49:
1084:
1125:
608:
yours will bring 5 or 6s per pound because she is beautiful, young, and very tender and will fetch a good price in her condition." With the rise in popularity of newspapers, reports of the practice become more frequent in the second half of the 18th century. In the words of 20th-century writer
Courtney Kenny, the ritual was "a custom rooted sufficiently deeply to show that it was of no recent origin". Writing in 1901 on the subject of wife selling, James Bryce stated that there was "no trace at all in our law of any such right", but he also observed that "everybody has heard of the odd habit of selling a wife, which still occasionally recurs among the humbler classes in England".
1117:
officer claimed that the man had gathered a "crowd of all sorts of vagabonds together, who appeared to listen to his ditty, but were in fact, collected to pick pockets." The defendant, however, replied that he had "not the most distant idea of selling his wife, who was, poor creature, at home with her hungry children, while he was endeavouring to earn a bit of bread for them by the strength of his lungs." He had also printed copies of the song, and the story of a wife sale, to earn money. Before releasing him, the Lord Mayor, judging the case, cautioned
Johnson that the practice could not be allowed, and must not be repeated. In 1833 the sale of a woman was reported at
638:
1157:(1864), author Robert Chambers wrote about a case of wife selling in 1832, and noted that "the occasional instances of wife-sale, while remarked by ourselves with little beyond a passing smile, have made a deep impression on our continental neighbours, constantly cite it as an evidence of our low civilisation." Embarrassed by the practice, a legal handbook of 1853 enabled English judges to dismiss wife selling as a myth: "It is a vulgar error that a husband can get rid of his wife by selling her in the open market with a halter round her neck. Such an act on his part would be severely punished by the local magistrate." Originally published in 1869,
721:, while staying at a small country inn, saw the ostler beating his wife in a most cruel manner; he interfered and literally bought her for half a crown. She was a young and pretty woman; the Duke had her educated; and on the husband's death he married her. On her death-bed, she had her whole household assembled, told them her history, and drew from it a touching moral of reliance on Providence; as from the most wretched situation, she had been suddenly raised to one of the greatest prosperity; she entreated their forgiveness if at any time she had given needless offence, and then dismissed them with gifts; dying almost in the very act.
966:
1080:
protested that it represented "a threat and insult to their sex". JPs in
Quarter Sessions became more active in punishing those involved in wife selling, and some test cases in the central law courts confirmed the illegality of the practice. Newspaper accounts were often disparaging: "a most disgusting and disgraceful scene" was the description in a report of 1832, but it was not until the 1840s that the number of cases of wife selling began to decline significantly. Thompson discovered 121 published reports of wife sales between 1800 and 1840, as compared to 55 between 1840 and 1880.
1224:
hundred pounds. You will probably tell me that you have never had a thousand farthings of your own in the world; but, prisoner, that makes no difference. Sitting here as an
English Judge, it is my duty to tell you that this is not a country in which there is one law for the rich and one for the poor. You will be imprisoned for one day. Since you have been in custody since the commencement of the Assizes you are free to leave." This affirmation later contributed to the passing of the 1857 Act.
896:
involved would often attempt further to legitimate the sale by forcing the winning bidder to sign a contract, recognising that the seller had no further liability for his wife. In 1735, a successful wife sale in St
Clements was announced by the common cryer, who wandered the streets ensuring that local traders were aware of the former husband's intention not to honour "any debts she should contract". The same point was made in an advertisement placed in the
1151:. Commenting on the drama and contemporary French attitudes on the custom, in 1846 the writer Angus B. Reach complained: "They reckon up a long and visionary list of our failings would as readily give up their belief in the geographical and physical existence of London, as in the astounding fact that in England a husband sells his wife exactly as he sells his horse or his dog." Such complaints were still commonplace nearly 20 years later; in
620:, a formal ceremony of marriage before a clergyman was not a legal requirement in England, and marriages were unregistered. All that was required was for both parties to agree to the union, so long as each had reached the legal age of consent, which was 12 for girls and 14 for boys. Women were completely subordinated to their husbands after marriage, the husband and wife becoming one legal entity, a legal status known as
2893:
877:
Parsons, doth sell, assign, and set over unto the said John Tooker, Ann
Parsons, wife of the said John Parsons; with all right, property, claim, services, and demands whatsoever, that he, the said John Parsons, shall have in or to the said Ann Parsons, for and during the term of the natural life of her, the said Ann Parsons. In witness whereof I, the said John Parsons, have set my hand the day and year first above written.
1190:, and subsequently led her by the halter to her buyer's house, the last case in which the use of a halter is mentioned. The most recent case of an English wife sale was reported in 1913, when a woman giving evidence in a Leeds police court during a maintenance case claimed that her husband had sold her to one of his workmates for £1 (equivalent to about £120 in 2024). The manner of her sale is unrecorded.
758:, where in January 1815 John Osborne planned to sell his wife at the local market. However, as no market was held that day, the sale took place instead at "the sign of 'The Coal-barge,' in Earl Street", where "in a very regular manner", his wife and child were sold for £1 to a man named William Serjeant. In July the same year a wife was brought to Smithfield market by coach, and sold for 50
1121:. She was sold for 2s. 6d., with a duty of 6d. Once sober, and placed before the Justices of the Peace, the husband claimed that he had been forced into marriage by the parish authorities, and had "never since lived with her, and that she had lived in open adultery with the man Bradley, by whom she had been purchased". He was imprisoned for "having deserted his wife".
1037:
to return "his" wife. He was given the outstanding sum by two generous bystanders, and paid the husband—who promptly "gave the Woman a modest Salute wishing her well, and his
Brother Sterling much Joy of his Bargain." An account in 1781 of a William Collings of South Carolina records that he sold his wife for "two dollars and half dozen bowls of grogg".
805:
the 158 cases in which occupation can be established, the largest group (19) was involved in the livestock or transport trades, fourteen worked in the building trade, five were blacksmiths, four were chimney-sweeps, and two were described as gentlemen, suggesting that wife selling was not simply a peasant custom. The most high-profile case was that of
1147:(1886). A bad-tempered, impulsive and cruel husband, feeling burdened by his wife, Henchard sells her to a stranger for five guineas. He becomes a successful businessman and rises to the position of mayor, but the return of his wife many years later prompts his fall back into penury. The custom was also referred to in the 19th-century French play,
834:, dated 1782: "Amie Daughter of Moses Stebbing by a bought wife delivered to him in a Halter". A jury in Lincolnshire ruled in 1784 that a man who had sold his wife had no right to reclaim her from her purchaser, thus endorsing the validity of the transaction. In 1819 a magistrate who attempted to prevent a sale at Ashbourne,
780:
following an altercation, offered to purchase the wife. The shopkeeper agreed, and in this instance the sale may have been an acceptable method of resolving the situation. However, the sale was sometimes spontaneous, and the wife could find herself the subject of bids from total strangers. In March 1766, a carpenter from
1006:
misunderstood the social context of the transaction. Markets were favoured not because livestock was traded there, but because they offered a public venue where the separation of husband and wife could be witnessed. Sales often took place at fairs, in front of public houses, or local landmarks such as the obelisk at
1210:
described the process in detail. "I will tell you what you ought to have done; ... You ought to have instructed your attorney to bring an action against the seducer of your wife for criminal conversation. That would have cost you about a hundred pounds. When you had obtained judgment for (though
1047:
On Friday a butcher exposed his wife to Sale in
Smithfield Market, near the Ram Inn, with a halter about her neck, and one about her waist, which tied her to a railing, when a hog-driver was the happy purchaser, who gave the husband three guineas and a crown for his departed rib. Pity it is, there is
628:
wrote in 1753: "the very being, or legal existence of the woman, is suspended during the marriage, or at least is consolidated and incorporated into that of her husband: under whose wing, protection and cover, she performs everything". Married women could not own property in their own right, and were
607:
that "Among other things I have ordered you a beautiful girl to be your wife ... If you do not like her after you have experimented with her for a while you can sell her and I think at a better price than a man received for his wife last week in London where he sold her for four sous a pound; I think
895:
By choosing a market as the location for the sale, the couple ensured a large audience, which made their separation a widely witnessed fact. The use of the halter was symbolic; after the sale, it was handed to the purchaser as a signal that the transaction was concluded, and in some instances, those
784:
sold his wife "in a fit of conjugal indifference at the alehouse". Once sober, the man asked his wife to return, and after she refused he hanged himself. A domestic fight might sometimes precede the sale of a wife, but in most recorded cases the intent was to end a marriage in a way that gave it the
736:
It is unclear when the ritualised custom of selling a wife by public auction began, but it seems likely to have been some time towards the end of the 17th century. In
November 1692 "John, the son of Nathan Whitehouse, of Tipton, sold his wife to Mr. Bracegirdle", although the manner of the
1169:
of conveyance. Although initially much less common than sale by auction, the practice became more widespread after the 1850s, as popular opinion turned against the market sale of a wife. The issue of the commonly perceived legitimacy of wife selling was also brought to the government. In 1881, Home
1036:
reported on 15 March 1736 an argument between two men "and a certain woman, each one claiming her as his Wife, but so it was that one of them had actually disposed of his Right in her to the other for
Fifteen Shillings". The purchaser had, apparently, refused to pay in full, and had attempted
804:
It was believed during the mid-19th century that wife selling was restricted to the lowest levels of labourers, especially to those living in remote rural areas, but an analysis of the occupations of husbands and purchasers reveals that the custom was strongest in "proto-industrial" communities. Of
686:
Although some 19th-century wives objected, records of 18th-century women resisting their sales are non-existent. With no financial resources, and no skills on which to trade, for many women a sale was the only way out of an unhappy marriage. Indeed, the wife is sometimes reported as having insisted
1223:
which would have rendered you free and legally competent to marry the person whom you have taken on yourself to marry with no such sanction. The Bill might possibly have been opposed in all its stages in both Houses of Parliament, and together you would have had to spend about a thousand or twelve
909:
Justice of the Peace in 1758, by a wife who about 18 months earlier had been sold by her husband for £6 6s "for the support of his extravagancy". The petition does not object to the sale, but complains that the husband returned three months later to demand more money from his wife and her new
591:
Wife selling in its "ritual form" appears to be an "invented custom" that originated at about the end of the 17th century, although there is an account from 1302 of someone who "granted his wife by deed to another man". The practice was common enough in the 17th century for the English philosopher
556:
Although the custom had no basis in law and frequently resulted in prosecution, particularly from the mid-19th century onwards, the attitude of the authorities was equivocal. At least one early 19th-century magistrate is on record as stating that he did not believe he had the right to prevent wife
1128:
A contemporary French print of an 1820 English caricature of a wife sale. The scene is set at a cattle market, which places it in the context of livestock sales and implies that the wife already has a lover, as the husband is shown apparently "wearing horns", a traditional symbol that he has been
670:
became law in 1857, divorce in England was only possible, if at all, by the complex and costly procedure of a private Act of Parliament. Although the divorce courts set up in the wake of the 1857 Act made the procedure considerably cheaper, divorce remained prohibitively expensive for the poorer
1116:
market, for 2s. 6d. In 1825 a man named Johnson was charged with "having sung a song in the streets describing the merits of his wife, for the purpose of selling her to the highest bidder at Smithfield." Such songs were not unique; in about 1842 John Ashton wrote "Sale of a Wife". The arresting
753:
In most reports the sale was announced in advance, perhaps by advertisement in a local newspaper. It usually took the form of an auction, often at a local market, to which the wife would be led by a halter (usually of rope but sometimes of ribbon) around her neck, or arm. Often the purchaser was
956:
was postponed "owing to the crowd which such an extraordinary occurrence had gathered together", suggesting that wife sales were relatively rare events, and therefore popular. Estimates of the frequency of the ritual usually number about 300 between 1780 and 1850, relatively insignificant
876:
It is this day agreed on between John Parsons, of the parish of Midsummer Norton, in the county of Somerset, clothworker, and John Tooker, of the same place, gentleman, that the said John Parsons, for and in consideration of the sum of six pounds and six shillings in hand paid to the said John
779:
says that "after several biddings she was knocked down for 5s; but not liking the purchaser, she was put up again for 3s and a quart of ale". Frequently the wife was already living with her new partner. In one case in 1804 a London shopkeeper found his wife in bed with a stranger to him, who,
1079:
Reports of wife selling rose from two per decade in the 1750s, to a peak of fifty in the 1820s and 1830s. As the number of cases increased so did opposition to the practice. It became seen as one of a number of popular customs that the social elite believed it their duty to abolish, and women
1075:
produced in the crowd "a great silence", and "a feeling of uneasiness in the gathering". When a labourer offered his wife for sale on Smithfield market in 1806, "the public became incensed at the husband, and would have severely punished him for his brutality, but for the interference of some
683:(1777) observed that, for the poor, wife selling was viewed as a "method of dissolving marriage", when "a husband and wife find themselves heartily tired of each other, and agree to part, if the man has a mind to authenticate the intended separation by making it a matter of public notoriety".
842:
Although the real object of my sending the constables was to prevent the scandalous sale, the apparent motive was that of keeping the peace ... As to the act of selling itself, I do not think I have a right to prevent it, or even oppose any obstacle to it, because it rests upon a custom
981:
Wife selling appears to have been widespread throughout England, but relatively rare in neighbouring Wales, where only a few cases were reported, and in Scotland where only one has been discovered. The English county with the highest number of cases between 1760 and 1880 was Yorkshire, with
1005:
Menefee argued that the ritual mirrored that of a livestock sale—the symbolic meaning of the halter; wives were even occasionally valued by weight, just like livestock. Although the halter was considered central to the "legitimacy" of the sale, Thompson has suggested that Menefee may have
1017:
There were very few reported sales of husbands, and from a modern perspective, selling a wife like a chattel is degrading, even when considered as a form of divorce. Nevertheless, most contemporary reports hint at the women's independence and sexual vitality: "The women are described as
829:
married, but the attitude of officialdom towards wife selling was equivocal. Rural clergy and magistrates knew of the custom, but seemed uncertain of its legitimacy, or chose to turn a blind eye. Entries have been found in baptismal registers, such as this example from Perleigh in
679:. Desertion or elopement was also possible, whereby the wife was forced out of the family home, or the husband simply set up a new home with his mistress. Finally, the less popular notion of wife selling was an alternative but illegitimate method of ending a marriage.
1025:
Along with other English customs, settlers arriving in the American colonies during the late 17th and early 18th centuries took with them the practice of wife selling, and the belief in its legitimacy as a way of ending a marriage. In 1645 "The P'ticular Court" of
1001:
considered many of Menefee's cases to be "vague and dubious", and that some double-counting had taken place, but he nevertheless agreed that about three hundred were authentic, which when combined with his own research resulted in about four hundred reported cases.
629:
indeed themselves the property of their husbands. But Blackstone went on to observe that "even the disabilities the wife lies under are, for the most part, intended for her protection and benefit. So great a favourite is the female sex of the laws of England".
