it would be helpful if you implemented a mechanism for lowering ARBPIA protections

2104:

to affected pages. The presence of the templates is required before the General Sanctions can be enforced on primary articles. The templates may be added to primary articles by any user, but may only be removed by an uninvolved administrator. Users who lack the appropriate permissions to create an

1609:

is one editor, one account, though there are several legitimate uses of an alternate account. The creation or use of an additional account to conceal an editing history, to evade a block or a site ban, or to deceive the community, is prohibited. Sockpuppet accounts that are not publicly disclosed

1846:

2) Editors are reminded that when editing in subject areas of bitter and long-standing real-world conflict, it is all the more important to comply with Knowledge policies such as assuming good faith of all editors including those on the other side of the real-world dispute, writing with a neutral

1016:

My thinking on this has changed rather sharply after the recent Huldra/Sir Joseph kerfuffle, especially the admin response at AE. It has become clear that the current sanction regime, in total, is not working. I think we need another ABRPIA case to review the entire situation. As a potential road

1105:

PIA ARCAs make me want to hide under the blankets, and it seems I'm not the only one. Frankly I'd love to see this topic area get a rules overhaul, but I don't have the time to do it. A number of these repetitive requests on PIA issues have centered on this point about "what if it's just a small

2499:

All actions designated as arbitration enforcement actions, including those alleged to be out of process or against existing policy, must first be appealed following arbitration enforcement procedures to establish if such enforcement is inappropriate before the action may be reversed or formally

2495:

These provisions apply only to contentious topics placed by administrators and to blocks placed by administrators to enforce arbitration case decisions. They do not apply to sanctions directly authorised by the committee, and enacted either by arbitrators or by arbitration clerks, or to special

1850:

Knowledge cannot resolve the dispute between the Israeli and Palestinian people or any other real-world conflict. What Knowledge can do is aspire to provide neutral, encyclopedic coverage about the areas of dispute and the peoples involved in it, which may lead to a broader understanding of the

988:

Airbnb is rather obviously not "reasonably construed" to be within the topic area of an international conflict, though it is "broadly construed" to be. That would mean discretionary sanctions are in force, but 1RR and the general prohibition do not apply. As for calls to review the entire topic

867:

I think I'm comfortable with the template wording as is so we don't need to be fiddling with "page/article/section/material". If someone feels that there is significant enough content which falls under a DS topic on a particular page/article then they can place a DS template. If another person

655:

is a US-based company that acts as a broker for people who have spare rooms in their homes and people who want to rent those rooms. Apparently there was some controversy related to Israel-Palestine and this company, so the article has a section on this issue. Ymblanter recently protected the

675:

If we assume either Ymblanter's perspective or mine, there's no room for dispute over whether this is an appropriate protection; if Arbcom meant to include all pages with Israel-Palestine sections, of course this is an appropriate protection, and if you didn't mean to include pages like this,

1976:

Editors who are not eligible to be extended-confirmed may use the Talk: namespace to post constructive comments and make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive. Talk pages where disruption occurs may be managed by any of the methods noted in

1040:

Read carefully what I have written. I have not proposed removing 500/30. I have proposed removing blanket 500/30 of "reasonably construed" pages in favor of discretionary but liberal use of 500/30 to combat abuse across all "broadly construed" pages. I have proposed zero removals of existing

849:

Sometimes we can bogged down with the letter of the law rather than the spirit. The intention of DS is to prevent disruption; if there is material on Knowledge which is likely to lead to disruption, then it is appropriate for us to monitor that material. If the DS wording inhibits us from

1335:

I support this in principle, and agree with the above, thanks AGK for tackling this. But I don't know that we have the bandwidth for this right now. One possibility would be to schedule the opening for a specific time in the future after we've moved through some of the current business.

668:

quite well without a tiny Israel-Palestine section sourced only to news reports and an advocacy organization. By the latter, I'm talking about Israeli politicians, places in the West Bank, events in the history of Gaza, etc. The situation here reminds me of the "weather" situation at

1980:

Editors who are not eligible to be extended-confirmed may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by editors who do not meet the criteria is permitted but not

775:

Yes, it is time to conduct review of all remedies. We are slowly moving towards professionalizing of AE in general and PI in particular, when one first needs to study for five years and then run an internship in order to be able to act there responsively. This is not really

1589:

can create the impression that an editor is following their own agenda with a non-neutral focus on a single topic. Editors operating such an account should take care to ensure that their edits are compatible with the project's broader goal of writing an encyclopaedia.

868:

doesn't agree, the matter can be taken to AE for discussion and consensus. While the template is in place, any inappropriate edit to any part of the page would be liable for sanction - that would be to prevent, for example in this case, anyone deliberately vandalising

753:

Without giving my opinion of the motion you mention, if someone compiles a list of articles where the notice must be placed I volunteer, after a reasonable check, place the notice to all these articles (which obviously is going to take time but it is still better than

1625:

7) Users who disrupt the editing of articles by engaging in sustained aggressive point-of-view editing and edit-warring may be banned from the affected articles, or in extreme cases from the site, either by community consensus or by the Arbitration Committee.

1641:

8) In cases where all reasonable attempts to control the spread of disruption arising from long-term disputes have failed, the Committee may be forced to adopt seemingly draconian measures as a last resort for preventing further damage to the encyclopedia.

2392:

Appeals may be made only by the editor under sanction and only for a currently active sanction. Requests for modification of page restrictions may be made by any editor. The process has three possible stages (see "Important notes" below). The editor may:

854:, does fall under the Palestine-Israel tension. It is currently neutral and factual, and we would want to keep it that way, so applying DS to that material is appropriate. (For me the greater debate is should that information be in the article on 2459:

placed by a former administrator, the administrator who made the modification becomes the "enforcing administrator". If a former administrator regains the tools, the provisions of this section again apply to their unmodified enforcement actions.

1106:

section in a larger and mostly-unrelated article" and I've generally held the view that such things should not be included in all the warning/templating/etc infrastructure. I don't see any reason this should be an exception to that general view.

1350:

It's daunting to think about redoing ARBPIA, but it looks like there is fairly widespread agreement among editors in that topic area and administrators trying to enforce remedies in that topic area that the restrictions there are in bad shape.

1121:

that are more tangential to the case, be it through time limitation of the sanction or through a tailored sanction which hits as small an area as possible. I like the idea of re-doing ARBPIA, similar to OR, I'd want to hide under the blanket!

676:

obviously this should be treated like any other victim of disruptive editing rather than an Israel-Palestine issue. So once again, no hard feelings exist yet, and I don't envision them arising in the future; I just want the scope to be clear.

1718:

3) Drawing a distinction between pages "broadly construed" and "reasonably construed" as relating to the Palestine-Israel conflict has been unintuitive and unhelpful, particularly for pages where only a portion of the content is relevant.

1720: 102: 2681: 2657: 2174:

8) In the case of disputes regarding whether or not an article is a primary article, or whether a portion of content is related to ARBPIA, editors should use normal dispute resolution methods to come to a consensus.

237: 2454:

Nothing in this section prevents an administrator from replacing an existing sanction issued by another administrator with a new sanction if fresh misconduct has taken place after the existing sanction was applied.

2382:

This procedure applies to appeals related to, and modifications of, actions taken by administrators to enforce the Committee's remedies. It does not apply to appeals related to the remedies directly enacted by the

97: 810:

case, which has been the subject of active deliberation. The specifics are being worked out, but when we open the case, it's likely to be suspended for a period of time before we start the evidence phase. Best,

2492:

request an easing or removal of the sanction on the grounds that said sanction is no longer needed, but such requests may only be made once every six months, or whatever longer period the committee may specify.

2349:

0) Should any user subject to a restriction in this case violate that restriction, that user may be blocked, initially for up to one month, and then with blocks increasing in duration to a maximum of one year.

1795: 1297:

appears that we don't have a clear way forward and that's what we're here to try to sort out. I do like the proposed scope, making this a bit more meta and might make things a bit more manageable, good job

91: 80: 1765: 1045:

some protections by eliminating from our vernacular this "reasonably construed" language that is proving hard for admins to parse. The current rule is clearly causing some issues, given the protection of

1790: 1321:

I have been meaning to do a motion on this for a little while now, but never got round to it, so thanks to AGK for taking the initiative, and for giving thoughtful shape to the proposed proceedings.

1815: 1809: 1785: 2543: 1771: 86: 75: 1050:, which I believe is rather plainly not intended by our sanctions, and I no longer think the benefits outweigh the harms of removing administrator discretion from the equation in this remedy. ~ 2313: 2241: 1760: 1755: 69: 664:

basically "I protected it intentionally, because the disruptive editing was related to Israel-Palestine". His response mentions some consultation with Galobtter regarding the duration.

2356: 1847:

point of view, remaining civil and avoiding personal attacks, utilizing reliable sources for contentious or disputed assertions, and making use of dispute resolution where necessary.

2248: 2512: 1384: 1674: 1470: 1345: 1316: 2647: 1927:

are activated for the area of conflict. Any uninvolved administrator may apply sanctions as an arbitration enforcement action to users editing the area of conflict whilst aware.

1136: 1115: 1851:

issues and the positions of all real-life conflict parties. The contributions of all good-faith editors on these articles who contribute with this goal in mind are appreciated.

1680: 1476: 1360: 1371: 1496:

2) The purpose of Knowledge is to create a high-quality, free-content encyclopedia in an atmosphere of camaraderie and mutual respect among contributors. Use of the site for

1061: 1028: 1699:

2) Editors working in the topic area have expressed concern that the rules governing editing and sanctions for pages relating to the Palestine-Israel conflict (summarized at

1155: 1398: 1010: 946: 929: 909: 884: 850:

appropriately preventing disruption then we may look to change the wording rather than allow the disruption to take place due to unclear wording. The material in this case,

717: 2279: 2205: 1668: 1464: 1330: 526: 2147:

in the editnotice to do so. If there is confusion about which content is considered related, the content in question may be marked in the wiki source with an invisible

1094: 969: 2412: 563: 395: 268: 1291: 785: 763: 741: 1209:. Evidence (and related submissions, including at the Workshop) must remain within the proceedings scope. The following matters will initially be within scope: 2639: 2059: 2041: 692: 681:

if the result of this clarification request is that only dedicated articles can be extended-confirmed protected (or anything else) this is perfectly fine with me

328: 226: 1508:

is prohibited. Contributors whose actions are detrimental to that goal may be asked to refrain from them, even when these actions are undertaken in good faith.

2554: 1924: 204: 1700: 557: 2593: 2032: 1724: 215: 672:— if we had similar sanctions on the topic of weather, I suppose we'd not consider all articles with "climate" sections liable to ARBWEATHER protection. 1265: 999:

The one positive clarification we could make here is to set forth a formal definition of "reasonably construed". I would suggest what I wrote above. ~

843: 1542:. Merely presenting a plurality of viewpoints, especially from polarized sources, does not fulfill the neutral point of view. Articles should always 837: 521: 2319:

The contentious topics procedure permits full and semi-page protections, including use of pending changes where warranted, and – once an editor has

1746:

1) For the sake of easy referencing, the following existing remedies are vacated (with the intention of replacing them elsewhere in this decision):

553: 349: 341: 2673:. The arbitration clerks are directed to amend all existing remedies authorizing discretionary sanctions to instead designate contentious topics. 1977:

paragraph b). This exception does not apply to other internal project discussions such as AfDs, WikiProjects, RfCs, noticeboard discussions, etc.

1505: 1877: 2124:

7) All edits made to related content (i.e. pages not otherwise related to the area of conflict) will be subject to ARBPIA General Sanctions.

495: 1501: 2320: 1890:

edits relating to the Arab-Israeli conflict, to pages and discussions in all namespaces with the exception of userspace ("related content")

2247:

Discretionary sanctions permit full and semi-page protections, including use of pending changes where warranted, and – once an editor has

345: 515: 360: 338: 2401: 2127:

When disruptive edits are being made to such content, any editor may invoke ARBPIA General Sanctions for that content. They must place

1454: 596: 548: 486: 405: 333: 261: 723: 1823:

Existing enforcement decisions relying upon these remedies are not vacated and will be appealable as if this remedy had not carried.

511: 705:

I am not sure I can now so easily remove or lower the protection. I do not think we have a mechanism of lowering ARBPIA protections.

2131: 2084: 2075: 683:

says Ymblanter. I agree — if the committee intends ARBPIA to apply to articles in an Airbnb-type situation, that's fine with me.

622: 491: 875:

In short, I think we're fine as we are, and nothing needs to be done. Disagreements about siting of templates can be taken to AE.

