1209:
are prohibited (i) from editing articles related to
Scientology or Scientologists, broadly defined, as well as the respective article talk pages and (ii) from participating in any Knowledge process relating to those articles. Editors topic banned above may apply to have the topic ban lifted after demonstrating their commitment to the goals of Knowledge and their ability to work constructively with other editors. Applications will be considered no earlier than six months after the close of this case, and additional reviews will be done no more frequently than every six months thereafter.
1217:
any page is directed to edit on these from only a single user account, which shall be the user's sole or main account, unless the user has previously sought and obtained permission from the
Arbitration Committee to operate a legitimate second account. They shall edit in accordance to Knowledge policies and refrain from advocacy, to disclose on the relevant talk pages any circumstances (but not including personal identifying information) that constitute or may reasonably be perceived as constituting a conflict of interest with respect to that page, and not through a proxy configuration.
75:
on. This is not a basis for consensus and not even a common effort, so I am actually wondering what happened to you in the past months. Did you get attacked for your neutral position on the issue? Yes, we have been working successfully together and yes I am interested in restoring this condition. It just doesn't work if we allow getting carried away in finger-pointing instead of doing research, adding sources and exchanging ideas on the grounds of
Knowledge policy.
1213:
and outlining the behaviours for which it is contemplated. If the editor fails to heed the warning, the editor may be topic banned, initially, for three months, then with additional topic bans increasing in duration to a maximum of one year. Any editor who, in the judgment of an uninvolved administrator, is (i) focused primarily on
Scientology or Scientologists and (ii) clearly engaged in promoting an identifiable agenda may be topic-banned for up to one year.
1667:
1474:
1179:) is to abide to a binding voluntary restriction that within the Scientology topic (i) he limits his edits to directly improving articles to meet GA and FA criteria, using reliable sources; (ii) he makes no edits of whatever nature to biographies of living people; and (iii) he refrains from sysop action of whatever nature.
1163:) gave up his status as an administrator in the face of controversy concerning his administrator actions during an arbitration case, he may not be automatically re-granted adminship. However, he is free to seek readminship, should he choose to do so, at any time by a request for adminship at Requests for adminship.
1212:
Any uninvolved administrator may, on his or her own discretion, ban any editor from editing within the
Scientology topic. Prior to topic banning the editor, the administrator will leave a message on the editor's talk page, linking to this paragraph, warning the editor that a topic ban is contemplated
426:
Can you explain this, bearing in mind your reply will have a bearing on not only whether you are blocked, but also for how long? This isn't the first time you have edited disruptively and I know that you are aware that all
Scientology-related articles are on ArbCom probation. Please choose your words
74:
You did attack Su-Jada and you are consistently nagging me for this and for that. This would be OK if you would currently contribute something to increase the quality of the article but you don't. What happened to you? You take what I write and complain about it, concentrating on how bad I am and so
1208:
Any editor who is subject to remedies in this proceeding, or who wishes to edit from an open proxy, is restricted to a single current or future account to edit
Scientology-related topics and may not contribute to the topic as anonymous IP editors. Editors topic banned by remedies in this proceeding
626:
you talk about your use of public internet hubs and not proxies. To what extend do you move around? I am not asking for any private info but I want to have a general idea on the distances you travel giving me an idea of how many different IPs you would be using. This may help resolve weather or not
444:
It was a mistake. I do not exactly know what happened but I would not blank a page intentionally and I have no track of vandalism. Nor would I add to the edit summary that I my edit reinstates the article from a POV edit and then blank the page. Sorry, if another editor would not have been faster I
362:
Why are you asking a question if you "know" the answer already. "Doctrine" vs "Scripture" was my change in the article. That's why I mentioned it. And I am not the Church of
Scientology. Somehow this has been ingrained in your mind but that does not make it true. I have a request with the Church to
1522:
When ArbCom blanks a case page, it is with the explicit intent of making certain it does not get blindly spidered and isn't accessible other than through the page history. Copying those revisions back to user space defeat that purpose; I've deleted your copy of the
Scientology case evidence page.
1216:
All IP addresses owned or operated by the Church of
Scientology and its associates, broadly interpreted, are to be blocked as if they were open proxies. Any current or future editor who, after this decision is announced, makes substantial edits to any Scientology-related articles or discussions on
160:
is one of the reasons Ive decided to vote in the way I did, Your deletion had references to back it up, we could get into a whole theological discussion but that would prove futile I fear. to cut to the chase I think your delusioned, That does not mean your a bad person. My friend If you say Im
58:
In the past, you and I had a reasonably good working relationship, so I ask again in good faith that you strike the comment you made accusing me of attacking Su-Jada. Contrary to it being an attack, it was a perfectly accurate description of an inappropriate edit and an inaccurate edit summary.
630:
Another thing you state is that you use "computers in the Church of Scientology" yet on the next paragraph you state that you have never been to the "church of scientology san francisco". TO my untrained eye it seems the two statements are contradicting each other. Care to elaborate?
161:
banning you from Knowledge because Im voting to Scientology topic ban you, you are on Knowledge for the wrong reasons. I from now on will abandon the subject of your banning. I hope I have not offended you in any way thank you, That is enough explanation for a whole day --
1396:
39:
1302:
As tempting as it would be to quarterback from the Talk pages, firing plays and references, it's probably best to let it all go and take a break. I plan to Wikiphoto-tour—you can critique my efforts. :)
201:
you picked one I did in April 2007(!) - which was corrected, including my understanding of Knowledge policy - to explain to me why you are attacking me? Do you want to provoke or something?
184:, so if there is something developing in the media we should wait until it has settled. That's why I moved it. Your argument is nil so I still do not understand why you are attacking me.
1684:
1318:
Thanks, I had not seen that yet. How boring. Now all that's left are those who have no intimate knowledge about the subject. Will check your Wikiphoto-tour for sure (if I find it)!
96:
701:
This arbitration case has been closed and the final decision is available at the link above. The following editors are subjected to bans/topic-bans/restrictions as listed below :
225:. I am trying to figure out the best approach to come a mutual understanding between all parties involved that will eventually lead to a consensus. I invite you to respond either
1425:
1335:
A lot of it is "drive by shooting" but even a bland photo improves a stub article. I'm still hoping to make a trip this season to duplicate the position/angle of this
292:
623:
1395:
694:
1645:, your access to this talk page has been revoked. Should you desire to lodge an appeal against this access, please contact the Arbitration Committee via e-mail.
180:. Instead I MOVED it on the talk page to sit there until the media news story settled into some encyclopedic occurrence. Point is, Knowledge is not a news source
1443:
587:
583:
571:
553:
463:
that can happen. You will already be aware, however, that your edits are under scrutiny in a number of venues, hence the quick reaction. Please be careful. --
1131:
1539:
1115:
1228:
1420:
1170:
1107:
1119:
1090:
1549:
894:
880:
397:
311:
1680:
1570:
1272:
695:
609:
602:
579:
572:
566:
1462:
1166:
1563:
684:
670:
488:
474:
454:
141:
1283:
1264:
616:
127:
1086:
438:
1389:
1348:
1327:
634:
To what extent are you involved with the Scientology dispute? Have you made any significant contribution to Scientology related topics?
545:
531:
834:
84:
1508:
286:
210:
193:
418:
1247:
554:
1696:
1602:
1582:
412:
372:
357:
329:
157:
Ill leave it here because I do not want to embarrass you: we all as humans are inheritly non neutral. your edits such as this one
68:
1336:
1233:
946:
1453:
requested an enforcement against you. Sounds more responsible. But I am not interested in this game anymore. Sorry, Antaeus.
50:
1622:
656:
249:
1312:
1141:
586:. Please submit your evidence within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page,
988:
733:
1488:
560:
I've opened a request for arbitration and listed you as a named party. You may wish to make a statement. Best wishes,
1526:
You can link to the appropriate revision if you feel the need for a handy pointer to the blanked page, but you may not
1058:
334:
I did not say "doctrine". But this edit acknowledges "Xenu, the Galactic Ruler mentioned in Scientology scripture" in "
216:
199:
1638:
335:
297:
1692:
1044:
974:
932:
918:
876:
792:
108:
1534:
1100:
1080:
960:
862:
778:
607:
230:
1484:
318:
1291:
1192:
1030:
904:
890:
848:
828:
764:
806:
719:
244:
28:
1402:
That was totally inappropriate. Do not upload something like this again, or you will be blocked. Thank you.
300:
is a most interesting edit. Are you saying that "in real life", Xenu is mentioned in Scientology scripture?
271:
1649:
1238:
unblock|I am neither on an open proxy nor did I violate any rules on Knowledge. This block is unwarranted.
1176:
1072:
1016:
820:
750:
33:
1493:
1339:. The building at the corner is definitely gone, but I'm hoping to catch the shoreline and street angles.
512:
158:
1688:
1160:
1002:
1374:
1514:
1439:
1076:
940:
170:
1654:
1332:
824:
1135:
226:
1676:
1655:
982:
727:
666:
469:
433:
123:
90:
24:
20:
1356:
342:
that Xenu is a part of "Scientology scripture" since Warren McShane testified to that effect in
1431:
1413:
1262:
1052:
59:
Striking your accusations would go a long way towards re-establishing good faith in general. --
582:. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page,
503:
Hello, there seem to be a lot of rules and regulation here. What would you recommend to read?
1435:
936:
619:. I want to point out that I am not the wiki-police nor do I have any kind of official role.
339:
647:
Hi Cat, apologies for the late answer. I guess I'll answer on your talk page so you see it.
479:
Thanks, I am very aware of the scrutiny each of my edits gets. Not necessarily a bad thing.
1578:
1370:
1344:
1308:
968:
926:
912:
870:
786:
541:
508:
1641:, you are banned from editing Knowledge under any account or IP address. Pursuant to the
1270:
8:
1123:
1094:
954:
856:
772:
105:
65:
1637:
With this edit, I hereby inform you, that per a consensus of the community, reached at
1490:
1225:
1186:
1024:
978:
898:
884:
842:
758:
723:
662:
464:
428:
267:
176:
The problem is: I did not delete your paragraph, even though I could have done it, per
166:
119:
1404:
1296:(i) from editing articles related to Scientology or Scientologists, broadly defined,
1255:
1111:
1048:
800:
713:
639:
257:
234:
1066:
1010:
814:
744:
598:
363:
send a rep here so this bullshit can finally stop. What do you think of this idea?
1646:
1574:
1500:
1468:
1454:
1381:
1366:
1340:
1319:
1304:
1275:
1239:
1154:
1034:
996:
964:
922:
908:
866:
782:
676:
648:
537:
523:
504:
480:
446:
404:
383:
364:
321:
278:
202:
185:
133:
76:
1632:
1618:
1598:
1559:
950:
852:
768:
519:
420:
393:
353:
307:
100:
60:
1642:
1432:
http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Shutterbug
1182:
1127:
1020:
838:
754:
705:
498:
460:
263:
181:
177:
162:
1608:
1588:
1545:
1362:
796:
709:
239:
115:
277:
I did. No computers, lots of peace. Would you mind to answer my question?
1062:
1006:
810:
740:
594:
561:
222:
152:
1269:
It seems to work again. I just uploaded a screen shot showing the block
382:
This was an interesting discussion until you chose to use inappropriate
1531:
1150:
992:
1613:
1593:
1554:
388:
348:
302:
1666:
615:
Hi, I am going to collect evidence for the Scientology RFAR as an
578:
An Arbitration case involving you has been opened, and is located
320:. But not in "doctrine" (I bet I know what your next comment is).
1274:. But I guess this is moot now. Thanks for coming by that fast!
1195:) is topic-banned from articles about Rick Ross, broadly defined.
1587:
Subsequent to violations of this with socking, please again see
1683:
for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with
95:
A discussion in which you are mentioned is currently under way
1473:
1430:
Arbitration enforcement has been requested against you. See
317:
There are some texts mentioning this name (like this one:
403:
I can not see why this is a good reason to stop talking.
233:, so we can start working towards a solution. Thank you.
1203:#Editors marked in * have since contacted the Committee.
262:
Either way I hope you enjoyed your Thanks giving time --
221:
Shutterbug, recently you were involved in a conflict on
588:
Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Scientology/Workshop
584:
Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Scientology/Evidence
1426:
Arbitration enforcement has been requested against you
1550:
Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Shutterbug
114:
Not "dead", only "sleeping". This has been moved to
1675:Your name has been mentioned in connection with a
293:Acknowledgement of Xenu in Scientology scripture ?
1397:File:Cirt_ArbitraryCommittee_20090529_0948pm.pdf
1681:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Shutterbug
1571:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Shutterbug
696:Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Scientology
573:Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Scientology
555:Knowledge:Requests_for_arbitration#Scientology
338:". I think this is the first admission by the
1540:17 May 2010 - Arbitration Enforcement notice
1487:in violation of your Scientology topic ban.
1298:as well as the respective article talk pages
40:User talk:Shutterbug/Archive/Archive-Sep2024
675:Seen it. Will try to find the time for it.
1253:It doesn't appear that you're blocked... –
1569:In regard to the above, and the related
1530:the contents of that page elsewhere. —
593:On behalf of the Arbitration Committee,
661:Hey, I put something there for you. --
346:in 1995, though I may be mistaken.
13:
1687:before editing the evidence page.
1472:
14:
1707:
1685:the guide to responding to cases
1665:
627:the ips are public ones or not.
445:had reverted myself right away.
1639:the Administrators' Noticeboard
99:. This is a courtesy notice. --
1650:05:20, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
1623:04:13, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
1603:03:43, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
1535:11:09, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
1234:Block issue (solved, somewhat)
643:18:40, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
1:
1697:19:44, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
1661:
1573:, I've blocked your account.
1349:04:38, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
1222:For the Arbitration Committee
685:02:17, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
671:06:23, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
657:04:41, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
603:04:20, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
386:language such as "bullshit".
250:14:48, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
171:02:14, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
142:22:41, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
132:Good morning! Have a coffee!
128:20:04, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
109:09:19, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
85:22:26, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
69:17:04, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
51:Please strike your accusation
567:18:28, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
546:20:02, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
532:04:00, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
513:02:59, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
489:23:21, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
475:23:13, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
455:23:09, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
439:23:03, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
413:23:36, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
398:23:28, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
373:22:52, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
358:22:48, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
330:22:40, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
312:17:39, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
287:00:41, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
272:00:37, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
211:00:39, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
198:PS: Out of hundreds of edits
194:00:34, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
7:
1689:The Resident Anthropologist
1106:To contact the Committee :
10:
1712:
217:Your feedback is requested
1361:There is a discussion on
536:Thank you, very helpful!
1583:17:04, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
1564:20:40, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
1509:03:51, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
1504:
1494:03:31, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
1463:02:30, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
1458:
1444:00:01, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
1421:02:27, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
1390:20:33, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
1385:
1375:13:25, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
1328:07:18, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
1323:
1313:06:26, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
1284:05:03, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
1279:
1265:04:58, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
1248:04:42, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
1243:
1229:01:31, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
680:
652:
527:
484:
450:
427:very, very carefully. --
408:
368:
325:
282:
206:
189:
137:
80:
1333:Le Tour de GTA, so far.
617:independent third party
1679:case. Please refer to
1477:
1292:Yup, Talk page ban too
1476:
1365:regarding the above.
1147:Other restrictions :
1077:The Legendary Shadow!
340:Church of Scientology
825:Jack Russell Terrier
722:) (Community Ban),
610:WP:RFAR/Scientology
518:Hi?! Try this one:
419:Recent Blanking of
38:Automatic Archive:
1515:Blanked case pages
1478:
1673:
1672:
1204:
642:
48:
47:
19:Manual Archives:
1703:
1669:
1662:
1548:, specifically,
1436:Antaeus Feldspar
1419:
1416:
1407:
1258:
1202:
937:Antaeus Feldspar
638:
564:
472:
467:
436:
431:
247:
242:
237:
103:
63:
16:
15:
1711:
1710:
1706:
1705:
1704:
1702:
1701:
1700:
1660:
1635:
1542:
1517:
1471:
1428:
1414:
1405:
1403:
1400:
1359:
1300:
1294:
1256:
1236:
739:Topic-banned :
699:
613:
576:
562:
558:
501:
470:
465:
434:
429:
424:
295:
260:
245:
240:
235:
219:
155:
101:
93:
91:Incident notice
61:
53:
12:
11:
5:
1709:
1671:
1670:
1659:
1653:
1643:banning policy
1634:
1631:
1630:
1629:
1628:
1627:
1626:
1625:
1541:
1538:
1516:
1513:
1512:
1511:
1470:
1467:
1466:
1465:
1427:
1424:
1399:
1394:
1393:
1392:
1358:
1355:
1354:
1353:
1352:
1351:
1295:
1293:
1290:
1289:
1288:
1287:
1286:
1235:
1232:
1206:
1205:
1199:
1198:
1197:
1196:
1180:
1164:
1145:
1132:Rick Alan Ross
1124:Tory Christman
1104:
737:
698:
693:
692:
691:
690:
689:
688:
687:
624:your statement
612:
606:
575:
570:
557:
552:
551:
550:
549:
548:
500:
497:
496:
495:
494:
493:
492:
491:
423:
421:L. Ron Hubbard
417:
416:
415:
380:
379:
378:
377:
376:
375:
344:RTC v. FactNet
294:
291:
290:
289:
259:
256:
254:
218:
215:
214:
213:
196:
154:
151:
149:
147:
146:
145:
144:
92:
89:
88:
87:
52:
49:
46:
45:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1708:
1699:
1698:
1694:
1690:
1686:
1682:
1678:
1668:
1664:
1663:
1657:
1652:
1651:
1648:
1644:
1640:
1624:
1620:
1616:
1615:
1610:
1606:
1605:
1604:
1600:
1596:
1595:
1590:
1586:
1585:
1584:
1580:
1576:
1572:
1568:
1567:
1566:
1565:
1561:
1557:
1556:
1552:. Thanks. --
1551:
1547:
1537:
1536:
1533:
1529:
1524:
1520:
1510:
1506:
1502:
1498:
1497:
1496:
1495:
1492:
1489:
1486:
1483:24 hours for
1482:
1475:
1464:
1460:
1456:
1452:
1448:
1447:
1446:
1445:
1441:
1437:
1433:
1423:
1422:
1417:
1411:
1410:
1398:
1391:
1387:
1383:
1379:
1378:
1377:
1376:
1372:
1368:
1364:
1350:
1346:
1342:
1338:
1334:
1331:
1330:
1329:
1325:
1321:
1317:
1316:
1315:
1314:
1310:
1306:
1299:
1285:
1281:
1277:
1273:
1271:
1268:
1267:
1266:
1263:
1260:
1259:
1252:
1251:
1250:
1249:
1245:
1241:
1231:
1230:
1227:
1226:Mailer Diablo
1223:
1218:
1214:
1210:
1201:
1200:
1194:
1191:
1188:
1184:
1181:
1178:
1175:
1172:
1168:
1165:
1162:
1159:
1156:
1152:
1149:
1148:
1146:
1143:
1140:
1137:
1133:
1129:
1125:
1121:
1117:
1113:
1109:
1105:
1102:
1099:
1096:
1092:
1088:
1085:
1082:
1078:
1074:
1071:
1068:
1064:
1060:
1057:
1054:
1050:
1046:
1043:
1040:
1036:
1032:
1029:
1026:
1022:
1018:
1015:
1012:
1008:
1004:
1001:
998:
994:
990:
987:
984:
980:
979:Fahrenheit451
976:
973:
970:
966:
962:
959:
956:
952:
948:
945:
942:
938:
934:
931:
928:
924:
920:
917:
914:
910:
906:
903:
900:
896:
892:
889:
886:
882:
878:
875:
872:
868:
864:
861:
858:
854:
850:
847:
844:
840:
836:
833:
830:
826:
822:
819:
816:
812:
808:
805:
802:
798:
794:
791:
788:
784:
780:
777:
774:
770:
766:
763:
760:
756:
752:
749:
746:
742:
738:
735:
732:
729:
725:
724:Justallofthem
721:
718:
715:
711:
707:
704:
703:
702:
697:
686:
682:
678:
674:
673:
672:
668:
664:
663:Justallofthem
660:
659:
658:
654:
650:
646:
645:
644:
641:
635:
632:
628:
625:
620:
618:
611:
605:
604:
600:
596:
591:
589:
585:
581:
574:
569:
568:
565:
556:
547:
543:
539:
535:
534:
533:
529:
525:
521:
517:
516:
515:
514:
510:
506:
490:
486:
482:
478:
477:
476:
473:
468:
462:
458:
457:
456:
452:
448:
443:
442:
441:
440:
437:
432:
422:
414:
410:
406:
402:
401:
400:
399:
395:
391:
390:
385:
374:
370:
366:
361:
360:
359:
355:
351:
350:
345:
341:
337:
333:
332:
331:
327:
323:
319:
316:
315:
314:
313:
309:
305:
304:
299:
288:
284:
280:
276:
275:
274:
273:
269:
265:
255:
252:
251:
248:
243:
238:
232:
228:
224:
212:
208:
204:
200:
197:
195:
191:
187:
183:
179:
175:
174:
173:
172:
168:
164:
159:
150:
143:
139:
135:
131:
130:
129:
125:
121:
120:Justallofthem
117:
113:
112:
111:
110:
107:
104:
98:
86:
82:
78:
73:
72:
71:
70:
67:
64:
56:
44:
43:
41:
36:
35:
30:
26:
22:
18:
17:
1677:sockpuppetry
1674:
1656:Sockpuppetry
1636:
1612:
1592:
1553:
1543:
1527:
1525:
1521:
1518:
1480:
1479:
1450:
1429:
1408:
1401:
1360:
1301:
1297:
1257:Juliancolton
1254:
1237:
1221:
1219:
1215:
1211:
1207:
1189:
1173:
1157:
1138:
1116:StephenAKent
1112:Karin Spaink
1097:
1083:
1069:
1055:
1049:Steve Dufour
1041:
1038:
1027:
1013:
999:
985:
971:
957:
943:
929:
915:
901:
887:
873:
859:
845:
831:
817:
803:
789:
775:
761:
747:
730:
716:
700:
636:
633:
629:
621:
614:
592:
577:
559:
502:
425:
387:
381:
347:
343:
301:
296:
261:
253:
220:
156:
148:
118:. Cheers. --
94:
57:
54:
42:
37:
32:
1544:Please see
1380:Thank you.
223:Scientology
1647:Courcelles
1575:PhilKnight
1501:Shutterbug
1455:Shutterbug
1382:Shutterbug
1367:PhilKnight
1341:AndroidCat
1337:1915 photo
1320:Shutterbug
1305:AndroidCat
1276:Shutterbug
1240:Shutterbug
1108:Arnielerma
1035:Shutterbug
965:Derflipper
923:AndroidCat
909:Voxpopulis
867:OngoingHow
783:Proximodiz
677:Shutterbug
649:Shutterbug
538:Proximodiz
524:Shutterbug
505:Proximodiz
481:Shutterbug
447:Shutterbug
405:Shutterbug
365:Shutterbug
322:Shutterbug
279:Shutterbug
203:Shutterbug
186:Shutterbug
134:Shutterbug
77:Shutterbug
34:My Sandbox
1120:Timbowles
1091:Touretzky
951:Anynobody
853:Maureen D
769:Makoshack
336:real life
258:Eitherway
1491:Thatcher
1481:Blocked:
1193:contribs
1183:Jayen466
1177:contribs
1161:contribs
1142:contribs
1128:Hkhenson
1101:contribs
1087:contribs
1073:contribs
1059:contribs
1045:contribs
1031:contribs
1021:Shrampes
1017:contribs
1003:contribs
989:contribs
975:contribs
961:contribs
947:contribs
933:contribs
919:contribs
905:contribs
895:Tturrisi
891:contribs
881:Seelltey
877:contribs
863:contribs
849:contribs
839:Jpierreg
835:contribs
821:contribs
807:contribs
793:contribs
779:contribs
765:contribs
755:Grrrilla
751:contribs
734:contribs
720:contribs
264:Zaharous
163:Zaharous
1607:Now at
1519:Hello.
1485:editing
1469:Blocked
1409:Symonds
797:Su-Jada
710:John254
520:WP:FIVE
466:Rodhull
430:Rodhull
384:uncivil
241:Spidern
55:Hello,
1633:Banned
1167:ChrisO
1063:Tilman
1007:Orsini
811:TaborG
741:CSI LA
706:Banned
595:Daniel
563:Durova
471:andemu
461:accept
459:OK, I
435:andemu
182:WP:NOT
178:WP:BRD
1611:. --
1609:WP:AN
1591:. --
1589:WP:AE
1546:WP:AE
1532:Coren
1449:Try:
1434:. --
1406:Peter
1363:WP:AE
1151:Jossi
993:Misou
499:Hello
116:WP:AE
106:Damon
66:Damon
1693:talk
1658:case
1619:talk
1614:Cirt
1599:talk
1594:Cirt
1579:talk
1560:talk
1555:Cirt
1528:copy
1505:talk
1499:Ok.
1459:talk
1440:talk
1415:talk
1386:talk
1371:talk
1345:talk
1324:talk
1309:talk
1280:talk
1244:talk
1187:talk
1171:talk
1155:talk
1136:talk
1095:talk
1081:talk
1067:talk
1053:talk
1039:talk
1025:talk
1011:talk
997:talk
983:talk
969:talk
955:talk
941:talk
927:talk
913:talk
899:talk
885:talk
871:talk
857:talk
843:talk
829:talk
815:talk
801:talk
787:talk
773:talk
759:talk
745:talk
728:talk
714:talk
681:talk
667:talk
653:talk
608:CSI
599:talk
580:here
542:talk
528:talk
509:talk
485:talk
451:talk
409:talk
394:talk
389:Cirt
369:talk
354:talk
349:Cirt
326:talk
308:talk
303:Cirt
298:This
283:talk
268:talk
231:here
227:here
207:talk
190:talk
167:talk
138:talk
124:talk
102:Good
97:here
81:talk
62:Good
27:and
1357:FYI
1130:*,
1126:*,
1122:*,
1118:*,
1114:*,
1110:*,
1089:),
1075:),
1061:),
1047:),
1033:),
1019:),
1005:),
991:),
977:),
963:),
949:),
935:),
921:),
907:),
893:),
879:),
865:),
851:),
837:),
823:),
809:),
795:),
781:),
767:),
753:),
640:Cat
622:On
229:or
153:Why
1695:)
1621:)
1601:)
1581:)
1562:)
1507:)
1461:)
1442:)
1388:)
1373:)
1347:)
1326:)
1311:)
1282:)
1261:|
1246:)
1224:,
1220:-
708::
683:)
669:)
655:)
637:--
601:)
590:.
544:)
530:)
522:.
511:)
487:)
453:)
411:)
396:)
371:)
356:)
328:)
310:)
285:)
270:)
209:)
192:)
169:)
140:)
126:)
83:)
31:.
23:,
1691:(
1617:(
1597:(
1577:(
1558:(
1503:(
1457:(
1451:I
1438:(
1418:)
1412:(
1384:(
1369:(
1343:(
1322:(
1307:(
1278:(
1242:(
1190:·
1185:(
1174:·
1169:(
1158:·
1153:(
1144:)
1139:·
1134:(
1103:)
1098:·
1093:(
1084:·
1079:(
1070:·
1065:(
1056:·
1051:(
1042:·
1037:(
1028:·
1023:(
1014:·
1009:(
1000:·
995:(
986:·
981:(
972:·
967:(
958:·
953:(
944:·
939:(
930:·
925:(
916:·
911:(
902:·
897:(
888:·
883:(
874:·
869:(
860:·
855:(
846:·
841:(
832:·
827:(
818:·
813:(
804:·
799:(
790:·
785:(
776:·
771:(
762:·
757:(
748:·
743:(
736:)
731:·
726:(
717:·
712:(
679:(
665:(
651:(
597:(
540:(
526:(
507:(
483:(
449:(
407:(
392:(
367:(
352:(
324:(
306:(
281:(
266:(
246:→
236:←
205:(
188:(
165:(
136:(
122:(
79:(
29:3
25:2
21:1
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.