83:(the first source mentioned, with 16 notes!!) and is according to elephant specialist veterinaries and experts a unique resource. Of course, being the largest elephant database in the world and on the entire Internet, and possibly the largest database in the available online, about individuals from a certain species, it may include some errors. It is an ongoing project to correct those, but in general it is normally viewed as a very reliable source, and is with ist over 1000 visitors/24 hours maybe the most trafficked elephant website, keeping in mind that the interest in individuals, is and will remain, a very specific field, which does not attract the majority, therefore a very narrow subject. Still considered this, it has a large number of visits.
90:, I became rather disappointed, and asked myself why I have invested 20 years of work, when it gets such a poor credit from another Knowledge user? As being maybe the only website in this topic, which always cites sources for each records etc, I would have thought that the other sources mentioned on that article, would be ranked pretty much lower in reliability, than a life work done by a professional with +40 years experience of elephants, having a network of some 500 people who report about individuals directly to me, and being cited by, and used in publications worldwide as well as by the EEP and SSP studbooks.
31:
238:
181:
144:
334:
105:
was not totally build from using the material from elephant.se but quite a lot, and I have cooperation with the admins on this project, reg cross linking. None of these three websites has as many elephants as I have recorded, since my records date back to the 37 elephants used by
Hannibal, and I have
117:
and other places where you may have left similar remarks. And if you after a reevaluation agree that this website is by far more reliable than most similar available on the
Internet, I ask you even to consider support the creation of an article about the website, so it can be officially used on more
74:
Could I please ask you what, in your view, makes my website www.elephant.se, not reliable? Contrary to your opinion, it is used as reference for researchers of elephant herpes from teams both in Europe and USA, and last year was referenced as source, for the publication on human cancer, compared to
79:, and I was in fact awarded a prize, initiated by the researchers. The website is resource and source for numerous articles about elephants, also on Knowledge, although not always mentioned. Elephant.se is the main resource and source for the Knowledge article about
109:
I have updated the content of my website since 2006, and programmed php script totally by myself. I have even contacted th EEP and SSP studbooks coordinators in Eurpe and US and they have later corrected the studbooks according to my references.
207:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
211:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
93:
Theres nothing similar existing in this world, and therefore even difficult to compare with similar websites, because there are only a few, and most of them actually started by using my material:
155:
356:
during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.
353:
345:
337:
326:
137:
365:
165:
147:
106:
records from about 85% of the dead historical circus elephants between 1800-1950, in a unique collection, never ever presented on one place in this quantity.
324:
170:
221:
204:
118:
places on
Knowledge, where it has been without doubt, used as source for articles, but for some reason were never mentioned as such.
319:
193:
132:
86:
I was just on the way to suggest the website to be described in a
Knowledge article, and when I saw your comment, which you made at
299:
101:
was also based on my records, and as confirmation for this, every single record about an elephant has a link to elephant.se.
80:
226:
151:
69:
303:
77:
Potential
Mechanisms for Cancer Resistance in Elephants and Comparative Cellular Response to DNA Damage in Humans
344:. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at
121:
With best regards, webmaster of elephant.se, the oldest information website on the
Internet, started 1995.
114:
87:
361:
291:
249:
227:
295:
38:
197:
357:
256:
This article seems to be a mistake. The title is ‘Amiriti’ but the content is about
Badhideeha.
113:
I ask you kindly to evaluate the website once more, and hopefully reconsider your comment at
97:
was based on the excel file I had on elephant.se before I created the real MySQL database,
76:
8:
307:
128:
98:
315:
274:
217:
47:
17:
261:
340:, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for
260:
While all constructive contributions to
Knowledge are appreciated, pages may be
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
188:
172:
124:
349:
341:
311:
278:
213:
284:
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing
102:
333:
245:
231:
94:
352:
with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of
346:
Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Village projects
156:
the template's entry on the
Templates for discussion page
302:
process can result in deletion without discussion, and
186:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
267:
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the
99:
http://www.elefanten-fotolexikon.eu/index.php?lang=en
192:
is suitable for inclusion in
Knowledge according to
154:. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
138:Nomination for deletion of Template:Terminology
205:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Vanisha Mittal
273:notice, but please explain why in your
14:
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
103:http://elefanten.wikia.com/Hauptseite
81:Elephant_endotheliotropic_herpesvirus
25:
194:Knowledge's policies and guidelines
23:
262:deleted for any of several reasons
252:because of the following concern:
236:
24:
376:
203:The article will be discussed at
332:
179:
142:
29:
13:
1:
95:http://www.asianelephant.net/
320:21:42, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
222:12:09, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
115:Thechikottukavu_Ramachandran
88:Thechikottukavu Ramachandran
7:
306:allows discussion to reach
287:{{proposed deletion/dated}}
270:{{proposed deletion/dated}}
10:
381:
366:19:22, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
354:Knowledge:Village projects
338:Knowledge:Village projects
327:Knowledge:Village projects
298:exist. In particular, the
133:08:29, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
70:Elephant.se not reliable??
292:proposed deletion process
166:04:12, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
196:or whether it should be
279:the article's talk page
348:and please be sure to
258:
241:
152:nominated for deletion
304:articles for deletion
254:
250:proposed for deletion
240:
42:of past discussions.
148:Template:Terminology
350:sign your comments
325:MfD nomination of
296:deletion processes
242:
358:Catgirllover4ever
228:Proposed deletion
67:
66:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
18:User talk:Wifione
372:
336:
289:
288:
272:
271:
239:
183:
182:
163:
161:Ten Pound Hammer
146:
145:
63:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
380:
379:
375:
374:
373:
371:
370:
369:
330:
300:speedy deletion
286:
285:
269:
268:
237:
235:
184:
180:
177:
159:
143:
140:
72:
59:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
378:
329:
323:
310:for deletion.
290:will stop the
234:
225:
189:Vanisha Mittal
178:
176:
173:Vanisha Mittal
171:Nomination of
169:
139:
136:
71:
68:
65:
64:
52:
51:
34:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
377:
368:
367:
363:
359:
355:
351:
347:
343:
339:
335:
328:
322:
321:
317:
313:
309:
305:
301:
297:
293:
282:
280:
276:
265:
263:
257:
253:
251:
247:
233:
229:
224:
223:
219:
215:
209:
206:
201:
199:
195:
191:
190:
174:
168:
167:
162:
157:
153:
149:
135:
134:
130:
126:
122:
119:
116:
111:
107:
104:
100:
96:
91:
89:
84:
82:
78:
62:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
331:
294:, but other
283:
275:edit summary
266:
259:
255:
244:The article
243:
210:
202:
187:
185:
175:for deletion
160:
141:
123:
120:
112:
108:
92:
85:
73:
60:
43:
37:
36:This is an
308:consensus
248:has been
150:has been
125:Dan Koehl
75:elephant
61:Archive 1
342:deletion
312:Mccapra
246:Amiriti
232:Amiriti
214:Edwardx
198:deleted
39:archive
277:or on
16:<
362:talk
316:talk
218:talk
129:talk
230:of
164:•
364:)
318:)
281:.
264:.
220:)
200:.
158:.
131:)
360:(
314:(
216:(
127:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.