1024:, thanks for the heads up and a hat tip to you for all of your previous efforts - and for floating the idea now in any case! I generally refrain from making time commitments to Knowledge these days as I no longer have the luxury of dictating when I will have time like I did once upon a time. As you have approached me while I am sporadically around, I can say that if time permits and I'm given notice when it proceeds, I'd be happy to assess a few articles. Beyond that, I'm just not sure how much time or how many articles that would amount to though. Sorry, I'm not sure if that's particularly helpful, so thought it might be better to leave my message here for now. I think you might be able rope in a few more editors by using a similar personal touch, if you have seen other good editors in the WP India area.
385:
have given supports those claims. But I can't comment as to whether other uninvolved editors agree with me or not." As to the closing, the allegation is about civility so NWQA is actually not right. I wouldn't put any tag on it; more reasoned discussion may have produced some better outcome. If not, or if that was all that could be done and I must put a tag on it, perhaps "stuck" to say no resolution between parties. ANI might be (in part) correct for wikihounding, and AN3 for edit-warring, but I would not have recommended either venue unless the request specifically asked for admin action. Would not have made the comments dated 23 July either; need to know when to let it go stale unless he is genuinely wanting some perspective - in which case direct answers to the questions would be more helpful.
485:
the time I left, I could see the ultimate fate of the project and accepted it, but I'm here with the mindframe that it can be delayed at least. It's funny that with so many neat bells and whistles (improvements technically to the site) since I left, the deeper issues and fundamental problems thrive in a lot of ways and still chip away at the roots; that part is a pity and I don't miss it at all. Anyway, I am very pleased to see you back also, and hope you've had a well-rested break - and that you're staying for as long as I am here at the very least.Ā :) Regards,
1259:
550:
643:
753:
1205:
1113:
932:
150:
efficiently. Second, in simple cases like this where an user is clearly trying to convey an appeal to the community, it would be helpful if the actual appeal by the restricted user (that is, the original text they made in the appeal) can be pasted at AN rather than the whole thing being shut down after the community was notified of the appeal. I think both would require explicit authorisation from arbs though....
21:
279:
other dispute resolution (usually arbitration). The only other option is for certifiers to withdraw their certification which will allow the RfC/U to be deleted (but they can only exercise that option while the RfC/U remains open for comment - and obviously, a note can't refer to a RfC/U which is non-existent or deleted). Hope that helps (and more importantly, makes sense).Ā :)
1028:
questions and given some thought to the couple or so I picked out (eg; noting that you would not answer a question which did not make sense without having the benefit of some context) was enough for me today, when coupled with the efforts I have seen you undertake for WP India generally. All the best,
399:
Cheers for the response, I agree, in hindsight, that I should have let it go stale. I pointed to ANI because there was an active and ongoing discussion on the wikiproject medicine page about this topic that was getting very messy. Some of the editors also have a large history of previous interactions
484:
Hiya...your return has made my day...I have not seen you online in ages! Actually, I was pleasantly surprised by how quickly VasuVR noticed my return (barely made a few edits I think), but it was depressing when I found that so many went on wikibreak or were not longer active - yourself included. At
164:
The first point is actually already addressed in the WP:AE header, where the text from the motion is reproduced. However, it's a lengthy header and the appeal bits are easily overlooked. I don't have time right now to look at this closely myself but I will mention it to one of my colleagues, and see
521:
That's a fair point, and my findings are fairly indifferent. I expect I will be following a similar example too.Ā :) As for common sense perspective, I find that attempts are too often made to drown or discourage it, as it usually does not bode well with the other agendas being pushed around at this
278:
It can't really be closed early unless the users come to an agreement on the summary (which might include sending a note that you propose), or unless the users agree to close the RfC/U without a summary (but with whatever views/endorsements already provided) or unless it is being overtaken by some
149:
about some inconsistency, it would help if the following two suggestions are implemented. First, the notice at the top of the AE page (and any other relevant arb pages) are updated in line with the page you've linked - it would mean both the experienced and inexperienced can look at the same place
384:
Instead of "Do not make baseless accusations against me, or involve me in your dispute.", something like "Not sure what long term pattern you are talking about or how that is relevant to whether WLU has actually made personal attacks. Though you've made some claims, I don't think the evidence you
49:
522:
place. Unfortunately, the product doesn't match what is said on the label/packaging. Overall, that's when it seems that the time, effort, stress, or hassle is simply not worth it. Well, I hope you do hang around for a bit longer at least, but I can't blame you and will probably follow suit soon.
