583:
mean they didn't say it voluntarily, or come up that judgement themselves, or the quote from the
Observer (again, cited by the publisher); the 'Publishers Weekly' review is definitely independent, and I'm sure a large publisher like Bloombury wouldn't say things like the Kofi Annan quote without a basis for it. The Daily Telegraph review, I accept, is 'from the publisher'; the 'National Library of Australia' description seems to be their own. If you think some of the quotes are based on publisher's promotional stuff, then either put that in the reference/footnote, or qualify the comment appropriately in the text. But your deletion has just taken out lots of references, most of which are perfectly valid, even by your unfairly strict criteria. Alex
561:
that article but am not sure how to improve it (it was never going to be a long piece of writing, but it has to be good enough to stay). I am in the position of trying to document something that is genuinely hard to verify, simply because very little is written about
Science prizes, apart from the Nobel, and possibly the Fields in mathematics. The universities themselves take note always when someone on staff gets something, but if their mention of it doesn't qualify as an independent source then it's difficult. I think I'll switch to a few different search engines!! cheers and thanks for your suggestions and action on this one.
1401:
795:
31:
1041:
627:
969:
896:
358:
153:
871:
legitimize that silliness, actually only show how silly it is. I do feel if I were to tinker with the text from the Times too much I'd be pushing into OR territory. So we need to figure a way to expand on the NY Times material with the intent of establishing that gang stalking as it is widely believed is simply delusional thinking, if there aren't examples of what their delusions are as included in the article, that's difficult.
1121:
responsibility, I'm an admin for almost three years and I don't feel any significant changes in my editing habits or more pressure. I think that the admin tool in your hands would be good a)for you in evaluating various complicated situations (such as viewing deleted content) and b)for
Knowledge, as you are one of the best and most experienced editors in deletion areas. You have my full support or co-nomination if you want. --
545:
with normal, colloquial, clearly malice-free use of such language, but some more sensitive souls might be offended) comes back then I think that the best thing to do is simply remove the comments without reply. Such people are usually attention seekers who give up when they don't receive any attention.
560:
Phil, my deepest apologies regarding possible upsetting language toward others, even it you weren't offended it makes no difference. As you say, others may be, and I need to remain vigilant about that. If I see him/her post again I will simply remove the remarks also. I have a sort of fondness for
219:
of my PROD rationale as "blatantly untrue". The article (prior to your edit) consisted of a brief introduction to a story, with a speculation that the story might be talking about a particular town in Turkey, followed by the text from the Qu'ran, with absolutely no other interpretation or analysis.
582:
On your huge deletion from the 'Iain King' page, your assertion that these are all publisher's quotes is not true - look at the economist review (are you saying they're not independent?), or the quote from the Royal
Institute of Philosophy - just because it's cited on the publisher's webpage doesn't
263:
Dear Phil, I saw that you deleted the proposals for the deletion of the two above articles, stating that "an anachronistic name is perfectly valid as redirect". I have the impression that you have not read the edit history of the article (as it was suggested in the proposal template). My concern was
870:
of that editor's erroneous assertion used to justify deletion of long standing content). What I was trying to reflect there was a brief description of what the Times was saying their claims were describing gang stalking- the mere presence of red and white cars for instance- I'm in no way trying to
544:
I've removed the rants. I should have done so in the first place rather than try to engage in rational argument with someone who is obviously not interested in rational argument. If the "lunatic" (you might want to be a bit more careful with your words - I have a mental illness and have no trouble
1270:
In the last of those cases there was no issue to be dealt with, the article already had enough reliable sources to demonstrate notability. In the case of the first two I happened to be too busy to do more than point people in the direction where they could easily find sources. And I don't believe
1120:
I've seen your comments at an AfD (again :) and I thought about the same thing. You work in content related areas and I can't imagine that you would fail as an admin. Your competence is indisputable, your comments and interaction with others is sometimes uncompromise but always fair. As for the
1139:
Thanks for the vote of confidence, but the answer is still "no". I certainly don't feel any pressing need to be able to delete or protect articles or block editors. You're right that it would be useful to be able to read deleted articles, especially when I think that an article might have been
1140:
speedily deleted in error, but that need is not great enough for me to put myself through the RFA process where I'm sure that some of my more robust comments would be taken out of context and used against me. I'll just carry on as a rather curmudgeonly editor without admin rights.
69:
Do you have a link to that part of Google, I used to llve it with teh timeline but then they changed it and I couldn't find it and had no idea that was only a search within last 39 days. It would be immensely helpful for my work not only with new page patrol but article creation.
865:
About that passage you deleted, we're on the same page as far as it being delusions and what prompted the entry was that some weeks ago another editor deleted some of that as not matching the reference (it did- and note I specifically mentioned direct C/P
995:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
922:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
384:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
179:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
527:
Phil, how do i get that anonymous lunatic off the Samuel
Friedman Foundation Talk page? Is there someone I can report it to? Any help would be appreciated. Should I just delete the comments? I have never had this happen before. regards
764:
Thank you for removing the speedy deletion thingy on the page. I was so scared that the page might be deleted. I worked so hard, it is my first time creating a page. Thank You again Mr Phil. Hope to hear from you again.
1354:
How many Google hits would you expect to find for one of the many possible transliterations into the Roman alphabet of the name of someone who was active in
Djibouti in the 1970s? Your ignorance is simply breathtaking.
999:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.
926:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.
388:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.
183:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.
327:
Dear Phil, thank for your above remarks. I redirected
Castrum Clus to the medieval period of the town's history (as it is suggested by the above sources). I still suggest that "Clus (castra)" should be deleted.
1377:
Thank you for keeping a watchful eye on the Lizzie Phelan article. I worked on saving this article from deletion and only got involved because she seems to inspire a strong negative reaction.
953:
1248:
You're right in one respect - I shouldn't have said what I said, and for that I apologise. However, your claim that my comments were "completely untrue" is itself completely untrue - see
691:
490:
1115:
1100:
398:
98:
1134:
1026:
1364:
1188:
Não tenho conhecimentos na língua inglesa. O artigo principal está sob nome errado, e preciso que esse redirecionamento seja eliminado para a página ser movida para esse título.
1304:
1288:
611:
1329:
1167:
1149:
246:
554:
436:
744:
730:
706:
570:
537:
337:
320:
237:
Your rationale said that the article contained "only the text of the story". That is blatantly untrue, because it also contained an introduction, as you now say yourself.
1192:
656:
132:
1220:
885:
860:
903:
887:
79:
511:
301:
838:
818:
500:
442:
1348:
880:
919:
421:
1335:
1062:
1075:
I see that you have been asked before, but that was a while ago. How would you feel about running for adminship? You would pass RfA very easily, I think. —
780:
648:
772:
826:
347:
1085:
755:
1415:
727:
688:
231:
1264:
1243:
1053:
thank you so much for your help. I am still new to wiki and learning the "proof" links from those considered spam. I appreciate your input. mary
592:
1054:
958:
381:
1386:
1231:
501:
http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia_talk:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion#Non-English_language_articles_-_reconsider_their_fortnight.27s_free_pass.3F
460:
205:
992:
519:
160:
144:
456:
1312:
176:
1091:
Thanks, but no thanks. Since I retired from gainful employment I have made it a principle to avoid responsibility whenever possible.
981:
908:
470:
370:
165:
427:
Thanks for fixing that. It has never crossed my mind to check for non-free images when moving articles. I'll do so in the future.
1275:
go on. Two examples out the hundreds where I have improved articles for which I have contested deletion do not amount to me not "
1209:. Not sure why I decided to nominate it for deletion since the only problems with the page were technical. Anyway, thanks again!
1163:
1130:
463:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.
466:
216:
495:
252:
1197:
308:
1317:
1020:
947:
104:
843:
715:. How is claim of production of notable TV series an assertion of importance when notability itself isn't inherited?
142:
807:
403:
1249:
227:
1341:
If "one person" can only find 60 hits on Google, all originating from
Knowledge, then I would say yes, hoax.
1181:
1031:
785:
447:
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
1252:
64:
1255:
89:, where xxxxxxx is what I am searching for, enclosed in double quotes if I'm looking for an exact phrase.
1334:
848:
617:
1391:
1189:
1159:
1126:
520:
220:
While you might disagree with the validity my rationale, you can't exactly call it "blatantly untrue".
75:
38:
672:. Hence, it's not a claim of importance. Lower standard only means that an article needs to contain a
1320:. This looks to me like a case of Not here/didn't hear that. Btw, I support you for admin above ;) .
985:
912:
374:
193:
169:
1360:
1284:
1239:
1145:
1096:
856:
754:
740:
702:
607:
550:
432:
316:
242:
94:
86:
1325:
834:
814:
776:
128:
1301:
1261:
1014:
941:
669:
658:
588:
201:
115:
I'm not usually a deletionist, but I just couldn't find anything to make this article notable.
52:
17:
1370:
1216:
1206:
1182:
1155:
1122:
1108:
1078:
210:
105:
85:
The people at Google seem to have done their best to hide this option. The url that I use is
71:
1400:
644:
394:
8:
1058:
137:
1321:
1257:- I could go on - PROD tags removed without you dealing with any of the issues raised.
876:
830:
810:
566:
533:
417:
124:
1356:
1298:
1280:
1258:
1235:
1226:
1141:
1092:
1070:
1003:
930:
852:
736:
724:
698:
685:
603:
584:
575:
546:
507:
486:
477:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
428:
333:
312:
297:
238:
197:
90:
284:
fort in medieval Cluj-Napoca) is a non-exising term. Could we create articles like "
1212:
1105:
Fair enough. :) But don't hesitate to get in touch if you change your mind. Best —
365:
349:
1411:
1382:
640:
390:
51:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
599:
409:
277:
221:
794:
1371:
976:
960:
872:
639:
It has been noticed that you have saved multiple pages from getting deleted.
562:
529:
413:
281:
257:
716:
677:
503:
482:
478:
448:
329:
293:
253:
1040:
626:
1297:
go one, but I'm sure we both have more important things to do than that.
452:
269:
265:
187:
1407:
1378:
289:
412:, you did not changed the NFUR in the article, I have changed it now.
576:
285:
666:
producing notable TV series an indication of importance/significance
112:
Just a quick message to say thanks for improving this article.
273:
87:
http://www.google.com/search?q=xxxxxxx&tbm=nws&tbs=ar:1
829:
Something has to be done about the AfD and Prod guidelines.
1154:
Well, it's your choice. Thanks for all your good work. --
697:
Your use of the word "hence" in your message is invalid.
676:
assertion of importance and it can be without a source.
974:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
920:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Movement
Control Group
901:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
451:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
363:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
158:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
980:
is suitable for inclusion in
Knowledge according to
907:
is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to
369:
is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to
164:
is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to
264:that the town where the castrum is located (modern
192:Hi Phil. I note that you haven't voted yet in the
382:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Mistral Aviation
735:Importance and notability are different things.
443:Disambiguation link notification for January 26
993:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Second Holmes
44:for the period 1 January 2013 – 31 March 2013
177:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Rob Trains
408:Just a friendly notice that when you moved
292:? I think it would be an original approach.
711:Why, in your opinion, is it so? Please do
280:name, therefore the "castrum at Clus" (an
1279:improving the article(s) in question".
14:
49:Do not edit the contents of this page.
633:The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
540:(talk) 21:24, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
25:
1313:Your comments deleted, among others
982:Knowledge's policies and guidelines
909:Knowledge's policies and guidelines
371:Knowledge's policies and guidelines
166:Knowledge's policies and guidelines
23:
1205:Thanks for catching my mistake on
24:
1429:
991:The article will be discussed at
918:The article will be discussed at
380:The article will be discussed at
175:The article will be discussed at
1399:
1039:
967:
894:
793:
625:
356:
151:
29:
771:Sincerely, Miss Ameba Parasit
13:
1:
819:15:30, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
781:20:40, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
745:13:58, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
731:13:29, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
707:11:05, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
692:09:50, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
657:Your argument against CSD at
649:17:31, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
612:22:39, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
593:12:44, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
571:16:58, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
555:21:54, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
538:21:26, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
512:17:49, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
496:You might like to look at...
491:11:41, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
437:14:01, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
422:13:08, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
399:14:03, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
338:12:12, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
321:09:25, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
309:far from a non-existing term
302:03:03, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
247:16:00, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
232:15:41, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
7:
1198:Thanks for Catching Mistake
206:04:13, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
133:18:25, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
99:19:08, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
80:00:53, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
10:
1434:
1416:19:31, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
1387:19:30, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
1365:21:27, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
1349:20:53, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
1330:01:06, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
1305:16:01, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
1289:15:58, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
1265:15:52, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
1221:20:14, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
839:07:08, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
521:Samuel Friedman Foundation
1244:20:02, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
1193:23:25, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
1168:06:14, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
1150:19:24, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
1135:12:30, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
1116:12:23, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
1101:10:59, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
1086:10:15, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
1063:23:02, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
1038:
1027:12:47, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
954:11:48, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
881:21:38, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
861:20:02, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
844:Stalking/NY Times article
801:The Barnstar of Diligence
792:
624:
268:) bore a special name in
984:or whether it should be
911:or whether it should be
404:Checking non-free images
373:or whether it should be
288:Eye" with a redirect to
168:or whether it should be
276:. The name "Clus" is a
215:I take issue with your
138:Rob Trains taken to AfD
904:Movement Control Group
888:Movement Control Group
659:Gravy Boat Productions
18:User talk:Phil Bridger
1318:your comment included
1207:Udayachal high school
1183:America Football Club
1047:The Original Barnstar
106:Hakim Imtiyaz Hussain
479:opt-out instructions
65:Google news archive.
42:of past discussions
1336:Ali Guelleh Janaleh
1032:A barnstar for you!
786:A barnstar for you!
668:? Notability isn't
618:A barnstar for you!
461:fix with Dab solver
1392:A cupcake for you!
469:• Join us at the
307:"Castrum Clus" is
1421:
1420:
1202:Hi Phil Bridger!
1068:
1067:
824:
823:
654:
653:
474:
59:
58:
53:current talk page
1425:
1403:
1396:
1395:
1346:
1344:Ten Pound Hammer
1111:
1110:Mr. Stradivarius
1081:
1080:Mr. Stradivarius
1043:
1036:
1035:
1023:
1017:
1009:
1006:
971:
970:
950:
944:
936:
933:
898:
897:
797:
790:
789:
756:Deepak Jaikishan
729:
722:
719:
690:
683:
680:
629:
622:
621:
464:
457:check to confirm
366:Mistral Aviation
360:
359:
350:Mistral Aviation
224:
217:characterization
155:
154:
72:Hell In A Bucket
33:
32:
26:
1433:
1432:
1428:
1427:
1426:
1424:
1423:
1422:
1394:
1375:
1342:
1339:
1315:
1229:
1200:
1186:
1109:
1079:
1073:
1034:
1021:
1015:
1007:
1004:
972:
968:
965:
948:
942:
934:
931:
899:
895:
892:
846:
788:
759:
726:
720:
717:
687:
681:
678:
662:
620:
580:
525:
498:
471:DPL WikiProject
445:
406:
361:
357:
354:
261:
230:
222:
213:
190:
156:
152:
149:
140:
110:
67:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1431:
1419:
1418:
1404:
1393:
1390:
1374:
1369:
1368:
1367:
1338:
1333:
1314:
1311:
1310:
1309:
1308:
1307:
1228:
1225:
1199:
1196:
1185:
1180:
1179:
1178:
1177:
1176:
1175:
1174:
1173:
1172:
1171:
1170:
1072:
1069:
1066:
1065:
1050:
1049:
1044:
1033:
1030:
966:
964:
959:Nomination of
957:
893:
891:
886:Nomination of
884:
845:
842:
822:
821:
804:
803:
798:
787:
784:
761:Dear Mr Phil,
758:
753:
752:
751:
750:
749:
748:
747:
661:
655:
652:
651:
636:
635:
630:
619:
616:
615:
614:
600:Talk:Iain King
579:
574:
558:
557:
524:
518:
516:
497:
494:
444:
441:
440:
439:
410:Ithaka Harbors
405:
402:
355:
353:
348:Nomination of
346:
345:
344:
343:
342:
341:
340:
278:Medieval Latin
260:
251:
250:
249:
226:
212:
209:
189:
186:
150:
148:
143:Nomination of
141:
139:
136:
109:
103:
102:
101:
66:
63:
61:
57:
56:
47:
34:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1430:
1417:
1413:
1409:
1405:
1402:
1398:
1397:
1389:
1388:
1384:
1380:
1373:
1372:Lizzie Phelan
1366:
1362:
1358:
1353:
1352:
1351:
1350:
1345:
1337:
1332:
1331:
1327:
1323:
1322:In ictu oculi
1319:
1306:
1303:
1300:
1296:
1292:
1291:
1290:
1286:
1282:
1278:
1274:
1269:
1268:
1267:
1266:
1263:
1260:
1256:
1253:
1250:
1246:
1245:
1241:
1237:
1233:
1224:
1222:
1218:
1214:
1210:
1208:
1203:
1195:
1194:
1191:
1184:
1169:
1165:
1161:
1157:
1153:
1152:
1151:
1147:
1143:
1138:
1137:
1136:
1132:
1128:
1124:
1119:
1118:
1117:
1114:
1113:
1112:
1104:
1103:
1102:
1098:
1094:
1090:
1089:
1088:
1087:
1084:
1083:
1082:
1064:
1060:
1056:
1052:
1051:
1048:
1045:
1042:
1037:
1029:
1028:
1024:
1018:
1012:
1011:
1010:
997:
994:
989:
987:
983:
979:
978:
977:Second Holmes
962:
961:Second Holmes
956:
955:
951:
945:
939:
938:
937:
924:
921:
916:
914:
910:
906:
905:
889:
883:
882:
878:
874:
869:
863:
862:
858:
854:
850:
841:
840:
836:
832:
831:In ictu oculi
828:
820:
816:
812:
811:In ictu oculi
809:
806:
805:
802:
799:
796:
791:
783:
782:
778:
774:
773:Ameba parasit
769:
766:
762:
757:
746:
742:
738:
734:
733:
732:
728:
725:
723:
714:
710:
709:
708:
704:
700:
696:
695:
694:
693:
689:
686:
684:
675:
671:
667:
660:
650:
646:
642:
638:
637:
634:
631:
628:
623:
613:
609:
605:
601:
597:
596:
595:
594:
590:
586:
578:
573:
572:
568:
564:
556:
552:
548:
543:
542:
541:
539:
535:
531:
522:
517:
514:
513:
509:
505:
502:
493:
492:
488:
484:
480:
475:
472:
468:
462:
458:
454:
450:
438:
434:
430:
426:
425:
424:
423:
419:
415:
411:
401:
400:
396:
392:
386:
383:
378:
376:
372:
368:
367:
351:
339:
335:
331:
326:
325:
324:
323:
322:
318:
314:
310:
306:
305:
304:
303:
299:
295:
291:
287:
283:
282:Ancient Roman
279:
275:
271:
267:
259:
258:Clus (castra)
255:
248:
244:
240:
236:
235:
234:
233:
229:
225:
218:
211:Declined prod
208:
207:
203:
199:
195:
185:
181:
178:
173:
171:
167:
163:
162:
146:
135:
134:
130:
126:
122:
119:
116:
113:
107:
100:
96:
92:
88:
84:
83:
82:
81:
77:
73:
62:
54:
50:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
1376:
1357:Phil Bridger
1343:
1340:
1316:
1294:
1281:Phil Bridger
1276:
1272:
1247:
1236:Phil Bridger
1230:
1223:Sosthenes12
1211:
1204:
1201:
1187:
1142:Phil Bridger
1107:
1106:
1093:Phil Bridger
1077:
1076:
1074:
1046:
1002:
1001:
998:
990:
975:
973:
963:for deletion
929:
928:
925:
917:
902:
900:
890:for deletion
867:
864:
853:Phil Bridger
847:
825:
800:
770:
768:God Bless.
767:
763:
760:
737:Phil Bridger
712:
699:Phil Bridger
673:
665:
663:
632:
604:Phil Bridger
585:AlexMoore300
581:
559:
547:Phil Bridger
526:
515:
499:
476:
449:Itzik Shmuli
446:
429:Phil Bridger
407:
387:
379:
364:
362:
352:for deletion
313:Phil Bridger
262:
254:Castrum Clus
239:Phil Bridger
214:
191:
182:
174:
159:
157:
147:for deletion
123:
120:
118:Great edit!
117:
114:
111:
91:Phil Bridger
68:
60:
48:
43:
37:
1406:Thank you,
1213:Sosthenes12
1156:Vejvančický
1123:Vejvančický
598:Replied at
453:Labor Party
270:Roman Dacia
266:Cluj-Napoca
161:Rob Trains
145:Rob Trains
36:This is an
808:and others
481:. Thanks,
391:FoxyOrange
290:London Eye
1271:that you
1227:PROD tags
1071:Adminship
1055:Paulhus15
670:inherited
577:Iain King
523:Talk page
465:Read the
286:Londonium
223:WikiDan61
198:Brangifer
1164:contribs
1131:contribs
1022:contribs
949:contribs
873:Batvette
674:credible
563:Ybidzian
530:Ybidzian
414:FrankDev
228:ReadMe!!
121:Regards
1302:Snowman
1262:Snowman
1232:Context
1190:RmSilva
1005:Phantom
986:deleted
932:Phantom
913:deleted
868:because
849:Context
664:How is
504:Peridon
483:DPL bot
375:deleted
330:Borsoka
294:Borsoka
170:deleted
39:archive
1293:No, I
713:expand
641:atnair
274:Napoca
125:Sirkus
1408:Crtew
1379:Crtew
1299:Giant
1295:could
1273:could
1259:Giant
1008:Steve
935:Steve
827:again
196:. --
16:<
1412:talk
1383:talk
1361:talk
1326:talk
1285:talk
1277:ever
1240:talk
1217:talk
1160:talk
1146:talk
1127:talk
1097:talk
1059:talk
1016:talk
943:talk
877:talk
857:talk
835:talk
815:talk
777:talk
741:talk
703:talk
645:talk
608:talk
589:talk
567:talk
551:talk
534:talk
508:talk
487:talk
433:talk
418:talk
395:talk
334:talk
317:talk
298:talk
243:talk
202:talk
129:talk
108:edit
95:talk
76:talk
1347:•
467:FAQ
194:AfD
188:AfD
1414:)
1385:)
1363:)
1328:)
1287:)
1254:,
1251:,
1242:)
1234:.
1219:)
1166:)
1162:/
1148:)
1133:)
1129:/
1099:)
1061:)
1025:\
988:.
952:\
915:.
879:)
859:)
851:.
837:)
817:)
779:)
743:)
718:Mr
705:)
679:Mr
647:)
610:)
602:.
591:)
569:)
553:)
536:)
510:)
489:)
459:|
435:)
420:)
397:)
377:.
336:)
319:)
311:.
300:)
272::
256:/
245:)
204:)
172:.
131:)
97:)
78:)
1410:(
1381:(
1359:(
1324:(
1283:(
1238:(
1215:(
1158:(
1144:(
1125:(
1095:(
1057:(
1019:|
1013:/
946:|
940:/
875:(
855:(
833:(
813:(
775:(
739:(
721:T
701:(
682:T
643:(
606:(
587:(
565:(
549:(
532:(
506:(
485:(
473:.
455:(
431:(
416:(
393:(
332:(
315:(
296:(
241:(
200:(
127:(
93:(
74:(
55:.
46:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.