User talk:Sulfurboy/Archive 17

1845:, Apologies for this being long, but there's some context that might be missing here. I'm not sure what warranted unease John has with my review process. I'm not even sure he fully understands the difference between AfC and NPP considering a couple of his comments and your pinging. His disagreement with my decline of FloridaArmy's article was done without assuming good faith and without proper due diligence. The article was in fact submitted and declined appropriately. FloridaArmy has been repeatedly warned and restricted and still has gone on and continuously disregarded reviewers very basic suggestions. Considering the volume of FloridaArmy's page creations, declines such as this are the only defense against a flood of improperly sourced articles, many of which have borderline/questionable notability. Why John even jumped in on this, with little to no background surrounding the issue, and why they tried to have a broader discussion about my ability as a reviewer on a submitter's talk page is beyond me. 1902:, all reviewers make errors, and though each reviewer does tend to have a characteristic style and a characteristic pattern , there are some errors that most of us make, and Sulfurboy is not alone in a tendency to decline articles for fixable problems, or to not notice the relevance of special notability guidelines, or misjudgments in dealing with areas where one is less competent than one would like to imagine--all of these are errors I recognize because I make them also. .Nor is he alone in declining instead of rejecting hopeless drafts, or in not always seeing the advantages of speedy or MfD, or in not dealing more actively with the probably undeclared paid editors --all areas where I have become more likely to take strong action than most reviewers. All of us are so aware of the need to clear backlogs that we often do not give sufficiently directed help, or become apt to treat a good faith beginner as if they were a SPA. 1717:, India. 90% of the content on this page is directly based on the press coverage in the Millenium Post and the most circulated Bengali daily Anandabazar. Even his researchgate profile has been given as an external source. The information contained herein is partly extracted from the University website (Office of Vice Chancellor (VC). It's almost impossible for a man to get vast coverage and I don't think it should be the only criteria for a draft to get published. He is an well known academic in West Bengal and holds the designation of VC in a State University. I do belive that I have adequate notability and reliable sources to support the article. Now it's arduous for me to gather more sources to validate what I have written there. Please consider that. You can check the university website also. Thanks. 989:

considered 'generally reliable' according to . These three reviews, on their own satisfy the notability requirements. On top of this I have cited reviews in Publishers Weekly and Quillette, as well as a minor review in the National Review and a blog review from a well respected computer scientist. I understand if you believe that the latter four reviews are from 'non-notable or unreliable sources' but I don't think that it is accurate to call the Wall Street Journal, New Yorker and New York Intelligencer 'non-notable and unreliable'. Please could you clarify the reasons for rejection, because as it stands, I believe that the article satisfies the notability requirements. Thanks, all the best,

2588:), you did not state exactly which of the other sources are not reliable. I clearly provided multiple media articles from "published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject". Maybe I need a second opinion. I've already invested too much time just trying to start this article and making changes you've suggested. Then it becomes something else that is wrong. As a (personally) disinterested party, it's almost not worth continuing to argue semantics with a single authority. It makes one wonder how single-source articles like this were ever approved and still exist: 2682:

were there from the very beginning and are in public domain...and I have just added 4 additional images that half were uploaded from Wiki Image sources and half from me Karl Ferris, their Author and copyright holder, (and I give Wiki permission to use them). I also corrected a few incorrect names and dates in the original article written by Michael Goldstein-Curator, of the Album Cover Hall of Fame.com And there are plenty of Periodical citations there also, and many related Knowledge interlinks on the page to many other related pages.

1288:, Sure, you provided four sources. One of the sources is from a blog website and the other is a press release. The other two focus more on notable driver's participation instead of the actual event itself, meaning any notability this event might have would hinge almost entirely on the notability of these already established drivers which means the event wouldn't be considered independently notable. We need to see at least one reliable source whose primary focus is on the event itself and not these professional drivers. 3290:, Knowledge might not be the best place for you if you feel that rejections are making your condition worse. Knowledge is full of rejections and mistake correction and eclines, etc. Knowledge policy is very strict and does not make exceptions for people's mental health. If you are currently having a mental health crisis, I would recommend texting NAMI to 741741. If you are in another country, please let me know and I can try to find your more applicable resources. I hope you are able to get help or feel better. 2605:, It is Knowledge, not me, that has decided that Youtube is typically considered unreliable. None of the sources your provided show significant coverage of the subject. The only sources that do directly cover the subject are primary interviews that do not denote notability. Again, these are not rules set by me, they're set across the whole wikipedia. And I'm not sure what your point is about the other article, I didn't create or approve it. Also, inclusion of another article is not an indicator of notability 1792: 31: 686: 3091:. Even if 4 was considered fully reliable or a notable publication, that still puts this article short one article to meet the aforementioned standard. I'm restoring the tag and posting this to the talk page. It should be noted that when I reviewed the page, I very much considered draftifying or sending to AfD, but I'm giving a benefit of a doubt. If it's not corrected, or the tag is removed without improvement, then one of those routes will have to be considered. 111:) published as a source. I was wondering if you see any big specifics to be addressed or if the comments refer to the entire article. There were some words to be changed in the intro although I can't seem to find any other blatant puffery in the rest of the article. The article includes quite a lot of varied, academic research and overall is neutral in its coverage of the topic. Would love to hear some more points to get working on them! Thanks! 2186: 2141: 1403:, The whole thing likely needs to be rewritten from the ground up. Knowledge is not a place to advertise or promote every organization this person has been part of. The article also needs to be written a formal, neutral tone. Do not use Knowledge as a voice, we care what others have to say about her in secondary sources, not what the user thinks or what the organizations she's involved with think 3342:, and it sure sounds like a nice bar to drink in, but I think there are some problems there. I've raised some of them in talk as you requested in your edit summary when you reverted back in all the promotional material sourced to long-dead blogs; you really shouldn't have done that but never mind. I'll see you at the talk page and we can see what needs to be done. -- 2584:, I drew a pretty clear and concise map as to the significance of the subject of the article. You do not appear to understand the game industry nor its technology. Maybe you disapprove of the particular contributions written about in the article. Other than a dislike for YouTube interviews (again, controlled and posted by the cited established media companies 1851:

to me and their response was "I talk how I talk". At that point, I made the choice to no longer interact with them. The only reason I even responded today was because you asked for me to join the discussion. This is why I'm choosing not to even tag them in this, as I have zero interest in dealing with their negativity unless it's absolutely necessary.

2831:. I moved it to draft in the hope that involved editors would source the content and remove that which can't be sourced. I will add the citation needed templates to the article In the hope that references are added, but if there are no changes I will probably source some and remove the rest of the content. Any better ideas to go forward? -- 3338:, I took the liberty of checking your contributions. I see you are mainly a tagger and reviewer of other editors' work, and there is nothing wrong with that. I then looked at the five articles you have started. Most of them look fine, but this one stands out as a terrible article in terrible shape. Now, I apologise if this comes over as a 1506:

activities, the template was based off other first ladies wiki pages which bear similar "advertisement", and I have yet to understand why the sources that were sited were not reliable they all stem from legitimate newspapers of Liberia, hence my previous question why are they not considered credible? Thank you --

2772:, Yeah you made the right move Angus, I had no idea when I reviewed it that it had been an article that was moved back to draftspace that had been in main for a decade. That being said, it is possibly an AfD candidate, and at the very least, all non-sourced BLP claims in the article should probably be removed. 3442:

I assumed that the sources were genuine. However, you and another reviewer have the opinion that they are press releases. As I am new, I am not fully aware of all the vetting processes of sources. I included all the sources I could find, and there are no other sources for the article. So if these are

1967:

I was just curious why the new proposed page on Bereskin & Parr LLP was declined? In viewing the landscape of IP firms in Canada (i.e., intellectual property), I had noted many IP firms had informative Knowledge pages (e.g., Smart & Biggar, Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP, etc.). Accordingly, I

1859:

is a completely different story. They are in fact one of my favorite editors here and I always welcome and, when needed, respond to their critique of my reviews. As far as I know, I've always been open to what they have to say and I don't think it's an ongoing unease they have with my review process,

983:

Hi there! Thanks for taking the time to review the article I wrote for the 'The Elephant in the Brain'. I wanted to ask for clarification as to why the article was rejected. You wrote 'Reviews on the book are from non-notable or unreliable sources. Not seeing any significant coverage of the subject.'

3703:

Another P.S. I saw your note, and I'm working up the two sections that need it. Really, it was the partnership of Madeleine, with her French (and Swiss) connections, and Arthur, with his Polish Connections, that made the gallery so influentual. So--the gallery is the important thing, I think, not so

2827:. There is enough coverage to justify inclusion so AfD does not make sense. After so many years most of the article is not backed by independent reliable sources, I thought of just trimming all unsourced claims, but that would leave mostly a gallery of images. In its current state it does not follow 1905:

I deal with such errors when I see them by mentioning a clear example from time to time, and hope that will help to correct imbalance; just as I hope others will correct my own. There are some reviewers I am reluctant to correct because I know they will get angry , but Sulfurboy is by no means one

1638:

counts as significant as he's directed three films which have their own (extensive) wikipedia pages but I guess it still needs a bit more work. Would it help if the post was longer? I tried to keep it concise so that every word was backed up by as many sources as possible but maybe that's unhelpful.

1190:

I am quite interested in writing about African-Americans in Tech/Venture Capital - it is important to note that over 200 Tech VC African-Americas are members of BLCK VC (this is why I am starting with Frederik Groce, the Co-Founder of BLCK VC). Also, I am not paid nor am I affiliated with BLCK VC. I

3688:

No worries. I was, in fact, surprised to hear back from anyone so quickly. Mid 20th C. art is... a challenging subject, with all the copyright issues it infringes on. And... the perceptible fade into self-promotion is going to be an ongoing issue. Definitely multiple eye passing over the content is

2896:

The draft properly links to the article on the species, so the draft almost certainly is about the venom. We edit-conflicted in a non-harmful way, because I renamed the draft while you declined it. I think that an article on the venom should be accepted when the title is clarified, but we need to

1971:

Alternatively, how could I change my submission to be acceptable, without it seeming like an "advertisment"? The original page noted a brief history of the firm (i.e., founded in 1965), it's founders, the number of lawyers, it's general ranking in IP landscape as well notable clients that have been

1909:

I'm responding here at some length both to reassure Sulfurboy, but also, Barkeep, in the hope that I can help you can work out more effective processes to improve the quality of reviewing. I was delighted to see you participation in this. because if always helps if things don't become just a back

1850:

Beyond that, I really have no interest in hearing out John or taking his critiques seriously. He has talked down to me on more than one occasion and I've seen them be very abrasive and have a general lack of AGF, particularly towards newer editors. I've even had to outright ask him not to talk down

1595:

3- Two Peer reviewed journal articles from the University of Sevilla in Spain: Manresa González, Carlos (2015). "Iconos, de Rafael Almanza Alonso: un nuevo caso de uso intencional del endecasílabo dactílico". Rhythmica. XIII (13): 97–127. doi:10.5944/rhythmica.16159 Manresa González, Carlos (2018).

1063:

This is regarding the article submitted through Article for Creation that was rejected and your response on 11th March that I need to clarify if I am being directly or indirectly compensated for the edits being made. Would like to clarify that I am being indirectly compensated for my edits. Looking

2681:

Could you please explain why this article "Karl Ferris",(about me) which has been on Knowledge for over 10 years, is now marked for Deletion or Draft? I, and much of the public, do believe this subject qualifies for a Knowledge article, and has over the past 10 years. And, half the pictures on it

2649:

of the subject". I do not know how else to illustrate the subject's proprietary contributions. It's not as if raw source code can be released. Many articles published by the most well-respected journals involve interviews, not second and third-hand information. This new learning experience has not

1637:

I had included the bio and his imdb page but a previous reviewer said they didn't count as reliable sources. So I stripped it all down to things that I was confident were as reliable as you can get. The seven sources are all international news organisations which I thought was good. In my eyes he

1194:

Key Question: As a starting point, does it make sense to write a WP draft for BLCK VC first and then list all its members - then create stubs for all its members and all the Venture Capital Companies they work for (I think this is around 300 VCs/Companies now)? If so, what info should I list for

359:

I was shocked to see my article was declined again. I've been declined twice now after fixing the previous problem which was to add multiple sources due to the fact I only had one at the time. All the sources I included posses accurate information about my topic and stay on point with the subject

3378:

All right, and for your hurt feelings you have my apologies, again. The article we are talking about was created by you seven years ago, as you say, and has had an "Advert" improvement tag on it for six of them. I am not in the least upset, and I hope you are not either. See you at article talk.

1587:

1- One Doctoral Thesis of the University of Montreal: Manresa González, Carlos (2018). "El agon en Rafael Almanza; Iconos de Almanza: revisión del endecasílabo dactílico". La obedencia rebelde: Roberto Manzano, Rafael Almanza y Jesús David Curbelo, tres poetas contemporáneos ante el canon cubano

1373:

I would like to know if I could get some pointers as to the peacock terms that were used in this article, as for the references they are verified and reliable but most of them are from Africa and in particular, Liberia is it the fact that they are from Africa that they are considered unreliable?

327:

I gave this one a major makeover, so it could pass as a stub. Should it be left like that or be merged into the Naver (corporation) article? It could potentially grow with more adaptations. 3 of the drama shows are already their own articles. The editor has copied it over to Naver article in the

1505:

Thank you once again for your feedback, indeed Knowledge is not a ground to express or promote any views, the overall tone of the article will be revised. But the comment on promotion or advertisement on every organisation she has been in is not true its a biography and part of her humanitarian

1591:

2- Two Books of a Distinguished Professor at Youngstown State University and an Associated Professor at Princeton University: Del Pozo, Ivania (2002). "El icono literario: Rafael Almanza". Espejo de vehemencia. Un viaje al Camagüey poético. Camagüey: Editorial Ácana. pp. 55, 56, 57, 61. ISBN

3729:

Please can you explain to me what should I change to be able to have the pages of the company Latin American Cargo published? This is my 1# article, I am new to this. You declined it a few minutes ago but I am not sure to understand why it is not approved as it does not counterfeit with the

988:

states that to qualify as notable the book must be the 'subject of two or more non-trivial published works appearing in sources that are independent of the book itself'. I have cited substantial reviews from the Wall Street Journal, New Yorker and the New York Intelligencer, all of which are

1906:

of them, The only real difficulty I have with Sulfurboy is that they do not necessarily realize that a correction about a specific draft is likely to be representative of other errors of the same nature--I don't think it friendly or productive to criticize at every possible opportunity.

1603:

5- Four Different magazine articles: Cino, Luis (October 16, 2018). "Rafael Almanza y el amor universal". Puente a la vista. Gina Picart (2009). "Eliseo Diego: el juego de dies o el ajedrez de la trascendencia". Constantín Ferreiro, Henry (2013). "La Peña de un Júcaro cada vez más recio".

528:

1. I have submitted 2 articles in Knowledge ? both of them are up for review. So which article should I start to edit in order to get it accepted in Knowledge.... 2. How much time would it take to actually publish my edit? 3. is there a problem in how my content is specifically placed?

1583:

Hello,thanks you for your comments. Could you please advise if the below references are in compliance with Knowledge guidelines? Are Spanish language references acceptable? If no, could you kindly point what needs to be done to complain? Do you prefer I to translate the references to

300:

Hi Sulfurboy, I read you were busy as a result of COVID19. Wishing you all the best! On a different note: I have update the page Startup Fest Europe, giving it more relevance as you pointed out. After all the event was the biggest thing to happen to the Dutch startup eco-system.

2040:, The entire article was an unambiguous advertisement which is why it was speedy deleted. If you are not able to see that it was nothing but an advert, then it is likely you have a conflict of interest in play that is affecting your ability to view the subject neutrally. 1186:

I am not being paid directly or indirectly, therefore I do not require the paid tag (where do I state this officially to proceed with edits). If the article does not read neutrally, certainly, I would appreciate editorial guidance as a first time contributor.

1827:

Sulfur, I don't want this to get lost in the discussion about FA but you have two respected editors (John and DGG) who both express some unease with your review process. I would take heed and if you don't understand the concerns ask for more detail. Best,

1270:

To confirm, I was helping out MiasmaEternal on the IRC and took a quick look at the article. The Independent and Yahoo Sports sources looked sufficient to me to pass GNG, but as I'm not knowledgeable about e-sports, there may be things I missed. Regards,

1860:

but instead issue with certain individual articles. Mistakes will always be made, but I would like to think I'm always willing to admit to them and improve from them. I do welcome of course DGG to correct any of those assumptions I've just made though.

2862:

I will give it just a few more days before I take out the flamethrower. It has been like that for years so a few more days won't matter much. The best scenario would be that at least some of the content is sourced before the much needed slashing.

3593:. To be honest, this subject is completely over my head, so my input is useless which is why I turned to the Mathematics talk page for help. You're welcome to discuss it there, on the page's talk page or be bold and just rename it if you like. 2634:, Not sure how else to get this across, but if the subject is being interviewed, that is considered primary and does denote notability and can also be considered unreliable. 8 literally has one quick sentence about the subject. Please review 3704:

much the individuals who ran it. I'll add the bits about Madeleine and the politics with the Guggenheim, the Met, &c. so the Gallery's importance is clearer. As I wrote above--wasn't clear when my end of the job could be considered

2619:

primary interviews and cover the subject, so I don't understand the issue with those. And where it may be unclear, if you read or listen closely, the authors establish that the source of their detailed information is in fact, Khan.

1115: 3106: 2930: 2055: 1335:

I submitted an article about Dr. Rajvir Sharma. It was declined due to some issues with the reference links provided. Could you please elaborate a little further, or share some directions / guidelines so I can rectify accordingly.

718: 460: 406:

Damn, yall don't make this easy, do you. All i wanted to do was start a page on a very important person, who is quite relevent in this time of election. I've been denied a couple times, and have spent way too much time on this.

2295: 915: 813:

Looking at it now, I totally understand that it has too many sources. I also see that some points are not so relevant for the subject and can be left out entirely, which should make the article (and the sources) much leaner.

280:

HI Sulfurboy, Today is 3/13/20. Thank you for your message. I am new at this and did not realize I had already submitted my article yesterday. I did make a few edits this morning - will you see the latest version? Thank you,

2412: 127: 564: 1247:? You said that it was declined because the citations "do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject", but 2964:

Beside the references from official government website, what else I need for the secondary references? I have removed some "peacock" words in it, please let me know if there more "peacock words" I have to remove ...

1633:

Hi thanks for your comments on this. In your view is the underlying content significant and this is just a technical hurdle regarding sources? Or is it more fundamental that I need to justify him being significant?

1599:

4- One Research of a University of Waikato (NZ) researcher about Cuban Visual Poetry: López-Fernández, Laura; Garceran, Carlos M. (2019). "Experimental Cuban Poetry. A Digital Humanities Project. Story Map Journal".

2550:) to their own channels (which they control), considered unreliable? Also, what do you mean by primary interview? They were interviewed by the gaming press and the public in the audience, at a scheduled open event. 1055: 1968:

sought to add a brief page discussing Bereskin & Parr. In particular, in viewing and passing by the Knowledge page for "Boutique law firm", I noted that Bereskin & Parr did not have a Knowledge page.

3615:

All right, I need some help here. I'm not sure why that happened, and I think I fixed it. This is article #1 for me, so if I typed the wrong button by accident... I have to feel philosophical about that.

2615:, "The only sources that do directly cover the subject are primary interviews..." No, only 2-4 are a "primary" interview (which I tried to explain they in fact, are not). But moving on... 1 & 5-8 are 2452: 3364:. Going back and digging up some article I worked on seven years ago because you are upset that I put a maintenance tag on one of your pages is about the most childish thing I've ever seen on here. 1206: 3708:. I've only experienced Knowledge from the users end, to date. So am learning today's standards as I go. I figured it was better to get that in process than sit back fussing with one piece. Best 3185: 2951: 2134: 1877:, I understand the hesitance to engage with people who you've had bad experiences with in the past. I'm glad to hear you remain open to feedback and growth - that is all any of us can do. Best, 797: 252: 2848:, I would just be bold and slash and burn anything that isn't backed with a source. This will encourage the page creator and anyone else to add in sources if they want to rebuild the article. 540: 2374: 955: 1050: 998: 2443: 386:, I would recommend reading the links provided in the decline message, your "shock" that they were rejected demonstrates that you haven't as the issues with the article are quite glaring. 395: 2516: 210: 167: 649: 1090: 802: 377: 946: 2956: 1418: 500: 2674: 373: 158: 3673:, AfC sometimes moves fast, and sometimes it moves slow. Just depends on when a reviewer with subject matter experience can review it. Let me know if you have any questions. 1436: 270: 1472:

says nothing about your product, wax, or using adhesive. The other citations saying that petrochemicals are bad for humans says nothing about your product, either. Finally,

848: 604: 3261:

I don't know why they rejected it. I do this for my mental health and when you do that it makes it worse. I need you to be there to support me not bring me down harder.

882:

Looks like you are occasionally being logged out and revealing your IP... check the history of recent pages you've reviewed or I can link to the edits if you don't care.

2480:"...they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject..." 2095: 1155: 2525:, You provided three youtube links (unreliable), one page is just listing credits and the other is a primary interview. None of those come close to proving notability. 2279:

that's not true bcuz you're not even really sure of that, those sources and independent newspaper and some owns by government and not a pay publish newspaper. Respect (

1542:

by coincidentally being a bank teller where she meets her future husband. Many of the claims you make are unsourced, and promotional. Bullet-listing her goals is clear

2993: 491: 3181: 3122: 383: 369: 3560: 2248:, and very sure that those source are very reliable, many Nigerians article uses those sources for reference. Pls I will like you to considered this. Much regards ( 3609: 1451: 1428: 758: 3580: 3534: 3514: 3494: 1497: 1191:

have added more neutral references as requested in the edit feedback from DGG, I have received no specific guidelines on refactoring the draft, how do I proceed?

1798: 1791: 1706: 1592:

959-267-007-2. Price, Rachel (2015). "Free Time". Planet/Cuba: Art, Culture and the Future of the Island. New York: Verso. pp. 128–140. ISBN 978-1-78478-122-4.

595: 360:

though I understand currently there is not much information around regarding my topic. Yet I feel that my draft meets the criteria for it to become an article.

2394: 2086: 1146: 1364: 3590: 3243: 3016: 2335: 1929: 1626: 1491: 1212: 1198: 1127: 234: 114: 3410: 3118: 2943: 2224: 2126: 2067: 855: 836: 789: 730: 282: 1007:, You're right. The WSJ article in particular was overlooked as a skimmed reading of the title was a bit deceptive. The article has been approved. Cheers 3146: 2915:, Agree to all this, I just wanted the page creator to clarify in an abundance of caution, particularly since I don't have much of a biology background. 2872: 2857: 2840: 1515: 1102: 3396: 3242:

Thank you Sulfurboy for helping out a new contributor move the article to the appropriate space, i look forward to more talks and edits on this space

2685:

So the article is definitely legitimate, therefore could you please review and reinstate the article as it was for many years? And please let me know:

1393: 1346: 546: 532: 472: 439: 420: 2924: 3452: 2981: 2709: 2691: 2030: 1994: 1675: 1232: 701: 410:

I'm not a programmer. Just trying to be a good samaritan. but, i'm done trying. last excuse was something about against the purpose of wiki. Really?

262: 2699: 1735:, The reliability and notability of the sources is not the problem. The problem is that the sources don't show significant coverage of the subject. 1319: 1297: 871: 3428: 2326: 1959: 1569: 307: 3299: 909: 558: 454: 3682: 3649: 3028: 2764: 2733: 2542:, Obviously these are not random anonymous youtube videos. Why are videos of interviews posted by independent, secondary source media companies ( 2238: 2037: 2018: 2004: 1982: 1975:

As well, apologies, this is one of my first draft submissions - I am unsure how to link to the deleted draft in this comment, as per the rules.

1805: 3388: 3373: 3100: 2810: 2781: 1886: 1869: 1837: 1768:, Resources for help have been provided on your talk page and the message in the decline. Repeating them here again would be redundant. Cheers. 1016: 3137: 2651: 2631: 2621: 2602: 2592: 2568: 2551: 2522: 2508: 2424: 2287: 2274: 2049: 1656: 1530: 1507: 1400: 1381: 1303: 1280: 202: 139: 2576: 2567:, Update - Original sources of youtube interview videos provided. Sources further widely expanded. Notability further explained. Resubmitted. 2559: 2534: 1777: 1744: 1412: 1101:

What do you mean by saying the sources are not independent? rte is Irelands foremost broadcaster, BAFTA is 'independent' of Niamh Algar etc.

3039:

I've removed the notability tag you placed there. The article has three solid secondary sources, so I do not think the tag is appropriate. --

670: 3734:

A reason for the decline was clearly outlined in the review message on the page. Let me know if you have any specific questions about that.

3210:

And when you compare it to other houses: I cited all my sources, seems very streamlined and compared to other wikis on vfx companies like:

1954: 1760: 2906: 1921: 122: 3235: 1821: 3743: 2712:, I moved this back to mainspace. I agree this shouldn't have been moved to draft, and if it is not notable, should be subject to AFD. 246: 1264: 3717: 3698: 3664: 3640:, I've resubmitted for you. I'm going to allow for another reviewer to see it now, I've commented to this effect on your submission. 3631: 3434: 3251: 1596:"Rimas en libertad: apuntes para un estudio de la rima libre o mezclada en la poesía cubana contemporánea". Rhythmica. XVI: 113–147. 3602: 2232: 349: 1620: 290: 2686: 1695: 709: 3048: 432: 2999: 2743:, please do not move 10 year old articles back to draft. They should be put through AFD instead if the subject is not notable. 1726: 354: 3351: 2402: 1945:

I can take out Knowledge and IMDB. There are still other credible sources and i can find many more. Thank you for your time!

1358: 1110: 3024: 1648: 1137: 242: 2256: 3177: 3128: 2077: 1785: 844: 740: 2468: 2406: 3722: 3314: 3280: 1663:

We need to see significant coverage of the subject by secondary and reliable sources. The sources provided do not show

315: 3443:

not enough, you can delete the article, as I cannot do any more work on it. Thank you, and sorry for being a bother.

3276: 1354: 482: 428: 2989: 2317: 900:, Hmm weird. Thanks for pointing it out, seems to be an issue with the network I'm on knocking me off on occasion. 891: 1469: 3108: 2932: 2888: 2804: 2758: 2727: 2414: 2297: 2057: 1117: 1037: 937: 917: 720: 566: 462: 343: 129: 102: 2456: 971: 3608: 3463: 2026: 1990: 1604:

Convivencia. Pinar del Río. Escobar, Reinaldo (2018). "The Blasts of Rafael Almanza". Retrieved March 18, 2020

817:

Also, could you give me a hint which sources would be considered not reliable? Just so I can throw these out.

320: 94: 89: 84: 72: 67: 59: 2464: 2448: 2434: 1575: 1389: 183: 149: 2244:

Hi, I just like to let you know that you declined the page that i submit for review, with some purpose like

1304:

https://arstechnica.com/cars/2020/03/esports-fills-the-gap-as-coronavirus-cancels-in-person-sporting-events/

959: 2868: 2836: 1710: 1238: 586: 549:, Only one submission of an article will be considered at a time. That process can take up to three months 516: 215: 967: 3034: 2398: 1700: 1523: 1444: 1432: 951: 676: 171: 3319: 2196: 2151: 1972:

represented. I seem to have found similar information disclosed in other articles discussing law firms.

1223:

as I doubt the vast majority of the subjects you mentioned would meet our strict notability guidelines.

3020: 2179: 1652: 1641:

Very grateful for help! Thought this would be an easy one to start me off but it's been anything but!

238: 179: 38: 3619:

So my question has to be, having purged the junk at the bottom of the article, do I simply resubmit?

620: 163: 3448: 2902: 2589: 2204: 2159: 2111: 1473: 1171: 1074: 840: 504: 275: 3188:

Hi there, i'm extremely confused, Fuse is actually mentioned in various current wikipedia articles:

2502:

alone presents significant coverage of the subject (person) and was conducted independently by IGN.

