User talk:Oldelpaso

519:"cutting out" large sections which aren't immediately important to the topic but which books can go on about at length. The 1889 benefit match for the mine workers against Newton Heath for example - I've noticed that a lot of places talk about that game, but I intend to ignore it completely on Knowledge. Admittedly when I wrote up the filler on that History article I included a little more info than I might now like but you will notice far less incidental information making it into future edits, and I might even go back and retrovert the article a little by removing some of those incidental facts. I feel a little more secure on this issue than others, of course, because Gary James' book is a 300-ish page tome and even though we have four Knowledge articles on City's history instead of the one, anything I (and others) write up in those articles is never going to come close to rivalling a 300 page study for content and interest factor. I also feel more secure on adding extra info on the Early Grounds article because, frankly, AFAIK James has never tried to present a "here's a history of the early grounds and only the early grounds" text so it's untrodden ground. It's because Toovey's book is far less weighty and almost entirely just match reports that I am going to so studiously refuse to add what information on each season that Toovey provides to the season articles. In line with your suggestions, I'm also heavily considering simply not adding any more season articles, at least pre-1887 (and possibly at all, I'm not sure). As I say, as an inclusionist I want to make one for each of them but I'm not so idealistic that I can't see the truth of what you say. 505:

I had resolved to add, if I got round to it, little more than a one-paragraph filler for each article at the start describing the circumstances and in no place to do anything on the season articles which gave any more information about results than opponents, dates and scorers. You'll notice that the locations for the games appears on my season articles also but Toovey doesn't actually tell you them in his book, I had to do my own research to find that stuff out. I appreciate it's a sensitive subject but I liked to think that my season articles might in fact be a facilitator for the handful of people who read up on this stuff - and let's be honest, not many people are ever going to read these articles, they're on the very niche side of niche - to then go and read Toovey's book because they want to know more. It's a good point, though - to that end, I should really add a bibliography section for his book on each article.

2393:

53 African countries, so should be enjoyable! So it would be a good chance to win something for improving stubs on African sportspeople, including footballers, athletes, Olympians and Paralympians etc, particularly female ones, but also male. Even if contests aren't your thing we would be grateful if you could consider destubbing a few African articles during the drive to help the cause and help reduce the massive 37,000 + stub count, of which many are rated high importance (think Regions of countries etc). If you're interested in competing or just loosely contributing a few expanded articles on African Paralympians, Olympians and committees etc, please add your name to the Contestants/participants section. Diversity of work from a lot of people will make this that bit more special. Thanks. --

428:

tremendous reputation that they obtained their homeland, the great reputation that made the Yugoslav football, the sincere and profound happiness that we create. (...) To meet the United States - Yugoslavia is not held, it is the third took into account the outcome of the match Uruguay - Argentina. That the outcome of this game turned out more favorable to Argentina, and it would be her semifinal opponent came from outside Yugoslavia. Since, however, there is a way around it awarded Yugoslavia third place after Uruguay won the victory over Argentina, regarded as a stronger and better team than Argentina. Our will play a few more games in South America, but not as a national team, but under the name B. S. K.-a.

1501:- i'm Portuguese but i'm not blind - but his squad approach, unfortunately, is that of 99,999999999999999999% of the managers in the world, "the more (foreigners) the merrier". Stoke City, one of the teams (i read that last year, can't remember where) with the lowest budgets in the PL, never played with more than TWO (!) English players ALL season, last game against Fulham they fielded zero, talk about a tight budget... Maybe i'm seeing things wrong, but if i am, would like to know where in your opinion please. 3767: 2619: 2457:: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the 2757: 3192:. There's a new bonus prize of $ 200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale! 2896: 2715: 2026: 28: 3574: 1332: 3471: 3276: 3203: 3108: 2869: 2539: 3041:(i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at 3000:(i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at 2959:(i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at 286: 1616: 1541: 2824: 3348: 3022: 2981: 2940: 2311: 2776: 858:

text anyway; it's one of my most annoying flaws. Probably derives from the way that I often find it hard to filter between important bits to add to the text and circumstantial or unimportant details. To me it's so crucial to know absolutely everything about something if you are to truly understand it. Anyway, thanks for the assistance, just hope it gets reviewed soon. How did the GNR go, by the way?

2270: 661:. . . because I have some information about the site--namely that it's inactive. I think that's evident from visiting it and seeing that the latest updates were in March 2011. I know the creators of the site and they no longer have anything to do with it. They now operate Eurohockey.com, its successor site, which I mention in the re-opened discussion. Just thought I'd let you know. Cheers. 448:. I've already sampled PeeJay's opinion and he seems broadly in favour, but I wanted a few more opinions before blindly rushing in and changing something as drastically as this. Also I won't be rolling it out until every season article from 1880-81 through to 1889-90 has been published, which is something I'm working through at the moment, so no hurries for you or me to sort this/critique. 2704: 3678:. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are 2992:(i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the 2951:(i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the 1655: 3142:

On that topic though, I've had a gripe for some time now with the way someone split the main List of Players article into so that "contemporary" players are separated. I have never once thought this was a good idea and every year that goes by makes my regard for it all the worse. I'm just polling you

2496:

It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent

857:

It's all good. I'm hard enough on myself - I may not like admitting that people need to correct things of mine but I'm never brash enough to believe that my work can't be improved, and I take no offence for the way you did it. I've always had a bit of a problem with inserting over-long sentences into

504:

Fair points, and not ones I was entirely unaware of. I've always been an inclusionist at heart, so I naturally instantly favoured adding an article for each season as soon as I knew I had the material for it. But the issue of plagiarism or of simply over-using Toovey had crossed my mind, which is why

477:

a week or so ago. Feel free to give it a read and tell me if there's anything I should improve or alter if you have the time and inclination. Again I don't want to publish before I've turned those red links blue - I'm kind of thinking I'd like to offer it up as a Did You Know candidate and so I don't

2392:

which starts on October 15. Africa currently has over 37,000 stubs and badly needs a quality improvement editathon/contest to flesh out basic stubs. There are proposed substantial prizes to give to editors who do the most articles, and planned smaller prizes for doing to most destubs for each of the

1726:

that you own a copy of "A–Z of Manchester Football: 100 Years of Rivalry 1878–1978" by Derek Brandon. I've been fixing ISBNs, and I noticed that this book is listed on a few pages as having the invalid ISBN "0-86148-001-7". Would you please verify the ISBN with your copy and let me know what ISBN it

1432:

Hi Simon, I spotted your comment on the Manchester meetup talk page. Very good point, thanks! The Waterhouse is clearly not a good location on the 18th. Rather than cancel or postpone, I think we should find an alternative venue, probably on the other side of town, but still within striking distance

1069:

It was my main page debut. I'm not sure how much credit I feel entitled to though - I wrote pretty much the entire article, but I didn't nominate it for DYK and I didn't provide the first review, I only commented on it. I wasn't sure if I was entitled to claim review credit, but...I did. So it's all

518:

On a related note, the issue of plagiarism first came into my mind when I did a fair bit of bulking out on the first section of the History 1880-1928 article and I've now been deliberately reading through Gary James' book thinking about how much I would want to include on Knowledge, and deliberately

1075:

As for the Early grounds DYK, I also spoke to PeeJay and he wrote a rather gushing review praising my efforts, which I also thought was a little more praise than I deserved, but it has been reviewed now. I don't fully understand the DYK process, but I think it still needs someone to OK it and queue

546:

I did try to quote James and Toovey as much as I could in both my Early Grounds proto-article and the History article, but you're right in that more references are needed (I think DYK asks for one per paragraph, anyway) so I'll work on that later. I'll also check out that Signpost thing you linked,

441:

Hey OEP. I've been doing a bit of work (or rather, have only just started with doing a bit of work) to the early end of the City history articles and season articles and considering the situation, am thinking of updating the template for the season articles. I've done a mock-up of what I'm thinking

1766:

Hi am Jwale2,I am passionate about sport and i need you to help me out to improve upon my articles on sports in wikipedia projects.I know you are experienced sports writer and i believe that if you help out i would be good as you are.I have not yet started a sport article my self what i do is only

560:

Final comment - I'm still not 100% happy with the "Early Grounds of Manchester City F.C." title. I didn't want to use "Stadia" because in pretty much all of the cases here, they didn't build actually stadia there - at least not as far as I have seen reference to. I thought about "pitches" but that

396:

I send picture of the official medal to Fifa, it would make sense because you can't have bronze medal and made it 4th place. I know that issue. USA doesn't show it her medal and official page of Fifa can be fixed to opposite side. It will be responded in day or two in witch case it would make some

2138:

effort by Ric does mean that there is now a web-based source of all this data for virtually every player that has played for MCFC since the club's inception. The $ 64,000 question is how accurate that data is due to the seemingly high level of errors introduced into the raw data as it was entered

1117:

Thanks. I'm not a member so I didn't have that luxury, but I suspected that there wouldn't be a citable figure for actual membership anyway, which is why I didn't bother trying to find one after a peripheral glance at their website. The number of branches I got from counting up all the individual

1987:

has not. It's only a matter of time until that article is deleted, but I'm pleasantly surprised at the quality of the article, so could you perhaps userify the article onto my userspace so that we have a convenient backup for when Nacho (inevitably) gets his first senior game and qualifies to be

1099:

Hi mate, thanks for the info on Denis Law. I'm still at a loss as to whether those matches should be included in his stats table though. Was the Texaco Cup official enough to be included? I suppose if it is the same competition as the FL Trophy, it should be, but some competitions have waxed and

2100:

I had assumed that when I changed the stats. of Barnes, Young, Oakes and Quinn to align them with their supporting M.E.N. articles you would immediately push back and dispute them the way you did with the comparable changes done for Book, Booth, Power and Rösler which allowed us to focus in and

1194:

I think I'll open a peer review on it, get some wider input. I really think it deserves to be brought to FAC and this time attract more attention and comments. In the meantime if you could check to see that there's no dead URL links and that the translated Russian content is accurate I'll begin

2113:

if they weren't already. As you can see from the current state of the article I have gone quite a bit further than the David James / Antoine Sibierski divide I had mentioned a couple of weeks ago. Most of the players I had described back then as falling into a grey area (between Sibierski and

1804:

I am finding about a 75% / 25% in favor of the formal name in results rather than the nickname you just redirected to. I've been linking this name for several years, the article has been in existence for almost exactly 8 years. You made your first edit (I assume your first contact) with this

1468:

That "slower than a pint of milk" really brought a smile to my face. Yes, undoubtedly Lescott is quite "challenged" technically, and Demichelis is more evolved in that department, but i'll NEVER understand teams that play with two, one or zero national players, and that's a reality in both the

893:

Ouch. Though only one second out isn't bad at all - once you've gotten over the initial disappointment then you can surely contend yourself with knowing that a one-second gap is, in terms of effort and performance, essentially nothing at all. Congratulations on your PB. And yeah - it's funny.

427:

First column of the victorious Yugoslav tricolor flapped the first time, too, our country entered the front lines of the strongest and most powerful representatives footballing. It is an honor that many states have experienced. Let all our players affects the lofty beautiful thank you for the

3215:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

3288:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

2493:. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right. 2338:

established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:

478:

want to leave anything like the red links out as an eyesore. I know that I probably need to write an introductory paragraph or three but other than that I'm not immediately sure what else to add. I don't really have the free content images to add any graphics, for a start.

3164:

I'll look into re-merging the two tables when I can, although it has to be said that my enthusiasm for massive editing jobs has somewhat diminished from back in the days. I'll see about how long it takes me. When I get round to it, I'll implement your suggestions though.

894:

Academically I come from a mathematical background, but I am much more of a literature person in actual fact. I often read through novels thinking about how I would've altered the paragraph I just read or this and that. Eh, I'm a man of many contradictions in truth.

1799:

Why the move? No discussion was even initiated on the talk page, so obviously there is no consensus. You just did it on your own volition? She has a 25 year competitive history with numerous results. Yes, the redirect will find the article, but (in violation of

3033:(i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the 1076:

it. I'm not really sure who does that or how though, so I guess the waiting game begins? Anyway, thanks for your advice on improvements all the same - if I do get another DYK credit for the Early grounds article then you are entitled to part of the credit also.

532:

Incidentally I've spoken to Gary James a few times on the Bluemoon forum. Perhaps it would be worth actively seeking his advise on what he considers to be "too much", and perhaps even what he thinks of Knowledge full stop? By private message of course, not as a

2101:

determine the actual game(s) that were causing the Apps. tally discrepancy in each case and document it accordingly with a footnote. Do I assume from the fact that you haven't done so that you simply agree with those changes or that you have gone AWOL instead?

1407:

article is still in the FA review process. The article underwent a thorough copy-edit and now is significantly different from the last time you reviewed it. Since you provided helpful reviews to it in the past, your comments (and oppose/support vote) would be

1982:

Hi OEP. Noticed that some rookie has come along and made a handful of new articles about City youths who, while I support the effort in principle, clearly do not qualify for articles at present. Most of them seem to have been deleted already, but it seems

3447:? (Only if you have the time and desire of course) You have a great track record in writing and reviewing club articles and it would be good to have an experienced user to look at these. If there's anything I can do in return, please let me know. Thanks, 2078: 3602: 2551:

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

1667: 1592: 1580: 1460:

thank for your kind and in-depth message in my talk page. Also, sad to hear DK is leaving, but guess what? So am i after eight years, it was a good run overall, but it's not very fun anymore, will edit to the best of my abilities until the end of the

2328: 1651: 1840:

Its obvious the sport statistics, the media of the world (which is largely what we report on wikipedia), use the formal name, while in person she might use the shortened version. Jo is not exactly a stage name she is out trying to sell.

1161:

I'm sure your prediction will be correct; "B", "C", and "M" are going to be brutal. It's enough of a challenge making sure all of the statistics are correct, then you've got to make sure every player is included and in the correct order.

2974: 2933: 2118:

and I am almost done with processing them all (by migrating them from the "Historic players" table to the "Contemporary players" table). Horlock, Dickov and Brown will probably be the last three players that can be sourced to

2108:

against multiple other sources to determine if those players could still be genuinely sourced from there (by means of editorial adjustments plus the addition of explanatory footnotes) or even moved over to being sourced from

1861:

Hi,,,Just to say i am using your replica picture in an article for an online magazine, which is part of my masters course at oxford. I will credit the photo to 'Oldelpaso'. the article is about Victorian Football. M Freeman

451:

In case it's not immediately obvious, the colours represent the main shirt colours worn by the teams in question. For St Marks, AFAIK there is no information in existence for this, so I used a default white/black pairing.

2444:

based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your

140:

Yeah, I haven't got a birth date for Stockport in any of my Man Utd books, so sorry I can't help there. And I think, because he spent most of his pro career with City (as far as we know), it would be fair to say that

2497:

when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available

2184:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 1435:

What do you think about the Jolly Angler on Ducie Street? Do you know it? I don't, but reviews I've read seem favourable (it might not have wifi, but we can cope without that I suppose). Or do you have another

259: 118:

and I've tried to sort out the content so that it's just about Stockport Smith. Since we don't know enough about either player to disambiguate any other way, do you think it's worth moving this article to

1009: 2004:

I knew you'd been involved in expanding it. I was a bit surprised, actually, since it's pretty clear his article is for the chop. I just wasn't sure what you'd do with the article when it gets deleted.

3352: 3045:. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. — 3004:. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. — 2963:. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. — 3643:

has been a candidate for over three weeks, and there are almost no comments. I would really appreciate it if you took some time to leave a comment (it doesn't necessarily have to be a full review) :)

1005: 3498:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 3300:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 3227:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 3026: 2985: 2944: 2835:

When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (

2563:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1409: 3101: 2130:

is not much use (as in the cases of Kinkladze and Rösler), which leaves only the two flavours of James - i.e., the book version of his stats. and the version of his stats. that are now embodied on

1576: 3111: 1181:

That's a surprisingly great article on him. Any idea why it failed FAC? I can spot a few minor glitches but in my opinion it is a worthy candidate and I think it could get there with some work.♦

3708: 1050: 806: 3119: 1053:

live a few days back but it seems to have fallen by the wayside. Don't suppose you might drop over there and give it a very quick review? Only if you have the time/inclination, of course.

2881: 776:

Incidentally, I finally got round to making those improvements - mainly the in-line citations - to the "Early Grounds" article. If you give your consent, I think I'm ready to publish it.

2885: 1945: 3696: 3514: 3316: 3243: 3015: 2579: 2070: 215: 2104:

While waiting for your responses I simply pushed on with the process of working up from the bottom of the "List of players" table and validating each player's stats. as reported by

3589: 3484: 2290:

to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

1267: 3010: 2969: 2458: 211: 3774: 2666: 1261: 3159:

Well, on the plus side, MLITH is long gone from Knowledge, so at least that roadblock is gone. For the record, though, I don't believe it was him who first initiated the split.

2407: 3671: 2323:(also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned 1928:

I'm reverting to the earlier references in the table. The references you edited link to the general NYRR website (I know, I tried to make it link to individual results too).

3808: 3139:

Hi OEP. Thanks as ever for your continuing work on updating the players articles - it really is something of a thankless task I think but I very much appreciate the edits.

1632: 3363:

on pages if the page title is linked on other pages. Since the end of 2014, the creation of titles containing consecutive apostrophes has been restricted by Knowledge's

3129: 1524: 1509: 2643: 2432: 2277: 2071: 2470: 3633: 3796: 3551: 455:

Seriously though, I will take any ideas and if you think it's an abomination I'd be happy to simply leave the old one alone, but any opinion is a welcome opinion.

182:

I know I have more that I can add but I'm taking a break from editing at the moment and not sure when I will be back. Will try to do more when I return. Thanks. --

2331:

with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.

2090: 1356: 1208: 197: 2285: 1226: 2264: 1520: 1505: 2843: 3056: 2408: 952:

Yeah, the fact you'd previously mentioned running for RfA came to mind when I thought of asking you. I'll let you know when I've formally accepted. Cheers,

3051: 2523: 1222: 3720: 3189: 3182: 2597: 2490: 1970: 1290: 638: 473: 338: 2788: 3837: 2388: 1717: 983: 3820: 3541: 2854: 2802: 2638: 3334: 3261: 3737: 2910:(John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Knowledge seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009. 2718: 2402: 1923: 356: 2738: 2475: 2449:

in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the

926: 436: 3030: 2989: 2948: 2427: 2213: 2921: 2917: 2692: 2528: 1528: 1519:

Yes indeed, i have tried to take the odd break, it has never amounted to anything though. Thanks again for your insightful message, keep it up --

757:

Seems it's already been nominated. I don't much like their pull though - just using a line about the Mets opposing the Flushing Meadows stadium.

627: 3623: 1256: 352: 245: 3836:

has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the

3825: 3807:

has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the

3736:

has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the

3707:

has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the

1398: 145:

is his most common name. Add to that the fact that it's a pretty good disambiguator, I think we could go ahead and move the current article to

3096: 2123:. That will probably be a good juncture at which to leave the two tables as they are for some period while we work out what can be done next. 1745: 2925: 2298: 975: 961: 386: 2764: 2760: 1039: 3725: 1787: 1640: 465: 1696: 1422: 404:

Ok lets edit with official Fifa results with exception that bought national teams have bronze medals and that means that are bought 3rd.

3461: 2806: 2750: 2746: 1940: 989: 662: 1393: 3268: 3195: 2722: 2696: 2365: 1712: 1316: 648: 2691:

from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please

3428: 3407: 3175: 3076: 2730: 2381: 2015: 1850: 1760: 1236: 1086: 1019: 904: 868: 836: 786: 767: 728: 604: 575: 493: 419: 411: 405: 366: 225: 156: 2683: 2489:, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at 250: 3432: 2768: 2734: 1900: 1723: 191: 3849: 2846:

closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (

1915: 1679: 1604: 670: 333: 3675: 2441: 2351: 2163: 3749: 1229:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1063: 1012:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 946: 359:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 218:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 3359:. This has been done since titles with consecutive apostrophes (for example, '' or ''') have been known to cause issues with 3072: 3069:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2726: 2688: 2372: 1868: 1504:

Will now drop a message in Kangaroo's page, thanks for yours again. Be safe, "whistle" if you need anything until 12 JULY. --

1447: 1375:

if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the

1322: 1232: 1015: 362: 271: 221: 134: 3600:

You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives.

2232: 2158: 3537: 3330: 3257: 2813: 2742: 2593: 2519: 2498: 2484: 2466: 2398: 2209: 1708: 1427: 1139: 32: 3386: 3034: 2993: 2952: 2150: 1171: 1044: 703: 444: 3153: 1873:

Hello. Would you be interested in attending one of the next wikimeets in the north of England? They will take place in:

1829: 1513: 3560: 3115: 2218: 2196:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

1609: 1534: 1338: 107: 2792: 2259: 3704: 3698: 3679: 3368: 3356: 1951: 653:

I came across the discussion about Eurohockey.net that you commented on, which I missed out on. I re-opened it here:

2062: 1998: 3840:. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. 3811:. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. 3740:. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. 3711:. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. 2858: 2317:

Hello, Oldelpaso. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.

751: 656: 203: 167:

I should be able to add a few bits and pieces to the article. Will have a look at books over the next few days. --

3533: 3341: 3326: 3253: 2633: 2589: 2515: 2462: 2415: 2394: 2357: 2205: 1740: 1704: 1128: 920: 431: 398: 115: 3791: 3691: 3656: 3143:

for support in finally getting rid of the distinction and putting the article back to the way it was. Thoughts?

1151: 643: 3661: 2450: 2281: 1814: 1565: 1195:

looking through it again within a few days. It could also be updated a little, what has he done since 2011/2?♦

675: 418:

Yes it is. Politika is oldest Serbian (then Yugoslavian) newspaper founded in 1904. You translated that good.

251: 97: 92: 87: 2678: 2660: 1203: 1189: 3134: 3061:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2796: 2250:

and have therefore being patching links to the redirect. Therefore I've changed your distilleries page. HTH.

1482: 1213:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

988:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

343:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

277: 202:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

82: 77: 72: 67: 62: 57: 52: 47: 42: 1107: 684:

I nominated. I will try and see to the points you mentioned on the talkpage as quickly as possible. Thanks,

176: 3816: 3612: 3507: 3456: 3411: 3309: 3236: 2842:

Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Knowledge, an

2572: 1783: 3519: 3321: 3248: 3038: 2997: 2956: 2861:

to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.

2584: 2324: 2237: 2201: 1684: 1404: 1389: 329: 1856: 1570: 3632: 1833: 1494: 1376: 1362: 1167: 108: 2375:. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:49, 23 September 2016 (UTC) 1975: 1497:. Pellegrini seems like a polite and courteous human being, so i'm glad his team took the title over 1146: 410:

If you are interested in those newspapers i can translate you any section, tell witch one you want.

304: 2344:

Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective

2303: 1821: 1355:, which you created or substantially expanded. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at 3364: 2134:- as viable, but potentially conflicting, data sources for the rest of the "historic players". The 734: 294:

It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can

1884: 3812: 3804: 3798: 3754: 3031:

provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year

2990:

provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year

2949:

provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year

2086: 1955: 1903:(or remove it if you're already on the list and you don't want to receive future notifications!) 1452: 1156: 971: 957: 942: 657:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#Reviving_Eurohockey.net_discussion

1899:

If you want to receive future notifications about these wikimeets, then please add your name to

1890: 3787: 3716: 2674: 2656: 1675: 1600: 1385: 1112: 681: 618: 391: 325: 3181: 1954:. I (now) agree with you, but hope the article can survive. I have revised it and moved it to 1331: 3639:

Hey, how's it going? I see you've reviewed football-related articles for FA in recent years.

3495: 3297: 3224: 2560: 1350: 1343: 1214: 1196: 1182: 1163: 930: 626:

I haven't addressed everything yet, but could you go back and check what I have done please?

296: 565:

low-tech and inelegant, even though it's not entirely inaccurate. Do you have any thoughts?

3506:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3443:

Hi Oldelpaso, we have never met but I want to ask you something. Do you want to review FAC

3308:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3235:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2625: 2571:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2419: 2247: 2192:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1801: 1794: 1771: 1627:

that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

1552:

that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

1420: 1403:

Hello Oldelpaso. I hope to find you at a good time friend. It has been some years, but the

1309: 1283: 1141: 1689:

Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by

8: 3667: 3649: 3452: 3382: 2446: 2255: 2197: 2095: 2053: 1911: 1846: 1810: 1805:

article in the last few minutes. How well have you researched your unilateral decision?

1736: 1462: 1104: 719: 694: 162: 153: 131: 3391: 2505: 2320: 2228: 2082: 1836:; her own website show the shortened name pictorial in the header but the site name is 1372: 1366: 967: 953: 938: 1878: 3783: 3712: 3478: 3422: 3401: 3284: 3211: 3092: 3083: