User talk:Ohnoitsjamie/archive5

5775:

if the guidelines above imply that it should be linked. This is because of neutrality and point-of-view concerns; neutrality is an important and difficult objective at Knowledge. If your page is relevant and informative, mention it on the talk page and let unbiased Knowledge editors decide whether to add the link." It would take me some time to do properly, as my above "Comment and Question in response" on FiOS did, but if I have to, I will do it in each "Talk Page". As I said previously, I do my best to be "fair and balanced" in the presentation of my POV in order to be a good advocate for consumers. This addresses the valid "neutrality" issue Knowledge is justifiably concerned with. However, I vaigly remember reading something in Knowledge about how almost all content (reliable sources included) have a POV. It is unavoidable for all human beings. The key is the effort put into the neutrality, validity, credibility and fairness/balance of the presentation of POV, in my opinion.

3354:

The use of the calculator I proposed was free for me, nobody profited from me taking advantage of it. If somebody clicks on their ads, why should I care or why should you care for that matter? You are using Google search many times every day right? And they are providing you a huge service for free, right? Why would you care if they have ads and if anybody at all clicks on their ads or not? (And I bet that you secretly wish that enough people click on their ads so that they make enough money to be happy and continue to give you their valuable service for free). I understand that there is a lot of vandalism and spam and garbage you need to take care of – and I really pride your voluntary effort, but to compromise Knowledge’s quality by using poorer quality free material instead of better quality free material just because of the benign (in my opinion) Google ads, that’s something I don’t understand.

5671:. I will also do as you requested in the future, if the situation arises. But, since I'm still learning about Knowledge's rules, how to navigate around, and post properly, I need to ask you what you meant by "if others (anybody or other administrators?) object to it". When I created an account, one of the benefits was "Semi-protection" - should be considered if it is the only reasonable option left to deal with vandalism on a page or to stop a banned or blocked user from editing it." I ask, since I thought the original deletion of my external link was done by an employee of Verizon. I have gotten some very negative comments from some of them due to my exposure of this Verizon tricky marketing tactic. Can "Semi-protection" or any other kind of "deletion protection" be applied here to protect from deletion my external link, if "anybody or other administrators" object to it? 57:

happy to put those lectures in the public domain. Since you suggested it, can you tell me if Wikibooks can support *.pps content? Ultimately, they are just files that open on a link. Pardon me if I offended you in the email I sent. I was thoroughly offended by your instant deletion of my content. As I have said, my intent was to give away the content. I first attempted to see if I could just donate it to Knowledge. Since, however, I only saw Knowledge has the capability to host HTML content, I moved to the public googlepages and hosted it there. Please notice that I am not charging for it and--as of now--the site has no other purpose than to freely offer the content. Please advise what circumstances will cause you to delete the link again. If I put it in Wikibooks, will you delete that link too? Thank you kindly for your assistance in this matter. Regards,Tom

2621:

you saying those sites are appropriate, but the BIGMallrat site is not? Under what specific grounds? Don't direct me to "the rules" when I've read them and apparently my interpretation is different from yours. Cite the exact rule. In addition, the links to the other pages in the site are not a violation. All the links do not point to a single URL, which is spamming according to the rules. Instead, the links point to different URLs, which is not spamming. The rules do not expressly prohibit that. Not to mention, the information contained therein is appropriate to each and every subject; of which I've made contributions. I don't understand how this has been fine to everyone else all this time then you come around with your interpretation of the rules and say what was previously okay is suddenly not okay. Precedent has already been set. Please respond!

6247:

immersive a grand feat. It would also be an amazing spot to pool information on the subject, as the topic isn't widely known and has no real book written on the subject or place where you can find a large lump on information on the topic. I, personally, have probably the biggest chunk of information on this and would love to share it, though if you'd like to put it off as "insignificant" I guess I should understand. It *is* only a role playing world after all... but a magnificent one with a history almost as in-depth as that of the U.S. In the end, it's up to you, but I know of a large number of people who would support the creation of this topic. Would this maybe be better to start as a stub and allow it to grow a bit before being considered for deletion again? --

852:

myself and broken into what I consider interesting and worthwhile topics. It includes a relevant news feed and the facility to translate the website into a number of languages. I have developed a number of similar sites and linked to Knowledge, as well as contributing to various projects here. Basically, my question is what did you see straight-off that was wrong with it, I have been searching for answers on this topic here for a while and need more guidance. Another site I developed has gone through over 60 revisions on Knowledge and has just been dropped today also. It's quite frustrating, I am not looking to corrupt this website in any way, as it is a tremendous resource for all internet users such as myself. Would be grateful for any response thast could help me :)

2189:

tantalising info about "Pregnancy" and "Page three girls". It's true that "Women by occupation", etc, are available, but the subcategories seem to belong to different and unrelated lists. If you compare to the system of organization of "List of Chinese People", for instance, the difference in utility is clear. Subdividing the list into subcategories "Kinds of women", "Groups of Women", "Links to pictures of pretty girls", "female subsets of lists of people", and "aspects of womankind" would make the page much more readable. Although the concerns of middle-aged men are certainly valid, I think we should not rebuff the more intellectual needs of students with girl-free History books in hand. They deserve a clear path to the subjects of interest.

3866:

Knowledge is not allowing the free growth of our vernacular that is stated on the main page. It saddens me when power-hungry megalomaniacs impose their interpretations on OUR morality. This is censorship reminiscent of that which our government, most organized religions, and the Nazi SS have perpetrated on general populous for years. It is my hope that you are not one of those types of people, and that you will either allow me to take my name out and re-post or that you will edit and post the excerpt yourself. I won’t hold my breath though. -Thank you, Travis P.S. I do not appreciate the threat or the accusation of vandalism and would appreciate the decency of a reply. -

102:

person's content. However, I have added my link to my external content right below that guy's content. So, if that irks you, you can go delete my content link as well as the other person's link. Instead, I bet the person who administrates that site is not as spam-shocked as you apparently are. I understand you're trying to keep the garbage out but you ought to give content providers more of a benefit of the doubt. I offered my content for an altruistic purpose. Unless you take it upon yourself to mount a crusade against my googlepages content, it will stand and will no doubt help somebody learn to program in Java. Please just leave it be. Thank you, Tom

4483:

to have done so. I'm sorry; I hate spam as much as anyone, and hate to think those links were "polluting" Knowledge. The other you removed, however, leaves what I consider to be a hole in the St. John (US Virgin Islands) entry. It's about the awesome amount of volunteer work that goes into maintaining St. John's ecosystem, from ecotravelers. It adds to the financial health of the island, as well as that of the natural habitat's sustainability. I'd hate to think that people reading that entry would think that the only economic force on St. John is through the building of more and more hotels and resorts. What do you think?

1671:

noticed that within minutes, the link was removed. After going over some Knowledge rules, I realize that this link may be regard as spam, partly because you have to register for the group, and partly because it is a very localized group. I decided to just add a link for the national dachshund meetup where people can search for a group near their area. Some groups (like ours) require approval while some others don't. (We require it so to afford the group a modicum of privacy and protection, but there is no fee involved.) I hope the new link is ok. Please share your thoughts if you decide to delete it. Thanks, Vinnie

5521:"External link spam, wihout bots= This is a topic that really isn't covered by this policy, but should be. Rather then spam all pages just looking for google ranks, many spamers look for somewhat related articles and then just add their site to the list of external links at the bottom. Granted, about 5% of the time these links are probably appropriate, but the vast majority of the time they are not. Obvouslly the defacto policy is against this, but it would be easier to deal with spammers if we had a section of this page that delt more directly with this situation. any thoughts? --T-rex 15:31, 6 November 2006 (UTC) 3484:

and find how many there aren't. Ox(en) being a highly used means of agriculture is very important. Given the fact that there is NO Oxen specific entry (but rather a shared one under cattle) I see no issue with directing others to another educational source. I sell no product(s), make no money on the given link. The link was for a forum purely to provide an information exchange and to support 4H and Teamsters (Ox owners). Maybe next time you should take the time to educate yourself about a given link. Thank you. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.80.45.100 (talk • contribs) .

5679:. I ask, because, in the future, there may not always be others' blog posts, or reliable source content of any kind, I can use in Knowledge (where appropriate) that deal with the same consumer advocate issues that I do from my "personal experience" perspective. I am very self-aware of my own bias. I first research extensively, and then try to be "fair" all the time, and "balanced" when it is at all possible. I want to help Knowledge, as I have linked to it many times, and not be someone who takes up a lot of many Administrator's time. THANK YOU. 2145:

history student with a deadline approaching.) Does it make sense to redirect students to lists of "short women", and "tall women" for instance? Do you think it would be feasable to improve the usefulness of the Knowledge to students by giving a more organized redirection page in response to a request for "women" or "famous women" or "women in history", or should we create a new "famous women in history" page which refers the reader to a clear set of subcategories, sugh as "women in science", literature, art, etc.?--

5595:

proving Verizon's hugh investment. I have previously given a good argument why that blog post is a "reliable source" due to other reputable authors writing about the same subject. I believe that it is "useful, appropriately tasteful", and has "substantive longevity" even though Verizon may (small chance, IMO) eventually put a "clear and conspicuous" disclosure in the same place that that they promote their "30 Day Money-Back Guarantee". If they do, I will do an update to my blog post, as I've already done at =

5518:

you to know that my External Link on "FiOS Does Inconspicuous "No Turning Back To DSL" Disclosure" was not put back in without an attempt (bad one) by me to try to get an Administrator's input. My ignorance of how the editorializing of Knowledge works is proven by my posting of my request for Administrative input at "Knowledge talk:Spam". Since no one responded to my request, I guess I put it in the wrong place. Anyway, here it is as a "Comment and Question in response" to "T-rex's great comment:

2692:

did that to you. Precedent has already been set, but apparently that means nothing here. Knowledge will never be a credible source as long as each editor does his or her own thing, without regard to the greater community. I can't believe the efforts I've put in to a number of articles and this is the thanks I get. I'm sure everyone who had their links removed by Trisha thanks her, too. Don't bother presenting any of the links. I have better things to do that deal with a bunch of control freaks.

4673:, is a program for people who want help learning some of the more subtle aspects of Knowledge policy and culture. People are matched with experienced users who are willing to offer coaching. The program is designed for people who have figured out the basics of editing articles; they're not newcomers any more, but they might want some help in learning new roles. In this way, Esperanza would help keep hope alive for Knowledge because we would always be grooming the next generation of admins. 4297:--I have read the SPAM guidelines! It seems that your decision on this matter is purely subjective. I think you need to realize that there are 100 plus quality photo's in those galleries and that the one picture that is on the Laoshan Article is crap! If you showed that photo to anyone here in Qingdao they would not recognize it as being from Laoshan. One, two, or even three pictures can't truly show the beauty of Laoshan, that is why that article needs a comprehensive photo gallery! 3488:

with, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Knowledge. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie Talk 20:31, 12 October 2006 (UTC)"

5543:

not think it appropriate for some reason. Before I post it again, I want to make sure my thinking on this is not totally biased, because that deleted post was "really worth reporting", since someone else DID so. The someone else is the well know OM Malik (Om was a senior writer for Business 2.0 magazine covering telecom and broadband stories) on his blog "GigaOM". His article is entitled "GigaOM " Verizon FIOS insures future monopoly".

3292:, but you're wrong. Probably somebody else read these comments and acted. LOL. You can check the IP for the edits if you don't believe - the other person certainly didn't edit from my place, so don't rush to conclusions. Regarding what you said about the other calculators with no ads, I will consider it. I'll look for a nice one without ads (if you say there are so many) and I'll link to that. I'll see then if you're cool or not..... 5992:. If you feel that your links are acceptible under those policies and guidelines, you're welcome to post them to the talk page of the articles in question to see if others think they are as well. However, given that the links you posted are to a pay site with Google ads, I doubt you'll get much support for them. If you see other links that you don't feel meet the guidelines and policies, you're welcome to remove them. Regard, 3365:

the first one you posted (though I don't know enough about the topic to evaulate it for accuracy). It would be a quixotic quest to attempt to remove all links with ads from Knowledge. What I (and people on the spam project) look for is patterns. Reverting and warning within the first few edits often solves the problem. Unfortunately, sometimes I erroneously apply that "profiling" to innocent folks.

4422:. To help the community, I am putting the results of my research as I make progress. I understand that all sources are still not there for I'm working on it right now. Could you please give me a bit of time before deleting the content. Or could you please indicate what exactly that does not match the rules? I did indicate that the biography came from the book "Maitres et Epigones" from Sam Aberg. 5602:

buyers of FiOS probably look at Knowledge in doing research before they make their buying decision. I'm just trying to help them make a totally "informed decision" with all the facts made "clear and conspicuous". I, therefore, believe that I am acting in the spirit of Knowledge's written policies. I hope you agree, not for my benefit, but for the benefit of many broadband consumers.

2584:." I can assure you, however, that the site removed is not a commerical link. Nothing is being sold, nor is the site run by a commercial entity. It's a personal Web page dedicated to shopping malls. Of course, I've reviewed the guidelines for links and the site is not in violation. It seems to me the removal of the link was in error and I would like it restored. Thank you. 6556:

showed up in google for the keywords in those communities' histories. Who in the world gives you the right to accuse people (myself) who spent the time to create valid historical content about small communities as a spam. How dare you sir just simply delete content references. ALL HISTORICAL CONTENT IN WIKI (unless it is general public knowledge) REQUIRES REFERENCES.

236:

we may offer other services in the future, but the tutorials in and of themselves are a free resource for the search community and complement the information foudn on Knowledge. Also, I have noticed that other sites which have links on Knowledge contain ads. I have taken that to mean that a commercial site is not a site which has ads on them.

180:

could try by posting a request to an article's talk page suggesting a link and seeing what others think. Keep in mind that just because an article currently has competitor/commercial links doesn't mean that they are appropriate (in fact, I often end up deleting multiple commercial links while I'm cleaning up after a multi-page spammer). Thanks,

5141:

calls it "conspiracy theory", for yourself. Just take a mobile phone, with headset or not makes no difference, and call someone and speak for about 15 minutes, the whole side of your head which you were holding the phone will ache for days. Unless you already use them often, or have other conditions, then you will not feel any difference. --

2267:. I know that you banned one IP, but it seems that either he/she has access to multiple IPs or there are a lot of other retards who insist that it is neccesary to ignore consensus, not to mention Knowledge policy. I don't know if it's severe enough to warrant semi-protection, but yeah, we need some kind of admin help I think. -- 1624:

still not clear on why some sites are allowed and others like the one I just added are removed. I'm starting to feel that Knowledge is useless as a site. I'm trying to add value and contribute and only get frustrated and see other sites of less value and links to sites that display google ads allowed. What's the point?

6420: 3011:; though the article seems to make that claim, none of the cited sources support that (i.e., they don't state that AJJ is the most promiment rep of a scene, only that they are part of a local scene). If you could find supporting sources (or if they meet another criteria I'm missing) I'd be happy to weigh in. 1056:

to make people feel appreciated, be it by some kind words or the awarding of a Barnstar. This is where the Barnstar Brigade comes in. The object of this program is to seek out the people which deserve a Barnstar, and help them feel appreciated. With your help, we can recognize more dedicated editors!

6796:

Now I know you're not taking this seriously! NO ONE would regard a chiropractor as a reliable source, and Roger Rabbit is clearly too busy for this kind of petty nonsense. DON"T YOU KNOW wikipedia is all about consensus...you are outnumbered by three real estate agents, a barber, and a janitor...that

6598:

I disagree I think this is the best source because it is from a local person who accually knows what is and has happened in the area. I also disagree with you as to www cedarcityonline com being a real estate site. It is more of a portal then a real estate site. This area is very small and this is

6385:

Jamie, sorry about this, it is not me who has recently vandalised pages, I left my account logged in and a so called 'friend' at university used it to vandalise some pages, Ive been trying to find out which ones and revert them. So no I am not the same person as that IP address and bennelliott, sorry

5586:

I really believe T-rex is on to something with his suggestion, as, right now, the Knowledge (External) "Links normally to be avoided" needs to be clarified more, IMO. It says: "Links to blogs, social networking sites (such as MySpace), or discussion forums unless mandated by the article itself." I

5527:

Forgive me for not knowing how to start a new topic, but I'm leaving my comments here as they are potentially appropriate for where they are being placed. I feel that my blog post come under the 5% category of "appropriate" external links. I do not have any advertising on my blog, and I'm not selling

5206:

Thanks for your efforts Jamie (too informal?), you have far more patience than I. In fact, I'll try to learn from the example you set in this situation. We haven't worked on articles together, but I've "seen you around" and you seem to be doing a darn good job as admin (I was on wikibreak during your

4968:

Sorry to add to this post, Im a new user and cannot find were to start a new post on your talk link. Anyway I submitted some links to some pontiac and some other automotive resources. Im wondering why you deleted them when they were relevent links with useful resources. I see several other commercial

4482:

Hello, Jaime, I'm relatively new to this, and never posted in a "Talk" area before, so please excuse me if this comment isn't in the appropriate place. Anyway: Now that you've deleted a few links I put in (Kobe beef, Madagascar, etc), I reread the spam policies and I see you were absolutely correct

3865:

My addition to the term douche bag, with the possible exception of adding my name, was appropriate, relevant, and accurate. This is completely a POV issue. But I'm sure I know your response, "I have the right to hold discretion over what is appropriate and inappropriate.” If that is the case, then

3364:

I understand where you're coming from. Sadly, your sentiments/intentions account for what seems to be a very small percentage of new users who add links. I'll concede that in the 15 minutes that I looked for an ad-free refinancing calculator, I was unable to find one that had as many input fields as

3353:

I’m usually rational, un-stubborn and certainly not fanatic, but your action to reverse my first edit made me feel pissed-off and determined to fight back, for a philosophical reason…..I mean, by trying to protect the idea of non-profit, you are willing to sacrifice the quality of Knowledge’s output.

2181:

The first two searches, of course, returned nothing. Although one might argue that no one should conduct such a search, I can imagine a good faith desire to fill a void in, for instance, a History textbook. The search "famous women", results in a red (dead) link to "famous women in History", followed

2144:

I voted for non-deletion. The general view, however, was that the subject was too "broad". I now find that a search for "famous women" results in a list of articles considerable less useful to a searcher with only a broad idea of what he or she is looking for. (I'm thinking of perhaps a middle-school

1385:

Well duhh I am also working on it, and formatting it, I will change the tone and all my sources are cited. So if you, revert it then you will be vandalizing the page. Are you a misogynist or a supporter of women abuse? if no then let me do what I am doing, as I am a former Hindu converted to Islam so

1055:

Here in Knowledge there are hundreds of wikipedians whose work and efforts go unappreciated. One occasionally comes across editors who have thousands of good edits, but because they may not get around as much as others, their contributions and hard work often go unnoticed. As Esperanzians we can help

1009:

that quote is from the documentary (look at 42 minutes 30s to 43 minutes sample of it) , as almost everything i added. i did not know much about malcolm x and have no particular reason to have any bias in this matter (i am neither black nor muslim or anything like that); much of the article is poorly

239:

I would appreciate it if you could let me know the guidelines of what is considered a commercial site. Also, could you please let me know whether or not free, online tutorials comes under the category of "neutral and accurate material not already in the article" which contain "a level of detail that

6395:

Jamie, I have found that that IP is the same IP adress as the computer my friend used to vandalise pages on my account, so some of those edits were the same person. Im still not sure where this benelliott comes into it though. I'll ask to see if my friend has that account, dunno why because he's not

5629:

I don't believe that 100% of blog links are inappropriate for the reasons you mention. However, Knowledge does strongly discourage editors from adding links to their own site. At this point, I'm taking a neutral stance on it; I won't remove it, but I won't support it's inclusion if others object to

5195:

Hi again. My wikistress has reached explosive levels due to the antics of this disruptive editor. I feel that I'm legitimately reverting nonsense that borders on vandalism and POINT, but I don't want to cross the line into 3RR if this could be interpreted as a "content dispute". How do you view this

3233:

With shoes or not, here is the deal: I took your advice and I read 2 times very careful the guidelines for adding links. I think that my edit does not violate any of those guidelines and is justified, so I will put the link back. If you delete it again, I’ll put it back again. If you give me a valid

2620:

But you said it was removed because it was a commercial site, as it is not. No where in the rules does it say personal sites may not have ads. In addition, some of the external links from that page link to sites that have ads. Malls of America, Labelscar, and so forth. They all are ad-supported. Are

2135:

Guest:I have been accused of vandelizum (and bad spelling) in my messages for an IP address that isn't mine and for pages that I have never gone to. It says itself that AOL uses the same IP address for multiple users. And it has now blocked me from editing pages. (which i don't do much) I would like

1436:

How do you expect any articles to work on here if you go an revert everything back just because someone hasn't formated it correctly. The point of wiki is to do collaborations to expand the articles. So please I am asking you nicely don't revert my work or help me to format it and to remove the text

851:

Hi Joe, I added a new external link today to a website I am developing about spam, I note that you removed it. Apologies if it didn't meet the criteria, but I have gone over the external links guidelines a couple of times and I cannot see what was wrong. The site offers advise articles researched by

235:

This site is a work in progress and eventually will include a list of tutorials on various subjects relating to search engine marketing (similar to an online textbook), such as search engine optimization, pay-per-click advertising, blogs, and more. It is true that there are ads on the site and that

6246:

Unfortunately I was not finished with the entire article and was unable to yet cite my sources on the subject. It seems that the empty ToC wasn't enough evidence and I'm sure anyone interested would find a Role Playing world created by a 13 year old and evolved in such detail that it becomes fully

5960:

Sorry about adding inappropriate external links. I saw several that were similiar to what I can provide and felt my free materials would be helpful to teachers. I get plenty of traffic, so that really was not my motive. First time I tried and I found out fast what not to do. I am wondering how the

5774:

Jamie, thanks for the three good answers. As to the "Followup", I would be glad to do the same kind of lengthy justification for each one of my other links as I did for the one we just discussed. From your #3 answer it says in "Links normally to be avoided: "A page that you own or maintain, even

5716:

Semi-protection would not be appropriate to protect the link. It's only to be used in the case of a continuing pattern of vandalism (that cannot be dealt easily with via blocks) or as a temporary measure to work out "edit wars." It's unlikely that a dispute over the inclusion of a blog link would

5674:

Also, is there a Knowledge web page you can point me to that expalains in more detail why (besides the very obvious "commercial and egotistical motives") Knowledge "does strongly discourage editors from adding links to their own site.", and better yet, when it IS appropriate? The only page I found

5542:

I recently had a blog post of mine (FiOS Does Inconspicuous "No Turning Back To DSL" Disclosure Brokerblogger blog post (7/19/06 Updated)" under the "External Links" section of "Verizon FiOS" deleted by someone (would like to know if it can be anyone or has to be an administrator) who evidently did

5140:

Ok, lets say thats a bogus newspaper, whats more important to you, the truth about RF and the use of it in mobiles which causes brain damage, prooved by swedish studies on rats for example, or the reliablity of a newspaper? You can test the fact, or as the mobile sellers and the people they bought

4584:

An article went up earlier this year about a newish yoga teaching, posted by the guy who created the system. It was distressingly self-promotional, and so it drew Wiki ire (properly so). The guy edited down the hype, but then it was knocked off for reasons of verification/notability and moved to my

4248:

thatsqingdao com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=158&Itemid=82 External Link is not SPAM according to Wiki's guidelines. Those photos add so much to that article. "A picture is worth a thousand words!" Do you honestly think that these gallery's do not add anything to the Wiki

4154:

Hi Jamie, This site fills the gap of what is missing on the internet, a extensive collection of published studies focused on an extremely important topic in today's world. There's no other site that points to all the studies on this topic. I'm sorry for offending you. Please don't kill the momentum

3955:

When someone makes an edit you consider biased or inaccurate, improve the edit, rather than reverting it. Provide a good edit summary when making significant changes that other users might object to. The Three Revert Rule forbids the use of reverts in repetitive succession. If you encounter rude or

3483:

While you may have removed the link, you are obviously clueless about what spam (in this context)is and isn't. The link provided was not spam nor was it self promotion of a given product. It was not generated to incure "hits". I provided a link for an Oxen forum. Use a search engine and do a search

3372:

talk page asking for input on the link (be sure to mention that you and other editors attempted to find a non-commercial alternative first), I'll respect any consensus that arises from that discussion (i.e., I'll leave the link be if others agree that it's a worthwhile resources for that article).

3183:

It was an external link which I found useful. I thought that others could find it useful, too. It isn't my web site or anything like that by no means and I know the address if I need it....so I couldn't care less that you deleted it.... I just feel discouraged to try to edit something to Knowledge

2947:

I delete when I see a pattern of contributions that suggest that someone is trying to promote a site. There are plenty of other external links on Knowledge that probably should be deleted as well, so their presense isn't an argument for the inclusion of yours. Feel free to delete any links you find

2691:

Well that's rude to anyone who has an appropriate link that was acceptable until Trysha showed up. I would have prefered if Trysha just minded her own business and BUT out. Clearly the rules are being reinterpreted as the minutes tick by. That's unfair and unethical. You would be just as angry if I

526:

I am the user that Devios was not thrilled about. I am a chemist who has insight into GSE. I have copies of the studies done on GSE. I actually read the studies unlike Devios. The info Devios put in the article is false and speculation. And worse it is copyrighted info that the copyright holder did

490:

I added a link to the loose change video, which you removed. It was placed right below the link to the "The Path To 9/11" video. I would like you to tell me why you removed this. If a link can be placed for such a right-wing piece of propaganda, surely a left-oriented link can be placed in the same

202:

Hello Jamie, I am new to Knowledge and am not familiar with all of the guidelines. I added a link to the following website (www.sembasics.com), which was subsequently removed. I have looked over the guidelines and realize that I personally cannot suggest this site as I am the owner of the site in

161:

OK, I'll take a stab at it. I work for an online publisher of free information for professionals. We have users who ask us if we can put links to our info in Knowledge, the way our competition does. They say our stuff is more useful and lacks ads. They also are almost never knowledgeable enough

101:

Also--and I may regret alerting you to this--there IS an external link on the Wikibooks entry for 'Java programming'--and it is an external link to a site that has basically the kind of plain static text that you want me to convert my content to. Funny, nobody on the Wikibook site has molested that

6555:

I live in Chicago, I love history. I actually found the site in Cedar City discussions, I looked at the site and it is a reference site as well as a commercial site. I do not live in Cedar City, I dont own that site. The guy did the only research for history of those small communities and actually

5582:

As it turned out, my town was the 2nd town in the entire US to have FiOS installed! So, I am an expert ("reliable source") on "No Turning Back to Verizon DSL", and this topic has withstood the "test of time" as FiOS finally buried a disclosure in their TOS, but made it very inconspicuous. I even

5557:

I have done extensive research on the FTC's mandates on "Disclosure", and I am fair and balanced with Verizon in that post of mine that was deleted. As a consumer advocate, I feel it important that other people know that once they agree to FiOS installation, they can't go back to their Verizon DSL

5517:

I'm Against All SPAM In Its Purest Form, But Sometimes Its Definition is Debatable; (and I obviously don't know how to start a new post here, so forgive me again) Hi Jamie, I honestly respect your good intentions, and I'm looking forward to a good and informative discussion on this. First, I want

2678:

Actually, sorry for butting in here - but that is clearly linkspam. I've cleaned up the list of links in the main shopping mall article, as well as removed all the bigmallrat stuff. Looks like there is a bunch of cleanup work to be done on all these mall articles for other sites as well - I've

2493:

I'm not bitter about anything. I do, however, object to people using Knowledge as a promotional vehicle. You've already attempted to add numerous links to your own site until you were called on it; now you're trying to get other people to do it for you. I'm simply following policies and guidelines

2397:

fails to mention that you can be jailed for calling it a genocide. There's not much that can be done, as I think that an overwhelming majority of editors are Turkish, and feel offended by criticism of Turkey. I'm not Armenian or anything, but this seems to be quite a serious problem. Any ideas? Is

1790:

Sorry about editing ur comment. I was just confused and i forgot how to add a comment on the page so i accidently pressed somthing, and i think i deleted ur comment by mistake. and then when i realsed i did so, i found out that it actually works so i edited it more. Anyways, i apoligise deeply for

1432:

You're reverting my work back with no-good reasons, I am new to wiki so obviously, I am not going to know how to format the sources properly, hence why I have added them all unformatted that someone can do them (i.e) format the. SO why revert my work back to some apologetic misogynistic supporting

877:

Read the guidelines again; in fact, the first thing that the "spam1" template says is to not add links to your own sites. It's generally not a good idea to develop sites solely for the purpose of linking Knowledge to them. If you want to contribute to Knowledge, contribute content to the articles.

97:

Jamie, First, thank you for your reply. Second, the whole point of those Java Lectures is the dynamic content. If you had perhaps clicked on one of the links--especially the later ones--you would see that the whole point is the dynamic content that illustrates the execution path for the code being

7159:

Divorce is in general a state-specific issue in the United States. The website provides a wealth of information about divorce issues, articles about divorce as well as information about divorce laws. Please also see the website for other useful information such as directory of all local courts in

5646:

P.S. In the future, long discussions like this probably belong on the talk page of the article in question; rather than copy the whole or parts of the discussion here, I would've suggested simply posting a link to the discussion on my talk page with a note asking me to have a look at it. Thanks,

5339:

Jamie, I added the pharmacies merely to give readers more choices and options from which to choose. Isn't it fair that if you are going to mention several U.S. pharmacies, that pharmacies in Canada and other countries that want to be added get their names there too -- without any external links.

4588:

After a few months of stalling (sorry, been busy), I went over the article (it's true and it's non-promotional) and I responded on issue of verification/notability. I don't want to just move this back to public if it's just going to piss people off. Can you advise? A quick read of these two pages

3639: 3400:

Thanks for being understanding and taking time to discuss the issue. You'll find that the majority of folks who are active in the project are quite reasonable and friendly. I'm glad that you appreciate Knowledge as much as I do; if you have any other questions or thoughts, don't hesitate to ask.

2450:

Hi,I was just wondering a few things about an ip adress being blocked. I use the computers at school sometimes to surf wikipedia, and this IP adress is banned, 151.196.98.43. I sometimes make edits too, and under my account. I dont have a history of vandalism, yet im blocked, and I am a fairly

2228:

serves as a good starting point, with info about category guidelines in general as well as links to active projects. Categories is one area that I haven't delved into much, so I can't help you much beyond pointing you to that resource. I think you have some good ideas; I'm sure your input will be

1830:

Umm... I don't think so. You don't like blogs? Fine. I have no connection to the satire site in question - take it up on the article's discussion page, and don't make assumptions on my talk page, please. For Toledoans, the site is a go-to humor site - I live in between Detroit and Toledo, and

1670:

Hello...I'm sort of new at this, so I'm sorry if I make any mistakes. I happened to look up Dachshund, and read the Wiki article. Toward the bottom I saw a heading for "Clubs, Associations, and Societies," so as assistant organizer of the Boston Dachshund Meetup, I added a link to our group. I

1623:

Jamie, I created a useful reference for the antique industry. A glossary, newel.com/glossary.aspx. I added a link under the antique furniture section and it was removed. Can you explain why this was removed and not allowed and the other links are allowed. I notice links to sites all the time. I'm

1481:

You told me once not to post my link. Fine. But when I remove your links "WHICH WERE BROKEN" you still revert my work back. Now that page has your 2 broken links again. What are you insane? Did you even check your own links? Your really power-stricken and a "know-it-all". Maybe you need to

6643:

3 different people have now confirmed that the information on that webpage is true and accurate. One of the main factors in determining a reliable source is that multiple people have verified it. Maybe before you rush to judgement and delete something you know nothing about you should do some

5594:

My blog post that you deleted twice (my fault for the second time) is "fair and balanced" as I put in it: "I wish Verizon well, as they are one of only a few companies who could afford the big initial investment it takes to install Fiber-To-The-Premises (FTTP)." followed by a link to an article

5151:

I've been using mobile phones since 1996 and have not experienced any of the symptoms you described. I'd estimate there are millions of other folks who have been using them for similar periods. There is already information in the article about health risk studies (and an entire separate article

3487:

Quote from you "Please do not add inappropriate external links to Knowledge. Knowledge is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites that you are affiliated

2177:

Thank you for the suggestions. I searched for "Famous Women in Colonial American history", "Famous Women in Modern Turkish history", "Famous Women", and "Category:Women". I also looked up "women" and "women in history". I noticed a void, not in the underlying articles, but in the response to the

1868:

I have no idea what you are talking about in your most recent entry on my talk page. I am sitting at a public library in Toledo making some edits, and you are accusing me of all sorts of strange edits. If prior users of the IP you listed are quacks or spammers, that's too bad, but I am not the

179:

generally advise against adding links to your own site, ad-free or not. The focus at Knowledge is clearly on article content, not on external links, so the most of the time editors err on the side of deleting anything that's questionable. It can be a case-by-case judgement for each article; you

75:

If you add the content to Wikibooks, I don't see why it's necessary to also have the link here. Wikibook material is just as accessible as Knowledge. I'm pretty sure that you'd need to export all of your Powerpoint content to plain text in order to add it to Wikibooks. As I said earlier, you're

56:

Jamie, I will see about adding my Java Lectures you deleted to WikiBooks.If I do, will you again delete the link to it from this article? 20 or so lectures were written in powerpoint because I can simulate the execution of code with the animations. That is why I hosted it externally. I will be

5601:

Finally, I believe that my blog post does "provide relevant and non-trivial information that isn't present in the page", and therefore brings substantive value to Knowledge. My blog is not "commercial in nature", and the content of the deleted post is definitely "relevant", as many prospective

3694:

Ohnoitsjamie About the Spam(team) article: I thought it might be notable because the team's name reflects the cultural influence of SPAM, especially that a team of elementary school kids would choose that for their team name. Hormel in fact sent hats as a gift to each player. Thank you, Hpgeek

2195:

Would the inadequacy of the response to a "famous women in history" search be best improved by creating a short article by that name with links to proper narrower searches? Can the searches "Famous women" and "famous women in History" be redirected to "women in history" to take advantage of the

3349:

OK, Jamie. I appreciate your zeal to keep the world free of the profiteering greed. (And I REALLY appreciate what Knowledge is doing). But the particular example you give is not even close to the one I proposed. When you have some time, try to crunch some numbers in both of them using your own

2188:

However, few searchers will find this page without site-specific knowlege, which we can't assume. Also, aesthetically, I find the list odd in two ways: First, the breadth of the subcategories is bewilderingly variable. My eyes are drawn to a whole series of British nobility categories, then to

961:

such data as oxford union debate, meeting castro and some other details that, after watching documentary, i found missing in the article, i have added. it is extremely rude to delete hours of other people's work, and indeed i do not understand what have you against my edits that added a lot of

6461:

Thanks so much! Most messages I get here are from people upset that I've deleted their external links or articles. It's nice to get some positive feedback now and then. I've noticed that you've been a pretty active vandalism patroller yourself; keep up the good work, and you'll make a great

3739:

article, I've tried to create a new link to the snake image alone, but the Naturemagics server apparently performs a so-called "referer check" to prevent this. I can't stop you from deleting this link from the article, and I'm not going to deny that this webpage exists mainly for advertising

2199:

I think either would be better than presenting an error message in response to a simple, clear, and popular* request. Better, because even the conversation about the propriety of looking for a list of famous women would be advanced by giving the information, along with a note explaining the

5564:

I put that "Comment and Question in respsonse" in after reading a previous comment: external links "if I want to put in an external link that has good information on the subject, am I right in thinking that I should put it at the bottom of the list and contribute to the page by adding some

6199:

This link has been in the article throughout the AfDs. That means that it should remain in the article unless something has changed making it no longer valid. Please discuss on the discussion page before removing it, and provide evidence of the previous discussions you mention. Thanks.

2715:

Trysha didn't change any rules; she's simply helping to develop a new template to make the existing rules and guidelines more clear. Personally, I prefer my Knowledge to be free of advertisements. I'm sure that the many others who feel the same way will continue to value and use it.

5003:); external links that exist for that subject do so because there is a community consensus that they are either official or have a high degree of content to merit inclusion. However, when in doubt, I personally tend to exclude rather than include links if they are questionable. 1073:

are upon us! Anyone wishing to be a part of the Advisory Council may list themselves as a candidate from 18 September until 24 September, with the voting taking place from 25 September to 30 September. Those who wish to help with the election staff should also list themselves!

2789:

here, i'm tempted to go ahead and stick my version (the version that most folks have liked) in the spam template. I think that the bigmall guy would have been diffused a bit more by this one, as it doesn't get hung up on that whole 'commerical' point. What do you think? -

1596:

Something interesting I just found. Once of my sources re-checked fitness.gov and it does not work for him in Internet Explorer (I use IE6). When he originally checked, he was using firefox. I just checked on firefox and it works. Have you guys checked those links in IE6?

435:

Now that I've taken a closer look at the links, I'm not sure if the ones you added were that bad. Clearly there is a problem on that page with commercial links, but a couple are probably appropriate. I've started a discussion on the talk page; I apologize if I acted in haste.

6925: 266:

Your site has Google ads. I don't see any content in it that couldn't be included (or isn't already include) in the article. Most editors, including myself, will remove links to similar sites, as Knowledge is not a vehicle for promoting commercial or personal sites. Thanks,

6042:

and external links that i submit to wiki shows the articles that turkcebilgi.net volunteers have submitted to our site. and i saw there , there are some other links to other turkish article sites . my aim is not spam or advertising my site. let me explain it with examples

5023:

Thanks taking the time to respond, I know you must be busy w/all the editing - And I do appreciate your time! Im wondering though why a certain commercial link is allowed to be linked in most all of the classic and muscle car pages. One page that I posted a link for was

2155:

I'm not sure that the elimination of that list leaves a real void. I would suggest to a student wishing to do a report on a famous woman to start in a narrower category first; e.g., famous women in Colonial American history? Modern Turkish history? There's always the

1363:

Even without the copyright issue, it's not a good idea to make such sweeping changes to such an article without proposing them first on the talk page. Furthermore, much of the text you added was not well-organized and not formatted properly and is not written from a

501:"Loose Change" has been discussed endlessly on the talk page (probably in the archives now). The other movies you mention in the edit summary are major theatrical or television releases, while Loose Change is amateur. There is a link for it on the conspiracy page. 3244:

Here's a reason. A Google search for "mortgage calculator" yields over 18 million hits. Knowledge is not a link directory. If a mortgage calculator link were to be included on the page, an ad-free one would be more appropriate. Please do not add the link again.

3216:

Obeisant, see the WP:SHOES policy : "Editors should only ever edit Knowledge whilst wearing tartan carpet slippers, or failing that, plastic sandals worn over knee-length white socks". To say an editor has been wearing shoes on duty is a very serious accusation.

3550:

Just so people know #9 says "Blogs, social networking sites (such as MySpace) and forums should generally not be linked to unless mandated by the article itself." The Notability issue isn't relevent, #9 is. The link was to a free forum. Consider me vaporware.

3145:

If you look at other school articles, you'll see that we don't maintain info like current student council representatives and other transient information like that. It's too difficult to maintain and beyond the scope of what's appropriate for the article. See

6688:

I think god himself could come down and say the source was reliable and because of your personal interests you would deny the link. This is obviously a personal opinion but one that multiple sources have validated therefor passing your reliablity standards.

1675:

I'm OK with it, but if another editor feels that it's spam, you'll have to take it to the talk page for that article (i.e., ask for input regarding the inclusion of that link). P.S. Don't forget to sign your talk page comments with four tildes: ~~~~. Thanks,

632:

fool, why don't you quit being a idiot by reverting the page to an incorrect stance instead of fixing the true problems of the page, I inserted the real facts and figures so that the page contains true information. Nice bluff though about Mr. Hoke (you ass)

6268:

The deletion of the article has nothing to do with the quality or scope of the project. Indeed, I'm sure there are many talented bands, artists, etc. whose articles are deleted; not because their talent is disputed by Knowledge, but because they don't meet

3303: 3350:

mortgage refinance scenario, and see which one will give you information to make a decision. But I will give it to you and I will eventually look for another good calculator which is non commercial and with no ads (I wonder if I’ll find such an animal….).

3310:

is a Knowledge cornerstone, it does look suspicious when someone's first edit from a registered account it to add a link with ads, especially when that link has been the subject of previous spam campaigns. If that wasn't your intent, I apologize. Cheers,

5778:

By the way, the "Links normally to be avoided" page says: "Except where noted, this list does not override the list of what should be linked." Could you point me to the page that has that information. Thanks. (Whoops, I guess it means this page =

4969:

links in these catagories also (such as muscle car club) and yet the link that I submitted allows enthusuests to post pictures, specs and info on these makes/models pages. So Im wondering why now these links are being removed? One of my postings was

7026:. I can understand why you would want to keep your connection with your father on the down-low (to be able to succeed on your own), but unfortunately it seems that the "cat is out of the bag," and it's nearly impossible to put a cat back in the bag. 4014:

Sometime earlier this year you left a vandalism warning on this user's talk page. I have just been through his contribs, and there is no vandalism to be found. Could you please justify your use of this template? Thanks. Heweyeweyeweyeweyeweyewey...

1126: 5388:). BTW, Knowledge doesn't really have a "management" that you can complain to about these sorts of matters; decisions are made by community consensus. I doubt you will find much support for turning that page into a directory of online pharmacies. 5036:

If you have a chance please visit that page - and also go into 1962 Pontiac Catalina. You will then see even more info that has been added for that year Catalina. I guess Im wonderin why that other link is allowed and not the one that I submitted.

613:

Actually, I've spoken with an administrator there (a Mr. Hoke) regarding some of the vandalism to the page. He confirmed that most of the additions anon IPs have attempted to add were bogus; I will continue to remove similar crap from the entry.

4737: 3154:

Names of noteworthy (e.g. award-winning, published) faculty of the past can be mentioned. Generally timeless information (such as published teachers) is preferred over transitory information (like the exact number of math teachers at a point in

5869:

Thanks! Just trying to keep the pages clean. Keep up the good work with your botany contributions; it's nice to have folks around who are experts on topics other than video games, television shows, and comics (we have plenty of those already!)

4899:

needs to be blocked. Despite being a school IP, there has been relentless attacks on a user page (and incidentally the user whose page is being attacked goes to the same schoool) so these are most likely repeated personal attacks on the user.

5712:

By that I mean anyone. Most content/link decisions on Knowledge are made by consensus of all editors, not just admins. If there is any weight given, that weight tends to be more associated with contribution history and involvement, not admin

5605:

I look forward to your more experienced input, and if you convince me that my deleted post is hurting the spirit of Knowledge's written guidelines, as well as Knowledge itself, I will gladly "cease and desist" in further promotion of my POV.

527:

not grant Devios permission to use. Just thought I set the record straight and clear up the air. Review the factual article and you will see that their are verifiable references that prove the facts. Devios is incredulous! Good Day, Nicole.

5180:

Thanks for your actions in removing POV material from this article. IP 66 (the Anon editor involved) has inserted the same material a number of times recently, always to be reverted by other editors. I created a new section on the Talkpage

7001:

Hey, the yoriyos page is back up, i proposed for it to be deleted. would you mind nominating it for deletion or deleting it. it links to a page called Muhammad Islam. who hasnt done anything noteworthy of being included on wiki. thanks.

4733: 7160:

Washington State. All of this information is not readily available anywhere else. This is an appropriate website as an external link. This complies with guidelines of Knowledge. I would appreciate if you could review the website again.

2408:

It's sanitizing/censorship as far as I'm concerned. If I have time today, I may try to put together another section that outlines major issues in EU membership as reported by reliable sources; if that isn't acceptible, I'll take it to

4874:

Although having the newsletter appear on everyone's userpage is desired, this may not be ideal for everyone. If, in the future, you wish to receive a link to the newsletter, rather than the newsletter itself, you may add yourself to

1251:

1831:

have a lot of relatives there. Do you? Gauging from your contributions, you seem to spend most of your time just making snap decisions about a user's intent and issuing blocks, warnings, and the like. But heck, just my opinion.

7252:

Jamie-- I see your argument for perhaps not including this link on the divorce page. However, it is very appropriate for family law page, which contains similar articles about divorce in Souther n California and Pennsylvania.

5346:

In my view, if you are going to take off some pharmacies, then there should not be any list of pharmacies at all. Why give preference to some over others? Or, are you getting paid off by the pharmacies that are listed here?

203:

question. I am wondering, though, if someone else could recommend it as I think that it would be a helpful resource for the search engine marketing, search engine optimization and/or other relevant articles on Knowledge.

6281:

writes an article about Loigh, then by all means recreate the article and add the appropriate references. However, Knowledge is not free web-hosting for up-and-coming (but not yet notable) bands/projects/games, etc. Thanks,

6032:

turkcebilgi.net is a free turkish article directory which contains 12.000 pages now and it's being updated daily by its volunteers . Turkcebilgi.net is one of the most popular reference sites on the web in Turkish language .

5539:) says: "However, editors should exercise caution for two reasons: first, if the information on the professional researcher's blog (or self-published equivalent) is really worth reporting, someone else will have done so;..". 5185:

to discuss the issue. Unfortunately, my patience is exhausted and I'm not certain I can respond reasonably right now. If you have the time and inclination, your participation would be most welcome. Thanks, and happy editing.

3578:

discourages forum links (unless the forum itself is the topic), most editors don't argue against the inclusion of high-popularity/high traffic forums on a topic. Posting a link to a fledling forum suggests promotion. Cheers,

1936:

In my 15k or so edits, I've probably added less than ten external links total (if that), and certainly not to a friend's site. (I don't have any friends who make money from websites as far as I know). Feel free to peruse my

162:

to do this themselves, so they ask us, believing it to be possible given our competitor's links, and our job besides. Is there any way for us to try this, short of training a cadre of users to edit Knowledge pages? Thanks.

4692:

is a new Esperanza program! In an effort to make complicated processes on Knowledge easier for everyone, Esperanza working to create and compile a list of tutorials about processes here on Knowledge. Consider writing one!

7108:

Hi Jamie-- I just noticed that you removed an external link that was previously added. I believe that the link is extremely relevant and provides a wealth of useful information that is relevant to the topic. The topic is

2892:

account about my deletion of external links, and I wanted to be sure that it was from you. It seemed somewhat out of character, as you have always said you prefer to use talk pages for these sorts of discussions :) -

1409:

for the article. Please fix the formatting and references there before attempting to add it to the article space. Also, I'm warning you once again to not make personal attacks on other users. You won't be warned again.

6818:

Accually your hero Jaime has stated that if multiple people tell you you are wrong you probally are. Well multiple people tell Jaime he is wrong daily but guess what. He is an all mighty editor and can do no wrong.

4603:

This system's growing fast...if consensus is not to add it now, there'll likely be a groundswell later. Time frame doesn't matter to me...the article's ready to go up whenever it's appropriate, that's the main thing.

4910:

I don't have any qualms with blocking school IPs. If it causes inconvenience for other students, the school administration should do something about it. (I see someone has beat me to it and blocked them for a month).

2223:

I don't think internal search optimization is a good solution (nor do I think it's considered acceptible). If you have suggestions about organization of categories, there are ongoing discussions regarding that issue.

2413:. I don't have issues with any country in the world (though I'm not a big fan of all governments). I do have a generally favorable opinion of Turkey's government, but I am firmly against censorship and sanitizing. 6484:

I am really starting to get tired of even bothering to be an editor on Knowledge. When an article can be deleted without even any DISCUSSION about it; basically at someone's whim, then there are serious problems.

4618:, which would make it vulnerable to an AFD nomination. Some my question the external links as well unless they are somehow (1) official or (2) widely considered to be the most notable links on the topic. Cheers, 7211:

washingtondivorceonline com/articles/divorce-issues.html , which is a compilation of articles about important divorce issues such as child custody, child support, alimony and division of property. Best, Brian

3119:

I'm sorry if we keep bumping into each other like this but i really would prefer it if you would give me a proper and detailed xplanantion as to why you keep on deleting parts of my article as well as others.

761:

First, your not supposed to delete comments on user talk, specifically when you refuse to listen to reason, leave PTS to people of PTS since you know nothing about the school beyond whst s web page tells you.

6905:

Please, read all this quotes and follow the sources, particularly the quran sources.You will find that all the quotes are actually true and that nothing is wrong. Please do not revert my edits in the future.

5457:

Could you please at least read conent under links before deleting it? Also, If you are going to delete one link that you deem as unworthy, why not delete the others (that are far worse) in the same article?

1161: 1069: 7234:

It's still not appropriate. It's state-specific info from a commercial site. We obviously can't have locale specific info links from every state (and province, territory, etc.). Please don't addd it again.

3961:

Writing according to the "perfect article guidelines" and following the NPOV policy can help you write "defensively", and limit your own bias in your writing. For some guidelines, see Knowledge:Wikiquette."

2182:

by links to the abovementioned "famous short women" and "famous tall women". At this point, the student might wonder why women between 5 feet and 5 foot 10 inches have been deleted. No answer is presented.

4876: 1253: 1165:

will open for nominations on 18 September 2006. The voting will run from 25 September 2006 until 30 September 2006. If you wish to be a candidate or a member of the elections staff, please list yourself!

4044:. All articles that this user has created have gone on to be expanded from a stub to at least starting-article class. Finally, whatever happened to not biting the newbies? Heweyeweyeweyeweyeweyewey... 932:

My finger was on the block button waiting for that one. ;) I noticed months ago you'd surpassed my edit count (you must be over 20k by now). Do you have the highest number of non-admin/non-bot edits?

243:

I assure you that these tutorials are extremely well researched and are constantly being revised to keep them accurate and up-to-date. Thank you for your time, Yours truly, Moshe Morris SEMBasics.com

1180: 1713:

policies, there are probably only a small fraction of links that are appropriate. Personally, I tend to lean toward deletion of links rather than keep; it's easier to avoid the gray areas that way.

7051:

I was wondering what the reasoning behind permanently deleting the Jeffree Star page was? If the content was inappropriate, I can understand deletion, but preventing re-creation seems a bit much.

5587:

feel that to eliminate blogs of all kinds from external links on Knowledge is partially defeating what Knowledge stands for. For example, that policy would eliminate External Links to Wonkette (

4128:

Less than an hour before you added it, an anon IP was spamming it all over the place. Furthermore, it doesn't appear to be anything more than an aggregator of other articles with Google ads. See

39:. A "team" of anonymous editors disagrees with me, saying this is an official website. Can you review the site in question, and tell me if this is a site with value to Knowledge's audience? -- 5550:) part of "Verizon Fios" are 3 links to "Broadband Reports FiOS" which is a very well known forum for discussion, and someone posted a topic for discussion with a link to my blog post on FiOS ( 3714: 2903:

Yeah, that was me. It was one of those rare things I preferred to keep off-line for various reasons. I'm not too worried about the outcome either way; just wondering what you thought about it.

2110:

are limited just to Quinn and Quinn's dissertation. I'm letting you know about the PROD in case your previous interactions gave you insight into a reason to keep the article around after all.

2371:, it's hard to tell what's vandalism since folks aren't using edit summaries. (It's always a good idea to put something in the edit summary box; for vandalism reverts, "rvv" is fine). Cheers, 4304:, have you ever visited Laoshan or even Qingdao for that matter? Will you please stop vandalizing my posts to the talk pages? These pages are for open discussion of relevant matters, right?-- 5152:

dedicated to that). A 1999 article about tests conducted in the seventies is of questionable relevance to modern phones, which are all rated in terms of how much radiation they produce (see

5030:

The only link there is the one to muscle car club - were they are linked all over wikipedia and use google adwords also. The link that I submitted was to a catalina resource page also here:

7020:

Well, this is a weird situation. Though the old article for Yoriyos didn't make any successful arguments for notability, now it does; NME certainly qualifies as non-trivial press coverage.

3626:

haha! No relation. Mr. Cherry was, during my time, a math (or history) teacher in the middle school. We always joked about being related, but to our knowledge are not. - BobbyCherry2

3710: 5081:

Hey, made a submission about the newest Palmer Trinity scandal. I'm sure you can find some flaw with it, but please do your best to put the news up to the best Knowledge standards.

2393:

I've noticed that this avoidance of delicate issues isn't restricted to the Turkey page. A whole load of pages relating to Turkey conveniently fail to make any mention of it. Even

989:

Malcolm X had great energy, he was able to work day after day with just four hours of sleep or less, he read a lot and once he believed in a cause devoted himself to it completely.

1646:. Folks are constantly trying to spam Knowledge with commercial/promotional links, and as such it's not difficult to find inappropriate ones. If you do, feel free to remove them. 1406: 4271:

discourage users from adding links to their own sites. Knowledge is not a vehicle for promotion or advertising. If you feel those articles are lacking, you are encouraged to add

3609:

Nice work on that page (and other Moon-related pages) yourself! I recall Mr. Cherry as a principal at the high school (or was it the middle school?) at some point....a relation?

3740:

purposes, but I'd like to ask you to leave the link there anyway. As advertisements go, this one is hardly the worst, and to me the image is an excellent example of how slender

2820:

Thanks! I didn't even notice that grammatical bit. I went ahead and did the replacement on spam/spam-n. I totally understand what you mean about the wikilawyering :) _

284:

Three questions: 1) Are step-by-step insturctions of how to properly implement a search engine marketing campaign they type of info that would be part of a Knowledge article?

4501:

You're welcome to add new content to the article regarding St. John's ecosystem. I still don't think the link is appropriate (and I doubt other spam patrollers will either).

3028: 729: 685: 352:

Jamie, I added an external link to the only website dealing with information about climbing in western colorado. This is an informational resource. Why would you delete it?

3330:

that's similar to the everycalc one (it's from a credit union's site; no ads). Looks like credit union sites frequently have them. You might be able to find a better one.

6014:

heh - I was wondering why I couldn't find that crap on the real estate page when I hit edit, you beat me to it. Shame there is not a quicker way to blacklist spammers. --

3776:

Hi i am read a story with hobos in it and when i add the hobos in the book to the notable hobo's page Eyrian keeps erasing it and yelling at me. Can you tell her to stop

6386:

to have bothered you, I'll make sure i log off shared computers in future. That Ip address may be the same 'friend', just not on my account. Ill ask, but sorry anyways.

4783:, those involved in translation projects will be asked what English Knowledge policies are most important and confusing to editors coming from other language Wikipedias. 4332: 2470:

I hope you don't mind if I move this conversation here. I see you are very bitter about me. I am sorry for that. Can we talk this over and come to a truce of some kind?

974: 5572:

As a consumer advocate, I hope you agree with the widely read and very reputable "Technology Evangelist" who did an article on my first three blog posts on 12/21/05 =

1447:

I've given you the reasons for the reverts. Formatting is less of an issue than sourcing. Any time you make a submission, the statement, "Encyclopedic content must be

864: 2646:

The presense of other links with ads does not justify your link. If other links with ads are not highly relevant to the subject (i.e., they are not official sites or

3037: 5897:

have pretty much created everything we have on this stuff, and they're starting to spread it throughout related articles. It looks like a smear campaign to me. --

5812: 4382: 1010:

sourced. when i watched the documentary on google video i checked the web, and find out that some interesting details were missing in wiki article, and added them.

6862:

Many thanks for the Barnstar! I'm not sure what brought me so favorably to your attention, but I really appreciate it. It's nice being noticed by someone besides

5216:

Thanks for the kind words! I used to get stressed sometimes, but over time I've realized that most things like this are resolved (eventually) by the community.

1741:

is correct, as i watch it practically every monday-friday on channel 10 at 6:30 pm on Australian television. Sorry to seem rude, but i know the actors/actresses.

5380:

I deleted a number of listings where the subject did not have an article (though more should probably deleted). List pages like that should generally only list

5145: 5113: 6734:

I think you need to back off on this one Jamie. My barber assures me that this is all true, so does the janitor in my office. Why do you refuse to accept these

5142: 5110: 4512: 4473: 4429: 3878: 3446: 3234:

reason why it shouldn’t be there I’ll stop – I promise. If not, I’ll put it back every time I have the time to play the game of nerves, until the end of days.

2988: 2185:

The search for "Category:Women" does present links leading, eventually, to lists of scientists, writers, actors, etc. which would bbe acceptable to a teacher.

2089: 970: 240:

is not suitable for inclusion in an article". After all, they contain "other, meaningful, relevant content that is not suitable for inclusion in an article".

6581:. Google hits to his real estate site are irrelevant. You added the links quickly after they'd been removed (with reasons given for their removal). Thanks, 6610: 4555: 4407: 3929: 860: 641: 596: 163: 5837:

It's not something I would have added to the article, but it is properly sourced. I made the wording a bit more encyclopedic and cleaned up the formatting.

4402: 2012:. The site in question sells Apostille's. It's advertising. Period. Furthermore, I recommend that you not make personal attacks, as doing so is grounds for 379: 6907: 6827: 6697: 6651: 6473: 6328: 6311: 6215: 5686: 5613: 5465: 5419: 5367: 5104: 4896: 2350: 2318: 2311: 2111: 927: 7029:

I see that you've already nominated it for deletion....well, you started the nomination (there are still two more steps). I'll take care of the next two.

6527: 6518: 5512: 5167: 5134: 5048:, and has a lot more content than your site. The presense of ads isn't a deciding factor in itself in this case; it's more a question of limited content. 3022: 7300: 7260: 7219: 7167: 7125: 7058: 5808: 4983: 4250: 4191: 4147: 3558: 3497: 3412: 3384: 3322: 3256: 3207: 2301: 1987: 1889: 1873: 1863: 943: 575: 559: 191: 109: 98:

explained. If we are limited to just static text than I don't want to essentially rebuild from scratch content that took at least six years to develop.

58: 5790:. I would provide an e-mail on Knowledge, except I am not comfortable giving out my own e-mail address unless I absolutely have to (nothing personal). 5500: 4581:

Wondering if you can tell me the next step on this. I'm an old-time Wikepedian, newly returned, and I'm not well- informed re: how things are done now.

7246: 6248: 5848: 5765: 5658: 4922: 4629: 4345: 4290: 3341: 3280: 2477: 1852:

on that one). Blogs are rarely appropriate links for articles unless the blog has (1) verifiable notability or is is written by the article's subject.

1625: 1614: 1272:

Can you stop going around and giving others warnings? you have no authority. Leave me alone and never leave comments on my page, you, you dog lover. --

746: 719: 339: 287:

2) If the answer to that question is no, then is this the type of information that would compliment a Knowledge article? If not, may I ask why not?

278: 130: 6806: 6779: 6747: 6390: 6293: 5227: 3466: 3390:

I think we eventually could be friends, even :-). When I’ll have time, I’ll do exactly what you suggest. In the end it was a pleasure talking to you.

2983:

Because of your input on previous music AfDs, I was hoping you would take a look at this article and provide your thoughts on whether or not it meets

2763:

No problem...it's fairly easy once you get the hang of it (though it can be tricky to get text to flow nicely around images in some larger articles).

150: 7003: 6599:

an authority site for that area. Call it what you want you are the admin so even if you are completely wrong I guess we can just agree to disagree.

6400: 6188: 5890: 5211: 5085: 4163: 4111: 4096: 3874: 3784: 3718: 3664: 3368:

Anyway, I appreciate your efforts to find an equivalent ad-free site; you certainly don't have to spend hours doing so. If you post a message to the

3094:

Yeah, I suspect that North Korea will be a popular vandalism target for the next few days. Indef blocking accounts like that can slow it down a bit.

3077: 3058: 2844: 2534: 423: 4376: 1285:

is the vandalism in question. Furthermore, your assertion about my authority is incorrect, as you will discover if you continue to vandalize pages.

840: 6606: 5831: 4276: 3172: 2240: 2171: 2129: 2075: 2065: 2039: 1923: 1819: 1531: 91: 5945: 5922: 4954: 4324: 4308: 3765: 3225: 2437: 2430: 2424: 2292: 2107: 1470: 1421: 1323: 1296: 912: 6235: 5968: 5415: 5363: 4484: 4095: 3852: 3435: 3394: 3358: 3296: 3238: 3190: 3178: 2914: 2824: 2811: 2683: 2382: 2247: 2214: 2146: 2093: 1724: 1700: 512: 6988: 6971: 6039:) . it's a different site. my site is turkcebilgi.net . because of this i choose turkcebilgi.net as title. i want add my article to wiki again? 4608: 2084: 5452: 5300: 5250: 4853: 4419: 4409: 4305: 3974: 2941: 1598: 1546: 1489: 397: 7293:

Ok, I removed a link promoting a lawyer matching service in Southern California since it is both commercial and locale-specific. Best, Brian.

6592: 6108: 4234: 479: 6671:. "Testimonials" from various editors (most of whom in this case are new or anonymous users) does not confer reliability status upon a link. 6262: 5894: 4399: 4231: 4087: 4059: 3832: 3044: 1835: 297: 250: 197: 6954: 2402: 2297:

Hah. I was just thinking, "Hmmm, I haven't seen the crazy person mangling Bong lately." Thanks for the semi-protection; it's a nice relief.

2203:/*The "famous women in history" page was #849 in that (disputed) visit count of June, 2005. That would put it in the top 0.5% of articles. ( 2118:

Yeah, that editor was pretty unclear on the ropes. I'd have to agree with you that the book/author doesn't appear to meet notability tests.

5911:

Could be a smear campaign or a campaign to promote the film. In any case, it's easy enough to remove anything that's not properly sourced.

4313:

Any reverts I did on talk pages were because you were replicating a discussion on multiple pages, which is not necessary (and confusing).

680:

Just thought I'd let you know about that Jonathan Nguyen page you just prodded – it's been deleted and recreated several times. Regards, —

535:

Hey, i have to ask you that if i revert again, will it be under 3RR. I only reverted clear vandalism. There was no content dispute. Thanks.

419: 404: 166: 5738: 5641: 5583:

filed a complaint with the FTC about "non-disclosure" at first, and now "lack of clear and conspicuous disclosure" which break FTC rules.

2106:), has been proposed for deletion. I noticed on Sheldunn's talk page that you had some issues with Sheldunn's contributions, which as of 1230: 5934: 4585:

user page for repair (because I'd chimed in to defend it...I happen to practice this system, plus I'm a Wikipedian with a track record).

4001: 3130:". It is an essentail aspect of school life and provides readers with extra background as well as current and contemporary information. 2997: 2800:

No, I hadn't see that (though I just added my $ .02). I like it. I get tired of the Wiki-lawyering over the fine points of the policies.

1979:

You are just a little Hitler, where do you get off? Almost any page on the net could be considered commecial nowadays. You have issues!

1919: 1738: 1441: 1379: 353: 4224:

with some comments and proposals about your latest merge. Could you please check it and leave your comments on the matter at that page.

2967: 2877: 2863: 6452: 4253: 4215: 2727: 2669: 2614: 804: 5281: 6915: 6544:

as a relevant resource to refer to. My web site is as useful as wikipidia and if you think I was spammig, It's up to you at the end

5793: 3047:, though I haven't used either of the tools mentioned. I'm pretty sure that they have some facillities for edit summary automation. 2250: 2217: 2149: 51: 4904: 3187:

I'll reverse back my edit once.....if you delete it again, peace be with you, man - you must feel very powerful in your shoes......

2192:

I then tried "women in history". Although no such page exists, the list of near-miss pages was extensive and more-or-less on-point.

1399: 1390: 878:

Your site has Google ads; Knowledge is not a vehicle to drive traffic to a revenue-generating site. By the way, I'm not Joe either.

133: 6725: 6682: 6637: 5328: 3418: 1657: 1590: 1520: 206:

Here, are the relevant sections of the External LInks guidelines page which indicate why I think it would be worthwhile including:

6018: 5905: 5863: 4788: 4703: 4664: 7296: 7256: 7215: 7163: 7054: 6910: 6647: 6602: 6307: 6069: 5964: 5804: 5682: 5609: 5461: 5411: 5246: 4551: 3970: 3698: 3554: 3493: 2840: 2695: 2530: 2473: 2388: 1779: 1744: 1485: 1343: 1306: 1276: 765: 702: 415: 293: 246: 105: 6644:

research and accually find out if it is reliable or not rather then rush to judgement and imediately delete then ask questions.

6489: 3161:

It's safe to assume that if lists of current teachers are discouraged, the same would apply to current student representatives.

2513: 1705:

Trysha is correct. My focus is mostly on ridding Knowledge of promotional/advertising links, but according to the letter of the

889: 669: 625: 542: 322:. Also, it's not appropriate to add content just for the sake of linking a commercial/personal site as a source of that content. 6894: 5059: 5014: 4937: 4573: 4538: 1800: 1033: 895: 356: 43: 2344: 2333:

reverted their edits, but can you do something about the user, like temporarily blocking them or something? To be honest, the

2271: 7097: 6380: 4635: 4439: 2565: 1153: 1083: 1079: 978: 6960:

Thanks! I've never seen this barnstar. I appreciate the support (it's always nice to get the occasional positive feedback).

6874: 5446: 5399: 5099: 4933:

You jumped fast on that guy! I was still trying to find the best warning message when you dropped the hammer on him. ;-) --

3105: 2794: 447: 328:(3) Then they should probably be removed unless there was a consensus on the talk page of that article for their inclusion. 6241: 6204: 6023: 5930: 4773: 4563: 4155:

of what this site is striving to be because of how it was added to wikipedia by an unaware wikipedia user - me. We need it.

3937: 3899:

that I recently reverted, there isn't much to debate. The article already mentions that the term can be used as an insult.

2774: 2027: 1878:

The edit patterns speak for themselves. (By the way, I've rooted out most of the other nationalnitwit blog links). Cheers,

1687: 1427: 1047: 1002: 868: 649: 604: 7316:

That's fine. There are plenty of inappropriate links that should be removed throughout Knowledge. Thanks for helping out.

6571: 6003: 5200: 5190: 4030: 3841:

Actually, I have the power to block you indefinitely as a vandalism-only account, which you are probably noticing by now.

3620: 3590: 3543: 3139: 2460: 1960: 7040: 6835: 6705: 6659: 6338: 6319: 5694: 5621: 5473: 2897: 2360: 6852: 6304:

Ever noticed how sometimes you contradict wikipedia rules, when you so easily critisise others for apparently doing so?

6063:

please inform me about my article and my external links . i want to submit it again to biggest internet encyclopaedia .

5405:

I look forward to you stripping all of the other pharmacies that don't have articles attached. Fair is fair, isn't it?

4394:. Basically some people are reverting back previous text without any explanation. You can follow the discussions at the 3910: 2337:

pages have been getting a lot of vandalism by IP logs, is there some way of only letting register users edit the pages?

7308: 7268: 7227: 7175: 7133: 7066: 6327:

I don't know what you're talking about. I'm also trying to figure out if these three accounts are the same individual:

5816: 4991: 4762: 4688: 4649: 4259:

I think you need to read the guidelines more closely. Simply stating that it's not a violation doesn't make it so. The

3820: 3687: 3566: 3505: 2451:

established user. Is it possible for my username to be unblocked? or is the ip adress as a whole completely blocked?

1995: 742: 698: 588:

Quit editing palmer trinity school, you no nothing of it and its interactions, look how flawed the website curently is

117: 68: 7327: 7287: 7202: 7153: 5859:

Quick catch on the Flower spam. Warned, cleaned up, and blocked before amateur-me could figure out the right pages.

2363:) is blocked for 48 hours (length extended for second block). It is possible to restrict anons from editing pages via 1973:

On the word "apostille" , why are you deleting a link to a site that has had useful info about apostilles since 1998?

1911:

And you allow your friends websites with hardly any members - who just copy and paste content from other large sites?

6366: 6352: 6258: 3754:

Fair enough. I was unaware that the photo in question was significantly different than those already in the article.

2707: 2637: 2591:

The removal of the link was not an error. It is a personal site with advertisements; please refer to the policies at

2485: 1825: 1635: 786: 462: 7117:

washingtondivorceonline com) . I would greatly appreciate if you could review the link that was added. Best, Brian.

7074:

Protecting the page from re-creation is justified when numerous attempts are made to recreate an article that meets

6163: 4395: 3480:

I read the guidelines and my opinion differs from yours. However, because you have the power and I do not, I lose.

3069:

Well done for blocking Wiki-liki-bo-biki Much appreciated I'm sure did you see what he/she put on the N Korea page?

7013: 6081: 4210: 4171: 4119: 3882: 3835: 3792: 3748: 3452: 3266: 3085: 2852: 2786: 2542: 2364: 2047: 1849: 958: 495: 216:. Ideally this content should be integrated into the Knowledge article, then the link would remain as a reference, 823: 7078:. In this case, the versions of the deleted article that I saw were borderline nonsensical and made no claims of 6614: 5573: 3945: 2754: 2655: 2139: 1329: 156: 5481:

It's a travelogue link; those are rarely appropriate for articles. If you see other links that you feel violate

5123:

has a reputation is a conspriacy-oriented newspaper, so yes, I would question it's status as a reliable source.

900: 6221: 5976: 5423: 5371: 4494: 2920: 2832: 2103: 1869:

person you should be complaining about. Please find more productive uses of both your and my time. Thank you.

1756: 1028: 777: 77: 5929:

A lot of it is a matter of phrasing/implication rather than sources. I looked at the other articles involved (

5667:

Jamie, thanks for the "neutral stance", and after I posted here first, I did post the shorter version over at

5937:) and tried to work towards something more like NPoV, but you might want to have a look as well. Cheers! -- 5884: 5751: 5568:

Yes. Also, please consider whether your link is a reliable source (e.g. not someone random guy's blog). : -->

5308: 5258: 4750: 4362: 4239: 4083: 4055: 4026: 3982: 3801:

I would've done the same thing as Eyrian. You've already been warned several times about adding spurious and

3147: 2571: 1806: 1554: 1497: 1355: 754: 347: 4036:

Oh, wait, he incorrectly inserted some data that was changed later down the track in some article (he added

2367:, but that should only be used if individual IP blocks doesn't solve the problem. Looking at the history of 2204: 5238: 4943:

Thanks...I like to think that nipping things in the bud early sends a message that vandalism is pointless.

3831:

From now on, this is POPopedia, not Knowledge, so you have no power to warn me about anything. SO FUCK OFF.

2976: 1846: 1267: 305: 290:

3) I noticed that the other links in External Link section for Search Engine Marketing also contained ads.

258: 6169:

Your questions have already been answered on your talk page. The relevant policies and guidelines include

5596: 2925:

I keep running into deletions when there are similar ones already there to the one I added on the page???

2651: 2600: 6943:

for diligence in fighting spam on Knowledge and resilience in weathering spammers' subsequent complaints

5854: 4341:

Can you help me find an administrator of this English version of this website that also speaks Dutch. --

2211: 1842: 1148: 427: 129:

Jamie, would you mind emailing me for a discussion on external link guideline interpretation? Thanks. --

124: 6114: 5724: 3517: 518: 6892: 6668: 6623: 6578: 6450: 6278: 4928: 4890: 4615: 4455: 3806: 2647: 2309: 1927: 1765: 1452: 6981: 6567: 6550: 6410: 6137: 6050: 5786:

11/13/06 - Jamie, I just wanted you to know I posted my response above (with a little more added) on

5287: 4433: 4078: 4050: 4021: 3896: 3514: 3123:

No offence, but lately you've been on quite alot of our nerves and i apoligise if i seem offensive.

2255: 1905: 1785: 1567: 1482:

find something better to do with your day than harass every one else who use and enjoy this website.

1476: 5577: 5073:

Sorry about adding inappropiate links... I thought I was adding them in ralated content. I atopped.

3956:

inappropriate behavior, resist the temptation to respond unkindly, and do not make personal attacks.

1941:. If you feel that some of the other remaining links are non-notable, feel free to delete them. See 1538:

you guys were correct. I was wrong. I had 2 sources check for me, it's my computer. I appoligise.

6049:: i have submitted one link to this article . Ankara is capital of my country and i have submitted 5153: 4559: 4203: 3933: 3428: 3127: 2780: 2330: 1437:

whcih is not appropriate for an encyclopedia article. Why are you trying so hard to piss me off? --

1282: 923: 908: 645: 600: 572: 539: 26: 4595: 2785:

Heya, I dunno if you have been watching it, but there is a new spam warning template in the works

6831: 6701: 6655: 6332: 6315: 6194: 6009: 5690: 5617: 5469: 5084: 3669:

award you the original barnstar for all your vandalism removal and your ability to edit articles

2354: 1732: 1335: 675: 6125:

i have asked 2 question above . 1. why my article is deleted 2. why my external link is deleted

5317:

I didn't need to see the update. It was already pretty clear that it was going to be deletable.

4221: 1334:

Firstly, I own the copty rights, and seccondly there is a copy right clearance on the text see:

7324: 7304: 7284: 7264: 7243: 7223: 7199: 7171: 7150: 7129: 7094: 7062: 7037: 6968: 6899: 6776: 6722: 6679: 6634: 6589: 6515: 6470: 6377: 6290: 6232: 6185: 6105: 6000: 5919: 5878: 5845: 5828: 5762: 5735: 5655: 5638: 5497: 5443: 5396: 5325: 5278: 5224: 5164: 5131: 5056: 5011: 4987: 4951: 4919: 4626: 4509: 4470: 4373: 4321: 4287: 4188: 4144: 3998: 3907: 3849: 3817: 3762: 3684: 3617: 3587: 3562: 3540: 3501: 3463: 3409: 3381: 3338: 3319: 3277: 3253: 3204: 3169: 3102: 3055: 3019: 2964: 2911: 2874: 2808: 2771: 2724: 2666: 2611: 2562: 2510: 2465: 2421: 2394: 2379: 2289: 2237: 2168: 2126: 2062: 2024: 1991: 1957: 1886: 1860: 1816: 1776: 1721: 1684: 1654: 1611: 1603:

Both worked in my IE6; maybe a security setting or some kind of spyare/antivirus/proxy plugin?

1587: 1517: 1467: 1418: 1376: 1320: 1293: 999: 940: 886: 846: 837: 801: 736: 716: 692: 666: 622: 583: 556: 509: 476: 444: 394: 336: 275: 188: 147: 113: 88: 62: 17: 5076: 226:

Sites with other meaningful, relevant content that is not suitable for inclusion in an article

6886: 6801: 6742: 6444: 6435: 6360: 6346: 6252: 5794: 4960: 4535: 4007: 3602: 3009:

Has become the most prominent representative of a notable style or the local scene of a city

2883: 2703: 2633: 2481: 2457: 1629: 755: 5561:

Before I repost it, I wanted someone to give me their opinion of my point of view. Thanks."

901:

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Ohnoitsjamie&diff=76697279&oldid=76697256

7121: 7007: 6823: 6693: 6524: 6496: 6486: 6396:

called Ben or Eliott. If he keeps vandalising pages, I would get him blocked from editing.

6270: 6077: 5676: 5381: 5359: 5296: 5045: 4979: 4167: 4159: 4115: 4107: 3925: 3870: 3802: 3788: 3780: 3706: 3659: 3529: 3111: 3081: 3073: 2992: 2977: 2848: 2742: 2625: 2538: 2225: 2054:

Hasn't been moved to the "old" list yet, but it looks like a consensus for deletion to me.

1983: 1915: 1542: 1448: 966: 856: 637: 592: 530: 453: 5065: 4275:

to them. If you have some photos you'd like to contribute, you can freely license them as

3327: 2205:

http://en.wikipedia.org/User:Dcoetzee%5CList_of_Wikipedia_articles_with_at_least_1000_hits

1845:. I distinctly recall other users sneaking that site in among "minor grammar" edits (e.g. 8: 7046: 6857: 6843: 6479: 6299: 5961:

similiar links (to other sites of the same genre) were added? Anyway, message received.

4829: 4802:

as life is rather busy; his spot will be filled by the runner up from the last election,

4040:

to an infobox), but this could have been an innocent mistake. Also, you used the heading

3261:

In the context of spam violations, it's also worth noting that Knowledge has a policy on

3126:

PLease tell me why you deleted the Student Repressetnative Coucil section on my article "

2750: 2522: 2298: 1870: 1832: 1222: 1210: 919: 904: 821: 569: 536: 7113:

and the link is to a comprehensive website about obtaining divorce in Washington State (

5120: 4543: 6015: 5972: 5334: 5031: 4488: 4450:

debate will be open for a week. Notability guidelines for biographies are outlined in

3064: 2576:

Hi, on 16:20, 21 June 2006, you removed an external link from the Shopping Mall page (

2212:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:List_of_articles_frequently_visited_through_Google)--

2097: 1752: 1139: 1122: 773: 403: 222:

because the site has a level of detail which is inappropriate for the Knowledge article

4390:

Hi, your help would be appreciated to resolve the controversies for the article about

2263:

Hey, as you're probably aware, we're still having a problem with IP users vandalising

7318: 7278: 7237: 7193: 7144: 7088: 7031: 7024: 6962: 6940: 6879: 6770: 6716: 6673: 6628: 6583: 6509: 6464: 6371: 6284: 6226: 6179: 6099: 5994: 5942: 5913: 5902: 5872: 5839: 5822: 5756: 5729: 5649: 5632: 5491: 5437: 5390: 5319: 5304: 5272: 5254: 5218: 5173: 5158: 5125: 5050: 5005: 4945: 4913: 4901: 4849: 4803: 4670: 4620: 4605: 4518: 4503: 4464: 4367: 4356: 4315: 4298: 4281: 4182: 4138: 4069: 3992: 3978: 3901: 3843: 3811: 3756: 3678: 3611: 3581: 3534: 3457: 3403: 3375: 3332: 3313: 3306:. (In theory, .org sites are supposed to be non-profit, but some do have ads). While 3271: 3247: 3218: 3198: 3163: 3096: 3049: 3013: 2958: 2905: 2868: 2802: 2765: 2733: 2718: 2660: 2605: 2556: 2504: 2415: 2373: 2283: 2231: 2162: 2120: 2056: 2018: 1966: 1951: 1880: 1854: 1810: 1770: 1715: 1678: 1663: 1648: 1605: 1581: 1550: 1511: 1493: 1461: 1451:

appears below the textarea. Please read that link as well as Knowledge's policies on

1412: 1370: 1351: 1314: 1287: 993: 949: 934: 880: 831: 795: 726: 710: 682: 660: 616: 550: 503: 470: 438: 388: 330: 269: 182: 141: 82: 7276:

It is a commercial site. Please do not add it again. I'm not discussing it further.

5408:

I guess I have to get busy writing articles for the pharmacies you deleted don't I?

1505:

I checked both links and both were working, so I restored them. Your links violated

6871: 6798: 6739: 6500: 6397: 6387: 6356: 6342: 5955: 5208: 5197: 5187: 5182: 4197: 3990:

Those guidelines have nothing to do with reverting spam (see user's edit history).

3596: 3472: 3432: 2699: 2629: 2585: 2368: 2334: 2326: 1899: 301: 254: 36: 5558:

service even if they get their money back within the 30 Day Money-Back Guarantee.

3528:

has five registered members and five posts. That doesn't come close to addressing

6996: 6160: 6073: 5754:

to your site throughout Knowledge. That sort of thing is definitely discouraged.

5001: 4845: 4795: 4524: 4391: 4384: 3826: 3654: 3442: 3424: 3034: 2984: 2013: 1312:

And you need to stop making personal attacks. The next one will get you blocked.

485: 139:

Is there a reason you want to communicate via email? I prefer to use talk pages.

35:

is a spam link similar to the one you removed from the External links section of

5000:

The site in question is relatively low in content and have Google ads (example:

4596:

http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:O._Pen_Sauce/Advanced_Yoga_Practices_%28AYP%29

4523:

Hey, I dont know what you can do about this, but 172.203.244.72 is vandalising

3676:

Thanks for the barnstar! Seems like awhile since I've been awarded one. Cheers!

3605:

page. Students at the school keep adding useless content to it. - BobbyCherry2

1768:

your additions. Declaring that you know the actors/actresses isn't good enough.

1395:

Will you leave me the hell alone are you some sort of a commie? or something. --

7188: 6507:

for info on the speedy deletion policy and notability guidelines for websites.

6090: 5989: 5860: 5486: 5432: 5385: 5092: 4765:! Consider writing a tutorial on something you are good at doing on Knowledge. 4663:

If you are an administrator, or even a generally experienced user, do consider

4342: 4334: 4260: 4133: 3858: 3726: 3289: 3262: 3004: 2949: 2746: 2592: 2580:). The reason given for the removel was "rv commercial links." The link was "* 2499: 2157: 2005: 1946: 1710: 1506: 1456: 1365: 1014: 959:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2485457538368783680&q=malcolm+x+bbc

816: 371: 172: 40: 5574:

http://www.technologyevangelist.com/2005/12/fios_growing_pains_at_verizon.html

3525: 7083: 7079: 7075: 6561: 6504: 6211: 6174: 5267: 4841: 4713: 4528: 4451: 4447: 4008: 3771: 3629: 3307: 3136: 2551: 2410: 2398:

there a way we can make a public announcement for help from neutral editors?

2072: 2044: 2033: 1797: 1748: 1528: 1171: 1102: 1092: 1024: 790: 769: 319: 6133: 5292:

Please dont be stupid, it was deleted before I had the chance to update it.

4244:

I think that the Qingdao Travel & Living Guide's Laoshan Photo Gallery

1938: 1566:

No worries. If you can see some sites and not others, it could be that your

658:

Why don't you ask Mr. Hoke if he spoke with an editor from Knowledge? (ok?)

7184: 7103: 6849: 6765: 6761: 6170: 6094: 6056:

general information about ankara , regional meal, regional shopping center

6036:

i choose turkcebilgi.net as subject because there is turkcebilgi subject (

5985: 5938: 5898: 5591:) which is widely read, respected and very reputable in political circles. 5551: 5482: 5096: 4934: 4837: 4821: 4717: 4459: 4352: 4264: 4129: 4073: 4045: 4016: 3745: 3575: 3574:

To clarify what I meant by informally applying notability to links; though

3521: 3516:, so your opinion appears to be a minority at this point. Notice #9 in the 2953: 2596: 2495: 2445: 2434: 2399: 2322: 2268: 2009: 1942: 1706: 1693: 1643: 1438: 1396: 1387: 1347: 1303: 1273: 1218: 1202: 1106: 176: 7142:

It's a commercial, state-specific service. As such, it's not appropriate.

7021: 6622:

As already mentioned, a commercial real estate site does not qualify as a

6136:

appropriate to this article ? why dont you delete that link? i have added

3045:

Here is some good information on vandal-fighting tools that anyone can use

228:, such as professional athlete statistics, screen credits, interviews, or 6419: 6210:

We've already discussed you spamming your own site via your old account,

6201: 5677:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources#Self-published_sources

2894: 2821: 2791: 2680: 2341: 2281:. I'll have a few of the IPs checked; if it persists, I'll semi-protect. 1697: 1226: 810: 492: 458:

Thanks a lot for reverting the vandalism to my talk page. Appreciate it.

3043:

My automated edit summaries are a function of my administrator account.

7082:. If you (or anyone) can provide some evidence of notability based on 6985: 6951: 6540:

Thank you Jamie for catching me red-handed. I thought I added the URL

5597:

http://www.brokerblogger.com/brokerblogger/2006/04/fios_does_incon.html

4833: 4825: 4207: 2650:, they should be removed as well. If you like, I'd be happy to present 2278: 1214: 1206: 410:

Jamie and visitor's wikipedia, i'm so sorry about my url, i don't know.

6495:

An article can be deleted without discussion if it makes no claims of

5532: 4180:

You're not offending me. I just don't think we need it on Knowledge.

80:; I just started a review discussion of current links in the article. 5547: 5343:

Or, are you simply opposed to online pharmacies. What's the deal?

5174: 3532:

guidelines (which are informally applied to forums for some topics).

1967: 1692:*points at the talk page* :) I'd say it violates multiple points of 1664: 5721:

does strongly discourage editors from adding links to their own site

4600:

Sorry to dump work on you, but I hope you can take a sec to advise.

3638: 568:

Thanks for your encouragements and clearing my long standing doubts.

6557: 3369: 1841:

Like you said, we're all entitled to our opinions. I still call it

1020: 459: 367: 363: 32: 6848:

for your kind comment. Just trying to keep the vandalism down! :)

6138:

http://www.turkcebilgi.net/tatil-yoreleri/turkiye/ankara-6124.html

6051:

http://www.turkcebilgi.net/tatil-yoreleri/turkiye/ankara-6124.html

1906:

http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone/related/default.mspx

954:

why did you revert my edits on malcolm x? thats extremely uncool!

5787: 5578:

http://gigaom.com/2005/10/14/verizon-fios-insures-future-monoply/

3891:

Your contribution history (under this account) shows no edits to

375: 6053:. this is an article related to ankara . this article contains 4970: 4592: 4531:. Take a look at the articles they changed, blatant vandalism. 3953:

This means primarily: Do not simply revert changes in a dispute.

2431:

Talk:Turkey#Request_for_Comment:_Sanitization_of_Turkish_history

2321:

has again vandalised not one, but two pages again (specifically

1904:

How come you delete a Microsoft recommend expert zone website (

1095:

has been redesigned! Many thanks to all who worked hard on it.

6141: 6129: 5489:, feel free to delete them. Knowledge is not a link directory. 4103:

Hi Jamie. Why did you remove the global warming newswire link?

3892: 3859: 3735: 1571: 31:

Maybe you can help me out here. I'm under the impression that

3805:

info to that page. Don't do it again unless you can provide a

2433:. I hope we can bring in some neutral editors to debate this. 1336:

http://www.geocities.com/~abdulwahid/hinduism/hindu_women.html

6541: 6274: 5536: 4728: 4643: 4454:. Essentially, to establish notability you need to provide a 2210:

It was #48 in Google to Knowledge links on March 7th, 2003. (

1187:, which will help those who welcome new Esperanzains greatly! 1117: 1041: 318:(1) I don't understand the question, though I will note that 6924: 5780: 5546:

Besides OM Malik, right on the Knowledge "External Links" (

4792:

is being held, with all thoughts of all Esperanzians wanted!

3916: 3150:

for more info. Note in that guideline the following remark:

2581: 548:

Nope, 3RR does not apply to obvious vandalism. Revert away.

5668: 5588: 5350:

I will take this up with Knowledge management. Peace out.

2264: 2257: 2246:

Thanks again, and I'll look up Categories. And Illinois. --

957:--- all my additions are from an excelent bbc documentary 383: 6714:

They're not my standards. They are Knowledge's standards.

6535: 5576:

That article came after the GigaOM article on 10/14/05 =

5109:

Are you saying daily express UK is unreliable source? :)--

5025: 3302:

If you're looking for an ad-free one, you can have Google

1086:! Share your good ideas on how to make it awesome there! 2931:

Chat Acronyms — Meanings of acronyms used in online chat

3427:

for vandalizing your Userpage, given the fact you're an

214:

neutral and accurate material not already in the article

6122:

i need an answer why my article is deleted from wiki .

5801:

Hey, I'm not sure if the gay scandal entry is neutral.

5554:) which has two long pages of opinions attached to it. 4614:

Though the article is well-written, it's still lacking

3003:

I looked at it; I'm having trouble seeing how it meets

2577: 6060:

and i can explain the other external links like this.

3744:

can be compared to the average terrestrial viperid. --

2934:

The link I added was even better site than this one.

918:

Much obliged, and thanks for the user page revert. --

6037: 5270:

for guidelines regarding the notability of websites.

4754:

has been updated, with some proposals being archived.

3431:. Disciplinary action should be taken against him. -- 3029:

Linking to a contibutor page when reverting vandalism

2229:

welcome there, as there is a lot of work to be done.

1908:) - SoftwareTipsandTricks with over 35,000+ members. 1176:

has but put up - many thanks to all who worked on it!

1143:

has been updated, with some proposals being archived.

5533:

http://en.wikipedia.org/WP:RS#Self-published_sources

5531:

The "Self Published Sources" section of Knowledge (

5032:

http://www.oldride.com/library/pontiac_catalina.html

4418:

My name is Henri, I'm doing my Phd thesis on artist

2603:

would be considered to be spamming by most editors.

2601:

adding the site to 16 other articles (as of 10/4/06)

793:

the article (nor does anyone else for that matter).

789:

from talk pages is perfectly acceptable. You do not

6224:). I don't wish to have the same discussion again. 5548:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Verizon_Fios#External_links

5528:anything except the free "education" of consumers. 5207:

RfA, but glad to see you made it). Thanks again. --

3951:"Be respectful to others and their points of view. 2928: 6984:and has only been awarded to a very select few. -- 6577:It's a commercial site that does not qualify as a 4249:Laoshan Article? How can we resolve this issue?-- 3733:Regarding the Naturemagics link at the end of the 987:Here's a direct quote from your lengthy addition: 366:. If we have a Colorado climbing resource link at 7110: 6797:means you have to give me what I want. So there. 6626:, whether you call it a portal or anything else. 6119:i did not understand anythink from your answer. 6046: 5095:. Good job on his recreate--you're fast!! :) 4869: 1246: 5788:http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Brokerblogger 5535:) under the definition of "Reliable Sources" ( 3477:Please excuse any mis-posting of this comment. 3455:) blocked him indef as vandalism-only. Cheers! 991:I reverted it mostly because it was unsourced. 76:welcome to propose addition of the link on the 6177:(regarding notability of web sites). Regards, 4971:http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:64.13.18.159 4593:http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:O._Pen_Sauce 1082:, a program currently in development, now has 1019:Thanks for reverting vandalism to my page. -- 7208: 7114: 6142:http://en.wikipedia.org/Ankara#External_links 6130:http://en.wikipedia.org/Ankara#External_links 4365:), though he hasn't been on since yesterday. 4245: 3513:I wasn't the only one who reverted that link 7086:, let me know and I can unprotect the page. 6089:Knowledge is not a collection of links. See 5710:if others (anybody or other administrators?) 5105:Regarding your reverting of sourced material 5935:Factor 8: The Arkansas Prison Blood Scandal 5750:I just noticed that you seem to have added 5537:http://en.wikipedia.org/WP:Reliable_sources 4877:Knowledge:Esperanza/Newsletter/Opt Out List 4789:discussion of Esperanza's role in Knowledge 4458:. Additionally, Knowledge has a policy on 3304:limit the search to certain domains like so 1254:Knowledge:Esperanza/Newsletter/Opt Out List 5781:http://en.wikipedia.org/WP:EL#What_to_link 5569:Radiant< 08:05, 16 October 2006 (UTC)" 5435:notability standards, it will be deleted. 5431:If the pharmacy in question does not meet 4770:a cohesive look to all the Esperanza pages 3133:I do not see at all how it is irrelavent. 2738:Thanks for editing my picture formatting. 2038:Hi Jamie. Could you please have a look at 1152:is getting lots of good ideas, it now has 491:section. Please leave msg on my talk page 7183:Once again, it's commercial. Please read 6922: 6417: 6173:(regarding appropriateness of links) and 6147:do you protect some sites or somebodies? 6134:http://ansiklopedi.turkcebilgi.com/Ankara 5893:'s contributions? It looks like him and 5669:http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Verizon_FiOS 4700:how Esperanza relates to the encyclopedia 4669:Admin Coaching, now being coordinated by 3636: 2160:for women and all of the sub-categories. 815:You forgot to sign your last nomination. 7207:Ok, I have changed the link to point to 5552:http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/76326 5026:http://en.wikipedia.org/Pontiac_Catalina 4072:. Thanks. Heweyeweyeweyeweyeweyewey... 3966:Can you please follow these guidelines? 3179:You reverted my edit for no reason..... 370:, then why shouldn't we have links for 14: 5453:Are you a crazy link-deleting machine? 3699:Please don't delete articles on a whim 2888:Heya, I got an email message from and 2040:Articles for deletion/Islamic violence 1570:is having a problem with one of their 218:but in some cases this is not possible 6982:civilization's greatest Photoshoppers 4781:useful interlanguage welcome template 2578:http://en.wikipedia.org/Shopping_mall 320:Knowledge is not an instruction guide 198:I thought this would be a useful link 5931:Health Management Associates Scandal 5243:How about you dont delete my pages? 5119:That story was printed in 1999; the 3921:I am very sorry. please forgive me. 2940:Thanks - 01:23, 7 October 2006 (UTC) 2837:How do I delete my account on here? 2085:I prod'ed William W. Quinn, Jr (FYI) 1527:seconded. just checked both links. 362:Because it's not highly relevant to 6369:). The edit patterns are similar. 2042:afd closure? Thanks in advance. -- 1642:We've been over this before on the 23: 6760:Hmmm....I might be swayed if your 5524:Comment and Question in response: 4798:informed everyone that he will be 4216:Some comments on your latest merge 3524:. Furthermore, I notice that the 2582:BIGMallrat Guide to Shopping Malls 2527:Do you deny my obvious manness. - 2196:excellent set of near-miss links? 1509:, which is why they were removed. 1386:I know what I am talking about. -- 24: 7339: 6980:It was custom-designed by one of 6916:The prestigious Spamstar of Glory 6428:The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar 6156:why my external link is deleted? 4408:Help needed for the biography of 4383:Help needed for the biography of 3433:D.F. "Jun Kazama Master" Williams 3288:Ha, I see what you mean with the 2929:http://en.wikipedia.org/Chat_room 1146:Since the program in development 430:) 15:02, 12 September 2006 (UTC) 52:My Non-Commercial, Useful Content 6923: 6418: 5091:Has struck again. I put him on 4720:, for delivering the newsletter. 4279:and upload them to the article. 3637: 3601:Thanks for keeping watch on the 3419:Userpage vandalism by Wellsey123 3007:. The closest criteria would be 2787:Knowledge:WikiProject_Spam/Spam1 2200:controversy. What do you think? 1848:; might be interesting to run a 1340:Look at the bottom of the page! 1162:September 2006 Council elections 1109:, for delivering the newsletter. 378:in Colorado? Knowledge is not a 7111:http://en.wikipedia.org/Divorce 6271:Knowledge's notability criteria 5889:Have you looked at the rest of 4660:Admin Coaching needs coaches!!! 4220:Hi. I updated the talk page at 2937:DO you compare or just delete? 2679:done some of this already. - 2389:The whole Turkey-Genocide thing 2178:searches. This is what I mean: 519:Grapefruit Seed Extract: Update 6150:please answer my 2 question ! 4574:Need help restoring an article 4462:that may be relevant. Cheers, 2566:08:00, 29 September 2006 (UTC) 2514:22:37, 28 September 2006 (UTC) 2461:21:35, 28 September 2006 (UTC) 2438:07:54, 28 September 2006 (UTC) 2425:15:58, 26 September 2006 (UTC) 2403:07:29, 26 September 2006 (UTC) 2383:06:58, 26 September 2006 (UTC) 2345:06:48, 26 September 2006 (UTC) 2293:01:51, 25 September 2006 (UTC) 2277:Looks like he may be using an 2272:23:51, 24 September 2006 (UTC) 2251:22:59, 25 September 2006 (UTC) 2241:22:03, 25 September 2006 (UTC) 2218:21:56, 25 September 2006 (UTC) 2172:07:17, 25 September 2006 (UTC) 2150:20:21, 24 September 2006 (UTC) 2130:21:25, 23 September 2006 (UTC) 2108:20:22, 23 September 2006 (UTC) 2076:00:18, 26 September 2006 (UTC) 2066:21:25, 23 September 2006 (UTC) 2048:14:44, 23 September 2006 (UTC) 2028:05:31, 23 September 2006 (UTC) 1961:04:43, 23 September 2006 (UTC) 1890:22:31, 22 September 2006 (UTC) 1874:22:29, 22 September 2006 (UTC) 1864:22:02, 22 September 2006 (UTC) 1836:22:00, 22 September 2006 (UTC) 1820:04:29, 22 September 2006 (UTC) 1801:03:38, 22 September 2006 (UTC) 1780:03:30, 22 September 2006 (UTC) 1725:20:44, 21 September 2006 (UTC) 1701:20:29, 21 September 2006 (UTC) 1688:20:24, 21 September 2006 (UTC) 1658:05:50, 21 September 2006 (UTC) 1615:00:02, 21 September 2006 (UTC) 1591:23:38, 20 September 2006 (UTC) 1532:23:30, 20 September 2006 (UTC) 1521:23:29, 20 September 2006 (UTC) 1471:23:08, 20 September 2006 (UTC) 1442:23:02, 20 September 2006 (UTC) 1422:23:00, 20 September 2006 (UTC) 1400:22:52, 20 September 2006 (UTC) 1391:22:55, 20 September 2006 (UTC) 1380:22:50, 20 September 2006 (UTC) 1324:22:50, 20 September 2006 (UTC) 1307:22:45, 20 September 2006 (UTC) 1297:22:30, 20 September 2006 (UTC) 1277:22:28, 20 September 2006 (UTC) 1231:04:04, 18 September 2006 (UTC) 1034:September Esperanza Newsletter 1029:05:15, 20 September 2006 (UTC) 1003:06:08, 20 September 2006 (UTC) 944:00:46, 20 September 2006 (UTC) 928:00:45, 20 September 2006 (UTC) 913:00:43, 20 September 2006 (UTC) 896:Will you please do the honors? 890:17:36, 16 September 2006 (UTC) 841:20:22, 15 September 2006 (UTC) 824:19:20, 15 September 2006 (UTC) 805:03:46, 15 September 2006 (UTC) 747:13:40, 15 September 2006 (UTC) 720:03:46, 15 September 2006 (UTC) 703:05:00, 14 September 2006 (UTC) 670:02:52, 14 September 2006 (UTC) 626:23:51, 13 September 2006 (UTC) 576:20:26, 13 September 2006 (UTC) 560:20:22, 13 September 2006 (UTC) 543:20:21, 13 September 2006 (UTC) 513:21:54, 12 September 2006 (UTC) 496:21:41, 12 September 2006 (UTC) 480:15:55, 12 September 2006 (UTC) 463:15:32, 12 September 2006 (UTC) 448:15:55, 12 September 2006 (UTC) 13: 1: 7328:21:41, 28 November 2006 (UTC) 7288:21:26, 28 November 2006 (UTC) 7247:20:57, 28 November 2006 (UTC) 7203:20:39, 28 November 2006 (UTC) 7154:18:07, 28 November 2006 (UTC) 7098:02:36, 28 November 2006 (UTC) 7041:02:31, 28 November 2006 (UTC) 6989:22:37, 26 November 2006 (UTC) 6972:21:34, 26 November 2006 (UTC) 6955:19:35, 26 November 2006 (UTC) 6911:20:37, 23 November 2006 (UTC) 6895:04:30, 23 November 2006 (UTC) 6875:04:10, 23 November 2006 (UTC) 6853:19:45, 21 November 2006 (UTC) 6807:01:25, 29 November 2006 (UTC) 6780:00:37, 29 November 2006 (UTC) 6748:00:34, 29 November 2006 (UTC) 6726:04:02, 28 November 2006 (UTC) 6683:04:21, 27 November 2006 (UTC) 6667:You need to go back and read 6638:00:51, 23 November 2006 (UTC) 6593:18:51, 21 November 2006 (UTC) 6572:18:41, 21 November 2006 (UTC) 6528:07:14, 21 November 2006 (UTC) 6519:04:00, 20 November 2006 (UTC) 6490:03:38, 20 November 2006 (UTC) 6474:23:45, 18 November 2006 (UTC) 6453:23:37, 18 November 2006 (UTC) 6440:RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar 6401:12:11, 19 November 2006 (UTC) 6391:22:58, 18 November 2006 (UTC) 6381:22:33, 18 November 2006 (UTC) 6294:21:05, 18 November 2006 (UTC) 6263:16:34, 18 November 2006 (UTC) 6236:15:22, 18 November 2006 (UTC) 6205:06:05, 18 November 2006 (UTC) 6189:15:21, 18 November 2006 (UTC) 6164:13:16, 18 November 2006 (UTC) 6109:17:05, 17 November 2006 (UTC) 6019:18:05, 16 November 2006 (UTC) 6004:23:30, 14 November 2006 (UTC) 5984:The policies are outlines at 5946:01:16, 13 November 2006 (UTC) 5923:01:14, 13 November 2006 (UTC) 5906:00:38, 13 November 2006 (UTC) 5864:02:56, 12 November 2006 (UTC) 5849:19:12, 11 November 2006 (UTC) 5832:19:08, 11 November 2006 (UTC) 5783:, or is there another page?) 5766:22:33, 11 November 2006 (UTC) 5739:22:30, 11 November 2006 (UTC) 5659:19:16, 11 November 2006 (UTC) 5642:19:14, 11 November 2006 (UTC) 5501:01:43, 11 November 2006 (UTC) 5447:02:18, 10 November 2006 (UTC) 5400:02:02, 10 November 2006 (UTC) 5228:00:01, 10 November 2006 (UTC) 4800:leaving the Esperanza council 4639: 4636:November Esperanza Newsletter 3148:Knowledge:WikiProject_Schools 3033:Is there a faster way than ]? 1185:list new members of Esperanza 1037: 412:can i share a picture again? 398:20:38, 8 September 2006 (UTC) 357:18:47, 8 September 2006 (UTC) 340:22:14, 5 September 2006 (UTC) 279:16:16, 5 September 2006 (UTC) 192:06:15, 5 September 2006 (UTC) 167:04:59, 5 September 2006 (UTC) 151:19:38, 2 September 2006 (UTC) 134:17:39, 2 September 2006 (UTC) 92:20:10, 1 September 2006 (UTC) 44:18:04, 1 September 2006 (UTC) 7076:criteria for speedy deletion 6768:also stood behind the link. 6242:Loigh Speedy Deletion Appeal 6024:information about my article 5565:information that's relevant 5329:22:31, 9 November 2006 (UTC) 5282:22:04, 9 November 2006 (UTC) 5212:23:52, 9 November 2006 (UTC) 5201:23:25, 9 November 2006 (UTC) 5191:20:24, 9 November 2006 (UTC) 5168:17:38, 9 November 2006 (UTC) 5146:17:31, 9 November 2006 (UTC) 5135:17:24, 9 November 2006 (UTC) 5114:17:12, 9 November 2006 (UTC) 5100:05:11, 9 November 2006 (UTC) 5060:17:16, 8 November 2006 (UTC) 5015:06:07, 8 November 2006 (UTC) 4955:05:27, 8 November 2006 (UTC) 4938:01:08, 8 November 2006 (UTC) 4923:19:28, 7 November 2006 (UTC) 4905:19:12, 7 November 2006 (UTC) 4854:20:33, 1 November 2006 (UTC) 4820: 4630:19:34, 7 November 2006 (UTC) 4609:17:15, 6 November 2006 (UTC) 4539:23:56, 4 November 2006 (UTC) 4513:20:32, 1 November 2006 (UTC) 4474:06:12, 1 November 2006 (UTC) 4403:08:02, 31 October 2006 (UTC) 4377:22:00, 30 October 2006 (UTC) 4346:21:23, 30 October 2006 (UTC) 4337:21:23, 30 October 2006 (UTC) 4325:05:58, 31 October 2006 (UTC) 4309:05:27, 31 October 2006 (UTC) 4291:16:21, 30 October 2006 (UTC) 4254:06:22, 30 October 2006 (UTC) 4235:09:00, 28 October 2006 (UTC) 4211:23:26, 27 October 2006 (UTC) 4192:04:08, 28 October 2006 (UTC) 4148:00:40, 28 October 2006 (UTC) 4099:00:01, 28 October 2006 (UTC) 4088:16:12, 27 October 2006 (UTC) 4060:16:09, 27 October 2006 (UTC) 4031:16:02, 27 October 2006 (UTC) 4002:15:51, 26 October 2006 (UTC) 3911:06:09, 22 October 2006 (UTC) 3853:20:34, 20 October 2006 (UTC) 3836:20:29, 20 October 2006 (UTC) 3821:15:54, 20 October 2006 (UTC) 3766:17:02, 19 October 2006 (UTC) 3749:12:16, 19 October 2006 (UTC) 3711:subst:Boob the type of bird 3688:23:30, 17 October 2006 (UTC) 3621:23:29, 17 October 2006 (UTC) 3591:05:29, 13 October 2006 (UTC) 3544:03:49, 13 October 2006 (UTC) 3467:18:50, 12 October 2006 (UTC) 3436:17:25, 12 October 2006 (UTC) 3413:05:29, 13 October 2006 (UTC) 3385:03:41, 13 October 2006 (UTC) 3342:01:20, 13 October 2006 (UTC) 3323:01:12, 13 October 2006 (UTC) 3281:00:28, 13 October 2006 (UTC) 3257:00:05, 13 October 2006 (UTC) 3226:11:42, 12 October 2006 (UTC) 3208:04:39, 12 October 2006 (UTC) 3173:16:18, 11 October 2006 (UTC) 3140:06:42, 11 October 2006 (UTC) 3106:16:07, 10 October 2006 (UTC) 3059:16:07, 10 October 2006 (UTC) 3038:15:52, 10 October 2006 (UTC) 3023:18:05, 10 October 2006 (UTC) 2998:00:25, 10 October 2006 (UTC) 2864:User page deletion guidlines 1737:The information i placed on 1428:I have a problem with you... 1201: 7: 6884:Thanks for the barnstar :). 6279:notable and reliable source 6153:why my article is deleted? 5044:The musclecar club site is 4589:will bring you up to date: 4068:Oh, and please reply on my 2968:02:04, 7 October 2006 (UTC) 2915:19:02, 5 October 2006 (UTC) 2898:18:43, 5 October 2006 (UTC) 2878:17:50, 5 October 2006 (UTC) 2825:22:39, 4 October 2006 (UTC) 2812:22:29, 4 October 2006 (UTC) 2795:22:21, 4 October 2006 (UTC) 2775:21:04, 4 October 2006 (UTC) 2728:22:50, 4 October 2006 (UTC) 2684:22:18, 4 October 2006 (UTC) 2670:22:12, 4 October 2006 (UTC) 2615:20:37, 4 October 2006 (UTC) 2302:07:12, 2 October 2006 (UTC) 2226:Knowledge's Categories page 10: 7344: 6870:overwrought editors : ) -- 6736:obviously reliable sources 6442:! You have earned it :). 5077:Palmer Trinity Gay Scandal 4042:Creating nonsense articles 2004:I don't think you've read 1644:talk page for that article 78:Java programming talk page 6929: 6424: 5384:companies (also refer to 4768:The suggestion of adding 4425:Thank you for your help. 3895:. If you're referring to 3643: 962:interesting information. 708:Thanks for the heads up. 220:for copyright reasons or 209:What should be linked to 6462:candidate for an admin! 6438:, hereby award you this 5717:merit the need for that. 5589:http://www.wonkette.com/ 5513:New To Knowledge Editing 5154:Specific_absorption_rate 5066:Links to related content 4704:please add your thoughts 4665:signing up to be a coach 4204:Discounts and allowances 4074:The Duke of Copyeditting 4046:The Duke of Copyeditting 4017:The Duke of Copyeditting 3128:Trinity Catholic College 1302:You need to get laid. -- 6866:confused newcomers and 4544:YOU are the TRUE VANDAL 3946:Wiki’s guidlines State: 3441:Thanks for the revert; 3196:I'm not wearing shoes. 2140:Famous Women in History 1330:I own the copyrights... 1179:TangoTango has written 829:Doh! Fixed it, thanks! 157:External link follow-up 6523:That's a crap policy. 6277:magazine or a similar 4776:if you are interested! 2921:compare or just delete 2833:Deletion of user pages 2454:Thanks for your time. 2395:Human rights in Turkey 2340:Thank you! Sincerely, 2092:an article created by 1407:created a staging area 212:4. Sites that contain 33:The Orlando Area Guide 18:User talk:Ohnoitsjamie 7299:comment was added by 7259:comment was added by 7218:comment was added by 7166:comment was added by 7057:comment was added by 6933:The Spamstar of Glory 6650:comment was added by 6605:comment was added by 6547:Keep up the good job 6310:comment was added by 6072:comment was added by 5967:comment was added by 5885:Tainted Blood Scandal 5807:comment was added by 5795:Palmer Trinity School 5685:comment was added by 5612:comment was added by 5464:comment was added by 5414:comment was added by 5249:comment was added by 4772:is being considered; 4554:comment was added by 4240:LaoShan Photo Gallery 4206:. You beat me to it. 4202:Thanks for reverting 3973:comment was added by 3647:The Original Barnstar 3603:Moon Area High School 3557:comment was added by 3496:comment was added by 2843:comment was added by 2698:comment was added by 2658:for second opinions. 2648:reliable news sources 2572:External Link Removal 2533:comment was added by 2476:comment was added by 1949:for link guidelines. 1764:Solution to problem; 1747:comment was added by 1488:comment was added by 1457:neutral point of view 1366:neutral point of view 1346:comment was added by 768:comment was added by 756:Palmer Trinity School 418:comment was added by 296:comment was added by 249:comment was added by 108:comment was added by 5239:Non-notable websites 4222:Talk:Fethullah Gülen 3269:is at our disposal. 2978:Andrew Jackson Jihad 2090:William W. Quinn, Jr 1976:Doesn't make sense! 1939:contribution history 1268:What was vandalism?? 1172:Esperanza front page 1093:Esperanza front page 6669:WP:Reliable sources 5855:Florist Spam Patrol 4779:In order to make a 4774:join the discussion 4734:The last AC meeting 3308:assuming good faith 2411:Request for comment 1123:The last AC meeting 1070:September elections 348:External link query 325:(2) Answered in #1. 125:External link query 6888:¤~Persian Poet Gal 6446:¤~Persian Poet Gal 4929:User: Mnbvcxzlkjhg 4897:User:12.111.77.131 4891:User:12.111.77.131 4702:has been started; 1181:a script for a bot 7312: 7272: 7231: 7179: 7138: 7124:comment added by 7070: 6947: 6946: 6840: 6826:comment added by 6710: 6696:comment added by 6663: 6618: 6551:Cedar City Online 6458: 6457: 6411:Barnstar for YOU! 6323: 6085: 5980: 5820: 5698: 5625: 5477: 5427: 5376: 5362:comment added by 5313: 5299:comment added by 5288:Why dont you read 5262: 4996: 4982:comment added by 4888: 4887: 4884: 4883: 4864: 4863: 4860: 4859: 4751:proposed programs 4725: 4724: 4648:Program Feature: 4567: 4460:original research 4176: 4162:comment added by 4124: 4110:comment added by 4081: 4053: 4024: 3986: 3942: 3928:comment added by 3887: 3873:comment added by 3797: 3783:comment added by 3723: 3709:comment added by 3673: 3672: 3570: 3509: 3090: 3076:comment added by 2856: 2759: 2745:comment added by 2711: 2642: 2628:comment added by 2546: 2489: 2429:I put in an RfC: 2000: 1986:comment added by 1932: 1918:comment added by 1786:Sorry about that~ 1760: 1559: 1545:comment added by 1501: 1477:Stop being Hitler 1359: 1265: 1264: 1261: 1260: 1241: 1240: 1237: 1236: 1114: 1113: 1080:Appreciation Week 1046:Program Feature: 983: 969:comment added by 873: 859:comment added by 781: 654: 640:comment added by 609: 595:comment added by 431: 309: 262: 121: 7335: 7322: 7294: 7282: 7254: 7241: 7213: 7197: 7161: 7148: 7137: 7118: 7092: 7052: 7035: 6966: 6927: 6920: 6919: 6839: 6820: 6804: 6774: 6745: 6720: 6709: 6690: 6677: 6645: 6632: 6600: 6587: 6513: 6468: 6436:Persian Poet Gal 6422: 6415: 6414: 6375: 6305: 6288: 6230: 6183: 6103: 6067: 5998: 5962: 5917: 5876: 5843: 5826: 5802: 5760: 5733: 5680: 5653: 5636: 5607: 5495: 5459: 5441: 5409: 5394: 5375: 5356: 5323: 5312: 5293: 5276: 5266:Please refer to 5244: 5222: 5162: 5129: 5054: 5009: 4995: 4976: 4949: 4917: 4870: 4866: 4865: 4729: 4698:A discussion on 4652:(needs coaches!) 4644: 4640: 4624: 4616:reliable sources 4549: 4536:Bearingbreaker92 4507: 4468: 4371: 4351:Offhand, I know 4319: 4302: 4285: 4186: 4175: 4156: 4142: 4123: 4104: 4077: 4049: 4020: 3996: 3968: 3941: 3922: 3905: 3886: 3867: 3847: 3815: 3796: 3777: 3760: 3722: 3703: 3682: 3667: 3662: 3657: 3641: 3634: 3633: 3615: 3585: 3552: 3538: 3526:site in question 3491: 3461: 3423:I have reported 3407: 3379: 3336: 3317: 3275: 3251: 3223: 3202: 3167: 3100: 3089: 3070: 3053: 3017: 2995: 2962: 2909: 2872: 2838: 2806: 2781:new spam warning 2769: 2758: 2739: 2722: 2693: 2664: 2656:Wikiproject Spam 2652:this link search 2641: 2622: 2609: 2560: 2528: 2508: 2471: 2458:Bearingbreaker92 2419: 2377: 2369:Prince of Tennis 2335:Prince of Tennis 2327:Kunimitsu Tezuka 2287: 2235: 2166: 2136:this corrected. 2124: 2060: 2022: 1999: 1980: 1955: 1931: 1912: 1884: 1858: 1814: 1774: 1742: 1719: 1682: 1652: 1609: 1585: 1558: 1539: 1515: 1483: 1465: 1453:reliable sources 1416: 1374: 1341: 1318: 1291: 1247: 1243: 1242: 1149:Appretiaion week 1118: 1048:Barnstar Brigade 1042: 1038: 997: 982: 963: 938: 884: 872: 853: 835: 819: 799: 787:personal attacks 763: 732: 714: 688: 664: 653: 634: 620: 608: 589: 554: 507: 474: 442: 413: 392: 334: 291: 273: 244: 230:online textbooks 186: 145: 103: 86: 37:Orlando, Florida 27:Orlando, Florida 7343: 7342: 7338: 7337: 7336: 7334: 7333: 7332: 7320: 7295:—The preceding 7280: 7255:—The preceding 7239: 7214:—The preceding 7195: 7162:—The preceding 7146: 7119: 7106: 7090: 7053:—The preceding 7049: 7033: 6999: 6964: 6918: 6902: 6882: 6868:raving lunatics 6860: 6846: 6821: 6802: 6772: 6743: 6718: 6691: 6675: 6646:—The preceding 6630: 6624:reliable source 6601:—The preceding 6585: 6579:reliable source 6553: 6538: 6525:Mike Richardson 6511: 6487:Mike Richardson 6482: 6466: 6413: 6373: 6306:—The preceding 6302: 6286: 6244: 6228: 6197: 6195:LoseTheGame.com 6181: 6159:best regards -- 6132:. is this link 6117: 6101: 6097:for more info. 6068:—The preceding 6026: 6012: 6010:bloody spammers 5996: 5963:—The preceding 5958: 5915: 5891:User:SwampStomp 5887: 5874: 5857: 5841: 5824: 5803:—The preceding 5799: 5758: 5731: 5681:—The preceding 5651: 5634: 5608:—The preceding 5515: 5493: 5460:—The preceding 5455: 5439: 5410:—The preceding 5392: 5357: 5337: 5321: 5294: 5290: 5274: 5245:—The preceding 5241: 5220: 5178: 5160: 5143:213.113.243.140 5127: 5111:213.113.243.140 5107: 5089: 5086:User:Mrballer11 5079: 5068: 5052: 5007: 4977: 4963: 4947: 4931: 4915: 4893: 4856: 4815: 4757:There is now a 4741: 4721: 4712:Many thanks to 4681: 4653: 4638: 4622: 4576: 4550:—The preceding 4546: 4525:Cannibal Corpse 4521: 4505: 4466: 4456:reliable source 4430:Dr. Henri Monet 4413: 4398:. Thank you, -- 4392:Fethullah Gulen 4388: 4385:Fethullah Gulen 4369: 4339: 4317: 4300: 4283: 4242: 4218: 4200: 4184: 4157: 4140: 4136:for more info. 4105: 4101: 4086: 4058: 4029: 4012: 3994: 3969:—The preceding 3948: 3923: 3919: 3903: 3868: 3863: 3845: 3829: 3813: 3778: 3774: 3758: 3731: 3704: 3701: 3680: 3665: 3660: 3655: 3632: 3613: 3599: 3583: 3553:—The preceding 3536: 3492:—The preceding 3475: 3459: 3425:User:Wellsey123 3421: 3405: 3377: 3334: 3315: 3273: 3267:Check user tool 3249: 3219: 3200: 3181: 3165: 3114: 3098: 3071: 3067: 3051: 3031: 3015: 2993: 2981: 2960: 2923: 2907: 2886: 2870: 2839:—The preceding 2835: 2804: 2783: 2767: 2740: 2736: 2720: 2694:—The preceding 2662: 2623: 2607: 2599:. Furthermore, 2574: 2558: 2529:—The preceding 2525: 2506: 2494:established in 2472:—The preceding 2468: 2448: 2417: 2391: 2375: 2365:semi-protection 2315: 2285: 2261: 2233: 2164: 2142: 2122: 2087: 2058: 2036: 2020: 1981: 1971: 1953: 1913: 1902: 1882: 1856: 1828: 1826:"Sneaky Spam??" 1812: 1788: 1772: 1743:—The preceding 1735: 1733:???NEIGBOURS??? 1717: 1680: 1668: 1650: 1607: 1583: 1540: 1513: 1484:—The preceding 1479: 1463: 1430: 1414: 1372: 1342:—The preceding 1332: 1316: 1289: 1270: 1233: 1196: 1154:its own subpage 1130: 1110: 1101:Many thanks to 1084:its own subpage 1063: 1050: 1036: 1017: 995: 971:137.205.132.170 964: 952: 936: 898: 882: 854: 849: 833: 817: 813: 797: 764:—The preceding 759: 745: 730: 724:My pleasure! — 712: 701: 686: 678: 676:Jonathan Nguyen 662: 642:74.225.220.122 635: 618: 590: 586: 552: 533: 521: 505: 488: 472: 456: 440: 414:—The preceding 408: 390: 350: 332: 292:—The preceding 271: 245:—The preceding 200: 184: 159: 143: 127: 104:—The preceding 84: 54: 29: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 7341: 7331: 7330: 7291: 7290: 7250: 7249: 7232: 7205: 7157: 7156: 7105: 7102: 7101: 7100: 7048: 7045: 7044: 7043: 7027: 6998: 6995: 6994: 6993: 6992: 6991: 6975: 6974: 6949: 6945: 6944: 6936: 6935: 6930: 6928: 6917: 6914: 6901: 6900:Islamic terror 6898: 6881: 6878: 6859: 6856: 6845: 6842: 6816: 6815: 6814: 6813: 6812: 6811: 6810: 6809: 6787: 6786: 6785: 6784: 6783: 6782: 6753: 6752: 6751: 6750: 6729: 6728: 6686: 6685: 6641: 6640: 6596: 6595: 6552: 6549: 6537: 6534: 6533: 6532: 6531: 6530: 6481: 6478: 6477: 6476: 6456: 6455: 6431: 6430: 6425: 6423: 6412: 6409: 6408: 6407: 6406: 6405: 6404: 6403: 6301: 6298: 6297: 6296: 6243: 6240: 6239: 6238: 6196: 6193: 6192: 6191: 6116: 6113: 6112: 6111: 6059: 6031: 6025: 6022: 6011: 6008: 6007: 6006: 5957: 5954: 5953: 5952: 5951: 5950: 5949: 5948: 5886: 5883: 5882: 5881: 5856: 5853: 5852: 5851: 5798: 5792: 5773: 5771: 5770: 5769: 5768: 5752:multiple links 5742: 5741: 5725:WP:EL, item #3 5718: 5714: 5706: 5705: 5666: 5664: 5663: 5662: 5661: 5514: 5511: 5509: 5506: 5504: 5503: 5466:203.213.80.48 5454: 5451: 5450: 5449: 5403: 5402: 5353: 5336: 5333: 5332: 5331: 5289: 5286: 5285: 5284: 5240: 5237: 5235: 5233: 5232: 5231: 5230: 5177: 5172: 5171: 5170: 5138: 5137: 5106: 5103: 5088: 5083: 5078: 5075: 5067: 5064: 5063: 5062: 5040:Thanks Again! 5018: 5017: 4962: 4959: 4958: 4957: 4930: 4927: 4926: 4925: 4892: 4889: 4886: 4885: 4882: 4881: 4862: 4861: 4858: 4857: 4852: 4830:Celestianpower 4817: 4816: 4813: 4810: 4809: 4808: 4807: 4793: 4784: 4777: 4766: 4763:Tutorial Drive 4755: 4743: 4742: 4732: 4726: 4723: 4722: 4716:, courtesy of 4711: 4708: 4707: 4695: 4694: 4689:Tutorial Drive 4683: 4682: 4679: 4676: 4675: 4655: 4654: 4650:Admin Coaching 4647: 4637: 4634: 4633: 4632: 4575: 4572: 4570: 4556:219.146.82.130 4545: 4542: 4520: 4517: 4516: 4515: 4477: 4476: 4446:Hi Henri; the 4412: 4406: 4387: 4381: 4380: 4379: 4338: 4331: 4330: 4329: 4328: 4327: 4294: 4293: 4241: 4238: 4217: 4214: 4199: 4196: 4195: 4194: 4153: 4151: 4150: 4100: 4094: 4093: 4092: 4091: 4090: 4082: 4079:Bow before me! 4063: 4062: 4054: 4051:Bow before me! 4025: 4022:Bow before me! 4011: 4006: 4005: 4004: 3947: 3944: 3930:68.100.112.145 3918: 3915: 3914: 3913: 3862: 3857: 3856: 3855: 3828: 3825: 3824: 3823: 3773: 3770: 3769: 3768: 3730: 3725: 3700: 3697: 3693: 3691: 3690: 3671: 3670: 3650: 3649: 3644: 3642: 3631: 3628: 3624: 3623: 3598: 3595: 3594: 3593: 3549: 3547: 3546: 3518:Links to avoid 3474: 3471: 3470: 3469: 3420: 3417: 3416: 3415: 3393:Best Regards, 3388: 3387: 3366: 3357:Best Regards, 3347: 3346: 3345: 3344: 3286: 3285: 3284: 3283: 3231: 3230: 3229: 3228: 3211: 3210: 3180: 3177: 3176: 3175: 3159: 3158: 3157: 3113: 3110: 3109: 3108: 3066: 3063: 3062: 3061: 3030: 3027: 3026: 3025: 2980: 2975: 2973: 2971: 2970: 2922: 2919: 2918: 2917: 2885: 2882: 2881: 2880: 2859: 2834: 2831: 2830: 2829: 2828: 2827: 2815: 2814: 2782: 2779: 2778: 2777: 2735: 2732: 2731: 2730: 2689: 2688: 2687: 2686: 2673: 2672: 2618: 2617: 2573: 2570: 2569: 2568: 2524: 2521: 2519: 2517: 2516: 2467: 2466:UntraveledRoad 2464: 2447: 2444: 2443: 2442: 2441: 2440: 2390: 2387: 2386: 2385: 2329:), thankfully 2314: 2308: 2307: 2306: 2305: 2304: 2299:William Pietri 2260: 2254: 2244: 2243: 2175: 2174: 2141: 2138: 2133: 2132: 2086: 2083: 2082: 2081: 2080: 2079: 2035: 2032: 2031: 2030: 1970: 1965: 1964: 1963: 1901: 1898: 1897: 1896: 1895: 1894: 1893: 1892: 1871:Johnbrownsbody 1833:Johnbrownsbody 1827: 1824: 1823: 1822: 1791:that mistake. 1787: 1784: 1783: 1782: 1734: 1731: 1730: 1729: 1728: 1727: 1690: 1667: 1662: 1661: 1660: 1622: 1620: 1619: 1618: 1617: 1578: 1577: 1576: 1575: 1561: 1560: 1535: 1534: 1524: 1523: 1478: 1475: 1474: 1473: 1429: 1426: 1425: 1424: 1405:You'd already 1383: 1382: 1331: 1328: 1327: 1326: 1300: 1299: 1269: 1266: 1263: 1262: 1259: 1258: 1239: 1238: 1235: 1234: 1229: 1223:Freakofnurture 1211:Celestianpower 1198: 1197: 1194: 1191: 1190: 1189: 1188: 1177: 1166: 1157: 1144: 1140:proposals page 1132: 1131: 1121: 1115: 1112: 1111: 1105:, courtesy of 1100: 1097: 1096: 1088: 1087: 1076: 1075: 1065: 1064: 1061: 1058: 1057: 1052: 1051: 1045: 1035: 1032: 1016: 1013: 1012: 1011: 1006: 1005: 951: 948: 947: 946: 930: 920:Omicronpersei8 905:Omicronpersei8 897: 894: 893: 892: 861:125.63.145.233 848: 847:External links 845: 844: 843: 812: 809: 808: 807: 758: 753: 752: 751: 750: 749: 735: 691: 677: 674: 673: 672: 631: 629: 628: 597:72.144.108.236 585: 584:Palmer Trinity 582: 581: 580: 579: 578: 563: 562: 532: 529: 520: 517: 516: 515: 487: 484: 483: 482: 455: 452: 451: 450: 411: 407: 402: 401: 400: 380:link directory 372:Square dancing 349: 346: 345: 344: 343: 342: 326: 323: 282: 281: 199: 196: 195: 194: 164:70.231.142.138 158: 155: 154: 153: 126: 123: 95: 94: 53: 50: 48: 28: 25: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 7340: 7329: 7326: 7325: 7323: 7315: 7314: 7313: 7310: 7306: 7302: 7298: 7289: 7286: 7285: 7283: 7275: 7274: 7273: 7270: 7266: 7262: 7258: 7248: 7245: 7244: 7242: 7233: 7229: 7225: 7221: 7217: 7210: 7206: 7204: 7201: 7200: 7198: 7190: 7186: 7182: 7181: 7180: 7177: 7173: 7169: 7165: 7155: 7152: 7151: 7149: 7141: 7140: 7139: 7135: 7131: 7127: 7123: 7116: 7112: 7099: 7096: 7095: 7093: 7085: 7081: 7077: 7073: 7072: 7071: 7068: 7064: 7060: 7056: 7042: 7039: 7038: 7036: 7028: 7025: 7022: 7019: 7018: 7017: 7015: 7012: 7009: 7005: 6990: 6987: 6983: 6979: 6978: 6977: 6976: 6973: 6970: 6969: 6967: 6959: 6958: 6957: 6956: 6953: 6942: 6939:Presented to 6938: 6937: 6934: 6931: 6926: 6921: 6913: 6912: 6909: 6908:84.146.202.69 6906: 6897: 6896: 6893: 6891: 6890: 6889: 6877: 6876: 6873: 6869: 6865: 6855: 6854: 6851: 6841: 6837: 6833: 6829: 6828:72.174.170.18 6825: 6808: 6805: 6800: 6795: 6794: 6793: 6792: 6791: 6790: 6789: 6788: 6781: 6778: 6777: 6775: 6767: 6763: 6759: 6758: 6757: 6756: 6755: 6754: 6749: 6746: 6741: 6737: 6733: 6732: 6731: 6730: 6727: 6724: 6723: 6721: 6713: 6712: 6711: 6707: 6703: 6699: 6698:72.174.170.18 6695: 6684: 6681: 6680: 6678: 6670: 6666: 6665: 6664: 6661: 6657: 6653: 6652:72.174.170.18 6649: 6639: 6636: 6635: 6633: 6625: 6621: 6620: 6619: 6616: 6612: 6608: 6604: 6594: 6591: 6590: 6588: 6580: 6576: 6575: 6574: 6573: 6569: 6566: 6563: 6559: 6548: 6545: 6543: 6529: 6526: 6522: 6521: 6520: 6517: 6516: 6514: 6506: 6502: 6498: 6494: 6493: 6492: 6491: 6488: 6475: 6472: 6471: 6469: 6460: 6459: 6454: 6451: 6449: 6448: 6447: 6441: 6437: 6433: 6432: 6429: 6426: 6421: 6416: 6402: 6399: 6394: 6393: 6392: 6389: 6384: 6383: 6382: 6379: 6378: 6376: 6368: 6365: 6362: 6358: 6354: 6351: 6348: 6344: 6340: 6337: 6334: 6330: 6329:86.140.132.80 6326: 6325: 6324: 6321: 6317: 6313: 6312:86.140.132.80 6309: 6295: 6292: 6291: 6289: 6280: 6276: 6272: 6267: 6266: 6265: 6264: 6260: 6257: 6254: 6250: 6237: 6234: 6233: 6231: 6223: 6220: 6217: 6213: 6209: 6208: 6207: 6206: 6203: 6190: 6187: 6186: 6184: 6176: 6172: 6168: 6167: 6166: 6165: 6162: 6157: 6154: 6151: 6148: 6145: 6143: 6139: 6135: 6131: 6126: 6123: 6120: 6110: 6107: 6106: 6104: 6096: 6092: 6088: 6087: 6086: 6083: 6079: 6075: 6071: 6066:Best Regards 6064: 6061: 6057: 6054: 6052: 6048: 6044: 6040: 6038: 6034: 6029: 6021: 6020: 6017: 6016:Charlesknight 6005: 6002: 6001: 5999: 5991: 5987: 5983: 5982: 5981: 5978: 5974: 5970: 5966: 5947: 5944: 5940: 5936: 5932: 5928: 5927: 5926: 5925: 5924: 5921: 5920: 5918: 5910: 5909: 5908: 5907: 5904: 5900: 5896: 5892: 5880: 5879: 5877: 5868: 5867: 5866: 5865: 5862: 5850: 5847: 5846: 5844: 5836: 5835: 5834: 5833: 5830: 5829: 5827: 5818: 5814: 5810: 5806: 5796: 5791: 5789: 5784: 5782: 5776: 5767: 5764: 5763: 5761: 5753: 5749: 5746: 5745: 5744: 5743: 5740: 5737: 5736: 5734: 5726: 5722: 5719: 5715: 5711: 5708: 5707: 5704: 5701: 5700: 5699: 5696: 5692: 5688: 5687:Brokerblogger 5684: 5678: 5672: 5670: 5660: 5657: 5656: 5654: 5645: 5644: 5643: 5640: 5639: 5637: 5628: 5627: 5626: 5623: 5619: 5615: 5614:brokerblogger 5611: 5603: 5599: 5598: 5592: 5590: 5584: 5580: 5579: 5575: 5570: 5566: 5562: 5559: 5555: 5553: 5549: 5544: 5540: 5538: 5534: 5529: 5525: 5522: 5519: 5510: 5507: 5502: 5499: 5498: 5496: 5488: 5484: 5480: 5479: 5478: 5475: 5471: 5467: 5463: 5448: 5445: 5444: 5442: 5434: 5430: 5429: 5428: 5425: 5421: 5417: 5413: 5406: 5401: 5398: 5397: 5395: 5387: 5383: 5379: 5378: 5377: 5373: 5369: 5365: 5361: 5354: 5351: 5348: 5344: 5341: 5330: 5327: 5326: 5324: 5316: 5315: 5314: 5310: 5306: 5302: 5298: 5283: 5280: 5279: 5277: 5269: 5265: 5264: 5263: 5260: 5256: 5252: 5248: 5236: 5229: 5226: 5225: 5223: 5215: 5214: 5213: 5210: 5205: 5204: 5203: 5202: 5199: 5193: 5192: 5189: 5184: 5176: 5169: 5166: 5165: 5163: 5155: 5150: 5149: 5148: 5147: 5144: 5136: 5133: 5132: 5130: 5122: 5121:Daily Express 5118: 5117: 5116: 5115: 5112: 5102: 5101: 5098: 5094: 5087: 5082: 5074: 5071: 5061: 5058: 5057: 5055: 5047: 5043: 5042: 5041: 5038: 5034: 5033: 5028: 5027: 5021: 5016: 5013: 5012: 5010: 5002: 4999: 4998: 4997: 4993: 4989: 4985: 4981: 4973: 4972: 4966: 4961:OldRide links 4956: 4953: 4952: 4950: 4942: 4941: 4940: 4939: 4936: 4924: 4921: 4920: 4918: 4909: 4908: 4907: 4906: 4903: 4898: 4895:I'm thinking 4880: 4878: 4872: 4871: 4868: 4867: 4855: 4851: 4847: 4843: 4839: 4835: 4831: 4827: 4823: 4819: 4818: 4812: 4811: 4805: 4801: 4797: 4794: 4791: 4790: 4785: 4782: 4778: 4775: 4771: 4767: 4764: 4760: 4756: 4753: 4752: 4747: 4746: 4745: 4744: 4739: 4735: 4731: 4730: 4727: 4719: 4715: 4710: 4709: 4705: 4701: 4697: 4696: 4691: 4690: 4685: 4684: 4678: 4677: 4674: 4672: 4666: 4662: 4661: 4657: 4656: 4651: 4646: 4645: 4642: 4641: 4631: 4628: 4627: 4625: 4617: 4613: 4612: 4611: 4610: 4607: 4601: 4598: 4597: 4594: 4590: 4586: 4582: 4579: 4571: 4568: 4565: 4561: 4557: 4553: 4541: 4540: 4537: 4532: 4530: 4529:George Fisher 4526: 4514: 4511: 4510: 4508: 4500: 4499: 4498: 4496: 4493: 4490: 4486: 4480: 4479:____________ 4475: 4472: 4471: 4469: 4461: 4457: 4453: 4449: 4445: 4444: 4443: 4441: 4438: 4435: 4431: 4426: 4423: 4421: 4416: 4411: 4405: 4404: 4401: 4397: 4393: 4386: 4378: 4375: 4374: 4372: 4364: 4361: 4358: 4354: 4350: 4349: 4348: 4347: 4344: 4336: 4326: 4323: 4322: 4320: 4312: 4311: 4310: 4307: 4303: 4296: 4295: 4292: 4289: 4288: 4286: 4278: 4274: 4270: 4266: 4262: 4258: 4257: 4256: 4255: 4252: 4247: 4237: 4236: 4233: 4228: 4225: 4223: 4213: 4212: 4209: 4205: 4193: 4190: 4189: 4187: 4179: 4178: 4177: 4173: 4169: 4165: 4161: 4149: 4146: 4145: 4143: 4135: 4131: 4127: 4126: 4125: 4121: 4117: 4113: 4109: 4098: 4089: 4085: 4080: 4075: 4071: 4067: 4066: 4065: 4064: 4061: 4057: 4052: 4047: 4043: 4039: 4035: 4034: 4033: 4032: 4028: 4023: 4018: 4010: 4009:User:Magicpoo 4003: 4000: 3999: 3997: 3989: 3988: 3987: 3984: 3980: 3976: 3972: 3967: 3963: 3962: 3958: 3957: 3954: 3943: 3939: 3935: 3931: 3927: 3912: 3909: 3908: 3906: 3898: 3894: 3890: 3889: 3888: 3884: 3880: 3876: 3872: 3861: 3854: 3851: 3850: 3848: 3840: 3839: 3838: 3837: 3834: 3822: 3819: 3818: 3816: 3808: 3804: 3800: 3799: 3798: 3794: 3790: 3786: 3782: 3767: 3764: 3763: 3761: 3753: 3752: 3751: 3750: 3747: 3743: 3738: 3737: 3729: 3724: 3720: 3716: 3712: 3708: 3696: 3689: 3686: 3685: 3683: 3675: 3674: 3668: 3663: 3658: 3652: 3651: 3648: 3645: 3640: 3635: 3627: 3622: 3619: 3618: 3616: 3608: 3607: 3606: 3604: 3592: 3589: 3588: 3586: 3577: 3573: 3572: 3571: 3568: 3564: 3560: 3556: 3545: 3542: 3541: 3539: 3531: 3530:WP:Notability 3527: 3523: 3519: 3515: 3512: 3511: 3510: 3507: 3503: 3499: 3495: 3489: 3485: 3481: 3478: 3468: 3465: 3464: 3462: 3454: 3451: 3448: 3444: 3440: 3439: 3438: 3437: 3434: 3430: 3429:administrator 3426: 3414: 3411: 3410: 3408: 3399: 3398: 3397: 3396: 3391: 3386: 3383: 3382: 3380: 3371: 3367: 3363: 3362: 3361: 3360: 3355: 3351: 3343: 3340: 3339: 3337: 3329: 3326: 3325: 3324: 3321: 3320: 3318: 3309: 3305: 3301: 3300: 3299: 3298: 3293: 3291: 3282: 3279: 3278: 3276: 3268: 3264: 3260: 3259: 3258: 3255: 3254: 3252: 3243: 3242: 3241: 3240: 3235: 3227: 3224: 3222: 3215: 3214: 3213: 3212: 3209: 3206: 3205: 3203: 3195: 3194: 3193: 3192: 3188: 3185: 3184:again....... 3174: 3171: 3170: 3168: 3160: 3156: 3152: 3151: 3149: 3144: 3143: 3142: 3141: 3138: 3134: 3131: 3129: 3124: 3121: 3117: 3107: 3104: 3103: 3101: 3093: 3092: 3091: 3087: 3083: 3079: 3075: 3060: 3057: 3056: 3054: 3046: 3042: 3041: 3040: 3039: 3036: 3024: 3021: 3020: 3018: 3010: 3006: 3002: 3001: 3000: 2999: 2996: 2990: 2986: 2979: 2974: 2969: 2966: 2965: 2963: 2955: 2951: 2948:that violate 2946: 2945: 2944: 2943: 2938: 2935: 2932: 2930: 2926: 2916: 2913: 2912: 2910: 2902: 2901: 2900: 2899: 2896: 2891: 2884:email message 2879: 2876: 2875: 2873: 2865: 2862: 2861: 2860: 2857: 2854: 2850: 2846: 2842: 2826: 2823: 2819: 2818: 2817: 2816: 2813: 2810: 2809: 2807: 2799: 2798: 2797: 2796: 2793: 2788: 2776: 2773: 2772: 2770: 2762: 2761: 2760: 2756: 2752: 2748: 2744: 2729: 2726: 2725: 2723: 2714: 2713: 2712: 2709: 2705: 2701: 2697: 2685: 2682: 2677: 2676: 2675: 2674: 2671: 2668: 2667: 2665: 2657: 2653: 2649: 2645: 2644: 2643: 2639: 2635: 2631: 2627: 2616: 2613: 2612: 2610: 2602: 2598: 2594: 2590: 2589: 2588: 2587: 2583: 2579: 2567: 2564: 2563: 2561: 2553: 2549: 2548: 2547: 2544: 2540: 2536: 2532: 2520: 2515: 2512: 2511: 2509: 2501: 2497: 2492: 2491: 2490: 2487: 2483: 2479: 2475: 2463: 2462: 2459: 2455: 2452: 2439: 2436: 2432: 2428: 2427: 2426: 2423: 2422: 2420: 2412: 2407: 2406: 2405: 2404: 2401: 2396: 2384: 2381: 2380: 2378: 2370: 2366: 2362: 2359: 2356: 2352: 2351:218.188.16.66 2349: 2348: 2347: 2346: 2343: 2338: 2336: 2332: 2328: 2324: 2320: 2319:218.188.16.66 2313: 2312:218.188.16.66 2303: 2300: 2296: 2295: 2294: 2291: 2290: 2288: 2280: 2276: 2275: 2274: 2273: 2270: 2266: 2259: 2256:Vandalism of 2253: 2252: 2249: 2242: 2239: 2238: 2236: 2227: 2222: 2221: 2220: 2219: 2216: 2213: 2208: 2206: 2201: 2197: 2193: 2190: 2186: 2183: 2179: 2173: 2170: 2169: 2167: 2159: 2158:Category link 2154: 2153: 2152: 2151: 2148: 2137: 2131: 2128: 2127: 2125: 2117: 2116: 2115: 2113: 2112:66.167.139.50 2109: 2105: 2102: 2099: 2095: 2091: 2078: 2077: 2074: 2070:Thanks mate. 2069: 2068: 2067: 2064: 2063: 2061: 2053: 2052: 2051: 2050: 2049: 2046: 2041: 2029: 2026: 2025: 2023: 2015: 2011: 2007: 2003: 2002: 2001: 1997: 1993: 1989: 1988:82.154.44.61 1985: 1977: 1974: 1969: 1962: 1959: 1958: 1956: 1948: 1944: 1940: 1935: 1934: 1933: 1929: 1925: 1921: 1917: 1909: 1907: 1891: 1888: 1887: 1885: 1877: 1876: 1875: 1872: 1867: 1866: 1865: 1862: 1861: 1859: 1851: 1847: 1844: 1840: 1839: 1838: 1837: 1834: 1821: 1818: 1817: 1815: 1808: 1805: 1804: 1803: 1802: 1799: 1795: 1792: 1781: 1778: 1777: 1775: 1767: 1763: 1762: 1761: 1758: 1754: 1750: 1746: 1740: 1726: 1723: 1722: 1720: 1712: 1708: 1704: 1703: 1702: 1699: 1695: 1691: 1689: 1686: 1685: 1683: 1674: 1673: 1672: 1666: 1659: 1656: 1655: 1653: 1645: 1641: 1640: 1639: 1637: 1634: 1631: 1627: 1616: 1613: 1612: 1610: 1602: 1601: 1600: 1595: 1594: 1593: 1592: 1589: 1588: 1586: 1573: 1569: 1565: 1564: 1563: 1562: 1556: 1552: 1548: 1544: 1537: 1536: 1533: 1530: 1526: 1525: 1522: 1519: 1518: 1516: 1508: 1504: 1503: 1502: 1499: 1495: 1491: 1487: 1472: 1469: 1468: 1466: 1458: 1454: 1450: 1446: 1445: 1444: 1443: 1440: 1434: 1423: 1420: 1419: 1417: 1408: 1404: 1403: 1402: 1401: 1398: 1393: 1392: 1389: 1381: 1378: 1377: 1375: 1367: 1362: 1361: 1360: 1357: 1353: 1349: 1345: 1338: 1337: 1325: 1322: 1321: 1319: 1311: 1310: 1309: 1308: 1305: 1298: 1295: 1294: 1292: 1284: 1281: 1280: 1279: 1278: 1275: 1257: 1255: 1249: 1248: 1245: 1244: 1232: 1228: 1224: 1220: 1216: 1212: 1208: 1204: 1200: 1199: 1193: 1192: 1186: 1182: 1178: 1175: 1173: 1167: 1164: 1163: 1158: 1155: 1151: 1150: 1145: 1142: 1141: 1136: 1135: 1134: 1133: 1128: 1124: 1120: 1119: 1116: 1108: 1104: 1099: 1098: 1094: 1090: 1089: 1085: 1081: 1078: 1077: 1072: 1071: 1067: 1066: 1060: 1059: 1054: 1053: 1049: 1044: 1043: 1040: 1039: 1031: 1030: 1026: 1022: 1008: 1007: 1004: 1001: 1000: 998: 990: 986: 985: 984: 980: 976: 972: 968: 960: 955: 945: 942: 941: 939: 931: 929: 925: 921: 917: 916: 915: 914: 910: 906: 902: 891: 888: 887: 885: 876: 875: 874: 870: 866: 862: 858: 842: 839: 838: 836: 828: 827: 826: 825: 822: 820: 806: 803: 802: 800: 792: 788: 784: 783: 782: 779: 775: 771: 767: 757: 748: 744: 743:damage report 741: 738: 734: 733: 728: 723: 722: 721: 718: 717: 715: 707: 706: 705: 704: 700: 699:damage report 697: 694: 690: 689: 684: 671: 668: 667: 665: 657: 656: 655: 651: 647: 643: 639: 627: 624: 623: 621: 612: 611: 610: 606: 602: 598: 594: 577: 574: 571: 567: 566: 565: 564: 561: 558: 557: 555: 547: 546: 545: 544: 541: 538: 528: 524: 514: 511: 510: 508: 500: 499: 498: 497: 494: 481: 478: 477: 475: 467: 466: 465: 464: 461: 449: 446: 445: 443: 434: 433: 432: 429: 425: 421: 417: 406: 399: 396: 395: 393: 385: 381: 377: 373: 369: 365: 361: 360: 359: 358: 355: 341: 338: 337: 335: 327: 324: 321: 317: 316: 315: 312: 311: 310: 307: 303: 299: 295: 288: 285: 280: 277: 276: 274: 265: 264: 263: 260: 256: 252: 248: 241: 237: 233: 231: 227: 223: 219: 215: 210: 207: 204: 193: 190: 189: 187: 178: 174: 171: 170: 169: 168: 165: 152: 149: 148: 146: 138: 137: 136: 135: 132: 122: 119: 115: 111: 107: 99: 93: 90: 89: 87: 79: 74: 73: 72: 70: 67: 64: 60: 49: 46: 45: 42: 38: 34: 19: 7317: 7301:Brianjones10 7292: 7277: 7261:Brianjones10 7251: 7236: 7220:Brianjones10 7192: 7168:Brianjones10 7158: 7143: 7126:Brianjones10 7107: 7087: 7059:69.178.58.84 7050: 7030: 7010: 7000: 6961: 6948: 6941:Ohnoitsjamie 6932: 6904: 6903: 6887: 6885: 6883: 6872:Doc Tropics 6867: 6863: 6861: 6847: 6817: 6769: 6766:Roger Rabbit 6762:chiropractor 6735: 6715: 6687: 6672: 6642: 6627: 6597: 6582: 6564: 6554: 6546: 6539: 6508: 6483: 6463: 6445: 6443: 6439: 6427: 6370: 6363: 6349: 6335: 6303: 6283: 6255: 6245: 6225: 6218: 6198: 6178: 6158: 6155: 6152: 6149: 6146: 6128:please look 6127: 6124: 6121: 6118: 6098: 6065: 6062: 6058: 6055: 6045: 6041: 6035: 6030: 6027: 6013: 5993: 5959: 5912: 5888: 5871: 5858: 5838: 5821: 5809:74.225.37.41 5800: 5785: 5777: 5772: 5755: 5747: 5728: 5720: 5709: 5702: 5673: 5665: 5648: 5631: 5604: 5600: 5593: 5585: 5581: 5571: 5567: 5563: 5560: 5556: 5545: 5541: 5530: 5526: 5523: 5520: 5516: 5508: 5505: 5490: 5456: 5436: 5407: 5404: 5389: 5355: 5352: 5349: 5345: 5342: 5338: 5318: 5291: 5271: 5242: 5234: 5217: 5194: 5179: 5157: 5139: 5124: 5108: 5090: 5080: 5072: 5069: 5049: 5039: 5035: 5029: 5022: 5019: 5004: 4984:64.13.18.159 4974: 4967: 4964: 4944: 4932: 4912: 4902:WarthogDemon 4894: 4873: 4850:HighwayCello 4804:HighwayCello 4799: 4787: 4780: 4769: 4758: 4749: 4748:The list of 4699: 4687: 4671:HighwayCello 4668: 4659: 4658: 4619: 4606:O. Pen Sauce 4602: 4599: 4591: 4587: 4583: 4580: 4578:Hiya, Jamey 4577: 4569: 4547: 4533: 4522: 4502: 4491: 4481: 4478: 4463: 4436: 4427: 4424: 4420:Maryse Casol 4417: 4414: 4410:Maryse Casol 4389: 4366: 4359: 4340: 4314: 4280: 4272: 4268: 4251:219.146.94.4 4243: 4229: 4226: 4219: 4201: 4181: 4152: 4137: 4102: 4084:I'm a P. I.! 4056:I'm a P. I.! 4041: 4037: 4027:I'm a P. I.! 4013: 3991: 3965: 3964: 3960: 3959: 3952: 3950: 3949: 3920: 3900: 3864: 3842: 3830: 3810: 3775: 3755: 3741: 3734: 3732: 3727: 3702: 3692: 3677: 3646: 3625: 3610: 3600: 3580: 3559:71.80.45.100 3548: 3533: 3498:71.80.45.100 3490: 3486: 3482: 3479: 3476: 3456: 3449: 3422: 3402: 3392: 3389: 3374: 3356: 3352: 3348: 3331: 3312: 3294: 3290:sockpuppetry 3287: 3270: 3263:sockpuppetry 3246: 3236: 3232: 3220: 3197: 3189: 3186: 3182: 3162: 3153: 3135: 3132: 3125: 3122: 3118: 3115: 3112:WHY?WHY?WHY? 3095: 3068: 3048: 3032: 3012: 3008: 2982: 2972: 2957: 2956:guidelines. 2939: 2936: 2933: 2927: 2924: 2904: 2890:Ohnoitsjamie 2889: 2887: 2867: 2858: 2836: 2801: 2784: 2764: 2737: 2717: 2690: 2659: 2619: 2604: 2575: 2555: 2550:I deny your 2526: 2518: 2503: 2469: 2456: 2453: 2449: 2414: 2392: 2372: 2357: 2339: 2323:Shusuke Fuji 2316: 2282: 2262: 2245: 2230: 2209: 2202: 2198: 2194: 2191: 2187: 2184: 2180: 2176: 2161: 2143: 2134: 2119: 2100: 2088: 2071: 2055: 2043: 2037: 2017: 1978: 1975: 1972: 1950: 1910: 1903: 1879: 1853: 1829: 1809: 1796: 1794:sorry again 1793: 1789: 1769: 1736: 1714: 1677: 1669: 1647: 1632: 1621: 1604: 1599:User:Gouimet 1580: 1579: 1510: 1480: 1460: 1435: 1431: 1411: 1394: 1384: 1369: 1339: 1333: 1313: 1301: 1286: 1271: 1250: 1184: 1169: 1160: 1147: 1138: 1068: 1018: 992: 988: 956: 953: 933: 899: 879: 850: 830: 814: 794: 760: 739: 725: 709: 695: 681: 679: 659: 630: 615: 587: 549: 534: 531:Ku klux klan 525: 522: 502: 489: 469: 468:No problem! 457: 454:My talk page 437: 409: 387: 351: 329: 313: 289: 286: 283: 268: 242: 238: 234: 229: 225: 221: 217: 213: 211: 208: 205: 201: 181: 160: 140: 128: 110:Curmudgeon99 100: 96: 81: 65: 59:Curmudgeon99 55: 47: 30: 7120:—Preceding 7047:Jefree Star 6858:More thanks 6822:—Preceding 6692:—Preceding 6542:skillipedia 6480:Peekvid.com 6398:Rossenglish 6388:Rossenglish 6357:Rossenglish 6343:Bennelliott 6300:Hello Jamie 6249:CptnWaffles 6074:Trichnosis 5895:User:Rdysan 5797:gay scandal 5358:—Preceding 5295:—Preceding 5209:Doc Tropics 5198:Doc Tropics 5188:Doc Tropics 4978:—Preceding 4759:new program 4680:What's New? 4227:Thank you. 4158:—Preceding 4106:—Preceding 3924:—Preceding 3869:—Preceding 3779:—Preceding 3742:D. russelii 3705:—Preceding 3520:section of 3265:and that a 3072:—Preceding 2987:its latest 2741:—Preceding 2700:sparsonsusa 2630:sparsonsusa 2624:—Preceding 2586:sparsonsusa 2523:Deleted bio 2478:KelvinSmith 2331:Yamaguchi先生 1982:—Preceding 1914:—Preceding 1843:sneaky spam 1626:Rickbrown55 1541:—Preceding 1062:What's New? 965:—Preceding 855:—Preceding 737:wreak havoc 727:riana_dzast 693:wreak havoc 683:riana_dzast 636:—Preceding 591:—Preceding 131:Irwinstreet 7209:http://www 7191:. Thanks, 7115:http://www 7080:notability 7004:Rarechords 6497:notability 6161:Trichnosis 5335:Pharmacies 4846:Shreshth91 4796:Shreshth91 4415:Hi Jamie, 4246:http://www 4164:Logtenberg 4112:Logtenberg 4097:Logtenberg 3875:Sivartbook 3803:unverified 3785:Kendermage 3443:AlphaChimp 3328:Here's one 3078:SMcDouglas 3065:Well done! 3035:HalfShadow 2845:Darkness88 2552:notability 2535:Tony Arena 2502:. Cheers, 2279:open proxy 1449:verifiable 1183:that will 523:Hi Jamie, 405:User:Sanke 386:for that. 6880:Thanks :) 6844:Thank you 6607:Raspy1980 6501:WP:SPEEDY 5861:KP Botany 5703:Answers: 5196:issue? -- 5175:Christmas 4814:Signed... 4519:Vandalism 4396:talk page 4343:Jessica93 4335:Jessica93 4267:policies 4070:talk page 3917:Apologies 3897:this edit 3295:Regards, 3237:Regards, 2747:Erikeltic 2734:Thank you 1968:Apostille 1850:CheckUser 1739:Neigbours 1665:Dachshund 1433:article? 1195:Signed... 950:malcolm x 818:Yomangani 785:Removing 41:SwissCelt 7321:itsJamie 7309:contribs 7297:unsigned 7281:itsJamie 7269:contribs 7257:unsigned 7240:itsJamie 7228:contribs 7216:unsigned 7196:itsJamie 7176:contribs 7164:unsigned 7147:itsJamie 7134:contribs 7122:unsigned 7091:itsJamie 7067:contribs 7055:unsigned 7034:itsJamie 7014:contribs 6965:itsJamie 6836:contribs 6824:unsigned 6773:itsJamie 6719:itsJamie 6706:contribs 6694:unsigned 6676:itsJamie 6660:contribs 6648:unsigned 6631:itsJamie 6615:contribs 6603:unsigned 6586:itsJamie 6568:contribs 6536:jukcoder 6512:itsJamie 6467:itsJamie 6374:itsJamie 6367:contribs 6353:contribs 6339:contribs 6320:contribs 6308:unsigned 6287:itsJamie 6259:contribs 6229:itsJamie 6222:contribs 6212:Jonty303 6182:itsJamie 6102:itsJamie 6082:contribs 6070:unsigned 5997:itsJamie 5977:contribs 5969:Sandkems 5965:unsigned 5956:New Here 5916:itsJamie 5875:itsJamie 5842:itsJamie 5825:itsJamie 5817:contribs 5805:unsigned 5759:itsJamie 5748:Followup 5732:itsJamie 5695:contribs 5683:unsigned 5652:itsJamie 5635:itsJamie 5622:contribs 5610:unsigned 5494:itsJamie 5474:contribs 5462:unsigned 5440:itsJamie 5424:contribs 5416:Mpirages 5412:unsigned 5393:itsJamie 5372:contribs 5364:Mpirages 5360:unsigned 5322:itsJamie 5309:contribs 5297:unsigned 5275:itsJamie 5259:contribs 5247:unsigned 5221:itsJamie 5161:itsJamie 5128:itsJamie 5053:itsJamie 5008:itsJamie 4992:contribs 4980:unsigned 4948:itsJamie 4916:itsJamie 4842:The Halo 4738:full log 4714:MiszaBot 4623:itsJamie 4564:contribs 4552:unsigned 4534:Thanks 4506:itsJamie 4495:contribs 4485:Friday33 4467:itsJamie 4440:contribs 4370:itsJamie 4363:contribs 4318:itsJamie 4301:itsJamie 4284:itsJamie 4185:itsJamie 4172:contribs 4160:unsigned 4141:itsJamie 4120:contribs 4108:unsigned 3995:itsJamie 3983:contribs 3971:unsigned 3938:contribs 3926:unsigned 3904:itsJamie 3883:contribs 3871:unsigned 3846:itsJamie 3814:itsJamie 3793:contribs 3781:unsigned 3759:itsJamie 3719:contribs 3707:unsigned 3681:itsJamie 3614:itsJamie 3584:itsJamie 3567:contribs 3555:unsigned 3537:itsJamie 3506:contribs 3494:unsigned 3473:Not Spam 3460:itsJamie 3453:contribs 3406:itsJamie 3401:Cheers, 3395:Obeisant 3378:itsJamie 3373:Cheers, 3370:Mortgage 3359:Obeisant 3335:itsJamie 3316:itsJamie 3297:Obeisant 3274:itsJamie 3250:itsJamie 3239:Obeisant 3201:itsJamie 3191:Obeisant 3166:itsJamie 3137:Truelife 3099:itsJamie 3086:contribs 3074:unsigned 3052:itsJamie 3016:itsJamie 2985:WP:MUSIC 2961:itsJamie 2908:itsJamie 2871:itsJamie 2853:contribs 2841:unsigned 2805:itsJamie 2768:itsJamie 2755:contribs 2743:unsigned 2721:itsJamie 2708:contribs 2696:unsigned 2663:itsJamie 2638:contribs 2626:unsigned 2608:itsJamie 2559:itsJamie 2543:contribs 2531:unsigned 2507:itsJamie 2486:contribs 2474:unsigned 2418:itsJamie 2376:itsJamie 2361:contribs 2286:itsJamie 2248:Davidrei 2234:itsJamie 2215:Davidrei 2165:itsJamie 2147:Davidrei 2123:itsJamie 2104:contribs 2094:Sheldunn 2059:itsJamie 2021:itsJamie 2014:blocking 1996:contribs 1984:unsigned 1954:itsJamie 1928:contribs 1916:unsigned 1900:Deletion 1883:itsJamie 1857:itsJamie 1813:itsJamie 1798:Truelife 1773:itsJamie 1757:contribs 1749:Truelife 1745:unsigned 1718:itsJamie 1681:itsJamie 1651:itsJamie 1636:contribs 1608:itsJamie 1584:itsJamie 1555:contribs 1543:unsigned 1529:Syrthiss 1514:itsJamie 1498:contribs 1486:unsigned 1464:itsJamie 1415:itsJamie 1373:itsJamie 1356:contribs 1344:unsigned 1317:itsJamie 1290:itsJamie 1127:full log 1103:MiszaBot 996:itsJamie 979:contribs 967:unsigned 937:itsJamie 883:itsJamie 869:contribs 857:unsigned 834:itsJamie 798:itsJamie 778:contribs 770:OneKorea 766:unsigned 713:itsJamie 663:itsJamie 650:contribs 638:unsigned 619:itsJamie 605:contribs 593:unsigned 553:itsJamie 506:itsJamie 473:itsJamie 441:itsJamie 428:contribs 416:unsigned 391:itsJamie 368:Colorado 364:Colorado 333:itsJamie 306:contribs 294:unsigned 272:itsJamie 259:contribs 247:unsigned 185:itsJamie 144:itsJamie 118:contribs 106:unsigned 85:itsJamie 69:contribs 7189:WP:SPAM 6997:Yoriyos 6864:vandals 6850:Cpl Syx 6803:Tropics 6744:Tropics 6091:WP:SPAM 5990:WP:SPAM 5939:Mwanner 5899:Mwanner 5713:status. 5487:WP:SPAM 5433:WP:CORP 5386:WP:CORP 5382:notable 5301:Rjbrock 5251:Rjbrock 5097:Urania3 5093:WP:AIAV 5070:Jamie, 5046:notable 5020:Jamie, 4975:Thanks 4965:Jamie, 4935:llywrch 4838:FireFox 4822:Natalya 4718:Misza13 4353:R._Koot 4306:Gaoshan 4277:WP:GDFL 4273:content 4269:clearly 4261:WP:SPAM 4134:WP:SPAM 4038:Shakira 3975:Gaoshan 3827:Oh, No! 3746:Jwinius 3221:yandman 3005:WP:BAND 2950:WP:SPAM 2942:Geomguy 2593:WP:SPAM 2500:WP:SPAM 2435:Yandman 2400:Yandman 2317:The IP 2269:Anaraug 2006:WP:SPAM 1947:WP:SPAM 1807:Oh, OK. 1711:WP:SPAM 1572:routers 1547:Gouimet 1507:WP:SPAM 1490:Gouimet 1439:Rizzwan 1397:Rizzwan 1388:Rizzwan 1348:Rizzwan 1304:Rizzwan 1274:Rizzwan 1219:FireFox 1203:Natalya 1107:Misza13 486:Sept 11 376:Archery 314:Answers 298:GDMSEO 173:WP:SPAM 7084:WP:BIO 6505:WP:WEB 6499:. See 6273:. If 6202:Kernow 6175:WP:WEB 6047:Ankara 5268:WP:WEB 4761:: the 4548:STOP! 4452:WP:BIO 4428:Henri 4400:Harput 4232:Harput 4198:Thanks 3893:Douche 3860:Douche 3833:ThePOP 3807:source 3736:Daboia 3728:Daboia 3597:Thanks 3155:time). 2895:Trysha 2822:Trysha 2792:Trysha 2681:Trysha 2342:Vera26 2073:Szvest 2045:Szvest 1766:source 1698:Trysha 1227:Titoxd 1225:, and 1174:design 1015:Thanks 493:Cavell 382:. Try 251:GDMSEO 7185:WP:EL 6986:A. B. 6952:A. B. 6738:?!?! 6275:Wired 6171:WP:EL 6095:WP:EL 5986:WP:EL 5630:it. 5483:WP:EL 4834:EWS23 4826:Banes 4265:WP:EL 4208:Danny 4130:WP:EL 3772:Hobos 3630:Award 3576:WP:EL 3522:WP:EL 2954:WP:EL 2597:WP:EL 2496:WP:EL 2310:User 2010:WP:EL 1943:WP:EL 1707:WP:EL 1694:WP:EL 1215:EWS23 1207:Banes 420:Sanke 224:. 5. 177:WP:EL 16:< 7319:OhNo 7305:talk 7279:OhNo 7265:talk 7238:OhNo 7224:talk 7194:OhNo 7187:and 7172:talk 7145:OhNo 7130:talk 7104:Link 7089:OhNo 7063:talk 7032:OhNo 7008:talk 6963:OhNo 6832:talk 6799:Doc 6771:OhNo 6764:and 6740:Doc 6717:OhNo 6702:talk 6674:OhNo 6656:talk 6629:OhNo 6611:talk 6584:OhNo 6562:talk 6510:OhNo 6503:and 6465:OhNo 6372:OhNo 6361:talk 6347:talk 6333:talk 6316:talk 6285:OhNo 6253:talk 6227:OhNo 6216:talk 6180:OhNo 6115:???? 6100:OhNo 6093:and 6078:talk 5995:OhNo 5988:and 5973:talk 5943:Talk 5933:and 5914:OhNo 5903:Talk 5873:OhNo 5840:OhNo 5823:OhNo 5813:talk 5757:OhNo 5730:OhNo 5723:See 5691:talk 5675:was 5650:OhNo 5633:OhNo 5618:talk 5492:OhNo 5470:talk 5438:OhNo 5420:talk 5391:OhNo 5368:talk 5320:OhNo 5305:talk 5273:OhNo 5255:talk 5219:OhNo 5183:here 5159:OhNo 5126:OhNo 5051:OhNo 5006:OhNo 4988:talk 4946:OhNo 4914:OhNo 4848:and 4686:The 4621:OhNo 4560:talk 4527:and 4504:OhNo 4489:talk 4465:OhNo 4434:talk 4368:OhNo 4357:talk 4316:OhNo 4299:OhNo 4282:OhNo 4263:and 4183:OhNo 4168:talk 4139:OhNo 4132:and 4116:talk 3993:OhNo 3979:talk 3934:talk 3902:OhNo 3879:talk 3844:OhNo 3812:OhNo 3789:talk 3757:OhNo 3715:talk 3679:OhNo 3666:.M.S 3612:OhNo 3582:OhNo 3563:talk 3535:OhNo 3502:talk 3458:OhNo 3447:talk 3404:OhNo 3376:OhNo 3333:OhNo 3314:OhNo 3272:OhNo 3248:OhNo 3199:OhNo 3164:OhNo 3116:Hi, 3097:OhNo 3082:talk 3050:OhNo 3014:OhNo 2959:OhNo 2952:and 2906:OhNo 2869:OhNo 2849:talk 2803:OhNo 2766:OhNo 2751:talk 2719:OhNo 2704:talk 2661:OhNo 2634:talk 2606:OhNo 2595:and 2557:OhNo 2539:talk 2505:OhNo 2498:and 2482:talk 2446:BCPS 2416:OhNo 2374:OhNo 2355:talk 2325:and 2284:OhNo 2265:bong 2258:Bong 2232:OhNo 2163:OhNo 2121:OhNo 2098:talk 2057:OhNo 2019:OhNo 1992:talk 1952:OhNo 1945:and 1924:talk 1920:Keke 1881:OhNo 1855:OhNo 1811:OhNo 1771:OhNo 1753:talk 1716:OhNo 1709:and 1679:OhNo 1649:OhNo 1630:talk 1606:OhNo 1582:OhNo 1551:talk 1512:OhNo 1494:talk 1462:OhNo 1455:and 1413:OhNo 1371:OhNo 1352:talk 1315:OhNo 1288:OhNo 1283:This 1170:new 1168:The 1159:The 1137:The 1091:The 1025:talk 994:OhNo 975:talk 935:OhNo 924:talk 909:talk 881:OhNo 865:talk 832:OhNo 796:OhNo 774:talk 711:OhNo 661:OhNo 646:talk 617:OhNo 601:talk 570:nids 551:OhNo 537:nids 504:OhNo 471:OhNo 439:OhNo 424:talk 389:OhNo 384:Dmoz 374:and 354:Bigh 331:OhNo 302:talk 270:OhNo 255:talk 183:OhNo 175:and 142:OhNo 114:talk 83:OhNo 63:talk 7311:) . 7271:) . 7230:) . 7178:) . 7069:) . 6662:) . 6617:) . 6558:MKS 6434:I, 6355:), 6322:) . 6140:to 6084:) . 6028:Hi 5979:) . 5819:) . 5697:) . 5624:) . 5485:or 5476:) . 5426:) . 5261:) . 5156:). 4566:) . 4448:afd 3985:) . 3661:dog 3656:Sea 3569:) . 3508:) . 2989:AfD 2855:) . 2710:) . 2654:to 2545:) . 2488:) . 2034:AfD 2008:or 1759:) . 1638:) 1568:ISP 1500:) . 1358:) . 1021:Nlu 903:-- 811:AFD 791:own 780:) . 573:(♂) 540:(♂) 460:Clq 308:) . 261:) . 120:) . 71:) 7307:• 7267:• 7226:• 7174:• 7136:) 7132:• 7065:• 7023:, 7016:) 6950:-- 6838:) 6834:• 6708:) 6704:• 6658:• 6613:• 6570:) 6341:), 6318:• 6261:) 6144:. 6080:• 5975:• 5941:| 5901:| 5815:• 5727:. 5693:• 5620:• 5472:• 5422:• 5374:) 5370:• 5311:) 5307:• 5257:• 5186:-- 4994:) 4990:• 4844:, 4840:, 4836:, 4832:, 4828:, 4824:, 4786:A 4706:. 4667:. 4562:• 4497:) 4442:) 4333:-- 4230:-- 4174:) 4170:• 4122:) 4118:• 4076:, 4048:, 4019:, 3981:• 3940:) 3936:• 3885:) 3881:• 3809:. 3795:) 3791:• 3721:) 3717:• 3653:I 3565:• 3504:• 3088:) 3084:• 2994:PT 2991:. 2866:. 2851:• 2757:) 2753:• 2706:• 2640:) 2636:• 2554:. 2541:• 2484:• 2207:) 2114:. 2016:. 1998:) 1994:• 1930:) 1926:• 1755:• 1696:- 1557:) 1553:• 1496:• 1459:. 1368:. 1354:• 1221:, 1217:, 1213:, 1209:, 1205:, 1027:) 981:) 977:• 926:) 911:) 871:) 867:• 776:• 652:) 648:• 607:) 603:• 426:• 304:• 257:• 232:. 116:• 7303:( 7263:( 7222:( 7170:( 7128:( 7061:( 7011:· 7006:( 6830:( 6700:( 6654:( 6609:( 6565:· 6560:( 6364:· 6359:( 6350:· 6345:( 6336:· 6331:( 6314:( 6256:· 6251:( 6219:· 6214:( 6076:( 5971:( 5811:( 5689:( 5616:( 5468:( 5418:( 5366:( 5303:( 5253:( 4986:( 4900:- 4879:. 4806:. 4740:) 4736:( 4558:( 4492:· 4487:( 4437:· 4432:( 4360:· 4355:( 4166:( 4114:( 3977:( 3932:( 3877:( 3787:( 3713:( 3561:( 3500:( 3450:· 3445:( 3080:( 2847:( 2749:( 2702:( 2632:( 2537:( 2480:( 2358:· 2353:( 2101:· 2096:( 1990:( 1922:( 1751:( 1633:· 1628:( 1574:. 1549:( 1492:( 1350:( 1256:. 1156:. 1129:) 1125:( 1023:( 973:( 922:( 907:( 863:( 772:( 740:| 731:a 696:| 687:a 644:( 599:( 422:( 300:( 253:( 112:( 66:· 61:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index