31:
449:
956:
Academic
Journal project to include only the IF, because (whatever its failings may be), it's the index everybody looks at. Nobody pays much attention to all those other indices (they're not even used on publisher's websites) and go against the spirit (and perhaps also the letter, no time to check right now) of
656:. They are consistent with my understanding of the terms: magnetism is the phenomenon while magnetization is what you get when a material is magnetized. I also have several textbooks on paleomagnetism and rock magnetism and they all agree with me. As for the other usages, redirects can take care of them.
886:
632:
Natural remanent magnetism gets quite a few more google hits than
Natural remanent magnetization from a quick check 74K vs 57K. Natural remanent magnetisation gets 15K. However if magnetization is preferred in the field it can be renamed. Then there is the US/British z/s bit to contend with. What are
208:
As for a WikiProject, that's not for the immediate future. At the moment I just have a list page in my user space, but eventually a WikiProject might be a good tool for measuring progress. I might just be able to manage a paleomagnetism project, but geophysics sounds too large for a single person. Do
595:
Quite o.k. I'm impressed by how quickly you respond to page changes. I considered doing a page move, but I wasn't sure what happens if you try moving a page on top of an existing page. I think I tried that with rock magnetism and ended up with two pages. How do you recommend I proceed in this case?
579:
article so I undid it to do a proper page move. In the process I missed the magnetism/magnetization bit --- so that also can be fixed with yet another page move. Note that to preserve article history WP frowns on "cut-n-paste" page moves. Sorry 'bout the confusion I seem to have caused - wanted to
955:
Hi, I've reverted part of you latest edit here (I've left in the reference to
Science Watch with the info on it being the 6th cited journal on climate change). However, I have remove the 5-year IF, immediacy index, etc, leaving only the usual IF. There has been a long-standing consensus in the WP
247:
I too started editing when I realised the poor quality of many of the geology pages (back in 2006), as I knew from my children they were increasingly being used as primary sources by school kids (and even undergraduates). Quality is generally a lot better now, although geophysics pages are often
182:
Thanks for the welcome, Mikenorton. I was thinking about outreach and realized that a lot of the top Google hits for paleomagnetism subjects are
Knowledge pages, so that says something about where my priorities should lie. I've spent the last few days looking for paleomagnetism-related Knowledge
166:
with a section on magnetic pole data, so both of those could use being looked over if you have the time. BTW (by the way), I don't want to curb your enthusiasm but we don't yet have a
Geophysics WikiProject so I think that a Paleomag one is a little premature for now. Sadly there are very few
234:, which explains the process. To be effective you need a group of editors involved ideally, it becomes less effective if it's down to just one or two editors. WikiProject Geology gets along OK, as there are enough of us out there to keep it reasonably effective but I find that
907:
We are appealing to all GOCE members, and any other editors who wish to participate, to come and help us reduce the number of articles needing copyediting, as well as the backlog of requests. If you have not signed up yet, why not take a look at the
614:
I was doing my routine vandalism patrol on my watchlist when your page move showed up. Moving a page over an existing one requires administrator assistance unless the existing page is just a redirect with no significant history.
909:
835:
426:
Thanks, Dpinna85. So his real claim to fame was that he knew a poet! And here I was thinking it had something to do with magnetism ;) Don't forget to sign your contributions to talk pages (just add four tildes).
921:
1016:
838:
for all the articles that are part of WikiProject
Geology (assuming that you haven't found it already). It's a quick way to keep an eye on a lot of articles, without having to watch them individually.
913:
916:
will be given to anyone who edits more than 4,000 words, with special awards for the top 5 in the categories: "Number of articles", "Number of words", and "Number of articles of over 5,000 words".
894:
459:
268:
BTW I indented your reply above, which is the normal style on talk pages. There is a fair bit of etiquette to learn but most editors don't get upset with newcomers and will just help out.
137:-
815:(particularly its second paragraph), to my (reverted) edits to it, and to the endless discussion with Sbharris concerning the question whether weight is a force. Thanks. --
248:
still lacking, I agree. Anyway this place can be a timesink and occasionally you come across difficult editors, but I think that overall the experience is good. Cheers,
1012:
904:. Although we have cleared the backlog of 2009 articles there are still 3,935 articles needing copyediting and any help, no matter how small, would be appreciated.
975:
Thanks for explaining that, Crusio. I'm not sure I agree with the consensus, but I'll start a discussion on the project site instead of editing the article again.
1078:
564:
901:
796:
277:
847:
862:
383:
353:
299:
257:
218:
683:
436:
327:
1043:
998:
984:
754:
720:
697:
665:
624:
605:
525:
398:
Hey RockMagnetist! Sorry for getting back to you so late. I have added the reference to
William Fuller Brown's death date on his wikipedia page.
829:
1063:
969:
483:
897:
is under way! It began on 1 July and so far 18 people have signed up to help us reduce the number of articles in need of copyediting.
230:
was started about 3½ years ago, when an editor just went ahead and created it. If you do want to go ahead at some point, then look at
1054:
Hello RockMagnetist, thank you so much for your notice. I deleted all templates to prevent issues with categories. Have a good day,
510:
948:
167:
geophysicists actively editing here - quite a few geologists like me that use geophysical data in their day job though. Cheers,
824:
781:
549:
730:- don't recall seeing it before, but then I hadn't done any merges for quite awhile. Old dogs learn new tricks. Good job.
231:
176:
739:
642:
589:
498:
418:
134:
130:
126:
235:
122:
118:
114:
110:
106:
102:
98:
94:
72:
479:
1028:
1049:
949:
671:
466:
for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative
414:
494:
227:
769:
488:
475:
374:
Not a problem, it was deleted within a couple of minutes after tagging - a nice clear case for deletion.
580:
get it before any more content was added. And yes I should have left you a note here first, apologies,
543:
315:
38:
1074:
1039:
980:
858:
792:
765:
750:
716:
693:
661:
601:
576:
560:
521:
432:
349:
295:
214:
1059:
497:
article should be of interest to you. The addition based on a
Science News blurb is questioned on
957:
777:
192:
51:
17:
802:
471:
454:
442:
1019:. I am informing you, because I was not sure if you have known about that. Have a nice day. --
1017:
Knowledge talk:WikiProject
Academic Journals/Writing guide#Impact factor only the most recent?
154:
Hi RockMagnetist, good to see someone who actually knows this stuff contributing. I split off
843:
787:
I have two articles in my user space that will point to it. I hope to move them out soon.--
402:
379:
323:
273:
253:
200:
172:
163:
8:
1055:
820:
772:). If you know of other articles that should link to it, you should create those links.
768:
is an orphaned article, i.e. no or very few other articles link to it (actually just the
538:
196:
155:
1070:
1035:
976:
854:
788:
773:
746:
712:
689:
657:
597:
556:
517:
428:
410:
345:
291:
210:
43:
536:
We need more geologists around. Welcome to
Knowledge - a constant work in progress :)
745:
Unlike me, you probably don't have to look at the instructions when you move a page.
570:
467:
463:
868:
501:
as the article it is based on is not yet in print and may be controversial. Thanks,
1024:
994:
965:
735:
679:
638:
620:
585:
506:
839:
375:
319:
269:
249:
168:
149:
50:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
937:
879:
816:
812:
808:
760:
203:
are among the best, so I'll be doing a lot of triage before I worry about them.
188:
184:
941:
653:
531:
406:
1006:
159:
1020:
1013:
Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Academic_Journals#Is_one_impact_factor_enough?
990:
961:
731:
675:
634:
616:
581:
502:
711:
is plagued with synonyms. It's a nuisance when you're writing about it!
462:
has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the
885:
708:
649:
238:
has very few active participants and is less effective because of it.
811:. Now, I would appreciate if you could give a look at the article
912:
and help us by adding your name and copyediting a few articles.
900:
This drive will give a 50% bonus for articles edited from the
448:
1069:
You're welcome. I think your page looks nicer that way too!
834:
Hi RockMagnetist, you may be interested in this link to the
853:
Thanks for the tip, Mikenorton. I'll keep that in mind.
344:
Thanks for that too, and sorry for making it necessary.
209:you know how the geology WikiProject got started?
187:) were the stubbiest of stubs, while others (like
318:tag on that page that you created by accident.
575:I noticed your move by "cut-n-paste" of the
726:Well i be... I'm learning. Never used that
1011:Hello, I have added to your discussion at
516:Thanks. I had a look at in and commented.
1015:a wikilink to the previous discussion
830:WikiProject Geology recent changes list
555:Hello, ResMar. Thanks for the welcome.
14:
1034:Snek01, thanks for pointing that out.
48:Do not edit the contents of this page.
807:Hi, we met recently discussing about
474:for further information. Thank you.
460:User:List of paleomagnetism articles
25:
232:Knowledge:WikiProject Council/Guide
23:
884:
290:Thanks. Now I know how to indent!
24:
1090:
872:
470:. You may also wish to read the
447:
29:
950:Journal of Geophysical Research
1079:16:32, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
1064:08:48, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
1044:05:23, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
1029:16:57, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
797:04:45, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
782:02:52, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
755:12:03, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
740:03:35, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
721:13:39, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
698:14:21, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
684:14:13, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
672:natural remanent magnetization
666:13:34, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
643:03:15, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
625:14:13, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
606:13:34, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
590:02:56, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
499:Talk:Brunhes–Matuyama reversal
13:
1:
999:15:54, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
985:15:49, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
970:15:44, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
565:02:02, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
550:18:51, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
526:16:57, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
511:14:08, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
484:15:25, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
384:21:27, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
354:21:20, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
328:20:23, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
300:21:20, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
278:20:09, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
258:20:09, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
219:15:16, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
195:) don't even exist yet. Your
863:12:53, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
848:10:05, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
825:08:56, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
770:list of mathematics articles
89:
7:
944:on 09:24, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
177:22:01, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
10:
1095:
458:that you made to the page
452:Welcome to Knowledge. The
895:backlog elimination drive
766:Adams-Williamson equation
577:natural remnant magnetism
495:Brunhes–Matuyama reversal
437:21:37, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
419:19:23, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
42:of past discussions with
960:. Hope this explains. --
925:Sign-up now <<<
1050:Re: Not user categories
472:introduction to editing
236:WikiProject Earthquakes
193:environmental magnetism
84:
71:
64:
62:
18:User talk:RockMagnetist
936:Sent on behalf of the
889:
476:Pharaoh of the Wizards
938:Guild of Copy Editors
888:
880:Guild of Copy Editors
869:GOCE drive invitation
633:your thoughts on it?
493:A recent addition to
183:pages and some (like
489:Geomagnetic reversal
201:plate reconstruction
164:plate reconstruction
989:OK, sounds good. --
910:current signatories
878:Greetings from the
836:recent changes list
674:per your comments.
648:Consider the pages
228:WikiProject Geology
197:magnetostratigraphy
156:magnetostratigraphy
902:GOCE requests page
890:
670:Moved the page to
162:article and added
945:
933:
932:
422:
405:comment added by
144:
143:
80:
79:
58:
57:
52:current talk page
1086:
958:WP:NOTADIRECTORY
935:
893:The latest GOCE
873:
548:
546:
457:
451:
421:
399:
314:Also I've put a
140:
82:
81:
75:
69:
60:
59:
33:
32:
26:
1094:
1093:
1089:
1088:
1087:
1085:
1084:
1083:
1052:
1009:
953:
929:
928:
883:
871:
832:
809:inertial frames
805:
763:
728:Template:Copied
573:
544:
537:
534:
491:
453:
445:
400:
316:speedy deletion
152:
139:... (up to 100)
138:
74:Archive 2 : -->
73:
65:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1092:
1082:
1081:
1056:Jacopo Werther
1051:
1048:
1047:
1046:
1008:
1005:
1004:
1003:
1002:
1001:
952:
947:
931:
930:
919:
918:
891:
876:
870:
867:
866:
865:
831:
828:
813:Weightlessness
804:
803:Weightlessness
801:
800:
799:
762:
759:
758:
757:
724:
723:
705:
704:
703:
702:
701:
700:
630:
629:
628:
627:
609:
608:
572:
569:
568:
567:
533:
530:
529:
528:
490:
487:
444:
443:September 2010
441:
440:
439:
397:
395:
394:
393:
392:
391:
390:
389:
388:
387:
386:
363:
362:
361:
360:
359:
358:
357:
356:
335:
334:
333:
332:
331:
330:
307:
306:
305:
304:
303:
302:
283:
282:
281:
280:
263:
262:
261:
260:
242:
241:
240:
239:
222:
221:
205:
204:
189:paleointensity
185:rock magnetism
158:from the main
151:
148:
146:
142:
141:
88:
78:
77:
70:
63:
56:
55:
34:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1091:
1080:
1076:
1072:
1071:RockMagnetist
1068:
1067:
1066:
1065:
1061:
1057:
1045:
1041:
1037:
1036:RockMagnetist
1033:
1032:
1031:
1030:
1026:
1022:
1018:
1014:
1000:
996:
992:
988:
987:
986:
982:
978:
977:RockMagnetist
974:
973:
972:
971:
967:
963:
959:
951:
946:
943:
939:
927:
926:
917:
915:
911:
905:
903:
898:
896:
887:
882:
881:
875:
874:
864:
860:
856:
855:RockMagnetist
852:
851:
850:
849:
845:
841:
837:
827:
826:
822:
818:
814:
810:
798:
794:
790:
789:RockMagnetist
786:
785:
784:
783:
779:
775:
774:Michael Hardy
771:
767:
756:
752:
748:
747:RockMagnetist
744:
743:
742:
741:
737:
733:
729:
722:
718:
714:
713:RockMagnetist
710:
707:
706:
699:
695:
691:
690:RockMagnetist
687:
686:
685:
681:
677:
673:
669:
668:
667:
663:
659:
658:RockMagnetist
655:
654:magnetization
651:
647:
646:
645:
644:
640:
636:
626:
622:
618:
613:
612:
611:
610:
607:
603:
599:
598:RockMagnetist
594:
593:
592:
591:
587:
583:
578:
566:
562:
558:
557:RockMagnetist
554:
553:
552:
551:
547:
542:
541:
527:
523:
519:
518:RockMagnetist
515:
514:
513:
512:
508:
504:
500:
496:
486:
485:
481:
477:
473:
469:
465:
461:
456:
450:
438:
434:
430:
429:RockMagnetist
425:
424:
423:
420:
416:
412:
408:
404:
385:
381:
377:
373:
372:
371:
370:
369:
368:
367:
366:
365:
364:
355:
351:
347:
346:RockMagnetist
343:
342:
341:
340:
339:
338:
337:
336:
329:
325:
321:
317:
313:
312:
311:
310:
309:
308:
301:
297:
293:
292:RockMagnetist
289:
288:
287:
286:
285:
284:
279:
275:
271:
267:
266:
265:
264:
259:
255:
251:
246:
245:
244:
243:
237:
233:
229:
226:
225:
224:
223:
220:
216:
212:
211:RockMagnetist
207:
206:
202:
198:
194:
190:
186:
181:
180:
179:
178:
174:
170:
165:
161:
157:
147:
136:
132:
128:
124:
120:
116:
112:
108:
104:
100:
96:
92:
87:
83:
76:
68:
61:
53:
49:
45:
44:RockMagnetist
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
1053:
1010:
954:
934:
920:
906:
899:
892:
877:
833:
806:
764:
727:
725:
631:
574:
539:
535:
492:
468:edit summary
446:
401:— Preceding
396:
160:stratigraphy
153:
145:
90:
85:
66:
47:
37:
455:recent edit
36:This is an
840:Mikenorton
376:Mikenorton
320:Mikenorton
270:Mikenorton
250:Mikenorton
169:Mikenorton
86:All Pages:
914:Barnstars
817:GianniG46
709:Remanence
650:magnetism
571:Page move
67:Archive 1
688:Thanks!
415:contribs
407:Dpinna85
403:unsigned
464:sandbox
150:Welcome
39:archive
1021:Snek01
991:Crusio
962:Crusio
940:using
761:orphan
732:Vsmith
676:Vsmith
635:Vsmith
617:Vsmith
582:Vsmith
503:Vsmith
924:: -->
923:: -->
922:: -->
532:Hello
16:<
1075:talk
1060:talk
1040:talk
1025:talk
1007:Info
995:talk
981:talk
966:talk
859:talk
844:talk
821:talk
793:talk
778:talk
751:talk
736:talk
717:talk
694:talk
680:talk
662:talk
652:and
639:talk
621:talk
602:talk
586:talk
561:talk
522:talk
507:talk
480:talk
433:talk
411:talk
380:talk
350:talk
324:talk
296:talk
274:talk
254:talk
215:talk
199:and
191:and
173:talk
133:-
129:-
125:-
121:-
117:-
113:-
109:-
105:-
101:-
97:-
93:-
942:AWB
545:Mar
540:Res
1077:)
1062:)
1042:)
1027:)
997:)
983:)
968:)
861:)
846:)
823:)
795:)
780:)
753:)
738:)
719:)
696:)
682:)
664:)
641:)
623:)
604:)
588:)
563:)
524:)
509:)
482:)
435:)
417:)
413:•
382:)
352:)
326:)
298:)
276:)
256:)
217:)
175:)
135:12
131:11
127:10
46:.
1073:(
1058:(
1038:(
1023:(
993:(
979:(
964:(
857:(
842:(
819:(
791:(
776:(
749:(
734:(
715:(
692:(
678:(
660:(
637:(
619:(
600:(
584:(
559:(
520:(
505:(
478:(
431:(
409:(
378:(
348:(
322:(
294:(
272:(
252:(
213:(
171:(
123:9
119:8
115:7
111:6
107:5
103:4
99:3
95:2
91:1
54:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.