4344:(below passage was a refactored version on Jcbutler's talk page of the above strikethrough portion) Well, all right, I was wrong about the Monopoly picture-- see how easy that was? But let's consider the guideline for board games: Photographs of a game in progress may possibly be allowable provided that the copyright elements are incidental and de minimis to the overall image, but that is unlikely to be the case if the whole board or box design is clearly shown. The whole board and box design were not shown at all, so that is not an issue. You could argue that the copyright elements are not "incidental" but my reply is that only a small portion of the game was shown, and thus the game itself was not represented. This is starting to get tedious, but I maintain that what we have here is either a misinterpretation of a vague guideline, or simply a flawed guideline. Maybe the admin I contacted will clarify the situation, but I am about done with it. No hard feelings, I hope. --Jcbutler (talk) 03:22, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
3822:
consider first publishing. If the photo was not published before 1923 (by remaining in private collection), then there could be 95 years of US copyright protection (if registered). So the key thing here is to establish the first publishing of those desired photos; this also carries the benefit that if there is dispute over qualification of PD-old and thus copyright status in the country of origin, the photos could still be stored on
Knowledge as pre-1923 (PD in US) items. The big problem with the current collage of the Five is that there are no sources for who took those photos, when were they taken, when were they published and where. Borodin's image on Britannica has a creation date, but publishing date and authorship are lacking (UK has a 20-year protection for unpublished till now images).
714:
photographs as they do today, and those that they took they generally took for the purpose of using. Finding a photograph that we have no reason to believe is a government work and refraining from using it because it might be, even if it seems nearly certain that the photograph would have been published prior to 1958 strikes me as being too cautious, especially given that the doctrine of fair use almost certainly applies to what we're doing anyway. But that's jut my opinion, just as your belief that it's important to be almost completely sure is just your opinion. Sometimes I find your approach frustrating, but I need to bear in mind that it's no less legitimate than mine. Fundamentally, you're obviously doing very good work, and I don't have any problem with you. Does that clear things up?
305:) to tone down the screaming yellows and uploaded it to the existing image file. I would like this color-edited version ("21:32, 5 January 2009") to show on my article, which appears to be the case. However, when I click to get the full-resolution image, I get the old, overly yellow version. Plus I made a mess of things by doing a couple of "reverts." Could you help by (1) correctly linking the article image, with the correct full-resolution image, to version "21:32, 5 January 2009" (third version from bottom as seen in the "File history.") and (2) delete my "reverts" (the top two versions in the "File history"), if that can be done. Many thanks.
1704:(later) Am I missing a trick, or am I merely obtuse, or is it both? Of the various links to images you have provided, the only ones that take me to actual pictures are the various score covers. The links to the KobbĂŠ books simply take me to the google book titles. Have you actually viewed the KobbĂŠ book images online, if so, how? It's the same with the long list of National Geographic pics - I can't decide which of these to use without seeing the pictures. I'm sorry if I sound stupid, but I have no idea how to view any of these pictures, short of acquiring the books they are in. Can you advise?
3225:
4293:- it was published in a US patent application back in 1935: see w:Image:DarrowPage1.png. Modern standard sets may be shown provided that they are substantially identical in design to the original. Sets with significant new design elements, such as Monopoly Junior, are not allowed since the new design elements will be entitled to a new copyright.", you would have known that. This applies to the original playing pieces. If you believe the tokens here are new designs, you can nominate the photo for deletion.
3660:
2873:
31:
2812:
4229:, if I made a simplifed version of the map and some knock off counters, along with a short form of the rules, this would be a copyright violation. But for goodness sake, I took a picture of a game in progress that is so incomplete that you could never play the game by the information in the picture. Don't you see the difference? Can't you admit you made a mistake? You said yourself you "mixed up" the images and didn't know what you were talking about!
4155:, if I made a simplifed version of the map and some knock off counters, along with a short form of the rules, this would be a copyright violation. But for goodness sake, I took a picture of a game in progress that is so incomplete that you could never play the game by the information in the picture. Don't you see the difference? Can't you admit you made a mistake? You said yourself you "mixed up" the images and didn't know what you were talking about!
381:
4035:. As you can plainly see, there is no box cover art, rule books, or any of the other things you claim. Granted, there are not "a bunch of people around a table" but I consider this is to be a minimal image of the game. Of course, I'm not a lawyer, though I doubt you are either. In any case, I'm not planning to argue this any further, but you should try to get your facts straight before you request that any more images be deleted. --
3894:
image on the t-shirt. Likewise, there is a difference between a small portion of mapboard showing a few counters during a game in progress and a photograph or scan of the complete map and counter set in such detail that it could be reproduced accurately. The picture that was deleted showed very little of the contents of the game and is therefore an excellent example of the principle of
3424:
license of each photo we would want to use? Or could he send an email to OTRS that would suffice (and then we could upload the images that were useful and add a template with the OTRS ticket / permission)? Or would posting something on his Flickr page saying he released the PA state park photos under the CC-BY-SA license suffice? Thanks in advance for your advice on this,
123:). From the ensuing discussion, it is clear that the uploader had the misconception that all images on Flickr are free, and had not asked for permission from Sergio Quiros, the owner of the picture in question. As the copyright violation is obvious, should I replace the PUI templates I had placed on the image page with {{subst:db-copyvio|url=
1265:; none of my work appears there at present, since all my research is in a sandbox. However, I would appreciate your comment on the image of Smetana that appears in the article. To me its licencing looks suspect â author unknown, no details of where originally published, so is it PD? There are two other (better) Smetana portraits on Commons (
324:). This is what happened with my one other applicable book reference (if a book was published by the U.S. Government Printing Office or was published before a certain date, for example, it doesn't have an ISBN). Just wondering why the same didn't occur with Williams (2005), which should be "eligible." I'll try to add it manually. Cheers.
3159:, as well as the map of the scuttled ships and then transferring it into an svg. There are, however, some spelling problems with the new version: #2 should be "der" instead of "de", #4 should read "GroĂer KurfĂźrst", #6 should be "Markgraf", and #20 should be "Derfflinger". Can you fix them when you have a minute? Thanks a lot. Regards,
1530:, but I wanted to check that this would make it through FAC as a PD image. I've beefed up the description and dates, but I'm not sure whether the catalogs I've been able to find would count as reliable sourcing for this information. You have a great deal more experience with images than I do - do you think this is satisfactory?
1313:
3478:. Ignoring the obvious problems with his post here (no free license specified, etc.), I am nearly 100% sure that it needs to be an OTRS email, not a Flickr mail or a Knowledge talk page posting, right? I thought I would double check with you before pestering him to send an email again. Thanks and sorry to bother you,
3942:
copyright infringement, and it is no defence to say that the poster was 'just in the background'. If the existence of the poster was the reason the photograph was taken in the first place, copyright infringement cannot be avoided by additionally including within the frame more of the setting or the surrounding area.
2192:(talk page stalker reply) for explicitness' sake we're probably better off if he states plainly what license he's releasing them (or if he's releasing them under pub domain.) If you have him send an email verifying that for the images onwiki at permissions, we can archive it via OTRS, which is much more ironclad. --
4313:
Well, all right, I was wrong about the
Monopoly picture (see how easy that was?). But let's consider the guideline for board games: Photographs of a game in progress may possibly be allowable provided that the copyright elements are incidental and de minimis to the overall image, but that is unlikely
3921:
and its application here. Your photo's subject was the game and its contents. It prominently displays the box cover art, rule books, counters, map, and reference sheetsâmost of which show the designs in clear details. Its intent is clear; the photo was not to show anything but a copyrighted game.
3893:
Thanks for your prompt response. In my opinion, however, you and the admin that deleted the picture are misinterpreting an admittedly vague and poorly written policy. In the example provided, there is a difference between a picture of a person wearing a t-shirt and a high resolution photograph of the
2848:
Thanks for yet more Lang stuff - great news about the de Laszlo, that's the one I wanted. As to the
British Dictionary of Portraiture, I live in a small country town whose library doesn't run to such extravagances, so I may not get to look at it until I'm next in London. My guess is that it will list
1097:
Yes, one of our goals is to get photos for all 120 Pennsylvania state park articles. There are several parks that have photos in the "photo tour" pages which currently do not have a photo on
Knowledge. There is an intact Kinzua Bridge picture on the photo tour which would seem to be free, I am not as
713:
I disagree with some of the approaches that you take on images, but I can respect them; I certainly don't think your behaviour is totally inappropriate, or anything. It's really just a question of what assumptions we're prepared to make. In the early 1900s, governments obviously didn't take as many
4292:
The monoply tokens are not copyrighted; if you had read the Image casebook link earlier: "Old board games such as backgammon, chess and go are allowable unless the board incorporates some original artistic design. Monopoly is also a special case: the 'original' Monopoly board is now out of copyright
3353:
is a piece of art, therefore images of it do not have freedom of panorama, therefore they must be deleted from the commons. This will have lasting effects on the bridge's FA. You checked out the images during the article's FAC, so I was hoping you'd have an opinion on the matter. If you could please
3130:
I'd probably include it even if there were no signs there. It's the only store/restaurant in town and is the most prominent building in town. I don't know if there are any signs like this in
Braeburn, but when I go there and take pictures, we'll see. As to the Carston Thies photos ... do you think I
2293:
Hi Stifle, I found large sized images on
Commons licensed under CC but on Flickr, they are smaller in size and marked copy-righted. I contacted the Flickr user through email, and he confirmed that he is the uploader of the files at Commons. Should I forward the email to OTRS so that his intent can
1755:
I would have thought that stained glass is generally decorative so I wonder why "works of artistic craftsmanship" wouldn't apply? Thanks for clearing things up on the Maiden Castle FAC by the way, I was disappointed as it was the closet I could manage to an aerial photo but it had to go (the current
1730:
article. I see no need to pursue the
National Geographic images at this stage; the Smetana article is copiously imaged, and the opera article will be, too. On the Smetana article, I have addessed the remaining PR issues with bits more text, and am going to leave it for a short while before its final
940:
Thanks for the comment, I hadn't really thought about it. I'm rather hesitant about using any of the reconstructions because they are either a) dead wrong (in terms of the pronated hands), or possibly inaccurate in context (I'm not sure if
Utahraptor has actually been found with feathers, and either
4220:
A "translation, arrangment, dramatization, motion picture version" or similar work preserves the essence of the original work but merely puts it in a new form. A bootleg copy of a movie would be a clear example of a derivative work, and a copyright infringement. Even an "abridgment or condensation"
4215:
A 'derivative work' is a work based upon one or more pre-existing works, such as a translation, musical arrangement, dramatization, fictionalization, motion picture version, sound recording, art reproduction, abridgment, condensation, or any other form in which a work may be recast, transformed, or
4146:
A "translation, arrangment, dramatization, motion picture version" or similar work preserves the essence of the original work but merely puts it in a new form. A bootleg copy of a movie would be a clear example of a derivative work, and a copyright infringement. Even an "abridgment or condensation"
4141:
A 'derivative work' is a work based upon one or more pre-existing works, such as a translation, musical arrangement, dramatization, fictionalization, motion picture version, sound recording, art reproduction, abridgment, condensation, or any other form in which a work may be recast, transformed, or
2935:
Hi and thanks for the message. As most of the photos I post, the images are truly check, so they do NOT violate US copyright laws! The photo File:S.M.S Derfflinger.jpg was taken in 1915 and published by W.Schäfer, Kiel in 1918. Obviously, it could not been taken after 1919 (since the ship was sunk)
2585:
Thanks for uploading the Cosmos, I'll be sure to use them. The 1910 postcard doesn't give a more varied portrait (we really need one of "old" Cosmo, post 1920) so I don't think it's worth uploading the postcard image. The article is still very much in the gestation stage, and won't appear for a few
895:
picture. It wasn't the Ross Sea party photographer, Arnold
Spencer-Smith, because he died in the Antarctic. It may have been taken by one of the crew who experienced the drift, it may have been a newspaper photograph, or taken by a passer-by. Since it was published in Shackleton's "South" in US and
226:
Thanks for the offer. I won't be blocking him because I also revert a lot of his edits for simply being corny, all the time. He always makes all these articles - first
Vietnamese American to graduate from law school, first VA killed in Iraq, first VA to become and army officer etc. and a whole pile
3423:
Hi Jappalang, a user on Flickr who has many photos of Pennsylvania state parks has agreed in a Flickr email to me to license all of them for use here (CC-BY-SA license). The problem is that they are all under the default all rights reserved licens on Flickr now. Does he have to manually change the
2810:
Thank you for the latest Lang images. Biographical accounts describe how, due to stress combined with alopecia, Lang's appearance changed between 1914 and 1918 from that of a dark-haired youthful man to that of a bald, elderly man. This process evidently continued; pictures of him as Archbishop of
1374:
Sounds good. I was unsure if the gate was considered architeture/art, thanks for clarifying. I just got permission for an image on Flickr to upload to the article of the reflecting pool and gate to replace the one with the chairs. Thanks for your assistance, I appreciate it. Hopefully you can take
1355:
which describe the significance of their design. Would that be acceptable for use of the image? If not, does the gate in the same image qualify as artwork (in the background of the image)? There are a few images on Commons with the reflecting pool and gates, so if this image doesn't work, we could
854:
First, I'd like to associate myself with what is written above. Your work in reviewing images and your constructive commentsâin sharp contrast to those of some othersâprovide wonderful examples of the cooperative approach to article building. I have learned a great deal from your reviews, and from
4400:
If you had even bothered to read the image page, you would have known this image is used under fair use considerations. I never claimed copyrights over the elements in the image, and in fact, acknowledged very clearly who owns the copyright, and why this image can be used under claim of fair use
3821:
Usually, I would respond to each of you on your talk page, but to avoid replying twice with the same message... Although it is now (approaching 2010) quite likely that items created around c.1870 could qualify for PD-old (by virture of their creator's likely deaths by more 70 years), US law does
2177:
Hi there; I hope you can help with this. I wanted to add an image from a website, so I contacted the copyright holder to see if he'd release one. He said that we're free to use any of the press content hosted there; unfortunately, the only indicator of this is the following statement on the site:
814:
Hello, and thanks for the message. I do not have access to that image. Maybe Tim does? However, I think the image of Coward in the sharp suit is equally iconic, and it is even taken by a famous photographer. It shows Coward's determination and ambition as well as his keen sense of style. The
4083:
Yeah, Not wrong in essence... Good lord, why did I come back to Knowledge? I was so happy during the break I took from editing here. Now seriously, are you sure you want to defend the notion that any clear display of copyrighted material is forbidden, unless there is explicit permission from the
1775:
I'd be surprised if Edward Cunnington, an antiquarian interested in the site, didn't make drawings of the site but the books I've looked through have had nothing older than photographs and diagrams from the 1930s excavations (a google search drew a blank too). There are some good black and white
1689:
Your response was awe-inspiring. Plenty for me to get my head round there. I also have my own photographs of Prague, rather more recent than 1923 I must admit, so it does not look as though the battered lady article will be short of illustration, when I get to work seriously on it. Much thanks,
1051:
which would be great to use. Does the statement make these photos free to use here? If so it would be a great help to the Cherry Springs article now (we have found no other free photos of the show) and to all the articles on the parks pictured. If you could let me know about using these photos I
4101:
4061:
I may have mixed up the images (since I was nominating a bunch of copyviolations at the same time), but I am not wrong in essence. Each element of the game is copyrighted; the clear display of only those counters (and map) is nothing but an intent to show only copyrighted artwork (counters).
3518:
Yeah, I am not sure what the Flickr universe is either. I gave him the boilerplate OTRS permissions email (CC-BY-SA) with the proper links to his Flickr set and the one picture we uploaded onto Commons, to try and make the email process as painless for him as possible. I wanted to see what the
2073:, which is being slowly pulled up towards featured standard. I am fairly ignorant about these things, but if the recording is PD under US law, albeit not under UK law, is there any procedure whereby the file can still be used in Knowledge (as is the case with images in similar circumstances)?
670:
Thanks for the work. It's certainly clearer than the original, but maybe a bit too much; it's very harsh and naked. Do you think there is a middle way, perhaps by increasing the contrast without going entirely black/white? Anyway, here's the article if you want to see how it looks in context:
251:
I am taking a break from looking through the images. Is there a way to simply delete them all? I would think that the collatoral damage would be minimal, compared to the strain the user imposes on others to check through his falsehood. If any can be used for "fair-use", I am pretty certain
3941:
In determining whether the copying was sufficiently trivial, the court will consider all the circumstances. So, for example, if the poster forms an essential part of the overall photographic composition, or if the photograph was taken deliberately to include the poster, there is likely to be
4246:
I am continuing to argue with you because I don't like the heavy handed interpretation you have made, and I don't want you removing other valuable images from Knowledge on these erroneous arguments. Nevertheless, I readily admit that I am not an expert on copyright, and I have requested a
4158:
I am continuing to argue with you because I don't like the heavy handed interpretation you have made, and I don't want you removing other valuable images from Knowledge on these erroneous arguments. Nevertheless, I readily admit that I am not an expert on copyright, and I have requested a
1020:- photos published in the Russian Empire and which weren't published within 30 days on the territory of Soviet Russia are not eligible for copyright. Hence, any photos pre-1917 which were first published in the Russian Empire are public domain -- even those which come from Novosti. --
3205:. It's a photo of a sculpture that was created in 1918/1919 and displayed publicly on a college campus. The sculpture is signed. The sculptor died in the 1950s, and to our knowledge no copies of the scukpture have ever been made. Is this PD or can it be used only under fair use?
2425:
This does not sound overly promising. As a last resort, I e-mailed the Philadelphia Orchestra to see whether their archivist could answer the question, but I don't know how long a reply might take or whether one would be forthcoming. How much longer should we wait, in your opinion?
4282:
s counters are copyrighted. If you take a picture of a single counter (with copyrightable artwork), it is still a copyright violation (derived work) regardless of its being as one of several components of the game. The clearly and detailed display of the counters do not count as
4191:
s counters are copyrighted. If you take a picture of a single counter (with copyrightable artwork), it is still a copyright violation (derived work) regardless of its being as one of several components of the game. The clearly and detailed display of the counters do not count as
1138:
OK, thanks yet again - I will contact DCNR and ask for clarification. I also will look to see if I have the OTRS email from PennDOT (I think I got a copy but am not sure). My recollection was that any of the photos taken for a survey of bridges for inclusion on the
266:
Unfortunately, only commons has a delete all mode. I don;t think you should worry about tagging it. Some admins are onto it and they'll be deleted without someone having to put an application form on it, like you. It would be good if you voted for the ban though.
2915:
ok to use in an article? I'd never seen the "published outside the US before 1923" line used before, and wondered if it's legally kosher. Just to note, the uploader doesn't appear to be active on Knowledge anymore. Thanks for any help you can give me. Regards,
773:
The director of Vroma gave me permission to use the images you referenced 3 years ago - I don't know if she was aware they could be used elsewhere (At the time, I don't believe there was an image use statement on their website). I can try e-mailing her again.
2227:
Well... my talk-page stalker (My very first one!!! Glee!!!) has answered your query, Steve. You would likely indeed require an OTRS ("all permission granted" for downloads only?). Make sure that the copyright holder state very clearly that he would allow:
1273:, but again author and source information is missing in each case. Would my best bet be to choose one of these images and make a fair use rationale on the basis that it might still be in copyright? Your advice (in prose or verse) would be much appreciated.
402:
Thanks so much, that looks great! I just couldnt get my head around that programme, from looking around the net it seems you cant do what i did; which was to copy and past a JPEG into that programme and save it. Did you have to create that map from scracth
1042:
that has many photos of state parks that seem to be free as long as they are attributed: "Feel free to download the images you see to promote Pennsylvania state parks, but be sure to credit the Pennsylvania Bureau of State Parks." We are about to take
2001:
on page 385 (page 4 in the PDF). Is it possible to do that? If you can't/don't want to, then no worries, maybe I can try contacting the authors of the report to see if they are interested in releasing the diagram under a free license. --Happy editing!
1324:, it was recommended that you take a look. The memorial itself is a part of the National Park Service, but the chairs were designed by independent artists, so I'm wondering if it is necessary to include a non-free license tag (and FUR) for this image.
1077:, not all DCNR photos (the same notice appears on the main Photo Tours page and on all seven subpages, but nowhere else on the DCNR's webpages I have found). I will contact the DCNR and see if they can clarify this if you still think that is needed.
737:
with a view to a possible FAC. Apart from one, the images were in place when I took the article up. Could you possibly visit, and let me know any problems with these images, so that I can deal with them (there aren't many)? I would be most grateful.
3898:
which you mention in your second paragraph. The justification and reasoning you provide would have disastrous implications if it were applied broadly to pictures on Knowledge. Sidenote: this is yet another reason why I no longer submit photos here.
4242:
Is this derivative work? It's pretty comparable to the picture I took: good detail, partial game components, and no people sitting around a table. There are lots of pictures like this on Knowledge. Are you going to nominate them all for deletion?
3829:
should serve your purposes (they are PD-1923, thus qualifying storage on Knowledge at the least). In any event, you can try searching on Google Books with the names of the composers and "date:1850-1922" fields to look for pre-1923 publications.
3469:
Hi Jappalang, here is an update. The user has agreed on Flickr mail to license the photos in the PA Parks set, but still has not sent the email to OTRS to my knowledge (I asked him to copy me, but have received no CC or BC; also the license of
2440:
Thanks for the new information. As far as I know, there was only one photo of the orchestra and choruses involved, so my guess would be that this is the image in question. I think it is time to cut losses and remove the photo from the article.
2335:
No news yet on the status of this photo. How much longer should we wait, or should I go ahead and delete the photo? I hate to lose it, but at the same time, if it is the only opposing factor with the article at this point ... Know what I mean?
1665:
article, though none of my work shows on the main page yet. Can you advise me whether either of the images in the article have any claim to PD? I would like to keep the Kecal image if that is possible. Also, some time ago you advised me that
1667:
2107:
3981:
A useful test may be to ask whether the photograph would be as good or as useful if the poster were to be masked out. If no, then it is difficult to argue that the poster is actually de minimis, even if the poster is small and is "in the
2401:
I am currently out of the office. I am not able to state definitively whether or not the image is in public domain. I don't know if there is a photographer listed, and I do not know the copyright law in terms of photographs and public
470:
It is still on English WP...so one can't contact a Commons Admin. It likely cannot be kept since Livius does not allow commercial use as you told me on my Commons account. (before I thought it did as you can see from the file history.
3033:
for FAC and was wondering if you might have a moment to do a quick image check. Everything should be good (I took most of the pictures myself), but there are a few I didn't take. If you don't have the time, drop me a note. Thanks!
252:
interested editors can find them again via the web. On another note, why are there no templates to declare the information given (author, source, or date) are false? I have to go around, trying to fit db-i9 or npd to the mess.
4314:
to be the case if the whole board or box design is clearly shown. Could you please point out the board or box design in the picture I took? Oh yes, you were mixed up about that... --Jcbutler (talk) 03:22, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
3093:
issue, is there anything I can do? It's about a five-hour drive away, so I can't easily take another picture. But I am headed out to Whitehorse and Dawson City in a few weeks, so any photo-taking tips would be appreciated.
1605:
has made it washed-out looking on my screen, whereas before it was quite dark. Is there any way round this? I have no knowledge of gifs versus jpegs (or why one is preferred over the other), so I don't know how to fix it.
2379:
FYI, I sent a second, more detailed request tothe library this evening. Turns out the photo is being used by the library in a cyber exhibit on Stokowski and his years with the Philadelphia Orchestra. The page it is on is
863:
is PD? It certainly is for Australia, but does that cover Knowledge? I have a feeling that something like this arose a few months ago and was declared OK, but I can't remember the details. I hope to include the image in
172:
I have had a lot of trouble with this guy's 80% + fake image source uploads and have started a ANI thread about him. He is a disgrace, claiming US-Army on photos of a Vietnamese-prince-cum-French-biochemistry professor.
