User talk:Loggie - Knowledge

1244:

a wider range of motion." Gores can be used in exactly the same manner, no? Stick a few gores into the skirt and it too will flare. The OED's definition of gore is: "Any wedge-shaped or triangular piece of cloth forming part of a garment and serving to produce the difference in width required at different points, esp. used to narrow a skirt at the waist" On godets, the OED says: "A triangular piece of stuff inserted in a dress, glove, etc." I'm having trouble finding books that mention both gores and godets, and do so in terms that seem different to me.

391:

in. Since both article had the same info (well, underlay had less after I'd gone through and edited it and wikified it) and underlay had been around longer and is the one other articles link to, I changed underlayment back to the redirect. So we could move all of if from underlay to underlayment, however since it is the same thing, there should be only one article. Also, before moving the article we would need to let other people have input and see if they think it should be moved.

1647: 1576: 936: 868: 800: 732: 554: 416: 274: 2014: 1939: 1866: 1454: 1275: 1250:

used not only in skirts but also elsewhere? I can't find anywhere else that talks about a difference between inserting the triangular piece of cloth into a cut in the garment, as opposed to a seam, though I have seen that technique mentioned with the term godet. That doesn't prove though that something inserted couldn't be called a gore. Is any of this consistent with your knowledge? Thanks,

621:: no problems, "brusque" commens, truly better described as concise :), perfectly taken aboard- I've a thick skin and probably thicker skull. I will find text resources (some accessible as free ebooks) to substantiate my comments- I did originally have them- but accidentally stupidly closed "Notepad" in windows- losing them. Your constructive criticism most appreciated. Bye for now. 1283: 109:

important (well, in as far as that not very important article can be important) to get across that that explanation is something that some people think/claim, but definitely isn't true. Anyways, I can see why you were reverting, but IIRC that's still a hell of a long way from how the minor tag's meant to be used

376:

My name is Scott and i am new to the Knowledge experience. I had written an article regarding Underlayment tyhat i thought was important but it looks like you undid it. I was simply curious if i did something wrong as originally Underlay was a page already in there but the Underlayment I think is a

108:

I agree it was badly written, tbh I'm not so good at the encyclopedic writing, so I just tend to bung the facts in and let other people straighten it out, basically it bugged me seeing wiki giving that crap as a possible origin when even the source wiki's using says it's a load of crap...think it was

81:

The statement that "Cats and dogs do not actually get into thatch." bugs me. Sure, they may have not burrowed into the thatch-that doesn't mean they couldn't, just that they didn't have the incentive to do so. Also the tense is inconsistent, and there is no transition. Perhaps "However, cats and dogs

1243:

though, a godet is "an extra piece of fabric in the shape of a circular sector which is set into a garment, usually a dress or skirt. The addition of a godet causes the article of clothing in question to flare, thus adding width and volume. Adding a godet to a piece of clothing also gives the wearer

520:

Knowledge isn't the right forum for warnings about what products to use or not use-it tells you what the object is, and what it is used for, but doesn't tell you what is a good brand or not. It also isn't a how-to on how to install things, so directions on how to install the stuff shouldn't be here.

482:

Thanks for the explanation on the undo of the article. I understand your motivations for having done so. I still see the need for the addition of plywood (since it is not specificly addressed in Underlay) as well as some warnings. There are many products that are used as underlayment that are not

1294:

So, with a skirt, for example, if you subtract the gores, then you have no garment left. However, if you took out the godets in a skirt, you could sew up the cut(s) and still have a fully functionally garment left, it would merely be less full. Gores are the components of construction of an object,

1224:

Well, if a three-dimensional shape is made entirely out of joined together two-dimensional sections, then those sections are called gores. If a cut is made in a piece of clothing, and then an extra section of cloth is inserted into the cut, then that section is called a godet. Hope this explanation

390:

In general having the exact same text in two places isn't ideal, so when there are two terms for the same thing it is best to have only one article, and generally (as best as I can tell) the better written/longer/more contributors/ etc. article is the one kept, and information from the other merged

246:

I am considering the comments- but I have been a bit busy this weekend. Spinning off a section and leaving a precise is the way I usually work. There are some constraints- it may be necessary to merge in an existing legacy article- and this needs sensitivity as this may be an essential extension to

175:

I just stopped by to say hello. In your blitz yesterday you tagged three of the articles that I have been working on for membership of Textile Arts. It is just nice that someone is taking an interest. I have been putting a bit of time into Industrial Textile articles- you know the stuff being bold

130:

instead of do not would imply that nowadays they do (still some thatches over here, people seem to like 'em). As for disproving...it does say they're improbable, and it does say the kata doksa one isn't likely. Anyways, like I say, I'm poor at grammar and phrasing so feel free to chop and change it

55:

Could you let me know (here, my IP changes all the time so don't write on my talk :) ) why you marked your revert to raining animals article as minor. I can just about understand why someone might think it was unsourced (although it's actually from the pre-existing source), but I can't agree at all

1249:

As best as I can tell, from what I'm reading, a godet is generally a section of a circle and has a bigger difference in width-makes things flare more-than a gore does, and a gore doesn't have to actually come to a point whereas a godet does. Gores are also most common in skirts, whereas godets are

121:

I've changed my edit a little, but not so much for a few reasons....I think fictional is a fair word to describe it...mebe could go into more detail with something like 'an email containing a list of mostly fabricated facts and misconceptions' but I reckon fictional is more consice....I never

1721:

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the

1951:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

1751:

I am self publishing a textile text book and would like to use your image of a heddle which you uploaded to Knowledge. as much as the licence implies use of the image my publisher is requesting that I have written permission from the owner to use it. here is the link to the image

227:

from my own experiences, which is part of why there are no references. I really like how you split those articles, by the way-it was too long and awkward to have them in the same spot. So yeah-happy to proof read, but my knowledge of the machinated processes is limited.

1717:

or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

1878:

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

1354:

Well, one of the dead-tree format sources that I added to the godet article speaks about both at some point, if I remember correctly. Also, a quick look at my copy of the Oxford English dictionary gave each a distinct definition.

77:

none of the other improbable etymologies list where they came from, and I don't think that knowing this etymology gained fame (not originated-we don't know if it originated in that e-mail or not) through e-mail is

1407:

article, I have to say that it really needs some rewriting, as it really isn't very clear on the concept of a gore at all. The way it's written, I doubt a casual reader would realize that the term even applied to

1821:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 247:

some other mature articles. Spinning off, may require the cotton text to be expanded to embrace worsted and silk-- and others that I haven't yet discovered so at the moment I am a little cautious. Speak soon. --

1286:

The skirt itself, here, is made from gores. sections of cloth, called godets, were inserted into the seams. (Note that godets do not necessarily have to be added into the seams, they can be added in any

2041:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1963:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1890:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1146: 126:

get into thatch...just that they don't. I have no idea about grammar for the most part, but can't see what you mean about tense...it's a separate sentence and I think to say that they

2057: 1979: 1906: 2027: 1708: 156: 136: 61: 358: 1425:

I'm going to put this on my list of things to do, but I doubt that I'll get a chance to do it soon, due to summer semester finals rearing their ugly head.

1738: 612: 1924: 622: 297:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 71:

So, I marked the edit as minor because I was reverting the page, and my general habit is to mark reverts as minor. I reverted it for several reasons:

2083: 1997: 82:

wouldn't crawl into the thatch." This still leaves us with the fact that this is the only etymology that the article attempts to disprove, however.

1855: 1328:? I haven't had much success in finding sources that mention both of them, let alone anything that actually talks about how they differ. Thanks, 500: 224: 1850: 630: 1213: 2004: 1931: 223:

I would be more than happy to proof-read stuff, however my area of expertise is really in making the stuff by hand-I basically wrote

1794: 176:

and hoping a real expert would come along and fine tune my prose- and waited -and waited---. Well it is pretty lonely out there.

160: 140: 96: 1433: 1363: 1337: 1307: 1259: 256: 237: 1800: 1775: 1670:, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page 1599:, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page 1533: 1448: 959:, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page 891:, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page 823:, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page 755:, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page 577:, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page 439:, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page 368: 1176: 1124: 1093:

No problem. I'd like to do more, but I've got a lot on my plate right now. Hopefully, I'll get back to it in the near future.

538: 1703: 1682: