Knowledge

User talk:Sj/Arc1

Source 📝

245:, and instead to break up a monolithic article into pages/segments with a unified TOC and navigation at the start and end of each page reminding users that they are in the middle of a single article. I'm no expert in "naming standards for articles" (link?), but here is a link to my suggestions for naming/format standards for 208:
posted elsewhere somtimes though, like i mentioned home front on the halo page, and was thinking of mentioning on some aircraft pages games that have them in it. Its weird with mods rivaling official games in content and innovation. Let me know if you have any more ideas for standerdizing disambigs for this stuff.
343:
Sj- I haven't looked through enough of the 'pedia to select pages needing copyediting the most, so I will go along with your suggestions. I know that you will find German articles written in English, by Germans, in Biology. That was another group you pointed out as particularly needing copyediting.
59:
after I left in frustration.... one needs to provide a source -- especially when talking about speculations. Had the contributor merely wrote what "is taught by Rabbis in Moscow", I would have had no objection to it. If you can attribute the POVs he expounds, I for one would be very happy; I enjoy
562:
The reason I'm treating each model separately is so that if I or someone else wants to add more information, photos, drawings, etc. on a specific model, it can be done without causing undue confusion. If all of the models are listed and described on the same page, I'm afraid things will eventually
207:
Wow nice user page man! Like the talk comment thing. Yea I hear ya on the mod stuff-things link to random links, disambig issues. I if there was a standard like just (mod), (computer game mod), or (BF1942 game). A lot of mods cross multiple engines so I cant use BF:1942 throughout... Mods do get
394:
Please explain about the -- I am surprised to hear it, and have yet to notice.... Speaking of which, we should probably draft a quick addition to the current Knowledge:style manual, noting the convention for all kinds of silly things, such as em-dashes (in what character set? substitute -- when
582:
Stress inducing isn't a good thing as it de-motivates editors. Good feedback and finding errors others don't see however, is critical to making truly great articles. With that in mind please note the responses to your objections and offer clarification at
395:
necessary, or just a single hyphen?), ellipses (three or four dots at the end of a sentence?), &c. (use an ampersand in &c., write out etc., or either? disallow parentheticals after sentence-ending abbreviations, due to final-stop ambiguities?).
390:
Yes. I think it was decided somewhere that either Am or Br spelling is alright, but it has to be consistent within an article. We can note which is the native tongue of each editor, to properly match up final reviewers with
287:
Hi, I noticed you have me down as a minor villian with the tag "imp+++". I decrypted this as meaning "very impatient". This is the only thread I remember having with you.. maybe it pissed you off somehow? Yours intrigued,
160:. I had no idea how to go about creating anything that wouldn't resemble that breakup. I'm going to use the origins article as a template for dividing long articles from now on. Thanks again. Great user pages too! 487:
In BRE, the closing quotation mark comes before any punctuation marks, unless these marks form part of the quotation itself (or what is quoted is less than a full sentence in its own right). For example:
460:
In AME, double quotation marks are used for the first quotation; single quotation marks are used for a quotation within a quotation; double quotation for further quotation inside that; etc. For example:
325:
came up with a similar, though more colorful, format, for the number articles in the Spanish Knowledge, and that is sometimes referred to as "tabla de Sabbut" in edit summaries in the Spanish Knowledge.
295:
Not at all; you were also once severely provoked by trolls, in public. Perhaps on IRC? In any case, lest there be any confusion, you rock. (: villiany is far more ambivalent than villainy.
417:
Sj - I finally got this together. As you can see (below), Garner had the most complete entry. I went to some online British newspaper sites in hopes of seeing these rules supported, but
563:
get too cluttered. The articles on the newer models (Dash-8 and Dash-9 series, etc.) will be a bit more detailed as I have better information on them, as well as personal observations.
478:
In AME, it is usual to place a period or comma within the closing quotation mark, whether or not the punctuation so placed is actually part of the quoted matter. For example:
225:
I understand the need to break up the overlong page at Isaac Newton in depth -- couldn't you have used titles that didn't violate the naming standards for articles? See
173: 271:
why Alexa don't list us as a reference site yet... I believe it is you that made contact originally. Do you think the time is right nudge them again? Thanks.
604:
Thanks for the compliments on the US government articles. I don't mind nitpicking, nor would I be in a position to do so, as I occasionally do the same. --
584: 347:
I intend to post something on the mailing lists, both pointing out that copyediting is different than other types of validation and requesting volunteers.
398:
These don't matter much, but it would be nice to start building a structure which could eventually produce a stylistically self-consistent volume.
195:
has come up on the mailing list. I'm really concerned about Mav and Bryan Derksen's proposals. I'd really appreciate your thoughts on the subject.
90: 369:
In Knowledge. our articles are a mix of American and British English. There are major differences between the two in punctuation and spelling!!!
168:
perhaps it would be worth making a list of the long chapter-length articles/series (is there one?) and trying yo apply a nice template to them.
321:: "Docuan table" began to be used in the edit summaries of users (other than User:Docu) who added such tables to existing number articles. 172:
I find your solution interesting. Since you fixed the size issue, the article is now going through the FA nomination process again. See
378:
Copyediting will be strange with no author to appeal to for disambiguation of content, clarification of content, etc.
192: 153: 141: 68:
Providing Zest with good information, instead of demanding it from him, seems to have brought peaceful resolution.
574:
Your objections on FAC are tremendously nitpicky and stress-inducing. I approve of this wholeheartedly ;-) -
330: 318: 246: 237:
Please note that the nav-box for that set of articles includes the header " the History of the English penny
140: 268: 226: 157: 93:
page, not the main page. Please see my response to your comments (and other changes) there. Thanks!
156:!!!! It's downright elegant! To get an idea about how pleasantly surprised I am, take a look at the 45: 569: 60:
reading unfamiliar new theories... am not planning on reworking his idiosyncratic material. --
443:
In AME quotations that are inline are set off by pairs of double quotation marks. For example:
313: 533:: I emailed Ben Goertzel about whether the Danny Hillis article was a copyright violation. 8: 366:
In Knowledge, since we have multiple authors, American and British English are mixed :-).
119:
Kudos on the numbers articles :) When I have the stamina, I'll try and pitch in too! :)
605: 449:
In BRE, quotations that are inline are set off by single quotation marks. For example:
372:
Copyediting does not seem to need a scale to evaluate articles, just a simple "Yes/No."
523: 595: 575: 42: 38: 34: 30: 537: 209: 262: 275: 177: 514: 383: 120: 594:
Speaking of which, replies to my replies on Mission Earth would be welcomed -
354:
The selection and access to copyediting reference books. For Nupedia, we used
127:
excellent. there's so much fun to be had... we need our own local ramanujan!
327: 230: 529: 467:
In BRE, the practice is the exactly the reverse at each step. For example:
402: 299: 255: 241:" (emphasis mine). The style I am using is explicitly designed to avoid a 219: 131: 105: 72: 61: 17: 508:
In BRE, the first comma remains outside the quotation mark. For example:
502:
In AME, the first comma is placed within the quotation mark. For example:
588: 534: 322: 289: 272: 174:
Knowledge:Featured_article_candidates#Origins_of_the_American_Civil_War
158:
crude 8/03 two-part division of the History of the Soviet Union article
421:. I really have to find a BRE source that does use these conventions. 491:‘She looked back on her school years as being “unmitigated misery”.’ 484:“She looked back on her school years as being ‘unmitigated misery.’” 56: 196: 161: 94: 83: 218: 399: 375:
Copyeditors do not need content knowledge to copyedit an article.
296: 252: 128: 102: 69: 338: 184:
Lovely. (and look at the recent community copyedits! amazing.)
554: 50: 82: 202: 114: 498:
Quotations that are Interrupted to Indicate the Speaker
494:‘Joan said, “We will sing ‘God save the Queen’.”’ 481:“Joan said, ‘We will sing “God save the Queen.”’” 470:Joan said, ‘We will sing “God save the Queen”.’ 464:Joan said, “We will sing ‘God save the Queen.’” 511:‘Sally’, he said, ‘is looking radiant today’. 505:“Sally,” he said, “is looking radiant today.” 474:Closing Quotation Marks with a Period or Comma 452:He said, ‘Your next assignment is an essay’. 446:He said. “Your next assignment is an essay.” 362:And, for British English, we used Fowler's 358:for American English, as well as, Garner's 412:Punctuation Differences between AME and BR 14: 429:A Dictionary of Modern English Usage, 360:Dictionary of Modern American Usage. 23: 229:for an example of another method. 24: 617: 193:Origins of the American Civil War 176:and vote one way or the other. -- 154:Origins of the American Civil War 142:Origins of the American Civil War 55:Hi Sj, I see you participated in 559:Thanks for the suggestions... 191:: The subject of reorganizing 13: 1: 319:Knowledge:WikiProject Numbers 431:1998) (Supported by Fowler. 282:Indeed. No response though. 269:Wikipedia_talk:Announcements 227:History of the English penny 101:Fixed, w/cheer all around! 7: 570:Featured Article Candidates 356:The Chicago Manual of Style 267:Someone was asking over at 10: 622: 608:00:10, Jun 27, 2004 (UTC) 591:17:07, Jun 26, 2004 (UTC) 540:11:46, Mar 14, 2004 (UTC) 424:Is this familiar to you? 382:I welcome your feedback. 278:11:45, 2 Apr 2004 (UTC) 233:14:35, Apr 12, 2004 (UTC) 578:18:59, 25 Jun 2004 (UTC) 517:03:28, 27 Jul 2004 (UTC) 386:23:30, 23 Jul 2004 (UTC) 350:Some problems I foresee: 180:21:26, 27 Mar 2004 (UTC) 164:14:44, 27 Mar 2004 (UTC) 123:13:13, 27 Mar 2004 (UTC) 97:23:42, 12 Mar 2004 (UTC) 598:19:59, 26 Jun 2004 (UTC) 331:19:18, 16 May 2004 (UTC) 258:18:04, 2004 Apr 12 (UTC) 199:06:23, 9 Jun 2004 (UTC) 89:Put discussion on the 585:FAC Supply and Demand 433:Modern English Usage, 364:Modern English Usage. 263:Alexa reference site 248:long article layout 427:(Based on Garner. 64:15 Mar 2004 (UTC) 439:Inline quotations 292:4 May 2004 (UTC) 212:1 Apr 2004 (UTC) 613: 524:Awaiting Updates 405: 302: 621: 620: 616: 615: 614: 612: 611: 610: 572: 557: 526: 403: 341: 316: 300: 265: 223: 205: 145: 117: 87: 53: 27:1 : Before 7/04 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 619: 602: 601: 600: 599: 571: 568: 566: 556: 553: 551: 548: 546: 545: 544:Much obliged. 525: 522: 520: 500: 499: 476: 475: 458: 457: 441: 440: 410: 408: 407: 396: 392: 380: 379: 376: 373: 370: 367: 340: 337: 335: 315: 312: 311: 310: 309: 308: 307: 306: 305: 304: 264: 261: 260: 259: 222: 217: 215: 204: 201: 186: 185: 170: 169: 144: 139: 137: 135: 134: 116: 113: 111: 109: 108: 86: 81: 79: 77: 76: 52: 49: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 618: 609: 607: 597: 593: 592: 590: 586: 581: 580: 579: 577: 567: 564: 560: 552: 549: 543: 542: 541: 539: 536: 532: 531: 521: 518: 516: 512: 509: 506: 503: 497: 496: 495: 492: 489: 485: 482: 479: 473: 472: 471: 468: 465: 462: 456:Nested Quotes 455: 454: 453: 450: 447: 444: 438: 437: 436: 434: 430: 425: 422: 420: 419:they were not 415: 413: 406: 401: 397: 393: 389: 388: 387: 385: 377: 374: 371: 368: 365: 361: 357: 353: 352: 351: 348: 345: 336: 333: 332: 329: 324: 320: 314:Docuan tables 303: 298: 294: 293: 291: 286: 285: 284: 283: 281: 280: 279: 277: 274: 270: 257: 254: 250: 249: 244: 240: 236: 235: 234: 232: 228: 221: 216: 213: 211: 200: 198: 194: 190: 183: 182: 181: 179: 175: 167: 166: 165: 163: 159: 155: 151: 150: 143: 138: 133: 130: 126: 125: 124: 122: 112: 107: 104: 100: 99: 98: 96: 92: 85: 80: 74: 71: 67: 66: 65: 63: 58: 48: 47: 44: 40: 36: 32: 28: 19: 603: 596:David Gerard 576:David Gerard 573: 565: 561: 558: 550: 547: 528: 527: 519: 513: 510: 507: 504: 501: 493: 490: 486: 483: 480: 477: 469: 466: 463: 459: 451: 448: 445: 442: 432: 428: 426: 423: 418: 416: 411: 409: 381: 363: 359: 355: 349: 346: 342: 334: 317: 266: 247: 242: 238: 224: 220:Isaac Newton 214: 206: 188: 187: 171: 148: 147: 146: 136: 118: 110: 88: 78: 54: 26: 25: 18:User talk:Sj 339:Copyediting 323:User:Sabbut 210:Greyengine5 75:2004 Mar 15 555:Rail stubs 290:Pete/Pcb21 273:Pete/Pcb21 51:Eber et al 43:5 : 2006.1 39:4 : 2005.2 35:3 : 2005.1 31:2 : 2004.2 515:RoseParks 391:articles. 384:RoseParks 149:Beautiful 121:Dysprosia 57:Talk:Eber 606:Emsworth 328:PrimeFan 231:Rmhermen 152:work on 84:47 Ronin 203:bf mods 115:numbers 62:llywrch 589:Taxman 535:Angela 530:Hillis 435:1998) 276:(talk) 243:series 239:series 189:Update 16:< 95:Noel 91:talk 400:+sj 297:+sj 253:+sj 197:172 178:mav 162:172 129:+sj 103:+sj 70:+sj 46:+/- 587:- 414:: 251:. 41:| 37:| 33:| 29:| 538:. 404:+ 301:+ 256:+ 132:+ 106:+ 73:+

Index

User talk:Sj
1 : Before 7/04
2 : 2004.2
3 : 2005.1
4 : 2005.2
5 : 2006.1
+/-
Talk:Eber
llywrch
+sj
+
47 Ronin
talk
Noel
+sj
+
Dysprosia
+sj
+
Origins of the American Civil War
Origins of the American Civil War
crude 8/03 two-part division of the History of the Soviet Union article
172
Knowledge:Featured_article_candidates#Origins_of_the_American_Civil_War
mav
Origins of the American Civil War
172
Greyengine5
Isaac Newton
History of the English penny

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