User talk:Mhiji - Knowledge

1629:. I think you are doing a great job, identifying these templates, and proposing them for deletion. But, if there is anyway that you could see to proposing at a slightly slower rate, it would be much appreciated. Sure, we could restructure the way that the discussions are displayed, but there is the broader issue of trying to create a manageable workload, and not create fatigue for the folks who comment. By the way, if you find very obvious ones, you can always use prod or CSD-T3, which should close in the same amount of time. If you find that there is a backlog of prods or CSD-T3, just drop a note on my talk page and I will see what I can do. Just a suggestion. Thanks! 3065:

of wikipedia went through this issue around this time last year and we ended up saying that EVERY BLP must now be sourced, or it can be deleted in 10 days time. In an ideal world "simple" sourcing efforts like this one (although the language/name/era (mid 90s are actually not always well covered online) and spelling issues may make it more difficult than you'd imagine sometimes) should be done in preference to BLPPRODing but in the end every editor makes the call for each article they view: ignore, fix or tag. I maintain that it was a bad creation, not a bad prod.

825:), please do not delete without discussing with me the reason for the deletion. I am the grandson of Nathaniel Shilkret, who commmissioned the Genesis Suite project as work-for-hire and wrote one of the seven pieces. I made the edit, for which the commons provide verification, to correct errors in the previous version which did harm to possible use of the work by claiming the written work was no longer extant. I also corrected several other errors and added substantially to the history of the composition, again making use of the commons. 2930:

prods of dead people, horses, poorly sourced articles and articles where a quick look at the history would establish that they didn't qualify. In retrospect I'd agree that we created BLP prod as a concession to deletionism rather than as an improvement to Knowledge. But before getting rid of it we do need to shift the focus away from backlogs aned especially the uBLP backlog and back to the idea that there is no deadline, and that improving articles is better than tagging them.

3840: 3557: 3401: 2832:

size too? New unreferenced BLP stubs are fair game for prodding, but those that are _either_ old, large, or not tagged as stubs, should avoid PROD in favour of AfD instead? Nor should we ever (usually though we do) get too worked up about losing one sentence articles. If they're that small, the work to re-make them from scratch is trivial. Obviously there's still a general "right to prod" and also an encouragement to just fix the things anyway.

3937: 3468: 3663: 3622: 2099: 2600: 1170: 733:, this is a sure way to discourage prospective editors. How long to give them? depends on apparent good faith, but the minimum most of the admins use is an hour or so. Various technical fixes have been proposed to prevent speedy deletion too early, but they have all come to grief on the need to distinguish those few that really must be immediately deleted. Therefore we rely on human judgement. 4106: 4052: 4002: 3896: 3798: 3751: 1418: 1144: 164:, since it is certainly used as it if were. It is no longer really an essay at all but a consensus-based summary guideline on how to write articles properly, from top to bottom. I may not be available to !vote on it, due to some legal and medical stuff, but if you agree with this, feel free to copy-paste this message, noting that it came from your talk page, into that debate as a 1311:- if it is made mandatory, moan as much as you like. Sorry that I didn't notify you on this one occasion - it's not efficient for me to double check on every occasion that Twinkle has done it all properly. This is all rather unnecessary. You've now annoyed 2 editors for no reason. I really don't see any reason to be pedantic that the redirect was speedy deleted - just to make a 3857:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 3576:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 51: 894:

within the last few minutes.' I would have preferred something more constructive criticism on how the article could be improved. I am looking to remove the tag within the next seven days. If you can provide substantive evidence as to why the tag should remain, and can propose an action plan to remedy this, this would be appreciated

2654:

that you have not been particularly willing to stop and listen when problems are pointed out. Many of your edits which are not harmful are not actually useful and could be described as "pointless tidying" - eg, deleting hidden text from redirects (deletion saves no space), renaming other peoples' user subpages

519:

could editors improve it when it is not yet ready to be improved? If you are an editor, it for you to act responsibly and within policy and guidelines. I suggest it's better to think before you act and then act cautiously and responsibly. Nevertheless, thanks for the advice in the second part of your comment.

1182: 2929:

Actually, if bizarrely, this was a perfectly legitimate BLP prod. If people have problems with BLP prod then may I suggest trying to amend that process rather than criticising a newish editor who followed that process? I was involved in the design of BLP prod, and spend a lot of my time declining BLP

2350:

Hello, I have seen that you have removed the content of the pages that I have redirected. I am not sure it is a good idea: these pages contain personal data which could be used for statistical or other tables. I ignore how personal data are used in Knowledge, and it is the reason for what I have not

893:

Mhiji, I was taken aback when an hour after I had created a stub (requiring some research thereafter), it was tagged, and seemed to be scheduled for deletion. I concur with the sentiment 'Please do not place a speedy deletion tag for an article lacking significant content or context if it was created

761:

as the article states notability (significant role in a prime-time television episode) which automatically stops it from being a candidate for speedy deletion. From looking at the history, I see that it has been declined for speedy deletion before, as well as declined for PROD. If you still believe

728:

Please do not place a speedy deletion tag for an article lacking significant content or context if it was created within the last few minutes. People often write the first sentence first, and then continue. When you place a speedy tag for no-context 3 minutes after the article was started, as you did

233:

I am split on this nomination for deletion, I understand that it lacks in detail; but in the past I have been informed that a musician must have a substantial amount of singles for a template to need to be created and Nero with five singles surely fit that description? However, if an album comes into

3222:

Mhiji, please come by and post something on your talk page. You obviously want to help the project and you're a talented individual that can help in the area of bots. The block was only to slow you down so you could have time to talk with others. The block can be lifted as soon as you reply. Please

3064:

If he was actually a North Korean, or a janitor, or a porn star, and someone made an article that said "he was the prime minister of South Korea" you'd just accept it? It is contentious to make a significant claim about someone, and it should be sourced. Full stop. Period. No questions. The rest

2981:

whilst the BLPPROD was applied. I don't want people like David, DGG or others to do the sourcing (but greatly appreciated when they do), and sometimes I don't want to do it myself. The person who knew enough about the topic to start the article should be compelled to source the article - and in my

2664:

An indefinite block does not mean infinite; you can be unblocked, but we need to agree conditions about your editing which will ensure that you do not cause further problems of this kind and that your undoubted energy is usefully employed. In similar cases conditions have been imposed such as limits

2653:

I have reluctantly blocked you. Reluctantly, because I am sure your editing is well-intentioned, but it is causing damage and disruption, mainly because you are making wholesale changes far too fast to be able to check whether a particular edit will be harmful, and it is apparent from your talk page

1323:

anyway. Even you the creator only give it a "Weak keep" and you don't have a solid argument for keeping it. You've also written numerous comments (as have I and RHaworth) regarding this on a number of pages. This all just unnecessarily adds to the server work load. So if you got nothing constructive

850:

There isn't any need to delete this article. I translated it - as said on the discussion page - from the Dutch wiki. Most of her biographical information can also be found in other Wiki's and in the link I placed under "references". Besides, don't you have a list here where people can vote in favour

3173:

the block; doing so will likely decrease any chances of you being unblocked. And, like Rich says above, don't let an indefinite block let you down. I'm fully aware that you've had a strenuous start in your Knowledge career (which has only been going on for three months), especially given the blocks

2779:

Nevertheless, it is obvious that we should have an article on a former prime minister of South Korea; prodding it borders on the absurd. However, there is an appearance that the prods were automated, and that there was no manual review of the articles anyway. That might explain why this article was

1939:

careful when speedily closing a debate in which you have participated, doubly so when the consensus is not unanimous. I'd so far as to say that this is something you should almost never do - twice in a year should be a lot of times. Speedily closing a split discussion in which you have participated

778:

Hello! I see you're mass-nominating templates which are unused. However, I'm not sure whether doing things like this benefits Knowledge. Personally, regarding unused templates, I would nominate those I'm absolutely sure will never be used (again). It doesn't seem like searching for unused templates

3962:

and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion

3348:

In the future is it better to leave the page empty (giving people who click on the link no definition at all even lacking context) or is there some better way to start a short stub for you or others to latter contribute to. In other words when I'm working on article A and find that I need to talk

3344:

So I started a new page that *should* be filled in with more than the minimal content I had provided (Minimal Turing Degree) and it was deleted for lack of content. I'm not complaining I'm simply wondering what should be done when you know a subject has sufficient material to support a whole page

828:

If removing the commonscat will not remove the images from the commons for the Genesis Suite or Nathaniel Shilkret articles, you may remove the commonscat. If this is the case, I would very much appreciate an explanation of how I could have placed the images in the commons without having created a

2880:

My second point wandered off onto size. We don't want to lose a large piece of unreferenced work, because it represents effort, and so we should be careful to try and fix it first, rather than just deleting. However if it's only one or two sentences, do we care? There has been more work added to

2831:

be referenced, if they were created since the policy's introduction — presumably to provide some buffer against the risk of "good work being lost through over-zealous and simplistic policy application". Might we also wish to qualify our heavy-handed deletion-based response on the basis of article

1977:

Why have you moved User:DASHBot/Wikiprojects/Templates etc to ...WikiProject...? Are you sure that the bot code isn't going to be affected? Did you check with Tim that it isn't a problem? It's a bit of a risk for the sake of an insignificant capitalisation change. Please confirm that it is OK

620:

I only did the deletion, it was originally tagged by User:User:Mhiji, also I think you should first have a read of WP:AUTOBIO, and maybe ask the Mhiji what his view is, as he may have a more specific idea of what is required for your type of work. If you wish to recover the deleted page into your

518:

I think that's the point. It is plainly vexatious to tag the house as not yet perfect when there has been no time to perfect it. This is plainly a published Knowledge policy! You can be sure that as this house is built, it will be sourced, referenced and footnoted within an inch of its life. How

2846:

For an article that claims to be about a former prime minister of South Korea, even if no references are provided, it's not very hard to check whether the person really was the prime minister. There is no "fair game"; we expect editors to apply at least a tiny bit of discretion in their editing.

1845:

Probably I don't know what the template de means. I took the information from the German WP, unsourced as so often, so found the template useful to explain that. Then I looked for sources and added information I found in the process. But I still thought the line applies that the article includes

1440:

Hello. Please do not nominate new categories for speedy deletion because they are unpopulated. Give them chance to be populated. In some cases, new categories are populated but the members do not show up in the category for a while because of some sort of lag that I do not understand. Thank you.

629:

e know. Ronhjones (Talk) 12:46, 5 January 2011 (UTC) I have now read the AUTOBIO and feel my article was so sparse and factual so as to avoid the pittfalls! My point to Ronjones was I had t--Hughlay1407 15:44, 9 January 2011 (UTC)hought that the six works by me in the NPG and the links to them

3526:

deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Knowledge's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can

3021:

BLPprod is stricter than our policy of verifiability. There is a large drive on to resolve our backlog of old unreferenced BLPs and as I understand it the community decided to stop accepting new unreferenced BLPs. If someone wants to make the case that our shift from a policy of verifiable to a

94: 2851:

was flat-out wrong. Taking the article to AFD would also be wrong. If it had been just one article, we would give Mhiji a trout for it, which is what I think David Eppstein was doing. Making these prods in an automated way, along with other editing problems, is what led to a block and, quite

2270:

showed up on my talk page, unless you're using a process that notifies editors about clerical deletion work. After all, the article in question wasn't a content article, it was an AfD. I guess my point is that, it's the wrong template for the deletion in question. Just a thought, thanks for

3345:

but don't currently have the time to give more than a one or two line definition. At some point I hope to come back and provide the (fairly influential) proof method used to show their existance, and various other relevant facts but of course hope someone else will fill in details too.

582:

I've fixed it. An essay is just something that one editor (or a number of editors) has written. You can't claim that I am doing anything wrong by "violating" it. I could write an essay about anything and then claim you are violating it. The tag wasn't intended to be vexatious. Please

1900:

Hi, I am wondering, what is your purpose in deleting these user and talkpage? Such an action in regards to an indef blocked contributor, it will be very difficult to access his contributions if they are deleted? Would you please explain the benefits to the community, thanks.

1673:

Thank you for experimenting with Knowledge. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our

2976:

My feeling about this is that it was entirely appropriate. The key is that as well as the BLPProd, the article originator was also notified - and he did NOTHING to fix it. It is he, who in my opinion is MOST at fault here, not the BLPPRODer. And the originator was

3508:. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time. 3516:) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the 4092: 1800: 3349:

about B which doesn't yet have a page but should eventually do I just leave B blank? How can I both leave a link to the blank B so others know it needs contributions while still providing the reader of page A a way to learn the definition of B?

2819:

It's not constructive to prod in these cases, but AGF requires us not to regard it as a "bad edit" either, if we're looking for punitive reasons. An unreferenced article on a prime minister of Korea is one thing, but an unreferenced fake article

1924:

Be careful when closing discussions you have contributed to. It's normally better to wait for an uninvolved person to do the closing - if one hasn't been forthcoming a couple of days after the debates have had their full time then drop a note at

1652:

I have removed the CSD template as I see no evidence it is a test. Since it's an actual program that is currently functioning I would be reluctant to have it deleted. I am sure Gabrielm is in progress of editing and expanding the project page.

1000:

Has there been a change in policy that redirects shouldn't be templated, except if they are cross-nmsp redirects to project pages? I know that would keep the # of pages down in the category, but I wasn't aware of the policy change, if any.

820:

The images in the commons for the artice Genesis Suite supply essential references for the article. If eliminating the "Commonscat: Genesis Suite" will delete the commons for the article (which is also used in the commons for the article

556:

I see. While you're at it, perhaps you'll also tell me how many angels can dance on the point of a pin. The fact that you can argue the toss over its definition does not give you the right to violate it at will. Also, I'm trying to add

3742: 2728:. The correct procedure to follow in such cases is to take the time to look for sources with which to reference the article, not to paper over the gap in our encyclopedia by attempting to have the badly-sourced article deleted. — 4094: 2565: 2697: 2082:, but I have undone it because the redirect was already in place, and its only effect was to remove a message about the Incubator version of the article designed to prevent anyone starting a new, parallel one here. Regards, 2555: 2410:, with a "WP" in front of it, so not to cause confusion. I think that redirecting it to the flag template will cause less problems. Let me know if you agree, because if it's changed, the backlinks need to be fixed again. -- 1947:- 10-20 people expressing the same thing with policy based reasons with only a small handful of dissenters is suitable for a snow closure. Three-four commenters total is not suitable for a snow closure in almost all cases. 297: 322:

Hmmmm. Interesting. I can understand that the Royal Australian Air Force would (should?) NEVER appear on a page of NATO members. Regarding Italian Warrant Officers, I have no knowledge (or interest), so I can't usefully

3279: 2560: 3758: 3992: 1777:. It seems pointless to delete Gloucestershire because the cat is currently empty. On any more similar deletion nominations, please restrict yourself to those which are never likely to be used in the future. — 2545: 410:

Thank you for acting on my redirect request so quickly. Given the BLP issue involved, should a request be made to hide the discussion? If so, I'm not sure how to do that. Can you do it, or guide me? Thanks.

25:

to automatically archive your talk page once a day. This would keep your talk page clear yet keep a better record of old discussions, and prevent discussions being removed before they have run their course.--

3766: 4125: 918:

The salient part of my comment was "I concur with the sentiment". I also see that no constructive advice was forthcoming, just a desire to mark up yet another article with your tags, which I find negative.

4042: 3528: 3109:

I agree that each editor makes the call. In this case, Mhiji made the wrong call. Period. Full stop. No questions. :) When someone does make the wrong call, we need to gently point it out, rather than

3511:

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion

3886: 1770: 1115: 815: 3208:

able to edit your own talk page while blocked right? I'm hoping you haven't completely given up in frustration, as Rich says above, don't walk away from project, your work here is still valuable. --

2233:

So why did you get involved in the first place then? And why did you say, "You didn't even went to noticeboard before I talked to you." if you didn't know? (and you hadn't even bothered to check...)

2873:

is wrong, but it's excusable because it's not obviously wrong. Korea might be, but how many presidents of Elbonia do you know, and how obvious is their web presence? We shouldn't trout if it wasn't

3711: 21:

I've noticed that quite a few users are having to restore conversations which you have blanked and I'd like to suggest the possibility of using an archiving strategy. You could use a bot like

4014: 2217:

Yes I noticed you replied. No I do not want to reply anymore, please refrain from posting the talk back again. As for your pure speculation, no comment. I do not know what pages you view. --

1465:

Hi Mhiji, nice work on the BLP prodding, but please can you check the infobox before you apply a BLPprod? Many poorly sourced sports bios do have a link there. If so they might well need a

1095: 1090: 3022:

policy of verified was not a good idea and that uncontentious new unreferenced BLPs should be allowed then the place to do so is not the page of a user who has taken the policy literally.

1266:

speedies). Also since you contested the speedy, it was quite clear that you were watching the page anyway so sending you a notification of the RfD one would have been rather pointless...

4064: 3849: 2669:

to invite comment from those with previous experience of situations like this. Any admin mayunblock you who is satisfied that suitable conditions have been agreed to protect the project.

1774: 3813: 3834: 1920:

While I don't disagree with how you've closed (in terms of outcome) any of the recent RfDs you have, there are a few points I think you ought to bear in mind for future reference -

3789: 2550: 472: 3439:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any 4006: 1232: 3650: 1307:). I realise it is considered civil - but it isn't mandatory, so there's no need to moan about it if I don't. If you want it to be made mandatory, your welcome to suggest it at 360: 3784: 3666: 3655: 3435:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "

3317: 2824:

to be about a prime minister is quite another — without refs, there's no way to tell them apart. Acordingly we shouldn't look too harshly on prodding of such very small stubs.

172:!vote, again as my proxy, since it should not remain in the MOS pseudonamespace (and I think I'm the one who put it there before I knew better) if it isn't part of the MOS. — 3904: 4056: 1643: 4138: 3298: 3609: 2803:-- it is not constructive in a case like these to prod rather than to add sources, but that's what happens when one used automated tools without checking the results. 490:

That's not a policy, and I wasn't demolishing the house, I was putting a sign up saying that the house isn't perfect yet, so please would editors improve it. That's what

2205: 1932:

Don't speedily close debates unnecessarily, particularly when nobody has advocated a speedy deletion and/or when the recommendations are not unanimous. There is no rush.

293: 1166:

Hello, I'm a sometimes-regular participant at TfD and I keep running across your name in nominations and !votes. I just wanted to say thank you for all the work you do

3518: 920: 895: 433:

The 'self-published' tag is pure incompetence. These are from a work published by Oxford University Press in 1929, as the source makes explicit, not by me in 2011!

4037: 3959: 3944: 3930: 3805: 3456: 838: 941:

Just wondering why you deleted the "r to project" template from Knowledge:WikiProject Adventure travel. Last year, the project was merged, due to inactivity, see

3925: 1863:

is deprecated anyway so it shouldn't be used any more. There's already a link to the German article anyway, so it's probably not necessary to add anything else.

1587: 1316: 1299:

As I said, I did it using Twinkle, so it should have notified you automatically. It obviously didn't. It seems to be a problem with Twinkle. You can bring it up

1224: 4087: 3043:

We don't expect editors to take policies literally: that's almost always a mistake. We do expect editors to think about what they are doing. Nothing in BLPprod

3900: 1378:, which provides some guidance in this area. I think that you have removed some categories that are legitimately placed on article redirects, such as those on 3428:

if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see

471:

I deleted the tag because it also alleges that that there is no source, when plainly there is one - also because the tag is in violation of Wikiedia policy:

3920: 3549: 3829: 3424:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 1661: 3412: 2390:

FYI- there's a problem with redirecting this to WPRussia, I've had to fix several backlinks that were assuming the it was a redirect to the flag template:

1622: 2204:

Yes I did. How do you know what I am doing?!!?!??!?! I wasn't aware of a feature where you can see which pages I've viewed. And I quite clearly did, see

1475:

tag, but they aren't eligible for BLP prod (provided of course the link does have info on them and isn't a 404 or a completely different person). Cheers

3682: 1277: 623: 3393: 3352:

Sorry don't mean to sound combative just wanted to communicate the issue and ask if there is some template or something that addresses this situation.

243: 1382:. To summarize, if they are categories that can't legitimately be placed on the target article, the category is appropriately placed on the redirect. 3881: 1644: 1397: 3670: 3645: 1126:

If you do not list it within a reasonable amount of time, I'll assume you no longer wish to see it deleted and will remove the template. Thanks. --

1685: 228: 1701: 696: 3687: 3629: 3544: 2540: 2267: 1751: 1244:

Can I point out that as the author of the page you should have notified me about first the speedy deletion and then the deletion request :). --

1611: 1196:

Since there isn't a TfD barnstar (yet)(as far as I can tell), here is a template barnstar for you for all the work you do over at TfD. Thanks!

936: 3444: 1950:

When the nominator changes their mind to agree with commenters this is best closed as "nomination withdrawn" or something similar rather than

3604: 2672:

As a first step, please explain how you were able to do your "redirect cleaning" so fast, up to nine edits a minute, and others even faster,

1860: 730: 461:

tag was removed twice... If you agree that I'm "right that it is not yet referenced", why did you remove that tag twice in the first place?!

