212:
The article that you declined because of not "adequately supported by reliable sources" is perfectly reliable, I think there's a mistake because the source
Discogs is, let's say, "the wikipedia for music", I linked to Discogs because is the most trusted source on the net. I don't understand why you
66:
I do not believe my page needs adequate sources, as it is a system of beliefs, and thus, can not be proven or disproven. I myself, created this system of beliefs, and thus their are no sources to reference, other than the
Religion's facebook page. This is a well thought out, scientific, system of
267:
Thanks you for the clarification. Actually the only reason I thought of adding this article was because I saw an article published by a competitive company so thought it was OK. I even used it as a template, changing the relevant details and adding more general info. I can only guess they were
194:
Please tell me how to correct this. I am the publicist for Lael A. Alexander and his companies-I am the author of his websites so the content that I have posted here is by my own hand. I write all of the content for online and print use. I am simply trying to post it here as well. He is the
67:
beliefs, that is intelligent in its design, and explains many things about the nature of existence. As such, I believe that its
Knowledge Article should be verified for creation, as other people have the right to know about this Religion.
155:
Thanks so much for helping me refine the Vodans page for inclusion on
Knowledge. I have added an additional reference supporting the release date. Is there anything else you can suggest before I resubmit it for review? Thanks in advance.
246:
213:
declined my submission. Please let me know what I have to do. There are plenty of sources on the net that prove that this album in question exist and it is fully supported for many labels around the world.
251:
This is an app I developed so I am the 'reliable source' for info about the app itself. Regarding other sections, can you please tell me which do not have sufficient reliable sources? thanks, Galit
133:
If what you say is true, then every
Knowledge page about every Religion should be deleted, as no Religion is based upon verifiable information, as it cannot be proven or disproven.
259:
Hey, I want to know why you are not checking my article since 3 to 4 days........Is there any reason, then please tell me....I am waiting for your reply. Thanks.
195:
inventor of a new frequency 802.11L and I have to have all of these things in order as the work goes to market. You can reach me at the office at 713-952-9034.
268:
published because they hired someone who knows how to do it while I tried to do it by myself. So naive of me. And I thought Wiki was different. Thanks, Galit
276:
125:
You declined my page a few days ago, I made major edits based upon your suggestions. I resubmitted it, can you please review again and possibly approve?
288:
105:
227:
175:
262:
179:
142:
87:
239:
117:
50:
83:
284:
54:
171:
204:
113:
128:
235:
167:
61:
46:
247:
The article Call
Recorder - IntCall was declined for 'not adequately supported by reliable sources'
138:
79:
280:
147:
272:
223:
163:
101:
71:
42:
38:
17:
8:
134:
75:
34:
i have mentioned few outside parties as reference, hope i have done it in proper way.
109:
231:
186:
254:
26:
14:
23:
263:Call Recorder - intCall submission
24:
301:
198:Thank you so much, Nicole Murray
13:
1:
289:20:24, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
240:10:12, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
180:15:33, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
143:22:34, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
118:22:27, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
88:14:29, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
55:13:22, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
7:
10:
306:
205:Waves in the Sky Above
168:Christopher.widdowson
219:Suzanne Caseneuve.
18:User talk:Snowysusan
129:Re: Cosmic Biology
122:Hello Snowysusan,
62:Re: Cosmic Biology
292:
275:comment added by
243:
226:comment added by
187:Lael A. Alexander
183:
166:comment added by
121:
104:comment added by
91:
74:comment added by
58:
41:comment added by
297:
291:
269:
242:
220:
182:
160:
159:Cheers, Chris.
120:
98:
90:
68:
57:
35:
305:
304:
300:
299:
298:
296:
295:
294:
270:
265:
257:
255:Delay in review
249:
221:
207:
189:
161:
150:
131:
99:
69:
64:
43:Vikassharma2512
36:
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
303:
264:
261:
256:
253:
248:
245:
206:
203:
201:
188:
185:
149:
146:
130:
127:
94:
63:
60:
28:
25:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
302:
293:
290:
286:
282:
278:
274:
260:
252:
244:
241:
237:
233:
229:
225:
217:
214:
210:
202:
199:
196:
192:
184:
181:
177:
173:
169:
165:
157:
153:
148:Vodans review
145:
144:
140:
136:
135:Overdrive 418
126:
123:
119:
115:
111:
107:
103:
97:
92:
89:
85:
81:
77:
76:Overdrive 418
73:
59:
56:
52:
48:
44:
40:
32:
19:
277:Telestarinfo
271:— Preceding
266:
258:
250:
222:— Preceding
218:
215:
211:
208:
200:
197:
193:
191:Dear Susan~
190:
162:— Preceding
158:
154:
151:
132:
124:
100:— Preceding
95:
93:
70:— Preceding
65:
37:— Preceding
33:
30:
216:Thank you,
209:Dear Susan
96:New Article
31:Hey Susan,
152:Hi Susan,
285:contribs
273:unsigned
236:contribs
224:unsigned
176:contribs
164:unsigned
114:contribs
102:unsigned
84:contribs
72:unsigned
51:contribs
39:unsigned
106:BoatFan
228:SuCas
16:<
281:talk
232:talk
172:talk
139:talk
110:talk
80:talk
47:talk
287:)
283:•
238:)
234:•
178:)
174:•
141:)
116:)
112:•
86:)
82:•
53:)
49:•
27:re
279:(
230:(
170:(
137:(
108:(
78:(
45:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.