1027:
In the meantime and in any case though, I've added one count to your tally for the elections you are a candidate in. This is probably the first time I've done so in any election without really reading about a candidate. However, the fact that you have taken the time to answer so many of the 60+
260:
There still would an issue if the commenting editors disagree - if they think there are other issues that bring the certifiers own conduct into question or the involved users approach to the dispute into question (which they clearly do), then they are probably not going to endorse that note; I
1044:
Thank you for your voteĀ :). I would love to have a conversation with you regarding my answers at any time. I really do understand regarding the Tag & Assess editing. I was myself in a pandemic-induced fugue with sporadic editing till some friends pressed me out of my slumber to stand as a
329:
Sorry I got impatient on the block page (I sometimes think I must have a cripplingly low boredom threshold) but no, I could not face researching the sections above for warnings. Actually, proving my lack of clue, I sort of assumed that a user referred to in such terms was most probably
633:
I was pleasantly surprised by you seeing a person where others saw only saw admin abuse, and I looked a bit deeper, but naturally only a bit. "Veteran editor" is for me anybody who is here longer than I am, so I will never be oneĀ ;) - You deserve the image, part of my
1229:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
935:
924:
504:
has the right approach to editing here. Edit for a few months and then disappear for long periods of time. My goal is to emulate him as far as possibleĀ :) But it is good to see you providing your common sense perspective again - much needed on wiki.
922:
240:
Thanks for looking at that. Also on a procedural note, if I get agreement from the certifiers for my proposal (which effectively involes me leaving a note for Bidgee), would there be any issue with closing, since editors have commented?
900:
I must say it was very kind of you to pro-actively volunteer to take that responsibility, and spend the time doing that, especially as it saves requiring yet another person to do it when it is not critically necessary here. Thank you.
186:
Hi
Ncmvocalist. I know I've seen you at RfC's before, which I normally read and don't comment on. As such, I'm not quite as confident on the procedure. In your opinion, has the RfC on Bidgee met the minimum requirements of an RfC?
293:
Indeed it does, and means tat I will be looking at this RfC differently, as something that will be going ahead. I'll have a think about what to do next, most probably offering an outside view. Thanks a lot for your help here.
225:
to understand what I mean. And, obviously, the question of whether it was necessary to escalate to RfC/U or whether it is going to go very far is a question for others to decide in the views they express/endorse in the RfC/U.
943:
499:
Thanks. But, this is merely a curiosity visit. Knowledge is, unfortunately, a time sink of colossal proportions with no obvious real life return and I find that it detracts from the many other things I would like to do.
614:
Thank you. Looking back through some of those things made me cringe but some of those things I'm rather pleasantly surprised with too. I suppose that's the reaction to be expected of a "veteran" editor though huh?Ā ;)
1233:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
165:
where we go from there. The second point would, as you say, probably involve a broader committee discussion and our current workload being what it is is unlikely to be swiftly resolved. Thanks for the input,
1077:
967:, thanks for bringing this to my attention. I agree that it can be deleted so I've requested a speedy delete as the author; you are welcome to withdraw or close the discussion you have referred to above.
221:
As far as procedure, I've looked at it and so long as a part of it is shifted to the RfC/U page, it does seem to meet minimum requirements (though the presentation is a bit shoddy) - see what I wrote
1140:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
999:
1081:
1156:
591:
1085:
954:
1266:
1126:
699:
801:
However, I do have the tools, and as nominator I am very happy to take responsibility for implementing the close. So if you felt able to reinstate the close, I can do the rest.
1072:
1066:
222:
1045:
candidate. Whatever few assessments you do are most welcome. I would also request a vote of support on WT:INB talk page for the New Tag & Assess, if you see fit.
261:
imagine they would think the note suggests the issue is with Bidgee alone and is therefore misleading (they were of the view that issues extended beyond the one user).
128:
577:
and warning of unconstructive editing, for
Signpost arbitration reports, "There is a distinction between moving on and forgetting about it", and for voicing the
1193:
868:
452:
Hi!Ā :) Thanks; nice to see someone familiar even after all this time. I'm not expecting to be online very often at this point, but more than before. Regards,
1211:
1195:
1246:
1226:
1183:
403:
467:
Hi. Just checked in today after a while off-wiki and was pleasantly surprised to see you at ANI. Good to see you back and hope you're here to stay! --
888:
401:
1296:
308:
288:
255:
216:
910:
862:
100:
735:
715:
687:
624:
173:
159:
531:
516:
494:
235:
1103:
414:
394:
116:
976:
358:
1054:
1037:
461:
1216:
1318:
1097:
145:
Indeed, thank you. I don't recall this page (but I remember about AN/ANI). Given the concern expressed in the first couple of lines
1302:
982:
559:
Thank you, veteran editor defined by appreciation, recognition and nice things, for contributions to articles about India, such as
1011:
767:
Merry
Christmas to you Ncmvocalist and a Happy and Prosperous New Year! Thank you for everything you do in this place. Cheers.Ā :)
570:
883:
857:
816:
1288:
1179:
478:
795:
778:
201:
831:
I'm happy to reinstate the close if you can do the rest; have reinstated on that basis. Glad to have assisted. Regards,
939:
579:
446:
78:
743:
139:
840:
1307:
Request message sent to you since you seem to have participated in discussions @ Talk:Carnatic music previously.
1175:
574:
127:
For future reference, the relevant procedures for reversing/appealing administrator enforcement actions are also
606:
1070:
is going on at this moment. We request you to participate in the assessment drive. Learn more about the event
146:
342:
1274:
1149:
440:
422:
1161:
378:
295:
242:
188:
74:
1242:
1220:
879:
853:
812:
561:
804:
If feel that's inappropriate, the no prob ... but the offer is there. Either way, thanks again. --
1284:
731:
711:
683:
602:
1137:
786:
660:
651:
585:
511:
501:
473:
306:
253:
199:
181:
122:
70:
1238:
1148:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
895:
872:
846:
826:
805:
566:
323:
8:
1093:
703:
410:
374:
952:
339:
331:
97:
39:
1280:
1120:
727:
707:
679:
598:
427:
Hello there, Nice to see you back... Hope you will be a bit active again... Regards.
166:
132:
1314:
1168:
1133:
1050:
1029:
1007:
990:
968:
902:
832:
616:
541:
523:
506:
486:
468:
453:
434:
386:
350:
322:
280:
227:
208:
151:
773:
666:"Justice suffered in great need. Truth is slain dead. Faith has lost the battle"?
1258:
549:
1145:
1089:
406:
370:
112:
66:
1141:
962:
947:
335:
90:
798:. I understand why you felt it appropriate to revert due to lack of tools.
1310:
1046:
1019:
1003:
428:
364:
1152:
describes the
Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
642:
1130:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
768:
752:
1112:
107:
27:
936:
Template:Requests for comment/User conduct/Assistance/Archive navbox
925:
Template:Requests for comment/User conduct/Assistance/Archive navbox
48:
1165:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add
1155:
If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review
1124:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All
998:
Have proposed a New Tag & Assess for WikiProject India
131:, which is probably easier than looking up cases/motions.
1301:
Seeking some nuanced details regarding
Carnatic music, @
794:
Thanks for taking the time to carefully review and close
1209:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
1136:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
1215:
is suitable for inclusion in
Knowledge according to
69:
and nails the whole process of community consensus.
1227:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Aishwarya
Prabhakar
796:
Talk:St. Mirren F.C.#Requested_move_20_January_2016
942:. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
369:At the WQA, what would you have done differently?