2946: 986:

Thanks for noticing that, it should only categorize to "redirects to project space", and not cross-nmsp redirects. I'm going to fix that. --

1667: 3987: 3451: 2978: 2665:

on the number of automated or semi-automated edits in a given time, or getting prior agreement before embarking on them. I have posted at

3735: 2426: 2051: 591: 550: 512: 465: 238: 2924: 1855: 871: 149: 39: 2466:), it is still required that there be a disambiguation for this page because the exclamation point is not enough to differentiate it.— 953: 928: 913: 286: 257: 3361: 3339: 3287:

You added this to my talkpage in January. I have no clue why you wrote that on my page, since I have not had anything to do with it.

2535: 2455: 2068: 1501: 1120: 749: 723: 222: 2108:

it seems this is not an isolated incident, but it is a good example of why what you are doing is harmful. This is a formal warning:

2045: 768: 3387: 3244: 3059: 3038: 2971: 2774: 1010: 3869: 3588: 1513: 113: 4111: 3149:

A block can be very discouraging, but it's not a reason to walk away from the project. I would suggest that there is plenty at

3138: 2655: 1885: 1867: 616:

On seeing my attempted article about me Peter Edwards (artist) was deleted I contacted Ronjones. I have copied below his reply:

3926: 3532: 3457: 2002: 1435: 1351: 1342: 1328: 1293: 1270: 1253: 3174:

you've received so far. Don't give up – if you want to be unblocked, then carefully address the issues surrounding the block.

2894: 2864: 2841: 2517: 2479: 2447: 2433: 1958:

Please don't think I'm being harsh or combative here, they're just friendly suggestions to help keep things running smoothly.

1429: 1019: 995: 981: 76: 2379: 2324:) has bought you a whisky! Sharing a whisky is a great way to bond with other editors after a day of hard work. Spread the 1547: 1155: 1746:

you posted a csd on my page for a article I've never worked on.....Perhaps this was a mistake? 15:07, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

1638: 1517: 3724: 2709: 2570: 2121: 1581: 1379: 3074: 3016: 2991: 2237: 2228: 2212: 2199: 2183: 2174: 2155: 2146: 2130: 1455: 1386: 809: 744: 393: 367: 346: 304: 3825: 3316:

for the page to be moved to the help namespace. This discussion is going nowhere and since you were a participant in the

2631: 1135: 606: 576: 528: 484: 445: 2792: 2290: 4116: 4098: 4060: 4044: 4010: 3994: 3888: 3791: 3744: 3651: 3610: 2915:

No, and that wasn't my point - merely that the pre-tag article really was "hardly worth keeping", even though genuine.

2360: 1616: 1062: 974: 903: 40: 3853:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 3572:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 3416:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 2328:

by buying someone else a whisky, whether it be someone with whom you have collaborated or had disagreements. Enjoy!

1736: 1081:. Can you please complete the second step of the nominations per the instructions at the WP:RFD page? The pages are: 805:

I'm not nominating all unused templates. I'm doing, as you said, those which I don't think will ever be used (again).

2814: 2456: 2367: 2345: 2105: 2057: 1707: 1525: 1276:

I personally consider communication important and want to be notified regardless :). Additionally per stage three of

652: 216: 186: 157: 112:

categories has not gone unnoticed. If you feel like working full time on regular maintenance please consider joining

2284: 1409: 4080: 4030: 3980: 2698:

Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive665#Mhiji blocked - suggestions invited for unblock conditions

2079: 2014: 1491: 1375: 1202: 762:

the article should be removed, I would suggest AFD, or maybe redirecting it to the Doctor Who episode in question.

3951:, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term. 3720: 3707: 3505: 2585: 1105: 602: 572: 524: 480: 441: 3274: 799: 2750:

Mhiji did not PROD it due to notability issues, but because it was unsourced. But yes, users are encouraged to

2593: 2463: 2419: 1815: 1789: 1681: 1369: 1052: 860: 153: 131: 3858: 3577: 3429: 3216: 2996:

What more than "he was the prime minister of South Korea" do you need to know to start the article? WP:V only

2091: 1769:

I am very dubious about many of your recent batch of deletion nominations of categories. To take one example:

1227:. I do not feel strongly enough to do anything more but if you raise a deletion proposal, I will support you. 168:, as my proxy. If you don't agree with this, feel free to complete the RfD and copy paste this message as a 2687: 2279: 1839: 1820: 1794: 1537: 2737: 2643: 1057: 883: 4126:

Knowledge:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 June 8 § Template:Wikiproject WikiProject Colombian Departments

3477: 3383: 3334: 3259: 3194: 3190: 2770: 2321: 1967: 1391: 924: 899: 795: 773: 192: 2351:

removed the content. In any case, this does not change what the users see, thus it is not very important.

2030: 1571: 3250: 3029: 2937: 2745: 2615: 2336: 1724: 1482: 1304: 673: 420: 34: 22: 2522: 1262:

and just use the default on there (not sure why it didn't notify you of the RfD one, but it doesn't for

1037: 3964: 3916: 3501: 2073: 1910: 598: 568: 520: 476: 437: 234:

the reasons for deletion, then I agree and feel that the template should be given a speedy deletion --

4067:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.

4017:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.

3907:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.

3144: 2502:

Just because there is no article at the (song) location does not mean you are allowed to move the page

2112:

unless you achieve consensus at this ANI discussion about what you are allowed to do in this respect.

1626: 1206: 504:

if you don't want other editors to touch an article while you are doing major work to it, or create a

3625: 3614: 3158: 2904: 2800: 2648: 2607: 779:

and then nominate them is a good way to help Knowledge. But remember, these are just my suggestions.

161: 2959:

nominated for deletion; it doesn't say that one should do so in every possible circumstance. — Carl

2666: 2179:

That doesn't really answer the question. Why did you say "No you have not."? (When I clearly have.)

3484: 3357: 2733: 1709: 865: 856: 1758: 3821: 3500:, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a 3436: 3303: 2385: 1987: 1764: 888: 3706:

or as one of the commenters on it's talk page, I would like to inform you that there has been a

2720:

I realize you're currently blocked, but if/when you come back, please do not attempt to use the

2589: 1174:

I'm impressed with the amount of work you've done on here! Anyhoo, below is a barnstar for you!

3024: 2932: 2920: 2890: 2837: 2332: 2064: 2041: 1881: 1851: 1835: 1654: 1633: 1521: 1507: 1477: 1469: 1284:

to not notify users, especially given it is trivial to do so with Twinkle you should do so. --

1239: 1031: 718: 611: 425: 84: 2614:

from editing for disruptive editing - see below. If you would like to be unblocked, you may

3700: 3678: 3540: 3294: 3234: 3000:

sources for controversial items, and this is not one of them. I don't agree with the idea of

2277: 1596: 1589: 1553: 1338: 1289: 1249: 1131: 963: 669:, then I'll be able to see it again and might be able to give you some tips on improving it. 648: 631: 455: 416: 292:

The ones I tagged aren't being used anywhere... I don't have a problem with the others (e.g.

235: 210: 180: 127: 1223:

does not apply to redirects to the Knowledge namespace and I have been forced to re-instate

144:

You did not complete the RfD; you just tagged it for RfD on the 21st, but there's no actual

3638: 3598: 3568: 3309: 3155: 2901: 2527:

Apparently due to Twinkle issues, the following of your TfD's have not went through to the

2443: 2415: 2261: 1915: 1906: 1696: 1460: 1405: 1006: 991: 949: 834: 640: 505: 430:

The 'one source' tag is ludicrous. It is known that this material is all from one source.

30: 2982:

mind I wouldn't ignore the talk page article like this guy did. He's at fault, not Mhiji.

198:

Well, it's been a week and you've still not actually filed the RfD, so I have removed the

8: 3780: 3353: 3214: 2729: 2581: 2400:. Usually, based on WikiProject naming conventions, the redirect to the project would be 2026: 2008: 1963: 1825: 1533: 1383: 852: 843: 666: 117: 4120: 4015:

Knowledge:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 24 § Template:Doctor Who audio book

3817: 3493: 3461: 3070: 2987: 2356: 2325: 1998: 1983: 1809: 1783: 1308: 1046: 822: 764: 139: 2724:

process to delete articles on obviously-notable subjects such as former head of state

1719:

concerns. I'll try and find some references, but will most certainly not contest the

1559: 3730: 3270: 2952: 2916: 2886: 2833: 2511: 2473: 2404: 2060: 2037: 1877: 1847: 1831: 1732: 1630: 1567: 1300: 942: 16: 4065:

Knowledge:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 24 § Template:Torchwoodaudiobook

4134: 3674: 3536: 3421: 3373: 3328: 3226: 3200:

I'm curious as to why you haven't responded yet since your block? I'm assuming you

3180: 3150: 2951:

The idea that people should apply the BLP prod system thoughtlessly isn't correct.

2760: 2715: 2705: 2683: 2639: 2621: 2375: 2311: 2272: 2223: 2194: 2169: 2141: 2117: 2087: 1449: 1334: 1285: 1245: 1085: 879: 785: 758: 751: 644: 543: 539: 535: 412: 405: 389: 342: 282: 253: 205: 175: 122: 71: 3496:, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge. This has been done under 1690:

Ditto. I'd say Mhiji is the one who could learn a few things at the welcome page.

50: 4069: 4019: 3969: 3877: 3669:

has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at

3633: 3628:

has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at

3592: 3448: 3313: 3223:

stop by and talk with us as we need people like you to help Knowledge. Thanks. -

3170: 2439: 2411: 1902: 1895: 1741: 1691: 1608: 1543:

Yeah, that seems good. If no-ones using it anyway, we might as well redirect it.

1401: 1312: 1281: 1197: 1002: 987: 945: 830: 561: 498: 26: 3963:

tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with

3948: 3947:

requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge. This has been done under

3497: 1220: 3912: 3770: 3714:. Your comments and thoughts on the matter would be welcomed. Happy editing! 3425: 3209: 2751: 2721: 2577: 2022: 1959: 1951: 1944: 1873: 1720: 1595:

Hello Mhiji. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of

1529: 1161: 1127: 714: 662: 273:

You're not requesting speedy deletion any more; you're planning to list at TfD.

1374:

Hello, I noticed you have removed some categories from redirects. Please read

909:

What article are you referring to? Also an hour isn't "the last few minutes".

3133: 3121: 3066: 3054: 3011: 2983: 2966: 2859: 2810: 2787: 2528: 2352: 2160: 1994: 1979: 1804: 1778: 1716: 1333:

Sorry I misread your reply. I apologise and retract my last comment here. --

1320: 1078: 1041: 970: 740: 703: 690: 584: 145: 3854: 3573: 3417: 3280:

Speedy deletion nomination of Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Brent Jackson

3266: 2882: 2870: 2848: 2725: 2505: 2467: 2394: 2018: 1926: 1728: 1599:, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: 1563: 1263: 1259: 1214: 1071: 491: 199: 959:

Your welcome to propose it to be deleted. I was under the impression that

148:

entry for it. I think it would actually be much more productive to go to

4130: 3476:

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

3368: 3322: 3175: 2755: 2701: 2679: 2635: 2497: 2493: 2371: 2306: 2218: 2189: 2164: 2136: 2113: 2083: 1972: 1443: 1110: 875: 844: 780: 385: 338: 278: 249: 64: 3905:

Knowledge:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 8#Template:Zodiac sign

3873: 1993:

And the bot didn't run today. Well done. Are you proud of your edits?

1715:

Hi, Mhiji. Yeah, you're right, of course - article currently has clear

1324:

to say, let's just leave it and please stop wasting everyone's time...

1181: 679:

I've developed my userfy. Is it ready to be posted? What do you think--

3954:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may

248:

Sorry, but why are you requesting speedy deletion of these templates?

116:. Whatever you decide, your faithful efforts are appreciatied by this 3908: 2676:

at 00:45 16 Jan - were you using AWB, or some kind of script or bot?

1602: 1096:

List of Unicode characters/CJK Unified Ideographs, part 3 (7800-8CFF)

1091:

List of Unicode characters/CJK Unified Ideographs, part 1 (4E00-62FF)

710: 3004:

Mhiji's bad edits by trying to blame other people for them. — Carl

2661:, or nominating at WP:UAA accounts which have not edited for years. 2488:

of your recent page moves to change disambiguations are bad because

1830:

The English article expanded the German, not the other way round, --

1625:

problem pointed out by the IP, and further comments on my talk page

4123:. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at 3129: 3117: 3111: 3050: 3007: 3001: 2962: 2855: 2805: 2783: 2098: 816:

Comments on request for speedy deletion of Commonscat:Genesis Suite

735: 695:

Please don't add articles directly to the stub category as you did

683:

13:56, 8 January 2011 (UTC) Done a little more on external links.--

661:

Sorry, I can't actually remember what that article was. If you ask

436:

You are right that it is not yet referenced. I have not had time.

93: 3367:

Mhiji hasn't edited since the block, so I doubt (s)he may reply.

1803:

is useful to point people to the same category on the Commons. —

1562:— I didn't know that was possible to do. Thanks for fixing it! 1100: 334:

surprised that the "blank" ones are unused - I'll look into that.

109: 1801:

Category:Author died more than 50 years ago public domain images

630:

would have been verification enough. A similar artical would be

4055:

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect

4005:

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect

2462:

As there are plenty of other articles with similar titles (see

277:

I'm looking forward to understanding what is going on. Cheers,

4105: 4051: 4001: 3895: 3797: 3750: 2188:

You didn't even went to noticeboard before I talked to you. --

1940:

is clear grounds for a deletion review if anyone is so minded.

1077:, but you did not complete the nominations by listing them at 275:

Sorry, but why are you requesting deletion of these templates?

3804:

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect

3757:

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect

1954:, unless there truly are a large number of people commenting. 1278:

Knowledge:Templates for discussion/Header#Listing a template

709:

template, which creates a stub message on the page. Thanks.

63:

For your great work in spotting useless templates! Regards.

294:

Template:Ranks and Insignia of NATO Navies/OF/United States

3835:

Orphaned non-free image File:Adele-Rolling In The Deep.jpg

3743:

Knowledge:WikiProject/Vietnam Province and City listed at

2869:

Sorry my digression there between the two paras. Prodding

3671:

the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page

3630:

the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page

3153:

that you could address with a bot account, for example.

1400:, he converted my redirect to an article. Happy editing. 313:

Oh! Well! Now I think I understand! (Your explanation is

3522:

to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for

4112:

Template:Wikiproject WikiProject Colombian Departments

4095:

Template:Wikiproject WikiProject Colombian Departments

3587:

will be deleted after seven days, as described in the

3443:

will be deleted after seven days, as described in the

3899:

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect

2566:

Template:2007 Vanderbilt Commodores baseball game log

473:

Don't demolish the house while it's still being built

4119:

to determine whether its use and function meets the

3047:

that anything has to be tagged for deletion. — Carl

2556:

Template:2009 Independent Football Standings (OHSAA)

1727:

for two months, but same concerns there. Thanks! --

587:. I've done nothing wrong so let's just leave it... 296:) - I wouldn't want to see them deleted. But how is 1518:

Template_talk:Disambig#The_other_disambig_templates

944:. Maybe the page should be deleted all together? -- 3868:will be deleted after seven days, as described in 3712:implementation of previously deprecated parameters 3164:14:50, 18th day of January in the year 2011 (UTC). 2910:14:50, 18th day of January in the year 2011 (UTC). 2331:Spread the good cheer and camaraderie by adding {{ 2899:That is not necessarily cause and effect though. 2852:possibly, will lead to edit restrictions. — Carl 2561:Template:2009-10 Milwaukee Bucks playoff game log 2438:Okay, I'm trying to cleanup the backlinks now. -- 1754:). But yes, the nomination was a mistake, sorry. 1645:Knowledge:Campus Ambassadors/Syracuse University/ 1528:. Do you think that was the correct thing to do? 1396:Thanks for the notice but you might want to warn 1258:There's no obligation to do that. I did it using 2341:Message received at 21:40, 15 January 2011 (UTC) 3763:Knowledge:WikiProject/Vietnam Province and City 3759:Knowledge:WikiProject/Vietnam Province and City 2339:}} to their talk page with a friendly message. 1752:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Seymour Brunson 337:Meanwhile, thanks for the explanation. Cheers, 3949:section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion 3870:section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion 3864:Note that any non-free images not used in any 3583:Note that any non-free images not used in any 3498:section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion 2368:WP:ANI#Mass pruning of redirects by user:Mhiji 2208:. That was 5 minutes before you talked to me. 2106:WP:ANI#Mass pruning of redirects by user:Mhiji 2058:WP:ANI#Mass_pruning_of_redirects_by_user:Mhiji 265:nor can I figure it out--they are named as sub 3550:Orphaned non-free image File:Me & You.jpg 2163:You need to be active on that noticeboard. -- 1524:was simply forgotten. I now redirected it to 1303:if you like. I always notify the author (see 731:Wenceslao national high school-caba, la union 542:. I do act cautiously and responsibly within 475:This is not helpful or constructive editing. 152:(and leave a notice about the discussion at 3993:"Template:Doctor Who audio book" listed at 3812:redirect, you might want to participate in 3765:redirect, you might want to participate in 2630:below this notice, but you should read the 2289: 636:--Hughlay1407 20:29, 5 January 2011 (UTC) 3808:. Since you had some involvement with the 3761:. Since you had some involvement with the 3394:Orphaned non-free image File:Hustle On.jpg 3114:a pattern of poor decision making. — Carl 1219:Some hopeless pedant has pointed out that 872:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Oleg Frish 244:Template:Ranks and Insignia of NATO Navies 150:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Manual of Style 2546:Template:2009–10 NBA Conference standings 2536:Template:Campaignbox Salvadoran Civil War 2013:Please stop uncategorizing redirects per 1771:Category:Public houses in Gloucestershire 1116:South Klang Valley Expressway interchange 622: 91: 4043:"Template:Torchwoodaudiobook" listed at 625:File:R space (see WP:USERFY), then let m 567:as you suggested, but it isn't working. 229:Nomination for deletion of Nero template 3696:As one of the previous contributors to 3478:the guide to writing your first article 3308:There is currently a discussion on the 2799:ditto for the Mayor of /rochester, NY, 2490:there are other songs with these titles 1978:before the bot runs again at 0500 UTC. 1723:otherwise. The article has existed as 1067:You have tagged a number of pages with 757:I have declined the speedy deletion of 319:clearer than the edit comment.) Thanks. 1846:information from the German WP. No? -- 1179: 937:Knowledge:WikiProject Adventure travel 3320:, I thought you may like some imput. 2285:Happy tenth anniversary of Knowledge! 1621:Just wanted to make you aware of the 120:and the whole Knowledge community. -- 2885:post-tag than there was beforehand. 2571:Template:2003 English cricket season 2301:Happy 10th anniversary of Knowledge! 1668:I have no idea what you are on about 1167: 1015:I'm afraid I have no idea... Sorry. 3965:Knowledge's policies and guidelines 3675:Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) 3535:the page or email a copy to you. 3483:You may want to consider using the 3126:17:09, 23 January 2011 (UTC)— Carl 2827:We already have a policy that BLPs 2052:Redirect stripping raised at WP:ANI 1231:OK, thanks. I've nominated it over 363:if you want to look into them too. 13: 3935: 3850:File:Adele-Rolling In The Deep.jpg 3838: 3796: 3769:if you have not already done so. 3749: 3555: 3531:to request that the administrator 3466: 3420:. However, the image is currently 3399: 2598: 2097: 1516:. It seems from the discussion at 975:Category:Cross-namespace redirects 41:Knowledge:Templates for discussion 14: 4149: 3887:"Template:Zodiac sign" listed at 3790:Knowledge:TOOMANYCOOKS listed at 3340:Appropriate Way to Start New Page 2457:Anything Goes! (Maki Ohguro song) 2370:- you may like to comment there. 1775:Category:Public houses in England 1526:Template:Knowledge disambiguation 851:of or against deletion? Greets, 724:speedy deletion for stub articles 160:simply be adopted as part of the 158:Knowledge:Writing better articles 57:The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar 4104: 4063:. This discussion will occur at 4050: 4013:. This discussion will occur at 4000: 3894: 3661: 3620: 2015:Knowledge:Categorizing redirects 1416: 1380:ASEAN–China Free Trade Agreement 1376:Knowledge:Categorizing redirects 1180: 1168: 1142: 359:The other unused one are listed 92: 49: 4129:until a consensus is reached. 3903:. The discussion will occur at 3710:started on the talk page as to 2551:Template:2009 Perth Heat roster 2291: 2078:Hi. I am not sure why you made 1872:Thank you, will remove it from 1319:will undoubtedly be deleted at 1106:Radio stations in san francisco 4007:Template:Doctor Who audio book 3265:but I guess you're blocked. -- 2752:source the articles themselves 2667:WP:AN#Mass edits by user Mhiji 2464:Anything Goes (disambiguation) 2266:Hello. I'm not quite sure why 1601:User page does not exist, but 1436:Categories for speedy deletion 451:I only added them because the 154:Knowledge talk:Manual of Style 1: 3859:our policy for non-free media 3830:18:29, 23 February 2019 (UTC) 3683:12:24, 27 February 2013 (UTC) 3578:our policy for non-free media 3519:the page's talk page directly 3430:our policy for non-free media 3255:I was going to ask you about 223:06:42, 28 December 2010 (UTC) 193:21:05, 25 December 2010 (UTC) 156:), and propose that the page 132:08:32, 21 December 2010 (UTC) 4088:22:48, 24 January 2023 (UTC) 4038:22:45, 24 January 2023 (UTC) 3988:05:19, 24 January 2023 (UTC) 3882:18:30, 25 January 2021 (UTC) 3785:21:42, 1 November 2017 (UTC) 3667:Template:Auto italic title 2 3656:Template:Auto italic title 2 3646:11:56, 26 October 2012 (UTC) 3605:06:10, 13 January 2012 (UTC) 3589:criteria for speedy deletion 3487:to help you create articles. 3445:criteria for speedy deletion 3275:19:32, 23 January 2011 (UTC) 3245:01:22, 21 January 2011 (UTC) 3217:03:50, 19 January 2011 (UTC) 3195:15:25, 18 January 2011 (UTC) 3139:17:06, 23 January 2011 (UTC) 3075:16:01, 23 January 2011 (UTC) 3060:23:33, 21 January 2011 (UTC) 3039:18:57, 21 January 2011 (UTC) 3017:12:01, 21 January 2011 (UTC) 2992:10:32, 21 January 2011 (UTC) 2972:20:00, 19 January 2011 (UTC) 2947:19:29, 19 January 2011 (UTC) 2925:14:58, 18 January 2011 (UTC) 2895:14:07, 18 January 2011 (UTC) 2865:13:50, 18 January 2011 (UTC) 2842:11:27, 17 January 2011 (UTC) 2815:11:06, 17 January 2011 (UTC) 2793:22:24, 16 January 2011 (UTC) 2775:20:31, 16 January 2011 (UTC) 2738:20:27, 16 January 2011 (UTC) 2710:11:30, 17 January 2011 (UTC) 2688:15:27, 16 January 2011 (UTC) 2644:14:34, 16 January 2011 (UTC) 2594:02:17, 16 January 2011 (UTC) 2518:02:07, 16 January 2011 (UTC) 2480:02:02, 16 January 2011 (UTC) 2448:00:43, 16 January 2011 (UTC) 2434:00:41, 16 January 2011 (UTC) 2420:00:39, 16 January 2011 (UTC) 2380:21:51, 15 January 2011 (UTC) 2361:21:45, 15 January 2011 (UTC) 2280:21:35, 15 January 2011 (UTC) 2238:21:23, 15 January 2011 (UTC) 2229:21:18, 15 January 2011 (UTC) 2213:21:14, 15 January 2011 (UTC) 2200:21:11, 15 January 2011 (UTC) 2184:21:09, 15 January 2011 (UTC) 2175:21:07, 15 January 2011 (UTC) 2156:21:06, 15 January 2011 (UTC) 2147:21:05, 15 January 2011 (UTC) 2131:21:01, 15 January 2011 (UTC) 2122:21:00, 15 January 2011 (UTC) 2092:20:54, 15 January 2011 (UTC) 2069:20:53, 15 January 2011 (UTC) 2046:20:38, 15 January 2011 (UTC) 2031:20:34, 15 January 2011 (UTC) 2003:08:03, 16 January 2011 (UTC) 1988:17:53, 15 January 2011 (UTC) 1968:05:45, 15 January 2011 (UTC) 1943:Refamiliarise yourself with 1911:00:51, 15 January 2011 (UTC) 1886:11:48, 14 January 2011 (UTC) 1868:11:45, 14 January 2011 (UTC) 1856:11:41, 14 January 2011 (UTC) 1840:11:26, 14 January 2011 (UTC) 1821:10:49, 14 January 2011 (UTC) 1795:10:46, 14 January 2011 (UTC) 1759:17:52, 13 January 2011 (UTC) 1737:10:15, 13 January 2011 (UTC) 1686:05:50, 13 January 2011 (UTC) 1662:01:02, 13 January 2011 (UTC) 1639:23:20, 12 January 2011 (UTC) 1612:07:27, 12 January 2011 (UTC) 1582:20:48, 11 January 2011 (UTC) 1572:16:43, 11 January 2011 (UTC) 1548:15:42, 11 January 2011 (UTC) 1538:08:34, 11 January 2011 (UTC) 1502:18:52, 10 January 2011 (UTC) 1492:18:44, 10 January 2011 (UTC) 1456:09:45, 10 January 2011 (UTC) 1430:03:40, 10 January 2011 (UTC) 1410:03:39, 10 January 2011 (UTC) 1352:00:26, 10 January 2011 (UTC) 1343:00:24, 10 January 2011 (UTC) 929:13:40, 18 January 2011 (UTC) 687:15:44, 9 January 2011 (UTC) 77:10:55, 1 December 2010 (UTC) 35:08:01, 1 December 2010 (UTC) 7: 4057:Template:Torchwoodaudiobook 3529:one of these administrators 2674:44 edits in a single minute 2366:Comment: see discussion at 2337:User:HJ Mitchell/WikiScotch 2021:to explain your changes. -- 1387:22:04, 9 January 2011 (UTC) 1329:18:00, 9 January 2011 (UTC) 1305:Special:Contributions/Mhiji 1294:17:42, 9 January 2011 (UTC) 1271:17:22, 9 January 2011 (UTC) 1254:17:16, 9 January 2011 (UTC) 1240:15:12, 9 January 2011 (UTC) 1207:20:20, 8 January 2011 (UTC) 1156:22:08, 8 January 2011 (UTC) 1136:19:54, 8 January 2011 (UTC) 1058:14:33, 8 January 2011 (UTC) 1020:02:24, 8 January 2011 (UTC) 1011:02:23, 8 January 2011 (UTC) 996:02:03, 8 January 2011 (UTC) 982:01:58, 8 January 2011 (UTC) 954:01:54, 8 January 2011 (UTC) 914:21:17, 7 January 2011 (UTC) 904:21:11, 7 January 2011 (UTC) 884:18:12, 7 January 2011 (UTC) 861:16:43, 7 January 2011 (UTC) 839:18:36, 6 January 2011 (UTC) 810:17:47, 6 January 2011 (UTC) 800:17:41, 6 January 2011 (UTC) 769:10:21, 6 January 2011 (UTC) 745:01:48, 6 January 2011 (UTC) 719:23:46, 5 January 2011 (UTC) 674:20:35, 5 January 2011 (UTC) 607:12:18, 5 January 2011 (UTC) 592:11:37, 5 January 2011 (UTC) 577:11:31, 5 January 2011 (UTC) 551:11:26, 5 January 2011 (UTC) 529:11:25, 5 January 2011 (UTC) 513:11:18, 5 January 2011 (UTC) 485:11:12, 5 January 2011 (UTC) 466:03:16, 5 January 2011 (UTC) 446:03:14, 5 January 2011 (UTC) 421:20:01, 4 January 2011 (UTC) 394:13:13, 5 January 2011 (UTC) 368:11:58, 5 January 2011 (UTC) 347:10:32, 5 January 2011 (UTC) 305:18:29, 4 January 2011 (UTC) 287:16:15, 4 January 2011 (UTC) 258:02:10, 4 January 2011 (UTC) 239:20:33, 3 January 2011 (UTC) 23:User:MiszaBot/Archive HowTo 10: 4154: 3721:MediaWiki message delivery 3452:04:22, 27 April 2011 (UTC) 3388:17:05, 22 April 2011 (UTC) 3362:16:10, 22 April 2011 (UTC) 3335:23:53, 19 April 2011 (UTC) 1702:16:54, 30 March 2011 (UTC) 1617:Proposing templates at TFD 1588:Speedy deletion declined: 1063:Incomplete RFD Nominations 3943:A tag has been placed on 3921:02:34, 8 March 2021 (UTC) 3839: 3736:18:27, 8 March 2014 (UTC) 3719:This message was sent by 3626:Template:Alistair Griffin 3615:Template:Alistair Griffin 3556: 3492:A tag has been placed on 3400: 3299:12:23, 9 March 2011 (UTC) 2801:Tom Richards (politician) 2632:guide to appealing blocks 2346:Content of redirect pages 1682:That Guy, From That Show! 1186: 971:Cross-namespace redirects 202:tag from the redirect. — 162:Knowledge:Manual of Style 98: 48: 4139:14:16, 8 June 2024 (UTC) 4117:redirects for discussion 4099:Redirects for discussion 4045:Redirects for discussion 3995:Redirects for discussion 3889:Redirects for discussion 3816:if you wish to do so. – 3792:Redirects for discussion 3745:Redirects for discussion 3545:14:34, 16 May 2011 (UTC) 2955:only says that articles 2658: 2292:File:Verre de whisky.jpg 2151:What are you on about?! 1799:And for another reason: 1679:What's up with that? -- 1623:Post-expand include size 973:, since it adds them to 4059:and has thus listed it 4009:and has thus listed it 3814:the redirect discussion 3767:the redirect discussion 3652:Nomination for deletion 3611:Nomination for deletion 1773:. We have many cats in 1750:You created that page ( 829:commonscat. Thank you. 384:That's useful. Thanks, 3956:contest the nomination 3945:Template:Infobox pizza 3940: 3931:Template:Infobox pizza 3844: 3810:Knowledge:TOOMANYCOOKS 3806:Knowledge:TOOMANYCOOKS 3801: 3754: 3561: 3489: 3471: 3405: 2603: 2296: 2102: 1725:pt:Cristóvão de Aguiar 1558:Per your edit summary 1522:Template:Meta disambig 1370:Categorizing redirects 3939: 3847:Thanks for uploading 3842: 3800: 3753: 3569:File:Me & You.jpg 3566:Thanks for uploading 3559: 3506:articles for deletion 3474: 3470: 3410:Thanks for uploading 3403: 2626:Your reason here ~~~~ 2602: 2295: 2101: 1597:User:Lenko/box-footer 1590:User:Lenko/box-footer 1317:Knowledge neutral pov 1225:Knowledge neutral pov 1190:The Template Barnstar 870:Hi Mhiji, please see 699:. You should add the 632:Tai-Shan Schierenberg 599:Time Will Say Nothing 569:Time Will Say Nothing 544:policy and guidelines 521:Time Will Say Nothing 494:are for. You can use 477:Time Will Say Nothing 438:Time Will Say Nothing 3901:Template:Zodiac sign 1392:John Roth (musician) 774:Template nominations 102:The Jupiter Barnstar 4121:redirect guidelines 4115:has been listed at 3692:be interested in... 3426:You may add it back 3260:Infobox given name2 3251:Infobox given name2 2618:by adding the text 2425:Yeah, that's good. 2135:No you have not. -- 2126:I have already.... 2017:. Also, please use 1710:Cristóvão de Aguiar 3941: 3845: 3802: 3755: 3562: 3494:Blind Faith (song) 3472: 3462:Blind Faith (song) 3413:File:Hustle On.jpg 3406: 3169:And please do not 2696:see discussion at 2604: 2297: 2103: 2074:Race 2 (2011 film) 1203:(background check) 921:GreenwichPensioner 896:GreenwichPensioner 823:Nathaniel Shilkret 300:useful to anyone? 108:Your hard work on 4082:What I been doing 4032:What I been doing 3982:What I been doing 3960:visiting the page 3855:claim of fair use 3738: 3574:claim of fair use 3418:claim of fair use 3318:TFD for this page 3204:realize that you 3165: 3137: 3125: 3058: 3015: 2979:online and active 2970: 2911: 2863: 2791: 2746:talk page stalker 2649:Reasons for block 2616:appeal this block 2342: 1700: 1657:Basket of Puppies 1497:Will do, thanks. 1280:it is considered 1212: 1211: 750:CSD Declined for 657: 643:comment added by 597:I agree, thanks. 585:assume good faith 220: 190: 137: 136: 114:Taskforce Jupiter 82: 81: 4145: 4114: 4108: 4083: 4075: 4072: 4054: 4033: 4025: 4022: 4004: 3983: 3975: 3972: 3938: 3898: 3841: 3777: 3734: 3718: 3705: 3699: 3688:An RfC that you 3665: 3664: 3636: 3624: 3623: 3601: 3595: 3564: 3558: 3515: 3469: 3437:my contributions 3408: 3402: 3380: 3371: 3331: 3325: 3292: 3264: 3258: 3241: 3229: 3212: 3187: 3178: 3163: 3127: 3115: 3048: 3036: 3032: 3027: 3005: 2960: 2944: 2940: 2935: 2909: 2853: 2781: 2780:prodded. — Carl 2767: 2758: 2749: 2694:Reviewing admin: 2629: 2601: 2523:Incomplete TfD's 2514: 2508: 2476: 2470: 2409: 2403: 2399: 2393: 2340: 2318: 2309: 2293: 2226: 2221: 2197: 2192: 2172: 2167: 2144: 2139: 1819: 1793: 1694: 1659: 1489: 1485: 1480: 1474: 1468: 1452: 1446: 1424: 1420: 1419: 1184: 1177: 1176: 1173: 1172: 1171: 1150: 1146: 1145: 1086:Cardinals Roster 1076: 1070: 1056: 968: 962: 866:AfD notification 792: 783: 759:Laurence Belcher 752:Laurence Belcher 708: 702: 656: 637: 628: 626: 566: 560: 503: 497: 460: 454: 267: 266: 221: 215: 214: 191: 185: 184: 130: 125: 96: 89: 88: 74: 68: 53: 46: 45: 4153: 4152: 4148: 4147: 4146: 4144: 4143: 4142: 4110: 4102: 4085: 4081: 4073: 4070: 4048: 4035: 4031: 4023: 4020: 3998: 3985: 3981: 3973: 3970: 3936: 3934: 3927:Speedy deletion 3892: 3872:. Thank you. -- 3837: 3795: 3771: 3748: 3728: 3727:) on behalf of 3703: 3697: 3694: 3662: 3659: 3643: 3634: 3621: 3618: 3599: 3593: 3553: 3552: 3513: 3502:deletion debate 3490: 3467: 3465: 3458:Speedy deletion 3397: 3396: 3374: 3369: 3354:Peter M. Gerdes 3342: 3329: 3323: 3314:Template:R help 3306: 3304:Template:R help 3288: 3282: 3262: 3256: 3253: 3239: 3235: 3227: 3210: 3181: 3176: 3147: 3145:Don't walk away 3034: 3030: 3025: 2942: 2938: 2933: 2761: 2756: 2743: 2718: 2651: 2646: 2619: 2599: 2525: 2512: 2506: 2474: 2468: 2460: 2407: 2401: 2397: 2391: 2388: 2386:Template:Russia 2348: 2343: 2312: 2307: 2304: 2303: 2287: 2264: 2224: 2219: 2195: 2190: 2170: 2165: 2142: 2137: 2076: 2054: 2011: 1975: 1918: 1898: 1828: 1807: 1781: 1767: 1765:Cruelty to cats 1744: 1713: 1670: 1655: 1649: 1636: 1619: 1593: 1556: 1510: 1487: 1483: 1478: 1472: 1466: 1463: 1450: 1444: 1438: 1417: 1415: 1398:User:Freaking67 1394: 1384:Good Ol’factory 1372: 1217: 1205: 1169: 1164: 1143: 1141: 1074: 1068: 1065: 1044: 1034: 966: 960: 939: 891: 889:Speedy deletion 868: 848: 818: 786: 781: 776: 755: 726: 706: 700: 693: 638: 624: 614: 564: 558: 501: 495: 458: 452: 428: 408: 246: 231: 209: 203: 179: 173: 142: 126: 121: 87: 72: 66: 44: 19: 12: 11: 5: 4151: 4101: 4091: 4079: 4061:for discussion 4047: 4041: 4029: 4011:for discussion 3997: 3991: 3979: 3933: 3929:nomination of 3924: 3891: 3885: 3836: 3833: 3794: 3788: 3747: 3741: 3740: 3739: 3693: 3686: 3658: 3649: 3639: 3617: 3608: 3551: 3548: 3485:Article Wizard 3473: 3464: 3460:nomination of 3455: 3447:. Thank you. 3395: 3392: 3391: 3390: 3341: 3338: 3305: 3302: 3281: 3278: 3252: 3249: 3248: 3247: 3237: 3198: 3197: 3146: 3143: 3142: 3141: 3107: 3106: 3105: 3104: 3103: 3102: 3101: 3100: 3099: 3098: 3097: 3096: 3095: 3094: 3093: 3092: 3091: 3090: 3089: 3088: 3087: 3086: 3085: 3084: 3083: 3082: 3081: 3080: 3079: 3078: 3077: 2912: 2878: 2825: 2730:David Eppstein 2717: 2714: 2713: 2712: 2650: 2647: 2605:You have been 2597: 2574: 2573: 2568: 2563: 2558: 2553: 2548: 2543: 2538: 2524: 2521: 2459: 2454: 2453: 2452: 2451: 2450: 2387: 2384: 2383: 2382: 2347: 2344: 2329: 2299: 2298: 2288: 2286: 2283: 2263: 2260: 2259: 2258: 2257: 2256: 2255: 2254: 2253: 2252: 2251: 2250: 2249: 2248: 2247: 2246: 2245: 2244: 2243: 2242: 2241: 2240: 2075: 2072: 2053: 2050: 2049: 2048: 2019:edit summaries 2010: 2007: 2006: 2005: 1974: 1971: 1956: 1955: 1948: 1941: 1933: 1930: 1917: 1914: 1897: 1894: 1893: 1892: 1891: 1890: 1889: 1888: 1874:Werner Neumann 1827: 1824: 1766: 1763: 1762: 1761: 1743: 1740: 1712: 1706: 1705: 1704: 1688: 1669: 1666: 1665: 1664: 1648: 1642: 1634: 1618: 1615: 1592: 1586: 1585: 1584: 1577:No worries :) 1555: 1552: 1551: 1550: 1509: 1508:Merge template 1506: 1505: 1504: 1462: 1459: 1437: 1434: 1433: 1432: 1393: 1390: 1371: 1368: 1367: 1366: 1365: 1364: 1363: 1362: 1361: 1360: 1359: 1358: 1357: 1356: 1355: 1354: 1347:No problem :) 1216: 1213: 1210: 1209: 1201: 1193: 1192: 1187: 1185: 1163: 1160: 1159: 1158: 1124: 1123: 1118: 1113: 1108: 1103: 1098: 1093: 1088: 1064: 1061: 1033: 1032:Edit summaries 1030: 1029: 1028: 1027: 1026: 1025: 1024: 1023: 1022: 938: 935: 934: 933: 932: 931: 890: 887: 867: 864: 853:The Wiki ghost 847: 842: 817: 814: 813: 812: 775: 772: 754: 748: 725: 722: 692: 689: 677: 676: 663:User:Ronhjones 619: 613: 612:self portrait! 610: 595: 594: 554: 553: 516: 515: 469: 468: 427: 426:Up To Now tags 424: 407: 404: 403: 402: 401: 400: 399: 398: 397: 396: 375: 374: 373: 372: 371: 370: 352: 351: 350: 349: 335: 324: 320: 308: 307: 276: 274: 271: 270: 269: 268: 245: 242: 230: 227: 226: 225: 141: 138: 135: 134: 105: 104: 99: 97: 86: 85:Barnstar Award 83: 80: 79: 60: 59: 54: 43: 38: 18: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4150: 4141: 4140: 4136: 4132: 4128: 4127: 4122: 4118: 4113: 4109:The redirect 4107: 4100: 4096: 4090: 4089: 4084: 4077: 4076: 4066: 4062: 4058: 4053: 4046: 4040: 4039: 4034: 4027: 4026: 4016: 4012: 4008: 4003: 3996: 3990: 3989: 3984: 3977: 3976: 3966: 3961: 3957: 3952: 3950: 3946: 3932: 3928: 3923: 3922: 3918: 3914: 3910: 3906: 3902: 3897: 3890: 3884: 3883: 3879: 3875: 3871: 3867: 3862: 3860: 3856: 3852: 3851: 3832: 3831: 3827: 3823: 3819: 3818:Deacon Vorbis 3815: 3811: 3807: 3799: 3793: 3787: 3786: 3782: 3778: 3776: 3775: 3768: 3764: 3760: 3752: 3746: 3737: 3732: 3726: 3722: 3717: 3716: 3715: 3713: 3709: 3702: 3691: 3685: 3684: 3680: 3676: 3672: 3668: 3657: 3653: 3648: 3647: 3644: 3642: 3637: 3631: 3627: 3616: 3612: 3607: 3606: 3602: 3596: 3591:. Thank you. 3590: 3586: 3581: 3579: 3575: 3571: 3570: 3563: 3547: 3546: 3542: 3538: 3534: 3530: 3525: 3521: 3520: 3509: 3507: 3504:, such as at 3503: 3499: 3495: 3488: 3486: 3481: 3479: 3463: 3459: 3454: 3453: 3450: 3446: 3442: 3438: 3433: 3431: 3427: 3423: 3419: 3415: 3414: 3407: 3389: 3385: 3381: 3379: 3378: 3372: 3366: 3365: 3364: 3363: 3359: 3355: 3350: 3346: 3337: 3336: 3333: 3332: 3326: 3319: 3315: 3311: 3301: 3300: 3297: 3296: 3291: 3290:Snailwalker | 3285: 3277: 3276: 3272: 3268: 3261: 3246: 3242: 3232: 3231: 3230: 3221: 3220: 3219: 3218: 3215: 3213: 3207: 3203: 3196: 3192: 3188: 3186: 3185: 3179: 3172: 3168: 3167: 3166: 3161: 3160: 3157: 3152: 3140: 3135: 3131: 3123: 3119: 3113: 3108: 3076: 3072: 3068: 3063: 3062: 3061: 3056: 3052: 3046: 3042: 3041: 3040: 3037: 3033: 3028: 3020: 3019: 3018: 3013: 3009: 3003: 2999: 2995: 2994: 2993: 2989: 2985: 2980: 2975: 2974: 2973: 2968: 2964: 2958: 2954: 2950: 2949: 2948: 2945: 2941: 2936: 2928: 2927: 2926: 2922: 2918: 2914: 2913: 2907: 2906: 2903: 2898: 2897: 2896: 2892: 2888: 2884: 2879: 2876: 2872: 2868: 2867: 2866: 2861: 2857: 2850: 2845: 2844: 2843: 2839: 2835: 2830: 2826: 2823: 2818: 2817: 2816: 2812: 2808: 2807: 2802: 2798: 2797: 2796: 2795: 2794: 2789: 2785: 2778: 2777: 2776: 2772: 2768: 2766: 2765: 2759: 2753: 2747: 2742: 2741: 2740: 2739: 2735: 2731: 2727: 2723: 2711: 2707: 2703: 2699: 2695: 2692: 2691: 2690: 2689: 2685: 2681: 2677: 2675: 2670: 2668: 2662: 2660: 2656: 2645: 2641: 2637: 2633: 2627: 2623: 2617: 2613: 2610: 2609: 2596: 2595: 2591: 2587: 2583: 2579: 2572: 2569: 2567: 2564: 2562: 2559: 2557: 2554: 2552: 2549: 2547: 2544: 2542: 2541:Template:Afad 2539: 2537: 2534: 2533: 2532: 2530: 2520: 2519: 2515: 2509: 2503: 2499: 2495: 2491: 2487: 2482: 2481: 2477: 2471: 2465: 2458: 2449: 2445: 2441: 2437: 2436: 2435: 2432: 2428: 2424: 2423: 2422: 2421: 2417: 2413: 2406: 2396: 2381: 2377: 2373: 2369: 2365: 2364: 2363: 2362: 2358: 2354: 2338: 2334: 2330: 2327: 2323: 2319: 2317: 2316: 2310: 2302: 2294: 2282: 2281: 2278: 2276: 2275: 2271:listening. -- 2269: 2239: 2236: 2232: 2231: 2230: 2227: 2222: 2216: 2215: 2214: 2211: 2207: 2203: 2202: 2201: 2198: 2193: 2187: 2186: 2185: 2182: 2178: 2177: 2176: 2173: 2168: 2162: 2159: 2158: 2157: 2154: 2150: 2149: 2148: 2145: 2140: 2134: 2133: 2132: 2129: 2125: 2124: 2123: 2119: 2115: 2111: 2107: 2100: 2096: 2095: 2094: 2093: 2089: 2085: 2081: 2071: 2070: 2066: 2062: 2059: 2047: 2043: 2039: 2035: 2034: 2033: 2032: 2028: 2024: 2020: 2016: 2004: 2000: 1996: 1992: 1991: 1990: 1989: 1985: 1981: 1970: 1969: 1965: 1961: 1953: 1949: 1946: 1942: 1938: 1934: 1931: 1928: 1923: 1922: 1921: 1913: 1912: 1908: 1904: 1887: 1883: 1879: 1875: 1871: 1870: 1869: 1866: 1862: 1859: 1858: 1857: 1853: 1849: 1844: 1843: 1842: 1841: 1837: 1833: 1823: 1822: 1817: 1814: 1811: 1806: 1802: 1797: 1796: 1791: 1788: 1785: 1780: 1776: 1772: 1760: 1757: 1753: 1749: 1748: 1747: 1739: 1738: 1734: 1730: 1726: 1722: 1718: 1711: 1703: 1698: 1693: 1689: 1687: 1684: 1683: 1678: 1677: 1676: 1675: 1663: 1660: 1658: 1651: 1650: 1646: 1641: 1640: 1637: 1632: 1628: 1624: 1614: 1613: 1610: 1606: 1604: 1603:the user does 1598: 1591: 1583: 1580: 1576: 1575: 1574: 1573: 1569: 1565: 1561: 1554:MFD templates 1549: 1546: 1542: 1541: 1540: 1539: 1535: 1531: 1527: 1523: 1519: 1515: 1512:In regard to 1503: 1500: 1496: 1495: 1494: 1493: 1490: 1486: 1481: 1471: 1470:refimproveBLP 1458: 1457: 1454: 1453: 1447: 1431: 1428: 1423: 1414: 1413: 1412: 1411: 1407: 1403: 1399: 1389: 1388: 1385: 1381: 1377: 1353: 1350: 1346: 1345: 1344: 1340: 1336: 1332: 1331: 1330: 1327: 1322: 1318: 1314: 1310: 1306: 1302: 1298: 1297: 1296: 1295: 1291: 1287: 1283: 1279: 1274: 1273: 1272: 1269: 1265: 1261: 1257: 1256: 1255: 1251: 1247: 1243: 1242: 1241: 1238: 1234: 1230: 1229: 1228: 1226: 1222: 1208: 1204: 1199: 1195: 1194: 1191: 1188: 1183: 1178: 1175: 1157: 1154: 1149: 1140: 1139: 1138: 1137: 1133: 1129: 1122: 1119: 1117: 1114: 1112: 1109: 1107: 1104: 1102: 1099: 1097: 1094: 1092: 1089: 1087: 1084: 1083: 1082: 1080: 1073: 1060: 1059: 1054: 1051: 1048: 1043: 1039: 1021: 1018: 1014: 1013: 1012: 1008: 1004: 999: 998: 997: 993: 989: 985: 984: 983: 980: 976: 972: 965: 958: 957: 956: 955: 951: 947: 943: 930: 926: 922: 917: 916: 915: 912: 908: 907: 906: 905: 901: 897: 886: 885: 881: 877: 873: 863: 862: 858: 854: 846: 841: 840: 836: 832: 826: 824: 811: 808: 804: 803: 802: 801: 797: 793: 791: 790: 784: 771: 770: 767: 766: 760: 753: 747: 746: 742: 738: 737: 732: 721: 720: 716: 712: 705: 698: 688: 686: 682: 675: 672: 668: 665:to userfy it 664: 660: 659: 658: 654: 650: 646: 642: 634: 633: 627: 617: 609: 608: 604: 600: 593: 590: 586: 581: 580: 579: 578: 574: 570: 563: 552: 549: 545: 541: 537: 533: 532: 531: 530: 526: 522: 514: 511: 507: 500: 493: 489: 488: 487: 486: 482: 478: 474: 467: 464: 457: 450: 449: 448: 447: 443: 439: 434: 431: 423: 422: 418: 414: 395: 391: 387: 383: 382: 381: 380: 379: 378: 377: 376: 369: 366: 362: 358: 357: 356: 355: 354: 353: 348: 344: 340: 336: 333: 332: 331: 326:However, I'm 325: 321: 318: 317: 312: 311: 310: 309: 306: 303: 299: 295: 291: 290: 289: 288: 284: 280: 264: 263: 262: 261: 260: 259: 255: 251: 241: 240: 237: 224: 218: 212: 208: 207: 201: 197: 196: 195: 194: 188: 182: 178: 177: 171: 167: 163: 159: 155: 151: 147: 133: 129: 124: 119: 115: 111: 107: 106: 103: 100: 95: 90: 78: 75: 70: 69: 62: 61: 58: 55: 52: 47: 42: 37: 36: 32: 28: 24: 4124: 4103: 4097:" listed at 4068: 4049: 4018: 3999: 3968: 3955: 3953: 3942: 3893: 3865: 3863: 3848: 3846: 3809: 3803: 3773: 3772: 3762: 3756: 3731:Technical 13 3701:Infobox film 3695: 3689: 3660: 3640: 3619: 3584: 3582: 3567: 3565: 3554: 3523: 3517: 3510: 3491: 3482: 3475: 3440: 3434: 3411: 3409: 3398: 3376: 3375: 3351: 3347: 3343: 3324:McLerristarr 3321: 3307: 3293: 3289: 3286: 3283: 3254: 3225: 3224: 3205: 3201: 3199: 3183: 3182: 3154: 3148: 3044: 3023: 2997: 2956: 2931: 2917:Andy Dingley 2900: 2887:Andy Dingley 2883:Lee Hong-koo 2874: 2871:Lee Hong-koo 2849:Lee Hong-koo 2847:Prodding of 2834:Andy Dingley 2828: 2821: 2804: 2763: 2762: 2726:Lee Hong-koo 2719: 2693: 2678: 2673: 2671: 2663: 2652: 2625: 2612:indefinitely 2611: 2606: 2575: 2531:daily logs: 2526: 2501: 2489: 2485: 2483: 2461: 2430: 2389: 2349: 2314: 2313: 2305: 2300: 2273: 2265: 2262:Clerical CSD 2234: 2209: 2180: 2152: 2127: 2109: 2077: 2061:Andy Dingley 2056:Please note 2055: 2038:Andy Dingley 2012: 1976: 1957: 1936: 1919: 1916:RfD closings 1899: 1878:Gerda Arendt 1864: 1848:Gerda Arendt 1832:Gerda Arendt 1829: 1812: 1798: 1786: 1768: 1755: 1745: 1714: 1680: 1674:encyclopedia 1672: 1671: 1656: 1631:Plastikspork 1620: 1607:Thank you. 1600: 1594: 1578: 1557: 1544: 1511: 1498: 1476: 1464: 1461:Sticky prods 1445:McLerristarr 1442: 1439: 1426: 1421: 1395: 1373: 1348: 1325: 1275: 1267: 1236: 1218: 1189: 1165: 1152: 1147: 1125: 1066: 1049: 1035: 1016: 978: 964:R to project 940: 910: 892: 869: 849: 827: 819: 806: 788: 787: 777: 763: 756: 734: 727: 694: 684: 680: 678: 670: 639:— Preceding 635: 618: 615: 596: 588: 555: 547: 534:No, it's an 517: 509: 492:cleanup tags 470: 462: 456:unreferenced 435: 432: 429: 409: 364: 329: 328: 327: 315: 314: 301: 272: 247: 232: 204: 200:Template:rfd 174: 169: 165: 143: 101: 65: 56: 20: 3537:Crisco 1492 3228:Hydroxonium 2659:break links 2498:Get Back Up 2494:Secret Love 2274:Hojimachong 2110:please stop 2009:Please stop 1876:as well, -- 1861:Template:De 1826:Alfred Dürr 1335:Eraserhead1 1286:Eraserhead1 1246:Eraserhead1 1111:Shah family 845:Dana Winner 685:Hughlay1407 681:Hughlay1407 645:Hughlay1407 413:David in DC 236:StreetDarcy 206:SMcCandlish 176:SMcCandlish 3635:The Banner 3594:Skier Dude 3514:{{db-...}} 3449:Courcelles 3284:Hi Mhiji, 3159:Farmbrough 2953:WP:BLPPROD 2905:Farmbrough 2657:which can 2440:Funandtrvl 2412:Funandtrvl 2036:Seconded! 1903:Off2riorob 1609:Courcelles 1425:, thanks. 1402:Tassedethe 1198:cymru.lass 1151:, thanks. 1003:Funandtrvl 988:Funandtrvl 946:Funandtrvl 874:. Thanks, 831:Niel Shell 140:MOS:BETTER 3774:Steel1943 3310:talk page 3151:WP:BOTREQ 2875:obviously 2578:Train2104 2484:In fact, 2080:this edit 2023:Admrboltz 1960:Thryduulf 1937:extremely 1530:Debresser 1514:this edit 1221:WP:CSD#R2 1128:JLaTondre 1038:read this 118:Taskforce 17:Archiving 3917:contribs 3866:articles 3585:articles 3527:contact 3441:articles 3422:orphaned 3384:contribs 3191:contribs 3112:enabling 3067:The-Pope 3045:requires 3035:Chequers 3002:enabling 2998:requires 2984:The-Pope 2943:Chequers 2877:obvious. 2822:claiming 2771:contribs 2716:Bad prod 2624:|reason= 2586:contribs 2405:WPRUSSIA 2353:D.Lazard 2326:WikiLove 2322:contribs 1995:The-Pope 1980:The-Pope 1816:contribs 1805:RHaworth 1790:contribs 1779:RHaworth 1488:Chequers 1313:WP:POINT 1053:contribs 1042:RHaworth 969:was for 796:contribs 765:Stephen! 653:contribs 641:unsigned 538:, not a 406:Redirect 323:comment. 217:Contribs 187:Contribs 3267:Hutcher 2722:WP:PROD 2634:first. 2622:unblock 2608:blocked 2507:Ryūlóng 2500:, etc. 2486:several 2469:Ryūlóng 2427:Done it 1952:WP:SNOW 1945:WP:SNOW 1896:VU 2345 1742:Curious 1729:Shirt58 1721:WP:PROD 1564:Nyttend 1282:uncivil 1260:Twinkle 1121:VP:VAND 1101:MOS:ALT 1036:Please 508:first. 166:Support 110:Jupiter 4131:Gonnym 3826:videos 3822:carbon 3533:userfy 3524:speedy 3330:Mclay1 2957:can be 2702:JohnCD 2680:JohnCD 2636:JohnCD 2529:WP:TFD 2372:JohnCD 2220:Hinata 2191:Hinata 2166:Hinata 2161:WP:ANI 2138:Hinata 2114:JohnCD 2084:JohnCD 1717:WP:BLP 1708:About 1451:Mclay1 1321:WP:RFD 1309:WT:RFD 1162:hello! 1079:WP:RFD 876:Drmies 562:In use 540:policy 499:In use 386:Pdfpdf 339:Pdfpdf 279:Pdfpdf 250:Pdfpdf 170:Delete 146:WP:RFD 128:Orator 3874:B-bot 3171:evade 3031:Spiel 2939:Spiel 2811:talk 2590:count 2431:Mhiji 2333:subst 2235:Mhiji 2210:Mhiji 2181:Mhiji 2153:Mhiji 2128:Mhiji 2104:From 1927:WP:AN 1865:Mhiji 1756:Mhiji 1579:Mhiji 1545:Mhiji 1520:that 1499:Mhiji 1484:Spiel 1427:Mhiji 1349:Mhiji 1341:: --> 1326:Mhiji 1301:there 1292:: --> 1268:Mhiji 1264:WP:R3 1252:: --> 1237:Mhiji 1153:Mhiji 1017:Mhiji 979:Mhiji 911:Mhiji 807:Mhiji 741:talk 691:stubs 671:Mhiji 589:Mhiji 548:Mhiji 536:essay 510:Mhiji 506:draft 463:Mhiji 365:Mhiji 302:Mhiji 213:ʕ(ل)ˀ 211:Talk⇒ 183:ʕ(ل)ˀ 181:Talk⇒ 123:Novus 27:Salix 4135:talk 4074:mann 4071:Zack 4024:mann 4021:Zack 3974:mann 3971:Zack 3913:talk 3909:Elli 3878:talk 3781:talk 3729:{{U| 3725:talk 3679:talk 3641:talk 3600:talk 3541:talk 3358:talk 3295:talk 3271:talk 3156:Rich 3134:talk 3122:talk 3071:talk 3055:talk 3026:Ϣere 3012:talk 2988:talk 2967:talk 2934:Ϣere 2921:talk 2902:Rich 2891:talk 2860:talk 2838:talk 2829:must 2788:talk 2734:talk 2706:talk 2684:talk 2640:talk 2582:talk 2444:talk 2416:talk 2376:talk 2357:talk 2268:this 2225:talk 2206:here 2196:talk 2171:talk 2143:talk 2118:talk 2088:talk 2065:talk 2042:talk 2027:talk 1999:talk 1984:talk 1964:talk 1907:talk 1882:talk 1852:talk 1836:talk 1810:talk 1784:talk 1733:talk 1697:Talk 1692:Eddi 1627:here 1568:talk 1560:here 1534:talk 1479:Ϣere 1422:Done 1406:talk 1339:talk 1337:< 1290:talk 1288:< 1250:talk 1248:< 1233:here 1215:NPOV 1148:Done 1132:talk 1047:talk 1040:. — 1007:talk 992:talk 950:talk 925:talk 900:talk 880:talk 857:talk 835:talk 729:for 715:talk 711:PamD 704:stub 697:here 667:here 649:talk 603:talk 573:talk 525:talk 481:talk 442:talk 417:talk 390:talk 361:here 343:talk 330:very 316:much 298:this 283:talk 254:talk 31:talk 3967:. 3958:by 3861:). 3708:RfC 3690:may 3654:of 3613:of 3580:). 3432:). 3377:Mid 3370:Hey 3312:of 3206:are 3184:Mid 3177:Hey 3130:CBM 3118:CBM 3051:CBM 3008:CBM 2963:CBM 2856:CBM 2806:DGG 2784:CBM 2764:Mid 2757:Hey 2395:RUS 2315:Mid 2308:Hey 1973:Why 1935:Be 1647:CSD 1072:rfd 789:Mid 782:Hey 736:DGG 621:use 73:man 67:Reh 33:): 4137:) 4086:) 4078:(/ 4036:) 4028:(/ 3986:) 3978:(/ 3919:) 3915:| 3880:) 3828:) 3824:• 3783:) 3733:}} 3704:}} 3698:{{ 3681:) 3673:. 3632:. 3603:) 3543:) 3386:) 3360:) 3327:| 3273:) 3263:}} 3257:{{ 3243:) 3202:do 3193:) 3162:, 3132:· 3120:· 3073:) 3053:· 3010:· 2990:) 2965:· 2923:) 2908:, 2893:) 2858:· 2840:) 2813:) 2786:· 2773:) 2754:. 2736:) 2708:) 2700:. 2686:) 2642:) 2628:}} 2620:{{ 2592:) 2588:• 2584:• 2576:— 2516:) 2513:竜龙 2504:.— 2496:, 2492:. 2478:) 2475:竜龙 2446:) 2429:. 2418:) 2408:}} 2402:{{ 2398:}} 2392:{{ 2378:) 2359:) 2120:) 2090:) 2067:) 2044:) 2029:) 2001:) 1986:) 1966:) 1909:) 1884:) 1854:) 1838:) 1735:) 1635:―Œ 1570:) 1536:) 1473:}} 1467:{{ 1448:| 1408:) 1315:? 1235:. 1134:) 1075:}} 1069:{{ 1009:) 1001:-- 994:) 977:. 967:}} 961:{{ 952:) 927:) 902:) 882:) 859:) 837:) 798:) 743:) 717:) 707:}} 701:{{ 655:) 651:• 605:) 575:) 565:}} 559:{{ 546:. 527:) 502:}} 496:{{ 483:) 459:}} 453:{{ 444:) 419:) 392:) 345:) 285:) 256:) 4133:( 4093:" 3911:( 3876:( 3843:⚠ 3820:( 3779:( 3723:( 3677:( 3597:( 3560:⚠ 3539:( 3512:( 3480:. 3404:⚠ 3382:( 3356:( 3269:( 3240:O 3238:3 3236:H 3233:( 3211:œ 3189:( 3136:) 3128:( 3124:) 3116:( 3069:( 3057:) 3049:( 3014:) 3006:( 2986:( 2969:) 2961:( 2919:( 2889:( 2862:) 2854:( 2836:( 2809:( 2790:) 2782:( 2769:( 2748:) 2744:( 2732:( 2704:( 2682:( 2638:( 2580:( 2510:( 2472:( 2442:( 2414:( 2374:( 2355:( 2335:: 2320:( 2116:( 2086:( 2063:( 2040:( 2025:( 1997:( 1982:( 1962:( 1929:. 1905:( 1880:( 1850:( 1834:( 1818:) 1813:· 1808:( 1792:) 1787:· 1782:( 1731:( 1699:) 1695:( 1605:. 1566:( 1532:( 1404:( 1200:⁄ 1130:( 1055:) 1050:· 1045:( 1005:( 990:( 948:( 923:( 898:( 878:( 855:( 833:( 794:( 739:( 713:( 647:( 601:( 571:( 523:( 479:( 440:( 415:( 388:( 341:( 281:( 252:( 219:. 189:. 29:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index