825:. According to authors Wade Mansell and Belinda Meteyard, money seems usually to have been a secondary consideration; the more important factor was that the sale was seen by many as legally binding, despite it having no basis in law. Some of the new couples
749:
lately adopted", suggesting that even if it was by then established in some parts of the country it was only slowly spreading to others. It persisted in some form until the early 20th century, although by then in "an advanced state of decomposition".
2321:
1178:, in which a man sold his wife for a quart of beer. Harcourt replied: "no impression exists anywhere in England that the selling of wives is legitimate", and "that no such practice as wife selling exists", but as late as 1889, a member of the
816:
Prices paid for wives varied considerably, from a high of £100 plus £25 each for her two children in a sale of 1865 (equivalent to about £18,100 in 2024) to a low of a glass of ale, or even free. The lowest amount of money exchanged was three
900:
in 1789: "no person or persons to intrust her with my name ... for she is no longer my right". Those involved in such sales sometimes attempted to legalise the transaction, as demonstrated by a bill of sale for a wife, preserved in the
1161:
states that "publicly selling or buying a wife is clearly an indictable offence ... And many prosecutions against husbands for selling, and others for buying, have recently been sustained, and imprisonment for six months inflicted".
2883:
702:
For the husband, the sale released him from his marital duties, including any financial responsibility for his wife. For the purchaser, who was often the wife's lover, the transaction freed him from the threat of a legal action for
762:
and a horse. Once the sale was complete, "the lady, with her new lord and master, mounted a handsome curricle which was in waiting for them, and drove off, seemingly nothing loath to go." At another sale in September 1815, at
737:
sale is unrecorded. In 1696, Thomas Heath Maultster was fined for "cohabiteing in an unlawful manner with the wife of George ffuller of Chinner ... haueing bought her of her husband at 2d.q. the pound", and ordered by the
771:
were offered for the lot, no one choosing to contend with the bidder, for the fair object, whose merits could only be appreciated by those who knew them. This the purchaser could boast, from a long and intimate acquaintance."
2881:
699:'e turned shy, and tried to get out of the business, but Mattie mad' un stick to it. 'Er flipt her apern in 'er gude man's face, and said, 'Let be yer rogue. I wull be sold. I wants a change'."
2882:
2221:
576:, writing in 1901, wife sales were still occasionally taking place during his time. In one of the last reported instances of a wife sale in England, a woman giving evidence in a
2301:
2241:
745:
to perform public penance, but between 1690 and 1750 only eight other cases are recorded in England. In an Oxford case of 1789 wife selling is described as "the vulgar form of
785:
legitimacy of a divorce. In some cases the wife arranged for her own sale, and even provided the money for her agent to buy her out of her marriage, such as an 1822 case in
925:
were a regular venue for wife-selling, and alcohol often formed part of the payment. For example, when a man sold his wife at the Shoulder of Mutton and Cucumber in
508:
1211:
not necessarily actually recovered) substantial damages against him, you should have instructed your proctor to sue in the Ecclesiastical courts for a divorce
2987:
553:, in which the central character sells his wife at the beginning of the story, an act that haunts him for the rest of his life, and ultimately destroys him.
1602:
2170:
1395:
1063:
Towards the end of the 18th century, some hostility towards wife selling began to manifest itself amongst the general population. One sale in 1756 in
597:
982:
forty-four, considerably more than the nineteen reported for Middlesex and London during the same period, despite the French caricature of Milord
997:, author Samuel Pyeatt Menefee collected 387 incidents of wife selling, the last of which occurred in the early 20th century. Historian
1106:, considered wife sales to be a conspiracy to commit adultery, but few of those reported in the newspapers led to prosecutions in court.
1457:
796:
Cross for five shillings. But after Kaye's death she returned to her husband, and the couple remained together for the next 30 years.
671:
members of society. An alternative was to obtain a "private separation", an agreement negotiated between both spouses, embodied in a
580:
1100:
2947:
2898:
1067:
was interrupted by a group of women who rescued the wife, following which the husband was given a mock trial and placed in the
2841:
2820:
2799:
2763:
2742:
2724:
2706:
2664:
2646:
2624:
2606:
2588:
2570:
2543:
2518:
2500:
1219:, you should have appeared by counsel before the House of Lords in order to obtain a private Act of Parliament for a divorce
1103:
1093:
263:
1269:
The "gas pillar" was a large cast iron vase erected in the early 19th century, in Bolton's market square, atop which was a
1171:
1018:'fine-looking', 'buxom', 'of good appearance', 'a comely-looking country girl', or as 'enjoying the fun and frolic heartily
1030:, reported the case of Baggett Egleston, who was fined 20 shillings for "bequething his wyfe to a young man". The
666:), on the grounds of adultery or life-threatening cruelty, but it did not allow a remarriage. From the 1550s, until the
2962:
806:
718:
48:
2992:
1350:
515:
253:
2982:
2977:
2972:
2967:
178:
2925:
2486:
1083:
695:
in 1830 was quite determined that the transaction should go ahead, despite her husband's last-minute misgivings:
573:
173:
2427:
1242:
A common cryer was a person whose responsibility it was to make public announcements on behalf of his employer.
228:
223:
531:
in England was a way of ending an unsatisfactory marriage that probably began in the late 17th century, when
123:
843:
preserved by the people of which perhaps it would be dangerous to deprive them by any law for that purpose.
448:
143:
1124:
775:
Although the initiative was usually the husband's, the wife had to agree to the sale. An 1824 report from
2957:
2272:
1719:
727:
667:
303:
138:
862:
market and sold for one shilling, the parish paying for the cost of the journey and a "wedding dinner".
1088:
957:
compared to the instances of desertion, which in the Victorian era numbered in the tens of thousands.
851:
authorities forced the husband to sell his wife rather than have to maintain her and her child in the
821:(three-quarters of one penny), but the usual price seems to have been between 2s. 6d. and 5
754:
arranged in advance, and the sale was a form of symbolic separation and remarriage, as in a case from
2952:
2917:
1215:. That would have cost you two hundred or three hundred pounds more. When you had obtained a divorce
792:
Such "divorces" were not always permanent. In 1826 John Turton sold his wife Mary to William Kaye at
549:
483:
1637:
2674:
1493:
398:
818:
577:
383:
193:
974:
637:
965:
568:
Wife selling persisted in England in some form until the early 20th century; according to the
535:
was a practical impossibility for all but the very wealthiest. After parading his wife with a
1153:
1143:
1027:
793:
759:
704:
657:
558:
443:
388:
348:
243:
238:
128:
103:
2913:
707:, a claim by the husband for restitution of damage to his property, in this case his wife.
233:
133:
2781:
Reach, Angus B. (1846), Douglas William Jerrold (ed.), "The England of the French drama",
8:
2451:
1207:
1032:
1007:
653:
453:
378:
93:
76:
1921:
1747:
1485:
1477:
953:
738:
625:
602:
408:
248:
203:
2273:"Wife Selling at Smithfield: Authentic Case and a Ballad in which the Heroine is Sold"
2997:
2837:
2816:
2795:
2759:
2738:
2720:
2702:
2660:
2642:
2635:
2620:
2602:
2584:
2566:
2539:
2514:
2496:
2490:
2475:
2457:
1489:
1346:
1260:
Private sales have not been counted. Thompson, 1991, pp. 409–410 and see pp. 411–412.
933:(£50 in 2024) and 1 imperial quart (1.1 L) of beer. A sale a century earlier in
852:
848:
645:
617:
458:
413:
268:
198:
108:
88:
32:
1112:
reported one such case in 1818, in which a man was indicted for selling his wife at
1607:
1469:
1137:
The return of a wife after 18 years results in Michael Henchard's downfall in
662:
648:. The painting gives the viewer the impression that the sale was "a genial affair".
561:
forcing husbands to sell their wives, rather than having to maintain the family in
501:
488:
403:
298:
218:
188:
183:
113:
2434:, vol. IX, no. 436, paperspast.natlib.govt.nz, p. 1, 19 August 1881
1619:
2930:
2563:
The Struggle for the Breeches: Gender and the Making of the British Working Class
1927:
1714:
1187:
1072:
583:
in 1913 claimed that she had been sold to one of her husband's workmates for £1.
363:
328:
323:
318:
258:
213:
163:
158:
71:
66:
2829:
2808:
2751:
2657:
Sexual Revolution in Early America: Gender Relations in the American Experience
2469:
1932:
1928:"The Annual RPI and Average Earnings for Britain, 1209 to Present (New Series)"
1611:
1529:
Humour, Halters and Humiliation: Wife Sale as Theatre and Self-divorce (thesis)
1179:
998:
902:
468:
433:
373:
273:
168:
148:
118:
81:
19:
This article is about the English custom. For related practices elsewhere, see
1594:
98:
2941:
2527:
2479:
1118:
368:
153:
2531:
2461:
1138:
922:
688:
544:
423:
418:
393:
353:
308:
208:
20:
952:
Public wife sales were sometimes attended by huge crowds. An 1806 sale in
945:
in 1790, a man who swapped his wife at the village inn for half a pint of
338:
2901:
was created from a revision of this article dated 20 April 2012
676:
358:
313:
293:
2229:, no. 14784, infotrac.galegroup.com, p. 6, col. E, 26 February 1832
1751:
1113:
835:
776:
593:
56:
2309:, no. 12539, infotrac.galegroup.com, p. 3, col. C, 1 January 1825
1481:
2329:, no. 15115, infotrac.galegroup.com, p. 4, col. C, 18 March 1833
1175:
1108:
1054:
983:
970:
855:
781:
755:
621:
562:
16:
17th–?19th-Cent custom for publicly ending an unsatisfactory marriage
2178:, no. 3949, infotrac.galegroup.com, p. 3, col. B, 18 July 1797
1473:
1270:
1183:
1048:
no stop put to such depraved conduct in the lower order of people.
942:
938:
934:
906:
822:
786:
478:
2511:
Burn's Justice of the Peace and Parish Officer: (V. 5a, 1869)
1592:
FitzGerald, J. D. (2004). "Maule, Sir William Henry (1788–1858)".
1096:(1705–1793), viewed wife selling as conspiracy to commit adultery.
1014:'s "gas pillar" (1835), where crowds could be expected to gather.
543:
her to the highest bidder. Wife selling provides the backdrop for
1738:
Cawte, E. C. (1985), "Precise Records of Some Marriage Customs",
1527:
1130:
859:
810:
764:
540:
532:
283:
40:
838:, but was pelted and driven away by the crowd, later commented:
596:
to write (apparently as a joke) in a letter to French scientist
2699:
Women, Work & Sexual Politics in Eighteenth-century England
1370:
1368:
1366:
1364:
1362:
1068:
1064:
1011:
926:
914:
826:
652:
Five distinct methods of breaking up a marriage existed in the
569:
536:
1786:
1784:
1206:
In his 1844 judgement against a bigamist, at Warwick Assizes,
930:
692:
681:
The Laws Respecting Women, As They Regard Their Natural Rights
831:
742:
1359:
1071:
until early the next morning. In about 1777, a wife sale in
890:
Bill of sale for a wife, contained within a petition of 1768
2138:
2114:
1895:
1871:
1781:
1507:
1166:
918:
672:
2815:(illustrated, reprint ed.), Oxford University Press,
2410:
2408:
2068:
2066:
1964:
1962:
1672:
1670:
1273:. The whole structure was about 30 feet (9.1 m) tall.
1981:
1979:
1977:
1808:
1561:
946:
809:, who is reported to have bought his second wife from an
539:
around her neck, arm, or waist, a husband would publicly
2381:
2357:
2051:
2015:
1458:"The Scottish Case That Led to Hardwicke's Marriage Act"
847:
In some cases, such as that of Henry Cook in 1814, the
2717:
Lay People and Religion in the Early Eighteenth Century
2405:
2369:
2333:
2249:, infotrac.galegroup.com, p. 3, col. B, 30 October 1818
2126:
2102:
2090:
2063:
1991:
1959:
1947:
1844:
1832:
1820:
1796:
1769:
1682:
1667:
1551:
1549:
1437:
1413:
1307:
2150:
1974:
1861:
1859:
1694:
1324:
1322:
2554:
The Book of Days: A Miscellany of Popular Antiquities
2039:
1883:
905:. The bill is contained in a petition presented to a
2492:
Studies in history and jurisprudence, Volume II
2393:
2345:
2201:
2078:
2003:
1573:
1546:
1282:
Thank you, sir, thank you, said the bold auctioneer,
986:"booted and spurred, in Smithfield Market, crying '
2253:
2189:
2027:
1856:
1757:
1655:
1425:
1345:. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 76–77.
1319:
2634:
2320:
2300:
2240:
2220:
2169:
1593:
2774:The History Of Emley – A West Riding Village
2939:
2732:
1916:
1914:
1912:
1910:
1389:
1387:
1385:
1383:
1374:
1159:Burn's Justice of the Peace and Parish Officer
1715:"The Contrast, by the Author of "Yes and No""
960:
509:
2988:Marriage, unions and partnerships in England
1907:
1606:(online ed.). Oxford University Press.
1380:
1288:Going! Going! I say—she is gone for ten bob.
949:changed his mind and bought her back later.
2659:, The Johns Hopkins University Press,
1712:
1631:
1629:
990:' , while Milady stood haltered in a pen".
2789:
2601:(illustrated ed.), Federation Press,
2526:
1713:Cave, Edward; Nichols, John (April 1832),
1591:
1567:
1513:
656:of English history. One was to sue in the
516:
502:
2733:Mansell, Wade; Meteyard, Belinda (2004),
2672:
1924:inflation figures are based on data from
1343:John Locke : selected correspondence
1313:
1286:Will bid any more? Is this not a bad job?
2909:, and does not reflect subsequent edits.
2892:
2849:
2828:
2551:
2414:
2375:
2144:
2132:
2120:
2108:
2096:
2072:
1997:
1968:
1953:
1901:
1877:
1838:
1826:
1790:
1775:
1688:
1626:
1123:
1082:
964:
937:involved "eight pots of beer" and seven
636:
2750:
2737:(Third ed.), Routledge Cavendish,
2654:
2578:
2156:
2045:
1700:
1603:Oxford Dictionary of National Biography
1596:Oxford Dictionary of National Biography
1525:
1455:
1174:was asked to comment on an incident in
2940:
2771:
2632:
2614:
2596:
2467:
2449:
2339:
2259:
2009:
1889:
1814:
1635:
1579:
2807:
2780:
2714:
2560:
2536:Gendering European history: 1780–1920
2485:
2387:
2363:
2351:
2207:
2084:
2057:
2021:
1985:
1925:
1763:
1737:
1555:
1443:
1431:
1419:
1393:
1340:
1328:
1104:William Murray, 1st Earl of Mansfield
1094:William Murray, 1st Earl of Mansfield
1040:
557:sales, and there were cases of local
2696:
2508:
2399:
2195:
2033:
1865:
1850:
1802:
1676:
1661:
1165:Another form of wife selling was by
2783:Douglas Jerrold's shilling magazine
2556:, vol. 1, W. & R. Chambers
799:
660:for separation from bed and board (
586:
13:
2879:
2836:, Merlin Press, pp. 404–466,
2813:Road to Divorce: England 1530–1987
2790:Sokol, B. J.; Sokol, Mary (2003),
2565:, University of California Press,
1284:Going for ten—is there nobody here
807:Henry Brydges, 2nd Duke of Chandos
14:
3009:
2860:
2891:
2832:(1991), "The Selling of Wives",
2597:Finlay, Henry Alan (2005),
2453:Social England Under the Regency
1182:sold his wife for a shilling in
626:Sir William Blackstone
47:
2785:, vol. 4, The Punch Office
2442:
2420:
2313:
2293:
2265:
2233:
2213:
2162:
1731:
1706:
1585:
1519:
1276:
1263:
1254:
1245:
1236:
1227:
1200:
624:. As the eminent English judge
2794:, Cambridge University Press,
2792:Shakespeare, Law, and Marriage
2772:Pobjoy, Harold Norman (1970),
2735:A Critical Introduction to Law
2719:, Cambridge University Press,
2675:"Book review: E. P. Thompson:
2513:, Cornell University Library,
1449:
1334:
769:three shillings and four pence
1:
2948:Divorce in the United Kingdom
2758:, Stanford University Press,
2637:Thomas Hardy: A Literary Life
1526:Vaessen, Rachel Anne (2006),
1375:Mansell & Meteyard (2004)
1295:
969:A French depiction of Milord
632:
2854:, W. W. Norton & Company
2776:, Ridings Publishing Company
1620:UK public library membership
1300:
929:in 1898, the purchaser paid
885:'Witness: WILLIAM CHIVERS.'
687:on the sale. A wife sold in
675:of separation drawn up by a
7:
2495:, Oxford University Press,
611:
10:
3014:
2686:Journal of Legal Pluralism
2222:"Buying and Selling Wives"
1636:Wright, John deP. (2004),
1089:Portrait of Lord Mansfield
961:Distribution and symbolism
18:
2963:Social history of England
2850:Woodbury, George (1951),
2655:Godbeer, Richard (2002),
2552:Chambers, Robert (1864),
1396:"Wife-Selling in England"
1076:officers of the police."
988:à quinze livres ma femme!
616:Until the passing of the
550:The Mayor of Casterbridge
484:Private electronic market
2993:Human commodity auctions
2852:The Great Days of Piracy
2673:Griffiths, John (1995),
2579:Collins, Sophie (2007),
1720:The Gentleman's Magazine
1568:Sokol & Sokol (2003)
1514:Caine & Sluga (2002)
1394:Kenny, Courtney (1929),
1193:
865:
728:The Gentleman's Magazine
179:Generalized second-price
2983:20th century in England
2978:19th century in England
2973:18th century in England
2968:17th century in England
2926:Discussion and examples
2599:To have but not to hold
2474:, Chatto & Windus,
2322:"Public Sale of a Wife"
1926:Clark, Gregory (2017).
1409:(subscription required)
710:
174:Generalized first-price
2887:
2867:Listen to this article
2697:Hill, Bridget (1994),
2641:, Palgrave Macmillan,
2633:Gibson, James (1996),
2615:Gibson, Colin (1993),
1612:10.1093/ref:odnb/18369
1462:Law and History Review
1456:Leneman, Leah (1999),
1134:
1097:
1050:
978:
941:(£40 in 2024); and in
887:
845:
723:
668:Matrimonial Causes Act
649:
559:Poor Law Commissioners
229:Simultaneous ascending
2886:
2715:Jacob, W. M. (2002),
2583:, Snake River Press,
2471:Modern Street Ballads
2468:Ashton, John (1888),
2456:, Chatto and Windus,
2450:Ashton, John (1899),
1144:Mayor of Casterbridge
1127:
1086:
1045:
1028:Hartford, Connecticut
968:
870:
840:
715:
705:criminal conversation
658:ecclesiastical courts
640:
264:Vickrey–Clarke–Groves
2918:More spoken articles
2561:Clark, Anna (1997),
2509:Burn, John (2009) ,
1644:, Green Bag Archives
1400:Law Quarterly Review
1341:Locke, John (2002).
1221:a vinculo matrimonii
1149:Le Marché de Londres
618:Marriage Act of 1753
144:Discriminatory price
2931:Documented examples
2756:The Sexual Contract
2581:A Sussex Miscellany
2428:"A Brutal Practice"
1208:William Henry Maule
1033:Boston Evening-Post
858:. She was taken to
654:early modern period
454:Revenue equivalence
139:Deferred-acceptance
2958:Culture of England
2888:
2617:Dissolving Wedlock
2432:New Zealand Tablet
2390:, pp. 146–147
2366:, pp. 335–336
2280:The New York Times
2147:, pp. 224–225
2123:, pp. 458–459
2060:, pp. 147–148
2024:, pp. 144–145
1922:Retail Price Index
1904:, pp. 413–414
1880:, pp. 440–441
1853:, pp. 216–217
1817:, pp. 216–217
1805:, pp. 215–216
1793:, pp. 408–409
1679:, pp. 217–218
1446:, pp. 816–817
1422:, pp. 819–820
1135:
1101:Lord Chief Justice
1098:
1041:Changing attitudes
979:
650:
224:Sealed first-price
2884:
2843:978-0-85036-411-8
2834:Customs in Common
2822:978-0-19-822651-2
2801:978-0-521-82263-3
2765:978-0-8047-1477-8
2744:978-1-85941-892-5
2726:978-0-521-89295-7
2708:978-1-85728-213-9
2677:Customs in common
2666:978-0-8018-6800-9
2648:978-0-312-15945-0
2626:978-0-415-03226-1
2608:978-1-86287-542-5
2590:978-1-906022-08-2
2572:978-0-520-20883-4
2545:978-0-8264-6775-1
2520:978-1-112-03657-6
2502:978-0-559-45406-6
1618:(Subscription or
975:Smithfield Market
646:Thomas Rowlandson
526:
525:
304:Cancellation hunt
254:Value of revenues
124:Click-box bidding
3005:
2953:Women in England
2908:
2906:
2895:
2894:
2885:
2875:
2873:
2868:
2855:
2846:
2825:
2804:
2786:
2777:
2768:
2747:
2729:
2711:
2693:
2683:
2669:
2651:
2640:
2629:
2611:
2593:
2575:
2557:
2548:
2523:
2505:
2482:
2464:
2436:
2435:
2424:
2418:
2412:
2403:
2397:
2391:
2385:
2379:
2373:
2367:
2361:
2355:
2349:
2343:
2342:, pp. 95–97
2337:
2331:
2330:
2324:
2317:
2311:
2310:
2304:
2297:
2291:
2290:
2289:
2287:
2277:
2269:
2263:
2257:
2251:
2250:
2244:
2237:
2231:
2230:
2224:
2217:
2211:
2205:
2199:
2193:
2187:
2186:
2185:
2183:
2173:
2166:
2160:
2154:
2148:
2142:
2136:
2130:
2124:
2118:
2112:
2106:
2100:
2094:
2088:
2082:
2076:
2070:
2061:
2055:
2049:
2043:
2037:
2031:
2025:
2019:
2013:
2007:
2001:
1995:
1989:
1988:, pp. 86–87
1983:
1972:
1966:
1957:
1951:
1945:
1944:
1942:
1940:
1918:
1905:
1899:
1893:
1887:
1881:
1875:
1869:
1863:
1854:
1848:
1842:
1836:
1830:
1824:
1818:
1812:
1806:
1800:
1794:
1788:
1779:
1773:
1767:
1761:
1755:
1754:
1735:
1729:
1728:
1710:
1704:
1698:
1692:
1686:
1680:
1674:
1665:
1659:
1653:
1652:
1651:
1649:
1633:
1624:
1623:
1615:
1599:
1589:
1583:
1577:
1571:
1565:
1559:
1553:
1544:
1543:
1542:
1540:
1534:
1523:
1517:
1516:, pp. 12–13
1511:
1505:
1504:
1503:
1501:
1492:, archived from
1453:
1447:
1441:
1435:
1429:
1423:
1417:
1411:
1410:
1407:
1391:
1378:
1372:
1357:
1356:
1338:
1332:
1326:
1317:
1314:Griffiths (1995)
1311:
1289:
1280:
1274:
1267:
1261:
1258:
1252:
1249:
1243:
1240:
1234:
1231:
1225:
1217:a mensa et thoro
1213:a mensa et thoro
1204:
1184:Hucknall Torkard
1172:William Harcourt
1154:The Book of Days
1059:
1021:
993:In his account,
977:to sell his wife
891:
800:Mid-19th century
732:
698:
663:a mensa et thoro
644:(1812–1814), by
606:
587:Legal background
518:
511:
504:
449:Price of anarchy
299:Calor licitantis
51:
28:
27:
3013:
3012:
3008:
3007:
3006:
3004:
3003:
3002:
2938:
2937:
2922:
2921:
2910:
2904:
2902:
2899:This audio file
2896:
2889:
2880:
2877:
2871:
2870:
2866:
2863:
2858:
2844:
2830:Thompson, E. P.
2823:
2809:Stone, Lawrence
2802:
2766:
2752:Pateman, Carole
2745:
2727:
2709:
2681:
2667:
2649:
2627:
2609:
2591:
2573:
2546:
2521:
2503:
2445:
2440:
2439:
2426:
2425:
2421:
2415:Thompson (1991)
2413:
2406:
2398:
2394:
2386:
2382:
2376:Chambers (1864)
2374:
2370:
2362:
2358:
2350:
2346:
2338:
2334:
2319:
2318:
2314:
2299:
2298:
2294:
2285:
2283:
2275:
2271:
2270:
2266:
2258:
2254:
2239:
2238:
2234:
2219:
2218:
2214:
2206:
2202:
2194:
2190:
2181:
2179:
2168:
2167:
2163:
2155:
2151:
2145:Woodbury (1951)
2143:
2139:
2133:Thompson (1991)
2131:
2127:
2121:Thompson (1991)
2119:
2115:
2109:Thompson (1991)
2107:
2103:
2097:Thompson (1991)
2095:
2091:
2083:
2079:
2073:Thompson (1991)
2071:
2064:
2056:
2052:
2044:
2040:
2032:
2028:
2020:
2016:
2008:
2004:
1998:Woodbury (1951)
1996:
1992:
1984:
1975:
1969:Thompson (1991)
1967:
1960:
1954:Thompson (1991)
1952:
1948:
1938:
1936:
1919:
1908:
1902:Thompson (1991)
1900:
1896:
1888:
1884:
1878:Thompson (1991)
1876:
1872:
1864:
1857:
1849:
1845:
1839:Thompson (1991)
1837:
1833:
1827:Thompson (1991)
1825:
1821:
1813:
1809:
1801:
1797:
1791:Thompson (1991)
1789:
1782:
1776:Thompson (1991)
1774:
1770:
1762:
1758:
1736:
1732:
1711:
1707:
1699:
1695:
1689:Thompson (1991)
1687:
1683:
1675:
1668:
1660:
1656:
1647:
1645:
1634:
1627:
1617:
1590:
1586:
1578:
1574:
1566:
1562:
1554:
1547:
1538:
1536:
1535:, ir.lib.sfu.ca
1532:
1524:
1520:
1512:
1508:
1499:
1497:
1454:
1450:
1442:
1438:
1430:
1426:
1418:
1414:
1408:
1392:
1381:
1373:
1360:
1353:
1339:
1335:
1327:
1320:
1312:
1308:
1303:
1298:
1293:
1292:
1287:
1285:
1283:
1281:
1277:
1268:
1264:
1259:
1255:
1250:
1246:
1241:
1237:
1232:
1228:
1205:
1201:
1196:
1188:Nottinghamshire
1073:Carmarthenshire
1061:
1052:
1043:
1019:
963:
898:Ipswich Journal
893:
889:
884:
882:
878:
875:
873:
868:
813:in about 1740.
802:
734:
725:
719:Duke of Chandos
713:
696:
635:
614:
600:
598:Nicolas Toinard
589:
522:
493:
463:
428:
333:
329:Tacit collusion
278:
194:Multi-attribute
24:
17:
12:
11:
5:
3011:
3001:
3000:
2995:
2990:
2985:
2980:
2975:
2970:
2965:
2960:
2955:
2950:
2934:
2933:
2928:
2911:
2897:
2890:
2878:
2865:
2864:
2862:
2861:External links
2859:
2857:
2856:
2847:
2842:
2826:
2821:
2805:
2800:
2787:
2778:
2769:
2764:
2748:
2743:
2730:
2725:
2712:
2707:
2694:
2670:
2665:
2652:
2647:
2630:
2625:
2612:
2607:
2594:
2589:
2576:
2571:
2558:
2549:
2544:
2528:Caine, Barbara
2524:
2519:
2506:
2501:
2483:
2465:
2446:
2444:
2441:
2438:
2437:
2419:
2404:
2402:, p. 1025
2392:
2380:
2368:
2356:
2344:
2332:
2312:
2292:
2264:
2252:
2232:
2212:
2200:
2188:
2161:
2157:Godbeer (2002)
2149:
2137:
2125:
2113:
2101:
2089:
2077:
2062:
2050:
2046:Collins (2007)
2038:
2026:
2014:
2002:
1990:
1973:
1958:
1946:
1933:MeasuringWorth
1906:
1894:
1882:
1870:
1855:
1843:
1831:
1819:
1807:
1795:
1780:
1768:
1756:
1730:
1705:
1701:Pateman (1988)
1693:
1681:
1666:
1654:
1625:
1584:
1572:
1560:
1545:
1518:
1506:
1496:on 25 May 2012
1474:10.2307/744190
1468:(1): 161–169,
1448:
1436:
1424:
1412:
1379:
1358:
1351:
1333:
1318:
1305:
1304:
1302:
1299:
1297:
1294:
1291:
1290:
1275:
1262:
1253:
1244:
1235:
1233:£10.99 in 2018
1226:
1198:
1197:
1195:
1192:
1180:Salvation Army
1044:
1042:
1039:
999:E. P. Thompson
995:Wives for Sale
962:
959:
903:British Museum
880:
872:'Oct. 24, 1766
871:
869:
867:
864:
801:
798:
767:market, "only
739:peculiar court
714:
712:
709:
642:Selling a Wife
634:
631:
613:
610:
588:
585:
572:and historian
547:'s 1886 novel
524:
523:
521:
520:
513:
506:
498:
495:
494:
492:
491:
486:
481:
475:
472:
471:
465:
464:
462:
461:
459:Winner's curse
456:
451:
446:
440:
437:
436:
430:
429:
427:
426:
421:
416:
411:
406:
401:
396:
391:
386:
381:
376:
371:
366:
361:
356:
351:
345:
342:
341:
335:
334:
332:
331:
326:
321:
316:
311:
306:
301:
296:
290:
287:
286:
280:
279:
277:
276:
271:
266:
261:
256:
251:
246:
241:
236:
231:
226:
221:
216:
211:
206:
201:
196:
191:
186:
181:
176:
171:
166:
161:
156:
151:
146:
141:
136:
131:
126:
121:
116:
111:
106:
101:
96:
91:
86:
85:
84:
79:
74:
63:
60:
59:
53:
52:
44:
43:
37:
36:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3010:
2999:
2996:
2994:
2991:
2989:
2986:
2984:
2981:
2979:
2976:
2974:
2971:
2969:
2966:
2964:
2961:
2959:
2956:
2954:
2951:
2949:
2946:
2945:
2943:
2936:
2932:
2929:
2927:
2924:
2923:
2919:
2915:
2900:
2853:
2848:
2845:
2839:
2835:
2831:
2827:
2824:
2818:
2814:
2810:
2806:
2803:
2797:
2793:
2788:
2784:
2779:
2775:
2770:
2767:
2761:
2757:
2753:
2749:
2746:
2740:
2736:
2731:
2728:
2722:
2718:
2713:
2710:
2704:
2701:, UCL Press,
2700:
2695:
2691:
2687:
2680:
2678:
2671:
2668:
2662:
2658:
2653:
2650:
2644:
2639:
2638:
2631:
2628:
2622:
2619:, Routledge,
2618:
2613:
2610:
2604:
2600:
2595:
2592:
2586:
2582:
2577:
2574:
2568:
2564:
2559:
2555:
2550:
2547:
2541:
2538:, Continuum,
2537:
2533:
2532:Sluga, Glenda
2529:
2525:
2522:
2516:
2512:
2507:
2504:
2498:
2494:
2493:
2488:
2484:
2481:
2477:
2473:
2472:
2466:
2463:
2459:
2455:
2454:
2448:
2447:
2433:
2429:
2423:
2417:, p. 455
2416:
2411:
2409:
2401:
2396:
2389:
2384:
2378:, p. 487
2377:
2372:
2365:
2360:
2354:, p. 337
2353:
2348:
2341:
2340:Gibson (1996)
2336:
2328:
2323:
2316:
2308:
2303:
2296:
2282:, 2 July 1894
2281:
2274:
2268:
2261:
2260:Ashton (1888)
2256:
2248:
2243:
2236:
2228:
2223:
2216:
2210:, p. 146
2209:
2204:
2198:, p. 217
2197:
2192:
2177:
2172:
2165:
2159:, p. 131
2158:
2153:
2146:
2141:
2135:, p. 461
2134:
2129:
2122:
2117:
2111:, p. 418
2110:
2105:
2099:, p. 408
2098:
2093:
2087:, p. 145
2086:
2081:
2075:, p. 409
2074:
2069:
2067:
2059:
2054:
2047:
2042:
2036:, p. 218
2035:
2030:
2023:
2018:
2011:
2010:Gibson (1993)
2006:
2000:, p. 223
1999:
1994:
1987:
1982:
1980:
1978:
1971:, p. 451
1970:
1965:
1963:
1956:, p. 415
1955:
1950:
1935:
1934:
1929:
1923:
1917:
1915:
1913:
1911:
1903:
1898:
1892:, p. 132
1891:
1890:Pobjoy (1970)
1886:
1879:
1874:
1868:, p. 216
1867:
1862:
1860:
1852:
1847:
1841:, p. 428
1840:
1835:
1829:, p. 433
1828:
1823:
1816:
1815:Ashton (1899)
1811:
1804:
1799:
1792:
1787:
1785:
1778:, p. 412
1777:
1772:
1765:
1760:
1753:
1749:
1745:
1741:
1734:
1726:
1722:
1721:
1716:
1709:
1703:, p. 122
1702:
1697:
1691:, p. 462
1690:
1685:
1678:
1673:
1671:
1664:, p. 215
1663:
1658:
1643:
1639:
1632:
1630:
1621:
1613:
1609:
1605:
1604:
1598:
1597:
1588:
1581:
1580:Finlay (2005)
1576:
1570:, p. 144
1569:
1564:
1558:, p. 141
1557:
1552:
1550:
1531:
1530:
1522:
1515:
1510:
1495:
1491:
1487:
1483:
1479:
1475:
1471:
1467:
1463:
1459:
1452:
1445:
1440:
1434:, p. 819
1433:
1428:
1421:
1416:
1405:
1401:
1397:
1390:
1388:
1386:
1384:
1376:
1371:
1369:
1367:
1365:
1363:
1354:
1352:9780198235422
1348:
1344:
1337:
1331:, p. 820
1330:
1325:
1323:
1316:, p. 163
1315:
1310:
1306:
1279:
1272:
1266:
1257:
1248:
1239:
1230:
1222:
1218:
1214:
1209:
1203:
1199:
1191:
1189:
1185:
1181:
1177:
1173:
1168:
1163:
1160:
1156:
1155:
1150:
1146:
1145:
1140:
1132:
1126:
1122:
1120:
1115:
1111:
1110:
1105:
1102:
1095:
1091:
1090:
1085:
1081:
1077:
1074:
1070:
1066:
1060:
1057:
1056:
1049:
1038:
1035:
1034:
1029:
1023:
1015:
1013:
1009:
1003:
1000:
996:
991:
989:
985:
976:
973:, heading to
972:
967:
958:
955:
950:
948:
944:
940:
936:
932:
928:
924:
923:public houses
920:
916:
911:
908:
904:
899:
892:
886:
881:JOHN PARSONS.