3967:
It may be relevant how the image is described or classified: it will be difficult to argue de minimis if the photograph is described as illustrating "an advertising poster" and is placed within the category Advertising
3471:
1260:
You're a busy person, I know, but in accordance with my belief that prevention is better than cure, I'd like to raise a couple of image queries concerning an article that I have in progress. The article in question is
117:
2178:"Hi-Res Press stills for download (all permissions granted)". Would this be enough? And if it is, have the images effectively been released into the public domain? (We're in the UK, if that matters.) All the best,
1620:
Oh, now I see it's because you resourced it. I think we should stick with the better quality one. What is the problem with gifs, and if there is a problem, could the version I uploaded not simply be converted?
3763:
that I would like to include. However, there is no record of where the photos that make up this composite actually came from. Since they date from the 1860s and 70s, would they qualify for public domain under
3618:
2611:
Hi there, thanks for commenting on our FAC, even though it's been closed yet again. Anyway, I've been working on the image issues you highlighted, and I'd like to know if you're happy with the work I've done:
1561:
Sorry for not letting you know :P Really I only got it because I wanted to not bug others when checking images at FAC. If you run up to that kind of issue a lot or upload lots of OTRS images you might as well
920:
by Catherine Drinker Bowen and Barbara von Meck. This book was published in the United States in 1937. The photo of Mme. von Meck from which the sketch currently in the article was taken is also in this book.
227:
of VA guys who became councillors in a small US town (100k people). And then accused me of being anti-Vietnamese. Apart from that sticking "he is a devout anti-communist" almost ad nauseum all over the place.
3395:
page. Would a coat of arms such as that classify as a free image, or would it be in some sort of copyright? I normally wouldn't think a coat of arms was worth adding, but this one is mentioned in the text of
4102:
commons:Commons:Derivative works#If I take a picture of an object with my own camera, I hold the copyright to the picture. Can't I license it any way I choose? Why do I have to worry about other copyright
969:
by Ădouard Chavannes (Paris: E Leroux, 1909-, Series Publications de l'Ăcole française d'ĂxtrĂŞme-Orient, vol. 13, pt. one.) So, Jappalang, since the picture was originally published before 1923, can I add
1578:
952:
3264:
Right, there is no close up, so the best I can do is a large 700x550 shot of the same photo for better detail, as the studio was dark and they only filmed it with a handheld camera. What do you think?
3612:
3666:
3659:
3317:
2464:
2998:
2127:
2849:
the Orpen portrait of 1924, a black & white version of which acts as the frontispiece to Lockhart's biography (Lang's critics called it the portrait of the most pompous man in England).
2994:
3801:. Assuming I could find sources for the rest, would the images be PD-Old? My assumption is that the lack of source information would be problematic for these images in any article at FAC.
4216:
adapted. A work consisting of editorial revisions, annotations, elaborations, or other modifications, which, as a whole, represent an original work of authorship, is a 'derivative work'.
4142:
adapted. A work consisting of editorial revisions, annotations, elaborations, or other modifications, which, as a whole, represent an original work of authorship, is a 'derivative work'.
982:
3626:
2781:, a joint programme between Russia and the USA, meaning that any images taken of the programme were released in NASA's usual public domain manner, including any taken by the Russians.
1994:
1927:
I'd greatly appreciate it, as (a) I have little understanding of copyright law and (b) I'd like to know what images I've uploaded, if any, should be tagged for deletion. Thank you, â
641:, that's in even worse shape? I'm currently trying to get the article up to GA level, and a slightly better looking picture would help with the visual appeal of the article. Cheers!
2759:
2552:
Thanks for the information on the de Laszlo portrait. The only picture of Lang I can find that appears definitely PD is the Spy caricature of him as Bishop of Stepney, published in
3742:
3707:
3700:
2492:
596:
510:
107:
2482:
1827:. I put down the information you mentinoed but got the licensing wrong and do not know how to fix it. Could you tell me whaat to do to change the licensing accordingly? Thanks.
4031:
You appear to be confusing my photo with someone else's. My photo was a closeup of part of the map with some counters. It was also accepted at boardgamegeek and can be viewed
3648:
3355:
2556:
in April 1906. It looks as though I may have to enter the turbulent waters of non-free rationales to include a suitable image, but any ideas you might have would be welcome.
941:
way it doesn't have feathers in Bakker's book so I wouldn't want to misrepresent his work.) I contacted the Flickr user you mentioned about grabbing the image for free use. --
2811:
Canterbury, post 1928, show him as a veritable dotard. I'll try and decide how to use these pics as the article develops. Meanwhile, do you think there is any chance that
2473:
portrait of Archbishop Lang, painted in 1932 by Philip de Laszlo (1869-1937). As de Laszlo died more than 70 years ago, can you say what is the PD status of this? Thanks,
1118:
PS There are many PennDOT photos of bridges that were covered by that one OTRS ticket - if I uploaded them, would I just have to add the same ticket notice? Thanks again,
113:
3997:(a bunch of people around a table, on which lies maps and counters, etc). It is not a photo that focuses on something else (children at play or a notable person) and
136:
2309:
Good question. The main issue with flickr is that it's hard to connect an email address with a flickr account. I'm not honestly sure what's best to do with this; try
3242:
2021:
Alright, I wanted to be sure. Now comes the fun part of tracking the original author down. I'm still in your debt for the map image, thanks again. --Happy editing!
1270:
2787:
I hope that deals with all the issues, but please do let me know if you have any other suggestions. If they're all fixed, brilliant, and would you mind giving us a
4005:, a copyrighted game (artwork and layout). You had good intentions, but the photo as intended, unfortunately, was a definite copyviolation and not qualified for
2670:
I'm looking for a decent set of raw data so that I can make a newer, more up-to-date SVG version of this graph, but in the meantime I've made the PNG conversion.
4348:
None at all. Commons has several conflicting policies/guidelines over certain matters, so it is not unexpected that such issues would be confusing to anyone.
3258:
2834:
is a more relavant illustration than Couch boy's modern photograph, so I've replaced. Can't thank you enough â and all this after I was rude about your poetry!
1916:
1456:'s FAC closes, so no rush at all. Thanks in advance⌠(Yes, I know Earl Spencer's looking out of the page, but there isn't an obvious place to move him to.) â
320:
I greatly appreciate your help with the figure! I asked about the ISBN # of the one book because according to the MoS, ISBN #'s are "wikified automatically" (
2172:
971:
475:
BTW, You should consider placing a link on your Commons userpage account to your Knowledge account. PS: I didn't know you were even Singaporean. Regards, --
1997:. I was wondering if you'd be interested in creating another image for the Oklahoma City bombing article based off of another image. The image can be found
1207:
4434:
2405:
On the other hand, it terms of Penn being the physical owner of the image, you have its permission to use. Penn, however, does not legally hold copyright.
2303:
2288:
1321:
600:
514:
1419:
I checked the Village Pump, and the one guy who has commented thus far thinks that the rubbing picture is ok and classifes as PD-art. So, what to think?--
3875:
3247:
2800:
1971:
378:
I have downloaded inkscape, imported the image into the programme and resaved it as a SVG file however i when i upload it here it is not displaying: see
2203:
Oh well, I half figured OTRS was the most likely way it would have to go, but I wanted to hold off bothering this person until I really had to. Thanks,
2186:
2858:
2843:
2595:
2580:
2101:
1740:
1713:
1699:
1527:
1297:
905:
762:
4420:
3631:
to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.
2967:
2603:
2056:
2034:
1587:
1572:
1388:
1369:
896:
UK in 1919, I have never doubted its PD status - nor that of any other images in Shackleton's book, all reproduced in the Project Gutenberg edition.
450:
412:
397:
284:
3673:
3140:
3121:
3103:
3078:
3060:
2950:
2886:
2256:
2082:
2043:) and added it to the article. It's great that there so many high-quality and informative free images available for that article. --Happy editing!
1891:
1644:
1629:
1488:
1133:
4106:
out to you earlier (now bolded if you did not read it). Since you insist on your stance that clear display of copyrighted material is okay, read
3736:
2503:. The licence is claimed to be PD, but Iâd be surprised if the Duchy allows free use, including commercial purposes. Should I delete the image? .
1098:
sure about the photos on the Kinzua Bridge State Park website, although the historic one appears to be from the reconstruction and thus pre-1923.
3859:
3839:
3534:
3513:
3493:
3464:
3303:
3279:
2537:
1158:
1113:
1092:
261:
244:
4414:
4205:
4131:
4071:
4044:
4018:
3816:
3595:
3908:
3774:, or would they have to qualify as such from first publication, wherever that might be for the five photos that make up the composite? Thanks.
3019:
2450:
2435:
2393:
2374:
2360:
2222:
2211:
2198:
1836:
1250:
930:
843:
498:
3783:
3607:
2322:
221:
161:
4275:
are incidental and de minimis to the overall image, but that is unlikely to be the case if the whole board or box design is clearly shown."
4184:
are incidental and de minimis to the overall image, but that is unlikely to be the case if the whole board or box design is clearly shown."
3237:
1231:
698:
684:
665:
333:
4232:
1047:
to FAC and one complaint raised at its peer review was that there was no photo of the Woodsmen's Show in the article. There is such a photo
3374:
3224:
May I draw on your inexhaustible knowledge of all appertaining to Archbishop Lang, and ask you whether his signature is copyright? I found
3011:. I'll be very grateful if you can look the article over and confirm at FAC that the image review issues have been resolved. Thanks again,
3002:
1860:
1512:
91:", which I've been trying to improve recently. However, can you correct the spelling of "South Lodge" to "South Ledge"? Thanks. â Cheers,
64:
morning, afternoon or evening, i'm not that bothered though some of the images now render quite small, where is the 'upright' bit in MOS?
3694:
2069:
This still languishes under threat of deletion. It is not required for the Smetana article, but is of course of much more importance for
957:
Aha! I just visited the library as promised, and I am relieved to find out that I can add the picture back to the article! I checked out
3439:
2879:
2872:
509:
Oh. The tracks can also be found on the games, so it would be free if recorded off of the games. However, since it is not the case in
3168:
1789:
1757:
2113:
1445:, so there shouldn't be any problems with those, but a couple of the paintings might have insufficient info. (I can't find a date for
723:
3191:
2936:
and definitely could not been published after 1920 since Schäfer stopped publishing military related cards that year. Regards, Maria
2064:
2040:
911:
3584:
3043:
2945:
1683:
1024:
1005:
3747:
1865:
1427:
1345:
4363:(The following was moved from another threadâDYK for Sword of Aragon. Its content and context was more relevant to this thread.)
4225:
to half its length and tried to publish it as my own work, this would also count as a derivative work. In the example of the game
4151:
to half its length and tried to publish it as my own work, this would also count as a derivative work. In the example of the game
3069:
That's exactly what I was looking for. Thanks. From your description, I thought the sources needed to be put in the image itself.
623:
592:
314:
2972:
2138:
1555:
102:
4256:
2565:
1467:
4357:
4337:
4306:
3589:
3214:
2925:
1282:
947:
884:
860:
672:
321:
4392:
4168:
4093:
3887:
2141:...what a great resource. I've added a few of them from volume 1 to the Commons and and put them into article space. They are
2015:
1817:
1329:
795:
Do you think you could give this article an image review? It is all I think it is waiting for for promotion to FA. Thanks.--
747:
351:
3344:
2622:
2167:
2145:
in 'Session 5'. I plan to keep working on them but it may take some time. Do you know of anyone else working on them? Cheers,
1352:
1226:
1067:
877:
1539:
783:
73:
4267:
4176:
2824:
2283:
1983:
804:
581:
540:
298:
3689:
2517:
2345:
1603:
650:
484:
3413:
3219:
1948:
1614:
1504:
824:
190:
2901:
1477:
just in case anyone else passing by wants to chip in; basically, can reliably confirm the subject but not the artist. â
1409:
1208:
http://books.google.com/books?id=u7po7vT_oIwC&pg=PA81&dq=checkers+speech+emile&as_brr=3&client=firefox-a
2986:
1769:
564:
3878:) due to copyright issues. I find this curious, as I took the picture myself. Could you explain your actions, please?
204:
4366:
3418:
2470:
2052:
2030:
2011:
1842:
1384:
1365:
1341:
1197:
370:
3699:
Feeling wikistress? Wish you could have a vacation someplace with two dozen waterfalls? Well the next best thing is
1325:
603:. Just wait until the weekend. There are some things that must be done before we can erase them from Knowledge. -
4107:
3798:
3546:
3150:
2725:
2708:
2310:
1848:
1756:
images look a big drab and only get a real idea of the size of the thing with an aerial shot like the second image
1494:
568:
3927:
3339:
3173:
2244:
1967:
1674:
can provide some pre-1923 photos of Prague. Are these images available online, or do I have to buy the magazine?
1317:
3475:
2239:
Whether he chooses to release into public domain, or license under GFDL or CC has to be clearly stated as well (
1780:
and since he died in 1940 they'll be available sometime next year so if nothing turns up at least there's that.
1474:
4388:
3333:
1941:
1882:
alone though because I think it is better in that case to use the image with Cuvier's orignial French caption.
1726:
Thank you for resolving this. It looks like I will have a plentiful choice of images when I come to expand the
1320:
as well as the "Field of Empty Chairs". The chairs appear to be a form of artwork, and after a suggestion at a
987:
1974:. Will their status allow them to be used in the article? Wasn't sure, so thought I'd ask the expert. Thanks.
891:, I must have read dozens of accounts of Shackleton's expedition, and none have given details of who took the
993:
302:
292:
3759:
and intend eventually to bring it before FAC. There is a composite photo at the beginning of the article on
815:
Hirschfeld image already has him in a dressing gown, so the suit gives more variety, IMO. Best regards, --
4294:
3622:
3576:
3051:
Thanks for the review. In regards to the map issue, do you have an example that I could copy the style of?
3024:
3001:
has been restarted, so I've uploaded a new version of the article illustration using public domain images,
2978:
1523:
78:
2982:
2628:
2604:
719:
656:
Thanks, whatever you can manage - without altering the original too drastically - is highly appreciated.
586:
4372:
Uh oh. While we are on the issue of copyrights, this looks like it might be another derivative work...
1048:
4247:
clarification from one of the admins here who has done a lot of editing on the copyright guidelines. --
4159:
clarification from one of the admins here who has done a lot of editing on the copyright guidelines. --
2912:
1912:
1650:
1303:
1247:
38:
3196:
2941:
1920:
1266:
1044:
638:
429:
146:
2294:
be made clear with an OTRS ticket and avoid any misunderstanding in the future, or just ignore it?
2216:
Ping me when you've done them; I've got OTRS access and I can tie the tickets to the image pages. --
3869:
3790:
3756:
3580:
3202:
3007:
2906:
1871:
1795:
1544:
1432:
1168:
634:
3826:
2381:
1777:
868:(for which you provided the first line, remember?); I am pretty sure all the other images are OK.
2930:
2616:
2318:
2161:
1963:
1887:
1875:
1805:
1801:
1508:
708:
348:
157:
84:
3551:
Another user and I are having a discussion about the use of images of medication on Knowledge.
3446:
2911:
Hi, Jappalang. I've got a question for you, since you're pretty good with copyright stuff :) Is
1924:
1073:
Thanks for the quick reply. I understood the notice about the photos to apply only to the eight
4430:
3233:
2854:
2839:
2831:
2820:
2591:
2576:
2561:
2543:
2478:
2268:
2097:
2078:
1856:
1736:
1709:
1695:
1679:
1517:
1293:
1278:
1029:
935:
901:
873:
788:
758:
743:
715:
560:
277:
237:
183:
4328:
are incidental and de minimis to the overall image" and the counters are copyrighted pieces.
4001:
was incidentally on a table within the frame. It is indisputably a photo of nothing else but
1074:
1039:
127:}} (or just add it to the page) for speedy deletion, or just leave things as is? Thank you.
4410:
4353:
4333:
4201:
4067:
3835:
3445:
Thanks so much - I will contact him about the OTRS option - the PA State Parks are all a set
2657:
2252:
2048:
2026:
2007:
1988:
1953:
1750:
1437:
If you get the chance, to save tying up space at FAC, can you have a skim over the images on
1421:
1414:
1403:
1380:
1361:
1337:
1309:
1255:
1014:
976:
628:
446:
408:
393:
366:
195:
I agree with you. He is spinning more tales as his lies are unraveled (see his talk page).
3400:
as it is particularly interesting (note the rope around the man's head at the top). Thanks,
2956:
4376:
4252:
4164:
4089:
3685:
3603:
3379:
3350:
3136:
3117:
3099:
3074:
3056:
3039:
3016:
2937:
2897:
2796:
2766:" It was taken by the Mir crew, not NASA... are Russian cosmonauts under NASA employment?
2328:
2274:
2240:
1446:
779:
768:
728:
637:, it's much improved. If you find the time, would you mind having a look at another image,
504:
462:
88:
69:
59:
2108:
Copyright & fair-use rationale of SVGified logo - new policy on SVGified images needed
1202:
8:
4302:
4127:
4014:
3849:
3806:
3726:
3524:
3503:
3483:
3454:
3429:
3296:
3272:
3164:
2921:
2778:
2640:
2634:
2532:
2512:
2487:
2299:
1896:
1442:
1148:
1123:
1103:
1082:
1057:
849:
809:
619:
536:
339:
257:
200:
132:
47:
17:
2619:: point the source to the page the image is hosted on, not directly to the image itself.
1143:
was covered, but I will look at the example you provided and the email. Thanks so much,
121:
4384:
4040:
3904:
3883:
3779:
3653:
3642:
3408:
3327:
3210:
3187:
2446:
2431:
2389:
2370:
2356:
2341:
2147:
2132:
2089:
2070:
2039:
Just wanted to let you know (a month later) that I got permission for a similar image (
1979:
1935:
1883:
1832:
1813:
1651:
1535:
1233:
1214:
Obviously if the film is public domain, a still or screencap from it is public domain.
1001:
926:
839:
820:
494:
480:
345:
4426:
3794:
3718:
3680:
I asked WikiProject Canada to clarify the copyright issue - here's their responses.
3229:
2963:
2850:
2835:
2816:
2805:
2742:
2688:
2587:
2572:
2557:
2545:
2500:
2474:
2093:
2074:
1998:
1852:
1732:
1705:
1691:
1675:
1595:
1500:
1289:
1274:
1222:
897:
869:
800:
754:
739:
734:
694:
680:
661:
646:
572:
555:
545:
438:
329:
310:
269:
229:
175:
1851:? It's a Library of Congress photograph but I suspect that's not enough on its own.
855:
those of Elcobbola before you. One thing I try to do is to get image issues settled
4261:
OK, let's consider the definition of a derivative work from the link you provided:
4211:
OK, let's consider the definition of a derivative work from the link you provided:
4137:
OK, let's consider the definition of a derivative work from the link you provided:
3572:
2866:
2217:
2193:
2122:
2044:
2022:
2003:
1824:
1582:
1567:
1550:
1438:
1376:
1357:
1333:
942:
887:. I will probably go with it, and do as you suggest if it is challenged at FAC. On
442:
404:
389:
362:
217:
1198:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/gallery/2009/jan/23/nixon-on-film?picture=342251286
4271:: "Photographs of a game in progress may possibly be allowable provided that the
4180:: "Photographs of a game in progress may possibly be allowable provided that the
3789:
Hi Jappalang, I offered to help Jonyungk make a similar lead composite image for
3768:
3710:
and pick which ones you like best. You'll be helping make a better article too.
3681:
3599:
3179:
3132:
3113:
3095:
3070:
3052:
3035:
3012:
2893:
2792:
1658:
1637:
1622:
1607:
1479:
1458:
1453:
1262:
1174:
888:
865:
775:
753:
I have now responded to your very helpful image review on the article's PR page.
167:
65:
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
4406:
4402:
4349:
4329:
4298:
4197:
4123:
4063:
4010:
3845:
3831:
3802:
3722:
3520:
3499:
3479:
3450:
3425:
3251:
3160:
2917:
2677:
2525:
2505:
2295:
2248:
1906:
1879:
1823:
Thanks for yout help on this, but may I ask a favor? The file I downloaded was
1785:
1765:
1375:
another look at the images when it goes to FAC at some point. --Happy editing!
1244:
1177:, I use two screencaps from the speech. I believe them to be free use images:
1144:
1119:
1099:
1078:
1053:
789:
604:
576:
521:
253:
196:
128:
1636:
Okay, thank you for that explanation. I'll leave it in your capable hands. :)
4380:
4248:
4160:
4085:
4036:
3900:
3879:
3775:
3634:
3556:
3387:
I know you're somewhat of an image expert, so I'd appreciate your opinion on
3359:
3322:
3206:
3183:
3155:
Hi, Jappalang. First, let me thank you profusely for finding those images of
2681:
2661:
2442:
2427:
2385:
2366:
2352:
2337:
1975:
1929:
1828:
1809:
1531:
1401:
Thanks for the link to the map here at Wiki. It is now used in the article.--
1021:
997:
922:
835:
816:
490:
476:
301:, I modified the color and contrast of the figure at the top of the Infobox (
4032:
2142:
3714:
3402:
3397:
3311:
2959:
2329:
2279:
1731:
polishing (I need a break from it). I'm really grateful for all your help.
1218:
1035:
834:
article. Your efforts have really helped us improve it! All the best, --
796:
690:
676:
657:
642:
356:
325:
306:
92:
3392:
3564:
3388:
3318:
Knowledge:Featured article candidates/Amagi class battlecruiser/archive1â
3030:
2990:
2314:
2117:
1847:
Sorry to bother you yet again, but what is your opinion of the status of
831:
212:
153:
4425:
THANKS for doing this. I had not a clue how to cut out the white space
593:
7th criterion of the General section in the Criteria for Speedy Deletion
344:
Thanks very much -- it was needed; and it looks much better as an svg.
2999:
Knowledge:Featured article candidates/Fertilisation of Orchids/archive1
2351:
Thanks for the encouragement. I was letting the sutuation get me down.
2204:
2179:
1396:
3552:
1441:
before I submit it? All but one of the photos are by either myself or
859:
rather than during FACs. With this in mind, can you advise me whether
2995:
Commons:Authorization to use material from http://www.larsen-twins.dk
1902:
1781:
1761:
1596:
1503:
we're discussing creating an incidence map, and your name popped up.
1241:
551:
489:
Thanks. I didn't know the copyright deletion code at all. Regards, --
437:
Full book details, i.e. complete title, ISBN etc can be found on the
4297:, and I am not obliged to go through all of the project in one go.
3182:
article. A nice surprise and, as you wrote, better for alternation.
1328:
of the chairs, and mention of the chairs' construction can be found
1038:
and I work on Pennsylvania state parks articles and I just found an
953:
Found the original source for the Pillar Gate picture in Han Dynasty
380:
3760:
3749:
2365:
And thanks for the Pendrecki photo, which I've already put to use.
1186:
2496:
1181:
3993:
Your photo was not focusing on a scene of a wargaming session of
3917:
James, I believe you are very much mistaken about the concept of
3613:
File:City Building in Henderson, Kentucky.jpg listed for deletion
3560:
1995:
File:Timothy McVeigh's movements during Oklahoma City bombing.svg
689:
Yeah, I think that's better, thanks. And it just passed as a GA.
633:
Hi, I noticed the work you did cleaning up the image I uploaded,
3922:
Refer to the example given in Commons on the interpretation of
3228:, and wondered if I could use it under a PD-ineligible licence?
2684:; I also advise to remove the logo to eliminate the need for a
2465:
On a totally different matter (no brides, bartered or otherwise)
2092:
article, which I hope to have in Peer review by the week's end.
1351:
Thanks for getting back to me. There are a few sentences on the
517:, there is nothing standing in your path of deleting the files.
2660:: as above; this image should also be transcluded to a PNG per
2112:
You are invited to participate in an interesting discussion at
1959:
1800:
Hi, was just told there may be a problem with the licensing of
468:
3178:
Hi, Jappalang. Thanks for the new photo of Penderecki for the
2815:
is PD? It's early 19thC, but publication details are unclear.
