User talk:MastCell/Archive 7

1770:... He has been abusive to me, reverts without comment, has posted my personal email address on wikipedia while thoughtfully redacting his own and in general been extremely territorial about this article. Though I disagree with the rulings made on some of the above which were prompted by his actions, I was punished and "served my time." Is he above the law? I warmly invite you MastCell to read the article on Arellano and see if I have been engaged in "POV pushing and near vandalism" or, as is actually the case, Evrik is engaging in sheer hyperbole for as I have stated previously, he is out of control and feels he is above the rules we are all supposed to abide by and that he argues so strenously for. You went out of your way now several times to help him avoid embarrassment and save face, but he has failed to abide by the previous agreement he made with you and now is basically refusing to comply with the ruling you left on his talk page. Hence, I request that he be formally sanctioned and blocked as the only fair option left. Thanks -- 1806:? Besides being unfair it is willfully disobedient. He does, yet again, what he wants. I don't understand that. Again I invite you to examine my "disruptive" edits to the article and you will see I added (and cited) material directly from the legal brief filed on behalf of Ms. Arellano's son and stipulated to by her. I did not pull it out of thin air. You will see it is I as well that added two separate RfCs on the talk page, both of which Evrik has made snide and disruptive comments at. Lastly, you will see under the Neutrality section of the talk page, it is Evrik, not I, who placed a NPOV dspute tag on the article and then fails to support the need of it on the talk page. Evrik may write on a lot of articles, but it should not allow him immunity from the rules, especially when he tries to lord them over others... -- 984:

articles just the same, or who don't know how the word draught is pronounced but are editing beer. Can you believe I was asked for citations to prove that a well-known anthropologist with a double-barrelled name actually shouldn't be cited using only the second half of his last name when a simple phone call to any anthropology department or a simple search of the Library of Congress catalog would have cured one of one's ignorance? When those who don't really know insist they are right rather than admit that they don't really know, I suggest that they simply leave Knowledge. Why invest your ego in proving yourself right about something which you don't know anything about?!!! Damn silly.

1639:. I asked him nicely to remove it. He would not. I removed it. He put it back and said "Don't edit my comments." Frankly, this has gotten rather old. You asked him to remove them before and he stated he would not use them in the future with me. Later, after he put them back when I removed them after you told me I could, you asked him to remove them which he grudgingly did. Now, he is trying a new way to get around it. I don't understand why he is getting such leeway here. If I were to do these actions, I would be blocked. Why is he not and what are you going to do about it since he is violating a ruling you made previously? Thanks... -- 1787:, which is a good thing. Evrik, if LordPathogen has been that disruptive (which I partway agree with), I'd suggest filing an RfC. Please don't use the spa template any further on the article talk page. I won't insist you remove the current instances where the template is not expanded, but if you use the template again then I'm going to feel forced to block you for personal attacks and intentionally throwing fuel on the flames. That doesn't excuse or validate LordPathogen's behavior, but your own conduct is independent of his. 155: 31: 1058:

can re-nominate it for AfD at any time, but AfD's initiated by abusive sockpuppets are invalid. For the record, I saw a balance of "keep" and "delete" opinions expressed during the brief time the AfD was online. I'm not validating IPSOS' conduct (I haven't looked into it deeply) - I looked into this as a case of abusive sockpuppetry, which it was, and acted based on that. Using an IP to evade a block is also not recommended.

1922: 214: 2118:. In various talk pages he insists he has the right to use Knowledge as a vehicle for self-publishing whatever he likes. I don't know what the policy is for users like this. Perhaps you can explain Knowledge policy and guidelines to him better than any of the rest of us have. I'll leave it up to your discretion what (if anything) to do. 1611:

had a point to delete. But, it goes to show you that user VinylJoe is constantly acting on bad faith and is grasping on things based on nada. He even had the audacity to harass me for a confirmation of a degree right there at the ANI. I will keep you informed if I suspect there is another sock puppet of his lurking around. Thanks again!

1747:. LP is lamely trying to game the system and your warning is not only unjustified but is just giving credence to an account that is a thin mask fore POV pushing and near vandalism. I have resisted posting any notices to WP:ANI because I thought this user could be controlled. I also didn't want to escalate this further. -- 2479:

Yes, it's pretty clearly Gon4z based on the editing patterns, talk page edit, and abusive edit summaries. We typically block IP addresses for shorter times initially, as they can shift, but if he comes off the block with his usual behavior (which, sadly, seems likely) then let me know and I'll extend

2276:

used when s/he prodded the article. What do you expect me to do, ignore such a blatant and obvious indication of sockpuppetry? Attempting to expose sockpuppetry is not a personal attack when proper reporting and rfcu is used, and I'd appreciate it if you both would cease and desist pretending it is.

1610:

Dear MastCell, I am not going to start ranting on your page, but it has to be said that the user who accused me of deleting his external links (Which I deemed were too commercial for Wiki) has no longer an issue with me and the reason no action was taken on his allegations is that I may have actually

1235:

The last block was 48 hours, and they've never been blocked more than a week. I agree there's a high likelihood they'll vandalize more when they return, at which point a longer block could be in order. On the other hand, if you feel strongly about it, feel free to extend the block yourself as you see

874:

Frankly, that is not good enough. Evrik should have to remove the existing tags as well. And though Evrik may find my edits "questionable", it was I who found the legal brief on behalf of Ms. Arellano's son which provided most of the pertainent details of the case which she stipulates to in court. In

661:

even though they have been endorsed by multiple other editors (see the last few sections of the talk page). Could you keep an eye on it? He/she pops up every few days *just* to revert me on that article and other people on various other related articles. It's pretty much all he/she does on wikipedia.

2233:

has requested a checkuser of my account. I'm happy for to be investigated by an admin because I have nothing to hide and no connection to any other user on here. But, as Arthana mentions I do find it highly suspicious that both of these users are using allegations of sock puppetry against my account

1634:

Hi Masthead. Sorry to bother you but Evrik is at it again with the "highly discouraged" and in his case, also impoperly used SPA tag. He is trying to circumvent your previous request to him to stop using it regarding me by making my name part of a sentence and using the nowiki tag so it does not get

905:

I agree and will quit posting here. I am also trying your advice... Hence I have set up a Request for Comment section on the talk page. In the meantime, Evrik reverted my deletions of the SPA tag... again, despite my noting in the edit you gave me permission. He wrote: "no such permission was given,

2498:

Gon4z isn't getting under my skin :-) I'm just annoyed by all the time wasted to clean up behind him, but as reverting his edits fits timely and nicely in my coffee breaks (to short to write new articles:-( I just do that- and it is much better then hitting the snack machine downstairs with all the

1057:

As I said in the AfD closure, I wasn't making a judgement about the notability of the article. It may very well warrant deletion. But it's simple: when you're blocked, you're blocked. Using a sockpuppet to nominate an article for deletion is not the way to get things done. Any user in good standing

1102:

I know you weren't "making a judgement about the notability of the article" but I am again respectfully asking you to do so now . . . please consider the views of the three editors who supported my proposed delete, take into account that the only two people who argued for keep are the very two who

226:

Congratulations! You really deserve this and I'm sure you'll wield your mop wisely. I personally would like to see Knowledge make a determined effort to officially become a reliable source by its own standards (which is one of Citizendium's goals). Vandalism wastes an enormous amount of time here,

107:

I see I just missed the deadline on your RfA nomination. I can't believe I missed that. I just wanted to drop you a personal note to give you my support. I've only had positive experiences with you on wikipedia, which is saying a lot because the places I've run into you are on fairly controversial

2109:

The anonymous user you blocked the other day for "tendentious editing" has now taken on an identity of Mcampbell422. He has been posting his unreferenced mumbo-jumbo about sodium/potassium ratio (actually he references himself as the source) to an article someone else is trying to develop on soil

1875:

I haven't been involved in editing that set of articles, so don't really have any insight that would be useful in an RfArb. My involvement's been mostly limited to blocking Billy Ego sockpuppets. Sorry, but I don't think I can be of assistance. You may want to consider an RfC first, especially if

1278:

Excuse me, this is verging on slander. I am not a sockpuppet and slurring the reputation of a wiki user is offensive and crass. You refer to the Dune (novel) article and my edits. Discussion is evident on these pages, and you were not a part of it. A resolution was made, and the edits were agreed

1082:

I am sorry about circumventing the ban in such an obvious way but it was, and is, the only way I can approach you directly and I have a dynamic IP that is why there is no record of my history. I've never bothered with an account in the past and the Sock Puppet case was trumped up and I guess you

983:

Problem with Knowledge The main problem with Knowledge is that complete fools cribbing from books consider themselves the equals of people who have studied a field and are intimately acquainted with it. Like people who don't even know how Maugham or Goethe or Jung are pronounced but edit their

1370:

In the discussion for deletion of this article, which lasted no longer than a day I should add, you made a decision for a speedy keep based on the fact the nomination came from a "sockpuppet of a blocked user". I made the nomination (see the discussion page on the article), and I am neither a

970:

Brief Background Summary: User IPSOS is an aggressive editor and very skilled at applying guidelines robotically as rules. He has been involved in four edit-wars in the last couple of months. He has lied to admin about his aggressive personal attacks blaming Emnx, for proof see the section

1279:

upon by all concerned. Simply because you disagree is not grounds for reverting edits, or for accusing other users of being sockpuppets. You clearly have a conflict of interest in the Mandrake article and are raising this into a vendetta as a result. I suggest you take a break to cool off.

131:

Also wanted to congratulate you on the successful RfA nomination. Not a single vote in opposition! Like Andrew c, I think you are the perfect candidate for adminship, because you've already proven yourself more than capable. Good luck, and I look forward to continuing to work with you!

787:

is watching him. He's had enough warnings. If he continues disruption after Prodego's final warning, I'd be willing to block him for an extended period of time as he clearly is not getting the message and continuing to cause problems. You may want to notify him of the AN/I thread.

1975:

I'm sorry that I don't really know the proper route to deal with abuse, but there's a user that you've already communicated with (IP 74.195.17.240)who continues to add schizophrenic-type drivel to pages on biologically-relevant ions. Would you be able to block his IP? Thanks,

2147:

GlassFET and IPSOS created the article concerned. I believe this AFD has been compromised by the actions of these two editors and their alleged COI. I request that this discussion and Mandrake Press be dealt with on Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents or elsewhere.

1092:

Truthfully, I guess you don't have the time or inclination to investigate such an apparently complex matter and it is easier to follow the most eloquent editor who knows how to apply the rules to his best advantage. What suffers on such occasions is the integrity of

2334:

OK, break it up. The AfD will close when it closes; I'm going to let another admin close it to get an outside set of eyes. As far as sockpuppetry, if there are still concerns then checkuser is the way to go. Beyond that, I'd suggest looking at the steps outlined in

2088:

i.e. stealing images, claiming them as his and then releasing them as PD... plus insults, edit warring, ... well we know it all. As he came of a week long block and immediately returned to his well-known ways, can we end this now and block him once and for all?

685:

Please understand that as RFCU clerk, I follow the rules strictly. I never claim WP:IAR in the clerk work. Furthermore, I cannot act as advocate for any party, requestor or editor listed in the RFCU. Thank you for your participation in correcting the RFCU

1836:

Thanks for adding the warning to that person I listed on WP:AIV. Name doesn't matter because there are so many. Until yesterday, I didn't know how to list things on AIV so I just gave lower level warnings on my own, even to multiple offence vandals.

1333:

Re: Vision Thing, there are a number of characteristics of the Billy Ego sockpuppets, including constant minor revisions of Talk page entries, that I don't see in VT's postings. He may be an edit-warrior on the "same team," but that's a different issue.

2065:

Hi there; I did say in a previous post that I would respect the view of an independent admin. I must say that I do not agree with it, but there is no point in my making these comments if I do nor follow through on them. I will change the block to six

457:

Many thanks for your help on this site: I thought there may have been an Admin only bar on this, but as I was going away from my desk I thought that would be the quickest way to stop them! Thanks again and if they come back I'll let you know. Gavin

183:

is very important, I ackowledge that noone is perfect. Good luck with the tools, and try to use them wisely, especialy when dealing with a suspected sockpuppet(Again, noone's perfect, I'm sure you'll do your best using them with good judgement, and

727:

article despite your warnings to both parties to back off. I tried to give a third opinion to parties but, apparently, this proved futile. I don’t really want to get involved further but these recent edits just don’t make any sense. Good luck.

2374:

for ongoing disruption, creating blatant copyright violations, incivility, worsening behaviour, edit-warring coming right off his 4th block for the same, seeming inability to edit collaboratively, and a general pattern of worsening disruptive

998:

The article clearly does not meet Knowledge criteria for inclusion. On that basis alone I would most respectfully ask you to reconsider your position from a NPOV and perhaps resurrect the Mandrake of Oxford AFD process SOLELY on its merits.

1500:

I blocked the sock as it was clearly disruptive. VinylJoe's use of a sock was unacceptable, but blocks are meant to be preventive rather than punitive, so I didn't see that it would be appropriate to punish his main account. I think you and

1940:! I hope I will meet your expectations, and be sure I will continue trying to be a good editor as well as a good administrator :) If I may be of any assistance to you in the future (or if you see me commit some grievous error :), please 1893:

For your support and your message :) Don't worry, I won't practice on anyone. I'll send out "proper" thank-you notes later, but I'd like you to know I really appreciated your support, and I look forward to working with you again :)

1259:'s page as I wasn't sure either. The Emnx sock may simply have cut and pasted as it said (I see our friend is back editing from an IP). Though I have other reasons to suspect Coldmachine based on contribs (readdition of linkspam on 768:

as usual there is vandalism, insulting other users, 3rr edit wars, lies, unsourced edits and so on too... I have requested that he be banned once and for all, as he clearly is disruptive in everything he does and has been since his

2211:

Please stop making personal attacks and try to maintain NPOV. I did not make the accusation of COI that was already made in the AFD by others. As to allegation as to my being a sock puppet that is all it is — an allegation made by

875:

short, my edits have provided the most neutral info about the subject. Evrik doesn't point out any flaws in the legal brief data, he just makes vague accusations and deletes what he does not like. And gets a free pass for it.

