677:(Undid revision 731479464 - you still aren't explaining how it is related to the ruler function, formatting a section header correctly, or showing the correctness of the code.) Knowledge doesn't currently explain the simplified ruler function. If you plot out core OEIS sequence A001511 1, 2, 1, 3, 1, 2, 1, 4, 1, 2, 1, 3, 1, 2, 1, the result looks like a ruler, hence the name Ruler function. I'm not a Knowledge expert. If the section header was wrong, why couldn't you have fixed it instead of starting an edit war and rejecting OEIS as a source? This sequence is the position of change of the Gray code. If the Gray code is accepted, what extra hoops need to be made for a more elegant solution? Move $ n$ uses a disk sized one more than the power of 2 in $ n$ . You are asking again for the connection to the Tomae function, which I removed several iterations ago because that page also has errors of omission. I've added a Talk discussion on the Tower of Hanoi page. If you want to suggest that one of Neil Sloane's original core sequences is wrong, please explain your reasoning there. I've added an explanation of the Ruler function at the
715:, focuses on articles that relate to wildfires. There is a lot of work that needs to be done. From updating templates, to classifying and improving articles. Any level of commitment is welcome! If you care to just add some input on the founding of the new project, awesome. If you would like to take an active role in editing articles, that is awesome as well! Knowledge of wildfires is NOT a prerequisite for joining the project. In fact, it would be great to have some members of the project who are NOT fire-buffs. That way we make sure that articles aren't just written by and for people in the fire community. If this is something you have any interest in, I would love to have you join the project! Please feel free to
848:
701:
31:
385:
169:
Another reason why I reverted, which I couldn't include in the edit summary due to length restrictions, was that details about those individual storms are excessive for the lead and belong in the season summary section. Note that the 2015 PHS article mentions only two of the 26 systems of the year in
144:
Why did you at least revert every edit I did? Especially for the season summary at the top. You don't have to revert everything, at least revert the first paragraph about the "hyperactive season", but retain the season summary of storms. It is just because of TSR's updates, as they still have not yet
248:
Even the 2014 PTS season? Ok, so what I think, is that because this is your opinion as you did say in your edit summaries in both the 2014 and 2015 PTS articles, then you're wanting a change in all articles? Just look at the 2015 PHS and AHS articles, they have summaries at the top. Although, as you
504:
Hi. You know how we have the season timeline box in the "Seasonal summary" section and we update them? Are we suppose to update them if it's 00Z (or do we follow UTC time)? Because last week, I got warned by United States Man for updating the timeline 'early' and stated that I should follow the UTC
986:
of over 14,000 pages, by far the worst since 2011, and we need an all out drive to get this back down to just a few hundred that can be easily maintained in the future. Unlike AfC, these pages are already in mainspace, and the thought of what might be there is quite scary. There are also many good
415:
Thanks for your usual assistance on editing / building the article I linked above. I hope you maybe give more tips on how to create a
Tropical Cyclone article properly. I do really appreciated your assistance on this. And to tell you honestly, this is my first tropical cyclone related article I've
279:
If so, for PTS articles, I think the 2015 season is a good one (despite there are a lack of sources in its summary). But as you did to the 2014 article, there's like hardly anything at the top. But anyways, seeing the 2014 PHS article, mentioning major events/storms are (only) included at the top
226:
I would say that
Hyperactive is a definite no no, above average could be used at a push but I personally prefer near average since it was only 1 or 2 systems above average I think. I agree with Jasper that the seasonal summary in the lead is too long and I would encourage you Typhoon2013 to merge
213:
It's called a "lead" not a full season summary for a reason. The "slightly below normal" classification of the 2014 PTS is just because it produced a below-normal number of named storms compared to normal. It's perfectly reasonable to conclude that from the number of storms in that season. In the
994:
can occasionally be somewhat more challenging than AfC, the criteria for obtaining the right are roughly the same. The Page
Curation tool is even easier to use than the Helper Script, so it's likely that most AfC reviewers already have more than enough knowledge for the task of New Page Review.
327:
For the 2015 PTS we have
Soudelor and Maysak as the most notable storms; however, for 2014 I'm not so sure. Vongfong, Nuri, and Hagupit all have their own merits, though, so maybe we can start with them. But we definitely should only mention a select few storms that contributed the most to each
189:
So you are saying that one of your reasons for doing this is because the info summary I've put is too much? Also what I've seen like in the 2014 PTS article, some bits at the top are followed from the TSR. For example, the 2014 PTS is slightly below normal etc.
310:
I am saying that I think we should follow the format of the 2014 PHS and the 2015 PTS articles. The edit you did in the 2014 PTS article, now it looks like there's hardly anything at the top with only a few sentences.
902:, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the
545:
We go through this same ignorant crap every year. After the 2100z advisory, it is perfectly okay for me or any other user to update the timeline, as we have done for years, and I will continue to do that. Thanks,
505:
time. But recently, he made an edit in the timeline, stating he updated it, around 21Z, which I have always been doing. Do we need to make up this 'rule' about to only update the timelines if it's 00Z?
266:
There's a difference between a concise summary that briefly mentions the most important storms of a season (good), and a verbose summary that essentially says what a full seasonal summary section would
979:
As an AfC reviewer you're probably aware that a new user right has been created for patrolling new pages (you might even have been granted the right already, and admins have it automatically).
787:
I don't use that for the same reason we don't track remnant lows of eastern
Pacific or Atlantic tropical cyclones, even if they are mentioned in NWS High Seas reports - that the JMA
926:
398:
446:
Ok so what you've said about me editing from the trackfile before the official advisory, does this include for all basins or is it only the EPac and
Atlantic basins? --
249:
mentioned, there are some in the "Season summary" section. So what are you trying to do? Do you want to do the same in other articles like the PHS and AHS articles?
394:
824:
1026:
134:
145:
issued their season summary for the 2015 PTS for nearly three months. I have talked about this with JR. But surely, the 2015 season is one of the most active.
555:
813:
Hi Jasper. Thanks for the example of king versus king and rook pawn. I was looking to have more complicated examples like this included in the article.
126:
102:
820:
540:
491:
478:
335:
322:
303:
291:
274:
221:
201:
184:
660:
646:
621:
600:
577:
365:
353:
236:
468:
775:
for any dissipation of tropical cyclones in the
Northwest Pacific Ocean. Meranti is still active as a tropical depression at 12:00 UTC today. --
214:
2015 season, that is definitely not the case. A "hyperactive" season would be like the 1997 PTS - one with many many storms, like the 2015 PHS.--
936:
915:
802:
173:
The term "hyperactive" is definitely not appropriate for this, especially when no official (read: RSMC or JTWC) source explicitly says so, per
761:
516:
358:
Normally, weak systems that didn't affect land would not deserve note in the lead, but in this case we have nothing else, so it's fine.--
454:
120:
436:
742:
987:
faith article creators who need a simple, gentle push to the Tea House or their pages converted to Draft rather than being deleted.
568:
is to answer: What time and date is it as you write your response in UTC or Zulu time. I have a sneaking suspicion about something.
260:
156:
971:
883:
721:
Note that you are receiving this message from me because I saw you made multiple edits on a wildfire related page, specifically
112:
You were previously nominated to receive a free t-shirt from the
Wikimedia Foundation through our Merchandise Giveaway program (
402:
341:
690:
1022:
954:
891:
832:
747:
716:
930:
781:
942:
828:
906:. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.
795:
to connect that low with
Meranti (no matter how obvious) because the JMA is not explicitly labelling it as such. --
752:
Thank you for mentioning it. A remarkable lot of history happened in that area. Feel free to edit as you see best.
735:
499:
94:
86:
81:
69:
64:
59:
1018:
408:
966:
712:
441:
429:
878:
551:
695:
838:
38:
379:
139:
409:
130:
467:
This is only for the NHC (eastern
Pacific and Atlantic) and CPHC (central Pacific), as you were
911:
672:
547:
528:
948:
799:
757:
708:
643:
597:
537:
513:
475:
362:
332:
319:
300:
288:
271:
257:
218:
198:
181:
153:
47:
17:
983:
816:
656:
617:
573:
349:
232:
791:
for what really are invests or remnant lows doesn't change that. After all, I consider it
651:
Just a theory I had based on some of your edits, about you not really knowing when UTC is.
8:
766:
903:
861:
700:
686:
678:
422:
907:
874:
808:
788:
796:
753:
636:
607:
590:
563:
534:
524:
506:
484:
472:
462:
447:
359:
329:
312:
297:
281:
268:
250:
215:
208:
191:
178:
164:
146:
792:
728:
652:
630:
613:
584:
569:
345:
228:
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
999:
847:
1007:
1003:
991:
682:
417:
174:
391:
Thanks for helping me with the sphere integral, your approach was clearest!
865:
959:
920:
722:
344:
by either of you would be appreciated before I put it live on Saturday.
899:
893:
776:
681:
page. If that sticks around, then a link to Thomae would make sense.
860:
Thanks for finding and reverting that anti-Hillary Clinton stuff on
122:
and we will send you full details on how to accept your free shirt.
113:
384:
772:
589:
What do you mean? Are you talking about different time zones?
998:
It is hoped that AfC reviewers will apply for this right at
227:
bits of it with the seasonal summary section and source it!
483:
Wow I forgot that we even discussed before. But thanks! --
1002:
and lend a hand. You'll need to have read the page at
612:
Just tell me what is the current time and date in UTC?
280:
whilst the summary in its section. Should we do that?
533:
Please do it strictly only at 0z or later each day.--
116:). Congratulations and thank you for your hard work!
982:
Since July there has been a very serious backlog at
711:and am trying to recruit new members. The project,
635:As of this edit, it is 02:38, 24/7 in UTC. Why?
114:https://meta.wikimedia.org/Merchandise_giveaways
328:season. Think of the 2015 PHS as an example.--
104:Merchandise Giveaway Nomination Notification
471:. Please do not make me remind you again.--
719:or leave me a message on my talk page. (
14:
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
707:Hello! I have recently started a new
25:
296:I am not sure what you mean here.--
23:
1015:(Sent to all active AfC reviewers)
725:. Not just spamming you at random.
699:
383:
24:
1037:
846:
29:
972:New Page Review needs your help
803:17:05, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
782:16:16, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
13:
1:
1027:16:33, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
967:08:34, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
727:) Hope you have a great day!
916:05:22, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
884:17:55, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
560:I have a question that only
177:, no matter what TSR says.--
7:
854:The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
833:09:03, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
762:09:40, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
748:Miles Rocks and Point Lobos
10:
1042:
1019:MediaWiki message delivery
743:22:04, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
366:23:46, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
354:23:43, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
336:07:19, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
323:03:21, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
304:03:01, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
292:02:16, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
275:01:59, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
261:23:33, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
135:16:41, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
109:Hi Jasper Deng/Archive 23
845:
691:21:50, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
661:12:03, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
647:02:38, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
622:21:15, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
601:21:05, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
578:20:17, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
556:19:29, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
541:00:56, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
517:23:33, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
492:00:55, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
479:00:47, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
455:21:34, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
237:16:18, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
222:15:46, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
202:10:39, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
185:07:55, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
157:04:18, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
927:Jasper Deng Genghis Khan
771:You should refer to the
500:Season timeline updating
437:06:59, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
403:08:31, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
410:Typhoon Nepartak (2016)
704:
442:Trackfile confirmation
388:
703:
387:
42:of past discussions.
18:User talk:Jasper Deng
984:Special:NewPagesFeed
713:WikiProject Wildfire
696:WikiProject WIldfire
892:GA reassessment of
839:A barnstar for you!
717:join the discussion
469:previously reminded
119:Please email us at
992:New Page Reviewing
949:current autoblocks
862:Template:NYT topic
789:abuses the term TD
705:
389:
1017:
904:reassessment page
889:
888:
882:
835:
819:comment added by
737:What I been doing
679:Thomae's function
548:United States Man
529:United States Man
433:
426:
380:A kitten for you!
100:
99:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
1033:
1013:
1008:the new tutorial
976:Hi Jasper Deng,
964:
958:
872:
870:
850:
843:
842:
814:
779:
773:high seas report
738:
731:
641:
634:
611:
595:
588:
567:
532:
511:
489:
466:
452:
434:
431:
427:
424:
420:
340:Any thoughts on
317:
286:
255:
212:
196:
168:
151:
140:Season summaries
78:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
1041:
1040:
1036:
1035:
1034:
1032:
1031:
1030:
974:
960:
925:
923:
897:
866:
841:
811:
777:
769:
750:
740:
736:
729:
698:
675:
637:
628:
605:
591:
582:
561:
522:
507:
502:
485:
460:
448:
444:
430:
423:
418:
413:
382:
313:
282:
251:
206:
192:
162:
147:
142:
107:
74:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1039:
973:
970:
922:
919:
896:
890:
887:
886:
857:
856:
851:
840:
837:
810:
807:
806:
805:
768:
765:
754:Paul, in Saudi
749:
746:
734:
697:
694:
674:
673:Tower of Hanoi
671:
670:
669:
668:
667:
666:
665:
664:
663:
626:
625:
624:
558:
501:
498:
497:
496:
495:
494:
443:
440:
412:
407:
405:
381:
378:
377:
376:
375:
374:
373:
372:
371:
370:
369:
368:
308:
307:
306:
246:
245:
244:
243:
242:
241:
240:
239:
171:
141:
138:
106:
101:
98:
97:
92:
89:
84:
79:
72:
67:
62:
52:
51:
34:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1038:
1029:
1028:
1024:
1020:
1016:
1011:
1009:
1005:
1001:
996:
993:
988:
985:
980:
977:
969:
968:
965:
963:
956:
953:
950:
947:
944:
941:
938:
935:
932:
928:
918:
917:
913:
909:
905:
901:
895:
885:
880:
876:
871:
869:
863:
859:
858:
855:
852:
849:
844:
836:
834:
830:
826:
822:
818:
804:
801:
798:
794:
790:
786:
785:
784:
783:
780:
774:
764:
763:
759:
755:
745:
744:
739:
732:
726:
724:
718:
714:
710:
702:
693:
692:
688:
684:
680:
662:
658:
654:
650:
649:
648:
645:
642:
640:
632:
627:
623:
619:
615:
609:
604:
603:
602:
599:
596:
594:
586:
581:
580:
579:
575:
571:
565:
559:
557:
553:
549:
544:
543:
542:
539:
536:
530:
526:
521:
520:
519:
518:
515:
512:
510:
493:
490:
488:
482:
481:
480:
477:
474:
470:
464:
459:
458:
457:
456:
453:
451:
439:
438:
435:
428:
421:
411:
406:
404:
400:
396:
392:
386:
367:
364:
361:
357:
356:
355:
351:
347:
343:
339:
338:
337:
334:
331:
326:
325:
324:
321:
318:
316:
309:
305:
302:
299:
295:
294:
293:
290:
287:
285:
278:
277:
276:
273:
270:
265:
264:
263:
262:
259:
256:
254:
238:
234:
230:
225:
224:
223:
220:
217:
210:
205:
204:
203:
200:
197:
195:
188:
187:
186:
183:
180:
176:
172:
166:
161:
160:
159:
158:
155:
152:
150:
137:
136:
132:
128:
127:Jseddon (WMF)
123:
121:
117:
115:
110:
105:
96:
93:
90:
88:
85:
83:
80:
77:
73:
71:
68:
66:
63:
61:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
1014:
1012:
997:
989:
981:
978:
975:
961:
951:
945:
939:
933:
924:
908:Double sharp
898:
867:
853:
815:āĀ Preceding
812:
770:
751:
720:
706:
676:
638:
592:
508:
503:
486:
449:
445:
414:
393:
390:
314:
283:
252:
247:
193:
148:
143:
124:
118:
111:
108:
103:
75:
43:
37:
821:Synesthetic
797:Jasper Deng
767:Dissipation
709:WikiProject
639:Typhoon2013
608:Typhoon2013
593:Typhoon2013
564:Typhoon2013
535:Jasper Deng
525:Typhoon2013
509:Typhoon2013
487:Typhoon2013
473:Jasper Deng
463:Typhoon2013
450:Typhoon2013
360:Jasper Deng
330:Jasper Deng
315:Typhoon2013
298:Jasper Deng
284:Typhoon2013
269:Jasper Deng
253:Typhoon2013
216:Jasper Deng
209:Typhoon2013
194:Typhoon2013
179:Jasper Deng
165:Typhoon2013
149:Typhoon2013
36:This is an
943:page moves
730:Zackmann08
723:North Fire
653:Jason Rees
631:Jason Rees
614:Jason Rees
585:Jason Rees
570:Jason Rees
346:Jason Rees
229:Jason Rees
95:ArchiveĀ 30
87:ArchiveĀ 25
82:ArchiveĀ 24
76:ArchiveĀ 23
70:ArchiveĀ 22
65:ArchiveĀ 21
60:ArchiveĀ 20
990:Although
955:block log
900:Chalcogen
894:Chalcogen
809:Stalemate
432:KushKush!
416:created.
170:its lead.
937:contribs
879:contribs
829:contribs
817:unsigned
793:WP:SYNTH
683:EdPeggJr
419:Hamham31
267:(bad).--
125:Thanks!
1000:WP:PERM
868:MRD2014
39:archive
1004:WP:NPR
962:Ks0stm
800:(talk)
644:(talk)
598:(talk)
538:(talk)
514:(talk)
476:(talk)
395:××× ×¤'
363:(talk)
333:(talk)
320:(talk)
301:(talk)
289:(talk)
272:(talk)
258:(talk)
219:(talk)
199:(talk)
182:(talk)
175:WP:DUE
154:(talk)
425:Heke!
16:<
1023:talk
1006:and
931:talk
912:talk
875:talk
825:talk
778:Meow
758:talk
687:talk
657:talk
618:talk
574:talk
552:talk
527:and
399:talk
350:talk
342:this
233:talk
131:talk
1010:.
921:FYI
864:. ā
1025:)
914:)
877:ā¢
831:)
827:ā¢
760:)
741:)
733:(/
689:)
659:)
620:)
576:)
554:)
401:)
352:)
235:)
133:)
91:ā
1021:(
957:)
952:Ā·
946:Ā·
940:Ā·
934:Ā·
929:(
910:(
881:)
873:(
823:(
756:(
685:(
655:(
633::
629:@
616:(
610::
606:@
587::
583:@
572:(
566::
562:@
550:(
531::
523:@
465::
461:@
397:(
348:(
231:(
211::
207:@
167::
163:@
129:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.