Knowledge

User talk:Yunshui/Archive 2

Source 📝

3931: 3059: 1586: 140: 31: 3989: 4217: 2976: 4040: 3572:
anymore; my days of flitting from OGS to KGS to Dragon and back are now behind me. It turned out that there just aren't enough hours in the day, so now I only play on Brainking (whose incredibly poorly-contrived and over-generous ranking system labels me a 6kyu; I'm actually more like a 15...). Would love to see you there if you can fit another bookmark in your browser. Cheers, and belated thanks for your original notification above.
904: 2152: 1053: 621:), and many developed articles did indeed start out as one-or-two-sentence stubs before being developed by other users. Lack of sources is a problem, however. I'm slowly going through these articles checking to see if sources are available - so far I haven't found anything to support keeping them, but you never know. The speedy tags would have been nuked by most admins, though; speedys only work if their 3524: 2241:, I strongly doubt you would find any - if you could be bothered to look. I'm insulted that you would make such an accusation, and although I see you have retracted the statement in question, the tone of your message above indicates that you don't even appear to see anything wrong in making it. As for "not wanting to make this personal", who was it who insulted my impartiality, 4457:. Here you can get a more experienced editor to mentor you and help you out with the labyrinthine legalities of Knowledge. They can also help you should you get embroiled in content disputes or arguments over policy. Being adopted gives you a leg up with the technicalities of Knowledge, and might help you channel your enthusiasm to become a really excellent Wikipedian. 4730:. By the way, I believe I have made more than 5,000 contributions to Knowledge, unfortunately it appears that those who contribute to articles that are later deleted from Knowledge have those edits subtracted from theier total count, something that many Wikipedians seem to care a lot about. Not a good way to encourage wikipedians to be bold imo. 3415:) or be available in the public domain. This essentially means that the photographer waives their copyright beyond attribution (i.e. anyone can use, modify or redistribute the image - not just on Knowledge, but anywhere - and even make money from it, and all they need to do is credit the original creator). It is not possible to release material 2915:
if possible, in the unlikely case that a warning might make the user reflect and change his ways. Obviously, any other admin is free to disagree and block the log. Should nobody do so, and should they vandalize further, I will gladly block them. I have not protected the page and instead will just block the SPA if they keep going.
4320:, removing or changing comments in the thread (your own included) makes it very difficult for other editors to get a handle on the conversation. It's like listening to someone on the telephone; you can't fully understand the situation because you can only hear one side of it. For this reason, the talkpage guidelines (under 3206:
form of emailed press agency reports so there is no proof that they are from a press agency (I could have concocted them). This provides a reason for his time in Cyprus and his incarceration, there contrary to his book where he is in Cyprus serving as a bodyguard. I can send you the cutting but I don't know how to !!!
3164:- in other words, if sources say it, Knowledge reports it, even if the information is not factually true. If it was widely believed that the Moon was made of cheese, and scholarly papers existed supporting it, then Knowledge would probably have a page on lunar lactose levels. We also have strict sourcing policies for 1432:, XMORPHEUSX also presented himself in a friendly manner in an attempt to cover up his vandalism "necessary indeed.....the more specific the better.....this is to help some readers its not ur prefererance,its mine.....do urs ur way n i'll do mine my way :)" won't get as much notice as a wall of gibberish. 3437: 4377:
Oh, I see. Well in that case, I'd suggest just adding a comment to that effect at the bottom of the page; something like, "I realise some of my comments above might be viewed as badgering other editors; this was not my intent," but in your own words, obviously. There's no real need to strike all your
3457:
Replace "nameofyourfile" with the name you saved your file under (and change the .png to .jpg or whatever file extension is appropriate), replace "descriptionofimage" with a brief description of the image (this will only be visible if someone mouse-hovers over the image), and replace "caption" with -
3205:
I do have a press cutting clearly stating that In was a Kawasaki Motorcycle not a cyclist. in the same article TA is refered to as a CYPRIOT. In the original court case the crown prosecution made a number of references to his Cypriot background. I have copies of these references but they are in the
3114:
As a matter of history you may note that TA's biography was completely been removed from Knowledge in the past because there is no evidence substantiating the majority of his early life biography. This is still the case. indeed there is an increasing ammount of evidence that would indicate the this
2671:
article. You can see the jumbled discussion on my user-page. The issue is this: It's a game with tanks, and the developers have added a golden tank. The other editor finds that this complete destroys the core of the game and wants to include it in the article. They have two sources, both Chinese. The
2427:
There's also something I don't understand, Imagine I added something about the forums. The description and the structure. I then added the reference from the own forum. That doesn't count? It's like I say "the site has a grey layout" and then add the source link which is the homepage and it shows the
2409:
Thank you for your reply. Hum. I have ChillBlast, Alexa and hopefully GamersGate will also verify my information. Is that enough? Can you take a look now and give your feedback? Your help is much appreciated. P.S. I am not the site owner or anything. I'm just an admin. I don't earn money and I am not
1427:
into "I've been looking at different versions of this article and my sources are good, so all I'll do is make minor edits and update release dates which, by the way, are correct as far as my information provides. So, just because it's accurate, don't accuse people and envy them just because they took
1157:
5) Original Research - All the data quoted above is not research as per say. It is a mere accumulation of the public data availiable. The subtext on Nerve Conduction is not an original work of Mr. Chopra or the NIF. The idea of such a watch , though an original idea, is very much publically available
596:
Since when did Knowledge become a dumping ground were someone can just drop off a word or two and leave it for someone else to take care of the rest? None of these terms are notable, they should at most be included as terms in a martial arts article but certainly not as articles themselves. This user
109:
Actually, you're right - not necessarily in terms of your edit content, which I'm not qualified to take a position on, but in terms of the dispute you haven't technically broken 3RR yet, and you have initiated discussion on the talkpage, which is more than the other editors involved have. My mistake,
3754:
Thank you for the information! And for your time and patience as you not only read my post, but responded, in kind, with much detail. I didn't know about the archives; perhaps I could have saved us some time. I will check it out in the future. I somehow completely missed this: "Knowledge does not
2914:
I was thinking more on the lines of people coordinating offwiki on some board. In any case, I have the one that edited after warning(s) and warned the others. While it's pretty obvious that their purpose here is not constructive, I personally do not feel comfortable with blocking without any warning
1404:
and many island nations. Most of these would display the same release date (being in the same region), making their usefulness more to the point of being overly-informative (I'd compare it to a minute-by-minute "summary" of a 190 minute film). The basis of his edits was likely from a document on his
4452:
Looking over your wikihistory, it seems as though you're very willing to get involved with lots of areas of the project. That's great! We are encouraged to be bold and it's always nice to see such enthusiasm from a new contributor. However, it also looks like you're having some trouble dealing with
4362:
tags around my comments, but that is very time consummning and error-prone for someone like me. I chose instead to simply revert all my own comments, but half-way thru I was advised by the system that most of my comments cannot be reverted and must be undone manually, so with quite a bit of effort
1559:
are pretty mainstream) I suspect, based on what you're referencing, that it only contains another passing mention claiming that Realtech publish the Open GL Extensions Viewer, rather than covering the company in detail. If I'm wrong (you have the book, after all!), please feel free to disregard. As
2848:
I'm sorry if you were offended; it struck me as somewhat suspicious that your first couple of edits were both in comparatively obscure areas of Knowledge and in support of the same user, so I raised an SPI. If it transpires that I was wrong, then you have nothing to worry about, and you'll have my
1218:
Great! It looks as though our editing patterns are not going to overlap very much (once again, I'm just about to go offline, probably for the whole weekend!) so you may find our communication a little stilted. However, as long as you can put up with a bit of a time lag in my responses, I'd be very
540:
No, no bother at all, it was actually pretty useful for improving the article (he e-mailed me a few of the sources, which I added if appropriate) until he got cold feet. Though thinking about it, I have had a previous legal threat from the guy's agents (he claims no knowledge of that though) which
2220:
I will stop short of an actual apology as it is clear that you ARE in fact a proud Atheist who has come down harshly on this topic on occasion. To be an Atheist is to be sure there is no divinity whatsoever, and makes you somewhat biased for a discussion of a theological term. An Agnostic or an
1224:
I'll try not to be too hands on - I'm not going to monitor your every edit unless you want me to, but I will watch your talkpage, answer any questions you have (post them here) and advocate for you if you get into any disputes. If you'd like tuition in the use of Knowledge I'd be happy to provide
3776:
hello yunshui. i am kalyan. recently i created an article "atomic force acoustic microscopy". it seems that because of some issues you have deleted the contents.citing that it can form a subsection of atomic force microscopy. but the fact is that it is an entirely different technique in scanning
3171:
What we need, therefore, is a reliable source (a newspaper article, news broadcast or properly-published book, ideally) which debunks Tony Anthony's claims. Once that exists, the article can be appropriately balanced. At present, however, we can't claim that Anthony's life up to 1989 is unknown,
2216:
I have taken out the "history of anti-theist postings" part. I don't want to make this personal and if you find that offensive than it is not necessary. The discussion should be on the relevance of the term, not the individuals commenting. I have neither the time nor interest to go tit for tat
1112:
deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Knowledge guidelines. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the
3571:
My interest in the project is, I confess, pretty casual (not to downplay its importance, I'm just not convinced I have a lot to contribute to it), but if it doesn't cost you too much extra effort then I'd certainly be interested to hear how it's going. Thanks for the Go invite - I'm not on OGS
2236:
See, what you're doing there (again!) is making assumptions about me based purely upon my belief system. If you could show evidence of systemic bias in my editing then that would be acceptable, but since, like most other responsible Wikipedians (including those involved in the deletion of your
2325:
is actually an essay about the systemic bias inherent in Knowledge as a whole, rather than that of individual editors... but I digress; there are more important things to do than squabble over whether the fact that I don't believe in a deity makes me more or less biased in editing articles on
723:
AfD. I'd posted there, but then I didn't know if you checked the page regularly, so I thought I'd mention it here as well. I was just curious if they were reliable or not, since that would affect my votes on the AfDs for her books. If she's notable enough for an article then I have no problem
1749:
Hi Eik Corell. I take it from a cursory look at the page and associated talk that this is the patches issue? I must confess I can't immediately see what the problem is; the article seems to have been stable for the last couple of weeks, and the talkpage discussions seem to show pretty clear
2025:
not only is the entry an advertisment to her pay nude site, it leaves out details that are credible, and would be damaging to her rep. if we gave every cosplayer their own page, wikipedia would turn to garbage quickly. not to mention her photo is a heavy shopped picture. delete it
1625:
Hello! You responded to my feedback saying that if my paragraph I removed under Roger McDowell was put up again, I should contact you! Is there any way I can permentaly take that off, as what was written is hear-say. It's the paragraph about the ATT BallPark Incident. Thanks!
1161:
We would further encourage all the readers to edit this article as per their knowledge. They may use the internet or the links we have referred to while writing. The article was nominated for deletion after which it was fundamentally rewritten to match Wikipedian standards.
3698:
Hello Yunshui, If you have any spare time, I would love if you would weigh in on a discussion on my page about official links and the "External links" section, since you were one of the people who removed official Facebook, Twitter, MySpace, and YouTube links. I am citing
2300:
ad homminem but rather an important piece of information when weighing the statements of various individuals who may or may not have agendas. To be truly ad homminem, an argument to person must rest solely on the attack and have no substance if the attack were removed.
1279:
discussion. The Article Rescue Squadron was notified, and as notifications to previous involved parties isn't normal practise, I and a few ARS members agreed that, in the interests of transparency and fairness, we should let everyone know...hence this talkpage message ;).
4526:
Also, whilst I'm flattered that you would replicate my message to you, I'd be grateful if you didn't try to pass my words off as your own - the text above was addressed specifically to you on your talkpage, and was not intended to be delivered to other users. Thanks,
1143:
1) It does not advocate any individual or organization. It talks about all the parties involved in making of the device. This includes NIF, Government of India and Manu Chopra. It does not credit a single individual but explains the entire process of development.
