1130:
472:
211:
1571:. Now I have read both these project pages and am no closer to understanding why it's there. Overcrowding? It's the only block element in the article besides the infobox. Just because the average song article shouldn't have album artwork on it just by dint of it being on the album, doesn't mean when there is a connection to be discussed that it shouldn't be there. Taking away the image make the article no better, no more legal and in fact harder to follow. So why?
2191:
1528:. I don't want to waste a bunch of time edit warring with him again, so I'm instead going to try a new tactic. I'd like to get as many NBA editors as possible together on this, so that we can make a single unified push to the appropriate admins. I am at a loss for other tactics we can use to avoid his continued attempts to push his agenda and his unwillingness to compromise. Please contact me at
1778:. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Knowledge's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
141:. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Knowledge's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
863:
different from pre-screenings. I have no idea how accurate that is, but his actions were clearly based on reason rather than a deliberate attempt to damage the encyclopedia (i.e. 'vandalism'). Further, you violated 3RR in your edit war with him. That is itself a blockable offense... and blocking someone while engaged in a content dispute with them is one of the
1100:. People are continually taking spoilers out of it to be newbie-friendly, or for whatever reason, but that's not how it should be done. You get your point across much better than I do, you've had to argue a similar point before, and you're a VM fan, so I think you can sort it out better than I can. Leave me a message either way. --
1986:
appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.". I know if you hit edit you can see the markup, but I'm pretty sure no one does this. I couldn't find any template, nor could I find it on the AFD page. So what's the template?
1845:
What I referred to was that if events such as the winners of the NBA are to be included should say
Chelsea winning the Premiership or Liverpool winning the FA Cup be included to? Show me the edition where that happened. World and inter-continental champions fine but not national, it simple not world news.
1400:. Last I checked, there's never been a precedent of posting indvidual scores of games in Best-of-7 championship series, whether it was the World Series, NBA Finals, or Stanley Cups. I can see that you're from Edmonton, but you shouldn't let your personal biases get in the way of editing on Knowledge. --
1487:
protect the image in the version it is right now. As I have pointed out on it's talk page, the copyright for the current image - peach suit and "busy background" - is not licensed correctly (you should have read that on the discussion page). Please unlock and revert yourself or let me know once it is
1159:
status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on
Knowledge (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to
835:
Nice trying to accuse me of vandalism when I have already stated the reason for removing the statement. I didn't remove a section, I removed a statement, so you can atleast get that straight. Also, try providing the direct link to Rotten's verifiability, because the page you listed doesn't talk about
501:
status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on
Knowledge (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to
240:
status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on
Knowledge (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to
47:
for someone to know that the text was taken from wikipedia, as you didn't leave your note on the talk page until you recreated the article . . . I am always as careful as possible not to delete pages unnecessarily; following up on notes on the talk page, deleting and then restoring a version without
1844:
Well I knew that the
Champions League Final had been included and did research. The Cricket World Cup as I said should be included as it a World Championship. The Heiniken Cup and the Champions League I didn't actually mention and they should have been included being inter-continental Championships.
2109:
I hope we don't need to see this go wrong. I don't want lies and incorrect information on the Zelda pages. That's just a thing of me, and I don't want to see that being rediculously vandalized by people who don't know what they're talking about and do nothing but annoy, vandalize and delete, rather
1825:
page? Most of the info comes from the pages of the referenced artists. I agree the "notable piano rockers..." section is a little bit subjective and has expanded from its original list - the beauty of wikip I guess. Originally I got the notable artists from allmusic.com - would this be enough of a
836:
Juggernaut. Also, pay attention to the Talk Page, but you were out voted when it comes to waiting until Friday to post the bit of trivia. By adding the continuously, after it has been agreed upon that it should wait till it can be verified by the movie itself, you are in fact vandalizing the page.
31:
the page had been marked as a copyvio for three weeks, and as coldplaying.com states nowhere that they took the text from wikipedia but instead says that the site is copyrighted by them, what else should i have done in that situation? after almost a month, nobody had done a thing to make it clear
2106:
Besides the fact that not everything, like media, can be added to the articles, WikiPedia wants it's sources cited, thus should they be. And most certainly when links like IGN are all over the place, there needs to be sources that correct them. On both Tingle RPG and
Twilight Princess, two of the
862:
Madchester, I'm going to unblock
Bignole. I understand that you feel this information is sufficiently verified for inclusion, but that does not make its removal by those who feel otherwise 'vandalism'. Bignole was clearly operating based on his belief that the official theatrical release could be
568:
could you please explain to me what your reasons are for deleting my report on the aaron donahue article. the greatest concern about the aaron article in the first place was that he wasnt sourched and not notable enough. so i took the time to write why i believe he is. this has nothing to do with
1985:
Hey
Madchester. Knowing the your an admin and the you probably close debates sometimes, what is the code the makes a gray box and says "The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the
867:
few things admins are specifically precluded from doing. Please, let's all take a step back and find some way to resolve this peacefully. Waiting three days seemed like a reasonable compromise, but failing that... it ought to be possible to say something like, 'While the movie has not officially
2034:
Hi there. I'm a user with an interest in
Transformers and was wondering why many articles had been cited as unsourced. I can't see anything that would be classed as needing a source (apart from the odd tech spec). Maybe I just can't see it but if you could post what it is occuring across these
1459:
These daily reversions for and against the World Cup scores are getting rather ridiculous. The fact is both sides have valid arguments, and you can't really say that one side is more "correct" than one another. Personally I don't like how editors are taking sides when these edit wars are not
620:
In regards to your sockpuppet warning, I also believe 67.101.128.103, 67.100.49.172, 67.101.128.6, and just about every IP in the 67.*.*.* range in the edit history of the Da Vinci Code is the same guy. But not in 66.*.*.* range, those are likely User:Rodgerbales, who I have talked to and has
1685:
If I were uncivil, I'd be saying much worse things about you. I'm not really sure why you're so insistent about removing things like noting that the models cited their modeling career for not going through with the head shaving, or why you're wanting to draw your little line in the sand over
1942:
What part of copyright is violated by mentioning a tech spoec number? I can understand it's not good to mention the whole text of the Tech Spec, but the 8 numbers? If I say starscream has 77979877 or somesuch, is that a violation? I didn't think anyone could copyright an 8 digit number - so
1552:
twice. Can I assume you just didn't read the rest of the article? It discusses the album, in particular the artwork, and its connection to the single. This makes it fair use, for the purpose of illustrating the discussed record. It's an essential illustration for the article to make sense.