979:. He had offensive material on his user page which brings Knowledge into disrepute and which was conveniently removed today after many complaints, over many weeks, by editors and admins alike. The material he had was :- 2312:

in raising these false allegations. Why? It cries 'vendetta' to me, and I can only assume these are continued personal attacks against my reputation as a user of good standing among the wikipedia community. Do you

1461:

Hi there, I've gone through the process and hope I got it right. If you've got the time, would you be able to take a look and see if it's formed properly etc? If not, don't worry! I know how busy you must be :S

168:

After your successful RfA, you're now an admin. Spend some time on the admin reading list, and ask if you're unsure. If you keep up the good efforts you've made so far I'm sure you'll be fine. Again, congrats -

1681:

is an essay and not a guideline. I honored your previous request and removed it from the talk page. I used it in this instence because i wanted to illustrate a point. I have read and noted that the use of the

1401:

for a full discussion. SKRINE2 did this, and I closed it because this user was a sockpuppet. As you are currently a user in good standing, if you'd like to renominate the article for deletion, you can go to

2398: 1361: 2305:

and I didn't find clear evidence that User:Coldmachine is a sockpuppet. If there's further concern, it could go to checkuser; failing that, he should be able to edit without a shadow on him. Let's move

1735: 1524:

Fair enough Sir. I think even if nothing happens at the notice board, he is going to think twice before he starts attacking me again, with or without new sock puppets. Thanks again for your help.

1731: 1375:. Could you please explain what happened to my nomination, and why there appears to confusion over this? I should like the prod reopened accordingly since I believe a mistake has been made. 1714: 1438:

Yes, the deletion process is confusing, and it took me some time to figure out its ins and outs. If the AfD nomination does not appear as it should, let me know and I can look it over.

2171:

I feel the only sensible conclusion is that this discussion should be suspended forthwith, all aspects properly investigated and the matter dealt with at a higher level. A default

1379: 2369: 2136: 1263:

after I'd cleaned up the links, which I hadn't even noticed). I'm happy to wait and see if Coldmachine takes up the crusade or quest or whatever the sock is on about.

764:

to the Administrators' noticeboard today as I found another large amount of insults he threw at other users (i.e. "I can see you an American ASS licker"). Here is the

1421:

Thanks, I really do appreciate it. May just call you on that offer for technical help since as is probably almost certainly clear I'm still figuring all this out...

2417:, ... ) have now all been vandalized anew, with exactly the same Albanian-nationalistic, pro islamic and anti Serbian bias Gon4z displayed before his block. i. e. 1831: 1319:

I respond less and less all the time. But there seems to be something to be said for reasserting that the show will go on, despite the sockpuppetry. It's mostly

2246: 440:

Thanks a million for that tip. This PMID to cite journal conversion tool is a real time saver. I wasn't aware it existed. Great. Thanks, for pointing that out.

890:

Feel free to remove the tags which Evrik has placed. He's agreed not to place any more. In the meantime, please take this back to the article talk page or to

2216: 2186: 2161:

that the sock puppet allegations made by IPSOS and GlassFET may be little more than attempts to remove or disparage views that don't coincide with their own

2103: 1147: 528: 1212:? Futile. They'll be back again next week. Mark my word. 6 months would have been a lot more appropriate considering they've been at it since January. -- 1807: 1771: 1665: 1640: 1248: 576: 2002:

All vandalism was reverted. The root of the problem might require neuroleptics; but thats a bit beyond our powers :-) Thanks for helping out for now.

2179: 1386: 480: 2028: 765: 2425:. Therefore I request that the IP 82.35.34.170 rapidly be blocked indefinitely too. I posted the above on the Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents 1846: 1774: 1487:

without blocking him (He is the master puppeteer) why? He has been making accusations of identity fraud against me up to just a few hours ago (See:

196: 1272: 857:

The content issue is being driven by the one user ... perosnally, I'd like to see the page protected with an earlier version in place. This is one

827: 392:

DISCLAIMER: This humor does not reflect the official humor of Knowledge, the Wikimedia Foundation, or Jimbo Wales. All rights released under GFDL.

205: 2295:

Except that when this admin looked into the allegation when my account was accused by you - falsely and with obvious malice - of having a link to

1128: 1064: 928: 400:

From me as well. We've not had much contact in the past, but I trust your judgment and am sure you'll make excellent use of your new tools! Best,

2131: 1996: 426: 1810: 1793: 1668: 1659: 1643: 1338: 118:

The general convention is to allow comments up until the RfA is closed by a bcrat, but registering your comments here is great too of course. -

2349: 2098: 1933: 1466: 1444: 1425: 1412: 1306: 913: 876: 293: 1353: 2114:. Despite repeated attempts to remove this stuff, he keeps putting it back. He has also been disruptive (to a lesser degree) in the article, 1882: 1825: 1751: 1727: 1723: 1710: 1569: 1323:. And on the Tucker page, there really is a substantive issue about how we handle that Late Life section. Thanks for keeping on top of this. 991:

Putting all other points, arguments, disputes, bans, and who did what to whom and when aside . . . the original reason for the nomination of

2490: 2470: 2321: 2286: 1575: 1283: 1242: 807: 794: 256: 122: 2043: 1615: 1551: 1528: 1519: 1249: 900: 444: 2205: 2006: 1980: 704: 141: 2222: 2193: 1164: 545: 2466:

has blocked him, but only for a duration of 24h which is -in my eyes- not enough, as this just means that tomorrow all begins anew...

935: 865: 2426: 2386: 1629: 927:

I hadn't seen where you said LP could remove it (which I disagree with), but I have made the change. By the way, please look at this

593: 1856:

Hello, it's me again. I'm getting sick of repeatedly telling Vision Thing to stop POV-pushing. Will you support me for an RFAr? --

964:

was nominated for AFD for the right reasons but you chose to revert the proposal without considering the merits of the nomination.

497: 227:

and other matters also contribute to keeping Knowledge from ever approaching that goal. I hope you will work toward those ends. --

188: 2074: 643: 1327: 286: 282: 1596: 847:

Thanks for the note. I won't tag any of the new comments. I really am at a loss for what to do about this page and this user. --

462: 1635:

parsed. This is how it looks: "...every edit this month made by {{spa|LordPathogen}} has made..." You can see what I mean here

415: 1043:

said in his edit summary "This article is not 'encyclopedic' and seems to be based on commercial-minded exposure/advertising."

2055: 1494: 1229: 252:

Good to see you on board. Congratulations, although it is one tempered with a hightened workload ahead for you I fear :-)

1986:

Blocked for 24 hours; if it becomes a problem again when the block lifts, let me know and I'll extend it (or you can go to

2517: 1182: 2406: 2382: 1956: 1904: 1397:

nomination which you made. However, once a proposed deletion is contested (as this one was), the article must be sent to

1158: 539: 410: 1961: 1909: 1051: 736: 245: 173: 2021: 587: 162: 1111:— that is not a balanced split ? . . . please consider re-instating the AFD or maybe setting up an RFC about deletion? 192: 491: 467: 2444: 2422: 2418: 906:

you are a spa and need to be identified as such." But hey, that's not harrassment, right? ;-) Would you please make

1970: 1678: 950: 2503: 2433: 2093: 2385:. Also he is trying to hide behind a non-existent user, by overwriting his IP by with a link to the non-existent 1031: 851: 835: 447: 1488: 1073:

First up thanks for not blocking the IP (for now) and allowing me to converse with you. It is truly appreciated.

946:

Thank you for blocking User:Nozzlehog so quickly. I wish I could do that myself sometimes. Have a great day. --

777: 2127: 1706: 750: 675: 1869: 112: 2402: 2239: 2034: 1478: 1206: 569: 94: 2260:

to be investigated. So far, every attempt to delete the article has been traced to vandal and sockpuppeteer

617: 2414: 1314: 1170: 692: 557: 521: 452: 89: 84: 72: 67: 59: 1002:

In support of that request I would quote three other editors who have expressed clear views in support of

605: 2235: 1406:

and follow the instructions there to do so. If you need help with technical aspects, please let me know.

1200: 563: 509: 625:

This isn't accidental or minor vandalism, but serious stuff. Such persons aren't needed here - ever! --

348:. Remember that when you are applying these principles most diligently, you are probably dealing with a 1140: 611: 38: 2339:- disengaging for a little while to edit other articles, or failing that, getting outside input via a 1821:

Since this user only edits on a single topic, I don't think the RFC process would be really useful. --

1636: 1571:

was brough up on the administrative notice board by another user. Admins did nothing to resolve it. --

770: 551: 515: 599: 2234:

merely because I hold a position with which they disagree. The whole thing smacks of violation of

2085: 2060: 1952: 1941: 1900: 1568:

I'm not the only one who has a dispute with user Jrod2. This matter and complaints against Jrod2

1152: 533: 503: 406: 362:

Remember when you make these errors, someone will be more than happy to point them out to you in

185: 149: 1730:

on WP:ANI – both times the complaints were turned aside. Also in the last week, LP has accused

1176: 710: 581: 988:

A rather unpleasant text and shows an attitude I doubt you had perceived of IPSOS previously.

373:

and finally, Remember to contact me if you ever need assistance, and I will do what I am able.

2508: 2067: 1490:) Now, that he knows that he can create sock puppets, his harassment will resume. Thank you . 1393:, a sockpuppet of a blocked user. Such nominations are not valid. You may be thinking of the 485: 323: 2513:

Thanks for your support and defense in my recent, unsuccessful RfA. It's much appreciated.

823: 380: 281:

Many Congratulations. Not sure if anyone has given you the links, but here are the guides:

2480:

it. I'll keep an eye out. In the meantime, try to treat it as a minor annoyance; the more

2381:

and keeping up his disruptive behaviour including his insults and threats to other users!

842: 8: 2394: 2196:. I mean, when a sockpuppet accuses somebody of conflict of interest, what's that prove? 1863: 1803: 1125: 1048: 976: 831: 669: 108:

articles that can get heated at times. You'll make a great admin. Keep up the good work.-

2155:

the suspicion mentioned in the main discussion above that IPSOS and GlassFET have a COI,

2410: 2123: 2025: 2003: 1977: 1947: 1895: 1363: 1222: 1188: 992: 961: 432: 401: 47: 17: 2012:

No surprise, the problematic user is back. He's mostly limiting his contributions to

1743:

This user has spent a fair amount of time causing grief and making edits that violate

1713:, one of which was blocked. During one of those blocks, LP sent me and one other user 2390: 2221:

MastCell, I noticed actually that IPSOS had accused me of being a sockpuppet of this

2141:

As the admin who determined the AFD -- can I ask you to intervene as I have placed a

2099: 654: 2317:

accuse people who disagree with your perspective on this site of being sockpuppets?

1541:

Yes, if more suspicious new accounts show up, feel free to let me know or return to

662:

I would even file a RFC or even a RFAr but I don't have the time to organise it. --

2463: 2318: 2273: 2243: 2111: 2017: 1888: 1709:

twice for violating 3RR. Additionally, one of those blocks also involved using two

1484: 1463: 1422: 1376: 1293: 1280: 1256: 1040: 820:

apology for threats of violence. in the same way, people should learn to be civil

716: 637: 472:

An Arizona user using at least three IPs is making libelous BLP violations against

239: 137: 2175:

for lack of consensus would not, in the circumstances, be a satisfactory outcome.

1300:; failing that, he should be able to edit without a shadow on him. Let's move on. 2514: 2481: 2359: 2282: 2201: 2079: 2051: 1784: 1744: 1702: 1650: 1335: 1324: 1268: 955: 947: 741: 356: 349: 330: 290: 1990:, although it may be easier to come back here). Has all the damage been undone? 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

1857: 1758:

Once again, Evrik attemps to distract from the issue at hand. The issue is not

1510: 1394: 1297: 1108: 941: 663: 459: 345: 253: 154: 2500: 2486: 2467: 2430: 2345: 2340: 2230: 2119: 2090: 1992: 1987: 1878: 1789: 1655: 1592: 1572: 1547: 1542: 1515: 1502: 1440: 1408: 1403: 1398: 1349: 1302: 1238: 1215: 1060: 1019: 896: 804: 790: 774: 755: 700: 423: 341: 334: 180: 109: 2378: 2336: 2265: 2213: 2183: 1686: 1587: 1506: 1390: 1292:

OK, break it up. The case is closed, and I didn't find clear evidence that

1260: 1015: 891: 784: 729: 720: 680: 473: 1798:

Excuse me, but why is he allowed to keep the current instance on the page

2448: 1509:(the first of which is disengagement). However, I'll leave a note at the 653:

hey, i have a favour to ask you, if you have the effort to deal with it.

648: 628: 230: 170: 133: 119: 102: 2365: 2278: 2197: 2047: 1851: 1822: 1748: 1612: 1525: 1491: 1264: 1023: 1011: 932: 862: 848: 761: 747: 422:

Congratulations. You are a great contributor. Keep up the good work.

202: 159: 201:

Congratulations, another great addition to the administrator crew! --

2499:

talkative secretaries :-) Well, tomorrow 7:40am he will be back... --

2303:

exist (I quote from the above: "OK, break it up. The case is closed,

2296: 2261: 2035: 1841: 1372: 687: 658: 367: 359:

ability sparingly. Enjoy the insults you receive when you do block.

1505:

both ought to back off a little and pursue the steps outlined in

2256:

of sockpuppetry involving the attempt to delete the article. It

746:

I've replied to your comment at the Runcorn AN thread. Regards.

724: 715:

Hi MastCell, I thought you might want to take a look at recent

2484:

gets under your skin, the more likely they'll keep after you.

2439:

Also: he is now deleting the block notices regarding him from

308: 1921: 213: 1296:

is a sockpuppet. If there's further concern, it could go to

2115: 2013: 1083:

didn't look that deeply beyond the circumstantial evidence.

363: 1371:

sockpuppet nor am I the individual named as such which is

967:

I would ask you to please take a moment or two read this.

698:

No problem; didn't mean to give you a hard time about it.

2389:. Furthermore the articles constantly vandalized by him ( 315:. Here are what pass for words of wisdom from the puppy: 2158:

that IPSOS and GlassFET are acting and voting in consort

815: 337:

them. You will always pick the wrong one to do. (See #5)

1194: 1840:

You're not a mast cell, you're a mast cell stabiliser!

1876:

there are other editors also having trouble with VT.

158:

Congratulations! Now here's your mop and bucket! --

1034:

wrote "Delete Knowledge not a commercial directory."

2377:. Now he is back and editing under the IP address: 2308:. MastCell Talk 20:55, 7 June 2007 (UTC)", yet you 1018:. Should go asap. In addition, I suspect a case of 995:was valid and supported by other neutral editors! 2137:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Mandrake of Oxford 894:and don't continue this argument on my talk page. 2252:Both of you seem to be ignoring that there is a 861:editing one page whose edits are questionable. -- 1513:asking if others would handle this differently. 1124:Cheers (and bye, I'm off to be an anon again!)-- 1039:Earlier when applying a PROD tag to the article 2167:the contentious nature of the issues and events 1701:Since LordPathogen started editing the article 1255:Thanks for the action and update. I didn't tag 1802:of your previous decision and what you stated 960:A fundamental tenet is NPOV . . . the article 1832:another thanks, in addition to LordPathogen's 1483:Dear Sir, I noticed that you closed the case 1936:, which closed successfully with a tally of 1047:thank you for taking the time to read this-- 912:this time? I'm getting tired of doing it... 2429:, but I think you should now too. Thanks -- 2044:Knowledge:Suspected sock puppets/Emnx (3rd) 1783:I see more editors have become involved at 1250:Knowledge:Suspected sock puppets/Emnx (2nd) 2399:Template:Infobox National Military Albania 2194:Knowledge:Requests for checkuser/Case/Emnx 2020:. At least he has a login now, which is 212: 153: 2192:I'd suggest waiting for the results of 1722:In the last week, LP has accused me of 14: 287:Knowledge:Administrators' how-to guide 283:Knowledge:Administrators' reading list 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 2238:, and I feel I am being subject to a 2229:I posted the AfD, and now I see that 1946:Again, thank you, and happy editing! 1696:and may be seen as a personal attack. 322:Remember you will always protect the 2372:from editing Knowledge on June 12th 329:Remember you must always follow the 25: 2407:List of Albanian Air Force aircraft 803:I informed him of the AN/I thread. 23: 2299:, it was decided that no evidence 1920: 1030:In the AFD for Mandrake of Oxford 1010:In the AFD for Mandrake of Oxford 24: 2528: 1630:Evrik is at it again with SPA tag 1236:fit. That would be fine with me. 2178:I have explained in more detail 2143:REQUEST TO ADMIN TO SUSPEND AFD. 29: 1916: 1649:I have left another message at 1485:Suspected Sock puppets/VinylJoe 766:link to the new accident report 2151:In summary the reasons are :- 2084:He is back and has new tricks 1942:drop me a line on my Talk page 1717:and was unapologetic about it. 1103:created it as a result of the 13: 1: 2403:Albanian Naval Defense Forces 1366:and your speedy keep decision 2415:Albanian Land Forces Command 657:keeps reverting my edits to 7: 1932:hank you for commenting on 1724:Suspicious editing behavior 760:Once again I had to report 10: 2533: 1032:Gustav von Humpelschmumpel 2518:16:30, 14 June 2007 (UTC) 2504:20:54, 14 June 2007 (UTC) 2491:15:32, 14 June 2007 (UTC) 2471:06:09, 14 June 2007 (UTC) 2434:05:48, 14 June 2007 (UTC) 2350:15:52, 13 June 2007 (UTC) 2322:13:43, 13 June 2007 (UTC) 2287:12:46, 13 June 2007 (UTC) 2247:08:40, 13 June 2007 (UTC) 2217:08:32, 13 June 2007 (UTC) 2206:04:50, 13 June 2007 (UTC) 2187:04:20, 13 June 2007 (UTC) 2132:01:00, 13 June 2007 (UTC) 2094:00:27, 12 June 2007 (UTC) 2075:19:56, 11 June 2007 (UTC) 2056:01:39, 11 June 2007 (UTC) 2029:13:31, 12 June 2007 (UTC) 2007:21:54, 10 June 2007 (UTC) 1997:19:49, 10 June 2007 (UTC) 1981:17:50, 10 June 2007 (UTC) 1962:17:30, 10 June 2007 (UTC) 1910:16:37, 10 June 2007 (UTC) 1826:00:54, 10 June 2007 (UTC) 476:on a number of articles: 468:Another persistent vandal 1971:Blocking unsigned abuser 1883:20:49, 9 June 2007 (UTC) 1870:17:51, 9 June 2007 (UTC) 1847:18:20, 8 June 2007 (UTC) 1811:01:31, 9 June 2007 (UTC) 1794:23:01, 8 June 2007 (UTC) 1775:21:53, 8 June 2007 (UTC) 1764:behaviour right now but 1752:19:11, 8 June 2007 (UTC) 1669:18:19, 8 June 2007 (UTC) 1660:18:15, 8 June 2007 (UTC) 1644:18:07, 8 June 2007 (UTC) 1616:15:31, 8 June 2007 (UTC) 1597:15:09, 8 June 2007 (UTC) 1576:05:05, 8 June 2007 (UTC) 1552:23:00, 7 June 2007 (UTC) 1529:22:52, 7 June 2007 (UTC) 1520:22:33, 7 June 2007 (UTC) 1495:22:22, 7 June 2007 (UTC) 1467:08:29, 9 June 2007 (UTC) 1445:21:00, 7 June 2007 (UTC) 1426:20:57, 7 June 2007 (UTC) 1413:20:31, 7 June 2007 (UTC) 1380:20:26, 7 June 2007 (UTC) 1354:20:55, 7 June 2007 (UTC) 1339:20:53, 7 June 2007 (UTC) 1328:18:22, 6 June 2007 (UTC) 1307:20:55, 7 June 2007 (UTC) 1284:20:29, 7 June 2007 (UTC) 1273:00:34, 6 June 2007 (UTC) 1243:20:32, 5 June 2007 (UTC) 1230:20:12, 5 June 2007 (UTC) 1129:20:06, 5 June 2007 (UTC) 1065:19:26, 5 June 2007 (UTC) 1052:19:13, 5 June 2007 (UTC) 973:Look beneath the Surface 951:18:36, 5 June 2007 (UTC) 936:21:45, 4 June 2007 (UTC) 916:21:28, 4 June 2007 (UTC) 901:20:34, 4 June 2007 (UTC) 879:20:32, 4 June 2007 (UTC) 866:20:09, 4 June 2007 (UTC) 852:19:44, 4 June 2007 (UTC) 808:11:48, 2 June 2007 (UTC) 795:02:29, 2 June 2007 (UTC) 778:02:24, 2 June 2007 (UTC) 751:21:19, 31 May 2007 (UTC) 737:02:00, 26 May 2007 (UTC) 705:17:13, 24 May 2007 (UTC) 693:16:46, 24 May 2007 (UTC) 676:15:31, 24 May 2007 (UTC) 644:22:30, 22 May 2007 (UTC) 463:17:43, 21 May 2007 (UTC) 448:16:13, 17 May 2007 (UTC) 427:14:32, 15 May 2007 (UTC) 416:15:16, 12 May 2007 (UTC) 294:12:08, 12 May 2007 (UTC) 257:11:38, 12 May 2007 (UTC) 246:08:07, 12 May 2007 (UTC) 206:04:57, 12 May 2007 (UTC) 197:02:43, 12 May 2007 (UTC) 174:02:40, 12 May 2007 (UTC) 163:04:57, 12 May 2007 (UTC) 142:04:04, 12 May 2007 (UTC) 123:02:40, 12 May 2007 (UTC) 113:01:14, 12 May 2007 (UTC) 2164:the low number of votes 368:descriptive terminology 179:Congratulations. While 2343:or similar mechanism. 1925: 986: 333:, except for when you 218: 165: 1924: 1479:Quick question please 1014:wrote "Delete, fails 981: 929:email I got last week 826:comment was added by 216: 157: 42:of past discussions. 2370:blocked indefinitely 2341:request for comments 2270:the exact same words 1734:and another user of 1362:Deletion Nomination 1315:Billyego sockpuppets 453:Private Investigator 217:Open that champagne! 2395:Military of Albania 2272:in the last AfD as 1800:in direct violation 1511:admin's noticeboard 1145:A 1 week block for 977:User talk:Eagle 101 181:assuming good faith 2411:Albanian Air Force 2337:dispute resolution 2264:. One sockpuppet, 2104:User:74.195.17.240 1926: 1694:highly discouraged 1588:Dispute resolution 1507:dispute resolution 1364:Mandrake of Oxford 1141:Way too lenient... 993:Mandrake of Oxford 962:Mandrake of Oxford 892:dispute resolution 219: 184:congratulations)-- 166: 18:User talk:MastCell 2482:someone like that 2423:82.35.34.170 edit 2391:Serbian Air Force 2100:User:Mcampbell422 1968: 1967: 1960: 1908: 1395:proposed deletion 1228: 839: 773:over a year ago! 655:User:Vision Thing 414: 397: 396: 393: 342:assume good faith 100: 99: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 2524: 2461: 2458: 2456: 2242:by these users. 2112:Salinity control 2110:salinity called 2072: 2070:Anthony.bradbury 2038:seems to be back 2018:salinity control 1950: 1917: 1898: 1866: 1860: 1844: 1804:on his talk page 1715:harassing emails 1705:he/she has been 1691: 1685: 1664:Thank you :-) -- 1294:User:Coldmachine 1257:User:Coldmachine 1227: 1225: 1219: 1213: 1211: 1210: 1165:deleted contribs 821: 734: 690: 672: 666: 640: 631: 621: 594:deleted contribs 573: 546:deleted contribs 525: 498:deleted contribs 404: 391: 364:dazzling clarity 309: 242: 233: 81: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 2532: 2531: 2527: 2526: 2525: 2523: 2522: 2521: 2511: 2454: 2452: 2449: 2362: 2240:personal attack 2139: 2107: 2082: 2068: 2063: 2061:Indefblocked IP 2040: 1973: 1931: 1891: 1864: 1858: 1854: 1842: 1834: 1785:Elvira Arellano 1703:Elvira Arellano 1689: 1683: 1632: 1481: 1368: 1321:for the gallery 1317: 1253: 1223: 1217: 1214: 1150: 1146: 1143: 958: 944: 909:HIM remove them 845: 822:—The preceding 818: 758: 744: 730: 713: 688: 683: 670: 664: 651: 638: 629: 579: 531: 483: 470: 455: 435: 381:KillerChihuahua 313:Congratulations 240: 231: 152: 150:Congratulations 105: 77: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 2530: 2510: 2507: 2496: 2495: 2494: 2493: 2474: 2473: 2364:is back... As 2361: 2358: 2357: 2356: 2355: 2354: 2353: 2352: 2327: 2326: 2325: 2324: 2290: 2289: 2209: 2208: 2169: 2168: 2165: 2162: 2159: 2156: 2138: 2135: 2106: 2097: 2081: 2078: 2062: 2059: 2039: 2033: 2032: 2031: 2000: 1999: 1972: 1969: 1966: 1965: 1927: 1890: 1887: 1886: 1885: 1853: 1850: 1833: 1830: 1829: 1828: 1818: 1817: 1816: 1815: 1814: 1813: 1778: 1777: 1755: 1754: 1740: 1739: 1736:the same thing 1719: 1718: 1698: 1697: 1677:First of all, 1674: 1673: 1672: 1671: 1631: 1628: 1627: 1626: 1625: 1624: 1623: 1622: 1621: 1620: 1619: 1618: 1585: 1584: 1583: 1582: 1581: 1580: 1579: 1578: 1559: 1558: 1557: 1556: 1555: 1554: 1534: 1533: 1532: 1531: 1480: 1477: 1476: 1475: 1474: 1473: 1472: 1471: 1470: 1469: 1452: 1451: 1450: 1449: 1448: 1447: 1431: 1430: 1429: 1428: 1416: 1415: 1387:AfD nomination 1385:Actually, the 1367: 1360: 1359: 1358: 1357: 1356: 1342: 1341: 1316: 1313: 1312: 1311: 1310: 1309: 1287: 1286: 1252: 1247: 1246: 1245: 1142: 1139: 1138: 1137: 1136: 1135: 1134: 1133: 1132: 1131: 1126:86.147.169.220 1115: 1114: 1113: 1112: 1109:Mandrake Press 1097: 1096: 1095: 1094: 1087: 1086: 1085: 1084: 1077: 1076: 1075: 1074: 1068: 1067: 1049:86.147.169.220 1045: 1044: 1036: 1035: 1027: 1026: 957: 954: 943: 940: 939: 938: 924: 923: 922: 921: 920: 919: 918: 917: 883: 882: 881: 880: 869: 868: 844: 841: 817: 814: 813: 812: 811: 810: 798: 797: 783:It looks like 757: 754: 743: 740: 712: 711:Misc. Edit War 709: 708: 707: 682: 679: 650: 647: 623: 622: 574: 526: 469: 466: 454: 451: 434: 431: 430: 429: 419: 418: 395: 394: 388: 387: 386: 385: 384: 383: 375: 374: 371: 360: 353: 338: 327: 317: 316: 307: 306: 305: 304: 303: 302: 301: 300: 299: 298: 297: 296: 268: 267: 266: 265: 264: 263: 262: 261: 260: 259: 211: 210: 209: 208: 151: 148: 147: 146: 145: 144: 126: 125: 104: 101: 98: 97: 92: 87: 82: 75: 70: 65: 62: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2529: 2520: 2519: 2516: 2509:My recent RfA 2506: 2505: 2502: 2492: 2489: 2488: 2483: 2478: 2477: 2476: 2475: 2472: 2469: 2465: 2462: 2460: 2446: 2442: 2438: 2437: 2436: 2435: 2432: 2428: 2424: 2420: 2416: 2412: 2408: 2404: 2400: 2396: 2392: 2388: 2384: 2380: 2376: 2371: 2367: 2351: 2348: 2347: 2342: 2338: 2333: 2332: 2331: 2330: 2329: 2328: 2323: 2320: 2316: 2311: 2307: 2302: 2298: 2294: 2293: 2292: 2291: 2288: 2284: 2280: 2275: 2271: 2267: 2263: 2259: 2255: 2251: 2250: 2249: 2248: 2245: 2241: 2237: 2232: 2228: 2224: 2219: 2218: 2215: 2207: 2203: 2199: 2195: 2191: 2190: 2189: 2188: 2185: 2181: 2176: 2174: 2166: 2163: 2160: 2157: 2154: 2153: 2152: 2149: 2145: 2144: 2134: 2133: 2129: 2125: 2121: 2117: 2113: 2105: 2101: 2096: 2095: 2092: 2087: 2077: 2076: 2073: 2071: 2058: 2057: 2053: 2049: 2045: 2037: 2030: 2027: 2023: 2019: 2015: 2011: 2010: 2009: 2008: 2005: 1998: 1995: 1994: 1989: 1985: 1984: 1983: 1982: 1979: 1964: 1963: 1958: 1954: 1949: 1948:Fvasconcellos 1943: 1939: 1935: 1930: 1923: 1919: 1918: 1915: 1912: 1911: 1906: 1902: 1897: 1896:Fvasconcellos 1884: 1881: 1880: 1874: 1873: 1872: 1871: 1868: 1867: 1861: 1849: 1848: 1845: 1838: 1827: 1824: 1820: 1819: 1812: 1809: 1805: 1801: 1797: 1796: 1795: 1792: 1791: 1786: 1782: 1781: 1780: 1779: 1776: 1773: 1769: 1768: 1763: 1762: 1757: 1756: 1753: 1750: 1746: 1742: 1741: 1737: 1733: 1729: 1725: 1721: 1720: 1716: 1712: 1708: 1704: 1700: 1699: 1695: 1688: 1680: 1676: 1675: 1670: 1667: 1663: 1662: 1661: 1658: 1657: 1652: 1651:his talk page 1648: 1647: 1646: 1645: 1642: 1638: 1637:Arellano Talk 1617: 1614: 1609: 1608: 1607: 1606: 1605: 1604: 1603: 1602: 1601: 1600: 1599: 1598: 1595: 1594: 1589: 1577: 1574: 1570: 1567: 1566: 1565: 1564: 1563: 1562: 1561: 1560: 1553: 1550: 1549: 1544: 1540: 1539: 1538: 1537: 1536: 1535: 1530: 1527: 1523: 1522: 1521: 1518: 1517: 1512: 1508: 1504: 1503:User:VinylJoe 1499: 1498: 1497: 1496: 1493: 1489: 1486: 1468: 1465: 1460: 1459: 1458: 1457: 1456: 1455: 1454: 1453: 1446: 1443: 1442: 1437: 1436: 1435: 1434: 1433: 1432: 1427: 1424: 1420: 1419: 1418: 1417: 1414: 1411: 1410: 1405: 1400: 1396: 1392: 1388: 1384: 1383: 1382: 1381: 1378: 1374: 1365: 1355: 1352: 1351: 1346: 1345: 1344: 1343: 1340: 1337: 1332: 1331: 1330: 1329: 1326: 1322: 1308: 1305: 1304: 1299: 1295: 1291: 1290: 1289: 1288: 1285: 1282: 1277: 1276: 1275: 1274: 1270: 1266: 1262: 1258: 1251: 1244: 1241: 1240: 1234: 1233: 1232: 1231: 1226: 1221: 1220: 1208: 1205: 1202: 1199: 1196: 1193: 1190: 1187: 1184: 1181: 1178: 1175: 1172: 1169: 1166: 1163: 1160: 1157: 1154: 1149: 1148:70.106.74.152 1130: 1127: 1123: 1122: 1121: 1120: 1119: 1118: 1117: 1116: 1110: 1107:arguments on 1106: 1101: 1100: 1099: 1098: 1091: 1090: 1089: 1088: 1081: 1080: 1079: 1078: 1072: 1071: 1070: 1069: 1066: 1063: 1062: 1056: 1055: 1054: 1053: 1050: 1042: 1038: 1037: 1033: 1029: 1028: 1025: 1021: 1017: 1013: 1009: 1008: 1007: 1005: 1000: 996: 994: 989: 985: 980: 978: 974: 968: 965: 963: 953: 952: 949: 937: 934: 930: 926: 925: 915: 911: 910: 904: 903: 902: 899: 898: 893: 889: 888: 887: 886: 885: 884: 878: 873: 872: 871: 870: 867: 864: 860: 856: 855: 854: 853: 850: 840: 837: 833: 829: 825: 809: 806: 802: 801: 800: 799: 796: 793: 792: 786: 782: 781: 780: 779: 776: 772: 767: 763: 753: 752: 749: 739: 738: 735: 733: 726: 722: 718: 706: 703: 702: 697: 696: 695: 694: 691: 678: 677: 674: 673: 667: 660: 656: 646: 645: 642: 641: 634: 633: 632: 619: 616: 613: 610: 607: 604: 601: 598: 595: 592: 589: 586: 583: 578: 575: 571: 568: 565: 562: 559: 556: 553: 550: 547: 544: 541: 538: 535: 530: 529:130.13.18.126 527: 523: 520: 517: 514: 511: 508: 505: 502: 499: 496: 493: 490: 487: 482: 479: 478: 477: 475: 465: 464: 461: 450: 449: 446: 441: 438: 437:Hi MastCell, 428: 425: 421: 420: 417: 412: 408: 403: 402:Fvasconcellos 399: 398: 390: 389: 382: 379: 378: 377: 376: 372: 369: 365: 361: 358: 354: 351: 347: 343: 339: 336: 332: 328: 325: 324:wrong version 321: 320: 319: 318: 314: 311: 310: 295: 292: 288: 284: 280: 279: 278: 277: 276: 275: 274: 273: 272: 271: 270: 269: 258: 255: 251: 250: 249: 248: 247: 244: 243: 236: 235: 234: 225: 224: 223: 222: 221: 220: 215: 207: 204: 200: 199: 198: 195: 194: 190: 187: 182: 178: 177: 176: 175: 172: 164: 161: 156: 143: 139: 135: 130: 129: 128: 127: 124: 121: 117: 116: 115: 114: 111: 96: 93: 91: 88: 86: 83: 80: 76: 74: 71: 69: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 2512: 2497: 2485: 2450: 2441:OTHER useres 2440: 2379:82.35.34.170 2373: 2363: 2344: 2314: 2309: 2304: 2300: 2269: 2257: 2253: 2226: 2220: 2210: 2177: 2172: 2170: 2150: 2146: 2142: 2140: 2108: 2083: 2069: 2064: 2041: 2022:Mcampbell422 2001: 1991: 1974: 1945: 1937: 1928: 1913: 1892: 1877: 1862: 1855: 1839: 1835: 1808:LordPathogen 1799: 1788: 1772:LordPathogen 1766: 1765: 1760: 1759: 1693: 1666:LordPathogen 1654: 1641:LordPathogen 1633: 1591: 1590:, thataway. 1586: 1546: 1514: 1482: 1439: 1407: 1391:User:SKRINE2 1389:was made by 1369: 1348: 1320: 1318: 1301: 1261:Dune (novel) 1254: 1237: 1216: 1203: 1197: 1191: 1185: 1179: 1173: 1167: 1161: 1155: 1144: 1104: 1059: 1046: 1003: 1001: 997: 990: 987: 982: 972: 969: 966: 959: 945: 914:LordPathogen 908: 907: 895: 877:LordPathogen 858: 846: 819: 789: 785:User:Prodego 759: 745: 731: 721:User:Sacrumi 714: 699: 684: 668: 652: 636: 627: 626: 624: 614: 608: 602: 596: 590: 584: 577:130.13.18.88 566: 560: 554: 548: 542: 536: 518: 512: 506: 500: 494: 488: 474:Simon Cowell 471: 456: 442: 439: 436: 340:Remember to 312: 238: 229: 228: 191: 167: 106: 78: 43: 37: 2319:Coldmachine 2274:Coldmachine 2244:Coldmachine 2024:. Thanks. 1914:And yours: 1711:sockpuppets 1464:Coldmachine 1423:Coldmachine 1377:Coldmachine 1281:Coldmachine 1041:Coldmachine 771:first edits 481:130.13.16.4 291:David Ruben 36:This is an 2515:IvoShandor 2419:Gon4z edit 2366:User:Gon4z 2236:good faith 2225:also, the 1728:harassment 1336:Libertatia 1325:Libertatia 1201:block user 1171:filter log 1093:Knowledge. 1024:USER:IPSOS 948:Witchzilla 762:user:Gon4z 612:block user 606:filter log 564:block user 558:filter log 516:block user 510:filter log 433:vital tips 289:. Regards 95:Archive 10 2375:behaviour 2368:has been 2297:User:Emnx 2120:Karl Hahn 2066:months.-- 1732:me of 3RR 1298:checkuser 1218:Netsnipe 1207:block log 843:Head's Up 828:Mehudson1 732:aNubiSIII 659:Anarchism 618:block log 570:block log 522:block log 460:hydeblake 443:See you, 254:Shot info 90:Archive 9 85:Archive 8 79:Archive 7 73:Archive 6 68:Archive 5 60:Archive 1 2501:noclador 2487:MastCell 2468:noclador 2445:see here 2431:noclador 2383:see here 2346:MastCell 2231:GlassFET 2091:noclador 2086:see here 2026:Dan Levy 2004:Dan Levy 1993:MastCell 1978:Dan Levy 1879:MastCell 1859:infinity 1790:MastCell 1745:WP:Point 1656:MastCell 1593:MastCell 1573:VinylJoe 1548:MastCell 1516:MastCell 1441:MastCell 1409:MastCell 1350:MastCell 1347:Agreed. 1303:MastCell 1239:MastCell 1159:contribs 1061:MastCell 897:MastCell 836:contribs 824:unsigned 805:noclador 791:MastCell 775:noclador 719:made by 701:MastCell 686:request. 665:infinity 588:contribs 540:contribs 492:contribs 424:Remember 355:Use the 344:and not 110:Andrew c 2443:pages! 2387:user:NC 2310:persist 2266:SKRINE2 2254:history 2214:Arthana 2184:Arthana 1707:blocked 1692:tag is 956:SKRINE2 816:Apology 742:Runcorn 723:to the 39:archive 2315:always 2227:minute 2212:you.-- 1988:WP:AIV 1938:76/0/1 1934:my RfA 1889:Thanks 1679:WP:SPA 1543:WP:SSP 1404:WP:AfD 1399:WP:AfD 1020:WP:COI 1004:delete 942:Thanks 725:diplom 630:Fyslee 335:ignore 232:Fyslee 171:Taxman 134:Severa 120:Taxman 2360:Gon4z 2279:IPSOS 2268:used 2198:IPSOS 2080:Gon4z 2048:IPSOS 1823:evrik 1749:evrik 1613:Jrod2 1526:Jrod2 1492:Jrod2 1265:IPSOS 1177:WHOIS 1105:split 1022:with 1016:WP:NN 1012:Javit 933:evrik 863:evrik 849:evrik 756:Gon4z 748:Wooyi 717:edits 357:block 350:troll 331:rules 203:Samir 160:Samir 16:< 2427:here 2421:and 2283:talk 2262:Emnx 2223:Emnx 2202:talk 2180:here 2173:keep 2116:salt 2052:talk 2042:See 2036:Emnx 2016:and 2014:salt 1843:VK35 1726:and 1373:Emnx 1269:talk 1195:http 1189:RBLs 1183:RDNS 1153:talk 859:user 832:talk 689:VK35 681:RFCU 639:talk 600:logs 582:talk 552:logs 534:talk 504:logs 486:talk 445:Jasu 366:and 346:bite 285:and 241:talk 2301:did 2258:has 2126:) ( 1767:his 1687:spa 1006::- 975:on 931:. - 649:hey 138:!!! 103:RfA 2455:is 2447:! 2413:, 2409:, 2405:, 2401:, 2397:, 2393:, 2306:on 2285:) 2204:) 2182:-- 2130:) 2102:= 2089:-- 2054:) 2046:. 1944:. 1852:hi 1761:my 1690:}} 1684:{{ 1653:. 1545:. 1271:) 1224:► 838:). 834:• 458:-- 193:A. 189:S. 186:U. 140:) 64:← 2464:☺ 2459:n 2457:o 2453:l 2451:A 2281:( 2200:( 2128:C 2124:T 2122:( 2050:( 1959:) 1957:c 1955:· 1953:t 1951:( 1929:T 1907:) 1905:c 1903:· 1901:t 1899:( 1865:0 1738:. 1267:( 1209:) 1204:· 1198:· 1192:· 1186:· 1180:· 1174:· 1168:· 1162:· 1156:· 1151:( 830:( 671:0 635:/ 620:) 615:· 609:· 603:· 597:· 591:· 585:· 580:( 572:) 567:· 561:· 555:· 549:· 543:· 537:· 532:( 524:) 519:· 513:· 507:· 501:· 495:· 489:· 484:( 413:) 411:c 409:· 407:t 405:( 370:. 352:. 326:. 237:/ 136:( 132:- 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index