1007:
comments which were themselves contentious - such as the example given above. Knowledge policy states that blocks are to prevent damage or disruption to
Knowledge. The examples of justifications for blocking given on the policy page are far more extreme than I have been accused of - and relate to articles, not talk pages, which themselves often contain very robust debate. There was neither damage nor disruption caused by me. I do admit that I have been outspoken on talk pages, and perhaps too hasty to remove what I felt was unsourced and incorrect information in articles. I would be more careful in future. I also note that blocks are not meant to punish, yet it appears that this was precisely why the block was imposed in my case - I must have expressed views which offended against the political views of someone.
1064:{{unblock|I note that none of the reasons which I have given for being unblocked appear to have been mentioned, or even considered. Over the many years that I have been using Knowledge I have read many edits and more particularly comments on talk pages which are outrageous, opinionated and inflamatory, and far more worthy of blocking than anything I wrote. I request that the unilateral decision to permanently block me from Knowledge be reviewed. It is an extreme punishment for an offense which is not extreme. The suggestion that I am unaware of the problematic nature of the edits is simply incorrect. And the implication that I was going to, or had, removed declined requests from the page an uncalled for criticism.}}
524:
367:
1246:
1069:
921:
771:
612:
485:
179:
144:
1332:
by numerous users what was wrong with your edits". I have several times addressed the reason for the block, and also pointed out that a permanent block is supposed to be an extreme measure, only used in exceptional cases - this cannot be one of them. The decisions to continue the block may or may not be unilateral - I have no idea, as they are made in secret
1352:. You have never once indicated that you understand what was wrong with your. Nor have you indicated how, if unblocked, you would change. Please note that if you should make another unblock request without addressing the substance of the block, I or someone else will revoke your talk page privileges. After that, you'll have to appeal directly to
1331:
I repeat that the reasons which I have already given for asking to be unblocked appear to have been disregarded, as did my earlier requests and arguments. The erroneous suggestion that I "cannot understand what was wrong with your edits" clearly confirms this, as does the claim that I "have been told
1154:
I have requested a review of the justice, appropriateness or need for the permanent block. I do not understand what the request "Please include a decline or accept reason" means, assuming that it is a response to my request. Incidentally, I might add that according to my profile page I have made 1501
856:
block should not have been imposed at same time as warning being given. Allegation of trolling is disputed. There was no intent to provoke emotional responses, or otherwise disrupt normal on-topic discussion - Wikipedias own definition of trolling. Deletions were only made of uncorrobberated comments
1018:
This block was clearly placed to prevent disruption and, honestly, trolling. I'm sorry that this feels like normal discourse to you. As long as you are unaware of the problematic nature of the edits, then the likelihood of repeating the disruption makes it unwise to consider an unblock. Please do
1006:
The block should not have been imposed at same time as a warning was given. The allegation of trolling is disputed. There was no intent to provoke emotional responses, or otherwise disrupt normal on-topic discussion - Wikipedias own definition of trolling. Deletions were only made of uncorrobberated
868:
You were blocked days after your last warning. You have had previous warnings, and ample time to change your behavior. Your unblock request fails to convince any administrator that you understand why you were blocked and that you will modify your behavior if you are unblocked. As for trolling, the
664:, and could result in you being blocked. You have to understand, Knowledge is not a site for general discussion. Find an online chat/politics/debate site, and leave your comments there. Use Knowledge talk pages only to discuss improvements to articles.
82:
589:
Also, you need to sign every post you make on a talk page. You do this by typing four tildes, which will look like ~~~~. That will automatically add your name and time of posting, which is necessary to make threaded conversation possible.
1343:
No, the decisions aren't made in secret-they're made in public, right here, on your talk page. Looking above at this page, you have been warned numerous times for making offensive comments, for making comments in direction violation of
684:
Re: your recent deletions of sourced content, addition of unsourced opinion, and use of talk pages for commentary, it seems that the above suggestions and warnings are neither understood or heeded. I'll request administrative overview.
289:, can you elaborate on which part(s) you consider to be POV? I'm happy to edit the article to remove any bias, but it's not clear from your statement what you consider non-neutral. I look forward to your feedback. Thanks, --
754:. Knowledge is not the thought police - editors are entitled to whatever views they hold. However, editing against basic policy and with the apparent aim of advancing one point of view is likely to result in sanctions. --
1174:. I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
574:, off topic comments can and will be removed. There are thousands of places on the internet where you can get involved in arguments about homosexuality, politics, etc. Knowledge is not one of them.
1166:
If you cannot understand what was wrong with your edits then it is not going to be in
Knowledge's best interest to unblock you. That others may have behaved badly does not excuse your behavior, see
699:
566:. Talk pages are not a place to engage in a discussion about politics, sexuality, or, really, anything else. Talk pages are to discuss improvements to the attached article. Per
707:
132:
338:
70:
Hi - I was wondering if you could re-write that paragraph as I can't make heads or tails of it. If you could just say what it means in simple language. Thanks. --
229:. Knowledge generally avoids using the word "terrorist" in the narrative voice unless attributing it to a source. Please don't add it to articles. Thank you. —
750:) without going at once to the article talkpage to explain why it was a good idea. Do not add unsourced content. Especially, do not add unsourced content to
1390:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
1237:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
1057:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
912:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
737:
717:
230:
458:
420:
If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one.
1212:
1310:
1133:
985:
835:
1365:
887:
316:. By the way, you seem to be conflating several different topics and concepts. Read the article if you're not sure exactly what "Peak oil" means.
196:. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with
725:
1032:
355:
308:
Hi, I removed your comments to the Peak oil talk page because they do not address improvement of the article or discussion of the sources (see
763:
259:
If I say antisemitism I mean antisemitism not anti-zionism. I have a great deal of personal experience of both and can make the distinction.
876:
are clear and obvious enough. One does not use talk pages to leave disparaging comments that have nothing to do with improving an article. ~
673:
23:
394:
If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see
1397:
424:
1417:
42:
53:
599:
469:, and so forth. Please don't take this as a personal slight -- I'm nominating the article solely for policy concerns. Thanks --
251:
335:
Please sign your posts to talk pages. You can do this by either typing four tildes (~~~~) or clicking on the signature button
95:
273:
729:
686:
1375:
1222:
1200:
1042:
897:
395:
241:
1286:
1109:
961:
811:
624:
350:
473:
650:
109:. Thank you. It seems most, if not all, of your edits tonight are highly POV. Please read Knowledge's policies on
1258:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
1170:. This is not a unilateral decision, you have been told by numerous users what was wrong with your edits, you just
1081:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
933:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
783:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
156:
102:
694:
101:
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to
Knowledge articles. Doing so violates Knowledge's
874:
616:
246:
148:
552:
870:
452:
325:
38:
to the top of your user page, which will add you to this category automatically and also add a nice graphic.
516:
213:
172:
74:
1304:
1127:
979:
829:
748:
661:
642:
528:
346:
298:
1273:
1096:
948:
798:
105:
policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the
1281:
1104:
956:
806:
759:
356:
303:
1269:
1092:
944:
794:
583:
1348:, for removing valid sourced content to push a POV, and for attempting to turn WP into your own little
620:
60:
1295:
1118:
970:
820:
1259:
1082:
934:
784:
540:
466:
447:
1253:
1076:
928:
778:
733:
714:
690:
628:
197:
183:
1314:
1291:
1137:
1114:
989:
966:
839:
816:
634:
342:
330:
278:
235:
186:
755:
615:
Welcome to
Knowledge! I am glad to see you are interested in discussing a topic. However, as a
478:
1277:
1100:
952:
802:
657:
137:
130:
65:
1410:
1208:
882:
679:
605:
548:
462:
286:
218:
32:
16:
Hi John good to see you made it. Looks like you're finding your way round no problem. :) —
8:
1300:
1123:
975:
825:
711:
421:
399:
226:
219:
206:
165:
724:
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at
627:
about the topic. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting
1361:
669:
595:
579:
557:
512:
309:
269:
1019:
not remove declined requests from this page; this is stated explicitly in the notice.
1349:
1167:
571:
563:
501:
493:
489:
443:
410:
378:
374:
360:
313:
106:
1384:
1353:
1231:
1051:
906:
536:
294:
120:
47:
1403:
1204:
567:
544:
532:
488:
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on
Knowledge, as you did to
470:
429:
403:
388:
279:
17:
1171:
1025:
497:
321:
201:
160:
110:
71:
57:
1357:
1345:
877:
751:
665:
591:
575:
508:
383:
265:
39:
439:
114:
434:
Hello, JohnC. Just letting you know that I replied to your comment on the
200:
please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
1178:
the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to
Knowledge,
744:
290:
152:
728:
regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
1264:
1087:
939:
789:
457:
Hello John. As a courtesy I want to let you know that I have nominated
435:
193:
84:
1402:
Please pick one and remove the other or remove both and post another.
159:
and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.
1020:
317:
857:
which were themselves contentious - such as the example given above
656:
And you're still doing it (which I warned you about last month), on
708:
Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive735#User JohnC
631:
and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you.
496:. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been
178:
143:
337:
418:
Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced.
87:
1372:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
1219:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
1039:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
894:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
312:). If you have questions, feel free to pose them to the
91:
1392:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
1239:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
1059:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
914:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
504:
if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.
700:
492:, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
623:
are for discussion related to improving the article,
387:
created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one
1252:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
1190:
will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
1075:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
927:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
777:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
262:To suggest otherwise is patronising and offensive.
660:. Your behavior is beginning to cross over into
391:that directly supports material in the article.
54:Talk:Extraordinary rendition#Terminology.2C_again
726:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
1184:the block is no longer necessary because you
1155:edits - only a handful have been objected to
743:Consider this a one and only warning. Read
52:Hi John, please look at my question under
1187:understand what you have been blocked for,
562:Hi. I just removed 2 of your comments on
747:. Do not remove sourced content (as here
147:Please do not add commentary or your own
1193:will make useful contributions instead.
461:for deletion because of concerns about
402:. Once you have provided at least one
28:Hi, You might want to consider adding
151:to Knowledge articles, as you did to
381:because under Knowledge policy, all
396:Knowledge:Referencing for beginners
24:Category:Wikipedians in New Zealand
13:
1244:
1067:
919:
769:
745:Knowledge's policy on verification
365:
182:Please do not add content without
14:
1428:
1398:One unblock request is sufficient
96:War in Afghanistan (2001–present)
610:
522:
483:
336:
177:
155:. Doing so violates Knowledge's
142:
600:05:28, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
584:05:27, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
553:20:57, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
517:22:07, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
252:anti-semitism and anti-zionism
1:
425:10:03, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
384:biographies of living persons
351:18:41, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
214:07:13, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
1033:04:12, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
888:02:11, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
752:articles about living people
718:16:34, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
173:07:00, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
157:neutral point of view policy
133:05:50, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
83:Regarding edits made during
61:07:27, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
7:
1256:, who declined the request.
1079:, who declined the request.
931:, who declined the request.
781:, who declined the request.
764:01:29, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
738:15:53, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
695:14:41, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
674:08:21, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
651:21:16, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
43:00:27, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
10:
1433:
621:Talk:Irish Republican Army
326:06:39, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
1376:guide to appealing blocks
1366:09:38, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
1223:guide to appealing blocks
1201:guide to appealing blocks
1043:guide to appealing blocks
898:guide to appealing blocks
531:. If you continue to add
500:. Please make use of the
467:Knowledge:Autobiographies
448:10:19, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
299:06:49, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
274:18:47, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
247:06:58, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
1418:12:38, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
1213:17:52, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
474:03:27, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
285:Hi, re: your comment at
198:Knowledge:Citing sources
75:01:05, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
20:08:43, 3 Feb 2005 (UTC)
535:content, as you did at
1249:
1203:for more information.
1072:
924:
774:
658:Talk: Hung (TV series)
625:not general discussion
370:
341:above the edit box. --
1301:change block settings
1248:
1172:don't want to hear it
1124:change block settings
1071:
976:change block settings
923:
826:change block settings
773:
706:Archived ANI thread:
619:, talk pages such as
453:Articles for Deletion
406:, you may remove the
379:proposed for deletion
369:
111:neutral point of view
103:neutral point of view
662:disruptive territory
541:blocked from editing
463:Knowledge:Notability
287:Talk:Surafend affair
115:no original research
400:Knowledge:Help desk
304:Talk page questions
1250:
1073:
925:
775:
636:RepublicanJacobite
629:our reference desk
529:disruptive editing
371:
343:Steven J. Anderson
886:
756:Elen of the Roads
720:
564:Talk:Anita Bryant
527:Please stop your
490:White nationalism
459:John Cox (lawyer)
375:Olga Stringfellow
361:Olga Stringfellow
357:Proposed deletion
149:personal analysis
1424:
1414:
1407:
1389:
1383:
1320:
1318:
1307:
1289:
1287:deleted contribs
1247:
1236:
1230:
1199:Please read the
1143:
1141:
1130:
1112:
1110:deleted contribs
1070:
1056:
1050:
1030:
1023:
995:
993:
982:
964:
962:deleted contribs
922:
911:
905:
880:
869:recent evidence
845:
843:
832:
814:
812:deleted contribs
772:
705:
649:
645:
637:
614:
613:
537:Talk:Katie Price
526:
525:
487:
486:
415:
409:
368:
340:
245:
211:
204:
192:, as you did to
181:
170:
163:
146:
126:
123:
37:
31:
1432:
1431:
1427:
1426:
1425:
1423:
1422:
1421:
1412:
1405:
1400:
1395:
1387:
1381:
1380:, then use the
1369:
1334:
1308:
1298:
1284:
1267:
1260:blocking policy
1245:
1242:
1234:
1228:
1227:, then use the
1216:
1157:
1131:
1121:
1107:
1090:
1083:blocking policy
1068:
1062:
1054:
1048:
1047:, then use the
1036:
1026:
1021:
1009:
983:
973:
959:
942:
935:blocking policy
920:
917:
909:
903:
902:, then use the
891:
859:
833:
823:
809:
792:
785:blocking policy
770:
702:
682:
648:
643:
635:
632:
611:
608:
560:
523:
484:
481:
455:
432:
413:
407:
404:reliable source
366:
364:
333:
331:Sign your posts
306:
283:
280:Surafend affair
254:
233:
223:
210:
207:
202:
169:
166:
161:
140:
124:
121:
99:
68:
50:
35:
29:
26:
12:
11:
5:
1430:
1399:
1396:
1370:
1341:
1337:Decline reason
1329:
1325:Request reason
1322:
1243:
1217:
1197:
1196:
1195:
1194:
1191:
1188:
1182:
1164:
1160:Decline reason
1152:
1148:Request reason
1145:
1066:
1037:
1016:
1012:Decline reason
1004:
1000:Request reason
997:
918:
892:
866:
862:Decline reason
854:
850:Request reason
847:
768:
767:
766:
730:76.248.147.199
722:
721:
701:
698:
687:76.248.147.199
681:
678:
677:
676:
640:
607:
604:
603:
602:
559:
556:
480:
479:September 2011
477:
454:
451:
431:
428:
363:
354:
332:
329:
314:reference desk
305:
302:
282:
277:
253:
250:
222:
217:
208:
167:
139:
136:
98:
81:
79:
67:
64:
49:
46:
25:
22:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1429:
1420:
1419:
1416:
1415:
1409:
1408:
1394:
1393:
1386:
1379:
1377:
1368:
1367:
1363:
1359:
1355:
1351:
1347:
1340:
1338:
1333:
1328:
1326:
1321:
1316:
1312:
1306:
1302:
1297:
1293:
1288:
1283:
1279:
1278:global blocks
1275:
1274:active blocks
1271:
1266:
1261:
1257:
1255:
1254:administrator
1241:
1240:
1233:
1226:
1224:
1215:
1214:
1210:
1206:
1202:
1192:
1189:
1186:
1185:
1183:
1181:
1177:
1176:
1175:
1173:
1169:
1163:
1161:
1156:
1151:
1149:
1144:
1139:
1135:
1129:
1125:
1120:
1116:
1111:
1106:
1102:
1101:global blocks
1098:
1097:active blocks
1094:
1089:
1084:
1080:
1078:
1077:administrator
1065:
1061:
1060:
1053:
1046:
1044:
1035:
1034:
1031:
1029:
1024:
1015:
1013:
1008:
1003:
1001:
996:
991:
987:
981:
977:
972:
968:
963:
958:
954:
953:global blocks
950:
949:active blocks
946:
941:
936:
932:
930:
929:administrator
916:
915:
908:
901:
899:
890:
889:
884:
879:
875:
872:
865:
863:
858:
853:
851:
846:
841:
837:
831:
827:
822:
818:
813:
808:
804:
803:global blocks
800:
799:active blocks
796:
791:
786:
782:
780:
779:administrator
765:
761:
757:
753:
749:
746:
742:
741:
740:
739:
735:
731:
727:
719:
716:
713:
709:
704:
703:
697:
696:
692:
688:
675:
671:
667:
663:
659:
655:
654:
653:
652:
647:
646:
639:
638:
630:
626:
622:
618:
601:
597:
593:
588:
587:
586:
585:
581:
577:
573:
569:
565:
555:
554:
550:
546:
542:
539:, you may be
538:
534:
530:
520:
519:
518:
514:
510:
506:
503:
499:
495:
491:
476:
475:
472:
468:
464:
460:
450:
449:
445:
441:
437:
427:
426:
423:
419:
412:
405:
401:
397:
392:
390:
386:
385:
380:
376:
362:
358:
353:
352:
348:
344:
339:
328:
327:
323:
319:
315:
311:
301:
300:
296:
292:
288:
281:
276:
275:
271:
267:
263:
260:
257:
249:
248:
243:
240:
237:
232:
231:Malik Shabazz
228:
221:
216:
215:
212:
205:
199:
195:
191:
189:
185:
180:
175:
174:
171:
164:
158:
154:
150:
145:
138:February 2009
135:
134:
131:
129:
128:
127:
116:
112:
108:
104:
97:
93:
89:
86:
80:
77:
76:
73:
66:Blue fly Tail
63:
62:
59:
55:
45:
44:
41:
34:
21:
19:
1411:
1404:
1401:
1391:
1373:
1371:
1342:
1336:
1335:
1330:
1324:
1323:
1296:creation log
1263:
1251:
1238:
1220:
1218:
1198:
1179:
1165:
1159:
1158:
1153:
1147:
1146:
1119:creation log
1086:
1074:
1063:
1058:
1040:
1038:
1027:
1017:
1011:
1010:
1005:
999:
998:
971:creation log
938:
926:
913:
895:
893:
867:
861:
860:
855:
849:
848:
821:creation log
788:
776:
723:
683:
680:January 2012
644:TheFortyFive
641:
633:
617:general rule
609:
606:October 2011
561:
521:
507:
505:
494:edit summary
482:
456:
433:
417:
393:
382:
373:The article
372:
334:
307:
284:
264:
261:
258:
255:
238:
227:WP:TERRORIST
225:Please read
224:
220:WP:TERRORIST
187:
176:
141:
119:
118:
100:
78:
69:
51:
27:
15:
438:talk page.
310:wp:NOTFORUM
153:Paul Watson
33:User NZ res
1350:WP:SOAPBOX
1292:filter log
1205:Beeblebrox
1168:WP:NOTTHEM
1115:filter log
967:filter log
817:filter log
572:WP:SOAPBOX
558:Talk pages
545:Off2riorob
533:defamatory
471:Neutrality
436:Pedophilia
398:or ask at
194:Sonny Bono
85:January 11
56:. Thanks.
18:Christiaan
1374:read the
1354:WP:ARBCOM
1311:checkuser
1270:block log
1221:read the
1134:checkuser
1093:block log
1041:read the
986:checkuser
945:block log
896:read the
836:checkuser
795:block log
422:Ravendrop
377:has been
256:Hi John,
203:Terrillja
162:Terrillja
72:Stbalbach
58:Kosebamse
1358:Qwyrxian
1282:contribs
1105:contribs
957:contribs
878:Amatulić
807:contribs
666:Qwyrxian
592:Qwyrxian
576:Qwyrxian
568:WP:FORUM
509:Greenman
498:reverted
411:prod blp
266:Telaviv1
242:contribs
188:reliable
48:Question
40:Onco_p53
1385:unblock
1305:unblock
1232:unblock
1128:unblock
1052:unblock
980:unblock
907:unblock
830:unblock
502:sandbox
440:Flyer22
430:Replied
190:sources
107:sandbox
1346:WP:BLP
1028:(talk)
715:(talk)
389:source
291:Canley
184:citing
122:Auburn
1413:rolls
1378:first
1265:JohnC
1225:first
1088:JohnC
1045:first
940:JohnC
900:first
790:JohnC
712:Chris
416:tag.
125:Pilot
94:) to
1406:Tide
1362:talk
1209:talk
1022:Kuru
883:talk
873:and
871:here
760:talk
734:talk
691:talk
670:talk
596:talk
580:talk
570:and
549:talk
513:talk
444:talk
347:talk
322:talk
318:NJGW
295:talk
270:talk
236:talk
209:talk
168:talk
113:and
88:2007
1315:log
1262:).
1138:log
1085:).
990:log
937:).
840:log
787:).
543:.
359:of
92:UTC
1388:}}
1382:{{
1364:)
1356:.
1339::
1327::
1309:•
1303:•
1299:•
1294:•
1290:•
1285:•
1280:•
1276:•
1272:•
1235:}}
1229:{{
1211:)
1180:or
1162::
1150::
1132:•
1126:•
1122:•
1117:•
1113:•
1108:•
1103:•
1099:•
1095:•
1055:}}
1049:{{
1014::
1002::
984:•
978:•
974:•
969:•
965:•
960:•
955:•
951:•
947:•
910:}}
904:{{
864::
852::
834:•
828:•
824:•
819:•
815:•
810:•
805:•
801:•
797:•
762:)
736:)
710:--
693:)
672:)
598:)
582:)
551:)
515:)
465:,
446:)
414:}}
408:{{
349:)
324:)
297:)
272:)
117:.
36:}}
30:{{
1360:(
1319:)
1317:)
1313:(
1268:(
1207:(
1142:)
1140:)
1136:(
1091:(
994:)
992:)
988:(
943:(
885:)
881:(
844:)
842:)
838:(
793:(
758:(
732:(
689:(
668:(
594:(
578:(
547:(
511:(
442:(
345:(
320:(
293:(
268:(
244:)
239:·
234:(
90:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
