User talk:MehmoodS

1283:

my behavior to every editor and Administrator on Knowledge. I had an account HaughtonBrit which I created about 3 years ago and while trying to prevent being stalked by another user, I made a mistake by creating multiple accounts. When my account HaughtonBrit was blocked along with other accounts that I used simultaneously, I wasn’t aware that I should have waited 6 months to appeal unblock. Therefore, I ended up creating account MehmoodS and kept this as my one and only user account where I made well over 3000 sincere edits with reliable sources from scholars. I even made great contribution in preventing vandalism and was given the privilege as Pending Change reviewer. But then it was found that my account MehmoodS and HaughtonBrit were connected so I got blocked again. And I deliberately lied refusing to accept that HaughtonBrit was my previous account. This caused further lack of trust in admins who could clearly see through my lies. It was a very immature step I took when all I had to do was just fess up. Two-Three admins told me to fess up but I was worried and scared that if I admit then I would remain blocked. The other reason for lying was also because of being self egoistic. I felt with MehmoodS I created a well enough reputation as an editor that by accepting my past as HaughtonBrit, I would throw all that down the hole. I felt that by admitting my mistake, I would cause a threat to my identity as MehmoodS. Because of this immaturity I lied and lied and lied, denying to admit that I had any previous blocked account. This was just so wrong, immature and selfish of me. As I deserved, I was indefinitely blocked. Through these 6-7 months, I not only realized my mistakes but also grew in maturity and have repent myself. Like I said earlier, it’s been well over 6 months and I sincerely apologize for abusing multiple accounts and I will never ever make such mistake again. Also as an FYI, since I couldn't file an appeal directly from the talk page of MehmoodS, I created a temporary account Fatih200 to get advise on how to appeal from administrator. I wasn't aware that this platform WP:UTRS existed till administrator Ponyo notified me. You can see the talk page if you have any question. I am sorry, really really sorry as I wasn't aware that I could file an appeal this way through . Right after admin's suggestion, I retired the account Fatih200 with a tag. Once again I am really sorry for everything in the past and I have realized my mistake in all these 6 months and would really request to be unblocked so that I could continue making sincere contribution to Knowledge. As per WP:LASTCHANCE please give me this last and final opportunity to be unblocked. I assure you that I won't make any blunder or lie or make any false statement. Please accept my sincere apology.

1123:, due to dispute and it was necessary for 3rd opinions. Aman.kumar.goel I believe was upset with such submission of investigation and to prevent it, submitted this sock request in bad faith. I have been a very sincere editor throughout 8 months. Since I have been here, I have used necessary platforms to resolve disputes. I have also prevented disruptions and vandalism and made tremendous improvement to encyclopedia and would like to continue to do so. My edit history speaks for my contributions and credibility as faithful editor. I am sorry for this long message as I felt it was necessary to detail the facts and I am also sorry if I offended anyone as that isn't my intention from this message. Admin Bbb23 blocked me from editing my own talk page just to suppress my voice, so that is why I have to resubmit while logging out. Please go through my contribution. I have also known about sock policy and I have NOT used any other account simultaneously nor committed Sockpuppetry. This (MehmoodS) is my one and only primary account that I would continue to use moving forward. I have been using this account for last 9 months. Request you to please unblock me. 1741:

it or if some admin like you would have questioned, I would have given you the answer rightaway truthfully. I didn't know such discussion was going on in different platform. I would have saved everyone's time. Plus I have been traveling right now and not able to give update or keep any watch accordingly due to lack of access. Its also hard to keep track where the matter was last left off. That is why after a while I pinged Yamla to get an update on my appeal. About getting warnings about editing while logged out, yes, but that was when I had an account and that is why it was misunderstanding on my part because now as my account is blocked, therefore makes me just a random external user. And I realized that this too is block evasion. Bbb23, like I said earlier, I am literally an open book, you will get all answers truthfully. By hiding or not admitting, I know I am causing the issues for myself and my blocked account and I don't want to plus feel ashamed for my lies in the past. I am giving it all out to you about any question you have. I really really need one last final opportunity. Please hear me.

1395:

July 5 block, and also from 3 different airports. Kindly advise me an appropriate course of action on how to inform admins of his continued sock puppetry since July 5 or whether I should even proceed with it at all. I understand that I have a problematic history myself and I don't want admins to think that I am reverting to past behaviour - I have committed to admins that I will stay away from India + religion topics for a long time and I stand by that, however this user's extensive use of deception, block evasion and using unsavory methods to frustrate other users, particularly myself, and your comment that CheckUser data shows no evidence of block evasion has impelled to write this to. There is iron clad evidence that proves he most certainly has been evading his block in a pretty egregious manner.

652:, due to dispute and it was necessary for 3rd opinions. Aman.kumar.goel I believe was upset with such submission of investigation and to prevent it, submitted this sock request in bad faith. I have been a very sincere editor throughout 8 months. Since I have been here, I have used necessary platforms to resolve disputes. I have also prevented disruptions and vandalism and made tremendous improvement to encyclopedia and would like to continue to do so. My edit history speaks for my contributions and credibility as faithful editor. I am sorry for this long message as I felt it was necessary to detail the facts and I am also sorry if I offended anyone as that isn't my intention from this message. Please 936:

I haven't had any other account that I used simultaneously with this account and I don't know what CU data is of concern here. This is my one and only account that I have used in last 9 months and this the only account that I have been using and will continue with moving forward and this is my only primary account. When you say that find something else to do for 6 months, what exactly do you mean? Do you mean to step away for six months from Knowledge and then re-request to unblock? But can't admins continue to investigate as I have digressed enough to look at my contribution and tell me if I have in any way caused any nuisance or disruption on Knowledge. I just request to have my account unblocked.

1835:

otherwise if i can remember correctly. Even if I get to be able to edit again as an active user, I will have to rehash again about different platforms and processes especially since there has been a long gap. We are all humans. Just making you aware as it seems Suthasianhistorian8 is trying to twist my words. Bbb23 you know the history between me and him as you were involved in issues between me and him while back. I have grown out of it. Importantly, I have been traveling like I mentioned before, and don't have time enough or access enough to get all detail about this matter and makes it hard to keep track of where the matter left off especially when there is no update on talk page.

1665:

right after. I was under the impression that once your account is blocked then you are literally not a member anymore but become a non-Knowledge member who doesn't have an account and can edit pages but with IPs showing. After reading some explanation above, I realized that I misunderstood, made blunder and I really really apologize for it. Please forgive me. I had no intention to cause any disruption. Truly, deeply apologize. Please tell me what you suggest? Do you want me to reapply after certain period because of this mistake I made? Please do tell me.

1719:. You never said, "oh, I didn't know that logged out editing is block evasion", even though it's absolutely obvious that it is. Instead, you waited until now to admit to a fairly large amount of logged out editing and expect us to believe that you didn't know it was block evasion because it wasn't from a named account. And the history of your case at SPI indicates that you have been accused of logged out editing before, and you knew that as well.-- 1197: 993: 522: 437: 1783:.". However, he has filed at least 5 SPIs not too far back and the users he filed them against did not receive any message on their talk pages that a sock puppet investigation was opened up about them. (He filed 3 SPIs as HaughtonBrit and 2 as MehmoodS, one against me on June 11, 2022 and against another user in 2021 1780:

but usually we get message that a SPI case has been submitted about you (something around that line) so that is why I was waiting for it and just saw it today in detail through the link you provided. I am being brutually honest...... I didn't know such discussion was going on in different platform. I

1610:

As mentioned thoroughly prior, there is no way that the 199 FedEx IP range as well as the 2600:1016 IPs' recent edits from July to January while being inactive in those areas prior to the July 5 block is coincidental. The latter also matching up precisely with the 50* IP's geolocation and behavioral

854:

thank you for looking into my request. Like I mentioned in my unblock request, this is my one and only account. I have not used any other account simultaneously. Please look at my contribution history. My work speaks of me as a faithful editor who has worked everyday to stop disruption and vandalism.

130:

to get opinion about its reliability because its not as Barbara A. West holds a Ph.D. in social anthropology from the University of Rochester in New York. She is not an academicians historian. I didn't even look at her citation earlier due to above reason as it wasn't worthy to look at as compared to

935:

editors with two or more accounts simultaneously, is to mislead, deceive, vandalize or disrupt. A great example would be Suthasianhistorian8 who had about 7-8 accounts that he used simultaneously. I have followed sockpuppet policy and that is why only used one account. Since I have had this account,

888:

and then there are other pending change reviewers who have witnessed it, but just turn the blind eye. Please look at my contribution where I constantly warned and protected pages from such disruptions. Please do consider of unblocking me so that I can continue to improve encyclopedia and prevent its

1740:

I saw Suthasianhistorian8 message on my talk page but usually we get message that a SPI case has been submitted about you (something around that line) so that is why I was waiting for it and just saw it today in detail through the link you provided. I am being brutually honest. If I would have seen

1282:

I was blocked over 6 months ago for all right reasons and now decided to appeal as per the Knowledge policy of waiting 6 months. It’s been well over 6 months that my account had been blocked and I took all this time to understand and realize the mistakes that I made and very sincerely apologize for

1394:

but also consistently from two different ranges (close to a hundred or so edits since his block I believe, the last few as recent as January 19 of this year), not only that but also from a FedEx IP similar to the one listed on the Haughton Brit SPI page which he used to edit just one day after his

1834:

when I had an active account over a while ago, I filed various SPI reports but with such gap you don't remember much of the process. And even if some user might have said that he or she didn't get a SPI report, then it's my fault for not posting the message on their talk page. That is the process

1700:

Please hear me out. I agree with you but that is all in the past and I admitted to everything. I really need this please and would take any strong suggestions or recommendations you can provide to prove myself as I know it's hard to believe someone who lied. That is why I gave all detail about my

1664:

Yes, it is true that I made some edits while my account MehmoodS remained block but during that time I understood block evasion as someone whose account is blocked and then creates another account to disguise himself like I did when HaughtonBrit account was blocked and I created MehmoodS account

1573:

responded in part: "CU isn't a silver bullet. If the consensus is that behavioural evidence indicates block evasion, we obviously should not lift the block." (for my complete comments and Yamla's full response see the report). Because the purpose of the SPI was not to block any of the IPs (their

1526:

Please let me know how long the request takes for coming down with a decision. Also please let me know if you have any questions for me or if there is something you think I missed to mention or admit or need clarification, please do ask. I am literally an open book. Won't hide anything and will

1471:

These two users, particularly Suthasianhistorian8 was indefinitely blocked for abusing multiple accounts and just recently his request was approved to be able to edit again. He and Akshaypatill are two users who have had issues with me regarding edits and now with my request for appeal, it has

909:

MehmoodS, with two admins looking at the CU data, I don't think you can come back easily from this (I also note your use of simultaneously in "not used any other account simultaneously"). My suggestion is that you fess up on all accounts you have ever used, simultaneously or not, declare which

61:

There is no policy that states that something that has been there for years cannot be corrected. The information earlier had false quotes and I added the correct one which you reverted. Also its up to you and the previous user to reach concensus as there is discussion already in place that you

1102:

can provide more insight about this previous case. Aman.kumar.goel's reason for revert was "copyvio" and after questioning him for clarification, he made a statement that "You are not allowed to use large quotations in "quote=" parameter. It should not exceed more than 25 words in general."