640: 2141: 2094: 501: 481: 364: 2405: 2119: 506: 419: 400: 1882:

4) For the purposes of editing restrictions in the ARBPIA topic area, the "area of conflict" shall be defined as encompassing

469: 2696: 2169: 540: 431: 282: 2601: 2712: 1229:

Other general matters relating to the ease with which Knowledge keeps order on pages relating to the Arab–Israeli conflict.

1041:

protections, stating all existing protections should remain if we were to make such a switch. In fact, such a proposal may

464: 275: 2562: 2525: 1887:

the entire set of articles whose topic relates to the Arab-Israeli conflict, broadly interpreted ("primary articles"), and

390: 319: 25: 1460: 1149:

For this motion there are 9 active arbitrators. With 0 arbitrators abstaining, 5 support or oppose votes are a majority.

2695:

Any block, restriction, ban, or sanction performed under the authorisation of a remedy for this case must be logged at

1518: 2316:

with page protections, blocks, or warnings even if they have edited the article themselves or are otherwise involved;

2244:

with page protections, blocks, or warnings even if they have edited the article themselves or are otherwise involved;

31: 1142: 806:

Hello everyone, I know this has been a bit quieter lately. I wanted to provide an update on case management for the

2520: 1663: 918: 2476:(i) the clear and substantial consensus of (a) uninvolved administrators at AE or (b) uninvolved editors at AN or 1539: 1497: 896:

editnotice is sufficient notice alone before sanctioning someone because, lets be honest, most people don't read

456: 296: 2302:, violating the policy on biographies of living persons, or making personal attacks may be blocked indefinitely; 2230:, violating the policy on biographies of living persons, or making personal attacks may be blocked indefinitely; 2447:

prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" below).

635: 442: 385: 21: 2627: 2288: 2278:

9) Uninvolved administrators are encouraged to monitor the articles covered by discretionary sanctions in the

2216: 2010: 800: 729: 700: 649:

some sort of complaint/argument/etc. Just trying to get an authoritative statement on this decision's scope.

790: 377: 2344: 2299: 2227: 2204:

Uninvolved administrators are encouraged to monitor the articles covered by discretionary sanctions in the

1381: 795: 615: 427: 325: 155: 2323:

of the contentious topic designation – any other appropriate remedy may be issued without further warning.

1694: 917:, I see what you are saying. Though the rule regarding editnotices has been in place since January 2018: 437: 355: 2451:

Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped.

2364: 1523:

3) It is not the role of the Arbitration Committee to settle good-faith content disputes among editors.

2416: 1547: 1341: 1310: 1261: 1206: 1130: 1111: 833: 476: 166: 1902: 1657: 1580: 1463:

over prior cases, in this instance, the three previous cases related to Palestine-Israel articles:

1356: 851: 1533: 1377: 608: 281:

Actions taken to enforce remedies authorised in the case (if applicable) are to be logged at the

150: 2539:

case is amended by inserting, at the end of the list titled "ARBPIA", the following list item:

2251:

of sanctions for the topic – any other appropriate remedy may be issued without further warning.

1741: 1713: 1567: 1703:) have become overly complicated and confusing, making them difficult to enforce effectively. 2159:

made to unrelated content on the same page should be handled by normal administrative means.

1491: 1376:

Per everybody else - inescapably necessary, but let's deal with our other priorities first. ♠

1337: 1302: 1122: 1107: 315: 161: 17: 2660:

to re-designate existing discretionary sanctions remedies as contentious topic designations.

954:

at whether 1RR is effective – both in general and under the current rules of notification.

1620: 1394: 1069:

Note: We are trying to reach a consensus, so placing comments by a retired arbitrator into

55: 2440:

No administrator may modify or remove a sanction placed by another administrator without:

1213:

Trends in disruptive editing of related pages, but not the specific conduct of any editor.

1201:

The committee opens proceedings on pages relating to the Arab–Israeli conflict, naming it

256:

This case is closed. No edits should be made to this page except by clerks or arbitrators.

8: 2306: 2234: 2185: 1652: 1352: 781: 759: 737: 267:

Specific requests for amendment or clarification about the decision should be raised at

2689: 1861: 1562:, is therefore contrary to the neutral point of view. The neutral point of view is the 1367: 1326: 1223:

Currently-authorised remedies under any arbitration decision that affect related pages.

942: 925: 905: 880: 859: 130: 47: 657: 2148: 1991:

5) The following set of sanctions will be considered the "ARBPIA General Sanctions".

713: 688: 144: 1662:

1) This case relates to behavioral issues occurring around articles relating to the

2653: 1841: 1255: 827: 1636: 872:

to reflect badly on the company in retaliation for their actions on the West Bank.

2670: 2666: 1555: 1551: 1390: 1285: 1088: 1073: 963: 2282:

case to ensure compliance. To assist in this, administrators are reminded that:

2208:

case to ensure compliance. To assist in this, administrators are reminded that:

2339: 2292: 2220: 2000: 1606: 777: 755: 733: 669: 580: 2706: 2152: 2106: 2101: 1600: 1586: 1559: 1449: 1365:

With the caveat that we get the big thing on our plate out of the way first.

1322: 1051: 1035: 1018: 1000: 938: 921: 901: 889: 876: 125: 119: 584: 2582: 1963: 1217: 728:

The consultation with Galobtter which Nyttend mentions is at my talk page,

709: 684: 656:

article under ARBPIA following some disruptive editing to this section. I

139: 2482:

is required. If consensus at AE or AN is unclear, the status quo prevails.

2331: 2265: 2050: 1935: 1666:. This area has been the subject of three previous arbitration cases, the 2444:

the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or

2080:

6) All primary articles will be subject to the ARBPIA General Sanctions.

1962:

The phrase "other internal project discussions" mentioned below includes

1736: 1563: 1543: 934: 914: 748: 660:, saying basically "did you accidentally protect the wrong article", and 2105:

editnotice should place the talk page template as normal, then make an

2397:

ask the enforcing administrator to reconsider their original decision;

1444: 260:

Any violations of the remedies passed in the case should be raised at

1249: 1241: 821: 813: 304: 2415:. If the editor is blocked, the appeal may be made by email through 1298: 1278: 1081: 956: 770: 582: 114: 1226:

Prospective amendments to, or replacements for, existing remedies.

