User talk:Makemi/Archive4

1899:. It is not clear to me if that means that the article was taken as a whole from it or used as a resource to write the article, and in my opinion we are better safe than sorry as regards copyright. I understand that you worked on this article, and don't want to see that work deleted. I would suggest that you re-write the article, using the seemingly copyrighted text as a source, on the subpage linked to from the copyvio notice, and that article can then be moved to where the possible-copyvio was. (You can go back in the history and use the material you wrote from scratch as well). Also, if the original article was essentially copied from another source, even if that is out of copyright, that needs to be made clearer, otherwise it is 862:...Plus he had a bad habit of cutting/pasting text directly from external websites. He was very cordial about the bits of editing advice I had giving him. But when I went through and tried to cleanup some of his errors, he responded with a bit a name calling.(which I removed). The user edits under his anon IP more often than he does under his login name. He only logs in to upload images and place them. Most of his edits have been OK lately and, thankfully, he has stopped pasting copyvio text into articles. He will learn as time goes by. And I will do my best to try and help him(or direct him to where he can get help) if I see he is getting into trouble. Cheers! 1814:: this deletion is entirely unrelated to sex, and I think the key is that Brian Boyd (one of the most distinguished Nabokov scholars) calls part of this early work "banal"; the huge majority of Nabokov's oeuvre is the absolute reverse of banal, so if you're one of the huge majority of Nabokovians who hasn't read this elusive work, the criticism would strike you as an egregious insult. (I have read it; the criticism is not undeserved.) Seven days seems a long block, enough for the grapes to sour and for new accounts to be made. I recommend shortening it to one day, of course with full readiness to reimpose it. But I'm not going to fight you over it. -- 1871:. I had somewhat revised this article some time ago, and was too initially concerned about the copyvio issue. However, I found out that the author had used a written source that is out of print (with an expired copyright), in fact the exact same source copied word for word by the website you mentioned in the tag. I had added a fair amount of Civil War original text that I scratch-wrote. Hence, I removed the tag as the article essentially copied material from a public source. Regards! 1808:

uncontroversial, helpful edits. I rather get the impression that he wants to protect the dignity of people he admires (in itself, an admirable motive), and that he sees description of homosexuality as an indignity. (I don't entirely disagree with this -- and am neutral about any homo/hetero distinction -- because the descriptions can easily trivialize and tabloidize articles about people who are notable for something else.) I infer this from his repeated deletion of a sentence from

880:. Whose use of third person are you referring to? If Jeffrey Babcock had written the article in first person, that would be bad Knowledge form...and maybe it would have gotten the article more summarily deleted, but it's hardly the kind of thing to be encouraged. I also think it's bad form to use second person on an open discussion like that; on a talk page, though, there's an obvious audience, so I have no issues addressing you as "you." So, what's the issue? — 754: 2134:

upset over nothing; I thought the best solution would be to copyedit it to get rid of all the crap and then just go ahead and assume it's notable enough to keep, even with the shitty references. I know I'm more of an inclusionist than you are though. And yes, it's pretty funny that someone you didn't know voted delete, while I, who actually did learn about the afd from you indirectly, vote keep. Anyway, keep the good faith man.

2106:

then ask for a review, as even without ISBNs the article should have been passed anyway, as the objection was more for FAs than GAs. That might be quicker than it spending another month on the GA list. (Fairy-Queen's up to 12th, BTW, so it's going quicker than usual - but if we're going to get a moronic review that might be a bad thing!). Enjoy the French Baroque, and it's great to have you back. Cheers,

222:, and I decided that this (combined with all of the other actions I've seen on your logs) more than warranted a barnstar. Feel free to move/copy it to your userpage. Keep up the good work- we always need admins who are willing to protect Knowledge, and not coddle those who threaten to disrupt it. Feel free to send me a message anytime should you need help or advice. 305::-) I was just trying to explain this all to "lay" people at dinner tonight, how in the Renaissance they actually believed that if you sang in a certain meter and in a certain mode it could make you a better person, even a non-violent one; and they certainly had a reason for longing for those changes in Paris in the 1570s, thinking of poor 2833:, where I've made the case that "myth" is right and "rumor" wrong, and asked him/her not to re-revert until we reach consensus on the talk page. If you have a better argument than mine, please consider adding it. Should this turn into an edit war, I'll just edit the page to quote the source directly. The source uses "myth." 2567:

thanks for the wikiwelcome. You might like to know that when I last taught World Religions, I recommended the relevant Knowledge articles as background reading (after vetting them, of course). So I'm definitely a great admirer of the entire wikiproject and any wikiedits I make are only ever attempts to make it wikibetter.

1415:

similar categories as this was being done to conform with those pages. -This quote WAS your opinion on album covers fair use earlier: "These are copyrighted, and using them to illustrate the band's page is almost certainly NOT fair use" (NOTE: There's no mention of "discussed" IMAGES.) but...whatever...--

2566:

BTW, you might want to call Ludwig a "transition" composer. "Borderline" makes him sound like he was only marginally good, and I think it is widely known that he had considerable talent, though I have no sources for this. :-) And again, why did you stick your tongue out at me with your emoticon? Also

2133:

Hey, I'm sorry about all the crap too. And hey, I didn't mean to be stalking your talk page :). I have you and Antandrus and several other editors' pages on my watchlist so I often go check out what people were talking about. For that one artist's article, it seemed like everybody was getting way too

1926:

The website specifically says its sources are books which, being published in 1914 and earlier, have their copyrights expired into the public domain. It is perfectly acceptable for public domain text to be copied onto Knowledge; plagiarism is an academic concern for evaluating whether the assigment a

1894:

How do you know that? There's nothing on his talk or userpage or the article's talk page or the article history to indicate either that the articles are taken part-and-parcel from an out-of-copyright work (as opposed to sourced from them) or that this editor has the right to post information from the

1618:

for deletion!!!1! You rouge admin, you. ZOMGLOL and other miscellaneous acronymic typos. --Good grief. Looking at it, borderline keepability (I count 935 ghits, though many are in blogs and suchlike), and probably enough inclusionists will show up to guarantee it. Sure is irritating dealing with

1571:

Funny, I was just thinking about that (I usually check my watchlists a few times each day while I'm at work, and spotted the activity at Anton's underfed article). Dunno, every time I think about running the FA gauntlet, the thought of all those unpaid bruises and niggling nit-tweezerings just keeps

1390:

fair use if the image in question is specifically discussed. I could be wrong, IANAL, etc. When copyrighted images are put in tables which seem to be equivalent to galleries, that gives me serious pause, however. The albums are "discussed" to the extent that they are named and perhaps a couple facts,

1287:

Sorry if I seem to be haunting this page, but I'm going on holiday fairly soon (the 6th) and I'm trying to get a whole load of stuff done before I go, as Snowdonia means complete wikibreak. Do you know of any inline citations or other references that it would be good to put in? Pretty much all of the

1030:

Cheaper, IIRC. It's on one of the pages you get to as you are signing up. Since I already have a subscription I just left it alone. I was just looking at the schedule and program for their convention in November in LA ... looks awfully interesting, and I'm pretty sure I'll be there. :-) See ya!

336:

Hey Mak, you might just still be writing this article, but I was wondering whether it was custumary to leave blank sections as you did with "Synopsis" if there's a section that clearly needs to exist for the article, but that you don't have the resources or desire to write at the time. Still learning

79:

This sounds stupid, but I'm having trouble getting pictures on Knowledge to come up on my computer. I just get a blank space, with a red cross in the corner. The problem only seems to apply to Knowledge, though sporadically beforehand other websites have misfunctioned in this fashion. Do you have any

2509:

Thanks for the charitable word "obnoxious" and your generous interpretation of my edits as "ruining the integrity of Knowledge." I made the changes in good faith. When I took music theory in college, we were taught that Mozart was a Romantic composer, "Classical" being a vague catch-all term that is

2301:

Hey Mak, regarding the template, I didn't know you created one, although I saw the box on your page. It looked like you had just added code, but maybe you subst'ed a template? I couldn't find it, so I just created one based exactly on the BA and BS templates. We're the only two in the category right

1760:

Hey, thanks, that looks great. Really shows how lacking that whole area is. It's too bad, because French Baroque opera can be so gorgeous. I think it's too bad Kleinzach doesn't want to acknowledge the importance of things (in terms of lists) until the articles are up to snuff, I think it means that

2057:

by some ridiculous person (oh, and I don't think saying " it took all the goodwill I could muster to trust Makemi and assume Jbirken is not a sockpuppet." is particularly AGF), that people think the sources on that article are just fine, when they are geocities and scans on the guy's own website of

1807:

Well done. You beat me to it by a couple of seconds if not less. (My attempt to block him failed precisely because you'd beat me to it.) However, although he's intensely irritating and his deletions detract from the articles, he doesn't seem to be a vandal in the conventional sense. He's capable of

1435:

me. I've never claimed to be infallible, and if people revert me I don't threaten to dog them with anonymous IP edits. I don't think anyone discusses every single edit they make, if that were the case nothing would ever get done. We probably need a larger discussion on the use of copyrighted images

1091:

Sorry for the delay. I've given it a copy-edit (I don't think I'll be able to pass it - I've done too much), but I'll leave a note on the GA nominations page to say that it probably should go through. One thing is still ambiguous and confusing: the paragraph beginning "They generally wrote of.." is

304:

And there's so much more to write ... and to learn, and hopefully not cross over the WP:NOR boundary. Some of the people involved in the "secret music" movement in France had recently spent time in Venice and... and.... just maybe.... 'cause it's so close.... the other place. We need to find out.

