Knowledge

:Cabals - Knowledge

Source πŸ“

402:"This highlights a perennial and worrying problem about Esperanza: that they constantly set themselves apart. They say they give Wikipedians hope – but who has any interaction with Esperanza who isn’t Esperanzan? Why is there even a special term for someone who's in Esperanza? This organization ought to be deleted because they’re targeting new and vulnerable users, who then see everything on Knowledge through green-tinted lenses, and it is not good. It does lead to superiority complexes, regardless of what the front page says. Esperanzans, at least the active ones, see themselves as Esperanzans first and foremost. We have to delete Esperanza for their own good, to show them what Knowledge is like outside the wall of their sub-culture" (from the 29: 70: 139: 187:
in order to pursue an interest. Whether any given cabal actually exists usually is impossible to determine conclusively. Often the existence of a cabal is posited by a group holding opposite views to those of the supposed cabal; they may look like a cabal to others.
307:
Joke cabals are generally tolerated until they affect the project, at which point the matter often is taken up at one of the administrative noticeboards. Knowledge pages used by individuals who are solely here to socialize, not contribute, may be raised at
196:
In the early days of Knowledge, annoyed by a huge amount of vandalism and other irresponsible editing, a number of persons, including "fathers-founders" themselves, considered the idea of "benign cabals".
254:
on the encyclopedia. While speculation exists about how much influence such groups have over the encyclopedia, social groups are a fact of life, and some users have been known to use off-wiki means (
286:– Knowledge is often accused of operating hierarchical cabals which most editors would not know the existence of. To satirize the theory a number of editors formed joke cabals. Some examples are 391: 403: 380: 272:. The main concern about Esperanza was that it was bureaucratic and elitist and this was a strong concern when the group was brought to 427: 234:– This type of cabal is restricted in its membership and secretive about its functions or existence. The aims of such groups may be 201:
was a strong proponent of giving editors considered to be experts an extra power, which was one of his major disagreements with
43: 88:
It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Knowledge contributors and is made to be humorous. This page is not one of
422: 89: 277: 17: 432: 209:. In 2001, Jimbo himself mused on the idea of "cabal membership", which had eventually led to the concept of 93: 326: 184: 331: 295: 54: 321: 222: 210: 47: 180: 359: 341: 381:
Jimmy Wales Thu Oct 18 19:22:46 UTC 2001 post on Knowledge-l: A proposal for the new software
354: 291: 346: 264:– This type of cabal went through discussion on Knowledge. In August 2005, a group called 114: 8: 149: 121: 336: 106: 37: 247: 239: 96:. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints. 298:. They can offer light relief to editors especially after periods of heavy editing. 251: 81: 78: 269: 243: 176: 28: 416: 309: 287: 273: 265: 235: 198: 206: 202: 258:, e-mail, external websites, etc.) to coordinate their actions on-wiki. 164: 280:
is an example of a sanctioned cabal, dedicated to fight vandalism.
175:
is often used loosely to describe real or imagined collectives of
238:, promotion of its members to become Knowledge functionaries, or 367: 302: 170: 315: 268:
was formed with the idea of fellowship and strengthening
255: 191: 153:. Two or more people who disagree with you constitute a 205:, and he even attempted to implement "expertocracy" in 44:
Knowledge:Words of wisdom – on Knowledge and the Cabal