1303:Talk:R. K. Padmanabha#"Clarification needed" tags
1084:details. Please add your name as a participant
1002:. Do let us know your view.Ā :) Happy editting!
944:the entry on the Templates for discussion page
1297:Carnatic music, seeking some nuanced details
670:The poem ends with "Praise the right thing".
562:"lots of bits and pieces" on Carnatic music
1257:
46:
750:
1067:WikiProject India Tag & Assess 2021
571:Zee Tamil Sa Re Ga Ma Pa 2009 Challenge
30:and may not respond swiftly to queries.
706:, mentioned above, died in January. --
658:Did you know ... that a church's 1510
1121:2021 Arbitration Committee elections
15:
1217:Knowledge's policies and guidelines
1104:ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
698:A year ago, you were recipient no.
13:
14:
1329:
1225:The article will be discussed at
1203:
1111:
983:Proposing a new Tag & Assess
930:
845:Many thanks. I'll do it now. --
751:
641:
548:
47:
19:
1159:and submit your choices on the
702:of Precious, a prize of QAI! -
1:
1184:00:12, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
1138:Knowledge arbitration process
1098:04:54, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
911:14:51, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
889:11:50, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
863:11:30, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
841:10:06, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
779:07:31, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
649:Thank you for reflecting the
309:15:16, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
289:15:11, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
256:14:53, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
236:14:44, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
217:11:39, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
202:09:28, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
1319:06:23, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
1047:Ashwin Baindur (User:AshLin)
565:, for quality articles from
7:
1055:02:48, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
1038:18:44, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
1012:04:45, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
923:Nomination for deletion of
174:21:15, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
160:14:24, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
140:13:19, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
10:
1334:
1289:09:30, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
1176:MediaWiki message delivery
736:07:53, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
716:06:29, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
688:21:55, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
625:21:43, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
607:11:41, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
462:14:39, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
447:17:37, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
1265:
1256:
1247:03:02, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
977:08:22, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
955:01:29, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
757:
744:Best of the Season to you
415:15:33, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
395:15:08, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
379:14:42, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
359:18:55, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
117:17:18, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
101:09:42, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
79:07:36, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
53:
1219:or whether it should be
1173:to your user talk page.
1033:
972:
906:
836:
620:
532:17:17, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
527:
517:18:37, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
495:14:32, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
490:
479:23:35, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
457:
390:
354:
343:18:26, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
284:
231:
212:
155:
207:I'll take a look soon.
940:nominated for deletion
1134:Arbitration Committee
1118:Hello! Voting in the
652:Gerechtigkeitsspirale
57:The Socratic Barnstar
26:This user is busy in
1275:Precious anniversary
575:encouraging comments
567:Nithyasree Mahadevan
423:Nice to see you back
63:Regarding this edit
1253:
1212:Aishwarya Prabhakar
1196:Aishwarya Prabhakar
1251:
1150:arbitration policy
1078:assessment process
871:. Thanks again. --
726:Five years now! --
592:awesome Wikipedian
1272:
1271:
1191:
1190:
1186:
887:
861:
820:
784:
783:
661:spiral of justice
580:spiral of justice
515:
477:
84:
83:
34:
33:
1325:
1261:
1254:
1250:
1207:
1206:
1174:
1172:
1115:
1108:
1107:
1023:
994:
966:
950:
934:
933:
899:
878:
875:
852:
849:
830:
811:
808:
776:
771:
761:Merry Christmas!
