User talk:Urve/Archive 1

6348:

disappointments and some shock but mostly a continued curiosity. When I "hear" someone "speak", which can be written or spoken word, my mind, body (I call Physical) and Soul (I call Spirit) interpret it as a song. A color filled song. As a child I couldn't even hear the words and only the notes and saw the colours. As I got older I was able to suppress the notes and colours long enough to be able to "listen" to the words. I still hear and see both. As a three or four year old you don't think you might be different. You just assume everyone is like you. Then you are told you are different and you wonder how and why. And as you explore this thing called Life you realize that the subtle differences between us are just that, subtle, and the reality is that we are not as different as we think. We all start with the same colors and build from there. Each color represents a part of us. Some choose us, some are developed as time passes, some are strong, some are weak but we all started with the same colors. In that world, what I see and hear, there are no races, no genders and no conflicts. The only differences in the Song's I see and Colors I hear are what makes every individual thing unique. Such a contrasting view between Physical and Spirit but it is precisely where Physical and Spirit meet, among the shadows of light and dark, in the details of our journey, that true Soulwork happens. That is where poets sing, painters write and singers paint. That is where true masterpieces are sculpted into reality. Where symphonies are felt as vibrations through the fabric of existence itself, the very atoms transferring those notes as energy through all matter and washing over my ears as waves of the ocean crashing on the shore. It is the Song of Life; the Song of Earth; the Song of Us. Written books were the start of my fascination but they could never fully satisfy because they are representations, some more realistic than others, of the real stories, adventures and experiences that I see in the living books I read daily. How beautiful are the red, orange, yellow, green, blue, indigo and violet hues I see in each of you? There is no competition in its beauty. No sweeter sound than the sound of your strings being played. --

5700: 5724: 5676: 5736: 5712: 5688: 9658:, my prediction (though I can't prove it either way) is that hooks that don't represent minority history as painful don't perform very well. Maybe that's the case with other subjects. Lately I've been thinking about our social responsibility as a project; I might have to write something up, though words alone can't express what I feel. I think you understand. There are two sentiments that randomly cycle on my userpage that capture how I feel about this place and what should be done about it. Funnily, I noticed I'm not at listed at the precious page because of an accident. Don't fix it: I think it's kind of fitting, and fixing would be unnecessary. Maybe it's like ALTURVE: a dissident voice, or a marker of my confusion, or of being out of place ;)? There's an 5652: 5664: 4658:

garden. Just because you plant the seed doesn't mean that fruit appears the same day. It takes time and effort. Urve, your impact has made its mark and over time it has become even more prevalent. Don't let this intimidation alter who you are here. Listen to my music. Hear my Song of love drowning out this terrible attempt to force you to change who you are and silence your voice. Knowledge is an amazing place where so many from every corner of this planet get together and we build something so unbelievably wonderful. But it takes every note in every color to make it that. So I WILL take the time to reflect your beautiful colors back to you. --

6243: 9690:. - I wrote about three singers from our last concert, two passed DYK without problems, and Talia Or caused discussions an estimated 10 times the article length, which is in no proportion to what DYK should do: simply expose an article to a readership that otherwise wouldn't notice it. The "broad audience" clause is still new, compared to the long history of DYK, and has made it more dependent on the personal view of a reviewer, because it's a myth that there's an objective definition of what "broad audience" means, or even what "interesting" means. I liked your ALT! - More later. I decorated my talk for thanksgiving. -- 6413:, for example, might not be illuminating to a general audience, and might contribute a bit to that feeling of too much information. Whether this is a good example of that issue, I don't know - I'm just trying to make a general point. Footnote p may be interesting, but only really mentionable in light of secondary references. The quote of footnote f speaks to the point, but unsure if we need to do more than just summarize. Do you understand what I mean? I'm having trouble expressing my thoughts, and it's a complicated subject that requires some complicated thinking. And I'm not skilled in that department ;) 440: 863: 5319: 3934: 2920: 9609: 9721: 4372: 8003: 3417: 7676: 8364: 1882: 7805: 3642: 7405: 726: 31: 5902:) it would just be a matter of copyediting it. Then I realized that it needed to go into the legal background as much as, if not more, than the baseball background. And that led to adding more about the predecessor cases (and finding citations to the actual cases even when they were over a century old) and then the follow-on cases, and the more research I did in that department the more I found out it needed to have. And it's like getting up to light speed ... the closer you are to 8163:, for the comment and your edits! I'm glad people got to learn about it; I only learned any of the details when I first started the article. I agree with the change from indigenous to more specific words - just want to say that this was deliberate in one place ("Around this time, they also shot at a group of several Seminole men, though they never arrested or struck them" - some of the group weren't Seminole, but if I remember right, Littlefield doesn't give their tribes). 8877: 3080: 5123: 4855: 4213: 9654:

doesn't require a click because it gives enough information for our curiosity to be satiated? Of course, people reading our articles is always great, but should that be the end-goal? I don't know. I tried my hand at Talia Or, but I'm afraid even what I came up with was trite - and it was trite, I think, because of the hostility (or perhaps just the reception) toward articles that aren't about fleeting memes, politics and politicians, or pop science. As I said

9296: 8830: 8484: 4499: 3033: 2313: 1991: 1192: 8704: 5828: 1065: 4711: 9836: 253: 2195: 5384: 3587: 3362: 1568: 1316: 1253: 7303:, p. 292, he writes he hasn't used it "on any documents since I was in my teens", so that is part of why it's so difficult. The birth name is given in "Autumn Changes -- Part III", p. 1061. If you Google CNC09546252, you will also find it there, and you might be able to find some other sources that list it. I haven't looked further, but it might be in some other writings. This is somewhat of a can of worms; I was advised when I nominated 9171: 7523: 9558: 9473: 8185: 8059: 7012: 6907: 6802: 6651: 6571: 5523: 5432: 3776: 2643: 1616: 1467: 658: 538: 479: 329: 82: 6215: 7478: 9274: 8808: 8462: 4477: 3011: 2291: 1969: 1170: 3874: 9307: 8841: 8495: 4510: 3044: 2324: 2002: 1203: 9347: 5898: 2861:

Knowledge, but I'd bet that, like the Greenlandic Inuit, there's so much missing - and that's a real shame. If we are serious about improving knowledge equity on the project, highlighting the work and lives of indigenous people is important (and that's whether or not they're "good people" - a good person in this case, but it's important that we cover and consider the whole of the human condition).

9285: 8819: 8473: 4488: 3022: 2302: 1980: 1181: 8888: 3091: 4784: 4142: 4254:, and I will always respond and love to talk to my good friends from this project — as few as they are and you definitely are one. I am writing to you because it has been a while and I wanted to say hello, and because I was somewhat worried. You can always approach me and I hope everything is okay. If it is not, there are ways to handle it and I hope you know that you are not alone. 1424:, I've had the biopsies done and will take a look over the next few days. My approach is to list sources that are problematic, and for anything that checks out, I won't comment on. That can be discouraging (it's just a list of problems!), but I'll do this because I expect most of the issues to have been resolved with your closer eye, and we're entering the final cleanup stages. :) 7494: 3739:, a professor at my alma mater. Based on what I've found, she was perhaps one of only two black women to have tenure at the university when it was awarded to her. Her work was important, and it was varied. She worked in the areas of administrative law, legal education, sexual harassment, human trafficking, immigration, and diversity. She wrote brilliantly about 7621:, but I would be lying if I said that (1) I've ever read that section before, or (2) that I can make heads or tails of anything relating to disambiguation, categories, templates, etc. :) If we're still unsure, the reviewer can offer some thoughts; our readers are smart enough to navigate through the link, I was just unsure if the dab was intentional or not. 6405:. I know it was not your intention to minimize anyone's pain, and I'm glad you apologized without being defensive. I respect both you and the original nominator very much - as far as Knowledge goes, I think of both of you as friendly colleagues that I'd gladly work with at any point in the future (and I don't say that about most people I come across!). 2834:. It's good to hear from you. I was actually going to approve the draft, but haven't had the time. There were some small (small) cite errors when I looked; I'll take a look again later. I'd love to help, too. The articles you wrote actually inspired me to continue with my personal goal of Greenlandic biography writing, which I kind of lost steam on: 8301:. I think they're helpful, yes, and really focus the narrative on the lynching. Not sure how I feel about such a fragmentary structure (distinct from the narrative, which I think is OK); maybe that's just how it has to be. No worries about not looking, it was just a suggestion if you were interested. By the way, since some notes were removed, 7161:- an interesting person. I have some projects I'm working on, so I can't add too much more at the moment. But the book I cited also contains significant coverage of Arobateau‎, more from a literary perspective than a biographical one. I accepted the draft; hopefully that doesn't discourage anyone from continuing to edit it. For DYK? 4339:, but that probably has a wide scope beyond the US, and I don't feel comfortable with looking for global sources on it. You'll notice that I tried - probably unsuccessfully, but I wouldn't know either way - to use Bluebook here ... all writing is an exercise in novelty. And I haven't forgotten to email you; busy, but talk soon. 9402:) and now this is coming to light. Maybe Greenlandic independence movements will finally go somewhere; I certainly wouldn't want to be Mette Frederiksen right now. With Greenland propping up the coalition, I just don't know. Anyway, I will write it up - people deserve to learn about it, and find more sources than I ever could. 6042:

and did some tutoring, got a sub at Subway and came home and then the guy who usually mows our lawn came over and did the rest at dusk so our village won't send someone to do it and send us the bill). I will feel better after a good night's sleep (and honestly writing all this here helps more than I thought it would, too, TBH)

9686:, where the main editor left Knowledge because an infobox was added, and those who had supported it were blaimed with this loss. These times are over, but the time that someone adding an infobox is no longer regarded as a warrior but someone who tries to make an article a bit more accessible has still not arrived, see 6510:

to GA and eventually FA so we can run it on the Main Page for its 50th anniversary at the end of 2023. I want to make some tracks on that before the end of the year (first order of business has so far been the trickiest: getting a good video copy of the arteriogram scene to go with the section on it)

5765:

is after the date of December 31, 1926, which is the universal public domain date. So I think it would only be allowable if it weren't printed with a copyright notice, or registered afterwards. As for whether this happened or not, well, I'm of no use :). I just stick to pre-1927 images because of how

3501:

Thank you, feel understood. I had FACs failed, - it's just an invitation to try harder, and even if not, the improved state of an article is worth it. I just nominated one yesterday, - see my user page if you consider reviewing. I promised myself a FAC nine years ago, and still didn't get past a peer

2079:

I’m sorry you feel that way, I saw your message but carefully removed it due to any potential unpleasant incident it may attract Look Urve, I’m kicking myself for even posting at all in the first place yesterday. I was concerned about ARW, a very good friend of mine and I insisted on knowing what was

9974:

I initially trimmed it much more, but then it looked awkward with the Sacred Heart, which has to be large. We have to venerate wounds. I learned trimming from you. A good idea to wait. Unfortunately I think vengeance is coming; we'll see. I should have run - all of my ideas are so popular I'd surely

7123:

and I have exhausted every resource that was available to my disposal to add as much relevant content as I could find. Would you have access to sources that could potentially have information on the subject? I was not planning on working so much on the draft but now I am fairly invested. Let me know

6746:

newspaper in DYK today, and I just wanted to drop by to say thank you. It is an excellent contribution and a piece of Nebraska history I was totally unaware of. We have talked before of working together to create content or to bring articles to Good Article status (which I have never done). I'd like

6323:

That is a fascinating question! I am not sure if humans understood penguin family dynamics back then, but if Oosten did, he probably painted only one penguin because its significant other was likely watching over a newborn or an egg, and that this penguin was on its way back with food; could be true

7763:

seems to be a notable topic. I don't know enough (where to look? what sources are good? is it just the US?) to create an article, but my understanding is that HIV-positive visitors to the US must (or used to be required to?) apply for an HIV waiver to gain entry. There is a story about this process

7279:

I think the article is mostly complete (or at least I added as much as I could). However, I think the article is missing his birth name, considering that the article elaborates on how he formulated his eventual name. I have been looking everywhere — for days now — but I just can't seem to find this

6308:

was one of the few DVDs we had, so I watched it endlessly - LBT still on VHS. You have every right to 'blabber' about this - though I'd say it's more sharing beauty than blabbering ;). I wonder what can be said of the painting having recurring pairs of creatures, but for the penguin (and maybe some

6268:

Here I was looking at a painting with a penguin from such an early period! Even if there are other works from the time that depict penguins — which I do not think there are — this was such an incredibly rare and pleasantly surprising find. I blabbered about this to anyone who cared to listen, for a

6117:

coughing ... he'd get out an answer to my questions, then put out seven or eight of just the most awful coughs I've ever heard before he was able to talk again. I tell people that (my wife notwithstanding) I have not seen the face of COVID but I've definitely heard its voice, and I think that might

5968:

to be the metaphor that comes to mind) so soon just yet. So for now I am focusing on smaller tasks, either administrative ones like reviewing and acting (or not acting) on reports at AIV/ANEW/RFPP, or editing ones that I know will not take up so much time or grow beyond my control/expectations (The

2875:

I do very much hope you could help with the article and provide any extra research, two pairs of eyes are better than one after all! Let me know when you're able to, no rush at all. I'm really glad I've inspired you, very genuinely glad to hear it honestly! This will be my third article on Canadian

2814:

is currently in the works, and I would really love to have your input and potential collaborative help in the article to further expand on his page, if you do have the time! (perhaps help to figure out a DYK hook with me?) Thank you again for your kind words and advice, I hope to hear back from you

8281:

Thanks for the tag earlier. It's been a busy time for me, so I didn't get much of a chance to look at it earlier. Since the GAN brought up the "well-written" criterion I tried smoothing out or simplifying a few places, and hopefully you find those to be improvements. I haven't touched the lede - I

7564:

Thanks. Unfortunately, DYK is increasingly irksome to even look at (much less engage with), so I'll probably stop participating. And it's not that our articles have gotten any worse, our hooks have gotten any less punchy or accurate, or our rules have changed - it's entirely an atmospheric problem

6108:

I am sorry to hear that you have COVID ... I hope it is not too severe. At the very least it should be a chance to get some rest. My wife got it during the first week of the year; the worst symptom she reported was the nighttime fever spikes, and one night of a brief coughing fit ... I worked as a

6041:

Maybe, also, I am not ready to focus on any major tasks tonight (EDT) because I am at the end of a long hot day here in the Northeast during which I did some mowing of an overgrown lawn at high solar noon (in the shade mostly, to be fair) when it was about 92 °F (33 °C) outside, showered, went out

10007:

Debussy, where I still saw the language of former wars, and pointed at it (which was not welcome, which is another sign), - creative thoughts to change that welcome, while the outcome of any particular discussion really doesn't matter to me, and I would never start one. I was tempted about giving

9648:

pretty much aligns with mine. And by the way, I am one of the fiends in the anti-infobox camp ;) - but not militantly so; I don't care enough to intervene when someone adds one. You can see it in my creations - almost none with an infobox, and very few that I've ever added myself. I wrote a very

6347:

I have always been fascinated with learning as much as I could about every culture I could possibly get information on. As a small girl all I had were books to experience my curiosity of earth and everything on it. As a young adult I traveled to see what I had read in those books. There were some

6218:

Thanks. Feeling much better - the infection is gone, now hoping the effects of it won't last for too long. Still a lot to think about, which I'll continue to mull over. Ended up sleeping more than planned - probably good - so no Finnegans Wake. (And I didn't admit this before, but I've also never

4657:

Sometimes negative things impact us too and their impact can be felt so much harder. Sometimes the music we hear is sown as discord. I remember being terrified as a child by all the experiences I had. Love is unassuming and so a lot of times its impact is less felt initially. I liken it growing a

3538:

