Knowledge

User talk:Schissel/Archive06

Source đź“ť

407: 354: 286:
Sorry, I think you misunderstand me. An ndash is preferred, but what you did was replace what was already visible as an ndash (–) with html code which results in the same thing, but looks more confusing in the wikitext, and wasn't necessary in the first place, since it was already an ndash, rather
302:
Anyway, as for the piano concerto, according to Grove's article on von Paradis (the only source I have at the moment), Mozart wrote a piano concerto for her, and that piano concerto was probably k456. I think the emphasis is a bit different in what is currently in the article. My point is that he
187:
I appreciate your thanks for starting the article. I have to confess that my knowledge of music theory is fairly limited, so I'm afraid that any attempts at trying to explain Valen's music might be misleading to most readers and annoying to those who know something about it. (Add to that the fact
485:
Good work. You have brought past the stage of a dull dictionary definition. I can't remember how I came across that page in the first place. I haven't actually listened to the work, to my knowledge; the Adagio for Strings is so good I am afraid of what his other pieces might sound like, lest his
301:
Yeah, they look pretty similar, I was confused at first as well. I try to use the one you can insert instead of the html code, because it's less initially confusing to newbies (it's too bad that the very first sentence of most articles is so full of markup - I suspect it puts some people off).
219: 173:. I certainly agree that consistency is king, in the end. My hope is that a sufficient number of us will keep a watchful eye on that article. It tends to get bloated with all manner of odd assertions and style. We will need to be assertive, to keep things in trim. – 122:
I have had left copyrighted material on the article because I thought that someone would be inspired to write a better biography based on the one I have (blatantly) copy/pasted. I didn't had much time back then, and afterwards I completly forgot about the
68:
pour le message de bienvenue ;-) ! (if JC Bach has never wrote a viola concerto, it seems to me that his brother Johann Christoph Friedrich wrote a concerto for viola and pianoforte, founded some years ago. It have been recorded by Reinhardt Goebel (see
202:
Hi, thanks very much for your compliments - good to hear from you again! Translating articles is a relatively fun way to revise German vocab while also finding out about all these half-forgotten composers. If you're planning on expanding the
224:
There's a micro-organism whose diet consists (almost) entirely of paramecium, and which is extremely effective as an eater of them. (Not speaking of the as-it-were mutant paramecium which attacks others.) Does this ring a bell?
458:
composed film music, then the classification would be appropriate. However, filing him under film music composers misses the sheer breadth of his output. Like you, I got to know him though his "serious" music - I heard
140:
Hello, may be that both is possible. But the original german surname is "Bronsart von Schellendorff" with double FF at the end. Sources are "Genealogisches Handbuch des Adels", the modern "Gotha", and also f.e.
287:
than a regular short dash. (–=– vs. -, if you see what I mean) Again, not a big deal, just silly to replace something which shows up the same with something which is confusing to more people.
31:
Hi, I'm planning on expanding the Vainberg/Weinberg article. Before I get going, would you mind if I moved the article to the Weinberg spelling, since it seems to be increasingly common and (
120:
You have removed too much material from the article. A part of it was not copyrighted. I have left in the article only material added by Wikipedians, not from outside, copyrighted, sources.
233: 99:
For the work of Telemann, I think that the viola concerto is really written for viola and not for others instruments. I don't know either the works for viola alta of Draeseke nor the
39: 272:, you changed what was actually already an ndash into a longer, more confusing ndash, which is not preferred. Just pickiness on my part, but I wanted you to know. 36: 396: 311: 288: 454:
I disagree with the categorisation of Frankel. To classify a composer, you need the most informative category that encompasses their work. If he had
343: 466:
So my suggestion, for what it's worth, is that dropping the film composer category is less damaging than limiting Frankel to just that category.
314: 125:
I don't think I shall contribute to the article any time soon, so probably how the article looks now, it's likely to stay as such for a while.--
174: 486:
other works might be like Albinoni's works other than Adagio in G minor, inasmuch as very few people can name another piece by the composer.
291: 281: 269: 142: 334:
OK, it wasn't a deeply researched change on my part. Gail Kubik was my wife's aunt's second husband, but I don't let it go to my head!
158: 149: 475: 107: 41: 490: 214: 188:
that I find dissonance, well, a little jarring). Please do not hesitate to elaborate on Valen's musical work and contributions. --
129: 57: 449: 310:. At least that's what I get from Grove. I might try to expand that article some when I've got time. Happy Thanksgiving! 220:
I need to look this up- and this may better be part of another article but I see nothing under links to at the moment...
192: 134: 480: 338: 113: 262: 177: 197: 169:
Hi Schissel. Greetings to you too, fellow lover of music. Thanks for your note concerning flats and sharps at
80:(don't hesitate to correct my sentences, the English tenses pose problem to me (but not only the tenses ;-) ) 77: 425:
If possible, we would appreciate your assistance in cleaning up this article to bring it up to Knowledge's
372:
If possible, we would appreciate your assistance in cleaning up this article to bring it up to Knowledge's
255:
Hi, I see you are working on Mozart PC 14, so I will leave that one alone and look at 15 and 16 instead!
70: 204: 46: 26: 114: 436:
If you do not want to receive bot-generated messages on your talk page, please consider using the
383:
If you do not want to receive bot-generated messages on your talk page, please consider using the
207:
page, it looks like the public domain text of the 1911 Britannica might help you start the task
182: 463:
on the radio, and was astonished that someone who could write that seemed to be forgotten.
96:
has so many meanings for a non-english speaker as me, i didn't understand the sentence ;-).
8: 73:). I think that this is a "authentic" concerto. Have you more information about it ? -- 230: 17: 47: 335: 276: 245: 429:. If you are unsure what the nature of the problem is, please discuss this on the 376:. If you are unsure what the nature of the problem is, please discuss this on the 437: 426: 384: 373: 208: 155: 146: 250: 211: 164: 430: 414: 377: 361: 329: 259: 226: 63: 54: 487: 472: 418: 365: 189: 126: 85: 318: 295: 273: 32: 417:, to which you have helped contribute, has been flagged as requiring 364:, to which you have helped contribute, has been flagged as requiring 104: 74: 406: 353: 240: 170: 84:
Hello Schissel, i didn't understand why you talked to me about
306:
write a piano concerto for her, and the only disagreement is
397:
Article in need of cleanup - please assist if you can
344:
Article in need of cleanup - please assist if you can
238:I think you are almost certainly thinking of 404: 351: 14: 23: 24: 501: 405: 352: 411: 358: 193:13:38, 26 September 2006 (UTC) 13: 1: 491:23:49, 27 December 2006 (UTC) 476:10:46, 20 December 2006 (UTC) 339:08:24, 15 December 2006 (UTC) 315:15:55, 23 November 2006 (UTC) 298:behind an annoying firewall) 292:03:03, 23 November 2006 (UTC) 282:05:10, 22 November 2006 (UTC) 263:09:34, 14 November 2006 (UTC) 178:23:27, 4 September 2006 (UTC) 321:behind an annoying firewall) 215:04:21, 5 November 2006 (UTC) 42:22:22, 25 January 2006 (UTC) 7: 450:Categories, large and small 234:15:03, 27 August 2006 (UTC) 10: 506: 135:Bronsart von Schellendorff 159:08:41, 28 July 2006 (UTC) 150:04:48, 28 July 2006 (UTC) 130:16:36, 26 July 2006 (UTC) 78:15:29, 30 June 2006 (UTC) 481:Re Cello Sonata (Barber) 115:Pietro Domenico Paradisi 108:13:08, 3 July 2006 (UTC) 58:23:55, 4 June 2006 (UTC) 90:Viola sonata stuff, yes 440:on your user talk page 387:on your user talk page 198:Recently-created pages 33:according to an expert 205:Félicien-César David 143:Meyer's Enzyklopädie 53:Just expanded this ( 18:User talk:Schissel 446: 445: 441: 427:quality standards 393: 392: 388: 374:quality standards 48:Vladimir Rebikoff 27:Vainberg/Weinberg 497: 435: 409: 402: 401: 382: 356: 349: 348: 279: 505: 504: 500: 499: 498: 496: 495: 494: 483: 452: 447: 438:nobots template 399: 394: 385:nobots template 346: 332: 277: 253: 231:Sound the Note! 222: 200: 185: 167: 137: 118: 103:. What's it? -- 66: 51: 29: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 503: 482: 479: 451: 448: 444: 443: 434: 423: 410: 400: 398: 395: 391: 390: 381: 370: 357: 347: 345: 342: 331: 328: 327: 326: 325: 324: 323: 322: 252: 249: 221: 218: 199: 196: 184: 181: 166: 163: 162: 161: 152: 136: 133: 124: 121: 117: 112: 111: 110: 97: 65: 62: 50: 45: 35:) preferable? 28: 25: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 502: 493: 492: 489: 478: 477: 474: 470: 467: 464: 462: 461:Marching Song 457: 442: 439: 433:'s talk page. 432: 428: 422: 420: 416: 415:1996 in music 408: 403: 389: 386: 380:'s talk page. 379: 375: 369: 367: 363: 362:1996 in music 355: 350: 341: 340: 337: 320: 316: 313: 309: 305: 300: 299: 297: 293: 290: 285: 284: 283: 280: 275: 271: 267: 266: 265: 264: 261: 256: 248: 247: 243: 242: 236: 235: 232: 228: 217: 216: 213: 209: 206: 195: 194: 191: 183:Fartein Valen 180: 179: 176: 172: 160: 157: 154:It's done. -- 153: 151: 148: 144: 139: 138: 132: 131: 128: 116: 109: 106: 102: 98: 95: 91: 87: 83: 82: 81: 79: 76: 72: 61: 59: 56: 49: 44: 43: 40: 38: 34: 19: 484: 471: 468: 465: 460: 455: 453: 424: 413:The article 412: 371: 360:The article 359: 333: 307: 303: 257: 254: 239: 237: 223: 210:. Regards, 201: 186: 168: 119: 100: 93: 89: 88:(you said : 86:Viola Sonata 67: 52: 30: 336:GrahamBould 319:User:Makemi 312:69.19.14.35 296:User:Makemi 289:69.19.14.15 101:viola alta 308:which one 270:this edit 212:Defrosted 156:Dobschütz 147:Dobschütz 260:Grahbudd 241:Didinium 227:Schissel 123:article. 55:Meladina 488:Rintrah 473:Rconroy 431:article 419:cleanup 378:article 366:cleanup 258:Graham 190:Leifern 175:Noetica 127:RockyMM 469:Bests 278:(talk) 251:Mozart 171:Sonata 165:Sonata 330:Kubik 94:Stuff 64:Merci 16:< 456:only 246:Josh 145:. -- 105:Kiwa 75:Kiwa 71:this 37:Mark 304:did 274:Mak 268:In 92:). 244:. 229:| 60:) 421:. 368:. 317:( 294:(

Index

User talk:Schissel
according to an expert
Mark

22:22, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
Vladimir Rebikoff
Meladina
23:55, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
this
Kiwa
15:29, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
Viola Sonata
Kiwa
13:08, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
Pietro Domenico Paradisi
RockyMM
16:36, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
Meyer's Enzyklopädie
DobschĂĽtz
04:48, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
DobschĂĽtz
08:41, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
Sonata
Noetica
23:27, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
Leifern
13:38, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
FĂ©licien-CĂ©sar David

Defrosted

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