661: 2581:

case ("ARBPIA General Sanctions"), shall be construed to include

1216:

Difficulties in Knowledge administrative processes, particularly

992:

top level without delving into the topic area. That really isn't

1047: 869: 855: 652: 585: 2513:

procedure for the standard appeals and modifications provision

900:

editnotices. But they do read notices left on their talkpage.

586: 1546:

use the best and most reputable sources, with prevalence in

1610:

are not to be used in discussions internal to the project.

1585:

5) Editors should contribute from a neutral point of view.

1276:

and hopefully matches with what colleagues were thinking.

2515:

adopted 3 May 2014, this provision did not require a vote.

2359:

adopted 3 May 2014, this provision did not require a vote.

269:

Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment

2309:

in place to deal with editors who violate the BLP policy;

2237:

in place to deal with editors who violate the BLP policy;

2155:

for someone with permissions to create the edit notice.

2109:

for someone with permissions to create the edit notice.

2090:

should be added to the talk page of affected pages, and

862:. But that's an editorial decision, not an ArbCom one.) 2648:

Motion: contentious topic designation (December 2022)

2619:) is amended by replacing item B with the following: 1701:

Knowledge:Arbitration/Index/Palestine-Israel articles

2656:, the Arbitration Committee adopted the following 2654:2022 adoption of the contentious topics procedure 1538:4) All Knowledge articles must be written from a 2704: 2357:procedure for the standard enforcement provision 1768:(for "All Arab-Israeli conflict-related pages") 2259:Passed 6 to 0 at 05:06, 20 December 2019 (UTC) 2180:Passed 6 to 0 at 05:06, 20 December 2019 (UTC) 2164:Passed 6 to 0 at 05:06, 20 December 2019 (UTC) 2114:Passed 6 to 0 at 05:06, 20 December 2019 (UTC) 2026:Passed 6 to 0 at 05:06, 20 December 2019 (UTC) 1897:Passed 6 to 0 at 05:06, 20 December 2019 (UTC) 1872:Passed 5 to 1 at 05:06, 20 December 2019 (UTC) 1856:Passed 5 to 1 at 05:06, 20 December 2019 (UTC) 1833: 1828:Passed 6 to 0 at 05:06, 20 December 2019 (UTC) 1731:Passed 6 to 0 at 05:06, 20 December 2019 (UTC) 1708:Passed 6 to 0 at 05:06, 20 December 2019 (UTC) 1689:Passed 6 to 0 at 05:06, 20 December 2019 (UTC) 1647:Passed 6 to 0 at 05:06, 20 December 2019 (UTC) 1631:Passed 6 to 0 at 05:06, 20 December 2019 (UTC) 1615:Passed 6 to 0 at 05:06, 20 December 2019 (UTC) 1595:Passed 6 to 0 at 05:06, 20 December 2019 (UTC) 1575:Passed 6 to 0 at 05:06, 20 December 2019 (UTC) 1528:Passed 6 to 0 at 05:06, 20 December 2019 (UTC) 1513:Passed 6 to 0 at 05:06, 20 December 2019 (UTC) 1486:Passed 6 to 0 at 05:06, 20 December 2019 (UTC) 2608: 2574: 616: 2479:(ii) a passing motion of arbitrators at ARCA 2532: 1999:: The area of conflict is designated as a 623: 609: 262:Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement 1455:Jurisdiction of the Arbitration Committee 852:Airbnb#Delisting_of_West_Bank_settlements 2076:Standing sanctions upon primary articles 730:User talk:Ymblanter#Protection of Airbnb 701:User talk:Ymblanter#Protection of Airbnb 2669:shall be treated as a reference to the 2417:Special:EmailUser/Arbitration Committee 283:centralised arbitration enforcement log 14: 2705: 2496:functionary blocks of whatever nature. 2120:General sanctions upon related content 2697:Knowledge:Arbitration enforcement log 2170:Disputes about scope of conflict area 2680:Passed 10 to 0 with 1 abstention by 2630:is imposed on the area of conflict. 2571:"other internal project discussions" 2419:(or, if email access is revoked, to 1878:Definition of the "area of conflict" 396:Clarification and Amendment requests 276:Knowledge talk:Arbitration Committee 244: 2402:arbitration enforcement noticeboard 2291:may be blocked if they violate the 2219:may be blocked if they violate the 2013:is imposed on the area of conflict. 1812:(of users not "extended confirmed") 708:or allowing other self-reverting. 274:General questions can be raised at 38: 2411:submit a request for amendment at 2298:Accounts whose primary purpose is 2226:Accounts whose primary purpose is 1675:West Bank - Judea and Samaria case 1166:Support votes needed for majority 40: 39: 2724: 2667:discretionary sanctions procedure 2642:at 10:15, 20 September 2021 (UTC) 2044:at 10:15, 20 September 2021 (UTC) 1519:Role of the Arbitration Committee 230:on 10:15, 20 September 2021 (UTC) 2684:at 21:36, 14 December 2022 (UTC) 2665:21) Each reference to the prior 2557:at 19:17, 27 December 2019 (UTC) 2469:For a request to succeed, either 2423: 2334:at 21:36, 14 December 2022 (UTC) 2312:Administrators may act on clear 2268:at 21:36, 14 December 2022 (UTC) 2240:Administrators may act on clear 2053:at 21:36, 14 December 2022 (UTC) 1938:at 21:36, 14 December 2022 (UTC) 1925:Standard discretionary sanctions 1836:at 19:17, 27 December 2019 (UTC) 1766:Standard discretionary sanctions 1681:Palestine-Israel articles 3 case 1506:furtherance of outside conflicts 303: 248: 241:on 21:36, 14 December 2022 (UTC) 208:on 19:17, 27 December 2019 (UTC) 197:on 06:30, 20 December 2019 (UTC) 2436:Modifications by administrators 2295:or any other applicable policy; 2223:or any other applicable policy; 2132:ArbCom Arab-Israeli enforcement 2085:ArbCom Arab-Israeli enforcement 2062:at 15:42, 11 October 2023 (UTC) 1220:, with regard to related pages. 1205:. Proceedings will take place 844:Arbitrator views and discussion 2628:extended confirmed restriction 2624:Extended confirmed restriction 2142:ArbCom Arab-Israeli editnotice 2095:ArbCom Arab-Israeli editnotice 2011:extended confirmed restriction 2007:Extended confirmed restriction 1669:Palestine-Israel articles case 189:on 04:09, 5 October 2019 (UTC) 181:on 07:10, 16 August 2019 (UTC) 13: 1: 2521:Amendments and Clarifications 2388:Appeals by sanctioned editors 1997:Contentious topic designation 1472:West Bank - Judea and Samaria 2671:contentious topics procedure 2596:at 18:42, 12 July 2021 (UTC) 2374:0) Appeals and modifications 2035:at 18:42, 12 July 2021 (UTC) 2017:One Revert Restriction (1RR) 1955:Superseded version of item B 1912:Superseded version of item A 1664:Israeli–Palestinian conflict 1218:arbitration enforcement (AE) 527:Conflict of interest reports 219:on 18:42, 12 July 2021 (UTC) 7: 2713:Knowledge arbitration cases 2613:Palestine-Israel articles 4 2579:Palestine-Israel articles 4 2537:Palestine-Israel articles 4 2500:discussed at another venue. 2406:administrators’ noticeboard 2345:Enforcement of restrictions 1564:guiding editorial principle 1478:Palestine-Israel articles 3 1266:06:44, 16 August 2019 (UTC) 1203:Palestine-Israel articles 4 838:02:00, 15 August 2019 (UTC) 808:Palestine-Israel articles 4 356:Search archived proceedings 10: 2729: 2651: 2602:Amendment (September 2021) 1961: 1796:Suspension of restrictions 1399:19:34, 6 August 2019 (UTC) 970:10:20, 28 April 2019 (UTC) 947:01:27, 30 April 2019 (UTC) 930:22:34, 29 April 2019 (UTC) 910:16:06, 29 April 2019 (UTC) 885:00:49, 26 April 2019 (UTC) 786:10:33, 28 April 2019 (UTC) 764:21:13, 26 April 2019 (UTC) 742:05:40, 25 April 2019 (UTC) 718:23:54, 25 April 2019 (UTC) 693:23:48, 25 April 2019 (UTC) 401:Arbitrator motion requests 45: 2563:Clarification (July 2021) 2526:Amendment (December 2019) 2424: 2365:Appeals and modifications 2280:original Palestine-Israel 2206:original Palestine-Israel 1466:Palestine-Israel articles 1385:13:59, 30 July 2019 (UTC) 1372:16:42, 23 July 2019 (UTC) 1361:20:54, 21 July 2019 (UTC) 1346:07:36, 18 July 2019 (UTC) 1331:15:29, 16 July 2019 (UTC) 1317:12:18, 16 July 2019 (UTC) 1292:11:17, 16 July 2019 (UTC) 1095:11:21, 16 July 2019 (UTC) 996:complicated or confused. 179:Case opened and suspended 2617:ARBPIA General Sanctions 1903:ARBPIA General Sanctions 1137:08:45, 2 June 2019 (UTC) 1062:08:00, 11 May 2019 (UTC) 1029:19:15, 10 May 2019 (UTC) 2544:General 1RR restriction 2511:In accordance with the 2490: 2355:In accordance with the 1921:Discretionary sanctions 1791:Lifting of restrictions 1772:General 1RR restriction 1695:Confusion over remedies 1587:Single-purpose accounts 1581:Single purpose accounts 1116:08:48, 6 May 2019 (UTC) 1011:05:18, 2 May 2019 (UTC) 858:, or in the article on 2632: 2400:request review at the 2100:should be added as an 1742:Condensing of remedies 1534:Neutrality and sources 1502:advocacy or propaganda 791:Statement by Galobtter 724:Statement by Ymblanter 658:questioned this action 636:Preliminary statements 2621: 2137:on the talk page and 1540:neutral point of view 597:Track related changes 457:Arbitration Committee 297:Knowledge Arbitration 18:Knowledge:Arbitration 1721:Ymblanter's evidence 1658:Locus of the dispute 1492:Purpose of Knowledge 1461:retains jurisdiction 796:Preliminary decision 641:Statement by Nyttend 406:Enforcement requests 334:Guide to arbitration 136:Drafting arbitrators 2293:sockpuppetry policy 2289:clear shared agenda 2221:sockpuppetry policy 2217:clear shared agenda 2186:Available sanctions 1816:Sanctions available 1810:General Prohibition 1723:, paragraph 3, and 1621:Tendentious editing 1560:"original research" 1159: 662:Ymblanter responded 2307:special provisions 2235:special provisions 2195:Superseded version 1862:Editors counselled 1714:Scope of sanctions 1566:of Knowledge, and 1207:in the normal form 1154: 980:Retired arbitrator 860:Israeli settlement 428:Contentious topics 326:Arbitration policy 214:Case clarified by 151:Premeditated Chaos 2638:Passed 8 to 0 by 2592:Passed 7 to 1 by 2553:Passed 5 to 0 by 2506: 2505: 2404:("AE") or at the 2275: 2274: 2001:contentious topic 1988: 1987: 1947: 1946: 1761:Editors counseled 1558:claims, or other 1459:1) The Committee 1389:Sadly necessary. 