This is nice to wake up to! I took a brief look at the singer: promising, for DYK please. Will check later (which may be tommorrow). Today I have a topic of the same kind which I couldn't get done the last two days when more or less on the road, and I couldn't even remember how to spell the name:

2888:

later when my schedule frees up actually! You are definitely right, Knowledge has a very clear deficit on articles covering Indigenous issues and I'm doing my due diligence in making sure that Indigenous-related articles are put out there! I'll definitely look into submitting the article for a GA

6494:

and being a little miffed that no one at DYK responded to my request that someone review it in time to have gotten it on the Main Page yesterday (this is uncharacteristic and in my extensive experience has not happened for a nom of mine in a few years, I am in that stage between long articles to

6416:

I don't know your interests, but if you need some lighter stuff to work on - quite little secondary referencing (but enough for GNG/NBOOK), sometimes not even the books themselves are available to a general audience to create a plot summary, so the articles themselves would probably all be quite

2784:

Still thinking about our loss of Bersani. I found a quote about zombie porn that resonates: "Their insatiable drive to cannibalize their victims can be read as a sublimation of an equivalent sexual drive. This calls to mind Leo Bersani's discussion of the homophobia displayed by the press in the

9653:

post above, bring - for me, this place is often an island where I write and edit alone, in subjects where there's not much outside interest. But do metrics matter when we're playing with the very real histories of very real people? Should we be striving for the most-viewed hook, or a hook that

5994:

on the occasion of that film's 10th anniversary, I was in turn led to overhaul and expand the article to nearly double its original length. Down the line I can see GA and FA out of that, but I'm not focused on that for the immediate future. I have also contemporaneously been working on a draft

2860:

I also wanted to say that Nungak's article is a very good candidate to be a good article. I hope you submit it soon after it's accepted at AfC. It's important for our good articles to include people from underrepresented groups on the project. I'm not sure of the state of the Canadian Inuit on

6194:

as an exemplar of judicial humor and innovative writing, but Roberts takes the cake. An interesting related thought: There's been a lot of talk - I'm not sure if it's in sources yet, though - about Gorsuch's plain, down-to-earth style of writing. May warrant some elaboration in his biography.

6257:

I grew up adoring penguins — they were, still are, and will always be my favorite/spirit animal. Back when I was little and things were not so readily available on the internet, I used to stay up so that I can watch documentaries on penguins — which often aired late at night. I had books and

2544:

I've read so many extremely bad takes on this in the past 48 hours that I'm going mildly insane, so I am here to tell you: if you're looking for a Deleuze project to follow Body without Organs, there are a lot of historians and games studies folks who need to know what "control" means... --

9649:

long response with some thoughts but deleted it. This response is also long, but not nearly as long. The point was that, as I've said before, DYK is increasingly becoming a battle of personalities that makes me feel unwelcome and uneasy. I appreciate the recognition that view counts, as in

7732:

Last year about this time, I met him by chance at a restaurant where he had pasta with family. (we had fish on 3 June, another birthday, pictured if you click on songs.) I planned to see him next week for a meeting of the friends of RMF, but now I have this infection and it may be to soon.

2809:

Hey Urve! Sorry for not getting to responding to your review on time, it got a bit swept up, but I just wanted to thank you so much for your kind words! I wanted to let you know that since you had pointed out that Zebedee Nungak's page is currently a redlink, I wanted to inform you that

5909:

But late last night I did ... just about in time for the June GA backlog drive. I hope it gets reviewed soon; I think it will. (Meanwhile I'm getting over the emotional down from finishing something that took so long to do, as well as the end of a fairly busy month for me offline).

7608:

seems especially relevant now (see my userpage changes, about a religious fundamentalist group taking over the US to impose power over reason) - only just created, and there's always more to say, but have to move on. Might have to buy a copy to create a good plot summary, but the

6265:. On a closer look, I realized that this painting from the 1650s had a penguin in it — and that absolutely made my day! Because I do not think there is anything else like it; from what I have read, penguins weren't commonly depicted in art until well over a century or two later. 6165:

also has an interesting history. I'm not too familiar with the West - my knowledge only extends as far as Nebraska :P - but these little movements in history make me think a lot about the harsh realities of settlement and living. (Of course, settlement is a harsh reality on

2160: 3476:

Thank you! A welcome surprise to awake to... Much of what I am trying to write is LGBT and Nebraska history (especially where the two overlap as in the Cather suite of articles), and there are so many holes yet to be filled. There are still four redlinks in

5963:

have other things I must attend to, both online and off, but for the moment I need to regenerate and can't find it in me to tuck my head and put my shoulder to the grindstone (or, really, the blocking sled ... I played enough football in high school for

4739: 4192: 5944:

interesting. I'm not too knowledgeable about law, but if you are, you might find that article fun. It doesn't have a very coherent scope (how is quoting a poem the same as poetry? sources aren't too clear, lol) but it's still an interesting subject.

5937:, for someone who did not know much of the background), but there's always more to say! I hope it gets picked up soon. I just tested positive for COVID, so I can't take it now. But if it's not taken when I get better, I'll be sure to take a look. 4834: 9677:

Thank you, Urve, for great thoughts to wake up to! "Soon" you said, and here I am, before even checking my watchlist ;) - I love your dissident voice! In the infoboxes case as on DYK, my problem is the enormous waste of time discussing

4127: 2838:, a small but important biography on the settler conscious. Nungak's article mentions an experiment on children - that might be a good project to work on, too. I've written two articles about child experimentation in settler states: 2080:

going on, I should have not argued with Blaze, after they asked not to. Even though I didn’t push it anymore after my encounter with them, I shouldn’t have argued at all. I apologize, if I let you down, I ought to have acted better.

6525:

Thank you. I was going to review House Bill 5414, but was worried that I didn't understand the process enough for special occasions to make sure it was promoted to the correct queue on time. And DYK is a bit irritating now, anyway.

9662:

article on the intersections of my interests that almost fits here. Oh, well, there's not actually a point to any of what I've written, other than to complain without making a suggestion; my forte? Take care, Gerda, and talk soon.

6093:

lists in just a few pages, minus the multilingual puns. The odd choices of words, to me, gives it away—especially "environs", a word familiar from its use in the first sentence of Joyce's novel, which only makes sense there that

7333:

I had no idea that this was a contentious topic. Also, it is very impressive how quickly you found this — I have really been looking for this for well over a month. Thanks so much! On an unrelated note, I have also emailed you.

6451:

in New York's June primary for executive positions, we have today off, so we can rest up and get stuff done before tomorrow's 16-hour marathon finish (I have to get up before the sun, which at this time of year says something).

4583:

I would highly encourage you to come forward (either privately or publicly) with any information you have about this. That's really serious stuff, and who ever threatened you should be immediately sanctioned. You can do so by

4245:

Urve, I consider you to be an old Knowledge friend of mine with whom I have had nothing but pleasant and constructive interactions. Your work on Knowledge is valued — and I personally find your style of writing particularly

7308: 6408:

As to the article itself, one place that might be worth reconsidering, in light of the complaint about length, is the number and length of footnotes - at least in this article, and not any future spin-offs. Footnote e of

4769: 4330:

of similar examples that could, with appropriate sourcing, be added. Thankfully we can quote as much as we want of the opinions themselves - like the entirety of Fisher v. Lowe - per (my sophomoric understanding of) the

8200: 9573: 4627:

I'm so sorry to see this. Urve, you are an amazing editor here and you are wanted. Don't let this intimidation keep you from being here and contributing to this project. People can be so cruel. Don't let them win.

3995: 3183: 5890:

I appreciate it very much ... especially since that article has kept me busy for the last two months after another user expanded it and nominated it for GA. I figured at first (as always with so much of my work,

4612:

Oof, I'm really sorry to see this. If it was someone trying to log into your account, I noticed some people on the talk page of the RFA talking about an LTA case who is targetting people replying to the RFA. --

4274:

I appreciate the reference. It's one I occasionally look back on to see that my writing matters, and that friends are near. Below, an AfC approval notice for a subject I've always found interesting. Talk soon.

7356::) You will find the quoted Autumn Changes bit I mentioned in the results, if you haven't already. It is contentious, but I don't see there being any changes to the policies in the near future - articles like 5256:

Nice idea. You might also give each their own DYK and then assemble as I did (which I did for a vanity thing, but will probably repeat for topics). It came out as a nice summary of what I stand for this year.

4655:"I have always been enamored by your idea, of listening to others and letting them impact us, unreservedly, allowing ourselves to be washed over by the music. We are as much ourselves as we are those we love." 3175: 3191: 6774:

may have had the first black newspaper in Nebraska had I not looked for it. I will keep in touch with you about working together - I have some specific things I need to work on for the next while, but the

673: 494: 968:", and occupying myself, even for a moment, with beauty - like those articles on the main page. But that is a privilege those who experience horror may never know, so I only do this with appreciation. 964:(I didn't visit either of the locations or the fight), but interesting nonetheless. For now, I'm writing about an experiment where Greenlandic children were taken from their families to be raised as " 9892:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 9136: 6794: 5995:

article from a recent news story that has also been emotionally draining as I've found more and more to add to it. I am getting into the homestretch on that one and I hope I can make a DYK out of it.

5735: 5711: 5699: 5687: 6219:

read Moby Dick, which seems to share that same cultural space.) Pinging friends to share some beautiful moments or pictures they've discovered or remember, for the strength that memory provides!

2034:

Hello Urve! I decided that I would attempt to revive WikiProject Nebraska. Don't know if you'd be interested in it or not but you have shown some interest in Nebraska-related articles before. ―

5723: 6159:. It's surprising we didn't have an article on either yet, considering so many editors are active in the referendums and elections area. You will like the Newby article that I cite there. 5754:! These will be useful. (I made them a gallery just for talk page purposes, but the code will remain in the history so I can retrieve it.) Please do reach out if I can be of assistance. 5651: 9908: 5675: 5566: 4235: 9877: 8566: 7818: 4726: 3502:

review ... - You see me mostly in Classical music, Germany, and recent deaths, - two of those today, and one I was blessed to have seen conducting, last on his farewell tour. --

6083:

s Section I and poetry, I have noticed (not for the first time) that its verbal style suggests that Blackmun was really doubling down on that bet ... by echoing the rhythms of

4876: 3223: 3155: 8420: 3339: 3199: 7307:

for GAN to not include her birth name, but there is no explicit guidance on this. (For the last RfC on whether birth names for dead trans people are acceptable or not, see

3454: 982:

Thank you! The opera article is not be me, but by two friends here, and one died three years ago, - remembered. I just cared for it appearing on the day of the premiere. --

9398:

Terrifying indeed. It makes me sick. The Danish government just finished up an expensive and highly-publicized apology tour for another cruel genocidal program from 1951 (

7504: 6467: 7311:.) I think it should be included - not in the lead, but in the discussion of changing names and the name's significance - but I can't open that can myself. I follow the 6563: 1728: 768:

Seconded! I'm nervously waiting until the clock strikes one am UTC tomorrow; I can't wait to see how this does with respect to pageviews. should be just a bit longer...

9449: 4957: 4814: 4172: 3699: 3445: 3303: 3247: 2455: 2423: 1752: 1744: 3487:- maybe time to return to editing that area, which after a (well-deserved) failed FAC I lost most of my interest in. I hope to see you around, Gerda, soon and often. 3122: 9073: 9001: 8654: 8590: 8558: 7238:

Thank you for doing that. I'll follow and try to help. There are some gay press tidbits with Arobateau on archive.org, though I'm not sure all are worth mentioning.

7109: 7004: 5663: 5053: 5029: 4965: 4949: 4091: 4067: 4003: 3894: 3279: 3239: 3231: 2415: 1651: 9049: 8606: 6899: 6487:

Yes, that footnote is exactly the sort of thing that would be more at home in a general article about the baseball antitrust exemption. I do plan to move it there.

4973: 4688: 4011: 2431: 8333:

Yes! It's very handy. I just figured it was better to leave them in at the time, in case you preferred to revert the changes or repurpose some of the sources. --

225:, above (with some 30,000), say something worth considering - people want to learn more about LGBT history and ideas, but Knowledge has little coverage. I recall 9033: 8614: 8582: 7718:, wow! My German was surprisingly OK enough to understand much of it, even though I haven't tried to keep up in a long while. You make me want to learn again ;) 5005: 4997: 4059: 3295: 3263: 3215: 2447: 2439: 1816: 1736: 6145:. I'll have to think this over and provide a more coherent reply when I can. Your comments are helpful re the poetry article. I have to confess I've never read 2163:

on the way? Whether you're one of our top reviewers, or haven't reviewed in a while, I want to thank you for helping out in the past and in the future. Cheers,

9384:

What an absolutely horrifying program. I'm glad that the truth is coming out, even if it's so many decades later. Thanks for writing it up. Planning on a DYK?

9041: 8993: 8969: 8622: 8542: 8534: 7176: 6606: 5790: 5021: 5013: 4933: 4909: 4901: 4051: 3987: 3971: 3255: 3167: 2487: 2479: 2463: 2391: 2375: 2151:

when there is a redirect in the way of an acceptance, but specifically tells the patrolling admin to let you (the draft reviewer) take care of the actual move.

1760: 1712: 1704: 3397: 9340: 5576: 4893: 2363: 1545: 1504: 1438:

Feel free to give negative feedbacks, I won't mind that much. In fact, this is the very philosophy of Starship's development: build, launch, kaboom, repeat!

8936: 810:?) may have gotten some more views, but I think the regularity with our other hooks was a good choice. A fun idea for someone else may be: Did you know ... 9065: 8985: 8550: 7360:

would not be complete without that information, and there are no BLP considerations. Thanks for adding the content and continuing to shepherd the article.

6696: 6368: 6113:

last year; one guy I talked to was in a household where everyone had gotten it so they wound up being called as their family members' contacts. He had the

4925: 3979: 3890: 3207: 2399: 1808: 1603: 2846:(where Greeenlandic children were shipped to Denmark to have their culture erased, eerily similar to Nungak's experience). You may find them interesting. 1288: 121: 9025: 8598: 6732: 6643: 4989: 4043: 2407: 1824: 997: 806:. A fun little detour from my normal editing - and it got some laughs from those who edit Knowledge, so the reader stats being low is okay. :) ALT1 (... 8098: 7073: 6968: 6863: 2533: 7977: 7653: 7630: 7597: 7274: 7251: 7233: 7214: 7193: 7170: 7153: 6442: 6342: 6318: 5341:, which you created and nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the 5247: 5229: 4348: 4307: 4284: 1862: 9009: 7613:

was disappointing. Our readers probably deserve to learn something about it, and DYK is a good way to do that (and it's a good way to deorphan).BTW,

6978: 6767: 5399:

within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility.

4981: 4760: 4035: 3823: 3602:

within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility.

3377:

within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility.

3137: 2495: 2029: 1832: 1720: 1661: 1583:

within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility.

1331:

within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility.

1268:

within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility.

1230: 9480: 8305:

is useful for catching references that are no longer cited. I'll add them back in, so no need to remove them, but I thought you'd find that useful.

5176:. Lovely. I've been thinking of a fun project -- unsure yet, but thinking -- of writing all of the notable Urves we do not yet have an article for, 4121: 3333: 2650: 336: 9526:, and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to 9250: 8977: 8784: 8574: 8438: 8113:, and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to 7138: 7088:, and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to 6983:, and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to 6878:, and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to 6711:, and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to 6621:, and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to 5581:, and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to 5488:, and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to 5361: 4941: 4336: 4019: 3838:, and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to 2885: 2697:, and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to 1776: 1666:, and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to 1519:, and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to 588:, and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to 545: 382:, and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to 136:, and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to 89: 9935: 6616: 5102: 2045: 131: 9057: 9017: 8638: 5515: 5045: 4917: 4027: 3271: 2471: 2383: 1800: 1768: 1623: 1514: 1474: 629: 6706: 5602: 5302: 5284: 5266: 3065: 2692: 904: 9802: 9246: 9087: 8668: 8646: 7935: 5419: 5086: 5072: 4105: 4083: 3736: 3317: 2889:

nomination when it gets approved at your suggestion, that seems like a very worthy endeavor. I look forward to working with you in the future!

2517: 2503: 1846: 1366: 9103: 8108: 8066: 7083: 6873: 3622: 2775: 1447: 1433: 1415: 1401: 643: 9818: 9762: 9758: 9752: 9748: 9744: 9511: 9220: 9213: 9207: 9201: 9195: 8767: 8753: 8746: 8740: 8734: 8728: 8630: 8407: 8400: 8394: 8388: 7446: 7441: 7437: 7433: 7429: 7425: 6105:, where he recounted the facts of the case not in the usual dry legal style but as if it were hardboiled pulp-novel midcentury crime fiction. 5860: 5853: 5847: 5841: 5064: 5037: 4426: 4419: 4411: 4403: 4397: 4075: 3833: 3564: 3287: 2973: 2966: 2959: 2951: 2945: 2682: 2252: 2246: 2239: 2232: 2226: 2220: 2056: 1931: 1924: 1918: 1912: 1906: 1792: 1784: 1116: 1110: 1104: 1098: 1089: 941: 789: 367: 7294: 3908: 825: 315: 9459: 8951: 8684: 7987: 7760: 5308: 4251: 2176: 1000:. "But there must be a way to increase the chances of such work (the important work) being carried on." Thank you, for also caring for it. 957: 9969: 9951: 7952: 6495:

expand or create where I just do little things I've noticed to do relevant to other articles I've worked on in the past like add stuff to

5483: 5473: 4678: 4585: 3783: 9521: 7859: 5354: 5234:

Thank you! I appreciate the help :) Sunny-Dzidzaria is one I considered, too - a great candidate for an article. I've started looking at

4864: 3733: 3402: 377: 170: 9600: 7796: 7750: 7727: 7667: 7019: 6914: 6809: 6603:

adopted "Red" as his first name after dyeing his hair red because he thought the color represented sensuality and eroticism of his work?

6536:

is among my favorites), and when you say recent, you mean it :) I'll watch for a GA nomination one day. So much to do. I am thinking of

6504:

I have some ideas for my next serious effort, but I haven't decided yet what to work on. I am also remembering my long-term plan to get

6283: 5530: 5439: 5203: 5114: 3925: 3758: 3723: 3698:

Thank you! 2022 began happily with vacation. I uploaded images but stopped at 22 January - click on songs. 30 January means 10 years of

3693: 3633: 3552: 3533: 3511: 3496: 2898: 2870: 2855: 2106: 2023: 1687: 1351: 1027: 1009: 991: 977: 935: 918: 887: 431: 212: 198: 6788: 6658: 6578: 6549: 6520: 6479: 6461: 6373:

Lovely. Below, an interesting woman - and a sad loss. It's unfortunate we frequently only learn of important women once they are gone.

6236: 6204: 6179: 6136: 5954: 2906: 1224: 926:, an Italian opera, my second ever, as the TFA written by two dear people, and a park where I went with dear people, as pictured DYK -- 854: 5391:

for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a

4622: 3594:

for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a

3369:

for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a

2798: 2627: 2607: 2573: 2068: 1575:

for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a

1378: 1323:

for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a

1260:

for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a

295: 6382: 5183:, and submitting as a single hook, or trying to see if a full queue could be built out of them. Or perhaps the masculine equivalent, 4648: 4319: 2735: 1293: 5762: 4543: 1540: 424: 238: 180: 9262: 9143:. Difficult, though, to find any details on many of these people, who are often referred to only by first initials and last names. 8796: 8450: 5808: 5623:. I've also uploaded some images of the mastheads and an alternate cover page, which I'll leave below should you want to use them. 4531: 4465: 3627: 2999: 2718: 2279: 1957: 1158: 625: 268: 7369: 7348: 7328: 7179:

the article for DYK and credited you. Do you have access to those two sources in a way that you can share their excerpts with me?

5929:. And congratulations on having it be in a position that you're proud of! The emotional down is real. Before I started working on 5761:) or ones that are appropriately licensed (for newspapers, that will be those in the public domain). I don't speak copyright, but 4797:

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Knowledge! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

4155:

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Knowledge! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

2091: 583: 524: 9256: 8790: 8444: 7972:

New library partners: SAGE Journals, Elsevier ScienceDirect, University of Chicago Press, Information Processing Society of Japan

5879: 4459: 3864: 2993: 2273: 1951: 1608: 1152: 759: 9530:. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the 8117:. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the 7092:. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the 6987:. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the 6882:. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the 6756: 6715:. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the 6625:. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the 6056:... I've read a couple of other examples, though of course they don't need to be in there. You might be interested in one of my 5585:. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the 5492:. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the 3859: 3842:. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the 2701:. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the 1670:. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the 1523:. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the 843: 592:. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the 386:. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the 140:. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the 9823: 9806: 9590: 9091: 8672: 8258: 8217: 7940: 6288:

That's beautiful, thank you. A touching background, too. I had a similar fascination with the "long neck dinosaurs" - probably

6045:

I have to start the copyediting part of a huge GA I signed up to review almost a month ago when I thought I would be done with

5132: 5090: 4607: 4578: 4268: 4109: 3321: 2757: 2521: 2351: 1850: 777: 741: 698: 573: 516: 287: 5396: 3706:, - I'm so happy I mentioned his DYK on his 90th birthday when he was still alive. I have a great singer on DYK whom I heard, 3599: 3374: 2345: 1580: 1328: 1265: 464: 229:

on Böttner's artwork: "There may be more of her work out there, but this is all we could manage to collect." Yes. More later.

163: 8225: 5789:

I will be double checking, but all of those, including the post-1925 issues should still be within the public domain, as per

2877: 2763: 2554: 1692: 716: 9859: 8516: 7579:

I sure hope not, Urve — your articles have always been on unique and interesting topics, and your hooks are definitely more

4737:

You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives.

9931: 9814: 9782: 9233: 9099: 8680: 8302: 8023: 7948: 7696: 7647: 7591: 7342: 7288: 7280:

piece of information. Would you know where to look for this or would you be able to find a source that has his birth name?

7268: 7227: 7187: 7132: 6336: 6277: 6150: 5223: 5098: 4301: 4262: 4117: 3366: 3329: 3071: 2529: 2172: 1858: 710: 4563: 2771: 409: 5919: 3959: 3143: 2824: 1459: 9989:

Some candidates seemed surprised that I asked the same question again, - well, I go for peace not the absence of war. --

9594: 9455: 9328: 8947: 8266: 8244: 7983: 7309:

Knowledge talk:Manual of Style/Biography/2021 archive § RfC on non-notable pre-transition names of deceased trans people

7144:

Thank you for letting me know! Very interesting article. I'll do some searches in the next few days and add what I can.

6470:; only a couple of days long, I didn't work the polls, but I've been tired of it. Doesn't help we didn't win, either ;) 3674: 3133: 9728: 9178: 8957: 8862: 8780: 8711: 8434: 8371: 7614: 7412: 7114: 6067:

s Section I as a "trace of resistance to the hyperrationality of contemporary legal discourse" ... he sees Rehnquist's

5378: 4697: 4379: 3581: 3356: 2927: 2635: 2202: 1889: 1868: 1562: 1310: 1247: 1137: 1072: 7538: 7465: 4446: 9788: 9527: 8350: 8154: 8140: 8114: 7089: 6984: 6879: 6712: 6622: 5814: 5635: 5582: 5510: 5489: 4881: 3839: 3749:, an important decision in desegregation litigation. More can (and deserves to) be said about her. I will look more. 2698: 1667: 1520: 1051: 589: 383: 137: 10021: 9998: 9984: 9699: 9672: 9630: 7911: 7871: 7849: 5766:

complicated it is, or ones that I know are usable. This might be a problem in the future for you, just so you know.

