User talk:Racerx11/Archive 2

2384: 1698: 1517: 31: 1241: 1369:

500 ft above sea level, and the highest point in the city center is 250 ft asl. Also Mount Rainier is 65 miles away from Seattle and its actual base is at 1,000 to 4,000 ft asl. So using your logic Mount Rainier only rises 10,000ft or so above Seattle even though the difference in elevation is 14,411 ft? No one would agree with this statement, but using your logic this is what the case would be!

1658:. The problem is your edit was a blatant violation of this important policy. We cannot simply copy word-for-word text from the sources. Also, the images posted appeared to have originated from the same source, but you have claimed in the fair-use rational that they are your own work. Then for some reason, you filled the external links section with links to websites about 1288:

the words "UP TO". Also I know 14,115 ft minus 5,750 isn't exactly 8,400 ft I'm using it as a base number rather than saying 8,365 ft, this is the only reason! Plus 14,115 minus 6,035 doesn't equal 8,000 exactly, it's just a base number. We're only talking about the summit, so why did you mention that not all of Pikes Peak is at 14,115ft. The summit is all that matters.

350:, I'm not sure what to say about it at this point. We're mostly backtracking, looking for his older stuff, and he's been steadily focused on the Miles/Eagles/Eric Carmen/Gary Moore thing for a few months, so I don't think there's much we can spill the beans about. I should be able to start on this in a little bit - RL stuff and all. 1778:"I will show you Kuz'kina mat'" means threat - "I will show you!!!" -"You will be sorry" - " I'll kick your butt" It has only one meaning -threat. Very common idiom in Russia (a little bit old-fashioned though) , nothing mysterious about it. It doesn't mean " I will show you new thing" . Reference: any russian know it :) 258:

probably not a huge secret about how or what we have been doing to deal with this and other vandalism, but there may be a few tricks or techniques that are not obvious. Should any technical details on how we have been dealing with this vandal be kept to ourselves, just in case we know something he doesn't?--

1625:

Mr Racerx11 I had previously tried editing the Tilicho Peak article. You have dissapproved of all the data and re-instated the previous page. I respect that and understand that I am new to this wikipedia editing and I would like your guidance on this matter since I want to edit Tilicho Peak in order

1032:

Yeah I know. I had no idea it could get this bad. I have been taking some time to see if some of this stuff survives in the current articles. I don't have a good technique to do that quickly or efficiently however. And of course since many of the edits or parts of them appear legitimate, well you see

452:

report if necessary. I'll add some sort of description of his behavior, and all I've done is put the list of known (so far) IPs in numerical order. You can edit the page as you see fit: if you think the layout needs tweaking, go ahead and do it. And thanks for reverting the guy at the Eagles article!

1376:

You say Ludicracy? how is using 5,750 ft more senseless than using 6,035, they're both just numbers from certain points in the city. Downtown is at 6,035 ft yes but theres more to the city than just downtown. Denver is only at 5,280 ft on the south side of Downtown, but varies from 5,170 ft to 5,660

1287:

Colorado Springs is at 6,035 ft in the city center. The elevation in the city limits ranges from 5,740 to around 7,200 ft. You keep saying that it rises only 8,000 ft above the city, but that's just the city center. The reason I said up to 8,400 ft is because I'm counting the whole city. Again I use

257:

Are there certain things that we shouldn't talk about at this point, assuming the vandal could possibly be monitoring our discussions? For example, should we not mention how it could get any worse (if that's possible): "At least he hasen't done x or y yet." So we don't give him any ideas? Also, it's

134:

Ok, maybe we should step back and look at what we are trying to do. If the goal is to get a complete list as possible then maybe we should start catagorizing by date or something. So far there's the recent batch from the last couple months. Not much in 2011, but a whole mess from 2010...now '09 etc.

2092:

Actually, I saw what was happening on that page as i've been on that page before, as you can see, I only edited twice before as a joke, not the spree of last night that was done, I added that form of edit as a joke as well. Just check my history and you'll see how serious I am with my edit history,

1419:

Anyone who knows the elevation of the city or checks it would find the statement either immediately confusing or just plain false, so I don't think you are doing it right at all. But I really don't care anymore. You didn't even bother to sign your last post and when a person is editing from both an

1327:

8000 ft above the city and I said your estimation wasn't even close. My point is by your logic, a 5800 ft peak could also be descibed as rising above the city, even though one could look down on it from downtown. Why would anyone measure the low point of a city and compare it to the high point of a

1368:

Well I'll agree to disagree with you, the only reason I'm using the low point of a city is to show what the whole elevation difference is from Pikes Peak to the lowest point in Colorado Springs. I mean people say that Mount Rainier rises 14,411 ft above Seattle, but the highest point in Seattle is

1310:

Of course only the summit matters. I mention not all of the mountain is at 14,115 ft to point out the ludicracy of your own statement, choosing the use the low point of the city. And damn, why can't you just edit from one account and sign your posts?! You are confusing the hell out of me! I posted

516:

Doc, I have broken the list down into recent and older IP's in hopes it may be useful to have it that way in the future. Pretty sure its accurate but I will double check it later. Added a couple more to the list while I was at it. Also added some comments for the more notable IP's. Do you remember

1834:

here and believe what you are telling me. With that in mind, I will remove the vandalism template from your talk page and do my best to fix the "mistake in translation" within the article. Note that I will probably use "We will bury you" with the source I found, instead of "We'll kick your butt",

1364:

First of all a 5,800ft peak would not be considered a peak in Colorado Springs that's a hill, and yes you would have to look down on it from Downtown but that would still make it a hill. What is your point? We're only talking about Pikes Peak and your phylosophical argument is totally unrelated.

573:

I have the same feeling about 2011 but wondering why we haven't stumbled on to much from that year. I remember looking into that one we have from '11 and it didn't lead to anything else. I will check it again though. That's why I'm very interested in any more from that year and of course any more

2263:

until just now... and good work! All are clearly the same vandal. We gotta figure out how to list them, especially as early ones: the only ones I don't like to list are ones from the 2010 Alvin spree, where so many IPs were used so furiously that it was mind-boggling. Again, good catch with this

1723:

That was me. I just wanted to thank you (with some help from Cluebot) for reforming me into the NPOV-protecting, anti-vandal reviewer I am now. I have myself done much to improve Knowledge and made many, many similar reverts (hopefully reforming more editors), all as a result of your one

549:) in 2011, but the jury's still out on his activities. I'm getting a good picture of the guy. Probably a little older than me (mid-40's to early-50's), probably from the U.S. or U.K. originally... and some more stuff I won't reveal per the beans thing. Keep digging! Cheers :: --> 1380:

Also sorry I didn't sign, and forgot to log in twice. I wasn't aware of this process because wikipedia is just a past time for me it's not my life and I don't always remember small things like this non stop every day! So if I didn't sign a couple times forgive me for being

1372:

Do you not understand the point I'm trying to make, it's very simple and You're being way to specific! Looking from 5,750 ft to the summit of Pikes Peak 15 miles away or so from southern Colorado Springs is a difference of around 8,400 ft, this is all I'm trying to say!

168:

I have to go out for a bit, but I'll put some thought into it. I'll create the subpage when I get back, and we can go from there. 2011 could be just as rife as the other years, and I would guess that it is. I'll let you know when the subpage is up. Cheers ::

1452:

Like I just said, I wasn't aware that there was an action called signing for talk pages, I do now and will remember. Also I didn't realize I wasn't still logged in when I posted changes and comments under my IP address, it was a simple mistake. Understand?

1420:

unregistered IP and a registered account and posting unsigned comments from both the IP and the registered account, well that just ticks me off. Like I said at your IP page, if I thought were deliberately trying to deceive me, I would be reporting you for

1377:

ft overall in the city limits yet it's still known as the Mile High City. Do you have a problem with this? You should going by your logic. Anyways this argument over 8,000ft vs 8,400ft is totally not worth my time, so just do what will make you happy.

95:

It's going to get gruesomely long very quickly, I'm afraid. How many Elton John/Carpenters fans, who change song lengths as part of their behavior, do you suppose there are in Hanoi? My guess would be: not too many. We're now at September, 2009 with

2061:

Peakbagger's coordinates are also unreliable, more than once they have misled hikers, on one occasion a group failed to summit an ultra in Morocco because of peakbagger coordinate misinformation. Peaklist coordinates are better. Re Neblina,

1157:

Heh, it does feel like being a detective sometimes. Thank you. Very kind of you. There is a level of interest in it and dare I say enjoyment involved in somethiing even this tedious. Like an old joke: It must be fun, we're not getting paid.

2116:. Thanks so much for your help with this clown, and please enter what you find at this more official place from now on. Since 2007 this guy has been doing this: I think he qualifies for "long-term abuse", no? ;P Cheers, and thanks again! 390:

Half-kidding eh? Man, I thought you were serious, really. I thought you were gonna come back with some wild name like "Hanoi Insidious Vandal". Could you imagine? then calling him by the initials like that other one from New York?! Haha.

543:

Looks fine. Until April of this year I had no knowledge of this guy, and only then because of his bizarre attempted Eagles additions. My hunch that he'd have been just as active during 2011 as the others is based on speculation, really.

490:

Ok great. I will check it out later and maybe tweak it. We should probably give the guy on the Eagles article an edit war warning now that you mention it. I also researched the claim and only found the same stuff you did from last year.

2260: 1593:

Thanks Mike, I ran this by the editors at the talk page. We'll see how it goes. For the record, I believe the normal RM process to be seriously flawed for reasons that were all too obvious last year at the Shishapangma page.

1662:, a completelty different and unrelated peak. So that is why I reverted to the old version. There was hardly anything usable. It was either irrelevant or "copyvios". If you need help, I will be glad to work with you. -- 1577:

parameter. If it is indeed found to be uncontroversial by the admin who choses to deal with it, it will be moved. If for any reason the move is deemed controversial, it will have to go through the normal RM process.

235:

Im fine with "The Hanoi Vandal" or maybe include in the name something about the subject of his vandalism like "Track List Vandal" just for example, but I will let you decide on the name. Since you have mentioned

2290: 660:

a few days later. There are now so many IPs in the 2008-2010 section that it's time to make three sections, I believe. If there's no times where the Korean IP and any Vietnamese IP conflict, then it's

1268:

I just wanted to thank you for your recent edits to the Jimmy Robinson (recording engineer) article. Your revisions were excellent and so improved the article as a whole, I thought.. thank you :) --

1830:

that states the phrase means "We Will Bury You", which sounds very familiar (I may have heard this before) and also is similar to what you are saying above, more or less. So I believe it is safe to

2323:, we can see a bunch of other ones (some are obviously him, and some are obviously not). Don't forget to check the bottom of the page for the next set. Plugging in the 58.187.42.XXX range, we get 2319:

Cool! Hey, let me show you this tool in case you've never seen it. Let's take the 58.187.64.XXX range, since only three IPs are listed in the suspected sock category. If you plug the range in

453:

I don't know if I can revert again per 3RR, but what that guy is adding does not seem correct at all. The only mention I can find goes back to September of last year, where it says the Eagles

2032:

Ahh nevermind that last statement, these maps are have all kinds of errors, should have known better. I actually have to leave soon, will check into all of this when I have more time. --

199:

I'm ready to create the page and dump all the so-far known IPs on it, but part of me wants a new name for this one. "The Hanoi Horror"? "The Hanoi Harlequin"? Some would claim that

709:

I went though the entire list twice to make sure I didn't miss anything. No conflicts, nothing from between December 29, 2009 though February 13, 2010. I'm pretty sure it's him. --

1798:

OK my apologies, but it appears you may have got the wrong idea about one or two things. It wasn't because I think I, an English speaker, know any better and it is certainly

1781:

But if you think that you as English speaker know better, well, it is your article. It has a mistake in translation now. I will not try to change it again. It is up to you.

2327:, and so on. Let me know if you have any questions - it didn't take me long, with no range experience at all, to get the hang of it. A useful tool to have. Cheers :: --> 747:: Just-discovered Vietnamese IP reinserts the exact same edit. Good work - I think this one is confirmed. It seems he went on vacation or a job assignment or something. 923: 872: 858: 1638: 909: 101: 1473: 1743:

Good to hear first hand that a former vandal has become a productive editor and that the smallest of actions can have profound effects...but of course it is

1490: 1247: 1189: 919: 868: 854: 609: 574:

from this year. I suspect there are still outstanding edits of his floating around and anything more recent may reveal those. Let me know if you find any. --

1817:. Now look at your changes. Note that, at a glance, they look strikingly like the blatant vandalism I see on Knowledge every day. Specifically the wording 1634: 1505: 1269: 2067: 1282: 905: 97: 1626:

for it not to be a stub anymore. Could you possible point me in the right direction so even I could contribute something to the wikipedia. Thank You

1033:

what I mean. I wonder if its even worth worrying about anything that's fairly far back in the histories. Just saying in general. Talk to you later. --

1784: 1468: 1409: 1303: 1068:

to be the same creep. The sheer volume of IPs used to repeatedly insert the same garbage over and over again is just staggering. There is something

1767: 1682: 798:

beginning in January, 2010. Korean IP edits it extensively, then 3 different Hanoi IPs come along. It also appears that the vandal was a fan of

2328: 2265: 2198: 2117: 1460: 1397: 1382: 1135: 1093: 1013: 983: 882: 803: 748: 665: 550: 458: 351: 204: 170: 111: 2079: 2052: 2025: 1994: 1945: 1891: 1860: 1614: 1534: 729: 297:

Another thought on the name. As cool as "The Hanoi Horror" sounds, I have been hoping you don't choose that particular name. In addition to

2368: 2313: 2249: 2212: 2188: 2157: 1444: 1357: 1312: 1107: 1053: 1027: 997: 842: 787: 704: 679: 594: 564: 472: 411: 365: 325: 278: 218: 184: 155: 1792: 1178: 1008: 952: 896: 817: 762: 642: 537: 511: 2168:

it (preserving the edit history), as opposed to copy-pasting into a new page as it appears you have done. Is it too late to fix that? --

1149: 125: 1255: 932:). Both in Hanoi but the latter IP is nothing but military weaponry. I dont think its him. Coud be wrong though. Im done for a while. -- 648:

Hmm... interesting. We'd have to see if there was any times where that IP was editing at the same time one of the Vietnam IPs was. Note

2002: 1773: 1587: 1003: 1733: 850: 664:

that the guy went on vacation in Korea for a couple of months at that time - who knows? I agree that the edits are eerily similar.

1225: 2405: 1906:: are you sure that the summit is within Brazil and not on the Venezuela border? If so, please can you give a citation. Thanks. 89: 2066:

data prove that peakbagger is about 30 seconds too far north but here peaklist's coordinates are also inaccurate. Comparison of

1903: 743: 737: 2113: 979: 1117: 974: 548:

opened the Carpenters floodgate, you clueful bastard! Same dude, no question. He may have taken a break (forced or not ;: -->

1964: 1915: 1646: 684:

Already on it. So far no cases where known IPs have edited between the Dec 09 - Feb 10 time frame. Still checking though. --

1523: 1516: 969: 929: 878: 864: 619: 1642: 1277: 2293:, just in case he has any info that may help. The other editor, who created the cat you linked, is no longer active. -- 1951:

Thanks for drawing this to my attention. I cannot find any official citations, but I added the summitpost reference to

1202: 1073: 915: 650: 107: 1867:

When making the change I noticed the statement was already sourced. I had somehow overlooked this. The source states:

1556: 1197: 1561: 606: 2102: 1530: 2324: 2320: 1212: 767:

Meant Feb 13th just above. I have now changed it. Sure looks like it's him, but I did add a disclaimer anyways. --

1551: 1231: 1060:

I mean, I am blown away. I've never seen anything like this. I'm desperately trying to convince myself it's some

656: 1925:

particularly the Common misconceptions section. As I recall, I probably just assumed this all to be accurate. --

1869:'A major headache for translators, the famous Russian idiom equates roughly with the English “We’ll show you!”' 622:) geolocates in Korea and the user held on to it for a while. But man, some of the diffs look eerily similar. -- 2365: 2342: 2310: 2279: 2246: 2185: 2154: 2131: 2049: 2022: 1991: 1942: 1888: 1857: 1764: 1679: 1655: 1611: 1441: 1354: 1175: 1089: 1050: 949: 839: 784: 726: 701: 639: 591: 534: 508: 408: 322: 275: 152: 2070:

with Google Earth and SRTM data suggests the correct coordinates are N 0:47:57 W 66:00:28, but that is my OR.

2374: 1717: 1405: 1295: 457:

do a musical. Nothing from this year, and certainly no 2014 opening nights listed anywhere that I can find.

1835:

just an fyi. On second thought, maybe "We'll show you" is best. I will try to find some more sources later.

1084: 81: 76: 71: 59: 1747:

who is to be congratulated. No one was more instrumental in your "reform" than yourself. Bravo friend! --

1688: 1459:

If all of this ticks you off then get over it, as there was no deliberate deceiving behind any of this!–

38: 1810: 1570: 203:

discourages this sort of thing, but I prefer presenting evidence. Who shall this scourge be known as?

445: 1251: 1193: 963: 613: 603: 440:

Yeah, the "HIV" wouldn't go over too well ;P Any name that either glorifies (he might actually be

1897: 1815:'“We’ll show you Kuz'kina Mat!” in this usage meaning "something that has not been seen before"' 1729: 1273: 1134:

For your excellent efforts (and astute observations) in dealing with a certain long-term vandal.

1092:

What kind of a mind would even dream up such utter nonsense? Very discouraging. Well, TTYL :: -->

1078: 1573:. Assume the move is uncontroversial when you list it and link the talk page discussion in the 2348:

No I haven't seen that trick and thank you for sharing it! I will certainly give it a try:-) --

1421: 2001:

These new coordinates show the peak to be entirely within Brazil using the first on the list,

1804:"my article". The short explanation is: I mistakenly interpretted your edit as pure vandalism. 795: 2286: 2197:

Heh - good question. Hadn't thought of that. Let me ask the admin who deleted the subpage...

1546: 741:: The Korean IP adds a bunch of crap about Delta Goodrem, not Amanda Seyfried, being a lead. 2075: 1960: 1911: 1871:. So I just changed the article so it states no more than that. Is this now acceptable? -- 1840:

It was all an honest mistake on my part and I thank you for bringing it to my attention. --

1788: 1630: 1620: 1583: 1393: 1291: 1974:, and I have just added some better coordinates using Peakbagger as a source, just fyi. -- 1921:

Uh...well technically "no" and "no", are the short answers to your questions. See article

1207:

Thanks for drawing attention to a gnarly passage! And i hope you'll also learn more about

8: 2401: 1821:

to my eyes just looked like a kid goofing around. So I reverted and templated you. Sorry.

1501: 959: 444:

of the "Hanoi Horror") or disparages him would be frowned upon, so I created the page at

2359: 2304: 2240: 2179: 2148: 2087: 2043: 2016: 1985: 1936: 1882: 1851: 1758: 1725: 1673: 1605: 1483: 1475: 1435: 1348: 1169: 1044: 943: 833: 778: 720: 695: 633: 585: 528: 502: 402: 316: 269: 146: 47: 17: 2335: 2272: 2205: 2124: 2098: 1724:

anti-vandalism deed. It just goes to show how every little action here is important.

1464: 1401: 1386: 1299: 1263: 1142: 1100: 1020: 990: 889: 810: 755: 672: 557: 465: 358: 211: 177: 135:

Should we group them like that for a while? or do you have something else in mind? --

118: 1456:

Trying to deceive? That's really what you thought? You're correct this is annoying.

1827: 1510: 1491:

Talk:Monty Hall problem#Conditional or Simple solutions for the Monty Hall problem?

2071: 1956: 1952: 1922: 1907: 1579: 1222: 347: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

2397: 1971: 1541: 1497: 1208: 298: 237: 200: 2383: 1697: 346:

Hehe - I was half-kidding about the names: he's just the Hanoi Vandal. As for

2349: 2294: 2230: 2169: 2138: 2107: 2033: 2006: 1975: 1926: 1872: 1841: 1831: 1748: 1663: 1595: 1425: 1338: 1183: 1159: 1034: 933: 823: 768: 710: 685: 623: 575: 518: 492: 449: 392: 306: 301:

concerns, it sounds too much like a story from a Vietnam POW. Brings to mind

259: 136: 1712:

Several months ago, you reverted a few edits made by an anonymous vandal at

2094: 1713: 302: 1218: 1826:

Now just a few minutes ago I did a very quick Google search and found

799: 867:) edits it. The Korean IP appears a few days later, and in February 1328:

mountain? Take the difference between the two official elevations."

602:

Doc, you may not like the looks of this, but have a look at this

517:

running accross any more from 2011 other than the one I noted? --

2285:

Yeah I guess there was no SPI though. I have left a message at

1659: 1240: 2396:

Consitent Anti-Vandalism Edits that I wish I could have done.

1813:, and as you can see the exact wording before your edit was: 1537:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

1424:. As it is, it's just annoying and not worth the trouble. -- 982:

shows who they were dealing with. This is utterly absurd...

2063: 240:, there have been couple things on my mind related to that. 794:

I doubt we even need a disclaimer: look at the history of

1819:"We’ll show you Kuz'kin's mother!...We'll kick your butt" 958:

You have no idea how much worse it is. I just discovered

2225:

I see now the edit history has been restored. The admin

978:, but looking at the history starting at July 9, 2010 1486:, I am inviting you to comment on the following RfC: 904:Thought I'd leave this here before I turn in. 2291:Category:Knowledge sockpuppets of 58.187.64.7 1213:Talk:Sherpa people#Sensitivity? to low oxygen 1076:" was actually written by the guys who wrote 1522:Hello, Racerx11. You have new messages at 1283:Pikes Peak elevation above Colorado Springs 2164:Though I would have prefered you actually 1482:Because of your previous participation at 972:). Not only are they an Elton John vandal 654:from a just-discovered IP was followed by 1116: 1115: 1004:Christmas with The Chipmunks (2008 album) 2227:(they do tend to come in handy at times) 851:Elton 60 - Live at Madison Square Garden 1571:Knowledge:RM#Requesting_technical_moves 14: 2114:Knowledge:Long-term abuse/Hanoi Vandal 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 1072:wrong with this individual. I mean, " 1188:Thanks for helping me on Knowledge. 25: 1087:and that song appeared in the film? 23: 2264:sockpuppet category! Cheers :: --> 1515: 1323:"No, what I said is that it rises 1074:Sorry Seems to Be the Hardest Word 24: 2419: 2229:must have came through for us. -- 1389:) 03:56, 4 September 2012 (UTC) 1337:Please reply here from now on. -- 975:a lengthy copy edit for a change 2382: 1696: 1239: 1118: 29: 90:Hanoi Vandal discussion (cont.) 1955:which appears to be accurate. 1656:Knowledge:Copyright violations 13: 1: 1734:22:56, 26 December 2012 (UTC) 1718:South Kingstown, Rhode Island 1506:22:27, 6 September 2012 (UTC) 1469:06:27, 4 September 2012 (UTC) 1445:04:07, 4 September 2012 (UTC) 1410:03:50, 4 September 2012 (UTC) 1358:03:23, 4 September 2012 (UTC) 1304:02:59, 4 September 2012 (UTC) 1012:. Il Divo, huh? Nightmare... 918:) contributions lead to this 2406:13:27, 25 January 2013 (UTC) 2369:02:15, 15 January 2013 (UTC) 2343:22:17, 14 January 2013 (UTC) 2314:11:45, 14 January 2013 (UTC) 2280:06:14, 14 January 2013 (UTC) 2259:Aw, crap! I didn't even see 2250:23:03, 11 January 2013 (UTC) 2213:11:46, 11 January 2013 (UTC) 2189:11:42, 11 January 2013 (UTC) 2158:11:29, 11 January 2013 (UTC) 2132:07:26, 11 January 2013 (UTC) 2103:21:02, 13 January 2013 (UTC) 2080:20:21, 13 January 2013 (UTC) 2053:19:17, 13 January 2013 (UTC) 2026:19:13, 13 January 2013 (UTC) 1995:18:51, 13 January 2013 (UTC) 1965:18:42, 13 January 2013 (UTC) 1946:18:23, 13 January 2013 (UTC) 1916:18:16, 13 January 2013 (UTC) 1892:00:48, 12 January 2013 (UTC) 1861:00:06, 12 January 2013 (UTC) 1793:09:20, 11 January 2013 (UTC) 1683:22:48, 6 December 2012 (UTC) 1647:18:46, 6 December 2012 (UTC) 1615:00:33, 10 October 2012 (UTC) 1569:Follow the instructions at: 1215:. All's well that ends well! 7: 2390:The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar 1768:12:33, 5 January 2013 (UTC) 1704:The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar 1588:23:42, 9 October 2012 (UTC) 1557:22:53, 3 October 2012 (UTC) 1531:22:53, 3 October 2012 (UTC) 1278:13:26, 27 August 2012 (UTC) 1256:20:42, 17 August 2012 (UTC) 1119:File:Detective barnstar.png 10: 2424: 2005:after zooming in a bit. -- 2003:da Neblina ACME Mapper 2.0 1203:Sensitivity? to low oxygen 2381: 2289:, the editor who created 1695: 1562:Re: Led Zeppelin DVD move 1474:Invitation to comment at 1226:08:37, 25 July 2012 (UTC) 1198:17:11, 17 July 2012 (UTC) 1179:10:52, 11 July 2012 (UTC) 1150:05:38, 11 July 2012 (UTC) 1124: 1108:07:38, 10 July 2012 (UTC) 1054:06:51, 10 July 2012 (UTC) 1028:06:41, 10 July 2012 (UTC) 998:06:34, 10 July 2012 (UTC) 953:06:19, 10 July 2012 (UTC) 897:05:43, 10 July 2012 (UTC) 843:05:02, 10 July 2012 (UTC) 818:05:00, 10 July 2012 (UTC) 788:04:45, 10 July 2012 (UTC) 763:04:39, 10 July 2012 (UTC) 730:04:26, 10 July 2012 (UTC) 705:04:10, 10 July 2012 (UTC) 680:04:03, 10 July 2012 (UTC) 643:03:26, 10 July 2012 (UTC) 448:. It's the basis for any 446:User:Doc9871/Hanoi Vandal 595:07:36, 9 July 2012 (UTC) 565:07:23, 9 July 2012 (UTC) 538:07:08, 9 July 2012 (UTC) 512:00:16, 9 July 2012 (UTC) 473:22:57, 8 July 2012 (UTC) 412:21:48, 8 July 2012 (UTC) 366:20:02, 8 July 2012 (UTC) 326:16:47, 8 July 2012 (UTC) 279:12:04, 8 July 2012 (UTC) 219:07:51, 8 July 2012 (UTC) 185:01:02, 8 July 2012 (UTC) 156:00:50, 8 July 2012 (UTC) 126:00:36, 8 July 2012 (UTC) 110:). A total nightmare... 1710:Hello there, Racerx11. 1232:A cheeseburger for you! 1079:Chitty Chitty Bang Bang 1832:assume some good faith 1520: 1128:The Detective Barnstar 2287:User talk:Avicennasis 2137:Great, thanks Doc! -- 1524:HueSatLum's talk page 1519: 42:of past discussions. 2375:A barnstar for you! 1774:Re: "Kuz'kina mat'" 1689:A barnstar for you! 1970:There is also the 1535:remove this notice 1521: 1484:Monty Hall problem 1476:Monty Hall problem 1315:at your IP adress: 18:User talk:Racerx11 2411: 2410: 2363: 2308: 2244: 2228: 2183: 2152: 2047: 2020: 1989: 1940: 1886: 1855: 1762: 1740: 1739: 1677: 1650: 1633:comment added by 1609: 1439: 1413: 1396:comment added by 1352: 1294:comment added by 1261: 1260: 1173: 1155: 1154: 1048: 1009:Look at this edit 947: 881:) returns to it. 837: 782: 724: 699: 637: 589: 532: 506: 406: 320: 273: 150: 87: 86: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 2415: 2386: 2379: 2378: 2357: 2355: 2352: 2340: 2333: 2302: 2300: 2297: 2277: 2270: 2238: 2236: 2233: 2226: 2210: 2203: 2177: 2175: 2172: 2146: 2144: 2141: 2129: 2122: 2041: 2039: 2036: 2014: 2012: 2009: 1983: 1981: 1978: 1934: 1932: 1929: 1880: 1878: 1875: 1849: 1847: 1844: 1811:here is the diff 1756: 1754: 1751: 1700: 1693: 1692: 1671: 1669: 1666: 1649: 1627: 1603: 1601: 1598: 1554: 1549: 1544: 1538: 1433: 1431: 1428: 1412: 1390: 1346: 1344: 1341: 1306: 1243: 1236: 1235: 1167: 1165: 1162: 1147: 1140: 1122: 1120: 1113: 1112: 1105: 1098: 1091: 1086: 1042: 1040: 1037: 1025: 1018: 1011: 995: 988: 977: 941: 939: 936: 894: 887: 831: 829: 826: 815: 808: 776: 774: 771: 760: 753: 746: 740: 718: 716: 713: 693: 691: 688: 677: 670: 659: 653: 631: 629: 626: 583: 581: 578: 562: 555: 526: 524: 521: 500: 498: 495: 470: 463: 400: 398: 395: 363: 356: 314: 312: 309: 305:specifically. -- 267: 265: 262: 216: 209: 182: 175: 144: 142: 139: 123: 116: 68: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 2423: 2422: 2418: 2417: 2416: 2414: 2413: 2412: 2377: 2353: 2350: 2336: 2329: 2298: 2295: 2273: 2266: 2234: 2231: 2206: 2199: 2173: 2170: 2142: 2139: 2125: 2118: 2110: 2090: 2037: 2034: 2010: 2007: 1979: 1976: 1972:Peakbagger page 1953:Pico da Neblina 1930: 1927: 1923:Pico da Neblina 1900: 1898:Pico da Neblina 1876: 1873: 1845: 1842: 1776: 1752: 1749: 1691: 1667: 1664: 1628: 1623: 1599: 1596: 1575:reason for move 1564: 1552: 1547: 1542: 1539: 1528: 1513: 1480: 1429: 1426: 1391: 1342: 1339: 1289: 1285: 1266: 1234: 1205: 1186: 1163: 1160: 1143: 1136: 1101: 1094: 1088: 1083: 1038: 1035: 1021: 1014: 1007: 991: 984: 973: 937: 934: 890: 883: 849:More proof: on 827: 824: 822:Im convinced -- 811: 804: 772: 769: 756: 749: 742: 736: 714: 711: 689: 686: 673: 666: 655: 649: 627: 624: 579: 576: 558: 551: 522: 519: 496: 493: 466: 459: 396: 393: 359: 352: 310: 307: 263: 260: 212: 205: 178: 171: 140: 137: 119: 112: 92: 64: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 2421: 2409: 2408: 2393: 2392: 2387: 2376: 2373: 2372: 2371: 2317: 2316: 2257: 2256: 2255: 2254: 2253: 2252: 2218: 2217: 2216: 2215: 2192: 2191: 2161: 2160: 2112:I moved it to 2109: 2106: 2089: 2086: 2085: 2084: 2083: 2082: 2056: 2055: 2029: 2028: 1998: 1997: 1949: 1948: 1899: 1896: 1895: 1894: 1864: 1863: 1837: 1836: 1823: 1822: 1809:For reference 1806: 1805: 1775: 1772: 1771: 1770: 1738: 1737: 1707: 1706: 1701: 1690: 1687: 1686: 1685: 1622: 1619: 1618: 1617: 1563: 1560: 1529:Message added 1527: 1514: 1512: 1509: 1479: 1472: 1450: 1449: 1448: 1447: 1363: 1361: 1360: 1334: 1333: 1332: 1331: 1317: 1316: 1284: 1281: 1265: 1262: 1259: 1258: 1248:WanderingE1000 1244: 1233: 1230: 1228: 1216: 1204: 1201: 1190:WanderingE1000 1185: 1182: 1153: 1152: 1131: 1130: 1125: 1123: 1111: 1110: 1058: 1057: 1056: 1002:Same story at 1000: 960:113.160.112.78 920:113.171.139.68 902: 901: 900: 899: 869:118.71.187.123 855:113.22.107.209 847: 846: 845: 792: 791: 790: 734: 733: 732: 610:112.167.163.24 600: 599: 598: 597: 568: 567: 488: 487: 486: 485: 484: 483: 482: 481: 480: 479: 478: 477: 476: 475: 425: 424: 423: 422: 421: 420: 419: 418: 417: 416: 415: 414: 377: 376: 375: 374: 373: 372: 371: 370: 369: 368: 335: 334: 333: 332: 331: 330: 329: 328: 288: 287: 286: 285: 284: 283: 282: 281: 248: 247: 246: 245: 244: 243: 242: 241: 226: 225: 224: 223: 222: 221: 192: 191: 190: 189: 188: 187: 161: 160: 159: 158: 129: 128: 91: 88: 85: 84: 79: 74: 69: 62: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2420: 2407: 2403: 2399: 2395: 2394: 2391: 2388: 2385: 2380: 2370: 2367: 2366: 2362: 2361: 2356: 2347: 2346: 2345: 2344: 2341: 2339: 2334: 2332: 2326: 2322: 2315: 2312: 2311: 2307: 2306: 2301: 2292: 2288: 2284: 2283: 2282: 2281: 2278: 2276: 2271: 2269: 2262: 2251: 2248: 2247: 2243: 2242: 2237: 2224: 2223: 2222: 2221: 2220: 2219: 2214: 2211: 2209: 2204: 2202: 2196: 2195: 2194: 2193: 2190: 2187: 2186: 2182: 2181: 2176: 2167: 2163: 2162: 2159: 2156: 2155: 2151: 2150: 2145: 2136: 2135: 2134: 2133: 2130: 2128: 2123: 2121: 2115: 2105: 2104: 2100: 2096: 2081: 2077: 2073: 2069: 2068:this routemap 2065: 2060: 2059: 2058: 2057: 2054: 2051: 2050: 2046: 2045: 2040: 2031: 2030: 2027: 2024: 2023: 2019: 2018: 2013: 2004: 2000: 1999: 1996: 1993: 1992: 1988: 1987: 1982: 1973: 1969: 1968: 1967: 1966: 1962: 1958: 1954: 1947: 1944: 1943: 1939: 1938: 1933: 1924: 1920: 1919: 1918: 1917: 1913: 1909: 1905: 1893: 1890: 1889: 1885: 1884: 1879: 1870: 1866: 1865: 1862: 1859: 1858: 1854: 1853: 1848: 1839: 1838: 1833: 1829: 1825: 1824: 1820: 1816: 1812: 1808: 1807: 1803: 1802: 1797: 1796: 1795: 1794: 1790: 1786: 1782: 1779: 1769: 1766: 1765: 1761: 1760: 1755: 1746: 1742: 1741: 1736: 1735: 1731: 1727: 1726:RedSoxFan2434 1721: 1719: 1715: 1709: 1708: 1705: 1702: 1699: 1694: 1684: 1681: 1680: 1676: 1675: 1670: 1661: 1657: 1653: 1652: 1651: 1648: 1644: 1640: 1636: 1635:SujanTamrakar 1632: 1616: 1613: 1612: 1608: 1607: 1602: 1592: 1591: 1590: 1589: 1585: 1581: 1576: 1572: 1567: 1559: 1558: 1555: 1550: 1545: 1536: 1532: 1525: 1518: 1508: 1507: 1503: 1499: 1494: 1493: 1492: 1487: 1485: 1477: 1471: 1470: 1466: 1462: 1457: 1454: 1446: 1443: 1442: 1438: 1437: 1432: 1423: 1418: 1417: 1416: 1415: 1414: 1411: 1407: 1403: 1399: 1395: 1388: 1384: 1378: 1374: 1370: 1366: 1359: 1356: 1355: 1351: 1350: 1345: 1336: 1335: 1329: 1325:approximately 1324: 1321: 1320: 1319: 1318: 1314: 1309: 1308: 1307: 1305: 1301: 1297: 1293: 1280: 1279: 1275: 1271: 1270:GingerPatrick 1257: 1253: 1249: 1245: 1242: 1238: 1237: 1229: 1227: 1224: 1220: 1214: 1210: 1200: 1199: 1195: 1191: 1181: 1180: 1177: 1176: 1172: 1171: 1166: 1151: 1148: 1146: 1141: 1139: 1133: 1132: 1129: 1126: 1121: 1114: 1109: 1106: 1104: 1099: 1097: 1090: 1085: 1081: 1080: 1075: 1071: 1067: 1063: 1059: 1055: 1052: 1051: 1047: 1046: 1041: 1031: 1030: 1029: 1026: 1024: 1019: 1017: 1010: 1005: 1001: 999: 996: 994: 989: 987: 981: 976: 971: 968: 965: 961: 957: 956: 955: 954: 951: 950: 946: 945: 940: 931: 928: 925: 921: 917: 914: 911: 907: 898: 895: 893: 888: 886: 880: 877: 874: 870: 866: 863: 860: 856: 852: 848: 844: 841: 840: 836: 835: 830: 821: 820: 819: 816: 814: 809: 807: 801: 797: 796:this template 793: 789: 786: 785: 781: 780: 775: 766: 765: 764: 761: 759: 754: 752: 745: 739: 738:Jan. 14, 2010 735: 731: 728: 727: 723: 722: 717: 708: 707: 706: 703: 702: 698: 697: 692: 683: 682: 681: 678: 676: 671: 669: 663: 658: 652: 647: 646: 645: 644: 641: 640: 636: 635: 630: 621: 618: 615: 611: 607: 604: 596: 593: 592: 588: 587: 582: 572: 571: 570: 569: 566: 563: 561: 556: 554: 547: 542: 541: 540: 539: 536: 535: 531: 530: 525: 514: 513: 510: 509: 505: 504: 499: 474: 471: 469: 464: 462: 456: 451: 447: 443: 439: 438: 437: 436: 435: 434: 433: 432: 431: 430: 429: 428: 427: 426: 413: 410: 409: 405: 404: 399: 389: 388: 387: 386: 385: 384: 383: 382: 381: 380: 379: 378: 367: 364: 362: 357: 355: 349: 345: 344: 343: 342: 341: 340: 339: 338: 337: 336: 327: 324: 323: 319: 318: 313: 304: 300: 296: 295: 294: 293: 292: 291: 290: 289: 280: 277: 276: 272: 271: 266: 256: 255: 254: 253: 252: 251: 250: 249: 239: 234: 233: 232: 231: 230: 229: 228: 227: 220: 217: 215: 210: 208: 202: 198: 197: 196: 195: 194: 193: 186: 183: 181: 176: 174: 167: 166: 165: 164: 163: 162: 157: 154: 153: 149: 148: 143: 133: 132: 131: 130: 127: 124: 122: 117: 115: 109: 106: 103: 99: 94: 93: 83: 80: 78: 75: 73: 70: 67: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 2389: 2364: 2358: 2337: 2330: 2318: 2309: 2303: 2274: 2267: 2258: 2245: 2239: 2207: 2200: 2184: 2178: 2165: 2153: 2147: 2126: 2119: 2111: 2091: 2048: 2042: 2021: 2015: 1990: 1984: 1950: 1941: 1935: 1901: 1887: 1881: 1868: 1856: 1850: 1818: 1814: 1800: 1799: 1783: 1780: 1777: 1763: 1757: 1744: 1722: 1714:Led Zeppelin 1711: 1703: 1678: 1672: 1654:Please read 1629:— Preceding 1624: 1621:Consultation 1610: 1604: 1574: 1568: 1565: 1540: 1495: 1489: 1488: 1481: 1458: 1455: 1451: 1440: 1434: 1422:Sockpuppetry 1392:— Preceding 1379: 1375: 1371: 1367: 1362: 1353: 1347: 1326: 1322: 1290:— Preceding 1286: 1267: 1206: 1187: 1174: 1168: 1156: 1144: 1137: 1127: 1102: 1095: 1077: 1069: 1065: 1064:nut, but it 1061: 1049: 1043: 1022: 1015: 992: 985: 966: 948: 942: 926: 912: 906:58.187.33.23 903: 891: 884: 875: 861: 838: 832: 812: 805: 802:for awhile. 783: 777: 757: 750: 744:May 25, 2010 725: 719: 700: 694: 674: 667: 661: 638: 632: 616: 601: 590: 584: 559: 552: 545: 533: 527: 515: 507: 501: 489: 467: 460: 454: 441: 407: 401: 360: 353: 321: 315: 303:Hanoi Hilton 274: 268: 213: 206: 179: 172: 151: 145: 120: 113: 104: 98:113.22.56.62 65: 43: 37: 1209:WP:BOLDness 36:This is an 2360:Talk to me 2305:Talk to me 2241:Talk to me 2180:Talk to me 2149:Talk to me 2093:thank you. 2088:Bronygarth 2072:Viewfinder 2044:Talk to me 2017:Talk to me 1986:Talk to me 1957:Viewfinder 1937:Talk to me 1908:Viewfinder 1883:Talk to me 1852:Talk to me 1785:Jpimshteyn 1759:Talk to me 1674:Talk to me 1606:Talk to me 1580:Mike Cline 1533:. You can 1436:Talk to me 1349:Talk to me 1330:- Racerx11 1246:Thank you 1170:Talk to me 1045:Talk to me 944:Talk to me 834:Talk to me 779:Talk to me 721:Talk to me 696:Talk to me 657:Korean IP 634:Talk to me 586:Talk to me 529:Talk to me 503:Talk to me 403:Talk to me 317:Talk to me 270:Talk to me 147:Talk to me 1904:this edit 1498:Guy Macon 1264:Thank You 1070:seriously 800:Green Day 651:this diff 608:. The IP 605:and this 82:Archive 5 77:Archive 4 72:Archive 3 66:Archive 2 60:Archive 1 1643:contribs 1631:unsigned 1511:Talkback 1406:contribs 1394:unsigned 1381:human.–– 1292:unsigned 970:contribs 930:contribs 916:contribs 879:contribs 865:contribs 853:, first 662:possible 620:contribs 348:WP:BEANS 108:contribs 2321:like so 2095:Corabal 1566:Racer, 1461:Hogs555 1398:Hogs555 1383:Hogs555 1296:Hogs555 299:WP:Deny 238:WP:DENY 201:WP:DENY 39:archive 1660:Lhotse 450:WP:LTA 2398:-LQN2 2351:Racer 2296:Racer 2232:Racer 2171:Racer 2166:moved 2140:Racer 2108:Moved 2035:Racer 2008:Racer 1977:Racer 1928:Racer 1874:Racer 1843:Racer 1750:Racer 1665:Racer 1597:Racer 1427:Racer 1340:Racer 1219:Jerzy 1211:from 1184:Thanx 1161:Racer 1062:other 1036:Racer 935:Racer 825:Racer 770:Racer 712:Racer 687:Racer 625:Racer 577:Racer 520:Racer 494:Racer 455:might 442:proud 394:Racer 308:Racer 261:Racer 138:Racer 16:< 2402:talk 2338:talk 2325:this 2275:talk 2261:this 2208:talk 2127:talk 2099:talk 2076:talk 2064:SRTM 1961:talk 1912:talk 1828:this 1789:talk 1730:talk 1716:and 1639:talk 1584:talk 1502:talk 1465:talk 1402:talk 1387:talk 1313:this 1300:talk 1274:talk 1252:talk 1194:talk 1145:talk 1103:talk 1023:talk 993:talk 980:here 964:talk 924:talk 910:talk 892:talk 873:talk 859:talk 813:talk 758:talk 675:talk 614:talk 560:talk 468:talk 361:talk 214:talk 180:talk 121:talk 102:talk 2331:Doc 2268:Doc 2201:Doc 2120:Doc 1902:Re 1801:NOT 1745:you 1553:Lum 1548:Sat 1543:Hue 1478:RfC 1138:Doc 1096:Doc 1066:has 1016:Doc 986:Doc 885:Doc 806:Doc 751:Doc 668:Doc 553:Doc 546:You 461:Doc 354:Doc 207:Doc 173:Doc 169:--> 114:Doc 2404:) 2101:) 2078:) 1963:) 1914:) 1791:) 1732:) 1720:. 1645:) 1641:• 1594:-- 1586:) 1578:-- 1504:) 1496:-- 1467:) 1408:) 1404:• 1302:) 1276:) 1254:) 1217:-- 1196:) 1158:-- 1006:. 491:-- 391:-- 2400:( 2354:X 2299:X 2235:X 2174:X 2143:X 2097:( 2074:( 2038:X 2011:X 1980:X 1959:( 1931:X 1910:( 1877:X 1846:X 1787:( 1753:X 1728:( 1668:X 1637:( 1600:X 1582:( 1526:. 1500:( 1463:( 1430:X 1400:( 1385:( 1343:X 1298:( 1272:( 1250:( 1223:t 1221:• 1192:( 1164:X 1082:, 1039:X 967:· 962:( 938:X 927:· 922:( 913:· 908:( 876:· 871:( 862:· 857:( 828:X 773:X 715:X 690:X 628:X 617:· 612:( 580:X 523:X 497:X 397:X 311:X 264:X 141:X 105:· 100:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index