5075:. Daedalus969, Landon1980 and Prophaniti are all biased, unreasonable, irrational, disrespectful, lack all sense and logic and frequently disrupt Knowledge, as shown by their frequent attempts to alter these articles to fit their perspective, no matter who is editing which article. They frequently make attempts to remove sourced information and facts, and when faced with the undeniable truth, claim that established users such as myself are the ones who are removing content, even when this is clearly untrue. I have had six featured articles and countless good articles. I should not have been blocked in the first place, when all I have ever tried to do is improve the quality of Knowledge, even in the face of attempts by editors like these three to lower the quality of Knowledge by removing sourced information, strongarming their own POV, and repeatedly reverting any attempts to improve the quality of any given article. (
3964:
articles and countless good articles. Why would I attempt to evade a 24-hour block? There is absolutely no evidence of any of the claims that have been made against me. And furthermore, the accusations that I attempted a sockpuppet are ridiculous, considering that the "editors" that accused me of sockpuppetry ARE ALL THE SAME PERSON! They don't even try to hide it. All of these editors sound exactly the same. There is absolutely no difference between Landon1980, Prophaniti, Daedalus969, etc. They are all unreasonable, disrespectful, and lack all sense and logic. These users conduct themselves by engaging in edit wars based in what was already established as the accepted facts about whatever subject is being written about, then get irate whenever their own POV isn't being represented in articles, when
Knowledge's rules are supposed to abide by a NPOV writing tone. Is there anyone who does not get this?
6384:
have already been over this, however, you have attacked people, as evidenced on this talk page. Me, Landon, that other guy, Dayewalker, several people. The differences between reversions can't lie, it has been shown threw the listed evidence that you did in fact violate 3RR. And no, you have not been asked more than once to run for adminship, you have nominated yourself once, and in fact, that was the only nomination you have ever received. A message your your talk page by another user suggesting adminship is not a nomination, it is only a nomination when all the paperwork has been filled out, and filed at the request for adminship page. But also to note, that this is irrelevant, whether you've been nominated for adminship or not does not say anything about you, and the fact that you're using this as reason to get unblocked just makes you look bad.
4024:{{Unblock on hold|1=Luna Santin|2=There's absolutely no evidence that I made the supposed "sock" edits. Daedalus969, Landon1980 and Prophaniti's only basis of claim is that the editors made changes that they disagreed with. All of the edits, despite the accuser's statements, are entirely different, baring absolutely no relation to any edit I have ever made. I have never engaged in any edit war, and I only wish to continue to have the ability to improve and maintain the quality standards of Knowledge. I have brought six articles to FA status, and countless articles to GA status. I am clearly not here to disrupt Knowledge, and there is absolutely no reason for me to evade blocking or operate a "sock".|3=
3979:. Contrary to your belief, the encyclopedia will not fall apart with you gone for a week; your continued protests that it will seem to be enough motivation for you to evade a block; the number of FA's you've written is irrelevant when you are being disruptive; your accusations against other editors are completely unfounded, ridiculous, spiteful, and not helping your unblock chances; and none of this even remotely deals with your own behavior, not even that which led to your initial block before all the block evasion began. Another unblock request that does not address those concerns will result in the protection of your talk page for the duration of your block. —
7635:
lasted 24 hours. Upon the finish of this duration, I was blocked again for supposedly evading the block, even though I have absolutely no way of doing so. The editors who accused me of evading the block have shown extreme levels of POV in their decision to continue to hound me and accuse me of sock puppetry in spite of an extreme lack of evidence. I wish to have the block revoked so I can defend myself and have the block investigation overturned. Without the ability to defend myself against these attempts at slander, you are not giving me a fair chance, even though I have not violated any
Knowledge rule, and these allegations come from editors who
8607:
your actions by several people, yet you continued to revert. Since your material, or rather, removal thereof, was against article consensus, the best course of action is proceed to the article talk page, as for a third opinion, and proceed to gain consensus. Please note, that when material, or the removal thereof, is challenged, the challenged version doesn't get to stay up while you talk it out, but the version that has consensus. What you did is war trying to get your version to stay, before gaining consensus, and that is why what you did was wrong, personal attacks aside.—
5372:, or when you continuously insulted me. That was disruptive. This is how NPA and CIVIL work: If someone insults you, you reply in a polite manner, and you keep doing so even if they keep insulting you, period. As you have so far noticed, this is what I have done, I have not insulted you a single time, yet you continue to insult me. This is not acceptable behavior, and although I will not be requesting an indefinate block, I will be requesting an extended block, and that you are forced to edit under a mentor, as this behavior is unacceptable.
5753:"sock" of the previous editors, and being that none of these edits have any connection with the style of my edits, I could not have made the first set of edits, and I certainly did not make the most recent set of edits as Landon1980 continues to accuse me of. This just proves bias on Landon's part, and that he and Prophaniti are the cause of the disruption, that they are violating Knowledge's rules. This is a strong indicator that my account should be reinstated, that the sourced genre of "punk rock" should be restored on the Hed PE article. (
8477:. "Copyright 1989-2008 Muze UK Ltd. For personal non-commercial use only. All rights reserved." Information from Muze is mass-distributed and appears on various websites, including NME. Just because it appears on the website of a reliable source doesn't mean that Muze is reliable. I've repeatedly apologized for my actions, but any stubbornness on my part does not mean that I was the only person who behaved against the rules. You were clearly being stubborn, as you are now, by denying that the biography is from Muze rather than NME. (
980:
how he has used aliases and a link to his page that explains them. If you have a good argument against including them at all, please bring it to the talk page and I might even support you if it seems reasonable. It's just not right to unilaterally remove that material when it has already been discussed. And if a consensus seems to be in favor of keeping the material out of the article, then if someone wants to add it later then it would be easier to keep it out and to get administrator support if necessary. Thanks! --
4387:-- PopMatters and Muze. These are not reliable sources for defining a band's genre. My edits to the article were in order to lower the amount of POV on the part of Prophaniti/Landon. I have repeatedly told you this, and yet you still refuse to listen. Do you wonder why you are not treated as a respected editor on Knowledge? Because you never utilize rationality in your editing and correspondence. Treating me like this in spite of the overwhelming evidence against you makes you appear extremely ignorant. (
9268:
had lots of sway in this swift unblock, but no editor's contribution history grants them a pass to skirt policy (good faith mistakes are something else altogether). Please don't lean on your bygone history here as an assertion of authority in content disputes but rather, use all those skills to cite reliable sources and find ways to get along with other editors who may not always agree with you, even on sources. More or less no volunteer editor here gets all the edits they want. Cheers,
1608:, he accused me of edit-warring (repeatedly removing the edits of others) even though that is what he and Prophaniti have been doing. He has repeatedly been attempting to lie about my edits in an attempt to save his own butt, accusing me of things that I clearly never did. It's ridiculous that this guy thinks he gets to treat me as if I were repeatedly vandalizing the article when, in fact, this is not true. I've had several successful FACs and was nominated twice for administration. (
6990:, whether or not the edits involve the same material, except in certain circumstances. A "page" is any page on Knowledge, including talk and project space. A revert is any action, including administrative actions, that reverses the actions of other editors, in whole or in part. A series of consecutive saved revert edits by one user with no intervening edits by another user counts as one revert. (This differs from the definition of "revert" used elsewhere in the project.)
6842:, whether or not the edits involve the same material, except in certain circumstances. A "page" is any page on Knowledge, including talk and project space. A revert is any action, including administrative actions, that reverses the actions of other editors, in whole or in part. A series of consecutive saved revert edits by one user with no intervening edits by another user counts as one revert. (This differs from the definition of "revert" used elsewhere in the project.)
8451:
expire? Why evade your block, why all the IP socks, why make all those spurious AN3 reports? You did a lot of things that were very disruptive and completely unnecessary. If you expect to regain the communities trust you owe a lot of people some apologies, and you need to promise you will not continue with the behavior you were blocked for. I will agree that you do some good work, and I would like to see you be unblocked and be able to contribute constructively again.
3325:
1286:
7450:
these edits. Finally, none of the content in this edit points to a revert to any past edit made by me. The most recently reverted edits are the amalgamation of several edits made since I was blocked without any attempt to clean-up the formatting, which I most certainly would have done had my account not been blocked. Now, if you look at the revisions of the
Sockpuppet investigation, it shows that the editor who added the IP who made the above edits is Landon1980:
7201:
these edits. Finally, none of the content in this edit points to a revert to any past edit made by me. The most recently reverted edits are the amalgamation of several edits made since I was blocked without any attempt to clean-up the formatting, which I most certainly would have done had my account not been blocked. Now, if you look at the revisions of the
Sockpuppet investigation, it shows that the editor who added the IP who made the above edits is Landon1980:
9238:
forth by Gwen above. No edit warring, no personal attacks and no sockpuppetry. Judging by the change of tone over the course of your talk page, I think that you are sincere in your intent to change. Understand that if I unblock, I will be watching closely. I will be going to the extent of putting a link on my firefox buttonbar with your contributions... one minor slipup and I will not hesitate to reblock you. Do you feel you can accommodate these conditions?
5200:
these edits. Finally, none of the content in this edit points to a revert to any past edit made by me. The most recently reverted edits are the amalgamation of several edits made since I was blocked without any attempt to clean-up the formatting, which I most certainly would have done had my account not been blocked. Now, if you look at the revisions of the
Sockpuppet investigation, it shows that the editor who added the IP who made the above edits is
3286:
encyclopedic fashion and is used by many other sites as info. So please do not revert it again; I don't want an edit war. And I know how strange the emo label is when applied to ATDI in today's terms, but that's not how it always was. In 2001, if you'd asked someone, "Can you name an emo band?" chances are they'd have mentioned ATDI. But that aside, it is sourced properly so please don't undo it. Thanks in advance for your cooperation. :) --
8920:
8138:
7549:
7309:
7088:
6185:
3878:
3707:
3560:
3413:
1364:
8029:
highly untowards. The sockpuppetry, however, is most worrisome, along with the email abuse, hence I have disabled your email-sending privileges. I hope you'll now begin talking with editors, here on your talk page, about how you might be brought back into the fold, if that's what you want. This can happen soon. However, if you further abuse this talk page, your ability to edit it will most likely be disabled.
4701:, and, in fact, I restored it in later edits, with proper {{cite web}} formatting. Funny how you NEVER mention this. And, lastly "I do not see you being welcome here"? Who are you? You are the person who had a respected editor blocked because you didn't agree with his edits. You are a person who repeatedly tried to enforce his own POV. Give it a rest. You just keep digging yourself deeper with this nonsense. (
8045:
6639:
circumstances. A "page" is any page on
Knowledge, including talk and project space. A revert is any action, including administrative actions, that reverses the actions of other editors, in whole or in part. A series of consecutive saved revert edits by one user with no intervening edits by another user counts as one revert. (This differs from the definition of "revert" used elsewhere in the project.)
1039:. But that's not for you to unilaterally decide against consensus. Knowledge doesn't work that way. However, as I said before I'm not contesting your edits any further, since you're essentially insisting on an edit war rather than discussion my only recourse would be something like an RFC or mediation and honestly I just don't care deeply enough to bother. Thanks for your reply on my talk page. --
9064:|Unblock request was reviewed before I had a chance to respond to the question of multiple accounts. As I state below, I do not intend to use multiple accounts, which is why I am requesting an unblock. (If I had intended to open a second account, I would not have bothered.) I wish to make myself useful on Knowledge, get some more FAs listed and make another run for adminship down the line.}}
2530:. The revisions clearly show that I attempted to clean-up the article and Prophaniti and eventually "Landon" repeatedly reverted these edits. Any material that I removed was biased. There is absolutely no proof that there is a consensus over the band's genre, but they tried to claim that there was ("Mudvayne is commonly described as"). My edits reflected an unbiased view, correlating to the
6674:, often abbreviated 3RR. The three-revert rule usefully measures edit warring, as it posits that surpassing three reverts on any one page in under 24 hours is edit warring. While nobody should interpret the three-revert rule blindly, reaching this threshold strongly signals that serious misconduct is afoot. The 3RR metric is not an exemption for conduct that stays under the threshold.
9073:
1064:. Granted, it takes 2 people for an edit war to occur, but the second time I reverted your changes I specifically requested a discussion; it was an attempt to end the edit war and help to come to a consensus. You don't seem to understand that just reverting changes because they are correct in your opinion is inappropriate behavior. I strongly encourage you to read that policy. --
75:
4478:, just not in the lead, because the genre term 'rock' was used in place of the term that wasn't as well-sourced. This is why I say that you are biased, because you repeatedly change things to fit your own POV. If you were anything other than a Michael Moore-grade hack, you would post THE REAL EVIDENCE, which clearly shows that I DID NOT REMOVE RELIABLE SOURCES. (
8894:. As I say, it is difficult to hold yourself to these standards when you feel the other side is betraying these standards. Still, you must find a way to remain above the fray - especially if you want to become an administrator someday. These skills are essential to passing an RfA and being useful to Knowledge. Other great reading is
5604:. Secondly, how long you have been here is irrelevant, I have been here four years as well, except, unlike you, I have a clean block record. I was not blocked for disruption in 2007, as you were. That is only proof that you've been disruptive in the past, and your behavior now only indicates that you haven't learned since then.—
8320:. Your threats are extremely disrespectful to the rules of Knowledge. All I have ever done is tried to improve the quality of Knowledge articles and maintain the standards of quality. I should NOT be treated like a vandal who only registered to muck up articles. My account should not be blocked. I should be an administrator. (
4150:
to back up your claims, such as how we can all edit at the same time, or you feel you can explain why this random IP comes out of nowhere to defend you, stop throwing accusations of sockpuppetry around, it's getting tiring. Serious, either back up your claims with diffs show how their editing style is the same, or stop.
8597:. If that was the case you would have won. You had a single nomination, which you nominated yourself for, then one person suggested that you run for adminship, and another asked if you would like a nomination. Note how they never followed through. Please stop using this as an exuse to step on everyone in your way.
5233:
history of the article, it can be seen that he and IPs who are similar to the reported IPs have basically warring over the content in the article. The goal of the IPs is to add sources, a great deal of sources, and it seems, to removal reliable sources, all while changing the genre of the band to suit their POV.
7174:
unblocked. I wish to undertake discussions in the issues involved and hope to come to an agreeable compromise between all parties involved. Since I was asked to provide this evidence, I present the following that I have gathered over the last few hours. One of the articles I am accused of evading block on is
9267:
Ok then, I have unblocked you because I take "I understand all of this" as a promise to abide within these three bounds: No edit warring, no PAs, one account. If you stray at all, you'll be reblocked and likely for a much longer time. Your long and helpful contribution history along with this promise
8873:
Knowledge works best when editors can stay cool during adverse times. It can certainly be frustrating when you are being cool and the editor on the other end is not being cool. But losing your cool is not going to help. Here are some valuable pages to read that you already may know about but wouldn't
8816:
OK, if you want to continue down that path I guess I can't stop you. That is your interpretation of how things work, you started by saying NME was unreliable, then that it was biased. My point is, people have differing opinions and that is what the discussion page is for. In the future seek consensus
8606:
Secondly, it is not an assumption that you can't discuss things, it is obvious from the revert warring that you cannot. You're so steadfast in your opinion that you're right that you're unwilling to compromise. The basic premise of changing content on wikipedia is that there was a consensus against
8417:
So you no longer deny this? My only problem with you being unblocked was your complete denial of everything down to violating 3RR. I have no problems whatsoever with you coming back and behaving, but the personal attacks, edit warring, etc has got to stop. The user above gave you some good advice, in
8085:
Are you kidding me? I never engaged in sockpuppetry, edit warring, harassment or email abuse. I am being harassed myself. Just look at the edits of
Daedalus969 and Landon1980. They repeatedly lied about my edits and prevented any attempt by anyone else at making a valid edit that disagreed with their
7950:
Here's my final advice to you. Stop. Serve your time, stop harassing other users. Never again try and make a case for yourself being superior to another editor based on someone suggesting to you that you should be an admin someday, that doesn't help your case at all. Sorry to break it to you, but you
7039:
you of breaking two policies. That is not a lie, despite what you think. The fact is, the opposite party will always believe what they believe is right, so calling me a liar based on what your idea of truth is is factually incorrect when based upon the evidence and arguments that have been posted.—
6638:
The three-revert rule (often referred to as 3RR) is a policy which applies to all
Wikipedians, and is intended to prevent edit warring: Contributors must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period, whether or not the edits involve the same material, except in certain
5875:
See, saying things like that doesn't work when you accuse everyone who doesn't agree with your opinions on any given music genre of being a sock puppet, and repeatedly try to twist things to fit your perspective. The real evidence is that I have been here for four years, and I have only ever tried to
5367:
Knowledge is as much getting articles to featured status as it is editing harmoniously with all those around you, and this insulting and incivil behavior just poisons the atomosphere. It is simply disruptive to insult people here, and like it or not, you were editing disruptively whenever you put in
4674:
Lastly, ROLLING STONE is a reliable source, and you remove them, and the other noted source. Funny how you don't mention that. Oh, forgot to mention, rolling stones lists the band as that genre, yet you still change it. You can't get away with this, you have been extremely disruptive, and I do not
4515:
No, you didn't, because you are biased and irrational. And stop trying to clutter up my page with crap that is already repeated TWICE now. The bias is clearly there. You just refuse to see it. I could upload a picture for you, clearly showing that the sources were still there, but I can't because you
3963:
The reasons that I was blocked were fabricated and the editors who actively campaigned for my blocking are biased. As I remain unavailable to edit articles, these editors continue to vandalize articles, strongarm their POV and add poorly-sourced material to articles. Moreover, I have had six featured
2188:
that was removed by
Prophaniti. These accusations hinge upon the preconception that I supposedly had/have a predetermined bias in editing based on my own personal opinion of the band's genre, which is entirely untrue. I do not have any opinion of the band's genre whatsoever. I am just trying to abide
975:
Hello, I noticed that you reverted back to the somewhat-controversial changes that you made to the Kool Keith article. I say "somewhat-controversial" because if you look at the talk page there has already been a discussion regarding the aliases that the artist has used in his career, and a compromise
318:
of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Please also note that after the roll call for active members, we've cleared
175:
My changes thus constitute removing unsourced information, something not only accepted, but indeed encouraged on wikipedia, and adding in sourced information, something at the very core of the whole site. Your removal of this information simply because you personally don't like it constitutes at best
9237:
I have spent the morning reading over this talk page as well as all the incidents that led up to the block. I am generally satisfied with
Ibaranoff24's responses to the questions that have been asked of him. Ibaranoff, I would be willing to unblock provided you commit yourself to the conditions laid
8709:
Fine. Don't believe me. My longstanding record of good contributions speaks for yourself. If you still want to believe that these edits were not wrongly attributed to be, I cannot change your mind. It's not as if a computer would ever make a mistake... even though every spell check I've ever had has
8578:
As I told you yesterday, nobody cares about your resume. You are not an admin. You are an indefinitely blocked user, an edit warrior, and a sockpuppeter, all confirmed by admins and checkuser. No offense intended, but you need to understand your situation. This page wasn't opened up again for you to
8562:
I think you are being ridiculous in your assumption that I can't discuss things. How else did I get so much support on my adminship nomination, followed by two more requests to run, not to mention the fact that I have six featured articles and countless good articles? There is no reason why I should
7749:
No, listen to me. Biased implies that I support a specific point of view. Clarify now what that point of view is, because I can say matter-of-factly that I don't support any point of view. I go by what is visible to my naked eye. The evidence speaks for itself, so then, instead of throwing terms
7634:
Gooba gabba gooba weeble wobble wabble ikki ikki ikki ni ni ni noo ooke ooke ooke oh-e-oh-e-oh. If the next block reviewer is actually reading this, I apologize for that. Let's summarize everything that's happened so far. Firstly, I have been blocked for violating 3RR, which I did not do. This block
7449:
Firstly, there are SEVEN citations in the lead. Not only do I not use citations in the leads of articles that I am CURRENTLY editing, I do not use more than two citations per statement. Secondly, the "discography" section contains a best-of compilation which I would have certainly removed had I made
7200:
Firstly, there are SEVEN citations in the lead. Not only do I not use citations in the leads of articles that I am CURRENTLY editing, I do not use more than two citations per statement. Secondly, the "discography" section contains a best-of compilation which I would have certainly removed had I made
6922:
Right now, you are clearly lying. The rules are there. Can you not read them? I have violated no Knowledge rule. Are you intentionally trying to offend me so you can push me over the edge? Sorry, pal. Not working. As long as you continue to insult my intelligence, you are digging yourself deeper and
6080:
I'm going to offer this advice to you on good faith. If you are innocent, stop arguing on this talk page. Getting snide with Daedalus, Landon, and myself does you absolutely no good. You were blocked by an admin with checkuser abilities, so just saying "it wasn't me" doesn't help you. If you wish to
5349:
Well, Landon's revert of sourced content certainly proves that something is wrong here. I apologize for any insult I may have directed at you, but for the longest time, I saw you as being uncooperative, and I merely wanted my block lifted so that I could defend myself against the continously ongoing
5199:
Firstly, there are SEVEN citations in the lead. Not only do I not use citations in the leads of articles that I am CURRENTLY editing, I do not use more than two citations per statement. Secondly, the "discography" section contains a best-of compilation which I would have certainly removed had I made
5070:
There's absolutely no evidence that I made these edits. Daedalus969, Landon1980 and Prophaniti's only basis of claim is that the editors made changes that they disagreed with. All of the edits, despite the accuser's statements, are entirely different, baring absolutely no relation to any edit I have
4149:
Lastly, your claim that we're all sockpuppets of each other is completely unfounded. So what if se disagree with you, you might as well claim that ever person who's posted to this page is a single user, as they all disagree with you. The only who who has agreed with you is you, so, unless you want
2874:
What are you talking about? I don't have a "style". It tells new users how to sign your posts ON the talk pages you edit. You are out of your mind if you think that you can get away with accusing me of this crap and continuing to bow down to vandals like Landon/Prophaniti (WHO IS THE SAME PERSON, NO
2787:
If you want even more evidence that Landon/Prophaniti is a vandal, check their latest accusation. They are claiming that I am not here as a valid contributor! I have several FA and GAs, and was nominated for adminship three times. Landon/Prophaniti is a straight-up liar and vandal. He is the one who
1506:
In spite of Landon1980's claims, the edits clearly show that I made three separate edits, not four revisions to the same page within the span of 24 hours. As Landon1980 continues to lie, accuse, attack and disrupt the proceedings, the quality and standards of Knowledge continue to be lowered. I hope
1179:
As you were explicitly told, Landon is allowed to remove whatever he likes from his talk page. As this is a wiki, previous versions of a page are viewable by anyone. You do not have permission to judge what comments do or not belong on Landon's talkpage, despite whatever time you took to decide. You
979:
Let me be frank with you here. In the discussions regarding the aliases, I was on the side of having them removed. At one time they were taking up more than half of the article space, and were a copyright violation of the artist's web site no less. So I had them removed with only a short blurb about
171:
Now, to the subject at hand: No, the genres haven't been sourced properly. The only reference in the "styles and influences" section which makes any real reference to their genre is the Naperville Sun one, and that link doesn't work. If you have real sources giving those genres, I suggest you add in
9172:
Yes. This helps. Thanks. So, as the blocking admin, if I understand, you're promising not to edit war over content (no 3rr or slow burn back-and-forths, even if you strongly believe the sources and policy are 100% with you), not to make personal attacks and to edit only from this account, no matter
8768:
short leash if/when unblocked and you need to understand this. There are many things you can do other than edit warring. I'm not out to get you like you think I am. NME is a as reliable as they come, and if they use a review so can we. I hope your first edits will not be to remove reliable sources,
8668:
I don't think you understand what I'm trying to say. The point is that I would not get all the support I got if I was any of these things or if I was trying to do what you accuse me of. There has clearly been a major understanding. And I've repeatedly stated that my provider mixes up IPs all of the
8649:
Anyway, the point being, it doesn't matter what you've done once you were disruptive. You blatantly sockpuppeted to get your way even after you were blocked, and even before that you socked to try and argue for yourself as a different person on the ANI page, and when confronted, you denied it. If
8528:
I intend to stay out of things for a while. I just wish that rather than abjectly reverting my edits, people would discuss things rather than immediately coming to the conclusion that I am trying to control the article. The idea of a topic ban is way over the edge, but I do think that any objection
8235:
I asked you to give this a rest. Instead, however, you simply could not let it go and have now earned yourself an indef block. Stop asking for an unblock or this page will be protected from editing. With it unprotected, you will be able to request an unblock at some time in the not-too-near future,
7943:
I politely asked you above, and am doing so again. Stop emailing me. I will not respond anywhere except here. I do not want to read your attacks on other editors, and I will not review your case any further than I have already done. You were guilty of the offense that resulted in your block, admins
7798:
have to be to the exact same revision, just reverts of someone's edits in general. Do you not realize how bad this makes you look, those edits are in the page history and anyone with eyesight can see them. Why would you lie about something completely visible to others? How many people must tell you
6467:
And for the last time, you violated 3RR, and I mean, as others have, and the ones who blocked you have, the spirit of the rules. Knowledge is now a law firm, we don't follow rules by the letter, we follow the spirit of the rules, but then again, would you like me to link to the four times that you
6383:
We've already been over this. First, back up what you say, I already acknowledged that you've been here for four years, but as I also said, the length of time you've been here is irrelevant. Second, not a single person has attacked you, I have seen the diffs provided, and they are not attacks, we
5860:
Then the checkuser will exonerate you. Either way you cannot be allowed to run around here half-cocked edit warring, attacking anyone that doesn't agree with you. You still deny violating 3RR, you denying things like that when confronted with definitive evidence tells me/and others you are here for
5164:
In response to the lack of response in my attempts to have my account restored so that I may restore order, I present the following evidence. One of the articles I am accused of evading block on is the article Hed PE. But if you look at the revisions, you can clearly tell that there is a difference
4827:
Hey, I have an idea, how about you take back all of the insults you've thrown at me and others, claiming I'm a sock of Landon, that he and that other user are the same person... all that stuff you have no base for other than they don't agree with you, take if all back, and I'll leave it at a link.—
4581:
Lastly, that insult is now another nail into your coffin, I suggest you retract it immediately, lastly, as stated, and as is quite visible above, the sources were reliable, as found on the reliable sources noticeboard, so stop claiming they aren't. The genre was well sourced, not poorly sourced as
2816:
To continue on, in case you may not know, Checkusers have several useful tools that they can use to determine if two users are the same user, but you need to compile evidence first, as I have, as presented on the case linked to above. But to the point, it is well known by users who have dealt with
2646:
waiting on those diffs of people attacking you. I'm not going to check the talk page, I want the diff, the unchanged edit, the edit as it happened, and I want you to find them, since you apparently have them. But besides that, I also want the diffs you claim you have linking those two accounts to
1974:
Strike that, first, I reviewed your contributions to the article, and your edits, and edit summeries, displayed the fact that you were in fact removing sourced information from the article, and the other two editors you speak of were adding it back in. Second, you have yet to display a single diff
731:
Unfortunately, I cannot help you at the moment (my browser is currently having problems displaying some pages, and unfortunately, this article is one of them, not sure what the problem is though...I don't think it has anything to do with the article, just my browser acting weird) but I am sure that
8690:
deny the obvious sockpuppetry? I'm not accusing you of doing it anymore, the checkuser came back positive, and apparently you don't know that much about IP addresses. You sockpuppetted to evade your block, period. The evidence has been gathered, the report submitted and returned. You have been
8513:
I'll ask a question here that seems to have come up. You said above you wouldn't sock or edit war if reinstated. However, your statement above clearly shows you still think you were right. If reinstated, would you continue to make that change on the article page? Would you be willing to agree to a
8223:
I am not being given a fair chance. The block is on the basis of actions I never made. There is not one bit of truth in Gwen Gale's claims. This administrator is overstepping her bounds. I do not wish to engage in any edit war. I wish to improve the quality and maintain the standards of Knowledge.
8028:
I have lengthened your block indefinitely for sockpuppetry, edit warring, personal attacks, harassment and email abuse. Indef does not mean forever, or even a week. The first step towards getting unblocked may be for you to acknowledge that many other editors have lately found your behaviour to be
7173:
As stated in my previous request for my block to be lifted, I was initially blocked for accusations of violating 3RR. Now, my block has been extended to a week based on unfounded accusations of sockpuppetry. Based on the overwhelming evidence against these accusations, I request that my account be
5844:
innocent. I want my account access restored, and I wish for you to stop trying to push your own POV. And you NEED to stop accusing every editor that disagrees with your opinion of being a sockpuppet of me. The sources for Hed PE clearly show that the majority of sources agree that Hed PE is a punk
5733:
As far as I remember, I have never accused you of sockpuppetry. Whether or not the IPs who are making the exact same edits to articles that you previously did are connected with you isn't even relevant to the discussion. When I referred to them as "socks" I was referring to them in terms of the IP
5675:
I'm sorry, but you need to be working with higher ups than me on this. I'm just a lowly admin and I don't have time to conduct investigations and I don't have the authority to override what's going on. The users listed in the Mediation link I gave you above are trained in dealing with this sort of
5148:
There is no evidence that the first IP's defense of me or use of a signature style similar to mine proves the IP as me. None of the IPs have been, as Daedalus claims, "reverting to the version last edited by the suspected sock master". All of the edits made by these IPs are entirely different from
8745:
I, for one, will let bygones be bygones. If this is what you want. All the "I'm right and everyone else is wrong's" and the stubbornness on your part needs to end. This is a collaborative project and you must be able to work with others, and be able to handle other editors disagreeing with you at
8450:
NME was, and that is all that matters. The fact NME used there review means they have endorsed it. I'm having a hard time assuming good faith with you. You call me a liar and a vandal, yet checkuser confirms you were lying in every other statement. Why did you not just let the short 24 hour block
7887:
I also showed that you also showed bias in reverting sourced content and claiming that I had made the edits, even though I have absolutely no ability to do so. Please do not make another reply to this talk page. I have repeatedly proven my points, but the fact that you choose not to listen proves
7018:
referring to 3RR. You've repeatedly said "3RR, 3RR" over and over again, thus proving that you have ABSOLUTELY NO IDEA what 3RR means. And yet you are telling ME what to do? I have been here for four years, I have brought six articles to FA status, and countless to GA status, in addition to being
6895:
Listen to me very closely, as I have stated many, many times before, if you want to obtain any success from your efforts, stop noting what you've done and how long you've been here, it makes you look like you have a superiority complex, in that you are using your contributions as justification to
6099:
I apologized for attacking you. I haven't sent any emails containing attacks since calming down. I respond to the comments posted here because, being blocked, I have absolutely no way of defending myself against these allegations. As these posters continue to make these statements here, I have to
5470:
Being that I have absolutely no ability of editing any article, being that the IP I use is permanently associated with this account (which I found out after attempting to edit this talk page without signing in first), I am unable to edit anything. Your recent statement that you now believe that I
5116:
The accusations I've made are true, as one can clearly see by your posts here, in which you clearly show no respect for the rules of Knowledge, or other editors. The investigation should never have gone underway in the first place, being that IT'S A COMPLETE LIE. There is absolutely ZERO evidence
2720:
In other words, Ibaranoff, you are consistently denying what is obvious to the rest of us. Your continued insistence that you are right and everyone else is wrong is severely testing the patience of the community. I strongly suggest that you take a voluntary wikibreak of a week or so to allow the
2624:
Too bad, but the shoe fits. A random IP appearing on the admin's noticeboard and, after having never participated in anything, defending your edits. No. The case is already filed, so, you can either admit now, because well, the evidence is overwhelming, or, you can continue to deny it, and get
1639:
It was the other way around. Prophaniti/Landon was removing sourced content, and I asked him to stop. By taking on the username 'Landon', Prophaniti gets to accuse me of edit-warring when I was only reverting his removal of not only my clean-up, but restoration of sourced material, and removal of
761:
One aspect I can instantly see is that the lead is quite long. The purpose of the lead is to provide a brief, condensed overview of the article while the main article deals with more in-depth issues. With such a long lead you are not enticing readers to read the rest of the article as they pretty
517:
to FA. Well I was reading through the TNA section and then went down and looked at the sources you used to source that section. I think you should replace the Online World of Wrestling sources since that site is unreliable. It would be best to change them to PWTorch.com sources. Their reviews are
5752:
I assume you mean for me to respond on here, because I have no way of editing your talk page while blocked for things that I didn't do. Being that the multiple edits made to that article in the last few days have absolutely no connection to each other, the most recent edits could not have been a
5559:
Your personal attacks suggest otherwise. People can be here for years, and not run into any problems, but once they do, it is obvious when mentorship is needed. The fact that you have insulted me, and others, and others still through email, is enough to prove you need mentorship in the area of
5264:
section, citations 1 and 7 are the same, as are 2 and 11 and 3 and 19. This repetition of sources just goes to show that Landon is changing the genre of the band to suit his POV that the band is "rap metal", when the majority of sources, including ones that are not being utilized in the article,
5232:
I'm not going to withdraw the sock case now, as I don't know how to split sock cases. Looking over the edits of all the IPs, aside from the one that looked distinctly like the suspected sock master, I would have to say that I do not believe that Ibaranoff is the controller of these IPs. In the
3792:
As I remain unavailable to improve articles, the quality of the articles I frequently edit are going down with the addition of poorly-sourced material, removal of properly-sourced material, and overal vandalism that is going unchecked because some vandal with two accounts accused me of trying to
6270:
I was initially blocked for accusations of violating 3RR. Now, my block has been extended to a week based on unfounded accusations of sockpuppetry. Based on the overwhelming evidence against these accusations, I request that my account be unblocked. I wish to undertake discussions in the issues
3301:
Allmusic frequently miscategorizes artists. It is not a reliable source for musical styles. For biographical information, it works fine, but for musical styles, it does not. And your opinion doesn't mean anything in regards to the style of a musical artist. Additionally, you are not supposed to
2853:
Yes, I can. It's called logging in with a different browser which does not have cookies enabled, therefore allowing you to edit while logged out. But besides that, the IP meets the duck test. Every single edit takes exactly the same style as you. The IP even signs their posts the same way.
4896:
Meh, screw it, I shouldn't be setting terms, but either way, I am not delisting the case. The fact of the matter is, I've been sockpuppet hunting for awhile now, I've dealt with many disruptive users, you aren't the first, nor will you be the last. I know what behavior to look for, and quite
918:
will use the gathered feedback to find new ways to improve the project and reach out to potential members. The results of the questionnaire will be published in next month's newsletter. If you know of any editors who have edited film articles in the past, please invite them to take part in the
493:
of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have suggestions or comments related to the newsletter, please leave me a
6938:
Whether you believe me or not, I'm actually not lying, the fact is that you were gaming the system by edit warring and reverting your version continously, as stated above, but besides that, I am not the one who is digging my own grave, try looking in a mirror and you'll be much closer to your
3285:
Hey there. I noticed you reverted the "emo" content on the ATDI article. I just wanted to mention that Allmusic is the most widely-used reliable source for any music articles on Knowledge. I edit as part of 'WikiProject Punk music' and it is the agreed-upon source since it handles music in an
7699:
the block to be lifted. I have clearly shown that I have done nothing wrong. I have provided more than enough evidence that these accusations are unfounded. Do you really think that it's perfectly fine to block a respected editor for a week for NO REASON? Especially seeing as how I now have
6349:
Daedalus, this is why I have repeatedly called you biased and unreasonable. Even after thoroughly discussing all of these issues, you still refuse to acknowledge that I have been a user of Knowledge for four years, and I have been asked more than once to run for adminship. But you focus on
5543:
I never attacked anyone purely for disagreeing with me. I may have gone overboard in trying to maintain the rules of Knowledge, but I do not need a "mentor". I have been here for four years. I have gained enough clout to be considered three times for adminship. I do not need a "mentor".
6147:
Exactly, you argue your POV, you do not explain the reason you were blocked, hense, why your unblocks keep failing. Like Daye has said, if you want your unblock to have a possibility of success higher than 1%, I suggest you write an unblock request which addresses, and I stress this,
8492:
You shouldn't really say "I'm not going to argue with you," and then argue with someone. Landon appears to have come here in good faith, and you seem to still want to argue about the incident that got you blocked in the first place. I hope you can see how that's not a promising sign.
7281:"Just because you tried to make some differences in your sock edits does not mean they are by other people"? WHAT?!? Do you not pay attention at all? I have been here for FOUR YEARS. I have six featured articles, countless good articles, and I HAVE BEEN ASKED TO RUN FOR ADMINSHIP
1644:-sourced biography which Landon/Prophaniti refuse to admit isn't a reliable source because they claim, incorrectly, that the content was created by the magazine New Music Express - even though the content is hosted by NME, it was created by Muze, which isn't a reliable source. (
167:
First off, please don't try to tell me in such a tone how to manage my talk page. Most users I've encountered remove sections when done with. I likewise remove things from my talk page when they have served their purpose. Don't try to order me around like that again, thank you.
5149:
any edit that I have ever made. Lastly, there is no evidence that because a user simply edits an article that I have edited in the past, that they are supposedly me. I have edited pretty much every article on Knowledge. There is NO evidence to support Daedalus' allegations. (
198:, the section on "Removal of comments, warnings", for further evidence. I am perfectly within my rights to remove whatever I wish from my talk page. So again, do not attempt to order me about regarding it, nor undo my comment removals there, be they yours or anyone elses.
703:
of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. My apologies for the late delivery, and thanks go to both
1345:
You made 4 reverts, only three of which were marked as such. The 4th was marked clean up. Anyone else's claims are irrelevant; no-one blocks people at AN3 based on what the reporters say; we check the edit histories first. Your attacks below don't help you at all
7954:
If you want to help the encyclopedia and not just fight and settle old scores, then stop disrupting things and sit out the rest of your block. When it's over, it's over, and you won't be judged on it. You can start over, but you have to accept your punishment.
5584:
You have never been blocked for no reason. You have never been a member for four years. You have never gone four years on Knowledge without running into any problems until an unstable editor who can't handle any difference in opinion tries to have you blocked.
8109:
I warned you above about falling back on your credentials. No one cares, nor are they applicable anymore since you are serving a indef block. I would advise you to strike your comments about Gwen and realize this situation needs to end, before things get even
5651:
In reply to the e-mail sent to me, I have to stay out of this. Multiple users and admins are already examining the situation and Knowledge processes are already underway. If you feel the process is against you then I recommend, if you haven't already, seeking
2432:
by the vandal. The "idiocy" summary may have been slightly out of line, but that summarizes the level of contribution given by this editor who repeatedly reverts clean-up of the article and adds poorly-sourced or unsourced statements just to promote his bias.
1635:
edit warring. The consensus of the article was that the content was sourced. You disagreed, after you were reverted, with a note in the edit summery to see the talk page, mind you, you simply reverted back, and you continued to do so until you were blocked.
6676:
For instance, edit warring could take the form of 4+ reverts on a page in a day, or three, or one per day for a protracted period of time, or one per page across many pages, or simply a pattern of isolated blind reverts as a first resort against disagreeable
2813:, where your suspected sockpuppet is under review. As a note, to you, if this user is found to be a sockpuppet of you, it will likely result in an extension of your block to prevent further disruption, as blocked users are not allowed to edit while blocked.
140:
election has begun. We will be selecting seven coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of candidates. Additionally, we are keeping nominations open during the voting period, in case any additional editors wish to nominate themselves. Please
7427:. But if you look at the revisions, you can clearly tell that there is a difference between the edits that I made on the article, and the edits that are being attributed to me. Here is the edit that my accusers believe is being reverted to by a "sock" of me:
7178:. But if you look at the revisions, you can clearly tell that there is a difference between the edits that I made on the article, and the edits that are being attributed to me. Here is the edit that my accusers believe is being reverted to by a "sock" of me:
7888:
that this conversation is going nowhere. I am in the process of gaining administrative help in not only preventing the both of you from harassing me like this, but also in overturning your ridiculous, biased "sockpuppet investigation". Have a good life. (
7733:
You are clearly biased, being that you have posted NONE of the evidence that I have provided that proves my innocence, nor have you overturned the investigation, which was NOT needed in the first place being that I MADE ABSOLUTELY NO EDITS WHILE BLOCKED.
5212:
I had previously stated my opinion that this editor, Landon, had me blocked only so he could continue pushing his POV. These recent actions just prove it. These edits clearly show violation of Knowledge's rules and prove me innocent of any wrongdoing.
9204:
I'm not here to drag all these promises out of you. I was ready to unblock, but your answer sounds as though you are only promising not to edit war. That's not enough and I can't unblock you at this time. Perhaps another admin can have a look at this.
2207:. You removed sourced content, the sources were brought up at the source noticeboard, and found to be reliable, but you still removed them. This is not acceptable behavior, you cannot say otherwise in light of overwhelming evidence to the contrary.—
8418:
theory, even if you know you are right sometimes it's best to let it go. In this case though, the content and sources you were removing were found to be reliable at the noticeboard. You cannot take it upon yourself to decide a source is unreliable.
5940:
You do realize a checkuser is who extended your block don't you? They magically found their way back to you upon reviewing the "IP socks a plenty" thread on ANI which did not even so much as mention you. Quite a coincidence they traced back to you.
4083:
Except when the editors who are removing accurate, sourced information are Daedalus969, Landon1980 and Prophaniti, in which case, it's okay, apparently. I never removed "accurate, sourced information". I removed inaccurate, unsourced information. I
365:
Hi Ibranoff. I'd really like it if you would engage in the MedCab case. Obviously I can't force you, but it makes sense to at least attempt to resolve the dispute, don't you think? I'm sure we can all come to an agreement that satisfies everyone.
5401:
I apologize for these actions, but you have to understand that I have been an editor for a long time here, and I have always tried to follow and maintain the rules of Knowledge, and find myself frustrated with outright violations of the rules. An
751:
has removed this as you need to wait a couple of weeks before renominating the article. This is to ensure that the FAC process does not get overwhelming backlogs and that articles improve in the mean time. May I suggest you send the article for a
8857:
even when you know you're right, it is better to concede. Is it really worth all this? You have a lot of great work to do on Knowledge. Sometimes you just have to give in on some things so you can do good work elsewhere. Just food for thought,
4716:
I'm not the person with a block log dating back to 2007 for disruption. I don't see any evidence that you're a respected editor here, all I see is you spewing personal attacks and baseless accusations which you refuse to provide evidence for.
7394:
I was initially blocked for untrue accusations of violating 3RR. Now, my block has been extended to a week based on unfounded accusations of sockpuppetry. Firstly, let's go over the 3RR accusations. Here are the edits that I was blocked for:
6885:
And again, you fail to realize that it doesn't matter what you've done or how long you've been here if you've been disruptive, and once again, these accusations are not completely unfounded, the evidence of you gaming the system can be found
8361:
Note to other admins - this user emailed me asking to be unblocked, saying he had been wrongfully blocked for edit warring and wrongfully blocked for socking. I used checkuser to look into the allegations of wrongful sockpuppetry block, per
6081:
plead your case, ask for an unblock or contact an administrator. Stop emailing people with attacks, stop trying to drop in how many times you've been nominated for admin, and just stop trying to say that you were right in the first place.
5097:
Yes, I did post this reply, but I suggest you re-write it. Defend yourself, do not throw accusations every which way and argue about others. You're arguing to defend yourself here, not get others blocked. It only makes you look bad.—
5259:
In response to your comment: I saw no reliable sources being removed. I looked at the edits, and all of the sources used to back up the lead's assertion of "rap metal" had already been in the mainline of the article. If you look at the
5051:. Please post your response to these accustaions below, and, take note, your response must be explaining the evidence that has been gathered and shown, if you just go on a rant about how others were socking, I shall not copy it over.—
1159:
The warning was about removing comments. I did not remove any comments. I made a new post, and I took the time to restore earlier, relevant comments in relation to Landon1980's recent disruption, attacks, accusations, and edit-warring.
6846:
I guess you aren't getting what I'm hinting at, so I'll just post it flatly: You are gaming the system by reverting once every day back to your own version, it is in this way that you violate wikipedia's edit warring rules, and 3RR.—
8631:
Thirdly, one last note. Even editors who have been here for awhile, or have brought many articles to good or featured status, partake in activities that cause them to be banned or blocked by the community. Take for example the user
6994:
No, I'm not referring to 3RR, I'm referring to edit warring and gaming the system, which is what you were doing. Take the time to read my posts, and take back your insult, if you ever want to better your chances of being unblocked.—
7650:
You have full read access to everything that happened, and can document whatever wrongs may have been done to you here on your talk page. At least, unless you keep posting pointless unblock requests and get your talk page protected.
2820:
To the point, it is quite apparent due to the edits of this IP that it is you, and blocked editors are not allowed to edit while blocked, so, if you want your case to go smoothly, I suggest you admit it before the case is finished.—
7958:
In any case, do not email me again, and certainly do not email me with personal attacks on other, productive users. Trying to convince someone to be on your side in a fight is still fighting, and that's a waste of everyone's time.
7793:
I don't see how you can argue you did not violate 3RR, you have been shown the diffs dozens of times. All it takes is 4 reverts on a single page within the span of 24 hours, which you clearly did. Contrary to your belief it does
5284:, is not a reliable source then? I checked both Rolling Stone sources, and, although they both are from rolling stone, they are from two separate articles which souce the band as being that genre. Just so you know, this is not
5985:
Don't patronize me. You know fully well that I never made those edits. You just want to push your own POV, as evidenced by your refusal to acknowledge the fact that the consensus for Hed PE's genre is that they are a punk band.
2958:
So, let me get his straight, you want to be unblocked, yet you persist with personal attacks? I have laid out the evidence, several admins have had the chance to look at it. The only one who refuses to face the facts is you.—
8555:(OD)So, from what I can tell, you still think you were right and you're still willing to argue over it in any forum. You can't say you won't make the same edits that got you blocked, and aren't willing to agree to a topic ban.
8086:
personal opinions. You are reaching far beyond your ground. I have been a respected member of Knowledge for four years. I have six featured articles, countless good articles, and I have been asked to be nominated for adminship
3070:
I don't care about whatever fake fights he had to have to convince people that he is two separate people. He is a troll, end of story. He repeatedly reverted sourced content, and then had me blocked for doing what editors are
875:. As you may have noticed, WikiProject Horror has suffered from a lack of direction and coordination of late. A suggestion on how to improve the Project and maintain it as a viable resource has been placed up for discussion
5410:, even in the face of this new evidence? Lastly, I do not need a mentor. I have been an editor here for a long time, and I would just prefer to try and discuss these issues a little more rather than be treated like a child. (
4382:
For starters, I didn't remove that from this page. You've posted it twice now. You can clearly see it by scrolling up. I did not remove those citations. I moved the reliable sources to the "musical styles" section. I removed
1892:
Neither of those are nominations, one has a possible hint at a possible nomination(but, strictly speaking, isn't one), the other is asking if you're interested in applying, not hinting at a possible nomination like the other
5782:
And for future reference, when my first personal contact with you is opening my email to find insults, I'm not going to bother investigating your case. I'm going to assume you were blocked for a good reason, and ignore you.
7059:
No, it is a lie, because I did not engage in any edit war, nor did I "game the system". You refuse to acknowledge the overwhelming evidence against your claims, and this is why I accuse you of bias. (00:16, 19 January 2009
5861:
the wrong reasons. You have had one RFA, which you nominated yourself which ended in more opposes than supports. You do not decide whether sources are reliable or not, you have a bad habit of treating your opinion as fact.
2875:
MATTER HOW MUCH THEY DENY IT). This crap is inexcusable. You are using Knowledge as a substitute for real life and taking it out on me because I am a more productive editor than you are. THIS IS A HOBBY! Get a real life! (
839:
of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank
6058:
of making these edits, being that they conflict with your attempts to push the POV opinion of the less-attributed genre term (rap metal) rather than the genre term that was backed up by seven citations that you removed.
4897:
simply, all the evidence points directly to you. Lastly, yes, you did. When you edit-warred. It takes two, or three, to edit war, and when you edit-warred, you caused disruption, not to mention those quacking socks.—
5560:
editing nicely with others. This sheer inability to not attack people is what the problem is, and it obviously needs to be fixed. Mentorship is the only answer. Yes, I have gotten frustrated with others in the past,
4202:
I removed no reliable sources. This is clearly shown in the edits, if you had actually took the time to look at the revisions carefully. Why do you continue to ignore the facts, Daedalus? Do you have something to hide?
7974:
I apologize, Dayewalker. This was a mistake. I sent several emails about this email, and I was unaware of the fact that I had already emailed you. I never harassed any users. I am being harassed myself. Pay attention.
4846:
I'll take back all of the insults if you stop this quest to have me blocked, stop accusing me of operating socks to evade my block, and let me restore the edits that you and others repeatedly removed without reason.
6117:
Also, make sure your unblock request only addresses your behavior, and the actual problems which lead to the block. If you lace the request with accusations, personal attacks, etc, it is not going to be successful.
5729:
I received your email, however, any discussions you wish to have about wikipedia should remain on wikipedia talk pages. Any attempts to email me and begin personal attacks through correspondence will be deleted.
6870:. What you fail to realize is that I have been here for four years, I've been approached for adminship more than once, and I have written six featured articles. Why would I do the things that you accuse me of? (
5970:
If multiple users on wikipedia are using that IP range the checkuser will also confirm that. This is the excuse you are going to use when the checkuser comes back "confirmed" isn't it? You've got to be kidding.
5676:
thing. I am noting the thread below where it appears you may be e-mailing some of the users involved. I strongly advise you not to do so as this only harms your case. You need to follow the mediation procedure.
3163:'''Mudvayne''' is an American ] band formed in ], ] in 1996. Members are ] ], guitarist ], bassist ] and drummer ]. Signed onto ], Mudvayne has released four studio albums, two compilations albums, and two DVDs.
6816:
This clearly shows four reverts OVER SEVERAL DAYS. I'm sorry, you are clearly acting out of your own bias. The 3RR rule is reverting four times within the span of 24 hours. Would you like me to post it again?
91:
and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing!
4862:
No, I am the one setting the terms, not you. I cannot just look to the side as disruption and sockpuppetry run free. Take back the insults, and I'll leave the images as links, those are the terms, period.—
3804:
This is the third time you've requested an unblock, and the third time it's been denied. Because you're abusing the unblocking process, I'm fully protecting your talk page for the remainder of your block. —
4450:
See that big block of red text? Do you see the sources? The band genre is referenced by several sources, all of which were found to be reliable at the reliable sources noticeboard. You can't deny this.—
7423:*****Second revert. Four separate edits. Only two reverts to the same revision. Does not violate 3RR. Moving on to the accusations of block evasion, one of the articles I am accused of evading block on is
5772:
If you feel your block is unjust, take it up with an admin or use the unblock template. If those socks of that person aren't you, you should be taking your case to admins, not emailing me to make personal
4915:
There is no evidence. Your only evidence is that you don't agree with the edits made by the IPs. Secondly, I didn't edit-war. I was restoring sourced content and NPOV disrupted by Landon and Prophaniti.
1093:
Allmusic is a fine source for genres. Really what you need to do is establish a consensus of genres, by evaluating different sources, if you want to establish why it's incorrect on any particular issue.
9005:
I had agreed not to engage in any edit war or otherwise step over the line, but have yet to receive any response; my longstanding history of good edits shows that I should not be indefinitely blocked.
5600:
You just don't get it do you? The fact of the matter is is that editors who personally attack others continously are not welcome on wikipedia. You continue to do this, such as the above, calling me
2078:
That is an accusation of using multiple accounts for abuse, and, as said, unless you back it up with significant evidence, it can be considered, and will be considered, a personal attack, until you.—
9137:
I apologize for the evasion attempt, and I do not wish to abuse my privileges. I wish to make myself useful on Knowledge, get some more FAs listed and make another run for adminship down the line. (
7069:
Since the useless argument on this page continues, might I again suggest you discuss your complaints with an admin. Posting DIFFS here after an admin has already declined your unblock doesn't help.
3146:{{cite book | first = Essi | last = Berelian | title = The Rough Guide to Heavy Metal | page= 244 | month = August | year = 2005 | publisher = ] | location = ] | isbn = 1-84353-415-0 }}</ref: -->
1683:
Finally, in that very paragraph above this one, you accuse the editors who have disagreed with your against-consensus edits liers, and that, is a personal attack. Please become more familiar with
5240:
socks, that I know for sure, but who, well, I just hope the checkuser is accepted. If anything, the checkuser can at least figure out a range for us so that this IP user can be range-blocked.—
9333:
This goes against what you promote in your profile regarding letting you know if you make a mistake, or censorship. Why do you feel you have to dominate the Plan 9 page with your own opinion?
3855:
Sorry to say, but I'm increasing the length of this block to one week, owing to what appears to be continued sockpuppetry and edit warring from the blocked user. Please reconsider this path. –
1824:
Strike that. I just did a search for you, in regards to requests for adminship. Do not try to give false information in order to make yourself look like you are more qualified in what you do.
5184:
Now, if you look at the edits of the editors that are being called "socks", you can clearly see several striking differences that send out a clear signal that these edits were NOT made by me:
7439:
Now, if you look at the edits of the editors that are being called "socks", you can clearly see several striking differences that send out a clear signal that these edits were NOT made by me:
7190:
Now, if you look at the edits of the editors that are being called "socks", you can clearly see several striking differences that send out a clear signal that these edits were NOT made by me:
2858:. This is completely random behavior for a new user, and for your information, block evasion is disruption, whether you think the block had a purpose or not, this is not for you to decide.—
4107:
Except that you didn't. The difference between reversions clearly shows that you removed sourced information from a source that was deemed reliable at the noticeboard for reliable sources.
2230:
content. What "evidence" do you speak of? You are making up statements and coming up with an answer without looking at the evidence. I never did any of the things you accuse me of, period. (
1975:
in regards to your accusations of the falsifying of information, and that my friend, is a personal attack. Don't say that they are lying, or liers, anymore. It is not acceptable behavior.
1180:
are clearly trying to prolong and exascerbate the drama surrounding this incident; do not post or remove comments from his talk page again, or a short block will be placed on your account.
5690:
The contacts are in the Knowledge Mediation link I gave you above. Please use my talk page for further correspondence as I prefer not to receive half the conversation via e-mail. Thanks.
4640:. Hence it is an insult as it is referring to that post. Take it back, now if you want to get better chances of unblocking. Personally attacking editors is unacceptable behavior here.
3191:
the citation, liar. I moved it to the correct section. Your entire evidence on my supposed removal of sources hinges on taking things out of context in an attempt to prove a point. I did
6132:
I only present the evidence, which includes the fact that you reverted sourced material and accused any difference of opinion of being a sock puppet of me in order to promote your POV. (
4609:
is an entertainment magazine, not a established authority on music genres. Finally, "no one believes you but you"? What are trying to pull here? The only people who are on your side are
2341:
Daedalus, I reverted to the non-POV version of the article, and added the sources and genre to the "musical styles" section. Stop changing things around to try and back an untrue claim.
7768:
No, listen to ME. You are biased, because you only show one side of the argument, and make no attempt to show the evidence that I have given for my innocence. You are biased. Goodbye. (
2184:
I reverted to a previous revision which did not contain the numerous unsourced material, including claims of influences that are in no way backed up by citations. My edit also restored
1001:
Fine, if you refuse to discuss it I'll let things be, since I don't really care if they are in there or not. But in the future please take care to consider consensus, and remember that
5622:
No, what this is is proof that you can and will take things out of context to get the results you want, which is why you refuse to face up to the facts and withdraw your accusations. (
4422:
Respected editors don't accuse editors with six featured articles and countless GAs of only existing on Knowledge to vandalize, even though his edits are perfectly within his rights. (
9089:
You have promised not to edit war or make personal attacks and to edit only from one account. For more about this unblock, please see the comments made by Trusilver and myself below.
5486:
IPs are not permamently associated with accounts, as they can change along their ranges, but anyway, that statement is meaningless unless you actually show us the diff you refer to.—
3090:
You honestly need to stop saying that, no one here believes you are telling the truth but you. I have seen the differences in reversions. Others have seen the differences. Several
2043:
It was the other way around. Prophaniti/Landon was removing sourced content, and I asked him to stop. By taking on the username 'Landon', Prophaniti gets to accuse me of edit-warring
125:
8579:
discuss your block and how you were wronged, it was opened up to allow you to show admins that you understand what you did wrong, and you won't continue that behavior in the future.
3155:
band formed in ], ] in 1996. Members are ] ], guitarist ], bassist ] and drummer ]. Signed onto ], Mudvayne has released four studio albums, two compilations albums, and two DVDs.
7947:
I have given you advice on your page as to how to handle things, which has been ignored. Multiple admins have reviewed your case, and your block has done nothing but grow longer.
7911:
1255:
798:
2375:
That is an attempt to not give off the predetermined bias of Landon/Prophaniti by not suggesting that there is a consensus on the opinion of the band's genre, when none exists. (
1223:
Prophaniti and Landon1980 have been making a series of disruptive edits, including reverting to their own personal opinions, and accusing anyone of pointing this out to them of "
157:
2766:
I abused no rights. Stop lying. Remember, Knowledge and computer world are separate from what goes on outside your house. Turn off your screen and get some fresh air for once! (
1473:
1340:
7399:*****Shows revert to past edit (meaning, separate from the other reverts) without discussion. This does not count in 3RR, because it is entirely separate from the other edits,
6957:
Wrong again. Whether you acknowledge it or not, you are clearly lying. The rules are as clear as possible. Would you like me to post them again, so you can read them clearly? (
314:
306:
5923:
Again, this is untrue. There is a staggering amount of evidence pointing against these edits being performed by me. The evidence suggests that you are, indeed, pushing POV. (
4218:
I have nothing to hide, say it flat out and cite your evidence. They can pull a checkuser on me, if you can find enough evidence for your claims, but it will find nothing.—
1600:, Landon repeatedly accused me of "messing" with his talk page, lied about me making personal attacks toward him, and continued to justify his disruption of the article. In
835:
827:
808:
699:
691:
419:. Hopefully this will prevent future similar occurances. You will see the other editor continues to have concerns about your actions. A slight ... "apology" might help.
8984:
8202:
7613:
7373:
7152:
6249:
3942:
3771:
3624:
3477:
1428:
7838:
Shows revert to past edit (meaning, separate from the other reverts) without discussion. This does not count in 3RR, because it is entirely separate from the other edits,
6500:
Shows revert to past edit (meaning, separate from the other reverts) without discussion. This does not count in 3RR, because it is entirely separate from the other edits,
6330:. It was found that you did violate 3RR. Also, reviewing admins, please note that this user has engaged in numerous acts of incivilty and personal attacks upon others.—
489:
481:
8650:
someone isn't willing to admit they did something wrong, and they keep using their past status to step on people, well, that's why I oppted for the indef block on AN/I.—
3214:
The pictures don't lie my friend. Lastly, personal attacks will not fly here, and you will never become an admin here if you stick with the attitude you have right now.
976:
reached. When I requested that you bring things to the talk page, not only did you fail to do so but you reverted and didn't even give the slightest explanation for it.
7234:
The evidence is on the WP:ANI thread is pretty compelling; just because you tried to make some differences in your sock edits does not mean they are by other people. --
2890:
Whether I have a life or not is irrelevant, secondly, yes, it does tell users how to sign their posts, but it does not tell them how to put a ( in front of their ~~~~.
2335:
1516:
3260:
shows that you repeatedly reverted to a vandalized version of the article in an attempt to push your own bias, and, might I add, violated the 3RR several times over. (
1355:
5876:
present factually-accurate articles, and never tried to push my own opinion, as you clearly have tried to do with yours. And I have been asked to run for adminship
2838:
Well, since you already know everything, can you explain how I am able to make any edits when my account's been blocked for something that I clearly did not do? (
2534:
that the band has been described with many style terms, but not inserting my own opinion into the proceedings by picking any of the terms as a dominating style. (
820:
4445:
3246:
3195:
remove content from the article. And the fact that you block my emails shows that you are continuing to evade facts and ignore all reasoning. You are hopeless. (
9359:
7700:
absolutely no ability to defend myself, as my accusers are COMPLETELY BIASED are refuse to acknowledge the massive amount of evidence disproving their claims. (
4720:
I've never made any legitimately disruptive edits. The only people who accuse me of disruption are people who, like you, are trying to push their own opinion. (
3168:
That is clearly a removal of sourced content. Explain yourself. Any reversion or deletion of this content will look like you're trying to evade hard facts.—
1550:
9052:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
8269:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
7687:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
7523:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
7270:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
6319:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
4017:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
3847:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
3698:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
3551:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
2578:
Forget the edit summaries, and look at his actual talk posts as Landon/Prophaniti. He repeatedly attacks me without inserting the attacks in his summaries. (
1498:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
1115:
As you were told at AN/I, Landon1980 is allowed to remove almost anything from his own talk page. Consider this a final warning: Leave the page alone or you
957:
8764:
Where and when did you apologize? I'm not arguing with you either, and you still seem to not understand. Edit warring is never the answer, you will be on a
1597:
1140:
Yesterday you were given a final warning, telling you not to post to this user's talk page again, yet you did so again today. Explain your actions, please.
651:
593:
570:
227:": it's best to avoid using all-capital letters, as it can give an impression of shouting. Users are allowed to remove messages from their talk pages; see
6797:
This clearly shows four reversions of material, I shall now go over each of these diffs to calculate the time between them. I've also added more diffs.—
5337:
okay to personally attack someone. Although I will change my proposal at AN/I, if you want to increase your chances of getting unblocked, I suggest that
2593:
Still waiting on those diffs from you. Lastly, retract your accusations of sockpuppetry, or back them up with diffs showing how they are the same user.—
2361:
1328:
721:
554:
6720:
No, I do believe the evidence I posted a few moments ago shows otherwise, but since you appear to be selectively reading, I'll post it again right here:
5341:, you strike through every single one of your personall attacks, calling me a lier, Landon and whats-his-name sockpuppets without evidence, calling me a
539:
Okay, thanks for the info. I just thought to inform you of the sources so if it ever comes up for FA removal, that the TNA section is reliably sourced.--
503:
304:
142:
2694:
607:
335:
4751:
But since you are apparently not the only editor who doesn't respect me, why don't you provide some diffs, and links to editors who don't respect me.—
852:
825:
689:
5594:
5579:
5136:
4940:
I am sick of playing this stupid game with you. You can deny the diffs all you want, it won't change anything. See you once you try to sock again.—
4162:
3269:
2510:
were the one removing sourced material, not them. Do not look me in the face and tell me this, when there is overwhelming evidence to the contrary.—
2442:
1699:
7991:
7951:
will not be an admin. Your actions in the last few weeks have caused a lot of lost faith in you, and personal attacks and unwanted email won't help.
4998:
Yes, they are. You are arguing that you did not change and remove content, but the images obviously show otherwise. They are completely relevant.—
3047:
Secondly, since you seem to know for a fact that the two users who you claim to be a single user are in fact a single user, could you please explain
479:
8723:
8704:
8678:
8663:
8620:
8505:
7928:
7916:
7777:
7763:
7743:
7728:
7452:
7203:
7028:
6966:
6952:
6932:
6917:
6879:
6826:
6714:
6630:
6562:
6481:
6455:
6437:
6410:
6377:
6173:
5631:
5617:
5553:
5513:
5499:
5480:
5419:
5312:
5274:
5207:
5126:
5111:
5084:
5033:
5011:
4971:
4925:
4910:
4890:
4876:
4856:
4841:
4778:
4764:
4729:
4710:
4688:
4660:
4626:
4570:
4552:
4525:
4510:
4487:
4431:
4417:
4396:
4249:
4231:
4212:
4197:
4127:
4101:
4078:
3226:
3204:
3127:
3113:
3084:
3040:
2989:
2972:
2952:
2902:
2884:
2869:
2847:
2775:
2761:
2662:
2618:
2604:
2587:
2543:
2521:
2463:
2406:
2354:
2282:
2262:
2239:
2218:
2198:
2179:
2118:
2103:
2089:
2003:
1938:
1886:
1864:
1796:
1754:
1740:
1653:
1617:
1591:
1566:
1545:
8887:
8845:
8799:
8759:
8588:
8538:
8523:
8486:
8460:
8444:
8128:
7999:
7984:
7897:
7808:
6141:
6109:
6068:
6024:
5995:
5980:
5964:
5932:
5889:
5870:
5854:
5833:
5818:
5792:
5762:
5737:
Please note I'm not making a comment as to whether those IPs are socks of yours or not, only that I don't really care. That's a matter for admins.
1193:
1169:
947:
9258:
9229:
9197:
8907:
8778:
8329:
8099:
8017:
7825:
7814:
Contributors must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period, whether or not the edits involve the same material
6127:
6010:
5950:
5908:
As of now they are hesitant to waste their time running a checkuser on the grounds it is blatantly obvious it is you and you are already blocked.
3311:
2094:
The timing of the two individual users' edits is seemingly perfect, their editing style is the same, and they always seem to back each other up. (
793:
777:
286:
Thanks for your reponse. Hope you get your machine to work soon again! Drop me a note whenever you think of something to work on. Kind regards, --
249:
9164:
9146:
9116:
8363:
8280:
to disable your talk page. Please take this as a second warning to abuse neither it, nor the unblock template (the above unblock request is your
7072:
You seem to be proud of previous editors who suggested you apply for adminship. Perhaps one of them would be willing to listen to your requests.
5713:
5048:
3510:
2893:
I have seen dozens of users sign their post the same way. It is ridiculous that this is your only evidence that I made those posts. Get a life. (
2797:
2744:
1631:. To your second diff, accusing someone of edit warring is not a personal attack, and actually, after reviewing the history of the article, you
1236:
943:
771:
468:
9244:
8409:
8311:
1623:
If you want to get along here, you're going to have to play by our rules. First, in the first diff which you present, he is removing a message
1214:
584:
473:
437:
8633:
8427:
4363:
This is the last time I'm posting this, if you remove it again, I'm posting a screen capture showing the same thing, and you can't deny that.—
8343:
Sorry, but due to continued abuse of the unblock process after warnings from both administrators and other editors, I have locked this page. —
5699:
5685:
896:
8750:
works? It does not have to be to the exact same revision as you contend. You need to know these things before you are allowed to edit again.
8558:
No offense, but I think an unblock is very premature in this situation. Ibaranoff24 doesn't seem to understand how he's done anything wrong.
5660:
is available as a last resort (but mediation and all other dispute resolution processes available through Knowledge need to be tried first).
877:
8079:
5451:
I'm going to have to retcon what I said above about the IPs perhaps not being Ibaraoff24, and therefore my ANI report stays the way it is.—
732:
there are other editors over at the Guild who would be happy to help. Thank you for thinking of me though, and I am sorry I could not help!
320:
298:
8090:. This clearly proves that these allegations are outrageously false. You have overstepped your bounds by taking the side of my harassers. (
919:
questionnaire. Please stop by and take a few minutes to answer the questions so that we can continue to improve our project. Happy editing!
8293:
8038:
3369:
When your block expires, you are welcome to contribute constructively and politely. In the meanwhile, the following links may be helpful.
2317:
You can't deny the facts, you removed sourced information, the source is reliable, it was found such at the reliable sources noticeboard.
1464:
2009-01-15T17:59:05 Ibaranoff24 ((Undid revision 264274979 by 206.53.144.145 (talk) - again, the bio was written by Muze, not NME) (undo)
1153:
467:
Per the consensus at that thread, and my own review your rollback has been revoked. You are more than welcome to reapply in a few months.
268:
to FA, I was wondering if you had plans of expanding other Zappa album articles? In that case, I would be happy to help out/collaborate.--
9220:
That was not my intention. I'm sorry if I gave this impression. As I've stated, I do not intend to attack or edit from another account. (
8244:
5955:
My provider has several IPs being used by multiple users. This means absolutely nothing in face of the staggering evidence against you. (
911:
5805:
I apologize if I attacked you, but I don't exactly find being blocked without reason or being accused of things that I did not do to be
4808:
And I'm going to have to say no, as those images are completely relevant to the conversation, and secondly, stop refactoring my posts.—
2917:
Lastly, there is strong evidence that you have evaded your block to try and defend yourself on ANI as an IP user. This IP comes out of
1453:
edits on the article during the period in which I am being blocked for. None of them were reverts. Further information explained below.
1080:
1055:
6660:
The three-revert rule (often referred to as 3RR) is a policy which applies to all Wikipedians, and is intended to prevent edit warring.
858:
9330:, dismissing it is "spam and insults," when in my opinion, it was neither. I brought up very valid points which you chose to ignore.
389:
371:
7968:
7915:. Thus, you and Landon1980 have absolutely no ground to continue editing the page, especially by adding false statements, as you did
6048:
5917:
5746:
1927:
But alas, that still leaves my other questions, regarding providing evidence of personal attacks on yourself by others, unanswered.—
872:
5471:
have been making any edits outside my account in spite of the overwhelming evidence against this claim does not bode well for you. (
2735:
Even a blind person could see that the edits I made were completely separate from each other and were completely within my rights. (
1745:
I've posted several instances in which Prophaniti/Landon lied about my actions and removed sourced content, sources, and clean-up. (
1605:
931:
915:
137:
9436:
7476:. I have brought six articles to FA and countless more to GA status. I am not the kind of person who would evade a 24-hour block.
6387:
4153:
I never tried to evade the block. Stop telling me to "stop throwing accusations around" when you are doing the exact same thing. (
1870:
663:
643:
Right now I am working on expanding all the Hed PE related articles, because most of their albums and member articles are stubs.
8960:
8178:
7589:
7349:
7128:
7053:
7008:
6860:
6810:
6695:
6611:
6343:
6225:
3918:
3747:
3600:
3453:
1572:
Claiming that you posted something out of spite is not a personal attack. Now, you said he has been attacking you, and the word
1404:
1127:
640:
Alright thanks for the tips man. Yeah thanks for deleting that post though, really doesn't deserve any purpose for the article.
7453:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Knowledge%3ASockpuppet_investigations%2FIbaranoff24&diff=264917350&oldid=264830350
7204:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Knowledge%3ASockpuppet_investigations%2FIbaranoff24&diff=264917350&oldid=264830350
6093:
6084:
If you want to debate this, ask for an admin or make an unblock request. Anything else is just prolonging the drama. Good luck.
5208:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Knowledge%3ASockpuppet_investigations%2FIbaranoff24&diff=264917350&oldid=264830350
3256:
It's pathetic that you repeatedly accuse me of the very things that you have repeatedly done. One look at the edits you made to
6294:
4793:
And I must ask you to please stop adding the out-of-context image to my page when I have repeatedly asked you not to. Thanks. (
2689:
2572:
2501:
2384:
1576:
implies more than once, so less I've mis-quoted you, why don't you go ahead and cite all instances in which you believe he has
560:
228:
9027:
5288:, this is sourced content, and since the edits were removing that sourced content, and changing the content, he was reverting.
4601:
How is it that "nail in your coffin" isn't an insult, but that "Michael" is? "Michael" is not considered an insult. Secondly,
9349:
9339:
9277:
9214:
9182:
9103:
3406:
3295:
914:. It is intended to gauge your participation and views on the project. At the conclusion of the questionnaire, the project's
9316:
9131:
8338:
3181:
3064:
3025:
2936:
2832:
741:
684:
8867:
8351:
8023:
5537:
5464:
5394:
5359:
5253:
5222:
5158:
5064:
2729:
635:
120:
47:
7944:
have confirmed this, it's a dead issue. You are merely eating up other people's time in your refusal to serve your block.
4991:
4953:
4821:
4802:
4595:
4464:
4376:
4055:
3870:
1729:
Lastly, I'm still waiting on the main instances which you claim to exist in regards to personal attacks directed at you.—
9037:
8669:
time. Why this has not been made apparent, I don't know. But I am willing to discuss my edits even when others are not. (
8636:, how was a great editor, but he personally attacked many people, and hence, was disruptive to the project, you can take
8254:
7672:
7508:
7255:
6304:
4046:, but that the people who actively campaigned to have me blocked were the ones who were making actual disruptive edits? (
4002:
3832:
3683:
3536:
3363:
1483:
1132:
659:
602:
579:
449:
409:
280:
8572:
963:
8826:
5824:
If you are innocent the checkuser will come back as such. If these are not your socks you have nothing to worry about.
4030:
3992:
3526:
1601:
786:
778:
220:
1103:
533:
354:. I would appreciate it if you could please visit the case page and indicate if you will be participating. Thank you.
9389:
8701:
8660:
8617:
8375:
7760:
7725:
7709:
7540:
7300:
7050:
7005:
6949:
6914:
6857:
6807:
6692:
6608:
6478:
6434:
6340:
6170:
5614:
5576:
5534:
5496:
5461:
5391:
5250:
5108:
5071:
ever made. Lastly, I have never "warred" over any article. The editors that have been warring over these article are
5061:
5008:
4950:
4907:
4873:
4838:
4818:
4761:
4685:
4592:
4549:
4507:
4461:
4414:
4373:
4228:
4194:
4075:
3178:
3110:
3061:
3022:
2969:
2933:
712:
for writing the newsletter. Remember that anyone can edit the newsletter, so feel free to help out! Happy editing! --
8394:
7081:
3822:
3673:
1021:
996:
207:
185:
8955:
8932:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
8173:
8150:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
7584:
7561:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
7344:
7321:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
7123:
7100:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
6902:
It's not violating the policy if a editor who has been nominated for adminship, and has featured articles, does it.
6220:
6197:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
4404:
That's rather funny. Before I respond, please inform me who thinks on this site doesn't respect me as an editor?—
3913:
3890:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
3742:
3719:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
3595:
3572:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
3448:
3425:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
1399:
1376:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
6986:(often referred to as 3RR) is a policy which applies to all Wikipedians, and is intended to prevent edit warring:
6838:(often referred to as 3RR) is a policy which applies to all Wikipedians, and is intended to prevent edit warring:
5669:
1690:
It's not a personal attack if it's true. Prophaniti/Landon was lying about my edits in order to justify his own. (
762:
much know it all from reading the lead. I'm sure a peer review can help you with a few other pointers. Take care.
461:
9346:
8978:
8196:
7607:
7367:
7146:
6388:
http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Ibaranoff24/Archive3#Would_you_still_be_interested_in_running_for_adminship.3F
6243:
3936:
3765:
3618:
3471:
1422:
785:
Hi. You've been pretty active on-wiki in the past few days, but you haven't yet done anything in regards to the
9355:
8947:
8165:
7938:
7576:
7336:
7115:
6212:
5724:
3905:
3734:
3587:
3440:
3302:
include citations in the Infobox. Find some better sources, and include them in the "musical styles" section. (
1469:
1391:
1351:
1336:
1306:
901:
561:
431:
359:
59:
43:
5524:
Secondly, you do need a mentor, as you obviously have a problem with attacking people who disagree with you.—
1553:
he accuses me of nominating an article for deletion out of "spite", posting the following remark: "Oh that is
400:
Just a quick warning to let you know I've added a report regarding your edits to the wikiquette alerts board.
8943:
8883:
8161:
7662:
7572:
7498:
7332:
7245:
7111:
6208:
3901:
3730:
3583:
3436:
1387:
153:
9300:
8969:
8187:
7598:
7358:
7137:
6234:
3927:
3756:
3609:
3462:
1413:
1108:
868:
9425:
8385:
Ibaranoff, if unblocked, can you behave in a reasonable way? E.g, with no sockpuppetry or revert warring?
1249:
9458:
8474:
8063:
7875:
7865:
7847:
7833:
7750:
on me, you might as well throw terms on the evidence, and thus, all the evidence is biased against you.—
7420:
7416:
7404:
7396:
6537:
6527:
6509:
6495:
3355:
2247:
2165:
1979:
1627:
from his talk page. An action which he is allowed to do and is completely within our policy, please see
1318:
907:
7830:
Landon, I clearly showed earlier that those were four separate edits. Do you want me to show you again?
8119:(EC) And stop with the unblocks. You've been warned by an admin about abusing that process today, too.
7435:
7429:
7186:
7180:
5303:
is reliable in noting an opinion or certain biography information that cannot be backed up elsewhere. (
5179:
5171:
8988:
8965:
8206:
8183:
7617:
7594:
7377:
7354:
7156:
7133:
6758:
again makes same changes found in first, second, and third reverts, along with several minor changes.
6253:
6230:
5299:
No. What I said was that the majority of the sources state punk, not metal, is the genre of the band.
4982:
relevant to the conversation, as they are taken ENTIRELY OUT OF CONTEXT. Do you not understand this? (
4769:
How about every editor you've had blocked for trying to maintain the quality standards on Knowledge? (
3946:
3923:
3775:
3752:
3628:
3605:
3481:
3458:
2448:
It doesn't matter if you think it summerizes the intelligence level of the other user or not, this is
1432:
1409:
9351:
8933:
8895:
8151:
8055:
7990:
Along those same lines...who are you and why are you emailing me? Have we had interactions before?
7562:
7322:
7101:
6594:
again makes same changes found in first, second, and third reverts, along with several minor changes.
6198:
6075:
3891:
3720:
3573:
3426:
3341:
3332:
3138:
No, everyone believes you did, hence, why you are still blocked. Let's look at the facts, shall we?
2674:
Lastly, you're in no position to order me around, tell me what to do, or whatever, when there exists
1465:
1377:
1347:
1332:
1298:
1293:
680:
6781:
6766:
6755:
6744:
6733:
6723:
6591:
6585:
6579:
6574:
2557:
Last one there. So far, none of the edit summeries by the two users above have been a violation of
2478:
2414:
2392:
2370:
9412:
8974:
8951:
8927:
8529:
to my edits should be responded to with a discussion rather than immediately reverting the edits. (
8192:
8169:
8145:
7603:
7580:
7556:
7363:
7340:
7316:
7142:
7119:
7095:
6239:
6216:
6192:
4497:
Actually, I did a search for the sources while on that revision, and they were clearly not there.—
3932:
3909:
3885:
3761:
3738:
3714:
3614:
3591:
3567:
3467:
3444:
3420:
2817:
sockpuppet cases, that CUs can see the IP behind the username, which is normally hidden from view,
1418:
1395:
1371:
726:
613:
547:
526:
149:
6001:
Stop beating around the bush. If you are suggesting those IP's are mine just come out and say it.
5441:
5430:
3513:, three separate admins (at least one a checkuser) have confirmed that there is clear evidence. —
9327:
9254:
9225:
9193:
9142:
8913:
8841:
8795:
8719:
8674:
8640:. I can't exactly remember why he was banned from the community, you'd have to do some research.
8568:
8534:
8501:
8482:
8440:
8405:
8325:
8095:
7980:
7924:
7893:
7773:
7739:
7705:
7536:
7296:
7024:
6962:
6928:
6875:
6822:
6710:
6626:
6558:
6451:
6406:
6373:
6137:
6105:
6064:
6020:
5991:
5960:
5928:
5885:
5850:
5814:
5758:
5709:
5627:
5590:
5549:
5509:
5476:
5415:
5355:
5308:
5270:
5218:
5154:
5122:
5080:
5029:
4987:
4967:
4921:
4886:
4852:
4798:
4774:
4725:
4706:
4656:
4622:
4566:
4521:
4483:
4427:
4392:
4245:
4208:
4158:
4123:
4097:
4051:
3307:
3280:
3265:
3222:
3200:
3123:
3080:
3036:
2985:
2948:
2898:
2880:
2843:
2793:
2771:
2740:
2614:
2583:
2539:
2497:
2438:
2402:
2380:
2350:
2278:
2269:
2235:
2194:
2114:
2099:
1999:
1882:
1750:
1695:
1649:
1613:
1562:
1512:
1232:
1165:
655:
598:
575:
2109:
I've provided several instances of disruption, denial and attacks on Landon/Prophaniti's part. (
190:
Oh, and also, this: "If a user removes a comment from their own talk page, (legitimate or not),
31:
This archive page covers approximately the dates between 17 September 2008 and 23 January 2009.
8891:
8817:
before making controversial edits, and do not insult people as that always makes things worse.
8300:
7995:
5229:
Now that I've had enough sleep, finally... I guess if seven hours is enough.. To the point!
3351:
1785:
Oh, one more thing. You say you've been nominated for adminship. Care to show me the links?—
1031:
refers mainly to whether or not an article itself is notable, it's not for regulating content.
767:
6988:
Contributors must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period
6840:
Contributors must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period
5132:
The checkuser page on the matter cites evidence, and you need to try to refute that evidence.
1978:
If you looked at the article, then why are you still claiming that I removed sourced content?
881:. As a member of the Project, your voice is valued and your input is requested. Thank you,
8698:
8657:
8614:
7757:
7722:
7047:
7002:
6946:
6911:
6854:
6804:
6689:
6605:
6475:
6431:
6337:
6167:
5657:
5611:
5573:
5531:
5493:
5458:
5406:
is ridiculous -- the three days I have been blocked is too many, and you want me blocked for
5388:
5247:
5165:
between the edits that I made on the article, and the edits that are being attributed to me.
5105:
5058:
5005:
4947:
4904:
4870:
4835:
4815:
4758:
4682:
4613:. Prophaniti and Landon are the only people siding with you. That's a good reason for you to
4589:
4546:
4504:
4458:
4411:
4370:
4225:
4191:
4072:
3865:
3175:
3107:
3058:
3019:
2966:
2930:
2865:
2828:
2757:
2699:
This has become ridiculous in the extreme. Amusingly, the dialog above brings back memories:
2685:
2658:
2600:
2568:
2517:
2459:
2331:
2258:
2214:
2175:
2085:
1934:
1860:
1792:
1736:
1587:
1541:
1099:
753:
717:
499:
255:
55:
36:
9303:
to help us figure out exactly what consensus is. I hope things work out for you. Regards,
8832:
I never said those things about NME. You must have misunderstood me. Based on your edits to
3217:
Are you intentionally ignoring the facts? LOOK AT THE EDITS. I didn't remove the citation. (
3118:
No one believes that I removed content, but that vandal with two accounts. And HE'S LYING! (
9024:
8903:
8875:
8863:
8852:
8822:
8774:
8755:
8584:
8519:
8496:
I was merely informing him of why I made the edit, which I attest was made in good faith. (
8456:
8423:
8124:
8013:
7964:
7821:
7804:
7077:
6123:
6089:
6044:
6006:
5976:
5946:
5913:
5866:
5829:
5788:
5742:
2810:
2804:
1203:
1187:
1147:
1133:
1109:
676:
675:
Your article looks great. I'm rather busy at the moment. I'm sorry I can't help right now.
647:
457:
405:
347:
245:
234:
203:
181:
116:
111:
I'm well within my rights to do so when I have a totally valid source for the information.
106:
17:
7531:"No new arguments"? Are you kidding me? Are you INTENTIONALLY ignoring everything I say? (
6598:(two edit conflicts)Well, what do you know, four reverts. The reverts are clear as day.—
4240:
article, then claimed that I had made the edits in order to evade being banned yourself? (
789:
GAN, which has been on-hold for two days. I'm just notifying you in case you missed it. –
618:
Just to remind you that the DEFAULTSORT magic word is used with a colon, not a pipe: thus
8:
9334:
9304:
9273:
9210:
9178:
9099:
8465:
I'm not going to argue with you. The page clearly said that the biography was written by
8366:. Checkuser suggests that most, if not all, of the IPs alleged to be his are indeed his.
8307:
8289:
8075:
8034:
7715:
You keep saying that. You want to define it? Bias as to what, your own point of view?—
5704:
I am unable to post on any talk page other than my own, as my account is still blocked. (
5042:
3394:
3291:
540:
519:
7909:
Daedalus969, it has come to my attention that the sockpuppet investigation proposal was
9399:
9321:
9288:
9162:
9129:
8879:
8349:
8242:
6617:
Those edits were made on several different days. You apparently do not understand what
5695:
5681:
5665:
5176:
And here is the most recent reversion of an edit that is being attributed to a "sock":
5133:
3318:
2727:
1212:
1125:
1061:
968:
937:
927:
848:
514:
421:
395:
331:
88:
7433:
And here is the most recent reversion of an edit that is being attributed to a "sock":
7184:
And here is the most recent reversion of an edit that is being attributed to a "sock":
2647:
one user, because, as far as I can tell from my own diff hunting, they are indeed two
9386:
9282:
8390:
8371:
8356:
6664:
6648:
6416:
Please notice now neither of these editors follows through with a nomination. Being
5445:
4352:
4306:
3656:
Activities that you get to take a 24 hour break from. Enjoy your newfound free time.
1257:
1032:
891:
763:
748:
737:
294:
276:
7445:
7441:
7196:
7192:
6282:
You do not provide the "overwhelming evidence" that you speak of in this section. —
5193:
5188:
4437:
You are one person, you don't speak for everyone else. Get that straight, secondly:
3048:
1534:
in which they do so, less your accustations could be labled as attacks themselves.—
567:
Hi. Can you tell me your source for labeling this film as "public domain"? Thanks.
9250:
9221:
9189:
9138:
9061:
9046:
8837:
8791:
8715:
8693:
8670:
8652:
8637:
8609:
8564:
8530:
8497:
8478:
8436:
8401:
8380:
8321:
8263:
8091:
7976:
7920:
7889:
7799:
you violated 3RR? You know you violated 3RR, and there is no point lying about it.
7769:
7752:
7735:
7717:
7701:
7681:
7532:
7517:
7436:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Hed_PE&diff=264921318&oldid=264920892
7430:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Hed_PE&diff=263343081&oldid=263310245
7292:
7264:
7187:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Hed_PE&diff=264921318&oldid=264920892
7181:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Hed_PE&diff=263343081&oldid=263310245
7042:
7020:
6997:
6958:
6941:
6924:
6906:
6871:
6849:
6818:
6799:
6706:
6684:
6622:
6600:
6554:
6470:
6447:
6426:
6402:
6369:
6332:
6313:
6271:
involved and hope to come to an agreeable compromise between all parties involved.
6162:
6133:
6101:
6060:
6016:
5987:
5956:
5924:
5881:
5846:
5810:
5754:
5705:
5623:
5606:
5586:
5568:
5545:
5526:
5505:
5488:
5472:
5453:
5411:
5383:
5351:
5304:
5266:
5242:
5214:
5180:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Hed_PE&diff=264921318&oldid=264920892
5172:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Hed_PE&diff=263343081&oldid=263310245
5150:
5118:
5100:
5076:
5053:
5025:
5000:
4983:
4963:
4942:
4917:
4899:
4882:
4865:
4848:
4830:
4810:
4794:
4770:
4753:
4721:
4702:
4677:
4652:
4618:
4584:
4562:
4541:
4517:
4499:
4479:
4453:
4423:
4406:
4388:
4365:
4329:
4283:
4241:
4220:
4204:
4186:
4154:
4119:
4093:
4067:
4047:
4011:
3857:
3841:
3815:
3692:
3666:
3545:
3303:
3261:
3218:
3196:
3170:
3119:
3102:
3076:
3053:
3032:
3014:
2981:
2961:
2944:
2925:
2894:
2876:
2860:
2839:
2823:
2789:
2767:
2752:
2736:
2680:
2653:
2610:
2595:
2579:
2563:
2535:
2512:
2493:
2454:
2434:
2398:
2376:
2346:
2326:
2274:
2253:
2231:
2209:
2190:
2170:
2110:
2095:
2080:
1995:
1929:
1878:
1855:
1787:
1746:
1731:
1691:
1645:
1609:
1582:
1558:
1536:
1508:
1492:
1228:
1161:
1095:
811:. What about it does this article need to have the "unreferenced" tag removed? ----
713:
670:
631:
495:
51:
5168:
Here is the edit that my accusers believe is being reverted to by a "sock" of me:
4359:, Mudvayne has released four studio albums, two compilations albums, and two DVDs.
4313:, Mudvayne has released four studio albums, two compilations albums, and two DVDs.
756:? I'm sure you'll find some helpful editors to improve the article with you there.
9326:
I was surprised to see that you deleted our discussion about the aspect ratio of
9021:
8938:
8899:
8859:
8818:
8770:
8751:
8580:
8515:
8452:
8419:
8156:
8120:
8009:
7960:
7817:
7800:
7567:
7327:
7106:
7073:
6705:, not four. And 3RR is specifically for edits made within the span of 24 hours. (
6621:
means. 3RR means four reverts to the same revision within the span of 24 hours. (
6203:
6119:
6085:
6040:
6002:
5972:
5942:
5909:
5862:
5825:
5784:
5738:
5328:
5201:
3896:
3811:
3725:
3662:
3578:
3431:
3346:
1382:
1181:
1141:
1077:
1052:
1018:
993:
816:
453:
401:
377:
241:
199:
177:
112:
8790:. If NME had written the page, it would be a reliable source, but NME did not. (
8514:
topic ban on the pages you were edit warring over? I appreciate your responses.
5504:
Logging into Knowledge has been the first thing I've done since being blocked. (
3240:
Lastly, I blocked your emails because I'm sick of your insults to me and others:
9269:
9239:
9206:
9174:
9095:
9017:
8303:
8285:
8071:
8030:
6285:
5021:
4037:"the number of FA's you've written is irrelevant when you are being disruptive"
3287:
1628:
1531:
1088:
804:
341:
214:
97:
6392:
3100:. Seriously. Give it a rest, you'd have more luck becoming an astronaught.—
1874:
9378:
9296:
9157:
9124:
8747:
8344:
8237:
7655:
7491:
7238:
7064:
6983:
6835:
6747:
makes the same changes found in first and second reverts, along with others.
6671:
6653:
6644:
6618:
5691:
5677:
5661:
5646:
5324:
5047:
As you well know, you have been accused of sockpuppetry, please see the case
4647:. Seriously, the "evidence" you have has been posted several times, and it's
4348:
4344:
4302:
4298:
4025:
3980:
3976:
3514:
3378:
3373:
3031:
I don't have to explain anything. I didn't evade my block, and you know it. (
2722:
2721:
situation to cool down before someone has to give you an involuntary break. —
2558:
2482:
2422:
1684:
1577:
1527:
1302:
1207:
1120:
1002:
923:
844:
790:
705:
416:
381:
327:
162:
6588:
makes the same changes found in first and second reverts, along with others.
6354:
engage in numerous acts of incivility, and directed personal attacks toward
3975:
This addresses absolutely none of the reasons for your block. Please review
3645:
I need my account to make edits, respond to questions and revert vandalism.
1035:
is a better guideline for determining whether or not information is notable
9382:
8386:
8367:
4539:
Also, you changed sourced information, and that is not acceptable either.—
4356:
4310:
3388:
3383:
3324:
1314:
1310:
1285:
884:
733:
288:
270:
84:
9249:
I understand all of this. I intend on staying out of things for a while. (
5261:
5653:
4337:
4291:
2854:
What's more, the IP had no previous edits before it randomly came in and
1507:
everyone involved is proud of themselves for blocking me for no reason. (
1028:
627:
508:
443:
261:
8898:. If you have any questions or concerns, please let me know. Sincerely,
8060:
sockpuppetry, edit warring, personal attacks, harassment and email abuse
8008:
Will you please not e-mail me again, you can say what you need to here.
7456:
Thus suggesting an apparent bias in favor of the opinion that the band
7207:
Thus suggesting an apparent bias in favor of the opinion that the band
4651:. That gives me more than enough reason for me to call you "Michael". (
4606:
4325:
3806:
3657:
3498:
I never tried to evade my block. There is no evidence of these claims.
1604:
he removed personal attacks and accusations he made towards me, and in
1260:
1066:
1041:
1007:
982:
969:
812:
39:, copying or summarizing the section you are replying to if necessary.
9447:
8593:(reply to Ibaranoff(the post above Daye's))Except that you didn't get
8470:
1530:, if you are going to accuse other editors of attacking you, cite the
194:." (quoted from "Knowledge:Don't restore removed comments"). Also see
7461:
7212:
4340:
4294:
1640:
unsourced/poorly-sourced material, most recently the addition of the
709:
195:
4582:
you keep claiming. Give up already. No one believes you but you.—
747:
Hi there, just noticed that you nominated the article for FA again.
415:
It would be wise of you to acknowledge the WQA about you located at
8691:
found to have been sockpuppeting. Accept it and stop denying it.—
7652:
7488:
7235:
5379:
it doesn't matter how many FAs you've had if you've been disruptive
4333:
4287:
4279:
1982:
clearly shows Landon/Prophaniti removing my clean-up and restoring
1267:
176:
a bad edit with good intentions behind it, and at worst vandalism.
6446:
more than once. I stated that I was asked to run more than once. (
4470:
If you were paying attention, you'd notice that you could clearly
2943:
If it looks and sounds like a liar, it's probably a Daedalus969. (
27:
DO NOT EDIT OR POST REPLIES TO THIS PAGE. THIS PAGE IS AN ARCHIVE.
9115:
Unless Ibaranoff24 admits to his sockpuppetry/block evasion (see
4561:
change sourced information, MICHAEL. I rewrote text for a NPOV. (
8044:
7446:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Hed_PE&oldid=264917865
7442:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Hed_PE&oldid=264866090
7197:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Hed_PE&oldid=264917865
7193:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Hed_PE&oldid=264866090
5194:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Hed_PE&oldid=264917865
5189:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Hed_PE&oldid=264866090
4881:
Except that I NEVER DISRUPTED WIKIPEDIA OR OPERATED ANY SOCKS. (
4236:
How about the fact that you repeatedly violated 3RR rule on the
1853:
RFA, and you nominated yourself. That doesn't prove anything.—
8833:
7457:
7424:
7208:
7175:
6160:. Failure to do so will not result in you getting unblocked.—
5656:
on this issue. If this has been attempted without success then
4237:
3257:
351:
9156:
This is what some of us have been waiting to see. Thank you. —
8563:
be physically restrained. I'm not a beginner at this thing. (
2609:
And I must ask you to not accuse me of sock-puppetry. EVER. (
319:
the specialized delivery lists. Feel free to sign-up in the
9072:
6393:
http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Ibaranoff24/Archive4#Admin
2481:
you called another editor's edits vandalism, a violation of
217:. I'm not an administrator, but I help at that noticeboard.
8787:
8746:
times. You are not always right. Do you now understand how
8466:
8432:
7857:
7412:
6519:
4602:
4516:
had me blocked so you wouldn't have to deal with reality. (
4111:
4065:
It is disruptive to remove accurate, sourced information.—
3145:'''Mudvayne''' is an American ]<ref name="berelian": -->
1991:
1869:
Most recently, I have been approached to run for adminship
1641:
1263:
6682:
I have bolded the relevant note within the second quote.—
6364:. I did not make four reverts to the same revision. I did
4638:
If you were anything other than a Michael Moore-grade hack
126:
WikiProject Films coordinator elections - voting now open!
9123:
account, I would strongly recommend against unblocking. —
9034:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
8251:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
7669:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
7505:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
7252:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
6301:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
5563:
but that is no exuse to insult and personally attack them
4636:
Don't play coy, you referred to me in the above post as,
3999:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
3829:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
3680:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
3533:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
1480:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
1027:
Perhaps the content was or wasn't notable. Remember that
74:
9054:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
8473:. Scroll all the way down to the bottom, and you'll see
8271:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
7689:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
7525:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
7272:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
6321:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
4019:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
3849:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
3700:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
3553:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
3000:
So, do you care to explain why an IP address, which has
1500:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
809:
The Big Problem ≠ The Solution. The Solution = Let It Be
799:
The Big Problem ≠ The Solution. The Solution = Let It Be
7856:
source, but removed the link to the unreliable source
7411:
source, but removed the link to the unreliable source
6896:
edit war and game the system. Just like Nixon argued
6518:
source, but removed the link to the unreliable source
6100:
respond to them, because the truth needs to be said. (
866:: You've received this message as you are listed as a
494:
message on my talk page. Thank you and happy editing!
4605:
is a mass-published provider, not a reliable source.
3354:. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may
2488:
Removing clean-up and adding unsourced material/bias
1557:
what is going on, Ibaranoff24, and you know it is." (
8926:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
8144:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
8062:. If you believe this block is unjustified you may
7555:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
7407:*****After looking over the edits, I cleaned up the
7315:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
7094:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
6549:
Well, what do you know? TWO REVERTS. The four edits
6191:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
3884:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
3713:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
3566:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
3419:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
1370:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
1317:. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may
1202:
And I am extending the above restriction to include
65:
8710:tried to tell me that I've misspelled my own name.
5265:
describe the band as punk-based, not metal-based. (
3094:have seen the differences, and they all agree that
2417:, not to mention the edit summery of, and I quote:
376:I would also like to remind you of our policies on
223:"Please do not remove messages from your talk page
6898:It's not breaking the law if the president does it
2980:. You are making all of this up out of thin air. (
9419:
5323:All that aside, no matter the circumstances, per
3350:. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to
2750:No, what you did is called abusing your rights.—
1297:from editing for a short time in accordance with
4675:see you being welcome here in the near future.—
4184:Shall I display pictures of the diffs for you?—
3075:when faced with removal of legitimate content. (
9291:- there is plenty of time to correct Knowledge
9117:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Ibaranoff24
8364:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Ibaranoff24
7852:After looking over the edits, I cleaned up the
7487:No new arguments here, no new answer either. --
6670:The most common measure of edit warring is the
6514:After looking over the edits, I cleaned up the
3511:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Ibaranoff24
944:Knowledge:Featured article candidates/Meshuggah
6326:Please correct the discrepency where you say,
4268:Also, the information below states otherwise:
2561:, but yours have. Care to explain yourself?—
229:Knowledge:Talk page guidelines#User talk pages
100:}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
7468:, although suggested by one reliable source (
7219:, although suggested by one reliable source (
2226:. I reverted Prophaniti/Landon's addition of
9430:
452:regarding you abusing the rollback feature.
9067:
6399:HAVE been asked to run for adminship twice!
5117:that any of these edits were made by me. (
4042:Except for the fact that the edits I made
3097:it was you who removed the sourced content
382:not making personal attacks on other users
9452:
9188:I promise not to edit war over content. (
8769:and to pick up right where you left off.
6643:Please review the following, first, from
4645:STOP CLUTTERING UP MY PAGE WITH YOUR CRAP
1273:made on January 15 2009 to Mudvayne": -->
213:Hello, Ibaranoff24. I saw your report at
9372:
7019:approached to run for adminship TWICE. (
6769:same as past four, this is what we call
4960:I NEVER TRIED TO SOCK IN THE FIRST PLACE
9366:
2421:. This, by the way, is a violation of
922:This has been an automated delivery by
843:This has been an automated delivery by
326:This has been an automated delivery by
264:FAC! Since you have previously brought
14:
8888:staying cool when the editing gets hot
6787:Revision as of 03:10, January 15, 2009
6776:Revision as of 02:27, January 14, 2009
6761:Revision as of 22:53, January 13, 2009
6750:Revision as of 03:23, January 13, 2009
4962:. You have absolutely ZERO evidence. (
4474:and see that all the reliable sources
3147:<ref name="The Metal Observer": -->
3051:on the talk page of another article?—
1060:You did start an edit war. Please see
910:, you are invited to take part in the
9119:) and commits to restrict himself to
8874:hurt in reviewing as you go forward:
8783:As I explained, the page was sourced
7419:*****Reverts to second revision. ****
6739:Revision as of 00:05, January 9, 2009
6728:Revision as of 21:36, January 7, 2009
5016:As I've said, these images are taken
2625:caught red-handed. But besides that,
2164:look me in the face and tell me that
132:Roll call and Coordinator nominations
70:Sorry about the Mfd, I was reckless.
8469:, not NME. If you don't believe me,
6424:are two different things entirely.—
6054:I have no idea. But I never accused
5880:outside of my own self-nomination. (
2224:No, I did NOT remove sourced content
2189:by the sources, content and rules. (
48:Knowledge:How to archive a talk page
8836:, I suggest that you do the same. (
2711:"But I just watched you poke her."
2166:you did not remove information here
590:Thanks, I appreciate the response.
260:Hi! Thanks for your support at the
23:
9441:
8918:
8136:
8043:
7547:
7472:). I have been an editor here for
7307:
7086:
6350:accusations by users who actually
6183:
5845:rock band, not a rap metal band. (
3876:
3705:
3558:
3411:
3362:}} below, but you should read our
3323:
1687:before you continue to edit here.
1362:
1284:
859:WikiProject Horror needs your help
87:has smiled at you! Smiles promote
73:
24:
9472:
6442:Again, I never stated that I was
6360:. And, for the last time, I made
6039:Then who do they belong to then?
5734:user who edit warred previously.
3149:<ref name="Rolling Stone": -->
1990:material, including that link to
787:Sweet Sweetback's Baadasssss Song
779:Sweet Sweetback's Baadasssss Song
624:{{DEFAULTSORT|Butcher Shop, The}}
620:{{DEFAULTSORT:Butcher Shop, The}}
513:I see you are the editor who got
9071:
8054:from editing in accordance with
4092:accurate, sourced information. (
2703:"Son, leave your sister alone."
1250:User notice: temporary 3RR block
942:Thanks a lot for the support on
8301:Knowledge:ANI#Summary_of_events
3352:make constructive contributions
9375:The Rough Guide to Heavy Metal
8435:wasn't found to be reliable. (
3153:<ref name="Popmatters": -->
2324:. You simply can't deny it.—
2268:No, I didn't, as clearly seen
2246:Yes, you did, as clearly seen
562:The Most Dangerous Game (film)
346:A MedCab case has been opened
299:21:04, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
281:10:21, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
250:00:26, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
233:I'm also putting a message on
208:23:20, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
186:22:59, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
158:20:51, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
121:10:31, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
44:User talk:Ibaranoff24/Archive5
13:
1:
9459:Mudvayne review at popmatters
9086:for the following reason(s):
8066:by adding the text {{unblock|
6866:Again, these accusations are
5020:. Do you not understand what
3389:Dispute resolution guidelines
3358:by adding the text {{unblock|
3336:from editing for a period of
1321:by adding the text {{unblock|
1307:discuss controversial changes
1005:is strongly frowned upon. --
912:project's first questionnaire
821:04:34, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
794:21:29, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
772:17:15, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
685:11:52, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
664:20:54, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
636:06:25, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
608:01:53, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
585:01:36, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
555:23:44, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
534:22:00, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
518:more in-depth and reliable.--
138:WikiProject Films coordinator
9360:22:21, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
9340:21:06, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
9317:18:20, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
9278:17:19, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
9259:16:45, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
9245:16:38, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
9230:16:45, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
9215:16:26, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
9198:16:16, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
9183:15:52, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
9165:15:41, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
9147:14:59, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
9132:14:54, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
9104:16:58, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
9080:Your request to be unblocked
9028:14:58, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
8908:17:27, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
8868:14:33, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
8846:20:43, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
8827:20:39, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
8800:20:24, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
8779:20:08, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
8760:19:51, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
8724:14:27, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
8705:21:33, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
8679:21:27, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
8664:21:24, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
8621:21:18, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
8589:21:16, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
8573:21:07, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
8539:20:20, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
8524:20:08, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
8506:20:20, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
8487:20:01, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
8461:19:47, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
8445:19:39, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
8428:17:37, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
8410:16:48, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
8395:05:16, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
8376:03:43, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
8352:03:11, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
8330:03:05, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
8312:02:59, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
8294:02:58, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
8245:03:02, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
8236:i.e. some months from now. —
8129:02:55, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
8100:02:50, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
8080:02:44, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
8039:02:44, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
8024:I think this should stop now
8018:02:43, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
8000:02:17, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
7985:01:38, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
7969:01:21, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
7929:02:16, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
7898:00:33, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
7826:00:30, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
7809:00:23, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
7778:00:37, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
7764:00:32, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
7744:00:10, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
7729:00:08, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
7710:23:21, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
7663:23:18, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
7541:23:09, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
7499:22:57, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
7464:, which is not backed up by
7301:22:42, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
7246:22:27, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
7215:, which is not backed up by
7082:22:09, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
7054:00:11, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
7029:00:16, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
7009:00:09, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
6967:00:07, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
6953:00:05, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
6933:23:09, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
6918:23:02, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
6880:22:55, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
6861:22:51, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
6827:22:47, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
6811:22:43, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
6715:22:40, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
6696:22:27, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
6631:22:14, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
6612:22:10, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
6563:21:59, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
6482:21:55, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
6456:22:14, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
6438:22:12, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
6411:22:01, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
6378:21:46, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
6344:21:40, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
6295:21:48, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
6174:21:31, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
6142:21:26, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
6128:21:21, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
6110:21:26, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
6094:21:18, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
6069:21:26, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
6049:21:22, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
6025:21:19, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
6011:21:16, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
5996:21:19, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
5981:21:15, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
5965:21:12, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
5951:21:10, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
5933:21:12, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
5918:21:08, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
5890:21:12, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
5871:21:05, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
5855:21:00, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
5834:20:53, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
5819:20:49, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
5793:20:15, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
5763:19:59, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
5747:19:52, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
5714:23:58, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
5700:23:46, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
5686:19:57, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
5670:16:11, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
5632:21:29, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
5618:21:25, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
5595:21:16, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
5580:21:11, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
5554:20:58, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
5538:20:53, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
5514:21:16, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
5500:21:11, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
5481:20:58, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
5465:20:51, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
5420:20:45, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
5395:20:35, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
5360:20:45, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
5350:and expanding accusations. (
5313:20:45, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
5275:20:22, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
5254:20:16, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
5223:19:55, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
5159:10:52, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
5137:10:45, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
5127:10:38, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
5112:10:35, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
5085:06:47, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
5065:21:03, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
5034:10:28, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
5012:10:26, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
4992:10:25, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
4972:10:52, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
4954:10:47, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
4926:10:37, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
4911:10:33, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
4891:10:31, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
4877:10:30, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
4857:10:27, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
4842:10:25, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
4822:10:23, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
4803:10:21, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
4779:10:19, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
4765:10:17, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
4730:10:19, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
4711:10:10, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
4689:10:08, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
4661:10:11, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
4627:10:03, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
4596:09:59, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
4571:09:59, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
4553:09:57, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
4526:09:58, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
4511:09:55, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
4488:09:54, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
4465:09:51, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
4432:09:46, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
4418:09:42, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
4397:09:35, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
4377:08:11, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
4250:09:38, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
4232:08:09, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
4213:06:41, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
4198:20:52, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
4163:06:41, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
4128:06:41, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
4102:19:33, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
4079:19:23, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
4056:19:12, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
4031:08:10, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
3993:18:41, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
3871:09:24, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
3823:07:05, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
3674:06:37, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
3527:06:27, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
3407:15:53, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
3312:13:22, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
3296:12:24, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
3270:06:53, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
3227:06:53, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
3205:18:25, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
3182:07:04, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
3128:07:00, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
3114:06:59, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
3085:06:56, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
3065:06:43, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
3049:this huge arguement they had
3041:06:56, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
3026:06:41, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
2990:09:44, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
2973:06:39, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
2953:06:29, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
2937:06:27, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
2903:09:43, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
2885:06:24, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
2870:18:14, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
2848:13:19, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
2833:11:20, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
2798:06:34, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
2788:should be blocked, not me. (
2776:06:25, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
2762:18:11, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
2745:15:30, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
2730:14:36, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
2690:07:28, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
2663:07:27, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
2619:06:46, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
2605:06:01, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
2588:05:57, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
2573:05:49, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
2544:06:14, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
2522:06:01, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
2502:05:55, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
2474:Let's continue on shall we,
2464:06:01, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
2443:05:52, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
2407:05:52, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
2385:05:52, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
2355:13:28, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
2336:08:57, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
2283:09:49, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
2263:08:53, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
2240:05:54, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
2219:05:51, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
2199:05:43, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
2180:05:40, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
2119:05:35, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
2104:05:49, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
2090:05:38, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
2004:05:41, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
1939:05:32, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
1887:05:29, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
1865:05:23, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
1797:05:20, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
1755:05:29, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
1741:05:18, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
1700:05:29, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
1654:05:29, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
1618:05:08, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
1592:05:00, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
1567:04:57, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
1546:04:32, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
1517:04:05, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
1474:13:44, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
1356:08:45, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
1341:19:13, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
1305:. Please be more careful to
1237:16:45, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
1215:16:41, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
1194:16:08, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
1170:15:59, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
1154:15:56, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
1128:14:40, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
1104:04:05, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
1081:16:45, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
1056:00:38, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
1022:19:09, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
997:20:37, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
964:14:58, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
932:03:53, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
742:02:58, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
722:08:29, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
504:09:01, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
474:20:23, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
462:19:16, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
438:18:24, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
410:22:52, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
390:20:54, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
372:20:47, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
360:18:14, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
96:Smile at others by adding {{
60:14:47, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
42:Please add new archivals to
7:
9173:how nettlesome things get?
8930:, who declined the request.
8712:Open the pod bay doors, HAL
8148:, who declined the request.
8056:Knowledge's blocking policy
7870:Reverts to second revision.
7559:, who declined the request.
7319:, who declined the request.
7285:. Do you REALLY think that
7279:I DID NOT MAKE THOSE EDITS.
7098:, who declined the request.
6532:Reverts to second revision.
6492:violate 3RR, edit by edit:
6195:, who declined the request.
3888:, who declined the request.
3717:, who declined the request.
3570:, who declined the request.
3423:, who declined the request.
3342:Knowledge's blocking policy
2923:and defends you? Please.—
2322:removed sourced information
1598:Administrators' noticeboard
1374:, who declined the request.
1313:rather than engaging in an
1299:Knowledge's blocking policy
897:23:15, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
853:03:35, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
336:00:27, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
10:
9477:
9426:Mudvayne at Metal Observer
9348:; I believe he means this
9299:- and also that there are
9070:
6397:Well, what do you know! I
6157:not the behavior of others
3379:No personal attacks policy
9437:Mudvayne at Rolling Stone
9038:guide to appealing blocks
8255:guide to appealing blocks
7673:guide to appealing blocks
7509:guide to appealing blocks
7256:guide to appealing blocks
6900:, you're trying to argue
6486:Here is proof that I did
6305:guide to appealing blocks
4643:I'll take it back if you
4003:guide to appealing blocks
3833:guide to appealing blocks
3684:guide to appealing blocks
3537:guide to appealing blocks
3364:guide to appealing blocks
3006:edited the encyclopedia,
1484:guide to appealing blocks
307:September 2008 Newsletter
9113:NOTE to reviewing admin:
6923:deeper into your hole. (
6328:accused of violating 3RR
5368:an edit summery such as
5343:Michael moore-grade hack
2428:Restoration of clean-up
1119:be blocked. Thank you. —
828:December 2008 Newsletter
692:November 2008 Newsletter
192:it should remain removed
9373:Berelian, Essi (2005).
9328:Plan 9 from Outer Space
6551:WERE SEPARATE after all
6015:I said no such thing. (
5377:As stated by an admin,
5280:So, you're saying that
5018:ENTIRELY OUT OF CONTEXT
4649:ENTIRELY OUT OF CONTEXT
3509:From what I can see at
3151:<ref name="NME": -->
2706:"I didn't do anything!"
2678:evidence against you.—
482:October 2008 Newsletter
225:UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES
9295:we have established a
9016:And what about use of
8923:
8141:
8048:
7939:Again, do not email me
7552:
7312:
7091:
6992:
6844:
6680:
6662:
6641:
6188:
5725:Please do not email me
5286:Landon's point of view
4476:WERE STILL ON THE PAGE
4039:
3881:
3710:
3563:
3416:
3328:
3165:
3157:
1367:
1289:
902:WP:FILMS Questionnaire
78:
8975:change block settings
8922:
8193:change block settings
8140:
8047:
7604:change block settings
7551:
7364:change block settings
7311:
7143:change block settings
7090:
6980:
6832:
6668:
6658:
6636:
6240:change block settings
6187:
4472:click on the revision
4446:File:Moreevidence.png
4336:in 1996. Members are
4290:in 1996. Members are
4035:
3933:change block settings
3880:
3762:change block settings
3709:
3615:change block settings
3562:
3468:change block settings
3415:
3327:
3247:File:Hardevidence.png
3187:Except that I didn't
3161:
3143:
1419:change block settings
1366:
1288:
864:Sugar Bear/Archive 5
803:I have a copy of the
77:
9352:William M. Connolley
9289:there is no deadline
8052:blocked indefinitely
7460:supposedly performs
7211:supposedly performs
6868:COMPLETELY UNFOUNDED
4118:a reliable source. (
3009:comes out of nowhere
2978:THERE IS NO EVIDENCE
2856:argued in your favor
2526:Once again, this is
1526:Please, in light of
1466:William M. Connolley
1348:William M. Connolley
1333:William M. Connolley
1327:The duration of the
1256:Regarding reversions
1204:User talk:Prophaniti
1134:User talk:Landon1980
1110:User talk:Landon1980
946:! Have a nice day!--
315:September 2008 issue
35:Post replies to the
18:User talk:Sugar Bear
9093:Request handled by:
8896:Raul654/Raul's laws
8884:no personal attacks
7291:am evading block? (
6784:same as past five.
6773:here at wikipedia.
6701:And, again, I made
6362:four separate edits
5654:Knowledge Mediation
4044:were NOT disruptive
3384:Edit-warring policy
3340:in accordance with
836:December 2008 issue
700:November 2008 issue
150:Girolamo Savonarola
136:The September 2008
9407:Unknown parameter
8924:
8142:
8064:contest this block
8049:
7553:
7313:
7092:
6736:reverts to first.
6189:
5408:longer than a week
4385:unreliable sources
3882:
3711:
3564:
3417:
3329:
1368:
1311:dispute resolution
1301:for violating the
1290:
869:WikiProject Horror
826:WikiProject Films
690:WikiProject Films
515:Insane Clown Posse
490:October 2008 issue
480:WikiProject Films
305:WikiProject Films
172:some clear links.
79:
9337:
9313:
9309:
9110:
9109:
9018:multiple accounts
7660:
7496:
7243:
6984:three-revert rule
6836:three-revert rule
6672:three-revert rule
6582:reverts to first.
6401:How about that? (
6293:
6076:Good Faith Advice
5282:The Rolling Stone
4978:These images are
4353:Matthew McDonough
4307:Matthew McDonough
3403:
3399:
3356:contest the block
1319:contest the block
1303:three-revert rule
954:
934:
908:WikiProject Films
855:
749:User:SandyGeorgia
667:
650:comment added by
338:
321:relevant sections
232:
102:
82:I'm really sorry.
9468:
9461:
9456:
9450:
9445:
9439:
9434:
9428:
9423:
9417:
9416:
9410:
9405:
9403:
9395:
9370:
9335:
9314:
9311:
9307:
9242:
9160:
9127:
9075:
9068:
9065:
9051:
9045:
8994:
8992:
8981:
8963:
8961:deleted contribs
8921:
8696:
8655:
8638:User:Betacommand
8612:
8347:
8268:
8262:
8240:
8212:
8210:
8199:
8181:
8179:deleted contribs
8139:
8068:your reason here
7755:
7720:
7686:
7680:
7659:
7656:
7623:
7621:
7610:
7592:
7590:deleted contribs
7550:
7522:
7516:
7495:
7492:
7383:
7381:
7370:
7352:
7350:deleted contribs
7310:
7269:
7263:
7242:
7239:
7162:
7160:
7149:
7131:
7129:deleted contribs
7089:
7045:
7000:
6944:
6909:
6852:
6802:
6687:
6603:
6473:
6429:
6335:
6318:
6312:
6292:
6290:
6283:
6259:
6257:
6246:
6228:
6226:deleted contribs
6186:
6165:
5609:
5571:
5529:
5491:
5456:
5386:
5245:
5103:
5056:
5003:
4945:
4902:
4868:
4833:
4813:
4756:
4680:
4617:. You've lost. (
4587:
4544:
4502:
4456:
4409:
4368:
4223:
4189:
4070:
4028:
4016:
4010:
3952:
3950:
3939:
3921:
3919:deleted contribs
3879:
3869:
3862:
3846:
3840:
3821:
3818:
3793:evade my block.
3781:
3779:
3768:
3750:
3748:deleted contribs
3708:
3697:
3691:
3672:
3669:
3634:
3632:
3621:
3603:
3601:deleted contribs
3561:
3550:
3544:
3487:
3485:
3474:
3456:
3454:deleted contribs
3414:
3404:
3401:
3397:
3360:your reason here
3173:
3105:
3056:
3017:
3012:to defend you?—
2964:
2928:
2863:
2826:
2755:
2725:
2683:
2656:
2598:
2566:
2515:
2457:
2329:
2256:
2212:
2186:sourced material
2173:
2083:
1932:
1858:
1790:
1734:
1585:
1539:
1497:
1491:
1438:
1436:
1425:
1407:
1405:deleted contribs
1365:
1323:your reason here
1281:
1280:
1276:
1210:
1190:
1184:
1150:
1144:
1123:
1075:
1072:
1069:
1050:
1047:
1044:
1016:
1013:
1010:
991:
988:
985:
960:
952:
948:
921:
895:
888:
842:
727:Re: Ralph Bakshi
666:
644:
625:
621:
614:Category sorting
552:
545:
531:
524:
471:
436:
434:
430:
424:
388:
370:
358:
325:
240:
218:
145:by September 28!
94:
9476:
9475:
9471:
9470:
9469:
9467:
9466:
9465:
9464:
9457:
9453:
9448:Mudvayne at NME
9446:
9442:
9435:
9431:
9424:
9420:
9408:
9406:
9397:
9396:
9392:
9371:
9367:
9336:The Photoplayer
9324:
9305:
9301:tools available
9285:
9240:
9158:
9125:
9059:
9057:
9049:
9043:
9042:, then use the
9031:
9007:
8982:
8972:
8958:
8941:
8934:blocking policy
8919:
8916:
8914:Unblock request
8855:
8694:
8653:
8610:
8595:so much support
8475:this disclaimer
8383:
8359:
8345:
8341:
8274:
8266:
8260:
8259:, then use the
8248:
8238:
8226:
8200:
8190:
8176:
8159:
8152:blocking policy
8137:
8082:
8026:
7941:
7876:Fourth revision
7848:Second revision
7753:
7718:
7692:
7684:
7678:
7677:, then use the
7666:
7657:
7641:
7611:
7601:
7587:
7570:
7563:blocking policy
7548:
7528:
7520:
7514:
7513:, then use the
7502:
7493:
7478:
7421:Fourth revision
7405:Second revision
7371:
7361:
7347:
7330:
7323:blocking policy
7308:
7275:
7267:
7261:
7260:, then use the
7249:
7240:
7225:
7150:
7140:
7126:
7109:
7102:blocking policy
7087:
7067:
7043:
6998:
6942:
6907:
6850:
6800:
6685:
6601:
6538:Fourth revision
6510:Second revision
6471:
6427:
6333:
6324:
6316:
6310:
6309:, then use the
6298:
6286:
6284:
6273:
6247:
6237:
6223:
6206:
6199:blocking policy
6184:
6163:
6078:
5727:
5649:
5607:
5569:
5527:
5489:
5454:
5426:Actually, per
5384:
5243:
5101:
5054:
5045:
5001:
4943:
4900:
4866:
4831:
4811:
4754:
4678:
4585:
4542:
4500:
4454:
4407:
4366:
4328:band formed in
4324:is an American
4282:band formed in
4278:is an American
4221:
4187:
4068:
4026:
4022:
4014:
4008:
4007:, then use the
3996:
3966:
3940:
3930:
3916:
3899:
3892:blocking policy
3877:
3858:
3856:
3852:
3844:
3838:
3837:, then use the
3826:
3816:
3809:
3795:
3769:
3759:
3745:
3728:
3721:blocking policy
3706:
3703:
3695:
3689:
3688:, then use the
3677:
3667:
3660:
3647:
3622:
3612:
3598:
3581:
3574:blocking policy
3559:
3556:
3548:
3542:
3541:, then use the
3530:
3500:
3475:
3465:
3451:
3434:
3427:blocking policy
3412:
3395:
3374:Civility policy
3367:
3321:
3283:
3281:At The Drive-In
3171:
3103:
3054:
3015:
2962:
2926:
2861:
2824:
2807:
2753:
2723:
2714:"No, I didn't!"
