110:; so, perhaps, they are a relative or a friend or a supporter or a ... of yours? It is quite amusing that JJ is supposedly a part of our cabal but not of your's! Do you see how silly this is? Of course, you know as well as me that all this is bluster which is intended to obfuscate than to clarify; other longstanding editors like Bishonen, OIDDDE, et al. have already weighed in — with views that appear to align with mine and JJ's — and not in your support.
89:- I am 'friends' with none on Knowledge. In about the last three years — I do not have access to my wiki-communication before that —, I have corresponded with JJ only twice and only twice/thrice with V93. I guess our email frequency and the volume of our edits tell you something about our supposed hush-hush collaboration.
136:
I ignore your tortuous arguments and assumptions, which you do without evidence / diffs. Here is what is relevant: you acknowledge you have corresponded off-wiki with Joshua
Jonathan and Vanamonde93. You clarify that this has been infrequent in the last three years. You did not disclose your off-wiki
56:
Read the case carefully and what I actually said. No aspersions there. What is your point here? Are you saying you never had off-wiki correspondence and never were friends with any of them? In the ANI case, you yourself wrote, "K3 with V93, me, and others, has guarded the " – a
Knowledge article you
71:
There is nothing wrong with off-wiki correspondence and friendships. In some situations – such as access to peer-reviewed scholarly sources – it helps
Knowledge. In some situations, it harms. During proceedings, it is important for uninvolved independent reviewers to be aware of the relationships
113:
I understand that you have come back to en-wiki after a rather long vacation — three years is an eon in internet-time — but I can assure you that contemporary policy requirements, especially on the need to prove DIFFs for aspersions, have not been (yet) done away with.
102:
is at work. You might be interested to know that I and K3 have disagreed ample times and even reverted each other to the point of edit-warring — given your propensity at digging up diffs, I am certain that you can locate them if you try
72:
between the accused and his or her supporters, possible motives in a friend's or relative's testimony, or attempts to introduce straw man arguments and false consensus, and other potential conflicts of interest.
18:
Please do not post invitations, wiki-loves, please-help-me type messages on this page. Formal notices required by wikipedia proceedings are welcome. Please leave this message here. Thank you.
106:
Leave my dynamics with K3, JJ, and V93. JJ has agreed with you on numerous occasions — far more than with me because we mostly do not edit in the same area — and he had awarded you multiple
137:
correspondence with
Kautilya3, who is the focus of the WP:Canvass and WP:COI case under scrutiny. You do mention, you "do not have access to wiki-communication before that".
93:
During proceedings, it is important for uninvolved independent reviewers to be aware of the relationships between the accused and his or her
98:- Once again, this is an aspersion because your usage of the words is meant to poison the well by implying that some (sort of)
146:
123:
81:
65:
107:
60:
Kautilya3 and you have co-edited many articles. See, for example, the TP and articles such as when you joined an
61:
50:
64:
to keep
Kautilya3-favored flawed version; or, the editing history of the article and its TP where you
27:
119:
46:
87:
Are you saying you never had off-wiki correspondence and never were friends with any of them?
8:
138:
73:
19:
115:
42:
99:
32:
37:
Hi, please provide evidence that I have tag-teamed with K3, JJ, and V93
57:
allege suffers from "persistent attempts at whitewashing".
41:retract the unsubstantiated aspersion.
13:
14:
162:
147:22:40, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
124:19:32, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
82:16:58, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
51:07:29, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
1:
7:
10:
167:
142:
77:
28:21:41, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
23:
108:barnstars/wikilove
158:
166:
165:
161:
160:
159:
157:
156:
155:
35:
12:
11:
5:
164:
154:
153:
152:
151:
150:
149:
139:Ms Sarah Welch
129:
128:
127:
126:
111:
104:
90:
74:Ms Sarah Welch
69:
58:
34:
31:
20:Ms Sarah Welch
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
163:
148:
144:
140:
135:
134:
133:
132:
131:
130:
125:
121:
117:
112:
109:
105:
101:
97:
96:
91:
88:
85:
84:
83:
79:
75:
70:
67:
63:
59:
55:
54:
53:
52:
48:
44:
40:
30:
29:
25:
21:
16:
116:TrangaBellam
94:
92:
86:
43:TrangaBellam
38:
36:
17:
15:
95:supporters
66:apologized
33:Aspersion
62:edit war
103:enough.
68:; etc.
100:CABAL
143:talk
120:talk
78:talk
47:talk
24:talk
145:)
122:)
80:)
49:)
39:or
26:)
141:(
118:(
76:(
45:(
22:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.