1634:
september it was quite obvious you had an issue biting users. I haven't trawled your contribs looking for issues, this was just from AN/I archives. So since that time I don't know whats happened. All I know is that in this incident it looks to be more of the concern. It bothers me when I see long term issues like this on
Knowledge. it means as a community we've failed to address these things appropriately, however that may be. I'd encourage you to work more closely with your mentors and find a solution to whatever it is that's causing this kind of behaviour. I will say that you seemed to handle this AN/I discussion much better than the previous two, so kudos on that.--
1369:
31:
667:
495:
1605:
1554:
1672:
808:
132:
1420:
1982:
Well, those alloys typically contain only some 1% thorium and are used for military/space (or other non-civilian) applications, where safety regulations are different. I don't have any personal experience with those alloys, and believe their use is getting limited, i.e., what we read on this topic is
1633:
Not sure why you turned around and reverted that. I was tied up trying to sort out an EC at AN/I. Restrictions treat symptoms, they don't really treat the cause of the problem. You've previously had 2 pretty thorough discussions regarding some of your editing issues. My concern is this: As recent as
324:
The problem is that we don't have consensus on what to replace median with. In fact we never discussed that. That's why I want this RFC stopped and replaced with another one regarding the method of representing the data. I would agree to remove median until there'll be clear consensus on the matter.
210:
Please source your "most of the
Internet." Many large providers do have native IPv6 these days, but few end-users are taking advantage of it...so not only do most end nodes not have IPv6, the networks they're connected to don't even have it available. Yes, it's continuing to improve...but it's still
1105:
the way admins proceed in such cases, instead changing the block settings to revoke the users' access to their talk page. Protection would be appropriate if there were multiple IP socks posting to the same talk page, or any situation where there was a long-term pattern of disruption of a particular
577:
You say that "Twinkle ... will have to undergo extensive modification to gain IPv6 support." As a developer of
Twinkle, I would assert that Twinkle would require very minimal modification to support IPv6. From a networking perspective, so long as the user's networking stack, OS, and browser support
1011:
protection for some socks talk page. They had only requested unblock once. Of course it was a hopeless request and I denied it, but that doesn't warrant indef full protection. Disruption would have to be very extreme before such a measure would be taken. RFPP has been backlogged on a regular basis
1006:
I realize you are only trying to help, but I've noticed you seem to constantly be reporting blocked users at RFPP asking that their talk pages be revoked, sometimes after only one unblock request. There are admins who regularly review unblock requests, they are able to determine when it is time to
257:
I agree, deploy is a better generic term here; support is too broad, since many hosts DO obviously "support" it, even if that support hasn't been deployed (as is the case most of the time...) Seems like our edits are in sync then, so all's good there I hope! (Sincerely, IPv6 documentation prefix.)
1211:
As you see, I've been accused by CPL of calling you and Elen "Asshats" and "Idiots". Did I ever? I would never do that. It is a rather violent accusation, I'm not going to just stand and take it. I've asked for confirmation, or apology. What is your position on this? Abusive false accusations of
284:
After some thinking I came to conclusion that the RFC you've opened represents the issue in a biased manner: it focuses on median instead of data representation. I would like to discuss a possibility of closing this RFC and opening another one that would ask editors to suggest a preferable way of
1837:
Please don't edit too fast for me to keep up when I am dealing with someone as an admin. I know your excellent intentions, but I prefer to handle my own warnings when I'm around. It is however now late night in NYC, and I am stopping till tomorrow. As for the article, I will take a look in the
1479:
User:Goodbyz's claim in both unblock requests that the threat was not a legal threat within the meaning of WP:legal does not sit easily with me. When
Goodbyz appeared at the Gingrich presidential campaign article talk page to advocate for the edit-warring multiple-IP user there (who promptly
1132:
Realistically, just ignore the user talk pages of blocked editors unless they are posting BLP violations, spam, or copyvios. It's not worth your time or administrators' time to look for 192.168.1.100 who replaced his talk page with: "Reaper
Eternal is a monster faggot" after getting blocked.
615:
I just thought of warnings when I posted this... that will be more of a challenge, and I would need some more implementation details to write such code. On the other hand, even though the
SanitizeIP function is not directly available to Twinkle (being written in PHP), it looks like it can be
1300:
I know that broken clients and db schema changes (presumably to accommodate the longer addresses) are problems. To test the stack means that WMF's IPv6 network will be tested, but will not be put into production use. Hopefully we'll have full IPv6 access by the start of the next fundraiser.
1096:
which is regularly reviewed by admins. If they are just doing something other than requesting unblock, many feel it is best to let them talk to themselves, they will run out of steam eventually. However if there is severe vandalism or BLP violations being posted to their page while blocked
1816:] -- this is computer software, and computer software is not one of the things included under that CSD criterion; it is not included under what is meant by "web content". The article has been prodded, and that should do the job of removing it. If not, it will have to be AfD.
355:
Yes, but this RFC is in fact useless, as in any case the answer for question "What are we going to do next?" will make the result of this RFC void any way. My suggestion only helps to save time, it doesn't influence the end result. Why don't You want to give it a try? ā
1284:
From what I'm told, the WMF hopes to be able to participate only to test its stack on that day, but not to keep IPV6 on, as there is more work to be done before that can happen. I have no real comprehension of what that means, but I hope you do. :D
1969:
The thing was, I was surprised that thorium could be useful, alloyed with magnesium (at least thorium-232). A large chunk of thorium with lots of alpha radiation emittance would be used to make such a thing, even though it has a such a long
1166:
211:
not proper penetration of the technology. In any case, I think it's important to note that you don't need to *switch* to IPv6, just to support it. I'm re-editing the lede and will try to make that more informative... ā
619:
Still, I don't really see the need to mess with this sort of thing until some sort of announcement is made about the plans for enabling IPv6 (unless one has already been made and I have missed it...) ā
1906:
This one came from Reddit; there are usually no long-term participants (except for LTA cases). I was afraid reporting the title only would interfere with the helperbots, but bots are not intelligent.
1855:
PS. At least some of the references that user put in are probably in fact usable, if they aren't in the main article already; if you can find a neutral wording, no reason why you shouldn't add them.
893:
If you could post an explanatory note and apology on the IP's talk page, they will see it. They were editing there within the last few hours. Thank you for acknowledging your mistake so readily. --
382:
I don't care median. I want the data properly represented. As of now, the median is the best way, but I would be happy to be able to work out a better way. Or a worse but still acceptable way. ā
1187:
157:
I saw that there was lots of back and forth with you and another user on my talk page and that it was all revdeleted. What happened? I know it is about the Kris Herzog article I declined.
1891:
In 4chan attacks, report only the article title and long-term participants to AIV, there is no use reporting them all, the admin who'll get to the article will see whom to block. Cheers.
1120:
AIV has the specific instruction to not use it for talk page access removal (since it would be removed by an AIV helperbot), and these things just seem to be not worth taking up at ANI.
578:
IPv6, Twinkle and all other user scripts will transparently support IPv6 without requiring modification. From a functionality perspective, Twinkle will need one function updated (
1261:
Hi.Ā :) I tried to get an answer to this question before it archived on Jimmy's talk page, but, unfortunately, I just missed it. :D You had asked, of course, the following:
1939:
Thanks. In any case, I find it strange that we can treat some radioisotopes as if they were stable, especially things like thorium, and use them like ordinary materials.
721:
862:). She was trying to contact users privately to pass along information, including passwords to email accounts needed to run the newspaper. Please see also this thread
533:
603:
IPv6 addresses also take many forms. Is the
SanitizeIP() function available to you? Also, we'll also have to change it so there's the option to warn the IPv6 subnet.
242:. Most consumer operating systems have IPv6 tunnel support already and many cable modems already support IPv6 (especially the newer models). This is not the same as
1335:
647:
635:
610:
1342:
1041:
848:
1992:
1977:
1964:
1946:
1927:
1913:
1468:
1611:
875:
1175:
1168:
2054:
1754:
1742:
1724:
1250:
1154:
1142:
1326:
1308:
197:
183:
800:
146:
1051:
854:
2114:
2102:
1793:
1534:
1522:
1508:
1404:
1127:
1115:
1065:
1034:
989:
977:
961:
949:
479:
838:
425:
412:
Keeping two RFCs side by side is a bad idea, I think. Furthermore, it is not needed if new RFC is stated in unbiased way (including concerns about
407:
391:
377:
365:
350:
338:
319:
271:
252:
1779:
1656:
1200:
914:
902:
888:
824:
1452:
764:
2129:
1481:
1878:
1294:
1086:
1021:
312:
Because we're involved, none of us can close this RFC ourselves. If the median is removed we can replace it with something else like a mean.
1951:"Stable" is a relative term, safety matters depend on the total dose and intensity of radiation emitted by a real chunk of material. Say,
1813:
1686:
774:
Can you delete the userpage for Sk8rownot? I tagged it as a puppeteer and then realized who it really was a minute later. Just nuke it.
1866:
657:
306:
1388:
1354:
597:
224:
166:
1221:
466:
1620:
1590:
1900:
1711:
740:
if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the
552:
if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the
452:
See the DYK nom for this. In addition to comment there that needs addressed, avoid single-sentence paragraphs and sections.