846:
Again I would suggest reviewing the sources provided; which have in turn also been referenced by RottenTomatoes, more or less the internet standard in film reviews. It is a poor-faith deletion to remove information independently verified by multiple reviewers on separate websites.
1888:
The user's been removing multiple tags raning from PROD warnings to {{unsourced}} ones on multiple TF pages. Just before your series of comments on his talk page, he had also removed a series of image licensing warnings as well as my earlier tag removal warnings on his talk page.
817:
it's very difficult to remove a block, if I don't know your friend's IP address. I've been working on a rash of vandalism patrols lately and I don't want to release an IP used by a blocked vandal editor.... I don't want to release the IP addresses of such editors prematurely.
2373:
Yes, I just looked at this. I was not aware of this policy, although it does seem rather petty, particularly as words can be wikified. As an alternative, however, I shall find external links that display the lyrics in full, without any complaints from the copyright holder.
2340:), the site was non-notable (low Google search relevance) and there was votespamming from anonymous users to keep the site up. When regular editors vote for deletion and a host of anonymous first-timers vote to keep it, the notability of the site is seriously in doubt. --
1410:
It wasn't a point. And what does that have to do with you using rollback? To answer your question: the round robins of the World Cup games surely cannot be that much more important than the games of a
Stanley Cup final. And I don't even see how adding scores to a template
362:, I also believe that this deserves to stay on Knowledge. Everything here (aside from the 'made up one day in school' type articles, which I can't remember the accurate name of), in my mind, deserves to stay, as, if it happened, it should be in an encyclopedia.
328:
yielded a near unanminous decision to delete the article. I didn't vote in the poll, I simply reviewed the votes and opinions to close the poll and delete the article. Once again, if you believe that the article is worthy of un-deletion, then submit it to
1204:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on
546:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on
285:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on
1689:
One thing you might want to keep in mind, when deleting people's material because they're unable to offer you things like episode numbers when I've yet to see a similar demand for episode numbers in response to any other edit, is that just because
1740:
I've already indicated my intent not to engage with you and I have no interest in seeing your messages on my talk page or anywhere else. I am attempting to "agree to disagree" here, so, with all due respect and all possible civility, step off.
669:
Well, this doesn't matter now. Hganesan decided to personally attack another contributor, so I have restarted the 48 hour block from scratch. The block probably should have been longer, but it probably won't matter. Thanks anyway.
1580:
The guidelines indicate that (song) articles should not be crowded with excessive photos. The Knights of Cydonia article only contains one written section with less than 500 words. It's impractical per the guidelines above (and
32:
that the page wasn't a copyvio, and the deletion was done according to policy. the other "complaint" was not a complaint, but a question, as the user leaving the comment had no familiarity with wikipedia copyright policy and was
653:
for an extra 48 hours. The way I understand the blocking mechanism, since you blocked for a longer length while the previous block was active, it won't take effect. You have to unblock and then reblock for the desired length.
572:
in other words i am trying to sourch him, and provide a list of his accomplishments. if i cant get this through the wiki board, i will have to wait for aarons book to come out before i start another page on him.
1610:
despite having no relevance to the song except that it appeared on that album. Its only real value is to add a little instant context in the huge mass of text. To me it puts the discussed image in perspective.
1659:" for appropriate usage of additional photos in music-related articles. These articles are over 1500 words in length and the images provide appropriate breaks to the text and provide complimentary information.
1923:
has just modified some of your cleanup templates. I just figured I would tell you... {{Cleanup|MONTH YEAR}} is not a valid template. Use {{Cleanup-date|MONTH YEAR}}. Just figured that I would tell you.
1297:
2262:
1317:
886:
Yes, I saw that you had edited the text to use 'early reports indicate' wording similar to what I suggested above. I think that makes sense. Hopefully it will be good enough for everyone until Friday. --
708:
mentioned above. The pages and selections edited, comments and styles are essentially the same. The username and a number of IPs were blocked on May 19 and he seems to have found a new IP. I have added
1686:
including the "Frankenberry" nickname but if it makes you feel better to leave it out then by all means I hope you're satisfied, since I have no intention of getting into an edit war with you over it.
1874:, it is not a fix this article or it gets deleted process. In my understanding if someone removes the tag and it is still felt that the article should be deleted then it should go through the normal
581:
Why do you keep following ed dames, i know your one of his lackies. i keep sending messages to the varies parties involved in the deletions, but they dont answer me. i wonder if they feel guilty.
1200:
If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "
542:
If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "
281:
If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "
740:
Duhon all that hganesan and I are doing are posting articles and putting on relevant facts that you are deleting, and you are loving steve nash like no other. Something should be done to you.
759:
I am apparently caught in an AOL "wide net" block for the last 3 hours. I am trying to edit one of the pages I created. It says you are looking for a vandal with IP address 152.163.100.68--
1598:
The photo would be the only non-meta image in the article. 108 of the 255 words in the article are written about it. How does this not only not support the text, but overcrowd the article?
1810:
The Ransack page was not only considered and given a disparaging comment. That's why I reverted it. If you want to consider it for deletion, don't print insults, or you'll get one back.
1755:
Basically it was a 1 goal game, the empty net was well, an empty net when the game was basically over. It was a pretty close game, don't you think we should leave the narrowly in --
1750:
2235:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any
2326:
It seems as if the general consensus on both the discussion and deletion page of the article is to bring it back. There was never a good reason to delete it in the first place. --
2181:
1151:
1119:
2212:
1451:
2231:
If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "
1368:
1467:
to decide whether the scores stay or not. It's a rather standard procedure for dispute resolution. This is probably the best way to resolve the matter once and for all. --
999:. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.
1870:
etc. For the removal of the PROD tag, I'm a bit confused by your action. PROD is uncontested deletion if the user wants to contest it (for any reason) they can do so,
569:
starting the article on another page, if you read through the text on the talkpage you will clearly see that i am trying to verivy aaron by providing legimite links.
137:
129:
1471:
442:'d it. Unsurprisingly, it's been vandalised repeatedly. Seems simpler to draw your attention to it than to try to work out how to get it protected elsewhere... —
2312:
1998:
1759:
704:
Thanks for blocking him. I notice that you blocked the IP for 24 hours which I fear will be insufficient. I believe this user is almost certainly a sockpuppet of
48:
any copyvio in the history, etc. but there was no note on the talk page, no possibility of cleaning the history, no reference at coldplaying.com, and ultimately
794:
I need to know his IP address to be able to unblock it. Your friend is probably using a shared IP address and another vandal was probably using it yesterday. --
81:
Can you look up the history and revert to a version good enough, even if it's old? I gues you can choose a better than me. Aslo, find a better image, please. --
2247:
992:
337:
1774:
1766:
2104:
As an administrator, I hope you know better then get fedged up by a bunch of deleters. That's all they do. They don't contribute, they annoy and vandalise.
2070:
1866:
Looks like there is a bit of history with this, so if the user understands the problems of removing the tags I cannot easily tell, so I've pointed them to
1348:
1117:
493:
461:
389:
316:
2224:, meaning that is not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
636:
198:
168:
127:
2327:
2166:
1216:
297:
986:
392:
377:
359:
345:
181:
I'd like a response on your opinion, since you removed the link I added, if you don't mind... just want to alert you that I made a note about it. --
1805:
1575:
1006:
890:
2344:
1674:
1615:
1593:
679:
1428:
822:
798:
325:
307:
I do not like being ignored, especially as you seemed so quick to disagree with my article, now you can't even be bothered to muster up a reply.
2378:
1729:
1589:" featured article: multiple sections and a word count of over 1800 words. Suffce to say, additional photos to support the text are welcome. --
812:
2301:
1987:
1764:
1502:
876:...'. Gets the desired info into the article, but preserves the disclaimer that the final release version has not yet been seen. Acceptable? --
851:
808:
tells me he is on AOL. Does that help to explain what has happened? If so what advice can we give him? He is not an overly 'technical' user. -
435:
428:
2240:
2141:
2132:
1205:
732:
547:
286:
190:
2147:
2138:
2114:
2111:
1247:
1226:
439:
693:. He's back to editing wars and posting pov. Reverting back to his old edits. Basically, destroying Steve Nash/Kobe Bryant pages again.
607:
558:
2337:
1893:
1822:
1109:
745:
2150:
788:
1285:
1264:
121:
2232:
2095:
1536:
1201:
1078:
543:
282:
173:
2173:
1745:
625:
2065:
459:
1404:
2048:
2039:
1718:
1703:
1492:
1391:
1163:
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the
505:
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the
403:
It+s my article, i wrote most of it. and you have no right to delete a article because you dont agree with the ideology behind it.
244:
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the
1882:
1557:
1060:
921:
is not for controversial deletions. For this reason, it is best not to propose deletion of articles that have previously been de-
1083:
996:
319:
981:
719:
2367:
1932:
1038:
1020:, but didn't upload it. Doing so leaves the image open for vandalism on Commons; any changes would then be reflected here. See
880:
663:
352:
2137:
Please answer my issues rather then contributing to this violation. You are an administrator, you have your resposibilities.
1647:
Given the word count for the song is less than 500 words, there is no need to overcrowd the article with excess images. See
763:
639:
2330:
1852:
597:
2002:
1443:
1415:
can possibly be interpreted as disruptive. Just watch the use or rollback, do it manually and add an edit summary. Cheers.
960:
2316:
1801:
1209:
768:
551:
290:
164:
2281:, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on
1336:, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on
1190:
532:
451:
271:
2300:, to 13 a number of times. As I saw on his talk page, you already blocked him once for it. Please do it again. Thanks-
2023:
1858:
1508:
2062:
1830:
2160:
1735:
419:
2090:
1908:
than most other articles on television shows including at least a dozen other Alias articles. Hope you're appeased.
1331:
1300:
1260:
It's kind of a pain, give me a shout if you are confused as to what's going on and why I'm bitching about this. --
953:
917:, which you proposed for deletion, because its deletion has previously been contested or viewed as controversial.
690:
I saw you banned him previously. He's supposed to be banned for a week. He got his IP unbanned from another admin
1373:
98:
1645:
Once there is enough text to support the image, any contributor is free to shift the image back into the article.
1476:
1464:
1453:
1425:
1388:
946:
932:
840:
784:
is apparently being blocked by you. Maybes an IP mix-up? Can you please let me know what is happening? Thanks. -
691:
348:
article is non-notable, then you can bring up a 2nd AfD, if you please. Attack the content, not other users. --
1937:
742:; I'm not saying thats a threat but its pretty close, funny thing is i never even edited any of his Nash stuff.
384:
example of sarcasm directed at the method in which articles on Knowledge are moderated, not specifically to you.
1949:
1790:
1680:
1194:
536:
275:
153:
69:
1871:
2307:
2029:
1993:
1184:
526:
265:
726:
232:
200:
970:
All in place I think. It's not often I get to create an ITN article so I'm a bit shaky on the procedure!--
1666:
1043:
918:
777:
710:
699:
694:
644:
2282:
2107:
games that are vandalised by the others, they are giving incorrect information. Talk about reliability.
1785:
1710:
1635:
1541:
1337:
1017:
148:
43:
Sorry if this sounds snippy, but i did nothing against policy in this situation. There was absolutely
1954:
Just how much talk was there about deleting the Ransack page? DId anyone besides you want it deleted?
2350:
2087:
1365:
754:
613:
330:
1914:
1434:
1011:
584:
1980:
965:
857:
302:
175:
1664:
Please adhere to official policy as outlined by Knowledge. There are already two wiki-links to
1477:
976:
2261:
1316:
2291:
2269:
2075:
1713:, edits with no reliable references can be removed by any editor. Note that another editor (
1353:
1324:
1240:
1129:
635:
Thank you very much for your help with the KNHC_(FM) article. Your work is much appreciated.
622:
471:
415:
210:
1970:
1960:
1021:
2321:
2053:
1839:
1075:
1030:
896:
675:
659:
630:
621:
complied with my requests and DOES NOT start edit wars that violate the 20 reverts rule. --
427:
407:
17:
1235:
Thanks, but you still haven't provided the detailed fair-use rationale for its use in the
380:
talk page were in no way an attempt to belittle you, because the criticism was a somewhat
8:
2276:
1966:
1421:
1384:
2296:
Madchester-Please block/warn 208.187.86.74 , the person that has changed 12 episodes in
104:
Nevermind abotu the image, it was a vandalized one, I reverted it to a good version. --
2297:
1974:
1920:
1816:
1549:
1542:
1529:
1178:
1167:
1067:
590:
520:
509:
340:), despite the obvious AfD results of your Adam and Andrew article can be considered a
259:
248:
55:
So sorry it got deleted, but again, i'm really not sure what else i could have done.
2015:
Wow...what a small world. Perhaps all Canadians really DO meet each other eventually
1160:
the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.
1155:. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the
502:
the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.
497:. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the
241:
the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.
236:. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the
2356:
2010:
1955:
1944:
1860:
1811:
1607:
1105:
1071:
971:
805:
781:
769:
614:
447:
186:
1670:
which is more than sufficient for users wishing to view the album cover. Thanks. --
2216:. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image can be used under a
1849:
1721:
While the nickname is used within the fan community, fancruft is not permitted per
1612:
1599:
1572:
1554:
1093:
887:
877:
411:
74:
1899:
2341:
2129:
1925:
1905:
1890:
1726:
1671:
1631:
1603:
1590:
1586:
1564:
1499:
1468:
1401:
1397:
1223:
1066:
Hey, I just wanted to make sure you were aware of the interesting development at
1057:
1025:
950:
848:
819:
795:
671:
655:
367:
Adam and Andrew in particular had a significant effect on the description of the
349:
112:
89:
1585:) to place so many photos within such a short article. Contrast this with the "
1092:
Having battled on and off with you over spoilers in various articles related to
336:
Otherwise, belittling administrators for deleting your article (per comments on
2375:
2364:
2225:
2190:
2146:
Must I contact another administrator? Or could you have the decency to answer?
2125:
2064:
probably could have been mentioned somewhere if there was an issue, perhaps on
2045:
2036:
2020:
1797:
1714:
1627:
1568:
1417:
1380:
1051:
809:
785:
160:
66:
26:
2360:
2170:
2121:
2083:
2016:
1875:
1867:
1742:
1722:
1700:
1652:
1582:
1533:
1517:
1509:
1439:
I didn't re-add it after said explaination, no need to make block threats --
1361:
1305:
1236:
1097:
1085:
939:
925:
907:
830:
729:
716:
705:
650:
341:
713:
2217:
1827:
1648:
1489:
1101:
914:
897:
837:
760:
604:
594:
443:
182:
2221:
1969:, it will start to Far East and will end in the West. Here's the source:
1756:
1548:
Hi there. You've now removed the album artwork thumbnail from the single
1525:
1440:
1003:
935:. If you still feel the article should be deleted, please don't add the
931:
ed, even by the article creator, or which have previously been listed on
738:
Yeah this guy is really going overboard he just posted this on my page :'
555:
381:
368:
294:
1821:
Hey Madchester What sort of sources would you like to see quoted on the
1521:
1282:
1261:
1244:
1213:
107:
84:
1694:
don't happen to remember something doesn't mean that it's unverified.
685:
2244:
1516:
After a succession of blocks by numerous admins over the last month,
1156:
1074:, the article in question being one you had shown an interest in. --
498:
237:
62:
2252:
2079:
1879:
1357:
1177:. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading
519:. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading
258:. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading
75:
2120:
Please stop introducing material from your personal websites per
2100:
Why are you adding to the vandalism on the Legend of Zelda pages?
1781:
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
144:
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
563:
2054:
1656:
36:
as to why that particular page had been deleted. (That page
344:, which is not allowed on Knowledge. If you belive that the
1174:
516:
255:
2068:]? I see it got reverted per current DYK policy. Thanks!
945:
template back to the article, but feel free to list it at
52:
to lead me to believe that the article was clean . . .
2182:
Orphaned fair use image (Image:IveBeenExpectingYou.gif)
2102:
What good is it to remove information from the article?
1751:
It was a 1 goal game, wouldn't you consider it narrowly
371:, which had been widely spread throughout the Internet.
1197:
for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
1096:, I'd like to enlist your help with similar issues in
539:
for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
278:
for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
2165:
Please discuss the current Twilight Princess reverts
1626:
Again, please do not re-insert the album cover, per
1016:
Hello, Madchester! I noticed that you had protected
1208:. If you have any questions please ask them at the
550:. If you have any questions please ask them at the
289:. If you have any questions please ask them at the
2239:will be deleted after seven days, as described on
2035:articles that needs sourcing maybe we can fix it.
1719:noticed the lack of verifiability to the nickname.
1222:A music-promo screenshot, licensing tag updated.--
1024:, where I've included some more details. Thanks!
1800:. For assistance on the image use policy, see
163:. For assistance on the image use policy, see
1973:, which teams have spotted in 5 continents. -
1281:Thanks, Madchester! Have a great weekend. --
576:
1532:if you're interested in helping out. Thanks.
2363:have been displayed without any objection?
2338:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Thilo Savage
1052:http://www.mingpaonews.com/20060601/gma1.htm
398:
326:Adam and Andrew Article for Deletion process
2355:Could you please explain why the lyrics in
1460:conducive to Knowledge's daily operations.
1378:...to revert things that aren't vandalism.
358:I have nothing against the article for the
1563:So you removed it again, this time citing
991:An image or media file that you uploaded,
728:to document this time. Thanks in advance.
2273:was updated with a fact from the article
1643:Knowledge's Image use policy states that
1328:was updated with a fact from the article
987:Image:Julie delpy.jpg listed for deletion
2228:if you think that that will be useful.
2110:then contribute something for a change.
1977:- 06:08 pm, June 28, 2006 (Manila time)
1602:20:40, 18 June 2006 (UTC) Incidentally,
1173:tag can be used to release it under the
515:tag can be used to release it under the
254:tag can be used to release it under the
1191:Knowledge:Image copyright tags#Fair_use
997:Knowledge:Images and media for deletion
533:Knowledge:Image copyright tags#Fair_use
272:Knowledge:Image copyright tags#Fair_use
14:
1872:WP:PROD#Contesting_a_proposed_deletion
1398:making a dispruption to make a point
1243:on fair use rationales. Thanks. --
1056:does that ineterest you? Kenny, aka
434:It looks like you forgot to protect
2359:are copyrighted, whereas those for
2169:before reverting again, thanks. --
1965:I added the confirmed locations of
1938:Tech Specs and copyright violations
1802:Knowledge:Media copyright questions
1606:includes a copy of the artwork for
1396:I'm rather disappointed in editors
1189:or one of the other tags listed at
531:or one of the other tags listed at
270:or one of the other tags listed at
165:Knowledge:Media copyright questions
23:
2220:. However, the image is currently
2096:Vandalism on Legend of Zelda pages
313:I would appreciate your comments.
24:
2390:
1943:mentioning it isn't a violation.
2260:
2189:
1950:Ransack Page's untimely deletion
1332:A Rush of Blood to the Head Tour
1315:
1301:A Rush of Blood to the Head Tour
1128:
470:
209:
2185:
1796:This is an automated notice by
1346:Thanks for your contributions!
1124:
947:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
933:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
649:Hi, I noticed that you blocked
593:goes wrong. You had to fix it.
466:
324:Once again, the results of the
205:
159:This is an automated notice by
1791:Knowledge:Image copyright tags
1210:Media copyright questions page
1195:Knowledge:Image copyright tags
1152:Image:SomethingStupidVideo.jpg
1120:Image:SomethingStupidVideo.jpg
552:Media copyright questions page
537:Knowledge:Image copyright tags
291:Media copyright questions page
276:Knowledge:Image copyright tags
154:Knowledge:Image copyright tags
13:
1:
2283:the "Did you know?" talk page
2213:Image:IveBeenExpectingYou.gif
1338:the "Did you know?" talk page
1181:, and then use a tag such as
523:, and then use a tag such as
262:, and then use a tag such as
233:Image:BrushfireFairytales.jpg
201:Image:BrushfireFairytales.jpg
2241:criteria for speedy deletion
1488:unlocked so I can do so. --
1454:Coin flip dispute resolution
1206:criteria for speedy deletion
872:that there is a scene where
548:criteria for speedy deletion
287:criteria for speedy deletion
7:
1667:Black Holes and Revelations
1018:Image:Flag of Indonesia.svg
603:I'm already fix it. Cheers
10:
2395:
2044:Could you answer, please?
1786:Knowledge:Image use policy
1711:Knowledge:Reliable sources
1636:Knowledge:Image use policy
1634:guidelines and especially
1520:has returned yet again to
1452:World Cup status on ITN -
725:yup, he's returned. Added
191:06:19, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
169:03:04, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
149:Knowledge:Image use policy
122:00:38, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
99:00:36, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
70:19:54, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
2379:04:39, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
2368:04:32, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
2345:15:14, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
2336:At the time of it's AFD (
2331:14:18, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
2317:03:05, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
2161:Twilight Princess reverts
2040:16:37, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
2024:20:43, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
2003:14:08, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
1971:Amazing Race 10 locations
1961:Amazing Race 10 locations
1933:16:56, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
1894:21:21, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
1883:16:55, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
1853:13:20, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
1831:09:51, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
1806:10:42, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
1760:03:31, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
1746:07:45, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
1736:Please stop talking to me
1730:07:57, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
1704:06:19, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
1675:21:27, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
1616:21:06, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
1594:21:09, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
1576:12:49, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
1558:14:59, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
1537:23:29, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
1503:19:08, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
1493:19:03, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
1472:00:39, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
1463:I would suggest a simple
1444:04:03, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
1429:03:23, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
1413:with scores already on it
1405:03:16, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
1392:03:04, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
1369:02:22, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
331:Knowledge:Deletion review
138:Image:ColdplayAROBTTH.jpg
130:Image:ColdplayAROBTTH.jpg
2248:17:33, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
2174:20:06, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
2151:21:48, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
2142:19:21, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
2133:19:10, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
2115:19:10, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
2091:01:01, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
2049:20:46, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
1286:17:23, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
1265:16:57, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
1248:16:56, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
1227:16:54, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
1217:13:59, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
1110:02:52, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
1079:22:57, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
1061:03:15, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
1039:21:48, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
1007:13:06, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
982:08:05, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
961:19:14, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
891:01:13, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
881:00:36, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
852:23:53, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
841:23:42, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
823:00:04, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
813:09:00, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
799:17:56, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
789:16:47, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
764:13:37, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
733:23:51, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
720:07:47, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
680:05:48, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
664:03:09, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
640:06:33, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
626:00:21, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
608:05:21, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
598:04:47, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
1638:'s official guidelines.
1478:Image:Angela Merkel.jpg
868:opened yet it has been
559:22:39, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
452:19:20, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
393:15:27, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
353:14:48, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
320:11:01, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
310:Archive 04, Number 21.
298:13:18, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
176:Talk:The Amazing Race 9
1681:Civility My Aunt Fanny
1651:for examples such as "
1022:WP:AN#Image protection
40:have been deleted.)
2210:Thanks for uploading
2030:Transformers sources.
1772:Thanks for uploading
1498:Wrong person, non? --
1374:Don't use rollback...
1149:Thanks for uploading
995:, has been listed at
993:Image:Julie delpy.jpg
491:Thanks for uploading
230:Thanks for uploading
135:Thanks for uploading
1900:Oh look! References!
1775:Image:Ian_Curtis.jpg
1767:Image:Ian_Curtis.jpg
1185:Non-free fair use in
527:Non-free fair use in
338:Talk:Icy_Hot_Stuntaz
266:Non-free fair use in
18:User talk:Madchester
2277:Polaris Music Prize
2226:You may add it back
2061:this change by you
1967:The Amazing Race 10
1304:, was selected for
1044:The Amazing Race :P
903:I have removed the
700:User:12.134.204.214
494:Image:Keaneband.JPG
462:Image:Keaneband.JPG
376:My comments on the
2298:The Amazing Race 9
2198:This media may be
1921:User:Alphachimpbot
1765:Image Tagging for
1550:Knights Of Cydonia
1543:Knights Of Cydonia
1530:User talk:Simishag
1137:This media may be
1068:User Talk:Hexadisc
748:21 May 2006 (UTC)
715:to document this.
591:The Amazing Race 9
479:This media may be
218:This media may be
128:Image Tagging for
2357:I Am Not Canadian
2351:I Am Not Canadian
2310:
2289:
2288:
2208:
2207:
1996:
1956:user:mathewignash
1945:user:mathewignash
1861:User:Mathewignash
1812:user:Mathewignash
1697:Have a nice day.
1649:featured articles
1608:Let It Be (album)
1344:
1343:
1147:
1146:
1072:Talk:B.J. Averell
1037:
980:
919:Proposed deletion
755:Please unblock me
615:The Da Vinci Code
589:Someone had make
489:
488:
450:
424:
410:comment added by
228:
227:
120:
97:
2386:
2306:
2264:
2257:
2256:
2233:my contributions
2218:fair use license
2203:
2193:
2186:
2073:
1992:
1930:
1915:Cleanup Template
1435:And if you noted
1351:
1319:
1312:
1311:
1202:my contributions
1188:
1172:
1166:
1142:
1132:
1125:
1094:The Amazing Race
1034:
1028:
1012:Image protection
974:
958:
944:
938:
930:
924:
912:
906:
645:Hganesan's block
623:M1ss1ontomars2k4
585:Goes Wrong......
544:my contributions
530:
514:
508:
484:
474:
467:
446:
423:
404:
283:my contributions
269:
253:
247:
223:
213:
206:
116:
110:
105:
93:
87:
82:
2394:
2393:
2389:
2388:
2387:
2385:
2384:
2383:
2353:
2324:
2315:
2294:
2255:
2204:
2197:
2184:
2163:
2098:
2071:
2059:
2032:
2013:
2001:
1983:
1981:Archived Debate
1963:
1952:
1940:
1926:
1917:
1902:
1864:
1842:
1819:
1770:
1753:
1738:
1683:
1604:Get Back (song)
1546:
1514:
1481:
1457:
1437:
1376:
1349:
1310:
1298:Your article,
1187:|article name}}
1182:
1170:
1164:
1143:
1136:
1123:
1090:
1076:Maxamegalon2000
1046:
1032:
1014:
1000:
989:
968:
966:Java Earthquake
954:
942:
936:
928:
922:
910:
904:
901:
860:
858:Content dispute
833:
774:
757:
702:
688:
647:
633:
618:
587:
579:
566:
529:|article name}}
524:
512:
506:
485:
478:
465:
432:
405:
401:
378:Icy Hot Stuntaz
360:Icy Hot Stuntaz
346:Icy Hot Stuntaz
342:personal attack
305:
303:Adam and Andrew
268:|article name}}
263:
251:
245:
224:
217:
204:
179:
133:
117:
114:
108:
94:
91:
85:
79:
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
2392:
2382:
2381:
2352:
2349:
2348:
2347:
2323:
2320:
2311:
2293:
2290:
2287:
2286:
2265:
2254:
2251:
2206:
2205:
2196:
2194:
2183:
2180:
2178:
2162:
2159:
2158:
2157:
2156:
2155:
2154:
2153:
2108:
2105:
2103:
2101:
2097:
2094:
2058:
2052:
2031:
2028:
2012:
2009:
2007:
1997:
1982:
1979:
1962:
1959:
1951:
1948:
1939:
1936:
1916:
1913:
1911:
1901:
1898:
1897:
1896:
1863:
1857:
1841:
1838:
1836:
1818:
1815:
1794:
1793:
1788:
1769:
1763:
1752:
1749:
1737:
1734:
1733:
1732:
1715:User:KsprayDad
1682:
1679:
1678:
1677:
1661:
1660:
1640:
1639:
1623:
1622:
1621:
1620:
1619:
1618:
1545:
1540:
1513:
1507:
1506:
1505:
1480:
1475:
1456:
1450:
1448:
1436:
1433:
1432:
1431:
1375:
1372:
1342:
1341:
1320:
1309:
1296:
1295:
1294:
1293:
1292:
1291:
1290:
1289:
1288:
1272:
1271:
1270:
1269:
1268:
1267:
1253:
1252:
1251:
1250:
1230:
1229:
1145:
1144:
1135:
1133:
1122:
1118:Image Tagging
1116:
1114:
1089:
1082:
1065:
1045:
1042:
1013:
1010:
990:
988:
985:
967:
964:
900:
895:
894:
893:
874:blah blah blah
859:
856:
855:
854:
832:
829:
828:
827:
826:
825:
802:
801:
773:
772:being blocked?
767:
756:
753:
751:
736:
735:
701:
698:
687:
686:User: Hganesan
684:
683:
682:
646:
643:
632:
629:
617:
612:
611:
610:
586:
583:
578:
575:
565:
562:
487:
486:
477:
475:
464:
460:Image Tagging
458:
456:
431:
426:
400:
397:
396:
395:
386:
385:
373:
372:
364:
363:
304:
301:
226:
225:
216:
214:
203:
199:Image Tagging
197:
195:
178:
172:
157:
156:
151:
132:
126:
125:
124:
113:
90:
78:
73:
28:
25:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2391:
2380:
2377:
2372:
2371:
2370:
2369:
2366:
2362:
2361:I Am Canadian
2358:
2346:
2343:
2339:
2335:
2334:
2333:
2332:
2329:
2319:
2318:
2314:
2309:
2305:
2304:
2299:
2292:208.187.86.74
2284:
2280:
2279:
2278:
2272:
2271:
2270:Did you know?
2266:
2263:
2259:
2258:
2253:Did you know?
2250:
2249:
2246:
2243:. Thank you.
2242:
2238:
2234:
2229:
2227:
2223:
2219:
2215:
2214:
2201:
2195:
2192:
2188:
2187:
2179:
2176:
2175:
2172:
2168:
2152:
2149:
2145:
2144:
2143:
2140:
2136:
2135:
2134:
2131:
2127:
2123:
2119:
2118:
2117:
2116:
2113:
2093:
2092:
2089:
2085:
2081:
2078:
2077:
2074:
2067:
2063:
2056:
2051:
2050:
2047:
2042:
2041:
2038:
2027:
2025:
2022:
2018:
2017:I am Canadian
2008:
2005:
2004:
2000:
1995:
1991:
1990:
1978:
1976:
1975:ApprenticeFan
1972:
1968:
1958:
1957:
1947:
1946:
1935:
1934:
1931:
1929:
1922:
1912:
1909:
1907:
1895:
1892:
1887:
1886:
1885:
1884:
1881:
1877:
1873:
1869:
1862:
1856:
1854:
1851:
1846:
1837:
1834:
1832:
1829:
1824:
1814:
1813:
1808:
1807:
1803:
1799:
1792:
1789:
1787:
1784:
1783:
1782:
1779:
1777:
1776:
1768:
1762:
1761:
1758:
1748:
1747:
1744:
1731:
1728:
1724:
1720:
1716:
1712:
1709:According to
1708:
1707:
1706:
1705:
1702:
1698:
1695:
1693:
1687:
1676:
1673:
1669:
1668:
1663:
1662:
1658:
1654:
1653:She Loves You
1650:
1646:
1642:
1641:
1637:
1633:
1629:
1625:
1624:
1617:
1614:
1609:
1605:
1601:
1597:
1596:
1595:
1592:
1588:
1584:
1579:
1578:
1577:
1574:
1570:
1566:
1562:
1561:
1560:
1559:
1556:
1551:
1544:
1539:
1538:
1535:
1531:
1527:
1523:
1519:
1518:User:Hganesan
1511:
1510:User:Hganesan
1504:
1501:
1497:
1496:
1495:
1494:
1491:
1486:
1479:
1474:
1473:
1470:
1466:
1461:
1455:
1449:
1446:
1445:
1442:
1430:
1427:
1423:
1420:
1419:
1414:
1409:
1408:
1407:
1406:
1403:
1399:
1394:
1393:
1390:
1386:
1383:
1382:
1371:
1370:
1367:
1363:
1359:
1356:
1355:
1352:
1339:
1335:
1334:
1333:
1327:
1326:
1325:Did you know?
1321:
1318:
1314:
1313:
1307:
1303:
1302:
1287:
1284:
1280:
1279:
1278:
1277:
1276:
1275:
1274:
1273:
1266:
1263:
1259:
1258:
1257:
1256:
1255:
1254:
1249:
1246:
1242:
1238:
1237:Nicole Kidman
1234:
1233:
1232:
1231:
1228:
1225:
1221:
1220:
1219:
1218:
1215:
1212:. Thank you.
1211:
1207:
1203:
1198:
1196:
1192:
1186:
1180:
1176:
1169:
1161:
1158:
1154:
1153:
1140:
1134:
1131:
1127:
1126:
1121:
1115:
1112:
1111:
1107:
1103:
1099:
1098:Veronica Mars
1095:
1087:
1086:Veronica Mars
1081:
1080:
1077:
1073:
1069:
1063:
1062:
1059:
1054:
1053:
1049:
1041:
1040:
1035:
1027:
1023:
1019:
1009:
1008:
1005:
998:
994:
984:
983:
978:
973:
963:
962:
959:
957:
952:
948:
941:
934:
927:
920:
916:
909:
899:
892:
889:
885:
884:
883:
882:
879:
875:
871:
866:
853:
850:
845:
844:
843:
842:
839:
824:
821:
816:
815:
814:
811:
807:
804:
803:
800:
797:
793:
792:
791:
790:
787:
783:
779:
778:Opera Project
776:My bona-fide
771:
766:
765:
762:
752:
749:
747:
743:
741:
734:
731:
727:
724:
723:
722:
721:
718:
714:
711:
707:
706:User:Hganesan
697:
695:
692:
681:
677:
673:
668:
667:
666:
665:
661:
657:
652:
651:User:Hganesan
642:
641:
638:
628:
627:
624:
616:
609:
606:
602:
601:
600:
599:
596:
592:
582:
574:
570:
561:
560:
557:
554:. Thank you.
553:
549:
545:
540:
538:
534:
528:
522:
518:
511:
503:
500:
496:
495:
482:
476:
473:
469:
468:
463:
457:
454:
453:
449:
445:
441:
437:
430:
425:
421:
417:
413:
409:
394:
391:
388:
387:
383:
379:
375:
374:
370:
366:
365:
361:
357:
356:
355:
354:
351:
347:
343:
339:
334:
332:
327:
322:
321:
318:
314:
311:
308:
300:
299:
296:
293:. Thank you.
292:
288:
284:
279:
277:
273:
267:
261:
257:
250:
242:
239:
235:
234:
221:
215:
212:
208:
207:
202:
196:
193:
192:
188:
184:
177:
171:
170:
166:
162:
155:
152:
150:
147:
146:
145:
142:
140:
139:
131:
123:
118:
111:
103:
102:
101:
100:
95:
88:
77:
72:
71:
68:
64:
59:
56:
53:
51:
46:
41:
39:
35:
19:
2354:
2325:
2322:Thilo Savage
2302:
2295:
2275:
2274:
2268:
2236:
2230:
2211:
2209:
2199:
2177:
2164:
2128:. Thanks --
2099:
2069:
2060:
2043:
2033:
2014:
2006:
1988:
1984:
1964:
1953:
1941:
1927:
1918:
1910:
1903:
1865:
1847:
1843:
1840:Sport on ITN
1835:
1826:reference? (
1820:
1809:
1795:
1780:
1773:
1771:
1754:
1739:
1699:
1696:
1691:
1688:
1684:
1665:
1644:
1547:
1515:
1512:(yes, again)
1484:
1482:
1462:
1458:
1447:
1438:
1416:
1412:
1395:
1379:
1377:
1347:
1345:
1330:
1329:
1323:
1322:On June 11,
1299:
1199:
1162:
1150:
1148:
1138:
1113:
1091:
1064:
1055:
1050:
1047:
1015:
1001:
972:Keith Edkins
969:
955:
915:B.J. Averell
902:
898:B.J. Averell
873:
869:
864:
861:
834:
806:Buondelmonte
782:Buondelmonte
775:
770:Buondelmonte
758:
750:
744:
739:
737:
703:
689:
648:
637:66.165.21.53
634:
631:Thank you...
619:
588:
580:
571:
567:
541:
504:
492:
490:
480:
455:
436:Jagjeet Mann
433:
429:Jagjeet Mann
402:
335:
323:
315:
312:
309:
306:
280:
243:
231:
229:
219:
194:
180:
158:
143:
136:
134:
109:drini's page
86:drini's page
80:
60:
57:
54:
49:
44:
42:
37:
33:
30:
2328:4.89.184.26
2267:On July 8,
1878:process. --
1850:Jimmmmmmmmm
1613:BigBlueFish
1600:BigBlueFish
1573:BigBlueFish
1555:BigBlueFish
1526:Kobe Bryant
1239:page. See
949:. Thanks!
888:CBDunkerson
878:CBDunkerson
440:Deletedpage
412:Cro..Scream
406:—Preceding
174:Please see
2342:Madchester
2130:Madchester
1928:Alphachimp
1906:references
1891:Madchester
1823:Piano Rock
1817:Piano Rock
1727:Madchester
1672:Madchester
1591:Madchester
1522:Steve Nash
1500:Madchester
1469:Madchester
1402:Madchester
1224:Madchester
1084:Help with
1058:SYSS Mouse
1026:Flcelloguy
849:Madchester
820:Madchester
796:Madchester
672:PS2pcGAMER
656:PS2pcGAMER
564:crowscream
350:Madchester
2376:Quiensabe
2365:Quiensabe
2313:Guestbook
2046:SMegatron
2037:SMegatron
2021:KsprayDad
2011:KsprayDad
1999:Guestbook
1859:block of
1798:OrphanBot
1465:coin flip
1418:Sasquatch
1381:Sasquatch
1168:GFDL-self
1157:copyright
913:tag from
810:Kleinzach
786:Kleinzach
510:GFDL-self
499:copyright
438:when you
249:GFDL-self
238:copyright
161:OrphanBot
2308:Contribs
2237:articles
2222:orphaned
2171:ReyBrujo
1994:Contribs
1919:My bot,
1743:Otto4711
1701:Otto4711
1632:WP:IMAGE
1587:Get Back
1565:WP:IMAGE
1534:Simishag
1241:this bit
1179:fair use
1088:, please
870:reported
730:Simishag
717:Simishag
521:fair use
420:contribs
408:unsigned
260:fair use
76:Coldplay
2303:TeckWiz
2200:deleted
2126:WP:SPAM
2066:WPT:DYK
1989:TeckWiz
1828:Westius
1717:) also
1655:", or "
1628:WP:SONG
1569:WP:SONG
1490:Boereck
1483:Please
1193:. See
1139:deleted
1102:SonicAD
1048:Colin,
838:Bignole
780:friend
761:Hokeman
605:Aleenf1
595:Aleenf1
535:. See
481:deleted
444:Haeleth
274:. See
220:deleted
183:SonicAD
58:cheers
50:nothing
34:curious
2148:Hyrule
2139:Hyrule
2122:WP:NOT
2112:Hyrule
2057:change
1876:WP:AFD
1868:WP:NOR
1757:Tawker
1723:WP:NOT
1583:WP:MoS
1485:do not
1441:Tawker
1004:Arniep
556:Jkelly
295:feydey
45:no way
38:should
27:clocks
2055:T:DYK
1904:More
1657:Layla
1283:Yamla
1262:Yamla
1245:Yamla
1214:Yamla
1033:note?
956:juice
951:Mango
831:Funny
746:Duhon
16:<
2245:meco
2167:here
2124:and
1725:. --
1630:and
1567:and
1524:and
1175:GFDL
1106:talk
1070:and
977:Talk
940:prod
926:prod
908:prod
865:very
712:and
696:-EW
676:talk
660:talk
517:GFDL
448:Talk
416:talk
390:Will
333:.
317:Will
256:GFDL
187:talk
2080:Lar
1880:pgk
1692:you
1358:Lar
1306:DYK
382:emo
369:Emo
67:ah?
2285:.
2082::
2026:T
2019:.
1924:--
1889:--
1855:)
1833:)
1804:.
1360::
1340:.
1183:{{
1171:}}
1165:{{
1108:)
1031:A
975:(
943:}}
937:{{
929:}}
923:{{
911:}}
905:{{
847:--
818:--
678:)
670:--
662:)
654:--
577:NN
525:{{
513:}}
507:{{
422:)
418:•
264:{{
252:}}
246:{{
189:)
167:.
106:(
83:(
63:He
61:--
2202:.
2088:c
2086:/
2084:t
2076:+
2072:+
1848:(
1426:c
1424:|
1422:t
1389:c
1387:|
1385:t
1366:c
1364:/
1362:t
1354:+
1350:+
1308:!
1141:.
1104:(
1036:)
1029:(
1002:—
979:)
674:(
658:(
483:.
414:(
399:h
222:.
185:(
119:)
115:☎
96:)
92:☎
65::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.