3335: 3247: 2460: 2194:

It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can

2149:

It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can

1691: 1562: 1484: 1202: 1131: 512: 401: 118: 774: 608: 496: 3272: 2947: 2864: 2845: 2832: 2740: 2609:. If you have issue with that article you are welcome to improve it or nominate it for deletion. 2228: 2130: 2099: 2071: 1681: 1350: 1159: 793: 734: 424: 286: 616: 3471: 3464: 3406: 2985: 2351: 2107: 1608:

References in other languages is fine. You can find more information about reliable sources at

1167: 1106: 963: 600: 321: 2091: 1151: 762: 257:

Thank you sulfurboy for your suggestions. I have added more resources per your suggestion for

3739: 3678: 3645: 3598: 3424: 3369: 3310: 3295: 3162: 3096: 2920: 2853: 2798: 2777: 2752: 2721: 2530: 2270: 2237: 2045: 1950: 1865: 1773: 1740: 1671: 1616: 1408: 1327: 1293: 1228: 1086: 1033: 1012: 905: 887: 867: 666: 554: 536: 476: 450: 391: 337: 770: 175: 3713: 3694: 3660: 3627: 3444: 3264: 3012: 2977: 2912: 2898: 2695: 2390: 2370: 2339: 2311: 2022: 2014: 1986: 1978: 1644: 1377: 1342: 1025: 832: 754: 705: 416: 266: 230: 8: 3384: 3347: 3150: 3073: 3058: 3044: 2347: 2265:, As already stated, too many of those sources are paid for promotion or press releases. 1882: 1833: 1817: 1687: 1556: 1478: 1385: 1096: 1046: 994: 931: 311: 47: 17: 3539: 2384:

Hi! I've seen that you declined the Hyva page that I've setted up. Can you tell me why?

2331: 508: 3158: 2008: 1465: 1307: 1285: 1252: 634:

How many links are needed for this page to be published? I have TV links and articles.

3565: 3519: 3499: 3479: 3142: 2495:

are all "published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject".

3476:

Thank you very much for your review. You changed the title from modular forms modulo

3416: 3402: 3320: 3076:, in particular "expansions, acquisitions, mergers, sale, or closure of the business" 2889: 2655: 2625: 2596: 2572: 2555: 2512: 2428: 1756: 1722: 1511: 749: 658:, The issue is the reliability of your sources, not the quantity of them. Please see 612: 443: 295: 206: 143: 2103: 1163: 3306: 3287: 3268: 3225: 2824: 2635: 1946: 1664: 897: 883: 645: 580: 1546:. You have gone out of your way to list her social media profiles in violation of 1427:. Perhaps I should remove the "Environmental effects"? Thanks for all your help. 3709: 3690: 3670: 3656: 3637: 3623: 3256: 3229: 3088: 2547: 2366: 2307: 1535: 1457: 766: 413:

since you're the expert, why not just create the page yourself?????????????????

2643:, Again, the interviews were conducted by "reliable, secondary sources that are 1244: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

3735: 3674: 3641: 3594: 3420: 3380: 3365: 3361: 3357: 3343: 3291: 3228:

of the company. Companies have much stricter notability guidelines. Please see

3092: 3054: 3040: 2916: 2849: 2818: 2790: 2786: 2773: 2769: 2744: 2713: 2705: 2640: 2612: 2581: 2564: 2539: 2526: 2266: 2041: 1899: 1878: 1874: 1861: 1842: 1829: 1813: 1769: 1736: 1667: 1612: 1547: 1423:

I wrote 2 versions of an article, each getting shorter and more to the point.

1404: 1289: 1276: 1224: 1082: 1042: 1029: 1008: 1004: 990: 927: 901: 863: 698:

Thank you for reviewing my article, even though I made some mistakes in it :).

662: 550: 446: 387: 329: 3401:

Hey there. I removed the IMDB citations as suggested. Thanks for your review.

2499: 2343: 2828: 2606: 2280: 2262: 2249: 1917: 1551: 1220: 1216: 3154: 1195:

each member and what is a reliable source other than venture company sites?

3582:(it is a very special case), so I wonder if the change of title is needed. 3439: 3327: 2492: 2379: 2214: 2169: 1765: 1752: 1732: 1718: 1609: 985: 859: 659: 220:

Dear Sulfurbay, can you check please my edits what I did, for this article

685: 1714: 1056:

Request for assistance on article submitted through AfC that was rejected

877: 655: 641: 576: 3220:. It seems on par, let me know if I'm missing anything here. Thank you. 824: 3082:

6) Just an advertisement for the product that is likely self published.

2675: 1081:

You need to make the proper disclosures as outlined on your talk page.

364: 1068: 198: 3334:, when you did not answer my question about content creation over at 2488: 1580: 1272: 1248: 3723: 3007: 221: 107:

Hi there! I am looking to work on getting the Allan Flanders draft (

2789:, no worries, I find myself jumping on those drafts like that too. 1912: 1856: 201:, I have made the necessary changes in the citations as requested. 3205: 3199: 1543: 1461: 1369:

Hi, thank you for your feedback concerning my draft on Clar Weah

3004:

Hello Sulfurboy, can you check please my corrections? Thank you

3189: 1245:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Draft:The_Race_All-Star_eSports_Battle

253:

added additional works or notoriety and external links of works

3202: 1940: 1930: 1627: 261:. Please have a look when you have a moment, I appreciate you! 108: 3655:

Thanks. Am interested just to be walking through the process.

3562:). What has been written in the article do not generalize to 3516:. However, the article only talks about modular forms modulo 3326:

Hi there Sulfurboy. I am sorry you didn't like my fixing up

2191:

Hello, Sulfurboy. Please check your email; you've got mail!

2146:

Hello, Sulfurboy. Please check your email; you've got mail!

1808:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

1584:

English-language? I really appreciate very much your help.

3440:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Draft:Nabeel_Ahmad_(entrepreneur)

803:

Help how to improve my declined article / reliable sources

258: 2543: 2484: 1502: 1424: 1370: 3217: 2957:

about my article for Document Management in E-government

1419:

What should I remove to have the article I wrote posted?

3589:

So the discussion to change the title to that was held

825:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Draft:Thomas_Wagner_(Designer)

820:

Thank you so much for taking the time to help me here!

3689:

the way to go. Again, thanks for the quick response.

3211: 3072:

2, 3, 5, 7) All are considered trivial mentions under

2676:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Draft:Karl_Ferris#Karl_Ferris

862:

for help on what sources are not considered reliable.

3568: 3542: 3522: 3502: 3482: 3107:

Request on 16:08:23, 24 March 2020 for assistance on

2931:

Request on 07:04:09, 24 March 2020 for assistance on

2413:

Request on 09:01:02, 22 March 2020 for assistance on

2296:

Request on 07:49:06, 23 March 2020 for assistance on

2056:

Request on 23:43:01, 22 March 2020 for assistance on

1116:

Request on 19:20:58, 18 March 2020 for assistance on

1069:

https://en.wikipedia.org/User:MeeraShankar123/sandbox

916:

Request on 21:53:03, 17 March 2020 for assistance on

719:

Request on 20:04:12, 15 March 2020 for assistance on

565:

Request on 03:14:07, 13 March 2020 for assistance on

461:

Request on 08:45:16, 15 March 2020 for assistance on

199:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Draft:Tayo_Oladiran_Arulogun

128:

Request on 08:54:38, 13 March 2020 for assistance on

3360:, What you've done is a pretty blatant violation of 3236: 3196: 1581:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Draft:Rafael_Almanza_Alonso

384:

Igiveupicantchooseadecentusernamewithoutitbeingtaken

370:

Igiveupicantchooseadecentusernamewithoutitbeingtaken

3193: 3087:Thus, the article wholly fails the requirements of 3069:

1) Standard corporate directory entry. No coverage.

3008:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Draft:Anastasia_Kochetkova

365:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/Draft:Wicks_(hairstyle)#

222:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Draft:Anastasia_Kochetkova

197:I want to request for fresh review on my aricle on 3574: 3554: 3528: 3508: 3488: 3214: 1705:Hi, I noticed that, you have rejected my draft on 1022:Thanks for sorting that out so speedily! Cheers, 442:, I have zero interest in writing a page for you. 3206:https://en.wikipedia.org/Deadly_Class_(TV_series) 3061:. The article as it stands completely fails that. 1064:forward to knowing how I can proceed. Thank you! 3200:https://en.wikipedia.org/The_Punisher_(season_1) 1215:, I would recommend reviewing the guidelines of 328:meantime, so it could survive as a section too. 3622:How much of the process here is machine-driven? 2968:It is appreciated if you can be more specific. 3419:, Approved. Thanks for the quick improvement. 3305:I know, I got I am fine. sorry for the Drama. 3190:https://en.wikipedia.org/Agents_of_S.H.I.E.L.D 224:and tell me please if everything is correct. 3203:https://en.wikipedia.org/Luke_Cage_(season_1) 1941:https://en.wikipedia.org/Draft:Langston_Uibel 1931:https://en.wikipedia.org/Draft:Langston_Uibel 1628:https://en.wikipedia.org/Draft:Chris_Bouchard 109:https://en.wikipedia.org/Draft:Allan_Flanders 1797:Hello, Sulfurboy. You have new messages at 1498:Biography of Liberia's First Lady Clar Weah 1365:Biography of Liberia's First Lady Clar Weah 810:thank you for your feedback on my article! 3397:Removed IMDB from the page on Tommy Vicari 259:https://en.wikipedia.org/Draft:Dan_Shafer 3224:There is not a single source that shows 1960:Declined page on bereskin & parr LLP 1503:https://en.wikipedia.org/Draft:Clar_Weah 1425:https://en.wikipedia.org/Draft:YEW!,_Inc 1371:https://en.wikipedia.org/Draft:Clar_Weah 1251:checked it out and found nothing wrong. 3218:https://en.wikipedia.org/Digital_Domain 1936:Hey Sulfurboy. I have answered again. 1709:. He is the current Vice Chancellor of 1538:is laughably promotional. One does not 14: 2011:) 16:22, 22 March 2020 (UTC)IPlaw365 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 3212:https://en.wikipedia.org/Zoic_Studios 1243:Hey, just wondering why you declined 2195: 2150: 984:The Knowledge notability guidelines 25: 3237:https://en.wikipedia.org/Draft:Ojay 3197:https://en.wikipedia.org/Jim_Rygiel 2897:let the author work on the draft. 2444:Draft:Billy Ethan Khan (programmer) 1910:and forth between two individuals,. 23: 3435:Draft:Nabeel Ahmad (entrepreneur)‎ 3194:https://en.wikipedia.org/Mr._Robot 2184: 2139: 1790: 24: 3755: 3215:https://en.wikipedia.org/Rodeo_FX 1554:and can't see this objectively. 684: 29: 2650:been a pleasant one. I'm done. 1588:(PhD). University of Montreal. 947:Draft:The Elephant in the Brain 3536:(which is a special case when 3079:4) Unreliable blog, news site. 3000:Please check my new correction 2246:unreliable independent sources 355:The declination of my article. 13: 1: 1686:So much decline over drafts. 1476:isn't a reasonable argument. 2628:) 6:45, 24 March 2020 (UTC) 2599:) 6:26, 24 March 2020 (UTC) 2200:at any time by removing the 2155:at any time by removing the 1751:Then what should I do know? 1711:West Bengal State University 1120:submission by Gaussianfilter 1040:) 22:03, 17 March 2020 (UTC) 159:Draft:Tayo Oladiran Arulogun 7: 3111:submission by 47.232.188.74 2935:submission by Devkumar20201 2658:) 7:19, 24 March 2020 (UTC) 2060:submission by Musiciranfans 1786:Please join this discussion 1339:Much appreciated. Thanks! 723:submission by GauchainAltea 10: 3760: 3744:01:10, 25 March 2020 (UTC) 3724:Draft:Latin_American_Cargo 3718:00:49, 25 March 2020 (UTC) 3699:23:37, 24 March 2020 (UTC) 3683:23:29, 24 March 2020 (UTC) 3665:23:26, 24 March 2020 (UTC) 3650:23:23, 24 March 2020 (UTC) 3632:23:18, 24 March 2020 (UTC) 3603:00:08, 25 March 2020 (UTC) 3453:21:34, 24 March 2020 (UTC) 3429:21:20, 24 March 2020 (UTC) 3411:21:14, 24 March 2020 (UTC) 3389:18:59, 24 March 2020 (UTC) 3374:18:29, 24 March 2020 (UTC) 3352:18:24, 24 March 2020 (UTC) 3315:18:31, 24 March 2020 (UTC) 3300:18:26, 24 March 2020 (UTC) 3281:18:09, 24 March 2020 (UTC) 3252:18:21, 24 March 2020 (UTC) 3186:16:08, 24 March 2020 (UTC) 3101:13:31, 24 March 2020 (UTC) 3049:10:01, 24 March 2020 (UTC) 3029:10:21, 24 March 2020 (UTC) 2994:09:32, 24 March 2020 (UTC) 2952:07:04, 24 March 2020 (UTC) 2925:16:42, 23 March 2020 (UTC) 2907:16:10, 23 March 2020 (UTC) 2873:13:26, 23 March 2020 (UTC) 2858:13:16, 23 March 2020 (UTC) 2841:08:29, 23 March 2020 (UTC) 2811:23:40, 22 March 2020 (UTC) 2782:23:38, 22 March 2020 (UTC) 2765:23:34, 22 March 2020 (UTC) 2734:23:28, 22 March 2020 (UTC) 2700:23:10, 22 March 2020 (UTC) 2577:10:41, 23 March 2020 (UTC) 2560:08:12, 23 March 2020 (UTC) 2535:23:42, 22 March 2020 (UTC) 2517:09:01, 22 March 2020 (UTC) 2407:09:50, 23 March 2020 (UTC) 2375:07:49, 23 March 2020 (UTC) 2288:07:29, 23 March 2020 (UTC) 2275:23:39, 22 March 2020 (UTC) 2257:17:16, 22 March 2020 (UTC) 2233:23:48, 22 March 2020 (UTC) 2135:23:43, 22 March 2020 (UTC) 2050:23:41, 22 March 2020 (UTC) 2031:16:18, 22 March 2020 (UTC) 1995:20:46, 22 March 2020 (UTC) 1955:19:50, 22 March 2020 (UTC) 1922:08:37, 22 March 2020 (UTC) 1887:04:10, 22 March 2020 (UTC) 1870:03:07, 22 March 2020 (UTC) 1838:02:15, 22 March 2020 (UTC) 1822:22:50, 21 March 2020 (UTC) 1778:07:36, 22 March 2020 (UTC) 1761:02:13, 22 March 2020 (UTC) 1745:23:29, 21 March 2020 (UTC) 1727:15:57, 20 March 2020 (UTC) 1696:11:26, 21 March 2020 (UTC) 1676:06:53, 21 March 2020 (UTC) 1657:00:15, 21 March 2020 (UTC) 1621:22:44, 20 March 2020 (UTC) 1570:18:39, 20 March 2020 (UTC) 1516:17:07, 20 March 2020 (UTC) 1492:16:34, 20 March 2020 (UTC) 1437:16:24, 20 March 2020 (UTC) 1413:15:24, 20 March 2020 (UTC) 1394:12:00, 20 March 2020 (UTC) 1359:06:09, 20 March 2020 (UTC) 1320:06:56, 19 March 2020 (UTC) 1298:05:09, 19 March 2020 (UTC) 1281:05:04, 19 March 2020 (UTC) 1265:04:58, 19 March 2020 (UTC) 1233:04:02, 19 March 2020 (UTC) 1207:19:20, 18 March 2020 (UTC) 1183:Thank you for reviewing! 1111:22:46, 17 March 2020 (UTC) 1091:22:07, 17 March 2020 (UTC) 1051:21:53, 17 March 2020 (UTC) 1017:21:57, 17 March 2020 (UTC) 999:21:53, 17 March 2020 (UTC) 910:21:49, 17 March 2020 (UTC) 892:21:46, 17 March 2020 (UTC) 872:21:05, 17 March 2020 (UTC) 849:09:43, 17 March 2020 (UTC) 798:20:04, 15 March 2020 (UTC) 710:18:54, 15 March 2020 (UTC) 671:18:33, 15 March 2020 (UTC) 650:03:14, 13 March 2020 (UTC) 559:18:32, 15 March 2020 (UTC) 541:08:45, 15 March 2020 (UTC) 455:18:32, 15 March 2020 (UTC) 433:16:11, 14 March 2020 (UTC) 396:18:31, 15 March 2020 (UTC) 378:16:28, 15 March 2020 (UTC) 350:22:55, 14 March 2020 (UTC) 316:11:17, 14 March 2020 (UTC) 291:18:00, 13 March 2020 (UTC) 271:16:28, 13 March 2020 (UTC) 247:12:06, 13 March 2020 (UTC) 211:08:54, 13 March 2020 (UTC) 123:07:46, 13 March 2020 (UTC) 2590:Robert Duffy (programmer) 1550:. You undoubtedly have a 683: 465:submission by Stefanvihar 3496:to modular forms modulo 3336:Talk:Hitachi Zosen Inova 2961:Good morning Sulfurboy, 2300:submission by Bullaiytro 492:User:Stefanvihar/sandbox 2690:Thank you, Karl Ferris 1799:FloridaArmy's talk page 920:submission by Alfredsph 103:Allan Flanders Question 3610:Draft:Galerie Chalette 3576: 3556: 3530: 3510: 3490: 3472:Modular_forms_modulo_p 3465:Modular forms modulo p 2189: 2144: 1795: 322:Draft:Studio N (Naver) 3577: 3557: 3531: 3511: 3491: 3057:, You need to review 2417:submission by Maentik 2188: 2143: 1794: 1707:Draft:Basab Chaudhuri 1576:Rafael Almanza Alonso 1470:citation about hockey 1466:cannot cite Knowledge 692:The Original Barnstar 596:Draft:Cornell Conaway 132:submission by Nyamwij 42:of past discussions. 3730:wikimedia policies. 3566: 3540: 3520: 3500: 3480: 2087:Draft:Amir Mohammadi 2000:Thank you very much 1552:conflict of interest 1239:Submission declined? 1147:Draft:Frederik Groce 569:submission by Cse404 216:Article warification 3555:{\displaystyle p=2} 3035:Hitachi Zosen Inova 1701:Submission declined 1540:"launch her career" 1302:For example, would 677:A barnstar for you! 18:User talk:Sulfurboy 3572: 3552: 3526: 3506: 3486: 2865:Crystallizedcarbon 2846:Crystallizedcarbon 2833:Crystallizedcarbon 2795: 2749: 2741:Crystallizedcarbon 2718: 2197:remove this notice 2190: 2180:asking for details 2152:remove this notice 2145: 1806:remove this notice 1796: 1474:WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS 1460:and it reads like 1456:The subject isn't 823:Link to article: 334: 3575:{\displaystyle p} 3529:{\displaystyle 2} 3509:{\displaystyle p} 3489:{\displaystyle 2} 3283: 3267:comment added by 3031: 3015:comment added by 2996: 2980:comment added by 2890:Chironex fleckeri 2815:Hello Sulfurboy, 2791: 2745: 2714: 2409: 2393:comment added by 2033: 2017:comment added by 1997: 1981:comment added by 1659: 1647:comment added by 1452:Micheltvalenzuela 1429:Micheltvalenzuela 1396: 1380:comment added by 1361: 1345:comment added by 1067:Link to article- 1041: 1028:comment added by 858:, You can review 851: 835:comment added by 807:Hello Sulfurboy, 750:Draft:Hank Levine 716: 715: 700:Greetings, Lia. 435: 419:comment added by 330: 276:Victoria Romanoff 249: 233:comment added by 100: 99: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 3751: 3581: 3579: 3578: 3573: 3561: 3559: 3558: 3553: 3535: 3533: 3532: 3527: 3515: 3513: 3512: 3507: 3495: 3493: 3492: 3487: 3321:Talk:Lucky Lou's 3262: 3167: 3166: 3010: 2975: 2822: 2807: 2801: 2794: 2761: 2755: 2748: 2730: 2724: 2717: 2473: 2472: 2388: 2356: 2355: 2221: 2219: 2213: 2209: 2203: 2199: 2187: 2176: 2174: 2168: 2164: 2158: 2154: 2142: 2116: 2115: 2012: 1976: 1809: 1642: 1568: 1565: 1559: 1534: 1527: 1490: 1487: 1481: 1455: 1448: 1375: 1340: 1317: 1312: 1262: 1257: 1176: 1175: 1073:Regards, Meera ( 1023: 976: 975: 830: 779: 778: 688: 681: 680: 625: 624: 521: 520: 414: 402:Rachel Bitecofer 346: 340: 333: 228: 188: 187: 81: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 3759: 3758: 3754: 3753: 3752: 3750: 3749: 3748: 3727: 3613: 3567: 3564: 3563: 3541: 3538: 3537: 3521: 3518: 3517: 3501: 3498: 3497: 3481: 3478: 3477: 3468: 3445:MistyGraceWhite 3437: 3399: 3324: 3259: 3240: 3140: 3136: 3113: 3037: 3002: 2959: 2940: 2937: 2913:Robert McClenon 2899:Robert McClenon 2894: 2816: 2805: 2799: 2792: 2759: 2753: 2746: 2728: 2722: 2715: 2679: 2548:Digital Foundry 2498:The entire IGN 2493:Digital Foundry 2446: 2442: 2419: 2395:LucaColombo1990 2382: 2329: 2325: 2302: 2242: 2222: 2217: 2211: 2207: 2205:You've got mail 2201: 2193: 2185: 2182: 2177: 2172: 2166: 2162: 2160:You've got mail 2156: 2148: 2140: 2089: 2085: 2062: 1962: 1934: 1810: 1803: 1788: 1703: 1684: 1682:So much decline 1631: 1578: 1563: 1557: 1555: 1536:Draft:Clar_Weah 1528: 1521: 1500: 1485: 1479: 1477: 1449: 1442: 1421: 1367: 1330: 1313: 1308: 1306:be acceptable? 1258: 1253: 1241: 1149: 1145: 1122: 1099: 1058: 949: 945: 922: 880: 829:Best, Dennis 805: 752: 748: 725: 679: 635: 598: 594: 571: 494: 490: 467: 404: 357: 344: 338: 331: 325: 298: 278: 255: 218: 161: 157: 134: 105: 77: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3757: 3747: 3746: 3726: 3721: 3686: 3685: 3653: 3652: 3612: 3607: 3606: 3605: 3585: 3571: 3551: 3548: 3545: 3525: 3505: 3485: 3467: 3462: 3460: 3457: 3436: 3433: 3432: 3431: 3398: 3395: 3394: 3393: 3392: 3391: 3323: 3318: 3303: 3302: 3258: 3255: 3244:Bethel Sandius 3239: 3234: 3233: 3232: 3176: 3173: 3171: 3170: 3169: 3168: 3134: 3112: 3105: 3104: 3103: 3085: 3083: 3080: 3077: 3070: 3067: 3066:Source review: 3064: 3062: 3036: 3033: 3017:Bokhan.evgeniy 3001: 2998: 2958: 2955: 2942: 2938: 2936: 2929: 2928: 2927: 2893: 2887: 2886: 2885: 2884: 2883: 2882: 2881: 2880: 2879: 2878: 2877: 2876: 2875: 2737: 2736: 2678: 2673: 2672: 2671: 2670: 2669: 2668: 2667: 2666: 2665: 2664: 2663: 2662: 2661: 2660: 2659: 2562: 2505:Kind regards, 2477: 2476: 2475: 2474: 2440: 2418: 2411: 2381: 2378: 2365: 2362: 2360: 2359: 2358: 2357: 2327:Draft:Workpuls 2323: 2301: 2294: 2293: 2292: 2291: 2290: 2241: 2236: 2192: 2183: 2181: 2178: 2147: 2138: 2125: 2122: 2120: 2119: 2118: 2117: 2083: 2061: 2054: 2053: 2052: 2003:Kind Regards, 1961: 1958: 1933: 1928: 1927: 1926: 1925: 1924: 1907: 1903: 1894: 1893: 1892: 1891: 1890: 1889: 1854: 1852: 1848: 1846: 1802: 1789: 1787: 1784: 1783: 1782: 1781: 1780: 1748: 1747: 1702: 1699: 1688:Turkfromturkey 1683: 1680: 1679: 1678: 1649:90.240.194.255 1630: 1625: 1624: 1623: 1577: 1574: 1573: 1572: 1558:Chris Troutman 1524:by talk reader 1499: 1496: 1495: 1494: 1480:Chris Troutman 1445:by talk reader 1420: 1417: 1416: 1415: 1366: 1363: 1329: 1326: 1325: 1324: 1323: 1322: 1283: 1240: 1237: 1236: 1235: 1213:Gaussianfilter 1199:Gaussianfilter 1182: 1180: 1179: 1178: 1177: 1143: 1128:Gaussianfilter 1121: 1114: 1098: 1095: 1094: 1093: 1057: 1054: 1020: 1019: 982: 980: 979: 978: 977: 943: 921: 914: 913: 912: 879: 876: 875: 874: 804: 801: 788: 785: 783: 782: 781: 780: 746: 724: 717: 714: 713: 695: 694: 689: 678: 675: 674: 673: 640: 633: 631: 629: 628: 627: 626: 592: 570: 563: 562: 561: 527: 525: 524: 523: 522: 488: 466: 459: 458: 457: 403: 400: 399: 398: 356: 353: 324: 319: 297: 294: 277: 274: 254: 251: 235:Bokhan.evgeniy 217: 214: 194: 192: 191: 190: 189: 155: 133: 126: 115:Aceithistorian 104: 101: 98: 97: 92: 87: 82: 75: 70: 65: 62: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3756: 3745: 3741: 3737: 3733: 3732: 3731: 3725: 3720: 3719: 3715: 3711: 3707: 3701: 3700: 3696: 3692: 3684: 3680: 3676: 3672: 3669: 3668: 3667: 3666: 3662: 3658: 3651: 3647: 3643: 3639: 3636: 3635: 3634: 3633: 3629: 3625: 3620: 3617: 3611: 3604: 3600: 3596: 3592: 3588: 3587: 3586: 3583: 3569: 3549: 3546: 3543: 3523: 3503: 3483: 3474: 3473: 3466: 3461: 3458: 3455: 3454: 3450: 3446: 3441: 3430: 3426: 3422: 3418: 3415: 3414: 3413: 3412: 3408: 3404: 3390: 3386: 3382: 3377: 3376: 3375: 3371: 3367: 3363: 3359: 3356: 3355: 3354: 3353: 3349: 3345: 3341: 3337: 3333: 3329: 3322: 3317: 3316: 3312: 3308: 3301: 3297: 3293: 3289: 3286: 3285: 3284: 3282: 3278: 3274: 3270: 3266: 3254: 3253: 3249: 3245: 3238: 3231: 3227: 3223: 3222: 3221: 3219: 3216: 3213: 3208: 3207: 3204: 3201: 3198: 3195: 3191: 3187: 3183: 3179: 3178:47.232.188.74 3174: 3164: 3160: 3156: 3152: 3148: 3144: 3139: 3135: 3133: 3132: 3130: 3127: 3124: 3120: 3119:47.232.188.74 3117: 3116: 3115: 3110: 3102: 3098: 3094: 3090: 3086: 3084: 3081: 3078: 3075: 3071: 3068: 3065: 3063: 3060: 3056: 3053: 3052: 3051: 3050: 3046: 3042: 3032: 3030: 3026: 3022: 3018: 3014: 3009: 3005: 2997: 2995: 2991: 2987: 2983: 2979: 2972: 2969: 2966: 2962: 2954: 2953: 2949: 2945: 2944:Devkumar20201 2934: 2926: 2922: 2918: 2914: 2911: 2910: 2909: 2908: 2904: 2900: 2891: 2874: 2870: 2866: 2861: 2860: 2859: 2855: 2851: 2847: 2844: 2843: 2842: 2838: 2834: 2830: 2826: 2820: 2814: 2813: 2812: 2808: 2802: 2796: 2788: 2785: 2784: 2783: 2779: 2775: 2771: 2768: 2767: 2766: 2762: 2756: 2750: 2742: 2739: 2738: 2735: 2731: 2725: 2719: 2711: 2707: 2704: 2703: 2702: 2701: 2697: 2693: 2688: 2687: 2683: 2677: 2657: 2653: 2648: 2647: 2642: 2639: 2638: 2637: 2633: 2630: 2629: 2627: 2623: 2618: 2614: 2611: 2610: 2608: 2604: 2601: 2600: 2598: 2594: 2591: 2587: 2583: 2580: 2579: 2578: 2574: 2570: 2566: 2563: 2561: 2557: 2553: 2549: 2545: 2541: 2538: 2537: 2536: 2532: 2528: 2524: 2521: 2520: 2519: 2518: 2514: 2510: 2506: 2503: 2501: 2496: 2494: 2490: 2486: 2482: 2481: 2470: 2466: 2462: 2458: 2454: 2450: 2445: 2441: 2439: 2438: 2436: 2433: 2430: 2426: 2423: 2422: 2421: 2416: 2410: 2408: 2404: 2400: 2396: 2392: 2385: 2377: 2376: 2372: 2368: 2363: 2353: 2349: 2345: 2341: 2337: 2333: 2328: 2324: 2322: 2321: 2319: 2316: 2313: 2309: 2306: 2305: 2304: 2299: 2289: 2286: 2285: 2284: 2278: 2277: 2276: 2272: 2268: 2264: 2261: 2260: 2259: 2258: 2255: 2254: 2253: 2247: 2240: 2239:Draft:BetKing 2235: 2234: 2230: 2226: 2225:Musiciranfans 2216: 2206: 2198: 2171: 2161: 2153: 2137: 2136: 2132: 2128: 2127:Musiciranfans 2123: 2113: 2109: 2105: 2101: 2097: 2093: 2088: 2084: 2082: 2081: 2079: 2076: 2073: 2069: 2068:Musiciranfans 2066: 2065: 2064: 2059: 2051: 2047: 2043: 2039: 2036: 2035: 2034: 2032: 2028: 2024: 2020: 2016: 2010: 2006: 2001: 1998: 1996: 1992: 1988: 1984: 1980: 1973: 1969: 1965: 1957: 1956: 1952: 1948: 1943: 1942: 1937: 1932: 1923: 1919: 1915: 1914: 1908: 1904: 1901: 1898: 1897: 1896: 1895: 1888: 1884: 1880: 1876: 1873: 1872: 1871: 1867: 1863: 1858: 1855: 1853: 1849: 1847: 1844: 1841: 1840: 1839: 1835: 1831: 1826: 1825: 1824: 1823: 1819: 1815: 1807: 1800: 1793: 1779: 1775: 1771: 1767: 1764: 1763: 1762: 1758: 1754: 1750: 1749: 1746: 1742: 1738: 1734: 1731: 1730: 1729: 1728: 1724: 1720: 1716: 1713:, located in 1712: 1708: 1698: 1697: 1693: 1689: 1677: 1673: 1669: 1666: 1662: 1661: 1660: 1658: 1654: 1650: 1646: 1639: 1635: 1629: 1622: 1618: 1614: 1611: 1607: 1606: 1605: 1601: 1597: 1593: 1589: 1585: 1582: 1571: 1566: 1560: 1553: 1549: 1545: 1541: 1537: 1532: 1525: 1520: 1519: 1518: 1517: 1513: 1509: 1504: 1493: 1488: 1482: 1475: 1471: 1467: 1463: 1459: 1453: 1446: 1441: 1440: 1439: 1438: 1434: 1430: 1426: 1414: 1410: 1406: 1402: 1399: 1398: 1397: 1395: 1391: 1387: 1383: 1379: 1372: 1362: 1360: 1356: 1352: 1348: 1344: 1337: 1333: 1328:Rajvir Sharma 1321: 1318: 1316: 1311: 1305: 1301: 1300: 1299: 1295: 1291: 1287: 1286:MiasmaEternal 1284: 1282: 1278: 1274: 1269: 1268: 1267: 1266: 1263: 1261: 1256: 1250: 1246: 1234: 1230: 1226: 1222: 1218: 1214: 1211: 1210: 1209: 1208: 1204: 1200: 1196: 1192: 1188: 1184: 1173: 1169: 1165: 1161: 1157: 1153: 1148: 1144: 1142: 1141: 1139: 1136: 1133: 1129: 1126: 1125: 1124: 1119: 1113: 1112: 1108: 1104: 1092: 1088: 1084: 1080: 1079: 1078: 1076: 1071: 1070: 1065: 1061: 1053: 1052: 1048: 1044: 1039: 1035: 1031: 1027: 1018: 1014: 1010: 1006: 1003: 1002: 1001: 1000: 996: 992: 987: 973: 969: 965: 961: 957: 953: 948: 944: 942: 941: 939: 936: 933: 929: 926: 925: 924: 919: 911: 907: 903: 899: 896: 895: 894: 893: 889: 885: 873: 869: 865: 861: 857: 856:Daredevil1969 854: 853: 852: 850: 846: 842: 838: 837:Daredevil1969 834: 827: 826: 821: 818: 815: 811: 808: 800: 799: 795: 791: 790:GauchainAltea 786: 776: 772: 768: 764: 760: 756: 751: 747: 745: 744: 742: 739: 736: 732: 731:GauchainAltea 729: 728: 727: 722: 712: 711: 707: 703: 697: 696: 693: 690: 687: 682: 672: 668: 664: 661: 657: 654: 653: 652: 651: 647: 643: 638: 632: 622: 618: 614: 610: 606: 602: 597: 593: 591: 590: 588: 585: 582: 578: 575: 574: 573: 568: 560: 556: 552: 548: 545: 544: 543: 542: 538: 534: 530: 518: 514: 510: 506: 502: 498: 493: 489: 487: 486: 484: 481: 478: 474: 471: 470: 469: 464: 456: 452: 448: 445: 441: 438: 437: 436: 434: 430: 426: 422: 418: 411: 408: 397: 393: 389: 385: 382: 381: 380: 379: 375: 371: 367: 366: 361: 352: 351: 347: 341: 335: 323: 318: 317: 313: 309: 305: 302: 293: 292: 288: 284: 283:MarinaDelaney 273: 272: 268: 264: 260: 250: 248: 244: 240: 236: 232: 225: 223: 213: 212: 208: 204: 200: 195: 185: 181: 177: 173: 169: 165: 160: 156: 154: 153: 151: 148: 145: 141: 138: 137: 136: 131: 125: 124: 120: 116: 112: 110: 96: 93: 91: 88: 86: 83: 80: 76: 74: 71: 69: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 3728: 3705: 3702: 3687: 3654: 3621: 3618: 3614: 3584: 3475: 3469: 3459: 3456: 3438: 3417:TanookiKoopa 3403:TanookiKoopa 3400: 3339: 3331: 3325: 3304: 3263:— Preceding 3260: 3241: 3209: 3175: 3172: 3138:Draft:FuseFX 3125: 3114: 3074:WP:CORPDEPTH 3059:WP:CORPDEPTH 3038: 3011:— Preceding 3006: 3003: 2976:— Preceding 2973: 2970: 2967: 2963: 2960: 2941: 2895: 2689: 2684: 2680: 2645: 2644: 2616: 2585: 2507: 2504: 2497: 2483: 2479: 2478: 2431: 2420: 2389:— Preceding 2386: 2383: 2364: 2361: 2314: 2303: 2282: 2281: 2251: 2250: 2245: 2243: 2223: 2124: 2121: 2074: 2063: 2013:— Preceding 2002: 1999: 1977:— Preceding 1974: 1970: 1966: 1963: 1944: 1938: 1935: 1911: 1811: 1704: 1685: 1643:— Preceding 1640: 1636: 1632: 1602: 1598: 1594: 1590: 1586: 1579: 1539: 1501: 1422: 1376:— Preceding 1368: 1341:— Preceding 1338: 1334: 1331: 1314: 1309: 1259: 1254: 1242: 1197: 1193: 1189: 1185: 1181: 1134: 1123: 1103:Filmmoonshot 1100: 1072: 1066: 1062: 1059: 1024:— Preceding 1021: 981: 934: 923: 881: 831:— Preceding 828: 822: 819: 816: 812: 809: 806: 787: 784: 737: 726: 699: 691: 639: 636: 630: 583: 572: 531: 526: 479: 468: 415:— Preceding 412: 409: 405: 368: 362: 358: 326: 306: 303: 299: 279: 256: 229:— Preceding 227:Thank you. 226: 219: 196: 193: 146: 135: 113: 106: 78: 43: 37: 3328:Lucky Lou's 3307:Solangelo19 3288:Solangelo19 3269:Solangelo19 2646:independent 1947:Loisopokupr 1715:West Bengal 1374:Thank you 1347:JojaxNation 1097:Niamh Algar 898:Home Lander 884:Home Lander 547:Stefanvihar 533:Stefanvihar 473:Stefanvihar 440:WilliamR164 421:WilliamR164 304:Thanks. W 36:This is an 3710:Sicklemoon 3691:Sicklemoon 3671:Sicklemoon 3657:Sicklemoon 3638:Sicklemoon 3624:Sicklemoon 2982:Renwang101 2710:Ferris1182 2692:Ferris1182 2586:themselves 2367:Bullaiytro 2308:Bullaiytro 1060:Hi there! 