1643:
936:
123:
1699:
1616:
1569:
1001:
783:
2041:
1662:
1056:
my point was actually that you don't need to be asking for it anywhere, at least not with the frequency you have been.
1007:
revoke talk page access when reviewing requests. In the case of the latest one I've declined you asked for indefinite
673:
628:
590:
1240:
501:
2074:
1767:
1410:
1256:
1918:
Well, you can always attach some IP or account to the article name, so that the bot thinks its a vandal reportĀ :-).
1849:
1495:
2095:
1827:
326:
294:
94:
89:
84:
72:
67:
1484:
59:
1235:, unfortunately. An established editor might get in trouble for this, but this is a new user that you have been
1334:
1101:, which generally has a better response time than RFU or RFPP, would be a good bet since protection is usually
863:
760:
279:
267:
220:
622:
584:
1480:
vanished, and has not reappeared therafter), Goodbyz was at pains to claim that the IP user is "an attorney"
1317:
Thanks.Ā :) I'll let you know if I hear anymore about it, but I am pretty far removed from the tech desks. --
485:
1988:
1960:
1923:
1896:
1761:
1445:
1359:
1092:
If they are abusing the unblock template, they have essentially reported themselves as they get added to
858:
This thread is from someone named
Natalia, who was under instructions from Skomorokh ā(the editor of the
205:
1649:
Thanks for the concerns; I try, but like everyone I slip up. If you have any suggestions, bring them up.
741:
727:
553:
539:
38:
698:
685:
2037:
1789:
1738:
1707:
1217:
1138:
526:
513:
445:
108:
1322:
1290:
370:
So, you are dropping your support of the median? The RFC was intended to resolve that issue only.
193:
162:
1984:
1956:
1919:
1892:
1576:
Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.
1438:
1178:
been quiet for a while now. I believe that it is time to bring some form of closure to this. --
834:
779:
562:
152:
120:
1486:, i.e. someone with professional legal expertise of some kind. May or may not have a bearing.
666:
494:
2111:
2071:
2051:
1974:
1943:
1910:
1875:
1751:
1721:
1653:
1587:
1531:
1505:
1465:
1401:
1305:
1277:
1247:
1197:
1151:
1124:
1083:
1048:
1031:
974:
946:
911:
885:
797:
678:
644:
607:
506:
476:
404:
374:
347:
316:
285:
representing user agent statistic, so that we could actually gather the community's input on
249:
180:
143:
47:
17:
2090:
1628:
1544:
1518:
1501:
He isn't gonna be unblocked anytime soon. I'm trying to tell him that it is a legal threat.
1491:
1385:
1206:
1111:
1061:
1017:
986:
958:
933:
731:
461:
400:
going to ask for the RFC to be closed, but feel free to open a second RFC at the same time.
543:
8:
2033:
1785:
1734:
1703:
1228:
1213:
1134:
1027:
Then where do I ask for revocation? I'm sure that socks shouldn't have it from the start.
173:
1934:
1832:
1595:
1483:, and also claimed, at Goodbyz's UTP, that Goodbyz him/herself is the IP's "colleague",
1318:
1286:
1273:
because schema changes to the db were required, but would it be ready this time around?
754:
737:
549:
421:
387:
361:
334:
302:
263:
216:
189:
158:
1174:
Hi jasper. I don't know how and who will close an open RFC. But the RFC you opened at
1807:
1775:
1682:
1639:
1350:
1183:
924:
898:
871:
830:
820:
775:
112:
2108:
2068:
2064:
2048:
1971:
1940:
1907:
1872:
1748:
1718:
1717:
What I find ironic is that most of our readers come here to learn how to play. Sad.
1694:
1650:
1610:
Thanks for cleaning the garbage from my Talk page this morning. I appreciate it. ā
1584:
1528:
1502:
1462:
1419:
1398:
1302:
1274:
1244:
1194:
1148:
1121:
1080:
1045:
1028:
971:
943:
908:
882:
794:
641:
604:
473:
446:
401:
371:
344:
313:
246:
177:
140:
1012:
lately, as I'm sure you know, and these kinds of requests only add to the problem.
2085:
1553:
1514:
1487:
1382:
1232:
1107:
1057:
1013:
983:
955:
930:
453:
102:
942:
It demonstrates BEANS well. Not canvassing as only a few users are eligibleĀ :) .
724:.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page
536:.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
1730:
1270:
1239:
lately. The accusations are not as much as the actual name-calling but as your
1236:
769:
1368:
1886:
1862:
1845:
1823:
1345:
so we can come to a conclusion about how best to follow policy. Best regards
1098:
1093:
967:
750:
703:
417:
383:
357:
330:
298:
259:
212:
1771:
1678:
1635:
1346:
1179:
894:
867:
816:
790:
707:
572:
413:
2107:
I've wondered the same, but my AGF didn't go off with the wind, until now.
1955:
smoke detectors are still common, despite all the recent radiation fears.
2008:
1474:
711:
2121:
1176:
Talk:Usage_share_of_web_browsers#Medians_in_Usage_share_of_web_browsers
1169:
Talk:Usage_share_of_web_browsers#Medians_in_Usage_share_of_web_browsers
1604:
1952:
715:
1729:
Yeah that *is* ironic, even Jimbo did (maybe you knew) if you check
1857:
1840:
1818:
1343:
Knowledge:Files for deletion/2012 January 29#File:Vbox osx win7.png
970:: We violated POINT, NPOV, and BATTLE big-time with that blackout!!
530:, legend has it that the winning move drew a shower of gold coins?
1671:
1266:
866:. I think you owe this Natalia person an apology. Sincerely, --
566:
640:
2012 is supposed to be the year of widespread IPv6 deployment.
1677:
Thanks for cleaning my talk and having more patience than I.
693:
521:
2047:
Thanks, but I'm clearly not ready; it won't look good on me.
982:
Yeah, this has definitely been interesting to be a part of.
690:, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was
518:, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was
1871:
I'm well aware of this particular issue, but I'm no expert.
722:
Template:Did you know nominations/Rotlewi versus
Rubinstein
534:
Template:Did you know nominations/Levitsky versus
Marshall
1193:
Go ahead. You were right all along - it was inconclusive.
2081:
Feathers Trial, who are you and of whom are you a sock?
325:
If You OK this, I'll post a thread about my proposal on
230:
I didn't (mean to) say "most", but a "large part". IPv6
789:
I cannot. You, as the page author, can, however, apply
293:. But I though I should ask you before any action on a
855:
Diff of Knowledge:Edit filter/False positives/Reports
176:, apparently, because he posted lots of contact info.
954:
Heh, canvassing. Never even thought about that one.
720:
The nomination discussion and review may be seen at
532:
The nomination discussion and review may be seen at
1527:
Or he won't and get his talk page access revoked...
1766:I didn't find anything in the archives, but I saw
929:For the rather direct promotion of that box...Ā ;)
1838:morning. I've semiprotected the p. for 24 hours.
343:We can discuss this later, even in another RFC.
1212:name-calling is okay? Assume good faith? Huh?
849:I think you made a mistake here, Jasper Deng.
2021:The following discussion has been closed.
1341:Hi, I opened a discussion on the image at
1437:For coming to the aid of The Hopeless. --
1417:
682:was updated with a fact from the article
616:translated into JavaScript pretty easily.
510:was updated with a fact from the article
1381:For the quick revert on my talk page...
881:I didn't know the context of it. Sorry.
14:
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
1265:Is Knowledge going to participate in
297:share. What do you think about it? ā
1431:The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
661:
489:
139:, should be fully ready for DYK now.
25:
2032:Im gonna nominate you for an RFA --
23:
1812:I have removed your speedy tag on
582:), and that's really about all. ā
24:
2147:
1375:The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
658:DYK for Rotlewi versus Rubinstein
295:Talk:Usage share of web browsersā
107:Hey jasper, ref #7 needs a fix -
2119:Mhmm, I'm most curious as well.
1670:
1603:
1552:
1513:Maybe he'll listen this time...
1418:
1367:
806:
665:
493:
486:DYK for Levitsky versus Marshall
327:talk:usage share of web browsers
130:
29:
1784:Yes, that's it. (Thx Jessemv.)
569:) 08:03, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
13:
1:
1879:18:11, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
1867:07:28, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
1850:07:10, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
1828:16:29, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
1794:00:19, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
1780:23:19, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
1755:21:09, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
1743:07:03, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
1725:06:29, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
1712:07:14, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
1687:08:15, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
1657:01:51, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
1644:01:44, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
1621:22:35, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
1591:22:31, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
472:I'm watchlisting the DYK nom.
1535:23:10, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
1523:23:09, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
1509:23:05, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
1496:23:04, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
1469:03:28, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
1453:03:25, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
1405:04:04, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
1389:04:03, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
1355:11:43, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
1327:11:04, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
1309:23:42, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
1295:15:11, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
1280:20:41, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
1251:05:06, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
1222:05:01, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
1201:18:04, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
1188:17:43, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
1155:20:12, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
1143:20:10, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
1128:19:17, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
1116:19:16, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
1087:18:44, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
1066:08:21, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
1052:00:56, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
1035:00:55, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
1022:00:26, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
990:06:07, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
978:06:04, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
966:LOL. Also a huge example of
962:06:03, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
950:05:56, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
937:05:56, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
915:01:26, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
903:01:24, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
889:01:13, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
876:00:54, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
839:07:14, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
825:04:31, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
801:04:19, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
784:04:18, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
765:08:02, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
702:, Rubinstein sacrificed his
648:06:43, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
636:06:41, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
611:01:54, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
598:01:52, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
7:
2060:so modest. is that a yes?
1983:mostly echoes of the past.
1747:How did Jimbo get involved?
1002:user talk page RFPP reports
480:19:55, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
467:19:54, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
426:01:14, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
408:00:16, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
392:21:31, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
378:21:14, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
366:21:10, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
351:21:00, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
339:20:59, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
320:19:50, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
307:15:00, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
272:03:39, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
253:03:26, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
225:03:06, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
198:01:13, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
184:00:07, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
167:00:06, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
147:19:30, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
124:06:58, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
10:
2152:
1663:Some stroopwafels for you!
1241:attitude towards Knowledge
234:means something else than
2130:00:37, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
2115:22:43, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
2103:22:35, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
2075:05:25, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
2055:05:22, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
2042:05:21, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
1993:03:39, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
1978:03:33, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
1965:03:30, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
1947:03:26, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
1928:03:25, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
1914:03:21, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
1901:03:20, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
1427:
1411:It is an honour to award:
1366:
1267:World IPv6 Deployment Day
1257:World IPv6 Deployment Day
1233:stop beating a dead horse
829:Thank you Jasper and 28.
699:Rotlewi versus Rubinstein
686:Rotlewi versus Rubinstein
2024:Please do not modify it.
1583:Wanted it myself at ANI.
1570:whacked with a wet trout
1167:Time to close debate at
527:Levitsky versus Marshall
514:Levitsky versus Marshall
109:Levitsky versus Marshall
1770:in the main Talk page.
742:Did you know? talk page
554:Did you know? talk page
238:IPv6. The best term is
1336:File:Vbox osx win7.png
1282:
1231:and a need for you to
864:on SMaster's talk page
280:Median in web browsers
1263:
42:of past discussions.
18:User talk:Jasper Deng
1360:A barnstar for you!
1319:Maggie Dennis (WMF)
1287:Maggie Dennis (WMF)
1269:? I know it missed
418:Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
384:Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
358:Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
331:Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
299:Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
206:Re: IPv6 deployment
1040:As for this case,
907:Left a brief note.
2139:
2138:
1985:Materialscientist
1957:Materialscientist
1938:
1920:Materialscientist
1893:Materialscientist
1762:talk page stalker
1692:
1691:
1626:
1625:
1581:
1580:
1577:
1458:
1457:
1394:
1393:
1044:should be enough.
748:
747:
735:
632:
594:
560:
559:
547:
100:
99:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
2143:
2126:
2125:
2101:
2098:
2093:
2088:
2026:
2013:
2012:
1932:
1765:
1674:
1667:
1666:
1607:
1600:
1599:
1575:
1556:
1549:
1548:
1450:
1443:
1422:
1415:
1414:
1371:
1364:
1363:
857:
814:
810:
809:
725:
692:... that in the
669:
662:
634:
630:
625:
596:
592:
587:
581:
537:
520:... that in the
497:
490:
464:
459:
456:
447:Windows Server 8
138:
134:
133:
118:
115:
81:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
2151:
2150:
2146:
2145:
2144:
2142:
2141:
2140:
2123:
2122:
2096:
2091:
2086:
2082:
2022:
2011:
1889:
1835:
1810:
1759:
1733:Talk archives.
1697:
1665:
1631:
1619:
1598:
1547:
1477:
1446:
1439:
1413:
1362:
1339:
1259:
1209:
1172:
1004:
927:
853:
851:
807:
805:
772:
674:15 January 2012
660:
627:
621:
589:
583:
579:
575:
563:The DYK project
488:
462:
457:
454:
450:
282:
208:
155:
131:
129:
116:
113:
105:
77:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
2149:
2137:
2136:
2135:
2134:
2133:
2132:
2117:
2078:
2077:
2058:
2057:
2034:Feathers Trial
2028:
2027:
2018:
2017:
2010:
2007:
2006:
2005:
2004:
2003:
2002:
2001:
2000:
1999:
1998:
1997:
1996:
1995:
1888:
1885:
1884:
1883:
1882:
1881:
1834:
1831:
1809:
1806:
1805:
1804:
1803:
1802:
1801:
1800:
1799:
1798:
1797:
1796:
1786:Ihardlythinkso
1735:Ihardlythinkso
1731:Chess openings
1704:Ihardlythinkso
1696:
1693:
1690:
1689:
1675:
1664:
1661:
1660:
1659:
1630:
1627:
1624:
1623:
1615:
1608:
1597:
1594:
1579:
1578:
1557:
1546:
1543:
1542:
1541:
1540:
1539:
1538:
1537:
1476:
1473:
1472:
1471:
1456:
1455:
1434:
1433:
1428:
1426:
1424:
1412:
1409:
1408:
1407:
1392:
1391:
1378:
1377:
1372:
1361:
1358:
1338:
1333:
1332:
1331:
1330:
1329:
1312:
1311:
1271:World IPv6 Day
1258:
1255:
1254:
1253:
1214:Ihardlythinkso
1208:
1205:
1204:
1203:
1171:
1165:
1164:
1163:
1162:
1161:
1160:
1159:
1158:
1157:
1135:Reaper Eternal
1073:
1072:
1071:
1070:
1069:
1068:
1003:
1000:
999:
998:
997:
996:
995:
994:
993:
992:
926:
923:
922:
921:
920:
919:
918:
917:
850:
847:
846:
845:
844:
843:
842:
841:
771:
768:
746:
745:
736:and add it to
670:
659:
656:
655:
654:
653:
652:
651:
650:
617:
574:
571:
558:
557:
548:and add it to
502:9 January 2012
498:
487:
484:
483:
482:
449:
444:
443:
442:
441:
440:
439:
438:
437:
436:
435:
434:
433:
432:
431:
430:
429:
428:
291:what not to do
281:
278:
277:
276:
275:
274:
207:
204:
203:
202:
201:
200:
154:
153:What happened?
151:
150:
149:
104:
101:
98:
97:
92:
87:
82:
75:
70:
65:
62:
52:
51:
34:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2148:
2131:
2128:
2127:
2118:
2116:
2113:
2110:
2106:
2105:
2104:
2100:
2099:
2094:
2089:
2080:
2079:
2076:
2073:
2070:
2066:
2063:
2062:
2061:
2056:
2053:
2050:
2046:
2045:
2044:
2043:
2039:
2035:
2030:
2029:
2025:
2020:
2019:
2015:
2014:
1994:
1990:
1986:
1981:
1980:
1979:
1976:
1973:
1968:
1967:
1966:
1962:
1958:
1954:
1950:
1949:
1948:
1945:
1942:
1936:
1935:edit conflict
1931:
1930:
1929:
1925:
1921:
1917:
1916:
1915:
1912:
1909:
1905:
1904:
1903:
1902:
1898:
1894:
1880:
1877:
1874:
1870:
1869:
1868:
1864:
1860:
1859:
1854:
1853:
1852:
1851:
1847:
1843:
1842:
1830:
1829:
1825:
1821:
1820:
1815:
1795:
1791:
1787:
1783:
1782:
1781:
1777:
1773:
1769:
1763:
1758:
1757:
1756:
1753:
1750:
1746:
1745:
1744:
1740:
1736:
1732:
1728:
1727:
1726:
1723:
1720:
1716:
1715:
1714:
1713:
1709:
1705:
1701:
1688:
1684:
1680:
1676:
1673:
1669:
1668:
1658:
1655:
1652:
1648:
1647:
1646:
1645:
1641:
1637:
1622:
1618:
1613:
1612:Malik Shabazz
1609:
1606:
1602:
1601:
1593:
1592:
1589:
1586:
1574:
1573:
1571:
1565:
1564:
1563:
1558:
1555:
1551:
1550:
1536:
1533:
1530:
1526:
1525:
1524:
1520:
1516:
1512:
1511:
1510:
1507:
1504:
1500:
1499:
1498:
1497:
1493:
1489:
1485:
1482:
1470:
1467:
1464:
1460:
1459:
1454:
1451:
1449:
1444:
1442:
1436:
1435:
1432:
1429:
1425:
1421:
1416:
1406:
1403:
1400:
1396:
1395:
1390:
1387:
1384:
1380:
1379:
1376:
1373:
1370:
1365:
1357:
1356:
1352:
1348:
1344:
1337:
1328:
1324:
1320:
1316:
1315:
1314:
1313:
1310:
1307:
1304:
1299:
1298:
1297:
1296:
1292:
1288:
1281:
1279:
1276:
1272:
1268:
1262:
1252:
1249:
1246:
1242:
1238:
1234:
1230:
1226:
1225:
1224:
1223:
1219:
1215:
1202:
1199:
1196:
1192:
1191:
1190:
1189:
1185:
1181:
1177:
1170:
1156:
1153:
1150:
1146:
1145:
1144:
1140:
1136:
1131:
1130:
1129:
1126:
1123:
1119:
1118:
1117:
1113:
1109:
1104:
1100:
1095:
1091:
1090:
1089:
1088:
1085:
1082:
1078:
1067:
1063:
1059:
1055:
1054:
1053:
1050:
1047:
1043:
1039:
1038:
1036:
1033:
1030:
1026:
1025:
1024:
1023:
1019:
1015:
1010:
991:
988:
985:
981:
980:
979:
976:
973:
969:
965:
964:
963:
960:
957:
953:
952:
951:
948:
945:
941:
940:
939:
938:
935:
932:
916:
913:
910:
906:
905:
904:
900:
896:
892:
891:
890:
887:
884:
880:
879:
878:
877:
873:
869:
865:
861:
856:
840:
836:
832:
828:
827:
826:
822:
818:
813:
804:
803:
802:
799:
796:
792:
788:
787:
786:
785:
781:
777:
767:
766:
762:
759:
756:
752:
743:
739:
733:
729:
723:
719:
717:
713:
709:
705:
701:
700:
695:
689:
688:
687:
681:
680:
679:Did you know?
675:
671:
668:
664:
663:
649:
646:
643:
639:
638:
637:
633:
624:
618:
614:
613:
612:
609:
606:
602:
601:
600:
599:
595:
586:
580:isIPAddress()
570:
568:
564:
555:
551:
545:
541:
535:
531:
529:
528:
523:
517:
516:
515:
509:
508:
507:Did you know?
503:
499:
496:
492:
491:
481:
478:
475:
471:
470:
469:
468:
465:
460:
448:
427:
423:
419:
415:
411:
410:
409:
406:
403:
399:
395:
394:
393:
389:
385:
381:
380:
379:
376:
373:
369:
368:
367:
363:
359:
354:
353:
352:
349:
346:
342:
341:
340:
336:
332:
328:
323:
322:
321:
318:
315:
311:
310:
309:
308:
304:
300:
296:
292:
288:
273:
269:
265:
261:
256:
255:
254:
251:
248:
245:
241:
237:
233:
229:
228:
227:
226:
222:
218:
214:
199:
195:
191:
190:Ramaksoud2000
187:
186:
185:
182:
179:
175:
171:
170:
169:
168:
164:
160:
159:Ramaksoud2000
148:
145:
142:
137:
128:
127:
126:
125:
122:
119:
110:
96:
93:
91:
88:
86:
83:
80:
76:
74:
71:
69:
66:
63:
61:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
2120:
2083:
2059:
2031:
2023:
2016:Sock indeed
1890:
1856:
1839:
1836:
1817:
1811:
1698:
1632:
1629:Restrictions
1582:
1568:You've been
1567:
1566:
1561:
1560:
1559:
1545:Self-trouted
1478:
1447:
1440:
1430:
1423:
1374:
1340:
1283:
1264:
1260:
1229:WP:BOOMERANG
1210:
1207:Name-calling
1173:
1102:
1076:
1074:
1008:
1005:
928:
859:
852:
831:Night Ranger
811:
776:Night Ranger
773:
757:
749:
712:minor pieces
697:
691:
684:
683:
677:
576:
561:
525:
519:
512:
511:
505:
451:
397:
290:
286:
283:
243:
239:
236:switching to
235:
231:
209:
156:
135:
106:
78:
43:
37:
2109:Jasper Deng
2069:Jasper Deng
2049:Jasper Deng
1972:Jasper Deng
1941:Jasper Deng
1908:Jasper Deng
1873:Jasper Deng
1749:Jasper Deng
1719:Jasper Deng
1651:Jasper Deng
1585:Jasper Deng
1529:Jasper Deng
1503:Jasper Deng
1463:Jasper Deng
1399:Jasper Deng
1303:Jasper Deng
1275:Jasper Deng
1245:Jasper Deng
1195:Jasper Deng
1149:Jasper Deng
1122:Jasper Deng
1106:talk page.
1081:Jasper Deng
1046:Jasper Deng
1029:Jasper Deng
972:Jasper Deng
944:Jasper Deng
909:Jasper Deng
883:Jasper Deng
795:Jasper Deng
732:quick check
714:but forced
642:Jasper Deng
605:Jasper Deng
544:quick check
474:Jasper Deng
402:Jasper Deng
372:Jasper Deng
345:Jasper Deng
314:Jasper Deng
289:instead of
247:Jasper Deng
244:deployment.
178:Jasper Deng
174:oversighted
141:Jasper Deng
111:. Thanks,
36:This is an
1970:half-life.
1833:responding
1702:, Jasper!
1596:Thank you!
1515:Writegeist
1488:Writegeist
1108:Beeblebrox
1075:Then when
1058:Beeblebrox
1014:Beeblebrox
728:here's how
623:This, that
585:This, that
540:here's how
287:what to do
260:2001:db8::
213:2001:db8::
188:Oh... ok.
95:ArchiveĀ 15
90:ArchiveĀ 14
85:ArchiveĀ 13
79:ArchiveĀ 12
73:ArchiveĀ 11
68:ArchiveĀ 10
1953:americium
1814:MobiFiles
1808:speedy a7
1700:Good edit
1448:imacowboy
925:Thanks...
716:checkmate
629:the other
591:the other
172:That was
60:ArchiveĀ 5
1695:Good one
1441:Djathink
1227:I see a
860:Signpost
761:contribs
751:Casliber
738:DYKSTATS
710:for two
567:nominate
550:DYKSTATS
396:OK, I'm
117:Interior
1772:Jessemv
1679:Jim1138
1636:Crossmr
1461:Thanks!
1397:Thanks!
1347:Hekerui
1180:Useerup
1147:Got it.
817:28bytes
455:Pumpkin
232:support
103:Ref fix
39:archive
2112:(talk)
2072:(talk)
2052:(talk)
1975:(talk)
1944:(talk)
1911:(talk)
1876:(talk)
1752:(talk)
1722:(talk)
1654:(talk)
1588:(talk)
1562:Whack!
1532:(talk)
1506:(talk)
1466:(talk)
1402:(talk)
1383:Calabe
1306:(talk)
1278:(talk)
1248:(talk)
1237:biting
1198:(talk)
1152:(talk)
1125:(talk)
1099:WP:AIV
1094:WP:RFU
1084:(talk)
1079:I ask?
1077:should
1049:(talk)
1032:(talk)
984:Calabe
975:(talk)
968:WP:IAR
956:Calabe
947:(talk)
931:Calabe
912:(talk)
895:Dianna
886:(talk)
868:Dianna
798:(talk)
793:to it.
770:Delete
645:(talk)
631:(talk)
626:, and
608:(talk)
593:(talk)
588:, and
477:(talk)
405:(talk)
375:(talk)
348:(talk)
317:(talk)
250:(talk)
240:deploy
181:(talk)
144:(talk)
121:(Talk)
2124:Swarm
2092:COMMS
2087:ĘETCH
1887:A tip
1863:talk
1846:talk
1824:talk
1617:Stalk
791:WP:G7
704:queen
696:game
694:chess
524:game
522:chess
416:). ā
414:WP:OR
16:<
2038:talk
1989:talk
1961:talk
1924:talk
1897:talk
1790:talk
1776:talk
1768:this
1739:talk
1708:talk
1683:talk
1640:talk
1519:talk
1492:talk
1386:1992
1351:talk
1323:talk
1291:talk
1218:talk
1184:talk
1139:talk
1112:talk
1062:talk
1042:this
1018:talk
1009:full
987:1992
959:1992
934:1992
899:talk
872:talk
835:talk
821:talk
812:Done
780:talk
755:talk
708:rook
706:and
573:IPv6
463:talk
422:talk
388:talk
362:talk
335:talk
329:. ā
303:talk
268:diff
221:diff
194:talk
163:talk
136:Done
2009:RFA
1858:DGG
1841:DGG
1819:DGG
1475:Fyi
1103:not
672:On
500:On
458:Sky
398:not
264:rfc
217:rfc
114:The
2065:No
2040:)
1991:)
1963:)
1926:)
1899:)
1865:)
1848:)
1826:)
1792:)
1778:)
1741:)
1710:)
1685:)
1642:)
1521:)
1494:)
1353:)
1325:)
1293:)
1285:--
1243:.
1220:)
1186:)
1141:)
1114:)
1064:)
1037:i
1020:)
901:)
874:)
837:)
823:)
815:.
782:)
763:)
730:,
676:,
542:,
504:,
424:)
390:)
364:)
337:)
305:)
270:)
266:|
258:ā
223:)
219:|
196:)
165:)
64:ā
2097:/
2084:/
2067:.
2036:(
1987:(
1959:(
1937:)
1933:(
1922:(
1895:(
1861:(
1844:(
1822:(
1788:(
1774:(
1764:)
1760:(
1737:(
1706:(
1681:(
1638:(
1614:/
1572:.
1517:(
1490:(
1349:(
1321:(
1289:(
1216:(
1182:(
1137:(
1110:(
1060:(
1016:(
897:(
870:(
833:(
819:(
778:(
758:Ā·
753:(
744:.
734:)
726:(
718:?
565:(
556:.
546:)
538:(
420:(
386:(
360:(
333:(
301:(
262:(
215:(
192:(
161:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.