2697:
2681:
2654:
2596:
2564:
2528:entirely untrue
2513:
2455:
2364:
2362:Arbitrary Break
2327:
2254:
2210:
2171:
2081:
1930:
1856:
1788:
1732:
1583:
1537:
1503:
1495:
1489:
1488:, then use the
1477:
1455:
1426:
1416:
1402:
1385:
1378:blocking policy
1363:
1360:
1326:
1282:
1278:
1274:
1272:
1271:
1252:
1208:
1188:
1182:
1148:
1142:
1138:
1121:
1113:
1091:
1073:
1070:
1067:
1048:
1045:
1042:
1014:
1011:
1008:
989:
986:
983:
973:
962:
958:
950:
940:
906:As a member of
904:
889:
882:
861:
831:
801:
783:
729:
695:
677:Alastair Haines
673:
645:
623:
619:
616:
605:
582:
565:
548:
541:
527:
520:
511:
485:
469:
448:I have started
446:
432:
426:
422:
420:
398:
385:
367:
355:
344:
310:
258:
238:
165:
147:
134:
128:
109:
104:
68:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
9474:
9463:
9462:
9451:
9440:
9429:
9418:
9390:
9364:
9363:
9362:
9323:
9320:
9287:Remember that
9284:
9281:
9265:
9264:
9263:
9262:
9234:
9233:
9202:
9201:
9170:
9169:
9168:
9167:
9151:
9150:
9108:
9107:
9088:
9087:
9076:
9032:
9014:
9010:Decline reason
9003:
8999:Request reason
8996:
8917:
8915:
8912:
8911:
8910:
8854:
8851:
8850:
8849:
8814:
8813:
8812:
8811:
8810:
8809:
8808:
8807:
8806:
8805:
8804:
8803:
8736:
8735:
8734:
8733:
8732:
8731:
8730:
8729:
8728:
8727:
8644:
8643:
8642:
8641:
8626:
8625:
8624:
8623:
8601:
8600:
8599:
8598:
8591:
8553:
8552:
8551:
8550:
8549:
8548:
8547:
8546:
8545:
8544:
8543:
8542:
8511:
8510:
8509:
8414:
8413:
8382:
8379:
8358:
8355:
8340:
8339:Page protected
8337:
8336:
8335:
8334:
8333:
8249:
8233:
8229:Decline reason
8221:
8217:Request reason
8214:
8135:
8134:
8133:
8132:
8131:
8114:
8113:
8112:
8111:
8104:
8103:
8050:You have been
8042:
8025:
8022:
8021:
8020:
8005:
8004:
8003:
8002:
7940:
7937:
7935:
7933:
7932:
7906:
7905:
7904:
7903:
7902:
7901:
7885:
7884:
7883:
7882:
7881:
7880:Second revert.
7873:
7872:
7871:
7866:Third revision
7863:
7862:
7861:
7845:
7844:
7843:
7840:AS I'VE STATED
7834:First revision
7790:
7789:
7788:
7787:
7786:
7785:
7784:
7783:
7782:
7781:
7667:
7648:
7644:Decline reason
7632:
7628:Request reason
7625:
7546:
7545:
7544:
7503:
7485:
7481:Decline reason
7455:
7451:
7448:
7444:
7440:
7438:
7434:
7432:
7428:
7417:Third revision
7401:AS I'VE STATED
7397:First revision
7392:
7388:Request reason
7385:
7306:
7305:
7304:
7250:
7232:
7228:Decline reason
7206:
7202:
7199:
7195:
7191:
7189:
7185:
7183:
7179:
7171:
7167:Request reason
7164:
7085:
7066:
7063:
7062:
7061:
7033:
7032:
6979:
6978:
6977:
6976:
6975:
6974:
6973:
6972:
6971:
6970:
6890:
6889:
6888:
6887:
6831:
6830:
6795:
6794:
6793:
6792:
6791:
6790:
6789:
6788:
6779:
6778:
6777:
6764:
6763:
6762:
6753:
6752:
6751:
6742:
6741:
6740:
6731:
6730:
6729:
6635:
6634:
6596:
6595:
6589:
6583:
6577:
6571:
6570:
6569:
6568:
6567:
6566:
6547:
6546:
6545:
6544:
6543:
6542:Second revert.
6535:
6534:
6533:
6528:Third revision
6525:
6524:
6523:
6507:
6506:
6505:
6502:AS I'VE STATED
6496:First revision
6465:
6464:
6463:
6462:
6461:
6460:
6459:
6395:
6390:
6368:violate 3RR. (
6299:
6280:
6276:Decline reason
6268:
6264:Request reason
6261:
6182:
6181:
6180:
6179:
6178:
6177:
6176:
6114:
6113:
6077:
6074:
6073:
6072:
6037:
6036:
6035:
6034:
6033:
6032:
6031:
6030:
6029:
6028:
5999:
5937:
5936:
5906:
5905:
5904:
5903:
5902:
5901:
5900:
5899:
5898:
5897:
5896:
5895:
5894:
5893:
5798:
5797:
5796:
5795:
5777:
5776:
5775:
5774:
5767:
5766:
5726:
5723:
5722:
5721:
5720:
5719:
5718:
5717:
5648:
5645:
5644:
5643:
5642:
5641:
5640:
5639:
5638:
5637:
5636:
5635:
5522:
5521:
5520:
5519:
5518:
5517:
5449:
5448:
5435:
5434:
5433:by Ibaranoff24
5424:
5423:
5364:
5363:
5321:
5320:
5319:
5318:
5317:
5316:
5292:
5291:
5290:
5289:
5228:
5197:
5196:
5191:
5146:
5145:
5144:
5143:
5142:
5141:
5140:
5139:
5091:
5089:
5088:
5044:
5041:
5040:
5039:
5038:
5037:
4976:
4975:
4938:
4937:
4936:
4935:
4934:
4933:
4932:
4931:
4930:
4929:
4913:
4791:
4790:
4789:
4788:
4787:
4786:
4785:
4784:
4783:
4782:
4742:
4741:
4740:
4739:
4738:
4737:
4736:
4735:
4734:
4733:
4669:
4668:
4667:
4666:
4665:
4664:
4631:
4630:
4579:
4578:
4577:
4576:
4575:
4574:
4534:
4533:
4532:
4531:
4530:
4529:
4492:
4491:
4443:
4442:
4441:
4440:
4439:
4438:
4401:
4400:
4361:
4360:
4355:. Signed onto
4315:
4314:
4309:. Signed onto
4266:
4265:
4264:
4263:
4262:
4261:
4260:
4259:
4258:
4257:
4256:
4255:
4254:
4253:
4175:
4174:
4173:
4172:
4171:
4170:
4169:
4168:
4167:
4166:
4140:
4139:
4138:
4137:
4136:
4135:
4134:
4133:
4132:
4131:
4060:
4059:
3997:
3988:
3985:
3973:
3969:Decline reason
3961:
3957:Request reason
3954:
3875:
3874:
3873:
3827:
3802:
3798:Decline reason
3790:
3786:Request reason
3783:
3704:
3678:
3654:
3650:Decline reason
3643:
3639:Request reason
3636:
3557:
3531:
3522:
3519:
3507:
3503:Decline reason
3496:
3492:Request reason
3489:
3410:
3392:
3391:
3386:
3381:
3376:
3330:You have been
3322:
3320:
3317:
3316:
3315:
3282:
3279:
3278:
3277:
3276:
3275:
3274:
3273:
3244:
3243:
3242:
3241:
3235:
3234:
3233:
3232:
3231:
3230:
3209:
3208:
3167:
3136:
3135:
3134:
3133:
3132:
3131:
3073:supposed to do
3045:
3044:
2998:
2997:
2996:
2995:
2994:
2993:
2915:
2914:
2913:
2912:
2911:
2910:
2909:
2908:
2907:
2906:
2806:
2803:
2802:
2801:
2784:
2783:
2782:
2781:
2780:
2779:
2718:
2717:
2716:
2715:
2709:
2708:
2707:
2696:
2695:Give it a rest
2693:
2672:
2671:
2670:
2669:
2668:
2667:
2666:
2665:
2633:
2632:
2631:
2630:
2629:
2628:
2627:
2626:
2556:
2554:
2553:
2552:
2551:
2550:
2549:
2548:
2547:
2473:
2471:
2470:
2469:
2468:
2467:
2466:
2412:
2411:
2410:
2390:
2389:
2388:
2363:
2360:
2359:
2358:
2345:. Accept it. (
2315:
2314:
2313:
2312:
2311:
2310:
2309:
2308:
2307:
2306:
2305:
2304:
2303:
2302:
2301:
2300:
2299:
2298:
2297:
2296:
2295:
2294:
2293:
2292:
2291:
2290:
2289:
2288:
2287:
2286:
2139:
2138:
2137:
2136:
2135:
2134:
2133:
2132:
2131:
2130:
2129:
2128:
2127:
2126:
2125:
2124:
2123:
2122:
2107:
2061:
2060:
2059:
2058:
2057:
2056:
2055:
2054:
2053:
2052:
2051:
2050:
2049:
2048:
2047:
2046:
2024:
2023:
2022:
2021:
2020:
2019:
2018:
2017:
2016:
2015:
2014:
2013:
2012:
2011:
2010:
2009:
2008:
2007:
1988:POORLY-SOURCED
1957:
1956:
1955:
1954:
1953:
1952:
1951:
1950:
1949:
1948:
1947:
1946:
1945:
1944:
1943:
1942:
1909:
1908:
1907:
1906:
1905:
1904:
1903:
1902:
1901:
1900:
1899:
1898:
1897:
1896:
1895:
1894:
1836:
1835:
1834:
1833:
1832:
1831:
1830:
1829:
1828:
1827:
1826:
1825:
1811:
1810:
1809:
1808:
1807:
1806:
1805:
1804:
1803:
1802:
1801:
1800:
1771:
1770:
1769:
1768:
1767:
1766:
1765:
1764:
1763:
1762:
1761:
1760:
1759:
1758:
1716:
1715:
1714:
1713:
1712:
1711:
1710:
1709:
1708:
1707:
1706:
1705:
1704:
1703:
1670:
1669:
1668:
1667:
1666:
1665:
1664:
1663:
1662:
1661:
1660:
1659:
1658:
1657:
1521:
1520:
1478:
1462:
1458:Decline reason
1447:
1443:Request reason
1440:
1361:
1359:
1358:
1291:You have been
1283:
1270:
1254:
1253:
1251:
1248:
1247:
1246:
1245:
1244:
1243:
1242:
1241:
1240:
1218:
1217:
1197:
1196:
1174:
1173:
1137:
1131:
1112:
1107:
1090:
1087:
1086:
1085:
1084:
1083:
1037:to the subject
972:
967:
956:
939:
936:
920:
903:
900:
860:
857:
841:
830:
824:
805:Crispin Glover
800:
797:
782:
776:
775:
774:
758:
757:
728:
725:
694:
688:
672:
669:
615:
612:
611:
610:
597:
574:
564:
559:
558:
557:
510:
507:
484:
478:
477:
476:
445:
442:
441:
440:
397:
394:
393:
392:
374:
343:
340:
324:
309:
303:
302:
301:
257:
254:
253:
252:
237:'s talk page.
164:
161:
130:
129:
127:
124:
108:
105:
93:
72:
67:
64:
63:
50:.) Thank you.
37:main talk page
34:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
9473:
9460:
9455:
9449:
9444:
9438:
9433:
9427:
9422:
9414:
9401:
9393:
9391:1-84353-415-0
9388:
9384:
9380:
9379:New York City
9376:
9369:
9365:
9361:
9357:
9353:
9350:
9347:
9344:
9343:
9342:
9341:
9338:
9331:
9329:
9319:
9318:
9315:
9302:
9298:
9294:
9290:
9280:
9279:
9275:
9271:
9260:
9256:
9252:
9248:
9247:
9246:
9243:
9236:
9235:
9231:
9227:
9223:
9219:
9218:
9217:
9216:
9212:
9208:
9199:
9195:
9191:
9187:
9186:
9185:
9184:
9180:
9176:
9166:
9163:
9161:
9155:
9154:
9153:
9152:
9148:
9144:
9140:
9136:
9135:
9134:
9133:
9130:
9128:
9122:
9118:
9114:
9106:
9105:
9101:
9097:
9094:
9090:
9085:
9081:
9077:
9074:
9069:
9066:
9063:
9056:
9055:
9048:
9041:
9039:
9030:
9029:
9026:
9023:
9019:
9013:
9011:
9006:
9002:
9000:
8995:
8990:
8986:
8980:
8976:
8971:
8967:
8962:
8957:
8953:
8952:global blocks
8949:
8948:active blocks
8945:
8940:
8935:
8931:
8929:
8928:administrator
8909:
8905:
8901:
8897:
8893:
8889:
8885:
8881:
8877:
8872:
8871:
8870:
8869:
8865:
8861:
8847:
8843:
8839:
8835:
8831:
8830:
8829:
8828:
8824:
8820:
8801:
8797:
8793:
8789:
8786:
8782:
8781:
8780:
8776:
8772:
8767:
8763:
8762:
8761:
8757:
8753:
8749:
8744:
8743:
8742:
8741:
8740:
8739:
8738:
8737:
8725:
8721:
8717:
8713:
8708:
8707:
8706:
8703:
8702:
8700:
8697:
8689:
8688:
8683:
8682:
8680:
8676:
8672:
8667:
8666:
8665:
8662:
8661:
8659:
8656:
8648:
8647:
8646:
8645:
8639:
8635:
8630:
8629:
8628:
8627:
8622:
8619:
8618:
8616:
8613:
8605:
8604:
8603:
8602:
8596:
8592:
8590:
8586:
8582:
8577:
8576:
8574:
8570:
8566:
8561:
8560:
8559:
8556:
8540:
8536:
8532:
8527:
8526:
8525:
8521:
8517:
8512:
8507:
8503:
8499:
8495:
8494:
8491:
8490:
8488:
8484:
8480:
8476:
8472:
8468:
8464:
8463:
8462:
8458:
8454:
8449:
8448:
8446:
8442:
8438:
8434:
8431:
8430:
8429:
8425:
8421:
8416:
8415:
8411:
8407:
8403:
8399:
8398:
8397:
8396:
8392:
8388:
8378:
8377:
8373:
8369:
8365:
8354:
8353:
8350:
8348:
8331:
8327:
8323:
8319:
8315:
8314:
8313:
8309:
8305:
8302:
8298:
8297:
8296:
8295:
8291:
8287:
8283:
8279:
8273:
8272:
8265:
8258:
8256:
8247:
8246:
8243:
8241:
8232:
8230:
8225:
8220:
8218:
8213:
8208:
8204:
8198:
8194:
8189:
8185:
8180:
8175:
8171:
8170:global blocks
8167:
8166:active blocks
8163:
8158:
8153:
8149:
8147:
8146:administrator
8130:
8126:
8122:
8118:
8117:
8116:
8115:
8108:
8107:
8106:
8105:
8101:
8097:
8093:
8089:
8084:
8083:
8081:
8077:
8073:
8069:
8065:
8061:
8057:
8053:
8046:
8041:
8040:
8036:
8032:
8019:
8015:
8011:
8007:
8006:
8001:
7997:
7993:
7989:
7988:
7986:
7982:
7978:
7973:
7972:
7971:
7970:
7966:
7962:
7956:
7952:
7948:
7945:
7936:
7930:
7926:
7922:
7918:
7914:
7913:
7908:
7907:
7899:
7895:
7891:
7886:
7879:
7878:
7877:
7874:
7869:
7868:
7867:
7864:
7859:
7855:
7854:Rolling Stone
7851:
7850:
7849:
7846:
7841:
7837:
7836:
7835:
7832:
7831:
7829:
7828:
7827:
7823:
7819:
7815:
7812:
7811:
7810:
7806:
7802:
7797:
7792:
7791:
7779:
7775:
7771:
7767:
7766:
7765:
7762:
7761:
7759:
7756:
7748:
7747:
7745:
7741:
7737:
7732:
7731:
7730:
7727:
7726:
7724:
7721:
7714:
7713:
7711:
7707:
7703:
7698:
7694:
7693:
7691:
7690:
7683:
7676:
7674:
7665:
7664:
7661:
7654:
7647:
7645:
7640:
7638:
7631:
7629:
7624:
7619:
7615:
7609:
7605:
7600:
7596:
7591:
7586:
7582:
7581:global blocks
7578:
7577:active blocks
7574:
7569:
7564:
7560:
7558:
7557:administrator
7542:
7538:
7534:
7530:
7529:
7527:
7526:
7519:
7512:
7510:
7501:
7500:
7497:
7490:
7484:
7482:
7477:
7475:
7471:
7470:Rolling Stone
7467:
7463:
7459:
7454:
7447:
7443:
7437:
7431:
7426:
7422:
7418:
7414:
7410:
7409:Rolling Stone
7406:
7402:
7398:
7391:
7389:
7384:
7379:
7375:
7369:
7365:
7360:
7356:
7351:
7346:
7342:
7341:global blocks
7338:
7337:active blocks
7334:
7329:
7324:
7320:
7318:
7317:administrator
7302:
7298:
7294:
7290:
7289:
7284:
7280:
7277:
7276:
7274:
7273:
7266:
7259:
7257:
7248:
7247:
7244:
7237:
7231:
7229:
7224:
7222:
7221:Rolling Stone
7218:
7214:
7210:
7205:
7198:
7194:
7188:
7182:
7177:
7170:
7168:
7163:
7158:
7154:
7148:
7144:
7139:
7135:
7130:
7125:
7121:
7120:global blocks
7117:
7116:active blocks
7113:
7108:
7103:
7099:
7097:
7096:administrator
7084:
7083:
7079:
7075:
7070:
7058:
7057:
7056:
7055:
7052:
7051:
7049:
7046:
7038:
7030:
7026:
7022:
7017:
7013:
7012:
7011:
7010:
7007:
7006:
7004:
7001:
6991:
6989:
6985:
6968:
6964:
6960:
6956:
6955:
6954:
6951:
6950:
6948:
6945:
6937:
6936:
6934:
6930:
6926:
6921:
6920:
6919:
6916:
6915:
6913:
6910:
6903:
6899:
6894:
6893:
6892:
6891:
6884:
6883:
6881:
6877:
6873:
6869:
6865:
6864:
6863:
6862:
6859:
6858:
6856:
6853:
6843:
6841:
6837:
6828:
6824:
6820:
6815:
6814:
6813:
6812:
6809:
6808:
6806:
6803:
6786:
6785:
6783:
6780:
6775:
6774:
6772:
6768:
6765:
6760:
6759:
6757:
6756:Fourth revert
6754:
6749:
6748:
6746:
6743:
6738:
6737:
6735:
6734:Second revert
6732:
6727:
6726:
6725:
6722:
6721:
6719:
6718:
6716:
6712:
6708:
6704:
6700:
6699:
6698:
6697:
6694:
6693:
6691:
6688:
6679:
6678:
6673:
6667:
6666:
6661:
6657:
6655:
6651:
6650:
6647:, then, from
6646:
6640:
6632:
6628:
6624:
6620:
6616:
6615:
6614:
6613:
6610:
6609:
6607:
6604:
6593:
6592:Fourth revert
6590:
6587:
6584:
6581:
6580:Second revert
6578:
6576:
6573:
6572:
6564:
6560:
6556:
6552:
6548:
6541:
6540:
6539:
6536:
6531:
6530:
6529:
6526:
6521:
6517:
6516:Rolling Stone
6513:
6512:
6511:
6508:
6503:
6499:
6498:
6497:
6494:
6493:
6491:
6490:
6485:
6484:
6483:
6480:
6479:
6477:
6474:
6466:
6457:
6453:
6449:
6445:
6441:
6440:
6439:
6436:
6435:
6433:
6430:
6423:
6419:
6415:
6414:
6412:
6408:
6404:
6400:
6396:
6394:
6391:
6389:
6386:
6385:
6382:
6381:
6379:
6375:
6371:
6367:
6363:
6359:
6358:
6353:
6348:
6347:
6346:
6345:
6342:
6341:
6339:
6336:
6329:
6323:
6322:
6315:
6308:
6306:
6297:
6296:
6291:
6289:
6279:
6277:
6272:
6267:
6265:
6260:
6255:
6251:
6245:
6241:
6236:
6232:
6227:
6222:
6218:
6217:global blocks
6214:
6213:active blocks
6210:
6205:
6200:
6196:
6194:
6193:administrator
6175:
6172:
6171:
6169:
6166:
6159:
6158:
6153:
6152:
6151:your behavior
6146:
6145:
6143:
6139:
6135:
6131:
6130:
6129:
6125:
6121:
6116:
6115:
6111:
6107:
6103:
6098:
6097:
6096:
6095:
6091:
6087:
6082:
6070:
6066:
6062:
6057:
6053:
6052:
6051:
6050:
6046:
6042:
6026:
6022:
6018:
6014:
6013:
6012:
6008:
6004:
6000:
5997:
5993:
5989:
5984:
5983:
5982:
5978:
5974:
5969:
5968:
5966:
5962:
5958:
5954:
5953:
5952:
5948:
5944:
5939:
5938:
5934:
5930:
5926:
5922:
5921:
5920:
5919:
5915:
5911:
5891:
5887:
5883:
5879:
5874:
5873:
5872:
5868:
5864:
5859:
5858:
5856:
5852:
5848:
5843:
5842:
5837:
5836:
5835:
5831:
5827:
5823:
5822:
5820:
5816:
5812:
5808:
5804:
5803:
5802:
5801:
5800:
5799:
5794:
5790:
5786:
5781:
5780:
5779:
5778:
5771:
5770:
5769:
5768:
5764:
5760:
5756:
5751:
5750:
5749:
5748:
5744:
5740:
5735:
5731:
5715:
5711:
5707:
5703:
5702:
5701:
5697:
5693:
5689:
5688:
5687:
5683:
5679:
5674:
5673:
5672:
5671:
5667:
5663:
5659:
5655:
5633:
5629:
5625:
5621:
5620:
5619:
5616:
5615:
5613:
5610:
5603:
5599:
5598:
5596:
5592:
5588:
5583:
5582:
5581:
5578:
5577:
5575:
5572:
5565:
5564:
5558:
5557:
5555:
5551:
5547:
5542:
5541:
5540:
5539:
5536:
5535:
5533:
5530:
5515:
5511:
5507:
5503:
5502:
5501:
5498:
5497:
5495:
5492:
5485:
5484:
5482:
5478:
5474:
5469:
5468:
5467:
5466:
5463:
5462:
5460:
5457:
5447:
5443:
5440:
5439:
5438:
5432:
5429:
5428:
5427:
5421:
5417:
5413:
5409:
5405:
5400:
5399:
5398:
5397:
5396:
5393:
5392:
5390:
5387:
5380:
5374:
5373:
5371:
5361:
5357:
5353:
5348:
5347:
5346:
5344:
5340:
5336:
5335:
5330:
5326:
5314:
5310:
5306:
5302:
5301:Rolling Stone
5298:
5297:
5296:
5295:
5294:
5293:
5287:
5283:
5279:
5278:
5276:
5272:
5268:
5263:
5258:
5257:
5256:
5255:
5252:
5251:
5249:
5246:
5239:
5234:
5230:
5226:
5224:
5220:
5216:
5210:
5209:
5205:
5203:
5195:
5192:
5190:
5187:
5186:
5185:
5182:
5181:
5177:
5174:
5173:
5169:
5166:
5162:
5160:
5156:
5152:
5138:
5135:
5134:Baseball Bugs
5131:
5130:
5128:
5124:
5120:
5115:
5114:
5113:
5110:
5109:
5107:
5104:
5096:
5095:
5094:
5093:
5092:
5086:
5082:
5078:
5074:
5069:
5068:
5067:
5066:
5063:
5062:
5060:
5057:
5050:
5035:
5031:
5027:
5023:
5019:
5015:
5014:
5013:
5010:
5009:
5007:
5004:
4997:
4996:
4995:
4993:
4989:
4985:
4981:
4973:
4969:
4965:
4961:
4958:
4957:
4956:
4955:
4952:
4951:
4949:
4946:
4927:
4923:
4919:
4914:
4912:
4909:
4908:
4906:
4903:
4895:
4894:
4892:
4888:
4884:
4880:
4879:
4878:
4875:
4874:
4872:
4869:
4861:
4860:
4858:
4854:
4850:
4845:
4844:
4843:
4840:
4839:
4837:
4834:
4826:
4825:
4824:
4823:
4820:
4819:
4817:
4814:
4806:
4804:
4800:
4796:
4780:
4776:
4772:
4768:
4767:
4766:
4763:
4762:
4760:
4757:
4750:
4749:
4748:
4747:
4746:
4745:
4744:
4743:
4731:
4727:
4723:
4719:
4718:
4715:
4714:
4712:
4708:
4704:
4700:
4699:Rolling Stone
4696:
4692:
4691:
4690:
4687:
4686:
4684:
4681:
4673:
4672:
4671:
4670:
4662:
4658:
4654:
4650:
4646:
4642:
4641:
4639:
4635:
4634:
4633:
4632:
4628:
4624:
4620:
4616:
4612:
4608:
4604:
4600:
4599:
4598:
4597:
4594:
4593:
4591:
4588:
4572:
4568:
4564:
4560:
4556:
4555:
4554:
4551:
4550:
4548:
4545:
4538:
4537:
4536:
4535:
4527:
4523:
4519:
4514:
4513:
4512:
4509:
4508:
4506:
4503:
4496:
4495:
4494:
4493:
4489:
4485:
4481:
4477:
4473:
4469:
4468:
4467:
4466:
4463:
4462:
4460:
4457:
4448:
4447:
4436:
4435:
4433:
4429:
4425:
4421:
4420:
4419:
4416:
4415:
4413:
4410:
4403:
4402:
4398:
4394:
4390:
4386:
4381:
4380:
4379:
4378:
4375:
4374:
4372:
4369:
4358:
4354:
4350:
4349:Ryan Martinie
4346:
4345:Greg Tribbett
4342:
4339:
4335:
4331:
4327:
4323:
4320:
4319:
4318:
4312:
4308:
4304:
4303:Ryan Martinie
4300:
4299:Greg Tribbett
4296:
4293:
4289:
4285:
4281:
4277:
4274:
4273:
4272:
4271:You changed:
4269:
4251:
4247:
4243:
4239:
4235:
4234:
4233:
4230:
4229:
4227:
4224:
4217:
4216:
4214:
4210:
4206:
4201:
4200:
4199:
4196:
4195:
4193:
4190:
4183:
4182:
4181:
4180:
4179:
4178:
4177:
4176:
4164:
4160:
4156:
4152:
4151:
4148:
4147:
4146:
4145:
4144:
4143:
4142:
4141:
4129:
4125:
4121:
4117:
4113:
4109:
4108:
4106:
4105:
4103:
4099:
4095:
4091:
4087:
4082:
4081:
4080:
4077:
4076:
4074:
4071:
4064:
4063:
4062:
4061:
4057:
4053:
4049:
4045:
4041:
4040:
4038:
4034:
4032:
4029:
4021:
4020:
4013:
4006:
4004:
3995:
3994:
3991:
3990:
3989:
3986:
3983:
3978:
3972:
3970:
3965:
3960:
3958:
3953:
3948:
3944:
3938:
3934:
3929:
3925:
3920:
3915:
3911:
3910:global blocks
3907:
3906:active blocks
3903:
3898:
3893:
3889:
3887:
3886:administrator
3872:
3867:
3863:
3861:
3854:
3853:
3851:
3850:
3843:
3836:
3834:
3825:
3824:
3819:
3813:
3808:
3801:
3799:
3794:
3789:
3787:
3782:
3777:
3773:
3767:
3763:
3758:
3754:
3749:
3744:
3740:
3739:global blocks
3736:
3735:active blocks
3732:
3727:
3722:
3718:
3716:
3715:administrator
3702:
3701:
3694:
3687:
3685:
3676:
3675:
3670:
3664:
3659:
3653:
3651:
3646:
3642:
3640:
3635:
3630:
3626:
3620:
3616:
3611:
3607:
3602:
3597:
3593:
3592:global blocks
3589:
3588:active blocks
3585:
3580:
3575:
3571:
3569:
3568:administrator
3555:
3554:
3547:
3540:
3538:
3529:
3528:
3525:
3524:
3523:
3520:
3517:
3512:
3506:
3504:
3499:
3495:
3493:
3488:
3483:
3479:
3473:
3469:
3464:
3460:
3455:
3450:
3446:
3445:global blocks
3442:
3441:active blocks
3438:
3433:
3428:
3424:
3422:
3421:administrator
3409:
3408:
3405:
3390:
3387:
3385:
3382:
3380:
3377:
3375:
3372:
3371:
3370:
3365:
3361:
3357:
3353:
3349:
3348:
3347:block evasion
3343:
3339:
3335:
3334:
3326:
3313:
3309:
3305:
3300:
3299:
3298:
3297:
3293:
3289:
3271:
3267:
3263:
3259:
3255:
3254:
3253:
3252:
3251:
3250:
3249:
3248:
3239:
3238:
3237:
3236:
3228:
3224:
3220:
3216:
3215:
3213:
3212:
3211:
3210:
3206:
3202:
3198:
3194:
3190:
3186:
3185:
3184:
3183:
3180:
3179:
3177:
3174:
3164:
3160:
3156:
3154:</ref: -->
3152:</ref: -->
3150:</ref: -->
3148:</ref: -->
3142:
3141:You changed:
3139:
3129:
3125:
3121:
3117:
3116:
3115:
3112:
3111:
3109:
3106:
3099:
3098:
3093:
3089:
3088:
3086:
3082:
3078:
3074:
3069:
3068:
3067:
3066:
3063:
3062:
3060:
3057:
3050:
3042:
3038:
3034:
3030:
3029:
3028:
3027:
3024:
3023:
3021:
3018:
3011:
3010:
3005:
3004:
2991:
2987:
2983:
2979:
2976:
2975:
2974:
2971:
2970:
2968:
2965:
2957:
2956:
2954:
2950:
2946:
2942:
2941:
2940:
2938:
2935:
2934:
2932:
2929:
2922:
2921:
2904:
2900:
2896:
2892:
2891:
2889:
2888:
2886:
2882:
2878:
2873:
2872:
2871:
2868:
2867:
2864:
2857:
2852:
2851:
2849:
2845:
2841:
2837:
2836:
2835:
2834:
2831:
2830:
2827:
2818:
2814:
2812:
2809:See the case
2799:
2795:
2791:
2786:
2785:
2777:
2773:
2769:
2765:
2764:
2763:
2760:
2759:
2756:
2749:
2748:
2746:
2742:
2738:
2734:
2733:
2732:
2731:
2728:
2726:
2713:
2712:
2710:
2705:
2704:
2702:
2701:
2700:
2692:
2691:
2688:
2687:
2684:
2677:
2664:
2661:
2660:
2657:
2650:
2645:
2641:
2640:
2639:
2638:
2637:
2636:
2635:
2634:
2623:
2622:
2620:
2616:
2612:
2608:
2607:
2606:
2603:
2602:
2599:
2592:
2591:
2589:
2585:
2581:
2577:
2576:
2575:
2574:
2571:
2570:
2567:
2560:
2545:
2541:
2537:
2533:
2529:
2525:
2524:
2523:
2520:
2519:
2516:
2509:
2506:
2505:
2503:
2499:
2495:
2491:
2487:
2486:
2484:
2480:
2477:
2476:
2475:
2465:
2462:
2461:
2458:
2451:
2447:
2446:
2444:
2440:
2436:
2431:
2427:
2426:
2424:
2420:
2416:
2413:
2408:
2404:
2400:
2396:
2395:
2394:
2391:
2386:
2382:
2378:
2374:
2373:
2372:
2369:
2368:
2367:
2356:
2352:
2348:
2344:
2343:You are wrong
2340:
2339:
2338:
2337:
2334:
2333:
2330:
2323:
2318:
2284:
2280:
2276:
2272:
2271:
2266:
2265:
2264:
2261:
2260:
2257:
2250:
2249:
2244:
2243:
2241:
2237:
2233:
2229:
2225:
2222:
2221:
2220:
2217:
2216:
2213:
2206:
2203:
2202:
2200:
2196:
2192:
2187:
2183:
2182:
2181:
2178:
2177:
2174:
2167:
2163:
2159:
2158:
2157:
2156:
2155:
2154:
2153:
2152:
2151:
2150:
2149:
2148:
2147:
2146:
2145:
2144:
2143:
2142:
2141:
2140:
2120:
2116:
2112:
2108:
2105:
2101:
2097:
2093:
2092:
2091:
2088:
2087:
2084:
2077:
2076:
2075:
2074:
2073:
2072:
2071:
2070:
2069:
2068:
2067:
2066:
2065:
2064:
2063:
2062:
2044:
2040:
2039:
2038:
2037:
2036:
2035:
2034:
2033:
2032:
2031:
2030:
2029:
2028:
2027:
2026:
2025:
2005:
2001:
1997:
1993:
1989:
1985:
1981:
1980:This revision
1977:
1976:
1973:
1972:
1971:
1970:
1969:
1968:
1967:
1966:
1965:
1964:
1963:
1962:
1961:
1960:
1959:
1958:
1941:
1940:
1937:
1936:
1933:
1925:
1924:
1923:
1922:
1921:
1920:
1919:
1918:
1917:
1916:
1915:
1914:
1913:
1912:
1911:
1910:
1891:
1890:
1888:
1884:
1880:
1876:
1872:
1868:
1867:
1866:
1863:
1862:
1859:
1852:
1848:
1847:
1846:
1845:
1844:
1843:
1842:
1841:
1840:
1839:
1838:
1837:
1823:
1822:
1821:
1820:
1819:
1818:
1817:
1816:
1815:
1814:
1813:
1812:
1799:
1798:
1795:
1794:
1791:
1783:
1782:
1781:
1780:
1779:
1778:
1777:
1776:
1775:
1774:
1773:
1772:
1756:
1752:
1748:
1744:
1743:
1742:
1739:
1738:
1735:
1728:
1727:
1726:
1725:
1724:
1723:
1722:
1721:
1720:
1719:
1718:
1717:
1701:
1697:
1693:
1689:
1688:
1686:
1682:
1681:
1680:
1679:
1678:
1677:
1676:
1675:
1674:
1673:
1672:
1671:
1655:
1651:
1647:
1643:
1638:
1637:
1634:
1630:
1626:
1622:
1621:
1619:
1615:
1611:
1607:
1603:
1599:
1595:
1594:
1593:
1590:
1589:
1586:
1579:
1575:
1571:
1570:
1568:
1564:
1560:
1556:
1552:
1549:
1548:
1547:
1544:
1543:
1540:
1533:
1529:
1525:
1524:
1523:
1522:
1518:
1514:
1510:
1505:
1504:
1502:
1501:
1494:
1487:
1485:
1476:
1475:
1471:
1467:
1461:
1459:
1454:
1452:
1449:I made three
1446:
1444:
1439:
1434:
1430:
1424:
1420:
1415:
1411:
1406:
1401:
1397:
1396:global blocks
1393:
1392:active blocks
1389:
1384:
1379:
1375:
1373:
1372:administrator
1357:
1353:
1349:
1344:
1343:
1342:
1338:
1334:
1331:is 24 hours.
1330:
1324:
1320:
1316:
1312:
1308:
1304:
1300:
1296:
1295:
1287:
1277:
1269:
1265:
1262:
1258:
1238:
1234:
1230:
1226:
1222:
1221:
1220:
1219:
1216:
1213:
1211:
1205:
1201:
1200:
1199:
1198:
1195:
1192:
1191:
1185:
1178:
1177:
1176:
1175:
1171:
1167:
1163:
1158:
1157:
1156:
1155:
1152:
1151:
1145:
1135:
1130:
1129:
1126:
1124:
1118:
1111:
1106:
1105:
1101:
1097:
1082:
1079:
1078:
1076:
1063:
1059:
1058:
1057:
1054:
1053:
1051:
1038:
1034:
1030:
1026:
1025:
1024:
1023:
1020:
1019:
1017:
1004:
999:
998:
995:
994:
992:
977:
971:
966:
965:
961:
955:
953:
945:
935:
933:
929:
925:
917:
913:
909:
899:
898:
893:
887:
886:
880:
879:
874:
871:
870:
865:
856:
854:
850:
846:
838:
837:
829:
823:
822:
818:
814:
810:
806:
796:
795:
792:
788:
780:
773:
769:
765:
760:
759:
755:
750:
746:
745:
744:
743:
739:
735:
724:
723:
719:
715:
711:
707:
702:
701:
693:
687:
686:
682:
678:
668:
665:
661:
657:
653:
652:Manofthehour1
649:
641:
638:
637:
633:
629:
609:
606:
604:
600:
596:
595:
594:Ed Fitzgerald
589:
588:
587:
586:
583:
581:
577:
573:
572:
571:Ed Fitzgerald
563:
556:
553:
551:
546:
544:
538:
537:
536:
535:
532:
530:
525:
523:
516:
506:
505:
501:
497:
492:
491:
483:
475:
472:
466:
465:
464:
463:
459:
455:
451:
439:
435:
429:
425:
418:
414:
413:
412:
411:
407:
403:
391:
387:
383:
379:
375:
373:
369:
364:
363:
362:
361:
357:
353:
349:
339:
337:
333:
329:
322:
317:
316:
308:
300:
297:
296:
291:
290:
285:
284:
283:
282:
279:
278:
273:
272:
267:
263:
256:Zappa support
251:
247:
243:
236:
230:
226:
222:
216:
212:
211:
210:
209:
205:
201:
197:
193:
188:
187:
183:
179:
173:
169:
160:
159:
155:
151:
146:
144:
139:
133:
123:
122:
118:
114:
103:
101:
99:
90:
86:
83:
76:
71:
62:
61:
57:
53:
49:
45:
40:
38:
32:
29:
28:
19:
9454:
9443:
9432:
9421:
9383:Rough Guides
9374:
9368:
9332:
9325:
9292:
9286:
9266:
9203:
9171:
9120:
9112:
9111:
9092:
9091:
9083:
9079:
9078:
9058:
9053:
9035:
9033:
9015:
9009:
9008:
9004:
8998:
8997:
8970:creation log
8937:
8925:
8856:
8853:sometimes...
8815:
8784:
8765:
8711:
8692:
8686:
8685:
8684:........You
8651:
8634:User:Kwember
8608:
8594:
8557:
8554:
8384:
8360:
8342:
8317:
8316:I've abused
8281:
8277:
8275:
8270:
8252:
8250:
8234:
8228:
8227:
8222:
8216:
8215:
8188:creation log
8155:
8143:
8087:
8067:
8059:
8051:
8027:
7957:
7953:
7949:
7946:
7942:
7934:
7910:
7853:
7839:
7813:
7795:
7751:
7716:
7696:
7688:
7670:
7668:
7649:
7643:
7642:
7636:
7633:
7627:
7626:
7599:creation log
7566:
7554:
7524:
7506:
7504:
7486:
7480:
7479:
7473:
7469:
7465:
7408:
7400:
7393:
7387:
7386:
7359:creation log
7326:
7314:
7287:
7286:
7282:
7278:
7271:
7253:
7251:
7233:
7227:
7226:
7220:
7216:
7172:
7166:
7165:
7138:creation log
7105:
7093:
7071:
7068:
7041:
7036:
7034:
7015:
6996:
6993:
6987:
6981:
6940:
6905:
6901:
6897:
6867:
6848:
6845:
6839:
6833:
6798:
6796:
6782:Sixth revert
6771:edit warring
6770:
6767:Fifth revert
6745:Third revert
6724:First revert
6702:
6683:
6681:
6675:
6669:
6663:
6659:
6652:
6642:
6637:
6599:
6597:
6586:Third revert
6575:First revert
6550:
6515:
6501:
6488:
6487:
6469:
6443:
6425:
6421:
6417:
6398:
6365:
6361:
6356:
6355:
6351:
6331:
6327:
6325:
6320:
6302:
6300:
6287:
6281:
6275:
6274:
6269:
6263:
6262:
6235:creation log
6202:
6190:
6161:
6156:
6155:
6150:
6149:
6083:
6079:
6055:
6038:
5907:
5877:
5840:
5839:
5806:
5736:
5732:
5728:
5658:Arbiitration
5650:
5605:
5601:
5567:
5562:
5561:
5525:
5523:
5487:
5452:
5450:
5446:65.2.201.118
5436:
5425:
5407:
5403:
5382:
5378:
5376:
5375:
5369:
5366:
5365:
5342:
5338:
5333:
5332:
5322:
5300:
5285:
5281:
5241:
5237:
5235:
5231:
5227:
5211:
5206:
5198:
5183:
5178:
5175:
5170:
5167:
5163:
5147:
5099:
5090:
5073:the accusers
5072:
5052:
5046:
5017:
4999:
4979:
4977:
4959:
4941:
4939:
4898:
4864:
4829:
4809:
4807:
4792:
4752:
4698:
4694:
4676:
4648:
4644:
4637:
4614:
4610:
4583:
4580:
4558:
4540:
4498:
4475:
4471:
4452:
4449:
4444:
4405:
4384:
4364:
4362:
4357:Epic Records
4351:and drummer
4343:, guitarist
4321:
4316:
4311:Epic Records
4305:and drummer
4297:, guitarist
4275:
4270:
4267:
4219:
4185:
4115:
4110:Except that
4089:
4085:
4066:
4043:
4036:
4023:
4018:
4000:
3998:
3982:
3981:
3974:
3968:
3967:
3962:
3956:
3955:
3928:creation log
3895:
3883:
3859:
3848:
3830:
3828:
3803:
3797:
3796:
3791:
3785:
3784:
3757:creation log
3724:
3712:
3699:
3681:
3679:
3655:
3649:
3648:
3644:
3638:
3637:
3610:creation log
3577:
3565:
3552:
3534:
3532:
3516:
3515:
3508:
3502:
3501:
3497:
3491:
3490:
3463:creation log
3430:
3418:
3393:
3368:
3359:
3345:
3337:
3331:
3284:
3245:
3192:
3188:
3169:
3166:
3162:
3158:
3144:
3140:
3137:
3101:
3096:
3095:
3091:
3072:
3052:
3046:
3013:
3008:
3007:
3003:never before
3002:
3001:
2999:
2977:
2960:
2924:
2919:
2918:
2916:
2859:
2855:
2822:
2819:
2815:
2808:
2805:Sockpuppetry
2751:
2719:
2698:
2679:
2675:
2673:
2652:
2648:
2643:
2594:
2562:
2555:
2531:
2527:
2511:
2507:
2492:vandalism. (
2489:
2472:
2453:
2450:unacceptable
2449:
2429:
2418:
2397:See above. (
2365:
2342:
2325:
2321:
2319:
2316:
2267:
2252:
2245:
2227:
2223:
2208:
2204:
2185:
2169:
2161:
2079:
2042:
1987:
1983:
1928:
1926:
1854:
1850:
1786:
1784:
1730:
1632:
1624:
1581:
1573:
1554:
1535:
1499:
1481:
1479:
1463:
1457:
1456:
1450:
1448:
1442:
1441:
1414:creation log
1381:
1369:
1322:
1292:
1224:
1186:
1146:
1139:
1116:
1114:
1092:
1065:
1040:
1036:
1006:
1003:edit warring
1000:
981:
978:
974:
949:
941:
916:coordinators
905:
883:
876:
867:
863:
862:
834:
832:
802:
784:
764:Sillyfolkboy
730:
698:
696:
674:
642:
639:
617:
592:
591:
569:
568:
566:
549:
542:
528:
521:
512:
488:
486:
447:
427:
399:
386:
378:being polite
368:
356:
350:, regarding
345:
313:
311:
293:
287:
275:
269:
265:
259:
224:
221:your comment
191:
189:
174:
170:
166:
148:
135:
131:
110:
107:recent edits
95:
81:
80:
69:
41:
33:
30:
26:
25:
9251:Ibaranoff24
9222:Ibaranoff24
9190:Ibaranoff24
9139:Ibaranoff24
8892:don't panic
8838:Ibaranoff24
8792:Ibaranoff24
8716:Ibaranoff24
8671:Ibaranoff24
8565:Ibaranoff24
8531:Ibaranoff24
8498:Ibaranoff24
8479:Ibaranoff24
8471:take a look
8437:Ibaranoff24
8402:Ibaranoff24
8322:Ibaranoff24
8092:Ibaranoff24
7977:Ibaranoff24
7921:Ibaranoff24
7890:Ibaranoff24
7770:Ibaranoff24
7736:Ibaranoff24
7702:Ibaranoff24
7533:Ibaranoff24
7293:Ibaranoff24
7035:Also, I am
7021:Ibaranoff24
6959:Ibaranoff24
6925:Ibaranoff24
6872:Ibaranoff24
6819:Ibaranoff24
6707:Ibaranoff24
6703:two reverts
6623:Ibaranoff24
6555:Ibaranoff24
6468:reverted?—
6448:Ibaranoff24
6403:Ibaranoff24
6370:Ibaranoff24
6134:Ibaranoff24
6102:Ibaranoff24
6061:Ibaranoff24
6017:Ibaranoff24
5988:Ibaranoff24
5957:Ibaranoff24
5925:Ibaranoff24
5882:Ibaranoff24
5847:Ibaranoff24
5811:Ibaranoff24
5755:Ibaranoff24
5706:Ibaranoff24
5624:Ibaranoff24
5587:Ibaranoff24
5546:Ibaranoff24
5506:Ibaranoff24
5473:Ibaranoff24
5412:Ibaranoff24
5352:Ibaranoff24
5305:Ibaranoff24
5267:Ibaranoff24
5215:Ibaranoff24
5151:Ibaranoff24
5119:Ibaranoff24
5077:Ibaranoff24
5043:Sockpuppets
5026:Ibaranoff24
4984:Ibaranoff24
4964:Ibaranoff24
4918:Ibaranoff24
4883:Ibaranoff24
4849:Ibaranoff24
4795:Ibaranoff24
4771:Ibaranoff24
4722:Ibaranoff24
4703:Ibaranoff24
4653:Ibaranoff24
4619:Ibaranoff24
4611:THE VANDALS
4563:Ibaranoff24
4518:Ibaranoff24
4480:Ibaranoff24
4424:Ibaranoff24
4389:Ibaranoff24
4338:lead singer
4292:lead singer
4242:Ibaranoff24
4205:Ibaranoff24
4155:Ibaranoff24
4120:Ibaranoff24
4094:Ibaranoff24
4048:Ibaranoff24
3860:Luna Santin
3304:Ibaranoff24
3262:Ibaranoff24
3219:Ibaranoff24
3197:Ibaranoff24
3120:Ibaranoff24
3077:Ibaranoff24
3033:Ibaranoff24
2982:Ibaranoff24
2945:Ibaranoff24
2895:Ibaranoff24
2877:Ibaranoff24
2840:Ibaranoff24
2790:Ibaranoff24
2768:Ibaranoff24
2737:Ibaranoff24
2676:significant
2611:Ibaranoff24
2580:Ibaranoff24
2536:Ibaranoff24
2494:Ibaranoff24
2452:behavior.—
2435:Ibaranoff24
2399:Ibaranoff24
2377:Ibaranoff24
2347:Ibaranoff24
2275:Ibaranoff24
2232:Ibaranoff24
2191:Ibaranoff24
2111:Ibaranoff24
2096:Ibaranoff24
1996:Ibaranoff24
1879:Ibaranoff24
1747:Ibaranoff24
1692:Ibaranoff24
1646:Ibaranoff24
1610:Ibaranoff24
1559:Ibaranoff24
1509:Ibaranoff24
1229:Ibaranoff24
1162:Ibaranoff24
1096:WesleyDodds
1062:WP:EDIT_WAR
873:Participant
754:Peer review
714:Nehrams2020
646:—Preceding
496:Nehrams2020
262:Frank Zappa
98:subst:Smile
85:Josh Atkins
52:Ibaranoff24
9385:. p. 244.
9322:Re: Plan 9
9025:Od Mishehu
8966:filter log
8939:Sugar Bear
8900:Kingturtle
8876:wikiquette
8860:Kingturtle
8819:Landon1980
8771:Landon1980
8752:Landon1980
8581:Dayewalker
8516:Dayewalker
8453:Landon1980
8420:Landon1980
8184:filter log
8157:Sugar Bear
8121:Dayewalker
8070:}} below.
8010:Landon1980
7992:either way
7961:Dayewalker
7818:Landon1980
7801:Landon1980
7595:filter log
7568:Sugar Bear
7474:four years
7355:filter log
7328:Sugar Bear
7134:filter log
7107:Sugar Bear
7074:Dayewalker
6665:WP:EDITWAR
6649:WP:EDITWAR
6420:and being
6288:Sandstein
6231:filter log
6204:Sugar Bear
6120:Landon1980
6086:Dayewalker
6041:Landon1980
6003:Landon1980
5973:Landon1980
5943:Landon1980
5910:Landon1980
5863:Landon1980
5826:Landon1980
5785:Dayewalker
5739:Dayewalker
5262:References
5202:Landon1980
4697:to remove
4607:PopMatters
4347:, bassist
4301:, bassist
3924:filter log
3897:Sugar Bear
3753:filter log
3726:Sugar Bear
3606:filter log
3579:Sugar Bear
3459:filter log
3432:Sugar Bear
3319:Re-blocked
2479:where here
1410:filter log
1383:Sugar Bear
1325:}} below.
1261:January 15
1225:harassment
1033:WP:HTRIVIA
970:Kool Keith
951:LYKANTROP
938:Thank you!
454:Landon1980
402:Prophaniti
396:Incivility
266:Freak Out!
242:Coppertwig
235:Prophaniti
200:Prophaniti
178:Prophaniti
113:Prophaniti
9411:ignored (
9400:cite book
9297:consensus
9283:Good luck
9270:Gwen Gale
9241:Trusilver
9207:Gwen Gale
9175:Gwen Gale
9096:Gwen Gale
9082:has been
9036:read the
9022:עוד מישהו
8985:checkuser
8944:block log
8357:Checkuser
8304:Gwen Gale
8286:Gwen Gale
8253:read the
8203:checkuser
8162:block log
8072:Gwen Gale
8031:Gwen Gale
7671:read the
7614:checkuser
7573:block log
7507:read the
7466:consensus
7462:rap metal
7374:checkuser
7333:block log
7254:read the
7217:consensus
7213:rap metal
7153:checkuser
7112:block log
6939:answer.—
6444:nominated
6422:nominated
6303:read the
6250:checkuser
6209:block log
5442:this edit
5431:this edit
5404:extension
5370:rv idiocy
5339:right now
5238:someone's
5236:They are
4693:I didn't
4341:Chad Gray
4295:Chad Gray
4001:read the
3943:checkuser
3902:block log
3831:read the
3772:checkuser
3731:block log
3682:read the
3625:checkuser
3584:block log
3535:read the
3478:checkuser
3437:block log
3288:Tim010987
2419:rv idiocy
2228:UNSOURCED
2041:Thirdly,
1984:UNSOURCED
1606:this edit
1602:this edit
1574:attacking
1482:read the
1429:checkuser
1388:block log
196:user page
143:vote here
9308:HEFFIELD
8956:contribs
8880:civility
8381:Question
8174:contribs
7585:contribs
7345:contribs
7124:contribs
7037:accusing
7014:No, you
6221:contribs
5807:relaxing
5773:attacks.
5692:23skidoo
5678:23skidoo
5662:23skidoo
5602:unstable
5331:, it is
5329:WP:CIVIL
5024:means? (
4334:Illinois
4322:Mudvayne
4288:Illinois
4280:nu metal
4276:Mudvayne
3914:contribs
3743:contribs
3596:contribs
3449:contribs
3398:HEFFIELD
3338:24 hours
2651:users.—
2649:separate
1849:You had
1578:attacked
1451:separate
1400:contribs
1315:edit war
1309:or seek
1268:Mudvayne
1259:made on
924:BrownBot
845:BrownBot
791:sgeureka
706:Wildroot
671:Copyedit
660:contribs
648:unsigned
470:Tiptoety
450:a thread
328:BrownBot
89:WikiLove
9409:|month=
9084:granted
9062:unblock
9047:unblock
8979:unblock
8387:Raul654
8368:Raul654
8318:NOTHING
8264:unblock
8197:unblock
7682:unblock
7608:unblock
7518:unblock
7368:unblock
7265:unblock
7147:unblock
6314:unblock
6244:unblock
5345:, etc.
5022:WP:NPOV
4615:GIVE UP
4012:unblock
3937:unblock
3842:unblock
3766:unblock
3693:unblock
3619:unblock
3546:unblock
3472:unblock
3366:first.
3333:blocked
2920:nowhere
2430:removed
1629:WP:TALK
1596:On the
1555:exactly
1493:unblock
1423:unblock
1294:blocked
1136:, again
885:hornoir
734:Scapler
289:HJensen
271:HJensen
215:WP:3RRN
46:. (See
9159:Travis
9126:Travis
8834:Hed PE
8748:WP:3RR
8400:Yes. (
8346:Travis
8278:loathe
8239:Travis
8110:worse.
7912:denied
7458:Hed PE
7425:Hed PE
7415:. ****
7403:. ****
7209:Hed PE
7176:Hed PE
7060:(UTC))
6886:above.
6677:edits.
6654:WP:3RR
6645:WP:3RR
5444:by IP
5325:WP:NPA
4695:intend
4557:I did
4330:Peoria
4284:Peoria
4238:Hed PE
3977:WP:GAB
3258:Hed PE
3189:remove
3092:admins
2724:Travis
2559:WP:NPA
2483:WP:NPA
2423:WP:NPA
1685:WP:NPA
1625:by you
1580:you.—
1528:WP:NPA
1209:Travis
1122:Travis
1089:Hed PE
807:album
628:Paul A
622:, not
417:WP:WQA
352:Hed PE
342:MedCab
323:again!
9293:after
9040:first
8699:dαlus
8687:still
8658:dαlus
8615:dαlus
8282:tenth
8257:first
8088:TWICE
7758:dαlus
7723:dαlus
7675:first
7511:first
7283:TWICE
7258:first
7065:Again
7048:dαlus
7003:dαlus
6947:dαlus
6912:dαlus
6855:dαlus
6805:dαlus
6690:dαlus
6606:dαlus
6476:dαlus
6432:dαlus
6418:asked
6338:dαlus
6307:first
6168:dαlus
5878:twice
5647:Reply
5612:dαlus
5574:dαlus
5532:dαlus
5494:dαlus
5459:dαlus
5389:dαlus
5334:never
5248:dαlus
5106:dαlus
5059:dαlus
5006:dαlus
4948:dαlus
4905:dαlus
4871:dαlus
4836:dαlus
4816:dαlus
4759:dαlus
4683:dαlus
4590:dαlus
4547:dαlus
4505:dαlus
4459:dαlus
4412:dαlus
4371:dαlus
4226:dαlus
4192:dαlus
4090:moved
4086:added
4073:dαlus
4005:first
3835:first
3807:EVula
3686:first
3658:EVula
3539:first
3176:dαlus
3108:dαlus
3059:dαlus
3020:dαlus
2967:dαlus
2931:dαlus
2866:dαlus
2829:dαlus
2758:dαlus
2686:dαlus
2659:dαlus
2644:still
2642:I am
2601:dαlus
2569:dαlus
2518:dαlus
2460:dαlus
2332:dαlus
2259:dαlus
2215:dαlus
2205:Wrong
2176:dαlus
2086:dαlus
1935:dαlus
1861:dαlus
1793:dαlus
1737:dαlus
1588:dαlus
1542:dαlus
1486:first
1329:block
1189:Cobra
1183:Glass
1149:Cobra
1143:Glass
813:DanTD
163:Edits
66:Sorry
16:<
9413:help
9387:ISBN
9356:talk
9312:TEEL
9274:talk
9255:talk
9226:talk
9211:talk
9194:talk
9179:talk
9143:talk
9100:talk
8904:talk
8890:and
8864:talk
8842:talk
8823:talk
8796:talk
8788:Muze
8785:from
8775:talk
8766:very
8756:talk
8720:talk
8675:talk
8585:talk
8569:talk
8535:talk
8520:talk
8502:talk
8483:talk
8467:Muze
8457:talk
8441:talk
8433:Muze
8424:talk
8406:talk
8391:talk
8372:talk
8326:talk
8308:talk
8299:See
8290:talk
8276:I'm
8125:talk
8096:talk
8076:talk
8058:for
8035:talk
8014:talk
7996:talk
7981:talk
7965:talk
7925:talk
7917:here
7894:talk
7858:Muze
7822:talk
7805:talk
7774:talk
7740:talk
7706:talk
7697:NEED
7637:have
7537:talk
7413:Muze
7395:****
7297:talk
7078:talk
7025:talk
7016:were
6982:The
6963:talk
6929:talk
6876:talk
6834:The
6823:talk
6711:talk
6627:talk
6559:talk
6520:Muze
6452:talk
6407:talk
6374:talk
6138:talk
6124:talk
6106:talk
6090:talk
6065:talk
6045:talk
6021:talk
6007:talk
5992:talk
5977:talk
5961:talk
5947:talk
5929:talk
5914:talk
5886:talk
5867:talk
5851:talk
5830:talk
5815:talk
5789:talk
5759:talk
5743:talk
5710:talk
5696:talk
5682:talk
5666:talk
5628:talk
5591:talk
5550:talk
5510:talk
5477:talk
5437:and
5416:talk
5356:talk
5327:and
5309:talk
5271:talk
5219:talk
5155:talk
5123:talk
5081:talk
5049:here
5030:talk
4988:talk
4968:talk
4922:talk
4887:talk
4853:talk
4799:talk
4775:talk
4726:talk
4707:talk
4657:talk
4623:talk
4603:Muze
4567:talk
4522:talk
4484:talk
4428:talk
4393:talk
4326:rock
4317:To:
4246:talk
4209:talk
4159:talk
4124:talk
4112:Muze
4098:talk
4088:and
4052:talk
3987:fold
3984:Hers
3866:talk
3812:talk
3663:talk
3521:fold
3518:Hers
3402:TEEL
3344:for
3308:talk
3292:talk
3266:talk
3223:talk
3201:talk
3159:To:
3124:talk
3081:talk
3037:talk
2986:talk
2949:talk
2899:talk
2881:talk
2844:talk
2811:here
2794:talk
2772:talk
2741:talk
2615:talk
2584:talk
2540:talk
2532:fact
2498:talk
2439:talk
2415:here
2403:talk
2393:here
2381:talk
2371:here
2366:Or
2351:talk
2320:You
2279:talk
2270:here
2248:here
2236:talk
2195:talk
2115:talk
2100:talk
2000:talk
1992:Muze
1986:and
1893:one.
1883:talk
1875:here
1873:and
1871:here
1751:talk
1696:talk
1650:talk
1642:Muze
1633:were
1614:talk
1563:talk
1551:Here
1532:diff
1513:talk
1470:talk
1352:talk
1337:talk
1275:edit
1264:2009
1233:talk
1227:". (
1166:talk
1117:will
1100:talk
1029:WP:N
928:talk
892:talk
878:here
849:talk
840:you.
833:The
817:talk
768:talk
738:talk
718:talk
710:Erik
708:and
697:The
681:talk
656:talk
632:talk
543:Will
522:Will
500:talk
487:The
458:talk
406:talk
380:and
348:here
332:talk
312:The
295:talk
277:talk
246:talk
204:talk
182:talk
154:talk
117:talk
56:talk
9345:Re
9121:one
8989:log
8936:).
8714:. (
8284:).
8207:log
8154:).
7919:. (
7796:not
7653:fvw
7618:log
7565:).
7489:fvw
7378:log
7325:).
7236:fvw
7223:).
7157:log
7104:).
6619:3RR
6553:! (
6489:not
6366:not
6254:log
6201:).
6056:you
5809:. (
5566:.—
5381:.—
4980:NOT
4559:NOT
4116:NOT
4114:is
4033:}}
3947:log
3894:).
3814://
3810://
3776:log
3723:).
3665://
3661://
3629:log
3576:).
3482:log
3429:).
3193:not
2508:You
2273:. (
2251:.—
2168:.—
2162:not
2160:Do
1994:. (
1877:. (
1851:one
1433:log
1380:).
1266:to
1206:. —
781:GAN
626:. —
509:ICP
444:FYI
428:BMW
423:-t
219:re
9404::
9402:}}
9398:{{
9381::
9377:.
9358:)
9276:)
9257:)
9228:)
9213:)
9196:)
9181:)
9145:)
9102:)
9060:{{
9050:}}
9044:{{
9020:?
9012::
9001::
8983:•
8977:•
8973:•
8968:•
8964:•
8959:•
8954:•
8950:•
8946:•
8906:)
8886:,
8882:,
8878:,
8866:)
8844:)
8825:)
8798:)
8777:)
8758:)
8722:)
8695:Dæ
8681:)
8677:)
8654:Dæ
8611:Dæ
8587:)
8575:)
8571:)
8537:)
8522:)
8504:)
8489:)
8485:)
8459:)
8447:)
8443:)
8426:)
8408:)
8393:)
8374:)
8328:)
8310:)
8292:)
8267:}}
8261:{{
8231::
8219::
8201:•
8195:•
8191:•
8186:•
8182:•
8177:•
8172:•
8168:•
8164:•
8127:)
8098:)
8078:)
8037:)
8016:)
7998:)
7987:)
7983:)
7967:)
7927:)
7896:)
7824:)
7816:.
7807:)
7776:)
7754:Dæ
7746:)
7742:)
7719:Dæ
7712:)
7708:)
7695:I
7685:}}
7679:{{
7651:--
7646::
7639:.
7630::
7612:•
7606:•
7602:•
7597:•
7593:•
7588:•
7583:•
7579:•
7575:•
7539:)
7521:}}
7515:{{
7483::
7390::
7372:•
7366:•
7362:•
7357:•
7353:•
7348:•
7343:•
7339:•
7335:•
7299:)
7268:}}
7262:{{
7230::
7169::
7151:•
7145:•
7141:•
7136:•
7132:•
7127:•
7122:•
7118:•
7114:•
7080:)
7044:Dæ
7027:)
6999:Dæ
6965:)
6943:Dæ
6935:)
6931:)
6908:Dæ
6904:—
6882:)
6878:)
6851:Dæ
6825:)
6801:Dæ
6717:)
6713:)
6686:Dæ
6656:]
6629:)
6602:Dæ
6561:)
6472:Dæ
6454:)
6428:Dæ
6413:)
6409:)
6380:)
6376:)
6357:me
6352:do
6334:Dæ
6317:}}
6311:{{
6278::
6266::
6248:•
6242:•
6238:•
6233:•
6229:•
6224:•
6219:•
6215:•
6211:•
6164:Dæ
6154:,
6144:)
6140:)
6126:)
6108:)
6092:)
6067:)
6047:)
6023:)
6009:)
5994:)
5979:)
5967:)
5963:)
5949:)
5931:)
5916:)
5888:)
5869:)
5857:)
5853:)
5841:am
5838:I
5832:)
5821:)
5817:)
5791:)
5761:)
5745:)
5712:)
5698:)
5684:)
5668:)
5630:)
5608:Dæ
5597:)
5593:)
5570:Dæ
5556:)
5552:)
5528:Dæ
5512:)
5490:Dæ
5483:)
5479:)
5455:Dæ
5418:)
5385:Dæ
5358:)
5311:)
5277:)
5273:)
5244:Dæ
5225:)
5221:)
5204::
5161:)
5157:)
5129:)
5125:)
5102:Dæ
5083:)
5055:Dæ
5032:)
5002:Dæ
4994:)
4990:)
4970:)
4944:Dæ
4924:)
4901:Dæ
4893:)
4889:)
4867:Dæ
4859:)
4855:)
4832:Dæ
4812:Dæ
4805:)
4801:)
4777:)
4755:Dæ
4728:)
4713:)
4709:)
4679:Dæ
4659:)
4625:)
4586:Dæ
4569:)
4543:Dæ
4524:)
4501:Dæ
4486:)
4455:Dæ
4434:)
4430:)
4408:Dæ
4395:)
4367:Dæ
4332:,
4286:,
4248:)
4222:Dæ
4215:)
4211:)
4188:Dæ
4161:)
4126:)
4104:)
4100:)
4069:Dæ
4054:)
4015:}}
4009:{{
3971::
3959::
3941:•
3935:•
3931:•
3926:•
3922:•
3917:•
3912:•
3908:•
3904:•
3845:}}
3839:{{
3820://
3800::
3788::
3770:•
3764:•
3760:•
3755:•
3751:•
3746:•
3741:•
3737:•
3733:•
3696:}}
3690:{{
3671://
3652::
3641::
3623:•
3617:•
3613:•
3608:•
3604:•
3599:•
3594:•
3590:•
3586:•
3549:}}
3543:{{
3505::
3494::
3476:•
3470:•
3466:•
3461:•
3457:•
3452:•
3447:•
3443:•
3439:•
3310:)
3294:)
3268:)
3225:)
3203:)
3172:Dæ
3126:)
3104:Dæ
3087:)
3083:)
3055:Dæ
3039:)
3016:Dæ
2988:)
2963:Dæ
2955:)
2951:)
2939:\
2927:Dæ
2901:)
2887:)
2883:)
2862:Dæ
2850:)
2846:)
2825:Dæ
2796:)
2774:)
2754:Dæ
2747:)
2743:)
2682:Dæ
2655:Dæ
2621:)
2617:)
2597:Dæ
2590:)
2586:)
2565:Dæ
2542:)
2514:Dæ
2504:)
2500:)
2490:IS
2485:.
2456:Dæ
2445:)
2441:)
2425:.
2405:)
2383:)
2353:)
2328:Dæ
2281:)
2255:Dæ
2242:)
2238:)
2211:Dæ
2201:)
2197:)
2172:Dæ
2117:)
2102:)
2082:Dæ
2002:)
1931:Dæ
1889:)
1885:)
1857:Dæ
1789:Dæ
1753:)
1733:Dæ
1698:)
1652:)
1620:)
1616:)
1584:Dæ
1569:)
1565:)
1538:Dæ
1515:)
1496:}}
1490:{{
1472:)
1460::
1445::
1427:•
1421:•
1417:•
1412:•
1408:•
1403:•
1398:•
1394:•
1390:•
1354:)
1339:)
1235:)
1168:)
1102:)
1071:am
1068:At
1046:am
1043:At
1012:am
1009:At
987:am
984:At
959:✉
930:)
851:)
819:)
770:)
740:)
720:)
683:)
662:)
658:•
634:)
601:/
578:/
502:)
460:)
433:c-
408:)
384:.
334:)
292:,
274:,
248:)
206:)
184:)
156:)
119:)
58:)
9415:)
9394:.
9354:(
9310:S
9306:S
9272:(
9261:)
9253:(
9232:)
9224:(
9209:(
9200:)
9192:(
9177:(
9149:)
9141:(
9098:(
8993:)
8991:)
8987:(
8942:(
8902:(
8862:(
8848:)
8840:(
8821:(
8802:)
8794:(
8773:(
8754:(
8726:)
8718:(
8673:(
8583:(
8567:(
8541:)
8533:(
8518:(
8508:)
8500:(
8481:(
8455:(
8439:(
8422:(
8412:)
8404:(
8389:(
8370:(
8332:)
8324:(
8306:(
8288:(
8211:)
8209:)
8205:(
8160:(
8123:(
8102:)
8094:(
8074:(
8033:(
8012:(
7994:(
7979:(
7975:(
7963:(
7931:)
7923:(
7900:)
7892:(
7860:.
7842:.
7820:(
7803:(
7780:)
7772:(
7738:(
7734:(
7704:(
7658:*
7622:)
7620:)
7616:(
7571:(
7543:)
7535:(
7494:*
7382:)
7380:)
7376:(
7331:(
7303:)
7295:(
7288:I
7241:*
7161:)
7159:)
7155:(
7110:(
7076:(
7031:)
7023:(
6969:)
6961:(
6927:(
6874:(
6829:)
6821:(
6817:(
6709:(
6633:)
6625:(
6565:)
6557:(
6522:.
6504:.
6458:)
6450:(
6405:(
6372:(
6258:)
6256:)
6252:(
6207:(
6136:(
6122:(
6112:)
6104:(
6088:(
6071:)
6063:(
6059:(
6043:(
6027:)
6019:(
6005:(
5998:)
5990:(
5986:(
5975:(
5959:(
5945:(
5935:)
5927:(
5912:(
5892:)
5884:(
5865:(
5849:(
5828:(
5813:(
5787:(
5765:)
5757:(
5741:(
5716:)
5708:(
5694:(
5680:(
5664:(
5634:)
5626:(
5589:(
5585:(
5548:(
5544:(
5516:)
5508:(
5475:(
5422:)
5414:(
5362:)
5354:(
5315:)
5307:(
5269:(
5217:(
5213:(
5153:(
5121:(
5087:)
5079:(
5036:)
5028:(
4986:(
4974:)
4966:(
4928:)
4920:(
4916:(
4885:(
4851:(
4847:(
4797:(
4781:)
4773:(
4732:)
4724:(
4705:(
4663:)
4655:(
4629:)
4621:(
4573:)
4565:(
4528:)
4520:(
4490:)
4482:(
4426:(
4399:)
4391:(
4252:)
4244:(
4207:(
4203:(
4165:)
4157:(
4130:)
4122:(
4096:(
4058:)
4050:(
4027:w
3951:)
3949:)
3945:(
3900:(
3868:)
3864:(
3817:☯
3780:)
3778:)
3774:(
3729:(
3668:☯
3633:)
3631:)
3627:(
3582:(
3486:)
3484:)
3480:(
3435:(
3400:S
3396:S
3314:)
3306:(
3290:(
3272:)
3264:(
3229:)
3221:(
3207:)
3199:(
3130:)
3122:(
3079:(
3043:)
3035:(
2992:)
2984:(
2947:(
2905:)
2897:(
2879:(
2842:(
2800:)
2792:(
2778:)
2770:(
2739:(
2613:(
2582:(
2546:)
2538:(
2496:(
2437:(
2433:(
2409:)
2401:(
2387:)
2379:(
2357:)
2349:(
2285:)
2277:(
2234:(
2193:(
2121:)
2113:(
2106:)
2098:(
2045:.
2006:)
1998:(
1881:(
1757:)
1749:(
1702:)
1694:(
1656:)
1648:(
1612:(
1561:(
1519:)
1511:(
1468:(
1437:)
1435:)
1431:(
1386:(
1350:(
1335:(
1279:]
1239:)
1231:(
1172:)
1164:(
1160:(
1098:(
1074:a
1049:a
1015:a
990:a
926:(
894:)
890:(
847:(
815:(
766:(
736:(
716:(
679:(
654:(
630:(
603:c
599:t
580:c
576:t
550:C
529:C
498:(
456:(
404:(
330:(
244:(
239:☺
231:.
202:(
180:(
152:(
115:(
54:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
