4193:! I really appreciate the time you took to review my Australian Journal of Labour Law draft. Seriously, I know there is a huge backlog. Thank you so much! So, I know that creating a new article is a big deal, and actually I wanted to wait a while before I did this! However, in the list of journal articles on Knowledge, there is a note saying it is incomplete. This is one of the articles listed, but without a bluelink to click on. This journal is referenced in dozens of court cases, in books, etc/ I can easily provide a reference list to those, but they are not really relevant to Knowledge. I only created this article because it was a redlink listed in a Knowledge list, and thought that it would be a good place to start. Most journal articles do not get any press coverage or anything, their notability comes from being cited in other academic papers. The only thing I could do is add a list to the article showing where it has been cited previously? Happy to do that. Most people never talk about a journal article unless they are citing it? If you feel there is no way this article will get published, I will just let this go. There are only two journals in the Knowledge list which do not have entries, this is one of those two, I just wanted to complete that list. Most of the other journals are all stubs, because there is not much to say about them. I guess I could look up some famous cases or other scholars that have cited the journal? Anyway, thanks so much. Cheers,
2701:. While I understand your concern about WikiEd (and I did not realize this at the time I nominated the page for redirection), I really am confused by your decision to unilaterally close the discussion as a speedy keep. I'd ask that you reverse your speedy closure; an argument is provided for redirection in the AfD, which is enough to avoid the speedy closure criterion that you cited. I did not support a merger myself; I supported a redirect while keeping the history in order to make the redundancy eliminated and so the article subject could be covered in one place. While this does not explicitly prohibit editors from taking text from one to the other, I'm not advocating for a merge of the article content, so this doesn't meet
1734:) but was reverted by the closer and told to take my objections to the administratorās noticeboard. Should you be dissatisfied with the outcome of your current discussion with the closer, will you take your objections to the admin noticeboard as advised by the closer? Or will you leave it as us? If you do decide to take it to the noticeboard would you mind if I deferred to you to take the lead in writing the challenge? Your contributions on the subject articleās talk page and your aggregate contributions to the encyclopedia would appear to indicate that your commitment to this rsn closure issue and overall experience far exceeds mine
1319:
to the article (IP editor) also positively added something about another magician (COI?), as well as the person who wrote on the talk page about the conviction was another SPA account -- sounds like someone is very intent on making his crimes more public knowledge. Perhaps a victim, but also possibly an adversary in the field. Which even while the information is accurate it is a tiny but concerning. But to be clear motives do not detract from truth. And if Oliver is free to promote himself, others are equally free to factually detract from his public image.
2815:
31:
4310:
183:
2850:
5064:
4041:
3124:
268:
977:
2349:
4412:
3701:
2952:
3179:, which is excessively lengthy, but if you have, you will see that I am trying to arrange a set of RFCs, and that we aren't there yet, largely because I am having a difficult time in getting the participants to keep focused on what I see as the objective of putting together a set of RFCs, and also because there was a discussion of whether to AFD the article, which seemed to be decided as not taking the article to AFD, until it was taken to AFD.
1964:. However, due to your, ahem, humorous username, it is unlikely that your request will be considered. Since you will be regularly interacting with new editors, many of whom will be justifiably upset at being accused of abusing multiple accounts, you'll need to have a more appropriate username. I'd also recommend getting a username change if you intend on ever running for adminship, since that alone will get it shot down. Cheers!
2478:
4970:
4881:
3822:
3239:. I don't see any way that the current deletion discussion ends in a consensus to delete, though a "no consensus" outcome is honestly probably the most destructive thing that could happen because this will lead to everyone pressing the same deletion arguments and keep arguments again with the almost certain possibility that canvassing will occur because this is obviously a topic that a lot of people online seem to care about.
1036:
1636:. Except when community consensus is clearly established in discussions, such as from the result of an RfC or as from the result of substantial discussions with high participation, the RSP listing isn't necessarily reflecting community consensus. Discussion on RSN might actually help to flush this out a bit and to improve the extent to which the RSP listing can be seen as proceeding from a community consensus.
895:
323:
2256:, Love your detailed explanation as always! When we list a source like a video and it has the name of the cast members, is it considered a valid link? I understand you can't use the IMDB entry as a valid source. But how about a real video of the content? For instance, if I say the subject has done voices for X,Y and Z and then link to the actual voice mimic audio file, is that considered valid?
4361:
4454:
4243:
112:
3923:
1682:
2680:. The WikiEd dashboard seems to be down right now, but I'd hazard a guess that the latter was the article they were assigned, but that since their instructions directed them to make a userspace draft, they then didn't know how to reconcile the two versions. I'm just going to merge them and explain what I did to the editor; AfDs can be extremely alienating to new editors. ā
2618:. You can easily unmask it if you disagree. I left the gallery section at the end of the article because they are photos of alumni mentioned in the text. In some places you'll see I masked irrelevant information. If you disagree with any of the masking you can simply remove the arrow dash characters before and after it and the sentence will be reinstated.
574:. That seemed to be the frame in which the community was discussing the issue. And, it did not seem like there was a general consensus to purge Olympics participation from a presumption of notability outside of that scope. The discussion focused on the general notion of participation in the Olympics, rather than participation in any
1752:. I think that the most proper way to move forward, for now, is to discuss the close with the closer on their talk page. It is generally improper for a closed discussion to be re-opened by a user other than the uninvolved closer unilaterally. I find substantial issues with the top line summary of the close in light of
579:
for a presumption of notability) would presumably grant enough significant coverage (or plain notability by some other measure) for a competitor in that particular sport. Or editors could apply a similar analysis and find that, for a particular sport, the top X people are presumed notable where X is not three.
4506:
Thank you for leaving this message. I left a detailed description of how I evaluated the sources atop the submitted draft. Many of the sources were plainly not independent due to their author also being involved in running the organization, though for other sources I've made notes on the page itself.
4481:
Comments regarding the review say references "do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject". I was wondering if you could expound on these comments? Is an article in a newspaper considered
680:
Thank you for reaching out on this. I think
Twinkle may be running into an issue with automatically notifying people of CSDs when they select a redirect-specific deletion criteria, even with the box checked. I also have the page curation script running; could that lead to a conflict? In any case, how
649:
so please be sure that in your
Preferences, you have the "Notify page creator" box checked and that you have every CSD criteria checked. I think the Twinkle default is to only have a few speedy deletion criteria checked but it really doesn't matter whether the page has been tagged as a G11, C1 or R3,
213:
Removed proposed deletion. I encourage anyone proposing deletion to do more research before doing so. The
Universities Research Association Inc is a consortium of 89 research universities around the world and is a partnership to manage one of the premier research laboratories in the world (Fermilab).
4550:
The one article that predates the founding of the organization talks about the networkās
Executive Directorās grandfather. In another article is a reference to how the Executive Directorās grandfather influenced her. I see the background and influences on the outlook and formation of the Executive
4531:
If I might digress a little, I remember when I was at a recruiting fair at college where companies were looking to hire recent graduates. At the
Proctor and Gamble table sat three of their products, right at the front of the table. One of the products was Tide. This really stood out to me, seeing
3314:
Zeroth, I realize that, in asking if you had any suggestions, I was not clear as to what I was asking. I was asking sincerely for suggestions about the dispute resolution process in general and the mediation process in particular. I was also asking about what to do about MKUCR, but my question was
3211:
I think honestly that if there is at least one editor party to the dispute resolution process that is totally unwilling to accept anything other than their current point of view that the dispute resolution process will fail; the point of DR is to get editors to agree to some mutual solution and move
1686:
article in question because it was written by a news editor that has been highly used across
Knowledge, so I thought it may be appropriate. In case you did not see my note on the Talk page, you can read it in full on the Frontiers Media Talk page. Thanks for helping me better understand what sources
1623:
to cover claims involving individuals other than
Stavast; there aren't exceptions made for claims about the identity of her spouse, fiancƩ, child, parents, or close relatives in the BLP policy. If anyone were to come by and contest the material (I don't see why anybody would, but you never know), it
1318:
I think this will ultimately result in what I predicted over at COIN but it is best to go through the established processes when it is contentious and we have both COI and other involved editors dealing with this issue. As an aside I find it very interesting that the person who first added the crime
1291:
No bone to pick here with the article subject. My reading of the sources is that he's a public figure and a well-known now-retired magician, and that these sorts of widely reported criminal charges would belong in his article given their relative level of coverage. However I've self-reverted to make
582:
The sorts of questions of how to create SNGs for particular sports are not resolved by the RfC that I closed. The close itself was intended to reflect a consensus that participating in the
Olympics, in and of itself, does not merit a presumption of notability. This is should not be read to supersede
578:
sportās competition at the
Olympics. For example, some might expect it to be more likely that there exists in-depth coverage of Olympic figure skaters than, say, 1900s tug-of-war contestantsāthey might find it reasonable that Olympic participation (with or without a restriction on the earliest date
4582:
is because you see the network as being inseparably connected to the practice of enthronements. I'm going to push back a little on thatāthere are certainly some products that are notable even if the company that produces them is not itself notable. The reason for this is how
Knowledge intentionally
3234:
The first problem is the reason that I think any sort of non-binding mediation here is going to fail. It most significantly highlights the extreme gap between editors party to the DR IMO, and it's a bit hard to get editors who argue that a subject is inherently OR/SYNTH that anything in the article
3171:
You wrote: "This seems to be a feasible outline, and I see a path forward that involves a bunch of RfCs to determine how to weight content of the first two sections, but this seems like it would reasonably summarize the topic area. If the issue is the current content in some sections, then that is
2224:
on how to proceed. Alternatively, rather than reverting wholesale, you can manually revert the portions of edits made that you think were detrimental to the article, though be sure to explain why you are doing so in both the edit summary when making your edits and on the talk page after making them
1224:
I can see your passionate about this article, but your passion seems misplaced. You are not dealing with some POV or involved editor here. I plainly explained the reason for the removal both in the edit summary and on the AfD, but instead of discussing an item you know is contentious, you POV push,
2531:
and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion
2169:
Thanks for your feedback and review of my article Jonathan Roumie. After the acceptance I noticed couple of edits and comments about how itās not supported with enough documentation. And I also noticed something that is substantiated by references was removed by a user calling it promotional fluff
1827:
this sounds good. My only concern is if other editors put the rsn decision about aspi on the rsp list before you get the chance to issue the close challenge. If timing is an issue and you canāt do it then let me know and Iāll see what I can do to help out. If it isnāt then I look forward to seeing
1643:
explicitly notes that it doesn't necessarily reflect community consensus. I don't think that there's a reasonable reading that the source assessment table reflects a community consensus of sorts, and pointing to a nicely-formatted table that you created in a previous discussion doesn't actually do
548:
mentions "Olympics" in many other places on the page, essentially duplicating (before) that Olympic participants in the respective sport were notable. Based on this RfC, should those sport-specific guidelines also be updated? Or are they considered exceptions, not within the scope of the RfC. A
4602:
If there is reliable, independent sourcing that connects the Sacred Heart Enthronement Network to the practice of enthronement in some particularly unique and substantial wayāsuch as being the only organization within the Church that has come up with this idea and engages in its promotionāI'd be
3285:
Once these are done, the scope of the article should be much more clear. Once the scope of the article is clear, then we can actually move on to evaluating particular content to see how it lines up with relevant scholarship. Until the scope of the article is clear, these sorts of discussions are
1261:
I don't intend to discuss or debate this issue on your talk page. But rather point these out to point that this is a contentious issue, that should not be summarily dismissed with a simple click of UNDO. My ask is that you revert your own edit in the interest of privacy and process -- or -- talk
653:
If you expect doing a lot of this type of work, you might find it handy to check off the box to maintain a deletion log, for CSDs, PRODs and XfDs. It can be useful to look it over later and see if your taggings led to deletions and, if not, you can see why. I have been around 8 years and I still
3258:
Second, it's becoming increasingly apparent to me that the term "mass killings" doesn't have community consensus on what it actually means. What sources agree on is that the big three mass killing regimes (Soviet, PRC, Cambodia) were mass killings. After the RfC on whether this whole concept is
2146:
Tulu script is an olden script . This page will help for research people who is doing research regarding tulu script and tulu tradition. Presently there are so many people learning script from various places. So many people are working to teach tulu script. Karnataka Tulu sahithya academy and
1296:
policy and its application to this specific case via edit summaries wouldn't be productive nor beneficial to the project if it becomes a back-and-forth thing. I think that the extent to which he's a public figure could be pertinent to some potential arguments relating to deletion as an outcome
4554:
As for āThe EWTN source that clearly is a talk showā, I see it as giving insights into the network. This is what the network does: promote Enthronements. It is one thing to write about what the network does. It is another to give a concrete example of the type of promotion that the network
1985:
While my username has not been disruptive to any of the work I have done over my thousands of edits on Knowledge, and I have already posted a reason for why I chose this name above, I am ok to change it if this is going to be disruptive for clerking SPI and interacting with new users. I have
4136:
at 21:17, 3 November 2021? I don't remember seeing any actual evidence that real people feel "confined" by their mobility devices. I only remember seeing one editor speculating that it might happen. If that's what you've based that comment on, you might want to remove it from the closing
1904:
I am so sorry about that. I talked to some of the people in the house and one of them was playing a chess game with a friend, and in order to not lose, edited the wiki page so that the made up rule appeared. Thank you for telling me and I will try to make sure it won't happn again. Cheers!
1232:
on the issue. I think there is not enough consideration of the policies, precedents and facts when evaluating how this issue has been handled in the past. (The COI/POV editors do not help any!). THANK YOU for contributing to the AfD and the information you provided was definitely helpful!
4634:. The video amounts more or less to an interview with the founders of the Sacred Heart Enthronement Network on a daytime Catholic talk show. This sort of thing might be helpful in understanding the purpose and goals of the organization, but it would be a very hard sell for that to be
3254:
and any attempts to write a summary style article article are probably not going to gain community consensus. If the consensus is that it is not fringe (or if it's indeed the majority view), then the article is best as a summary style article that branches off into the other mass
2301:
another picture you have seen of him. Likewise, if you'd link to the voice mimic audio file, it would probably not be OK inasmuch as we'd need the primary source (the audio file) to explicitly affirm that it's the article subject saying it (it would probably be a violation of
2651:
I'll trust your judgement on the masking; it's not my area of expertise and your judgements seem reasonable. I'll take a look at the sections that you've indicated to need work, and I'll try to have this peer-reviewed for a content check before it gets submitted for GA. ā
2705:'s criteria for a speedy keep. If you believe that the text should be merged, rather than redirected, you should be willing to make that case at the AfD instead of prematurely closing it as a speedy keep and shortly thereafter merging the content of the two articles. ā
1729:
Greetings MikeHawk10. I see that you are currently in communication with the closer of the discussion thread about the Australian strategic policy institute on the reliable sources noticeboard and appear to be challenging to the close. I have also challenged the close
1756:
and how we generally characterize biased sources on RSP that are reliable in their area of expertise, but I would like to hear more from the closer on their intended meaning of the close (and to give them a chance to tweak the close) before I would take it to AN. ā
1585:
There is zero precedent found in guidelines or community consensus for summarily banning the use of all references that happen to contain content that's under RfC, when those references are used to support uncontroversial content unrelated to the topic of the RfC
3337:
misses the point of my role. As the mediator, my job is to stay in a role of attempting to develop the RFCs as long as I can, in spite of conduct allegations and conduct violations. If I have to abandon that role by failing the DRN, I will make a statement to
1001:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
1884:
Hi Milehawk10 itās been a couple of days since your last comment concerning this issue and I see you may have forgotten about this as your edit history shows youāve been preoccupied with other articles and topics, but can follow up on this? Thanks in advance
2228:
In general, pages are not protected due to disputes over content, unless there's really bad edit warring (which often results in some users being blocked by admins who are trying to keep the peace). If you'd like to request page protection, you can head to
1772:
this sounds good. But just to clarify will you take your objections to the admin noticeboard if the closer doesnāt change the decision? Or will you leave it as is? It sounds like you will take it to the administratorās noticeboard but Iām not 100% sure
4152:
Did you miss PsiÄ„edelisto, who themselves identified as a "wheelchair-bound person" on 01:14, 21 November 2021? It was more than one user that I based that comment on. I agree that the phrasing was not optimal, and I've tweaked it to be more clear. ā
3263:
isn't plainly described by the term of "mass killing", but the notion of "50K deaths over 5 years" that I'm seeing some editors advocate for goes against my native understanding of what a mass killing is and also would apparently draw a line between
4542:
On a different note, the company I work for was recently bought. The CEO of the company that brought us said the reason they bought the company was because of the people. The people are the company. Take away the people and there is no company.
4212:
right here is the list, and Labour Law and Law & History are the only two in the list. Please could you look at the other entries? the James Cook University Law Review is only one sentence, as many of them are. I intend on expanding thoseĀ :)
3315:
partly sarcastic, partly the result of frustration, and partly wondering if anyone had any new ideas after reading 27,000 words. I apologize if I wasted your time in asking a question that would partly agree with what I am already trying to do.
1251:& "Material that may adversely affect a person's reputation should be treated with special care; in many jurisdictions, repeating a defamatory claim is actionable, and there are additional protections for subjects who are not public figures."
4618:
I agree that the quality of a company's labor contracts-in-force is a factor to consider when undertaking a corporate acquisition, but having a notable set of employees doesn't really have a bearing on the corporation's notability itself since
4289:
1193:
396:. To be honest, I've never experienced a "the guideline is bad thus keep" discussion before, though I guess this is how guidelines can change over time. My hope is that it doesn't turn out to be a big waste of time for all those involved. ā
1935:: I deleted the GA review transclusion because editors can access the review from the template at the top of the Talk page. This is fairly common, but you can keep the GA review transcluded on the Talk page if you prefer. Happy editing! ---
162:
2170:
when there is clearly a reference cited. Is locking the article something I can look at? The last thing I want is for the article to be vandalised, since this is a BLOP. And how do I go about applying a protection level on my article?
4102:), we are currently engaging in a discussion around the WSJ lede statement concerning the Journalās editorial board. You made a change to this statement in the past. If youād like to contribute to this conversation, please join us at
2212:), then you want to explain in the discussion why each of the sources is reliable for the claim that is being made (many appear to be primary source videos; do they show the names of the people cast at any point?). Be careful not to
3764:
Please note, due to a technical error you may not have been able to previously vote, or you may have received this message twice or after opting out. This is a one-time notification. If you are having any issues voting now, please
3318:
First, I said that you were not required to have read the 27,000 words of DRN. Since I don't know whether you have read that lengthy exchange, I don't know whether you are mostly agreeing with me or mostly disagreeing with me.
1521:"When Heavy.com cites another source for their own article, it is preferable to read and cite the original source instead." This Heavy.com article clearly relies on Stavast's Instagram for her engagement announcement, and per the
3913:
4228:
598:
Just a suggestion to improve legibility of closing statements: perhaps in cases where you are making a long statement, you could consider just placing it at the top of the discussion, rather than in a sidebar box? Thanks.
4546:
One of the comments I see is that the references do not talk about the network. However, I would say that they talk about the significant people that make up the network, so in that way, they talk about the network.
1102:
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on
2357:
3675:
4577:
What I'm reading is that there is a (relatively) longstanding practice of enthronements to the Sacred Heart that predates the formal establishment of the network, and the reason that you've created the page on the
3322:
Second, I have already taken issue with one editor saying that "mass killing" is straightforward. In particular, there isn't agreement about the two famines, about whether they should be counted as mass killings.
4013:
You're very welcome! I've now added it. It will most probably run within the next 24 hours, and I'll be monitoring that it worked as intended. Remember to dust it off regularly and change the oil once in a while.
2152:
1005:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
766:
2233:
and file a request there, following the instructions on the page. It seems unlikely to me that protection would be granted here; there doesn't appear to be edit warring and the BLP issues seem to have been dealt
2289:
The reason I say the videos is because if there are (for example) movie/TV show credits, then those credits could be considered reliable for the purposes of saying that he was in the movie/TV show. However, you
4538:
For the Sacred Heart Enthronement Network, the product is the practice of Enthroning the Sacred Heart of Jesus. So, in the sources, I am saying if you want to know about the organization, look at the product.
97:
3249:
is itself a fringe theory. If the consensus is that it is fringe, the article probably needs to be rewritten as an article detailing the specific relationship between communism and mass killings in line with
1207:
1174:
370:. The relevant guideline is very clear, and you put a lot of effort into complying with that guideline, after I urged you to do so. There's now a multi-venue discussion going on about the appropriateness of
5058:
4035:
3118:
1624:
would have to be removed unless we have a non self-published source; Heavy.com is such a source and I believe that its inclusion as a reference improves the article's sourcing. I would gladly take this to
4615:
sufficient to establish the notability of Tide as a company or brand?" I think the answer is no (unless we want to presume notability for all laundry detergent brands, which is a bad idea in my opinion).
262:
3259:
fringe is concluded as "it is not", I'd fire off an RfC to try to determine what constitutes a "mass killing" for the purpose of a summary style article. I personally find it hard to imagine that the
2208:(read that bluelink first though, since it describes the "insert a bold edit, revert the bold edit, discuss how to move forward" process fairly well). If you object to edits challenging the sourcing (
3728:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
2979:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
1088:
3766:
3272:āthe definition doesn't seem like an obviously correct one. An RfC would help to resolve the criteria for what gets listed as a child article, so that this way we can get rid of the potential for
2787:
1849:
Ultimately, any editor has the prerogative to issue a close challenge if they'd like. I'm reading everything over again today and I'll let you know over the next 24 hours what I'm going to do. ā
2197:
To answer the last question first, that's probably a caching issue with Google. I'm able to get to the correct page when clicking on the link with both Google and Bing, so I think it's resolved.
4329:
1060:; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Knowledge. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
3959:
3245:
First, fire off an RfC (probably on the fringe theories noticeboard and also post on CENT, since this will affect a whole host of Eastern European history articles) on whether the idea that
200:
4535:
But, here I was evaluating companies and one company says āour company is our products. Without our products, we donāt exist. If you want to know about our company, look at our products.ā
4528:
You wrote: āThe practice of enthroning the Sacred Heart of Jesus itself seems to be given significant coverage by the sources present. However, the same cannot be said about the network.ā
924:
3797:
3189:
Do you have a suggestion for how to go forward in this dispute? Do you have a suggestion for how to handle protracted content disputes where editors have strong incompatible opinions?
4389:
3744:
2995:
1545:
Editing after others have raised objections may be viewed as disruptive editing or edit warring. Be patient; make your improvements in accord with consensus after the RfC is resolved.
3280:" do and, while lists are different than prose articles, I do think that this sort of thing would help to regulate what gets lumped into the article in order to keep it maintainable.
3186:
is difficult is that a protracted dispute is typically one in which there are different editors with strong and incompatible ideas, and that it is not easy to get to the RFC stage.
2156:
5101:
4078:
3161:
2112:
I reverted. Both of these were disruptive. If you cease editing disruptively, but instead choose to edit productively, then I see no need to make a formal report. Happy editing! ā
4334:
3714:
2965:
1109:. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the
1030:
305:
3432:
822:
Not intentional at all; the conflict system tangled my comment with yours and somehow removed yours (I double-checked too, which is doubly frustrating!). Very sorry about that.
1807:. I'm mulling over it; I'm seeing a good bit of opposition on the RSN thread itself, and I've discussed it with the user on their talkpage. I'm going to be writing a piece for
3781:
2161:
1510:
4603:
interested to read it. It seems like what you're saying, however, is that the practice of enthronements predates the founding of the organization by quite a number of years.
4641:
Again, I'm fairly convinced that the practice of enthronement (in the context of devotion to the Sacred Heart) is notable based upon the sources you've provided (and also a
4439:
1164:
4607:
also indicates that there have been a number of groups that have promoted Sacred Heart enthronements. Based off of my understanding, an appropriate analogous question with
4384:
3671:
232:
2772:
4476:
2466:
2275:
2184:
2173:
Also I noticed that when I click on the Knowledge page Jonathan Roumie on Google search the page automatically redirects to āThe Chosenā. How do I remove the redirect?
2148:
1126:
316:
205:
4685:
3656:
4789:
4564:
4493:
4269:
3464:
3440:
3022:
1445:
965:
257:
142:
4661:
might be helpful in establishing notability, but I can't find sources that cover the network itself in a way that would indicate notability after an extensive search.
2220:, there's no exception here and there's no real way to assert that. If you open discussions on the talk page and explain your analysis, then that would be helpful in
3456:
3448:
2754:
1419:
1387:
1213:
1025:
983:
967:
5106:
2545:
2317:. In other words, it would have to be hosted on some reliable service so that we can trust that it hasn't been tampered with by a random person prior to its upload.
1961:
1315:
No bone here either... I think there is good discussion taking place at AfD and your research has been helpful. And your insights on other AfD are also insightful!
480:
This does not seem to meet the criteria for a G10. Content is sourced and not entirely negative. It may still warrant deletion per BLP, you may want to take it to
4867:
3538:
1278:
374:
with that/those AFDs as a test-case, and the first of those articles has been nominated again. So maybe something will come of it. *sigh*. Keep up the good work.
5209:
5153:
5128:
4805:
4781:
4749:
3500:
3424:
2528:
2485:
2471:
1640:
1483:
1395:
1355:
1212:
998:
907:
794:
you are totally correct; thatās rather embarrassing on my behalf. I've apologized to the editor on their talk page. Thank you for letting me know about this. ā
4821:
4797:
4757:
3488:
3480:
3416:
2661:
1528:
Regardless of whether Heavy.com can be considered a reliable source here, I tried to be more clear in my next removal of your addition of the Heavy.com source
1411:
1403:
1363:
1188:
410:
Oh, its the intersection of gender equality and professional (or not) sports, it will absolutely be a colossal waste of time. But none of that is your fault.
5219:, if you are busy no worries, I understand, I can always request someone else finish it off. Either way thanks for your help in reviewing it so far. Regards
4920:
4222:
3598:
3584:
2121:
4773:
4107:
3408:
2444:
2324:. If you think that it's not absolutely clear that the source backs up that he's in something, it's probably not an appropriate use of a primary source. ā
1371:
936:
319:
that you were interested in becoming a SPI clerk. Could you please ensure your entry is up to date, and confirm that you are still interested. Many thanks
3685:
4765:
4482:
significant coverage and not just a passing mention? Is a Catholic newspaper a secondary source independent of the subject? Could you be more specific?
3691:
3472:
3390:
3303:
3089:
1435:
1427:
355:
3172:
something that the request for comment process is made for; protracted WP:DR seems to be running into the same shortcomings of the WP:Mediation Cabal."
3110:
2460:
422:
405:
4268:. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions ā kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the
2434:
1262:
about it on the article page. I am presuming an enormous amount of good faith in you at the moment and hoping that you don't have a bone to pick here.
467:
4176:
4162:
2333:
2246:
2058:
2044:
1788:
Hi Mikehawk10. I am not sure if my request for clarification escaped your notice but is it possible that can you follow up on this? Thanks in advance
1335:
1310:
868:
5229:
4829:
3943:
Thank you for reviewing or re-reviewing 209 articles, which helped contribute to an overall 1276-article reduction in the backlog during the drive. (
3871:
2760:
1719:
1696:
1661:
1168:
690:
531:
516:
367:
4673:
4516:
2838:
2746:
2714:
2635:
2417:
I heavily believe that Juan Mata is one of the best midfielders in the last decade and his period at Chelsea proves so. Why did you change my edit?
1152:
5191:
5172:
5032:, and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to
4935:, and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to
4604:
3886:, and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to
3829:
2353:
1872:
1858:
1837:
1822:
1782:
811:
781:
629:
608:
4468:
3562:
1628:
to discuss the reliability of the Heavy.com source. Its current listing doesn't really have more weight than an essay; keep in mind that RSP is a
5017:
4977:
4930:
4813:
4027:
4008:
2141:
1973:
1379:
4888:
336:
4851:
4837:
4146:
3522:
3508:
2735:(all 3 lines) should not be in that article, then go ahead and remove it, though it is relevant and referenced so I don't see why you would. ā
2013:
I reset up the move, using the process you described, could you let me know if I have done everything correctly? Thanks so much for the help.
1467:
1453:
668:
3881:
2406:
2003:
1506:
615:
600:
5163:! Really sorry that his had slipped my mind. I'll take a look through the changes and let you know any response over the next hour or so. ā
4957:
4419:
for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article.
3060:
5027:
3349:
Fifth, it is true that protracted dispute resolution very seldom results in compromise. Protracted disputes have to be resolved by RFC.
956:
4459:
Hi Mhawk10, Wish you a Merry Christmas and a very Happy New Year, Thank you for your support and great work on Knowledge. Happy Holidays.
3630:
3326:
Third, it is true that there isn't going to be a compromise, and I have been and am trying to direct the process toward a set of RFCs.
2942:
1766:
1731:
739:
474:
275:
3908:
5053:
4691:
Please note that one of the !voters for Option 2ā3Kingdoms, mentioning of fringe/extreme viewsāhas been indefinitely blocked for being
4444:
2035:
You've moved it to the new title within the Draft namespace, so you've done that correctly if your intent was to keep it as a draft. ā
4710:
2136:
2090:
1950:
3657:
https://wap.business-standard.com/article/pti-stories/areas-between-gairsain-bhararisain-to-be-developed-as-smart-114110401051_1.html
2691:
1894:
1813:
as my primary editing task until that article is complete, but it's likely that I could write a challenge to the close after that. ā
1797:
1743:
1096:
1071:
988:
637:
217:
Happy to discuss further but I do encourage you to do research first. If you have suggestions for improving the page, please do so.
3381:
a signpost article, so I'm going to take that on right now, but please ping me if I don't get back to you over the next 36 hours. ā
2937:
1920:
1536:
4115:
3861:
2426:
2022:
1667:
4256:
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Knowledge! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
3364:
2799:
125:
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Knowledge! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
4416:
720:
654:
maintain deletion logs. It can also alert you if a page that was deleted has been recreated as it might need to be tagged again.
346:. Thank you for your message. I'm still interested in becoming an SPI clerk and I will update my entry to bring it up-to-date. ā
5036:. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the
4939:. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the
3890:. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the
3611:
Hi, MHawk10 I'm working on a school project I appreciate the help but if you could just leave alone for a month that be great.
3247:
mass killings committed by communist regimes were unique in some way from mass killings committed by regimes of other ideologies
846:
592:
4855:
4737:
4732:
4595:, but they don't necessarily inherit notability from their mission itself (the fact that a religious building is listed on the
4364:
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.
4202:
3526:
3396:
2901:. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to
2467:
1556:
1532:
1471:
3198:
2380:
444:
4704:
4626:
I agree that the EWTN talk show can be usable to give insights into the network, but that particular show isn't one in which
3986:
2086:
1343:
1095:
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject,
765:
BLPvios. Since they're a brand-new user, might be a good idea to apologize. (I noticed this while reviewing Spicy's close at
558:
2905:. As with all user rights, be aware that if abused, or used in controversial ways without consensus, your page mover status
2858:
4863:
4642:
4596:
3777:
3534:
3018:
2147:
government approved to teach tulu script. This page will help people who are willing to learn tulu script .. Thank you..
1479:
494:
89:
935:
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself
734:
4873:
3809:
1301:), so I think that would be the proper forum to have the discussion around that point rather than at the article talk. ā
1140:
1114:
1110:
1065:
1053:
1044:
874:
81:
76:
64:
59:
2109:
386:
4406:
4402:
4395:
4347:
4340:
3277:
758:
645:
Please remember to leave a talk page notification any time you tag a page for speedy deletion, CSD. I see that you use
310:
4599:
does not necessarily mean that the religious organization that owns or meets in the building is notable, for example).
3212:
forward. In this case, the fundamental issues that editors don't seem to be agreeing on, in order of importance, are:
2886:
2310:
to link a voice file and say that it's 100% the person based on the sound of the voice alone). Do these examples help?
5033:
4936:
4120:
3887:
3626:
3286:
going to go in endless circles. And, if you believe and have evidence that people are acting in bad faith by being a
3083:
3054:
2928:
If you do not want the page mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing!
2418:
1955:
1912:
1105:
206:
4129:, you wrote that "Others still noted that there were indeed people who do feel confined/bound to their wheelchair".
1606:
that an argument that the addition of that reference in the way that I did is somehow precluded by text found on an
1254:. Therefore, it might be a really good idea to remove this contentious information, and wait out the AfD -- this is
4688:. To me, this looks like a supervote or over-verbosity failing to convey the very obvious consensus for Option 2.
2906:
2890:
2550:
1203:
745:
2209:
2105:
1580:
he grew up in Colorado and moved to Las Vegas where her then-fiancƩ Gavin was living when she got engaged in 2016.
916:
Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
708:
583:
all other established subject notability guidelines listed within NSPORT that involve the Olympics in some way. ā
4859:
4301:
4280:
4230:
3814:
3773:
3530:
3032:
3014:
2902:
2866:" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and
2271:
1475:
1249:
174:
153:
99:
3650:
3038:
1578:
source (which is fine for things like engagements and the like), and the reference is used to support the text,
1567:
3544:
1607:
220:
Furthermore, if you wish to delete a page, please open the discussion on the Talk page first where it belongs.
4551:
Director as significant factors influencing the network and important information to share about the network.
2648:
Thank you so much! This is really helpful and I really appreciate the time you put in to copyedit the article.
4962:
4099:
3606:
2049:
Fantastic, and the non draft page will be deleted at some point before any other steps can be made, correct?
1724:
138:
5020:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page
4923:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page
4591:). Religious nonprofits (which this appears to be) has a slightly lower bar for being presumed notable, per
4507:
Are there specific questions you have about that long comment that I left to explain the source analysis? ā
4296:
Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to
3874:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page
1676:, I hope to touch base with you regarding the Frontiers Media COVID-19 hub request edit that was posted at
169:
Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to
4846:
4297:
4276:
4103:
3948:
3737:
3594:
3558:
3517:
2988:
2788:
Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(television)#Request_for_comment_to_establish_this_notability_guideline_as_an_SNG
2667:
2631:
2602:
section and I have masked material in a number of sections that is out of date including the introduction,
1710:
19_hubs]]. If you still have time to review, I would appreciate your feedback. If not, I understand. Best,
1462:
1258:
so there is no rush, and we should error on the side of privacy. I believe this is a reasonable approach.
1163:
If this fact is not included then all his dead link to people he supposedly photographed should be erased.
945:
170:
149:
1932:
1529:
1503:
3749:
3067:
3000:
2509:
2493:
2082:
1677:
1199:
716:
435:
They were not exact recreations, namely, the pages now show that the players have an ongoing pro career.
2564:
Checking the article's edit history will give you a clear idea of any changes. I updated details in the
1680:. I found another source that mentions Frontiers Media Covid-19 knowledge hub. Also, I had proposed the
5037:
5023:
4940:
4926:
3891:
3877:
2844:
2533:
1943:
1298:
1179:
Not all dead links (archives are fine), but the list of exhibitions should be significantly trimmed. ā
1049:
38:
4994:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was
4905:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was
2451:. In other words, if you're going to add that statement, you need to find a reliable source for it. ā
1594:, even though the use of the source in the article doesn't then I'd point you towards the notion that
3360:
3194:
2916:
2777:
2768:
2132:
992:
883:
47:
17:
2386:
For clarification, you are not the main subject of the thread, but I did briefly mention you in it.
650:
page creators should receive a notification when a page they created has been tagged for deletion.
248:
from? And, I think the PROD rationale explained my views on the state of the article pretty well. ā
5011:
4723:
4265:
3352:
Sixth, do you have any general recommendations about how to deal with protracted content disputes?
3131:
2921:
2008:
1969:
1494:
Hi Mikehawk10, I am writing to follow up on my removal of your addition of the Heavy.com article, "
1252:
1198:
Please help to perfect and publish a draft of the article entitled (J. Mario Belougi). Thank you.
228:
5084:
subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
4061:
subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
3144:
subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
1194:
Please help to perfect and publish a draft of the article entitled (J. Mario Belougi). Thank you.
288:
subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
5003:
4391:
4336:
4218:
4198:
4111:
3622:
3590:
3589:
Thank you once again Mikehawk. You gave me my first GA! It's been a pleasure working with youĀ :)
3570:
3554:
3221:
3220:(Is the article about the relationship between a communist ideology and mass killing, or is it a
2867:
2643:
2627:
2342:
1916:
1899:
1099:, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
450:
They were almost identical to the versions of the Knowledge page archived at Everybody Wiki. See
196:
137:. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they
5118:. I was not sure if the ping went through as I did not recieve a notification that it was sent.
4522:
Thanks for the detailed descriptions. I did not see those initially. Here are some responses:
4700:
4172:
4142:
3856:
3805:
2412:
1629:
753:
712:
332:
3346:
if someone takes it there instead). I am trying to minimize conduct issues as long as I can.
2614:
section is masked because it does not really add to reader's understanding of the article per
2610:
sections. Some of this may be worth updating, some perhaps not. The gallery that followed the
5227:
5207:
5189:
5151:
5141:
5126:
4982:
4893:
3834:
3725:
3175:
Yes. Do you have a suggestion? You are not expected to have read the dispute resolution at
3077:
3048:
2976:
2898:
2422:
2267:
2066:
1936:
1715:
1692:
1595:
1566:
and thank you for your message. I disagree strongly with your assertion any implication that
1489:
1158:
817:
246:
you wish to delete a page, please open the discussion on the Talk page first where it belongs
5133:
Hi again, just wanted check youāre still planning on finishing /responding to the Zuby GAN?
3229:
The way that sources should be weighted in the text of the article once scope is determined.
4620:
4560:
4489:
4083:
3964:
3736:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
3681:
3614:
3372:
3356:
3309:
3206:
3190:
3106:
2987:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
2882:
2834:
2826:
2764:
2710:
2673:
2657:
2456:
2329:
2321:
2259:
2242:
2128:
2117:
2099:
2078:
2074:
2040:
1999:
1991:
1926:
1908:
1854:
1818:
1762:
1657:
1513:
and stated "and per pending RfC". In both AfDs, it is noted that this Heavy.com article is
1306:
1184:
1148:
864:
807:
799:
730:
686:
625:
588:
539:
512:
463:
440:
401:
351:
253:
3973:, would you like me to set up a nice archival bot for your talk page, as a Hanukkah gift?
8:
4909:
4900:
4715:
4435:
4380:
4249:
4234:
2814:
2497:
2180:
2054:
2018:
1980:
1965:
1616:
1330:
1273:
1097:
requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license
1020:
837:
239:
224:
4106:
under the heading āShould editorial opinions be posted in the lede summary.ā Take care.
707:
Thank you for your contributions, but please be careful with reverts because edits like
5049:
4325:
4214:
4194:
4126:
4048:
3970:
3636:
3273:
3176:
2933:
2875:
2871:
2782:
Not that it's likely to cause confusion, but I assume you meant to write "Consensus is
1552:
1217:
523:
486:
430:
192:
1706:, a friendly reminder that I replied to your question at [[Talk:Frontiers_Media#COVID-
1228:
In case you missed it, in the AfD which I notified you about, I made clear that I am '
5168:
5007:
4953:
4696:
4669:
4631:
4621:
notability of an organization is not inherited from the people involved in running it
4612:
4592:
4512:
4168:
4158:
4138:
4093:
4022:
4004:
3981:
3904:
3801:
3708:
3580:
3386:
3330:
3299:
3287:
2959:
2795:
2741:
2724:
2686:
2541:
2517:
2399:
2373:
1591:
1571:
1255:
1122:
859:
Not a problem! Just wanted to check; this sort of thing happens from time to time. ā
646:
554:
545:
473:
343:
328:
2615:
1590:
If your objection is that the referenced article contains content that's related to
5097:
4635:
4588:
4464:
4184:
4074:
3944:
3756:
3721:
3618:
3549:
Hey Mikehawk. Just letting you know that added a few comments to your GA review of
3251:
3157:
3096:
3071:
3042:
3007:
2972:
2702:
2440:
1890:
1868:
1833:
1793:
1778:
1753:
1739:
1711:
1688:
1620:
941:
604:
412:
393:
376:
371:
301:
134:
3796:
Although I did not mention your name, and had not requested any actions, it seems
2893:
and make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when
761:) for BLP violations. But it looks to me like the five edits in question were all
455:
4679:
4587:
at a very high bar (multiple reliable sources covering the company with in-depth
4584:
4572:
4556:
4501:
4485:
4355:
4309:
3914:
Thanks for your participation in the November 2021 New Pages Patrol backlog drive
3865:
3850:
3841:
3378:
3102:
2830:
2822:
2706:
2653:
2452:
2391:
2365:
2325:
2294:
2253:
2238:
2113:
2036:
1995:
1987:
1850:
1814:
1758:
1703:
1673:
1653:
1302:
1248:. And when we are talking about a BLP, we need to "(presume) in favor of privacy"
1180:
1144:
860:
803:
795:
726:
702:
682:
621:
584:
508:
459:
451:
436:
397:
347:
249:
182:
2532:
tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with
2489:
2488:
requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge. This has been done under
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
5220:
5200:
5182:
5160:
5144:
5134:
5119:
5093:
5071:
4431:
4426:
4376:
4371:
4070:
3733:
3260:
3242:
In any case, back to your original question on whether I have any suggestions:
3153:
2984:
2558:
The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors has been completed.
2505:
2448:
2284:
2263:
2230:
2192:
2176:
2050:
2030:
2014:
1575:
1320:
1286:
1263:
1010:
854:
825:
695:
571:
297:
3224:
article that serves as a hub for mass killings committed by communist regimes)
3101:
Thank you for alerting me to this! I'll keep this in mind in the future.Ā :) ā
3041:
elsewhere? I'm trying something myself and I'll get back to you if it works.ā
5216:
5215:
Hi again Mhawk10, I just wanted to check if you were going to finish off the
5115:
5108:
5085:
5081:
5045:
4998:
4989:
4319:
4062:
4058:
3729:
3651:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=Bhararisain#map=12/30.0955/79.2648
3550:
3343:
3236:
3166:
3145:
3141:
2980:
2929:
2501:
2303:
2221:
2217:
2216:
by continuously undoing edits on the page; since even article creators don't
2213:
2205:
1649:
1625:
1600:
links which are relevant to the topic but that some people find objectionable
1563:
1548:
1540:
1522:
1518:
1499:
1293:
1241:
502:
481:
289:
285:
4782:
STEM articles judged unsuitable for undergraduates below the first paragraph
4275:
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now
1388:
Editors brainstorm and propose changes to the Requests for adminship process
148:
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now
5164:
4949:
4665:
4508:
4422:
4367:
4351:
4190:
4154:
4133:
4089:
4015:
4000:
3994:
3974:
3900:
3576:
3382:
3339:
3334:
3295:
3291:
3265:
3183:
2807:
2791:
2736:
2731:, which is what you wanted to happen. If you really feel strongly that the
2728:
2720:
2698:
2681:
2677:
2537:
2201:
1809:
1633:
1531:, which is intended to keep the page stable while the RfC on the Talk page
1134:
1118:
565:
550:
4346:
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
1091:, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.
1056:. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have
4460:
3953:
3791:
3269:
2307:
1886:
1864:
1844:
1829:
1804:
1789:
1774:
1749:
1735:
1237:
950:
789:
773:
361:
118:
103:
4279:
without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to
3854:, who plays the character of Jesus Christ in American television series
3740:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
2991:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
2439:
Statements of opinion are fine, provided that they reflect are properly
2356:
regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.Ā The thread is
1495:
152:
without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to
5080:
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
4057:
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
3718:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
3140:
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
2969:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
2849:
2387:
2361:
1514:
1502:. I had two reasons for removing this source. In my first edit summary
284:
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
2523:
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may
3700:
2951:
2513:
2358:
Banana Republic casting ASPERSIONS and overall not assuming good fait
4969:
4880:
4686:
Wikipedia_talk:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources#Jacobin_(magazine)
3821:
3481:
Content translation tool helps create one million Knowledge articles
1292:
this procedurally more kosher; sparring over interpretations of the
913:
Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.
5059:
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
4308:
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
4036:
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
3664:
3660:
3119:
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
2616:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Image_use_policy#Image_galleries
1525:
related to Heavy.com, the original source should be used instead.
1035:
675:
659:
263:
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
181:
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
4453:
3999:
Sure! That would be nice; thank you so much for the kind offer. ā
3473:"Did You Know ..." featured a photo of the wrong female WWII pilot
4252:, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
769:. You should take a look there, if you haven't already.) Thanks.
121:, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
3753:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add
3465:
Interview with contributors to WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers
3004:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add
2812:
OOPS! Iāve fixed it in the statementāthank you for alerting me.
1648:
reference that I added by itself. That being said, that is what
1236:
However, this should underscore that the question on IF he is a
4914:
3743:
If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review
3182:
I personally have found that one of the reasons why protracted
2994:
If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review
2763:, and there are two unreferenced sections awaiting references.
1533:
about whether to include content related to "Let's Go Brandon!"
1517:, and in the second AfD, the source assessment table includes "
894:
4209:
3712:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All
2963:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All
2676:. It was created by a student editor under the original title
2313:
On top of that, you'd have to show that the primary source is
2297:
that he's in a movie/TV show because you see a character that
1986:
submitted a request for usurpation at the appropriate page. ā
1511:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Kelli Stavast (2nd nomination)
1420:
Wikimedia Toolhub, winners of the Coolest Tool Award, and more
544:
Thanks for your time to assess close the RfC. I noticed that
4649:. Independent coverage of the organization in something like
3641:
It is a place as you can see in OpenStreetMap wich is named
2870:. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a
1084:
with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
507:
Per your advice, I've nominated the article for deletion. ā
4758:
Jimbo's NFT, new arbs, fixing RfA, and financial statements
4627:
4608:
4242:
3922:
2204:. If you'd prefer to challenge particular edits, you could
1052:. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the
749:
111:
3649:
because it it translated from Hindi language to English.-
3215:
Whether any article along these lines should exist at all;
2561:
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
1048:. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of
4709:
MHawk10, since you asked to be notified, I've unarchived
4286:
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the
2878:
when moving the parent page(s), and move category pages.
2598:
sections. Another update that needs working on is in the
1372:
China bans, and is there intelligent life on this planet?
1364:
The sockpuppet who ran for adminship and almost succeeded
159:
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the
5075:
on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment
4052:
on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment
3135:
on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment
2202:
Knowledge is an Encyclopedia that anyone can freely edit
1496:
Kelli Stavast: NBC Reporter Behind Letās Go Brandon Meme
1031:
Replaceable fair use File:Katyn Memorial Jersey City.jpg
549:
statement, one way or the other, seems needed. Cheers.ā
279:
on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment
3724:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
2975:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
999:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/David Oliver (magician)
981:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
4525:
I wanted to give responses to some of your comments:
3937:
For reviewing at least 200 articles during the drive.
2887:
the criteria for moving pages without leaving redirect
2162:
Applying Protection level an article vs allowing edits
1615:
On another note, if you really want to get technical,
1080:
the original replaceable fair use template, replacing
5199:
Not sure you saw the ping but have responded again.
4921:
Template:Did you know nominations/Glen Rock (boulder)
3409:
Denial: climate change, mass killings and pornography
3276:
by having firm guidance. This is what articles like "
1113:. If you have any questions, please ask them at the
458:. I don't see a substantial difference in content. ā
5016:
The nomination discussion and review may be seen at
4919:
The nomination discussion and review may be seen at
3870:
The nomination discussion and review may be seen at
3449:
On the brink of change ā RFA reforms appear imminent
2885:
for more information on this user right, especially
987:
is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to
4477:
Review of Sacred Heart Enthronement Network article
3489:Reporting ticket sales on the edge of the Wiki, if
1574:" content into the article. The reference is to an
4645:). But, I don't think the organization is notable
3659:Also, it is part of sub adminstrative division of
2206:revert them and open a discussion on the talk page
620:Noted. I will keep this in mind for the future. ā
4806:We laughed, we cried, we closed as "no consensus"
3872:Template:Did you know nominations/Jonathan Roumie
2761:Template:Did you know nominations/Jonathan Roumie
2755:Template:Did you know nominations/Jonathan Roumie
1610:is unfounded. Please strike your reference to it.
1396:Welcome messages fail to improve newbie retention
570:my reading of the RfC is that it was specific to
4132:Did this get claimed in any comments other than
2924:, for article renaming requests awaiting action.
1960:Hello Mike, I noticed you have applied to be an
5018:Template:Did you know nominations/Thomas Binger
3329:Fourth, your final comment about reporting any
2354:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
2322:primary sources in biographies of living people
767:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/LaserSharkz
4693:too incompetent to edit in controversial areas
3655:Or you can see here with same problem in name
2621:Best of luck with the article moving forward.
2490:section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion
2225:if you need room to give a fuller explanation.
1143:. Please let me know if you have any reply. ā
141:over time. You may like to take a look at the
4585:notability for organizations and corporations
4210:https://en.wikipedia.org/List_of_law_journals
3846:, which you recently nominated. The fact was
3377:Thank you for the follow-up. I currently owe
1639:Regarding the "source assessment table" that
1507:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Kelli Stavast
919:Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive.
4713:at WP:AN where you may comment if you wish.
5114:Hi, there I've responded to your review at
3692:Special ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
1437:Knowledge and the Representation of Reality
1428:How Knowledge helped create a Serbian stamp
3501:Vandalizing Knowledge as rational behavior
1598:, which governs both content and external
4986:was updated with a fact from the article
4897:was updated with a fact from the article
3838:was updated with a fact from the article
2856:Hello, Mikehawk10. Your account has been
4272:to see how you can improve the article.
3862:extraordinary minister of Holy Communion
3670:Please remove deleting request. Thanks.
1608:information page on Requests for comment
145:to see how you can improve the article.
4417:Talk:Pseudo-reorganization acquisitions
2786:determined by a vote" in your close at
2142:Tulu script information is more needed.
1380:A photo on Knowledge can ruin your life
1175:2600:1700:3520:3CE0:2C5E:4748:8132:205F
1165:2600:1700:3520:3CE0:2C5E:4748:8132:205F
14:
5092:Message delivered to you with love by
4830:Another Wiki crossword for one and all
4611:would be: "Is significant coverage of
4069:Message delivered to you with love by
3672:2409:4063:431F:BEC0:E3EA:DBFE:401:F5E0
3152:Message delivered to you with love by
1644:anything to add to an analysis of the
296:Message delivered to you with love by
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
4822:Spider-Man, football and the departed
4766:Born three months before her brother?
4167:Thanks for clarifying the statement.
2566:Administration and academic buildings
2149:2402:8100:282C:77:EFE3:B0C3:3C81:29B5
1687:are appropriate for Knowledge. Best,
277:Talk:Republican Party (United States)
4798:Four billion words and a few numbers
4597:National Register of Historic Places
4532:as I remember it from 40 years ago.
3709:2021 Arbitration Committee elections
2960:2021 Arbitration Committee elections
2492:, because it is a redirect from the
1404:Reflections on the Chinese Knowledge
320:
25:
3457:What does it take to upload a file?
2943:ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
2534:Knowledge's policies and guidelines
2352:There is currently a discussion at
1602:. From a policy perspective, it is
1535:continues. Please note that in the
1412:James Bond and the Giant Squid Game
1141:File:Katyn Memorial Jersey City.jpg
1045:File:Katyn Memorial Jersey City.jpg
989:Knowledge's policies and guidelines
740:Think you read those diffs backward
23:
5062:
4744:
4445:Merry Christmas and Happy New Year
4403:Pseudo-reorganization acquisitions
4396:Pseudo-reorganization acquisitions
4348:Pseudo-reorganization acquisitions
4341:Pseudo-reorganization acquisitions
4241:
4039:
3931:The New Page Patrol Medal of Merit
3403:
3278:list of ethnic cleansing campaigns
3122:
2848:
2829:) 03:43, 19 November 2021 (UTC) ā
2476:
1828:the next steps that you will take
1678:Talk:Frontiers_Media#COVID-19_hubs
1350:
1034:
893:
521:I have voted deleted in this AfD.
266:
110:
24:
5241:
5181:Great thank you responded again.
5107:I've responded to your review at
4317:Thanks again, and happy editing!
4260:The article has been assessed as
3767:contact the election coordinators
2723:. What would reversing the close
2320:In short, use heavy caution with
1994:) 20:37, 9 November 2021 (UTC) ā
1505:, I pointed to the discussion at
997:The article will be discussed at
802:) 17:52, 20 October 2021 (UTC) ā
638:Tagging pages for speedy deletion
207:Universities Research Association
190:Thanks again, and happy editing!
129:The article has been assessed as
4968:
4879:
4452:
4410:
4359:
3921:
3820:
3699:
3218:The proper scope of the article
2950:
2897:is used. This can be done using
2813:
2347:
2200:Regarding the earlier questions
1668:re: Frontier Media COVID-19 hubs
1072:Di-replaceable fair use disputed
1054:first non-free content criterion
975:
321:
29:
5070:Your feedback is requested at
4638:for the purposes of notability.
4630:is acting in its capacity as a
4047:Your feedback is requested at
3747:and submit your choices on the
3235:is consistent with Knowledge's
3130:Your feedback is requested at
2998:and submit your choices on the
2881:Please take a moment to review
2576:Organization and administration
1621:self-published sources in a BLP
1225:instead of opting to discuss.
1171:) 00:23, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
910:for New Page Patrol will begin.
274:Your feedback is requested at
3509:A very new very Wiki crossword
1115:Media copyright questions page
13:
1:
5210:17:00, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
5192:14:48, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
5173:04:31, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
5143:17:10, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
5129:11:49, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
5002:, the lead prosecutor in the
4868:21:08, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
4733:15:27, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
4705:16:58, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
4684:Please express your views at
4674:20:02, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
4565:18:13, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
4517:19:55, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
4494:19:16, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
4469:15:08, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
4440:18:21, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
4385:21:01, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
4330:21:58, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
4300:without posting a request to
4223:07:14, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
4203:07:12, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
4177:02:43, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
4163:02:24, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
4147:21:47, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
3726:Knowledge arbitration process
3686:19:22, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
3631:19:05, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
3599:12:25, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
3585:03:35, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
3563:12:18, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
3539:00:47, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
3391:03:56, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
3365:02:33, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
3304:23:20, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
3199:22:27, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
3162:19:30, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
3111:01:17, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
3090:20:26, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
3061:17:58, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
3023:00:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
2977:Knowledge arbitration process
2938:17:15, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
2839:03:43, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
2800:03:18, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
2773:08:14, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
2747:06:48, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
2715:19:30, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
2692:07:49, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
2662:22:06, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
2636:21:40, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
2572:Environmental sustainability'
2546:20:44, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
2461:17:57, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
2427:17:54, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
2407:21:15, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
2381:21:15, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
2334:07:21, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
2276:07:08, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
2247:05:09, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
2185:08:05, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
2157:14:57, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
2137:00:21, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
2122:00:20, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
2091:00:14, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
2059:00:16, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
2045:00:13, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
2023:00:11, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
1356:Different stories, same place
681:do I report a Twinkle bug? ā
173:without posting a request to
5230:21:41, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
5154:17:10, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
5102:01:30, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
5096::) | Is this wrong? Contact
5077:. Thank you for helping out!
5054:00:02, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
4116:01:40, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
4104:Talk:The Wall Street Journal
4079:03:30, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
4073::) | Is this wrong? Contact
4054:. Thank you for helping out!
4028:20:20, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
4009:16:13, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
3987:06:56, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
3971:Knowledge police gets to you
3960:12:23, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
3909:00:03, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
3810:19:45, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
3782:02:53, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
3769:for assistance. Thank you!
3425:What we lost, what we gained
3355:Seventh, mostly thank you.
3156::) | Is this wrong? Contact
3137:. Thank you for helping out!
2891:post-move cleanup procedures
2889:. Please remember to follow
2727:? The page now redirects to
2004:20:37, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
1974:19:23, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
1951:12:43, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
1921:11:14, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
1895:15:14, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
1873:02:43, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
1859:20:12, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
1838:16:04, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
1823:02:24, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
1798:18:36, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
1783:10:41, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
1767:15:27, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
1744:14:32, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
1720:15:33, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
1662:22:17, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
1557:13:40, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
1484:20:14, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
1336:19:13, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
1311:05:51, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
1279:05:34, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
1208:12:56, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
1189:00:25, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
1153:06:39, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
1127:19:25, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
1026:23:12, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
957:01:58, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
869:01:37, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
847:01:36, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
812:17:52, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
782:17:41, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
735:14:36, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
721:11:22, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
691:22:31, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
669:22:25, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
630:21:50, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
609:21:22, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
593:13:59, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
559:07:40, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
532:22:03, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
517:18:55, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
495:09:31, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
468:05:58, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
445:05:53, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
423:00:11, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
406:21:13, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
387:12:52, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
356:03:57, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
337:18:39, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
306:05:31, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
300::) | Is this wrong? Contact
281:. Thank you for helping out!
258:09:19, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
233:02:10, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
201:11:23, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
7:
4958:12:03, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
4874:DYK for Glen Rock (boulder)
4264:, which is recorded on its
3037:Did you find the answer to
1697:14:00, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
922:Interested in taking part?
889:November 2021 Backlog Drive
875:November 2021 backlog drive
133:, which is recorded on its
10:
5246:
4860:MediaWiki message delivery
4847:Read this Signpost in full
4814:Wikicommons presents: 2021
3774:MediaWiki message delivery
3531:MediaWiki message delivery
3518:Read this Signpost in full
3015:MediaWiki message delivery
2108:that the bot reverted and
1476:MediaWiki message delivery
1463:Read this Signpost in full
311:Trainee SPI clerk interest
5006:, unsuccessfully ran for
5004:trial of Kyle Rittenhouse
4774:The past is not even past
4451:
4354:-status according to the
4121:Quick clarifying question
3927:
3920:
3761:to your user talk page.
3431:From a Knowledge reader:
2917:Knowledge:Requested moves
2672:We don't need an AfD for
2484:A tag has been placed on
2447:and are compliant with a
1956:SPI clerk trainee request
1596:Knowledge is not censored
1066:the file description page
934:
892:
657:Thank you for your work!
366:I can only apologise for
18:User talk:Red-tailed hawk
5082:Feedback Request Service
5012:Racine County, Wisconsin
4311:leaving us some feedback
4298:create articles yourself
4277:create articles yourself
4059:Feedback Request Service
3294:is around the corner. ā
3142:Feedback Request Service
3012:to your user talk page.
2922:Category:Requested moves
2551:University of Notre Dame
1139:I've left a response on
1089:the file discussion page
991:or whether it should be
286:Feedback Request Service
184:leaving us some feedback
171:create articles yourself
150:create articles yourself
3815:DYK for Jonathan Roumie
3335:Arbitration Enforcement
3237:policies and guidelines
3033:Your help desk question
1619:doesn't actually allow
1214:David Oliver (magician)
1111:non-free content policy
984:David Oliver (magician)
968:David Oliver (magician)
908:one-month backlog drive
5067:
5038:Did you know talk page
4941:Did you know talk page
4246:
4044:
3892:Did you know talk page
3575:I will take a look! ā
3545:Talk:Jordan Geller/GA1
3127:
2853:
2525:contest the nomination
2481:
1200:Christiani E. Landjaro
1039:
898:
271:
115:
5066:
4963:DYK for Thomas Binger
4421:Message delivered by
4366:Message delivered by
4302:Articles for creation
4281:Articles for creation
4245:
4231:Articles for creation
4043:
3722:Arbitration Committee
3706:Hello! Voting in the
3607:RE: Minoan Snake Tube
3126:
2973:Arbitration Committee
2957:Hello! Voting in the
2899:Special:WhatLinksHere
2852:
2612:Community development
2486:Wat Khao Wong Prachan
2480:
2472:Wat Khao Wong Prachan
2449:neutral point of view
2222:obtaining a consensus
1931:Hello! Just FYI, re:
1725:Reliable source close
1454:A very Wiki crossword
1074:|<your reason: -->
1042:Thanks for uploading
1038:
897:
270:
175:Articles for creation
154:Articles for creation
114:
100:Articles for creation
42:of past discussions.
4788:Arbitration report:
4659:Catholic News Agency
3798:I have to notify you
3463:WikiProject report:
3439:Arbitration report:
2903:secure your password
2883:Knowledge:Page mover
2759:Hi, I have reviewed
2674:Ki the Earth Goddess
2668:Ki the Earth Goddess
2580:Colleges and schools
1537:Responding to an RfC
1444:WikiProject report:
1082:<your reason: -->
315:Hi - you previously
5034:the statistics page
4937:the statistics page
4931:Glen Rock (boulder)
4901:Glen Rock (boulder)
4636:independent content
4589:independent content
4405:you nominated as a
4250:Glen Rock (boulder)
4235:Glen Rock (boulder)
4229:Your submission at
3888:the statistics page
3455:Technology report:
3447:Discussion report:
3433:What's Matt Amodio?
1418:Technology report:
1386:Discussion report:
1299:WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE
642:Hello, Mikehawk10,
98:Your submission at
5086:removing your name
5068:
4790:A new crew for '22
4741:: 28 December 2021
4350:you nominated for
4247:
4063:removing your name
4045:
3738:arbitration policy
3663:not same place as
3571:Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d
3400:: 29 November 2021
3184:dispute resolution
3146:removing your name
3133:Talk:Jack Posobiec
3128:
2989:arbitration policy
2854:
2845:Page mover granted
2644:Twofingered Typist
2628:Twofingered Typist
2482:
1058:no free equivalent
1040:
899:
290:removing your name
272:
244:Where did you get
116:
5089:
5031:
5008:district attorney
4934:
4804:Deletion report:
4780:Recent research:
4748:From the editor:
4695:and/or trolling.
4632:news organization
4613:laundry detergent
4474:
4473:
4429:
4374:
4237:has been accepted
4066:
3941:
3940:
3885:
3789:
3788:
3784:
3688:
3617:comment added by
3499:Recent research:
3423:Deletion report:
3225:
3149:
3030:
3029:
3025:
2778:Typo in RfC close
2745:
2719:See point 1.2 of
2690:
2529:visiting the page
2494:article namespace
2405:
2379:
2262:comment added by
2077:comment added by
2071:Don't report me
1923:
1911:comment added by
1394:Recent research:
1354:From the editor:
1347:: 31 October 2021
1068:and add the text
963:
962:
906:On November 1, a
844:
713:Wretchskull (alt)
530:
529:
493:
492:
293:
209:proposed deletion
106:has been accepted
95:
94:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
5237:
5225:
5205:
5187:
5149:
5139:
5124:
5079:
5065:
5021:
4972:
4924:
4883:
4838:Buying Knowledge
4820:Traffic report:
4796:By the numbers:
4756:News and notes:
4750:Here is the news
4731:
4728:
4720:
4711:the close review
4655:America Magazine
4576:
4505:
4456:
4449:
4448:
4420:
4414:
4413:
4365:
4363:
4362:
4322:
4313:
4305:
4292:
4056:
4042:
4025:
4020:
3998:
3984:
3979:
3956:
3925:
3918:
3917:
3875:
3824:
3772:
3760:
3703:
3696:
3695:
3679:
3633:
3574:
3487:Traffic report:
3479:News from Diff:
3417:The WikiCup 2021
3415:WikiCup report:
3376:
3219:
3210:
3139:
3125:
3100:
3086:
3080:
3074:
3057:
3051:
3045:
3013:
3011:
2954:
2947:
2946:
2896:
2895:suppressredirect
2865:
2861:
2817:
2811:
2739:
2684:
2647:
2600:Special programs
2596:Men's basketball
2479:
2438:
2403:
2395:
2377:
2369:
2351:
2350:
2288:
2278:
2196:
2103:
2093:
2034:
2009:Question on move
1984:
1946:
1939:
1938:Another Believer
1906:
1848:
1592:Let's Go Brandon
1572:Let's Go Brandon
1410:Traffic report:
1402:Community view:
1362:News and notes:
1333:
1325:
1290:
1276:
1268:
1178:
1138:
1108:
1083:
1076:
1023:
1015:
979:
978:
953:
890:
879:
878:
858:
845:
840:
834:
833:
828:
793:
780:
778:
776:
756:
706:
679:
667:
619:
569:
528:
522:
506:
491:
485:
419:
417:
383:
381:
326:
325:
324:
283:
269:
243:
186:
178:
165:
73:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
5245:
5244:
5240:
5239:
5238:
5236:
5235:
5234:
5221:
5201:
5183:
5145:
5135:
5120:
5112:
5098:my bot operator
5063:
5061:
5043:
5042:
4978:14 January 2022
4973:
4965:
4946:
4945:
4884:
4876:
4871:
4870:
4842:
4743:
4730:
4724:
4716:
4714:
4682:
4570:
4499:
4479:
4447:
4425:, on behalf of
4411:
4399:
4370:, on behalf of
4360:
4344:
4332:
4320:
4295:
4288:
4284:
4239:
4187:
4123:
4086:
4075:my bot operator
4040:
4038:
4023:
4016:
3992:
3982:
3975:
3967:
3954:
3916:
3897:
3896:
3882:Jonathan Roumie
3866:Catholic Church
3851:Jonathan Roumie
3848:... that actor
3842:Jonathan Roumie
3830:3 December 2021
3825:
3817:
3794:
3754:
3694:
3639:
3612:
3609:
3568:
3547:
3542:
3541:
3513:
3402:
3373:Robert McClenon
3370:
3357:Robert McClenon
3312:
3207:Robert McClenon
3204:
3191:Robert McClenon
3169:
3158:my bot operator
3123:
3121:
3094:
3084:
3078:
3072:
3055:
3049:
3043:
3035:
3005:
2945:
2894:
2863:
2857:
2847:
2805:
2780:
2765:Graeme Bartlett
2757:
2670:
2641:
2553:
2496:to a different
2477:
2475:
2468:Speedy deletion
2445:reliable source
2432:
2415:
2397:
2371:
2348:
2345:
2282:
2257:
2190:
2164:
2144:
2129:NewsChannel fan
2100:NewsChannel fan
2097:
2079:NewsChannel fan
2072:
2069:
2028:
2011:
1978:
1958:
1949:
1944:
1937:
1929:
1902:
1900:Chess Promotion
1842:
1727:
1670:
1630:WP:SUPPLEMENTAL
1604:extremely clear
1492:
1487:
1486:
1458:
1349:
1331:
1321:
1284:
1274:
1264:
1222:
1196:
1172:
1161:
1132:
1104:
1081:
1069:
1033:
1021:
1011:
1008:
980:
976:
972:
951:
888:
884:New Page Patrol
877:
852:
838:
831:
826:
823:
820:
787:
774:
771:
770:
748:
742:
700:
698:
673:
658:
640:
613:
563:
542:
500:
478:
433:
415:
413:
379:
377:
364:
322:
313:
302:my bot operator
267:
265:
237:
225:Bryan MacKinnon
211:
203:
168:
161:
157:
108:
69:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
5243:
5233:
5232:
5217:Zuby GA review
5197:
5196:
5195:
5194:
5176:
5175:
5111:
5105:
5078:
5060:
5057:
4974:
4967:
4966:
4964:
4961:
4889:3 January 2022
4885:
4878:
4877:
4875:
4872:
4843:
4841:
4840:
4833:
4832:
4825:
4824:
4817:
4816:
4809:
4808:
4801:
4800:
4793:
4792:
4785:
4784:
4777:
4776:
4772:In the media:
4769:
4768:
4761:
4760:
4753:
4752:
4745:
4742:
4736:
4722:
4718:Tayi Arajakate
4681:
4678:
4677:
4676:
4662:
4639:
4624:
4616:
4600:
4520:
4519:
4478:
4475:
4472:
4471:
4457:
4446:
4443:
4398:
4394:nomination of
4388:
4343:
4339:nomination of
4333:
4283:if you prefer.
4274:
4270:grading scheme
4257:
4254:
4240:
4238:
4227:
4226:
4225:
4186:
4183:
4182:
4181:
4180:
4179:
4122:
4119:
4085:
4082:
4055:
4037:
4034:
4033:
4032:
4031:
4030:
3966:
3963:
3939:
3938:
3934:
3933:
3928:
3926:
3915:
3912:
3826:
3819:
3818:
3816:
3813:
3793:
3790:
3787:
3786:
3745:the candidates
3715:eligible users
3704:
3693:
3690:
3684:comment added
3638:
3635:
3608:
3605:
3604:
3603:
3602:
3601:
3553:. Thank you!!
3546:
3543:
3514:
3512:
3511:
3504:
3503:
3496:
3495:
3484:
3483:
3476:
3475:
3468:
3467:
3460:
3459:
3452:
3451:
3444:
3443:
3441:ArbCom in 2021
3436:
3435:
3428:
3427:
3420:
3419:
3412:
3411:
3407:In the media:
3404:
3401:
3395:
3394:
3393:
3311:
3308:
3307:
3306:
3283:
3282:
3281:
3261:Katyn massacre
3256:
3240:
3232:
3231:
3230:
3227:
3216:
3168:
3165:
3138:
3120:
3117:
3116:
3115:
3114:
3113:
3034:
3031:
3028:
3027:
2996:the candidates
2966:eligible users
2955:
2944:
2941:
2926:
2925:
2919:
2912:Useful links:
2907:can be revoked
2846:
2843:
2842:
2841:
2779:
2776:
2756:
2753:
2752:
2751:
2750:
2749:
2669:
2666:
2665:
2664:
2649:
2608:Student Events
2588:Student events
2552:
2549:
2474:
2470:nomination of
2465:
2464:
2463:
2414:
2413:Juan Mata edit
2411:
2410:
2409:
2344:
2341:
2339:
2337:
2336:
2318:
2311:
2250:
2249:
2235:
2226:
2198:
2163:
2160:
2143:
2140:
2125:
2124:
2068:
2065:
2064:
2063:
2062:
2061:
2010:
2007:
1981:Reaper Eternal
1966:Reaper Eternal
1957:
1954:
1941:
1928:
1925:
1901:
1898:
1882:
1881:
1880:
1879:
1878:
1877:
1876:
1875:
1786:
1785:
1726:
1723:
1708:
1707:
1669:
1666:
1665:
1664:
1637:
1612:
1611:
1491:
1488:
1459:
1457:
1456:
1449:
1448:
1441:
1440:
1431:
1430:
1423:
1422:
1415:
1414:
1407:
1406:
1399:
1398:
1391:
1390:
1383:
1382:
1375:
1374:
1370:In the media:
1367:
1366:
1359:
1358:
1351:
1348:
1342:
1341:
1340:
1339:
1338:
1316:
1221:
1211:
1195:
1192:
1160:
1157:
1156:
1155:
1117:. Thank you.
1093:
1092:
1085:
1032:
1029:
974:
973:
971:
966:Nomination of
964:
961:
960:
932:
931:
930:
929:
920:
917:
914:
911:
901:
900:
891:
876:
873:
872:
871:
819:
816:
815:
814:
741:
738:
697:
694:
639:
636:
635:
634:
633:
632:
541:
538:
537:
536:
535:
534:
477:
472:
471:
470:
432:
429:
428:
427:
426:
425:
363:
360:
359:
358:
312:
309:
282:
264:
261:
240:Bryanmackinnon
223:
210:
204:
156:if you prefer.
147:
143:grading scheme
126:
123:
109:
107:
96:
93:
92:
87:
84:
79:
74:
67:
62:
52:
51:
34:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
5242:
5231:
5228:
5226:
5224:
5218:
5214:
5213:
5212:
5211:
5208:
5206:
5204:
5193:
5190:
5188:
5186:
5180:
5179:
5178:
5177:
5174:
5170:
5166:
5162:
5158:
5157:
5156:
5155:
5152:
5150:
5148:
5142:
5140:
5138:
5131:
5130:
5127:
5125:
5123:
5117:
5116:Talk:Zuby/GA2
5110:
5109:Talk:Zuby/GA2
5104:
5103:
5100:. | Sent at
5099:
5095:
5090:
5087:
5083:
5076:
5074:
5056:
5055:
5051:
5047:
5041:
5039:
5035:
5029:
5028:Thomas Binger
5025:
5019:
5015:
5013:
5009:
5005:
5001:
5000:
4999:Thomas Binger
4993:
4992:
4991:
4990:Thomas Binger
4985:
4984:
4979:
4971:
4960:
4959:
4955:
4951:
4944:
4942:
4938:
4932:
4928:
4922:
4918:
4916:
4912:
4911:
4907:... that the
4904:
4903:
4902:
4896:
4895:
4890:
4882:
4869:
4865:
4861:
4857:
4853:
4849:
4848:
4839:
4835:
4834:
4831:
4827:
4826:
4823:
4819:
4818:
4815:
4811:
4810:
4807:
4803:
4802:
4799:
4795:
4794:
4791:
4787:
4786:
4783:
4779:
4778:
4775:
4771:
4770:
4767:
4764:Serendipity:
4763:
4762:
4759:
4755:
4754:
4751:
4747:
4746:
4740:
4735:
4734:
4729:
4727:
4721:
4719:
4712:
4707:
4706:
4702:
4698:
4694:
4689:
4687:
4675:
4671:
4667:
4663:
4660:
4656:
4652:
4648:
4644:
4643:google search
4640:
4637:
4633:
4629:
4625:
4622:
4617:
4614:
4610:
4606:
4601:
4598:
4594:
4590:
4586:
4581:
4574:
4569:
4568:
4567:
4566:
4562:
4558:
4552:
4548:
4544:
4540:
4536:
4533:
4529:
4526:
4523:
4518:
4514:
4510:
4503:
4498:
4497:
4496:
4495:
4491:
4487:
4483:
4470:
4466:
4462:
4458:
4455:
4450:
4442:
4441:
4437:
4433:
4428:
4424:
4418:
4408:
4404:
4397:
4393:
4387:
4386:
4382:
4378:
4373:
4369:
4357:
4353:
4349:
4342:
4338:
4331:
4327:
4323:
4318:
4315:
4312:
4306:
4303:
4299:
4293:
4291:
4282:
4278:
4273:
4271:
4267:
4263:
4258:
4253:
4251:
4244:
4236:
4232:
4224:
4220:
4216:
4215:Such-change47
4211:
4208:
4207:
4206:
4204:
4200:
4196:
4195:Such-change47
4192:
4178:
4174:
4170:
4166:
4165:
4164:
4160:
4156:
4151:
4150:
4149:
4148:
4144:
4140:
4135:
4130:
4128:
4118:
4117:
4113:
4109:
4108:Stallion55347
4105:
4101:
4098:
4095:
4091:
4081:
4080:
4077:. | Sent at
4076:
4072:
4067:
4064:
4060:
4053:
4051:
4029:
4026:
4021:
4019:
4012:
4011:
4010:
4006:
4002:
3996:
3991:
3990:
3989:
3988:
3985:
3980:
3978:
3972:
3962:
3961:
3958:
3957:
3950:
3946:
3936:
3935:
3932:
3929:
3924:
3919:
3911:
3910:
3906:
3902:
3895:
3893:
3889:
3883:
3879:
3873:
3869:
3867:
3863:
3860:, is also an
3858:
3855:
3853:
3852:
3845:
3844:
3843:
3837:
3836:
3831:
3823:
3812:
3811:
3807:
3803:
3799:
3785:
3783:
3779:
3775:
3770:
3768:
3762:
3758:
3752:
3751:
3746:
3741:
3739:
3735:
3731:
3727:
3723:
3717:
3716:
3711:
3710:
3705:
3702:
3698:
3697:
3689:
3687:
3683:
3677:
3673:
3668:
3666:
3662:
3658:
3653:
3652:
3648:
3644:
3634:
3632:
3628:
3624:
3620:
3616:
3600:
3596:
3592:
3591:Dr. Swag Lord
3588:
3587:
3586:
3582:
3578:
3572:
3567:
3566:
3565:
3564:
3560:
3556:
3555:Dr. Swag Lord
3552:
3551:Jordan Geller
3540:
3536:
3532:
3528:
3524:
3520:
3519:
3510:
3506:
3505:
3502:
3498:
3497:
3494:
3492:
3486:
3485:
3482:
3478:
3477:
3474:
3471:Serendipity:
3470:
3469:
3466:
3462:
3461:
3458:
3454:
3453:
3450:
3446:
3445:
3442:
3438:
3437:
3434:
3430:
3429:
3426:
3422:
3421:
3418:
3414:
3413:
3410:
3406:
3405:
3399:
3392:
3388:
3384:
3380:
3374:
3369:
3368:
3367:
3366:
3362:
3358:
3353:
3350:
3347:
3345:
3341:
3336:
3332:
3327:
3324:
3320:
3316:
3305:
3301:
3297:
3293:
3289:
3284:
3279:
3275:
3271:
3267:
3262:
3257:
3253:
3248:
3244:
3243:
3241:
3238:
3233:
3228:
3223:
3222:summary style
3217:
3214:
3213:
3208:
3203:
3202:
3201:
3200:
3196:
3192:
3187:
3185:
3180:
3178:
3173:
3164:
3163:
3160:. | Sent at
3159:
3155:
3150:
3147:
3143:
3136:
3134:
3112:
3108:
3104:
3098:
3093:
3092:
3091:
3087:
3085:contributions
3081:
3075:
3069:
3065:
3064:
3063:
3062:
3058:
3056:contributions
3052:
3046:
3040:
3039:this question
3026:
3024:
3020:
3016:
3009:
3003:
3002:
2997:
2992:
2990:
2986:
2982:
2978:
2974:
2968:
2967:
2962:
2961:
2956:
2953:
2949:
2948:
2940:
2939:
2935:
2931:
2923:
2920:
2918:
2915:
2914:
2913:
2910:
2908:
2904:
2900:
2892:
2888:
2884:
2879:
2877:
2873:
2869:
2864:extendedmover
2860:
2851:
2840:
2836:
2832:
2828:
2824:
2820:
2816:
2809:
2804:
2803:
2802:
2801:
2797:
2793:
2789:
2785:
2775:
2774:
2770:
2766:
2762:
2748:
2743:
2738:
2734:
2730:
2726:
2722:
2718:
2717:
2716:
2712:
2708:
2704:
2700:
2696:
2695:
2694:
2693:
2688:
2683:
2679:
2675:
2663:
2659:
2655:
2650:
2645:
2640:
2639:
2638:
2637:
2633:
2629:
2625:
2622:
2619:
2617:
2613:
2609:
2605:
2601:
2597:
2593:
2589:
2585:
2581:
2577:
2573:
2570:
2569:
2562:
2559:
2556:
2548:
2547:
2543:
2539:
2535:
2530:
2526:
2521:
2520:namespaces.
2519:
2515:
2511:
2507:
2503:
2499:
2495:
2491:
2487:
2473:
2469:
2462:
2458:
2454:
2450:
2446:
2442:
2436:
2431:
2430:
2429:
2428:
2424:
2420:
2408:
2401:
2393:
2389:
2385:
2384:
2383:
2382:
2375:
2367:
2363:
2360:. Thank you.
2359:
2355:
2343:November 2021
2340:
2335:
2331:
2327:
2323:
2319:
2316:
2312:
2309:
2305:
2300:
2296:
2293:
2286:
2281:
2280:
2279:
2277:
2273:
2269:
2265:
2261:
2255:
2248:
2244:
2240:
2236:
2232:
2227:
2223:
2219:
2215:
2211:
2210:like this one
2207:
2203:
2199:
2194:
2189:
2188:
2187:
2186:
2182:
2178:
2174:
2171:
2167:
2159:
2158:
2154:
2150:
2139:
2138:
2134:
2130:
2123:
2119:
2115:
2111:
2107:
2101:
2096:
2095:
2094:
2092:
2088:
2084:
2080:
2076:
2067:I did nothing
2060:
2056:
2052:
2048:
2047:
2046:
2042:
2038:
2032:
2027:
2026:
2025:
2024:
2020:
2016:
2006:
2005:
2001:
1997:
1993:
1989:
1982:
1976:
1975:
1971:
1967:
1963:
1953:
1952:
1947:
1940:
1934:
1924:
1922:
1918:
1914:
1910:
1897:
1896:
1892:
1888:
1874:
1870:
1866:
1862:
1861:
1860:
1856:
1852:
1846:
1841:
1840:
1839:
1835:
1831:
1826:
1825:
1824:
1820:
1816:
1812:
1811:
1806:
1802:
1801:
1800:
1799:
1795:
1791:
1784:
1780:
1776:
1771:
1770:
1769:
1768:
1764:
1760:
1755:
1751:
1746:
1745:
1741:
1737:
1733:
1722:
1721:
1717:
1713:
1705:
1701:
1700:
1699:
1698:
1694:
1690:
1685:
1684:
1679:
1675:
1663:
1659:
1655:
1651:
1647:
1642:
1638:
1635:
1631:
1627:
1622:
1618:
1614:
1613:
1609:
1605:
1601:
1597:
1593:
1589:
1588:
1587:
1581:
1577:
1573:
1569:
1565:
1561:
1560:
1559:
1558:
1554:
1550:
1546:
1543:, it states,
1542:
1538:
1534:
1530:
1526:
1524:
1520:
1516:
1512:
1508:
1504:
1501:
1500:Kelli Stavast
1497:
1490:November 2021
1485:
1481:
1477:
1473:
1469:
1465:
1464:
1455:
1451:
1450:
1447:
1443:
1442:
1439:
1438:
1434:Book review:
1433:
1432:
1429:
1426:Serendipity:
1425:
1424:
1421:
1417:
1416:
1413:
1409:
1408:
1405:
1401:
1400:
1397:
1393:
1392:
1389:
1385:
1384:
1381:
1377:
1376:
1373:
1369:
1368:
1365:
1361:
1360:
1357:
1353:
1352:
1346:
1337:
1334:
1329:
1328:
1324:
1317:
1314:
1313:
1312:
1308:
1304:
1300:
1295:
1288:
1283:
1282:
1281:
1280:
1277:
1272:
1271:
1267:
1259:
1257:
1253:
1250:
1247:
1243:
1242:public figure
1239:
1234:
1231:
1226:
1219:
1215:
1210:
1209:
1205:
1201:
1191:
1190:
1186:
1182:
1176:
1170:
1166:
1159:Kiino Villand
1154:
1150:
1146:
1142:
1136:
1131:
1130:
1129:
1128:
1124:
1120:
1116:
1112:
1107:
1100:
1098:
1090:
1086:
1079:
1073:
1067:
1063:
1062:
1061:
1059:
1055:
1051:
1047:
1046:
1037:
1028:
1027:
1024:
1019:
1018:
1014:
1007:
1003:
1000:
994:
990:
986:
985:
969:
959:
958:
955:
954:
947:
943:
938:
933:
927:
926:
921:
918:
915:
912:
909:
905:
904:
903:
902:
896:
887:
885:
881:
880:
870:
866:
862:
856:
851:
850:
849:
848:
843:
841:
830:
829:
818:Kelli Stavast
813:
809:
805:
801:
797:
791:
786:
785:
784:
783:
777:
768:
764:
760:
755:
751:
747:
737:
736:
732:
728:
723:
722:
718:
714:
710:
704:
693:
692:
688:
684:
677:
671:
670:
666:
664:
663:
655:
651:
648:
643:
631:
627:
623:
617:
612:
611:
610:
606:
602:
597:
596:
595:
594:
590:
586:
580:
577:
573:
567:
561:
560:
556:
552:
547:
533:
527:
526:
520:
519:
518:
514:
510:
504:
499:
498:
497:
496:
490:
489:
483:
476:
469:
465:
461:
457:
453:
449:
448:
447:
446:
442:
438:
424:
421:
420:
409:
408:
407:
403:
399:
395:
391:
390:
389:
388:
385:
384:
373:
369:
357:
353:
349:
345:
341:
340:
339:
338:
334:
330:
318:
308:
307:
304:. | Sent at
303:
299:
294:
291:
287:
280:
278:
260:
259:
255:
251:
247:
241:
235:
234:
230:
226:
221:
218:
215:
208:
202:
198:
194:
193:Theroadislong
191:
188:
185:
179:
176:
172:
166:
164:
155:
151:
146:
144:
140:
136:
132:
127:
122:
120:
113:
105:
101:
91:
88:
85:
83:
80:
78:
75:
72:
68:
66:
63:
61:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
5223:Spy-cicleš„
5222:
5203:Spy-cicleš„
5202:
5198:
5185:Spy-cicleš„
5184:
5147:Spy-cicleš„
5146:
5137:Spy-cicleš„
5136:
5132:
5122:Spy-cicleš„
5121:
5113:
5091:
5072:
5069:
5044:
4997:
4995:
4988:
4987:
4983:Did you know
4981:
4975:
4947:
4908:
4906:
4899:
4898:
4894:Did you know
4892:
4886:
4845:
4739:The Signpost
4738:
4725:
4717:
4708:
4697:TrangaBellam
4692:
4690:
4683:
4658:
4654:
4650:
4646:
4605:Content here
4579:
4553:
4549:
4545:
4541:
4537:
4534:
4530:
4527:
4524:
4521:
4484:
4480:
4407:good article
4401:The article
4400:
4345:
4316:
4307:
4287:
4285:
4261:
4259:
4255:
4248:
4188:
4169:WhatamIdoing
4139:WhatamIdoing
4131:
4124:
4096:
4087:
4084:WSJ Lede RfC
4068:
4050:Talk:PragerU
4049:
4046:
4017:
3976:
3968:
3965:Archive bot?
3952:
3942:
3930:
3898:
3859:
3849:
3847:
3840:
3839:
3835:Did you know
3833:
3827:
3802:Paul Siebert
3800:. Regards,
3795:
3771:
3763:
3748:
3742:
3719:
3713:
3707:
3680:āĀ Preceding
3669:
3654:
3646:
3642:
3640:
3613:āĀ Preceding
3610:
3548:
3516:
3490:
3398:The Signpost
3397:
3354:
3351:
3348:
3328:
3325:
3321:
3317:
3313:
3266:mass killing
3246:
3188:
3181:
3174:
3170:
3151:
3132:
3129:
3036:
2999:
2993:
2970:
2964:
2958:
2927:
2911:
2880:
2868:moving pages
2855:
2818:
2783:
2781:
2758:
2732:
2729:Ki (goddess)
2678:Ki (goddess)
2671:
2626:
2623:
2620:
2611:
2607:
2604:Student Life
2603:
2599:
2595:
2591:
2587:
2583:
2579:
2575:
2571:
2567:
2565:
2563:
2560:
2557:
2554:
2524:
2522:
2483:
2416:
2396:(please use
2370:(please use
2346:
2338:
2314:
2298:
2291:
2258:āĀ Preceding
2251:
2218:own the page
2175:
2172:
2168:
2165:
2145:
2126:
2104:You've made
2073:āĀ Preceding
2070:
2012:
1977:
1959:
1930:
1927:Re: Rise Bar
1907:āĀ Preceding
1903:
1883:
1863:sounds good!
1810:The Signpost
1808:
1787:
1747:
1728:
1709:
1681:
1671:
1645:
1617:WP:ABOUTSELF
1603:
1599:
1584:
1583:
1582:
1579:
1544:
1527:
1493:
1461:
1436:
1345:The Signpost
1344:
1326:
1322:
1269:
1265:
1260:
1245:
1235:
1229:
1227:
1223:
1197:
1162:
1101:
1094:
1077:
1057:
1043:
1041:
1016:
1012:
1009:
1004:
996:
982:
970:for deletion
949:
939:
925:Sign up here
923:
882:
835:
824:
821:
762:
750:Taylorthewho
743:
724:
711:can happen.
699:
672:
661:
660:
656:
652:
644:
641:
581:
575:
562:
543:
540:Olympics SNG
524:
487:
479:
434:
411:
375:
365:
344:TheresNoTime
314:
295:
276:
273:
245:
236:
222:
219:
216:
212:
189:
180:
160:
158:
130:
128:
124:
117:
70:
43:
37:
4856:Unsubscribe
4852:Single-page
4828:Crossword:
4583:designates
4409:has failed
4137:statement.
3969:Before the
3750:voting page
3645:instead of
3643:Bhararisain
3619:DrewDevine0
3527:Unsubscribe
3523:Single-page
3493:should fail
3274:WP:COATRACK
3270:mass murder
3177:WP:DRNMKUCR
3097:Vchimpanzee
3073:Vchimpanzee
3044:Vchimpanzee
3001:voting page
2500:except the
2435:2.26.184.57
2419:2.26.184.57
2127:Ok I will
1913:49.2.69.102
1712:JBFrontiers
1689:JBFrontiers
1641:you created
1547:Thank you,
1539:section of
1472:Unsubscribe
1468:Single-page
1446:Redirection
1246:contentious
1218:WP:BLPCRIME
394:Stalwart111
392:Thank you,
368:this result
331:(she/her ā¢
131:Start-Class
119:Vito Trause
104:Vito Trause
36:This is an
5024:here's how
5014:, in 2016?
4927:here's how
4651:The Pillar
4593:WP:NCHURCH
4573:Shenaw2016
4557:Shenaw2016
4502:Shenaw2016
4486:Shenaw2016
3878:here's how
3857:The Chosen
3734:topic bans
3647:Bhararisen
3637:Bhararisen
3379:Smallbones
3331:sealioning
3288:WP:SEALION
3103:Mikehawk10
3068:a response
2985:topic bans
2831:Mikehawk10
2823:Mikehawk10
2819:Self-trout
2707:Mikehawk10
2654:Mikehawk10
2453:Mikehawk10
2441:attributed
2326:Mikehawk10
2315:legitimate
2299:looks like
2295:synthesize
2254:Mikehawk10
2239:Mikehawk10
2114:Mikehawk10
2037:Mikehawk10
1996:Mikehawk10
1988:Mikehawk10
1851:Mikehawk10
1815:Mikehawk10
1759:Mikehawk10
1704:Mikehawk10
1683:TechCrunch
1674:Mikehawk10
1654:Mikehawk10
1652:is for. ā
1570:inserted "
1515:churnalism
1303:Mikehawk10
1256:WP:NOTNEWS
1181:Mikehawk10
1145:Mikehawk10
861:Mikehawk10
804:Mikehawk10
796:Mikehawk10
779:(she/they)
727:Mikehawk10
725:Noted. ā
703:Mikehawk10
683:Mikehawk10
622:Mikehawk10
585:Mikehawk10
576:particular
546:WP:NSPORTS
509:Mikehawk10
460:Mikehawk10
437:Geschichte
431:Recreation
398:Mikehawk10
348:Mikehawk10
250:Mikehawk10
90:ArchiveĀ 10
5161:Spy-cicle
5094:Yapperbot
4996:... that
4910:Glen Rock
4812:Gallery:
4432:Shushugah
4427:Shushugah
4377:Shushugah
4372:Shushugah
4290:help desk
4266:talk page
4189:Hi there
4071:Yapperbot
3730:site bans
3310:Follow-Up
3255:killings.
3252:WP:WEIGHT
3154:Yapperbot
3066:You have
2981:site bans
2703:WP:SCLOSE
2624:Regards,
2510:Knowledge
2498:namespace
2404:on reply)
2378:on reply)
2285:Elenatina
2264:Elenatina
2193:Elenatina
2177:Elenatina
2166:Hi Mike,
2110:this edit
2106:this edit
2051:Zune4ever
2031:Zune4ever
2015:Zune4ever
1962:SPI clerk
1933:this edit
1754:WP:BIASED
1568:this edit
1378:Opinion:
1287:Tiggerjay
1106:this link
855:Mrschimpf
475:Couch Guy
372:WP:NFOOTY
317:indicated
298:Yapperbot
163:help desk
135:talk page
82:ArchiveĀ 5
77:ArchiveĀ 4
71:ArchiveĀ 3
65:ArchiveĀ 2
60:ArchiveĀ 1
5073:Talk:God
5046:valereee
4913:is very
4836:Humour:
4356:criteria
4321:Rusalkii
4185:Addition
4100:contribs
3665:Gairsain
3661:Gairsain
3627:contribs
3615:unsigned
3507:Humour:
3491:Eternals
2930:Primefac
2876:subpages
2872:redirect
2592:Football
2584:Rankings
2506:Template
2502:Category
2402:|Chess}}
2400:reply to
2376:|Chess}}
2374:reply to
2272:contribs
2260:unsigned
2252:Thanks @
2214:edit war
2087:contribs
2075:unsigned
1909:unsigned
1646:specific
1564:Beccaynr
1549:Beccaynr
1452:Humour:
1050:fair use
763:removing
759:contribs
525:HighInBC
503:HighInBC
488:HighInBC
5165:Mhawk10
4950:Amakuru
4680:Jacobin
4666:Mhawk10
4580:network
4509:Mhawk10
4423:Legobot
4368:Legobot
4262:C-Class
4191:Mhawk10
4155:Mhawk10
4134:Dhtwiki
4090:Mhawk10
4018:JBchrch
4001:Mhawk10
3995:JBchrch
3977:JBchrch
3901:Amakuru
3864:in the
3757:NoACEMM
3682:undated
3577:Mhawk10
3383:Mhawk10
3296:Mhawk10
3290:, then
3008:NoACEMM
2874:, move
2859:granted
2808:Colin M
2792:Colin M
2733:content
2725:achieve
2699:Joe Roe
2555:Hello:
2538:Stefan2
2306:and/or
2231:WP:RFPP
1586:itself.
1576:WP:MREL
1238:notable
1230:neutral
1216:&
1135:Stefan2
1119:Stefan2
993:deleted
839:chatter
647:Twinkle
572:WP:NOLY
566:Bagumba
551:Bagumba
139:develop
39:archive
4915:gneiss
4461:DMySon
4415:; see
4127:WT:MOS
4088:Hello
3955:buidhe
3344:WP:ANI
2518:Portal
2304:WP:NOR
1887:Estnot
1865:Estnot
1845:Estnot
1830:Estnot
1805:Estnot
1790:Estnot
1775:Estnot
1750:Estnot
1736:Estnot
1702:Hello
1672:Hello
1650:WP:RSN
1626:WP:RSN
1562:Hello
1541:WP:RFC
1523:WP:RSP
1519:WP:RSP
1332:(talk)
1323:Tigger
1297:(a-la-
1294:WP:BLP
1275:(talk)
1266:Tigger
1064:Go to
1022:(talk)
1013:Tigger
952:buidhe
790:Tamzin
775:Tamzin
746:warned
696:notice
616:Isaacl
601:isaacl
482:WP:AfD
4657:, or
4555:does.
4390:Your
4335:Your
3292:WP:AE
3226:; and
3167:MKUCR
2862:the "
2721:WP:SK
2516:, or
2443:to a
2388:Chess
2362:Chess
2292:can't
2234:with.
1634:WP:RS
1498:" to
1220:issue
1078:below
937:here.
709:these
418:lwart
382:lwart
16:<
5169:talk
5050:talk
4954:talk
4864:talk
4726:Talk
4701:talk
4670:talk
4628:EWTN
4609:Tide
4561:talk
4513:talk
4490:talk
4465:talk
4436:talk
4381:talk
4326:talk
4219:talk
4199:talk
4173:talk
4159:talk
4143:talk
4112:talk
4094:talk
4024:talk
4005:talk
3983:talk
3905:talk
3806:talk
3778:talk
3720:The
3676:talk
3623:talk
3595:talk
3581:talk
3559:talk
3535:talk
3387:talk
3361:talk
3342:(or
3300:talk
3268:and
3195:talk
3107:talk
3079:talk
3050:talk
3019:talk
2971:The
2934:talk
2835:talk
2827:talk
2796:talk
2769:talk
2742:talk
2711:talk
2687:talk
2658:talk
2632:talk
2606:and
2594:and
2542:talk
2536:.
2514:Help
2457:talk
2423:talk
2392:talk
2366:talk
2330:talk
2308:WP:V
2268:talk
2243:talk
2181:talk
2153:talk
2133:talk
2118:talk
2083:talk
2055:talk
2041:talk
2019:talk
2000:talk
1992:talk
1970:talk
1945:Talk
1917:talk
1891:talk
1869:talk
1855:talk
1834:talk
1819:talk
1794:talk
1779:talk
1763:talk
1740:talk
1732:this
1716:talk
1693:talk
1658:talk
1553:talk
1509:and
1480:talk
1307:talk
1204:talk
1185:talk
1169:talk
1149:talk
1123:talk
865:talk
827:Nate
808:talk
800:talk
754:talk
744:You
731:talk
717:talk
687:talk
626:talk
605:talk
589:talk
555:talk
513:talk
464:talk
454:and
441:talk
402:talk
352:talk
333:talk
254:talk
229:talk
197:talk
5159:Hi
5010:of
4976:On
4887:On
4647:yet
4430:--
4375:--
4125:At
3828:On
3792:ANI
3678:)
3333:to
3088:ā¢
3070:.ā
3059:ā¢
2784:not
2737:Joe
2697:Hi
2682:Joe
2527:by
1803:Hi
1748:Hi
1632:to
1327:Jay
1270:Jay
1244:is
1087:On
1017:Jay
772:--
676:Liz
362:AFD
342:Hi
329:TNT
5171:)
5052:)
5040:.
5026:,
4980:,
4956:)
4948:ā
4943:.
4929:,
4891:,
4866:)
4858:*
4854:*
4850:*
4844:*
4703:)
4672:)
4664:ā
4653:,
4563:)
4515:)
4492:)
4467:)
4438:)
4392:GA
4383:)
4358:.
4352:GA
4337:GA
4328:)
4314:.
4233::
4221:)
4205:\
4201:)
4175:)
4161:)
4145:)
4114:)
4007:)
3951:)
3947:Ā·
3907:)
3899:ā
3894:.
3880:,
3832:,
3808:)
3780:)
3759:}}
3755:{{
3732:,
3667:.
3629:)
3625:ā¢
3597:)
3583:)
3561:)
3537:)
3529:*
3525:*
3521:*
3515:*
3389:)
3363:)
3340:AE
3302:)
3197:)
3109:)
3082:ā¢
3076:ā¢
3053:ā¢
3047:ā¢
3021:)
3010:}}
3006:{{
2983:,
2936:)
2909:.
2837:)
2821:ā
2798:)
2790:.
2771:)
2713:)
2660:)
2634:)
2590:,
2586:,
2582:,
2578:,
2574:,
2568:,
2544:)
2512:,
2508:,
2504:,
2459:)
2425:)
2398:{{
2394:)
2372:{{
2368:)
2332:)
2274:)
2270:ā¢
2245:)
2237:ā
2183:)
2155:)
2135:)
2120:)
2089:)
2085:ā¢
2057:)
2043:)
2021:)
2002:)
1972:)
1919:)
1893:)
1871:)
1857:)
1836:)
1821:)
1796:)
1781:)
1765:)
1742:)
1718:)
1695:)
1660:)
1555:)
1482:)
1474:*
1470:*
1466:*
1460:*
1309:)
1240:,
1206:)
1187:)
1151:)
1125:)
1075:}}
1070:{{
995:.
948:)
944:Ā·
867:)
810:)
757:Ā·
733:)
719:)
689:)
665:iz
628:)
607:)
591:)
557:)
515:)
484:.
466:)
443:)
414:St
404:)
378:St
354:)
335:)
256:)
231:)
199:)
187:.
102::
86:ā
5167:(
5088:.
5048:(
5030:)
5022:(
4952:(
4933:)
4925:(
4917:?
4862:(
4699:(
4668:(
4623:.
4575::
4571:@
4559:(
4511:(
4504::
4500:@
4488:(
4463:(
4434:(
4379:(
4324:(
4304:.
4294:.
4217:(
4197:(
4171:(
4157:(
4141:(
4110:(
4097:Ā·
4092:(
4065:.
4003:(
3997::
3993:@
3949:c
3945:t
3903:(
3884:)
3876:(
3868:?
3804:(
3776:(
3674:(
3621:(
3593:(
3579:(
3573::
3569:@
3557:(
3533:(
3385:(
3375::
3371:@
3359:(
3298:(
3209::
3205:@
3193:(
3148:.
3105:(
3099::
3095:@
3017:(
2932:(
2833:(
2825:(
2810::
2806:@
2794:(
2767:(
2744:)
2740:(
2709:(
2689:)
2685:(
2656:(
2646::
2642:@
2630:(
2540:(
2455:(
2437::
2433:@
2421:(
2390:(
2364:(
2328:(
2287::
2283:@
2266:(
2241:(
2195::
2191:@
2179:(
2151:(
2131:(
2116:(
2102::
2098:@
2081:(
2053:(
2039:(
2033::
2029:@
2017:(
1998:(
1990:(
1983::
1979:@
1968:(
1948:)
1942:(
1915:(
1889:(
1867:(
1853:(
1847::
1843:@
1832:(
1817:(
1792:(
1777:(
1761:(
1738:(
1730:(
1714:(
1691:(
1656:(
1551:(
1478:(
1305:(
1289::
1285:@
1202:(
1183:(
1177::
1173:@
1167:(
1147:(
1137::
1133:@
1121:(
946:c
942:t
940:(
928:.
886:|
863:(
857::
853:@
842:)
836:(
832:ā¢
806:(
798:(
792::
788:@
752:(
729:(
715:(
705::
701:@
685:(
678::
674:@
662:L
624:(
618::
614:@
603:(
587:(
568::
564:@
553:(
511:(
505::
501:@
462:(
456:2
452:1
439:(
416:ā
400:(
380:ā
350:(
327:~
292:.
252:(
242::
238:@
227:(
195:(
177:.
167:.
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.