775:"grew up" with the subject matter. I also have some experience with GA & FA guidelines, though not nearly as much as you but enough to keep the article clean of the issues. You know what I intended to do there; I did some reading before adding the content I reverted in and did not want it to be lost in the edit history after massive editing, hence the reverts. Make the rest of your copy edit and I can then take a look and see if things are missing. In your last series of edits, you removed the sourced phrase "Jinnah's law career was full of victories" without rewriting it in any other form... but I guess, like you said, you are doing it in phases. So I'll compare when you're done with your copy edits to see that no information is lost. That is all I'm concerned about, other wise you're edited versions are going good. And sure, I'll see if the text complies with
194:"I would start with the lede. The first paragraph is generally fine. However, after that, I would, in the remainder of the lede, go through Jinnah's life chronologically, at least the highlights, while of course concentrating on what he is best known for, his leading the Muslim League and advocating establishment of Pakistan, his role as GG in independent Pakistan, then what he is remembered for. Also, I think you should merge the criticism section into the other sections of the article."
31:
1092:
1299:
429:
to the house of FA but sooner or later small problems come up which become a bottleneck in the process. By the way there are some images of Jinnah present in the public libraries which can be used with the consent of the publishing house and the author. Should I try to get them or we can get some from the
813:
TopGun, you seem to know a lot about this specific topic, and that is great. Wehwalt has more FAs than anyone on en wiki and his specialty is political article. I suggest you let
Wehwalt take the lead on copyediting and structure and you provide material and reliable sources. When I collaborate on an
428:
Yeah I also saw the comment on the talk page regarding the lead image. I thought to add some more information regarding him, but there is already a lot of work that needs to be done on the article before adding up more of it. Though I am quite excited as this is my first article that would be heading
232:
Yeah, some of the criticism is even undue. Those sentences should be moved to where he asked for a separate state and for a plebiscite for
Kashmir and then the lines about Junaghar can be added in context. Simply stating as such is out of context and just for the sake of criticism which, as you said
578:
Yes, it is better now. Headings should give some useful info already not given by other things. "Biography" is already obvious from the fact that it is a bio article so we should have some new information in the heading (this also goes for other bio articles). If you get a better idea, feel free to
733:
I haven't considered it an edit war. I'm here to improve the article because
Inlandmamba asked me and the subject matter seemed interesting and a change of pace from my usual US articles. I know what passes at FA, I need people who grew up with the subject matter, so to speak, to let me know the
196:
I will try to rewrite the lead paragraph as he has said but I don't exactly know how to merge the criticism paragraph in the rest of the article as some user's (you know) may be against it. But I have been going through some FA and GA, almost all of them were without such a section. So I think the
774:
Yes, take your shot and then I can see if there is any issue. I tried keeping in all the edits while making my revert and didn't know that you were editing the article consistently and simultaneously. I can help you on the subject matter; I can be attributed as, as you say, one of the editors who
513:
Hi dear TopGun,I think "Biography" includes and describes all sections. "Personal life" and then "Early life", that similarity is not suitable in my veiw, and meaning is same, then why same title as a section and subsection. You know better, now what do you suggest, "Biography" is appropriate or
1328:
Thanks for providing input. That was fast! Could you take a moment and check the RfC again ... the wording of your reply suggests that the RfC may be written poorly. Your comment sounds like the RfC is asking about whether a DRN case can proceed if a party refuses to participate. That is not
73:
I was also thinking of removing one or two pictures from the article so that a symmetry may be formed in it, it looks like that pictures have been just placed in it without any order. What do you recommend? I was also thinking of raising the picture related topic at the talk page so that other
801:
Hi Top Gun, just a quick word that it's best to give the person a couple hours to show you where they are going and THEN discuss... too many edit conflicts in the heat of editing lose the flow. This is a good faith editor and sometimes you just have to take a deep breath and then discuss the
643:
There is no great point in separate sections on his legal and political career, when most of his notable cases were in his early years. Please let me take a shot at it, and if it is unsatisfactory, it can always be reverted. I've written some at the FA level and I know how to present an
607:
Hi, I'm doing some work on article improvement there, putting things in a more organized fashion and so forth. Inlandmamba asked me to, with a view at GA or FA. There will be duplications and so forth as I go through it, but they will be short lived. Appreciate your consideration on
837:
Yes, it has been addressed above. Actually we came into conflict because I thought that some information was duplicated, and later some was lost when he adjusted it, so I made some reverts trying to keep everything. I'll let me edit away as much he wants before I edit further there ;)
882:
What I plan to do next is the early years as a politician. I may begin with a paragraph on the beginnings of the independence movement, then trace Jinnah's growing political involvement. I am not sure the names of the sections work well but will leave them for the time
708:
Sure, I'll stay away from it for a while and make objections in the end... I've edited some where I had objections without running down what you explained here about merging etc. Do not consider it an edit war, your edits are improving the article, keep on editing...
112:
Yes, I think the pictures will have to be re-arranged. Just keep in mind that they do not displace the edit buttons or headings. I've a few sources on my hardisk on his law carrier and will like to expand it into a section, I'll do that later maybe.
658:
The point of separate section was the notability of both carriers. If you have a way around to present it in another way keeping the due weightage, give it a try. As for the duplication, I think it is good now, so you can move the whole paragraph.
1118:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
68:
Sorry for catching up after so long. I was busy with some office work that's why couldn't spend more time on the Jinnah article. I have made some edits to the lead paragraph. You can check it and let me know if any more work is required on it.
303:
I have changed the heading of criticism to Views and oratory. Will be adding some more information in a day or two. I also wanted to take your opinion on this article as I created it and was thinking of nominating it for GA,
1278:
1122:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.
407:
I'm working on Jinnah too with you.. I'll add anything I think of. Good going till now. I'm watching the talk page discussion. There's some issue about images, hope it's not a big deal as they are in public domain.
1144:
Hell I should have started the work 2 days ago! Anyways, I plan to do a lot with the article and I'll finish by midnight and will go for Good article nom tonight, probably at 3 am. I'll ask the editor who reviewed
693:
Could you please allow me to work on it for a bit without edit conflicts? Your contributions are valuable, and I'm not running them down. But I'm trying to edit that section, and I can't, if you are as
1052:
No, I wasn't planning to take it to AN3 yet, that's why I asked him on the talk page instead. You can read the explanations made here for the purpose to which none of the involved further objected:
137:
Sure. Let me know if I could be of any assistance. In the mean while I'll try to do some more work on the articles body and make some amendments so that it may look better and become more readable.
1115:
738:
in it. Just wait half an hour after my last edit to the article, please. I'm trying to sort out that quote from the fellow barrister, which is wrong, it is not "leader", it is "pleader".--
1350:
Yes, I got it. I meant to convey that if a party has not yet responded and does not want to participate, it would waste other editors' time to comment on that. The RFC's wording is fine. --
192:
Hmmm. Yeah I saw some additions to the article. They seem good to me :). I was talking to the admin who has been guiding me. After adjusting the lead paragraph these are his comments:
1006:
in the exact previous version, but when you change to your further will... it results in a different version. That is a revert too. So every edit in which you edit previous content
1132:
987:" Since DS wasn't undoing another edit, but changing it, his first move wasn't a revert. The second one was, because it restored the article to his previous version.
430:
1081:
1182:
1175:
1156:
1333:
editors (not parties) supply helpful comments on the DRN case? or must they wait for the 3rd party. I hope that is clearer. Thanks for helping out! --
971:
Also, his first move was a revert because he changed content by another editor. Any amend of another editor's contribution, same or different, is a revert.
1207:
569:
832:
532:
Hi, the whole article is a "biography" so it will not really be a descriptive title. You're right, "personal life" is not elegant, try another title. --
1002:
Actually in the context I was right, if you check the history, there were previous very recent moves which were amended by this one. And as you stated
1038:
or any similar noticeboard and try to use your definition there. I certainly wouldn't block based on it and I doubt if any other admin would either.
958:
487:
467:
423:
402:
363:
285:
248:
227:
187:
167:
128:
1260:
1163:
1071:
1047:
1029:
949:
should be on the talk page of the article not here. This is not related page.It will be easy for uninvolved editors to review the discussion. Thanks.
853:
808:
594:
547:
1365:
1342:
1321:
892:
767:
703:
934:
920:
794:
747:
728:
688:
674:
653:
638:
985:
reverting means undoing the effects of one or more edits, which normally results in the page being restored to a version that existed previously.
996:
1227:, it will be soon expanded, but there will be needed your assistance in this regard. Please take a look at-, make better if needed. Thanks.
560:. Nevertheless, I have changed subsections rather than-.Please take a look at, that are good or you have a preference for another?. Thanks.
523:
1290:
1153:, you might be able to add few facts which I can never so please do if possible. Lets hope that it gets GA before the day arrives :)
1104:
348:
It looks good, but some more sources are needed, esp. in last three sections. Everything has to be sourced before you nominate. --
1236:
342:
106:
905:
article to make some sense and address the weightage... but I agree this is not really elegant. What do you have in mind? --
233:
is not done in good articles. Also try giving it a better heading sequence along with merging / removing undue criticism. --
1169:
617:
1137:
1329:
quite right: The RfC is trying to ask: If there are 3 parties, and 2 have commented (with an
Opening statement) can
1149:
as I'm using that article as a guideline and will see that all issues raised in that GAN are covered. As you live in
501:
623:
Yeah, I saw some duplications. I recently added the content in detail, so I've adjusted the duplication for you. --
172:
I've added the stuff I had. Take a look and see if you can give a better look to the over all heading sequence. --
818:
with User;Gerda Arendt, we define who is focusing on what ahead of time so we don't step on one another's toes.
964:
1053:
754:
Also check that I am complying with
English as it is spoken/written in, I suppose, Pakistan and India per
1138:
734:
things that they need to see in the article because that is what they expect an article about Jinnah to
38:
1128:
1108:
556:
Ok, I understand, actually I have added to many bio articles that "Biography" and that I learnt from
1268:
1146:
368:
Okay. I'll add some more when I have my hands on them. So what do you suggest should be done with
197:
admin is right in this respect that it should be merged. Where do you suggest I should begin with?
1099:
1083:
305:
460:
395:
335:
309:
278:
220:
160:
99:
1232:
1124:
1043:
992:
954:
827:
565:
519:
8:
1338:
1286:
946:
507:
71:
Secondly have you found any references for the sentences which have a tag added to them?
602:
1215:
1011:
930:
888:
776:
763:
743:
699:
684:
649:
613:
1358:
1314:
1253:
1200:
1064:
1022:
980:
973:" No, it isn't. If you think about it, defining like that would mean that nearly
913:
846:
787:
755:
721:
667:
631:
587:
540:
480:
440:
416:
375:
356:
315:
258:
241:
200:
180:
140:
121:
79:
47:
17:
1010:
a revert unless you are introducing completely new content. This was clarified at
1228:
1039:
988:
950:
819:
561:
515:
1172:- almost there guys! But need help with section 4 and 5, and require more refs.
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
1334:
1282:
803:
59:
1274:
1035:
945:
I am watching edits and waiting, but I think discussion about the article of
710:
514:"Personal life" because twice life, life, sound no good. I think so. Thanks.
926:
884:
759:
739:
695:
680:
645:
609:
1352:
1308:
1247:
1194:
1058:
1016:
907:
840:
815:
781:
715:
661:
625:
581:
557:
534:
474:
434:
410:
350:
235:
174:
115:
1116:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Rape in
Northeast India (2nd nomination)
901:
As you can see in the above section, I tried to get the sections at the
1224:
1216:
1150:
1277:
as an editor that may be willing to comment on RfCs. There is
312:
rated as a GA, so thought to give it a try. What do you suggest?
902:
369:
60:
1281:
that could use some input, if you are so inclined. Cheers. --
1245:
Great! I've watchlisted it, will add to it on the go. --
1097:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
1103:
is suitable for inclusion in
Knowledge according to
1034:As you wish, but I seriously wouldn't try going to
679:OK, I see how I can work it. I'll play with it.--
372:? Any more work you suggest should be done on it?
1279:an RfC about the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard
253:Okay. I will start working on that section.
1273:Hi. Your name was selected at random from
1223:Hi TopGun, I have just created the article
925:Not sure yet, will give it some thought.--
802:changes. Hope all is getting sorted out.
74:editors may also express there opinions.
14:
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
1170:Talk:Independence Day (Pakistan)/GA1
25:
1105:Knowledge's policies and guidelines
472:If you have access, that's good. --
23:
24:
1383:
1114:The article will be discussed at
1297:
1090:
29:
13:
1:
1054:WT:EW#Definition of a revert
969:At DS's talkpage you wrote "
814:article, such as I am on on
7:
1366:19:53, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
1343:19:50, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
1322:19:47, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
1291:19:30, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
1261:15:56, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
1237:19:38, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
1208:17:28, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
1183:08:46, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
1164:11:35, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
1139:Independence Day (Pakistan)
308:is the article. I just saw
10:
1388:
1192:Sure, I'll take a look. --
1133:00:41, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
1072:22:58, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
1048:22:05, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
1030:21:57, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
997:21:56, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
959:00:26, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
935:00:06, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
921:23:27, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
893:23:25, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
854:23:25, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
833:22:27, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
809:22:19, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
795:23:06, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
768:22:14, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
748:22:11, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
729:22:03, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
704:21:59, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
689:21:36, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
675:21:33, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
654:21:28, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
639:21:24, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
618:21:23, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
595:18:29, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
570:18:26, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
548:16:19, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
488:21:27, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
468:19:25, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
424:18:19, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
977:edit would be a revert.
524:17:48, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
403:15:24, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
364:21:01, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
343:15:48, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
286:05:46, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
249:10:54, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
228:11:29, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
188:13:35, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
168:15:54, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
129:13:25, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
107:17:12, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
1275:Feedback Request Service
1147:Independence Day (India)
1107:or whether it should be
1100:Rape in Northeast India
1084:Rape in Northeast India
579:rename them further. --
965:Making something clear
306:Manzoor Ul Haq Siddiqi
502:What do you suggest?.
310:Salimuzzaman Siddiqui
42:of past discussions.
508:Muhammad Ali Jinnah
777:Pakistani English
54:
53:
48:current talk page
1379:
1364:
1320:
1305:
1301:
1300:
1269:RfC input needed
1259:
1206:
1178:
1159:
1094:
1093:
1070:
1028:
1014:by us before. --
1004:normally results
919:
852:
830:
825:
822:
806:
793:
727:
673:
637:
593:
546:
486:
456:
455:
448:
422:
391:
390:
383:
362:
331:
330:
323:
274:
273:
266:
247:
216:
215:
208:
186:
156:
155:
148:
127:
95:
94:
87:
33:
32:
26:
18:User talk:TopGun
1387:
1386:
1382:
1381:
1380:
1378:
1377:
1376:
1351:
1347:You're welcome.
1307:
1298:
1296:
1271:
1246:
1220:
1193:
1176:
1157:
1142:
1125:Darkness Shines
1095:
1091:
1088:
1057:
1015:
967:
906:
839:
828:
823:
820:
804:
780:
714:
660:
624:
605:
580:
533:
504:
473:
466:
449:
442:
441:
409:
401:
384:
377:
376:
349:
341:
324:
317:
316:
284:
267:
260:
259:
234:
226:
209:
202:
201:
173:
166:
149:
142:
141:
114:
105:
88:
81:
80:
64:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1385:
1375:
1374:
1373:
1372:
1371:
1370:
1369:
1368:
1348:
1270:
1267:
1266:
1265:
1264:
1263:
1240:
1239:
1219:
1214:
1213:
1212:
1211:
1210:
1187:
1186:
1177:TheSpecialUser
1158:TheSpecialUser
1141:
1136:
1089:
1087:
1082:Nomination of
1080:
1079:
1078:
1077:
1076:
1075:
1074:
983:sums it up - "
966:
963:
962:
961:
942:
941:
940:
939:
938:
937:
896:
895:
879:
878:
877:
876:
875:
874:
873:
872:
871:
870:
869:
868:
867:
866:
865:
864:
863:
862:
861:
860:
859:
858:
857:
856:
799:
798:
797:
604:
601:
600:
599:
598:
597:
573:
572:
553:
552:
551:
550:
527:
526:
503:
500:
499:
498:
497:
496:
495:
494:
493:
492:
491:
490:
458:
438:
393:
373:
370:Jinnah article
333:
313:
302:
299:
298:
297:
296:
295:
294:
293:
292:
291:
290:
289:
288:
276:
256:
254:
218:
198:
195:
193:
158:
138:
132:
131:
97:
77:
75:
72:
70:
67:
63:
58:
56:
52:
51:
34:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1384:
1367:
1362:
1361:
1356:
1355:
1349:
1346:
1345:
1344:
1340:
1336:
1332:
1327:
1326:
1325:
1324:
1323:
1318:
1317:
1312:
1311:
1304:
1295:
1294:
1293:
1292:
1288:
1284:
1280:
1276:
1262:
1257:
1256:
1251:
1250:
1244:
1243:
1242:
1241:
1238:
1234:
1230:
1226:
1222:
1221:
1218:
1209:
1204:
1203:
1198:
1197:
1191:
1190:
1189:
1188:
1184:
1181:
1180:
1179:
1171:
1168:
1167:
1166:
1165:
1162:
1161:
1160:
1152:
1148:
1140:
1135:
1134:
1130:
1126:
1120:
1117:
1112:
1110:
1106:
1102:
1101:
1085:
1073:
1068:
1067:
1062:
1061:
1055:
1051:
1050:
1049:
1045:
1041:
1037:
1033:
1032:
1031:
1026:
1025:
1020:
1019:
1013:
1009:
1005:
1001:
1000:
999:
998:
994:
990:
986:
982:
978:
976:
972:
960:
956:
952:
948:
944:
943:
936:
932:
928:
924:
923:
922:
917:
916:
911:
910:
904:
900:
899:
898:
897:
894:
890:
886:
881:
880:
855:
850:
849:
844:
843:
836:
835:
834:
831:
826:
817:
812:
811:
810:
807:
800:
796:
791:
790:
785:
784:
778:
773:
772:
771:
770:
769:
765:
761:
757:
753:
752:
751:
750:
749:
745:
741:
737:
732:
731:
730:
725:
724:
719:
718:
712:
707:
706:
705:
701:
697:
692:
691:
690:
686:
682:
678:
677:
676:
671:
670:
665:
664:
657:
656:
655:
651:
647:
642:
641:
640:
635:
634:
629:
628:
622:
621:
620:
619:
615:
611:
596:
591:
590:
585:
584:
577:
576:
575:
574:
571:
567:
563:
559:
555:
554:
549:
544:
543:
538:
537:
531:
530:
529:
528:
525:
521:
517:
512:
511:
510:
509:
489:
484:
483:
478:
477:
471:
470:
469:
464:
463:
457:
454:
453:
447:
446:
437:for instance?
436:
432:
427:
426:
425:
420:
419:
414:
413:
406:
405:
404:
399:
398:
392:
389:
388:
382:
381:
371:
367:
366:
365:
360:
359:
354:
353:
347:
346:
345:
344:
339:
338:
332:
329:
328:
322:
321:
311:
307:
287:
282:
281:
275:
272:
271:
265:
264:
252:
251:
250:
245:
244:
239:
238:
231:
230:
229:
224:
223:
217:
214:
213:
207:
206:
191:
190:
189:
184:
183:
178:
177:
171:
170:
169:
164:
163:
157:
154:
153:
147:
146:
136:
135:
134:
133:
130:
125:
124:
119:
118:
111:
110:
109:
108:
103:
102:
96:
93:
92:
86:
85:
62:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
1359:
1353:
1330:
1315:
1309:
1302:
1272:
1254:
1248:
1201:
1195:
1174:
1173:
1155:
1154:
1143:
1121:
1113:
1098:
1096:
1086:for deletion
1065:
1059:
1023:
1017:
1007:
1003:
984:
979:
974:
970:
968:
914:
908:
847:
841:
788:
782:
735:
722:
716:
668:
662:
632:
626:
606:
588:
582:
541:
535:
505:
481:
475:
461:
451:
450:
444:
443:
417:
411:
396:
386:
385:
379:
378:
357:
351:
336:
326:
325:
319:
318:
300:
279:
269:
268:
262:
261:
242:
236:
221:
211:
210:
204:
203:
181:
175:
161:
151:
150:
144:
143:
122:
116:
100:
90:
89:
83:
82:
65:
55:
43:
37:
816:Franz Kafka
36:This is an
1229:Justice007
1040:Black Kite
989:Black Kite
951:Justice007
644:article.--
562:Justice007
516:Justice007
462:talk to me
397:talk to me
337:talk to me
280:talk to me
222:talk to me
162:talk to me
101:talk to me
66:Hi TopGun,
1335:Noleander
1283:Noleander
1225:Iqbal Day
1217:Iqbal Day
981:WP:REVERT
805:Montanabw
756:WP:ENGVAR
1354:lTopGunl
1310:lTopGunl
1249:lTopGunl
1196:lTopGunl
1151:Pakistan
1060:lTopGunl
1018:lTopGunl
909:lTopGunl
883:being.--
842:lTopGunl
783:lTopGunl
717:lTopGunl
663:lTopGunl
627:lTopGunl
583:lTopGunl
536:lTopGunl
476:lTopGunl
435:this one
412:lTopGunl
352:lTopGunl
237:lTopGunl
176:lTopGunl
117:lTopGunl
1109:deleted
927:Wehwalt
885:Wehwalt
821:Pumpkin
760:Wehwalt
740:Wehwalt
696:Wehwalt
694:well.--
681:Wehwalt
646:Wehwalt
610:Wehwalt
608:that.--
603:Rewrite
431:gallery
39:archive
1036:WP:AN3
947:Jinnah
903:Jinnah
711:WP:IAR
558:Drmies
445:Inland
380:Inland
320:Inland
263:Inland
255:Thanks
205:Inland
145:Inland
84:Inland
76:Thanks
61:Jinnah
1331:other
1012:WT:EW
975:every
506:Ref:
452:mamba
433:like
387:mamba
327:mamba
270:mamba
212:mamba
152:mamba
91:mamba
16:<
1360:talk
1339:talk
1316:talk
1303:Done
1287:talk
1255:talk
1233:talk
1202:talk
1129:talk
1066:talk
1056:. --
1044:talk
1024:talk
993:talk
955:talk
931:talk
915:talk
889:talk
848:talk
829:talk
789:talk
779:. --
764:talk
744:talk
736:have
723:talk
713:. --
700:talk
685:talk
669:talk
650:talk
633:talk
614:talk
589:talk
566:talk
542:talk
520:talk
482:talk
418:talk
358:talk
243:talk
182:talk
123:talk
824:Sky
758:.--
301:Hi,
1341:)
1306:--
1289:)
1235:)
1131:)
1111:.
1046:)
1008:is
995:)
957:)
933:)
891:)
838:--
766:)
746:)
702:)
687:)
659:--
652:)
616:)
568:)
522:)
439:--
408:--
374:--
314:--
257:--
199:--
139:--
113:--
78:--
1363:)
1357:(
1337:(
1319:)
1313:(
1285:(
1258:)
1252:(
1231:(
1205:)
1199:(
1185:`
1127:(
1069:)
1063:(
1042:(
1027:)
1021:(
991:(
953:(
929:(
918:)
912:(
887:(
851:)
845:(
792:)
786:(
762:(
742:(
726:)
720:(
698:(
683:(
672:)
666:(
648:(
636:)
630:(
612:(
592:)
586:(
564:(
545:)
539:(
518:(
485:)
479:(
465:)
459:(
421:)
415:(
400:)
394:(
361:)
355:(
340:)
334:(
283:)
277:(
246:)
240:(
225:)
219:(
185:)
179:(
165:)
159:(
126:)
120:(
104:)
98:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.