159:

Thanks for having a go at these. I was blissfully unaware of the muddle. I have changed Médée (Charpentier opera) to Médée (Charpentier), which I hope is correct (assuming he didn't also write an oratorio on the same subject or anything). The Cherubini, I think, ought to be Médée (opera) - as it is

2115:

Oh, and I've got rid of that tag on Philip Glass. There's a whole references section and the article is unreferenced? No, I don't think so. (BTW, although the yellow bar on Minun's user page may say he is online (even with poor grammar; ha, it's a good thing Tony1 isn't involved in this, god knows

2105:

O.K then, panic over. The Trobairitz thing was ludicrous, I agree. There's nothing wrong with that article and if the only qualm was wikilinking and giving ISBNs, then why on earth didn't the fellow who reviewed it put it on hold? If you want my advice, then I'd put the links into the article and

2960:

It looks to me like the user is appropriately tagging articles for speedy deletion, and then keeping track of them and of users who they think creates nonsense pages. It looks fine to me. Could you be more specific about what is worrying you? Also, on Mozilla at least your userpage is very weird

2547:

Thanks for the suggestions about edits. You are, of course, entirely correct. I'm new to the editing process, and certainly meant no offense. Usually I make only grammatical/stylistic/usage changes except in my field, which is philosophy of religion. Maybe I should stick to that. As someone once

1339:

Dude, Why don't you stick to your cl-ASS-ical muzak stuff or what ever and leave the RAP PAGES ALONE! You MUST have NEVER seen a RAP OR ROCK PAGE on the WIKIPEDIA because they all have ALBUM COVERS on their pages. They are okay to use because they are for PROMOTIONal things. Thanx for wasting my

1414:

Sorry, If I insulted you (just a little ticked though). I agree the CAREER SECTION of said page should note all albums (I WAS going to write a new BIOGRAPHY for this today; as I have been working on it for a few days) but why delete the images of JUST this page and NOT other artist's pages in

1076:

Say, if you're looking to get free access to Grove, it's actually quite simple. I get free online access to Grove through my library card from Brand Art & Music Library in Glendale. If you don't have access to a library that will get you access, I can always "lend" you my card number.

452:

The article's reached the top of its category on the GA nominations page. I rather panicked and carried out some drastic revisions. I think that the new bibliography section looks good, but is the deletion of the list of actors O.K with you? As you can see, I've provided a link to the play,

2901:

I'm mostly joking, and it's original research anyway. I just think the pope didn't like being upstaged by a more "happening" place, and was also pissed off that he could do little about Venice. Ferrara is so close to Venice that taking it over was a thumb in the eye of the Venetians.

272:

It looks to me like you may have thought he was talking about the article, while in reality he was talking about the talk page. It seems he edited other people's comments (something I never do, no matter how full of misspellings and grammatical burrs). Misunderstandings happen. :-)

2513:

Thank you for your apology, which I certainly accept. Please accept mine as well. If I was misinformed about Mozart's being a romantic composer, then I am happy to be corrected. I am a scholar (I hold a Ph.D. in philosophy), and the last thing I would do is try to ruin Knowledge.

1197:

but he deleted something i put in for no reason even tho it was funny and he does have no life cmon i think some1 like him needs to be told the truth i mean he describes himself as a 16 year old who fights vandals on wikipedai with some program? come on thats kind of pathetic

1781:

Just a note of support for your reversion of the Britten article. The one thing I dislike about Knowledge is the tendency towards blandness (usually in the name of NPOV). Britten was certainly never bland, so it's great to see you keeping some life and vigour in the article!

476:

would get reviewed quicker! However, do you want me to review the articles in question? There's no reason why I shouldn't; I certainly haven't contributed to them in any way and have no personal POV on either of the two subjects. Fingers crossed for The Fairy-Queen. Cheers,

2510:

applied to all kinds of music from baroque to modern neo-classical. It's like "Modern Art". That is a category, within which are minimalists, photo-realists, abstract-expressionists, etc. I was trying to make the article more precise by listing his species, not his genus.

110:

Yes, I had already read Leonora Sanvitale (nice job!). I also trimmed back my to-do list a bit: there are now some better editors than me in some areas ;-) . Now I'm fixing a few redirects prior to tackling a really big one, for which I've been reading up for a while

1462:

thanks for catching it there is no need to ever block my bot because as soon as there is a message on its talk page it automaticly stops untill i review it. if there is anything i can do for you let me know, or if you have sugestions dont hesatate to let me know. Thanks

170:

Thanks. "Médée (Cherubini)" might be a solution although we normally have the main contender as X (opera) and the second as X (composer). On the other hand having two disambiguation pages might be a bit, er, ambiguous. Or are you thinking along different lines? -

2676:

No problem. It's a fascinating subject and article, and a real pleasure to edit. The only real problem left is the paragraph lengths, I think. Several are a couple sentemces short of passing the full Tony Test (and the standards of quite a few others, as well).

2088:

I apologize for the dramatics, I just sort of had all my buttons pushed at once. I'm just going to go in my hole and write an article on a nice French Baroque Opera. Those are always soothing. Thanks for the concern guys, and again I'm sorry for the dramatics.

1092:

very strange. Who are "They"? "Women were generally the subject of the writing of troubadours, however" - but not of the female version, the trobairitz? Yet this contradicts what is written later on. Apart from these 2 odd sentences, it's a great article.

2713:

I'm now back and will have a look at your article - although I don't think I am really qualified to comment on the content. Japan was gloomy but cool with the rainy season going on for about a month longer than usual. Scotland is radiant however. -

1984:) from a redirect to a very short explanatory article, since it seems like the sort of thing uninitiated people would see on a score and want a quick definition of. I've got a bit on my plate, so it might be a little while before I can do much with 2882:

Hm, and what do you think the real reason is? According to what I've read, the pope came in with his henchmen, took anything beautiful and portable, stopped all the public works, and the city still hasn't recovered. But that's just one version.

2247:

I always thought the second line was a pun on "division" both in the usual sense, and in that of the broken consort (see under "broken music" in the Grove "consort" article). Literary critics rarely know anything about music, and miss it.

1505:

Ah, thanks for that, I've fixed it. Hmmmm, sorry, another article I was in the middle of working on is taking longer than expected (because tables are evil), then Grove was broken, blah blah, excuse excuse. I'll look at The Fairy-Queen now.

2828:

Thanks for the heads-up, Makemi. The article is on my watchlist; I've just been really busy this last week. Since Satanael seems determined to revert to his/her preferred version, I've left a message on his/her talk page directing him to

1846:; yes, it's pretty bad. ¶ It's most unusual for a user talk page to be protected against even edits by that user (unless permabanned) and I'm therefore about to remove the protection. If he deletes comments again, I'll protect it again. -- 96:

LOL, actually there are probably numerous duplications there, I made that page by querying out the links from a whole bunch of different lists, do these comma splices remind you of anyone we both know and love? Hope you had a great 4th!

705:. Seems she's managed to get herself put into an episode of "That's So Raven" at tv.com. (They allow unverified information there, and sometimes IMDB will pick it up.) So keep an eye out for her to reappear under a slightly changed name. 2384:

in North Carolina. He gets irritated when he's around for a while and no one notices. (I'm busy reading about French and Italian secular music of the 16th century ... probably not something he learns much about on King of the Hill.)

1961:

Meladina has been doing this for his Russian opera articles and I think it might be useful, seeing as they back up most of the airs. If so, we should probably explain what SATB means and how often the Chorus is used, in what role, etc.

1354:

Uh, ok, have fun with that. When I run across fair use images used in an un-fair way I remove them. Note that the articles I work on in classical music don't include five million fair-use recordings or album covers, when they could.

1542:

Thanks for your message. Can you help me? How can I revert the moving and restoring the original name? I prefer to restore the username "Al pereira" (lower letter) in order to keep all my preferences, watchlist and contributions.

592:

i am not creating a new list. it already exists under the page "bagpipes". in fact i may have started that page some time back. i am just jpdating the list and combining some names that appeared under the page "uilleann Pipes"

1792:

Thanks, I completely agree. That guy also seems to have a thing about removing mentions of homosexuality, for some reason. I've blocked him for not responding to other editors' complaints and perpetually blanking his talk page.

1827:

User talk edit (consisting, basically, of "shut up and leave me alone") and no article talk edits. If people are going to do controversial deletions, they need to be willing to discuss them. I'll shorten the block to 48 hours.

410:

The same anon has just put the same spammy AOL link into both "Baroque music" (which you reverted) and "Opera" (which I reverted). I think that he needs to be dealt with - either blocked or given his very last warning. Cheers,

917:

Thank you for notifying me of the need to source references directly on the article page. I have added several of these, although there are others. This is my first entry on Knowledge and I thank you for your kind advice.

2345:

Yeah, I unblocked him. There's a vandal who does page moves (a big reason why you have to have an account for a couple days before you can move pages), and there's an etiquette that admins don't undo others' blocks, but

471:

a month) on the list before being passed. Any slower and we'd be travelling backwards in time. In fact, once I remember copy-editing an article that was also on the GA list so that it would be passed quicker so that my

1009: 1144:

which was a pretty sexist construct, but was the standard construct of the time. The "however" is about the irony of praising women while at the same time limiting their power. I'll think about how I can make it

1226:

The thing you added may have been funny, but it wasn't useful. Just because you have the impression that someone is a loser doesn't mean you have to say it to them (if you don't have something nice to say....).

1131:

Trobairitz: Thanks for taking a look at it. For some reason I don't really like the word "female" when applied adult human females, however, I bow to the rest of the English-speaking world in this case. Does

2684:), but one day I found myself singing along and it's become my secret ambition in life. Give me a few more years. Certainly it's one of my favourite voices (contralto and basso profundo are the others). Are 2082:

which passed AfD recently. You just have to look at it for about two seconds to know why I was pissed off about that one. Add to that that George Reeves Guy/Squidward can't be dealt with because he's insane

2596: 2517:

One thing, though. Since I've been responding to users (you and another) just now, I've got virtually real time responses. Is editing Knowledge a full-time activity, or is my timing just unusually good?

633: 2309:, I have the Norton Recorded Anthology of Western Music where Pilar Figueras sings it a step higher than your notation. That CD only has an excerpt, but I also have the companion CD for Jeremy Yudkin's 1436:

in Knowledge, and I probably shouldn't try to change an entire segment of Knowledge without that discussion. Which is too bad, since I think the current practice makes Knowledge very vulnerable.

184:"Is the Cherubini one that much more likely to be the intended target?" - Perhaps, but I am not really familiar with either of them. I'm not sure anybody has sung the Cherubini much since Callas. 2979:

Ok, thanks for looking at that. I thought he was marking the pages he deleted, but I guess just pages that have had no use. Sorry about the false alarm and lack of detail. Have a good day. --

193:". . . unless you think Cherubini is far more likely to be someone's intended search I think the titles should be Médée (Cherubini) and Médée (Charpentier)". OK I'll try to implement this. - 2654:

Yeah, I've gotten them stuck in my head for quite a while. I have the ensemble Gilles Binchois one. It's not quite as brisk as the one on the NAWM CD I used to have, but it's really lovely.

210:

Hi Makemi! I know we haven't interacted much (though, looking at your userpage, we would have a lot to talk about, especially classical music and Latin), but I saw your quick and decisive

2078:(not put on hold, failed after almost 3 weeks, for lack of ISBNs, while other articles were put on hold by the same reviewer for much more serious problems). Then we have the fabulous 135:

Perhaps as a corollary to the famous "everything tastes more or less like chicken", everything in France "more or less relates to Cheese." --Although as I write this I'm listening to

1288:

other complaints the previous reviewer had have been at least partially addressed, but not this one. Once that's done I really think that it's ready for the GA process again. Cheers,

1761:

neglected articles are even more neglected than they should be, but I understand his reasoning. Thanks very much for your edits to the articles I've started, they're really helpful.

1264:

I'd like to create a workspace for a couple of articles I'm planning to write. How do you do this (is it similar to archiving a talk page, or do you have to be an admin, etc)? Best,

1044:

Bwa ha ha, I almost choked on that. Though perhaps John Cage would have approved (then again, he preferred the longer variety, especially when disrupted with ambient spontaneities)

2582:

I've left some comments in a rather insouciant response at the article's entry on the PR list. I'll see if I can make some time to do a thorough copy-edit. Enjoy the read! Cheers,

40:

Hi, thanks for your note. In this case I actually couldn't work out why the link didn't work. I think it was the apostrophe! I do agree with you about redirects though . . . -

849: 1927:

student completes represents his own work and understanding of the subject, though stating the source is a good idea, for example to alleviate copyright concerns like this. —

160:

listed on the opera corpus - but I can't move it unless I do cut and paste (which is bad style I understand). Assuming you agree is it possible to do an admin on it? Best. -

1302:

Argh, it's not just you. Server appears to be down. Oh well, there goes my plans for the next few hours ... maybe I should get off my butt and go do something outside ...

2079: 2728:

I'm just heading off to the wild, wet Welsh mountains for a good old hiking holiday. I'll be back on the 27th of August, so happy editing in the meantime. Good luck with

2472: 896:

D'oh! The indent threw me, since it looked like a comment to me. I follow you now. (Plus, he pulled a "Bob Dole" and referred to himself by name in the third person.) —

735:

I'm requesting to block anonymous editing from the IP I'm currently posting from because I have a small child using Internet who can cause unintentional vandalism.

611:

Hi Makemi: i am not sure what i am doing; i am an amateur. i am really not trying to create new articles, but only lists. i thoght that was what was suggested.

2302:

now ;p. Although I'm not sure why you're listed under "U" instead of "M". I'm also not sure if it was appropriate to create the template. First time doing that.

1474: 1416: 866: 377: 1344:

due to your COUNTER PRODUCTIVE MEASURES --UNLESS it is fixed and/or apologized for in reasonable amount of TIME. You will NEVER KNOW what IP I will be on.--

1345: 1206: 981: 840:

I appreciate your kind welcome message. I am doing everything to meet all Knowledge standards in my contributions, and I welcome any input. Cheers! --

80:

idea as to what the problem might be and, even better, how to fix it? If it's any help, I've got Windows XP and use Microsoft Internet Explorer. Cheers,

854:

The comment you pointed out wasn't the PA...I had removed it earlier. I had been trying to help the new user as he had been breaking a few Wiki-rules...

1478: 736: 2504: 31: 1395:

of the cover is never discussed. To me, that means that it isn't fair use. And being threatened doesn't really make me want to discuss it logically.

903: 887: 463:

No, I didn't use those books as sources so a separate bibliographic section should be O.K. I agree that the GA review process is terminally slow; my

2568: 2552: 2526: 1524:

Ha ha, we've both just welcomed OperaDevel at the same time. He gets two welcome messages and two specific greetings from the Project, lucky man.

2381: 2054: 1921: 1889: 877: 615: 496:

We surely don't need to expand on the development of the libretto, do we? My reasoning for this is on the talk page, but it seems superfluous.

44: 2164: 2148: 2053:

Sorry guys. I just got really pissed off because of a variety of stupid wiki things that I should have let just roll of my back. Specifically,

1481: 1445: 2425: 2412: 2255: 1560: 739: 2044: 2026:

Yes, me too, is there a problem? (O.K, so, that's a stupid question, but is it anything I can help with, or is real life in trouble?) Best,

1364: 775:

To the people who opposed the request: I'm certainly not ignoring the constructive criticism and advice you've offered. I thank you as well!

567:

Hey there, could you look into providing the missing volume, issue and page numbers for the nutter reference in this article? Thanks a lot.

104: 2194: 2110: 2030: 1938: 1912: 1325: 1051: 1019: 898: 882: 197: 175: 146: 126: 119:

long for though are those three volumes of Einstein .... maybe I can find them at a garage sale somewhere ... :-) Have fun with Ferrara!

2865:

felt the need to stomp on the place in 1597/8 and add it to the papal states (after all, Rome had become quite dull in the days since the

2837: 2359: 1589: 1404: 1381: 2702: 2120: 481: 425: 89: 3005: 2983: 2970: 2931: 2909: 2892: 2663: 2392: 2098: 1725: 1699: 1679: 709: 696: 517:

Thanks for responding so thouroughly and promptly to my query! Always appreciated! PS: Kudos for valiantly striving to use my system! --

1997: 1802: 1770: 1528: 1515: 1377:

have images of all of the bands albums. As I understood it, this was one of the main examples of fair use. What am I misunderstanding?

1180: 1167: 730: 724: 688: 581: 2806:

About the censor: that guy read my mind, so I'm reverting it back. In fact, I doubt I could have found a better way to say it myself.

2188: 2823: 94: 2037:

Whoa, logged in this morning and saw that. Hope you're doing ok: I don't see anything obvious in the history. Please take care.

1850: 1837: 1818: 1875: 1492:

I think that you just signed with 5 tildes, rather than four, on the Op Project talk page. There's time stamp, but no signature...

1122: 835: 440: 33: 1604: 1531:(I'm surprised there wasn't an edit conflict, though...I didn't mean to copy you! When I started editing there was nothing there!) 971: 826: 773:

To the people who have supported my request: I appreciate the show of confidence in me and I hope I live up to your expectations!

2020: 844: 571: 2087:

hasn't had an ArbCom case against him, and you see the levels of ridiculousness that are sometimes present here. </rant: -->

1419: 1273:

Thanks. I've called it my workspace, and there's a link to it now on my user page. Great work with Priest and Dioclesian, BTW.

2740:

gets through GA, would you mind adding it to the list of "Good articles" list on the Opera Project main page? Thanks. Cheers,

2267:

I just left an egregiously long list of possible suggestions for your article on its talk page. Keep on rocking the viols. :)

1969:, but seeing as you have Grove (which I should be getting around November), you might be able to do better than me... Cheers, 341: 2876: 2847:

I have a CD of Luzzaschi's music for the concerto delle donne. Would you like for me to send some samples for your article?

2718: 2317: 1661: 763: 603: 164: 2623:, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 1348: 394:

Well thanks, hi back! No, I haven't done any editing before--I just cut and paste the links so I know they'll work. Cheers!

2435:

Sorry, I didn't relaised you needed a reply. I think its better now, so I have put it back on the nominatons list, cheers —

2291: 1754: 1750:

I could find. Why not take a look? If you come across any omissions, please add them. It might be a useful tool in future--

1670:

Looks like it's been fixed :) Ant, it depends which Loeillet you're talking about, one's 1680, the other 1688 (I checked).

799: 2648: 562: 2172: 2167: 1086: 964: 215: 2817: 1292: 1158:

would both be good articles to write, next time I go to the library I'll see what I can do, thanks for the suggestions.

652:, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on 235: 2698:

Lots of countertenor friends? Hmph, you're not the only one. Good to see peer review being so productive, BTW. Cheers,

2313:, which has the same recording, but the full 5:30 minute version. What choir did you sing it with? That's really cool. 1595: 1236: 1214: 934: 507: 491: 457: 431: 317:...) Fun stuff, and so much more exciting than reverting "poo" from hundreds of articles. Have a great evening too! 2761:

Sorry about the lack of usage information; I'll add a more detailed explanation of usage on each script page. Thanks,

2555: 1881:

The author of the website Vermont in the Civil War IS the Wiki editor who created the article, as well as the one for

1647:

Please go to 1772 in music. Someone put Loeillet's birthdate as this year. How is this possible he was already dead.

702: 262: 2548:

said, there are some mistakes so big it takes a Ph.D. to make them. But why did you stick your tongue out at me? ;-)

2271: 2185: 1547: 84: 1316: 1136:

clarify what is meant? I'm not sure where that's contradicted - it's a little weird, but not surprising to me - the

1066: 1003: 2586: 2851: 2571: 2495: 2339: 907: 891: 351:

Ah okay, I thought any recreation of any deleted content was forbidden unless it went through a request process?--

2784: 2744: 2534: 2407: 2282: 1862: 1579: 1467: 1277: 1268: 952: 744: 687:

For your translations. I have corrected some mistakes you made, but it's a great job nevertheless. Best regards,

521: 421:

Good. "Given enough eyeballs, all bugs are shallow"; I suppose that this is living proof of that saying. Cheers,

415: 381: 2954: 2692: 2075: 1309: 557: 548: 535: 324: 211: 69: 2138: 2003: 1973: 1786: 2281:

Just had to share one chuckle: in addition to my other accomplishments, I am now an "obnoxious zionist rat."

1499: 1081: 280: 2374: 1895:

website. The website claims copyright over the work on it, and cites the probably-out-of-copyright work as a

1626: 677: 503:, and definitely no problem. Amazing article, by the way (and my review of Trobairtz is on the way). Cheers, 355: 294: 2770: 2457: 1716:

Ah! I don't know! I just don't! No more! Help! Jean-Baptiste! Jean Baptiste! Giovambattista! (cue meltdown)

1038: 691: 2856: 2708: 2067: 2009: 1642: 1253: 154: 1917:

I have received e-mails from Tom (the website owner) in the past. I will ask him to clarify this for you.

1843: 1737: 1692:

Since it had November 18 I presumed the London one was meant ... but I'm no expert on these guys ... ;-)

1133: 329: 205: 1885:. Hence, he is releasing the material by his own volition, so I am also reverting that copyvio as well. 1154:

You're right, Priest (don't know why he's not mentioned in Dido and Aeneas, it's probably my fault) and

2624: 2296: 2276: 2154: 653: 647: 996:

in general is going to be more and more of a problem for us here. Thanks for your help on this one.

2794:

Thanks for blocking Slowcheetah, his messages on my talkpage were getting kind of... well, you know.

2633: 2177:

Hello, could you please unprotect my user page? You said not too long and the vandals tapered off. --

1742:

Hi,I know you've got a major interest in the French Baroque. I've been trying to soup up the page on

1191: 1102:- he appears to have been fairly prolific as a choreogapher for Purcell's semi-operas, and worked on 958: 587: 250: 1282: 330: 2062:

is apparently unreferenced (and people try to underline this by changing the completely obviously

1386:

Ok, so perhaps it is standard practice. According to my understanding of fair use, however, it is

2812: 2436: 2116:

what he'd have to say) that isn't born out by his contributions, so we may have to wait. Cheers,

1868: 1331: 445: 2680:

Countertenor? No, not really. I'm working on it. Mostly I love the repertoire (Handel, Purcell,

1062:

D'oh! (smacks fist against forehead) I hadn't even realized I wasn't logged in. Thanks, Mak!

2755: 2417:

My latest insomniac creation - thought it might be up your alley considering your specialties-

1953:

Do you think that a mention of the chorus should go into the Singers list for fairy-queen, i.e

1210: 930: 2595: 1585:

Count me in for a Bruckner push. I don't know a huge amount, but I'd be glad to help. Cheers,

632: 249:}} tag only uses month and year for the first parameter, not the full date, as you can see in 2611: 2542: 2418: 2182: 978: 968: 871: 640: 246: 219: 74: 1369:

I'm a little confused about this too. Most band articles, especially featured articles like

2866: 2830: 2522: 2017: 1743: 1557: 1202: 922: 672: 369: 258: 240: 8: 2906: 2873: 2789: 2645: 2577: 2530: 2389: 2288: 2252: 2041: 1696: 1658: 1623: 1576: 1537: 1322: 1306: 1107: 1057: 1048: 1035: 1016: 1000: 987: 912: 512: 321: 310: 277: 143: 123: 101: 66: 2807: 2795: 2332: 2260: 1495:

On a separate note, can you think of any inline citations for The Fairy-Queen? Cheers,

526: 2862: 2842: 2775: 2723: 2561: 2462: 2196: 1918: 1886: 1872: 1259: 926: 841: 682: 612: 600: 405: 2350:

isn't around anymore, and the pagemoves seem to be out of confusion, not bad faith.

3000: 2965: 2926: 2887: 2669: 2658: 2422: 2398: 2369: 2354: 2336: 2328: 2314: 2268: 2179: 2145: 2135: 2093: 1992: 1966: 1932: 1907: 1832: 1797: 1765: 1720: 1674: 1566: 1510: 1464: 1440: 1432: 1399: 1378: 1359: 1231: 1162: 947: 719: 400: 338: 291: 17: 1114:. As far as I can remember, he was also the headmaster at the girl's school where 977:

Now that I think about it, I dont think I put "AfD closed" in the edit summary :/

2941: 2766: 2749: 2480: 2430: 2322: 2013: 1948: 1776: 1554: 1544: 1297: 1173: 1115: 1111: 663: 541: 446: 306: 299: 254: 231: 136: 59: 49: 2980: 2951: 2903: 2870: 2848: 2834: 2715: 2642: 2492: 2404: 2386: 2285: 2249: 2038: 1882: 1693: 1655: 1620: 1573: 1487: 1457: 1319: 1303: 1078: 1063: 1045: 1032: 1013: 997: 863: 818: 790: 437: 373: 346: 318: 274: 194: 172: 161: 140: 120: 98: 63: 41: 2781: 2741: 2699: 2689: 2618: 2583: 2443: 2203: 2117: 2107: 2027: 1970: 1783: 1751: 1648: 1637: 1601: 1586: 1525: 1496: 1289: 1274: 1265: 1177: 1119: 1099: 1071: 706: 504: 488: 478: 454: 422: 412: 267: 81: 2212:

Do you know this poem (by Sir Walter Ralegh, shortly before his execution):

2008:

Whatever it is... I hope you are okay. If there's anything I can do, please

2861:...is very good. You could also include a bit about the "real" reason that 2128: 2059: 1609: 1250: 1244: 993: 578: 568: 352: 314: 55: 544:

an okay removal / deletion of my RfA? Thanks for all of your help, Mak! --

2997: 2962: 2923: 2884: 2655: 2366: 2351: 2090: 1989: 1928: 1904: 1829: 1794: 1762: 1717: 1671: 1507: 1437: 1396: 1370: 1356: 1228: 1159: 1025: 944: 716: 623: 554: 545: 532: 518: 397: 2331:. I asked a couple of users for help, what the heck. I also found this: 1631: 1095:

If you're not too busy, perhaps a couple of articles for you to create:

2762: 2450: 2347: 2261: 2071: 1900: 1847: 1815: 1615: 1374: 1103: 464: 285: 223: 2780:

You've been watching her page, too, huh? Wonder what she's planning.