1359: 1248: 1194: 1193: 1101: 1100: 1059: 1026: 1008: 820: 703:, Ymblanter said 633: 632: 600: 568: 438:General sanctions 386:All open requests 316:About arbitration 291: 290: 175: 174: 170: 159: 148: 134: 123: 106: 98:Proposed decision 95: 84: 73: 32:Knowledge:ARBPIA4 30:(Redirected from 2720: 2430: 2428: 2427: 2426: 2370: 2369: 2287:Accounts with a 2215:Accounts with a 2191: 2190: 2146: 2140: 2136: 2130: 2099: 2093: 2089: 2083: 1951: 1950: 1908: 1907: 1842:Editors reminded 1786:Area of conflict 1756:Editors reminded 1653:Findings of fact 1548:reliable sources 1370: 1355: 1338:Opabinia regalis 1290: 1288: 1283: 1246: 1160: 1153: 1150: 1108:Opabinia regalis 1093: 1091: 1086: 1078: 1072: 1055: 1039: 1022: 1004: 976: 975: 968: 966: 961: 898:talkpage notices 818: 774: 752: 625: 618: 611: 599: 594: 587: 566: 522:Clerk procedures 514: 472: 443:Editor sanctions 420:Active sanctions 378:Open proceedings 348: 307: 293: 292: 252: 251: 245: 236:Case amended by 225:Case amended by 203:Case amended by 187:Case unsuspended 164: 162:Worm That Turned 153: 142: 128: 117: 100: 89: 78: 67: 58: 41: 35: 2728: 2727: 2723: 2722: 2721: 2719: 2718: 2717: 2703: 2702: 2692: 2690:Enforcement log 2676: 2675: 2661: 2652:As part of the 2650: 2634: 2633: 2604: 2588: 2587: 2583:requested moves 2565: 2549: 2548: 2528: 2523: 2507: 2463:Important notes 2422: 2420: 2375: 2367: 2347: 2342: 2326: 2276: 2254: 2196: 2188: 2172: 2144: 2138: 2134: 2128: 2122: 2097: 2091: 2087: 2081: 2078: 2022: 1989: 1984: 1967: 1964:requested moves 1956: 1948: 1913: 1905: 1893: 1880: 1864: 1844: 1744: 1739: 1716: 1697: 1660: 1655: 1639: 1623: 1603: 1583: 1568:is not optional 1536: 1521: 1494: 1457: 1452: 1447: 1366: 1286: 1279: 1277: 1233: 1232: 1148: 1145: 1102: 1089: 1082: 1080: 1076: 1070: 1058: 1033: 1025: 1007: 981: 964: 957: 955: 894:talkpage notice 846: 803: 798: 793: 768: 746: 726: 699:By the way, at 643: 638: 629: 595: 589: 588: 583: 573: 572: 571: 560: 543: 533: 532: 531: 518: 510: 498: 473: 468: 459: 449: 448: 447: 422: 412: 411: 410: 380: 370: 367: 352: 344: 322: 249: 242: 231: 220: 209: 198: 190: 182: 63: 62: 61: 54: 50: 37: 36: 29: 28: 12: 11: 5: 2726: 2716: 2715: 2691: 2688: 2687: 2686: 2663: 2662: 2649: 2646: 2645: 2644: 2606: 2605: 2603: 2600: 2599: 2598: 2567: 2566: 2564: 2561: 2560: 2559: 2547: 2546: 2530: 2529: 2527: 2524: 2522: 2519: 2518: 2517: 2504: 2503: 2502: 2501: 2497: 2493: 2489: 2486: 2485: 2484: 2483: 2480: 2477: 2471: 2470: 2449: 2448: 2445: 2438: 2437: 2433: 2432: 2409: 2398: 2390: 2389: 2377: 2376: 2373: 2368: 2366: 2363: 2362: 2361: 2346: 2343: 2341: 2338: 2337: 2336: 2325: 2324: 2317: 2314:BLP violations 2310: 2303: 2296: 2284: 2273: 2272: 2271: 2270: 2261: 2253: 2252: 2245: 2242:BLP violations 2238: 2231: 2224: 2212: 2198: 2197: 2194: 2189: 2187: 2184: 2183: 2182: 2171: 2168: 2167: 2166: 2121: 2118: 2117: 2116: 2077: 2074: 2073: 2072: 2071: 2070: 2069: 2068: 2067: 2066: 2065: 2064: 2021: 2020: 2014: 2004: 1993: 1986: 1985: 1983: 1982: 1978: 1973: 1958: 1957: 1954: 1949: 1945: 1944: 1943: 1942: 1941: 1940: 1934:Superseded by 1915: 1914: 1911: 1906: 1904: 1901: 1900: 1899: 1892: 1891: 1888: 1884: 1879: 1876: 1875: 1874: 1863: 1860: 1859: 1858: 1843: 1840: 1839: 1838: 1830: 1821: 1820: 1819: 1818: 1813: 1801: 1800: 1799: 1798: 1793: 1788: 1777: 1776: 1775: 1774: 1769: 1763: 1758: 1743: 1740: 1738: 1735: 1734: 1733: 1715: 1712: 1711: 1710: 1696: 1693: 1692: 1691: 1659: 1656: 1654: 1651: 1650: 1649: 1638: 1635: 1634: 1633: 1622: 1619: 1618: 1617: 1602: 1599: 1598: 1597: 1582: 1579: 1578: 1577: 1535: 1532: 1531: 1530: 1520: 1517: 1516: 1515: 1498:other purposes 1493: 1490: 1489: 1488: 1456: 1453: 1451: 1448: 1446: 1445:Final decision 1443: 1442: 1441: 1440: 1439: 1438: 1437: 1436: 1432: 1426: 1425: 1424: 1423: 1420: 1419: 1418:Abstain/recuse 1413: 1412: 1411: 1410: 1407: 1406: 1402: 1401: 1387: 1374: 1363: 1353:GorillaWarfare 1348: 1333: 1319: 1294: 1272: 1271: 1231: 1230: 1227: 1224: 1221: 1214: 1199: 1198: 1192: 1191: 1188: 1184: 1183: 1180: 1176: 1175: 1172: 1168: 1167: 1164: 1152: 1151: 1144: 1143:Motion to open 1141: 1140: 1139: 1118: 1099: 1098: 1067: 1066: 1065: 1064: 1056: 1031: 1023: 1005: 983: 982: 979: 974: 973: 972: 950: 949: 932: 912: 887: 873: 864: 863: 845: 842: 841: 840: 802: 799: 797: 794: 792: 789: 725: 722: 721: 720: 696: 695: 642: 639: 637: 634: 631: 630: 628: 627: 620: 613: 605: 602: 601: 591: 590: 581: 579: 578: 575: 574: 570: 569: 561: 556: 551: 545: 544: 539: 538: 535: 534: 530: 529: 524: 519: 509: 504: 499: 494: 489: 484: 479: 474: 467: 461: 460: 455: 454: 451: 450: 446: 445: 440: 435: 424: 423: 418: 417: 414: 413: 409: 408: 403: 398: 393: 388: 382: 381: 376: 375: 372: 371: 369: 368: 363: 358: 353: 343: 336: 331: 323: 318: 312: 309: 308: 300: 299: 289: 288: 287: 286: 279: 272: 265: 253: 234: 223: 212: 201: 193: 185: 177: 173: 172: 65:Main case page 60: 59: 51: 46: 44: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2725: 2714: 2711: 2710: 2708: 2701: 2700: 2698: 2685: 2683: 2678: 2677: 2674: 2672: 2668: 2659: 2655: 2643: 2641: 2636: 2635: 2631: 2629: 2625: 2620: 2618: 2614: 2610: 2597: 2595: 2590: 2589: 2586: 2584: 2580: 2576: 2573:, as used in 2572: 2558: 2556: 2551: 2550: 2545: 2542: 2541: 2540: 2538: 2534: 2516: 2514: 2509: 2508: 2498: 2494: 2488: 2487: 2481: 2478: 2475: 2474: 2473: 2472: 2468: 2467: 2466: 2464: 2460: 2456: 2452: 2446: 2443: 2442: 2441: 2435: 2434: 2429:wikimedia.org 2418: 2414: 2410: 2407: 2403: 2399: 2396: 2395: 2394: 2387: 2386: 2385: 2384: 2379: 2378: 2372: 2371: 2360: 2358: 2353: 2352: 2351: 2335: 2333: 2328: 2327: 2322: 2318: 2315: 2311: 2308: 2304: 2301: 2297: 2294: 2290: 2286: 2285: 2283: 2281: 2269: 2267: 2262: 2260: 2257: 2256: 2255: 2250: 2246: 2243: 2239: 2236: 2232: 2229: 2225: 2222: 2218: 2214: 2213: 2210: 2209: 2207: 2200: 2199: 2193: 2192: 2181: 2178: 2177: 2176: 2165: 2162: 2161: 2160: 2156: 2154: 2150: 2143: 2133: 2125: 2115: 2112: 2111: 2110: 2108: 2103: 2096: 2086: 2063: 2061: 2056: 2055: 2054: 2052: 2047: 2046: 2045: 2043: 2038: 2037: 2036: 2034: 2031:Clarified by 2029: 2028: 2027: 2024: 2023: 2018: 2015: 2012: 2008: 2005: 2002: 1998: 1995: 1994: 1992: 1979: 1975: 1974: 1971: 1965: 1960: 1959: 1953: 1952: 1939: 1937: 1932: 1931: 1930: 1929: 1928: 1926: 1922: 1917: 1916: 1910: 1909: 1898: 1895: 1894: 1889: 1886: 1885: 1883: 1873: 1870: 1869: 1868: 1857: 1854: 1853: 1852: 1848: 1837: 1835: 1829: 1826: 1825: 1824: 1817: 1814: 1811: 1808: 1807: 1806: 1803: 1802: 1797: 1794: 1792: 1789: 1787: 1784: 1783: 1782: 1779: 1778: 1773: 1770: 1767: 1764: 1762: 1759: 1757: 1754: 1753: 1752: 1749: 1748: 1747: 1732: 1729: 1728: 1727: 1725: 1722: 1709: 1706: 1705: 1704: 1702: 1690: 1687: 1686: 1685: 1683: 1682: 1677: 1676: 1671: 1670: 1665: 1648: 1645: 1644: 1643: 1632: 1629: 1628: 1627: 1616: 1613: 1612: 1611: 1608: 1596: 1593: 1592: 1591: 1588: 1576: 1573: 1572: 1571: 1569: 1565: 1561: 1557: 1554:. Relying on 1553: 1552:proper weight 1549: 1545: 1541: 1529: 1526: 1525: 1524: 1514: 1511: 1510: 1509: 1507: 1503: 1499: 1487: 1484: 1483: 1482: 1480: 1479: 1474: 1473: 1468: 1467: 1462: 1435: 1434: 1433: 1430: 1429: 1428: 1427: 1422: 1421: 1417: 1416: 1415: 1414: 1409: 1408: 1404: 1403: 1400: 1396: 1392: 1388: 1386: 1383: 1379: 1375: 1373: 1369: 1364: 1362: 1358: 1354: 1349: 1347: 1343: 1339: 1334: 1332: 1328: 1324: 1320: 1318: 1314: 1313: 1308: 1307: 1306: 1300: 1295: 1293: 1289: 1284: 1282: 1274: 1273: 1269: 1268: 1267: 1263: 1260: 1257: 1254: 1251: 1244: 1243: 1238: 1235: 1234: 1228: 1225: 1222: 1219: 1215: 1212: 1211: 1210: 1208: 1204: 1197: 1189: 1186: 1185: 1181: 1178: 1177: 1173: 1170: 1169: 1165: 1162: 1161: 1157: 1147: 1146: 1138: 1134: 1133: 1128: 1127: 1126: 1119: 1117: 1113: 1109: 1104: 1103: 1097: 1096: 1092: 1087: 1085: 1075: 1063: 1060: 1054: 1049: 1044: 1037: 1032: 1030: 1027: 1021: 1015: 1014: 1013: 1012: 1009: 1003: 997: 995: 987: 986: 985: 984: 978: 977: 971: 967: 962: 960: 952: 951: 948: 944: 940: 936: 933: 931: 927: 923: 919: 916: 913: 911: 907: 903: 899: 895: 891: 890:User:Zero0000 888: 886: 882: 878: 874: 871: 866: 865: 861: 857: 853: 848: 847: 839: 835: 832: 829: 826: 823: 816: 815: 809: 805: 804: 788: 787: 783: 779: 772: 766: 765: 761: 757: 750: 744: 743: 739: 735: 731: 719: 715: 711: 706: 702: 698: 697: 694: 690: 686: 682: 679: 678: 677: 673: 671: 665: 663: 659: 654: 650: 648: 626: 621: 619: 614: 612: 607: 606: 604: 603: 598: 593: 592: 577: 576: 565: 562: 559: 555: 552: 550: 547: 546: 542: 537: 536: 528: 525: 523: 520: 517: 513: 508: 505: 503: 500: 497: 493: 490: 488: 485: 483: 480: 478: 475: 471: 466: 463: 462: 458: 453: 452: 444: 441: 439: 436: 433: 429: 426: 425: 421: 416: 415: 407: 404: 402: 399: 397: 394: 392: 391:Case requests 389: 387: 384: 383: 379: 374: 373: 366: 362: 359: 357: 354: 351: 347: 342: 340: 337: 335: 332: 330: 327: 324: 321: 317: 314: 313: 311: 310: 306: 302: 301: 298: 295: 294: 284: 280: 277: 273: 270: 266: 263: 259: 258: 257: 254: 247: 246: 243: 240: 239: 232: 229: 228: 221: 218: 217: 210: 207: 206: 199: 196: 191: 188: 183: 180: 171: 168: 163: 157: 152: 146: 141: 137: 132: 127: 121: 116: 112: 108: 104: 99: 93: 88: 82: 77: 71: 66: 57: 53: 52: 49: 43: 42: 33: 27: 23: 19: 2694: 2693: 2679: 2664: 2637: 2623: 2622: 2616: 2612: 2607: 2591: 2578: 2570: 2568: 2552: 2536: 2531: 2510: 2462: 2461: 2457: 2453: 2450: 2439: 2391: 2381: 2380: 2354: 2348: 2329: 2321:become aware 2277: 2263: 2258: 2249:become aware 2211: 2203: 2201: 2179: 2173: 2163: 2157: 2153:edit request 2126: 2123: 2113: 2107:edit request 2079: 2057: 2048: 2039: 2030: 2025: 2016: 2006: 1996: 1990: 1969: 1933: 1920: 1918: 1896: 1881: 1871: 1865: 1855: 1849: 1845: 1831: 1827: 1822: 1804: 1780: 1750: 1745: 1730: 1717: 1707: 1698: 1688: 1679: 1673: 1667: 1661: 1646: 1640: 1637:At wit's end 1630: 1624: 1614: 1607:general rule 1604: 1601:Sockpuppetry 1594: 1584: 1574: 1550:determining 1537: 1527: 1522: 1512: 1495: 1485: 1477: 1471: 1465: 1458: 1311: 1304: 1303: 1280: 1258: 1252: 1240: 1236: 1202: 1200: 1195: 1163:Abstentions 1131: 1124: 1123: 1083: 1068: 1052: 1042: 1019: 1001: 998: 993: 990: 958: 897: 893: 830: 824: 812: 807: 767: 745: 727: 704: 680: 674: 666: 651: 646: 644: 255: 235: 233: 224: 222: 213: 211: 202: 200: 194: 192: 186: 184: 178: 176: 135: 110: 109: 107: 64: 2699:, not here. 2569:The phrase 2408:("AN"); and 2340:Enforcement 2330:Amended by 2264:Amended by 2058:Amended by 2049:Amended by 2040:Amended by 1970:500/30 Rule 1832:Amended by 1556:synthesized 935:User:Huldra 915:User:Huldra 801:Clerk notes 754:nothing).-- 361:Ban appeals 339:Noticeboard 195:Case closed 111:Case clerks 2383:Committee. 2305:There are 2300:disruption 2233:There are 2228:disruption 2102:editnotice 1544:verifiably 1500:, such as 1450:Principles 1391:Courcelles 1196:Proposed: 1158:reference 567:(pre-2016) 554:Statistics 487:Procedures 56:WP:ARBPIA4 2421:arbcom-en 1981:required. 778:Ymblanter 756:Ymblanter 734:Ymblanter 492:Elections 2707:Category 2609:Remedy 5 2575:Remedy 5 2533:Remedy 1 1805:ARBPIA3: 1781:ARBPIA2: 1737:Remedies 1431:Comments 1323:SilkTork 1156:Majority 1043:increase 1036:Zero0000 939:SilkTork 922:SilkTork 902:SilkTork 877:SilkTork 645:This is 126:Cthomas3 87:Workshop 76:Evidence 48:Shortcut 24:‎ | 22:Requests 20:‎ | 2611:of the 2577:of the 2535:of the 2149:comment 1751:ARBPIA: 1605:6) The 1270:Support 1237:Enacted 776:good.-- 710:Nyttend 685:Nyttend 670:WP:TBAN 564:Reports 502:History 482:Members 477:Contact 465:Discuss 329:(CU/OS) 140:Joe Roe 2682:motion 2658:motion 2640:motion 2626:: The 2615:case ( 2594:motion 2555:motion 2413:"ARCA" 2332:motion 2266:motion 2060:motion 2051:motion 2042:motion 2033:motion 2009:: The 1936:motion 1834:motion 1475:, and 1405:Oppose 1382:(talk) 1357:(talk) 1074:Hidden 1048:Airbnb 870:Airbnb 856:Airbnb 749:Huldra 653:Airbnb 507:Clerks 365:Report 238:motion 227:motion 216:motion 205:motion 160:& 149:& 124:& 1368:Katie 1242:Kevin 814:Kevin 541:Audit 16:< 1678:and 1395:talk 1342:talk 1327:talk 1312:talk 1305:Worm 1250:L235 1187:4–5 1179:2–3 1171:0–1 1132:talk 1125:Worm 1112:talk 994:that 943:talk 926:talk 906:talk 881:talk 822:L235 782:talk 760:talk 738:talk 714:talk 689:talk 558:Talk 549:Talk 516:Talk 496:Talk 350:Talk 320:Talk 167:Talk 156:Talk 145:Talk 131:Talk 120:Talk 103:Talk 92:Talk 81:Talk 70:Talk 26:Case 2202:9) 1968:B: 1919:A: 1504:or 1378:PMC 1299:AGK 1281:AGK 1247:aka 1084:AGK 1079:. 1053:Rob 1020:Rob 1002:Rob 959:AGK 819:aka 771:AGK 647:not 432:Log 115:SQL 2709:: 2585:. 2465:: 2431:). 2145:}} 2139:{{ 2135:}} 2129:{{ 2098:}} 2092:{{ 2088:}} 2082:{{ 1923:: 1726:) 1684:. 1672:, 1570:. 1481:. 1469:, 1397:) 1380:♠ 1344:) 1329:) 1315:) 1301:. 1264:) 1239:: 1190:3 1182:4 1174:5 1135:) 1114:) 1077:}} 1071:{{ 1057:13 1024:13 1006:13 945:) 928:) 908:) 883:) 836:) 784:) 762:) 740:) 716:) 691:) 138:: 113:: 96:— 85:— 74:— 2003:. 1966:. 1719:( 1393:( 1340:( 1325:( 1309:( 1287:■ 1262:c 1259:· 1256:t 1253:· 1245:( 1129:( 1110:( 1090:■ 1038:: 1034:@ 965:■ 941:( 924:( 904:( 879:( 834:c 831:· 828:t 825:· 817:( 780:( 773:: 769:@ 758:( 751:: 747:@ 736:( 712:( 687:( 624:e 617:t 610:v 512:+ 470:+ 434:) 430:( 346:+ 285:. 278:. 271:. 264:. 169:) 165:( 158:) 154:( 147:) 143:( 133:) 129:( 122:) 118:( 105:) 101:( 94:) 90:( 83:) 79:( 72:) 68:( 34:)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.