631:

92:

surprised that you are here as part of the discussion now. Interesting. It was clearly a correction as the quotes you added were false quotes which were part of the war during initial state and not what the end result was in 1782. Therefore, the quotes you used were definitely misleading.

1592:

I suggest the pretty strong consensus is that (comparatively recent) block evasion has indeed happened and that the unblock request should therefore be declined. That is, I believe this is the position of everyone involved in this review. If people think differently, please speak up.

1876:

This is clearly the end of the line at this point. The soonest we'll consider lifting your block is 2023-07-30, and only if you (you personally) make zero edits between now and then. I very, very, very strongly advise you to stop immediately. Step away entirely from en.wikipedia for

1798:. To further add, this user has been watching me like a hawk throughout the duration of my time here on Knowledge. There is absolutely no way he did not immediately know of the SPI on Jan 28 when I filed it. In fact, he even asked Akshaypatil to submit his concerns to SPI platform 969:

why block me from editing my own talk page. This is a great example of admins like you who like to use faithful editors like us as collateral damage and when we have to say something, you block us from editing our own talk page to suppress our voice. Its a shame! Please take note

1078:

This is my one and only account. This block is a mistake. Please look at my contributions and they are all made with sincerity and dedication in improving the encyclopedia. This request has been submitted in bad faith to prevent from examining edits by Aman.kumar.Goel on article

607:

1701:

lies in my appeal. I also realized now I should have added about editing while blocked and I would definitely include in my appeal as well. You asked and I answered truthfully and admitted. I am willing to take any suggestions. Please give me one last final opportunity.

830:

I'm sorry to say it, but I took a look at the CU data here + the logs for HaughtonBrit, and I'd give a stronger connection than Drmies did - I'd say the CU data makes this account fairly likely to past accounts. CUs can email me for the specific quirk I'm looking at.

1109:

and I let Aman.kumar.goel know about it on First Anglo-Maratha War article's talk page where I initially started discussion about the dispute. Aman.kumar.goel accused me of canvassing and I told him that to get verification or confirmation is not canvassing

638:

1568:

course of events, the IPs would be blocked for block evasion. In addition, MehmoodS has demonstrated by their own admitted use of IPs in the past that they edit from Pittsburgh, and the IPv6s noted in the diffs geolocate to Pittsburgh. After my comments,

1618:, a battle which was led by a British figure, Colonel Haughton, hence the succeeding sock account being named HaughtonBrit, as well as the aggrandizing of British forces in Anglo-Afghan and Anglo-Maratha conflicts, a trait shared by all accounts. 111:

on infobox which says "This period also coincided with the First Anglo-Maratha War, which was settled only in 1782 with a Maratha victory over the British and their local allies.". How you could "correct" anything by misrepresenting the source?

1881:

six months. Immediately. Frankly, I believe nobody will unblock you in six months unless you can somehow convince the administrator that you'll take a totally different approach with regard to honesty. However, that's between you and them.

884:, where IPs and new accounts are pushing honorifics into these pages. There is no one checking these pages and editors like Akshaypatill who are aware of this, are not taking any actions against such disruptions or warning editors of 1502:

I have nothing against you. I may have interacted with you maybe once or twice max and that too was peaceful. You had denied owning this account earlier and now accepting it. I am just helping admins to take a informed decision.

131:

other citations by actual historians such as M.S. Naravane, Richard Ernest Dupuy, Gay M. Hammerman, Grace P. Hayes, James C. Bradford. And the quotes by these historians were added as correction which were misrepresented earlier.

1563:

in the "Recent..." section, particularly those added earlier in the process as I haven't looked at every single one, the behavioral evidence that the IPs and MehmoodS are the same person is sufficiently persuasive that in the

1083:. The information had inconsistencies and was not supported by the citations. Even the quotes within the templates were incorrect. I made correction and added citation as well as updated quote parameter as can be seen here 612:. The information had inconsistencies and was not supported by the citations. Even the quotes within the templates were incorrect. I made correction and added citation as well as updated quote parameter as can be seen here 1472:

bothered them as they do not want my request to be approved. Please if you have any question regarding anything about my appeal, please do let me know. I have put everything on the table and there is nothing to hide.

910:

account you will continue to use going forward (that becomes your primary account), then find something else to do for a minimum of six months and see if you can convince someone to unblock you. I suggest you read

1092:

and after I reverted Abhishek0831996 with description to discuss concern in talk page which I previously did as well, Aman.kumar.goel steps in and reverts my changes back to version by Abhishek0831996

621:

1715:

On January 27, Suthasianhistorian8 posted here about your logged out editing. After that, they filed a report at SPI with details, which you could easily follow (and probably did). Yet, you said

47:

There was a clear need to revert. You are removing "Maratha victory" despite being warned not to remove it. It is staying there for years and you can't remove it without gaining consensus first.

33:

If that is the case, then the quotes can be shortened. You could have just notified but still needs to be verified if what you suggested is accurate. There was no need to revert.

16:

You are not allowed to use large quotations in "quote=" parameter. It should not exceed more than 25 words in general. If you have questions reply here, not on my talk page.

873: 226:

We were editing at the same time which I kinda messed up your edit without knowing. Knowledge is bugging for me, I cannot post a correct edit for some reason.

1342:

template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

1183:

template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

724:

template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

1261: 1057: 586: 1413:

is the way to go. Note that checkusers can't tie users to specific IP addresses, though. I will note that I saw no evidence of block evasion, though this

194: 273:

Well finished ..... kinda for some reason I can't edit properly which causes my edits to be a mess. Can you fix the rest since I can't for some reason

164: 1802: 1117:

on two questionable authors where one is Humanist and the other is Anthropologist and do not have expertise in the subject as neither are historians

646:

on two questionable authors where one is Humanist and the other is Anthropologist and do not have expertise in the subject as neither are historians

401: 379: 365: 351: 332: 318: 288: 274: 260: 241: 227: 1556: 465: 1574:

edits are not recent enough to warrant blocking), I bring this here as a better venue to discuss what to do and will close the SPI in a moment.--

1391: 483: 1795:. In fact, MehmoodS knew right away on June 10, 2022 that a SPI was filed against himself, and just one day later, he filed one against me 840: 476: 1121: 650: 140: 121: 87: 71: 53: 42: 1793: 217: 925: 187: 983: 424: 394: 344: 300: 253: 1118: 647: 945: 898: 864: 825: 487: 102: 1106:. I haven't heard of such rule so far and needed verification from admin. I contacted admin who didn't agree with this statement 635:. I haven't heard of such rule so far and needed verification from admin. I contacted admin who didn't agree with this statement 1303: 961: 108: 1237: 1132: 1033: 562: 1358:

I have reenabled talk page access for this user to make an unblock request here. Note that they did evade their block with

1158: 514: 1559:

for more details. The following is a modified version of what I stated at SPI. Based on the comparison diffs presented by

77: 1867: 1844: 1327: 1168: 1124: 975: 709: 494: 748: 677: 1942:

my apologies. I got message on my talk page so felt like I needed to give clarification. I am sorry. I am leaving now.

1804:. Also, he mentioned he was travelling, this may be why CU was unable to find any technical evidence of block evasion. 1611:

evidence. Not to mention that MehmoodS also neglected to mention his connection to the WorldWikiAuthorOriginal account

450: 202: 1796: 1627: 1426: 1404: 172: 699: 409: 373: 359: 326: 282: 268: 235: 1813: 1778:

I'm afraid that the above comment by MehmoodS is once again almost certainly indicative of further lies. He writes "

76:

You were not correcting anything but only modifying according what you wanted to by using a misleading edit summary.

1209:

Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the

1005:

Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the

534:

Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the

1536: 1512: 1481: 816:, anyone available? I know this isn't the orthodox way to ping admins but its been two days without any response. 430: 1799: 1790: 1612: 1459: 1232: 1028: 557: 469: 1912: 1255: 1051: 580: 1809: 1623: 1400: 1224: 1020: 549: 1951: 1930: 1891: 1750: 1728: 1710: 1688: 1674: 1220: 1016: 545: 1903:

Truly thankful to you for the much needed advise and suggestion. I will follow it to the core. Thank you.

1246: 1042: 836: 571: 1650: 1602: 1583: 163:

What is the problem in adding “Chhatrapati” to Shivaji Maharaj? How is this disruptive? Kindly explain!

1111: 640: 158: 22: 1377: 1210: 1096: 1093: 1090: 1087: 1084: 1006: 625: 622: 619: 616: 613: 535: 445: 117: 83: 1390:

Forgive me if this is out of line, but this user has been editing logged out not only from this IP

1265: 1242: 1061: 1038: 590: 567: 1805: 1619: 1560: 1396: 1204: 1107: 1000: 636: 529: 291:

Publication subsection looks good. Is there any section you need help with? Overall, well written.

1364:, but only to contest their block. Whether or not that precludes them from making a request under 1228: 1128: 1080: 1024: 979: 609: 553: 1317: 1104: 633: 244:

Please continue with your edits. I will review it later if any format or alignment needs fixed.

1784: 1508: 1455: 1251: 1047: 971: 869: 851: 832: 771: 661: 576: 455: 198: 1095:. I believe an off wiki canvassing was in place here as this concern was discussed previously 624:. I believe an off wiki canvassing was in place here as this concern was discussed previously 1349: 1312: 1152: 920: 881: 508: 168: 1787: 405: 369: 355: 322: 278: 264: 231: 113: 79: 58: 49: 30: 18: 1639:

I am literally an open book. Won't hide anything and will answer all questions truthfully.

306:

Thanks that means a lot. Well I wanted to do the same above with the exhibitions. Example

8: 1615: 911: 877: 668:

or any other Admins, please review my request and sincerely request you to unblock me.

1504: 1451: 383: 1368:

is up to the reviewing admin. Checkuser data shows no other evidence of evasion. --

1336: 1307: 1177: 1147: 932: 915: 755: 734: 718: 653: 503: 1926: 1887: 1724: 1684: 1679:

You have lied too many times. I can't see a route for you to ever be unblocked.--

1646: 1598: 1579: 1422: 1373: 1120:. I also submitted request for opinion on examining the result on the article on 957: 787: 695: 649:. I also submitted request for opinion on examining the result on the article on 1943: 1904: 1859: 1836: 1742: 1702: 1666: 1528: 1473: 1447: 1410: 1284: 1215: 1114: 1011: 937: 890: 856: 817: 795: 740: 669: 643: 540: 416: 386: 336: 292: 245: 209: 179: 132: 127: 94: 63: 34: 1351: 1365: 1099: 803: 779: 665: 628: 493:

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the

872:, vandalism is happening on pages that I prevented them from such as on 497:, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: 1937: 1922: 1898: 1883: 1853: 1829: 1821: 1773: 1766: 1735: 1720: 1695: 1680: 1659: 1642: 1594: 1575: 1570: 1521: 1466: 1441: 1418: 1385: 1369: 966: 953: 763: 691: 657: 400:

Thanks I'll check it. Also I made a new update check it if you want :)

193:

Why you are continuously removing Shivaji Maharaj's name as one liner?

335:

yes please continue. You can also use your own sandbox to experiment.

1190: 952:

I've revoked TPA; we really don't have to listen to this sophistry.--

811: 382:

This link will provide you information and instruction on sandbox.

1789:). Not only that but when Aman Kumar Goel filed a SPI against him 1450:

can't tie users to IPs what will be achieved by it? Just curious..

482:, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be 126:

You need to take such source such as that of Barbara West through

885: 436: 107:

You are forgetting I left a message here about 8 hours ago. A

1291:) 4:24 pm, 27 January 2023, last Friday (3 days ago) (UTC−5) 460: 1324:

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please

1165:

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please

706:

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please

1792:, MehmoodS did not receive any message on his talk page 1344:

Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

1185:

Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

1089:. And this change was first reverted by Abhishek0831996 855:

Please I request you to unblock me. Please do consider.

726:

Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

618:. And this change was first reverted by Abhishek0831996 1360: 364:

I just started editing Knowledge so I don't know much

1921:. Now is not the time to keep on commenting here. -- 1203:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an

999:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an

528:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an

1446:, he was using IP addresses to evade the block. If 1801:. That diff was made 14 hours after I filed a SPI 1145:This request has not been posted by this account. 317:and so on (hopefully you understand what I mean). 1557:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/HaughtonBrit 466:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/HaughtonBrit 1641:MehmoodS, do you have a response to all this?-- 1917:Please stop. I told you once, it's time to 760:again or can anyone else who can review? 1113:. I went ahead and submitted request on 642:. I went ahead and submitted request on 499:{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} 415:Made minor fix but looks good otherwise. 1858:pinging Yamla as well. Please suggest. 1614:, which used to heavily edit the page 1608:Strongly support the block in place: 13: 1195: 991: 520: 468:. Note that multiple accounts are 435: 14: 1969: 62:haven't even taken consideration. 1781:would have saved everyone's time 1527:answer all questions truthfully. 1409:If you have ironclad evidence, 889:articles from being disrupted. 464:per the evidence presented at 1: 1415:does not necessarily preclude 1952:20:37, 30 January 2023 (UTC) 1931:20:31, 30 January 2023 (UTC) 1913:19:30, 30 January 2023 (UTC) 1892:18:58, 30 January 2023 (UTC) 1868:17:58, 30 January 2023 (UTC) 1845:20:19, 30 January 2023 (UTC) 1814:19:45, 30 January 2023 (UTC) 1751:19:23, 30 January 2023 (UTC) 1729:18:47, 30 January 2023 (UTC) 1711:18:41, 30 January 2023 (UTC) 1689:18:30, 30 January 2023 (UTC) 1675:17:50, 30 January 2023 (UTC) 1651:17:29, 30 January 2023 (UTC) 1628:17:19, 30 January 2023 (UTC) 1603:16:58, 30 January 2023 (UTC) 1584:16:54, 30 January 2023 (UTC) 1537:23:14, 29 January 2023 (UTC) 1513:14:56, 28 January 2023 (UTC) 1482:14:46, 28 January 2023 (UTC) 1460:14:36, 28 January 2023 (UTC) 1427:17:19, 27 January 2023 (UTC) 1405:17:00, 27 January 2023 (UTC) 1378:12:30, 27 January 2023 (UTC) 1318:17:30, 30 January 2023 (UTC) 178:answered on your talk page. 7: 1919:step away from en.wikipedia 1207:, who declined the request. 1003:, who declined the request. 532:, who declined the request. 208:answered on your talk page. 10: 1974: 1417:your ironclad evidence. -- 739:Please review my request. 1328:guide to appealing blocks 1169:guide to appealing blocks 710:guide to appealing blocks 495:guide to appealing blocks 456:abusing multiple accounts 218:16:17, 28 June 2022 (UTC) 203:16:07, 28 June 2022 (UTC) 1947: 1908: 1863: 1840: 1746: 1706: 1670: 1532: 1477: 1288: 1159:20:32, 9 July 2022 (UTC) 1133:18:27, 9 July 2022 (UTC) 984:18:16, 9 July 2022 (UTC) 962:17:17, 9 July 2022 (UTC) 946:17:02, 9 July 2022 (UTC) 941: 926:16:12, 9 July 2022 (UTC) 899:12:12, 9 July 2022 (UTC) 894: 865:03:47, 8 July 2022 (UTC) 860: 841:01:53, 8 July 2022 (UTC) 826:11:46, 7 July 2022 (UTC) 821: 749:07:19, 6 July 2022 (UTC) 744: 700:17:23, 9 July 2022 (UTC) 690:Unadulterated nonsense. 678:23:18, 5 July 2022 (UTC) 673: 515:21:23, 5 July 2022 (UTC) 425:12:01, 1 July 2022 (UTC) 420: 410:03:11, 1 July 2022 (UTC) 395:03:04, 1 July 2022 (UTC) 390: 374:03:00, 1 July 2022 (UTC) 360:02:59, 1 July 2022 (UTC) 345:02:58, 1 July 2022 (UTC) 340: 327:02:50, 1 July 2022 (UTC) 301:02:45, 1 July 2022 (UTC) 296: 283:02:38, 1 July 2022 (UTC) 269:02:30, 1 July 2022 (UTC) 254:02:28, 1 July 2022 (UTC) 249: 236:02:26, 1 July 2022 (UTC) 213: 188:17:21, 9 June 2022 (UTC) 183: 173:17:13, 9 June 2022 (UTC) 141:15:50, 9 June 2022 (UTC) 136: 122:15:27, 9 June 2022 (UTC) 103:15:13, 9 June 2022 (UTC) 98: 88:15:09, 9 June 2022 (UTC) 72:14:49, 9 June 2022 (UTC) 67: 54:14:44, 9 June 2022 (UTC) 43:14:41, 9 June 2022 (UTC) 38: 23:14:37, 9 June 2022 (UTC) 1081:First Anglo-Maratha War 610:First Anglo-Maratha War 431:Blocked as a sockpuppet 1200: 996: 525: 440: 350:Oh, how does it work? 109:source already existed 1252:change block settings 1199: 1048:change block settings 995: 882:Baji Prabhu Deshpande 577:change block settings 524: 439: 874:Battle of Umberkhind 1806:Suthasianhistorian8 1620:Suthasianhistorian8 1616:Battle of Saragarhi 1561:Suthasianhistorian8 1397:Suthasianhistorian8 458:as a sockpuppet of 1352:UTRS appeal #68677 1201: 997: 878:Battle of Kolhapur 526: 441: 159:Whats the problem? 1316: 972:GeneralNotability 924: 870:GeneralNotability 852:GeneralNotability 833:GeneralNotability 772:GeneralNotability 662:GeneralNotability 461:User:HaughtonBrit 454:from editing for 384:Knowledge:Sandbox 1965: 1941: 1902: 1857: 1833: 1825: 1777: 1770: 1739: 1699: 1663: 1525: 1470: 1445: 1389: 1363: 1354: 1341: 1335: 1310: 1271: 1269: 1258: 1240: 1238:deleted contribs 1198: 1182: 1176: 1155: 1150: 1067: 1065: 1054: 1036: 1034:deleted contribs 994: 918: 815: 807: 799: 791: 783: 775: 767: 759: 738: 723: 717: 596: 594: 583: 565: 563:deleted contribs 523: 511: 506: 500: 463: 1973: 1972: 1968: 1967: 1966: 1964: 1963: 1962: 1935: 1896: 1851: 1827: 1819: 1771: 1764: 1733: 1693: 1657: 1519: 1464: 1439: 1383: 1359: 1356: 1350: 1347: 1339: 1333: 1332:, then use the 1321: 1304:this SPI report 1293: 1259: 1249: 1235: 1218: 1211:blocking policy 1196: 1193: 1188: 1180: 1174: 1173:, then use the 1162: 1153: 1148: 1136: 1055: 1045: 1031: 1014: 1007:blocking policy 992: 809: 801: 793: 785: 777: 769: 761: 753: 732: 729: 721: 715: 714:, then use the 703: 681: 584: 574: 560: 543: 536:blocking policy 521: 518: 517: 509: 504: 498: 491: 459: 433: 161: 114:Abhishek0831996 80:Abhishek0831996 59:Aman.kumar.goel 50:Aman Kumar Goel 31:Aman.kumar.goel 19:Aman Kumar Goel 12: 11: 5: 1971: 1961: 1960: 1959: 1958: 1957: 1956: 1955: 1954: 1894: 1871: 1870: 1848: 1847: 1762: 1761: 1760: 1759: 1758: 1757: 1756: 1755: 1754: 1753: 1654: 1653: 1635: 1634: 1633: 1632: 1631: 1630: 1587: 1586: 1552: 1551: 1550: 1549: 1548: 1547: 1546: 1545: 1544: 1543: 1542: 1541: 1540: 1539: 1491: 1490: 1489: 1488: 1487: 1486: 1485: 1484: 1432: 1431: 1430: 1429: 1355: 1348: 1322: 1302:declined (per 1300: 1296:Decline reason 1280: 1276:Request reason 1273: 1194: 1192: 1189: 1163: 1143: 1139:Decline reason 1076: 1072:Request reason 1069: 990: 989: 988: 987: 986: 949: 948: 929: 928: 906: 905: 904: 903: 902: 901: 846: 845: 844: 843: 751: 704: 688: 684:Decline reason 605: 601:Request reason 598: 519: 492: 443:You have been 442: 434: 432: 429: 428: 427: 398: 397: 348: 347: 315: 314: 311: 304: 303: 257: 256: 221: 220: 191: 190: 160: 157: 156: 155: 154: 153: 152: 151: 150: 149: 148: 147: 146: 145: 144: 143: 90: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1970: 1953: 1949: 1945: 1939: 1934: 1933: 1932: 1928: 1924: 1920: 1916: 1915: 1914: 1910: 1906: 1900: 1895: 1893: 1889: 1885: 1880: 1875: 1874: 1873: 1872: 1869: 1865: 1861: 1855: 1850: 1849: 1846: 1842: 1838: 1831: 1823: 1818: 1817: 1816: 1815: 1811: 1807: 1803: 1800: 1797: 1794: 1791: 1788: 1785: 1782: 1775: 1768: 1752: 1748: 1744: 1737: 1732: 1731: 1730: 1726: 1722: 1718: 1714: 1713: 1712: 1708: 1704: 1697: 1692: 1691: 1690: 1686: 1682: 1678: 1677: 1676: 1672: 1668: 1661: 1656: 1655: 1652: 1648: 1644: 1640: 1637: 1636: 1629: 1625: 1621: 1617: 1613: 1609: 1606: 1605: 1604: 1600: 1596: 1591: 1590: 1589: 1588: 1585: 1581: 1577: 1572: 1567: 1562: 1558: 1554: 1553: 1538: 1534: 1530: 1523: 1518: 1517: 1516: 1515: 1514: 1510: 1506: 1501: 1500: 1499: 1498: 1497: 1496: 1495: 1494: 1493: 1492: 1483: 1479: 1475: 1468: 1463: 1462: 1461: 1457: 1453: 1449: 1443: 1438: 1437: 1436: 1435: 1434: 1433: 1428: 1424: 1420: 1416: 1412: 1408: 1407: 1406: 1402: 1398: 1393: 1392:50.248.64.249 1387: 1382: 1381: 1380: 1379: 1375: 1371: 1367: 1362: 1353: 1346: 1345: 1338: 1331: 1329: 1320: 1319: 1314: 1309: 1305: 1299: 1297: 1292: 1290: 1286: 1279: 1277: 1272: 1267: 1263: 1257: 1253: 1248: 1244: 1239: 1234: 1230: 1229:global blocks 1226: 1225:active blocks 1222: 1217: 1212: 1208: 1206: 1205:administrator 1187: 1186: 1179: 1172: 1170: 1161: 1160: 1157: 1156: 1151: 1142: 1140: 1135: 1134: 1130: 1126: 1125:50.248.64.249 1122: 1119: 1116: 1112: 1108: 1105: 1101: 1097: 1094: 1091: 1088: 1085: 1082: 1075: 1073: 1068: 1063: 1059: 1053: 1049: 1044: 1040: 1035: 1030: 1026: 1025:global blocks 1022: 1021:active blocks 1018: 1013: 1008: 1004: 1002: 1001:administrator 985: 981: 977: 976:50.248.64.249 973: 968: 965: 964: 963: 959: 955: 951: 950: 947: 943: 939: 934: 931: 930: 927: 922: 917: 914:carefully. -- 913: 908: 907: 900: 896: 892: 887: 883: 879: 875: 871: 868: 867: 866: 862: 858: 853: 850: 849: 848: 847: 842: 838: 834: 829: 828: 827: 823: 819: 813: 805: 797: 789: 781: 773: 765: 757: 752: 750: 746: 742: 736: 731: 730: 728: 727: 720: 713: 711: 702: 701: 697: 693: 687: 685: 680: 679: 675: 671: 667: 663: 659: 655: 651: 648: 645: 641: 637: 634: 630: 626: 623: 620: 617: 614: 611: 604: 602: 597: 592: 588: 582: 578: 573: 569: 564: 559: 555: 554:global blocks 551: 550:active blocks 547: 542: 537: 533: 531: 530:administrator 516: 513: 512: 507: 496: 489: 485: 481: 479: 478: 471: 467: 462: 457: 453: 452: 448: 447: 438: 426: 422: 418: 414: 413: 412: 411: 407: 403: 396: 392: 388: 385: 381: 378: 377: 376: 375: 371: 367: 362: 361: 357: 353: 346: 342: 338: 334: 331: 330: 329: 328: 324: 320: 312: 309: 308: 307: 302: 298: 294: 290: 287: 286: 285: 284: 280: 276: 271: 270: 266: 262: 255: 251: 247: 243: 240: 239: 238: 237: 233: 229: 224: 219: 215: 211: 207: 206: 205: 204: 200: 196: 189: 185: 181: 177: 176: 175: 174: 170: 166: 142: 138: 134: 129: 125: 124: 123: 119: 115: 110: 106: 105: 104: 100: 96: 91: 89: 85: 81: 78: 75: 74: 73: 69: 65: 60: 57: 56: 55: 52: 51: 46: 45: 44: 40: 36: 32: 29: 28: 27: 26: 25: 24: 21: 20: 1918: 1878: 1779: 1763: 1716: 1638: 1607: 1565: 1505:Akshaypatill 1452:Akshaypatill 1414: 1357: 1343: 1325: 1323: 1301: 1295: 1294: 1281: 1275: 1274: 1247:creation log 1214: 1202: 1184: 1166: 1164: 1146: 1144: 1138: 1137: 1077: 1071: 1070: 1043:creation log 1010: 998: 974:and others. 912:WP:SOCKBLOCK 725: 707: 705: 689: 683: 682: 606: 600: 599: 572:creation log 539: 527: 502: 477:illegitimate 475: 473: 451:indefinitely 449: 444: 399: 363: 349: 316: 313:Exhibition 2 310:Exhibition 1 305: 272: 258: 225: 223:×== Edit == 222: 195:Ankitudawant 192: 162: 48: 17: 15: 1555:Please see 1308:RegentsPark 1149:Vanjagenije 933:RegentsPark 916:RegentsPark 756:Vanjagenije 735:Vanjagenije 654:Vanjagenije 505:Vanjagenije 165:Avinash.umb 1243:filter log 1039:filter log 788:EdJohnston 568:filter log 402:S.G ReDark 380:S.G ReDark 366:S.G ReDark 352:S.G ReDark 333:S.G ReDark 319:S.G ReDark 289:S.G ReDark 275:S.G ReDark 261:S.G ReDark 242:S.G ReDark 228:S.G ReDark 1326:read the 1262:checkuser 1221:block log 1167:read the 1086:and here 1058:checkuser 1017:block log 708:read the 615:and here 587:checkuser 546:block log 259:Thanks:) 1944:MehmoodS 1905:MehmoodS 1879:at least 1860:MehmoodS 1837:MehmoodS 1743:MehmoodS 1703:MehmoodS 1667:MehmoodS 1529:MehmoodS 1474:MehmoodS 1361:Fatih200 1285:MehmoodS 1233:contribs 1216:MehmoodS 1029:contribs 1012:MehmoodS 938:MehmoodS 891:MehmoodS 857:MehmoodS 818:MehmoodS 796:RoySmith 741:MehmoodS 670:MehmoodS 558:contribs 541:MehmoodS 484:reverted 474:not for 417:MehmoodS 387:MehmoodS 337:MehmoodS 293:MehmoodS 246:MehmoodS 210:MehmoodS 180:MehmoodS 133:MehmoodS 95:MehmoodS 64:MehmoodS 35:MehmoodS 1717:nothing 1337:unblock 1313:comment 1256:unblock 1178:unblock 1052:unblock 921:comment 886:MOS:HON 719:unblock 581:unblock 488:deleted 480:reasons 470:allowed 446:blocked 1566:normal 1448:WP:SPI 1411:WP:SPI 1191:Appeal 1154:(talk) 1115:WP:RSN 1100:Tamzin 804:Drmies 780:Tamzin 666:Tamzin 644:WP:RSN 629:Tamzin 510:(talk) 472:, but 128:WP:RSN 1938:Yamla 1923:Yamla 1899:Yamla 1884:Yamla 1854:Yamla 1830:Yamla 1822:Bbb23 1774:Yamla 1767:Bbb23 1736:Bbb23 1721:Bbb23 1696:Bbb23 1681:Bbb23 1660:Bbb23 1643:Bbb23 1595:Yamla 1576:Bbb23 1571:Yamla 1522:Yamla 1467:Yamla 1442:Yamla 1419:Yamla 1386:Yamla 1370:Yamla 1366:WP:SO 1330:first 1171:first 967:Bbb23 954:Bbb23 764:Bbb23 712:first 692:Bbb23 658:Bbb23 656:, or 1948:talk 1927:talk 1909:talk 1888:talk 1864:talk 1841:talk 1810:talk 1747:talk 1725:talk 1707:talk 1685:talk 1671:talk 1647:talk 1624:talk 1599:talk 1580:talk 1533:talk 1509:talk 1478:talk 1456:talk 1423:talk 1401:talk 1374:talk 1289:talk 1129:talk 980:talk 958:talk 942:talk 895:talk 861:talk 837:talk 822:talk 812:El C 745:talk 696:talk 674:talk 490:. 421:talk 406:talk 391:talk 370:talk 356:talk 341:talk 323:talk 297:talk 279:talk 265:talk 250:talk 232:talk 214:talk 199:talk 184:talk 169:talk 137:talk 118:talk 99:talk 84:talk 68:talk 39:talk 1306:) 1266:log 1213:). 1062:log 1009:). 591:log 538:). 501:. 486:or 1950:) 1929:) 1911:) 1890:) 1882:-- 1866:) 1843:) 1826:, 1812:) 1786:, 1749:) 1727:) 1709:) 1687:) 1673:) 1649:) 1626:) 1601:) 1593:-- 1582:) 1535:) 1511:) 1480:) 1458:) 1425:) 1403:) 1376:) 1340:}} 1334:{{ 1298:: 1278:: 1260:• 1254:• 1250:• 1245:• 1241:• 1236:• 1231:• 1227:• 1223:• 1181:}} 1175:{{ 1141:: 1131:) 1098:. 1074:: 1056:• 1050:• 1046:• 1041:• 1037:• 1032:• 1027:• 1023:• 1019:• 982:) 960:) 944:) 897:) 880:, 876:, 863:) 839:) 824:) 808:, 800:, 792:, 784:, 776:, 768:, 747:) 722:}} 716:{{ 698:) 686:: 676:) 664:, 660:, 627:. 603:: 585:• 579:• 575:• 570:• 566:• 561:• 556:• 552:• 548:• 423:) 408:) 393:) 372:) 358:) 343:) 325:) 299:) 281:) 267:) 252:) 234:) 216:) 201:) 186:) 171:) 139:) 120:) 101:) 86:) 70:) 41:) 1946:( 1940:: 1936:@ 1925:( 1907:( 1901:: 1897:@ 1886:( 1862:( 1856:: 1852:@ 1839:( 1832:: 1828:@ 1824:: 1820:@ 1808:( 1776:: 1772:@ 1769:: 1765:@ 1745:( 1738:: 1734:@ 1723:( 1705:( 1698:: 1694:@ 1683:( 1669:( 1662:: 1658:@ 1645:( 1622:( 1597:( 1578:( 1531:( 1524:: 1520:@ 1507:( 1476:( 1469:: 1465:@ 1454:( 1444:: 1440:@ 1421:( 1399:( 1388:: 1384:@ 1372:( 1315:) 1311:( 1287:( 1270:) 1268:) 1264:( 1219:( 1127:( 1066:) 1064:) 1060:( 1015:( 978:( 956:( 940:( 923:) 919:( 893:( 859:( 835:( 820:( 814:: 810:@ 806:: 802:@ 798:: 794:@ 790:: 786:@ 782:: 778:@ 774:: 770:@ 766:: 762:@ 758:: 754:@ 743:( 737:: 733:@ 694:( 672:( 595:) 593:) 589:( 544:( 419:( 404:( 389:( 368:( 354:( 339:( 321:( 295:( 277:( 263:( 248:( 230:( 212:( 197:( 182:( 167:( 135:( 116:( 97:( 82:( 66:( 37:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index