755:
748:
747:
667:
645:
582:
564:
552:
509:
471:
443:
437:
431:
400:with each other
304:
303:
251:
250:
197:
196:
171:
137:
99:
93:
71:Hell In A Bucket
51:
44:
43:
23:
22:
16:
1333:
1332:
1328:
1327:
1326:
1324:
1323:
1322:
1299:
1277:
1239:Laptopinmyhands
1236:
1208:
1204:
1200:
1166:
1106:
1017:
988:
985:
960:
948:
931:
928:
896:BrownHairedGirl
893:
873:
847:
827:BrownHairedGirl
824:
806:
789:
774:
769:
746:
673:
672:
671:
665:
646:
611:
610:
578:
560:
553:
544:
441:
435:
429:
425:
367:
327:
297:
296:
244:
243:
190:
189:
184:
167:
133:
125:
91:
88:
42:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1331:
1298:
1295:
1293:
1276:
1273:
1270:
1269:
1263:
1262:
1202:
1201:
1199:
1194:Nomination of
1192:
1189:
1188:
1157:the candidates
1127:eligible users
1116:
1105:
1102:
1101:
1100:
1062:
1061:
1060:
1059:
1058:
1057:
1025:
984:
981:
980:
979:
927:
921:
920:
919:
918:
917:
916:
915:
914:
913:
788:
785:
782:
781:
764:
763:
758:
756:
745:
742:
741:
740:
739:
738:
721:
720:
719:
718:
693:
692:
691:
690:
668:
656:
648:
647:
640:
639:
638:
637:
636:
635:
628:
627:
558:
547:
546:
545:
543:
540:
539:
538:
537:
536:
535:
534:
465:
464:
424:
421:
420:
419:
418:
417:
366:
363:
362:
361:
326:
321:
320:
319:
318:
317:
316:
315:
314:
313:
312:
311:
269:
268:
267:
266:
265:
264:
263:
262:
183:
180:
179:
178:
177:
176:
124:
121:
120:
119:
103:
82:
81:
60:
59:
54:
52:
41:
38:
36:
32:
31:
24:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1330:
1321:
1320:
1316:
1312:
1308:
1305:
1304:
1294:
1291:
1290:
1286:
1282:
1268:
1264:
1260:
1255:
1249:
1248:
1244:
1240:
1235:
1231:
1228:
1222:
1218:
1214:
1213:
1197:
1187:
1185:
1181:
1177:
1170:
1164:
1163:
1158:
1153:
1151:
1147:
1143:
1139:
1135:
1129:
1128:
1123:
1122:
1117:
1114:
1110:
1109:
1099:
1095:
1091:
1087:
1083:
1079:
1075:
1074:
1069:
1068:
1064:
1063:
1056:
1052:
1048:
1043:
1042:
1041:
1040:
1039:
1035:
1031:
1026:
1021:
1016:
1015:
1014:
1013:
1009:
1005:
1001:
996:
992:
978:
974:
970:
964:
959:
958:
957:
956:
953:
951:
945:
941:
937:
926:
912:
908:
904:
897:
892:
891:
890:
885:
881:
877:
870:
866:
865:
864:
859:
855:
851:
844:
843:
842:
838:
834:
828:
823:
822:
821:
818:
814:
810:
802:
799:
797:
792:
787:RM: St Mirren
780:
777:
772:
766:
765:
762:
759:
754:
749:
737:
733:
729:
725:
724:
723:
722:
717:
713:
709:
705:
701:
697:
696:
695:
694:
689:
685:
681:
677:
676:
675:
674:
669:
663:
662:
654:
653:
644:
632:
631:
630:
629:
626:
622:
618:
613:
612:
609:
608:
604:
600:
595:
593:
590:- you are an
589:
587:
581:
576:
572:
568:
563:
557:
551:
533:
529:
525:
520:
519:
518:
513:
508:
503:
498:
497:
496:
492:
488:
483:
482:
481:
480:
475:
470:
463:
459:
455:
451:
450:
449:
448:
444:
438:
432:
416:
412:
408:
404:
402:
398:
397:
396:
392:
388:
383:
382:
381:
380:
376:
372:
360:
356:
352:
348:
347:
346:
344:
341:
337:
333:
325:
310:
307:
305:
302:
301:
292:
291:
290:
286:
282:
277:
276:
275:
274:
273:
272:
271:
270:
259:
258:
257:
254:
252:
249:
248:
239:
238:
237:
233:
229:
224:
220:
219:
218:
214:
210:
206:
205:
204:
203:
200:
198:
195:
194:
182:RfC on Bidgee
175:
172:
170:
163:
162:
161:
157:
153:
148:
144:
143:
142:
141:
138:
136:
130:
123:AE discussion
118:
114:
110:
109:
104:
102:
98:
95:
94:
86:
85:
80:
76:
72:
68:
64:
62:
61:
58:
55:
50:
45:
37:
29:
25:
18:
17:
1309:
1306:
1300:
1292:
1281:Gerda Arendt
1278:
1267:Seven years!
1237:
1232:
1224:
1210:
1198:for deletion
1160:
1154:
1131:
1125:
1119:
1071:
1065:
997:
986:
929:
803:
800:
793:
790:
760:
728:Gerda Arendt
708:Gerda Arendt
680:Gerda Arendt
659:
657:
650:
599:Gerda Arendt
596:
583:
556:vocal spiral
555:
554:
466:
426:
368:
349:No worries,
328:
299:
298:
246:
245:
192:
191:
185:
169:RogerĀ Davies
168:
135:RogerĀ Davies
134:
126:
106:
89:
56:
35:
1162:voting page
1030:Ncmvocalist
991:Ncmvocalist
969:Ncmvocalist
903:Ncmvocalist
869:these edits
833:Ncmvocalist
617:Ncmvocalist
524:Ncmvocalist
507:regentspark
487:Ncmvocalist
469:regentspark
454:Ncmvocalist
387:Ncmvocalist
351:Ncmvocalist
281:Ncmvocalist
228:Ncmvocalist
209:Ncmvocalist
152:Ncmvocalist
1146:topic bans
876:HairedGirl
850:HairedGirl
809:HairedGirl
664:declares:
40:Recall RFA
1311:Bookku
1142:site bans
1090:Titodutta
938:has been
867:Done, in
704:My friend
634:memories.
407:IRWolfie-
371:IRWolfie-
65:], it is
28:real life
1252:Precious
1076:, learn
963:Terasail
949:Terasail
884:contribs
858:contribs
817:contribs
586:pictured
542:Precious
442:contribs
336:Bishonen
324:WT:BLOCK
92:SilkTork
1221:deleted
1169:NoACEMM
1082:rewards
512:comment
474:comment
105:+1. --
67:WP:BOLD
1020:AshLin
1004:AshLin
880:(talk)
854:(talk)
813:(talk)
573:, for
502:Fowler
430:VasuVR
334:.Ā :-)
874:Brown
848:Brown
807:Brown
1315:talk
1285:talk
1243:talk
1180:talk
1132:The
1094:talk
1088:. --
1086:here
1080:and
1073:here
1051:talk
1034:talk
1008:talk
1000:here
973:talk
907:talk
837:talk
732:talk
712:talk
700:1191
684:talk
621:talk
603:talk
528:talk
491:talk
458:talk
436:talk
411:talk
391:talk
375:talk
355:talk
340:talk
332:Jack
300:Worm
285:talk
247:Worm
232:talk
223:here
213:talk
193:Worm
156:talk
147:here
129:here
113:talk
108:Cirt
87:+1.
75:talk
987:Hi
882:ā¢ (
856:ā¢ (
815:ā¢ (
791:Hi
770:Dr.
569:to
365:WQA
1317:)
1287:)
1279:--
1245:)
1223:.
1182:)
1171:}}
1167:{{
1144:,
1096:)
1053:)
1036:)
1010:)
995:,
975:)
946:.
909:)
839:)
775:K.
734:)
714:)
686:)
678:--
623:)
605:)
597:--
594:!
530:)
505:--
493:)
460:)
445:)
439:,
413:)
405:.
393:)
377:)
357:)
345:.
338:|
287:)
234:)
215:)
158:)
115:)
77:)
1313:(
1283:(
1241:(
1178:(
1092:(
1049:(
1032:(
1022::
1018:@
1006:(
993::
989:@
971:(
965::
961:@
905:(
898::
894:@
886:)
860:)
835:(
829::
825:@
819:)
730:(
710:(
682:(
655:!
619:(
601:(
588:)
584:(
526:(
514:)
510:(
489:(
476:)
472:(
456:(
433:(
409:(
389:(
373:(
353:(
283:(
230:(
211:(
154:(
111:(
96:*
73:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.