216: 147:Two or more people who agree with you constitute a 179:who have chosen to group inside or outside of the 42:"WP:CABAL" redirects here. You may be looking for 276:. In December 2006, the group was disbanded. The 414: 227:Cabals can be roughly divided into three types: 98:This essay isn't meant to be taken seriously. 392:Signpost Introducing Esperanza 19/09/05 14: 415: 133: 64: 24: 94:thoroughly vetted by the community 90:Knowledge's policies or guidelines 27: 25: 444: 250:, possibly to impress a specific 428:Knowledge essays about consensus 137: 68: 46:, where it used to redirect, or 396: 385: 374: 13: 1: 53:For the Mediation Cabal, see 7: 327:Knowledge:There is no cabal 10: 449: 332:Knowledge:There is a cabal 220: 104: 52: 41: 35: 423:Humorous Knowledge essays 236:disruption of the project 55:Knowledge:Mediation Cabal 322:Knowledge:List of cabals 223:Knowledge:List of cabals 145:This page in a nutshell: 60:Humorous Knowledge essay 50:, a joke list of cabals. 48:Knowledge:List of cabals 360:Knowledge:Rouge editor 342:Knowledge:Meatpuppetry 278:Counter-Vandalism Unit 32: 433:Knowledge cabal humor 355:Knowledge:Rouge admin 351:Cabal-related humor: 292:The Rouge Admin Cabal 92:, as it has not been 31: 347:Knowledge:Canvassing 337:Knowledge:Tag team 288:The Bathrobe Cabal 38:Knowledge:Tag team 33: 296:The Penguin Cabal 185:project namespace 161: 160: 132: 131: 16:(Redirected from 440: 407: 400: 394: 389: 383: 378: 141: 140: 134: 124: 117: 72: 71: 65: 21: 448: 447: 443: 442: 441: 439: 438: 437: 413: 412: 411: 410: 401: 397: 390: 386: 379: 375: 370: 318: 305: 225: 219: 194: 138: 128: 127: 120: 113: 109: 101: 100: 69: 61: 58: 51: 40: 34: 23: 22: 18:Knowledge:CABAL 15: 12: 11: 5: 446: 436: 435: 430: 425: 409: 408: 395: 384: 372: 371: 369: 366: 365: 364: 363: 362: 357: 349: 344: 339: 334: 329: 324: 317: 314: 304: 301: 300: 299: 281: 259: 218: 215: 211:administrators 193: 190: 159: 158: 142: 130: 129: 126: 125: 118: 110: 105: 102: 87: 86: 75: 73: 59: 26: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 445: 434: 431: 429: 426: 424: 421: 420: 418: 405: 404:Esperanza MfD 399: 393: 388: 382: 377: 373: 361: 358: 356: 353: 352: 350: 348: 345: 343: 340: 338: 335: 333: 330: 328: 325: 323: 320: 319: 313: 311: 297: 293: 289: 285: 282: 279: 275: 271: 267: 263: 260: 257: 253: 252:point of view 249: 245: 241: 237: 233: 230: 229: 228: 224: 214: 212: 208: 204: 200: 189: 186: 182: 178: 174: 172: 166: 156: 152: 151: 146: 143: 136: 135: 123: 119: 116: 112: 111: 108: 103: 99: 95: 91: 85: 83: 80: 74: 67: 66: 63: 56: 49: 45: 39: 30: 19: 398: 387: 376: 306: 283: 262:Editor cabal 261: 244:meatpuppetry 232:Secret cabal 231: 226: 199:Larry Sanger 195: 168: 162: 154: 148: 144: 97: 76: 62: 248:tag teaming 221:Main page: 207:Citizendium 417:Categories 368:References 303:Conclusion 284:Joke cabal 240:canvassing 77:This is a 36:See also: 266:Esperanza 181:mainspace 167:the term 165:Knowledge 150:consensus 115:WP:CABALS 107:Shortcuts 316:See also 270:WikiLove 122:WP:CABAL 79:humorous 246:and/or 242:and/or 192:History 310:WP:MFD 217:Types 203:Jimbo 177:users 171:cabal 155:cabal 82:essay 294:and 274:MfD 256:IRC 183:or 163:On 419:: 312:. 290:, 213:. 406:) 173:" 169:" 157:. 84:. 57:. 20:)

Index

Knowledge:CABAL
There is no Cabal
Knowledge:Tag team
Knowledge:Words of wisdom – on Knowledge and the Cabal
Knowledge:List of cabals
Knowledge:Mediation Cabal
humorous
essay
Knowledge's policies or guidelines
thoroughly vetted by the community
Shortcuts
WP:CABALS
WP:CABAL
consensus
Knowledge
cabal
users
mainspace
project namespace
Larry Sanger
Jimbo
Citizendium
administrators
Knowledge:List of cabals
disruption of the project
canvassing
meatpuppetry
tag teaming
point of view
IRC

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