1498:
I've added the amended references (based from high traffic web sites and physical book). If you need more references, and suggestions, just ask me, I will give you all the information you may need. If possible, tried to leave the page the more concise possible.
4300:
I did not mean to badger anyone, just to express and make others aware of my frustration (I am probably not the only one with those issues). What should I do, if I cannot withdraw my comments? I thought of striking them all out but this takes a lot more time.
2615:
I think using the ole brain would see my edits were valid, anyways I don't care, I know this moran wont stop me "pirating" but instead will fuck up the irish economy unfortunately even Wiki cant understand this, and archive.org is a perfectly valid referance
1425:"(IvebeenlookingatdifferentversionsofthisarticleandmysourcesaregoodsoallIdoismakeminoreditsandupdatereleasedateswhichbythewayarecorrectasfarasmyinformationprovidessojustbecauseitsaccuratedontaccusepeople&envythemjustbcausetheytookthetimetoresearchit1st)" 556: 3391:
Yunshui, May I ask you advice about placing an image in my Knowledge article? I have written permission from the present owner of the image to use it. To whom should I turn to get clearance from Wiki? I would much appreciate your help. Many thanks
2284:
Knowledge acknowledges the problem of bias. You can say you are unbiased, but Atheism is, in fact a bias. You may or may not be able to overlook it, but again... I don't have time to go through this with you as it is relatively unimportant. As for
3796:
were purely cosmetic - bringing the spelling and language in line with Knowledge norms, fixing a few punctuation errors and removing some duplicated information. If I inadvertently introduced any factual errors I apologise; please feel free to fix
4453:
the (admittedly vast) range of policies and guidelines which govern all these different areas. I'd hate to see someone who clearly has a lot to contribute getting dispirited by a barrage of criticism, so I thought I'd draw your attention to the
4243:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
3110:
I joined yesterday because I saw inaccuracies in the biography of Tony Anthony Evangelist. i edited the page with my comments and they have been removed. i do not understand why. How can I edit and make sure that they are not removed ?
2583:
Is wikipedia pro or anti sopa, because I'm confused. I actually thought wikipedia would be interested in knowing a TD in Ireland trying to bring in sopa like censorship and who himself breached copyright would be interesting, obviously not,
3755:
attempt to document or provide links to every part of the subject's web presence or provide readers with a handy list of all social networking sites." I didn't know about whitelisting or the workings of an XLinkBot override, so thank you.
2499:
is the one you need to concern yourself with - after Game-Debate has been shown to be notable, you can then worry about verifying the information. Notability, being the criterion for entry into Knowledge, is the fisrt thing to deal with.
3800:
The article does need more sources, which should be included as inline citations - I don't know enough about the field of microscopy to track them down myself, I'm afraid. To create an inline citation, place the wikicode tags <ref:
508:
Thanks for the advice, will try OTRS. I was going to suggest that the subject e-mail them directly but he doesn't know how to use Knowledge, hence why he has been e-mailing me about issues with his article rather than edit it himself.
1392:, were based around expanding the release dates of the game to show as many countries' release dates as he count find. While most articles would list notable regions like North America; Japan; Australia and the EU, this user included 1147:
2)It does not contain any original research. The research conducted is free to anyone to edit as it has been declared open source by NIF. Knowledge is an open community and we want the help of all the readers to improve this device.
1098: 1673:. If an incident has been reported in reliable sources, it does, I'm afraid, belong here. I will, however, have a word with the editor who called your edits vandalism; they were not, and should not have been labelled as such. 1173:, so I'm going to remove the speedy tag and rewrite the article based on those, to bring it in line with Knowledge standards. This will probably entail the removal and re-writing of most of your work, just to forewarn you. 1085:, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read 4356:
Thanks for responding so promptly. I did not realize when I first made my comments that they come across as badgering other participants. I wanted to rectify this by simply removing my comments. Yes, I thought of putting
4247:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. –
4324:) request that editors use markup or placeholders to show that they want their comments disregarded. Just go through the page and find your comments (you've had to do this to delete them anyway) and enclose them with 3252:, not extrapolate information from them. (For example, the court documents may refer to Anthony as a Cypriot national, but that does not necessarily support the claim that he was not a bodyguard whilst living there.) 3141:
article is a personal bugbear of mine - as you're probably aware, he is widely regarded as a fraud in the martial arts community (and having read his book, it's easy to see why). Unfortunately, there are no
647:
Your probably right, I just hate to see people take advantage of Knowledge like this, they start something and then someone else has to try to make it worthwhile. It takes a lot of time to fix messes like
1225:
that as well; have a think about the areas you'd like to get involved with (article creation, anti-vandalism, copyediting, finding sources, specialist subjects and so on) and I'll tell you what I know.
3157:, for example). That these publications evidently take their information directly from Anthony's own account or from his press offices is, unfortunately, not sufficiently provable to discount them. 1555:; this again means it can't be used to pass the notability guidelines. The book I'm not sure about - I can't access the sample content on my computer, but although it looks like a reliable source ( 1547:, but says virtually nothing about Realtech - again, it's great for verifibility, but the coverage is a passing mention and so doesn't demonstrate notability. Slashdot is not usually regarded as a 660: 609: 3519:
and leave us some feedback about what you think about the new versions of the templates we tested (there are links to the templates), that would be very useful. (You can also email me at swalling
1646:, anything contentious (which these statements certainly are) must be sourced. However, other editors have since put in citations in which support the statements made. The text looks to me to be 1104: 625:
are fulfilled, and none of the articles would have passed the bar. The PROD process should take care of them, and it provides a bit of time for the articles to be improved, if that's possible.
1099: 3792:
Hi Kalyan. Sorry for the late response - you had posted this message at the very top of my discussion page, and since new messages usually go at the bottom, I hadn't spotted it. My edits to
110:
and also my apologies; I will go back and revert my own edit. However, this article and others are getting seriously disrupted as a result of these edit wars. I'm going to file a report at
1465:, which is for definite vandalism, and messy though the edit looked, it didn't seem to me to be clear-cut. Your diligence in investigating more thoroughly is to be commended; good stuff! 3419:
for use on Knowledge. Assuming that the copyright holder is happy to release their content in this way (either by posting a CC-BY-SA notice at the image's original source, by e-mailing
1077: 1046: 744:
there was something wiki-ish that I planned on doing today! Thank you for the reminder; this is going straight on my To Do list so's I don't forget again. Apologies for my rubbishness.
2534:
Yes, I'm pretty sure. The fact that they are partnered with Game-Debate creates an inherent conflict of interest, which makes them unreliable (even if only theoretically). Two essays:
1151:
3) The article is not written by creators of the device. We are mere sympathizers who felt to write on a few innovations happening in our country and letting the world know about it.
1102:. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit 2296:
This is a sidetrack, and I actually do apologize for initiating it despite the fact that I think (as in legal precedings) admitted and known bias of a witness or expert is actually
2253:? Kinda personal, dontcha think? Were I you, I would strike that entire statement as a demonstration of good faith and a willingness to contribute constructively to the discussion. 4726:
and teaching other wikipedians how to do this for other wikiprojects/deletion discussions. Looks like your efforts are already bearing fruit and new contributions are coming in to
2691: 2518:
Thank you for your reply. Hum..but they are independent entities. They just have affiliated with Game-Debate. You sure that doesn't count? Aren't they considered a third party?
3150:, but since this has only been published as a forum discussion we can't use it on Knowledge to verify the information. (Forum postings are not regarded as reliable sources.) 257: 180: 192: 4206: 2410:
considered an employee. I just thought we have grown enough to deserve a wikipedia page. Hell it's on the 20k top world-wide at Alexa. It's gotta count to something, no?
94:
So you're rewarding trolls for editing material previously approved by consensus without using the talk page first? And you spam my talk page with garbage? Shame on you!
2452:. Alexa is just a rankings engine - a high ranking on Alexa is evidence of popularity, but since it says nothing about Game-Debate beyond its ranking it doesn't provide 188: 4523:
Yasht, Ottawahitech's been with the project since 2007 (even longer than I have) and has over 5000 edits to his name. Adopt-a-user isn't likely to be of much interest.
4157: 4141: 3777:
probe microscopy,which has its own special importance. i would be if you allow me to update fully. any clarifications you need ,you are always welcome in my talk page.
3644: 3628: 3337: 3321: 3013: 2779: 2763: 2709:
Well, we do both have an "h" in our username - bit of a giveaway, really. We should have been more cunning. Or you should. Or I should. Hell, I'm really confused now.
2304:
You seem like a reasonable enough chap, and without the benefit of body language or tone, I realize that I have come off considerably more aggressive than I intended.
1868: 1852: 1484: 987: 971: 817: 801: 297: 281: 4260: 4602:
Oh, I'm not angry. Sorry if I came across as such. (By the way, I don't know if the pun was intended, but I love the idea of an Unambitious Copyright Infringement!)
4240: 4165: 4133: 3652: 3620: 3345: 2787: 2755: 2221:
Apatheist might be able to put aside their disdain, but most of the hardcore Atheists I know would better recuse themselves from any serious argument about Theism.
1876: 995: 825: 305: 1405:
computer pasted there some months earlier. This is evident by the amount of content reverted to older, cluttered forms that had been cleaned up before his editing.
4149: 3636: 3329: 2771: 2662: 1860: 979: 809: 289: 4001:
I hav seen u work since i joined this community. U r realy amazing editor n i'd luv 2 c u as a admin 1 day. So.. This barnstar for ur all-round contributions! :D
4125: 1844: 785: 1137:
This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (your reason here) --InnovationsIndia (talk) 07:44, 27 January 2012 (UTC) Respected Knowledge Community,
4297:
after being advised by a wiki-admin that I was badgering other Wikipedians. I hope my posting this comment on your talk page is not another type of violation.
4117: 3612: 3604: 3297: 3289: 2739: 1824: 955: 793: 777: 541:
went to ANI and was sorted so quickly I hadn't even realised what had gone on, as I was away over the weekend! Thanks for the Barnstar also, much appreciated.
265: 2833:
Accusing me of being a sockpuppet is not very nice, I challenge you to a game of go in order to decide who is right. Name a time and place and I'll be there.
522:
My pleasure - never nice when folk start threatening lawyers and the like, especially if it's in private emails. I hope it's not causing you too much bother.
4316:
Hi Ottawahitech. Technically, deleting your own comments isn't strictly forbidden, but it's very, very strongly discouraged. In a threaded conversation like
2519: 2429: 2411: 2681: 1165:
We assure the community that the article is notable to be here , neutral , does not contain original research and deserves a single article out of billions
4719: 4665: 4579: 4480: 4085: 4009: 3958: 3937: 2653: 2199: 2165: 1611: 1592: 573: 3516: 3305: 3240:; do you know if the records themselves are available in the public domain? Even if they're behind a paywall, they would still count for the purposes of 2747: 1832: 1169:
As it stands, the article is in terrible shape - laden with advertising-style copy and original research. However, the sources do just about scrape past
963: 273: 111: 95: 3547:
Thanks for the comments Yunshui. If you want, I can keep you updated on any further tests or revisions proposed to current notifications. Best regards,
2439: 666: 3458:
you got it - a caption. Helpfully, using the Commons uploader will automatically create the above text string for you, so you can just copy and paste.
2596:; you'd have to conduct a survey to check, though. I've posted a note on your talkpage regarding your edits; please read the policies I've linked to. 3883: 3876: 3874: 3168:, partly because of the dangers of libel. Anything remotely contentious which hasn't been reported in a reliable source should not be in the article. 2211: 638: 3559: 3313: 2448:
Hi Pip. I'm afraid these aren't enough, per my post at your talk page. Chillblast and GamersGate are both partnered with Game-Debate, and thus not
1642:
Hi Truth2Be. Well... this is awkward... Thing is, when I first took a look at your edits, the sections you were removing didn't have sources - per
577: 4279: 2873: 4656: 4570: 4471: 4461: 4078: 4002: 3951: 3210: 3122: 2649: 2316: 2230: 2195: 2161: 1704: 1627: 1607: 565: 2566: 2529: 2513: 4498: 3401: 495: 484: 444: 433: 4739: 4421: 4395: 4372: 4347: 3868: 3585: 1264: 548: 535: 426: 386: 127: 3899: 2308: 2250: 2222: 1276: 757: 4126:
Gender gap and conflict aversion; collaboration on breaking news; effects of leadership on participation; legacy of Public Policy Initiative
2136: 2122: 1954: 1803: 1781: 1763: 1519: 617:
I do tend to agree, believe me. However, article brevity isn't in itself a reason for deletion (except where it's so brief as to fall under
4652:
Actually, yes! It was intented otherwise why would I use ur text again in ur TP. I hav crammed all the CSDs as i love new page patrolling.
4317: 4294: 3944: 3764: 3498: 3484: 3386: 3072: 1599: 1573: 1315: 468: 467:
Hi Stephen, very considerate of you to let me know. I saw that you also blocked the offending user, good call! I've commended your work on
153: 4683: 4615: 4597: 4540: 4199: 3747: 3686: 3379: 3272: 3188: 2821: 2203: 2189: 1697: 4723: 4310: 3888:
A claim of being the 8th richest person in a country is sufficient to null an A7 - it may not be a true claim, that's a different issue..
2895: 2396: 2382: 2109:
Sorry about that; seems to be some sort of glitch with the Wikilove popup. I hope you don't mind that I reduced it back to just the one!
1910: 1478: 1393: 1235: 1029: 859: 339: 222: 3436:
will take you to their Upload Wizard, which is really straightforward to use. Alternatively, you can upload to Knowledge by filling out
2339: 2266: 708: 3723: 3118:
Forgive me if I get any of the technicalities of using this site wrong !!! I grew up with pen and paper, even chalk and blackboards !!
3065: 3058: 2722: 2067: 2014: 557: 4266:
Thanks Fayenatic - already found it on my watchlist and !voted whilst you were posting this! (Congrats on your recent adminship, BTW)
3146:
that actually state this - the main focus (on the internet, at least) of criticism is the thorough research carried out by members of
2637: 2609: 2487:
information. We have two seperate policies which govern the use of sources (okay, actually we have loads, but these are the BIG TWO):
719:
Hiya! I'm probably being a pest, but I was wondering if you'd had a chance to check into the sources that were being discussed on the
4229: 202: 3918: 461: 403: 367: 1086: 174: 103: 1444: 673: 585: 561: 4293:
I see that I managed to do something that is forbidden at Knowledge. All I was trying to do was remove all my OWN comments from
2101: 2087: 1743: 4186: 4106: 3673: 3593: 3366: 3278: 2925: 2808: 2728: 2421: 1897: 1134: 1042: 1016: 846: 326: 195:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 4025: 3693: 3032:
if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the
2842: 2578: 1813: 1723:
Hey there, I saw you listed on the Editor Assistance page. Well, I need some assistance in regards to a content dispute here
944: 763: 246: 198: 516: 3225:
That's a tricky one. I'm not sure how acceptable these would be. Might I suggest that you start a discussion either on the
2169: 918: 3541: 1417: 1389: 1370: 1212: 939: 4285: 3218: 2982: 2703: 889: 689: 4412:
Thanks again. I am greatly relieved that I have not done anything that could potentially get me blocked from Knowledge
4363:(and one boo-boo that I tried to rectify but then saw your reversion) I completed the removal of my comments manually. 3097: 2672:
way I see it, this is just trivial info and it has no real impact on the overall gameplay experience for the end user.
1154:
4) It contains adequate references to prove that the information contained is genuine not exaggerated/ underestimated.
3259:
before putting them into the article; that way you can ensure the consensus is on your side and avoid another revert.
3130: 2046: 1931: 1186: 2788:
October's coding challenge: results now in; progress on 1.19 steady; and why for a while interwiki links were no more
826:
ArticleFeedback moves into new trial phase; and how MediaWiki integrates with Facebook, IPv6, and PostgreSQL explored
733: 3974: 2363: 3793: 3786: 3407:
Hi Scríobhaí. The basic requirement for images on Knowledge is that they be released under a free license (such as
1615: 1409: 1374: 1321: 448: 354:
Could you please move your comment to the Pizza Hut one? I'm putting all these userboxes into the same MfD. Cheers,
2960: 2351: 1712: 1635: 169: 1985: 1515: 2657: 241: 89: 4674: 4588: 4489: 4101: 4094: 4018: 3967: 3408: 3256: 3230: 2903: 346: 4654:
This is my last edit and now next will be on 19th March as my exams are starting from 6th. Till then Good bye!
3714:
Nothing urgent or that important, so just if you have time and find the discussion interesting... thanks! --
3202:
Thank you for your comments they were helpful. By the way, my motiva tion is only in estsablishing the truth.
2860:
under the same username. I'm not convinced that beating me over the goban will sway the SPI decision, though.
1292: 4611: 4536: 4391: 4378:
comments (and personally I've seen far worse; you might have gotten a bit heated but you've steered clear of
4343: 4275: 3914: 3864: 3743: 3581: 3480: 3268: 3184: 2956: 2891: 2869: 2718: 2633: 2605: 2562: 2539: 2535: 2509: 2378: 2335: 2262: 2185: 2118: 2063: 2010: 1950: 1799: 1759: 1693: 1569: 1474: 1311: 1260: 1182: 935: 753: 704: 656: 634: 605: 531: 480: 432: 422: 382: 123: 3255:
With a potentially problematic edit like this, I would definitely suggest positing your proposed changes on
2879: 2648:
Thank you soo much for the barnstar... Its my first barnstar n feel relly good about it. Thanks again! :D --
1413: 1330:", appears to be a sockpuppet account of an indefinitely-blocked user, who was active in early-to-mid 2009. 4175: 3662: 3433: 3355: 2797: 2073: 1886: 1718: 1005: 835: 315: 3153:
There are, however, a number of article backing his claims in what would be regarded as reliable sources (
2966: 2935:
I sent you a thank you but I am not sure that I an facile enough to have actually sent it. Did you get it?
2686: 1361:" - active in July and August 2009. (again, notice the all-caps and insertion of "X" at the start and end) 4444: 3979: 2042: 1981: 1845:
Language analyses examine power structure and political slant; Knowledge compared to commercial databases
1429: 1062: 81: 76: 71: 59: 1750:
consensus. Which other editor are you referring to, and what's the exact nature of the content dispute?
1373:. Under this account the user received quite a lot of comment from users (myself, included), but simply 4257: 3468: 3175:
I hope this helps explain a little bit, if you need a bit more clarification, please feel free to ask.
3033: 3019: 2838: 1385: 1366: 1130: 1118: 38: 4233: 4224: 4208: 4181: 4058: 4050: 3668: 3361: 3138: 2803: 2593: 2350:
Quick reminder: Reversions of BLP-violating material are exempt from 3RR. (You erroneously warned me
2146: 1892: 1458:
you should do so. The similarities in edits, usernames and edit summaries should be more than enough.
1011: 894: 884: 841: 321: 3432:
First up, you need to make the image available. The easiest way to do this is to add it to Commons;
1435:
So, summarising; do you think this is enough evidence to report the user as a sockpuppet account?--
455:. I have moved the article out of mainspace into a user area for GSorby, and courtesy blanked it. 4334:
Why is it that you want to remove your comments anyway? You didn't specify in your edit summaries.
4048:
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can
3494: 3412: 3397: 3233:
so that other editors can weigh in with their opinions? Where is the press cutting originally from?
3003: 2994: 2525: 2435: 2417: 1527:
Hi Execom rt. Whilst your efforts are appreciated, I'm afraid none of these suffice to pass either
1397: 1354:" - active from January to May 2009 (notice the all-caps and insertion of "X" at the start and end) 1114: 665: 652: 601: 165: 146: 139: 3346:
January sees prototype new geodata API; but February looks to be a testing time for top developers
3511:
Hi Yunshui. Awhile back you got either an AfD or PROD notification, and it was during one of the
3088: 2492: 2404: 2020: 1734:, the other editor doesn't share that view and is being uncivil, so I figured I'd run it by you. 1275:
A notification that the Templates for Discussion discussion (oy, repetition) has been taken to a
1122: 2054:
I'm sorry, but your comment doesn't seem to make any sense. To which article are you referring?
1234:- over the weekend, why not have a go at creating an article about something (my userspace page 232:
Many thanks for the barnstar. It's always great to hear that my work is appreciated. Cheers -
4735: 4417: 4368: 4306: 3782: 3553: 3535: 3194: 3042: 1681: 1560:
it stands, though, there still isn't anything here that would convince me to keep the article.
1337: 1208: 677: 545: 513: 503: 398: 362: 99: 4569:
Dont get angry. I m sorry. I wouldnt do it again. It was Unambitious Copy Right Infragement!!
2975: 1535:. Realtech's own website is not an independent source, so, whilst it can be used sparingly to 1423:
Reading the edit summaries of the new account, "XAGENTXVECTORX", which can be translated from
4249: 2987: 2834: 2286: 2242: 1283:
If anyone has an issue with me sending these out, do drop me a note on my talkpage. Regards,
1126: 1036: 729: 2748:
Leading scholar hails Knowledge, historians urged to contribute while PR pros remain shunned
909:
To go with the tea you got some weeks back :)....and for finding the speedback dashboard ;)
4382:- Wikipedians, especially those who participate at AfD, tend to be pretty thick skinned!). 4195: 3700: 3682: 3506: 3375: 3102: 2817: 2677: 2496: 2488: 2132: 2097: 2083: 2030: 1969: 1938: 1927: 1906: 1777: 1739: 1503: 1239: 1192: 1025: 872: 855: 335: 3338:
Betacommand 3 closed, proposed decision in Civility enforcement, AUSC candidates announced
3023: 1140:
May we have the extreme privilege to explain why the above article should not be deleted,
8: 3490: 3393: 2853: 2828: 2345: 1677: 1511: 1327: 1288: 794:
WMF on the looming SOPA blackout, Knowledge turns 11, and Commons passes 12 million files
161: 2756:
Discussion swarms around Templates for deletion and returning editors of colourful pasts
1786:
That makes more sense. I've looked over the issues and I agree that it's pretty obvious
1676:
One final point: don't keep reverting the information. You can open a discussion on the
1242:
for the basics of Wiki markup, which is useful to learn a bit about, and read up on the
3930: 3924: 3760: 3731: 3719: 3445:
Once the file is uploaded, you can use it to your article by adding the following text:
3214: 3126: 3083: 3029: 3010:
designs took both first and second place in a contest to design Christchurch Town Hall?
2905: 1960: 1917: 1708: 1631: 1585: 1462: 1358: 1344: 914: 491: 457: 1082: 1081:, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge. This has been done under the 4731: 4607: 4532: 4413: 4387: 4364: 4339: 4302: 4271: 3910: 3860: 3778: 3739: 3708: 3577: 3549: 3531: 3476: 3424: 3264: 3180: 2952: 2940: 2930: 2887: 2865: 2714: 2629: 2601: 2558: 2505: 2392: 2374: 2359: 2331: 2289:
poor grasp of English, he says it himself on his User Page, and I said nothing about
2258: 2181: 2114: 2059: 2006: 1946: 1795: 1755: 1689: 1579: 1565: 1470: 1440: 1307: 1256: 1204: 1178: 931: 749: 700: 630: 542: 527: 510: 476: 418: 395: 378: 359: 237: 218: 209:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
119: 47: 17: 680:
I have restored it, and now notify you in case you wish to take it to AfD. Regards,
4321: 3512: 3052: 2312: 2226: 2158:
Just wanted to try a new thing on wikipedia.. Hope u dont mind. Its relly cute! ;)
1620: 1125:. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. 725: 714: 685: 622: 2326:
theistic topics than someone who does. Hatchet buried, let's not dig it up again.