879:
863:
861:
857:
854:
850:
844:
839:
837:
833:
828:
824:
820:
814:
812:
808:
797:
795:
790:
788:
783:
778:
773:
770:
766:
761:
757:
751:
748:
744:
740:
733:
730:
729:
722:
720:
708:
706:
700:
694:
690:
684:
682:
678:
674:
669:
665:
664:
659:
655:
647:
643:
639:
630:
627:
623:
619:
609:
604:
599:
595:
584:
582:
579:
575:
571:
566:
564:
560:
554:
552:
551:
546:
542:
538:
534:
530:
519:
514:
512:
507:
505:
500:
499:
497:
496:
490:
487:
485:
482:
480:
477:
476:
474:
473:
470:
467:
466:
460:
457:
455:
452:
450:
447:
445:
444:Digital goods
442:
441:
439:
438:
435:
432:
431:
425:
422:
420:
417:
415:
412:
410:
407:
405:
402:
400:
397:
395:
392:
390:
387:
385:
382:
380:
377:
375:
372:
370:
367:
365:
362:
360:
357:
355:
352:
350:
347:
346:
344:
343:
340:
337:
336:
330:
327:
325:
322:
320:
317:
315:
312:
310:
307:
305:
302:
300:
297:
295:
292:
291:
289:
288:
285:
282:
281:
275:
272:
270:
267:
265:
262:
260:
257:
255:
252:
250:
247:
245:
244:Uniform price
242:
240:
239:Traffic light
237:
235:
232:
230:
227:
225:
222:
220:
217:
215:
212:
210:
207:
205:
202:
200:
197:
195:
192:
190:
187:
185:
182:
180:
177:
175:
172:
170:
167:
165:
162:
160:
157:
155:
152:
150:
147:
145:
142:
140:
137:
135:
132:
130:
129:Combinatorial
127:
125:
122:
120:
117:
115:
112:
110:
107:
105:
104:Best/not best
102:
100:
99:Barter double
97:
95:
92:
90:
87:
83:
80:
78:
75:
73:
70:
69:
68:
65:
64:
62:
61:
58:
55:
54:
50:
46:
45:
42:
39:
38:
34:
30:
29:
26:
22:
2935:
2851:
2833:
2812:
2791:
2782:
2773:
2755:
2734:
2716:
2698:
2689:
2685:
2676:
2656:
2636:
2616:
2598:
2580:
2562:
2553:
2535:
2510:
2491:
2487:Bryce, James
2470:
2452:
2443:Bibliography
2431:
2422:
2395:
2388:Stone (1990)
2383:
2371:
2364:Reach (1846)
2359:
2352:Reach (1846)
2347:
2335:
2326:
2315:
2306:
2295:
2284:, retrieved
2279:
2267:
2255:
2246:
2235:
2226:
2215:
2208:Stone (1990)
2203:
2191:
2180:, retrieved
2175:
2164:
2152:
2140:
2128:
2116:
2104:
2092:
2085:Stone (1990)
2080:
2058:Stone (1990)
2053:
2048:, p. 65
2041:
2029:
2022:Stone (1990)
2017:
2012:, p. 51
2005:
1993:
1986:Clark (1997)
1949:
1937:. Retrieved
1931:
1897:
1885:
1873:
1846:
1834:
1822:
1810:
1798:
1771:
1766:, p. 76
1764:Jacob (2002)
1759:
1743:
1739:
1733:
1724:
1718:
1708:
1696:
1684:
1657:
1646:, retrieved
1642:greenbag.org
1641:
1601:
1595:
1587:
1582:, p. 15
1575:
1563:
1556:Stone (1990)
1537:, retrieved
1528:
1521:
1509:
1498:, retrieved
1494:the original
1465:
1461:
1451:
1444:Bryce (1901)
1439:
1432:Bryce (1901)
1427:
1420:Bryce (1901)
1415:
1403:
1399:
1377:, p. 88
1342:
1336:
1329:Bryce (1901)
1309:
1278:
1265:
1256:
1247:
1238:
1229:
1220:
1216:
1212:
1202:
1164:
1158:
1152:
1148:
1142:
1139:Thomas Hardy
1136:
1107:
1099:
1087:
1078:
1062:
1053:
1051:
1046:
1031:
1024:
1016:
1004:
994:
992:
987:
980:
951:
912:
897:
894:
888:
883:
874:
846:
841:
815:
803:
791:
774:
768:
752:
746:
735:
726:
724:
716:
701:
685:
680:
661:
651:
641:
615:
590:
581:police court
567:
555:
548:
545:Thomas Hardy
529:Wife selling
528:
527:
379:Domain names
234:Single-price
134:Common value
25:
21:Wife selling
2400:Burn (2009)
2262:, p. 3
2196:Hill (1994)
2182:17 December
2034:Hill (1994)
1866:Hill (1994)
1851:Hill (1994)
1803:Hill (1994)
1677:Hill (1994)
1662:Hill (1994)
1638:"Wife Sale"
1539:18 December
1500:16 December
1251:MSS. 32,084
1058:(July 1797)
1010:(1817), or
910:"husband".
691:Market for
677:conveyancer
601: [
574:James Bryce
94:Anglo-Dutch
77:Bidding fee
2942:Categories
2914:Audio help
2905:2012-04-20
1746:(2): 254,
1622:required.)
1296:References
1170:Secretary
1114:Leominster
827:bigamously
777:Manchester
633:Separation
594:John Locke
563:workhouses
349:Algorithms
249:Unique bid
204:No-reserve
2692:: 159–165
2480:463842992
2327:The Times
2307:The Times
2286:25 August
2247:The Times
2227:The Times
2176:The Times
1648:25 August
1490:144650291
1406:: 494–497
1301:Citations
1176:Sheffield
1141:'s novel
1131:cuckolded
1109:The Times
1055:The Times
984:John Bull
971:John Bull
939:shillings
856:workhouse
853:Effingham
823:shillings
819:farthings
782:Southwark
756:Maidstone
622:coverture
414:Virginity
269:Walrasian
199:Multiunit
109:Brazilian
89:Amsterdam
2998:Misogyny
2916: ·
2811:(1990),
2754:(1988),
2534:(2002),
2489:(1901),
2302:"Police"
1740:Folklore
1271:gas lamp
1092:, 1783.
943:Ninfield
935:Brighton
907:Somerset
849:Poor Law
787:Plymouth
612:Marriage
489:Software
479:Ebidding
404:Spectrum
369:Children
339:Contexts
219:Scottish
189:Knapsack
184:Japanese
114:Calcutta
41:Auctions
33:a series
31:Part of
2903: (
2874:minutes
2462:4395094
1752:1259650
1008:Preston
931:7s. 6d.
860:Croydon
765:Staines
760:guineas
747:Divorce
689:Wenlock
541:auction
533:divorce
384:Flowers
374:Players
364:Charity
324:Suicide
319:Sniping
314:Rigging
294:Shading
284:Bidding
259:Vickrey
214:Reverse
164:Forward
159:English
72:Chinese
67:All-pay
2840:
2819:
2798:
2762:
2741:
2723:
2705:
2663:
2645:
2623:
2605:
2587:
2569:
2542:
2517:
2499:
2478:
2460:
2242:"News"
2171:"News"
1750:
1616:
1488:
1482:744190
1480:
1349:
1119:Epping
1069:stocks
1065:Dublin
1012:Bolton
927:Yapton
915:Sussex
811:ostler
731:(1832)
570:jurist
537:halter
469:Online
434:Theory
409:Stamps
399:Slaves
274:Yankee
169:French
149:Double
119:Candle
82:Dollar
2682:(PDF)
2276:(PDF)
1939:7 May
1748:JSTOR
1727:: 347
1533:(PDF)
1486:S2CID
1478:JSTOR
1194:Notes
866:Venue
836:Derby
832:Essex
794:Emley
743:Thame
693:2s 6d
605:]
578:Leeds
424:Wives
389:Loans
354:Autos
154:Dutch
57:Types
2838:ISBN
2817:ISBN
2796:ISBN
2760:ISBN
2739:ISBN
2721:ISBN
2703:ISBN
2661:ISBN
2643:ISBN
2621:ISBN
2603:ISBN
2585:ISBN
2567:ISBN
2540:ISBN
2515:ISBN
2497:ISBN
2476:OCLC
2458:OCLC
2288:2011
2184:2009
1941:2024
1650:2011
1541:2009
1502:2009
1347:ISBN
1167:deed
954:Hull
921:and
919:inns
717:The
711:Sale
673:deed
419:Wine
394:Scam
309:Jump
209:Rank
1920:UK
1725:102
1608:doi
1470:doi
1022:".
947:gin
913:In
741:at
359:Art
2944::
2872:28
2690:35
2688:,
2684:,
2530:;
2430:,
2407:^
2325:,
2305:,
2278:,
2245:,
2225:,
2174:,
2065:^
1976:^
1961:^
1930:.
1909:^
1858:^
1783:^
1744:96
1742:,
1723:,
1717:,
1669:^
1640:,
1628:^
1600:.
1548:^
1484:,
1476:,
1466:17
1464:,
1460:,
1404:45
1402:,
1398:,
1382:^
1361:^
1321:^
1186:,
917:,
789:.
603:fr
565:.
35:on
2920:)
2912:(
2907:)
2876:)
2869:(
2679:"
1943:.
1614:.
1610::
1472::
1355:.
1133:.
1020:'
697:"
517:e
510:t
503:v
23:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.