444:WP:BUILDER 263:Jingleman2 95:Archive 20 90:Archive 19 85:Archive 18 79:Archive 17 73:Archive 16 68:Archive 15 60:Archive 10 3736:Sulfurboy 3675:Sulfurboy 3642:Sulfurboy 3595:Sulfurboy 3421:Sulfurboy 3381:The Huhsz 3366:Sulfurboy 3358:The Huhsz 3344:The Huhsz 3340:tu quoque 3332:mea culpa 3292:Sulfurboy 3226:WP:SIGCOV 3093:Sulfurboy 3055:The Huhsz 3041:The Huhsz 2971:Regards, 2917:Sulfurboy 2850:Sulfurboy 2825:WP:BEFORE 2819:AngusWOOF 2793:AngusWOOF 2787:Sulfurboy 2774:Sulfurboy 2770:AngusWOOF 2747:AngusWOOF 2716:AngusWOOF 2706:Sulfurboy 2641:Sulfurboy 2636:WP:SIGCOV 2613:Sulfurboy 2582:Sulfurboy 2565:Sulfurboy 2540:Sulfurboy 2527:Sulfurboy 2500:interview 2489:Eurogamer 2387:Thanks! 2267:Sulfurboy 2220:template. 2175:template. 2042:Sulfurboy 1900:Barkeep49 1879:Barkeep49 1875:Sulfurboy 1862:Sulfurboy 1843:Barkeep49 1830:Barkeep49 1814:Barkeep49 1770:Sulfurboy 1737:Sulfurboy 1668:Sulfurboy 1665:WP:SIGCOV 1613:Sulfurboy 1405:Sulfurboy 1290:Sulfurboy 1249:User:Sdkb 1225:Sulfurboy 1083:Sulfurboy 1075:Talk page 1043:Alfredsph 1030:Alfredsph 1009:Sulfurboy 1005:Alfredsph 991:Alfredsph 928:Alfredsph 902:Sulfurboy 864:Sulfurboy 663:Sulfurboy 551:Sulfurboy 447:Sulfurboy 388:Sulfurboy 332:AngusWOOF 308:Willamine 296:Thank you 3277:contribs 3265:unsigned 3230:WP:NCORP 3129:contribs 3089:WP:NCORP 3025:contribs 3013:unsigned 2990:contribs 2978:unsigned 2435:contribs 2403:contribs 2391:unsigned 2318:contribs 2283:F5pillar 2263:F5pillar 2252:F5pillar 2078:contribs 2038:IPLaw365 2027:contribs 2019:IPLaw365 2015:unsigned 2005:IPLaw365 1991:contribs 1983:IPLaw365 1979:unsigned 1804:You can 1645:unsigned 1390:contribs 1378:unsigned 1355:contribs 1343:unsigned 1138:contribs 1038:contribs 1026:unsigned 938:contribs 845:contribs 833:unsigned 741:contribs 637:Thanks! 587:contribs 483:contribs 429:contribs 417:unsigned 243:contribs 231:unsigned 150:contribs 3362:WP:HUNT 3257:Article 3151:history 2652:Maentik 2632:Maentik 2622:Maentik 2603:Maentik 2593:Maentik 2569:Maentik 2552:Maentik 2523:Maentik 2509:Maentik 2457:history 2425:Maentik 2340:history 2100:history 1766:DeoxysX 1753:DeoxysX 1733:DeoxysX 1719:DeoxysX 1548:WP:ELNO 1544:ad copy 1531:BramsKK 1508:BramsKK 1468:. Your 1462:ad copy 1458:notable 1401:BramsKK 1382:BramsKK 1315:Eternal 1260:Eternal 1160:history 960:history 763:history 609:history 505:history 203:Nyamwij 172:history 140:Nyamwij 39:archive 3470:Link: 2829:WP:BLP 2823:I did 2607:WP:INN 2491:, and 1939:LINK: 1812:Best, 1464:. You 1310:Miasma 1255:Miasma 1221:WP:GNG 1217:WP:BIO 656:Cse404 642:Cse404 577:Cse404 363:Link: 3159:watch 3155:links 2974:Ren 2892:venom 2806:sniff 2760:sniff 2729:sniff 2465:watch 2461:links 2348:watch 2344:links 2108:watch 2104:links 1918:talk 1610:WP:RS 1168:watch 1164:links 986:WP:NB 968:watch 964:links 860:WP:RS 771:watch 767:links 660:WP:RS 617:watch 613:links 513:watch 509:links 345:sniff 180:watch 176:links 16:< 3740:talk 3714:talk 3706:done 3695:talk 3679:talk 3661:talk 3646:talk 3628:talk 3599:talk 3591:here 3449:talk 3425:talk 3407:talk 3385:talk 3370:talk 3348:talk 3311:talk 3296:talk 3273:talk 3248:talk 3182:talk 3163:logs 3147:talk 3143:edit 3123:talk 3097:talk 3045:talk 3021:talk 2986:talk 2948:talk 2921:talk 2903:talk 2869:talk 2854:talk 2837:talk 2800:bark 2778:talk 2754:bark 2723:bark 2696:talk 2656:talk 2626:talk 2597:talk 2573:talk 2556:talk 2531:talk 2513:talk 2469:logs 2453:talk 2449:edit 2429:talk 2399:talk 2380:Hyva 2371:talk 2352:logs 2336:talk 2332:edit 2312:talk 2271:talk 2229:talk 2131:talk 2112:logs 2096:talk 2092:edit 2072:talk 2046:talk 2023:talk 2009:talk 1987:talk 1964:Hi, 1951:talk 1883:talk 1866:talk 1834:talk 1818:talk 1774:talk 1757:talk 1741:talk 1723:talk 1692:talk 1672:talk 1653:talk 1617:talk 1564:talk 1512:talk 1486:talk 1433:talk 1409:talk 1386:talk 1351:talk 1332:Hi, 1294:talk 1277:talk 1273:Sdkb 1229:talk 1219:and 1203:talk 1172:logs 1156:talk 1152:edit 1132:talk 1107:talk 1087:talk 1047:talk 1034:talk 1013:talk 995:talk 972:logs 956:talk 952:edit 932:talk 906:talk 888:talk 868:talk 841:talk 794:talk 775:logs 759:talk 755:edit 735:talk 706:talk 667:talk 646:talk 621:logs 605:talk 601:edit 581:talk 555:talk 537:talk 517:logs 501:talk 497:edit 477:talk 451:talk 425:talk 392:talk 374:talk 339:bark 312:talk 287:talk 267:talk 239:talk 207:talk 184:logs 168:talk 164:edit 144:talk 119:talk 3109:AfC 2939:}} 2933:AfC 2617:not 2544:IGN 2485:IGN 2415:AfC 2298:AfC 2215:ygm 2210:or 2170:ygm 2165:or 2058:AfC 1913:DGG 1857:DGG 1118:AfC 918:AfC 878:FYI 721:AfC 702:lia 567:AfC 463:AfC 130:AfC 3742:) 3716:) 3697:) 3681:) 3663:) 3648:) 3630:) 3601:) 3451:) 3427:) 3409:) 3387:) 3379:-- 3372:) 3350:) 3330:; 3313:) 3298:) 3279:) 3275:• 3250:) 3192:. 3184:) 3161:| 3157:| 3153:| 3149:| 3145:| 3131:) 3099:) 3047:) 3027:) 3023:• 2992:) 2988:• 2950:) 2923:) 2905:) 2871:) 2863:-- 2856:) 2839:) 2809:) 2803:• 2780:) 2763:) 2757:• 2732:) 2726:• 2708:, 2698:) 2575:) 2558:) 2546:, 2533:) 2515:) 2487:, 2467:| 2463:| 2459:| 2455:| 2451:| 2437:) 2405:) 2401:• 2373:) 2350:| 2346:| 2342:| 2338:| 2334:| 2320:) 2273:) 2231:) 2218:}} 2212:{{ 2208:}} 2202:{{ 2173:}} 2167:{{ 2163:}} 2157:{{ 2133:) 2110:| 2106:| 2102:| 2098:| 2094:| 2080:) 2048:) 2029:) 2025:• 1993:) 1989:• 1953:) 1920:) 1885:) 1868:) 1836:) 1820:) 1776:) 1759:) 1743:) 1725:) 1694:) 1674:) 1655:) 1619:) 1514:) 1435:) 1411:) 1392:) 1388:• 1357:) 1353:• 1296:) 1279:) 1231:) 1205:) 1170:| 1166:| 1162:| 1158:| 1154:| 1140:) 1109:) 1089:) 1077:) 1049:) 1036:• 1015:) 997:) 970:| 966:| 962:| 958:| 954:| 940:) 908:) 890:) 870:) 847:) 843:• 796:) 773:| 769:| 765:| 761:| 757:| 743:) 708:) 669:) 648:) 619:| 615:| 611:| 607:| 603:| 589:) 557:) 539:) 515:| 511:| 507:| 503:| 499:| 485:) 453:) 431:) 427:• 394:) 376:) 348:) 342:• 314:) 289:) 269:) 245:) 241:• 209:) 182:| 178:| 174:| 170:| 166:| 152:) 121:) 64:← 3738:( 3712:( 3693:( 3677:( 3659:( 3644:( 3626:( 3597:( 3570:p 3550:2 3547:= 3544:p 3524:2 3504:p 3484:2 3447:( 3423:( 3405:( 3383:( 3368:( 3346:( 3309:( 3294:( 3271:( 3246:( 3180:( 3165:) 3141:( 3126:· 3121:( 3095:( 3043:( 3019:( 2984:( 2946:( 2919:( 2901:( 2867:( 2852:( 2835:( 2821:: 2817:@ 2797:( 2776:( 2751:( 2720:( 2694:( 2654:( 2624:( 2595:( 2571:( 2554:( 2529:( 2511:( 2471:) 2447:( 2432:· 2427:( 2397:( 2369:( 2354:) 2330:( 2315:· 2310:( 2269:( 2227:( 2129:( 2114:) 2090:( 2075:· 2070:( 2044:( 2021:( 2007:( 1985:( 1949:( 1916:( 1881:( 1864:( 1832:( 1816:( 1801:. 1772:( 1755:( 1739:( 1721:( 1690:( 1670:( 1651:( 1615:( 1567:) 1561:( 1533:: 1529:@ 1526:) 1522:( 1510:( 1489:) 1483:( 1454:: 1450:@ 1447:) 1443:( 1431:( 1407:( 1384:( 1349:( 1292:( 1275:( 1227:( 1201:( 1174:) 1150:( 1135:· 1130:( 1105:( 1085:( 1045:( 1032:( 1011:( 993:( 974:) 950:( 935:· 930:( 904:( 886:( 866:( 839:( 792:( 777:) 753:( 738:· 733:( 704:( 665:( 644:( 623:) 599:( 584:· 579:( 553:( 535:( 519:) 495:( 480:· 475:( 449:( 423:( 390:( 372:( 336:( 310:( 285:( 265:( 237:( 205:( 186:) 162:( 147:· 142:( 117:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index