5166: 5148: 3649: 9707: 9640:. I appreciate that. It's always a pleasure to hear from you, see your beautiful photos, and listen to good music. 7639:

does not protect the right — absence of which seems like a grave deprivation of individual liberty — is beyond me.

7574: 7257: 5342: 4537: 4358: 4164: 3470: 2059:; it's not a very active page, but you could potentially find other people interested in Nebraska to recruit, too. 834:

for inspiring me to be more active in DYK. Would not have even thought to do this without your guidance and grace.

452: 8342: 8328: 8314: 5775: 2748:, whose work about antisociality is a fundamental part of my life, and which LaBruce's films answer in some ways. 610: 9927: 9810: 9421: 9411: 9393: 9379: 9095: 8868: 8676: 8522: 8172: 7958: 7944: 7830: 7642: 7586: 7337: 7283: 7263: 7222: 7182: 7158: 7127: 6331: 6272: 6258:

encyclopedias that had plenty on penguins but there was something about seeing them in nature that made me happy.

6156: 5551: 5542: 5218: 5094: 4846: 4825: 4771: 4296: 4257: 4204: 4183: 4129: 4113: 3885: 3768: 3423: 3352: 3345: 3325: 2525: 2168: 2074: 1854: 747: 74: 9720: 9152: 9130: 8042: 6484:

Sorry to be late responding ... but it's the holiday weekend and I finally got some other things out of the way.

5209: 5184: 5177: 3954: 2767: 9548: 8291: 8136: 7917: 7738: 6737: 4290: 405: 159: 9157: 6185: 6012: 5612:

Hello! I saw your message - it's definitely nice to know of someone else who is working on similar articles!

4810: 4168: 3658: 2744:. Thank you. It is somewhat of a sad day for this to run; just learned through the grapevine of the death of 1356: 965: 9960:, but probably not by the one who didn't answer any (and hasn't edited even edited for the last 2 weeks). -- 9514:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page 8101:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page 7076:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page 6971:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page 6866:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page 6699:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page 6609:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page 6034:

has extensive background material, which honestly I think both articles should). It is also 10K longer than

5569:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page 5476:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page 5293:(actually mostly from 29 May - I took the title pic), enjoy the music, two related videos worth watching! -- 4841:

Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

4250:(if you get the reference). Although I have not been much active lately, I am always readily accessible via 4199:

Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

3826:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page 3740: 3440: 2685:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page 1654:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page 1507:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page 576:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page 370:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page 124:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page 10012:

an infobox today that it's on the Main page, but then decided against more fire ;) - candles are better! --

9901: 9797: 9082: 8690: 8663: 7926: 7219:

Your sources helped me add quite a lot. The article is at GAN now, and I have added you as a co-nominator.

6690: 6160: 5081: 4842: 4821: 4749: 4200: 4179: 4100: 3312: 2539: 2512: 1841: 1572: 1443: 1411: 1374: 1284: 621: 9913: 9343:, a redirect, with Twinkle – doesn't technically qualify for G8, so just let me know if you want it back 8051: 7892: 7789: 7707: 7556: 7391: 6053: 5941: 4148: 4133: 3880: 3248:

Skeptics given heavenly judgement, whirlwind of Discord drama begins to spin for tropical cyclone editors

816:? (Or an article with that title, since self-referential humor would only be workable after passing GA.) 321: 226: 9655: 9139:- filling out the redlinks here would be a worthwhile project for those interested. I've done my first, 1369:, and I reckon that it is more convenient to do the review here, rather than in FAC. Thanks in advance! 9957: 9645: 9586: 9531: 9517: 9109: 8254: 8213: 8118: 8104: 8031: 7120: 7093: 7079: 6988: 6974: 6883: 6869: 6776: 6716: 6702: 6626: 6612: 6123: 6097:

It's not poetry, but you might also get a kick from the first two paragraphs of Chief Justice Roberts'

5586: 5572: 5493: 5479: 3843: 3829: 2702: 2688: 2112: 1671: 1657: 1524: 1510: 773: 694: 593: 579: 512: 387: 373: 283: 141: 127: 38: 9497:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 8970:

Board vote results, bot's big GET, crat chat gives new mop, WMF seeks "sound logo" and "organizer lab"

8083:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 7036:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 6931:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 6826:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 6675:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 6595:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 5547:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 5456:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 3800:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 2667:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 1640:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 1491:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 562:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 353:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 106:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 9618: 7899: 7814: 7734: 7715: 7684: 5290: 5272: 5154: 3942: 3662: 3061: 2341: 2019: 1599: 1220: 1015: 923: 892: 8535:

Admins wanted on English Knowledge, IP editors not wanted on Farsi Wiki, donations wanted everywhere

6421:

below, for some interesting books. If you want a very weird book that touches on body horror in the

6242: 7552: 7471: 6149:, which is a pity. That might be a bedbound project. I've been working on a little pamphlet called 6127:

while she was on the couch most of that week. May you get something similar out of your infection.

6121:

I hope that your time off is something you can use productively. My wife got caught up on watching

3899: 2614: 2181: 1257: 66: 9683: 9399: 9360: 7045: 6940: 6926: 6835: 6429:

might be up your alley (though I haven't read it yet, so no promises). Thanks for your help with

5885: 5607: 5424: 5388: 5363: 4809:. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they 4588:(depending on the nature and severity of the threat of course). I cannot stress this enough; you 4167:. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they 3566: 3341: 2843: 2724:

Excellent article: informative, well written and researched, appropriately neutral. Well done. ☆

2591: 2586:

interesting; it was stubbed not so long ago because it was opaque, but it's hardly been rebuilt.

1644: 1635: 1558: 1551: 1547: 1439: 1421: 1407: 1406:

I can adjust according to your need. Don't feel rushed, I won't nominate the article tomorrow :)

1385: 1370: 1295: 1280: 1275: 1232: 795: 617: 115: 7565:

that, if unaddressed, is going to chase away editors like me, who only occasionally contribute.

6530:

is beautiful (though abstract expressionism is not for me - I don't really like Grant Wood, but

3591: 2986:

Encourage someone to become a WiR member this month by registering in the box at the top of our

2266:

Encourage someone to become a WiR member this month by registering in the box at the top of our

1944:

Encourage someone to become a WiR member this month by registering in the box at the top of our

10017: 9994: 9965: 9947: 9695: 9626: 9465: 7907: 7867: 7826: 7746: 7692: 7315:

tradition of not caring about deadnames for transgressive figures (living or dead), but that's

6261:

Later in life, I started reading about art history for fun and I stumbled across a painting by

6026: 5298: 5280: 5262: 5162: 5144: 4806: 4527: 4440: 4327: 3950: 3719: 3711: 3670: 3548: 3507: 3466: 3431: 2987: 2894: 2820: 2804: 2267: 2087: 1945: 1023: 987: 931: 900: 883: 812: 460: 194: 6049:

in a week. But, like I said, June is GA Backlog Elimination Month so it's just the right time.

956:(who I made a promise to but have been too busy to follow up on) -- just down the street from 9889: 9650: 9582: 9485: 9366:

Hello, my dear friend! Thank you. No worries - I made the first mistake ;) You will find the

8876: 8250: 8232: 8209: 8071: 7993: 7357: 7024: 6919: 6814: 6752: 6663: 6583: 6516: 6457: 6132: 5915: 5535: 5444: 5235: 4318:

also shared this in an edit summary. I intended on creating a list of examples like this and

3788: 3481: 3079: 2655: 1628: 1479: 803: 769: 690: 550: 508: 341: 303: 279: 94: 6410: 5022:

Winners of the Human rights and Environment special nomination by Wiki Loves Earth announced

2582:, since I noticed you split off Halberstam's article. You may find the state of the article 252: 9900:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 9118: 8338: 8287: 7256:

That is a useful resource — thank you for pointing me in that direction! I will go through

6599: 6590: 6300: 5598: 5560: 5328: 4618: 3855: 3618: 3393: 3057: 2811: 2714: 2623: 2550: 2337: 2135: 2040: 2015: 1683: 1595: 1590: 1536: 1216: 530: 6447:

Yes, but not till after tomorrow ... I work at the polls, and after nine straight days of

6098: 5977:

why he always wrote such long books. Michener told him that every time he started one, he

2598:

all have problems, too. But these are all too big of projects for me to tackle for now :)

364:

started her own opera company in her early 20s, just a few years before her death in 1883?

8: 9778: 9500: 9389: 9356: 9324: 8858: 8512: 8274: 8147: 7461: 6532: 6361: 6167: 5934: 5875: 4671: 4641: 4332: 3435: 1496: 1486: 1243: 1236: 6016:(yes, an FA that's been on the Main Page), and that case is arguably of more widespread 1642:... that in 1951, 22 Greenlandic children were sent to foster families in Denmark to be 8282:

don't understand the reviewer's issue there, nor why the GAN was ultimately failed. --

8130: 8019: 7636: 7512: 7124:

if you can find anything. Also, feel free to expand and add as much as you would like!

6680: 6670: 6184:

Oh, and yes - I've always loved that Dunlap dissent. People talk up Kagan's writing in

5990: 5988:, for instance, was interrupted by two weeks when, having started to add some stuff to 5620: 5415: 5374: 5367: 3817: 3703: 3540: 2676: 2671: 2662: 2164: 2156: 1347: 996:

I understand. I have many of Brian's articles watchlisted, for the reasons outlined at

399: 153: 7304: 5190:. Unrelated to this message of kindness and grace, see an interesting conversation at 3577: 3570: 2448:

How editors and readers may be emotionally affected by disasters and terrorist attacks

110: 101: 10013: 10009: 9990: 9961: 9943: 9871: 9691: 9637: 9622: 9544: 7903: 7863: 7822: 7742: 7703: 7688: 7534: 7488: 7105: 7000: 6895: 6728: 6639: 6537: 6490:

I'm not short for things to do, but thanks for the suggestions. Having just finished

6220: 5933:

in depth, I had this same thought - it's just a matter of cleaning up (and it looked

5804: 5631: 5506: 5294: 5276: 5258: 5173: 5158: 5140: 5108: 4790: 4775: 4523: 3946: 3729: 3715: 3681: 3666: 3544: 3517: 3503: 3462: 2890: 2831: 2816: 2082: 1019: 983: 945: 927: 896: 879: 831: 606: 456: 439: 190: 5139:

was deemed quirky. - I took and picked the blue-and-yellow pic last year for May. --

2919: 862: 9920: 9885: 9687: 9299: 8833: 8487: 8275: 8087: 8078: 7837: 7618: 7610: 7508: 7316: 7312: 7061: 7053: 7031: 6956: 6948: 6851: 6843: 6821: 6763: 6748: 6512: 6453: 6422: 6402: 6262: 6247: 6142: 6128: 6069: 6007: 5926: 5911: 5350: 5336: 5318: 5310: 4745: 4502: 4228: 3036: 2595: 2316: 2145: 1994: 1320: 1195: 953: 8016:

I've seen you editing recently and you seem like an experienced Knowledge editor.

5616: 3933: 3216:

Top scholarly citers, lack of open access references, predicting editor departures

9608: 8334: 8298: 8283: 7551:}} to someone's Talk page with a friendly message! Give yogurt out liberally to 7548: 6686: 6501:

that's developed recently (I think that one will be a nice GA candidate someday).

6491: 6294: 6110: 5970: 5594: 5556: 4854: 4614: 4371: 4212: 3851: 3813: 3804: 3795: 3614: 3609: 3389: 3384: 2839: 2835: 2785:

1980s, stimulated by the AIDS crisis in "Is the Rectum a Grave?" ..." - p 144 of

2710: 2619: 2612:

Don't mind me, I'm just weeping piteously from underneath the still-somehow-12kb

2587: 2579: 2561: 2546: 2052: 2035: 1679: 1532: 1362: 755: 9034:

How readers assess Knowledge's trustworthiness, and how they could in the future

7706:! And a fitting image. Interesting that Wisser has been involved with politics. 3416: 2408:

War photographers: from Crimea (1850s) to the Russian invasion of Ukraine (2022)

46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

9980: 9897: 9855: 9774: 9682:, taking away of writing articles. In 2012, I met the infoboxes conflict, over 9668: 9407: 9385: 9375: 9352: 9320: 9148: 9140: 9126: 8854: 8508: 8363: 8324: 8310: 8240: 8168: 8160: 8036: 7888: 7845: 7785: 7723: 7626: 7570: 7457: 7365: 7324: 7247: 7210: 7166: 7149: 7039: 6934: 6829: 6784: 6545: 6540:

lately, but that's almost too large of a subject to cover. I'll keep in touch.

6475: 6438: 6378: 6349: 6314: 6232: 6224: 6200: 6175: 6085: 6020:

significance to most Americans (whether they realize it or not) ... I mean, it

5974: 5950: 5871: 5771: 5758: 5741:

The masthead for the Czech-language Omaha, Nebraska newspaper, "Pokrok Západu".

5717:

The masthead for the Czech-language Omaha, Nebraska newspaper, "Pokrok Západu".

5693:

The masthead for the Czech-language Omaha, Nebraska newspaper, "Pokrok Zapadu".

5243: 5199: 5136: 4869: 4659: 4629: 4574: 4344: 4323: 4280: 4240: 4060:

Student edits as "civic engagement"; how Knowledge readers interact with images

3754: 3689: 3529: 3492: 2866: 2851: 2794: 2753: 2603: 2569: 2121: 2102: 2064: 1881: 1429: 1397: 1005: 973: 914: 839: 821: 639: 420: 311: 234: 208: 186: 176: 47: 17: 9641: 9339:

Hi Urve, long time no chat and hope you're doing well! I accidentally deleted

9114: 8002: 7880: 7404: 9893: 8262: 8221: 8126: 7675: 6430: 6035: 5411: 5406: 4718:

On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.

4599: 4555: 3919: 3809: 3458: 2731: 2113: 1343: 1338: 781: 702: 520: 451:

Thank you for her article, and the DYK perseverance! She is also featured on

395: 291: 149: 8030:; currently Knowledge needs experienced users at this task. But kindly read 7804: 4820:

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

4178:

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

3641: 1801:

Should the Wikimedia Foundation continue to accept cryptocurrency donations?

9540: 8639:

A Fringe Affair (but not the show by Edward W. Feery that was on this year)

7530: 7484: 7239: 7101: 6996: 6891: 6724: 6635: 6506: 6448: 5800: 5757:

One thing I wanted to mention: We can only use either fair use images (see

5751: 5627: 5502: 5402: 4721:

Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed.

3707: 3605: 3427: 3380: 2583: 1586: 1334: 1271: 949: 725: 602: 221:

Some 10,000 people learned of her through this 'hook'. This and the one on

9956:

ps: my trim of the pompous message was simpler, and my vote will wait for

9277: 9137:

African American officeholders during and following the Reconstruction era

8811: 8465: 7544: 4480: 3520:. I have tried my hand at writing about opera, in recognition of you. See 3014: 2294: 2124:; nothing huge and fancy like a newsletter, but a few points of interest. 1972: 1173: 9504: 9492: 9438:

New collections: Edward Elgar, E-Yearbook, Corriere della Serra, Wikilala

9370:

interesting and sad, though there's not more I can easily find about it.

9367: 6497: 5346: 4754: 4223: 3521: 2745: 1306: 1299: 357: 348: 9904:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

9659: 8703: 5981:

it was going to be short. I know now just what he was talking about ...)

5827: 5131:

Sorry to hear about you intimidated, - that's frightening. - I have the

4824:

without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to

4182:

without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to

2128:

AFCH will now show live previews of the comment to be left on a decline.

1365:, which is in final phase of construction. Currently, the article is in 1064: 9881:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

9295: 9288: 8829: 8822: 8483: 8476: 7840:

would be good there, and important: Perhaps the first ever AIDS novel.

7604: 6795:

DYK for Boychick (novel), The White Paper (novel), and Street of Stairs

5930: 5122: 4710: 4498: 4491: 3032: 3025: 2312: 2305: 1990: 1983: 1191: 1184: 961: 799: 751: 222: 9572:

Your hook reached 13,887 views (578.6 per hour), making it one of the

8199:

Your hook reached 15,970 views (665.4 per hour), making it one of the

7902:, from Swiss Alps and a funeral, - and thank you for sharing hymns! -- 7780:

Interesting. And sad. Maybe someone else can find something for this.

5467: 5461: 5451: 1825:

Pooh entered the Public Domain – but Tigger has to wait two more years

1737:

Ringing in the new year: Subject notability guideline under discussion

493:

Your hook reached 13,913 views (579.7 per hour), making it one of the

267:

Your hook reached 10,432 views (434.7 per hour), making it one of the

9976: 9851: 9664: 9403: 9371: 9310: 9144: 9122: 8844: 8498: 8320: 8306: 8236: 8164: 8028:

it requires a good understanding of Knowledge policies and guidelines

7884: 7841: 7781: 7719: 7622: 7566: 7361: 7320: 7243: 7206: 7162: 7145: 7067: 6962: 6857: 6780: 6770:

black Nebraskan newspapers that deserve articles. I would never know

6541: 6471: 6434: 6374: 6328:

has a special place in my heart — my WiFi name is "LAN Before Time".

6310: 6289: 6228: 6196: 6171: 5946: 5783: 5767: 5239: 5195: 4570: 4513: 4340: 4276: 3873: 3750: 3685: 3525: 3488: 3047: 2862: 2847: 2790: 2749: 2599: 2565: 2464:

Does birthplace affect the frequency of Knowledge biography articles?

2327: 2098: 2060: 2005: 1425: 1393: 1206: 1001: 969: 910: 835: 817: 672:

Your hook reached 6,356 views (529.7 per hour), making it one of the

635: 416: 307: 230: 204: 172: 9835: 9557: 9472: 8184: 8058: 7011: 6906: 6801: 6650: 6570: 5522: 5431: 3820:– which was neither standard nor validated by contemporary evidence? 3775: 2642: 2194: 1615: 1466: 746:

Seriously, I appreciate the work you've been putting into articles!

657: 537: 478: 328: 185:

Thank you for the article on its way to GA! She is also featured on

81: 8092: 5395:

under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can

5157:, at the bottom an imaginary set of eight DYK - and more May pics-- 4853:

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

4594: 4550: 4211:

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

3598:

under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can

3373:

under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can

2881: 2741: 2726: 2055:. Thanks for your attempt. I would suggest watchlisting pages like 1579:

under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can

1327:

under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can

1264:

under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can

9170: 5705:

The cover page of the September 15, 1871 issue of "Pokrok Západu".

7771: 5657:

The cover page of the January 12, 1900 issue of "The Enterprise".

5567:

Template:Did you know nominations/1894 Montana capital referendum

4793:, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. 4151:, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. 1361:

As you said last year, you are willing to do a source review for

9917:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 9273: 8807: 8461: 7477: 6779:

is a uniquely significant article that deserves some attention.

6214: 5796:. There do exist exceptions, of course, so I will check on that. 4476: 3661:! - Today I show yesterday's snow (if you click on "songs") and 3010: 2290: 1968: 1817:

Articles with higher quality ratings have fewer "knowledge gaps"

1169: 688:

low number given the quality of this hook, no doubt about it...

9907:

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

9875:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All

9334: 9306: 9026:

Removing watermarks, copyright signs and cigarettes from photos

8978:

NPP: Still heaven or hell for new users – and for the reviewers

8840: 8494: 7855: 7516: 7500: 6689:, supported a separate African American department at the 1898 6118:

have been worse. It will be my lasting memory of this pandemic.

4653:

Urve, you said this the first time we interacted on Knowledge,

4509: 4289:

This might be outside the scope of your article but there is —

3043: 2323: 2001: 1389: 1202: 5681:

The cover page of the October 25, 1892 issue of Pokrok Západu.

4910:

Have your say in the 2022 Wikimedia Foundation Board elections

895:, rich in culture, culinary events and meeting dear people. -- 616:

This is surely the best hook in DYK history. That's for sure.

5729:

The cover page for the May 25, 1875 issue of "Pokrok Západu".

3524:- outside of my comfort zone, but she is important, I think. 9284: 9058:

A Festival Descends on the City: The Edinburgh Fringe, Pt. 2

8887: 8818: 8472: 4487: 3090: 3021: 2301: 1979: 1180: 118:, had both of her arms amputated following an electrocution? 9733:

December 2022, Vol 8, Issue 12, Nos 214, 217, 248, 249, 250

9184:

November 2022, Vol 8, Issue 11, Nos 214, 217, 245, 246, 247

7687:. Sharing music that was on DYK which has its moments ;) -- 7198:

Thank you for doing that! I emailed you and added a url to

6006:. This now makes it probably the longest actual article in 5669:

The masthead of the Omaha, Nebraska paper "The Enterprise".

5030:

The EU Digital Services Act: What’s the Deal with the Deal?

4783: 4141: 1753:

New arbitrators look at new case and antediluvian sanctions

566: 557: 8717:

October 2022, Vol 8, Issue 10, Nos 214, 217, 242, 243, 244

8607:

Our man drills are safe for work, but our Labia is Fausta.

7175:

Thank you for adding that and accepting the draft! I have

6433:, another light subject, and an important one. Talk soon? 6292:, but I don't speak dinosaur science anymore - because of 4950:

Portals, April Fools, admin activity requirements and more

3264:

Ukraine, werewolves, Ukraine, YouTube pundits, and Ukraine

2456:

Parties remonstrate, arbs contemplate, skeptics coordinate

2208:

Mar 2022, Vol 8, Issue 3, Nos 214, 217, 222, 223, 224, 225

1388:. When are you planning on creating the FAC? I have a few 8583:

The unexpected rabbit hole of typo fixing in citations...

8026:? Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but 6002:, I see that I have more than doubled its size to almost 5208:

I can give you a hand with Urves — I would love to write

4831:

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the

4189:

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the

1652:

Template:Did you know nominations/Little Danes experiment

7821:! - your dyk pos made me happy, spared me a reply ;) -- 5038:

How the entire country of Qatar was blocked from editing

3444:, for "your help made the article better", - you are an 9888:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

9505:

placed without their consent during the 1960s and 1970s

4569:

Your guess is more or less accurate. All fine, thanks.

4314: 2155:

Short and sweet, but there's always more to discuss at

9499:... that thousands of Greenlandic women and girls had 8623:

What dreams (and heavily trafficked articles) may come

8377:

September 2022, Vol 8, Issue 9, Nos 214, 217, 240, 241

7242:. Too much deserves to be said about too many topics. 6607:

Template:Did you know nominations/Red Jordan Arobateau

6060:

sources, that guy at Colorado (Campos?) who described

2842:(about Danish mainland child experimentation) and the 8146:

Thanks for your work on this interesting subject. —

5906:, the more and more impossible it gets to get there. 4934:

Three stories of Ukrainian Wikimedians during the war

4385:

May 2022, Vol 8, Issue 5, Nos 214, 217, 227, 229, 230

4092:

Wales resigned WMF board chair in 2006 reorganization

2933:

Apr 2022, Vol 8, Issue 4, Nos 214, 217, 226, 227, 228

2440:

The 10 most SHOCKING deletion discussions of February

1895:

Feb 2022, Vol 8, Issue 2, Nos 214, 217, 220, 221, 222

1505:

Template:Did you know nominations/Arnold Comes of Age

1078:

Jan 2022, Vol 8, Issue 1, Nos 214, 216, 217, 218, 219

9510: