Knowledge

User talk:Miller17CU94/Archive 2

Source šŸ“

156:
able to choose how to contribute, and I think you prefer editing articles yourself, but consider that Knowledge is a place where there is a strong sense of community, where users work together in order to build articles. Experience with other users is also needed in order to handle conflicts, which soon or later will arrive. Also, the high edit amount per article indicates you like to spend some more time in articles than most other users, which is understandable since you write them from scratch.
31: 181:
in order to get some feedback about how to expand them. Of course, I suggest you to spend some more time in article talk pages, inviting and discussing with others how to continue improving the article. To some users, people sometimes tell them to stop socializing and begin writing. In your case, the
155:
Something curious I noticed: Although you have 5,500 edits in articles, you only have 24 in article talk pages. I think (I may be wrong, of course) that you enjoy editing articles that are, as you say, "long overdue", without active editors, and that may be mostly stubs or new ones. Everyone here is
246:
The main issues I have dealt with previously have been images and the copyright issues, and with capitalization. The eleven images I had first downloaded werre deleted because of my unfamiliarity with the process, but since then I have been able to download without any problems, including two I was
151:
Mathbot indicates you use edit summaries only once every four times for minor edits. You should consider using them more often, There is a check in the Preferences section where you can make Knowledge ask for an edit summary everytime you write something. It is a good way to remember to use them if
255:). Capitalization has been adjusted on this to where I am not putting it on every single word like I had done previously. My main issue that I am dealing with right now is putting mathematical equations on Knowledge and I have asked for assistance which I am receiving right now, specifcally on the 144:
For someone who has started in May, you have been very active. I see you have increased your participation in this project until October, when you suddenly cut it by half. I hope it does not mean you burned yourself, but instead that you are still trying to find the right amount of edits per month
168:
You are doing a great job at creating needed articles. I always say that, between a red link and a stub, I prefer the stub, because anonymous editors can contribute to stubs, but can't create articles. You not only create articles, but develop them into reasonable articles. I don't have many
124:) I have contributing to Knowledge since Memorial Day weekend of 2006 and I am not trying to become an administrator. I just want to do my articles better and I would like a review on how my edits can be better 148:
Am I counting right? 13 DYK contributions? Impressive! It not only informs that you have a good number of created articles, but also interesting and pretty long ones! Congratulations!
242:
Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
205: 186:
article. Our success is not based in our individuality, but in our ability to share the responsabilities with others. Good luck! --
128: 190: 271:
I have had only very little contact with Miller17CU94 but have found this user extremely diplomatic and easy to work with. --
275: 159:
The images you have been uploading as of late have been well referenced and sourced, although you may consider adding a
223: 121: 81: 76: 71: 59: 248: 266: 183: 38: 218:
Of your contributions to Knowledge, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
170: 104: 160: 174: 115: 47: 17: 178: 139:
Hello there, Miller17CU94, how are you doing? Here is my review, I hope you find it useful.
8: 256: 125: 111: 105: 226:
which were sorely needed and overdue. 2) The articles I am working on right now in
182:
opposite may be true: try to gather some help to carry an article to good or even
272: 231: 46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
252: 187: 227: 94: 90: 222:
I am pleased on two things. 1) The articles on the individual
173:
perfectly. I may suggest to try to polish some articles into
145:
you can do without influencing your life outside Knowledge.
98: 247:
able to get permission from the organization officials (
163:for every article the image is being used in. 169:suggestions to do, as you seem to know our 14: 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 25: 23: 224:FIS Nordic World Ski Championships 204:View this user's edit count using 24: 286: 29: 249:Institute of Food Technologists 206:Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool 13: 1: 276:14:21, 21 November 2006 (UTC) 191:02:18, 12 November 2006 (UTC) 129:14:22, 2 November 2006 (UTC) 7: 152:you just forget about them. 10: 291: 18:User talk:Miller17CU94 177:, maybe asking for a 42:of past discussions. 89:Editor review from 257:Thermal death time 161:fair use rationale 106:User:Miller17CU94 87: 86: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 282: 68: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 290: 289: 285: 284: 283: 281: 280: 279: 269: 171:manual of style 109: 64: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 288: 268: 265: 264: 263: 262: 261: 240: 238: 237: 236: 210: 209: 196: 195: 194: 193: 166: 165: 164: 157: 153: 149: 146: 108: 103: 85: 84: 79: 74: 69: 62: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 287: 278: 277: 274: 260: 258: 254: 253:Phi Tau Sigma 250: 244: 243: 241: 239: 235: 233: 229: 225: 220: 219: 217: 216: 215: 214: 207: 203: 202: 201: 200: 192: 189: 185: 180: 176: 175:good articles 172: 167: 162: 158: 154: 150: 147: 143: 142: 141: 140: 138: 137: 136: 135: 131: 130: 127: 123: 120: 117: 113: 107: 102: 100: 96: 92: 83: 80: 78: 75: 73: 70: 67: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 270: 267:Brief review 245: 228:food science 221: 212: 211: 198: 197: 133: 132: 118: 112:Miller17CU94 110: 88: 65: 43: 37: 179:peer review 36:This is an 273:Coppertwig 232:technology 95:December 2 91:November 2 213:Questions 199:Comments 82:ArchiveĀ 5 77:ArchiveĀ 4 72:ArchiveĀ 3 66:ArchiveĀ 2 60:ArchiveĀ 1 259:article. 188:ReyBrujo 184:featured 134:Reviews 122:contribs 39:archive 126:Chris 16:< 251:and 230:and 116:talk 99:2006 93:to 101:. 97:, 234:. 208:. 119:Ā· 114:( 50:.

Index

User talk:Miller17CU94
archive
current talk page
ArchiveĀ 1
ArchiveĀ 2
ArchiveĀ 3
ArchiveĀ 4
ArchiveĀ 5
November 2
December 2
2006
User:Miller17CU94
Miller17CU94
talk
contribs
Chris
14:22, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
fair use rationale
manual of style
good articles
peer review
featured
ReyBrujo
02:18, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool
FIS Nordic World Ski Championships
food science
technology
Institute of Food Technologists
Phi Tau Sigma

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

ā†‘