1825:
Update on Global Development, Knowledge Day NYC is a success, JFK audio on Commons
1061:
You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the
4454: 4191: 3882:
Hello Yunshui. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of
3678: 3645:
Civility enforcement closed, proposed decision in TimidGuy, two cases remain open
3563:
P.S. If you're ever looking for a new Go opponent, I play on OGS at about 12 kyu.
3464: 3371: 2813: 2699: 2673: 2290: 2280:
I may well strike the statement, as I don't have time to squabble with you. But
2246: 2128: 2093: 2079: 2038: 1977: 1923: 1902: 1787: 1773: 1735: 1670: 1552: 1381: 1351: 1021: 988:
Four open cases, proposed decision in Muhammad images, AUSC call for applications
866: 851: 410: 331: 227: 3895: 3812:
Yunshui; ''Information about Knowledge'', Madeup Publications, 2007</ref: -->
3016:.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page 2545:
If you feel there's a case to be made for these sources meeting the criteria of
1096:
If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising,
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
2668: 2643: 2322: 2238: 1647: 1556: 1507: 1451: 1284: 1231: 1090: 569: 306:
December in more detail; and why the MediaWiki codebase was "slushed" this week
4150:
By plane, by ship, and by stagecoach: Featured content goes trekking this week
3653:
Major strands of development cycle coalesce as 1.19 is deployed to first wikis
2780:
Four open cases, final decision in Muhammad images, Betacommand 3 near closure
4379: 4033: 3771: 3756: 3715: 3704: 3226: 3165: 2550: 2546: 2461: 2457: 1922:
Yunshui, I couldn't find a thing on the page where the discussion should be.
1643: 1532: 1528: 1455: 1365:
At the start, in mid-2008, PaPiRiCoSuAvE made numerous, unnecessary edits on
1170: 910: 1539:
information (which is how you've used it), it doesn't contribute to proving
4603: 4528: 4383: 4335: 4267: 4068: 3906: 3886:, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: 3856: 3735: 3573: 3472: 3260: 3245: 3237: 3176: 3143: 2948: 2936: 2918: 2883: 2861: 2710: 2625: 2621: 2597: 2554: 2501: 2388: 2370: 2355: 2327: 2254: 2177: 2110: 2055: 2002: 1998: 1942: 1791: 1751: 1731: 1685: 1659: 1561: 1548: 1466: 1436: 1303: 1252: 1243: 1174: 927: 745: 696: 626: 618: 523: 472: 414: 374: 233: 214: 210: 115: 4727: 4464:
or any other adoptor, whichever you like can help you in becoming better.
3988: 3241: 3161: 2484: 1994: 1727: 1666: 1540: 1536: 1270: 681: 452: 2624:. For the purposes of supporting your statement, archive.org isn't one. 818:
Four open cases, Betacommand case deadlocked, Muhammad images close near
3172:
becuase no-one has come forth and published an opinion to the contrary.
2695: 2034: 1973: 1246:- that will give you a good grounding in what the project is all about. 720: 589: 133: 3891: 2947:
You are most welcome. Let me know if you need any help in the future.
2127::-) It played out like you had a lot of barnstars for me. I'm proud! 2585: 2553:, which enables other editors to discuss the matter more thoroughly. 2217:
through your contributions, and it is irrelevant to the discussion.
184: 2464:(the two guidelines which are relevent), you need sources which are 1428:
the time to research it first", I find it surprisingly familiar. At
1113:
article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any
903: 2151: 1877:
Why "Lua" is on everybody's lips, and when to expect MediaWiki 1.19
581: 258:
2011's technological achievements in review, and what 2012 may hold
1680:, but repeatedly removing the text will get you into trouble for 1401: 4467:
This is just a suggestion, not a demand, so take it or leave it!
1450:
Enough evidence? You've done an excellent job listening out for
3046: 1662:. As a result, I think that paragraph is going to have to stay. 1412:, which he used as an excuse to vandalise articles, as well as 672:
Hi. You PRODded this, and it was deleted,. Undeletion has been
274:
Knowledge ends annual fundraising drive; Monmouthpedia launches
1371:
replacing instances of the word "PC" with "Personal Computer"
447:. Just to let you know that the article was restored at the 4158:
Final decision in TimidGuy ban appeal, one case remains open
4118:
Finance meeting fallout, Gardner recommendations forthcoming
3947:
at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
3489:
Many thanks, Yunshui, I'll study and then try. Best regards
3463:
Hope that helps; more thorough instructions can be found at
3306:
Scholars and spindoctors contend with the emergent wikiorder
3075:
at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
2999:, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was 1724: 1602:
at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
1251:
I'm looking forward to collaborating with you! Best wishes,
980:
Interview with Muhammad Mahdi Karim and the best of the week
373:
Duely done; very considerate of you to let me know. Thanks!
156:
at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
4166:
1.19 deployment stress, Meta debates whether to enforce SUL
3621:
Discussion on copyrighted files from non-US relation states
3298:
Foundation launches Legal and Community Advocacy department
3147: 2857: 4241:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Tony Anthony (evangelist)
4045:
Hello, Yunshui. Please check your email; you've got mail!
3014:
Template:Did you know nominations/Joseph Clarkson Maddison
1869:
Five open cases, voting on proposed decisions in two cases
1769: 4142:
Just don't call it "sci-fi": WikiProject Science Fiction
2281: 1108:
to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for
4222:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
3314:
Skirmishes in the 'great sectarian war of the Internet'
3290:
Fundraising proposals spark a furore among the chapters
2667:
I'm engaged in a content dispute with an editor on the
1790:; I've reverted and explained on the article talkpage. 183:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 964:
World watched as Knowledge shut down for SOPA blackout
3613:
Fundraiser row continues, new director of engineering
3071:
Message added 04:22, 12 February 2012 (UTC). You can
1493: 1486: 114:
shortly, I'll let you know when it's up for comment.
4228:
is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to
3012:
The nomination discussion and review may be seen at
2764:
The Eye of the Storm: WikiProject Tropical Cyclones
298:
Four open cases, proposed decision in Betacommand 3
2852:The issue would be more appropriately resolved by 1333:The user operated under the following identities: 1238:will hopefully help you to start). Have a look at 996:Looking ahead to MediaWiki 1.19 and related issues 282:From Traditional to Experimental: WikiProject Jazz 2307:Let us bury this hatchet and move on. Be well. 392:Re:Silly KFC page. Haha, it was just a joke :) -- 2663:Content dispute - Need your perspective... again 724:redirecting her book titles to an entry for her. 2542:cover the reasoning behind this in more detail. 1454:here; if you haven't already filed a report at 1302:the close, and have !voted at DRV accordingly. 1298:Thanks for the notification. For the record, I 1230:The easiest way to learn about Knowledge is to 2740:The Foundation visits Tunisia, analyzes donors 1837:, editor engagement and the innovation plateau 3236:The court records would certainly hold up as 413:was intended to be a little tongue in cheek. 4724:Knowledge: Articles for deletion/Foot hockey 4295:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Ray Siderius 3811:All information should be cited.<ref: --> 4134:Focus on admin conduct and editor retention 3137:Hi Roundhse, and welcome to Knowledge. The 1768:I goofed that up, that was the wrong link. 3936:Hello, Yunshui. You have new messages at 3064:Hello, Yunshui. You have new messages at 2856:than by go, but if you want a game I'm on 1965:PLSS DONT DELETE LOG FOR ARKO R. PEREIRA 1591:Hello, Yunshui. You have new messages at 810:Lecen on systemic bias in featured content 778:English Knowledge to go dark on January 18 145:Hello, Yunshui. You have new messages at 3905:Fair enough; thanks for letting me know. 2991:was updated with a fact from the article 2594:the majority of Wikipedians are anti-SOPA 2212:Removed the questionable part of the post 972:The Golden Horseshoe: WikiProject Toronto 3244:. However, you would need to be wary of 1492:Hello; Regarding the edit of the page : 1087:the general criteria for speedy deletion 290:Contentious FAC debate: a week in review 3515:project's experiments. If you could go 3115:part of the biography is ficticious. 1543:. The IGN article is a good source for 14: 2282:http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:BIAS 1461:I reverted my revert because I'd used 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 3605:The plight of the new page patrollers 2620:We don't use "the ole brain", we use 1347:" - active from May 2008 to June 2009 160:Thank you! (That was very kind.) Ok, 4049: 3529:wikimedia.org if you want.) Thanks! 3387:Clearance for image for Wiki article 2970: 2772:Talking architecture with MrPanyGoff 2001:, that it does, it will be deleted. 1853:Digging Up WikiProject Palaeontology 1418:bullied other users via edit summary 1089:, particularly item G11, as well as 25: 4230:Knowledge's policies and guidelines 3160:Knowledge's policy is to report on 2456:coverage. Remember, to pass either 1997:. Unless you can demonstrate, with 1833:Zambian wiki-assassins, Foundation 1494:http://en.wikipedia.org/Realtech_VR 1487:http://en.wikipedia.org/Realtech_VR 1408:It was as XMORPHEUSX that the user 1121:to ensure that the article will be 409:I figured as much; my reference to 23: 4038: 3929: 3855:Let me know if you need any help. 3066:Wikipedia_talk:New_editor_feedback 3057: 2495:. People often get them confused. 2428:grey layout..that doesn't count?! 2150: 1861:Featured content soaring this week 1584: 1051: 695:Hi John, thanks for the heads-up. 138: 24: 4763: 4239:The article will be discussed at 3827:All information should be cited. 3803:on either side; thus typing this: 3711:to be able to keep those links. 3465:the style guidelines for pictures 3227:Reliable sources discussion board 1384:", made excessive alterations to 1078:Anti Molestation Device For Women 1047:Anti Molestation Device For Women 956:SOPA blackout, Orange partnership 597:is making a mockery of Knowledge. 489:That's very kind of you, thanks! 4215: 3987: 3794:Atomic force acoustic microscopy 3522: 3250:only report what the sources say 3049:) 00:28, 12 February 2012 (UTC) 2974: 2967:DYK for Joseph Clarkson Maddison 2551:the Reliable sources noticeboard 2549:you could start a discussion at 1200:I would gladly take your offer! 1105:the article's talk page directly 1097: 902: 266:Fundraiser 2011 ends with a bang 175:Disambiguation link notification 29: 786:What are our sisters up to now? 443:Thanks for your vigilance with 3838: 3471:. Let me know how you get on. 3084: 2694:Perma-bans for both of us? -- 1993:The article does not meet our 13: 1: 4422:17:58, 29 February 2012 (UTC) 4396:14:18, 29 February 2012 (UTC) 4373:14:07, 29 February 2012 (UTC) 4348:13:44, 29 February 2012 (UTC) 4311:13:31, 29 February 2012 (UTC) 4200:02:32, 28 February 2012 (UTC) 4102:18:11, 26 February 2012 (UTC) 4026:06:47, 25 February 2012 (UTC) 3975:06:51, 24 February 2012 (UTC) 3919:11:07, 22 February 2012 (UTC) 3900:11:01, 22 February 2012 (UTC) 3869:08:42, 21 February 2012 (UTC) 3787:18:43, 17 February 2012 (UTC) 3765:19:44, 21 February 2012 (UTC) 3748:08:32, 21 February 2012 (UTC) 3724:03:41, 21 February 2012 (UTC) 3694:Question about official links 3687:00:34, 21 February 2012 (UTC) 3586:22:50, 18 February 2012 (UTC) 3560:18:58, 17 February 2012 (UTC) 3542:01:04, 17 February 2012 (UTC) 3499:22:55, 15 February 2012 (UTC) 3485:22:28, 15 February 2012 (UTC) 3402:21:17, 15 February 2012 (UTC) 3380:04:25, 15 February 2012 (UTC) 3273:13:06, 14 February 2012 (UTC) 3219:12:49, 14 February 2012 (UTC) 3189:08:40, 14 February 2012 (UTC) 3131:07:34, 13 February 2012 (UTC) 3098:04:22, 12 February 2012 (UTC) 3089: 2961:20:12, 10 February 2012 (UTC) 2579:Is wikipedia pro or anti sopa 2540:Knowledge:Third-party sources 2536:Knowledge:Independent sources 2530:12:53, 02 February 2012 (UTC) 2440:11:59, 02 February 2012 (UTC) 2422:11:56, 02 February 2012 (UTC) 1726:. To me it's a clear case of 1660:criteria for reliable sources 179:Hi. When you recently edited 4054:at any time by removing the 3421:permissions-en@wikimedia.org 3166:biographies of living people 3080: 2926:12:56, 9 February 2012 (UTC) 2896:15:10, 8 February 2012 (UTC) 2874:10:17, 8 February 2012 (UTC) 2843:10:06, 8 February 2012 (UTC) 2822:00:51, 8 February 2012 (UTC) 2723:22:46, 6 February 2012 (UTC) 2704:00:17, 6 February 2012 (UTC) 2682:17:50, 5 February 2012 (UTC) 2658:10:15, 3 February 2012 (UTC) 2638:00:39, 3 February 2012 (UTC) 2610:00:33, 3 February 2012 (UTC) 2567:13:04, 2 February 2012 (UTC) 2514:12:05, 2 February 2012 (UTC) 2397:15:16, 1 February 2012 (UTC) 2383:15:15, 1 February 2012 (UTC) 2364:15:12, 1 February 2012 (UTC) 2340:13:46, 1 February 2012 (UTC) 2317:13:42, 1 February 2012 (UTC) 2267:13:29, 1 February 2012 (UTC) 2231:13:21, 1 February 2012 (UTC) 2204:15:26, 1 February 2012 (UTC) 2190:07:39, 1 February 2012 (UTC) 2176:Much tastier than a cookie! 2170:01:31, 1 February 2012 (UTC) 2137:15:20, 31 January 2012 (UTC) 2123:15:17, 31 January 2012 (UTC) 2102:15:16, 31 January 2012 (UTC) 2088:15:15, 31 January 2012 (UTC) 2068:14:18, 31 January 2012 (UTC) 2047:14:16, 31 January 2012 (UTC) 2015:14:12, 31 January 2012 (UTC) 1986:14:10, 31 January 2012 (UTC) 1955:12:55, 31 January 2012 (UTC) 1932:12:52, 31 January 2012 (UTC) 1911:04:31, 31 January 2012 (UTC) 1804:00:47, 31 January 2012 (UTC) 1782:23:58, 30 January 2012 (UTC) 1764:23:54, 30 January 2012 (UTC) 1744:15:23, 30 January 2012 (UTC) 1713:21:46, 30 January 2012 (UTC) 1698:14:02, 30 January 2012 (UTC) 1636:13:47, 30 January 2012 (UTC) 1616:06:54, 30 January 2012 (UTC) 1574:22:02, 29 January 2012 (UTC) 1520:01:15, 29 January 2012 (UTC) 1479:21:48, 29 January 2012 (UTC) 1445:21:38, 28 January 2012 (UTC) 1380:The other notable account, " 1316:18:59, 28 January 2012 (UTC) 1293:10:25, 28 January 2012 (UTC) 1265:15:28, 27 January 2012 (UTC) 1213:15:16, 27 January 2012 (UTC) 1187:07:53, 27 January 2012 (UTC) 1135:07:46, 27 January 2012 (UTC) 1083:criteria for speedy deletion 1030:19:28, 26 January 2012 (UTC) 940:21:02, 26 January 2012 (UTC) 919:15:24, 26 January 2012 (UTC) 890:13:23, 26 January 2012 (UTC) 860:07:16, 17 January 2012 (UTC) 758:20:42, 16 January 2012 (UTC) 734:17:42, 16 January 2012 (UTC) 709:20:40, 16 January 2012 (UTC) 690:17:27, 16 January 2012 (UTC) 661:21:03, 13 January 2012 (UTC) 639:15:03, 13 January 2012 (UTC) 610:14:55, 13 January 2012 (UTC) 549:10:17, 13 January 2012 (UTC) 536:10:09, 13 January 2012 (UTC) 517:10:06, 13 January 2012 (UTC) 496:00:25, 12 January 2012 (UTC) 485:13:01, 11 January 2012 (UTC) 462:12:58, 11 January 2012 (UTC) 427:12:12, 10 January 2012 (UTC) 404:12:10, 10 January 2012 (UTC) 387:11:13, 10 January 2012 (UTC) 368:11:09, 10 January 2012 (UTC) 340:05:33, 10 January 2012 (UTC) 7: 4286:Your reversions of my edits 3848:, Madeup Publications, 2007 3846:Information about Knowledge 2237:article), I strive to edit 242:16:25, 7 January 2012 (UTC) 223:11:29, 7 January 2012 (UTC) 181:Baba Sharif Uddin Hyderabad 170:15:28, 5 January 2012 (UTC) 128:14:09, 5 January 2012 (UTC) 104:14:02, 5 January 2012 (UTC) 10: 4768: 4318:the discussion in question 4176:Read this Signpost in full 3875:Speedy deletion declined: 3663:Read this Signpost in full 3356:Read this Signpost in full 2849:unreserved apologies too.. 2798:Read this Signpost in full 1887:Read this Signpost in full 1386:Resident Evil (video game) 1367:Resident Evil (video game) 1006:Read this Signpost in full 836:Read this Signpost in full 316:Read this Signpost in full 147:Ihardlythinkso's talk page 4740:01:59, 4 March 2012 (UTC) 4718:Thanks for including the 4684:09:49, 2 March 2012 (UTC) 4616:09:45, 2 March 2012 (UTC) 4598:09:42, 2 March 2012 (UTC) 4541:09:35, 2 March 2012 (UTC) 4499:09:24, 2 March 2012 (UTC) 4280:13:10, 1 March 2012 (UTC) 4261:13:07, 1 March 2012 (UTC) 4225:Tony Anthony (evangelist) 4209:Tony Anthony (evangelist) 3986: 3523: 1644:our policy on biographies 1244:Five Pillars of Knowledge 1219:happy to help mentor you. 1075:A tag has been placed on 4232:or whether it should be 3413:Creative Commons license 3322:WikiProject Stub Sorting 3162:verifiability, not truth 3004:Joseph Clarkson Maddison 2995:Joseph Clarkson Maddison 1416:. Under this account he 1398:Turks and Caicos Islands 1322:Regarding XAGENTXVECTORX 678:WP:DEL#Proposed deletion 3034:Did you know? talk page 2092:Stopit!!! :-D :blush: 1652:San Francisco Chronicle 1650:, and the sources (the 256:Technological roadmap: 4043: 3934: 3454: 3423:or by uploading it to 3062: 2483:be used as a link for 2249:intellect in the same 2245:grasp of language and 2155: 1995:criteria for inclusion 1658:) definitely meet our 1589: 1553:user-generated content 1388:. The edits, as shown 1091:the guidelines on spam 1067: 1056: 674:requested at WP:REFUND 623:very specific criteria 469:your admin review page 347:Comment on userbox MfD 143: 4042: 3995:The Editor's Barnstar 3933: 3448: 3061: 2592:It would appear that 2154: 1588: 1158:as it's open source. 1059: 1055: 142: 42:of past discussions. 4455:Adopt-a-user Project 4156:Arbitration report: 4140:WikiProject report: 3938:Yasht101's talk page 3779:Kalyan Phani Makkuva 3643:Arbitration report: 3637:The best of the week 3627:WikiProject report: 3550:Steven Walling (WMF) 3532:Steven Walling (WMF) 3469:the picture tutorial 3427:) you're good to go. 3336:Arbitration report: 3330:The best of the week 3320:WikiProject report: 3257:the article talkpage 2778:Arbitration report: 2762:WikiProject report: 2074:A barnstar for me??? 1867:Arbitration report: 1851:WikiProject report: 1719:Need some assistance 1593:Yasht101's talk page 986:Arbitration report: 970:WikiProject report: 816:Arbitration report: 800:WikiProject report: 296:Arbitration report: 280:WikiProject report: 211:opt-out instructions 90:What's your problem? 4164:Technology report: 4132:Discussion report: 3980:A barnstar for you! 3820:will give you this: 3651:Technology report: 3619:Discussion report: 3344:Technology report: 2786:Technology report: 2754:Discussion report: 1875:Technology report: 1678:article's talk page 1665:Knowledge is about 994:Technology report: 824:Technology report: 653:Samuraiantiqueworld 602:Samuraiantiqueworld 304:Technology report: 193:fix with Dab solver 4720:WikiProject Canada 4148:Featured content: 4110:: 27 February 2012 4051:remove this notice 4044: 3945:remove this notice 3935: 3635:Featured content: 3629:WikiProject Poland 3597:: 20 February 2012 3328:Featured content: 3282:: 13 February 2012 3073:remove this notice 3063: 2906:Christina Rossetti 2770:Featured content: 2732:: 06 February 2012 2156: 1859:Featured content: 1772:'s the right one. 1600:remove this notice 1590: 1410:learned of the 3RR 1340:- known IP address 1057: 978:Featured content: 871:you're very kind! 808:Featured content: 574:Kakushi Buki Jutsu 288:Featured content: 201:• Join us at the 154:remove this notice 144: 4655: 4449:Hey Ottawahitech! 4445:talk page stalker 4124:Recent research: 4031: 4030: 3802:and </ref: --> 3564: 3425:Wikimedia Commons 3246:original research 3040: 3039: 3027: 2687:We've been outed! 2147:A kitten for you! 2050: 2033:comment added by 1989: 1972:comment added by 1843:Recent research: 1817:: 30 January 2012 1703:Okay, thank you. 1606:Happy Editing! -- 1523: 1506:comment added by 1426: 1117:from independent 948:: 23 January 2012 924: 923: 895:A cookie for you! 784:Sister projects: 767:: 16 January 2012 250:: 09 January 2012 206: 87: 86: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 18:User talk:Yunshui 4759: 4681: 4672: 4663: 4653: 4595: 4586: 4577: 4496: 4487: 4478: 4448: 4380:personal attacks 4361: 4328: 4255: 4219: 4218: 4116:News and notes: 4099: 4092: 4083: 4075: 4073: 4067: 4063: 4057: 4053: 4041: 4023: 4016: 4007: 3991: 3984: 3983: 3972: 3965: 3956: 3948: 3849: 3842: 3813: 3611:News and notes: 3603:Special report: 3562: 3558: 3556: 3540: 3538: 3528: 3527: 3526: 3525: 3513:template testing 3452: 3296:News and notes: 3288:Special report: 3238:reliable sources 3231:article talkpage 3144:reliable sources 3095: 3086: 3082: 3076: 3017: 3009: 2983:12 February 2012 2978: 2971: 2921: 2835:MichelleBlondeau 2738:News and notes: 2622:reliable sources 2493:WP:Verifiability 2387:No problem! :) 2049: 2027: 1999:reliable sources 1988: 1966: 1823:News and notes: 1603: 1522: 1500: 1424: 1127:InnovationsIndia 1119:reliable sources 1101: 1071: 1054: 954:News and notes: 906: 899: 898: 887: 881: 878: 875: 802:WikiProject Beer 792:News and notes: 776:Special report: 667:StylishandTrendy 402: 366: 264:News and notes: 196: 189:check to confirm 157: 68: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 4767: 4766: 4762: 4761: 4760: 4758: 4757: 4756: 4679: 4675: 4670: 4666: 4661: 4657: 4593: 4589: 4584: 4580: 4575: 4571: 4494: 4490: 4485: 4481: 4476: 4472: 4442: 4358: 4325: 4288: 4251: 4220: 4216: 4213: 4204: 4170: 4112: 4095: 4090: 4086: 4079: 4076: 4071: 4065: 4061: 4059:You've got mail 4055: 4047: 4039: 4036: 4019: 4014: 4010: 4003: 3982: 3968: 3963: 3959: 3952: 3949: 3942: 3927: 3884:Mbaakanyi david 3880: 3877:Mbaakanyi david 3852: 3843: 3839: 3810: 3774: 3696: 3691: 3657: 3599: 3554: 3548: 3536: 3530: 3521: 3520: 3509: 3450: 3389: 3384: 3350: 3284: 3197: 3105: 3093: 3077: 3070: 3055: 3043:The DYK project 3007: 2969: 2933: 2919: 2909: 2831: 2826: 2792: 2734: 2689: 2665: 2646: 2581: 2407: 2405:Help and Advice 2369:My bad, sorry. 2348: 2214: 2149: 2076: 2028: 2023: 2021:Arko R. Pereira 1967: 1963: 1920: 1915: 1881: 1819: 1721: 1648:neutral in tone 1623: 1604: 1597: 1582: 1549:reliable source 1501: 1490: 1485:Regarding page 1324: 1277:deletion review 1273: 1195: 1073: 1069: 1052: 1050: 1043:Speedy deletion 1039: 1034: 1000: 950: 897: 885: 879: 876: 873: 869: 864: 830: 769: 717: 670: 593: 506: 438: 393: 357: 349: 344: 310: 252: 230: 203:DPL WikiProject 177: 158: 151: 136: 92: 64: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 4765: 4755: 4754: 4753: 4752: 4751: 4750: 4749: 4748: 4747: 4746: 4745: 4744: 4743: 4742: 4703: 4702: 4701: 4700: 4699: 4698: 4697: 4696: 4695: 4694: 4693: 4692: 4691: 4690: 4689: 4688: 4687: 4686: 4677: 4668: 4659: 4633: 4632: 4631: 4630: 4629: 4628: 4627: 4626: 4625: 4624: 4623: 4622: 4621: 4620: 4619: 4618: 4591: 4582: 4573: 4554: 4553: 4552: 4551: 4550: 4549: 4548: 4547: 4546: 4545: 4544: 4543: 4524: 4510: 4509: 4508: 4507: 4506: 4505: 4504: 4503: 4502: 4501: 4492: 4483: 4474: 4468: 4465: 4458: 4450: 4431: 4430: 4429: 4428: 4427: 4426: 4425: 4424: 4403: 4402: 4401: 4400: 4399: 4398: 4351: 4350: 4331: 4330: 4287: 4284: 4283: 4282: 4214: 4212: 4207:Nomination of 4205: 4203: 4202: 4189: 4184: 4179: 4171: 4169: 4168: 4161: 4160: 4153: 4152: 4145: 4144: 4137: 4136: 4129: 4128: 4121: 4120: 4113: 4111: 4105: 4088: 4046: 4037: 4035: 4032: 4029: 4028: 4012: 3998: 3997: 3992: 3981: 3978: 3961: 3941: 3928: 3926: 3923: 3922: 3921: 3879: 3873: 3872: 3871: 3851: 3850: 3836: 3835: 3834: 3833: 3832: 3831: 3830: 3822: 3821: 3817: 3816: 3815: 3814: 3805: 3804: 3798: 3773: 3770: 3769: 3768: 3751: 3750: 3695: 3692: 3690: 3689: 3676: 3671: 3666: 3658: 3656: 3655: 3648: 3647: 3640: 3639: 3632: 3631: 3624: 3623: 3616: 3615: 3608: 3607: 3600: 3598: 3592: 3591: 3590: 3589: 3588: 3566: 3565: 3508: 3505: 3504: 3503: 3502: 3501: 3460: 3459: 3447: 3446: 3442: 3441: 3429: 3428: 3388: 3385: 3383: 3382: 3369: 3364: 3359: 3351: 3349: 3348: 3341: 3340: 3333: 3332: 3325: 3324: 3317: 3316: 3309: 3308: 3301: 3300: 3293: 3292: 3285: 3283: 3277: 3276: 3275: 3253: 3234: 3199:Dear Yunshui, 3196: 3193: 3192: 3191: 3173: 3169: 3158: 3151: 3107:Dear Yunshui, 3104: 3101: 3091: 3079:(Section 29) 3069: 3056: 3054: 3051: 3038: 3037: 3028:and add it to 2979: 2968: 2965: 2964: 2963: 2932: 2929: 2908: 2902: 2901: 2900: 2899: 2898: 2850: 2830: 2827: 2825: 2824: 2811: 2806: 2801: 2793: 2791: 2790: 2783: 2782: 2775: 2774: 2767: 2766: 2759: 2758: 2751: 2750: 2743: 2742: 2735: 2733: 2727: 2726: 2725: 2688: 2685: 2669:World of Tanks 2664: 2661: 2645: 2642: 2641: 2640: 2613: 2612: 2580: 2577: 2576: 2575: 2574: 2573: 2572: 2571: 2570: 2569: 2543: 2477: 2443: 2442: 2406: 2403: 2402: 2401: 2400: 2399: 2347: 2344: 2343: 2342: 2278: 2277: 2276: 2275: 2270: 2269: 2213: 2210: 2209: 2208: 2207: 2206: 2172: 2148: 2145: 2144: 2143: 2142: 2141: 2140: 2139: 2075: 2072: 2071: 2070: 2022: 2019: 2018: 2017: 1962: 1959: 1958: 1957: 1919: 1916: 1914: 1913: 1900: 1895: 1890: 1882: 1880: 1879: 1872: 1871: 1864: 1863: 1856: 1855: 1848: 1847: 1840: 1839: 1828: 1827: 1820: 1818: 1812: 1811: 1810: 1809: 1808: 1807: 1806: 1720: 1717: 1701: 1700: 1674: 1663: 1622: 1619: 1596: 1583: 1581: 1578: 1577: 1576: 1557:Addison Wesley 1489: 1483: 1482: 1481: 1459: 1363: 1362: 1355: 1348: 1341: 1328:XAGENTXVECTORX 1323: 1320: 1319: 1318: 1272: 1269: 1268: 1267: 1248: 1247: 1240:the cheatsheet 1227: 1226: 1221: 1220: 1194: 1191: 1190: 1189: 1063:Article Wizard 1058: 1045:nomination of 1040: 1038: 1035: 1033: 1032: 1019: 1014: 1009: 1001: 999: 998: 991: 990: 983: 982: 975: 974: 967: 966: 959: 958: 951: 949: 943: 922: 921: 907: 896: 893: 868: 865: 863: 862: 849: 844: 839: 831: 829: 828: 821: 820: 813: 812: 805: 804: 797: 796: 789: 788: 781: 780: 772: 770: 768: 762: 761: 760: 716: 713: 712: 711: 669: 664: 650: 649: 644: 643: 642: 641: 599: 598: 592: 578:Jouhou Kaishuu 570:Torimono Dougu 555: 554: 553: 552: 551: 505: 504:Kashif Siddiqi 502: 501: 500: 499: 498: 437: 431: 430: 429: 390: 389: 355: 348: 345: 343: 342: 329: 324: 319: 311: 309: 308: 301: 300: 293: 292: 285: 284: 277: 276: 269: 268: 261: 260: 253: 251: 245: 229: 226: 176: 173: 162:Ihardlythinkso 150: 137: 135: 132: 131: 130: 91: 88: 85: 84: 79: 74: 69: 62: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4764: 4741: 4737: 4733: 4729: 4725: 4721: 4717: 4716: 4715: 4714: 4713: 4712: 4711: 4710: 4709: 4708: 4707: 4706: 4705: 4704: 4685: 4682: 4680: 4673: 4671: 4664: 4662: 4651: 4650: 4649: 4648: 4647: 4646: 4645: 4644: 4643: 4642: 4641: 4640: 4639: 4638: 4637: 4636: 4635: 4634: 4617: 4614: 4613: 4609: 4605: 4601: 4600: 4599: 4596: 4594: 4587: 4585: 4578: 4576: 4568: 4567: 4566: 4565: 4564: 4563: 4562: 4561: 4560: 4559: 4558: 4557: 4556: 4555: 4542: 4539: 4538: 4534: 4530: 4525: 4522: 4521: 4520: 4519: 4518: 4517: 4516: 4515: 4514: 4513: 4512: 4511: 4500: 4497: 4495: 4488: 4486: 4479: 4477: 4469: 4466: 4463: 4459: 4456: 4451: 4446: 4441: 4440: 4439: 4438: 4437: 4436: 4435: 4434: 4433: 4432: 4423: 4419: 4415: 4411: 4410: 4409: 4408: 4407: 4406: 4405: 4404: 4397: 4394: 4393: 4389: 4385: 4381: 4376: 4375: 4374: 4370: 4366: 4355: 4354: 4353: 4352: 4349: 4346: 4345: 4341: 4337: 4333: 4332: 4323: 4319: 4315: 4314: 4313: 4312: 4308: 4304: 4298: 4296: 4291: 4281: 4278: 4277: 4273: 4269: 4265: 4264: 4263: 4262: 4259: 4256: 4254: 4245: 4242: 4237: 4235: 4231: 4227: 4226: 4210: 4201: 4197: 4193: 4190: 4188: 4185: 4183: 4180: 4178: 4177: 4173: 4172: 4167: 4163: 4162: 4159: 4155: 4154: 4151: 4147: 4146: 4143: 4139: 4138: 4135: 4131: 4130: 4127: 4123: 4122: 4119: 4115: 4114: 4109: 4104: 4103: 4100: 4098: 4093: 4091: 4084: 4082: 4070: 4060: 4052: 4027: 4024: 4022: 4017: 4015: 4008: 4006: 4000: 3999: 3996: 3993: 3990: 3985: 3977: 3976: 3973: 3971: 3966: 3964: 3957: 3955: 3946: 3939: 3932: 3920: 3917: 3916: 3912: 3908: 3904: 3903: 3902: 3901: 3897: 3893: 3889: 3885: 3878: 3870: 3867: 3866: 3862: 3858: 3854: 3853: 3847: 3841: 3837: 3829: 3828: 3826: 3825: 3824: 3823: 3819: 3818: 3809: 3808: 3807: 3806: 3799: 3795: 3791: 3790: 3789: 3788: 3784: 3780: 3766: 3762: 3758: 3753: 3752: 3749: 3746: 3745: 3741: 3737: 3733: 3732:your talkpage 3729: 3728: 3727: 3725: 3721: 3717: 3712: 3710: 3706: 3702: 3701:WP:ELOFFICIAL 3688: 3684: 3680: 3677: 3675: 3672: 3670: 3667: 3665: 3664: 3660: 3659: 3654: 3650: 3649: 3646: 3642: 3641: 3638: 3634: 3633: 3630: 3626: 3625: 3622: 3618: 3617: 3614: 3610: 3609: 3606: 3602: 3601: 3596: 3587: 3584: 3583: 3579: 3575: 3570: 3569: 3568: 3567: 3561: 3557: 3551: 3546: 3545: 3544: 3543: 3539: 3533: 3518: 3514: 3500: 3496: 3492: 3488: 3487: 3486: 3483: 3482: 3478: 3474: 3470: 3466: 3462: 3461: 3456: 3455: 3453: 3444: 3443: 3439: 3435: 3431: 3430: 3426: 3422: 3418: 3414: 3410: 3406: 3405: 3404: 3403: 3399: 3395: 3381: 3377: 3373: 3370: 3368: 3365: 3363: 3360: 3358: 3357: 3353: 3352: 3347: 3343: 3342: 3339: 3335: 3334: 3331: 3327: 3326: 3323: 3319: 3318: 3315: 3311: 3310: 3307: 3304:In the news: 3303: 3302: 3299: 3295: 3294: 3291: 3287: 3286: 3281: 3274: 3271: 3270: 3266: 3262: 3258: 3254: 3251: 3247: 3243: 3239: 3235: 3232: 3228: 3224: 3223: 3222: 3220: 3216: 3212: 3207: 3203: 3200: 3190: 3187: 3186: 3182: 3178: 3174: 3170: 3167: 3163: 3159: 3156: 3152: 3149: 3148:Bullshido.net 3145: 3140: 3136: 3135: 3134: 3132: 3128: 3124: 3119: 3116: 3112: 3108: 3100: 3099: 3096: 3094: 3087: 3085:Non-Dropframe 3074: 3067: 3060: 3050: 3048: 3044: 3035: 3031: 3025: 3021: 3015: 3011: 3006: 3005: 2998: 2997: 2996: 2990: 2989: 2988:Did you know? 2984: 2980: 2977: 2973: 2972: 2962: 2959: 2958: 2954: 2950: 2946: 2945: 2944: 2942: 2938: 2928: 2927: 2924: 2923: 2922: 2912: 2907: 2897: 2894: 2893: 2889: 2885: 2881: 2877: 2876: 2875: 2872: 2871: 2867: 2863: 2859: 2855: 2851: 2847: 2846: 2845: 2844: 2840: 2836: 2823: 2819: 2815: 2812: 2810: 2807: 2805: 2802: 2800: 2799: 2795: 2794: 2789: 2785: 2784: 2781: 2777: 2776: 2773: 2769: 2768: 2765: 2761: 2760: 2757: 2753: 2752: 2749: 2746:In the news: 2745: 2744: 2741: 2737: 2736: 2731: 2724: 2721: 2720: 2716: 2712: 2708: 2707: 2706: 2705: 2701: 2697: 2693: 2684: 2683: 2679: 2675: 2670: 2660: 2659: 2655: 2651: 2639: 2636: 2635: 2631: 2627: 2623: 2619: 2618: 2617: 2611: 2608: 2607: 2603: 2599: 2595: 2591: 2590: 2589: 2587: 2568: 2565: 2564: 2560: 2556: 2552: 2548: 2544: 2541: 2537: 2533: 2532: 2531: 2527: 2523: 2522: 2517: 2516: 2515: 2512: 2511: 2507: 2503: 2498: 2497:WP:Notability 2494: 2490: 2489:WP:Notability 2486: 2482: 2478: 2475: 2471: 2467: 2463: 2459: 2455: 2451: 2447: 2446: 2445: 2444: 2441: 2437: 2433: 2432: 2426: 2425: 2424: 2423: 2419: 2415: 2414: 2398: 2394: 2390: 2386: 2385: 2384: 2381: 2380: 2376: 2372: 2368: 2367: 2366: 2365: 2361: 2357: 2353: 2341: 2338: 2337: 2333: 2329: 2324: 2321: 2320: 2319: 2318: 2314: 2310: 2305: 2302: 2299: 2294: 2293:intellect. 2292: 2291:Ism schmism's 2288: 2287:Vejvančický's 2283: 2274: 2273: 2272: 2271: 2268: 2265: 2264: 2260: 2256: 2252: 2248: 2247:Ism schmism's 2244: 2243:Vejvančický's 2240: 2235: 2234: 2233: 2232: 2228: 2224: 2218: 2205: 2201: 2197: 2193: 2192: 2191: 2188: 2187: 2183: 2179: 2175: 2174: 2173: 2171: 2167: 2163: 2159: 2153: 2138: 2134: 2130: 2126: 2125: 2124: 2121: 2120: 2116: 2112: 2108: 2107: 2106: 2105: 2104: 2103: 2099: 2095: 2090: 2089: 2085: 2081: 2069: 2066: 2065: 2061: 2057: 2053: 2052: 2051: 2048: 2044: 2040: 2036: 2032: 2016: 2013: 2012: 2008: 2004: 2000: 1996: 1992: 1991: 1990: 1987: 1983: 1979: 1975: 1971: 1956: 1953: 1952: 1948: 1944: 1940: 1939:your talkpage 1936: 1935: 1934: 1933: 1929: 1925: 1912: 1908: 1904: 1901: 1899: 1896: 1894: 1891: 1889: 1888: 1884: 1883: 1878: 1874: 1873: 1870: 1866: 1865: 1862: 1858: 1857: 1854: 1850: 1849: 1846: 1842: 1841: 1838: 1836: 1831:In the news: 1830: 1829: 1826: 1822: 1821: 1816: 1805: 1802: 1801: 1797: 1793: 1789: 1785: 1784: 1783: 1779: 1775: 1771: 1767: 1766: 1765: 1762: 1761: 1757: 1753: 1748: 1747: 1746: 1745: 1741: 1737: 1733: 1729: 1725: 1716: 1714: 1710: 1706: 1699: 1696: 1695: 1691: 1687: 1683: 1679: 1675: 1672: 1668: 1667:verifiability 1664: 1661: 1657: 1653: 1649: 1645: 1641: 1640: 1639: 1637: 1633: 1629: 1618: 1617: 1613: 1609: 1601: 1594: 1587: 1575: 1572: 1571: 1567: 1563: 1558: 1554: 1550: 1546: 1542: 1538: 1534: 1530: 1526: 1525: 1524: 1521: 1517: 1513: 1509: 1505: 1496: 1495: 1488: 1480: 1477: 1476: 1472: 1468: 1464: 1460: 1457: 1453: 1449: 1448: 1447: 1446: 1442: 1438: 1433: 1431: 1421: 1419: 1415: 1414:harrass users 1411: 1406: 1403: 1399: 1395: 1391: 1387: 1383: 1378: 1376: 1375:reverted them 1372: 1368: 1360: 1359:XBLACKXVIPERX 1356: 1353: 1349: 1346: 1345:PaPiRiCoSuAvE 1342: 1339: 1336: 1335: 1334: 1331: 1329: 1317: 1314: 1313: 1309: 1305: 1301: 1297: 1296: 1295: 1294: 1290: 1286: 1281: 1278: 1266: 1263: 1262: 1258: 1254: 1250: 1249: 1245: 1241: 1237: 1233: 1232:dive right in 1229: 1228: 1223: 1222: 1217: 1216: 1215: 1214: 1210: 1206: 1201: 1198: 1188: 1185: 1184: 1180: 1176: 1172: 1168: 1167: 1166: 1163: 1159: 1155: 1152: 1149: 1145: 1141: 1138: 1136: 1132: 1128: 1124: 1120: 1116: 1111: 1107: 1106: 1100: 1094: 1092: 1088: 1084: 1080: 1079: 1072: 1066: 1064: 1048: 1044: 1037:RE: Thank you 1031: 1027: 1023: 1020: 1018: 1015: 1013: 1010: 1008: 1007: 1003: 1002: 997: 993: 992: 989: 985: 984: 981: 977: 976: 973: 969: 968: 965: 962:In the news: 961: 960: 957: 953: 952: 947: 942: 941: 938: 937: 933: 929: 920: 916: 912: 908: 905: 901: 900: 892: 891: 888: 882: 861: 857: 853: 850: 848: 845: 843: 840: 838: 837: 833: 832: 827: 823: 822: 819: 815: 814: 811: 807: 806: 803: 799: 798: 795: 791: 790: 787: 783: 782: 779: 775: 774: 773: 766: 759: 756: 755: 751: 747: 743: 739: 738: 737: 735: 731: 727: 722: 710: 707: 706: 702: 698: 694: 693: 692: 691: 687: 683: 679: 675: 668: 663: 662: 658: 654: 646: 645: 640: 637: 636: 632: 628: 624: 620: 616: 615: 614: 613: 612: 611: 607: 603: 595: 594: 591: 587: 583: 579: 575: 571: 567: 566:Nagamonojutsu 563: 559: 550: 547: 544: 539: 538: 537: 534: 533: 529: 525: 521: 520: 519: 518: 515: 512: 497: 494: 493: 488: 487: 486: 483: 482: 478: 474: 470: 466: 465: 464: 463: 460: 459: 454: 450: 446: 441: 435: 428: 425: 424: 420: 416: 412: 408: 407: 406: 405: 401: 400: 397: 388: 385: 384: 380: 376: 372: 371: 370: 369: 365: 364: 361: 352: 351:Hi Yunshui, 341: 337: 333: 330: 328: 325: 323: 320: 318: 317: 313: 312: 307: 303: 302: 299: 295: 294: 291: 287: 286: 283: 279: 278: 275: 272:In the news: 271: 270: 267: 263: 262: 259: 255: 254: 249: 244: 243: 239: 235: 225: 224: 220: 216: 212: 207: 204: 200: 194: 190: 186: 182: 172: 171: 167: 163: 155: 148: 141: 129: 126: 125: 121: 117: 113: 108: 107: 106: 105: 101: 97: 83: 80: 78: 75: 73: 70: 67: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 4732:Ottawahitech 4676: 4667: 4658: 4606: 4590: 4581: 4572: 4531: 4491: 4482: 4473: 4414:Ottawahitech 4386: 4365:Ottawahitech 4338: 4303:Ottawahitech 4299: 4292: 4290:Hi Yunshui, 4289: 4270: 4252: 4246: 4238: 4223: 4221: 4211:for deletion 4174: 4108:The Signpost 4107: 4096: 4087: 4080: 4077: 4020: 4011: 4004: 3994: 3969: 3960: 3953: 3950: 3909: 3890:Thank you. 3887: 3881: 3859: 3845: 3840: 3775: 3738: 3713: 3697: 3661: 3595:The Signpost 3594: 3576: 3510: 3507:AfD and PROD 3475: 3449: 3420: 3416: 3390: 3354: 3280:The Signpost 3279: 3263: 3249: 3242:verification 3208: 3204: 3201: 3198: 3195:tony anthony 3179: 3154: 3139:Tony Anthony 3121:God bless ( 3120: 3117: 3113: 3109: 3106: 3103:Tony Anthony 3090: 3078: 3041: 3002: 3000: 2993: 2992: 2986: 2951: 2934: 2917: 2916: 2913: 2910: 2886: 2878:Guess I was 2864: 2832: 2796: 2730:The Signpost 2729: 2713: 2690: 2666: 2647: 2628: 2614: 2600: 2582: 2557: 2520: 2504: 2480: 2473: 2469: 2465: 2453: 2449: 2430: 2412: 2408: 2373: 2349: 2330: 2306: 2303: 2297: 2295: 2279: 2257: 2239:without bias 2219: 2215: 2180: 2160: 2157: 2113: 2091: 2077: 2058: 2029:— Preceding 2024: 2005: 1968:— Preceding 1964: 1945: 1937:Replying on 1921: 1885: 1834: 1815:The Signpost 1814: 1794: 1754: 1722: 1702: 1688: 1682:edit warring 1655: 1651: 1624: 1605: 1564: 1544: 1502:— Preceding 1497: 1491: 1469: 1434: 1422: 1407: 1379: 1364: 1338:67.81.62.215 1332: 1325: 1306: 1299: 1282: 1274: 1255: 1205:Sorceress150 1202: 1199: 1196: 1193:Re: Adoption 1177: 1164: 1160: 1156: 1153: 1150: 1146: 1142: 1139: 1109: 1103: 1095: 1076: 1074: 1068: 1060: 1004: 946:The Signpost 945: 930: 925: 870: 834: 771: 765:The Signpost 764: 748: 741: 736:tokyogirl79 718: 699: 671: 651: 629: 600: 526: 507: 490: 475: 456: 445:George Sorby 442: 439: 434:George Sorby 417: 394: 391: 377: 358: 353: 350: 314: 248:The Signpost 247: 231: 208: 178: 159: 118: 112:the EW board 96:Bodhidharma7 93: 65: 43: 37: 4728:Foot hockey 4460:Yunshui or 4360:</s: --> 4327:</s: --> 4187:Unsubscribe 4182:Single-page 3730:Replied on 3674:Unsubscribe 3669:Single-page 3367:Unsubscribe 3362:Single-page 3155:The War Cry 3024:quick check 2829:A challenge 2809:Unsubscribe 2804:Single-page 2470:independent 2450:independent 2346:BLP and 3RR 1898:Unsubscribe 1893:Single-page 1551:due to its 1326:The user, " 1017:Unsubscribe 1012:Single-page 926:Thank you! 847:Unsubscribe 842:Single-page 726:Tokyogirl79 453:User:GSorby 327:Unsubscribe 322:Single-page 36:This is an 4359:<s: --> 4326:<s: --> 4250:Fayenatic 4192:EdwardsBot 3709:WP:TWITTER 3679:EdwardsBot 3372:EdwardsBot 3312:In focus: 3020:here's how 2880:half-right 2814:EdwardsBot 2674:Eik Corell 2078:Thanks!!! 1961:User:Tst13 1924:Natkabrown 1918:ANI notice 1903:EdwardsBot 1835:über alles 1774:Eik Corell 1736:Eik Corell 1656:NBC Sports 1545:No Gravity 1541:notability 1382:XMORPHEUSX 1369:, such as 1352:XMORPHEUSX 1203:Thanks!!! 1123:verifiable 1070:Thank you. 1022:EdwardsBot 852:EdwardsBot 740:Dammit, I 721:Stonewylde 590:Intonjutsu 471:. Cheers, 332:EdwardsBot 213:. Thanks, 4322:WP:REDACT 4074:template. 3844:Yunshui; 3726:Kasamoto 3491:Scríobhaí 3438:this form 3434:this link 3394:Scríobhaí 3248:; we can 3209:regards ( 3001:... that 2931:Thank you 2858:Brainking 2854:checkuser 2586:hypocrite 2485:verifying 2479:The site 1715:Truth2Be 1638:Truth2Be 1580:Talk Back 1508:Execom rt 1430:one point 1394:Venuzuela 1285:Ironholds 1115:citations 676:, so per 197:Read the 185:Hyderabad 82:Archive 5 77:Archive 4 72:Archive 3 66:Archive 2 60:Archive 1 4470:Thanks! 4462:Yasht101 3943:You can 3925:Talkback 3767:Kasamoto 3757:Kasamoto 3716:Kasamoto 3211:Roundhse 3123:Roundhse 3053:Talkback 3047:nominate 3030:DYKSTATS 2692:Oh noes! 2650:Yasht101 2474:in-depth 2466:reliable 2454:in-depth 2196:Yasht101 2162:Yasht101 2043:contribs 2031:unsigned 1982:contribs 1970:unsigned 1788:WP:SYNTH 1705:Truth2Be 1628:Truth2Be 1621:Reverted 1608:Yasht101 1598:You can 1516:contribs 1504:unsigned 1463:rollback 1452:quacking 911:Lectonar 880:Articles 715:Sources? 582:Chikujou 558:Nagamono 492:Stephen! 458:Stephen! 436:Restored 411:WP:POINT 152:You can 4604:Yunshui 4529:Yunshui 4384:Yunshui 4336:Yunshui 4268:Yunshui 4234:deleted 3907:Yunshui 3857:Yunshui 3736:Yunshui 3574:Yunshui 3473:Yunshui 3261:Yunshui 3229:or the 3177:Yunshui 2949:Yunshui 2937:Endofix 2920:Snowolf 2884:Yunshui 2862:Yunshui 2711:Yunshui 2626:Yunshui 2598:Yunshui 2555:Yunshui 2502:Yunshui 2389:ElKevbo 2371:Yunshui 2356:ElKevbo 2328:Yunshui 2323:WP:BIAS 2255:Yunshui 2178:Yunshui 2111:Yunshui 2056:Yunshui 2003:Yunshui 1943:Yunshui 1792:Yunshui 1752:Yunshui 1686:Yunshui 1562:Yunshui 1467:Yunshui 1437:OsirisV 1402:Jamaica 1304:Yunshui 1300:endorse 1253:Yunshui 1175:Yunshui 928:Yunshui 867:Cheers! 746:Yunshui 697:Yunshui 627:Yunshui 546:Snowman 524:Yunshui 514:Snowman 473:Yunshui 449:request 415:Yunshui 375:Yunshui 234:Dumelow 228:Thanks! 215:DPL bot 116:Yunshui 39:archive 4258:(talk) 3707:, and 3705:WP:BLP 2644:Thanks 2547:WP:GNG 2462:WP:GNG 2458:WP:WEB 2309:JahSun 2223:JahSun 2194:LOL -- 1669:, not 1537:verify 1533:WP:WEB 1529:WP:GNG 1456:WP:SPI 1396:; the 1171:WP:GNG 1110:speedy 682:JohnCD 399:Rodney 396:Carbon 363:Rodney 360:Carbon 4329:tags. 4034:Email 3797:them. 3772:Hello 3411:or a 2696:Hoary 2129:Diego 2094:Diego 2080:Diego 2035:Tst13 1974:Tst13 1732:WP:OR 1671:truth 1197:Hey! 648:this. 619:WP:A1 586:Angou 562:Kyuba 543:Giant 511:Giant 16:< 4736:talk 4660:Yash 4574:Yash 4475:Yash 4418:talk 4369:talk 4307:talk 4196:talk 4081:Yash 4005:Yash 3954:Yash 3896:talk 3783:talk 3761:talk 3720:talk 3683:talk 3555:talk 3537:talk 3517:here 3495:talk 3467:and 3417:only 3409:GFDL 3398:talk 3376:talk 3215:talk 3127:talk 3092:talk 2941:talk 2911:Hi, 2904:Re: 2882:... 2839:talk 2818:talk 2700:talk 2678:talk 2654:talk 2538:and 2526:talk 2491:and 2472:and 2436:talk 2418:talk 2393:talk 2360:talk 2352:here 2313:talk 2251:edit 2227:talk 2200:talk 2166:talk 2133:talk 2098:talk 2084:talk 2039:talk 1978:talk 1928:talk 1907:talk 1778:talk 1770:Here 1740:talk 1730:and 1728:WP:V 1709:talk 1654:and 1632:talk 1612:talk 1512:talk 1441:talk 1390:here 1289:talk 1236:here 1209:talk 1131:talk 1026:talk 915:talk 886:Talk 856:talk 742:knew 730:talk 686:talk 657:talk 606:talk 440:Hi, 336:talk 238:talk 219:talk 166:talk 100:talk 4722:in 4678:101 4592:101 4493:101 4097:101 4069:ygm 4064:or 4021:101 3970:101 3801:--> 2981:On 2588:?? 2521:Pip 2481:can 2460:or 2431:Pip 2413:Pip 2354:.) 2298:not 1531:or 1271:DRV 1093:. 1049:== 877:dom 874:Ran 560:, 451:of 199:FAQ 4738:) 4420:) 4371:) 4309:) 4236:. 4198:) 4072:}} 4066:{{ 4062:}} 4056:{{ 3898:) 3892:Fæ 3785:) 3763:) 3734:. 3722:) 3703:, 3685:) 3552:• 3534:• 3497:) 3400:) 3378:) 3221:) 3217:) 3133:) 3129:) 3081:-- 3022:, 3008:'s 2985:, 2943:) 2841:) 2820:) 2702:) 2680:) 2656:) 2528:) 2468:, 2438:) 2420:) 2395:) 2362:) 2315:) 2229:) 2202:) 2168:) 2135:) 2100:) 2086:) 2045:) 2041:• 1984:) 1980:• 1941:. 1930:) 1909:) 1780:) 1742:) 1711:) 1684:. 1634:) 1614:) 1518:) 1514:• 1443:) 1420:. 1400:; 1377:. 1291:) 1211:) 1133:) 1065:. 1041:== 1028:) 917:) 883:|| 858:) 732:) 688:) 659:) 608:) 588:, 584:, 580:, 576:, 572:, 568:, 564:, 356:-- 338:) 240:) 221:) 191:| 168:) 134:Tb 102:) 4734:( 4669:t 4612:水 4610:‍ 4608:雲 4583:t 4537:水 4535:‍ 4533:雲 4484:t 4447:) 4443:( 4416:( 4392:水 4390:‍ 4388:雲 4367:( 4344:水 4342:‍ 4340:雲 4305:( 4276:水 4274:‍ 4272:雲 4253:L 4194:( 4089:t 4013:t 3962:t 3940:. 3915:水 3913:‍ 3911:雲 3894:( 3865:水 3863:‍ 3861:雲 3781:( 3759:( 3744:水 3742:‍ 3740:雲 3718:( 3681:( 3582:水 3580:‍ 3578:雲 3493:( 3481:水 3479:‍ 3477:雲 3451:] 3440:. 3396:( 3374:( 3269:水 3267:‍ 3265:雲 3213:( 3185:水 3183:‍ 3181:雲 3125:( 3068:. 3045:( 3036:. 3026:) 3018:( 2957:水 2955:‍ 2953:雲 2939:( 2892:水 2890:‍ 2888:雲 2870:水 2868:‍ 2866:雲 2837:( 2816:( 2719:水 2717:‍ 2715:雲 2698:( 2676:( 2652:( 2634:水 2632:‍ 2630:雲 2606:水 2604:‍ 2602:雲 2563:水 2561:‍ 2559:雲 2524:( 2510:水 2508:‍ 2506:雲 2476:. 2434:( 2416:( 2391:( 2379:水 2377:‍ 2375:雲 2358:( 2336:水 2334:‍ 2332:雲 2311:( 2263:水 2261:‍ 2259:雲 2225:( 2198:( 2186:水 2184:‍ 2182:雲 2164:( 2131:( 2119:水 2117:‍ 2115:雲 2096:( 2082:( 2064:水 2062:‍ 2060:雲 2037:( 2011:水 2009:‍ 2007:雲 1976:( 1951:水 1949:‍ 1947:雲 1926:( 1905:( 1800:水 1798:‍ 1796:雲 1776:( 1760:水 1758:‍ 1756:雲 1738:( 1707:( 1694:水 1692:‍ 1690:雲 1630:( 1610:( 1595:. 1570:水 1568:‍ 1566:雲 1510:( 1475:水 1473:‍ 1471:雲 1439:( 1357:" 1350:" 1343:" 1312:水 1310:‍ 1308:雲 1287:( 1261:水 1259:‍ 1257:雲 1207:( 1183:水 1181:‍ 1179:雲 1129:( 1024:( 936:水 934:‍ 932:雲 913:( 854:( 754:水 752:‍ 750:雲 728:( 705:水 703:‍ 701:雲 684:( 655:( 635:水 633:‍ 631:雲 604:( 532:水 530:‍ 528:雲 481:水 479:‍ 477:雲 423:水 421:‍ 419:雲 383:水 381:‍ 379:雲 334:( 236:( 217:( 205:. 187:( 164:( 149:. 124:水 122:‍ 120:雲 98:( 50:.

Index

User talk:Yunshui
archive
current talk page
Archive 1
Archive 2
Archive 3
Archive 4
Archive 5
Bodhidharma7
talk
14:02, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
the EW board
Yunshui


14:09, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Ihardlythinkso's talk page
remove this notice
Ihardlythinkso
talk
15:28, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
Baba Sharif Uddin Hyderabad
Hyderabad
check to confirm
fix with Dab solver
FAQ
DPL WikiProject
opt-out instructions
DPL bot

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.