1919:, an image that was used exactly like the one you cleared for
1449:, but as Gainsborough died in 1788 it shouldn't be an issue.)
4114:
guideline is wrong, please discuss with those concerned with
3676:
at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
3519:
options were before FLickr mailing him again. Thanks again,
2889:
at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
2469:
For use in a new article I am hoping to expand I have found
1332:. Let me know if you need further details. --Happy editing!
3288:
Oh well, can't say I didn't try. Damn those dingy studios!
3112:
I guess I'm not sure what the offending piece is, then. :)
2777:
under the employ of NASA - this image was taken during the
2694:
clause to be added (restricting its legal use for reusers).
2116:. Your comments & suggestions is very much appreciated
1549:
Aye, I'm a member. Had OTRS access since October '08. :) --
1140:
916:
I have discovered the photo of Tchaikovsky and Antonina in
3844:
Thanks very much - will look in old books as you suggest.
3596:
Knowledge:Media_copyright_questions#NRHP_nomination_photos
2277:. I can use this as a model for LOC pictures from now on.
434:
Source: Tank Combat in North Africa, Thomas Jentz, p. 131
108:
It is proved to be copyright violation, so what do I do?
2243:). You might want to point the copyright holder to use
4118:
guidelines on derivative work to implement a change in
3474:
is still OTRS Pending). He recently posted this to his
2088:
Thank you for the note. I will restore the overture to
1203:
http://www.buyoutfootage.com/pages/titles/pd_na_276.php
2571:(Added): just seen the Bosworth star. Congratultions!
1808:. Any chance you could please check this out? Thanks.
1288:
Thank you for your rapid and extremely helpful reply.
3617:
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered,
1657:
Sorry to trouble you again, but alongside my work on
1526:. I really like one of the images that was included
972:
File:Que, or pillar gate, at the Wu Family Shrine.jpg
210:
Need a semi-uninvolved admin for a block? See AN/I. -
3672:
Message added 07:44, 9 November 2009 (UTC). You can
3553:
http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Iridescent#Obesity
2114:
Knowledge talk:Image use policy#File:Man Utd FC .svg
1602:
Hi Jappa, your change of this image from gif to jpg
1528:File:PostcardTheodoreRooseveltSpeechAtTheAlamo.jpg
967:Mission archĂŠologique dans la Chine septentrionale
467:Could contact an Admin you know about this image:
4231:
3667:Knowledge talk:Canadian Wikipedians' notice board
3472:File:Buchanan's Birthplace State Park Pyramid.jpg
3243:Question?... tell me what you think about this...
1187:http://en.wikipedia.org/File:Patnixoncheckers.JPG
513:, and since we cannot verify that is the case in
2981:. The outstanding question of authorisation for
2680:: this image should be transcluded to a JPG per
1182:http://en.wikipedia.org/File:Checkers_speech.jpg
965:pillar-gate picture was originally published in
550:Do you know how to find us a new main image for
152:useful in this kind of situation in the future.
118:Knowledge:Possibly unfree images/2008 October 15
361:So how do you go about creating an SVG image?--
3498:Thanks very much, I will ask on Commons next.
2977:Thanks very much for resolving the issue with
3619:File:City Building in Henderson, Kentucky.jpg
3594:I've opened the discussion on NRHP photos at
3349:Some users at the Commons seem to think that
2985:is still unresolved, with no response yet to
2955:Can I get your opinion on the image question
2735:I've listed the sources in the image infobox.
2173:Yet another in a long line of image questions
3665:Hello, Jappalang. You have new messages at
3003:File:Fertilisation of Orchids figure 29d.jpg
2878:Hello, Jappalang. You have new messages at
2701:Replaced with an SVG version minus the logo.
2289:Request for advice: would this need an OTRS?
1776:aerial photos from the 1930s excavations by
142:I've speedied it as a copyvio. You may find
83:Hi, that's a great graphic you've added to "
3005:, and that is now the illustration used in
2791:vote next time we run a FAC? All the best,
1316:. The image shows a portion of the outdoor
4268:commons:Commons:Image casebook#Board games
4265:Please as again pointed out earlier, read
4177:commons:Commons:Image casebook#Board games
4174:Please as again pointed out earlier, read
3874:You speedy deleted a picture I submitted (
4421:fixing the svg file on Army of the Danube
3316:Got a question on Japanese copyrights at
3201:Hi Jappalang, I could use your advice on
2041:File:MurrahBuildingInjuriesbyFloorOCB.jpg
1993:I'd like to thank you again for creating
1312:ready for FAC, and I had a question with
2951:Second opinion on image question, please
2231:free use (commercial and non-commercial)
1522:Hi Jappalang. I'm working on improving
379:
112:Hi Stifle. I had raised the issue that
2728:: what is the source for those figures?
2273:Thanks for clearing up the issues with
1052:would appreciate it very much. Thanks,
885:Image:Endurance trapped in pack ice.jpg
861:Image:Endurance trapped in pack ice.jpg
14:
961:at the library and found out that the
673:Guy de Beauchamp, 10th Earl of Warwick
322:Knowledge:Citing sources/example style
116:was a possible copyright violation at
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
4221:counts as derivative. If I shortened
4147:counts as derivative. If I shortened
3928:commons:Commons:De minimis#An example
2745:: are any of these flags copyrighted?
2623:File:ISS configuration 2009-03 en.svg
1579:make you an offer you can't refuse...
733:I have been doing some heavy work on
3793:. I found a nicely sourced image of
3706:If you want to, please come look at
3598:and hope that you'll comment there.
3563:with the image in question. Thanks
3559:uses picture of medications as does
299:Maryland and Virginia Rifle Regiment
25:
4369:- Example #2. Copyright violation?
4110:in whole. If you still insist the
3695:Waterfalls, waterfalls, waterfalls!
3320:...could you lend a hand? Thanks, â
2523:Thanks for that, image now deleted
2398:Here is the reply I just received:
1452:Nothing will happen at least until
1356:use one of those. --Happy editing!
830:Thank you for all your help on the
23:
4234:File:US Deluxe Monopoly Tokens.jpg
3658:
2871:
2762:: I cannot fathom how this is PD "
2711:: Knowledge is not a valid source.
1240:It is in the public domain..... --
24:
4445:
4367:File:Sword of Aragon - Battle.png
3449:. os that seems the best option.
2830:Amazing work on the Barony pics.
2065:Bartered Bride Overture soundfile
1849:Image:Metropolitan opera 1905.jpg
1217:Thoughts Thanks for your help.--
912:Photo of Tchaikovsky and Antonina
883:Thank you for the information on
4233:
4108:commons:Commons:Derivative works
2726:File:ISS Hardware Allocation.png
2709:File:ISS Zvezda module-small.jpg
2417:Rare Book And Manuscript Library
2311:Commons:Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard
1962:article that I'd like to use in
1866:Better Cuvier elephant jaw image
29:
2973:Fertilisation of Orchids images
2764:because it was created by NASA.
2760:File:Atlantis Docked to Mir.jpg
2493:Image:Duchy of Cornwall-coa.png
2245:commons:Commons:Email templates
1968:File:Goethe Schiller Weimar.jpg
1318:Oklahoma City National Memorial
3743:User talk:Ruhrfisch/Waterfalls
3590:NRHP photos question/proposals
3414:14:47, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
3375:19:21, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
3340:02:53, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
2718:This is now correctly sourced.
1958:Hi, I found two photos in the
1566:ask for access yourself. :) --
1210:(bottom of page, footnote 62).
597:File:ThemeofLuBu~DWFireMix.ogg
595:, you are free to delete both
511:File:ThemeofLuBu~DWFireMix.ogg
103:03:45, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
74:23:07, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
13:
1:
3860:15:11, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
3840:09:10, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
3817:18:50, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
3784:00:21, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
3737:01:56, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
3345:Image question concerning FOP
3304:14:32, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
3280:14:22, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
3259:16:35, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
1874:, I also replaced the one in
1870:Thanks. Besides the image in
994:Talk:Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky
699:17:14, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
685:18:01, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
666:18:40, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
651:16:01, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
624:13:13, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
582:02:30, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
388:Any ideas whats went wrong?--
303:File:Riflemen at Saratoga.jpg
285:04:35, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
262:03:14, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
245:04:35, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
222:02:56, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
205:01:59, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
191:01:49, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
4435:21:52, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
4415:03:18, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
4393:03:08, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
4358:03:55, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
4338:03:31, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
4307:03:12, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
4257:02:51, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
4206:03:04, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
4169:02:51, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
4132:02:00, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
4094:01:15, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
4072:22:55, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
4045:21:53, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
4019:22:46, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
3909:20:04, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
3888:22:01, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
3690:07:44, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
3649:05:26, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
3623:Knowledge:Files for deletion
3608:22:08, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
3585:21:21, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
3535:02:41, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
3514:02:31, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
3494:04:50, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
3465:12:49, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
2979:File:Wallacesesquipedale.jpg
2278:
1577:Careful now, otherwise I'll
1524:Alamo Mission in San Antonio
541:13:54, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
499:20:38, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
485:05:39, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
451:18:55, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
413:09:05, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
398:13:27, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
162:08:07, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
137:01:00, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
7:
4324:(Again) "Provided that the
3440:14:39, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
3238:18:13, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
3220:Are signatures copyrighted?
3215:15:02, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
2983:File:Catasetum-saccatum.jpg
2629:File:Harmony Relocation.jpg
2605:International Space Station
371:13:05, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
352:22:41, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
334:14:15, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
315:22:09, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
10:
4450:
3755:I am currently working on
3741:P.S. That wikilink again:
3354:comment at the discussion
3192:03:26, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
3169:18:28, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
3141:21:49, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
3122:12:26, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
3104:12:21, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
3079:11:18, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
3061:10:21, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
3044:10:33, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
3020:21:05, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
2968:18:09, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
2946:10:03, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
2420:University of Pennsylvania
1322:peer review of the article
1267:Image:FriedrichSmetana.jpg
1159:21:31, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
1134:21:19, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
1114:21:19, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
1093:21:10, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
1068:14:02, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
1034:Hi Jappalang, as you know
1025:12:25, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
1006:03:25, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
983:19:28, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
974:back to the article now?--
906:11:34, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
878:17:55, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
844:13:54, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
825:13:20, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
805:20:24, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
114:Image:Bilicflickrphoto.jpg
3419:FLickr licensing question
3250:: Fair use solid enough?
3131:should just remove them?
2993:to forward the emails on
2926:18:49, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
2902:07:55, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
2859:10:36, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
2844:16:35, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
2825:08:56, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
2801:12:15, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
2596:11:11, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
2581:23:34, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
2566:10:06, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
2538:05:41, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
2518:19:12, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
2483:17:35, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
2451:23:17, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
2436:16:21, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
2394:04:53, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
2375:17:11, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
2361:03:26, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
2346:23:07, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
2323:09:27, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
2304:09:24, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
2284:11:57, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
2257:05:19, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
2219:Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs
2195:Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs
2057:23:11, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
2035:22:46, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
2016:19:57, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
1984:00:00, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
1949:01:33, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
1921:Design 1047 battlecruiser
1892:19:22, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
1861:19:02, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
1843:New York Met image (1905)
1837:17:29, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
1818:18:27, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
1790:16:51, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
1770:16:25, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
1741:16:04, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
1714:15:45, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
1700:09:42, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
1684:18:48, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
1661:I am also developing the
1645:06:02, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
1630:05:45, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
1615:05:40, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
1584:Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs
1569:Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs
1552:Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs
1045:Cherry Springs State Park
948:16:43, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
931:20:11, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
784:21:37, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
763:00:25, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
748:23:10, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
724:23:21, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
639:File:Guy de Beauchamp.jpg
3791:Tchaikovsky and the Five
3757:Tchaikovsky and the Five
3748:Composite photo used in
3547:Image licensing question
3151:Scuttle German ships map
3008:Fertilisation of Orchids
2773:Because, in a way, they
2223:21:51, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
2212:21:30, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
2199:18:39, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
2187:18:04, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
2168:21:05, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
2128:19:09, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
2102:08:53, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
2083:11:09, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
1872:On the Origin of Species
1588:02:29, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
1573:02:06, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
1556:01:57, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
1540:19:36, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
1513:08:06, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
1495:Mexican Flu in Singapore
1489:15:44, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
1468:01:25, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
1428:00:29, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
1410:14:18, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
1389:23:58, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
1370:17:08, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
1346:17:16, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
1298:08:32, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
1283:20:54, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
1271:Image:BedrichSmetana.png
1251:15:30, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
1227:18:06, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
1193:based on the following:
635:File:Richard Neville.jpg
441:article at the bottom.--
4099:I have already pointed
3555:A number of FA such as
3174:Thanks for the surprise
2832:Image:Barony Church.jpg
2617:File:ISS March 2009.jpg
2139:this list of ACW photos
1964:Symphonic poems (Liszt)
1923:. If you could comment
1876:History of paleontology
1806:Symphonic Poems (Liszt)
1802:File:Jjraffportrait.jpg
1308:I'm working on getting
992:Found the following on
944:Der Wohltempierte Fuchs
85:Pedra Branca, Singapore
4239:
3984:
3970:
3956:
3944:
3708:pictures of waterfalls
3663:
2880:Colds7ream's talk page
2876:
2499:was recently added to
2414:Curator of Manuscripts
988:More on Tchaik photos?
959:Recarving China's Past
384:
4237:
4223:The Lord of the Rings
4149:The Lord of the Rings
3979:
3965:
3953:
3939:
3662:
3621:, has been listed at
2875:
2779:Shuttle-Mir Programme
2658:File:ISS altitude.gif
2137:Thank you for adding
1915:) has speedy deleted
1353:Field of Empty Chairs
1310:Oklahoma City bombing
383:
293:Need help with figure
42:of past discussions.
3351:BP Pedestrian Bridge
3025:Quick image question
2275:File:JCW_Beckham.jpg
2241:commons:Commons:OTRS
1917:File:Design B-65.jpg
1878:. I left the one in
1473:Have replied to you
1447:File:Johnspencer.jpg
89:Pedra Branca dispute
79:Pedra Branca graphic
2813:Barony kirk Glasgow
2641:File:Space Fire.jpg
2635:File:Iss Node 3.JPG
1672:National Geographic
1443:User:Tarquin Binary
587:Speedily delete it!
18:User talk:Jappalang
4326:copyright elements
4295:Other things exist
4273:copyright elements
4240:
4182:copyright elements
3825:At any rate, this
3674:remove this notice
3664:
3391:image, taken from
3089:In regards to the
2887:remove this notice
2877:
2495:, the arms of the
2090:The Bartered Bride
2071:The Bartered Bride
1778:Major George Allen
1652:The Bartered Bride
1426:
1423:Pericles of Athens
1408:
1405:Pericles of Athens
1304:Fair use required?
1234:File:HideoNomo.png
1232:Hideo Nomo image (
981:
978:Pericles of Athens
601:File:SWDestiny.ogg
520:-Cordially yours,
515:File:SWDestiny.ogg
385:
4396:
4379:comment added by
3876:File:Glorypic.jpg
3856:
3827:page of portraits
3813:
3795:Alexander Borodin
3733:
3646:
3625:. Please see the
3531:
3510:
3490:
3461:
3436:
3302:
3278:
3248:File:BPGLodge.jpg
3197:3D image question
2743:File:ISS Logo.svg
2501:Red-billed Chough
2497:Duchy of Cornwall
2247:in their reply.
1972:File:HPIM4971.jpg
1946:
1643:
1628:
1613:
1420:
1402:
1155:
1130:
1110:
1089:
1075:Photo Tours pages
1064:
975:
735:Agrippina (opera)
716:Sarcasticidealist
580:
439:Operation Brevity
430:Photo as promised
54:
53:
48:current talk page
4441:
4395:
4373:
4281:
4235:
4190:
4122:the guideline.
3870:Picture deletion
3854:
3811:
3773:
3767:
3731:
3677:
3647:
3640:
3637:
3569:
3529:
3508:
3488:
3459:
3434:
3411:
3405:
3372:
3367:
3364:
3338:
3336:
3330:
3325:
3294:
3293:
3270:
3269:
3256:
2890:
2693:
2687:
2535:
2528:
2515:
2508:
2282:
2234:and derivatives.
2220:
2209:
2196:
2184:
2158:
2124:Blame it on me !
2120:
1947:
1944:
1938:
1934:
1932:
1825:File:Raff 14.jpg
1796:Raff image query
1642:
1640:
1627:
1625:
1612:
1610:
1585:
1570:
1553:
1545:Re: Image thingy
1485:
1482:
1464:
1461:
1439:Battersea Bridge
1433:Battersea Bridge
1424:
1406:
1326:Here's a closeup
1169:Help with images
1153:
1128:
1108:
1087:
1062:
1040:official website
1019:
1013:
1010:Please refer to
979:
945:
889:Image:Aurora.jpg
558:
280:
272:
240:
232:
186:
178:
151:
147:di-no permission
145:
100:
95:
33:
32:
26:
4449:
4448:
4444:
4443:
4442:
4440:
4439:
4438:
4423:
4374:
4279:
4188:
3872:
3853:
3810:
3771:
3765:
3753:
3730:
3697:
3678:
3671:
3656:
3635:
3632:
3615:
3592:
3565:
3549:
3528:
3507:
3487:
3458:
3433:
3421:
3409:
3403:
3382:
3368:
3365:
3360:
3347:
3334:
3328:
3323:
3321:
3314:
3289:
3265:
3252:
3245:
3222:
3199:
3180:Choral symphony
3176:
3153:
3027:
2975:
2953:
2938:Mariaflores1955
2933:
2931:SMS Derfflinger
2909:
2891:
2884:
2869:
2808:
2691:
2685:
2650:All above done.
2609:
2550:
2533:
2526:
2513:
2506:
2490:
2467:
2411:Nancy Shawcross
2333:
2291:
2271:
2218:
2205:
2194:
2180:
2175:
2148:
2135:
2125:
2118:
2110:
2067:
1991:
1956:
1942:
1936:
1930:
1928:
1899:
1868:
1845:
1798:
1753:
1659:Bedrich Smetana
1655:
1638:
1623:
1608:
1600:
1583:
1568:
1551:
1547:
1520:
1497:
1483:
1480:
1475:on my talk page
1462:
1459:
1454:Vauxhall Bridge
1435:
1422:
1417:
1404:
1399:
1306:
1263:Bedrich Smetana
1258:
1238:
1175:Checkers speech
1171:
1152:
1127:
1107:
1086:
1061:
1032:
1017:
1011:
990:
977:
955:
943:
938:
914:
852:
812:
793:
771:
731:
711:
709:Your image work
631:
589:
548:
507:
465:
359:
342:
297:In the article
295:
278:
270:
238:
230:
220:
184:
176:
170:
149:
143:
110:
96:
93:
81:
62:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
4447:
4422:
4419:
4418:
4417:
4361:
4360:
4342:
4341:
4310:
4309:
4289:
4288:
4209:
4208:
4135:
4134:
4081:
4080:
4079:
4078:
4077:
4076:
4075:
4074:
4052:
4051:
4050:
4049:
4048:
4047:
4024:
4023:
4022:
4021:
3988:
3987:
3986:
3985:
3974:
3973:
3972:
3971:
3960:
3959:
3958:
3957:
3948:
3947:
3946:
3945:
3934:
3933:
3932:
3931:
3912:
3911:
3871:
3868:
3867:
3866:
3865:
3864:
3863:
3862:
3850:
3823:
3807:
3752:
3746:
3727:
3696:
3693:
3670:
3657:
3655:
3652:
3614:
3611:
3591:
3588:
3548:
3545:
3544:
3543:
3542:
3541:
3540:
3539:
3538:
3537:
3525:
3504:
3484:
3476:talk page here
3455:
3430:
3420:
3417:
3381:
3378:
3346:
3343:
3313:
3310:
3309:
3308:
3307:
3306:
3283:
3282:
3244:
3241:
3221:
3218:
3198:
3195:
3175:
3172:
3152:
3149:
3148:
3147:
3146:
3145:
3144:
3143:
3125:
3124:
3107:
3106:
3086:
3085:
3084:
3083:
3082:
3081:
3064:
3063:
3026:
3023:
2974:
2971:
2952:
2949:
2932:
2929:
2908:
2907:Image question
2905:
2883:
2870:
2868:
2865:
2864:
2863:
2862:
2861:
2807:
2804:
2785:
2784:
2783:
2782:
2768:
2767:
2756:
2755:
2754:
2753:
2747:
2746:
2739:
2738:
2737:
2736:
2730:
2729:
2722:
2721:
2720:
2719:
2713:
2712:
2705:
2704:
2703:
2702:
2696:
2695:
2678:File:Cycle.gif
2674:
2673:
2672:
2671:
2665:
2664:
2654:
2653:
2652:
2651:
2645:
2644:
2638:
2632:
2626:
2620:
2608:
2602:
2601:
2600:
2599:
2598:
2549:
2542:
2541:
2540:
2489:
2486:
2466:
2463:
2462:
2461:
2460:
2459:
2458:
2457:
2456:
2455:
2454:
2453:
2423:
2422:
2421:
2418:
2415:
2412:
2409:
2406:
2403:
2332:
2327:
2326:
2325:
2290:
2287:
2270:
2269:J.C.W. Beckham
2267:
2266:
2265:
2264:
2263:
2262:
2261:
2260:
2259:
2237:
2236:
2235:
2232:
2174:
2171:
2146:
2134:
2131:
2123:
2109:
2106:
2105:
2104:
2066:
2063:
2062:
2061:
2060:
2059:
1990:
1987:
1955:
1952:
1901:Hi Jappalang.
1898:
1895:
1880:Georges Cuvier
1867:
1864:
1844:
1841:
1840:
1839:
1804:, which is in
1797:
1794:
1793:
1792:
1752:
1749:
1748:
1747:
1746:
1745:
1744:
1743:
1728:Bartered Bride
1719:
1718:
1717:
1716:
1663:Bartered Bride
1654:
1649:
1648:
1647:
1633:
1632:
1599:
1594:
1593:
1592:
1591:
1590:
1546:
1543:
1519:
1518:Image question
1516:
1496:
1493:
1492:
1491:
1434:
1431:
1416:
1413:
1398:
1395:
1394:
1393:
1392:
1391:
1305:
1302:
1301:
1300:
1257:
1254:
1237:
1230:
1212:
1211:
1205:
1200:
1192:
1190:
1189:
1184:
1173:In my article
1170:
1167:
1166:
1165:
1164:
1163:
1162:
1161:
1149:
1124:
1116:
1104:
1083:
1058:
1031:
1030:Photo question
1028:
989:
986:
954:
951:
937:
936:Re: Red images
934:
918:Beloved Friend
913:
910:
909:
908:
866:Aurora's drift
851:
848:
847:
846:
811:
808:
792:
790:Rudolf Wolters
787:
770:
767:
766:
765:
730:
727:
710:
707:
706:
705:
704:
703:
702:
701:
630:
627:
616:
608:
588:
585:
547:
544:
533:
525:
506:
503:
502:
501:
487:
464:
461:
460:
459:
458:
457:
456:
455:
454:
453:
435:
432:
420:
419:
418:
417:
416:
415:
386:
358:
355:
341:
338:
337:
336:
294:
291:
290:
289:
288:
287:
249:
248:
247:
216:
169:
166:
165:
164:
120:(Flickr page:
109:
106:
80:
77:
61:
58:
56:
52:
51:
34:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
4446:
4437:
4436:
4432:
4428:
4416:
4412:
4408:
4404:
4399:
4398:
4397:
4394:
4390:
4386:
4382:
4378:
4370:
4368:
4364:
4359:
4355:
4351:
4347:
4346:
4345:
4340:
4339:
4335:
4331:
4327:
4322:
4321:
4319:
4318:
4316:
4315:
4308:
4304:
4300:
4296:
4291:
4290:
4286:
4278:
4274:
4270:
4269:
4264:
4263:
4262:
4259:
4258:
4254:
4250:
4244:
4236:
4230:
4228:
4224:
4218:
4217:
4212:
4207:
4203:
4199:
4195:
4187:
4183:
4179:
4178:
4173:
4172:
4171:
4170:
4166:
4162:
4156:
4154:
4150:
4144:
4143:
4138:
4133:
4129:
4125:
4121:
4117:
4113:
4109:
4105:
4104:
4098:
4097:
4096:
4095:
4091:
4087:
4073:
4069:
4065:
4060:
4059:
4058:
4057:
4056:
4055:
4054:
4053:
4046:
4042:
4038:
4034:
4030:
4029:
4028:
4027:
4026:
4025:
4020:
4016:
4012:
4008:
4004:
4000:
3996:
3992:
3991:
3990:
3989:
3983:
3978:
3977:
3976:
3975:
3969:
3964:
3963:
3962:
3961:
3955:
3952:
3951:
3950:
3949:
3943:
3938:
3937:
3936:
3935:
3929:
3925:
3920:
3916:
3915:
3914:
3913:
3910:
3906:
3902:
3897:
3892:
3891:
3890:
3889:
3885:
3881:
3877:
3861:
3858:
3857:
3847:
3843:
3842:
3841:
3837:
3833:
3828:
3824:
3820:
3819:
3818:
3815:
3814:
3804:
3800:
3796:
3792:
3788:
3787:
3786:
3785:
3781:
3777:
3770:
3762:
3758:
3751:
3745:
3744:
3739:
3738:
3735:
3734:
3724:
3720:
3716:
3711:
3709:
3704:
3702:
3692:
3691:
3687:
3683:
3675:
3668:
3661:
3651:
3650:
3644:
3639:
3638:
3630:
3629:
3624:
3620:
3610:
3609:
3605:
3601:
3597:
3587:
3586:
3582:
3578:
3574:
3570:
3568:
3562:
3558:
3557:Schizophrenia
3554:
3536:
3533:
3532:
3522:
3517:
3516:
3515:
3512:
3511:
3501:
3497:
3496:
3495:
3492:
3491:
3481:
3477:
3473:
3468:
3467:
3466:
3463:
3462:
3452:
3448:
3444:
3443:
3442:
3441:
3438:
3437:
3427:
3416:
3415:
3412:
3407:
3406:
3399:
3394:
3390:
3385:
3377:
3376:
3373:
3371:
3363:
3357:
3352:
3342:
3341:
3337:
3331:
3326:
3319:
3305:
3300:
3299:
3292:
3287:
3286:
3285:
3284:
3281:
3276:
3275:
3268:
3263:
3262:
3261:
3260:
3257:
3255:
3249:
3240:
3239:
3235:
3231:
3227:
3217:
3216:
3212:
3208:
3204:
3194:
3193:
3189:
3185:
3181:
3171:
3170:
3166:
3162:
3158:
3142:
3138:
3134:
3129:
3128:
3127:
3126:
3123:
3119:
3115:
3111:
3110:
3109:
3108:
3105:
3101:
3097:
3092:
3088:
3087:
3080:
3076:
3072:
3068:
3067:
3066:
3065:
3062:
3058:
3054:
3050:
3049:
3048:
3047:
3046:
3045:
3041:
3037:
3032:
3029:I'm prepping
3022:
3021:
3018:
3014:
3010:
3009:
3004:
3000:
2996:
2992:
2988:
2984:
2980:
2970:
2969:
2965:
2961:
2957:
2948:
2947:
2943:
2939:
2928:
2927:
2923:
2919:
2914:
2904:
2903:
2899:
2895:
2888:
2881:
2874:
2860:
2856:
2852:
2847:
2846:
2845:
2841:
2837:
2833:
2829:
2828:
2827:
2826:
2822:
2818:
2814:
2803:
2802:
2798:
2794:
2790:
2780:
2776:
2772:
2771:
2770:
2769:
2765:
2761:
2758:
2757:
2751:
2750:
2749:
2748:
2744:
2741:
2740:
2734:
2733:
2732:
2731:
2727:
2724:
2723:
2717:
2716:
2715:
2714:
2710:
2707:
2706:
2700:
2699:
2698:
2697:
2690:
2683:
2679:
2676:
2675:
2669:
2668:
2667:
2666:
2663:
2659:
2656:
2655:
2649:
2648:
2647:
2646:
2642:
2639:
2636:
2633:
2630:
2627:
2624:
2621:
2618:
2615:
2614:
2613:
2607:image issues.
2606:
2597:
2593:
2589:
2584:
2583:
2582:
2578:
2574:
2570:
2569:
2568:
2567:
2563:
2559:
2555:
2547:
2539:
2536:
2531:
2529:
2522:
2521:
2520:
2519:
2516:
2511:
2509:
2502:
2498:
2494:
2485:
2484:
2480:
2476:
2472:
2452:
2448:
2444:
2439:
2438:
2437:
2433:
2429:
2424:
2419:
2416:
2413:
2410:
2407:
2404:
2400:
2399:
2397:
2396:
2395:
2391:
2387:
2383:
2378:
2377:
2376:
2372:
2368:
2364:
2363:
2362:
2358:
2354:
2350:
2349:
2348:
2347:
2343:
2339:
2331:
2324:
2320:
2316:
2312:
2308:
2307:
2306:
2305:
2301:
2297:
2286:
2285:
2281:
2276:
2258:
2254:
2250:
2246:
2242:
2238:
2233:
2230:
2229:
2226:
2225:
2224:
2221:
2215:
2214:
2213:
2210:
2208:
2202:
2201:
2200:
2197:
2191:
2190:
2189:
2188:
2185:
2183:
2170:
2169:
2165:
2164:
2159:
2157:
2154:
2151:
2144:
2140:
2130:
2129:
2126:
2121:
2115:
2103:
2099:
2095:
2091:
2087:
2086:
2085:
2084:
2080:
2076:
2072:
2058:
2054:
2050:
2046:
2042:
2038:
2037:
2036:
2032:
2028:
2024:
2020:
2019:
2018:
2017:
2013:
2009:
2005:
2000:
1996:
1989:Image request
1986:
1985:
1981:
1977:
1973:
1969:
1965:
1961:
1954:Weimar photos
1951:
1950:
1945:
1939:
1933:
1926:
1922:
1918:
1914:
1911:
1908:
1904:
1894:
1893:
1889:
1885:
1884:Rusty Cashman
1881:
1877:
1873:
1863:
1862:
1858:
1854:
1850:
1838:
1834:
1830:
1826:
1822:
1821:
1820:
1819:
1815:
1811:
1807:
1803:
1791:
1787:
1783:
1779:
1774:
1773:
1772:
1771:
1767:
1763:
1759:
1751:Stained glass
1742:
1738:
1734:
1729:
1725:
1724:
1723:
1722:
1721:
1720:
1715:
1711:
1707:
1703:
1702:
1701:
1697:
1693:
1688:
1687:
1686:
1685:
1681:
1677:
1673:
1669:
1664:
1660:
1653:
1646:
1641:
1635:
1634:
1631:
1626:
1619:
1618:
1617:
1616:
1611:
1604:
1598:
1589:
1586:
1580:
1576:
1575:
1574:
1571:
1565:
1560:
1559:
1558:
1557:
1554:
1542:
1541:
1537:
1533:
1529:
1525:
1515:
1514:
1510:
1506:
1505:70.29.208.129
1502:
1490:
1487:
1486:
1476:
1472:
1471:
1470:
1469:
1466:
1465:
1455:
1450:
1448:
1444:
1440:
1430:
1429:
1425:
1415:Hey Jappalang
1412:
1411:
1407:
1390:
1386:
1382:
1378:
1373:
1372:
1371:
1367:
1363:
1359:
1354:
1350:
1349:
1348:
1347:
1343:
1339:
1335:
1331:
1327:
1323:
1319:
1315:
1311:
1299:
1295:
1291:
1287:
1286:
1285:
1284:
1280:
1276:
1272:
1268:
1264:
1256:Image queries
1253:
1252:
1249:
1246:
1243:
1235:
1229:
1228:
1224:
1220:
1215:
1209:
1206:
1204:
1201:
1199:
1196:
1195:
1194:
1188:
1185:
1183:
1180:
1179:
1178:
1176:
1160:
1157:
1156:
1146:
1142:
1137:
1136:
1135:
1132:
1131:
1121:
1117:
1115:
1112:
1111:
1101:
1096:
1095:
1094:
1091:
1090:
1080:
1076:
1072:
1071:
1070:
1069:
1066:
1065:
1055:
1050:
1046:
1041:
1037:
1027:
1026:
1023:
1016:
1008:
1007:
1003:
999:
995:
985:
984:
980:
973:
968:
964:
960:
950:
949:
946:
933:
932:
928:
924:
919:
907:
903:
899:
894:
890:
886:
882:
881:
880:
879:
875:
871:
867:
862:
858:
845:
841:
837:
833:
829:
828:
827:
826:
822:
818:
807:
806:
802:
798:
791:
786:
785:
781:
777:
764:
760:
756:
752:
751:
750:
749:
745:
741:
736:
726:
725:
721:
717:
700:
696:
692:
688:
687:
686:
682:
678:
674:
669:
668:
667:
663:
659:
655:
654:
653:
652:
648:
644:
640:
636:
629:Image cleanup
626:
625:
621:
617:
615:
614:
610:
609:
606:
602:
598:
594:
584:
583:
578:
574:
570:
566:
562:
557:
553:
543:
542:
538:
534:
532:
531:
527:
526:
523:
518:
516:
512:
500:
496:
492:
488:
486:
482:
478:
474:
473:
472:
469:
452:
448:
444:
440:
436:
433:
431:
428:
427:
426:
425:
424:
423:
422:
421:
414:
410:
406:
401:
400:
399:
395:
391:
387:
382:
377:
376:
375:
374:
373:
372:
368:
364:
354:
353:
350:
347:
346:Mike Christie
335:
331:
327:
323:
319:
318:
317:
316:
312:
308:
304:
300:
286:
282:
281:
274:
273:
265:
264:
263:
259:
255:
250:
246:
242:
241:
234:
233:
225:
224:
223:
219:
215:
214:
209:
208:
207:
206:
202:
198:
193:
192:
188:
187:
180:
179:
163:
159:
155:
148:
141:
140:
139:
138:
134:
130:
126:
122:
119:
115:
105:
104:
101:
99:
90:
86:
76:
75:
71:
67:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
4427:Auntieruth55
4424:
4375:â Preceding
4371:
4365:
4362:
4343:
4325:
4323:
4320:
4317:
4312:
4311:
4284:
4276:
4272:
4266:
4260:
4245:
4241:
4226:
4222:
4219:
4214:
4213:
4210:
4193:
4185:
4181:
4175:
4157:
4152:
4148:
4145:
4140:
4139:
4136:
4119:
4115:
4111:
4100:
4082:
4006:
4002:
3998:
3994:
3982:background".
3980:
3966:
3954:
3940:
3923:
3918:
3895:
3873:
3848:
3805:
3754:
3740:
3725:
3712:
3705:
3698:
3679:
3633:
3627:
3616:
3593:
3566:
3550:
3523:
3502:
3482:
3453:
3428:
3422:
3401:
3398:Bramall Hall
3386:
3383:
3380:Coat of arms
3369:
3361:
3358:. Thanks! --
3348:
3315:
3297:
3290:
3273:
3266:
3253:
3246:
3230:Brianboulton
3223:
3200:
3177:
3156:
3154:
3090:
3028:
3006:
2976:
2954:
2934:
2910:
2892:
2851:Brianboulton
2836:Brianboulton
2817:Brianboulton
2809:
2788:
2786:
2774:
2763:
2610:
2588:Brianboulton
2573:Brianboulton
2558:Brianboulton
2553:
2551:
2524:
2504:
2491:
2475:Brianboulton
2468:
2334:
2330:File:8th.jpg
2292:
2272:
2206:
2181:
2176:
2162:
2155:
2152:
2149:
2136:
2111:
2094:Brianboulton
2075:Brianboulton
2068:
1992:
1957:
1909:
1900:
1869:
1853:Brianboulton
1846:
1799:
1754:
1733:Brianboulton
1727:
1706:Brianboulton
1692:Brianboulton
1676:Brianboulton
1671:
1662:
1656:
1601:
1563:
1548:
1521:
1498:
1478:
1457:
1451:
1436:
1418:
1400:
1307:
1290:Brianboulton
1275:Brianboulton
1259:
1239:
1216:
1213:
1191:
1172:
1147:
1122:
1102:
1081:
1056:
1033:
1015:PD-RusEmpire
1009:
991:
966:
962:
958:
956:
939:
917:
915:
898:Brianboulton
892:
870:Brianboulton
856:
853:
813:
794:
772:
769:VRoma images
755:Brianboulton
740:Brianboulton
732:
729:Images query
712:
632:
612:
611:
605:
590:
556:TonyTheTiger
549:
529:
528:
522:
519:
508:
505:Re: Deletion
466:
463:Livius image
360:
343:
296:
279:bananabucket
276:
271:YellowMonkey
268:
239:bananabucket
236:
231:YellowMonkey
228:
211:
194:
185:bananabucket
182:
177:YellowMonkey
174:
171:
124:
111:
97:
82:
63:
60:Image wp:mos
55:
43:
37:
3157:Derfflinger
3031:Yukon Quest
2987:the request
2586:weeks yet.
2554:Vanity Fair
2534:talk to me?
2514:talk to me?
2488:Image query
2045:Nehrams2020
2023:Nehrams2020
2004:Nehrams2020
1966:. They are
1897:Hello again
1377:Nehrams2020
1358:Nehrams2020
1334:Nehrams2020
850:Is this OK?
832:Noel Coward
810:Noel Coward
443:EnigmaMcmxc
405:EnigmaMcmxc
390:EnigmaMcmxc
363:EnigmaMcmxc
340:Coenred svg
36:This is an
4285:de minimis
4238:Example #1
4194:de minimis
4084:owner? --
4007:de minimis
3924:de minimis
3919:de minimis
3896:de minimus
3682:Colds7ream
3628:discussion
3600:Smallbones
3384:Hi there,
3203:this image
3133:JKBrooks85
3114:JKBrooks85
3096:JKBrooks85
3091:de minimis
3071:JKBrooks85
3053:JKBrooks85
3036:JKBrooks85
3013:dave souza
2913:this image
2894:Colds7ream
2793:Colds7ream
2643:: as above
2637:: as above
2631:: as above
2625:: as above
2408:Sincerely,
2133:ACW photos
1668:this issue
1639:SlimVirgin
1624:SlimVirgin
1609:SlimVirgin
1499:Hello, at
1314:this image
776:LaurenCole
573:WP:CHICAGO
125:source URL
4407:Jappalang
4350:Jappalang
4330:Jappalang
4299:Jappalang
4198:Jappalang
4124:Jappalang
4064:Jappalang
4011:Jappalang
3852:<: -->
3846:Ruhrfisch
3832:Jappalang
3809:<: -->
3803:Ruhrfisch
3729:<: -->
3723:Ruhrfisch
3567:Doc James
3527:<: -->
3521:Ruhrfisch
3506:<: -->
3500:Ruhrfisch
3486:<: -->
3480:Ruhrfisch
3457:<: -->
3451:Ruhrfisch
3432:<: -->
3426:Ruhrfisch
3335:contribs)
3254:Rafablu88
3161:Parsecboy
2997:to OTRS.
2918:Parsecboy
2806:Lang pics
2527:Jimfbleak
2507:Jimfbleak
2296:Jappalang
2249:Jappalang
2119:Arteyu ?
1943:Contribs)
1597:Abu Nidal
1151:<: -->
1145:Ruhrfisch
1126:<: -->
1120:Ruhrfisch
1106:<: -->
1100:Ruhrfisch
1085:<: -->
1079:Ruhrfisch
1060:<: -->
1054:Ruhrfisch
552:Jack Kemp
546:Jack Kemp
254:Jappalang
197:Jappalang
129:Jappalang
4389:contribs
4381:Jcbutler
4377:unsigned
4249:Jcbutler
4161:Jcbutler
4116:policies
4103:holders?
4086:Jcbutler
4037:Jcbutler
3968:posters.
3901:Jcbutler
3880:Jcbutler
3776:Jonyungk
3761:The Five
3750:The Five
3713:Thanks,
3654:Talkback
3636:howcheng
3577:contribs
3207:Karanacs
3184:Jonyungk
2885:You can
2867:Talkback
2689:insignia
2443:Jonyungk
2428:Jonyungk
2386:Jonyungk
2367:Jonyungk
2353:Jonyungk
2338:Jonyungk
1976:Jonyungk
1913:contribs
1829:Jonyungk
1810:Jonyungk
1532:Karanacs
1022:Russavia
998:Jonyungk
923:Jonyungk
836:Ssilvers
817:Ssilvers
491:Leoboudv
477:Leoboudv
4403:WP:NFCC
3797:online
3715:Dincher
3561:obesity
3404:Majorly
2960:Wehwalt
2789:Support
2402:domain.
2280:Acdixon
2153:eanâHun
2053:contrib
2031:contrib
2012:contrib
1385:contrib
1366:contrib
1342:contrib
1219:Wehwalt
1036:Dincher
797:Wehwalt
691:Lampman
677:Lampman
658:Lampman
643:Lampman
591:By the
577:WP:LOTM
403:then?--
326:Tfhentz
307:Tfhentz
168:Bnguyen
87:" and "
39:archive
4120:policy
4112:policy
3769:PD-old
3721:) and
3366:orsodo
2991:Cookie
2682:WP:IUP
2662:WP:IUP
2315:Stifle
1960:Weimar
893:Aurora
857:before
349:(talk)
154:Stifle
4401:(per
4277:Glory
4227:Glory
4186:Glory
4153:Glory
4003:Glory
3999:Glory
3995:Glory
3851:: -->
3808:: -->
3728:: -->
3581:email
3526:: -->
3505:: -->
3485:: -->
3456:: -->
3431:: -->
3329:(talk
2544:Auld
2207:Steve
2182:Steve
2156:terââş
2150:ââBer
1937:(Talk
1581::P --
1501:WT:SG
1484:scent
1481:iride
1463:scent
1460:iride
1150:: -->
1125:: -->
1105:: -->
1084:: -->
1059:: -->
613:Caper
530:Caper
66:Tom B
16:<
4431:talk
4411:talk
4405:).
4385:talk
4354:talk
4334:talk
4303:talk
4253:talk
4202:talk
4165:talk
4128:talk
4090:talk
4068:talk
4041:talk
4033:here
4015:talk
3905:talk
3884:talk
3836:talk
3799:here
3780:talk
3719:talk
3701:here
3686:talk
3643:chat
3604:talk
3573:talk
3447:here
3410:talk
3393:this
3389:this
3356:here
3312:Help
3291:RB88
3267:RB88
3234:talk
3226:this
3211:talk
3188:talk
3165:talk
3137:talk
3118:talk
3100:talk
3075:talk
3057:talk
3040:talk
3017:talk
2964:talk
2942:talk
2922:talk
2898:talk
2855:talk
2840:talk
2821:talk
2797:talk
2775:were
2592:talk
2577:talk
2562:talk
2548:syne
2546:lang
2479:talk
2471:this
2447:talk
2432:talk
2390:talk
2382:here
2371:talk
2357:talk
2342:talk
2319:talk
2300:talk
2253:talk
2143:here
2098:talk
2079:talk
2049:talk
2027:talk
2008:talk
1999:here
1980:talk
1970:and
1925:here
1907:talk
1903:Rama
1888:talk
1857:talk
1833:talk
1814:talk
1786:talk
1782:Nev1
1766:talk
1762:Nev1
1758:here
1737:talk
1710:talk
1696:talk
1680:talk
1536:talk
1509:talk
1381:talk
1362:talk
1338:talk
1330:here
1294:talk
1279:talk
1269:and
1242:CFIF
1223:talk
1141:NRHP
1049:here
1002:talk
927:talk
902:talk
874:talk
840:talk
821:talk
801:talk
780:talk
759:talk
744:talk
720:talk
695:talk
681:talk
662:talk
647:talk
620:talk
607:Blue
599:and
537:talk
524:Blue
495:talk
481:talk
447:talk
409:talk
394:talk
367:talk
357:SVGs
330:talk
311:talk
258:talk
201:talk
158:talk
133:talk
94:Jack
70:talk
4196:.
4009:.
3703:!
2989:to
2958:?--
2752:No.
2163:(â)
1760:).
1670:of
1564:beg
963:que
569:bio
554:?--
218:004
213:MBK
98:Lee
4433:)
4413:)
4391:)
4387:â˘
4356:)
4336:)
4305:)
4255:)
4204:)
4167:)
4130:)
4092:)
4070:)
4043:)
4017:)
3930:):
3907:)
3899:--
3886:)
3838:)
3782:)
3772:}}
3766:{{
3688:)
3606:)
3583:)
3579:¡
3575:¡
3332:â˘
3324:Ed
3236:)
3213:)
3190:)
3167:)
3139:)
3120:)
3102:)
3077:)
3059:)
3042:)
3015:,
2966:)
2944:)
2924:)
2900:)
2857:)
2842:)
2823:)
2799:)
2692:}}
2686:{{
2594:)
2579:)
2564:)
2530:-
2510:-
2481:)
2449:)
2434:)
2392:)
2384:.
2373:)
2359:)
2344:)
2321:)
2313:.
2302:)
2255:)
2166:)
2100:)
2081:)
2055:)
2051:â˘
2033:)
2029:â˘
2014:)
2010:â˘
1982:)
1940:â˘
1931:Ed
1890:)
1859:)
1835:)
1816:)
1788:)
1768:)
1739:)
1712:)
1698:)
1682:)
1538:)
1511:)
1397:Hi
1387:)
1383:â˘
1368:)
1364:â˘
1344:)
1340:â˘
1296:)
1281:)
1225:)
1018:}}
1012:{{
1004:)
996:.
929:)
904:)
876:)
842:)
823:)
803:)
782:)
761:)
746:)
722:)
697:)
683:)
675:.
664:)
649:)
622:)
579:)
539:)
497:)
483:)
449:)
411:)
396:)
369:)
332:)
313:)
283:)
260:)
243:)
203:)
189:)
160:)
150:}}
144:{{
135:)
72:)
4429:(
4409:(
4383:(
4352:(
4332:(
4301:(
4287:.
4280:'
4251:(
4200:(
4189:'
4163:(
4126:(
4088:(
4066:(
4039:(
4013:(
3926:(
3903:(
3882:(
3855:°
3834:(
3812:°
3778:(
3732:°
3717:(
3684:(
3669:.
3645:}
3641:{
3602:(
3571:(
3530:°
3509:°
3489:°
3460:°
3435:°
3370:g
3362:T
3301:)
3298:T
3295:(
3277:)
3274:T
3271:(
3232:(
3209:(
3186:(
3163:(
3135:(
3116:(
3098:(
3073:(
3055:(
3038:(
2962:(
2940:(
2920:(
2896:(
2882:.
2853:(
2838:(
2819:(
2795:(
2590:(
2575:(
2560:(
2477:(
2445:(
2430:(
2388:(
2369:(
2355:(
2340:(
2317:(
2298:(
2251:(
2160:(
2096:(
2077:(
2047:(
2025:(
2006:(
1978:(
1910:¡
1905:(
1886:(
1855:(
1831:(
1812:(
1784:(
1764:(
1735:(
1708:(
1694:(
1678:(
1534:(
1507:(
1379:(
1360:(
1336:(
1292:(
1277:(
1248:â
1245:â
1236:)
1221:(
1154:°
1129:°
1109:°
1088:°
1063:°
1000:(
925:(
900:(
872:(
838:(
819:(
799:(
778:(
757:(
742:(
718:(
693:(
679:(
660:(
645:(
618:(
575:/
571:/
567:/
565:c
563:/
561:t
559:(
535:(
493:(
479:(
445:(
407:(
392:(
365:(
328:(
309:(
275:(
256:(
235:(
199:(
181:(
156:(
131:(
68:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