1810: 812: 784: 2947: 753: 2602: 1172:

Great! Happy editing! BTW, a whole new load of stuff has gone into

992:

That was funny! Yeah, I got booted from IRC too. -- I fear that

531:

ummm . . . I think I'll take your advice . . . . Thanks for it!! --

2206:! There's yet another area that needs fattening up on Knowledge. 2638:

He's pretty darn good, isn't he? Which recording do you have?

860:

removing article cleanup tags...without actually cleaning them up

273:

Coincidentally, I just sent you an e-mail about something else.

808:

Thanks for your congratulations and the chats we've had on irc!

2799: 1106:(which is my second suggestion for an article to get started), 715:

Thanks for the heads up. Let me know if she creates any pages.

2471: 553:

Yeah - I got your post . . . all I can say is 'oops' . . . --

2641:

I get those stuck in my head for whole days at a time. :-)

2335:. Seems kind of ridiculous, I think you should unblock him. 1636:

Thank you for your helpful feedback re name clarifications.

337:

some stylistic things. And nice work with the new articles.

2606: 1981: 2209:

The word "division" is interesting in 17th century music.

389: 365:

Thanks Makemi for the post, look forward to Knowledge.

2505:

That time I was a dork and failed to assume good faith

850:

The personal attack that had been left on my talk page

360: 487:

I'll leave my comments on the articles's talk pages.

2327:Wow, so there is an Occitan babel. Check this out: 1654:'tis fix'd. I do believe he belongs in 1680. :-) 467:nomination spent absolute donkey's years (probably 2058:ridiculously local papers, while at the same time 1600:I've posted on the fairy-queen talk page. Cheers, 876:I'm confused about your "third person" comment in 2403:Thanks. Did you slay the Tawkerbot? Well done! - 1336:Deleting Three 6 Mafia Album Covers on 07/25/06: 2237:Are like drawne curtaynes when the play is done, 1823:You make a good point. I'm concerned that I see 2234:Our graves that hide us from the searching Sun, 2231:That sits and markes still who doth act amisse, 1342:I will now join the DARK SIDE of WIKI VANDALISM 1010:Knowledge:Requests_for_adminship/Jake_Remington 878:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Jeffrey Babcock 2074:isn't well enough referenced to pass freaking 2688:a countertenor, just out of interest? Best, 967:. I hope I did it right, as its my first :p 1842:I completely agree with you. I hadn't seen 1249:Very well, then. Thank you for warning me. 453:explaining about the removal of Hippolyta. 1976:(thanks for the thumbs-up, incidentally). 963:Just to let you know, I closed an AfD you 27:This is an archive. Please do not edit it. 2754:The checklist should pop up if you go to 2615:was updated with a fact from the article 2240:Thus march we playing to our latest rest, 1980:Chorus added. I'm gonna change the link ( 1746:. There's now a long, long list of every 1431:Look, if you disagree with me, you could 762:Thanks for contributing to my successful 644:was updated with a fact from the article 2479:Thanks for your invaluable help getting 2284:I need to start keeping a list. LOL... 2243:Onely we dye in earnest, that's no Jest. 2225:When we are drest for this short Comedy, 2222:Our mothers wombes the tyring houses be, 1572:me away. But maybe another day ... ;-) 1118:was first produced, was he not? Cheers, 2228:Heaven the Judicious sharpe spector is, 1867:Makemi, I reverted your copyvio tag on 1315:Hm, I learn more and more about myself 596:i hope i am not doing something wrong. 34:L'Upupa und der Triumph der Sohnesliebe 14: 2469: 751: 577:Fixed presentation now. Thanks a lot! 2946:I think you should check this out... 1988:, but I'll try to get to it. Cheers, 499:It was only a very minor quibble for 139:, who is more like very fine wine... 62:... guess we're not done yet... ;-) 2216:What is our life? a play of passion, 1619:the abrasive and the shrill though. 2413:Couperins, they're like bad pennies 90:Too many composers, too little time 23: 2219:Our mirth the musicke of division, 731:Requesting anonymous editing block 24: 3021: 2824:Myth vs. rumor in Gregorian chant 2594: 2470: 2451: 752: 697:Guess who's trying to come back? 631: 2961:(mostly just looks like code). 2948:Brat32 and his speedy vandalism 2922:That sounds about right to me. 2491: 1844:the talk page edit you refer to 1473:I've left a replied message on 778: 764: 13: 1: 2813: 2808: 2444: 2055:being accused of sockpuppetry 1965:BTW, I've started a stub for 1183:(Oh, and yes, the IP was me). 654:the "Did you know?" talk page 224: 7: 3006:03:17, 17 August 2006 (UTC) 2984:03:05, 17 August 2006 (UTC) 2971:02:19, 17 August 2006 (UTC) 2955:02:15, 17 August 2006 (UTC) 2932:22:47, 16 August 2006 (UTC) 2910:22:32, 16 August 2006 (UTC) 2893:21:17, 16 August 2006 (UTC) 2877:20:25, 16 August 2006 (UTC) 2852:06:28, 16 August 2006 (UTC) 2838:23:53, 13 August 2006 (UTC) 2818:15:33, 18 August 2006 (UTC) 2551:Again, thanks for the tip. 2437: 2173:Removing of protection page 1939:00:24, 20 August 2006 (UTC) 1087:Trobairitz and other things 10: 3026: 2785:14:02, 9 August 2006 (UTC) 2771:18:35, 7 August 2006 (UTC) 2745:10:27, 5 August 2006 (UTC) 2719:10:12, 5 August 2006 (UTC) 2703:21:22, 3 August 2006 (UTC) 2693:21:10, 3 August 2006 (UTC) 2664:01:24, 3 August 2006 (UTC) 2649:01:21, 3 August 2006 (UTC) 2587:19:50, 2 August 2006 (UTC) 2572:23:58, 1 August 2006 (UTC) 2556:23:44, 1 August 2006 (UTC) 2496:19:42, 1 August 2006 (UTC) 2458:18:43, 1 August 2006 (UTC) 2426:08:14, 1 August 2006 (UTC) 2408:05:28, 1 August 2006 (UTC) 2393:02:48, 1 August 2006 (UTC) 2375:02:43, 1 August 2006 (UTC) 2144:Cool, thanks for that. -- 1596:Edit War! (no, not really) 436:Thanks! You're awesome. -- 432:User:Xrblsnggt/monobook.js 290:Ah, I see. Hope it works. 2625:"Did you know?" talk page 2476: 2360:06:19, 31 July 2006 (UTC) 2340:06:13, 31 July 2006 (UTC) 2318:05:26, 31 July 2006 (UTC) 2292:05:23, 30 July 2006 (UTC) 2272:04:58, 30 July 2006 (UTC) 2256:04:30, 30 July 2006 (UTC) 2189:02:30, 30 July 2006 (UTC) 2168:22:56, 29 July 2006 (UTC) 2149:00:45, 30 July 2006 (UTC) 2139:20:59, 29 July 2006 (UTC) 2121:17:21, 29 July 2006 (UTC) 2111:16:38, 29 July 2006 (UTC) 2099:16:20, 29 July 2006 (UTC) 2070:section), and apparently 2045:15:51, 29 July 2006 (UTC) 2031:13:12, 29 July 2006 (UTC) 2021:07:58, 29 July 2006 (UTC) 1998:17:24, 28 July 2006 (UTC) 1974:14:28, 27 July 2006 (UTC) 1922:21:27, 28 July 2006 (UTC) 1913:17:08, 28 July 2006 (UTC) 1890:13:52, 27 July 2006 (UTC) 1876:13:47, 27 July 2006 (UTC) 1851:10:03, 27 July 2006 (UTC) 1838:09:31, 27 July 2006 (UTC) 1819:09:27, 27 July 2006 (UTC) 1803:08:48, 27 July 2006 (UTC) 1787:08:35, 27 July 2006 (UTC) 1771:07:45, 27 July 2006 (UTC) 1755:07:40, 27 July 2006 (UTC) 1726:04:54, 27 July 2006 (UTC) 1700:04:51, 27 July 2006 (UTC) 1680:04:50, 27 July 2006 (UTC) 1662:04:35, 27 July 2006 (UTC) 1627:02:15, 27 July 2006 (UTC) 1605:18:43, 26 July 2006 (UTC) 1590:08:04, 26 July 2006 (UTC) 1580:23:29, 25 July 2006 (UTC) 1561:01:25, 26 July 2006 (UTC) 1548:19:21, 25 July 2006 (UTC) 1529:19:28, 25 July 2006 (UTC) 1516:19:20, 25 July 2006 (UTC) 1500:19:10, 25 July 2006 (UTC) 1482:07:44, 25 July 2006 (UTC) 1468:07:31, 25 July 2006 (UTC) 1446:18:02, 25 July 2006 (UTC) 1420:12:13, 25 July 2006 (UTC) 1405:05:56, 25 July 2006 (UTC) 1382:05:47, 25 July 2006 (UTC) 1365:05:36, 25 July 2006 (UTC) 1349:05:22, 25 July 2006 (UTC) 1326:03:21, 25 July 2006 (UTC) 1310:18:41, 23 July 2006 (UTC) 1293:16:35, 23 July 2006 (UTC) 1278:15:47, 23 July 2006 (UTC) 1269:13:42, 23 July 2006 (UTC) 1254:07:03, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 1237:06:10, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 1181:21:43, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 1168:23:01, 21 July 2006 (UTC) 1123:19:08, 21 July 2006 (UTC) 1082:18:21, 21 July 2006 (UTC) 1067:18:16, 21 July 2006 (UTC) 1052:03:13, 21 July 2006 (UTC) 1039:00:21, 21 July 2006 (UTC) 1020:23:03, 20 July 2006 (UTC) 1004:05:23, 20 July 2006 (UTC) 982:05:05, 20 July 2006 (UTC) 972:05:05, 20 July 2006 (UTC) 953:03:34, 20 July 2006 (UTC) 908:03:42, 20 July 2006 (UTC) 892:03:30, 20 July 2006 (UTC) 867:10:43, 19 July 2006 (UTC) 845:05:43, 19 July 2006 (UTC) 827:00:32, 19 July 2006 (UTC) 800:00:32, 19 July 2006 (UTC) 758: 740:21:11, 18 July 2006 (UTC) 725:21:17, 18 July 2006 (UTC) 710:01:31, 17 July 2006 (UTC) 692:08:13, 16 July 2006 (UTC) 678:10:19, 15 July 2006 (UTC) 648:Margherita Gonzaga d'Este 616:03:27, 15 July 2006 (UTC) 604:03:20, 15 July 2006 (UTC) 582:23:27, 14 July 2006 (UTC) 572:23:10, 14 July 2006 (UTC) 563:Margherita Gonzaga d'Este 558:16:47, 13 July 2006 (UTC) 549:16:36, 13 July 2006 (UTC) 536:16:26, 13 July 2006 (UTC) 522:21:41, 12 July 2006 (UTC) 508:18:37, 13 July 2006 (UTC) 492:18:43, 12 July 2006 (UTC) 482:18:00, 12 July 2006 (UTC) 458:17:11, 12 July 2006 (UTC) 441:03:57, 12 July 2006 (UTC) 426:19:29, 11 July 2006 (UTC) 416:19:13, 11 July 2006 (UTC) 356:04:00, 11 July 2006 (UTC) 342:05:51, 10 July 2006 (UTC) 325:04:10, 10 July 2006 (UTC) 295:01:37, 10 July 2006 (UTC) 251:Category:Cleanup by month 2080:List of clichés in music 281:19:12, 9 July 2006 (UTC) 263:03:43, 9 July 2006 (UTC) 245:Just so you know, the {{ 236:19:24, 8 July 2006 (UTC) 198:17:54, 8 July 2006 (UTC) 176:15:26, 8 July 2006 (UTC) 165:10:49, 8 July 2006 (UTC) 147:03:52, 6 July 2006 (UTC) 127:03:37, 6 July 2006 (UTC) 105:00:50, 6 July 2006 (UTC) 85:14:16, 4 July 2006 (UTC) 70:04:07, 4 July 2006 (UTC) 45:16:04, 3 July 2006 (UTC) 1869:William Wells (general) 1863:William Wells (general) 1176:- take a look! Cheers, 745:Music Cabal RfA Thanks! 54:Yikes! No articles on 2756:User:AndyZ/Suggestions 2004:I hope you are okay... 313:(or, for that matter, 2419:Armand-Louis Couperin 2159:Thanks, Makemi. Yes, 220:User talk:Jimbo Wales 2867:Banquet of Chestnuts 2857:The dramatic version 2831:Talk:Gregorian chant 2734:Concerto delle donne 2709:Thanks for your note 2163:. My careless slip. 2161:basses fondamentales 1744:French lyric tragedy 1643:Why 1772 birth date? 836:Your welcome message 155:Muddle of the Médées 2996:No problem at all. 2311:Understanding Music 2195:Division viol, and 2012:. Feel better... -- 1748:tragédie en musique 1738:Tragédie en musique 1553:Thank you! Done! -- 331:Médée (Charpentier) 311:Antoine de Bertrand 232:Leave me a message! 206:A barnstar for you! 2736:. One request; if 2333:User talk:Cedric31 2297:BM & A Chantar 2277:Further amusements 2155:Fondamentale error 555:Josh, user:POLLUX 546:Josh, user:POLLUX 533:Josh, user:POLLUX 519:Josh, user:POLLUX 2863:Pope Clement VIII 2634:the divine Claude 2631: 2630: 2539: 2525:comment added by 2502: 2501: 2197:Sir Walter Ralegh 1219: 1205:comment added by 1192:phoenix w/e it is 959:Closed a deletion 939: 925:comment added by 805: 804: 660: 659: 588:List of Bagpipers 386: 372:comment added by 3017: 3003: 2968: 2929: 2890: 2815: 2810: 2661: 2598: 2591: 2590: 2538: 2519: 2498: 2474: 2467: 2466: 2455: 2448: 2441: 2372: 2357: 2329:Category:User oc 2096: 1995: 1986:The Indian Queen 1967:The Indian Queen 1910: 1835: 1800: 1768: 1723: 1677: 1513: 1443: 1417:Silent2thebizzob 1402: 1362: 1283:Fairy-Queen refs 1234: 1218: 1199: 1165: 979:SynergeticMaggot 969:SynergeticMaggot 950: 938: 919: 821: 815: 796: 793: 787: 780: 766: 756: 749: 748: 722: 675: 670: 635: 628: 627: 385: 366: 228: 218:of the troll at 18:User talk:Makemi 3025: 3024: 3020: 3019: 3018: 3016: 3015: 3014: 3001: 2966: 2944: 2927: 2888: 2869:). Nice job! 2859: 2845: 2826: 2792: 2778: 2769: 2752: 2738:The Fairy-Queen 2726: 2711: 2674: 2659: 2636: 2580: 2564: 2545: 2520: 2507: 2481:Gregorian chant 2465: 2433: 2415: 2401: 2370: 2355: 2325: 2299: 2279: 2265: 2200: 2175: 2157: 2131: 2094: 2068:further reading 2066:section into a 2006: 1993: 1951: 1908: 1865: 1833: 1798: 1779: 1766: 1740: 1721: 1675: 1645: 1634: 1632:Loeillet family 1612: 1598: 1569: 1540: 1511: 1490: 1460: 1441: 1400: 1391:and the actual 1360: 1334: 1332:DELETe yourself 1300: 1285: 1262: 1247: 1232: 1200: 1194: 1174:The Fairy-Queen 1163: 1116:Dido and Aeneas 1112:The Fairy-Queen 1089: 1074: 1060: 1028: 990: 961: 948: 920: 915: 874: 856:Fair use images 852: 838: 819: 813: 791: 785: 782: 747: 733: 720: 699: 685: 673: 664: 626: 590: 565: 529: 515: 450: 447:The Fairy-Queen 434: 408: 392: 367: 363: 349: 334: 307:Claude Goudimel 302: 288: 270: 243: 208: 157: 137:Nicolas Gombert 113:musique mesurée 92: 77: 60:rondeau (music) 52: 38: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3023: 3013: 3012: 3011: 3010: 3009: 3008: 2989: 2988: 2987: 2986: 2974: 2973: 2943: 2940: 2939: 2938: 2937: 2936: 2935: 2934: 2915: 2914: 2913: 2912: 2896: 2895: 2858: 2855: 2844: 2841: 2825: 2822: 2821: 2820: 2791: 2788: 2777: 2774: 2765: 2751: 2748: 2725: 2722: 2710: 2707: 2706: 2705: 2673: 2668: 2667: 2666: 2635: 2632: 2629: 2628: 2599: 2579: 2576: 2563: 2560: 2544: 2541: 2506: 2503: 2500: 2499: 2488: 2487: 2485: 2477: 2475: 2464: 2461: 2432: 2429: 2414: 2411: 2400: 2397: 2396: 2395: 2363: 2362: 2324: 2321: 2298: 2295: 2278: 2275: 2264: 2259: 2245: 2244: 2241: 2238: 2235: 2232: 2229: 2226: 2223: 2220: 2217: 2199: 2193: 2174: 2171: 2156: 2153: 2152: 2151: 2130: 2127: 2126: 2125: 2124: 2123: 2103: 2102: 2101: 2048: 2047: 2034: 2033: 2005: 2002: 2001: 2000: 1959: 1958: 1950: 1947: 1946: 1945: 1944: 1943: 1942: 1941: 1915: 1883:Lewis A. Grant 1864: 1861: 1860: 1859: 1858: 1857: 1856: 1855: 1854: 1853: 1778: 1775: 1774: 1773: 1739: 1736: 1735: 1734: 1733: 1732: 1731: 1730: 1729: 1728: 1707: 1706: 1705: 1704: 1703: 1702: 1685: 1684: 1683: 1682: 1665: 1664: 1644: 1641: 1633: 1630: 1614:You nominated 1611: 1608: 1597: 1594: 1593: 1592: 1568: 1565: 1564: 1563: 1539: 1536: 1535: 1534: 1533: 1532: 1519: 1518: 1489: 1486: 1485: 1484: 1459: 1456: 1455: 1454: 1453: 1452: 1451: 1450: 1449: 1448: 1412: 1411: 1410: 1409: 1408: 1407: 1333: 1330: 1329: 1328: 1299: 1296: 1284: 1281: 1261: 1258: 1246: 1243: 1242: 1241: 1240: 1239: 1221: 1220: 1193: 1190: 1189: 1188: 1187: 1186: 1185: 1184: 1149: 1148: 1147: 1146: 1126: 1125: 1088: 1085: 1073: 1070: 1059: 1056: 1055: 1054: 1027: 1024: 1023: 1022: 989: 986: 985: 984: 960: 957: 956: 955: 914: 911: 873: 870: 851: 848: 837: 834: 832: 830: 829: 803: 802: 776: 774: 770: 769: 759: 757: 746: 743: 732: 729: 728: 727: 698: 695: 684: 681: 658: 657: 636: 625: 622: 621: 620: 619: 618: 589: 586: 585: 584: 564: 561: 528: 525: 514: 511: 485: 484: 449: 444: 433: 430: 429: 428: 407: 404: 391: 388: 362: 359: 348: 345: 333: 328: 301: 298: 287: 284: 269: 266: 242: 239: 207: 204: 203: 202: 201: 200: 188: 187: 186: 185: 179: 178: 156: 153: 152: 151: 150: 149: 130: 129: 91: 88: 76: 73: 51: 48: 37: 30: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3022: 3007: 3004: 2999: 2995: 2994: 2993: 2992: 2991: 2990: 2985: 2982: 2978: 2977: 2976: 2975: 2972: 2969: 2964: 2959: 2958: 2957: 2956: 2953: 2949: 2933: 2930: 2925: 2921: 2920: 2919: 2918: 2917: 2916: 2911: 2908: 2905: 2900: 2899: 2898: 2897: 2894: 2891: 2886: 2881: 2880: 2879: 2878: 2875: 2872: 2868: 2864: 2854: 2853: 2850: 2840: 2839: 2836: 2832: 2819: 2816: 2811: 2805: 2804: 2803: 2801: 2797: 2796:Fredil Yupigo 2787: 2786: 2783: 2773: 2772: 2768: 2764: 2759: 2757: 2747: 2746: 2743: 2739: 2735: 2731: 2721: 2720: 2717: 2704: 2701: 2697: 2696: 2695: 2694: 2691: 2687: 2683: 2678: 2672: 2665: 2662: 2657: 2653: 2652: 2651: 2650: 2647: 2644: 2639: 2626: 2622: 2621: 2620: 2619:division viol 2614: 2613: 2612:Did you know? 2608: 2604: 2600: 2597: 2593: 2592: 2589: 2588: 2585: 2575: 2573: 2570: 2559: 2557: 2554: 2549: 2543:Wikietiquette 2540: 2536: 2532: 2528: 2524: 2515: 2511: 2497: 2494: 2490: 2489: 2486: 2483:to FA status! 2482: 2478: 2473: 2468: 2460: 2459: 2456: 2454: 2449: 2447: 2442: 2440: 2428: 2427: 2424: 2420: 2410: 2409: 2406: 2394: 2391: 2388: 2383: 2379: 2378: 2377: 2376: 2373: 2368: 2361: 2358: 2353: 2349: 2344: 2343: 2342: 2341: 2338: 2334: 2330: 2320: 2319: 2316: 2312: 2308: 2303: 2294: 2293: 2290: 2287: 2283: 2274: 2273: 2270: 2263: 2258: 2257: 2254: 2251: 2242: 2239: 2236: 2233: 2230: 2227: 2224: 2221: 2218: 2215: 2214: 2213: 2210: 2207: 2205: 2204:division viol 2202:Nice work on 2198: 2192: 2191: 2190: 2187: 2184: 2181: 2170: 2169: 2166: 2162: 2150: 2147: 2143: 2142: 2141: 2140: 2137: 2122: 2119: 2114: 2113: 2112: 2109: 2104: 2100: 2097: 2092: 2086: 2081: 2077: 2073: 2069: 2065: 2061: 2056: 2052: 2051: 2050: 2049: 2046: 2043: 2040: 2036: 2035: 2032: 2029: 2025: 2024: 2023: 2022: 2019: 2015: 2011: 1999: 1996: 1991: 1987: 1983: 1979: 1978: 1977: 1975: 1972: 1968: 1963: 1956: 1955: 1954: 1940: 1936: 1935: 1930: 1925: 1924: 1923: 1920: 1916: 1914: 1911: 1906: 1902: 1898: 1893: 1892: 1891: 1888: 1884: 1880: 1879: 1878: 1877: 1874: 1870: 1852: 1849: 1845: 1841: 1840: 1839: 1836: 1831: 1826: 1822: 1821: 1820: 1817: 1813: 1812: 1806: 1805: 1804: 1801: 1796: 1791: 1790: 1789: 1788: 1785: 1772: 1769: 1764: 1759: 1758: 1757: 1756: 1753: 1749: 1745: 1727: 1724: 1719: 1715: 1714: 1713: 1712: 1711: 1710: 1709: 1708: 1701: 1698: 1695: 1691: 1690: 1689: 1688: 1687: 1686: 1681: 1678: 1673: 1669: 1668: 1667: 1666: 1663: 1660: 1657: 1653: 1652: 1651: 1650: 1640: 1639: 1629: 1628: 1625: 1622: 1617: 1607: 1606: 1603: 1591: 1588: 1584: 1583: 1582: 1581: 1578: 1575: 1562: 1559: 1556: 1552: 1551: 1550: 1549: 1546: 1530: 1527: 1523: 1522: 1521: 1520: 1517: 1514: 1509: 1504: 1503: 1502: 1501: 1498: 1493: 1483: 1480: 1476: 1472: 1471: 1470: 1469: 1466: 1447: 1444: 1439: 1434: 1430: 1429: 1428: 1427: 1426: 1425: 1424: 1423: 1422: 1421: 1418: 1406: 1403: 1398: 1394: 1389: 1385: 1384: 1383: 1380: 1376: 1372: 1368: 1367: 1366: 1363: 1358: 1353: 1352: 1351: 1350: 1347: 1346:70.158.122.66 1343: 1337: 1327: 1324: 1321: 1317: 1314: 1313: 1312: 1311: 1308: 1305: 1295: 1294: 1291: 1280: 1279: 1276: 1271: 1270: 1267: 1257: 1255: 1252: 1238: 1235: 1230: 1225: 1224: 1223: 1222: 1216: 1212: 1208: 1204: 1196: 1195: 1182: 1179: 1175: 1171: 1170: 1169: 1166: 1161: 1157: 1153: 1152: 1151: 1150: 1143: 1139: 1135: 1130: 1129: 1128: 1127: 1124: 1121: 1117: 1113: 1109: 1105: 1101: 1100:Josias Priest 1098: 1097: 1096: 1093: 1084: 1083: 1080: 1069: 1068: 1065: 1053: 1050: 1047: 1043: 1042: 1041: 1040: 1037: 1034: 1021: 1018: 1015: 1011: 1008: 1007: 1006: 1005: 1002: 999: 995: 983: 980: 976: 975: 974: 973: 970: 966: 954: 951: 946: 942: 941: 940: 936: 932: 928: 924: 910: 909: 905: 901: 900: 894: 893: 889: 885: 884: 879: 872:Third person? 869: 868: 865: 861: 857: 847: 846: 843: 833: 828: 825: 824: 822: 816: 807: 806: 801: 798: 797: 794: 788: 772: 771: 768: 767: 760: 755: 750: 742: 741: 738: 726: 723: 718: 714: 713: 712: 711: 708: 704: 694: 693: 690: 680: 679: 676: 671: 668: 655: 651: 650: 649: 643: 642: 641:Did you know? 637: 634: 630: 629: 617: 614: 610: 609: 608: 607: 606: 605: 602: 599:please advise 597: 594: 583: 580: 576: 575: 574: 573: 570: 560: 559: 556: 551: 550: 547: 543: 538: 537: 534: 524: 523: 520: 510: 509: 506: 502: 497: 494: 493: 490: 483: 480: 475: 470: 466: 462: 461: 460: 459: 456: 448: 443: 442: 439: 427: 424: 420: 419: 418: 417: 414: 403: 402: 399: 395: 387: 383: 379: 375: 371: 358: 357: 354: 344: 343: 340: 332: 327: 326: 323: 320: 316: 312: 308: 297: 296: 293: 283: 282: 279: 276: 265: 264: 260: 256: 252: 248: 238: 237: 233: 229: 227: 221: 217: 213: 199: 196: 192: 191: 190: 189: 183: 182: 181: 180: 177: 174: 169: 168: 167: 166: 163: 148: 145: 142: 138: 134: 133: 132: 131: 128: 125: 122: 118: 114: 109: 108: 107: 106: 103: 100: 95: 87: 86: 83: 75:Minor trouble 72: 71: 68: 65: 61: 57: 47: 46: 43: 36: 35: 29: 28: 19: 2945: 2860: 2846: 2827: 2793: 2779: 2760: 2753: 2737: 2733: 2729: 2727: 2712: 2685: 2681: 2679: 2675: 2670: 2640: 2637: 2617: 2616: 2610: 2581: 2565: 2550: 2546: 2516: 2512: 2508: 2484: 2452: 2445: 2438: 2434: 2416: 2402: 2364: 2326: 2310: 2306: 2304: 2300: 2280: 2266: 2246: 2211: 2208: 2201: 2178: 2176: 2160: 2158: 2132: 2084: 2063: 2060:Philip Glass 2007: 1985: 1964: 1960: 1957:SATB Chorus? 1952: 1933: 1919:Scott Mingus 1896: 1887:Scott Mingus 1873:Scott Mingus 1866: 1824: 1809: 1780: 1747: 1741: 1646: 1635: 1613: 1599: 1570: 1541: 1494: 1491: 1475:my talk page 1461: 1413: 1392: 1387: 1341: 1338: 1335: 1301: 1286: 1272: 1263: 1248: 1207:72.74.11.221 1155: 1141: 1140:wrote about 1137: 1094: 1090: 1075: 1061: 1029: 994:astroturfing 991: 962: 943:No problem. 927:Derekdorephd 916: 897: 895: 881: 875: 859: 855: 853: 842:Chuchunezumi 839: 831: 810: 809: 781: 777: 761: 734: 700: 686: 666: 661: 646: 645: 639: 638:On July 15, 598: 595: 591: 566: 552: 539: 530: 516: 500: 498: 495: 486: 473: 468: 451: 435: 409: 396: 393: 364: 350: 335: 315:Anna Guarini 303: 289: 271: 247:cleanup-date 244: 241:Clean up tag 225: 209: 158: 116: 112: 93: 78: 56:formes fixes 53: 39: 32: 26: 25: 2790:Slowcheetah 2578:Peer review 2521:—Preceding 2423:MarkBuckles 2337:MarkBuckles 2315:MarkBuckles 2269:MarkBuckles 2146:MarkBuckles 2136:MarkBuckles 1538:Re:Username 1479:ADNghiem501 1465:Betacommand 1379:MarkBuckles 1371:The Beatles 1201:—Preceding 1142:fin' amours 1108:King Arthur 1058:Minor edits 988:The letters 921:—Preceding 737:86.57.13.43 513:A Thank You 368:—Preceding 339:MarkBuckles 292:Herostratus 2904:Antandrus 2871:Antandrus 2730:Trobairitz 2643:Antandrus 2574:uvaphdman 2558:uvaphdman 2387:Antandrus 2380:It's that 2348:User:Curps 2305:Regarding 2286:Antandrus 2262:Trobairitz 2250:Antandrus 2072:Trobairitz 2064:references 2039:Antandrus 2010:contact me 1901:plagiarism 1694:Antandrus 1656:Antandrus 1621:Antandrus 1616:Anne Frank 1574:Antandrus 1555:Al Pereira 1545:Al pereira 1477:, too. -- 1375:Pink Floyd 1320:Antandrus 1304:Antandrus 1156:Dioclesian 1138:trobairitz 1104:Dioclesian 1046:Antandrus 1033:Antandrus 1014:Antandrus 998:Antandrus 701:Check out 527:Re: My RfA 465:Pro Milone 319:Antandrus 275:Antandrus 255:Ricky81682 141:Antandrus 121:Antandrus 115:). And I 99:Antandrus 64:Antandrus 2981:Eiyuu Kou 2952:Eiyuu Kou 2849:Peirigill 2843:Luzzaschi 2835:Peirigill 2776:Christina 2724:Wikibreak 2716:Kleinzach 2569:uvaphdman 2562:Beethoven 2553:uvaphdman 2527:Uvaphdman 2493:Peirigill 2405:Kleinzach 2307:A Chantar 1811:Carrousel 1318:. Heh. 1260:Technical 1134:this edit 1079:Peirigill 1064:Peirigill 1012:. LOL. 913:Thank you 864:Fair Deal 703:this edit 683:Thank you 438:Xrblsnggt 406:Vandalism 374:Istheway2 195:Kleinzach 173:Kleinzach 162:Kleinzach 42:Kleinzach 2800:Vacation 2782:Fan-1967 2742:Moreschi 2700:Moreschi 2690:Moreschi 2671:Concerto 2603:3 August 2584:Moreschi 2535:contribs 2523:unsigned 2118:Moreschi 2108:Moreschi 2028:Moreschi 1971:Moreschi 1784:Bluewave 1752:Folantin 1649:Dogru144 1638:Dogru144 1602:Moreschi 1587:Moreschi 1567:Bruckner 1526:Moreschi 1497:Moreschi 1290:Moreschi 1275:Moreschi 1266:Moreschi 1256:Crisspy 1215:contribs 1203:unsigned 1178:Moreschi 1145:clearer. 1120:Moreschi 935:contribs 923:unsigned 707:Fan-1967 505:Moreschi 501:Concerto 489:Moreschi 479:Moreschi 455:Moreschi 423:Moreschi 413:Moreschi 382:contribs 370:unsigned 82:Moreschi 2942:Concern 2750:Scripts 2463:Thanks! 2431:Apology 2323:Occitan 2165:Noetica 1949:Chorus? 1777:Britten 1251:Crisspy 965:deleted 811:~Kylu ( 783:~Kylu ( 579:Circeus 569:Circeus 353:Crossmr 300:Thanks! 212:removal 50:Missing 3002:(talk) 2967:(talk) 2928:(talk) 2907:(talk) 2889:(talk) 2874:(talk) 2814:Yupigo 2809:Fredil 2798:is on 2660:(talk) 2646:(talk) 2399:Thanks 2390:(talk) 2371:(talk) 2356:(talk) 2289:(talk) 2253:(talk) 2180:Velair 2095:(talk) 2042:(talk) 1994:(talk) 1929:Centrx 1909:(talk) 1897:source 1834:(talk) 1799:(talk) 1767:(talk) 1722:(talk) 1697:(talk) 1676:(talk) 1659:(talk) 1624:(talk) 1577:(talk) 1558:(talk) 1512:(talk) 1488:Whoops 1458:My Bot 1442:(talk) 1433:Revert 1401:(talk) 1361:(talk) 1340:time. 1323:(talk) 1307:(talk) 1233:(talk) 1164:(talk) 1110:, and 1049:(talk) 1036:(talk) 1017:(talk) 1001:(talk) 949:(talk) 899:C.Fred 883:C.Fred 721:(talk) 665:Cactus 474:Milone 401:(talk) 398:Dybryd 390:Thanks 361:Thanks 347:repost 322:(talk) 278:(talk) 144:(talk) 124:(talk) 117:really 102:(talk) 67:(talk) 2682:et al 2365:foo. 1848:Hoary 1816:Hoary 1393:image 1298:Grove 1072:Grove 268:Ah... 253:. -- 226:EWS23 216:block 16:< 2732:and 2607:2006 2531:talk 2129:Dude 1982:SATB 1934:talk 1610:ZOMG 1388:only 1373:and 1245:Okay 1211:talk 931:talk 904:talk 888:talk 765:RfA! 542:this 469:over 378:talk 259:talk 214:and 2998:Mak 2963:Mak 2924:Mak 2885:Mak 2758:. 2686:you 2656:Mak 2601:On 2382:kid 2367:Mak 2352:Mak 2183:Wig 2091:Mak 2085:and 1990:Mak 1905:Mak 1830:Mak 1825:one 1795:Mak 1763:Mak 1718:Mak 1672:Mak 1508:Mak 1438:Mak 1397:Mak 1357:Mak 1229:Mak 1160:Mak 1026:AMS 945:Mak 717:Mak 689:RCS 669:man 624:DYK 613:joe 601:joe 540:Is 309:or 2950:-- 2802:. 2763:AZ 2627:. 2609:, 2605:, 2537:) 2533:• 2453:un 2446:in 2421:. 2186:ht 2076:GA 2016:| 2014:SB 1937:• 1903:. 1543:-- 1217:) 1213:• 937:) 933:• 906:) 890:) 858:, 823:) 779:♥! 662:-- 656:. 384:) 380:• 286:Ah 261:) 234:) 58:, 2767:t 2529:( 2439:M 2018:T 1931:→ 1209:( 929:( 902:( 886:( 820:t 817:| 814:u 795:) 792:t 789:| 786:u 674:✍ 667:. 376:( 257:( 230:( 111:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index