2347:
being there is obviously problematic. I started to ask these questions because I think RfA was getting to be too much of a free pass for editors who had been around long enough and not broken anything - I though my own RfA was too soft and didn't prepare me for the task ahead. But I will think about dropping the questions now: while I've received good feedback about them, it is very sad to see opposes based on the legitimate exercise of a discretion within policy. So I'm sorry. I do hope your RfA does turn around, it's not out of the question. --
2672:
3337:(update) It seems MikeNicho231 has stopped the edit war, at least for now. Had I woken up two hours earlier I might have handed out a block. Anyway, I added a note to his talk page asking him to not revert or remove content on the article while there is an active discussion about the content on the talk page. After that note, he's restored the caption to the picture. I've also added a note to the article's talk page explaining that further reverts while the discussion is ongoing won't be tolerated.
1269:
2014:, was tagged for speedy deletion by you today on the grounds that it was an 'unsourced attack article'; I presume it was an oversight, since the article was indeed sourced (to a detailed New York Times article), and the subject of the 'attack' was an alleged member of Al Qaeda. I've provisionally restored the article, with original source, and added a second unrelated source reference which confirms the content of the article. I imagine this was just an oversight on your part.
1725:
website. What's your view is on me copyediting it to some semblance of an encyclopedia article with proper referencing? Apart from being necessary (it makes
Knowledge look ridiculous), it would actually be in his best interests. I have no idea what the problem was with the edit in question, Unfortunately that one slipped under my radar, as I'm used to seeing it edited by various COI IPs. But in my experience articles written like that are often a target to detractors.
1544:: "Prior to any sanctions being imposed, the editor in question shall be given a warning with a link to this decision by an uninvolved administrator; and, where appropriate, should be counseled on specific steps that he or she can take to improve his or her editing in accordance with relevant policies and guidelines." I could not find such a warning, and the two edits in question are barely inside the 24 hour limit. Can you explain why you blocked immediately? --
1226:
2233:. It can be quite frustrating when folks who are essentially yelling at me, ignore the obvious point I was making - that they can not simply state on their own that a theory is fringe - especially when the theory is supported by publications in many academic presses - but they have to come up with some reliable source that questions the theory. I don't think capital letters constitute enough reason for a formal warning, but that is up to you.
683:
a fallacious canvassing argument, which is erroneous as a matter of procedure. It is hard to imagine that anyone who has had any exposure to the issue could proclaim with a straight face that
Jewishness is unrelated to acting, and there are some troubling aspects of attempts to stamp out Jewishness as an identity category on Knowledge. Under the circumstances, I may take this promptly to deletion review if you will not reconsider. Thanks, -
1755:
communication with the subject off-wiki which leads me to believe that there is probably scope to work with him to improve the article. Especially as (a) doing so will improve the chances of the article not being deleted at some point; and (b) doing so may help limit the extent to which the article is a "target". So if you're thinking of doing so, sending him note in advance might help, and I'm happy to help as well. --
1034:
1599:
this is in the public interest and is irrefutable and referenced fact, and the tone of the article was such that someone searching for specific information on
Richard Lukins would have found some evidence and further reference to his activities, again, all referenced and in the public domain. This is no "attack site" other than it is presenting a mixture of fact and links to discussions by other interested parties.
3117:? Not sure how to do this for templates. You can't prod the template, I'm guessing, so does it go straight to MfD? Or is there some intermediate step? (The deletion rationale is that the vast majority of the links in the template are, and always will be, redlinks, as the roads they refer to have no claim of notability, and that the remaining notable roads (if any) are too few to justify templating.) -
2739:
2327:" type of personality, even if some folks seem convinced that I am. Assuming (as seems more likely than not right now) that my RfA falls short — and even if, by some miracle, I do somehow pull through — I'm definitely going to have some homework to take away from this experience. Sincere thanks for the practice exercise; please be assured that I harbour no resentment of any sort.
1811:
not exist at least under the "bibliographic" information provided). Many of the sources which are online in the
Cornell archives, are not linked in the references, entailing very time-consuming hunts for them. I don't think that was unintentional on the part of the original authors either. Once you find the source it actually says something altogether different. Best,
2535:(on each occasion I can remember, there were numerous editors including admins who agreed with them), they were certainly bold and were met with opposition. I think it is useful to take time out, reflect on those actions and my general approach to the project as both an editor and admin, recharge, and consider how I can improve. --
2969:
people involved in AfD debates to stop "wasting time" and go do something "productive... elsewhere" comfortably fits into the standard definition of trolling and all editors should refrain from making such comments. I do see where you are coming from, but I'm afraid we'll have to agree to disagee in this case.
2531:
your own judgement as an editor on this project, which is why I stress I would not open myself to recall on your views alone. In the meantime, I'm going off-wiki for a few days to reflect on this and a few other bold calls I've made with and without the tools in recent months: while they weren't necessarily
3272:
Actually, could I ask you for another potential favour? I'm going to be on holiday (and away from
Knowledge) from now until 4 January. If you happen to spot anything happening on my talk page (proposed deletions, non-personal enquiries) I'd be grateful if you were able to field it. If not I'm sure
1355:
Thanks, I'm drafting a restriction at the moment. I'm considering defining the scope as "user conduct" processes generally because AE is the principal, but not only place, where user conduct issues within the area of conflict can be sanctioned. But I am going to set it at two months rather than three
434:
Thank you for the notice. I'll refrain from editing the article for some time and will endeavor to use better judgment in my edits. My thinking was that those who were weighing in on the AfD ought to see the longstanding version of the article with all the sourcing instead of the gutted stub which it
145:
Hi, I asked semiprotection for "Eye", denied because "It's a prominent article so vandalism will be picked up quickly. It's not frequent enough to justify protection locking out the IPs who are making helpful contributions." On the last 100 edits I see perhaps ten helpful edits by IP, which, however,
2968:
I did not call the contributor a troll, their contribution history would seem to clearly show that is not the case. However the editor deliberately and needlessly made a throwaway remark which was not a contructive contribution to the AfD and was only ever going to elict a negative reaction. Telling
1928:
Hi
Mkativerata. This may seem out of the blue, but I noticed your question on Richwales' RfA and just wanted to mention that I enjoy reading the RfA questions you pose, and the candidates' answers to them. They do an excellent job making the candidates think (they certainly made me think, in my RfA)
1783:
Hi, sorry I'm so late replying, got caught up with some other articles I'm writing. It's something I may tackle in the new year. Yes, he would survive an AfD, but I fear the comments there would not be very complimentary. Autobiographies rub a lot of editors the wrong way. I don't mind them, as long
682:
Hello. As a courtesy, I am asking you to reconsider your closing of the above-referenced list article, because it ran against consensus (it overrode the majority of reasoned opinions), and because it blatantly ignored the sourcing on the subject that the subject is in fact notable. You also raised
3233:
In fairness, they are far outweighed by the number of clowns who carry out bold unilateral moves without discussion. :) (Most RMs seem to be technical - they have to go to RM because the move requires the deletion of the target page which can only be done by an admin). RM is exhausting. A couple of
1810:
Re Irving
Literary Society. Yes, things seem to be thankfully quiet there. I've been doing some copy-editing etc. every now and then. But it still neds a lot work and one of the biggest problems is the dreadful referencing. Some are outright faked (they don't say what they are alleged to say, or do
1432:
I expect if the need becomes dire enough and I'm honestly the best candidate there'll be some kind of posse rounded up to nominate me. In the mean time, I'd feel reluctant to nominate myself until I had a featured article under my belt and enough time on my hands to learn the processes around such
698:
Hi there. Just briefly: (1) It is not a majority vote; (2) canvassing wasn't relevant to the decision, I mentioned it to highlight that it is not a majority vote; (3) the closing statement addressed the sources as they had been discussed in the AfD. So I'm not inclined to reconsider on those bases.
2530:
Look, Off2riorob if you want to round up a group of established editors to initiate a recall, go for it. Depending on the identity of the editors concerned, I'd consider resigning the tools without even initiating a formal process. I'll be perfectly frank with you: I have very little confidence in
2317:
Hi. Do you think I could have a set of those toy blocks to play with? :-) Unfortunately, it appears clear that a large number of people on my RfA are simply not willing to consider my perspective on the question you submitted. (Ironically, if I had answered it differently, I imagine a different
3196:
I don't know, I think for some people TfD and other obscure areas are their thing so they're probably quite happy to do it manually. I like your "This is my first TfD nomination" qualifier - there's nothing like wandering blind into one of this project's many obscure little worlds :) The last few
1598:
I recreated a page on
Richard Lukins - a living person who has been quoted in print as a subject matter expert in the motoring trade. Part of the page was specifically to air a piece of public domain information, namely the Official Receiver's Report into his previous company's collapse - I feel
201:
Yes I think my comment about a possible block in the edit summary neglected the fact that your earlier tags had been declined by other admins using rollback rather than declined with a reason as is usual. To be quite frank I can understand that you felt aggrieved by that. As for the merits of the
2990:
why did you not changed North Korea national team name? and South Korea is not official name. South Korea is a word that you(foreigners) used to feel comfortable. Anybody
Republic of Korean people are not write & say South Korea(남한). Republic of Korean people are use Korea(한국) or Republic of
2511:
EC - The issue was clearly a simple decision which the deacon made easily, there is a time to support new users and a time to let them know that their disruptive actions will result in restrictions on their editing privileges, you failed to recognize that clearly crossed line, you have upset and
2346:
Hi
Richwales, I'm genuinely very disappointed in the direction that your RfA has taken. I think some of the oppose concerns are quite valid (eg content) but the reaction to the question is sad. The fact that multiple admins and experienced editors are in either column citing Q4 as the reason for
1326:
Thanks for your response there, Offliner. I think this kind of restriction is only likely to work if you just allowed other editors involved in content disputes to report incidents, rather than report incidents yourself to other editors or admins to take to AE. By doing the latter, other editors
161:
G'day there - I think the only way for the vandalism to be stopped on this article is the old-fashioned way: by counter-vandalism patrollers. I think that's realistic here. I can't see any more than two incidents of vandalism per day on this article, so it's not frequent and it gets picked up by
3354:
Thanks, Mk .. sorry, I was out all day ... MikeNicho231 has yet to make a single policy-compliant addition to that article, and the time it takes to deal with such behaviors is certainly ... irritating ... I would like to get some real work done here :) I appreciate your input and watching the
2442:
Your actions and wheel warring there were very poor administration and I didn't support you at your RFA for reasons that have been reflected in your actions tonight, wheel warring, immaturity of decision imo and although I accepted your admin promotion and was willing to trust you, your actions
1754:
While I was dealing with yesterday's issues I must say I turned a blind eye to the state of the article. Looking briefly for sources, it seems the article would stand a better than even chance of surviving AfD, so improving it would certainly be a worthwhile cause. I've been in very productive
1724:
I woke up this morning to see the kerfuffle over the November 24th edit, re-read the article and was reminded how apalling it is. The article is a piece of personal promotion referenced only to his website. It's full of peacock language, exaggerated claims, and large chunks of copyvio from his
146:
simply change "color" to "colour", "maximise" to "maximize" or vice versa. This is all OK, but leaves two problems to me: everyday in my watchlist vandalisms to "Eye" appear uselessly one or more times; and, most importantly, the page history is unreadable. What can be done to prevent this? --
257:
G'day MQS - I'm sorry I'm afraid I barely have the technical ability to sign my own posts, let alone determine what is wrong with a tool. However, I do think this tool is inappropriate for the reasons you point out and it shouldn't be linked from anywhere on the project. If there is to be a
52:
I'm not very familiar with CfDs. But I do have strong feelings that whenever a close, anywhere on this project, goes against the numbers or even against a significant minority, it needs to be explained well. Transparency in decision-making and respect for contributors to debates demands it.
394:
What might be of more concern (at first glance) is the relationship of the edit to the editor's AfD contribution. It doesn't appear this editor has been notified of DIGWUREN though, which is a necessary prerequisite for discretionary sanctions. I'll look into it and notify if necessary.
2422:
One of Wee Curry Monster's main opponents (Richard) suggested he be allowed to remain in discussions. That is fairly persuasive to me. I have suggested a 0RR and specific warning about bad faith accusations to replace the topic bans. Please let me know if that seems appropriate to you.
2322:
insisting that admins should be held to a higher standard. Oh, well.) This issue (and also the "rvv" question) probably help illustrate what many of us have known for a long time about e-mail, talk pages, and other written communication — the fine nuances don't get communicated, and
1099:
Thanks for restoring the list for the review. It confirmed for me what the debate suggested. At the time of deletion there was only one non-notable on the list - Michael Rubenfeld. Sorry about the Overturn, but I see most of the Deletes as attempts to stretch policy beyond practice.
2475:
Off2riorob, I'd put it down to a blip. It was partly caused anyway by me seeming to ignore her position. @Mkativerata, I think you need more experience on WP:EW. I'm harsher than most, but 95% of admins would have blocked there ... if only to get the user's attention. All the best,
2458:
Your message here has conflicted with a note I made on Deacon's talk page. While I stand by my decision not to block the user and I did not cross the wheel-warring bright line, I'm going to take a few days to reflect because I am disappointed in myself for acting impulsively.
2109:
2720:
Thanks for the super fast pickup on the speedy tag I put on there. In fact you were so quick I was still mid way through putting on a note which created the associated talk page, so I've inadvertantly created an orphan talk page. Would you mind deleting that too. Thanks,
2914:
I will keep an eye on him/her, thanks for pointing it out. At this stage I see a lot of firm comments about the article's content but nothing personal. I'd suggest if you think his/her arguments are nonsense, just let the IP talk into thin air. But I will watch.
222:
Can you determine why or how the AFD Stastitics tool is broken? I have noticed that at several AFDs where my !vote was "keep", the toolserver instead had myself and other keep !votes listed as deletes... and in a few, several editors are listed as both keeps
2995:). Because Republic of Korea is the korean peninsula only unique rightful goverment, understand? and FIFA official name is Korea Republic. I don't understand you why change the name. Sorry for my bad english. I hope to you will be understand my meaning.
227:
deletes. WTF? I know that AFD is not a headcount, but if the tool is to be in the AFD template at all, should it at least be tallying accurately? Please refer to these recent examples of where information being tallied and reported inaccuratey:
2872:
Umawehiyo - It is the cheer created by Coach Brylle Jerome Guillermo Tamayo and used by the SJCS Knights SOPHOMORES and the SENIORS Golden Warriors. Chanting the Umawehiyo has been proven effective to boost player spirit and bewilder opponents.
3184:
That wasn't so hard, just annoyingly time consuming. I'm assuming there's some kind of allowable automation tool for doing these that lets people like TreasuryTag and LibStar do the kind of 30-nomination-a-day work that they specialise in. -
2185:
of another admin, but since you are quite active in the AE requests concerning me, I thought I should notify you of my question as well (also, your input would be appreciated). PS. I may be semi-active over the next few days (traveling).
272:
Im sure there was propbably some discussion somewhere when the tool was added to the template, offering reasons and justification for a tool that is seen as inappropriate (chuckle)... I just haven't found it yet. I did also ask over at
781:
First of all, I just got the tool today, and secondly, I was already told I wasn't to do that. I only made 2 mistakes, out of about 100+ good uses of the tool. I'm going to accept your decision, but I feel it is not fair one bit.
1302:
and some of the editors involved. It is my perception that most uninvolved editors and admins simply do not know or do not care about what is going on. So someone has to take responsibility for reporting violations, unless the
2128:
Unblocked, obviously...if you want to sit it out that's your choice (though what would happen if you accidentally indeffed yourself?), but please don't make my script apply a strikethrough to your name every time it appears:)
1854:
Thanks - I've watchlisted the articles. Hopefully the SPI case can be processed quickly. Unfortunately I know bugger-all about rangeblocks but if he comes back again I'll post to ANI to get the attention of an admin who does!
1891:
Thanks. I've blocked the new IP and the other two for a further 72 hours. I'm not ruling out semi-protection absolutely, it's just I'm reluctant to do it and lock out a globe's worth of IPs just because of one miscreant.
2492:
Thanks Deacon. To be honest I might have blocked him had I been in a different mood. I'm sure I've dished out edit-warring blocks in less-deserving circumstances than that. Another reason for me to reflect for a while.
3166:
I'll go try that out. Someday someone should make the effort to centralise all these processes. It'd be no more complex than the way that lists are covered at AfD despite sharing many policies with categories. -
1415:
2935:
The comment may have been made in good faith and by an experienced editor. However, those type of comments made at AfD serve no useful purpose and as such, in my book, is the very definition of trolling.
435:
has been reduced to. Maintaining that vastly reduced version seemed inclined to give a false impression of the article as it has been for year and militate toward a more likely determination of deletion.
450:
No worries - once an article is under a discretionary sanction regime (as this one is), one's actions on the article will be much more closely scrutinised than they would be on other articles. Cheers --
3530:
Thanks MRG, although my only contribution to this one seems to be doing a bit of work on it and forgetting about it! I hope you have a very good Christmas (if you celebrate it) and holiday season! --
2372:
35:. I am scratching my head as well, wondering why a discussion with 8 for keep and 7 for delete was closed as delete, from the same admin that relisted the discussion in the first place. Thoughts? --
2887:
Chanting and Clapping with the beat of the drums and the "wave" effect of the croud, the two batches sitting together are a sight to behold. They Proved that, with teamwork, everything is possible.
1169:
I believe that you intended to restore a deleted page that is being discussed at DRV, but when I click through from DRV it does not appear (only a template saying it was restored). Just an fyi.--
2592:
No worries - it seems I neglected to ping you so no wonder you missed it. I think it only transcludes once it's complete. Anyway, I will continue with the remainder tomorrow morning. Cheers --
1253:
You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.
307:
1784:
as the author/subject is willing to let them be edited for neutral encyclopedic tone and referenced properly without constant obstruction and reversion. I've rescued several from AfD e.g.
277:, and Fram has now set it so the tool will not appear at new AFDs (though still seen at old). I have asked there for its background and how it got broken. Join please, if you have input.
376:
2079:
I think I should sit this block out as punishment, the offence being "performing administrative tasks with too many browser windows open". Lucky I didn't hit an innocent bystander. --
3490:
1740:
Hi Voceditenore, thanks very much for the note. I'll give you a full reply in about 10 hours, if that's ok (sorry just off to bed soon but I don't want to leave this one hanging). --
2577:
For some reason, your GA review of Adelaide Leak never transcluded and so I've only seen it today! I apologise for the delay and have responded to your comments so far. Thanks! --
938:. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review.
512:
three times in the last three days, although never doing it within a 24 hour period. He has never discussed this on the talk page, although there is an active discussion thread.
3114:
550:
3340:
So it seems things are a bit more under control now but I will keep an eye on the article (and to anyone else reading this post - I will keep an eye on everyone's actions). --
638:
328:
3034:. As the English-speaking world refers to the football team as "South Korea", not "Korea Republic", wikipedia uses "South Korea" even if that is not the team's official name.
1627:
I'm sorry, it is quite clear that the entire page was designed to cast aspersions on the subject. If you'd like to seek review of my deletion of the article, please do so at
675:
84:
899:
Thanks Mazca. Ending-start: as Mazca says I will be more than happy to consider restoring rollback if you can demonstrate good vandalism fighting without it for a while. --
2829:
Ummm I was wondering if you could get me a copy of the article you just deleted named "Umawehiyo". I just wanna read it haha maybe you could post it on my account thanks
2416:
1490:
747:
sanctions but as this is now spilling out into the wider article space I feel it necessary to act. A full series of diffs are at the ANI thread for community examination--
739:. What led to your block is just the latest in a series of issues with LM - who was just warned a matter of days ago for having a history of Wikihounding another account,
3595:? "You have been blocked from editing for violating an arbitration decision with your edits on ]" I'm inexperienced and want to understand how Knowledge works. thanks. --
1308:
3431:
1298:. You probably won't believe this, but I just want to help, and it is not my intention to cause any trouble. I'm mostly a content editor who has a good knowledge of the
875:
3556:
is back and has re-instigated the edit war by editing the album as 'studio' again for the FOURTH time, having been blocked 3 times before. Please do something about it.
3505:
3301:
has done nothing but slow edit warring, editing against consensus, and now uploading a copyvio image to Commons since your December 3 block of him ... see my talk and
3075:
2368:
2033:
mention the subject? That was the only source in the deleted version, so it was essentially an unsourced negative biography of a living person, qualifying for G10. --
3323:
Sorry I missed this (was sleeping!) It seems he filed a report against you that has been dealt with at AN3. Dealt with of sorts. I'll watchlist the page anyway. --
1399:
is more than a week old and no longer has any delete votes. If you don't see any problems, could you do the editors involved the favour of closing it? Thanks. -
804:
The instructions on your talk page say "Rollback is only for blatant vandalism". I see in your recent edits the following uses of the tool that are not vandalism:
692:
1295:
2774:
an admin about possible early unblocking. I had the chance to point a few of the exact issues out and he has commented on his talkpage in an understanding way.
2143:
Thank you, I still don't really know how that happened - at least I know I'm not the only one who's done it. Those toy blocks are going over to my userpage. --
1262:
1215:
2553:
anyone, I was just speaking for myself, don't worry about it, my trust is on a short fuse, if we can all learn and improve then we will all be doing well. -
2502:
1593:
1466:
1232:
1217:
947:
676:
3410:
Thanks, I had seen that and I have been thinking about whether to, and how, to comment in light of my disappointment at the direction of your recent RfA. --
2691:, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the
2487:
3525:
1901:
1864:
1239:. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Knowledge policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the
211:
2411:
2152:
2138:
1870:
1619:
1482:
1254:
1247:
962:
542:
404:
289:
267:
3539:
3251:
3228:
3210:
3176:
3161:
2866:
2171:
1585:
1571:
1456:
1442:
1427:
3664:
3580:
2755:
3678:
3367:
3332:
2030:
1820:
1749:
1158:
1012:
998:
980:
922:
869:
847:
826:
274:
195:
3349:
2710:
2399:
2248:
No worries. Normally it would be no big deal, but on an article like this, editors really need to avoid actions that can aggravate other editors. --
2102:
1778:
1764:
1693:
1123:
669:
654:
421:
3404:
3058:
2924:
2816:
2802:
2562:
2544:
2468:
2306:
2257:
1207:
1193:
3419:
3338:
3087:
2977:
2963:
2615:
2601:
2521:
2356:
2042:
722:
708:
623:
171:
2656:
1874:
1379:
1365:
1350:
1336:
1282:
815:
588:
459:
3619:
3024:
1967:
1953:
1915:
1640:
1523:
1502:
1088:
3631:
3472:
2662:
1679:
770:
494:
371:
is acceptable: "Rv to longstanding version of article, so people can at least see what POV pushers are trying to have deleted". The article,
354:
303:
3102:
2088:
908:
894:
573:
409:
3377:
2512:
wasted my time and the other experienced contributor you left a 3rr note and the deacon said he thought your actions disruptive and I agree.
1944:
Thanks for the feedback! By the way, I hope to see you back at RfA in a few months. The "experience" opposes (including mine) will vanish. --
1467:
1275:
1268:
126:
112:
96:
78:
62:
32:
3388:, in a discussion of hypothetical scenarios in RfA's. In case you aren't following this page, I thought you would want to be aware of it.
3040:
2954:" (wiki definition linked to show that this wasn't trolling) amounts to a personal attack so please be careful throwing that word around. --
2770:
he needs to discuss more and has imo expressed understanding of why he was blocked and that he won't repeat the behavior. So I said I would
530:
340:
2073:
1553:
629:
505:
3458:
1143:
444:
155:
3126:
2647:
Hi there - no worries, but all I did was carry out a page move. Anyway, I learnt something about the shrew-mole today. Happy editing! --
1473:
Dear Mkativerata, could you userify my a copy of Claire Jowitt so that might work on it to try to improve its notability? Best wishes (
2230:
368:
3385:
3136:. Unfortunately I know nothing about TFD, I don't think I've visited there. It's amazing how many weird XfDs we have. My favourite is
2023:
233:
2048:
548:
251:
3512:
2432:
3149:
3145:
2944:
162:
vandalism patrollers very quickly. If there is a large spike in vandalism, that would warrant temporary semi-protection. Cheers --
3565:
3141:
3067:
2340:
1108:
524:
177:
2849:
2730:
1664:
388:
3604:
2787:
2162:
Again thanks for your help, thats one of the reasons I wouldn't want to be an admin. I'd probably block myself all the time.
202:
speedy deletion tagging, in my view, it wasn't a blatant hoax and that's borne out by the divided opinions at the RfD so far.--
3286:
3052:
2390:
I'm watching the page, thank you. As I said, the editing pattern is "unconventional" and I would like to hear from Dojarca. --
1885:
1848:
1408:
1370:
While you're at it, why don't you propose a similar restriction to all editors of the EEML case for exactly the same reasons.
1049:
3378:
3235:
2896:
2384:
2291:
953:
Thanks - good nomination (examining the reasons for the close, rather than calling for headcounting or something similar). --
509:
429:
1734:
1184:
Yes, you can see the full page from the last version in the history - it's standard practice for DRV restorations. Cheers --
1178:
2908:
2845:
2586:
989:. :) However, he has been blocked as a suspected sockpuppet, which should make his/her contributions to the DRV invalid. --
931:
608:
231:
140:
2219:
856:
back to front; (2) demonstrate that you can correctly identify vandalism by performing (say, 50) reverts manually or with
237:
3557:
3463:
No worries I'm trying to figure out if a rangeblock is feasible and how to do it because he/she is clearly IP-hopping. --
2000:
1938:
1320:
1114:
No worries - that's not how I saw it but I guess we'll have to agree to disagree! Thanks for your comments at the DRV. --
186:
a blatant hoax. Perhaps you should threaten your fellow admins for abusing rollback and not understanding WP:VANDALISM.--
2242:
1839:
Can be very persistent and really unpleasant, especially following admin intervention. Appreciate the rapid response.
1307:
remedies are supposed to be a joke. But I can fully understand why you feel my reporting could be disruptive. As I said
3305:. If you don't have time to have a look, I'll file a report tonight, but I must get to Christmas preparations. Best,
3239:
3060:
2641:
561:
3646:
3443:
3317:
3093:
Thanks, I was just about to !vote keep but I saw that you closed it. I'm quite proud of creating this one :) Cheers --
2443:
tonight have made me change my position and you have lost my trust as an Admin and I no longer support your position.
755:
2452:
2210:
Thank you. I just write on what I find interesting and Lat has provided me with much laughter in my earlier years.
2200:
1562:
It is very clear that this article is subject to 1RR, a bright line restriction that was very clearly contravened. --
1129:
229:
1070:
479:
3571:
Sorry I missed this, I've been offline. It seems the issue is stale for now but I will keep an eye on it. Cheers --
3242:. So far I've made about 400 edits over two days to clean up after the move, and have about another 1,000 to go. --
2692:
2005:
1532:
1198:
Aha ... I didn't realize I should look there, but had assumed it would appear beneath the template. Many thanks.--
798:
321:
46:
3400:
2405:
2336:
1700:
article. I'm probably one of the few editors to have it watchlisted. I review all new opera-related articles for
1236:
805:
2114:
2054:
808:
83:
It happens all the time, so I'd be reluctant to single out any one admin. However, I do feel compelled to write
3108:
3011:
2686:
2482:
1560:
1341:
I can agree to voluntary stop posting at AE for three months and not to ask other people to post at AE for me.
1646:
1615:
1058:
736:
235:
2930:
2182:
2373:
Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Discussion among uninvolved editors about the appeal by Dojarca
743:. He was also blocked twice in October for violating WP:BATTLE. I have been relucant until now to enforce
713:
Suit yourself, I won't argue with you. It may be several hours, unless someone else gets there first. -
331:
you did. Not an easy one, and you probably made no one happy, but I thought you summed it up very well. --
217:
2671:
2312:
2167:
2067:
1881:
1844:
191:
1396:
2778:- I will leave it with you as to what to do as he hasn't actually made a new unblock request, thanks -
2134:
2011:
1715:
533:
This kind of stuff would normally be sanctionable so I've notified him of DIGWUREN as a formal step. --
1433:
adminly things as imposing blocks and closing AfDs. But thank you for the hypothetical support :-) -
3586:
3480:
2477:
1240:
1094:
943:
560:
redirect is the longtime Philippine TV Vandal. The article he created there is 100% hoax. Please see
520:
384:
286:
248:
2876:
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
817:
To get this tool back, you need to demonstrate a clear recognition of what constitutes vandalism. --
3224:
3190:
3172:
3122:
2841:
2761:
1581:
1549:
1438:
1404:
1769:
PS it seems the Irving Literary Society hasn't been edited in ages? That must be a good sign :) --
3674:
3592:
3576:
3561:
3547:
3535:
3468:
3415:
3345:
3328:
3282:
3277:
Not a problem, I've got your page on watchlist. I'll probably be offline from 25th-1st though. --
3247:
3206:
3157:
3098:
3048:
2959:
2920:
2862:
2798:
2751:
2726:
2652:
2597:
2540:
2498:
2464:
2395:
2352:
2302:
2253:
2148:
2098:
2084:
2038:
1949:
1897:
1860:
1791:
1774:
1760:
1745:
1708:
1675:
1636:
1567:
1498:
1452:
1423:
1361:
1332:
1189:
1154:
1119:
1084:
994:
958:
904:
865:
822:
766:
704:
665:
619:
584:
538:
490:
455:
417:
400:
350:
263:
207:
167:
122:
92:
58:
3449:
also thank you for dealing with the vandal who I must have upset some how, not sure why or how.
3660:
3642:
3363:
3313:
3302:
3267:
2985:
2715:
2263:
2163:
1877:
1840:
1816:
1730:
1258:
1139:
1008:
976:
841:
792:
187:
3215:
I'd not really noticed that before either; that strange subset of people who know how to find
2793:
Thank you for that - I have unblocked him (no need in my view for a formal request). Cheers --
1718:
2824:
2775:
2572:
2380:
2362:
2130:
1923:
1652:
1164:
935:
924:
650:
594:
513:
500:
306:, which was quite elaborate summary and not a typical brief one. This has resulted so far in
17:
3031:
2999:
2904:
2890:
2833:
2812:
2783:
2679:
2558:
2517:
2448:
2284:
2238:
2205:
1603:
1289:
1203:
1174:
939:
630:
516:
380:
362:
279:
241:
2323:
misunderstandings can arise that quickly become impossible to resolve. I'm really not a "
8:
3615:
3600:
3522:
3509:
3425:
3396:
3220:
3186:
3181:
3168:
3118:
2975:
2942:
2837:
2706:
2629:
2611:
2582:
2332:
2215:
2019:
1976:
1685:
1577:
1545:
1447:
No worries. You can count on a standing offer to nominate/co-nominate/support from me. --
1434:
1400:
1391:
730:
718:
688:
604:
470:"The headcount here is about 9354235-9354234". Nice to find some humour in an afd close.
372:
151:
3020:
Hi - thanks for responding to my note. There are two reasons why the name was changed:
3007:
2722:
2637:
2623:
2428:
2123:
1837:
1785:
1541:
1375:
1346:
1316:
853:
569:
440:
319:
3653:
3635:
3356:
3306:
2297:
Yes, that's the second well-founded legal threat I've come across in a few days :) --
2224:
2193:
2176:
1996:
1984:
1963:
1934:
1911:
1812:
1726:
1611:
1519:
1478:
1135:
1064:
1004:
972:
857:
833:
784:
465:
26:
1788:
1704:
and periodically check the list of articles with clean up tags. I had tagged it for
1414:
Done. Especially now that AfD is backlogged for the first time I can recall, I hope
3670:
3572:
3531:
3464:
3454:
3439:
3411:
3341:
3324:
3278:
3243:
3202:
3153:
3094:
3044:
2955:
2916:
2858:
2794:
2747:
2648:
2593:
2536:
2494:
2460:
2391:
2376:
2348:
2298:
2249:
2144:
2094:
2080:
2034:
1945:
1893:
1856:
1832:
1770:
1756:
1741:
1671:
1660:
1632:
1563:
1494:
1448:
1419:
1357:
1328:
1250:
until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
1185:
1150:
1115:
1102:
1080:
1024:
990:
954:
900:
861:
818:
762:
700:
661:
646:
615:
580:
534:
486:
475:
451:
413:
396:
346:
336:
259:
203:
163:
118:
88:
54:
485:
Haha thanks, I had to humour myself after blowing an hour of my life on that :) --
3083:
2900:
2808:
2779:
2554:
2513:
2444:
2277:
2234:
2063:
1559:
Hi there - this editor has been on notice of DIGWUREN restrictions for some time.
1327:
might see it as battling and circumventing the restriction. What do you think? --
1199:
1170:
968:
811:
744:
3611:
3596:
3389:
2970:
2950:
The editor concerned no doubt thinks the comment served a useful purpose. And "
2937:
2702:
2607:
2578:
2437:
2328:
2273:
2211:
2015:
1304:
1299:
986:
714:
684:
600:
297:
147:
108:
74:
42:
2417:
Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Result concerning Wee Curry Monster
3625:
3292:
3137:
3133:
3003:
2633:
2424:
1979:
on 5 November? Was it an error? or have I missed something? (I often do). --
1701:
1628:
1371:
1342:
1312:
740:
565:
436:
311:
3298:
1793:. In any case, I'll be sure to leave him a note before I tackle the article.
556:
Hi! Just want to inform you that the anon that created a new article on the
3553:
3216:
3198:
2189:
1992:
1980:
1959:
1930:
1907:
1607:
1515:
1474:
1053:
67:
Agreed. So what should be done about this inappropriate admin behavior? --
3610:
It's ok now - I think I can see what's happened on Ironman's talk page. --
2369:
Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Result of the appeal by Dojarca
761:
Thanks - I will have a look at some point over the next 12 hours or so. --
3450:
3435:
2324:
1697:
1686:
1670:
No worries, the blanking will probably be removed in a couple of days. --
1656:
1079:
Thanks very much, Minimac! A ver nice change from the DRVs, ANIs, etc! --
748:
557:
471:
332:
3079:
2058:
879:
776:
2857:
I'll post it here, there's nothing damaging it about it so no harm. --
1714:
which the article's creator removed without remedying the the problem
3489:
3039:
There is currently a discusion under way to move the DPR's team: see
2269:
2229:
I'm sorry if I got carried away using CAP .. ur ..capital letters at
1534:
967:
I dont know if you had looked at the discussion lately. Apparently a
735:
Hi Mkativerata. I've openned a thread at ANi relating to LemonMonday
103:
69:
37:
1576:
Okido. I only checked back a few weeks in the talk page history. --
117:
I think your question just conflicted with my overturn !vote :) --
3030:(2) Knowledge does not always use official names. Knowledge uses
2951:
1311:, I can agree to voluntarily stay away from AE for three months.
1033:
3634:
was keeping your Support from showing up. Hope you get boned.
3504:
For your contribution to CCI and especially on this occasion to
2899:. Quite disruptive and at least bordering on personal attack.
3297:
Mk, I'm out the door and don't have time to file a report, but
3434:. I was away at the time when the block and unblock happened.
3201:- a very strange area I've previously known nothing about. --
3066:
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect
1651:
I like what you did to address the copyright concerns on the
515:
The edit history suggests to me someone who has experience.
2412:
Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Wee Curry Monster
2108:
1717:. I also pointed out the major problems with the article on
1285:
at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
2606:
All comments sorted now, I think. Thanks for the review. --
1235:, which you created or to which you contributed, should be
814:
and the revert for which you were warned on your talk page.
642:
2895:
Please check anon editor 76.15.192.5 at the talk page at
1003:
Good show. Wanted to make sure you were aware. Have fun!
599:
Yep, it was about time. Thanks for taking care of it. --
3273:
I'll survive! Thanks. - 06:16, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
3113:
Hi. Can you give me a hand with proposing deletion of
3032:
the name by which a country or person is commonly known
2683:
was updated with a news item that involved the article
2093:
Looks like T.Canens beat me to the unblock. Thanks! --
3027:. It's important to follow consensus-based decisions.
677:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/List of Jewish actors
3197:
days I've been trying to get through the backlog at
2807:
Cool, hopefully we can all forget about it, thanks.
1975:
Why did you put an RfA congratulatory message on
1929:
and I just wanted to note my appreciation for them.
831:
Alright, I understand. And may I ask how I do that?
1248:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Matthew Yusuf Smith
1876:. Perhaps semi-protection might be appropriate?
1540:I'm a bit concerned about this abrupt block. From
874:FYI, Ending-start re-requested rollback at RFP, I
2318:large group of people might have put me down for
1231:A discussion has begun about whether the article
579:Ah... thank you very much for letting me know. --
3219:but aren't ready to do a move for themselves? -
1514:and Richard Hakluyt project stuff. Best wishes (
1052:edit warring report. Keep up the good AN3 work!
1048:This was for your excellent decision related to
1987:) 05:53, 11 December 2010 (UTC) Ah... I see I
1416:Knowledge:Requests for adminship/DustFormsWords
302:I forget to say thanks to you for your work on
258:discussion about that, I will gladly join in.--
1274:Hello, Mkativerata. You have new messages at
971:believes your decision to be based on racism.
810:, in addition to using it for edit warring on
3591:Hi, why did you block Ironman for an edit on
3430:Thank you for looking into the block and for
2112:This toy block is awarded to Mkativerata for
1906:...and you've blocked yourself for 72 hours.
1594:your Speedy Deletion of Richard Lukins page =
1468:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Claire Jowitt
1276:Knowledge:Copyright problems/2010 November 27
33:Knowledge:Deletion review/Log/2010 December 1
3652:oops, or not, depending on the definition!
375:, comes under the Digwuren sanctions. Note
3074:redirect, you might want to participate in
3070:. Since you had some involvement with the
2231:Talk:Mass killings under Communist regimes
1721:, which have likewise not been remedied.
2367:I strongly disagree with your comment at
1510::) - I'll try and find some more via her
1031:
614:Cheers, I figured you'd be ok with it. --
564:regarding that vandal for more details. -
3023:(1) There was consensus for the change:
2628:...for your contribution to the article
2107:
1696:. I'm here to ask some advice about the
3521:I got an early Christmas present. :D --
1134:Nice close. Good review and reasoning.
310:regarding the deletion of the article.
101:And what about this particular DRV? --
14:
3487:
2663:ITN for Christmas Island boat disaster
2268:...of appreciation for weighing in at
1655:article. Thanks for your assistance.--
860:; and (3) stay away from edit wars. --
87:and spamming it around the project. --
3386:Knowledge talk:Requests for adminship
3379:Knowledge talk:Requests for adminship
3236:Korea Republic national football team
2897:Mass killings under Communist regimes
2190:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus
1692:Hi, you may may remember me from the
510:Mass killings under communist regimes
3384:Hi. You were mentioned just now at
3078:(if you have not already done so).
2666:
1958:Thanks, I appreciate hearing that.
345:Thank you very much to you both. --
327:And I just wanted to thank you for
23:
3240:South Korea national football team
2276:, but very close. See ya 'round
2010:Hi Mkativerata - A short article,
1489:Done - the userfied version is at
1267:
852:The best way would be to (1) read
641:. When I tried to read it I got a
24:
3692:
3669:Thanks. That's weird indeed... --
2049:Might want to re-check that block
1246:The article will be discussed at
631:You get the big brass balls award
3488:
3132:I think they have to go through
2737:
2670:
2053:Are you sure you meant to block
1694:Irving Literary Society brouhaha
1418:will turn blue in due course. --
1224:
1032:
985:Yes I did see that and chose to
878:and pointed him back to you. ~
178:Regarding the hoax you defended
3498:The Copyright Cleanup Barnstar
3140:. And thanks for helping save
2687:Christmas Island boat disaster
2371:. Please see my comment here:
1294:I think you put it quite well
660:Yeah that was a tiring one! --
31:Thank you for your comment at
13:
1:
3679:08:21, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
3665:08:20, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
3647:08:18, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
3630:Did you see that weirdness?
3620:23:54, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
3605:23:45, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
3581:07:15, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
3566:05:24, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
3540:18:47, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
3526:12:59, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
3513:12:59, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
3473:02:43, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
3459:02:38, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
3444:08:57, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
3420:05:37, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
3405:05:34, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
3368:01:04, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
3350:23:28, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
3333:18:17, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
3318:17:07, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
3287:06:17, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
3252:05:50, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
3229:05:48, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
3211:05:43, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
3177:05:19, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
3162:05:14, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
3127:05:11, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
3115:Template:Volusia_County_Roads
3103:04:03, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
3088:03:49, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
3053:18:44, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
2978:19:47, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
2964:19:33, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
2945:19:30, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
2925:18:49, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
2909:18:03, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
2867:18:44, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
2850:14:16, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
2817:20:03, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
2803:18:38, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
2788:14:03, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
2756:08:25, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
2731:07:55, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
2711:13:20, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
2657:07:21, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
2642:06:27, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
2616:13:41, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
2602:21:24, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
2587:21:15, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
2563:01:47, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
2545:01:28, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
2522:00:52, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
2503:00:57, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
2488:00:55, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
2469:00:55, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
2453:00:52, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
2433:17:59, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
2400:20:11, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
2385:20:05, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
2357:18:39, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
2341:17:22, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
2307:07:10, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
2292:06:38, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
2258:02:56, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
2243:01:03, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
2220:07:32, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
2201:06:27, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
2172:20:50, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
2153:19:38, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
2139:19:35, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
2103:19:32, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
2089:19:29, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
2074:19:26, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
2043:09:03, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
2024:08:51, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
2001:06:01, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
1968:05:34, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
1954:05:31, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
1939:05:29, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
1916:19:25, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
1902:19:24, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
1886:17:39, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
1873:another IP block evasion see
1865:22:24, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
1849:22:22, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
1821:14:46, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
1779:18:28, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
1765:18:27, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
1750:08:56, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
1735:08:08, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
1680:07:21, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
1665:01:07, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
1641:00:00, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
1149:Thanks for the kind words. --
1013:03:52, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
999:03:44, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
981:03:43, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
551:Job Network (television show)
508:has removed the POV tag from
430:Notice re Communist terrorism
3152:! So much easier to type. --
2272:. Not a classic example of
1620:23:57, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
1586:23:56, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
1572:23:53, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
1554:23:50, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
1524:11:11, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
1503:09:10, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
1483:08:52, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
1457:01:55, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
1443:01:53, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
1428:01:47, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
1409:01:41, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
1380:22:09, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
1366:22:03, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
1351:22:01, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
1337:19:11, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
1321:18:38, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
1263:12:05, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
1208:06:51, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
1194:06:35, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
1179:06:22, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
1159:02:59, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
1144:02:50, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
1124:20:46, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
1109:20:45, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
1089:18:05, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
1071:16:18, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
963:09:26, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
948:09:08, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
909:18:05, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
895:15:42, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
870:02:50, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
848:02:47, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
827:02:37, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
799:02:34, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
771:16:35, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
756:15:49, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
723:02:49, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
709:02:35, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
693:02:18, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
670:02:36, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
655:02:03, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
624:19:28, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
609:08:37, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
589:06:56, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
574:06:48, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
543:04:54, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
525:04:29, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
495:04:54, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
480:02:01, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
460:20:27, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
445:20:14, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
422:20:03, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
405:19:51, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
389:19:49, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
355:18:49, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
341:13:25, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
322:10:33, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
290:19:26, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
268:18:48, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
252:10:09, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
212:05:55, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
196:05:52, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
172:19:24, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
156:11:27, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
127:20:21, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
113:20:18, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
97:20:17, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
79:20:04, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
63:20:01, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
47:19:59, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
7:
2882:U-ma-we-hiyo-ho Umawehiyo!'
2057:for block evasion? :-) ---
1356:(my original suggestion).--
10:
3697:
2012:Manaf Abd al-Rahim al-Rawi
1491:User:Msrasnw/Claire Jowitt
930:An editor has asked for a
3632:One strange wayward slash
3494:
1130:Death of Jenni-Lyn Watson
1038:
3061:Redirects for discussion
2006:mistaken speedy deletion
3593:Gordon_Hamilton-Fairley
3076:the redirect discussion
2991:Korea(대한민국)(almost use
2746:Thank you very much. --
2406:Wee Curry Monster at AE
3303:Talk:Asperger syndrome
3109:Template deletion help
2119:
1272:
2776:User talk:Robintetley
2677:On 17 December 2010,
2111:
1653:Gayle Conelly Manchin
1647:Gayle Conelly Manchin
1271:
936:List of Jewish actors
925:List of Jewish actors
18:User talk:Mkativerata
2931:Restored AfD comment
2478:Deacon of Pndapetzim
1991:missed something. --
1042:The Admin's Barnstar
923:Deletion review for
329:another recent close
85:WP:Show your working
2766:User seems to have
2630:American shrew-mole
2313:Toy blocks — me too
1977:User talk:Richwales
1233:Matthew Yusuf Smith
1218:Matthew Yusuf Smith
373:Communist terrorism
308:no consensus result
3508:, freshly closed.
2549:No I am not going
2120:
1283:remove this notice
1273:
367:Do you think that
141:Vandalism to "Eye"
3587:Blocking Question
3518:
3517:
3481:Thank you so much
3234:days ago I moved
3144:. I just created
3016:
3002:comment added by
2853:
2836:comment added by
2699:
2698:
2485:
2170:
2164:Wee Curry Monster
2127:
2071:
1884:
1878:Wee Curry Monster
1871:user:66.177.19.78
1847:
1841:Wee Curry Monster
1702:WikiProject Opera
1623:
1606:comment added by
1095:Jewish actors DRV
1076:
1075:
562:my summary report
369:this edit summary
218:Here's a headache
188:William S. Saturn
3688:
3657:
3639:
3552:Disruptive user
3492:
3485:
3484:
3360:
3310:
3059:WP;AN listed at
3015:
2996:
2852:
2830:
2762:User:Robintetley
2745:
2741:
2740:
2674:
2667:
2481:
2288:
2281:
2198:
2196:
2166:
2121:
2117:
2115:blocking himself
2061:
1880:
1843:
1713:
1707:
1622:
1600:
1286:
1228:
1227:
1105:
1067:
1061:
1056:
1036:
1029:
1028:
892:
846:
844:
838:
797:
795:
789:
753:
317:
314:
304:this DRV closing
282:
244:
3696:
3695:
3691:
3690:
3689:
3687:
3686:
3685:
3655:
3637:
3628:
3589:
3550:
3548:MICHAEL (ALBUM)
3483:
3428:
3382:
3358:
3308:
3295:
3270:
3111:
3064:
2997:
2988:
2973:
2940:
2933:
2893:
2885:
2831:
2827:
2764:
2738:
2736:
2718:
2693:candidates page
2665:
2626:
2575:
2440:
2408:
2365:
2315:
2286:
2279:
2266:
2227:
2208:
2199:
2194:
2188:
2179:
2113:
2051:
2008:
1926:
1835:
1711:
1705:
1690:
1649:
1601:
1596:
1538:
1471:
1394:
1292:
1287:
1280:
1241:deletion policy
1229:
1225:
1222:
1167:
1132:
1103:
1097:
1065:
1059:
1054:
1027:
940:Stuart.Jamieson
932:deletion review
928:
880:
842:
834:
832:
812:Michael (album)
793:
785:
783:
779:
749:
733:
680:
637:...for closing
635:
597:
554:
503:
468:
432:
365:
315:
312:
300:
280:
242:
220:
180:
143:
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
3694:
3684:
3683:
3682:
3681:
3627:
3624:
3623:
3622:
3588:
3585:
3584:
3583:
3549:
3546:
3545:
3544:
3543:
3542:
3523:Moonriddengirl
3516:
3515:
3510:Moonriddengirl
3501:
3500:
3495:
3493:
3482:
3479:
3478:
3477:
3476:
3475:
3427:
3424:
3423:
3422:
3381:
3376:
3375:
3374:
3373:
3372:
3371:
3370:
3294:
3291:
3290:
3289:
3269:
3268:Another favour
3266:
3265:
3264:
3263:
3262:
3261:
3260:
3259:
3258:
3257:
3256:
3255:
3254:
3221:DustFormsWords
3187:DustFormsWords
3169:DustFormsWords
3119:DustFormsWords
3110:
3107:
3106:
3105:
3063:
3057:
3056:
3055:
3037:
3036:
3035:
3028:
2987:
2986:Korea Republic
2984:
2983:
2982:
2981:
2980:
2971:
2938:
2932:
2929:
2928:
2927:
2892:
2889:
2878:
2870:
2869:
2838:Mar vin kaiser
2826:
2823:
2822:
2821:
2820:
2819:
2763:
2760:
2759:
2758:
2717:
2716:Woking Martian
2714:
2697:
2696:
2675:
2664:
2661:
2660:
2659:
2625:
2622:
2621:
2620:
2619:
2618:
2574:
2571:
2570:
2569:
2568:
2567:
2566:
2565:
2525:
2524:
2508:
2507:
2506:
2505:
2472:
2471:
2439:
2436:
2420:
2419:
2414:
2407:
2404:
2403:
2402:
2364:
2361:
2360:
2359:
2314:
2311:
2310:
2309:
2265:
2264:Just a note...
2262:
2261:
2260:
2226:
2223:
2207:
2204:
2187:
2178:
2175:
2160:
2159:
2158:
2157:
2156:
2155:
2105:
2050:
2047:
2046:
2045:
2007:
2004:
1973:
1972:
1971:
1970:
1925:
1922:
1921:
1920:
1919:
1918:
1868:
1867:
1834:
1831:
1830:
1829:
1828:
1827:
1826:
1825:
1824:
1823:
1801:
1800:
1799:
1798:
1797:
1796:
1795:
1794:
1709:primarysources
1689:
1684:
1683:
1682:
1648:
1645:
1644:
1643:
1595:
1592:
1591:
1590:
1589:
1588:
1578:Stephan Schulz
1546:Stephan Schulz
1537:
1533:Your block of
1531:
1530:
1529:
1528:
1527:
1512:pirate studies
1470:
1465:
1464:
1463:
1462:
1461:
1460:
1459:
1435:DustFormsWords
1401:DustFormsWords
1393:
1390:
1389:
1388:
1387:
1386:
1385:
1384:
1383:
1382:
1291:
1288:
1279:
1266:
1223:
1221:
1216:Nomination of
1214:
1213:
1212:
1211:
1210:
1166:
1163:
1162:
1161:
1131:
1128:
1127:
1126:
1096:
1093:
1092:
1091:
1074:
1073:
1045:
1044:
1039:
1037:
1026:
1023:
1022:
1021:
1020:
1019:
1018:
1017:
1016:
1015:
927:
921:
920:
919:
918:
917:
916:
915:
914:
913:
912:
911:
778:
775:
774:
773:
732:
729:
728:
727:
726:
725:
679:
674:
673:
672:
645:in my head. --
634:
628:
627:
626:
596:
593:
592:
591:
553:
547:
546:
545:
502:
499:
498:
497:
467:
464:
463:
462:
431:
428:
427:
426:
425:
424:
364:
361:
360:
359:
358:
357:
299:
296:
295:
294:
293:
292:
219:
216:
215:
214:
179:
176:
175:
174:
142:
139:
138:
137:
136:
135:
134:
133:
132:
131:
130:
129:
28:
25:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3693:
3680:
3676:
3672:
3668:
3667:
3666:
3662:
3658:
3651:
3650:
3649:
3648:
3644:
3640:
3633:
3621:
3617:
3613:
3609:
3608:
3607:
3606:
3602:
3598:
3594:
3582:
3578:
3574:
3570:
3569:
3568:
3567:
3563:
3559:
3558:218.186.8.235
3555:
3541:
3537:
3533:
3529:
3528:
3527:
3524:
3520:
3519:
3514:
3511:
3507:
3503:
3502:
3499:
3496:
3491:
3486:
3474:
3470:
3466:
3462:
3461:
3460:
3456:
3452:
3448:
3447:
3446:
3445:
3441:
3437:
3433:
3432:unblocking me
3421:
3417:
3413:
3409:
3408:
3407:
3406:
3402:
3398:
3394:
3392:
3387:
3380:
3369:
3365:
3361:
3353:
3352:
3351:
3347:
3343:
3339:
3336:
3335:
3334:
3330:
3326:
3322:
3321:
3320:
3319:
3315:
3311:
3304:
3300:
3288:
3284:
3280:
3276:
3275:
3274:
3253:
3249:
3245:
3241:
3237:
3232:
3231:
3230:
3226:
3222:
3218:
3214:
3213:
3212:
3208:
3204:
3200:
3195:
3194:
3192:
3188:
3183:
3180:
3179:
3178:
3174:
3170:
3165:
3164:
3163:
3159:
3155:
3151:
3147:
3143:
3139:
3135:
3131:
3130:
3129:
3128:
3124:
3120:
3116:
3104:
3100:
3096:
3092:
3091:
3090:
3089:
3085:
3081:
3077:
3073:
3069:
3062:
3054:
3050:
3046:
3042:
3038:
3033:
3029:
3026:
3022:
3021:
3019:
3018:
3017:
3013:
3009:
3005:
3001:
2994:
2979:
2976:
2974:
2967:
2966:
2965:
2961:
2957:
2953:
2949:
2948:
2947:
2946:
2943:
2941:
2926:
2922:
2918:
2913:
2912:
2911:
2910:
2906:
2902:
2898:
2888:
2884:
2883:
2877:
2874:
2868:
2864:
2860:
2856:
2855:
2854:
2851:
2847:
2843:
2839:
2835:
2825:Excuse me....
2818:
2814:
2810:
2806:
2805:
2804:
2800:
2796:
2792:
2791:
2790:
2789:
2785:
2781:
2777:
2773:
2769:
2757:
2753:
2749:
2744:
2735:
2734:
2733:
2732:
2728:
2724:
2723:ThePaintedOne
2713:
2712:
2708:
2704:
2694:
2690:
2689:
2688:
2682:
2681:
2676:
2673:
2669:
2668:
2658:
2654:
2650:
2646:
2645:
2644:
2643:
2639:
2635:
2631:
2617:
2613:
2609:
2605:
2604:
2603:
2599:
2595:
2591:
2590:
2589:
2588:
2584:
2580:
2573:Adelaide Leak
2564:
2560:
2556:
2552:
2548:
2547:
2546:
2542:
2538:
2534:
2529:
2528:
2527:
2526:
2523:
2519:
2515:
2510:
2509:
2504:
2500:
2496:
2491:
2490:
2489:
2484:
2479:
2474:
2473:
2470:
2466:
2462:
2457:
2456:
2455:
2454:
2450:
2446:
2435:
2434:
2430:
2426:
2418:
2415:
2413:
2410:
2409:
2401:
2397:
2393:
2389:
2388:
2387:
2386:
2382:
2378:
2374:
2370:
2363:Dojarca at AE
2358:
2354:
2350:
2345:
2344:
2343:
2342:
2338:
2334:
2330:
2326:
2321:
2308:
2304:
2300:
2296:
2295:
2294:
2293:
2290:
2289:
2283:
2282:
2275:
2271:
2259:
2255:
2251:
2247:
2246:
2245:
2244:
2240:
2236:
2232:
2222:
2221:
2217:
2213:
2203:
2202:
2197:
2191:
2184:
2174:
2173:
2169:
2165:
2154:
2150:
2146:
2142:
2141:
2140:
2136:
2132:
2125:
2124:edit conflict
2116:
2110:
2106:
2104:
2100:
2096:
2092:
2091:
2090:
2086:
2082:
2078:
2077:
2076:
2075:
2069:
2065:
2060:
2056:
2044:
2040:
2036:
2032:
2028:
2027:
2026:
2025:
2021:
2017:
2013:
2003:
2002:
1998:
1994:
1990:
1986:
1982:
1978:
1969:
1965:
1961:
1957:
1956:
1955:
1951:
1947:
1943:
1942:
1941:
1940:
1936:
1932:
1924:RfA questions
1917:
1913:
1909:
1905:
1904:
1903:
1899:
1895:
1890:
1889:
1888:
1887:
1883:
1879:
1875:
1872:
1866:
1862:
1858:
1853:
1852:
1851:
1850:
1846:
1842:
1838:
1822:
1818:
1814:
1809:
1808:
1807:
1806:
1805:
1804:
1803:
1802:
1792:
1789:
1786:
1782:
1781:
1780:
1776:
1772:
1768:
1767:
1766:
1762:
1758:
1753:
1752:
1751:
1747:
1743:
1739:
1738:
1737:
1736:
1732:
1728:
1722:
1720:
1719:the talk page
1716:
1710:
1703:
1699:
1695:
1688:
1681:
1677:
1673:
1669:
1668:
1667:
1666:
1662:
1658:
1654:
1642:
1638:
1634:
1630:
1626:
1625:
1624:
1621:
1617:
1613:
1609:
1605:
1587:
1583:
1579:
1575:
1574:
1573:
1569:
1565:
1561:
1558:
1557:
1556:
1555:
1551:
1547:
1543:
1536:
1525:
1521:
1517:
1513:
1509:
1506:
1505:
1504:
1500:
1496:
1492:
1488:
1487:
1486:
1484:
1480:
1476:
1469:
1458:
1454:
1450:
1446:
1445:
1444:
1440:
1436:
1431:
1430:
1429:
1425:
1421:
1417:
1413:
1412:
1411:
1410:
1406:
1402:
1398:
1381:
1377:
1373:
1369:
1368:
1367:
1363:
1359:
1354:
1353:
1352:
1348:
1344:
1340:
1339:
1338:
1334:
1330:
1325:
1324:
1323:
1322:
1318:
1314:
1310:
1306:
1301:
1297:
1284:
1277:
1270:
1265:
1264:
1260:
1256:
1251:
1249:
1244:
1242:
1238:
1234:
1219:
1209:
1205:
1201:
1197:
1196:
1195:
1191:
1187:
1183:
1182:
1181:
1180:
1176:
1172:
1165:Restored page
1160:
1156:
1152:
1148:
1147:
1146:
1145:
1141:
1137:
1125:
1121:
1117:
1113:
1112:
1111:
1110:
1107:
1106:
1090:
1086:
1082:
1078:
1077:
1072:
1068:
1062:
1057:
1051:
1047:
1046:
1043:
1040:
1035:
1030:
1014:
1010:
1006:
1002:
1001:
1000:
996:
992:
988:
984:
983:
982:
978:
974:
970:
966:
965:
964:
960:
956:
952:
951:
950:
949:
945:
941:
937:
933:
926:
910:
906:
902:
898:
897:
896:
893:
891:
887:
883:
877:
873:
872:
871:
867:
863:
859:
855:
851:
850:
849:
845:
839:
837:
830:
829:
828:
824:
820:
816:
813:
809:
806:
803:
802:
801:
800:
796:
790:
788:
772:
768:
764:
760:
759:
758:
757:
754:
752:
746:
742:
741:User:HighKing
738:
724:
720:
716:
712:
711:
710:
706:
702:
697:
696:
695:
694:
690:
686:
678:
671:
667:
663:
659:
658:
657:
656:
652:
648:
644:
640:
632:
625:
621:
617:
613:
612:
611:
610:
606:
602:
595:Joel Monaghan
590:
586:
582:
578:
577:
576:
575:
571:
567:
563:
559:
552:
544:
540:
536:
532:
529:
528:
527:
526:
522:
518:
514:
511:
507:
501:Mass killings
496:
492:
488:
484:
483:
482:
481:
477:
473:
461:
457:
453:
449:
448:
447:
446:
442:
438:
423:
419:
415:
411:
408:
407:
406:
402:
398:
393:
392:
391:
390:
386:
382:
378:
374:
370:
356:
352:
348:
344:
343:
342:
338:
334:
330:
326:
325:
324:
323:
320:
318:
309:
305:
291:
288:
287:
284:
283:
276:
271:
270:
269:
265:
261:
256:
255:
254:
253:
250:
249:
246:
245:
238:
236:
234:
232:
230:
226:
213:
209:
205:
200:
199:
198:
197:
193:
189:
185:
173:
169:
165:
160:
159:
158:
157:
153:
149:
128:
124:
120:
116:
115:
114:
110:
106:
105:
100:
99:
98:
94:
90:
86:
82:
81:
80:
76:
72:
71:
66:
65:
64:
60:
56:
51:
50:
49:
48:
44:
40:
39:
34:
19:
3629:
3590:
3554:User:Chelo61
3551:
3497:
3429:
3390:
3383:
3299:MikeNIcho231
3296:
3271:
3112:
3071:
3065:
2998:— Preceding
2992:
2989:
2934:
2894:
2891:Please check
2886:
2881:
2880:
2875:
2871:
2832:— Preceding
2828:
2771:
2767:
2765:
2742:
2719:
2700:
2685:
2684:
2678:
2627:
2576:
2550:
2532:
2441:
2421:
2366:
2319:
2316:
2285:
2278:
2267:
2228:
2209:
2206:Re: Barnstar
2180:
2161:
2052:
2031:this article
2009:
1988:
1974:
1927:
1869:
1836:
1813:Voceditenore
1727:Voceditenore
1723:
1691:
1650:
1602:— Preceding
1597:
1539:
1511:
1507:
1472:
1395:
1293:
1290:AE reporting
1255:Mrodgers2099
1252:
1245:
1230:
1220:for deletion
1168:
1136:Wolfstorm000
1133:
1101:
1098:
1041:
1005:Wolfstorm000
973:Wolfstorm000
929:
889:
885:
881:
835:
786:
780:
750:
734:
681:
639:this monster
636:
598:
555:
504:
469:
433:
366:
363:Edit summary
301:
285:
278:
247:
240:
224:
221:
183:
181:
144:
102:
68:
36:
30:
3671:Mkativerata
3573:Mkativerata
3532:Mkativerata
3465:Mkativerata
3412:Mkativerata
3342:Mkativerata
3325:Mkativerata
3279:Mkativerata
3244:Mkativerata
3203:Mkativerata
3154:Mkativerata
3095:Mkativerata
3045:Mkativerata
2956:Mkativerata
2917:Mkativerata
2859:Mkativerata
2795:Mkativerata
2748:Mkativerata
2680:In the news
2649:Mkativerata
2594:Mkativerata
2551:rounding up
2537:Mkativerata
2533:wrong calls
2495:Mkativerata
2461:Mkativerata
2392:Mkativerata
2377:Petri Krohn
2349:Mkativerata
2325:Judge Dredd
2299:Mkativerata
2250:Mkativerata
2145:Mkativerata
2095:Mkativerata
2081:Mkativerata
2055:this person
2035:Mkativerata
2029:Where does
1946:Mkativerata
1894:Mkativerata
1857:Mkativerata
1771:Mkativerata
1757:Mkativerata
1742:Mkativerata
1698:Stuart Howe
1687:Stuart Howe
1672:Mkativerata
1633:Mkativerata
1564:Mkativerata
1542:WP:DIGWUREN
1508:Many thanks
1495:Mkativerata
1493:. Cheers --
1449:Mkativerata
1420:Mkativerata
1358:Mkativerata
1329:Mkativerata
1186:Mkativerata
1151:Mkativerata
1116:Mkativerata
1081:Mkativerata
991:Mkativerata
955:Mkativerata
901:Mkativerata
876:declined it
862:Mkativerata
854:WP:ROLLBACK
819:Mkativerata
763:Mkativerata
731:LemonMonday
701:Mkativerata
662:Mkativerata
647:Ron Ritzman
616:Mkativerata
581:Mkativerata
558:Job Network
535:Mkativerata
487:Mkativerata
452:Mkativerata
414:Mkativerata
397:Mkativerata
347:Mkativerata
275:WP:Talk AFD
260:Mkativerata
204:Mkativerata
164:Mkativerata
119:Mkativerata
89:Mkativerata
55:Mkativerata
3355:article.
2901:Smallbones
2809:Off2riorob
2780:Off2riorob
2624:Thanks....
2555:Off2riorob
2514:Off2riorob
2445:Off2riorob
2235:Smallbones
1535:User: Igny
1200:Epeefleche
1171:Epeefleche
1104:Jim Miller
969:Wm.Pittman
506:User:A5000
3612:Flexdream
3597:Flexdream
3426:Thank you
2972:wjemather
2939:wjemather
2703:BorgQueen
2608:Sarastro1
2579:Sarastro1
2329:Richwales
2270:Powerchip
2225:Sorry ...
2212:Jappalang
2177:CC to you
2131:T. Canens
2016:jackbrown
1392:AfD close
715:Wikidemon
699:Cheers --
685:Wikidemon
601:Mattinbgn
466:Afd close
377:this edit
182:The page
148:GianniG46
27:Thank you
3506:this one
3401:contribs
3012:contribs
3004:Fetx2002
3000:unsigned
2952:trolling
2846:contribs
2834:unsigned
2768:realized
2634:Chrisrus
2425:Vassyana
2337:contribs
2181:I asked
2068:contribs
1833:For info
1616:contribs
1604:unsigned
1397:This AfD
1372:Offliner
1343:Offliner
1313:Offliner
1281:You can
1025:Barnstar
745:WP:GS/BI
566:WayKurat
531:Notified
437:Mamalujo
410:Notified
281:Schmidt,
243:Schmidt,
239:Thanks,
3656:Georgia
3638:Georgia
3359:Georgia
3309:Georgia
2274:WP:DOLT
1993:Kudpung
1981:Kudpung
1960:28bytes
1931:28bytes
1908:Goodvac
1608:Daltone
1516:Msrasnw
1475:Msrasnw
1305:WP:EEML
1300:WP:EEML
1237:deleted
987:WP:DENY
858:twinkle
3451:Bidgee
3436:Bidgee
3150:wp;drv
3146:wp;afd
3138:WP:SFD
3134:WP:TFD
2438:Recall
1657:Pubdog
1629:WP:DRV
1055:Minima
836:ΣПDiПG
787:ΣПDiПG
751:Cailil
472:Occuli
379:too.
333:Avenue
298:Thanks
3654:Sandy
3636:Sandy
3626:Weird
3393:wales
3357:Sandy
3307:Sandy
3293:again
3217:WP:RM
3199:WP:RM
3182:Done.
3142:WP;AN
3080:Mhiji
3072:WP;AN
3068:WP;AN
2993:KOREA
2772:nudge
2375:. --
2287:rolls
2195:talk
2059:Barek
843:STΛЯT
794:STΛЯT
16:<
3675:talk
3661:Talk
3643:Talk
3616:talk
3601:talk
3577:talk
3562:talk
3536:talk
3469:talk
3455:talk
3440:talk
3416:talk
3397:talk
3391:Rich
3364:Talk
3346:talk
3329:talk
3314:Talk
3283:talk
3248:talk
3225:talk
3207:talk
3191:talk
3173:talk
3158:talk
3148:and
3123:talk
3099:talk
3084:talk
3049:talk
3043:. --
3041:here
3025:here
3008:talk
2960:talk
2921:talk
2905:talk
2863:talk
2842:talk
2813:talk
2799:talk
2784:talk
2752:talk
2743:Done
2727:talk
2707:talk
2653:talk
2638:talk
2612:talk
2598:talk
2583:talk
2559:talk
2541:talk
2518:talk
2499:talk
2483:Talk
2465:talk
2449:talk
2429:talk
2396:talk
2381:talk
2353:talk
2333:talk
2303:talk
2280:Tide
2254:talk
2239:talk
2216:talk
2183:this
2168:talk
2149:talk
2135:talk
2099:talk
2085:talk
2064:talk
2039:talk
2020:talk
1997:talk
1985:talk
1964:talk
1950:talk
1935:talk
1912:talk
1898:talk
1882:talk
1861:talk
1845:talk
1817:talk
1775:talk
1761:talk
1746:talk
1731:talk
1676:talk
1661:talk
1637:talk
1631:. --
1612:talk
1582:talk
1568:talk
1550:talk
1520:talk
1499:talk
1479:talk
1453:talk
1439:talk
1424:talk
1405:talk
1376:talk
1362:talk
1347:talk
1333:talk
1317:talk
1309:here
1296:here
1259:talk
1204:talk
1190:talk
1175:talk
1155:talk
1140:talk
1120:talk
1085:talk
1066:talk
1050:this
1009:talk
995:talk
977:talk
959:talk
944:talk
905:talk
866:talk
823:talk
767:talk
737:here
719:talk
705:talk
689:talk
666:talk
651:talk
643:BSOD
620:talk
605:talk
585:talk
570:talk
549:Re:
539:talk
521:talk
491:talk
476:talk
456:talk
441:talk
418:talk
412:. --
401:talk
385:talk
351:talk
337:talk
316:Hood
313:Grey
264:talk
208:talk
192:talk
168:talk
152:talk
123:talk
109:talk
104:Cirt
93:talk
75:talk
70:Cirt
59:talk
43:talk
38:Cirt
3238:to
2320:not
1989:had
934:of
633:...
517:TFD
381:TFD
225:and
3677:)
3663:)
3645:)
3618:)
3603:)
3579:)
3564:)
3538:)
3471:)
3457:)
3442:)
3418:)
3403:)
3399:·
3366:)
3348:)
3331:)
3316:)
3285:)
3250:)
3227:)
3209:)
3193:)
3175:)
3160:)
3125:)
3101:)
3086:)
3051:)
3014:)
3010:•
2962:)
2923:)
2915:--
2907:)
2865:)
2848:)
2844:•
2815:)
2801:)
2786:)
2754:)
2729:)
2721:--
2709:)
2701:--
2655:)
2640:)
2632:!
2614:)
2600:)
2585:)
2561:)
2543:)
2520:)
2501:)
2493:--
2486:)
2467:)
2459:--
2451:)
2431:)
2398:)
2383:)
2355:)
2339:)
2335:·
2305:)
2256:)
2241:)
2218:)
2186:--
2151:)
2137:)
2101:)
2087:)
2072:-
2066:•
2041:)
2022:)
1999:)
1966:)
1952:)
1937:)
1914:)
1900:)
1892:--
1863:)
1855:--
1819:)
1787:,
1777:)
1763:)
1748:)
1733:)
1712:}}
1706:{{
1678:)
1663:)
1639:)
1618:)
1614:•
1584:)
1570:)
1552:)
1522:)
1501:)
1485:)
1481:)
1455:)
1441:)
1426:)
1407:)
1378:)
1364:)
1349:)
1335:)
1319:)
1261:)
1243:.
1206:)
1192:)
1177:)
1157:)
1142:)
1122:)
1087:)
1069:)
1011:)
997:)
979:)
961:)
946:)
907:)
868:)
825:)
807:,
777:Re
769:)
721:)
707:)
691:)
668:)
653:)
622:)
607:)
587:)
572:)
541:)
523:)
493:)
478:)
458:)
443:)
420:)
403:)
395:--
387:)
353:)
339:)
266:)
210:)
194:)
184:is
170:)
154:)
125:)
111:)
95:)
77:)
61:)
53:--
45:)
3673:(
3659:(
3641:(
3614:(
3599:(
3575:(
3560:(
3534:(
3467:(
3453:(
3438:(
3414:(
3395:(
3362:(
3344:(
3327:(
3312:(
3281:(
3246:(
3223:(
3205:(
3189:(
3171:(
3156:(
3121:(
3097:(
3082:(
3047:(
3006:(
2958:(
2919:(
2903:(
2879:'
2861:(
2840:(
2811:(
2797:(
2782:(
2750:(
2725:(
2705:(
2695:.
2651:(
2636:(
2610:(
2596:(
2581:(
2557:(
2539:(
2516:(
2497:(
2480:(
2463:(
2447:(
2427:(
2394:(
2379:(
2351:(
2331:(
2301:(
2252:(
2237:(
2214:(
2192:|
2147:(
2133:(
2126:)
2122:(
2118:.
2097:(
2083:(
2070:)
2062:(
2037:(
2018:(
1995:(
1983:(
1962:(
1948:(
1933:(
1910:(
1896:(
1859:(
1815:(
1790:,
1773:(
1759:(
1744:(
1729:(
1674:(
1659:(
1635:(
1610:(
1580:(
1566:(
1548:(
1526:)
1518:(
1497:(
1477:(
1451:(
1437:(
1422:(
1403:(
1374:(
1360:(
1345:(
1331:(
1315:(
1278:.
1257:(
1202:(
1188:(
1173:(
1153:(
1138:(
1118:(
1083:(
1063:(
1060:c
1007:(
993:(
975:(
957:(
942:(
903:(
890:a
888:c
886:z
884:a
882:m
864:(
840:–
821:(
791:–
765:(
717:(
703:(
687:(
664:(
649:(
618:(
603:(
583:(
568:(
537:(
519:(
489:(
474:(
454:(
439:(
416:(
399:(
383:(
349:(
335:(
262:(
206:(
190:(
166:(
150:(
121:(
107:(
91:(
73:(
57:(
41:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.